Latest / The Bill Handel Show / LAUSD Supt. Carvalho’s Bet on AI Went Bust | Human Females & Neanderthal Males

Transcript

LAUSD Supt. Carvalho’s Bet on AI Went Bust | Human Females & Neanderthal Males · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You're list Saints k i AM six forty The Bill
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Handles show on demand on the iHeartRadio app k AM
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: six forty.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: Bill Handle here, good morning.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: It is a foody Friday, as Handle Anything Friday. Some
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: of the big stories we are looking at. Former President
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Bill Clinton is to be questioned today of his past
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and looks like plus documents actually
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: show that Clinton travel on Epstein's private plane sixteen times.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: We don't know if he was on the plane or not,
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: but there was certainly some connection. Yesterday it was Hillary
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: Clinton who had no connection to Epstein. It didn't matter.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: The committee, Republican Committee was nailing her anyway. And Jewish
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: advocacy groups are suing California in the Educasement Department alleging
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: that the state ignored pervasive anti Semitic harassment of Jewish
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: and Israeli students in public schools. But they have a
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: defense and that is everybody hates the Jews, and Judge's
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: going to go, yeah, yeah, pretty much, that's true. You're right,
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: case dismissed, all right. The ongoing story of the La
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Unified School District and Superintendent Alberto Carvallo now in March
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty four, he introduced ed Hey here's ed.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: Ed is an AI was an AI chatbot and it
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: was supposed to revolutionize how the districts dealt with students
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: and teachers, and it was going to put LA Unified
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: at the leading edge of school technology. The problem is
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: the project failed within months and was never fully launched.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: So now here comes the deal. They're looking at the
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: deal itself. This is the FBI and Carvallo's longtime association
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: with this woman, Deborah Kerr, a Florida consultant who helped
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: sell the technology to the LA district, and that's part
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: of the FBI's investigation. And what set this story off
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: is early morning raids on Wednesday at Carvallo's home, his office,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: and a home owned by care in Florida. So the
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: contract was signed with this Boston based startup called al Here.
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: We heard that in the news, but.
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: Behind the scenes, as the contract was was being set up, negotiated,
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: and signed, the company was collapsing and ultimately declared bankruptcy
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: and its owner was indicted on allegations that she defrauded investors,
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: and the charges against her were filed eight months after
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: she and Carvallo stood side by side of the unveiling
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: of the chatbot and that picture.
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: Well, it's not doing Carvallo any good.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: And so now you have this expansion and the activities
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: and records of the Carvallo and Care looking at by
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: the FBI.
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: Now, interestingly enough, on this one.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Care, who was the agent who represented out Here to
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: actually Miami Dade, that school district of which Carvallo was
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: head of. She says that I'll here oser six hundred
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: and thirty thousand dollars and she is suing or is
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: a creditor.
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: So this thing gets a little complicated, but the.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: Bottom line is Carvallo's relationship with Care and being part
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: of the negotiations and the signing of the all Here
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: contract which literally just collapsed. Carballo said he had nothing
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: to do with the signing. He was not negotiating it.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: It was the school board. Don't know the answer to that,
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: And the FBI has said where at least sources with
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: knowledge of the event have said that it's Carvallo and
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: not the school district that's the focus of the investigation. Yes, sir,
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: yesterday there was a meeting of the board of LA
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: and the sole agenda item was public Employment, General Superintendent
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: of Schools.
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: That was it.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: They were just talking about Carvallo. We don't know, by
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: the way, what's going on. So you've got the founder
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: of all here, Smith Griffin, indicted in November twenty twenty four,
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: and the hearings in her case have been repeatedly pushed back,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: back back, and the most recent one came in September.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: The prosecutor wanted some additional time to basically discuss a
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: plea bargain. That's what they're in the middle of doing.
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: Now here are the politics of this thing. The Trump
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: administration and Bill s. A. Lee or Sli, first Assistant
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: US Attorney for Southern California under Trump, is particularly focused
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: on fraud. Now the administration has been accused by various
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: political forces on the other side, the democratic side, that
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: the law enforcement arm of the federal government is targeting
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: perceived political enemies. Also former federal law enforcement employees saying
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: the same thing, Why would that, Why would they go
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: after Carvallo so diligently and to such a level. Well,
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: Carvallo has been outspoken in his defense of immigrant rights
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: with LAUSD, his criticism of Donald Trump, his opposition to
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: the administration's opposition to diversity equity inclusion programs. Now, on
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: the other side of it, the federal case against Smith
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Griffin began even before Trump took office. So now the
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: question is are they going even further? Are they moving
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: ahead where they have dropped the investigation? But for the
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: fact that Carvallo is anti Trump, don't know the answer
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: to that. I do know that the President the administration
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: is going after perceived enemies. There is no question. I
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: don't know who doesn't think that's the case. Where it's
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: very selective enforcement, there's no question. As I've said over
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: and over again, well let me put it this way.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: You're going to see the agents, the immigration agents, the
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: ICE agents, border patrol agents, who have been shooting people
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: and violating all rights. They are all going to be cleared.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: As far as Christy Gnoam is concerned, she's never walked
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: back her statements that Renee Good and Richard or yeah,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: Richard pretty were domestic terrorists who were there to kill
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: ICE agents.
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: She's never walked that back.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: And so you'll see ICE agents absolutely being.
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: Well, their position will be validated. It was a legitimate shooting.
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: The people who protest against the immigration are all terrorists.
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: They're all there to obstruct justice. And here's a case
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: against Carvallo. And here's the problem. It may be totally legitimate,
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: it may be completely legitimate and would have and it
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: has no implications at all politically, and had Trump not
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: been there, still would have gone forward as such.
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: But look at this.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: Every time there is one of these, the question mark
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: immediately comes up, Immediately, an investigation is tainted. And I'm
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: ending this with the best example I've said over and
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: over again.
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: Tom Holman, who is the czar, is the immigration zar.
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: There is a.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: Video of him being handed money by an FBI agent,
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: undercover FBI agent, a cash of money, say fifty thousand dollars,
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: and Pam Bondi said, we have investigated it thoroughly and
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: we find no evidence to go forward with any kind
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: of prosecution.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: All Right.
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: The latest chapter and probably the final chapter, in the
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: purchasing of Netflix, and that is what happened with Warner
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: Brothers Discovery. There's been a fight between Netflix and Warner Brothers,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: and we're talking about the buying. I always get confused
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: here that Netflix was going to buy Warner Brothers, as
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: was as was Paramount owned by the Ellisons. Okay, so
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: what happened? Well, Netflix had the deal, right, I mean
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: they had the deal. The board of Warner Brothers said yes,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: we're going for it, and Paramount comes in, Paramount sky
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: Dance comes in and says, no, we want to buy
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: it unsolicited hostile bid, which Netflix said, no, we've got
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: a deal, and you certainly had Warner Bers. They're saying, yeah,
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: we have a deal, we're selling to Netflix. Well the Ellisons,
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: well they don't take no for a an answer. You've
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: got Larry Ellison, who is one of the richest men
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: in the world, probably top five. His son David Ellison
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: is leading the charge here and has set up his company,
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: Paramount sky Dance, and he is moving into literally controlling
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: a huge swath of the media. And here is why
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Warner Brothers Warner switch gears and went, Okay, we're gonna
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: go to Paramount. We're undoing our Netflix deal. Is because
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: the Ellisons want Warner and the Ellisons have billions of dollars.
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: And guess what else they have. They have the administration
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: on their side. And how do we know this, Well,
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: because an investigation was started by the administration of the
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: deal with Netflix and Warner somehow it is antitrust and
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden that's disappeared when Warners is now
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: being sold to Paramount. On top of that, over the weekend,
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: when Trump did his speech, the elder Ellison Larry Ellison
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: ended up sitting next to Lindsay Graham at the State
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: of the Union as his guest. YEP, it's all over
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: the place now. Warner Brothers said after looking at the
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: offer that the deal from Paramount is a superior proposal,
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: which it is. They're offering more money. And originally when
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: they were considering Paramount, they said, Paramount's bid, we don't
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: care because there's no guarantees here. And that's when Larry
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: Elson came in and said, okay, I'll guarantee it personally,
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: and all of a sudden that changed everything. And the
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: problem is is now the politics have come into it.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: Susan Rice is on the board, is on the board
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: of Warner and she is not a big friend of
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. She is, i would say, an enemy, one
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: of those that would be a perceived enemy. She doesn't
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: talk very well of him. Over the weekend, President Trump
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: threatens Netflix if you don't fire Susan Rice, from your board.
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: You'll be paying the consequences.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: Okay, Now this is the president talking to a private
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: organization saying you fire this person from the board, or
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: you will pay the consequences. And the administration can stop
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: the deal cold. All it has to do is determine
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: that it is in violation of the Sherman anti trust laws,
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: and there the investigation starts in the government can say no,
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: and then you have an entire legal issue going on
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: for years and years. The bottom line is, of course
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: this thinks to high heaven. Naturally it does. And I
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: just hate, I just hate the politics of this. And
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice opened an investigation determine whether it
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: was going to block Netflix's proposal to take over Warner
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: And now there will be no investigation of Paramount Skydance
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: taking over Warner Why because you've got the Ellisons who
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: control Paramount sky Dance. They are allies of the President
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: of the administration.
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: So this is going to go through.
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: By the way, over the weekend, the President said he
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: would stay out of the Netflix versus Paramount battle, but
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: since he said that in a social media post, he
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: said Netflix must immediately big capital letters on immediately fire
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: Rice from its board.
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, doesn't stop, does it, man, it just doesn't stop.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: Boa And by the way, if this deal goes through
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: and it's going to the Ellisons are going to own
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: an insane amount of influence. They're going to have a
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: just a crazy amount of infinities. Also, they're probably going
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: to go for CNN, and they're going to go for CBS,
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: which is part of it. They have that it's going
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: to go. You're going to see probably the most powerful
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: group that is Paramount Sundance owned by the Ellisons, the
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: most influential group in news in the country. Also, you know,
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: you've got Superman and you've got Batman as part of
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: this whole deal.
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's great stuff, isn't it. All? Right?
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: Here is something that we are doing in the United States,
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: and that is not holding the bit the rich and
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: the powerful and the politically connected and the politicos yes,
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: responsible accountable for their crimes. Easy for me to say.
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: For example, former Brazilian president Jaira bol Sonaro was convicted
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: of trying to overthrow the government in a January sixth
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: style coup. South Korea, Yun Suk yul has just been
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: convey it's going to do jail time. Marcin and Romanski,
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: former deputy Justice minister in the right wing Polish government,
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: is in hiding because the authorities are going after him
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: for misusing funds. The former Prince Andrew he of course
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: you know what happened to him, and the former UK
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: ambassador the United States has been arrested for the well
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: actually he was arrested for financial misgivings, but was investigated
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: to be involved with Epstein. So when you look at
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump, who is pardoning all of these high brow folks,
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: hey man, he is just the last player to come
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: to the game. I mean this goes way back and
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: actually started with the pardon of Richard Nixon by Gerald Ford.
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: Nixon was he was looking at going to jail, obstruction
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: of justice, I mean, big time. They had him and
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: he resigned and gerald Ford pardoned him immediately, And all
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: of a sudden, it looks like the pardons and the authorities,
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: the US government leaving all these bad guys alone. The
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: point is in overseas, people connected to Epstein are being nailed,
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: and corruption is being nailed. Here, corruption is great, corruption
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: is accepted when bad things happen to bad people. Here,
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: pardons come down the pike. Investigations are dropped. But that's
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: only for those that are very wealthy and well connected,
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: by the way. I mean, let's go back, Okay. The
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: Reagan administration engaged in blatant violations of federal law during
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: the Iran Contra scandal, and that is arms was to
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: be given to the Iranian regime because they were fighting
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: the bad guy, Saddam Hussein, and he couldn't use law.
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: Wouldn't let Reagan use federal money. Congress they passed the
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: law saying you can't do that. So what he does
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: is secretly use the finance to support death squads in Nicaragua,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: and money then out of that came to the Iranians.
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: George W.
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: Bush HW pardoned all of the officials implicated.
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: In the Iran Contra when he came into office, just
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: pardoned everybody.
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: Everybody was okay with that because they were fighting, they
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: were fighting communism. Bill Clinton, as you know, light under oath,
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: was impeached, then was acquitted in the Senate and he
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: was convicted of perjury and a lot of American support
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: of that too, because they sympathized with lying about infidelity,
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: a very little known law by the way that was
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: not brought up publicly is that if a public official
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: does have a married public official does have sex with
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: someone other than his wife, then by law he cannot
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: admit it or tell her. I mean, it's just that simple.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: I'm making that up, by the way. And then you
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: got the Supreme Court of Barack Obama, right, we're going
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: to look forwards and not backwards, does not hold accountable
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: one person responsible for the two thousand and eight financial crisis,
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: where pure fraud existed by bankers, no one got nailed,
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: and the Great Recession fraud, no one got nailed.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: That was Obama.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: And so the problem is you've got a Supreme Court
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: also that happens to like a criminality. I mean, what
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: the president did certainly in the twenty twenty election or
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: subsequent to the twenty twenty election and January sixth, and
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: all of it goes on. The Court has said that
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: the president is completely immune from any prosecution. Why because
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: it's if he's doing it in the national interests, then
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: he cannot be prosecuted. And did Donald Trump not try
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: to overturn the twenty twenty election as a national interest
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: because it was a rigged election? Well, the argument is
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: he certainly believed that, and he was going for that.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: So the big and the beautiful and the powerful get
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: away with everything. All right, Now, we're gonna have fun.
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: Your spouse and you think your husband or your boyfriend
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: is a Neanderthal, well that may be truer than you think,
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: because it turns out this is science. Now I love
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: quoting science. Humans and Neanderthals stooped from time to time
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: when they lived in the same area. We're talking tens
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: of thousands of years ago, but we didn't know about
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: much who stooped, whom Neanderthal men stooping human women or
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: the other way around. So there's a new genetic analysis,
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: and here's some news. The pairings these stoopings were more
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: often female humans with male Neanderthals. Hasn't changed today, by
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: the way, Now, how does this happen?
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: Okay?
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: I did human women venture into Neanderthal populations like their
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: version of a cub fifty four? I'm going to get
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: in here. Were the Neanderthal males drawn to larger human enclaves.
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: That's one good looking babe, doesn't have that high brow
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: but still pretty good looking. Were the interactions peaceful confusing?
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: Were they violent? Was their rape involved? Were they secretive?
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: Hey baby, let's go around the corner. According to population
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: genetics expert Jinjiang the University of Michigan, hen he's looking this.
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: I don't know if we'll ever get a definitive answer
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: how this happened, because we can't travel back in time.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: But this study is a study published in the Journal
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: of Science shows that whenever Neanderthals and modern humans have
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: made it, there's always been a preference for male neanderthals
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: female modern humans as opposed to the other way around.
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: How do they know this, Well, you look at DNA.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: They can find stuff with DNA that is just crazy.
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: Who did what? How far back we go?
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: Didn't it isn't that has not DNA proved that man
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: mankind came from Africa?
• 20:24
  Speaker 2: And don't they have a patient zero at this point?
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: I think they do.
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: Now there's a whole bunch of science about chromosomes and
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: neanthrothol neanderthal DNA that I want to get into, and
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: the human genome that the scientists looked at and how
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: it got interspersed during a mating event, a mating event.
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: Two hundred and fifty thousand years ago. They tracked it
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: back that far.
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: So the most likely explanation for this combination of chromosomes
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: and genes go back to that era of Neanderthal and
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: human DNA, and the most likely explanation is they stooped.
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: That's because the way sex chromosomes are passed from parents
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: to children. And so Joshua Aiki, who studies evolutionary genomics, God, okay,
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: why not at Princeton University didn't even know there was
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: such a thing. Joshua says, I think they've taken some
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: really important steps Phillian missing pieces of the puzzle, which.
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: I don't understand why this is so important.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: It's fun, but people are I guess it's a PhD
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: thesis Somewhere. When did Neanderthals and humans first start shopping?
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: Was there a kind of website that they could look at?
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: The simplest and the most likely explanation, according to Aki,
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: is not the result of a strictly Darwinian survival of
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: the fittest. The fact that Neanderthal has disappeared. It's really
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: a result of how we interact with each other, what
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: our culture, society, and behavior is like. And we're finding
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: out more and more about the Neanderthals. And they're not
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: as dumb as we think. I mean, they looked a
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: little strange. But and I wonder if there wasn't Neanderthal
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: DNA and they can't tell us that, would we look different?
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: Would we be different? Now?
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: The studies seem to show skeletonly when they find these skeletons. No,
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: I mean humans are humans and Neanderthals or the Neanderthals,
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: and never the Twain shall meet. Well it turned out
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: the Twain did meet, So there you go. So when
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: you think your spouse is Neanderthal, you know what, you're
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: probably right?
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: All right, This is KFI A M six forty. You've
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: been listening to the Bill Handle Show.
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: Catch my Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio out