Latest / Dark Psychology Manipulation / He Built Her Doubt: The Paper Trail That Gaslit Cynthia Wells

Transcript

He Built Her Doubt: The Paper Trail That Gaslit Cynthia Wells · Dark Psychology Manipulation

0:03
Speaker 1: On July eleventh, two thoy nineteen, a utility meter reader
0:08
Speaker 1: named Glenn Tucker opened a basement storage room he had
0:11
Speaker 1: accessed dozens of times before. What he found there had
0:15
Speaker 1: nothing to do with meters or pipes. Seven cardboard filing boxes,
0:21
Speaker 1: neatly labeled by year, were stacked against the wall. Every
0:25
Speaker 1: document inside them named the same person, Cynthia Wells apartment
0:31
Speaker 1: to see. Tucker photographed the boxes and called his supervisor.
0:36
Speaker 1: By the following morning, an Olmsted police detective was standing
0:39
Speaker 1: in that basement, and the question that would consume the
0:42
Speaker 1: next several months of investigation was not who had stored
0:46
Speaker 1: those boxes. The question was what exactly they had been
0:50
Speaker 1: built to do. This is not a story about violence.
0:53
Speaker 1: It is a story about precision, about how one man
0:56
Speaker 1: spent nearly a decade constructing a paper reality designed to
1:01
Speaker 1: make a woman doubt her own The case that followed
1:03
Speaker 1: would hinge on a digital access log, six spiral notebooks,
1:07
Speaker 1: and a cat named Oscar Haverfield Arms sits on Greston
1:12
Speaker 1: Place in Olmsted, Ohio. The building went up in nineteen
1:16
Speaker 1: sixty one, four stories of brick central stairwell units that
1:21
Speaker 1: run about twelve hundred square feet. By two thousand and nine,
1:25
Speaker 1: it was a solid, if unremarkable address, affordable stable, the
1:32
Speaker 1: kind of building where people stayed. Cynthia Wells moved into
1:36
Speaker 1: Apartment two Sea that fall. She was twenty eight years old.
1:40
Speaker 1: In two thousand nine, she worked as a billing coordinator,
1:43
Speaker 1: a job that required exactness, matching invoices, reconciling accounts, catching
1:50
Speaker 1: discrepancies before they compounded. Her neighboring two be a woman
1:54
Speaker 1: named Patrice Holt, later described her as quiet and precise.
1:59
Speaker 1: Those two were would come back repeatedly during the investigation.
2:03
Speaker 1: Cynthia was separated. At the time of her moving, she
2:07
Speaker 1: was building something new carefully. Her rent was six hundred
2:11
Speaker 1: forty dollars a month, well below market for comparable units
2:15
Speaker 1: in Olmsted, which by the end of the decade would
2:18
Speaker 1: run closer to fourteen hundred. She stayed because it worked,
2:22
Speaker 1: because it was hers. Ronald Mitchell had owned Haverfield Arms
2:28
Speaker 1: since two thousand four. He managed three small buildings in
2:31
Speaker 1: the area. No prior criminal record. People who dealt with
2:35
Speaker 1: him professionally described him as methodical, patient and reasonable. He
2:41
Speaker 1: was fifty three years old in two thousand ninety he
2:44
Speaker 1: presented in every visible way as the kind of landlord.
2:48
Speaker 1: Tenants were grateful to have The trouble, according to the
2:52
Speaker 1: evidence later compiled, started in the spring of two thousand ten.
2:56
Speaker 1: That was when the first formal notice arrived at a
3:00
Speaker 1: apartment to s a noise disturbance complaint. Cynthia had no
3:04
Speaker 1: recollection of causing one. She filed it away. These things
3:09
Speaker 1: happened in apartment buildings. She was not alarmed. She should
3:13
Speaker 1: have paid closer attention to the pattern. Over the next
3:17
Speaker 1: six years, notices continued to arrive, a faucet misuse violation,
3:22
Speaker 1: a claim of an unauthorized occupant, a complaint about windows
3:26
Speaker 1: screen damage. Each letter was formally worded, each carried the
3:31
Speaker 1: weight of official documentation, and for several years, Cynthia absorbed
3:36
Speaker 1: them the way most tenants absorbed low level bureaucratic friction,
3:39
Speaker 1: with mild frustration and no particular alarm. Then in twenty thirteen,
3:45
Speaker 1: a notice arrived alleging she was operating a home based
3:48
Speaker 1: business out of apartment to see it cited a city filing.
3:53
Speaker 1: A housing authority investigator named Iris Tatum was assigned to
3:58
Speaker 1: look into it. Tatum found no home based business. She
4:02
Speaker 1: also found that the city filing number on the notice
4:05
Speaker 1: did not correspond to any real filing by Cynthia. It
4:09
Speaker 1: had been transposed from a legitimate public document onto a
4:12
Speaker 1: complaint that bore no factual basis. That detail would not
4:16
Speaker 1: become significant until years later. By twenty fifteen, the accumulating
4:22
Speaker 1: pressure could worn something down in Cynthia. She began seeing
4:25
Speaker 1: a therapist named doctor Frank Ossa. She told him about
4:29
Speaker 1: the notices. She also told him that small things in
4:32
Speaker 1: her apartment seemed to shift a chair at a different angle,
4:36
Speaker 1: an item not where she had left it. Doctor Osai
4:40
Speaker 1: noted her reports carefully. He also noted in his records
4:44
Speaker 1: that stress could affect perception. He did not dismiss her,
4:47
Speaker 1: but he did not have an explanation. In twenty sixteen,
4:51
Speaker 1: her cat Oscar was diagnosed with a chronic condition requiring
4:54
Speaker 1: daily subcutaneous saline injections. Cynthia's veterinarian, doctor Nea Oconquo, taught
5:01
Speaker 1: her the procedure. Every morning at seven fifteen. Cynthia administered
5:06
Speaker 1: the treatment before leaving for work at approximately eight thirty.
5:09
Speaker 1: That routine, established out of medical necessity, would become one
5:14
Speaker 1: of the most important evidentiary anchors. In the entire case,
5:18
Speaker 1: she kept a treatment log, then another. By the time
5:22
Speaker 1: the investigation began, she had filled six spiral notebooks covering
5:26
Speaker 1: six years of treatment entries. Cynthia Wells was not a
5:30
Speaker 1: difficult tenant. She was not behind on rent. She was
5:34
Speaker 1: not a source of documented complaints from other residents. She was,
5:38
Speaker 1: by every available account, exactly who she appeared to be,
5:42
Speaker 1: a quiet, precise woman living alone with her cat, doing
5:46
Speaker 1: her job, keeping her records. What she could not yet
5:49
Speaker 1: see was that someone else was keeping records too. The
5:53
Speaker 1: first anomaly was a number, not a large one, not
5:57
Speaker 1: dramatic in the way numbers in court cases sometimes uns on,
6:01
Speaker 1: just a city filing number printed on an official looking
6:04
Speaker 1: notice that did not correspond to any real city filing
6:08
Speaker 1: by Cynthia Wells. She had no way to know that
6:11
Speaker 1: at the time Iris Tatum knew it. The housing Authority
6:14
Speaker 1: investigator had been assigned to look into the home business
6:17
Speaker 1: complaint in twenty thirteen. She went through the proper channels.
6:21
Speaker 1: She checked the filing number printed on Mitchell's notice against
6:25
Speaker 1: actual municipal records. The number existed, It belonged to a
6:29
Speaker 1: real public document, but that document had nothing to do
6:33
Speaker 1: with Cynthia Wells a pardon in two C Haverfield Arms.
6:38
Speaker 1: Someone had taken a legitimate filing number and placed it
6:42
Speaker 1: onto a fabricated complaint Tatum, who closed the case no
6:47
Speaker 1: home based business fact. The notice went into a file
6:51
Speaker 1: someone life continued. What no one connected not yet was
6:55
Speaker 1: that this was the third year of formally documented pressure
6:59
Speaker 1: on a single tenant. A noised disturbance notice in twenty ten,
7:04
Speaker 1: a faucet misuse citation, an unauthorized occupant warning, and now
7:10
Speaker 1: a fabricated business complaint carrying a borrowed city number to
7:13
Speaker 1: make it look real. Each notice, taken a loan, was
7:17
Speaker 1: the kind of paperwork any landlord might generate. Together, they
7:22
Speaker 1: were something else, But in two thousand thirteen, nobody was
7:26
Speaker 1: looking at them together. Between two thousand fifteen and two
7:30
Speaker 1: thousand nineteen, the Veritech keypad system at Haverfield Arms logged
7:35
Speaker 1: forty one after hours entries to Apartment two S from
7:38
Speaker 1: a single account, Ronald Mitchell's account. None of those entries
7:42
Speaker 1: had a corresponding work order. Walter Gibbs, the part time
7:46
Speaker 1: superintendent who had standard VERITEC access, testified that Mitchell never
7:51
Speaker 1: told him about any of these visits. Forty one entries,
7:55
Speaker 1: no work orders, no disclosure to staff. The pattern held
8:00
Speaker 1: one more detail that made it harder to dismiss as coincidence.
8:03
Speaker 1: Twenty seven of those forty one entries clustered inside a
8:07
Speaker 1: specific daily window after eight thirty in the morning. Cynthia
8:11
Speaker 1: left for work at approximately eight thirty. She administered Oscar's
8:15
Speaker 1: treatment at seven point fifteen and then departed. The Vertex
8:20
Speaker 1: system had, without knowing it, recorded the shape of a routine.
8:24
Speaker 1: Pete Sorrento installed the Veritech system in twenty eleven. He
8:28
Speaker 1: testified to two things. First, he had left an installation
8:33
Speaker 1: phase override credential with Mitchell during SETI. Second, Mitchell had
8:38
Speaker 1: specifically asked him whether the master credential covered access to
8:43
Speaker 1: the basement utility room. The basement utility room had physical locks,
8:48
Speaker 1: it had no Veritech door entry logging routine access was
8:52
Speaker 1: restricted to utility workers. Sorrento answered the question the credential
8:57
Speaker 1: did cover that room. At the time deemed like a
9:00
Speaker 1: reasonable question from a thorough building room. Now consider what
9:04
Speaker 1: was in that basement utility room in July of two thousand,
9:07
Speaker 1: nineteen seven. Filing boxes labeled by a year twenty ten
9:12
Speaker 1: through twenty sixteen, inside lease violation notices, maintenance work orders,
9:18
Speaker 1: housing authority correspondence. Every document bore the name Cynthia Wells
9:23
Speaker 1: and the unit designation Apartment two S. Glen Tucker found
9:28
Speaker 1: them on July eleventh, two thousand nineteen. Tucker was a
9:32
Speaker 1: meter reader with an eleven year route. He had been
9:34
Speaker 1: in that basement many times. The boxes were not hidden.
9:38
Speaker 1: They sat in a corner of the room, stacked and labeled.
9:41
Speaker 1: Tucker photographed them. He was not certain what he was
9:44
Speaker 1: looking at. He reported what he had found. Detective Kevin
9:48
Speaker 1: Marsh arrived the following morning. Marsh subpoenaed the vera Tech
9:52
Speaker 1: serverlogs in July of two thousand nineteen. What came back
9:56
Speaker 1: was not a list of maintenance visits. It was a
9:59
Speaker 1: record of access that had no operational explanation. Forty one
10:04
Speaker 1: entries after hours, no work orders matched to any of them.
10:09
Speaker 1: A cluster aligned with one woman's morning departure from her
10:13
Speaker 1: own apartment, but the logs pointed somewhere else too. Mitchell's
10:17
Speaker 1: Veritec account was connected to a cloud storage holder. When
10:21
Speaker 1: investigators accessed that folder, they found photographs not maintenance photographs,
10:26
Speaker 1: not building condition documentation, photographs of Cynthia's bank statements, a
10:32
Speaker 1: letter from her physician, a draft housing complaint written in
10:36
Speaker 1: a format that mirrored the notices already in the filing boxes.
10:41
Speaker 1: This is the detail that reframes everything before it, Every
10:44
Speaker 1: small shifted object Cynthia had mentioned to doctor Osa, the
10:48
Speaker 1: chair at a different angle, the item not where she
10:51
Speaker 1: left it had an explanation that was not stress. Someone
10:54
Speaker 1: had been inside her apartment. Someone had found her financial records,
10:58
Speaker 1: her medical correspondents and had photographed on them. The draft
11:03
Speaker 1: housing complaint in that folder suggested those documents were not
11:06
Speaker 1: there by accident. They were being used to build something.
11:10
Speaker 1: Lauren Lewis, a clinical social worker specializing in coercive control,
11:15
Speaker 1: was brought in as a prosecution consultant in August of
11:18
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. She worked with Cynthia. She also reviewed the
11:22
Speaker 1: full document record. Her assessment organized the campaign into four movements. First,
11:28
Speaker 1: a legitimacy campaign, authoritative looking documentation generated over years to
11:33
Speaker 1: create paper record of a problematic tendency which did not
11:37
Speaker 1: actually exist. Second, gaslighting, fabricated records designed to make Cynthia
11:42
Speaker 1: doubt what she knew to be true about her own life. Third,
11:47
Speaker 1: unauthorized entries intelligence gathering inside the apartment, combined with the
11:52
Speaker 1: psychological effect on a person who notices things moving but
11:56
Speaker 1: cannot explain why. Forth, the filing boxes dedructed counter narrative,
12:01
Speaker 1: stored in a room with no entry logging available. If
12:05
Speaker 1: Mitchell ever needed to demonstrate that Cynthia had been a
12:08
Speaker 1: documented problem all along, Cynthia's rent in twenty nineteen was
12:13
Speaker 1: seven hundred ninety dollars. Comparable units in that area were
12:18
Speaker 1: renting for fourteen hundred dollars a month. She had a
12:22
Speaker 1: below market lease she had held since two thousand nine.
12:26
Speaker 1: That fact does not appear in any official document from
12:28
Speaker 1: the investigation, but it sits beside every other fact, like
12:33
Speaker 1: a frame around a picture. Ronald Mitchell, in his September
12:37
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen profer, offered an explanation. He described himself as
12:42
Speaker 1: a reasonable landlord maintaining thorough records for a difficult tenancy.
12:47
Speaker 1: He said the credential access had been a matter of confusion.
12:51
Speaker 1: He denied any intent to intimidate picture the basement utility
12:56
Speaker 1: room on the morning Tucker found those boxes labeled by year.
13:03
Speaker 1: Seven years of documentation bearing one tenant's name, stored in
13:07
Speaker 1: the one room in the building with no digital entry.
13:11
Speaker 1: If someone needed to explain why so much paperwork existed,
13:15
Speaker 1: those boxes were the answer. If someone needed to retrieve
13:18
Speaker 1: or add to them without creating a record, the unlogged
13:21
Speaker 1: room was the method. The reasonable landlord account requires that
13:26
Speaker 1: the veritec entries were administrative oversights. It requires that forty
13:31
Speaker 1: one after hours visits left no work orders because of
13:35
Speaker 1: filing lapses. It requires that the cloud fold or containing
13:38
Speaker 1: Cynthia's bank statements and physician letter was assembled for some
13:42
Speaker 1: legitimate purpose that Mitchell chose not to describe. It requires
13:46
Speaker 1: that the installation phased credential question, specifically whether access extended
13:52
Speaker 1: to the unlogged basement order was idle curiosity. Each of
13:56
Speaker 1: those things, as individually possible. Together, the produced something the
14:01
Speaker 1: evidence does not support, But the investigation had already found
14:05
Speaker 1: something that moved past Mitchell's account before he made it.
14:09
Speaker 1: Amy Cho, a prosecution paralegal, located two former tenants at
14:14
Speaker 1: properties Mitchell had managed before Haverfield Arms. Lisa Ferris had
14:19
Speaker 1: rented in Granville from two thousand one to two thousand three.
14:23
Speaker 1: George Wen had rented in Dayton in two thousand six.
14:26
Speaker 1: Both reported similar patterns unauthorized entry complaints, official looking notices,
14:32
Speaker 1: housing authority correspondents that did not hold up on close examination.
14:37
Speaker 1: Neither case had produced charges at the time. Both had
14:40
Speaker 1: produced one outcome. The tenant left Cynthia Wells in two
14:44
Speaker 1: thousand nineteen still lived in Apartment two C. She had
14:48
Speaker 1: not left. Her rent was still seven ninety dollars. That,
14:53
Speaker 1: according to testimony in the case record, is the variable
14:56
Speaker 1: that made this time different from the others, not method.
15:00
Speaker 1: The method, the evidence suggested, was familiar. What was different
15:05
Speaker 1: was that Cynthia kept a cat who needed daily treatment
15:08
Speaker 1: at seven fifteen in the morning, and she kept a
15:10
Speaker 1: log of every session in spiral notebooks, and those note
15:14
Speaker 1: books placed her inside her apartment at a precise time
15:18
Speaker 1: every single day for three years, and one morning, a
15:22
Speaker 1: meter reader with an eleven year route happened to look
15:25
Speaker 1: at a corner of the basement that had always been there.
15:29
Speaker 1: Ronald Mitchell was arrested on August twenty second, twenty nineteen.
15:34
Speaker 1: The charges were unlawful entry, computer fraud under the Federal
15:38
Speaker 1: Stored Communications Statute and harassment under Ohio's Criminal Menacing Law.
15:45
Speaker 1: He was fifty three years old. He had no prior
15:48
Speaker 1: criminal record. He had described himself in his own proffer
15:52
Speaker 1: to prosecutors as a reasonable man. The trial lasted four
15:57
Speaker 1: days in February of twenty twenty. The jury deliberated for
16:01
Speaker 1: six hours. They convicted on all counts, six hours for
16:06
Speaker 1: a campaign that had run from two thousand ten through
16:08
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. The sentencing record shows thirty one months Mitchell
16:14
Speaker 1: served twenty two. The court also entered a consent agreement
16:18
Speaker 1: with the Olmsted Housing Authority requiring the sale at Hawerfield Arms.
16:23
Speaker 1: Under the terms of that agreement, Cynthia Wells was offered
16:26
Speaker 1: the right of first refusal on a renewed lease under
16:29
Speaker 1: the new ownership. She declined. There is nothing in the
16:32
Speaker 1: record that explains that decision in her own words, but
16:35
Speaker 1: the record does show what she chose instead, a ground
16:38
Speaker 1: floor unit in a smaller building four blocks away, a
16:42
Speaker 1: place where no one had ever photographed her bank statements,
16:45
Speaker 1: a place where the entry system had no master credential
16:48
Speaker 1: tied to anyone's name but her own. She and Oscar
16:52
Speaker 1: moved together. What the verdict could not undo was the
16:55
Speaker 1: decade it had taken to arrive. From twenty ten to
16:59
Speaker 1: two thousand ninetheen Cynthia had filed complaints that produced no action.
17:04
Speaker 1: She had told a therapist that objects in her apartment
17:06
Speaker 1: were being moved, and the therapist had gently suggested that
17:10
Speaker 1: stress might affect perception. She had received official looking letters
17:14
Speaker 1: from her own landlord, written in the language of municipal authority,
17:18
Speaker 1: using real document numbers transposed on too fabricated violations. She
17:23
Speaker 1: had been told repeatedly and through legitimate looking channels, that
17:28
Speaker 1: the problem was her. Lauren Lewis, the coercive control specialist
17:32
Speaker 1: who consulted for the prosecution, described the campaign in four
17:36
Speaker 1: phases during her testimony. First, the legitimacy campaign, a year's
17:41
Speaker 1: long accumulation of authoritative documentation designed to make Mitchell appear
17:46
Speaker 1: the aggrieved party. Second, systematic gaslighting, fabricated records constructed to
17:53
Speaker 1: undermine Cynthia's confidence in her own observations. Third, the unauthorized
17:59
Speaker 1: entries not just intelligence gathering, but a method of destabilization
18:03
Speaker 1: that worked precisely because it could never be proven from
18:07
Speaker 1: inside the apartment. Fourth, the filing boxes themselves, a physical
18:11
Speaker 1: counter narrative stored where Mitchell alone knew to find it
18:16
Speaker 1: ready to be produced if the campaign ever required formal justification.
18:20
Speaker 1: The boxes were never needed for their purpose. They became
18:24
Speaker 1: instead the evidence that ended him. That inversion, the archive
18:29
Speaker 1: built to protect Mitchell becoming the archive that convicted him
18:33
Speaker 1: is what the case record returns to repeatedly. He documented everything,
18:38
Speaker 1: so did Cynthia. The difference for nine years was that
18:42
Speaker 1: his documents were believed and hers were not. What changed
18:46
Speaker 1: was not the quality of her account. What changed was
18:50
Speaker 1: a meter reader who glanced at a corner of a
18:52
Speaker 1: basement utility room on a July morning and thought the
18:56
Speaker 1: filing boxes looked out of place. Glen Tucker tested trial.
19:01
Speaker 1: He explained his eleven year route, the routine nature of
19:04
Speaker 1: the visit, the moment he saw the boxes. He identified
19:08
Speaker 1: his photographs as the ones he had taken that day.
19:11
Speaker 1: He was a utility worker doing a scheduled read. That
19:15
Speaker 1: was all. The case record shows that Tucker and Cynthia
19:18
Speaker 1: Wells have never met. They have never spoken, but Tucker
19:22
Speaker 1: keeps a copy of the local newspaper article about the
19:25
Speaker 1: conviction in his work truck. He has not said publicly why.
19:30
Speaker 1: Oscar was seventeen years old when the trial ended In
19:34
Speaker 1: February of twenty twenty, he was still receiving his saline
19:38
Speaker 1: treatment at seven fifteen every morning. Cynthia still kept the log.
19:43
Speaker 1: By the end of the trial, it filled six spiral notebooks,
19:47
Speaker 1: covering six years of entries. Those notebooks had begun as
19:51
Speaker 1: a medical record for a cat with a chronic diagnosis.
19:54
Speaker 1: They became without anyone intending it. The most precise corroboration
19:59
Speaker 1: in the case a daily time stamp in Cynthia's handwriting
20:03
Speaker 1: that placed her inside apartment to sea at the exact
20:06
Speaker 1: hour Mitchell's system was logging him out. She had not
20:10
Speaker 1: kept the note books to protect herself. She had kept
20:14
Speaker 1: them because Oscar needed her there. That is the detail
20:17
Speaker 1: that resists easy framing. Not the conviction, not the sentence,
20:22
Speaker 1: not the sale of Haverfield arms. The detail that stays
20:26
Speaker 1: is this, the mechanism that ultimately protected Cynthia. Was not
20:30
Speaker 1: a complaint she filed, not a lawyer she retained, not
20:33
Speaker 1: a system that recognized what was happening to her. It
20:37
Speaker 1: was a routine she built around the needs of an
20:39
Speaker 1: animal who could not speak for what he required. The
20:42
Speaker 1: case raised questions that the verdict alone does not answer
20:47
Speaker 1: the Spheris left her rental in Granville in two thousand three.
20:51
Speaker 1: George Wenn left his in Date in two thousand six.
20:55
Speaker 1: Neither departure produced charges. The pattern those tenancies represent methodical
21:01
Speaker 1: document official in appearance did not become visible until prosecution
21:06
Speaker 1: Parallelllgal went looking, sixteen years after it began. The record
21:11
Speaker 1: does not say whether there were others between Ferris and When,
21:15
Speaker 1: or between When and Haverfield Arms. It does not say
21:19
Speaker 1: whether there were others inside Haverfield Arms who are not
21:23
Speaker 1: named in the case file. What it says is that
21:25
Speaker 1: the method, when it worked, left no complainant in place
21:29
Speaker 1: to be interviewed. Cynthia Wells stayed. That is the single
21:34
Speaker 1: fact that made this case possible. Not because staying was
21:38
Speaker 1: safe or because the system rewarded her for it. She
21:41
Speaker 1: stayed because the rent was seven hundred ninety dollars a
21:45
Speaker 1: month in a market where comparable units ran fourteen hundred,
21:49
Speaker 1: and she had a cat who needed her home at
21:51
Speaker 1: seven fifteen, and she had nowhere else she could afford
21:55
Speaker 1: to go. The outcome arrived in the form it did
21:59
Speaker 1: because of a meter reader, a digital access log, and
22:03
Speaker 1: six notebooks kept for a tabby cat with a kidney condition.
22:07
Speaker 1: What Cynthia Wells understood and what the nine years before
22:11
Speaker 1: the conviction demonstrate, is that a person's reality can be
22:15
Speaker 1: dismantled without a single raised voice, without a threat anyone
22:20
Speaker 1: can point to, without a moment that looks from the
22:23
Speaker 1: outside like anything other than a landlord keeping thorough records.
22:28
Speaker 1: The machinery of it is patience, The camouflage is paperwork,
22:33
Speaker 1: and the damage accumulates in the gap between what a
22:36
Speaker 1: person knows to be true and what anyone around them
22:39
Speaker 1: is prepared to believe. She lives four blocks away now
22:43
Speaker 1: ground floor. Her name is on the lease. This show
22:47
Speaker 1: is made by Obomedia.