Latest / Honey Badger Radio / US Military Moves Towards Due Process, Kier vs The British People | HBR News 521

Transcript

US Military Moves Towards Due Process, Kier vs The British People | HBR News 521 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five twenty one. US military
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: moves towards due process here versus the British people. If
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: we discussed the news of the week and give it
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome back to Honey
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Badger Radio. I hope you guys are doing well this week,
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: and that you're laughing and all of this absurdity so
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: that you're not consumed by it. I'm your host, Brian.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, doctor
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Ran Rakam and Hannah Wallen, Good and talk We Yes,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: and you are back in Britain, right, you're back in
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: Ny fortunately, Yes, yes, well that's all right. You'll have
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: I'm sure that you'll have plenty to say about today's
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: story so and we hope that you guys watching will
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: also have plenty to say. Excuse me, so please continue
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: the conversations, both in the chat as well as the
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: common section. I'm sorry. I just eight dinner and then
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: I came to do the show right away, so things
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: are still processing inside of me. So I may make
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: unusual noises, but I'll try to keep that to.
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: Myself at all.
• 1:10
  Speaker 3: You said the word came with some emphasis.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: There.
• 1:14
  Speaker 4: It was a really good dinner he described it.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's how good it was. Anyway, on this week's show,
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: we're going to be talking about how Pete Hegseth has
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: basically upset people online, let's say, with some of these
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: statements he made that are pro due process, which kind
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: of validates the work that we've been doing here at
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: HBr by the way, but we'll get into that. So
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: and also British Prime Minister kier Sarma seems to have
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: declared war on the British people. There's a Polish thought
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Patrol which I think could be a lot of fun
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: and more so, stick around, it's going to be a
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: good time and be sure to join us afterwards for
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: the patron only show by going to feed the badgeertor
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: Calm Force slash subscribe by the way, if you want
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: to join us. We're going to be looking at our
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: very own Wikipedia page. So the Honey Badgers have a
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: Wikipedia and we're going to see what it is. They say,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: let's see how fair and balanced Wikipedia is in representing
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: who we are and what our positions are and if
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: we even exist, because I think that if Wikipedia doesn't
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: mention us, we don't actually exist, so some of us
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: may just that as it could be.
• 2:29
  Speaker 3: Folks, they don't say misogyny anything like as much he
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: would as you would expect them to.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it might even be fair, but we will, yeah,
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: we will endeavor to figure it out.
• 2:45
  Speaker 4: So what I have to say this, I'm not gonna
• 2:48
  Speaker 4: say who she is. But there's a Wikipedia entry on
• 2:52
  Speaker 4: my grandmother and I read it and it's one of
• 2:59
  Speaker 4: the those entries that has like stipulations on it. This
• 3:02
  Speaker 4: entry has problems, and the biggest problem they have is
• 3:06
  Speaker 4: that the entry, the entries information largely came from her
• 3:09
  Speaker 4: autobiography and they don't consider that to be accurate because
• 3:14
  Speaker 4: it's too close to the source. Oh and the and
• 3:16
  Speaker 4: and the website for her foundation. So basically they they
• 3:23
  Speaker 4: don't They don't like when information comes straight from the source.
• 3:27
  Speaker 4: They want information to come from somewhere else. And I've
• 3:31
  Speaker 4: I've got a couple of articles about Wikipedia on the
• 3:36
  Speaker 4: Honey Badger Brigade website explaining why that's bad. So but
• 3:42
  Speaker 4: go on.
• 3:44
  Speaker 3: I am, by the way, still not on Wikipedia, not
• 3:47
  Speaker 3: even in this article. But I have been on Encyclopedia
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: Dramatica for the last six years.
• 3:56
  Speaker 4: It's probably more accurate than Wikipedia would have been Encyclopedia Dramatica.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, uh yeah. So anyway, we're gonna be looking
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: at that, and maybe we'll compare it to the Men's
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: Rights Wiki, because you know, I remember when I met
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the guys that's set that up in twenty seventeen. I
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: think it was twenty seventeen when we went to Australia
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: for the ICMI and they were working on the Men's
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: Rights Wiki, So, which is a pretty good resource if
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: you guys. I don't know if they've been keeping up
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: on it, but it's a pretty good resource, especially if
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: you want to get like all of the factual data
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: for like a discussion you might be having with a
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: bluepill person and you want to like wake them up.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: But anyway, we're gonna be looking at that, and if
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: you want to join us for that, you have to
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: become a Badger yourself by going to feed the Badger
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: dot com for slast subscribe to set up a subscription
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: five bucks a months. We'll get you into the Discord
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: server and we'll allow you to watch all the additional content,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: which is probably almost twice as much content as we
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: already put out. So that's basically how big it is.
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: It's it's and you know, if you give it a higher levels,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: you can be a part of the conversation itself. And
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: maybe you know that will give you an opportunity to
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: become a Badger in like the truest sense. Who knows
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: like we don't. You never know who's going to become
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: an actual honey Badger. So fed the Badger dot Com
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: forward slash subscribe, and if you don't wake up one
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: morning to find that our content has been yeaeded from
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: the Internet, then go to badgerfeed dot com or Honeybadger
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com to find all of our archives content.
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: And by golly, there is a lot of it. So anyway,
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: pop a til and all hold on your ostrich and
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: we're gonna get into today's stories. So I want to
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: open up.
• 5:37
  Speaker 4: We will hire Etsy Witches to turn you into a
• 5:40
  Speaker 4: new See how that works.
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: It's a lot going on, folks.
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I can't cover it all, but I can sprinkle
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: it in. So anyway, So the US Secretary of War,
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: super cool Pete Hegseeth, addressed hundreds of generals and admirals
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: along President Donald Trump to unveil a series of military reforms.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: The focus was unshifting the Department of Defense into a
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: war department ethos, emphasizing warfighting readiness and traditional standards with
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: initiatives including gender neutral fitness standards and relaxed grooming rules.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: While the article does not directly address anonymity for accusers
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: or due process, it mentions Heseth call for a review
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: of the inspector general process, including the Equal Opportunity and
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: Military Equal Opportunity complaint systems. This review hints at potential
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: changes to how allegations will be handled, which could impact
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: the anonymity of accusers and the procedural rights of soldiers
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: facing accusations, though specific details remain unclear because this was
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: just like a recent recent announcement. So the system was
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: a circlely designed to protect accusers in cases of harassment
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: and misconduct. So like, if you've been watching our channel
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: for a while, you'll know that I've had a series
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: of interviews with various members of the military, and there,
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: let's say relatives, close relatives, and family members who have
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: had their entire lives destroyed by a false allegation. Now,
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: the reason why these worked were a couple of things.
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: Number One, the military was following a kind of the
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: same logic that the colleges were in terms of dealing
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: with allegations. Firstly, they had to operate under the study
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: that comes from the Merry Cost Study, which essentially says
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: that one in four women will be sexually assaulted in
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: her in her time at college or in her lifetime.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: The actual claims vary because it's a moving target, and
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: so someone in the government said that, oh, well, this
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: number is true of colleges, so it must be true
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: of the military. They saw that the military wasn't getting
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: the same allegations, so they said, we got to pump
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: those numbers up. And because of that, the military did
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: in fact act on this kind of a preponderance of
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: evidence standard instead of the normal sort of, you know,
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: beyond a reasonable doubt standard, and this led to a
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: lot of men being unjustly accused, and a lot of
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: how this sort of thing happened was it wasn't women
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: in the military. I was talking to my wife about
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: this and she said, well, there aren't that many women
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: in the military, and I was like, no, but it's
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: not women in the military that this generally happens with.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: It's women who meet up with soldiers, you know, like
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: on shore leave or on like you know, in like
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: a civilian environment, and they are cheating on their husbands
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: or boyfriends with these men, and then when it looks
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: like they're gonna get caught, and this is extremely common,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: they basically say, oh no, no, I didn't cheat on you,
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: I was raped, and they'll make the allegation to get
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: out of trouble with their boyfriends. And the man who
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: was accused, because the standard is so low to find
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: a conviction, his life is destroyed. And also because the
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: military wants to look good, so they don't like this,
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: just like the colleges, you know, they're protecting their reputation
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: and so this is what they do. But Pete Hegseth
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: says that we're not going to be doing things that way.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: So I'm going to play a clip from this. But
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: what this is what he just read a little bit
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: more so, Hegset's administration is going to or at least
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: they're planning on limiting anonymity to enhance accountability and transparency,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: potentially exposing accusers to reprisal and shifting the balance towards
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: the accused. Due process rights for soldiers accused of offenses,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: the lack of explicit mention of due process protections, and
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: heax set speech suggests that any reforms might prioritize disciplinary
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: efficiency over extended legal safeguards, aligning with his focus on
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: a combat ready force, because these false allegations and this
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: kind of like you know, this sort of kangaroo court
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: system they had was actually becoming a national security threat
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: to the military of the United States because men were
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: not signing up because they didn't want to deal with
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: that problem. And of course good men were being dishonorably
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: discharged or worse, thrown in jail. Again, look at my
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: fireside chats to see some of the people I've spoken
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: to about this. So, however, we don't have concrete policy details,
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: so we'll have to see where this actually goes. Has
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: remained speculative, but this was just recently announced and I'm
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: going to show you guys. This is a clip, and
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: I hope that we get some audio here of Pete
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: Hegsett's statements. So it's sort of like a general idea.
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: Truth be told.
• 10:48
  Speaker 5: For the most part, we don't need new standards. We
• 10:51
  Speaker 5: just need to re establish a culture where enforcing standards
• 10:53
  Speaker 5: is possible. And that's why today, at my direction, I'm
• 10:58
  Speaker 5: issuing new policies that will overhauled the IG, EO ANDMEO processes.
• 11:05
  Speaker 5: I call it the no more walking on eggshells policy.
• 11:09
  Speaker 5: We are liberating commanders and NCOs. We are liberating you.
• 11:16
  Speaker 5: We are overhauling an inspector general process, the IG that
• 11:19
  Speaker 5: has been weaponized putting complainers, id loogus and poor performers
• 11:25
  Speaker 5: in the driver's scene. We're doing the same with the
• 11:28
  Speaker 5: equal Opportunity and military equal Opportunity policies the EO and
• 11:33
  Speaker 5: MOO at our department.
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: No more frivolous.
• 11:37
  Speaker 5: Complaints, no more anonymous complaints, no more repeat complainants, no
• 11:42
  Speaker 5: more smearing reputations, no more endless waiting, no more legal limbo,
• 11:46
  Speaker 5: no more sidetracking careers, no more walking on eggshells.
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: And the last thing I'll say to that is, and
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: I do think this is uh, just something I want
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: to point out. I think that what we have been
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: doing on this channel, and especially working with the folks
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: over at would you doot care who made this a priority?
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: I think that what we have done has gotten us
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: to this point, and I think that we deserve a
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: pat on the back. We should put ourselves in the back,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: assuming this goes through. But it looks like that's the direction,
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: so we'll see. This was just announce And of course
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: the left and the feminists are losing their shit. Particularly
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: there's a guy named Wick who's been like an attempt
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: to rise in popularity by buddying up with people like Destiny.
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: He's like a debate bro and Alison and I were
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: on their show a couple of times, and he has
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: been He basically claims to be like a veteran and
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: he made some ridiculous statement about like guys in his
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: unit or whatever that created like a whole like you know,
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: sex trafficking pimp thing, and that like the people were
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: too afraid to step forward and make the allegations. And
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: he's basically losing his shit over this, and a lot
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: of them are because they like that kind of chilling effect,
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: that eggshell effect that this ideological, these ideal like shackles
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: have put on people. So yeah, I think that this
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: is something that is worth I don't know celebrating is
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: the right word, but at least it's encouraging. So anyway,
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: I leave it to you guys to give your thoughts.
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's admirably diplomatic of you to have skirted
• 13:29
  Speaker 3: around some of the more controversial points. But from what
• 13:33
  Speaker 3: I heard from the Excess himself in clips Beyond the
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: boneb just so, he did outline some general standards for
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: the military, basically along the lines of no more faties, right,
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: it's it's no more short fat like truths. I didn't
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: hear him mentioned truns, but he definitely emphasized that there
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: should be height and weight requires for military officials, including generals,
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: and that's kind of that's fair enough. It's okay for
• 14:08
  Speaker 3: the commander in chief to be a bit of a
• 14:11
  Speaker 3: fat bastard like Trump. The other edge of the sword
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: being it is okay for the commander in chief to
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: be a dribbling vegetable like Biden, and that's unfortunate but
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: perhaps unavoidable. But military generals are meant to act as
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: safeguards in the event of the commander in chief being
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: a dribbling vegetable like Biden, because military generals are supposed
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: to be the authorities informing the president of the geopolitical
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: details affecting the whole situation, so it's important that they
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: can be found to be in good health both physically
• 14:54
  Speaker 3: and mentally. Physically because they're supposed to be able to
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: be awake and lucid and physically upstanding at any given moment.
• 15:06
  Speaker 3: In the event of an emergency situation like if they
• 15:09
  Speaker 3: get a phone call in the middle of the night,
• 15:11
  Speaker 3: they ought to be able to roll out of bed
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: in one swift motion rather than flailing around like an
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: upturned tortoise. And mentally, because well, anyone in a position
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: of power ought to be mentally astute.
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: If you have.
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: Yourself a delusional oath like Rachel Levine telling obvious lies
• 15:39
  Speaker 3: like I'm a woman when they're obviously not a woman,
• 15:42
  Speaker 3: it throws a little bit of shade on the idea
• 15:45
  Speaker 3: that they're telling the truth about anything else. And it's
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: not just for the sake of the peace of mind
• 15:51
  Speaker 3: of the American people. It's for the sake of instilling
• 15:55
  Speaker 3: a reasonable amount of fear and respect into the minds
• 15:59
  Speaker 3: of the enemies of the American people. If America's enemies
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: are presented with a fat, cancerous, mentally ill blob like
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: Rachel Levine, then they're just gonna laugh in his or
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: her face. Sorry if this sounds racist or sexist, but
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: there ought to be standards of excellence, not in all
• 16:26
  Speaker 3: walks of life.
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: Of course, if.
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: You're an HR administrator in a diminutive company that sells
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: decorative charm bracelets, fine, you can be a useless fat
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: count and maybe it doesn't matter. But if you're the
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: top brass in the world's most powerful country to whom
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: the buck is to be passed in emergency situations, maybe
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: you should be subjected to high standards. Maybe in that
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: kind of high stakes situation you ought to be there
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: because of the merit you present, rather than the fact
• 17:06
  Speaker 3: that you're a fat, black, Islamic Mexican other king and
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: so on and so forth. Am I being controversial again?
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: I am I turning some of you off from this
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: unfashionable fringe of political thought we have here anibager radio. Well,
• 17:24
  Speaker 3: pardon my spleen and fuck you, sorry, not sorry, I'm
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: just a fat, alcoholic, degenerate insomniac, and so don't come
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: to me for military advice. I mean, why would you
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: therein I think I might have proven my point. Don't
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: do as I say and don't do as I do.
• 17:44
  Speaker 3: But can you see if you can do what Pete
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: Hegseth says no, all right, then fuck you be a fat,
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: useless true see if I care, I hereby drink and
• 18:01
  Speaker 3: so that I will drink, drink.
• 18:04
  Speaker 4: There you go. As usual, HBr Talk has done a
• 18:10
  Speaker 4: show on this, like I'm starting to sound like a
• 18:14
  Speaker 4: broken record. But we talked about this when we were
• 18:17
  Speaker 4: going through the funding the funding site that Musk exposed,
• 18:25
  Speaker 4: and we discovered that there is a massive shitload of
• 18:33
  Speaker 4: money being spent on feminist organizations to come in and
• 18:40
  Speaker 4: tell the soldiers how to get along with each other
• 18:43
  Speaker 4: the way that women get along with each other, in
• 18:46
  Speaker 4: order to make females comfortable in the military. And we
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: came to the conclusion that it is really not cost
• 18:56
  Speaker 4: effective at all for there to be females in the
• 19:01
  Speaker 4: military if this is what it takes, and it seems
• 19:06
  Speaker 4: like this is what it takes, right that now that
• 19:09
  Speaker 4: we've got like something like seventeen percent of the military
• 19:12
  Speaker 4: as women, men have to be subject to allegations of isms,
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: phobias and misconduct and misogynies and stuff in order to
• 19:25
  Speaker 4: make the women comfortable, and civilians have to be able
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: to make these allegations and destroy a soldier's life, even
• 19:33
  Speaker 4: when the soldier has not, Like there's been a few
• 19:37
  Speaker 4: cases that I've been told about by people involved with
• 19:42
  Speaker 4: them where the soldier never met the accuser and still
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: got into trouble because of the way that the system
• 19:54
  Speaker 4: handled the allegation. And there are people that didn't want
• 19:58
  Speaker 4: to come forward and talk on they didn't want to
• 20:02
  Speaker 4: get any more trouble basically, But I know about it,
• 20:07
  Speaker 4: and so that's that's that's enough. But in any case
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: like this is this is too much. This is this
• 20:15
  Speaker 4: is rampant destruction of people's lives over false allegations. And
• 20:22
  Speaker 4: the best overhaul that could happen would be if you
• 20:26
  Speaker 4: make an allegation and it falls flat, you can't make
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: another allegation, first of all. And second of all, if
• 20:34
  Speaker 4: you make an allegation and it's proved false, you face
• 20:39
  Speaker 4: military justice. Even if you're a civilian. If you lie
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: to the military to try to get one of the
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: soldiers court martialed or otherwise disciplined, and you get caught lying,
• 20:55
  Speaker 4: you should face military justice under the military system, and
• 21:02
  Speaker 4: you should have to rely on a military lawyer, and
• 21:07
  Speaker 4: you should have to pay because they're not your lawyer,
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: they're the military's lawyer. And if you don't want to
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: do that, don't lie about the soldiers like that. That's
• 21:18
  Speaker 4: the way that it should That's the way it should
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: be handled. Our soldiers should be protected from this kind
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: of bullshit, and the the allegation system should use the
• 21:32
  Speaker 4: beyond a reasonable doubt standard for any crime that would
• 21:36
  Speaker 4: require a beyond a reasonable doubt standard in a civilian
• 21:40
  Speaker 4: court system. Our soldiers should not be less protected from
• 21:45
  Speaker 4: false allegations than our civilians are. You don't lose the
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: right to do process because you become a soldier, Like,
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: that's bullshit. We want to recognize honor, not take away
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: recognition of it because someone outside the military acted dishonorably.
• 22:12
  Speaker 4: So that's that's all I gotta say about it. That
• 22:15
  Speaker 4: system needs to be taken down. That that that's being
• 22:18
  Speaker 4: paid for by the military, Like they're telling the military
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: what pronouns to use and everything they're they're having the
• 22:25
  Speaker 4: same stupid consent training that universities are using then, and
• 22:30
  Speaker 4: military funding shouldn't be paying a dime for that. That
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: should not be done. Like everything that's that's within the
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: military should be done by the military. That's it.
• 22:42
  Speaker 3: And by the way, consider yourself lucky that your Department
• 22:46
  Speaker 3: of War calls itself the Department of War, as opposed
• 22:49
  Speaker 3: to the Department of Defense. All well has warned us
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: about this, that the Department of War will call itself
• 22:58
  Speaker 3: the Department of Defense. Well, it sets up military bases
• 23:03
  Speaker 3: all across the world. The claim is defense. We're going
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: to get onto the subject of a government that completely
• 23:12
  Speaker 3: lies to its citizens all the time in the next story.
• 23:16
  Speaker 3: And yeah, yeah, a lot of us have been pointing
• 23:20
  Speaker 3: to the USA for the longest time saying that your
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: so called Department of Defense is obviously a department of offense.
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, for sure.
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: But yeah, consider yourself thankful that you finally have departments
• 23:39
  Speaker 3: of government that call themselves what they really are. And yeah,
• 23:42
  Speaker 3: there's nothing wrong with having a Department of War. You
• 23:44
  Speaker 3: should have a Department of War and it should hold
• 23:47
  Speaker 3: itself to high standards, which it finally is. And calling
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: yourself what it is.
• 23:54
  Speaker 4: God bless America, Apartment of Justice, I'm looking at you. Yeah,
• 23:58
  Speaker 4: all right, I just want to say a couple of
• 24:01
  Speaker 4: say what they really are A.
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: Couple of So here's the thing. He made this announcement
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: and it was not popular with a lot of people.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: So I talked about Wick the tick, because that's what
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: he is. He like attaches himself to bigger YouTubers and
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: tries to like increase his clout size and he just
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: gets fatter, but like he doesn't grow in popularity. But
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: there are also other comments right under Pete Hegseth's video
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: clip that I shared with you that I'm gonna read
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: really quick, just so you guys can get a sense
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: of like what kind of resistance and what kind of
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: uh dialogue is gonna be happening going forward. Okay, so
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: someone said slashing anonymous complaints and calling out frivolous EO
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: and ig gripes is just his latest move to shield
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: the good Old Boys club from any real accountability. Sure,
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: he says, is about letting commanders lead without fear, But
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: come on, this is the guy who's already fired top
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: women officers, nuked leadership programs for female troops, and erase
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: women's service histories from the record books. So this guy's
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: obviously approaching this. I don't know if it's a man,
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: could be a woman from a kind of like female
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: first perspective. Oh, Pete Hegseth his firing women, They must
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: have been qualified and he must hate them, and that's
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: what he's basically creating, a good old boys club in
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: the military. Can you imagine comparing the military where men
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: go usually to die and calling it a club. They're
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: not letting you in, that's what they're doing. That's the framing.
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: Another commentor said, calling accountability walking on eggshells, that's not liberation,
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: it's the death rattle of oversight. Heg Seth's September thirtieth
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: rebrand of whistleblower protections as frivolous complaints is authoritarianism in
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: a thesaurus. While announcing this, he summoned eight hundred generals
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: without agenda, causing chaos per DoD sources today. His February
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: DEI rollback already projected twenty two percent team efficiency loss
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: per September watchdog reports. Yeah, who cares what your reports say.
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: They're probably a good move. This mirrors February IGS Feb's
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: IG purchase for unwelcome findings, exposing a pattern silencing critics
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: weakened security. When you dismantle guardrails, the only thing liberated
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: is corruption. So people are mad one more and then
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna go on. So, yeah, people are just not
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: happy about this. Danny says, no, anonymous complaints. Those are
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: in place to protect victims from reprisals from superiors who
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: hold enormous power over their very lives. But whatever. But
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: it's really like no, because if you can make anonymous
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: complaints like like allegations of sexual assaults or rape against
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: like random soldiers, and no one can even like face
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: their accuser, which everyone should have a right to do,
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: that's not giving like accountability, you know, to the to
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: the person accused. That's that is essentially removing any account
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: of ability from the accuser and creating an environment or
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: a climate where anyone can be accused of anything by anybody,
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: and they can't. They many times they won't even if
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: they have evidence of the contrary. It doesn't matter because
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: they just have to get the convictions. And there's plenty
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: of stories of that too. Like I said, go to
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: the channel and look up the fireside chats for people
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: who I have interviewed and them there was a mother
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: of a guy who's still in jail for something that
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: he just did not do, like and they had all
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: the evidence and it didn't matter. So we're we're at
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: least trying to get close to something called due process.
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: But these feminists, and that's all I can describe them as,
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: they don't want that. They want the ability to just
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: throw people in prison, throw away the key for an allegation,
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: and that's what has to change. So all right, anyway,
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: I got I got some super chow's and then we're
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: gonna move on. But I'd like to know what you
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: guys think about this in the comments, all right, so
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: tell them now. Gave us.
• 28:01
  Speaker 4: The commenters are relying on the same media that that
• 28:06
  Speaker 4: everybody knows basically lies about everything. So they when they're
• 28:12
  Speaker 4: making these comments and they're saying, they're pulling things directly
• 28:16
  Speaker 4: from headlines and uh like like the the statements about
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: women in the military being erased and stuff. I looked
• 28:23
  Speaker 4: into that and there were some women that had gotten
• 28:27
  Speaker 4: credit for things that the men around them had done,
• 28:31
  Speaker 4: and he fixed that, and now women are mad. That
• 28:34
  Speaker 4: is essentially what happened, Uh that that the news media
• 28:39
  Speaker 4: turned into he's erasing the service records of women in
• 28:42
  Speaker 4: the military. No, he's not.
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, So I got a couple of super chows.
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: I'm going to read them out. Uh, let's see tell
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: him nar I gave us one hundred dollars yesterday late
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: and late last night and said, sending this in cause
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: in case Hannah wait. Sending this in cause Hannah was
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: so sweet during the meetup and she made excellent arm
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: candy for me when we went up Mount Sulfur. Thank
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: you Telenar for thee hundred and I'm sure Hannah appreciates that.
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: Remember she's married. Meredith g gives us five dollars. Old, yeah, Meredith,
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: she gives us five dollars and says, h barn News
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: five twenty one, honey for the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith.
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: All right, special chat is super special today. So there's
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: like four hundred and twenty three people watching on the vertical.
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: So everyone no idea like how you can get like
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: like suddenly we just blow up and they're mad at us.
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: They're mad, but you guys, like, you know, stop looking
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: at what you see on the screen and listen to
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: what we're actually saying because we're not lying. Yeah, they
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: don't like due process. No, they don't know. Not a
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: big fan, not not crazy about it. No, they don't
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: want due process for the people who sign up to
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: fight and die for our country. They want due process
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: for the illegals that aren't supposed to be here, though,
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: that's what they want to do. Process for people who literally,
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: like legitimately don't have that right because they're not citizens
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: of this country.
• 30:15
  Speaker 4: You're a citizen of the United States and somebody accuses
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: you of a crime, the standard has always been historically
• 30:22
  Speaker 4: that there needs to be evidence that you committed that
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: crime in order for you to be punished for it,
• 30:28
  Speaker 4: not that just somebody says you did something. And the
• 30:32
  Speaker 4: reason is because every time we've deviated from that, we've
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: had something happen like the Salem witch trials, where people
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: can show evidence that they feel harmed, and that was
• 30:43
  Speaker 4: literally the only evidence that was in the Salem witch
• 30:46
  Speaker 4: trials was a bunch of people claiming that they felt
• 30:50
  Speaker 4: harmed and pointing fingers at other people. And it results
• 30:54
  Speaker 4: in executions, land grabs, ruined reputations, ruined marriages, people having
• 31:01
  Speaker 4: to go back to to home countries, and so on,
• 31:06
  Speaker 4: like all kinds of chaos. So until you know, we
• 31:11
  Speaker 4: we stick to that standard that if someone accuses you
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: of a crime, there has to be evidence that you
• 31:18
  Speaker 4: committed that crime before you can be punished for committing
• 31:21
  Speaker 4: that crime. Then you know, you end up being subject
• 31:27
  Speaker 4: to a system that can be exploited by people who
• 31:30
  Speaker 4: want something and not you know, used to ensure remedy
• 31:37
  Speaker 4: for people who had something actually done to them.
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, well anyway, let us know what you
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: guys think about that one in the comments. We're gonna
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: move on to the next story. Appreciate the super chats
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: and super childs from all the people who wanted to
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: add their own commentary, and those of you guys who
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: are in the special chat can also contribute to the conversation.
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: If you are so inclined, maybe you can school us
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: on our with your superior logic and reason.
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: But thank you for being here.
• 32:07
  Speaker 4: Yeah, thank you for being here.
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: Really, no, really appreciate it. Okay, so let's move on
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: to the next one. All right. So at the Labor
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: Party conference on September thirtieth, twenty twenty five, United Kingdom
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister Kiir Starmer delivered a rousing speech that positioned
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: Reform UK led by Nigel Faraj, as a significant political adversary,
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: framing the party as an enemy of the British people.
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: According to the VBC article, of course, BBC would say
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: this Starmer emphasized a fight for the soul of the nation,
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: urging his party to confront and defeat Reform UK and
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: the broader populist right, suggesting that their policies and rhetoric
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: threatened national unity and progress. He sought to reclaim patriotism,
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: probably referencing symbols like the Union jack and other national flags,
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: while accusing Reform UK of fostering a politics of grievance
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: that undermines the collective good. This rhetoric was part of
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: a broader strategy to rally labor supporters ahead of crucial
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: elections in Scotland and Wales, positioning his government as a
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: defender of a united, inclusive Britain. Nigel Faraj responded sharply
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: expressing shock at Starmer's remarks, encountering that it was labor,
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: not Reform UK that was the true enemy of the
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: British people, asserting that only his party genuinely represented their interests.
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: The article that I Got This Problem highlighted that Starmer's
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: comments were intended to draw stark contrasts with Reform UK's
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: right wing populism, which has gained traction with five MP's
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: and growing local influence. As noted in related Wikipedia entries.
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: This exchange escalates political tensions, with Starmer's language potentially risking
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: accusations of divisiveness, while also raising questions about how due
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: process and democratic debate might be effected if such characterizations
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: influence poula or public perception. The ongoing battle for patriotic
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: narrative dominance suggests a contentious period ahead, with both leaders
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: vying to define the nation's future direction. Okay, I'm gonna
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: leave it to Mike, who I'm sure we'll have a
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: lot to say.
• 34:18
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a a veritable treasure trove of quotes that
• 34:23
  Speaker 3: I could dissect from that circus of a conference, and
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: we haven't got all day, So I'll focus on one
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: example from kistoma uh from Kiss thomas Dense Comedy of Errors. Quote.
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: If you.
• 34:47
  Speaker 3: Say or imply people cannot be English or British because
• 34:52
  Speaker 3: of the color of their skin, if you say that
• 34:56
  Speaker 3: they should be deported, then mark words, we will fight
• 35:01
  Speaker 3: to you with everything we have.
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: Quote.
• 35:07
  Speaker 3: First of all, England is a people, a European people,
• 35:13
  Speaker 3: and Britain is an island, a cold, wet island in
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: the North Atlantic. It is a biome that necessarily and
• 35:23
  Speaker 3: undeniably produces humans with pale skin because of the distinct
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: lack of sunlight compared with more equatorial continents. To say
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: that phenotypes from those continents cannot be of this land
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: or this people is no more controversial than saying penguins
• 35:49
  Speaker 3: cannot be from the North Pole. We call it a fact.
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: There are plenty of people who don't know this fact,
• 36:00
  Speaker 3: but I won't hold it against you, unless unless you're
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: simply pretending not to know it, even though you clearly do.
• 36:09
  Speaker 3: But it seems if you even so much as imply
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: that penguins cannot be from the North Pole, you are
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: officially karst Armer's enemy. Well, that's good to know. But
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: if there are penguins that do manage to make it
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: to the northern hemisphere, indeed to the British shaws, perhaps
• 36:40
  Speaker 3: because they've been imported to British zoos, Okay, it's no
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: skin off my rosy nose that there are all a
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: bunch of black and white bastards?
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: Is that racist?
• 36:56
  Speaker 3: I may have unlocked a new kind of race is
• 37:00
  Speaker 3: in there. We'll see. But yeah, when it comes to
• 37:04
  Speaker 3: the matter of deportations, that's another story, and it's not
• 37:10
  Speaker 3: about the color of their skin, Starmer, It's not why
• 37:16
  Speaker 3: we want to depart people. It's about their nation of origin,
• 37:22
  Speaker 3: the one they only just left, when.
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: They only just moved away from.
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: If someone with dark skin has married into British citizenship
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: or their family has been here for a century, nobody
• 37:36
  Speaker 3: is calling for their deportation except maybe the hardest of
• 37:41
  Speaker 3: the hard right, and that most definitely does not include
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: anyone in the Reform Party. Trust me, Reform is full
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: of milk toast wave.
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: Riders who will.
• 37:57
  Speaker 3: Only take one baby step at a time towards what
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: the British people actually want. We're talking about the Boris Wave,
• 38:07
  Speaker 3: the millions of people who were gushed into the country
• 38:11
  Speaker 3: and given indefinite leave to remain over the past five
• 38:16
  Speaker 3: years or so, while the rest of us were banned
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: from leaving even indefinitely. We're saying Boris and his Conservative
• 38:28
  Speaker 3: Party you know your political rivals, Starmer, We're saying they
• 38:35
  Speaker 3: made a mistake in inviting millions of third world freeloaders
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: into the country, regardless of the color of their skin.
• 38:46
  Speaker 3: We don't even want to give Irish people automatic citizenship
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: and limitless access to our services, just like Ireland doesn't
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: want to give it to us, and that's fine. We
• 39:00
  Speaker 3: don't want Dutch or German people taking advantage of us either,
• 39:08
  Speaker 3: and we sure as hell don't want any French people
• 39:13
  Speaker 3: and those other countries' closest to us geographically and ethnically.
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: So it was never about race, It's about nationality. You
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: keep calling us racists, you keep calling the policies we
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: promote racist. But when you put down the magical incantations
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: for a second, you notice that what we are, if anything,
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: is nationalist. Not nationalists, socialists, absolutely not. We're just people
• 39:52
  Speaker 3: who are ready and willing to acknowledge and recognize the
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: concept of a nation. Just people who can't agree on
• 40:03
  Speaker 3: where we draw the line between where one nation we
• 40:11
  Speaker 3: where one nation begins and the other nation ends. They're
• 40:15
  Speaker 3: called borders, that thing called borders, you know, and we
• 40:19
  Speaker 3: and we think they should be policed. And in Britain
• 40:25
  Speaker 3: they're not even all that extreme because our border has
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: been conveniently drawn for us by Mother Nature in the
• 40:33
  Speaker 3: form of that mass expansion of salt water we called
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: the sea. You know how most borders work, You know
• 40:43
  Speaker 3: how most borders are policed and enforced across the world,
• 40:48
  Speaker 3: especially in the Africa and Middle Eastern countries whose vagrants
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: are being invited into our green and pleasant land. What
• 41:00
  Speaker 3: do you think happens when you cross those borders in
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: North Africa and the Middle East? You get shot, Starmer,
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: no questions asked. You get shot so many times that
• 41:12
  Speaker 3: you become a pink blob of unidentifiable entrails and bullets
• 41:19
  Speaker 3: that goes on to get sold for scrap metal and
• 41:24
  Speaker 3: street food. And we're not even asking for that. Even
• 41:30
  Speaker 3: the so called far right, whom you've declared your enemy,
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: is not in favor of such extreme measures. Well, some
• 41:42
  Speaker 3: of us are, and to be honest based, but certainly
• 41:48
  Speaker 3: not the Reform party. Reform just wants them to be
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: sent back. And pardon my vast difference, but I think
• 41:58
  Speaker 3: that's a much more sensible option than text notes introducing
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: a digital ID card system that does absolutely fuck all
• 42:09
  Speaker 3: to prevent this, but does have the convenient effect of
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: controlling all and every aspect of the lives of the
• 42:17
  Speaker 3: native British people. Like, if we want to spend our
• 42:22
  Speaker 3: hard earned money on let's say, red meat or booze,
• 42:27
  Speaker 3: or heaven forbid, traveling perhaps to another country, heaven fucking forbid,
• 42:35
  Speaker 3: you can go Nope, you're not allowed such luxuries. We
• 42:40
  Speaker 3: can't afford it with the money we're stealing from you.
• 42:44
  Speaker 3: We're far too busy handing endless gibbs to people from
• 42:51
  Speaker 3: those African and Middle Eastern countries whose border policies we
• 42:56
  Speaker 3: would not hesitate to call far right if there was
• 42:59
  Speaker 3: ever any hint of them being enacted in Britain. And
• 43:04
  Speaker 3: as I said, it's nothing to do with the color
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: of people's skin. It is to do with nations. But you,
• 43:12
  Speaker 3: mister Starmer, are ignoring what it is really about, and
• 43:17
  Speaker 3: you are masking it about the color of people's skin.
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: What do we call someone who ignores reality, who ignores
• 43:28
  Speaker 3: nationality and sovereignty, and instead decides to hyper fixate on
• 43:36
  Speaker 3: the color of people's skin. Do we have a word
• 43:40
  Speaker 3: for that, mister Starmer.
• 43:42
  Speaker 2: I believe we do.
• 43:43
  Speaker 3: It's a word that can be used descriptively, but which
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: you and your ecophobic milk use as nought but a
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: magic incantation. It's a word.
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: Racist.
• 44:00
  Speaker 3: On the one hand, we've reached the point where we're
• 44:03
  Speaker 3: finally starting to dispel this incantation and brush it off
• 44:08
  Speaker 3: as lazy, psychosomatic pieces of white noise that you've tended into.
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: But at the same time, it is a real word
• 44:18
  Speaker 3: with an applicable definition, And if it applies to anyone,
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: mister Stumer, it is you. You are the racist. You
• 44:28
  Speaker 3: are the leader of a party of racists, a party
• 44:33
  Speaker 3: that is and always has been a trojan horse for communism.
• 44:39
  Speaker 3: We are not talking about the color of people's skin.
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: You are.
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: All you can see is black and white and the
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: brown in between, and you have long since decided that
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: black is good and white is bad. You're every decision,
• 44:58
  Speaker 3: you're every policy reflects this. So I'm not gonna call you.
• 45:05
  Speaker 3: I'm not gonna I'm not gonna let you call us racists,
• 45:10
  Speaker 3: Nor am I gonna let you dilute the word racist
• 45:13
  Speaker 3: until it no longer has any meaning. It does have meaning,
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: and it applies to you. You are an micophobic racist.
• 45:25
  Speaker 3: Mister Starmer, Join me, brothers. It is not enough that
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: we disam these communist traitors of their magic incantations. We
• 45:36
  Speaker 3: must take back this word and this concept, and we
• 45:40
  Speaker 3: must apply it to those who would corrupt it and
• 45:44
  Speaker 3: project it onto anyone who does not align with their
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: anti white racism. Just like we must take back the
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: word sexism and the plights are those who would corrupt
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: it and protect under anyone who does not align with
• 46:03
  Speaker 3: their anti male sexism. And let us not labor under
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: any delusions, gentlemen, that all of our problems spawn from
• 46:18
  Speaker 3: this immigration crisis. Do you really think it fell from
• 46:23
  Speaker 3: a clear blue sky? Do you really think it started
• 46:28
  Speaker 3: with Tony Blair?
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: It did not.
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: The path had already been cleared for Tony Blair and
• 46:35
  Speaker 3: his icophobic miss Andre revolution, just like it was clayed
• 46:39
  Speaker 3: for the Clintons and their wicophobic centric revolution. If we
• 46:46
  Speaker 3: ever do fix the anti white racism problem, I do
• 46:52
  Speaker 3: hope we finally get around to fixing the anti male
• 46:56
  Speaker 3: sexism problem, because that's what came before. And yes, I'm
• 47:02
  Speaker 3: sure something else came before that. If we have to
• 47:09
  Speaker 3: work our way backwards, first by culling the leaves, then
• 47:15
  Speaker 3: by culling the stems, then by culling the seeds, so
• 47:20
  Speaker 3: be it. But let us not lose sight of the seeds,
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: wherever and whatsoever they may be. Needless to say, I'm
• 47:33
  Speaker 3: not a real botanist. None of this is gardening advice.
• 47:38
  Speaker 2: Ignore me entirely. A's paradoxical. How's that might be?
• 47:47
  Speaker 4: This is this is pretty much that the same situation
• 47:55
  Speaker 4: but that they tried to create in the United States
• 47:58
  Speaker 4: with them shoot, and I think that might be No,
• 48:03
  Speaker 4: it's not mine. I'm hearing static all of a sudden.
• 48:11
  Speaker 4: But with with mass mass migration, Uh, that was that
• 48:17
  Speaker 4: was illegal immigration and uh, you know, not not dealing
• 48:23
  Speaker 4: with it when crimes are committed and then accusing people
• 48:27
  Speaker 4: of racism when they didn't want to be victimized by
• 48:32
  Speaker 4: the fact that criminals were being allowed in as as
• 48:37
  Speaker 4: much as or more so than people who were actual
• 48:42
  Speaker 4: refugees from from nations where people were trying to kill
• 48:45
  Speaker 4: them for something they believe in. And the term refugee
• 48:52
  Speaker 4: got stretched from somebody's trying to kill this person in
• 48:57
  Speaker 4: their home country because they've they've done something political or
• 49:01
  Speaker 4: done something religious, and the nation as opposed to it
• 49:06
  Speaker 4: to these people don't make enough money in their home country,
• 49:10
  Speaker 4: so they want to come here and rely on our
• 49:12
  Speaker 4: welfare system and send the money back to their home country.
• 49:15
  Speaker 4: And that's called a better life. That was the cabash
• 49:21
  Speaker 4: was put to that by people who realized that you
• 49:25
  Speaker 4: cannot polite your way out of a group of people
• 49:29
  Speaker 4: trying to use a system like this to dominate you.
• 49:33
  Speaker 4: In the United States, what we had was a war
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: between this is a cold civil war between people who
• 49:43
  Speaker 4: want the government to control their neighbors and people who
• 49:47
  Speaker 4: just wanted to be left alone. And being left alone
• 49:53
  Speaker 4: includes not having a criminal population inflicted on your neighborhood.
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 50:01
  Speaker 4: And and then then then used to control you by
• 50:05
  Speaker 4: telling you that a the police aren't going to do
• 50:08
  Speaker 4: anything about it, and b if you do, you're going
• 50:10
  Speaker 4: to get prosecuted, right and that that's basically been the
• 50:17
  Speaker 4: situation for four years prior to the Trump administration. That's
• 50:21
  Speaker 4: that's what was going on here.
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 50:24
  Speaker 4: And what ended up having to happen was people in
• 50:28
  Speaker 4: the United States who don't normally get involved in politics,
• 50:32
  Speaker 4: who don't normally get involved in elections, and many of
• 50:36
  Speaker 4: whom don't normally vote, had to step up and and
• 50:41
  Speaker 4: actually involve themselves. They couldn't just want to be left alone.
• 50:46
  Speaker 4: They actually had to participate. And I think that that's
• 50:50
  Speaker 4: probably the case in a lot of countries in Europe
• 50:52
  Speaker 4: right now. You have a lot of people who have
• 50:55
  Speaker 4: been complacent, you know, content because things were okay until
• 51:02
  Speaker 4: they weren't. And if you allow your politicians to use
• 51:08
  Speaker 4: the people who want the government to control you so
• 51:13
  Speaker 4: that your life isn't better than theirs, even if you
• 51:16
  Speaker 4: work harder than them, harder than them, even if you
• 51:20
  Speaker 4: work smarter than them. You're going to have to participate
• 51:24
  Speaker 4: in your system, even if it's not perfect, even if
• 51:27
  Speaker 4: you don't like your system, even if you think it's
• 51:29
  Speaker 4: not a good system, You're going to have to learn
• 51:33
  Speaker 4: how it works and push on your end of it
• 51:38
  Speaker 4: as hard as you possibly can, in unison, in all
• 51:42
  Speaker 4: of the ways that you legally can, in order to
• 51:46
  Speaker 4: push it back away from the circumstances that currently exist
• 51:51
  Speaker 4: that you don't like. And I would say the same
• 51:55
  Speaker 4: thing to Canadians, because yeah, y'all have the same situation,
• 51:59
  Speaker 4: but it's there are a couple of things about it
• 52:01
  Speaker 4: that are worse. And if you don't like this circumstance,
• 52:06
  Speaker 4: I know, mumbling about it on social media is one thing,
• 52:11
  Speaker 4: but if you don't do everything within your legal power,
• 52:17
  Speaker 4: everything that is legal in your country to do to
• 52:19
  Speaker 4: push back on it, then it's gonna just get worse.
• 52:26
  Speaker 4: So you gotta do the same thing that we did, all.
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: Right, Well, I can't add anything to that. So those
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: that's that's good. But whatever you guys think about this,
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: leave us your comments as well. It doesn't it doesn't
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: sound good whatever it is. But yeah, well we'll see
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: how things go and of course we'll follow up. Looking
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: forward to seeing your thoughts. All right. Next story a
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: little bit like smaller and scared, let's say, a little
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: less global. So there was a Guardian our article that
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: reported a woman named Roxana Laika I hope I'm not
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: butchering that a twenty two year old nursery worker from Hunslow,
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: West London, was sentenced to eight years in prison for
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: the sadistic abuse of twenty one babies across two nurseries,
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: Riverside in Twickenham and Little Munchkins in Hunslow between October
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty three and June of twenty twenty four. The abuse,
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: uncovered through CCTV footage analyzed by Metropolitan Police detectives, included pinching,
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: scratching and kicking children aged eighteen months to two years,
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: with one particularly harrowing incident involving a kick to a
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: boy's face. Leka admitted to seven counts of cruelty to
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: persons under sixteen and was convicted of fourteen additional count
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: at Kingston Crown Court on June twenty twenty five, as
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: corroborated by a related Guardian article from June sixteenth. Her actions,
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: which also involved pushing babies head first overcots and covering
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: a toddler's mouth to silence cries, were compounded by her
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: admission of smoking cannabis before shifts, further evidence by footage
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: of her vaping near infants. The sentencing followed a trial
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: where jurors and parents were visibly shaken by the video evidence,
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: with d Sion Hutchings of the met praising the family's strength.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: According to the Guardian's coverage, Lecca's defense did not contest
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: the severity of the acts, and the court highlighted her
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: exceptional cruelty as noted by Senior Crown Prosecutor Gemma Burns,
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: aligning with reports from both Guardian articles. The closure of
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: Riverside Nursery reflects the broader impact, while the case raises
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: concerns about oversight and childcare settings. Though no specific mention
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: of accuser, anonymity or accused due process emerges, standard UK
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: legal processes were followed, ensuring Leca's right to a fair
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: trial cross referencing with the earlier web results provided confirms
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: consistency in these details, underscoring a robust investigation and judicial response,
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: though it does there are some questions about preventative measures
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: in similar facilities in the future.
• 55:22
  Speaker 3: Eight years is that it?
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, eight years.
• 55:27
  Speaker 3: It's better than nothing, nothing being what most women get
• 55:32
  Speaker 3: for this kind of combat. Fox For all this shit
• 55:37
  Speaker 3: we hear about racial minority men getting led off with
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: fourteen violent crimes against adults before finally getting sent down
• 55:44
  Speaker 3: for stabbing a woman on a train, albeit in a
• 55:47
  Speaker 3: different country, Well, what is the excuse for a woman
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: violently abusing twenty one babies that leaves her with anything
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: short of the death penalty. This does appear to be
• 56:03
  Speaker 3: a difference between male serial abuses and female serial abuses,
• 56:09
  Speaker 3: but it's not. It's not a significant difference. They abuse
• 56:13
  Speaker 3: and murder anyone. They can abuse and murder without immediate retaliation.
• 56:18
  Speaker 3: I eat anyone significantly weaker than them. But I put
• 56:22
  Speaker 3: it to you that the strength gap between a man
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: and a woman on public transit pales into it in
• 56:32
  Speaker 3: significance compared with the strength gap between a woman and
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: a baby in a nursery and a significant discrepancy in
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: the outrage of pushback around such cases is that public
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: transport tends to be presented with CCTV, whereas nurseries are
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: not typically furnished with such video evidence. At least the
• 57:01
  Speaker 3: Guardian article from which we pulled this story has not
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: furnished us with it. Has anyone introduced the policy of
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: perhaps installing CCTV in nurseries or in children's wards, in hospitals,
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: or in the schools or universities, or any of the
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: institutions that have long since been populated by female employees
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: in the majority. I would like to see that. I
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: mean I wouldn't enjoy seeing it, because I get the
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: distinct feeling I would see a harrowing amount of female
• 57:39
  Speaker 3: made horrors beyond my comprehension. But if we are to
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: get to the bottom of these crimes committed in schools
• 57:49
  Speaker 3: and hospitals as such, then I think it might be
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: pertinent to be able to show video footage of the
• 57:57
  Speaker 3: crimes committed by the women who work in these facilities.
• 58:02
  Speaker 3: If we are to live in this surveillance age where
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: every violent crime can be viewed by the public like
• 58:10
  Speaker 3: we were able to see the real time murder of
• 58:14
  Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk. Then, I I don't want to sound morbid
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: on the carb, but I have to wonder, given the
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: outrage that happened as a result of Iriano Zaritzka getting
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: murdered on camera, I want to know how much outrage
• 58:32
  Speaker 3: could be stirred if we were subjected to video footage
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: of all the sixth shit that women do. I'm reminded
• 58:42
  Speaker 3: of the Johnny Depp versus Amber Heard case. I know
• 58:45
  Speaker 3: we all watched it like it was a TV show,
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: like it was a soap opera, and there was something
• 58:51
  Speaker 3: rather perturbing about the way we were all glued to
• 58:55
  Speaker 3: that shit like for a month or two. But if
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: that footage wasn't available, then we would have nothing to
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: go by except the spurious interpretations of the only journalists
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: who were allowed into the court at that time. If
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: we weren't allowed to see the footage of the Kyle
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: Rittenhouse case, we would have no way of interpreting what
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: happened except through the smear merchants of the legacy media
• 59:28
  Speaker 3: telling us what we should think about and what we
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: should think about it, which, as we saw at the time,
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: was a delusional hallucination of what was really going on. So,
• 59:42
  Speaker 3: despite what we're being told about this case about Roxana,
• 59:46
  Speaker 3: like the the baby batterer, I can't help but wonder
• 59:51
  Speaker 3: if we're only being presented with the tip of the iceberg.
• 59:55
  Speaker 3: Bear in mind is a British court where objective coverage
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 3: by video footage is not and has never had and
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: never has been permitted. And bear in mind we're only
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 3: being told what the guardian is willing or permitted to
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: tell us. We can only imagine how much worse the
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 3: reality is. At this point, I want to see the footage.
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: I know that sounds sick. I know at this point
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: I have watched footage of a man being shot through
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 3: the neck I have. On top of that, I've long
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 3: since listened to footage of babies being generously tortured at
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: eight days old, and I the oscillating screams they make
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 3: when their flesh is being ripped from their penis. I
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 3: wish wish I never heard it, because that sound will
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: never leave me because this is where we are now.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 3: So yes, I have been partially desensitized from such horrors,
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 3: So I'm ready. I'm ready to see and hear the
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: footage of what these women do to these children. More importantly,
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 3: I want everyone else to see it. I want everyone
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: to know what women do to children, very often with impunity,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: because exposing the public to these consequences, the consequences of
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: women's actions, might be the only way to set us
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: on the path to actually holding them accountable. The future
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 3: is going to be dark, as a gentleman, darker than
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: your worst nightmares can have visits. But that is what
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 3: it's going to take. We've been taken this far into
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 3: hell because we have been shielded from these consequences because
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 3: women have been shielded from this accountability. But shit needs
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 3: to change, and it's going to change, and not a
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: moment too soon. Sorry, I upset myself again. I almost
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: cried just now and I haven't cried since twenty twenty.
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 2: That was close.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 3: I will, I will regroup. Let's sorry, let's go, let's
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 3: do the next Sorry, well, I regroup.
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: Oh sorry, I'll let Hannah give her thoughts on this. Yeah,
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: go ahead, Hannah.
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 4: I I I raised my kid without without sending him
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 4: to daycare. Because of this, I I try using a
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 4: local y MCA daycare system to my hometown for a
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 4: few months to to give him a different group of
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 4: kids to play with where he was there for a
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 4: few hours a day, and one day one of the
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 4: other kids bullied him and he didn't do anything back
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 4: to the other kid. He just moved away from the
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 4: other kid. But he got into trouble for fighting because
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 4: the other kid hit him, and I pulled him out
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 4: that day, and I told him why I was pulling
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 4: him out, like this is, you can't allow somebody to
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 4: abuse my child and and then tell him that he
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 4: is partially to blame because he was present for his
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 4: own abuse. That's that's not okay. And they were They
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 4: were completely shocked by my logic. They didn't understand why
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 4: that bothered me. And that told me everything I needed
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 4: to know about the daycare system in the United States.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 4: Now I know this is this is in the UK,
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 4: but it sounds like it's fairly similar, uh, And that
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 4: that you know, parents are expected to drop their child
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 4: off and then not have any idea what's going on
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 4: with their kid. And by parents, I mean mothers, right,
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 4: because it's really normally mothers who stay at home to
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 4: take care of children when they're young. And it doesn't
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 4: matter whether you consider it sexist or not, that it's
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 4: usually mothers and not usually fathers. That's just the way
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 4: things have been. So it's usually mothers who are the
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 4: ones that if they decide they're going to work when
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 4: their child is young, they drop the child off at daycare.
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 4: There's a better way to handle if you want to
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 4: go to work. No one in your your your community
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 4: is going to be more invested in your child's welfare
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 4: than you are. Strangers do not care about your child.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 4: And it's a harsh reality, even if they work in
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 4: child care, even if they are school teachers, they do
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 4: not care about your child individually the way that you do,
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 4: the way that your immediate family does, the way that
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 4: some of your extended family might, or your close friends.
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 4: And if you're going to pay somebody to watch your child,
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 4: and you know daycare costs X number of dollars, it
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 4: would be hoove women who think it's very important that
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 4: they go to work to offer that money to their mother,
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 4: their sister, their cousin, their best friend, somebody that you
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 4: know their child plays with that other person's children and
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 4: that person has watched their child grow up and has
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 4: some love and care for their child, and not strangers.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 4: And and if you can't because you you don't make
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 4: enough money, do do it? My friends and I did.
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 4: We traded childcare growing up. We didn't use daycare centers.
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 4: We worked different shifts from each other. And sorry about
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 4: the sniffling. It's not tears, it's it's the weather. I'm
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 4: allergic to everything, so sorry. But we just worked together
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 4: and created a schedule with each other and we watched
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 4: each other's kids. You know, grandparent time is important. Grandparents
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 4: want to see their children. Let them. And women who
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 4: are divorced, you shouldn't be paying for child care during
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 4: hours when your husband, your ex husband is not working.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 4: Let him see his kids. Give him time with his children.
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 4: It's a thousand times better than strangers. And this type
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 4: of incidence will go down exponentially, and daycare centers will
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 4: not be so understaffed and so desperate for employees that
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 4: they stop doing their due diligence. It takes three months
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 4: or something like that for POT to get out of
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 4: your system, and I don't know how it is in
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 4: the UK, but in the US you can't work at
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 4: a daycare center if you have that in your system
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 4: and they're supposed to be doing routine testing. Companies like
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 4: mine are supposed to be doing routine testing. I'm not daycare.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 4: I take care of intellectually disabled adults. But we know
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 4: that at any moment of us might be told to
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 4: go get a blood test to find out if we've
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 4: been using drugs, or a urine test or a hair test.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 4: They could do any method that is used to test
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 4: for drugs. And you know, it's easy for me because
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 4: being allergic to everything in the world, I'm afraid to
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 4: use those kinds of substances. But even people who are
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 4: okay with using those types of substances, no, well, I
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 4: can't do this if I want to be employed in
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 4: this particular profession because I could be fired for it,
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 4: and it's legal for them to fire me for it,
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 4: even if the substance is not illegal. Marijuana is still included,
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 4: even though in my state it is one hundred percent
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 4: legal to use marijuana. If I were to use it
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 4: and then my company tested me and found it in
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 4: my system, I would still get fired and they can
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 4: do that, And it's not wrong that they can do that,
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 4: because there should be a higher level of accountability for
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 4: people who are providing care for people who are extremely vulnerable.
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 4: In fact, there should be the highest level of accountability
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 4: every bit is high as the accountability that we should
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 4: have for police officers but don't always right every bit
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 4: the level of accountability that we should have for people
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 4: who work in psychiatric care, where people's perceptions might not
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 4: be accepted by the people around them, and they may
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 4: even be able to report abuse and be not taken
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 4: seriously because their perceptions are not believed by the people
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 4: around them. So this is heinous that this happened, but
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 4: it's also something that needs to be put at the
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 4: feet of women. Be a better judge of who you
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 4: leave your child with. Your child is the most precious
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 4: person in your life, and you and your child's father
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 4: are the most precious people in your child's life. And
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 4: you absolutely cannot be flippant with where you decide your
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 4: child goes and who your child is exposed to. It
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 4: is not your fault this person behaved this way, But
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 4: is your fault your child was with that person. So
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 4: that's that's my that's my take on it. Maybe less
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 4: women using daycare and a smaller daycare system with a
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 4: great deal more accountability is what is in order to
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 4: fix this.
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: All right? Uh yeah, not much again, I think what
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: needed to be said was said. So let us know
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this one in the comments. Yes,
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: she is a monster, but they they're you know, female.
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: My whole point has always been female monsters exist. Let's
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 1: stop pretending they don't. I'm sure that you guys that
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: are watching this know this, but there are a lot
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: of people who want to pretend like it doesn't happen
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: and that men are the only perpetrators of you know,
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: evil and harm in the world. So let us know
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this one in the comments.
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: All right, we're gonna go look at the last story.
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: Let me just make sure I didn't miss any super
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: chats or anything. No, no, no, no, okay, So yeah,
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you want to send a super chat
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: in I will be sure to read it. Usually I
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: read them between you know, stories on the news show.
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: So all right, so this was kind of an interesting
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: one in Poland. All right, In Poland, there is there
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: has been an emergence of something called the zon Patrol,
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: which is a viral trend in Poland targeting girls and
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: young women. What are they doing, you might ask, They
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: are subjecting them to humiliation and the trend involves creating
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: social media profiles and groups where miners, predominantly girls, are
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: publicly evaluated and stigmatized based on their appearance, clothing, and behavior,
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: using the term zone as a derogatory label. This aligns
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: with the report from the Polish Office of the Commissioner
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: for Human Rights on September fifth, twenty twenty five, which
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: describes how the practice has led to stigmatization and instances
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: of peer violence which is not actual violence, with the
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: Commissioner urging meta and TikTok to monitor and curb the content.
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: So what has happened is a bunch of young men
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: are they basically formed the thought Patrol, the thought patrol
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: in Poland, all right, and they are shaming women for
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: our young girls, girls around their age, like their peers,
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: for their online behavior, for engaging in thoughttery basically, so
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: they're trying to curb that behavior by using shame. And
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: they're wearing they're wearing vests and calling themselves the thought Patrol. Essentially,
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: the viral nature has amplified its reach with examples of profiles, profiles,
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 1: rating and mocking young individuals, posing significant psychological risks according
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: to some, including potential suicidal ideation. Among victims. No, not really.
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: The Polish Commissioner for Human Rights has called for vigilance
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: from social media platforms, requesting the removal of the sound
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: patrol related content and preventative measures to address stigmatization and violence,
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: as confirmed by the report There's like a Polish report.
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: While the article does not delve into legal proceedings or
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: due process for accused perpetrators, to focus on platform accountability,
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: suggests an effort to protect the victims's annymity in safety,
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: though it raises questions about identifying and prosecuting those behind
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: the trend. So essentially, it's an online trend or sort
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: of like a trend online in public spaces of young
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: Polish boys basically thought patrolling Polish girls. And it's it's
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: made the news because, you know, you might say that
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: Poland is based or whatever. I know some people have
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: made this claim, but they're still extremely guynocentric, and they're
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: still really overprotective of their women, and they're not able
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: to see that, you know, women and girls can engage
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: in let's say, like anti civilizational or degenerate behavior, and
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: these boys are just calling it out and they're basically
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: doing their part. So I thought it was like a
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: funny story to end on that there is there's a
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: literal like a thought patrol in Poland. Of course they
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: would do it first. But anyway, guys don't.
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 4: Don't you realize that boys and men are never allowed
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 4: to engage in this type of relational aggression. Only girls
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 4: can do that and get away with it.
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 4: This is on one hand, you know, nobody should be
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 4: doing what these guys are doing. You shouldn't be targeting
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 4: people online like just random if they're not journalists or
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 4: or somebody who has influence and stuff. It's it's bullshit
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 4: to just gang up on somebody and say a bunch
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 4: of shitty things about them, even if you don't like
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 4: the way that they're behaving. But at the other end
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 4: of it, this is standard female behavior and it is
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 4: so common among women and girls that it is it
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 4: is known for causing other women and girls to commit suicide.
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 4: And they're girls who will make it their goal to
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 4: drive another girl to suicide using using this kind of behavior.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 4: It's it's tolerated.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 4: Girls are told to toughen up and learn to deal
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 4: with it because women do this all the time. Girls
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 4: do this all the time. Uh, and therefore you shouldn't
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 4: you should you shouldn't expect somebody to stop them.
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 4: It's the the girls will be girls of the feminist
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 4: boys will be boys meme, which the feminist boys will
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 4: be boys meme purports to be the UH answer to
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 4: society saying boys will be boys, but they always state
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 4: different circumstances than actually exist when people say that, uh so,
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 4: it's it's interesting when when boys act like girls, they
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 4: get painted as monsters, they get they get treated like
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 4: they've done some horrible, horrible thought crime against their their
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 4: UH community, and it's it makes international news and everybody
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 4: gets upset. What does that tell you about the way
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 4: girls normally behave that everyone tolerates that everyone says, oh,
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 4: this is funny when girls do it. Clearly you might
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 4: want to reconsider your opinion on this type of behavior
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 4: when girls do it, because if it is damaging, if
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 4: it is causing girls to say that they want to
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 4: commit suicide, if it is causing emotional pain and suffering,
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 4: if it is victimizing people, then it's also doing all
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 4: of those things every minute of every day that girls
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 4: do it and get away with it. Otherwise, if it's
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 4: harmless when girls do it, then nobody should be upset
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 4: when boys imitate them.
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you're going to have to reiterate the things that
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 3: Hannaja said. And there's not much I could say here
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 3: that wouldn't be controversial, at least in somebody's eyes. But
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: it's worth pointing out that Poland doesn't have to deal
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 3: with the foreign rape gangs that are plaguing the rest
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 3: of Northwest Europe, so they don't have to temper their
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 3: shame culture, but the offset of the scourge of such anomalies. Now,
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 3: I'm no advocate of shame culture. I've been quite vocal
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 3: about how shame culture does not work. In fact, if anything,
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 3: it only pushes people away, especially young adults, whether you're
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 3: pushing them in a left wing or right wing direction.
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 3: There's a reason these shame nudgings tend to skip generations.
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 3: But someone needs to say this, so I'll say this.
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 3: There are two huge problems in Northwest Europe and indeed
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 3: in European North America. One is we keep importing foreign
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: men who see Western girls as nothing but sluts.
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 3: Another is we keep teaching our girls that there's nothing
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 3: wrong with being sluts. Actually, whether actually there's a third problem.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 3: We keep teaching our girls that there's nothing worse than
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: white men. I feel like I should leave a pregnant
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: pause here for want.
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: Of a better turn offraise.
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: I want to let our detractors yell at me for
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 3: being a sexist and also a racist. How are you
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 3: doing over there in the special.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 2: Extreame.
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 3: But like I said, Eliot, there are the battle cries
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 3: of actual racists and sexists. Actual racists and sexists who
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: conduct their racism chophobically and misandercally because they have no
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 3: conception of sexism and racism other than the xenophobic and
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 3: misogynistic kind. It's very possible, ladies and dead word, that
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 3: foreign men are indeed really quite rape and that our
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 3: own women and girls are indeed quite.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: Slutty.
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 3: By no means does this excuse foreign men for their
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 3: systematic gang raping of Western girls. Nothing can excuse that.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: But at the same time, we're all observing.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: This, this.
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: Only found culture, this culture of I mean, if you
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 3: hang around outside nightclubs in any city, or any town,
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 3: or any small or large village, and you notice that
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 3: women and girls of all ages are hanging around dressed
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 3: as hawes, I'm reminded of that Dave Chappelle routine. You
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 3: might not be a whore, but you are wearing the
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 3: uniform of a whore. Again, to reiterate and clarify, your
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 3: choice of dress does not, and never should, excuse you
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 3: being raped by men who ostensibly do not know any
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 3: about it. This is something that Western men have learned.
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 3: We have grown accustomed to seeing women and girls, even
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 3: underage girls, dressed exactly as whores, with the boob tubes
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 3: and the miniskirts and the fuck me boots, like indistinguishable
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 3: from women who would dress to advertise themselves as whores.
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 3: I mean, to the point where you can't even tell
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 3: who is a whore and who is not, because the
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: average even underage girl attending a nightclub is dressed exactly
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: like the whes who are dressed in order in order
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 3: to get fucked for money. I mean, how far does
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: it have to go before it comes to us that
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 3: this is not normal? And how surprised can anyone really
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 3: be that when economic migrant fighting age men from the
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 3: Third World turn up in our countries and they see
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: streets full I mean lines of women dressed exactly like
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: hawes lining up around the street to get into nightclubs
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: and then leaving those nightclubs at three in the morning
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: trying to flag down cabs. Is there any wonder that
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 3: these fighting age men, these incredibly horny fighting age men,
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: get the impression that these women dressed as hawes want
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: nothing more than to get fucked in the pussy. And again,
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 3: I'm not saying that these fifty iq shadow beasts from
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 3: Pakistan are in the right. They're obviously not. I'm just
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 3: saying these fifty iq haws from pussy Stan are not
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 3: necessarily in the right either. What we have is a
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 3: confluence of the West women who have not been burdened
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 3: with any boundaries, and Eastern men who have not been
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 3: burdened with any boundaries either. We live in a society
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 3: in which the only people burdened with any boundaries whatsoever
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 3: are native Western men, and we're somehow expected to pick
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 3: up the pieces when these competing demographics of first class
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 3: citizens inevitably find themselves in this cultural clash. What I'm
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 3: saying is that maybe the answer to all this is
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 3: not to keep blaming European men for absolutely everything. Maybe
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: if we started blaming European women and non European men force,
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 3: so one thing, anything, Ever, maybe we could begin to
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 3: fix this. Poland right already fixed this problem with non
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 3: European men, and now they're starting to fix the problem
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 3: with European women. Maybe they're not in the wrong in
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 3: the wrong. Maybe they're doing exactly the right thing, one
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 3: thing at a time.
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: But that's my opinion.
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 3: I I'm not real whatever I am, None of this is.
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 2: Real advice from a.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 3: Real human being. I doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, none
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 3: of it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. Let's let's let's
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 3: end the show, all right.
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: All right? So that was that. Let me know what
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: you guys think. Basically, these kids just for the for
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: the clarification, because the way the article frames it, it
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: was translated from the Polish as well. These boys were
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: going around essentially up to women that are girls that
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: were you know, being a little too I guess, let's say, liberated,
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: and they were using social shame to try to like
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: get them to change their ways because that was what
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: they wanted to do. And you know, whether you are
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: for that or not, I think that that we covered
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: why there is a double standard there. I mean, they're
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: talking about making it illegal or having like the state,
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 1: step in and do something about it. And the truth
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: is women that's all they do is check each other
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: online and in social situations. And if these boys are
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: gonna one day be men and they're gonna be looking
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: for wives, they're gonna want, like, you know, a chaste woman,
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: then it's okay that they're like trying to at least
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: move the needle or state their preferences so that in
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: the hopes that, you know, some women will listen. So
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: not saying this is the best way to go about it,
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: but I thought it was funny.
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 4: On another note, guys, this doesn't work. Women have no shame.
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 4: They've made being being called out for for acting like
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 4: you are part of a profession. You are not part
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 4: of a right mimicking a hoe.
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 4: They've made that a term now for shaming that that
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 4: as if it's inappropriate. Well you're slut shaming me? Yes,
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 4: Well are you? Are you acting like a slut then
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 4: then gonna you're gonna get slut shamed. Women have no
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 4: shame and they don't.
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 3: Care for everyone who thinks they're going to fix this
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 3: problem by sending them back. Yeah, sending them back is
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 3: is just culing the leaves like we got this far
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 3: because became women the vote. And I don't know how
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 3: to say that controversial, but.
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 1: There is no way to say it. But yeah, I mean, like, uh,
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 1: the the truth is is that women, the modern women,
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 1: are the ones that created this problem. So if you
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: think it's just send the brown people away, that won't
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: matter because they're just gonna vote them back in or
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: they're gonna go seek them out, like you you guys,
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: you know, I see that there are some people in
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: the vertical chat that think that there's a Wignat solution
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: to this. Guys, if you don't do something about your women,
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: no amount of like talking about your white race is
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: going to help because they're your own. Women are seeking
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: out foreign men full stop. Period. You gotta change that.
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: Otherwise it doesn't matter. They control reproduction, they are deciding
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: these things. They're not just being victimized by these men.
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: They are choosing these men. And you know that you
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: have to go, like go anywhere and you'll see it.
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: So you know. There, that's the thing, like the one
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 1: thing that I think, well, I don't want to get preachy,
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: but there, but there is something that we've lost in
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: the West, and it is effect it is more so
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: affected the way women make choices. And yeah, no amount
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: of Like, you can't white nationalists your way out of this,
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: You just can't. You have to do something about the women,
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: full stop. But anyway, we're gonna.
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 4: By the way, by the way, zero days since some
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 4: stupid bitch on social media gave Hannah wall In an
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 4: internet sex change. I don't have the meme handy, but
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 4: it just happened. I'm not a dude, bitch, uh and
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 4: and and and don't tell me that you are a dude,
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 4: because that doesn't preclude you from being a bitch.
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 3: Yep, saying you are a dude.
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 4: Tell that to my obi jin.
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: Dudes.
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 3: There has always been a yeah, well you're you're a
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 3: bigger dude than I was than I have been.
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 4: There we go, that's bro.
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 3: Your dude, and dude, you're bo.
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 4: So when it comes to what we just talked about,
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 4: this is about female accountability. No man could get away
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 4: with with walking around in public dressed the way some
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 4: women dress. Right, people would consider him dangerous, crazy, or offensive,
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 4: possibly all three, right, But when a woman does it, somehow,
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 4: criticizing it makes you a bad person. I have no sympathy, none,
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 4: and and I'm not getting I'm not gonna say that
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 4: I've never showed off. I always liked to show off
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 4: my legs when I was young because they were long
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 4: and muscular and attractive. But you weren't gonna see my
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 4: butt cheeks, right, that's those are special that you don't
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 4: get to see those, you know. So it's it depends
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 4: on the individual, but you have accountability when you communicate
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 4: with other people that you have a level of sexual availability.
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 4: It doesn't mean that you're triggering rapists. They're sick people.
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 4: They don't care whether you're signaling availability or not. And
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 4: in fact, they will take advantage of people specifically because
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 4: of the opposite reason that they're unavailable. They will, they'll
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 4: do a lot of harm because of that. But it
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 4: doesn't change the fact that men have a right to
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 4: their boundaries and they do have a right to say,
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 4: you know, I don't want anything to do with you
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 4: because you look like a hope. And that's probably the
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 4: most effective thing, not walking up to some woman and
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 4: handing her a note. You know you, shame on you.
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 4: You look like a hope. Just don't don't go out
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 4: with those women. Don't treat them to dinner, don't take
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 4: them to movies, don't spend any time talking to them
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 4: that you don't have to. If you disapprove of that,
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 4: you show your disapproval by withdrawing the thing that women
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 4: value most attention.
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 3: I I have slept with Hannah by the way, quite recently,
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 3: and I have seen her lace, but I have not
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 3: seen her thighs, so I did not know how.
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 1: I Okay, that was an overshare. Guys. Yeah, I know,
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: I know it's a joke. It's a joke. I know
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: it's a joke, all right, but we're gonna wrap it up.
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 4: So it is technically correct. Correct, we slept in the
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 4: same room. But yeah, and I apologize for the snory.
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 4: I'm old, we do. I'm fat. Well, that's good, but
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 4: I am still old and fat, just so people know
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 4: so much, Just.
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: So you know, I am not. You're only as old
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 1: as the You're always as young as the woman you feel.
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 3: No, damn it, I wasn't.
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 4: I'm about three. I get to be old when I
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 4: say I'm old. I am way past twenty one.
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: I win. All right, all right, all right, but look,
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 1: we're gonna wrap it up there. We're gonna go into
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 1: the patron show now and look up ourselves on Wikipedia.
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: So if you guys want to join us, you have
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: to become a Badger yourself by going to feed the
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription. Five
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: bucks will get you into discord Server, where you'll be
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: able to participate in all of the additional activities. And
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 1: if you want to check it out for free, you
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 1: can get into the free version of the discord by
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: going to Badger Nation dot online. That's Badger Nation dot online,
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 1: so you can check that out. All right, So we're
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: gonna wrap the show up there. Thank you guys so
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: much for checking us out. Thank you to Mike and
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: Hannah for joining me. If you guys liked this video,
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: please hit like subscribe. If can not already subscribe to
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 1: the bellf notification, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: what you think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: and please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: of HPR News and we will talk to you all
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 1: in the next one.