Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / How many moons does the Earth have?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Kelly, do you ever wish that our night sky
- 0:11Speaker 1: was I don't know, a little bit more dramatic, more dramatic.
- 0:15Speaker 1: We've got a huge moon, planets, stars, and all of
- 0:19Speaker 1: the Milky Way. You've got pretty high standards for the
- 0:22Speaker 1: night sky. What did you have in mind? I don't know.
- 0:24Speaker 1: Sometimes I think it's boring to have just that one
- 0:27Speaker 1: huge moon. It seems like it might be more exciting
- 0:30Speaker 1: to have lots of little moons up there. Okay, all right,
- 0:33Speaker 1: that's true. It's kind of like having an only child. Yeah,
- 0:36Speaker 1: and not just an only child, like a single mega child.
- 0:40Speaker 1: You want drama. What's more dramatic than the Earth's mega
- 0:44Speaker 1: child hovering above you in the sky. Yeah, I guess
- 0:46Speaker 1: I wanted drama. But now I'm worried that the idea
- 0:48Speaker 1: of a mega child is going to give me nightmares. Yeah,
- 0:51Speaker 1: me too. I like my two little ones. Hi. I'm Daniel.
- 1:09Speaker 1: I'm a particle physicist, and I'm very happy to have
- 1:12Speaker 1: too normal sized children instead of one mega child. And
- 1:16Speaker 1: I'm Kelly. I'm a parasitologist, and I also have two
- 1:18Speaker 1: normal sized children, and that works well for me. You
- 1:21Speaker 1: having considered the concept of like combining them together into
- 1:24Speaker 1: one child unification of the children. You know, Zach likes
- 1:27Speaker 1: to joke that they stack when he stacks them. They
- 1:29Speaker 1: don't seem very happy about it, and so you know,
- 1:31Speaker 1: I haven't thought too hard about trying to combine them.
- 1:34Speaker 1: I don't think they'd be big fans of that. I'm
- 1:35Speaker 1: pretty sure my kids wouldn't be into that either. Well,
- 1:38Speaker 1: Welcome to the podcast Daniel and Jorge explain the universe
- 1:42Speaker 1: and which we ask the hard questions of the universe.
- 1:44Speaker 1: We talked about the crazy stuff that's out there deep
- 1:47Speaker 1: in the cosmos, and we talked about the tiny little
- 1:50Speaker 1: particles that are wriggling around inside my children, your children,
- 1:53Speaker 1: and everybody's children. We try to explore the entire universe
- 1:57Speaker 1: and explain all of it to you. Normally we have
- 1:59Speaker 1: my friend and co host Jorge him here on the podcast,
- 2:02Speaker 1: but he's unavailable today, so we have our wonderful, hilarious
- 2:05Speaker 1: guest host, Kelly Weener Smith. Hello, I'm excited to be back.
- 2:09Speaker 1: Thanks very much for joining us and for talking to
- 2:11Speaker 1: us about crazy stuff in the universe. So on the podcast,
- 2:14Speaker 1: we sometimes like to dig into stuff that's really complicated,
- 2:18Speaker 1: like how does quantum field theory work, and what is
- 2:21Speaker 1: the real charge of the electron? Or what is it
- 2:23Speaker 1: like to go inside a black hole? These are deep
- 2:26Speaker 1: and complicated questions about the universe that we try to
- 2:29Speaker 1: take apart and explain to you. But sometimes we also
- 2:32Speaker 1: like to dive into simpler seeming in questions, questions that
- 2:35Speaker 1: might seem like they have an obvious answer but then
- 2:38Speaker 1: have some interesting little wrinkles. It's good to have diversity, yeah,
- 2:41Speaker 1: because questions are at the heart of science, and they're
- 2:44Speaker 1: not just the questions that scientists ask when they're doing
- 2:46Speaker 1: their research, but we're also interested in the questions that
- 2:49Speaker 1: everybody asks. And sometimes the best questions are the questions
- 2:53Speaker 1: that children ask, the most obvious questions which sometimes have
- 2:57Speaker 1: a tricky answer. And I remember looking up at the
- 2:59Speaker 1: night sky with my kids, who are now twelve and fourteen,
- 3:02Speaker 1: but earlier asked very simple, basic, fun questions about the universe,
- 3:07Speaker 1: like why do we only have one moon? Or do
- 3:11Speaker 1: we only have one moon? Kelly, what kind of questions
- 3:14Speaker 1: do your kids ask when they look at the night sky?
- 3:16Speaker 1: I was just trying to think of a good example
- 3:19Speaker 1: of Like, my daughter is seven, and she's always asking
- 3:22Speaker 1: me questions that I don't know the answer to some
- 3:24Speaker 1: of them super fundamental, which makes me think, how is
- 3:27Speaker 1: it that I'm walking around not knowing the answer to
- 3:30Speaker 1: all of these fundamental things, but yet I still managed
- 3:32Speaker 1: to survive. But no good example is coming to mind
- 3:35Speaker 1: right now. But we've got one of those apps on
- 3:37Speaker 1: our phone where you can sort of point it at
- 3:39Speaker 1: whatever in the night sky and it tells you what
- 3:41Speaker 1: it is. And we spend a lot of time sitting
- 3:42Speaker 1: on our car at night looking up at stuff, and
- 3:44Speaker 1: it's a lot of fun. She asked lots of questions,
- 3:46Speaker 1: but nothing's coming to mind right now that I did
- 3:48Speaker 1: not know the answer to. What's your favorite question your
- 3:50Speaker 1: kids have asked you? One of my favorite questions my
- 3:53Speaker 1: kids have asked me are questions like where are we
- 3:56Speaker 1: in the universe. You know, they're just getting used to
- 3:59Speaker 1: the idea of like our houses in the neighborhood, and
- 4:01Speaker 1: the neighborhood is in the city, and that city is
- 4:03Speaker 1: in a state somewhere we have like a location and address,
- 4:07Speaker 1: and so they wanted to know, like, where are we
- 4:09Speaker 1: in the universe? What's our like universe address? And of course,
- 4:13Speaker 1: you know, the hardcore physics answer is that every place
- 4:16Speaker 1: in the universe is the same, and physics doesn't care
- 4:19Speaker 1: about location and translationally and variant and stuff. But that
- 4:22Speaker 1: answer is not very satisfying for a four year old. Yeah,
- 4:25Speaker 1: that's why it's a bummer to have a physicist for
- 4:27Speaker 1: a dad. But instead I try to describe to them,
- 4:31Speaker 1: you know, what the galaxy looks like, and how the
- 4:34Speaker 1: galaxy fits in with other galaxies, and what we know
- 4:36Speaker 1: about sort of our cosmic neighborhood. And the thing I
- 4:39Speaker 1: love about their questions is that they are both easy
- 4:42Speaker 1: and hard. They're like easy to ask but sometimes hard
- 4:46Speaker 1: to answer. And they're the obvious questions, as you said,
- 4:49Speaker 1: that you don't always think about when you're walking around
- 4:51Speaker 1: the world. But that's why I think that children really
- 4:53Speaker 1: are sometimes the most natural scientists, because they don't just
- 4:57Speaker 1: accept things as they are. They ask questions about the
- 5:00Speaker 1: and say why is it this way or is it
- 5:01Speaker 1: that way? After all? Totally, And what I love about
- 5:04Speaker 1: Ada is that she'll tell me that I'm wrong. I
- 5:07Speaker 1: wish I had that confidence. So you know, not only
- 5:09Speaker 1: do they ask good questions, but they still have the
- 5:11Speaker 1: confidence of children to be like, no, I don't think so.
- 5:14Speaker 1: And so today in the podcast, we'll be talking about
- 5:16Speaker 1: a question which seems to have an obvious answer. So
- 5:20Speaker 1: on today's program will be answering the question how many
- 5:28Speaker 1: moons does the Earth have? So, Kelly, tell me what
- 5:31Speaker 1: you thought when you saw that we would be talking
- 5:32Speaker 1: about this today. So you sent me a list of
- 5:35Speaker 1: topics we could talk about, And when I read this one,
- 5:38Speaker 1: I thought, well, the answer seems obvious. The answer is one.
- 5:42Speaker 1: And if the answer seems obvious, then either Daniel needs
- 5:45Speaker 1: to be fired because he's not asking good questions anymore,
- 5:49Speaker 1: or there's something fundamental that I'm missing, and it's probably
- 5:53Speaker 1: the second. And so I suggested that we talked about
- 5:56Speaker 1: this one because I figured this was a question that
- 5:57Speaker 1: would teach me something new. Awesome. This is a fun
- 6:00Speaker 1: question to dig into. We get to hear about like
- 6:02Speaker 1: what exactly is a moon, what counts as a moon,
- 6:05Speaker 1: even a little bit about the etymology of the word
- 6:08Speaker 1: moon and when it came into use, and what else
- 6:10Speaker 1: is out there orbiting around the Earth and could you
- 6:13Speaker 1: call it a moon? So, as usual, before I dug
- 6:16Speaker 1: into this, I wanted to know what everybody else out
- 6:18Speaker 1: there thought. Sometimes I used to walk around the campus
- 6:21Speaker 1: if you see Irvine and ask students there these questions
- 6:24Speaker 1: to see what the general level of knowledge was or confusion.
- 6:27Speaker 1: These days, of course, because the pandemic, I'm sending emails
- 6:30Speaker 1: out into the Internet asking listeners to speculate baselessly without
- 6:34Speaker 1: the chance to do any research on these difficult physics questions.
- 6:37Speaker 1: Did you actually stop students on the campus and ask
- 6:39Speaker 1: them how many moons does they are? Have? No, I
- 6:42Speaker 1: haven't because this question is too recent, But I wonder
- 6:45Speaker 1: what they would say. I've noticed that our listeners tend
- 6:47Speaker 1: to give better informed answers than the random you see
- 6:50Speaker 1: Irvine student. Nothing against you see Irvine. Of course, our
- 6:53Speaker 1: listeners may just be like a subset of the universe
- 6:56Speaker 1: that's more interested in understanding the universe. But I hope
- 6:59Speaker 1: one day to get back to campus and getting to
- 7:01Speaker 1: ask the students those questions. It was fun to sort
- 7:03Speaker 1: of see their faces when I asked them these questions.
- 7:06Speaker 1: I bet you have a reputation as being one of
- 7:08Speaker 1: the like super weird professors. Well, you know, I don't
- 7:11Speaker 1: dress very fancy, so maybe they just think I'm some
- 7:13Speaker 1: random homeless person asking them hard physical questions. Every college
- 7:17Speaker 1: has homeless person or physics professor, it can be hard
- 7:21Speaker 1: to tell the difference, physics professor, you can't tell the
- 7:23Speaker 1: difference between Yeah, anyway, Thank you to everybody who volunteered
- 7:28Speaker 1: to answer these questions. If you'd like to participate for
- 7:30Speaker 1: a future episode of the podcast, please write to me
- 7:33Speaker 1: two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Here's what
- 7:37Speaker 1: some of our listeners had to say. The obvious answer
- 7:40Speaker 1: that pops into my head immediately would be one. So
- 7:43Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure that answer is wrong. Well, we have
- 7:47Speaker 1: just our celebrity moon, the moon, and I don't know,
- 7:54Speaker 1: maybe we might have caught up some small objects there,
- 8:00Speaker 1: probably a Deslo car elon musk scent, who knows. I
- 8:05Speaker 1: don't know exactly. I'm one sure that the Earth has
- 8:10Speaker 1: two moons, the classic moon that we see in the
- 8:14Speaker 1: sky and Keith Moon. I would say the Earth has
- 8:18Speaker 1: one moon. I don't know if you would consider satellites
- 8:21Speaker 1: or a space station a moon because the orbit the Earth,
- 8:24Speaker 1: but I would probably just consider one moon. Well, I
- 8:27Speaker 1: guess this depends on your definition of moon the natural moons.
- 8:32Speaker 1: It has the one large natural moon, and I believe
- 8:36Speaker 1: they've discovered a couple of asteroids that have been captured
- 8:39Speaker 1: in loose enough for bits that they're probably temporary. If
- 8:44Speaker 1: you're going to call any artificial uh satellite a moon,
- 8:50Speaker 1: which they've been called artificial moons, then that number goes
- 8:54Speaker 1: into the millions, depending on how small a particle you
- 8:58Speaker 1: want to count. There's nuts and bolts and pieces of
- 9:03Speaker 1: rocket and larger things that satellites, fragments of satellites that
- 9:09Speaker 1: have collided with each other, so uh, a whole lot
- 9:13Speaker 1: of them, all right, Kelly, So what do you think
- 9:15Speaker 1: about our listeners responses here? I thought there were some
- 9:18Speaker 1: very insightful responses, you know. One of them was essentially
- 9:21Speaker 1: asking questions about maybe how do we define moons. I
- 9:25Speaker 1: thought somebody had a clever thought that the Tesla car
- 9:28Speaker 1: might now be sort of orbiting, although I think of
- 9:31Speaker 1: the Tesla car was shot Mars word instead of moonword.
- 9:35Speaker 1: But it was clear that people sort of thought through
- 9:37Speaker 1: their answers, and yeah, they had some clever answers. What
- 9:39Speaker 1: do you think? Yeah, I was impressed as well. In
- 9:42Speaker 1: the end, of course, it's going to come down to
- 9:43Speaker 1: the definition. I hope that we end up with the
- 9:45Speaker 1: definition of moon that doesn't allow Elon Musk to have
- 9:48Speaker 1: created his own personal moon. That would seems sort of unsatisfying.
- 9:52Speaker 1: That would be too much power for one person. The
- 9:55Speaker 1: dude's already a billionaire and owns three like really valuable
- 9:59Speaker 1: companies like it, doesn't need to create astronomical objects on
- 10:02Speaker 1: top of all of it. Although he wants to create
- 10:04Speaker 1: a Mars colony, which is maybe even more powerful than
- 10:08Speaker 1: creating a moon. So I guess we'll have to see
- 10:10Speaker 1: what the future holds. Do you think that's because he
- 10:11Speaker 1: wants to be dictator of Mars? I like joking about
- 10:14Speaker 1: that with Zack. Yes, he claims he wants a representative
- 10:19Speaker 1: not a direct democracy, So we'll see what happens when
- 10:22Speaker 1: the time comes. Well, if he gets to pick who
- 10:24Speaker 1: goes to Mars, and they're probably going to elect him
- 10:26Speaker 1: president anyway. But let's get back to the topic. We're
- 10:29Speaker 1: not talking about Elon Musk's plan to colonize Mars. We're
- 10:31Speaker 1: talking about moons and how many moons the Earth has
- 10:34Speaker 1: and what exactly is a moon? So let's dig into
- 10:38Speaker 1: that first and talk about what qualifies as a moon. So,
- 10:42Speaker 1: without doing any research, Kelly, what would you use to
- 10:45Speaker 1: define a moon? So I would have guessed that a
- 10:48Speaker 1: moon is a big thing that isn't bigger than the
- 10:53Speaker 1: planet that it orbits. So a big thing that orbits
- 10:56Speaker 1: around a planet, and it has to be big, but
- 10:59Speaker 1: it can't be bigger than the thing that it's orbiting around.
- 11:02Speaker 1: That's how I would have defined it. But but probably
- 11:05Speaker 1: that's wrong. And then your definition would it have to
- 11:08Speaker 1: be natural or could be manned? Me that? Could we
- 11:10Speaker 1: build an artificial moon? Oh h no, No, I've always
- 11:14Speaker 1: thought of it as being natural. Yeah, what about you? Well,
- 11:18Speaker 1: I really wasn't sure because it seems like in lots
- 11:20Speaker 1: of directions there are arbitrary distinctions you have to make.
- 11:23Speaker 1: And that's the problem often in astronomy is that the
- 11:25Speaker 1: categories between things get blurred, and you always find something
- 11:29Speaker 1: right on the edge between the different categories, and in
- 11:31Speaker 1: the end, you know, we're just we're looking at the
- 11:33Speaker 1: universe and we're trying to categorize it to understand is
- 11:35Speaker 1: that we can talk about it together. Doesn't mean that
- 11:37Speaker 1: those categories actually reflect something deep and true about the universe.
- 11:41Speaker 1: There's sometimes just the words we've used to describe stuff,
- 11:44Speaker 1: and so as we see more stuff out there in
- 11:46Speaker 1: the universe, we're gonna find things that break those categories.
- 11:49Speaker 1: But the definition that I found for moon is that
- 11:51Speaker 1: it has to be a quote natural body, right, So
- 11:54Speaker 1: it needs to be a natural body that's orbiting a planet.
- 11:57Speaker 1: And to me already this is problem that like a
- 12:00Speaker 1: natural body means not like a human made satellite. So
- 12:03Speaker 1: we built a death Star for example, Officially that wouldn't
- 12:07Speaker 1: qualify as a moon. But what if we just like
- 12:12Speaker 1: you know, pulled out a huge chunk of Earth and
- 12:15Speaker 1: threw it out into space and then it went into
- 12:18Speaker 1: orbit around the Earth. Is that a natural body? It's
- 12:21Speaker 1: like made of rock, right, It's essentially the same process
- 12:24Speaker 1: that created our moon as we understand it. But I
- 12:27Speaker 1: think according to this definition, it wouldn't be a moon
- 12:30Speaker 1: because you know, it would have been like as the
- 12:32Speaker 1: result of a human process. It really does seem like
- 12:34Speaker 1: if you just took a chunk of earth and you
- 12:36Speaker 1: put it up there, it should count. But I suppose
- 12:39Speaker 1: satellites are just chunks of Earth that we've we've done
- 12:42Speaker 1: things too, that we send up into space, and so
- 12:46Speaker 1: maybe it shouldn't count. Yeah, exactly, That's where I was going.
- 12:49Speaker 1: What is a satellite other than like an ultra refined
- 12:52Speaker 1: piece of Earth that you've somehow, you know, manipulated into
- 12:55Speaker 1: a complex technological object. But in the end, it's a
- 12:58Speaker 1: piece of the Earth that we've launched into space. And
- 13:00Speaker 1: you know, for those of you who don't know the
- 13:02Speaker 1: history of our moon, we think that our moon is
- 13:06Speaker 1: basically a big chunk of Earth that was vaulted out
- 13:09Speaker 1: into space when another proto planet hit Earth when it
- 13:12Speaker 1: was very very young, and this collision led to this
- 13:15Speaker 1: enormous blab of stuff getting tossed out there, which eventually
- 13:18Speaker 1: coalesced into the Moon. And when we studied the surface
- 13:21Speaker 1: of the Moon, we found elements of it which look
- 13:24Speaker 1: exactly the same as elements of the surface of the Earth,
- 13:27Speaker 1: which suggests that they really do have sort of a
- 13:28Speaker 1: common origin. So this definition of a moon being a
- 13:31Speaker 1: natural body not a human made object is a little tricky,
- 13:35Speaker 1: and I don't think the definition there is very clear.
- 13:37Speaker 1: Can I ask a sort of tangential question, of course, So, well,
- 13:41Speaker 1: Zach and I were reading about the Moon. We came
- 13:43Speaker 1: across this fact that the Moon is sort of carbon poor,
- 13:47Speaker 1: like maybe there's some carbon up there, but you're gonna
- 13:48Speaker 1: have trouble growing plants and stuff because there's not a
- 13:50Speaker 1: lot of carbon. If the Moon is just a chunk
- 13:53Speaker 1: of Earth that got expelled, why do we have so
- 13:57Speaker 1: much carbon and they have so little. Is that the
- 13:59Speaker 1: result of natal processes that happened after the Moon got
- 14:02Speaker 1: cut off partly, Yeah, Mostly the Earth and the Moon
- 14:05Speaker 1: are made up of very similar stuff. It's mostly oxygen
- 14:09Speaker 1: and silicon and calcium and iron and that kind of stuff.
- 14:12Speaker 1: That's because we think that the Moon and the Earth
- 14:15Speaker 1: are made up of the remnants of a huge collision
- 14:18Speaker 1: between the proto Earth and a Mars sized planet, like
- 14:22Speaker 1: fifty million years after the Solar system formed, and the
- 14:25Speaker 1: remnants of that huge collision coalesced into the Earth and
- 14:29Speaker 1: into the Moon. But you're right that there is very
- 14:32Speaker 1: little carbon on the Moon, but there is carbon on
- 14:34Speaker 1: the Earth's surface, and we're not sure why. One theory
- 14:38Speaker 1: is that carbon tends to form very volatile compounds, things
- 14:42Speaker 1: that would end up in an atmosphere if the Moon
- 14:44Speaker 1: could keep one. So the Earth hangs onto some of
- 14:46Speaker 1: these things, some of this carbon, because it's big enough
- 14:49Speaker 1: to keep hold of its atmosphere it has more gravity,
- 14:52Speaker 1: But the Moon can't. Anything like an atmosphere on the
- 14:54Speaker 1: Moon just boils away. Interesting okay, thanks. So the definition
- 14:58Speaker 1: of a moon is that needs to be a natural
- 15:00Speaker 1: a body in orbit around a planet, and you said
- 15:03Speaker 1: that it needs to be big. Officially, technically there's no
- 15:06Speaker 1: minimum size to a moon. A moon could be like huge,
- 15:10Speaker 1: like our moon, or you know, according to astronomers, it's
- 15:13Speaker 1: okay to have a moon that's like a kilometer in size.
- 15:16Speaker 1: I find that very unsatisfying. Like to me, a moon
- 15:19Speaker 1: is something that you should be able to, like put
- 15:21Speaker 1: a settlement on one day, and you can't really do
- 15:24Speaker 1: that with a one kilometer sized quote unquote moon. I
- 15:28Speaker 1: don't know. I don't want to buy that, but apparently
- 15:31Speaker 1: it's part of the definition. It would be like the
- 15:32Speaker 1: little prints right walking around this tiny little planet. But
- 15:35Speaker 1: I think that comes from our experience, right, just because
- 15:38Speaker 1: we have this one big moon, we tend to think
- 15:41Speaker 1: that's what you gotta have in a moon. But as
- 15:43Speaker 1: well talk about later, so many planets in the Solar
- 15:45Speaker 1: System don't have a huge moon, to have a lot
- 15:47Speaker 1: of smaller moons, And so part of the joy of
- 15:51Speaker 1: astronomy and and of exploring the universe is discovering that
- 15:54Speaker 1: our corner of the universe is weird, is unusual, is
- 15:57Speaker 1: not representative, and we've got to sort of like stretch
- 15:59Speaker 1: our mind then get used to a different way of
- 16:01Speaker 1: thinking about what a moon is. Yeah, it is really
- 16:04Speaker 1: hard to wrap your mind around just how different it is.
- 16:07Speaker 1: And yeah, I'm very earth centric. I guess I would
- 16:08Speaker 1: like moons to all sort of fits in a nice
- 16:11Speaker 1: little mold that matches the moon that I have, and
- 16:13Speaker 1: you touch it on really all the important issues. I
- 16:15Speaker 1: think that was really tremendous. The other thing you mentioned
- 16:18Speaker 1: is that it shouldn't be bigger than the planet, right,
- 16:20Speaker 1: And in the definition of a moon, officially, the upper
- 16:23Speaker 1: limit on the size of a moon is pretty vague,
- 16:26Speaker 1: Like what happens when the moon approaches the size of
- 16:29Speaker 1: the planet. Then you might ask, like, well, which one
- 16:31Speaker 1: is the planet and which one is the moon? Right?
- 16:33Speaker 1: Or if they're exactly equal size, could you consider them
- 16:37Speaker 1: to be like a binary planet system? So where does
- 16:40Speaker 1: our moon fall relative? And they'll like Earth to Moon
- 16:44Speaker 1: ratio side, Like, is our moon big for a moon?
- 16:48Speaker 1: Is it the biggest relative to the size of the
- 16:50Speaker 1: planet it orbits is? So is our moon weird relative
- 16:52Speaker 1: to the other moons? Our moon is very weird. Our
- 16:55Speaker 1: moon is basically that megachild. The diameter of the Moon
- 16:59Speaker 1: is more than a quarter of the diameter of the Earth,
- 17:02Speaker 1: and that's the biggest moon to planet ratio in the
- 17:05Speaker 1: Solar System by like a factor of five. There's no
- 17:08Speaker 1: other planet out there that has such a big moon
- 17:10Speaker 1: relative to the planet. Like there are moons of Jupiter
- 17:14Speaker 1: that are roughly the same size as our moon, but
- 17:16Speaker 1: of course Jupiter is huge, and so relative to the
- 17:19Speaker 1: size of Jupiter, those moons are very very small, So
- 17:21Speaker 1: we have a really weird big moon. You know, it's
- 17:24Speaker 1: kind of amazing that we've managed to figure out anything,
- 17:26Speaker 1: which is sort of a phrase that, if I'm remembering correctly,
- 17:29Speaker 1: I've said in almost every single one of these episodes
- 17:31Speaker 1: we've done together. But it seems like, you know, our
- 17:33Speaker 1: Solar System is so weird, and our planet and the
- 17:36Speaker 1: moon is so weird. It gives us such a weird
- 17:39Speaker 1: frame of reference. But I know, it's exciting that we
- 17:41Speaker 1: can still figure stuff out. Yeah, and it's a real
- 17:44Speaker 1: journey to peel away these preconceptions and understand that things
- 17:47Speaker 1: we thought were fundamental, things we thought we're obvious or universal,
- 17:51Speaker 1: are really just unusual. You know. It's just like when
- 17:54Speaker 1: you go traveling and you discover like, oh, not everybody
- 17:56Speaker 1: drinks coffee for breakfast. You know, it turns out there
- 17:59Speaker 1: are other ways to live, and that's the joy of
- 18:01Speaker 1: exploring the universe, you know, discovering the tea is also
- 18:04Speaker 1: acceptable at breakfast times. No, no, no, no, no, no,
- 18:08Speaker 1: that's just wrong. One fact that I really liked while
- 18:11Speaker 1: I was reading through here was that those like one
- 18:13Speaker 1: kilometer size moons are sometimes called moonlits. And I thought
- 18:17Speaker 1: that was super cute. So I asked my seven year
- 18:19Speaker 1: old today. I was like, how many moons does the
- 18:21Speaker 1: Earth have? So she, being a very clever kid, was like, well,
- 18:25Speaker 1: I thought it was one, but you're asking me this,
- 18:27Speaker 1: so what does that mean? And and so I told
- 18:30Speaker 1: her like, well, you know you can have these little
- 18:32Speaker 1: things called moonlits. And she said, well, what does that mean?
- 18:35Speaker 1: And so I tried to explain that let's means little
- 18:37Speaker 1: things and she was like, well, when else does it
- 18:39Speaker 1: mean that? And I had a like, uh, you know,
- 18:42Speaker 1: like a moment of not being able to figure it out,
- 18:44Speaker 1: but I came up with piglets and outlets, and I
- 18:46Speaker 1: was very proud of myself. So anyway, that was a
- 18:48Speaker 1: fun moment with the seven year old today. Yeah, I
- 18:50Speaker 1: love those little endings lits and like, it's just like
- 18:53Speaker 1: the diminutive in Spanish, you know, eto or eno or
- 18:57Speaker 1: these kind of things in romance languages. So I'm glad
- 18:59Speaker 1: that we have those in English. Also, you could really
- 19:01Speaker 1: stick them on anything, you know, like I'm not having dessert,
- 19:04Speaker 1: I'm having dessert lits. It makes everything cuter, it really does.
- 19:09Speaker 1: So where are we with the moons? Moons have to
- 19:11Speaker 1: be a natural body orbiting a planet. No minimum size.
- 19:14Speaker 1: The oppera limit is kind of vague. One thing I
- 19:17Speaker 1: read suggested that you could effectively describe an upper limit
- 19:20Speaker 1: on the moon by requiring that the center of mass
- 19:24Speaker 1: of the planet and moon together should be inside the
- 19:28Speaker 1: diameter of the planet. Right, So the center of mass
- 19:30Speaker 1: of two objects is sort of like the weighted average
- 19:34Speaker 1: of all of their stuff. If you've got more stuff
- 19:36Speaker 1: in the planet than in the moon, it's going to
- 19:38Speaker 1: be closer to the planet mathematically and physically. It's actually
- 19:41Speaker 1: the location that the two things are orbiting. Right. We
- 19:43Speaker 1: say that the Moon, for example, orbits the Earth, but
- 19:46Speaker 1: actually the two things are orbiting each other, or more precisely,
- 19:50Speaker 1: they're both orbiting the center of mass of the two things.
- 19:53Speaker 1: And if you have two things that are equal mass,
- 19:55Speaker 1: then their center of masses right between them. If one
- 19:58Speaker 1: of them is infinitely massive, then the center of mass
- 20:00Speaker 1: is at the center of that very massive object. In
- 20:03Speaker 1: a more realistic scenario, where one thing is very massive
- 20:05Speaker 1: and one thing is much smaller, you can have the
- 20:07Speaker 1: center of mass of the system of the two things
- 20:11Speaker 1: be close to the center of the larger object. And
- 20:14Speaker 1: so here the definition is like, is the center of
- 20:17Speaker 1: mass of the two objects underneath the ground within the
- 20:20Speaker 1: radius of the larger object. That's sort of a cool definition.
- 20:24Speaker 1: That is a cool So I have a couple of
- 20:25Speaker 1: questions to see if I understand. So one, does it
- 20:29Speaker 1: depend on how far apart the things are or is
- 20:32Speaker 1: it like you just when you make this comparison, you
- 20:34Speaker 1: you know, sort of mentally put these things right next
- 20:36Speaker 1: to each other and then compare the center of mass.
- 20:38Speaker 1: It definitely depends on how far apart they are, right
- 20:41Speaker 1: because for example, if they're equally massive, you'd be right
- 20:44Speaker 1: between them, and that definitely depends on the distance between
- 20:47Speaker 1: the two objects. Yes, and so that would mean you
- 20:49Speaker 1: have two planets as opposed to a moon and a
- 20:51Speaker 1: planet in that definition. And so so you have two
- 20:55Speaker 1: things that are like one is just a little bit
- 20:58Speaker 1: smaller than the other, and one is big er, but
- 21:00Speaker 1: the smaller one is made out of something much more
- 21:06Speaker 1: massive or dense or I'm not quite sure what word
- 21:08Speaker 1: I'm looking for here. Could the smaller thing end up
- 21:11Speaker 1: being the planet that gets orbited by a bigger thing
- 21:14Speaker 1: because it has more like gravitational pull? Absolutely? Yeah. For example,
- 21:18Speaker 1: if you had something orbiting a black hole, right, a
- 21:21Speaker 1: super duper dense object, then the center of mass of
- 21:24Speaker 1: the system is definitely going to be within the event horizon,
- 21:27Speaker 1: even if though the black hole could be smaller. Right,
- 21:29Speaker 1: black holes are very very compact. They don't have to
- 21:31Speaker 1: be very very large, but they are supermassive. So that's awesome.
- 21:34Speaker 1: You're really like pushing the boundaries of this definition. But
- 21:37Speaker 1: I don't know. I guess a black hole could have
- 21:39Speaker 1: a planet orbiting it. I'm not sure if you would
- 21:41Speaker 1: call that a planet or a moon, right, if you're
- 21:43Speaker 1: orbiting a black hole, Yeah, it's trippy, I guess, I,
- 21:46Speaker 1: as a not physicist, find it sort of unsatisfying that
- 21:51Speaker 1: if the moon is too far away, it might or
- 21:54Speaker 1: if something that feels sort of moon like is too
- 21:56Speaker 1: far away, it wouldn't count as a moon because the
- 21:59Speaker 1: center of masses is not within the bigger body or something.
- 22:02Speaker 1: It feels like distance shouldn't matter for the definition, But
- 22:05Speaker 1: that's a biologist take on it. Well, it definitely has
- 22:08Speaker 1: to be in orbit. And I think that one problem
- 22:10Speaker 1: with this whole categorization is that this is like a
- 22:13Speaker 1: natural hierarchy. I mean, you have the Sun and the
- 22:16Speaker 1: stuff orbiting around the Sun, and then you call those planets,
- 22:19Speaker 1: but that's sort of arbitrary because they're orbiting around the Sun.
- 22:22Speaker 1: And then there's things orbiting around the planets, right, and
- 22:25Speaker 1: you call those moons. In the end, it's just sort
- 22:27Speaker 1: of a natural hierarchy of stuff orbiting stuff that's orbiting
- 22:30Speaker 1: other stuff, and our categorization of it is you're really
- 22:33Speaker 1: going to try to draw lines there where they really
- 22:35Speaker 1: aren't lines. Yeah, but that's like a fundamental problem with science.
- 22:39Speaker 1: You know, in biology, we categorize things, and constantly nature
- 22:43Speaker 1: does not care how we categorize it. She moves away
- 22:45Speaker 1: outside of our categories. Yeah, I guess it's tough just
- 22:47Speaker 1: finding a definition that is useful I guess in biology
- 22:50Speaker 1: there was a huge revolution a couple hundred years ago,
- 22:52Speaker 1: right because you guys had been categorizing stuff based on
- 22:55Speaker 1: how it looked and what it did, and then discovered
- 22:58Speaker 1: the genetic relation ships between everything, and that there was
- 23:01Speaker 1: actually a real, true organization to all these animals that
- 23:05Speaker 1: didn't necessarily respect how they looked or how we observe
- 23:08Speaker 1: them well. And then it turns out that, you know,
- 23:10Speaker 1: how do you define species? That's actually a pretty difficult question.
- 23:13Speaker 1: The tree of life doesn't just branch, it sort of comes,
- 23:15Speaker 1: the branches come back together and you get horizontal gene transfer.
- 23:19Speaker 1: And how do you categorize species of bacteria when they're
- 23:22Speaker 1: swapping jeans all the time, and it gets complicated fast. Well,
- 23:25Speaker 1: in physics, it's interesting they think about how these words
- 23:28Speaker 1: were used for a long time. People use the word
- 23:31Speaker 1: satellite to also refer to moons, and this is before
- 23:34Speaker 1: we had things in space like GPS and telecommunications, satellites
- 23:38Speaker 1: and you know, laser weapons and all that kind of stuff. Now,
- 23:41Speaker 1: when you say satellite, you think of something people build,
- 23:43Speaker 1: maybe electronics and launched into space. But before spot Nick,
- 23:47Speaker 1: before ninety seven, astronomers used the word satellite to talk
- 23:51Speaker 1: about anything orbiting another object, and so they didn't really
- 23:55Speaker 1: use the word moon scientifically. They referred to Luna, for example,
- 24:00Speaker 1: as Earth satellite. Then when they launched sput Nick, they realized,
- 24:04Speaker 1: whole on a second, what are we going to call that?
- 24:06Speaker 1: And so they started to use the word artificial satellite.
- 24:08Speaker 1: But that was a little bit too cumbersome, and so
- 24:10Speaker 1: now we just say satellite when we mean artificial satellite.
- 24:14Speaker 1: And then moon, which was a word mostly used like
- 24:17Speaker 1: in science fiction and a sort of popular culture, became
- 24:20Speaker 1: a more official scientific word. I think that's sort of
- 24:23Speaker 1: cool that the scientists adopted a word from sort of
- 24:26Speaker 1: common usage. That's totally fascinating. And I've been reading about
- 24:29Speaker 1: the space race and I didn't know this history of
- 24:32Speaker 1: the word satellite. And when I saw that they named
- 24:34Speaker 1: spot Nick an artificial satellite, I was like, well, that's
- 24:37Speaker 1: sort of clunk. Why not just call it satellite? But
- 24:39Speaker 1: it makes sense now. A lot of the fathers of
- 24:42Speaker 1: rocket science or whatever. We're really into sci fi. I
- 24:46Speaker 1: think almost all of the fathers of rocket science claimed
- 24:49Speaker 1: that they were inspired by Jules Verns. What is it
- 24:51Speaker 1: called to the moon? I wonder if the fact that
- 24:54Speaker 1: they were all super into sci fi sort of helped
- 24:56Speaker 1: get the word moon into the scientific literature. Yeah it
- 24:59Speaker 1: makes me one or what else? Like will in the
- 25:01Speaker 1: future be part of science. You know, things that we
- 25:04Speaker 1: say but you wouldn't hear a scientists say, you know,
- 25:06Speaker 1: like a shooting star is our word for a meteor,
- 25:09Speaker 1: but you never see that in the science paper. But
- 25:11Speaker 1: maybe someday in the future, you know, the language will
- 25:13Speaker 1: transmogrify itself into official scientific physics speaker could be. All right,
- 25:18Speaker 1: So we have our definition of a moon. It has
- 25:21Speaker 1: to be a natural body, right, not something engineered by
- 25:25Speaker 1: humanity or elon Musk. Has to orbit a planet. But
- 25:29Speaker 1: there's really no minimum size to it, though there seems
- 25:32Speaker 1: to be some sort of sense of an upper limit
- 25:34Speaker 1: that you shouldn't have your moon being larger than your planet.
- 25:37Speaker 1: All right, So, now that we have our definition, or
- 25:40Speaker 1: at least a definition we're gonna work with for the
- 25:42Speaker 1: rest of this episode, let's take a break before we
- 25:44Speaker 1: move back to figuring out exactly how many moons Earth has.
- 25:59Speaker 1: So we have a definition. Now, how many moons do
- 26:03Speaker 1: we have, Daniel, So let's count them first. Of course,
- 26:06Speaker 1: we have the number one candidate. The classic moon, the
- 26:09Speaker 1: one you're familiar with, the one we all grew up loving. Right,
- 26:13Speaker 1: this is the moon we call the moon, which is
- 26:16Speaker 1: sort of a silly name, right, calling the moon the moon.
- 26:18Speaker 1: It reminds me actually, when I was a kid, we
- 26:20Speaker 1: had a cat and nobody could agree on what to
- 26:23Speaker 1: call the cat, so we just called it the cat,
- 26:26Speaker 1: and that just became its name. And for a while
- 26:29Speaker 1: I felt sad for like, oh, poor cat doesn't get
- 26:31Speaker 1: a name, But he didn't care. It got fed, it
- 26:34Speaker 1: got pet it doesn't need a name. I think it's
- 26:37Speaker 1: good that you became more creative that you got I
- 26:40Speaker 1: can't tell if calling it the moon is very egocentric,
- 26:43Speaker 1: like that is our moon, so it is the moon,
- 26:46Speaker 1: or if it just represents a lack of creativity. Hard
- 26:49Speaker 1: to say. Well, as we were saying earlier, it's really weird,
- 26:52Speaker 1: Like it's huge. It's more than a quarter of the
- 26:54Speaker 1: diameter of the Earth in the Solar System. The next
- 26:57Speaker 1: largest moon relative to his planet is one of the
- 27:00Speaker 1: moons of Neptune, which is almost six percent of the
- 27:02Speaker 1: diameter of Neptune. So that's a pretty big gap. Like
- 27:05Speaker 1: mostly moons are small compared to their planet. The moon
- 27:09Speaker 1: is really a very weird and Or and I did
- 27:11Speaker 1: a whole episode about how the Earth got its moon
- 27:13Speaker 1: and the various theories and how people are testing those,
- 27:16Speaker 1: and so if you're interested in the details of the
- 27:18Speaker 1: history of the moon, then good check out that episode.
- 27:22Speaker 1: But it's interesting that, you know, in the sort of
- 27:24Speaker 1: the history of astronomy I was reading about this, people
- 27:27Speaker 1: didn't really think about the Moon as a moon until
- 27:32Speaker 1: they discovered Jupiter's moons. Like people were looking up in
- 27:35Speaker 1: the sky and they saw, of course stars and they
- 27:38Speaker 1: saw the moon, but they just thought of it as
- 27:40Speaker 1: like another celestial object. They were wrong. And then you know,
- 27:46Speaker 1: when Galileo and other folks saw the moons of Jupiter
- 27:49Speaker 1: and they're like, hey, look at that, there are things
- 27:51Speaker 1: orbiting Jupiter. That's when it clicked in the place and
- 27:53Speaker 1: they're like, wait a second, what Jupiter's got over there
- 27:56Speaker 1: is the same thing that we've got over here. And
- 27:59Speaker 1: that's when they really eyes that this was a whole
- 28:01Speaker 1: new kind of thing in space. That's so interesting. That's
- 28:04Speaker 1: why it's so important to you know, to learn more
- 28:06Speaker 1: and to step outside your comfort zone because there's so
- 28:08Speaker 1: many things that become obvious when you see how other
- 28:10Speaker 1: things are done, and the moon is actually considered a
- 28:13Speaker 1: planet for a while, though the definition of a planet
- 28:16Speaker 1: has also changed. Back then, a planet was just like
- 28:19Speaker 1: another astronomical object. People didn't really understand the relationship between
- 28:23Speaker 1: the planets and the stars and all this kind of stuff.
- 28:25Speaker 1: So if you go back to very early astronomy, what
- 28:28Speaker 1: these words mean is totally different from what they mean today.
- 28:31Speaker 1: So it's pretty tricky to read, like you know, early
- 28:34Speaker 1: astronomical texts. That sounds super confusing. So it makes me wonder.
- 28:38Speaker 1: So if you can be changing what the definition of
- 28:40Speaker 1: a planet is, can you have things that are not
- 28:44Speaker 1: planets that have moons? You can definitely have things that
- 28:48Speaker 1: are not planets that have stuff orbiting them, and we
- 28:52Speaker 1: will talk about that later in the episode. There are
- 28:55Speaker 1: things in the Solar System orbiting other things that are
- 28:57Speaker 1: not planets, for sure. Sorry I got excited. It is
- 29:00Speaker 1: very cool. And for example, you know, just as a teaser,
- 29:03Speaker 1: Pluto no longer considered a planet, but it does have
- 29:08Speaker 1: things orbiting it, right, Pluto has something which you would
- 29:11Speaker 1: call a moon, Sharon, which is half the diameter of Pluto.
- 29:15Speaker 1: So that's pretty fuzzy, like which one is a planet,
- 29:18Speaker 1: which one is the moon. Pluto is only twice as
- 29:20Speaker 1: big as its moon. So if Sharon or Charon, however
- 29:23Speaker 1: you say, it ends up being called the moon, that
- 29:25Speaker 1: makes our moon a little bit less exciting. Yeah, Or
- 29:29Speaker 1: if Pluto gets repromoted back into it being a planet,
- 29:32Speaker 1: then Sharon would be the largest moon relative to a
- 29:35Speaker 1: planet in the Solar System. But because Pluto's no longer
- 29:38Speaker 1: technically a planet, Sharon loses that distinction. Sharon shure, Sharon, Alright,
- 29:43Speaker 1: so everybody knows about the moon. That's not what people
- 29:46Speaker 1: want to hear about. Are there other things orbiting the
- 29:48Speaker 1: Earth that could also be considered moons and so at?
- 29:52Speaker 1: In fact, there are, but they're sort of on the
- 29:55Speaker 1: border line of whether you would really technically call them
- 29:58Speaker 1: a moon. One of my favorites, they say, the object
- 30:00Speaker 1: which I won't even try to pronounce. You're gonna have
- 30:02Speaker 1: to look it up, but it goes by the name
- 30:03Speaker 1: of the space being, and it's this object like five
- 30:07Speaker 1: kilometers in diameter that's orbiting the Sun in the vicinity
- 30:12Speaker 1: of the Earth. But it seems like we've got to
- 30:13Speaker 1: try to pronounce it, right, So I'm gonna try crew
- 30:16Speaker 1: with me, Crew with crew with me. That sounds about right.
- 30:20Speaker 1: If I had no idea how to pronounce it, I
- 30:22Speaker 1: would guess that was correct. And I have no idea
- 30:24Speaker 1: how to pronounce it, so I guess that's correct. I
- 30:27Speaker 1: don't even know what the like, you know, origin of that,
- 30:29Speaker 1: what language that comes from. It looks Irish to me,
- 30:31Speaker 1: and I have I have no reason. I don't actually
- 30:34Speaker 1: know anything about the Irish language. So mean, maybe I
- 30:36Speaker 1: should stop. Maybe it's Gaelic for space being. Somebody out
- 30:39Speaker 1: there who speaks Gaelic let us know how to say
- 30:41Speaker 1: space being in Gaelic. So this is a fun object
- 30:45Speaker 1: because it's in orbit technically around the Sun, but it's
- 30:49Speaker 1: ring resonance with the Earth. This is something maybe people
- 30:52Speaker 1: haven't realized that, like things that are orbiting the Sun
- 30:55Speaker 1: are also interacting with each other. Right, our orbit around
- 30:58Speaker 1: the Sun is mostly a big lips and it's dominated
- 31:01Speaker 1: by the Sun. The shape of that lips is mostly
- 31:03Speaker 1: controlled by the gravitational power of the Sun. But there
- 31:07Speaker 1: are other things also orbiting with us, and they tug
- 31:09Speaker 1: on us, they pull on us, and they can change
- 31:12Speaker 1: our orbit. And sometimes you get two objects and what
- 31:15Speaker 1: you call a resonance, which means that they are very
- 31:18Speaker 1: regularly tugging on each other in a systematic way that
- 31:21Speaker 1: changes both of their orbits and makes it stable, so that,
- 31:23Speaker 1: for example, they will like meet two or four times
- 31:26Speaker 1: while going around the Sun, depending on their relative speed,
- 31:29Speaker 1: and nudge each other in just the right way. So,
- 31:32Speaker 1: for example, Saturday and Jupiter are both really really powerful
- 31:35Speaker 1: and they're in an orbital residence with each other. So
- 31:38Speaker 1: this is an object that's moving around the Sun, but
- 31:40Speaker 1: it's in resonance with the Earth, so it's strongly influenced
- 31:44Speaker 1: by the Earth's gravity. But does it does it orbit
- 31:47Speaker 1: in the same shape the Moon duns? So how is
- 31:49Speaker 1: an orbit and a resonance different? So this thing moves
- 31:53Speaker 1: around the Sun, you know, but so does the Moon.
- 31:56Speaker 1: Right if you tracked the moon. The Moon goes around
- 31:58Speaker 1: the Sun. The Earth goes around the Sun one but
- 32:00Speaker 1: the Moon is gravitationally mostly bound to the Earth. This
- 32:04Speaker 1: thing is primarily mostly bound to the Sun, but because
- 32:09Speaker 1: of the influence of the Earth, if you look at
- 32:11Speaker 1: its orbit from the Earth, it looks like it makes
- 32:14Speaker 1: a bean shaped motion around the Earth. Like if you
- 32:18Speaker 1: put the Earth, if you're sending of your reference frame
- 32:20Speaker 1: and you plot where the space being is and you
- 32:22Speaker 1: like take data points from day to day and imagine
- 32:25Speaker 1: where it is. It makes a bean shape all the
- 32:28Speaker 1: way around the Earth. So does that mean it doesn't
- 32:30Speaker 1: quite fit the definition? Because like do orbits need to
- 32:33Speaker 1: be elliptical and not not being shaped? It means that
- 32:37Speaker 1: there's not really a clear distinction. We have a three
- 32:40Speaker 1: body system. We have the Sun, we have the Earth,
- 32:42Speaker 1: and we have the space being, and they're all tugging
- 32:45Speaker 1: on each other. And so to ask the question like
- 32:48Speaker 1: what is the space being orbiting? Is it orbiting the Earth?
- 32:51Speaker 1: Is it orbiting just the Sun, doesn't have a clear
- 32:54Speaker 1: precise answer unless you define an arbitrary distinction. But there
- 32:57Speaker 1: is no natural distinction between these two scenarios. Is like
- 33:00Speaker 1: a smooth continuum of being like the Moon where you're
- 33:03Speaker 1: very clearly disorbiting the Earth and being like Mercury, where
- 33:07Speaker 1: you're very clearly disorbiting the Sun. And then these quasi
- 33:11Speaker 1: satellites of Earth that are very clearly affected by Earth
- 33:14Speaker 1: and sort of moving around Earth as they move around
- 33:17Speaker 1: the Sun. And that's what the space bean is. It's
- 33:20Speaker 1: a quasi satellite of the Earth. All right, So two things. One,
- 33:24Speaker 1: every time you say space being I'm going to continue
- 33:26Speaker 1: to chuckle. I don't think I'm gonna stop doing that,
- 33:28Speaker 1: because it's just funny and cute and too you know,
- 33:31Speaker 1: I feel like it would be really nice in science
- 33:34Speaker 1: classes if like, how hard it is to do these
- 33:37Speaker 1: definitions and how so few things fit into these definitions
- 33:41Speaker 1: was sort of made more clear, and maybe they do
- 33:42Speaker 1: that in school today. It constantly blows my mind how
- 33:45Speaker 1: much I think that we have the world bend nicely.
- 33:49Speaker 1: But everything breaks the bins. Everything breaks the bins because
- 33:52Speaker 1: the world is continuous, right, and it's huge, and so
- 33:55Speaker 1: there's always going to be an example of something in between.
- 33:58Speaker 1: These crisp distinctions are are our artificial way to try
- 34:02Speaker 1: to impose order on the universe. And back when we
- 34:04Speaker 1: hadn't seen so many things, those gaps might have seen meaningful.
- 34:08Speaker 1: But as we keep looking at the universe, we find
- 34:10Speaker 1: stuff that feels in those gaps, and you know, the
- 34:13Speaker 1: same must be true in biology, right, that's what the
- 34:15Speaker 1: duck bill platypus is. Right, It's like, hold on a second,
- 34:18Speaker 1: what do you mean mammals? You know, right, right, it's
- 34:20Speaker 1: nature's way of being, like, you cannot put me in
- 34:22Speaker 1: a box. Yeah, so that's the space being. Also, I'm
- 34:26Speaker 1: saying the space being because it is fun to say,
- 34:28Speaker 1: and because I'm trying to avoid having to pronounce the
- 34:30Speaker 1: actual name of the thing. Yeah. No, sure, that makes sense,
- 34:33Speaker 1: It's okay. So here's what I want to know. So
- 34:35Speaker 1: we're not taught that the space being is a moon
- 34:39Speaker 1: in school, or at least I wasn't. So if you
- 34:41Speaker 1: were to walk into a random astronomer's office at some
- 34:45Speaker 1: university and ask them does the space being count as
- 34:48Speaker 1: a moon? Are they gonna like roll their eyes and
- 34:51Speaker 1: be like not this again. Or are they going to
- 34:53Speaker 1: be like, oh, that's a really interesting question, Like how
- 34:56Speaker 1: does the astronomy community do this question? That's a great question.
- 35:01Speaker 1: I bet that half of them would roll our eyes
- 35:03Speaker 1: and half of them would be like, you know, I
- 35:05Speaker 1: was on the committee that decided what a quasi satellite is,
- 35:08Speaker 1: and I have a very strong opinion about it, because
- 35:10Speaker 1: you know, they get hotheaded about this stuff, right, And
- 35:12Speaker 1: you will now sit for three hours while I explain
- 35:15Speaker 1: the difference to you and you regret asking immediately. Yeah,
- 35:18Speaker 1: And sometimes I wonder, like what does it matter? You know,
- 35:21Speaker 1: people argue about whether Pluto is a planet or a
- 35:23Speaker 1: dwarf planet, like, what are the consequences? Why does anybody
- 35:26Speaker 1: really care? We're just making these names up. It doesn't
- 35:29Speaker 1: change what Pluto is. It's not like Pluto shrinks if
- 35:32Speaker 1: we call it a dwarf planet or grows in importance
- 35:36Speaker 1: if we call it a real planet. These are just
- 35:38Speaker 1: our arbitrary categorizations of the universe. So the affect how
- 35:41Speaker 1: we think and how we talk, but really it's it's inconsequential.
- 35:44Speaker 1: You know. I can see why it would matter to
- 35:46Speaker 1: you if you are an astronomer, because maybe it affects
- 35:48Speaker 1: the way you model things based on how these definitions
- 35:50Speaker 1: fall out. But I imagine to the lay public it's like,
- 35:53Speaker 1: what are we paying these people for. That's a good point.
- 35:57Speaker 1: That's a good point. And so we have this thing
- 35:59Speaker 1: that said the moons to the quasi satellite, and that's
- 36:02Speaker 1: just one example. You know, there are lots of these
- 36:04Speaker 1: things that are sort of loosely bound to the Earth
- 36:07Speaker 1: orbiting the Sun that can be fairly small, like this
- 36:10Speaker 1: thing is only five kilometers in diameter. As you get
- 36:12Speaker 1: smaller and smaller, there are many many more of these things.
- 36:15Speaker 1: Some of them are more loosely bound to the Earth.
- 36:18Speaker 1: But you know, if you're gonna call this thing a moon,
- 36:19Speaker 1: then you've got to call all those other little things
- 36:22Speaker 1: moons also, So if you're gonna open the door that wide,
- 36:25Speaker 1: then Earth is going to have a lot of little moons,
- 36:27Speaker 1: and high school astronomy becomes totally untenable. And unfortunately, it
- 36:32Speaker 1: doesn't change what it looks like in the sky, right,
- 36:34Speaker 1: You can't look up in the sky and see this thing.
- 36:36Speaker 1: The closest it ever comes to Earth is like seven
- 36:39Speaker 1: and a half million miles away, which is thirty times
- 36:43Speaker 1: further away from the Earth than our moon is. Plus,
- 36:46Speaker 1: of course it's super tiny, so you have almost no
- 36:48Speaker 1: change of spotting this thing. It was difficult for astronomers
- 36:51Speaker 1: to even see it in the first place. It was
- 36:53Speaker 1: only discovered in the last twenty years. Is it safe
- 36:55Speaker 1: to assume that it's center of masses within the Earth
- 36:58Speaker 1: or the center of mass for the two bodies falls
- 37:00Speaker 1: within Earth? Absolutely? Yeah, because the Earth totally dominates this
- 37:03Speaker 1: thing when it comes to mass. This thing is only
- 37:05Speaker 1: five kilometers in diameter, and it's just a big chunk
- 37:07Speaker 1: of rock, and so the Earth dwarfs this thing. Okay,
- 37:10Speaker 1: even though it's super far away, it still works. Okay,
- 37:12Speaker 1: that's our like best candidates, is there like a second
- 37:15Speaker 1: best candidate. There's something else which I think is super fun,
- 37:18Speaker 1: which astronomers and science communicators called a temporary moon for
- 37:22Speaker 1: a while. And this is a weird object which at
- 37:25Speaker 1: the end of last year sort of swooped in from
- 37:28Speaker 1: deep space and orbiting the Earth a couple of times,
- 37:32Speaker 1: and people are like, oh, what is this thing? It
- 37:34Speaker 1: was like only forty ft long, and it has this
- 37:36Speaker 1: strange cylindrical shape, and they spotted it on his telescope
- 37:40Speaker 1: and they're like, wait a second, what is this thing?
- 37:42Speaker 1: And it looks like a piece of a rocket. What
- 37:45Speaker 1: it's space debris. It's space debris. And so it turns
- 37:49Speaker 1: out this is a long lost piece of an ill
- 37:51Speaker 1: faded NASA mission. There was this mission in nineteen sixty
- 37:55Speaker 1: six called Surveyor two. Is a robotic spacecraft that was
- 37:58Speaker 1: going to go land on the Moon and it was
- 38:00Speaker 1: going to go explore the Moon, etcetera. But mid course
- 38:03Speaker 1: there was a failure in the sort of ballistics and
- 38:06Speaker 1: the trajection and they lost contact with the craft and
- 38:09Speaker 1: one of the thrusters failed to ignite, and so basically
- 38:12Speaker 1: they lost this thing. Part of it crashed on the Moon,
- 38:14Speaker 1: and part of it just like tumbled out into deep
- 38:16Speaker 1: space sort of lost, they thought forever. And so this
- 38:19Speaker 1: thing has been like out there in space for you
- 38:23Speaker 1: know what, seventy years, almost bouncing around, swooshing around, and
- 38:28Speaker 1: somehow it ended up coming back to Earth. That's crazy,
- 38:32Speaker 1: first of all, I think it's more like fifty years though, right,
- 38:34Speaker 1: But like, it's amazing that we have that much resolution
- 38:38Speaker 1: that we could find it again. It's really incredible. But
- 38:41Speaker 1: you know, we are monitoring stuff that comes close to Earth,
- 38:43Speaker 1: and we're looking for stuff that's sort of like tumbling
- 38:45Speaker 1: towards the Earth. This is a pretty small object though
- 38:48Speaker 1: that it's also a weird shape. Right. If you're looking
- 38:51Speaker 1: out in the space and you see this forty ft
- 38:52Speaker 1: long cylindrical object, my first guess is gonna be like aliens, right,
- 38:57Speaker 1: And so how disappointed to look at it and then see,
- 38:59Speaker 1: like you say, written down the side, it's just our
- 39:03Speaker 1: old trash. But it's fascinating. People have done a study
- 39:07Speaker 1: to figure out like what happened to it, and it
- 39:09Speaker 1: turns out that when it tumbled out into space. It
- 39:11Speaker 1: was very gently pushed further into space by the pressure
- 39:15Speaker 1: of sunlight. We talked about this on the podcast, that
- 39:18Speaker 1: you could build a spaceship that sails on light. It's
- 39:21Speaker 1: called a solar sail. Just have a huge sheet of
- 39:24Speaker 1: material and the photons from the sun when they hit
- 39:27Speaker 1: it are going to transfer their momentum to that, just
- 39:29Speaker 1: like wind on Earth transfers its momentum to a sail
- 39:33Speaker 1: on a sailboat. And so that's like by design. But here,
- 39:37Speaker 1: of course, it's just a rocket tumbling in space, was
- 39:39Speaker 1: very gently, over decades and decades pushed deeper out into space.
- 39:43Speaker 1: Are you familiar with Project Westward? No? Tell me, Oh
- 39:46Speaker 1: my gosh. So the idea here was so this was
- 39:48Speaker 1: like during the Cold War, and the US was worried
- 39:51Speaker 1: that they would lose their ability to communicate with other
- 39:53Speaker 1: nations if our undersea cables got cut by the Soviets,
- 39:58Speaker 1: and so in that case we would have to rely
- 40:00Speaker 1: on sending radio waves up and we would have to
- 40:02Speaker 1: hope that they would bounce off the ionosphere. But that's
- 40:05Speaker 1: sort of a not super reliable way of sending radio communications,
- 40:08Speaker 1: and so I think it was m i T came
- 40:10Speaker 1: up with the solution where they were like, well, we
- 40:13Speaker 1: could be sure that the ionosphere would have stuff that
- 40:17Speaker 1: would bounce the radio waves back if we put up
- 40:20Speaker 1: over four hundred million copper needles. That's a great idea, right,
- 40:26Speaker 1: And so the argument was that you would put these
- 40:29Speaker 1: needles up and it would give us some information about
- 40:31Speaker 1: how well this was gonna work. But in about two
- 40:33Speaker 1: to three years, the combination of gravity and the sun
- 40:37Speaker 1: pushing these needles back into the atmosphere would clear everything out,
- 40:42Speaker 1: clear everything out. Does that mean these copper needles come
- 40:45Speaker 1: raining back down to the service to impale people. Well,
- 40:48Speaker 1: they do start raining back down towards Earth, but they're
- 40:51Speaker 1: like literally only a couple of maybe centimeters long, like
- 40:53Speaker 1: maybe two centimeters or something. These aren't huge, and that's
- 40:55Speaker 1: why they needed four million of them. That sounds like
- 40:58Speaker 1: approximately the size is of a bullet. You're talking about
- 41:02Speaker 1: space bullets raining down on the Earth. But that would
- 41:05Speaker 1: definitely burn up before it hits Earth, right, right, Yes,
- 41:08Speaker 1: of course I think so. Yeah, so our atmosphere is
- 41:11Speaker 1: like a bulletproof vest. Yes, thank you atmosphere. But so
- 41:14Speaker 1: the first one that they shot up there, it didn't
- 41:16Speaker 1: deploy the right way, so a bunch of these needles
- 41:18Speaker 1: clumped instead of spreading nicely, and so some of these
- 41:20Speaker 1: clumps fifty years later are still tracked as space debris
- 41:25Speaker 1: because the clumps didn't de orbit the way that they
- 41:27Speaker 1: thought they would. And then they did a second shot,
- 41:29Speaker 1: and the second shot dispersed and they were able to confirm, yes,
- 41:32Speaker 1: the radio waves bounced back more when we have supplemented
- 41:35Speaker 1: the ionosphere with all of these needles. But then we
- 41:37Speaker 1: had to go to the United Nations and promise we
- 41:39Speaker 1: were going to stop messing up the space environment and
- 41:42Speaker 1: that we were going to consult people from here on out.
- 41:45Speaker 1: And one of the articles of the Outer Space Treaty
- 41:47Speaker 1: actually requires people to do consultations. And that was motivated
- 41:51Speaker 1: by Project Westward, because what the heck is the US doing?
- 41:54Speaker 1: So anyway, tangent related to the Sun pushing things back
- 41:58Speaker 1: into orbits or sorry, back into the atmosphere. Yeah, and
- 42:01Speaker 1: we have a whole fun podcast episode about space junk
- 42:04Speaker 1: and how dangerous it is and that's all smashing into itself.
- 42:07Speaker 1: And if we don't get this stuff under control, all
- 42:09Speaker 1: of space might be useless to us. We might be
- 42:12Speaker 1: trapped down here on Earth because we'd be surrounded by
- 42:14Speaker 1: our own garbage. So check out that episode if you're interested.
- 42:17Speaker 1: But this is one particularly interesting object, and it came
- 42:21Speaker 1: in November twenty and made a few large loops around
- 42:25Speaker 1: the Earth. And so that's why they called this sort
- 42:27Speaker 1: of like a temporary moon, because even though it was
- 42:30Speaker 1: lost in deep space, somehow it ended up close enough
- 42:32Speaker 1: for the Earth to grab it again and loop around.
- 42:35Speaker 1: But it wasn't a stable orbit, which is really fascinating.
- 42:38Speaker 1: It was like stable enough to loop around a few
- 42:40Speaker 1: times and then get tossed back out into space. So
- 42:43Speaker 1: in March continued his journey and is now back into
- 42:46Speaker 1: deep space somewhere. WHOA. So, so was this like a
- 42:49Speaker 1: sycom angle for getting people interested in this, because it
- 42:53Speaker 1: seems like because it was artificial, it shouldn't count as
- 42:56Speaker 1: a moon at all, not a temporary moon. It shouldn't
- 42:59Speaker 1: be a moon. Or do different people use different definitions
- 43:01Speaker 1: than the one that we settled upon at the beginning
- 43:03Speaker 1: of the episode, Yeah, exactly. I think this was just
- 43:05Speaker 1: a clickbait moon, not really by any definition. If you're
- 43:09Speaker 1: going to require that moons be natural, may not be
- 43:13Speaker 1: manufactured by humanity. Then this is definitely not a mood.
- 43:16Speaker 1: But it's cool that we capture something from deep space
- 43:18Speaker 1: and it orbited us a little while before going back
- 43:21Speaker 1: out into the dark deep emptiness. Yeah, no, that's super cool.
- 43:24Speaker 1: All right, So let's take our second break before we
- 43:26Speaker 1: start to talk a bit more about moons on planets
- 43:29Speaker 1: other than our own. Okay, so we've talked a bit.
- 43:44Speaker 1: How about how Earth has one for sure moon and
- 43:47Speaker 1: a couple maybe moons, quasi moons, quasi moons. Right, tell
- 43:52Speaker 1: me a bit more about what else is typical in
- 43:54Speaker 1: the Solar System. How many moons do the other planets have.
- 43:56Speaker 1: It's really interesting because the Earth, as we were saying,
- 43:59Speaker 1: is really weird, Like having a really big moon is weird. Also,
- 44:04Speaker 1: having just one moon is weird. So the eight planets
- 44:07Speaker 1: in the Solar System, of course, the Earth has one moon.
- 44:09Speaker 1: Two of the planets have no moons, Mercury and Venus,
- 44:13Speaker 1: and the other five planets have two hundred and four
- 44:17Speaker 1: moons in between them. So that's really fascinating and you
- 44:21Speaker 1: might wonder like, well, why do Mercury and Venus have
- 44:24Speaker 1: no moons? And the reason is that they're so close
- 44:28Speaker 1: to the Sun. The Sun is this like really terrible
- 44:31Speaker 1: overwhelming gravitational force and it tugs on things. We talked
- 44:35Speaker 1: to the program before about tidal forces. The closer you
- 44:39Speaker 1: are to the Sun, the more it tugs on you.
- 44:41Speaker 1: So if you're an object, it's not just like a point.
- 44:43Speaker 1: If you have like an extent to you, and the
- 44:45Speaker 1: Sun is going to tug harder on the bit that's
- 44:48Speaker 1: closer and not as hard on the bid that's further away,
- 44:51Speaker 1: and that's an effective force on you. So the Sun is,
- 44:53Speaker 1: for example, squeezing mercury and venus all the time. It's
- 44:56Speaker 1: pulling on them, and that makes it very hard for
- 44:58Speaker 1: them to have any in a stable orbit around them. Basically,
- 45:02Speaker 1: if they have a moon, the Sun is going to
- 45:04Speaker 1: steal it when it swoops around the planet on the
- 45:07Speaker 1: close side. So here I'm finding that I want to
- 45:09Speaker 1: ask you if that means in other Solar systems, the
- 45:12Speaker 1: close planets don't have moons. But I'm jumping if I
- 45:14Speaker 1: do that, aren't I We don't know the answer to
- 45:16Speaker 1: that question yet. We'll talk about that in a minute,
- 45:18Speaker 1: but yeah, it's a fascinating question. We know that in
- 45:21Speaker 1: our Solar system, the innermost planets Mercury and Venus have
- 45:24Speaker 1: no moons, and you know, that might be part of
- 45:27Speaker 1: the answer of why the Earth only has one moon
- 45:30Speaker 1: and it's a really big one. It might be that
- 45:32Speaker 1: anything else the Sun is basically going to steal, and
- 45:35Speaker 1: that we're only capable of having like either really big
- 45:38Speaker 1: moons or quasi moons that were sort of sharing with
- 45:41Speaker 1: the Sun. That might be the partial answer to that question. Interesting,
- 45:45Speaker 1: So we have the Sun to thank for the space being. Yeah,
- 45:47Speaker 1: the Sun is toasting our space being for us. But
- 45:49Speaker 1: then further out in the Solar system, there are lots
- 45:52Speaker 1: and lots of moons. You know, the other five planets
- 45:55Speaker 1: with moons have two hundred and four of these things combined,
- 45:58Speaker 1: you know, in Jupiter and sat And have like dozens
- 46:00Speaker 1: of them. And you know, Saturn has this crazy ring system,
- 46:04Speaker 1: and inside those rings are rocks that are big enough
- 46:07Speaker 1: to be considered moons. Sometimes they're called you know, moonlits,
- 46:11Speaker 1: sometimes are called minor moons. But there are all sorts
- 46:14Speaker 1: of things, and so the deeper you go out into
- 46:17Speaker 1: our Solar system, the more you find these objects that
- 46:19Speaker 1: have moons and lots and lots of moons. To do
- 46:22Speaker 1: any of the moons have moons. I wish they did
- 46:25Speaker 1: have moons. And what would you call that anyway? Would
- 46:27Speaker 1: that be like a moon moon or squared? That's a
- 46:33Speaker 1: great question. And so far we haven't found any moons
- 46:36Speaker 1: that have moons. And the reason is similar to why
- 46:40Speaker 1: Mercury doesn't have moons. If you're a moon, then you're
- 46:43Speaker 1: near a big planet, and that means that there are
- 46:45Speaker 1: tidal forces, and so it's pretty hard to hold onto
- 46:48Speaker 1: something and not have it gets slurred up and just
- 46:51Speaker 1: become another moon of the planet you're orbiting. So if
- 46:54Speaker 1: you're Io and you're orbiting Jupiter, right, Jupiter is an
- 46:57Speaker 1: enormous gravitational pull. The reason that Io is like hot inside,
- 47:01Speaker 1: it's because of Jupiter's tidal forces, and so anything orbiting
- 47:04Speaker 1: Io is just going to get pulled away. It's very
- 47:07Speaker 1: very hard to have a stable orbit. Although there's this
- 47:10Speaker 1: really crazy moon of Saturn. This moon is called Rhea,
- 47:14Speaker 1: and recently they've spotted some stuff in orbit around Rhea,
- 47:18Speaker 1: maybe sort of like these very small particles. It almost
- 47:21Speaker 1: looks like this moon of Saturn has its own ring system.
- 47:26Speaker 1: What I know, isn't that cool? I never thought about
- 47:29Speaker 1: like a moon with rings around. It is pretty cool.
- 47:32Speaker 1: That's awesome. So so how if it can't have moons,
- 47:35Speaker 1: how does it manage to maintain its rings? Well, the
- 47:38Speaker 1: reason you sometimes have rings instead of moons are because
- 47:41Speaker 1: of tidal forces. Basically, rings are moons that have been
- 47:44Speaker 1: torn apart by tidal forces. And so it might be
- 47:47Speaker 1: that there was an object there and then it got
- 47:49Speaker 1: sort of shredded by tidal forces, and what we're seeing
- 47:51Speaker 1: is something transient that these rings might not last for
- 47:54Speaker 1: very long. You know, by very long we mean on
- 47:56Speaker 1: astrophysical time scale. So they might be there a million
- 47:59Speaker 1: years or so. But if you leave the Solar system
- 48:01Speaker 1: and come back and five million, you might find that
- 48:03Speaker 1: they're not there anymore. Okay, so let's move out of
- 48:06Speaker 1: our solar system. What does this look like in other
- 48:08Speaker 1: solar system? So, for example, do the mercury and venus
- 48:12Speaker 1: equivalents and other solar systems lack moons like we see
- 48:16Speaker 1: in our solar system. It's such a good question and
- 48:18Speaker 1: one we just don't know the answer to yet because
- 48:21Speaker 1: we have never seen a moon in another solar system,
- 48:25Speaker 1: Like every moon that any human has ever seen has
- 48:28Speaker 1: only ever been in our solar system. Isn't that like
- 48:31Speaker 1: crazy and slightly frustrating. It's both of those things, And
- 48:35Speaker 1: it reveals to me, like just how often I assume
- 48:37Speaker 1: that science has figured out so many things that are
- 48:39Speaker 1: much harder than I apparently understand. So why do we
- 48:42Speaker 1: know that all these other solar systems have planets but
- 48:44Speaker 1: we don't know that they have moons? Well, moons are
- 48:46Speaker 1: much smaller, and they're just harder to see them planets.
- 48:49Speaker 1: You know, we now sort of take it for granted
- 48:51Speaker 1: that we can see planets around other stars, But that's
- 48:53Speaker 1: pretty recent. It was like that we started to be
- 48:57Speaker 1: able to really do this and spot planets and other soldiers.
- 49:00Speaker 1: Until then, we had never seen a planet around a
- 49:03Speaker 1: star that wasn't our star. We didn't know until then, if,
- 49:07Speaker 1: for example, our star was the only one that had planets,
- 49:10Speaker 1: we could have been like the weirdest star in the universe. Now,
- 49:13Speaker 1: of course, we know, because we've looked and we've seen
- 49:16Speaker 1: that lots and lots and lots of stars have lots
- 49:17Speaker 1: and lots of planets. We're also learning, of course, that
- 49:19Speaker 1: our Solar system is weird in all sorts of interesting ways.
- 49:22Speaker 1: But the problem is that the techniques we used to
- 49:25Speaker 1: see those planets are better when the planets are large
- 49:28Speaker 1: and when they're close to the Sun, and that makes
- 49:31Speaker 1: it pretty hard to see moons, which tend to be
- 49:33Speaker 1: small and further from the star. We haven't found any
- 49:36Speaker 1: instances of a moon that's like huge or one of
- 49:39Speaker 1: those instances where it's hard to determine which one is
- 49:41Speaker 1: the planet and which one is the moon because they're
- 49:43Speaker 1: both pretty big, and so there's no big things that
- 49:46Speaker 1: break this rule. We haven't confirmed any moons and other
- 49:50Speaker 1: solar systems are you're looking for the duck built platypus
- 49:52Speaker 1: of moons out there somewhere No so far zero. There
- 49:55Speaker 1: have been some candidates. People have some really clever ideas
- 49:59Speaker 1: for how you might see moons around planets in other
- 50:02Speaker 1: solar systems. Like one way that we see the planet
- 50:05Speaker 1: is that the planet passes in front of the star
- 50:08Speaker 1: makes like a little eclipse, it like dims the star
- 50:10Speaker 1: a little bit. And if it does that several times,
- 50:12Speaker 1: you can see a pattern, so you can get a
- 50:14Speaker 1: sense for like, oh, this is really something that's passing
- 50:16Speaker 1: in front of the star. It must be a planet. Now,
- 50:18Speaker 1: if there's a moon around that planet and it's orbiting
- 50:21Speaker 1: that planet. As it passes around the planet, it might
- 50:24Speaker 1: add to that eclipse a little bit and then pass
- 50:27Speaker 1: behind the planet and dip again. And so if you
- 50:29Speaker 1: have really refined measurements, you might see these like wiggles
- 50:33Speaker 1: on the wiggles that tell you that there's something going
- 50:36Speaker 1: around that planet. And there are some cases where people
- 50:40Speaker 1: look at the data and they're like, yeah, I think
- 50:41Speaker 1: those are wiggles and wiggles, but other people analyze the
- 50:44Speaker 1: same data and they're like, no, there's no evidence for that.
- 50:46Speaker 1: So we're really at the edge of being able to
- 50:48Speaker 1: detect XO moons. We haven't seen any yet. Well that's exciting, Like,
- 50:52Speaker 1: hopefully in our lifetime we figure out how to do that. Well, yeah,
- 50:55Speaker 1: hopefully in our lifetime. I mean, we're on the edge
- 50:58Speaker 1: of learning so much about these other solars to times,
- 51:00Speaker 1: like figuring out what's any atmosphere of those planets, seeing
- 51:03Speaker 1: what moons there are. There was also a lot of excitement.
- 51:05Speaker 1: I don't know if you remember about this one particular
- 51:07Speaker 1: star called Tabby Star, which dimmed really weirdly all of
- 51:11Speaker 1: a sudden, and people thought like, wait a second, what's
- 51:13Speaker 1: blocking this star? Is this evidence of like an alien megastructure.
- 51:17Speaker 1: Is somebody out there building a dison spear around this star,
- 51:20Speaker 1: which was really fun and you know inspired, I'm sure
- 51:22Speaker 1: a lot of science fiction novels. But it turns out
- 51:25Speaker 1: that it was just like a big cloud of dust
- 51:27Speaker 1: and debris. But it might be that, like, you know,
- 51:30Speaker 1: there was a planet out there and it had a moon,
- 51:33Speaker 1: and that moon got like tidally disrupted and torn up
- 51:36Speaker 1: and ended up being this big cloud of stuff that
- 51:39Speaker 1: partially blocked the star. So that might have been like,
- 51:42Speaker 1: you know, evidence of the destruction of an excellent moon. WHOA,
- 51:46Speaker 1: that's pretty cool. That's pretty cool. Yeah, But I'm looking
- 51:48Speaker 1: forward to scientists figuring that out and so we can
- 51:51Speaker 1: get a sense for like how unusual is it to
- 51:54Speaker 1: have just like one big moon, How unusual is it
- 51:57Speaker 1: to have inner planets with no moons? How weird is
- 52:00Speaker 1: it to have huge gas giants with like a dozen moons.
- 52:03Speaker 1: We ask these basic questions because we just don't know
- 52:06Speaker 1: the answers, and really the only way to figure it
- 52:08Speaker 1: out is to go out there and explore the universe
- 52:10Speaker 1: and to like actually look with our eyeballs and our
- 52:12Speaker 1: telescopes and get the answers. It's a cool time to
- 52:15Speaker 1: be alive. It is a cool time to be alive. So, Kelly,
- 52:18Speaker 1: what are you going to go back and tell your
- 52:20Speaker 1: seven year old about how many moons the Earth has? Well,
- 52:23Speaker 1: I think she's going to be super excited. She We've
- 52:25Speaker 1: been talking to her about Apollo and the space race,
- 52:28Speaker 1: and I think she'll be super excited to hear that
- 52:30Speaker 1: one of those you know, boosters came back around again
- 52:32Speaker 1: and is still floating in deep space. So I'll tell
- 52:34Speaker 1: her about that, and I definitely think she's going to
- 52:37Speaker 1: love that there's something called a space being or something
- 52:40Speaker 1: we referred to as a space being because we can't
- 52:42Speaker 1: pronounce its real name. I think she's going to get
- 52:44Speaker 1: a total kick out of that information. What about you,
- 52:46Speaker 1: what are you gonna tell your kids? Yeah, my kids
- 52:48Speaker 1: also will tell them that there's weird stuff floating out there,
- 52:52Speaker 1: and that in the end, it's all just sort of arbitrary.
- 52:54Speaker 1: What we call a moon and what we call a
- 52:56Speaker 1: quasi satellite is really just an arbitrary distinction, but that
- 53:00Speaker 1: their questions are valuable questions, and that these really simple,
- 53:03Speaker 1: basic questions about the universe are sometimes the most interesting,
- 53:06Speaker 1: the hardest to answer and reveal something about you know,
- 53:10Speaker 1: what we've thought about our place in the universe, what
- 53:12Speaker 1: we think is natural, what we think is normal, what
- 53:15Speaker 1: we think is typical, and it probably is really unusual.
- 53:18Speaker 1: And that's somewhere out there there's an alien kid looking
- 53:22Speaker 1: up at the sky and asking the alien mom, like,
- 53:24Speaker 1: why do we have five moons? You know, it's just
- 53:27Speaker 1: every planet to have five moons. I love that idea
- 53:29Speaker 1: that we're all asking the same questions, but just very
- 53:32Speaker 1: much separated. All right, So thank you very much everybody
- 53:35Speaker 1: for going on this curiosity journey with us and listening
- 53:38Speaker 1: to us talk about the number of moons around the Earth.
- 53:41Speaker 1: If you have stuff you'd like to hear us talk about,
- 53:43Speaker 1: please send them to us two questions at Daniel and
- 53:47Speaker 1: Jorge dot com. Thanks again, Kelly for joining us today
- 53:49Speaker 1: and thanks to all of you for tuning in. Thanks
- 53:51Speaker 1: for having me. It was a lot of fun. Thanks
- 54:00Speaker 1: for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explained. The
- 54:03Speaker 1: Universe is a production of I Heart Radio or more
- 54:06Speaker 1: podcast from my Heart Radio visit the I Heart Radio app,
- 54:10Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.