Latest / Quantum Bombs / Nothing In The Universe Is Dead — Materialism vs Idealism ✨

Transcript

Nothing In The Universe Is Dead — Materialism vs Idealism ✨ · Quantum Bombs

• There is no dead matter in our framework, right? Everything is conscious, even the rock. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy. We are in materialism and machines, and the machines, AI, will be leading our world unless we can focus on his theory, understand what we are, where we actually come from, and the moment we're actually able to tap into that and knowing that your consciousness that has nothing to do with this body, but everything to do with the fundamental field, everything will be turned on its head, and that will be the real paradigm shift. AI is not the real paradigm shift. AI is simply, and I know it's going to reach a moment of singularity where it's exponentially smarter than us, but it's all coming out of the framing of us directing it. Even its algorithm will never recreate the alignment that art and beauty and creativity can have when connected to our God, our fundamental field. Trees are conscious, and I can make experiments that show that trees are conscious, okay, and trees are no brain. So consciousness that is supposed to be coming off our brain, it comes off a tree that has no brain. Look at that. Is this being done? And I will do that. I will do that. Yeah? Would you agree with me that if I do that, I have disproved that consciousness is a product of the human brain? Or of the animal brain? Definitely. Is that good? All right. People will say, they cannot say anything. They will not have any objection anymore. See, entanglement took over 30 years to prove that entanglement exists after the first experiment showed it exists, because scientists didn't want entanglement. And finally, everybody now has to accept that there is entanglement, but nobody can explain it. Entanglement is what connects everything from the inside, is what allows the world to be holistic. Which is already what quantum physics is saying. Welcome to Quantum Bombs, a commentary show on the human condition through metaphysics and freedom. Guys, I'm going to start with what's at stake. We are losing to scientism and materialism, because God got lost in idealism. We're losing to materialists, meaning they don't believe God is real, not the money kind, but the science kind, that everything is made of matter. God isn't real. And we lost God, because you, by believing in God, are an idealist. And you don't even know what that means, really. And the gaping hole I discovered today, when I'm listening to this podcast, which we will be watching together, is that evangelicals post-modernity Christians in the West, which is us, are responsible for this. Evangelicals, Christians, today, we have no mechanism to explain ontology, our reality. We have no cosmology. We've lost it. And anything that's not in the Bible gets filed away as not unknown, but demonic. And that's the problem. And this is why we're losing the battle, because if we're not picking it up, scientism gets it, materialism gets it, right? And so the irony is that the people, we, saying God is in everything, you should see Him in everything. Christians would say Jesus is in everything. He is in everything. He's everywhere. He's the answer. Yet we have no framework or way to explain it to people. And that is the irony. And so by the end of this episode, I hope that you could be able to tell a friend how rocks and minerals and trees difference the differentiation of their consciousness from a human being's consciousness. And you're like, oh man, I'm not going there, Beth. I'm proving my point. I'm proving my point. You're already stepping out of the conversation because of woo words maybe, or things that you don't know or aren't discussed in the Bible. But yet you don't, you're losing the ability to argue for God. That's kind of my point, right? So today we are going to basically look at consciousness, right? I'm going to show you lots of different visuals and things to bring it on through the lens work and framework of Fred Rico Fagan's thought, massive physicist today, using, he's an idealist, meaning consciousness is first and fundamental. He is the man that literally invented the microchip in 1971. So the tiny little chip that made your phone and everything else an actual computer, he invented it. And then we're going to watch the part of the video that inspired this episode that'll give you some big framework. Also, if you're an idealist and you believe in God, what a, how a physicist would explain our reality, and see where you bump, right? Like see where you bump up. This all started because I was listening to this podcast and it reminded me of when I told my friend something, yeah, yeah, you know, Oh, I have a sleep story channel. Please go watch this episode. I was like, oh yeah, it's the secret life of trees on how they like talk to each other and stuff. And you know, they're conscious. And she's like, trees aren't conscious. And that kind of blew me away. I take for granted that just because we're idealists and we believe in God, doesn't mean we understand the world the same way. And I was like, what do you mean? And then I realized, you know, kind of hit me. This, this is a lot of stereotyping, but I'm going to start so you could kind of understand. She's a evangelical semi fundamentalist, homeschool teaching mother of four. So at first I was like, oh, it's cause she's kind of dumbing it down, you know, religions easy and personable and stories and theology for her kids. And I'm like, I don't think it's that really. You know, when I'm saying it in this instance with her, I'm also applying it to the whole West of again, losing its ability to understand God coming out in our reality. So it's a couple of different things. One of them is she probably got that from Descartes. Now that you probably heard his name, I think therefore I am. We attribute the founding of consciousness to this guy, but he separated consciousness to be only for humans. He said that animals don't even have it, and he even performed horrible surgeries on dogs and attributed the dog screaming to just part of the panic is just part of the mechanism, right? So Descartes separated mind from matter. And unfortunately, so Christians took on the mind part, right, the inner work, the consciousness part, and scientism, materialism, people that are atheists or don't or agnostic, et cetera, secular haven't really thought it out yet. They adopted matter as fundamental. And in case you don't know, we're definitely are losing the race because materialism is being taught at every university and AI is being taught as mainly materialism. One of the reasons, again, behind us losing idealism in post-modernity Christianity is because we are a theist, right? So if you're looking on screen, we're going to do a 30 second breakdown of ontology. This is not today's episode, but it will help you see the separation. I'm going to oversimplify it. We are a theist that God created the world. He's up there. We're down here and he intervenes in it a little bit, but he's separate, right? The East has a pantheistic mindset of God, that God equals the universe. But for us, that doesn't really have any personalization with God and the Holy Trinity is missing. It's got some issues. But really, if you look at the merge in between Western and Eastern, which is panentheism, that nothing exists outside of God. So you have God's consciousness holding everything together and everything is happening within it, and the universe is part of that product. In short, we are theist. However, our Bible and many other faiths also scripture support that panentheism is indeed what it is. All of quantum physics, everything that Federico Fagan is teaching is panentheism. All right, another nerd thing. I'm just going to let you screen capture it. If you really want to go down the rabbit hole of what is idealism and materialism, take a screen grab. And you will absolutely love this. AI even complimented me on this, like I've never seen this before. These two simple questions you could argue about. This is the eternal argument of all time right here. Screen grab it. It's another episode. I've already done one if you want to watch it. Okay, this brings us to Federico Fagan's framework. Federico Fagan has coined the term Seati, right? And it's basically an equivalent to a soul. When you boil everything down to irreducible properties of what you are. And that soul is part of a field. If everything is percolating and coming up from this invisible field, which lays between beneath our 17 quantum fields, those are also coming up from something, right? A Seati is a consciousness that is in the field. Now what's so interesting, we're going to get to the rock and the mineral and the tree, right? Well, the mineral, which we'll call rock, the tree and the human being. Just so you can understand, Federico is big on part whole. What does that mean? That means I have 51 trillion cells or something in my body. Every cell is a cell. It's whole. It's made whole. But it's part of a bigger whole, which is me, right? Well, the whole universe is like this. So even me, I basically, I call it capped out. Like I'm capped out. My consciousness that I'm running around yammering to you with is capped out at me. But I'm connected to a field, right? And the universe, same thing. All one field with different levels of consciousness. Now, how can we explain this to our friends like I promised, right? The easiest way to put it is that consciousness is either on or off. There's no like, oh, humans have more consciousness or what? Nope. Is the switch turned on or off? Think of it like electricity. Boop. All right. So the switch is on. The level of richness determined by the vehicle output is the differentiating factor. When I mean vehicle output, I mean, is it a tree? Is it a rock? Is it a car? This is the output coming up from the fundamental field, which is giving us all matter, right? And the field itself is conscious. Fagan makes this very clear that comprehension leads to meaning. So to really have meaning from something, you've got to first understand and comprehend what the heck that meant. So when I'm talking about levels of consciousness, it's not levels. Wrong vocabulary. Beth doing it live. The switch is turned on. Yes, there's consciousness there. Its richness is determined by its comprehension that will give it meaning in this big old system, right? So the tree's comprehension is, oh my god, this sun feels great. Oh, the soil is absorbing the water. The nitrogen levels and oxygen levels are just perfect. I'm talking to the tree 30 yards away. It's being, it's telling me this and that. It's got a fungus issue and the wind's coming out the north. Life is good. Oh, the cow just crapped on me and the chicken is pecking on me. This is fantastic. That's the consciousness level, the comprehension of the tree. Then going back to the part whole, right? It's plugged into the system. God is a larger part, the highest part of the whole. It is the whole. God is the whole. It's comprehending the tree and various other higher realms. Ah, this is the tree growing on Beth Ranch in Texas. It's experiencing this. This goes, Christians, you're feeling me because we know God knows what, what's the air inside our nose or the thought inside my brain. You know what I'm right? Okay, to take this further, I'm going to try to do it in three minutes, but you might love it. It might be the best thing you ever heard is the point is, there is no dead matter in our framework, right? Everything is conscious, even the rock. So what Fagan is saying with the CET is that rock, we could say is a accumulation, which is a clump of let's just say tiny sand particles. Now the rock isn't a living system capped out with its own self, like I'd like to call it. A living system like a tree has roots and leaves. It has a self and it, so it's a living system basically is what I'm getting it. A rock or mineral role isn't necessarily a living system, but it is an accumulation or a clump of points of view of tiny consciousness, very low comprehension. So this really got me thinking and stay with me. We're going to get trippy, especially you Christians, since we're going to look at reincarnation and then no reincarnation one lifetime. So I started to think about the little, because I've never thought about it the way Fagan pointed out the sand is basically a clump together. Tons and tons of tons of tiny consciousness, right? And I was like, okay, well through spiritual evolution, which was saying, would says, which is the supporting reincarnation. I know and thought that your spiritual evolution, you go from rock to plants to animals to human. So that would mean that the rock is already conscious because it's held together by God and everything is a tiny point of view percolating of his from the fundamental field. Then my consciousness, future Beth human comes into it and inhabits it and gets to enjoy the world and learn as this rock before I graduate onward. That's option one, option two is more so Christian and one lifetime. So the rock has the tiny little parts of consciousness. It is conscious on its own small comprehension level with many pieces clumped together, but it's in it remains that way. There's no tenant that gets to pass through it in spiritual evolution. It just that's all that rocks ever going to be. And Christian would also say that that's it too. It's held together by God, you're following me, right? So we're giving a camp for both people. But yeah, I found that quite interesting that, but because there's no dead matter, it couldn't be that I inhabit the rock, I get to learn my experience, my point of view as a consciousness as a rock before I move on to a plant. And then when I leave the rock becomes unconscious again. That's not the case because God's plugged into it. So it's good brain candy to think of. So I hope that helps you understand the difference between a rock, a tree, and a human being. We all have consciousness turned on. Yes, our comprehension level varies and that comprehension leads to our meaning in the system. Why? Because the system is trying to know itself, which is what a lot of, you know, Federico's work and in anybody that looks at quantum physics or spirituality knows is what the system is part of what it's doing, heavier topic for a different day. Hindus, the Eastern wisdom has, no one argues this, that studies this. They have the best cosmology and a perfect example. The cosmology that Christians are lacking is the framework, is the words to prescribe what the reality we're talking about with this tree and the rock and the human, the difference of how we see the world. Hinduism gave us the gunas. These are basically dials to understand how consciousness is actually tuned in throughout this field that's coming at us percolating. This is a decent representation. What it's saying is I as a human and have the ability to choose Satva, meaning intellect, alignment, intelligence, thought, peace, harmony. Rajas means activity, passion, change, movement. So when I work out, I'm high in Rajas and after my workout, I have plenty of Satva, meaning I feel enlightened, I'm able to think better. Tomas is more inert, non-activity, right? So the rock is full. These are, the rock is full of almost all, like 99 Tomas, right? So those sand sediments that have accumulated together, right? It's inert. You would also call Tomas ignorance, delusion. Meaning delusion for me means separation from reality and truth, right? Christians would call it demonic, right? So the rock is full of Tomas, has some Rajas because the minerals and the chemicals are actually alive and well and literally living as a part of our dynamic world, meaning nothing stays the same. There's not even, even when you boil it down in quantum physics, not even a concept is true, because everything is a continual change, basically. Anyways, that's just me pushing out that there's some Rajas in the rock, but there's little to no, maybe any Satva. So that's the rock's level of comprehension and its own consciousness. Now, so that's why it's still conscious. If you can follow me, it's because it's connected to the fundamental field that God has everything held together by, right? And we can't, we know that God is conscious and therefore everything is conscious. A tree, so a tree has a lot of Tomas, it does have some Rajas though, because it's taking in the sunlight and doing all these processes low in Satva. But again, it still has some Satva, because if you listen to my sleep story, you know, the secret life of trees, they have quite a fantastic life, like they sacrifice themselves for the greater good, and they have all kinds of amazing things happening on their tree level. Alright, for those that want to dive in now, as an idealist to explain with better framework and from a real physicist on how does reality work, Fred Rico is one of the few that actually has a working theory that will become testable in science to start to let what we're talking about come out to the world. I want to give it the proper context. So I'm going to start it a little bit before it kicks off, but there's five fundamental things that he's going to base his whole thesis on. And I really want you to hear him, but I want to give you the context. So I'm kind of giving you the full ramp into what made me start yammering to the camera today. But Kualya is the beginning of the inner journey. Kualya are the bringers of meaning, and we look for meaning. First comprehension and then meaning. Comprehension gets you to meaning. Meaning is the essence of comprehension. Meaning is what you get after you got it. You know, I got it. I understand it now. That's beyond comprehension. Comprehension is a path to meaning, and meaning is the ontology. The ontology is in the meaning, in the experience, in what we feel and what we know from within, not outside. If you say meaning is the ontology, so meaning is what ultimately exists in our universe. Yeah, yeah. Question. You're saying that meaning is ontology. Ontology is the entire branch of study of what is reality. And he's starting off with what we were just talking about. Comprehension to meaning. Trying to, a system wanting to know itself. A system trying to lower its entropy. But in order to make it more understandable, I start with the postulate. I start this all basic, resh framing with the postulate. Because I'm joining science and spirituality. I'm joining the outer and the inner. Science is about the outer world, but meaning, experience, consciousness, free will, is about the inner world. It's about the inner world. And right now they're separate. There is the spiritual people that think that this exists, but the scientists say that doesn't mean. These guys, look at those guys, it doesn't matter, doesn't care. So there is this separation now between science and spirituality. This way of thinking brings them together. They integrate them. Don't just oppose them. They integrate. They become one. They become one. So how do we start? That is rare. For those that just started your journey, science and spirituality being split since maybe the 1920s, it's never worked together. Him actually coming up with something that actually integrates it, saying this will explain quantum physics is massive. It's life changing. So if we want to start like a new theory, I start with the postulate. Because you have to. Because you can never start with something that is true. Because you have shown to be true, you have to start with postulate. Even in math, you start with postulates that are taken to be true and they had to be self-evident. So ground assumption. Ground assumption. But that ground assumption has to be self-evident. The ground assumption of quantum physics, they are so self-evident that you have to study 10 years before you say, oh, yeah, they are evident. Not self-evident. They are evident after 10 years. So they don't pass the test of self-evidence to me. Okay, now I'm going to tell you a postulate that is self-evident. One, the totality of what exists. One, the totality of what exists has three properties. Dynamic. Dynamic means it's never the same instant after instant. It's holistic means it's not made of separable parts. And so far, I have described the universe described by quantum physics. Yeah, now you know. As all these three, you know, is all there is this dynamic holistic. I add one more thing, one more quality. So you're following, so we're paying attention. One, everything can be explained, the universe in three ways. It's dynamic, meaning always in a state of fluctuation and change. Two, it's holistic. Think of a hologram. So it's many different part holes all the way up. Three, the magic recipe of what we've been talking about. I add one more thing, one more quality. One wants to know itself. One wants to know itself. Now, this comes from perennial philosophy. Knowing thyself was in the, you know, in the Delphi, Delphi, you know, temple, you know, it was part of the, you know, part of the Greek, some of the Greek philosophers. But the Vedas were saying the same thing. Oh, the Vedas is the most oldest Hindu scriptures again. So who are, as I told you before, are the best when it comes to cosmology, explaining what is the nature of our universe and reality. All the basic experiences of the deepest, the people that went deeper into the understanding or reality come to the same general conclusion that there is one that has those properties and they want to know itself. If I look within myself, what do I want it to know when I was suffering? Who am I? Why am I here? Why am I suffering? That's, what does it mean? Yeah, I want to know myself. So we all want to know ourself. We all deep down, then we forget about it because we can do nothing about it. So we go, you know, we go, we try to solve the problem by, you know, going outside ourselves and then we lose ourselves like I did. And then, you know, so if we start there. I guess I'll, I want to, I'll say that he, obviously you know what it means by going outside yourself, going into booze, women, materialism, but even things is, is organic as starting a family, pursuing a good career. All of that still is not going to answer the fear or the question inside you of what are you? Like what are you? You are a soul on a journey. You are made in the image of God trying to find your way back to him. My point is, is that question is always going to remain. It will never be quenched or answered through anything on the outward. It will only be answered on the inward journey of what are you in relation with God? As it, you know, is it self-evident? It was, it is self-evident to me. And if you think a little bit, it's self-evident to you. That is what you want. Okay. So wanting means free will. Because if, if you are a machine, what, what do you want as a machine? The next state of the machine is already defined by the algorithm. What do you want? Doesn't make any sense. I don't want anything. But the question doesn't make, there are no questions to a machine. There are only answers to a machine. So, and know, to know itself, one must be conscious. Because consciousness is what allows one to know itself. So you have defined, I have defined free will and consciousness. And, and why are those self-evident? Because you are conscious and you have free will and I am conscious and I have free will. So more self-evident than that. What is there? And if I start there, I can explain quantum physics by that posture. I can explain what physicists in a hundred years have not understood. Quantum information is the representation of inner experience and the collapse of the wave function is the representation of my free, of the free will. What more do you want? So good. So, so he is a physicalist, a scientism at its best, meaning he was living in deep in the materialism world. God actually gave him an enlightening blessing. I forget his story. I've listened to it years ago. He sells it on every podcast if you want to hear it. But God beamed him with energy and light and he had this massive experience. Boom. It woke him up, changed his whole world. Now he is a, the right man, meaning a scientist that can talk and dedicate his whole life to physics in an idealistic frame, a point of view. When you read the comments of this video, I highly recommend, I'll put it in the comments that you watch it. It covers so much more physics that, you know, that we didn't get into. But people in the comments say, this is the most important conversation that if the world could hear one, it'd be this. Now I've heard many that are kind of along these lines, but to have someone, he's I think 83 years old alive. Thank you. Thank you, Jesus. Working on our behalf of trying to put into context and truly actually bridge academia physics with the spiritual world, but in academia's language, which puts, you're going to start to see what he's up against. And he makes you, you know, the more and more you watch these academic physicists talk, you learn that there is this world they're in, right? You need to have the recommendation letters and do the equations and all this gravitas that goes into anybody even taking you seriously. You know, how dare you be Terrence Howard, you know, debating with Eric Weinstein, right? So it's a hard thing to penetrate. So these guys are fair and few. So his postulates were that by getting those three things from the universe, you also can deduct it's self-evident that we have free will and that we are conscious. And when you're talking about ontology, how does our reality work? Those two things in philosophy, free will and consciousness are pretty much the foundation bedrock that you, that's in every thought forward of how to explain this crazy world we're in. So did you follow me? Do you agree with me or disagree with me? Let me know in the comments. The comments are the lifeblood of helping my show get shared, whether you like what I'm saying or not. I love all thoughts. Everything makes me think. In fact, when you ask me hard questions, it gives me future episodes that I want to make. So even if you're pushing against me, it actually makes me dig deeper in my own thinking and research that I'm able to better understand something. So it's kind of awesome to have you pick at what I'm trying to get at. But I think my main thing today is like, it just hit me for the very first time of clarity on that Christianity in today's postmodern understanding of it is pushing back and helping scientism and materialism because you don't want to talk about things that aren't explained in the Bible. Therefore maybe deem demonic because you don't feel safe using the word even consciousness or vibration, things that are necessary and needed in academia to under in physics. We use these terms, right? That without having people comfortable to talk about and debate, if there's a consciousness in a rock or not, you're never going to be able to really push back against scientism. And without going down another episode, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. We are in materialism and machines and the machines AI will be leading our world unless we can focus on his theory, understand what we are, where we actually come from. And the moment we're actually able to tap into that and knowing that you're a consciousness that has nothing to do with this body, but everything to do with the fundamental field, everything will be turned on its head and that will be the real paradigm shift. AI is not the real paradigm shift. AI is simply and I know it's going to reach a moment of singularity where it's exponentially smarter than us, but it's all coming out of the framing of us directing it, of the algorithm. Even its algorithm will never recreate the alignment that art and beauty and creativity can have when connected to our God, our fundamental field. I hope that resonated with you. Follow me for more ontology. I'm really going to try to start doing every three of four of my episodes are in spirituality on ontology. I'm going to dive in. Obviously, I love geopolitics and more of the freedom vibe that are all surrounded around sovereignty and power. But this is kind of my what I need to the lane I need to stand because that's what matters most to me. And yeah, so stay human, stay free. I like this and I don't need to tell you anything else because you're going to stay part of that fundamental field, baby. So I can jokingly say stay conscious, but I know you won't have a problem doing it. Bye bye.