Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Misogyny is now TERRORISM! Sex robots can now say NO if they aren't in the mood | HBR News 468

Transcript

Misogyny is now TERRORISM! Sex robots can now say NO if they aren't in the mood | HBR News 468 · Honey Badger Radio

• 1:46
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number. What is this number anyway?
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: Four sixty eight.
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: Misogyny is now terrorism. Sex robots can now say no
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: if they aren't in the mood where we discuss the
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I hope
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: you guys are doing well this week and that you're
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: laughing at all of this absurdity so that you are
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian Martinez,
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: and I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts,
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: doctor Randa Mcam and Hannah Wallin. On today's HBr News shows,
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: we have more insanity of the week this week. We're
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: gonna be talking about, well, it's actually kind of a
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: slower week, like there's a lot of insanity but is
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: concentrated in like a specific in specific places. So we're
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: gonna be talking about news that Telsea gabbartt is planning
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: to sue the Biden DOJ. Misogyny is now going to
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: be treated as terrorism. Sex robots can have headaches and
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: decide they're not in the mood anymore and more so,
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: stick around. It's gonna be a good time. Sorry, sex
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: robot Bros. Sorry, So for the Patron Show. We try
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: to keep the Patrin shows lighter these days. So I
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: have this post on Twitter. This could turn into.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: A much bigger conversation anyway.
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: But there's this person on Twitter named Ali who is
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: trying to essentially inform men that women do not find
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: men with hobbies attractive. Now, she targets video games, but
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: there is a chart that she puts up where she
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: goes into all manner of hobbies.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: So essentially, what I think she's.
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: Getting at is is guys, fellas, if you're not doing
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: stuff for women and to like make women's lives better
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: and more comfortable, then you're useless and you shouldn't be
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: allowed to I guess, like have any of the things
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: that might give you a little bit of a sense
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: of like, you know, relaxation or zen or whatever.
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: You can't have it. So this is the thing.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: She's basically telling us that women hate video games and
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: they hate men who play video games.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: So I don't know we're gonna get us.
• 3:58
  Speaker 3: Women hate men, she's telling me, as women don't think
• 4:01
  Speaker 3: men are human and men don't need an outlet for
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: the stress they build up in their daily lives or
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: the creativity that doesn't get used for their jobs or
• 4:09
  Speaker 3: any kind of stress release or any kind of me time.
• 4:13
  Speaker 3: And I'll bet she spends hours, nine minutes, but hours
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: a week on her beauty routine or.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: Like watching reality TV or.
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: Something even you know, just TV is something that you
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: can share with another person. But you know, doing your
• 4:30
  Speaker 3: nails and getting your hair done and all of the
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: different things that I'm allergic to that I don't do
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: because I'm allergic to them, and that women waste time
• 4:40
  Speaker 3: on with regard to their beauty routine. Like the same
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: women who are doing all of that shit, who are
• 4:47
  Speaker 3: taking taking up the bathroom for half the day, who
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: are dedicating a buttload of time to their me time,
• 4:57
  Speaker 3: their stress release, their self satisfact, get mad that the
• 5:03
  Speaker 3: guys spends some time doing mental exercises that use gameplay
• 5:09
  Speaker 3: as their format. Yeah, yeah, this is this is going
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: to be an after show that you'll see me participating
• 5:15
  Speaker 3: in quite a bit.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Hannah's got a lot to say about that.
• 5:19
  Speaker 4: I'm going to go off.
• 5:21
  Speaker 5: I was going to say I was surprised that tax
• 5:24
  Speaker 5: dermy is so low on the list, because taxidermy is
• 5:26
  Speaker 5: a pretty fucking creepy thing to do as a hobby.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: I think it's at I think it's kind of high
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: on the list considering, I.
• 5:33
  Speaker 5: Mean, what what counts as a hobby, Because there are
• 5:35
  Speaker 5: some men who like murdering children and collecting their skulls
• 5:38
  Speaker 5: and necklaces and shit.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: Oh wait, women love that, don't they. I love serial killers?
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: They do, they do.
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: It's funny that taxidermy ranked higher than comic book collecting.
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: I guess that's how bad the comic book industry is.
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: And bird watching. But anyway, we'll look get into that
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: in the Patrons Show. If you want to join us
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: in the Patron Show, you have to become a badgery
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: yourself by going to feed the Badge dot com forward
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: slash Subscribe five bucks months will get you into our
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: discord where you'll be able to watch all of the
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: additional content, and if you give it higher levels, you
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: can even be a part of the conversation and join
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: us in the chat on discord. And if you don't
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: want to wake up one morning to find that we've
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: been needed from the Internet, please go to badgerfeed dot com.
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: That's badgerfeed dot com or honey Badger Radio dot com
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: So Allison's got She's got her fingers in many pots,
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: and she likes to like remain hard to pin down
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: because we are obviously on a list, and there are
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: people watching, Hello Feds, so you know, keep them guessing.
• 6:37
  Speaker 4: Right, more than one list, no, I.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Said, multiple lists?
• 6:41
  Speaker 4: Yeah, multiple list.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we're on lists. We're on lists of lists, that's correct.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: More are so anyway.
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, So with all that said, let us get into
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: today's story.
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna, like I said, it's kind of light.
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: But I thought there was one thing that came across
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: my desk this morning that I thought I would share
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: with you guys.
• 7:05
  Speaker 6: So.
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: Phil Donahue, the legendary TV journalist and host of his
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: show Phil Donahue Show, passed away at the age of
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: eighty eight. His groundbreaking talk show, which aired from nineteen
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: sixty seven to nineteen ninety six, was known for tackling
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: lots of different controversial issues. He even had Warren Ferrell
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: on as a guest at least once. Donahue Show was
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: also the first to incorporate audience participation, a format that
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: that became a staple in modern talk shows and influenced
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: future hosts like Oprah Winfrey. He has survived by his wife,
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: Marlo Thomas, along with his children, grandchildren, and his golden
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: retriever Charlie. So I don't know, I mean I used to.
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: I didn't watch a lot of it, but Phil Donahue
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: was kind of a big deal as far as talk TV,
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: and I thought I would make a mention that he
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: is no longer with us, so well, I don't know,
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: if you guys want to say anything.
• 7:57
  Speaker 3: Most of his viewers were probably women for the fact
• 8:02
  Speaker 3: that his show was on during the daytime. Like the
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: only time I ever would run across it flipping through
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: channels was when I was home from school sick, and uh,
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: you know, that's that's the only time I was home
• 8:15
  Speaker 3: from school when I wasn't outside. So yeah, he probably
• 8:19
  Speaker 3: had a lot of women, oh for sure, watching his show.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Like you know, like you know, yeah, he had a
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: lot of.
• 8:29
  Speaker 3: Controversial guests one so but the fact that he the
• 8:35
  Speaker 3: fact that he had Warren Ferrell on on a show
• 8:39
  Speaker 3: that is probably mostly watched by women, it was a
• 8:42
  Speaker 3: really good thing.
• 8:43
  Speaker 4: Yeah, And that's that's a really good.
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: Thing in that it gets the issue across from somebody
• 8:50
  Speaker 3: who like nobody nobody in the right mind could look
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: at at Warren Ferrell and think, you know, scary bad man,
• 9:00
  Speaker 3: like he is very very professional, very mild mannered. He's
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: absolutely nothing like me. Right, I'm an asshole, I'm scary.
• 9:10
  Speaker 3: I've been told that enough times that I like, fine,
• 9:13
  Speaker 3: I'm gonna embrace scary.
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: Right, But this guy is.
• 9:17
  Speaker 3: Like having your dad or your older brother explain it
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: to you in the gentlest terms possible. So if women
• 9:25
  Speaker 3: can't accept the message that men are human from him
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: on a format that is made for them to consume, like,
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: there's no hope, yep. And so that that basically was
• 9:41
  Speaker 3: one of the one of the best things that mister
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: Donahue could have done was to bring Warren Ferrell on
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: his show in the daytime what women would be watching,
• 9:54
  Speaker 3: and and give him the opportunity to be that gentle explainer.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: And I will say that, like, you know, one thing
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: that I thought was interesting about this is that Phil
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: Donnie who started the whole thing about the talk show
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: where you bring on controversial guests and you get audience participation.
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: But I think a lot of people take for granted
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: that he started it, and they credit Oprah with it
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: and I Oprah came after, so I think that is
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: also worth pointing out that, you know, Phil Donad, he
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: was doing it first.
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: Sorry ladies. And on top of that.
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: The other thing about Warren Ferrell I wanted to mention
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: is is that unfortunately, and I appreciate Warren Ferrell's approach
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: because I think it does it does have a place
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: in this conversation. But the people who oppose him, which
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: are the same people who oppose us, and people like
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: Aaron Pittsy, who is just like a gentle old lady,
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: they do not care how gentle you are. They will
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: claim that the way that you deliver your message matters,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: but they really don't care. Like they treat Warren Ferrell
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: terribly in the media and when they protest him and stuff,
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: and it still goes on. I mean, he gets he
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: gets to make appearances on you know, Larry Elder and
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: stuff like that, and that's great. But yeah, I mean
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: like when he gets attacked, it's with the same kind
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: of vitriol that anybody else does. It's just like, you know,
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: you need you need Warren Ferrell's and you need Paul
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: Elam's this game, just need both.
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: So Warren Ferrell one of the things that he does,
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: and he may not even be trying to do it,
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: just you know, it just may be a side effect,
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: but he exposes exactly how bitchy and mean and aggressive
• 11:39
  Speaker 3: those women are.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm yep.
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: But anyway, I don't know if this is just a
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: little story. I don't know if anybody else wants to
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: add anything, but just like, you know, rest in peace,
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: feel down to you really appreciate that you were at
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: least interested in bringing Warren Ferrell on your show and
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: like entertaining these ideas about men's issues, and you know
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: everything else you did. I mean, like he gave the
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: Klan a platform. Why not let's hear them out, you know.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: So yeah, anyway, anybody else got anything to say? All right,
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: So I'm gonna move on to the next story. Meredith
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: g gave us five bucks super chow.
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: Meredith, and I got it working on.
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: On the what you call it, h.
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: On obs now and she says, HBr news for sixty
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: eight honey for the Badger's no additional comment, thank you.
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: If you guys want to send a super uh chow
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: any point during the stream, it'll basically be like less
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: censored than like super chats, and you'll we will get
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: more of the money because Google takes a big chunk
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: of the super chat.
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: You can go to feed the badger dot com.
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: Forward slash just the tip and give a little super
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: chow to badcher Chan. All right, so we're gonna move
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: on to the next story. Let us know you guys
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: think about this one in the comments. So next we
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: got Tolsie Gabbard is in the news. Years after her
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: ousting from the Democrat Party, which included the likes of
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton suggesting that she was a groomed Russian asset, Telsey,
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: Gabbard once again finds herself being targeted by the Democratic establishment.
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: After spending the last several years speaking out against the
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: Biden administration, it came to her attention through Federal Air
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: Marshall whistleblowers that she had been placed on the Quiet
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: Skies program, better known as one of their terror watch lists.
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: This revelation is especially shocking as Gabbard was once a
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: member of Congress and is also a US military veteran.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: Gabbard plans on taking legal action against the Biden admin
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: over this House issue or over this issue, stating on Twitter,
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: quote my own government, my president, my commander in chief,
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: is targeting me as a potential domestic terrorist. The closet
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: word that comes to mind is a complete sense of betrayal.
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: After serving over twenty one years and continuing to serve
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: in our nation's military, my own government has labeled and
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: is targeting me direct now as a domestic terrorist. They're
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: using people like the Air Marshals as weapons and pawns
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: to target their political opponents. Of course, there's no explanation given,
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: which is why we are taking legal recourse. Obviously, I've
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: been very outspoken about the dangers of the Biden Harris
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: administration to our democracy and to our freedom and to
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: our national security.
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: This is what happens as a result. End quote.
• 14:24
  Speaker 3: This is getting to the point where your average person
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: should be aware we're watching a would be totalitarian government,
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: a government.
• 14:38
  Speaker 4: That is full of people who feel.
• 14:40
  Speaker 3: Entitled to be totalitarian, not just would like to be,
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: but feel like it's it should be their right to
• 14:48
  Speaker 3: do that, taking action against anybody who disagrees with them,
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: has any level of dissent, does any level of keeping
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: watch over them to make sure that they're not doing
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: wrong to the people, which they are, and so on, Like,
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: we're now to the point where it's.
• 15:12
  Speaker 4: It's just flat out.
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: Mm hmm. It's just flat out a threat. And it's
• 15:20
  Speaker 3: not about I hate the phrase our democracy. Right, we
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: keep hearing about our democracy. We do not have a democracy.
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: We don't live in a democracy. More than half the
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: public doesn't vote at least part of the time, and
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: almost half the public never votes, so that's not a democracy, right.
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: And and in addition, we don't directly vote for the
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: individual for most of most of the time, So you
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: you really don't have people are voting for party for
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: the first for for for the most part, and you
• 15:59
  Speaker 3: really don't have a democracy in that instance. You have
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: you have more of a situation where the news media
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: is telling you who should be running your country and
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: people are just automatically giving it to them.
• 16:12
  Speaker 6: Right.
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: But we're in a situation where our government is now
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: attacking the people for basically expecting the thing that we
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: keep getting told that we have our democracy. We haven't
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: had a democracy in a long time. I imagine that Tulsi
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: Gabbard's not the only one that's being falsely targeted like this,
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: because this is a false allegation. She's not a terrorist.
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: She's not going to blow things up. She's not going
• 16:43
  Speaker 3: to commit any kind of crime against the public or
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: against property, against any individual people, or against the government.
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: She's probably not even making mistakes on our taxes. Right,
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: She's probably the most meticulous person about that because and
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: I know this about a lot of people that are
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: in the military. She's still dedicated to the country and
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: she still does what she does what she thinks is right,
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: or she wouldn't have been listed.
• 17:14
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: So this is an individual who there there's no hint
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: of an excuse, there's not even remotely like, well, they
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: made a mistake thinking this about her because of XYS. No,
• 17:32
  Speaker 3: they know they are targeting a non terrorist whose only
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: crime is dissent. Her only crime is disagreeing with what
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: the political party in charge. And there is a political
• 17:49
  Speaker 3: party in charge, uh, and there has been my entire life.
• 17:54
  Speaker 3: Her only crime is disagreeing with what that political party
• 17:58
  Speaker 3: has as a set of stated goals and a set
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: of demonstrated goals. And that's you know, that's any of you,
• 18:08
  Speaker 3: that's all of you.
• 18:10
  Speaker 4: If this was if people are looking at this going.
• 18:12
  Speaker 3: Well, she shouldn't have been speaking out against the Democrats
• 18:15
  Speaker 3: because they're on the side of the people or whatever.
• 18:18
  Speaker 3: If you're a Democrat and you agree with the Democrats
• 18:20
  Speaker 3: and you think that anybody that disagrees as a terrorist,
• 18:24
  Speaker 3: understand that this can go both ways. Understand that when
• 18:32
  Speaker 3: the pendulum swings in the other direction, and it always
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: eventually does everything that you think is okay to do
• 18:41
  Speaker 3: when your party is in political power, the next party
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: that gets into political power is going to get the
• 18:49
  Speaker 3: message from you that it's okay for them to do
• 18:52
  Speaker 3: that too. I don't want Republicans doing this kind of shit, right,
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: I don't want Democrats doing it. I don't want Publicans
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: doing it. I don't want communists doing it, don't want
• 19:03
  Speaker 3: the Green Party doing it, which they're basically also communists.
• 19:06
  Speaker 3: They don't just don't tell anybody that. I would hope
• 19:09
  Speaker 3: libertarians wouldn't do it, But I don't want any party
• 19:15
  Speaker 3: doing this.
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: Right, So, yeah, we have to hold them to the
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: same standard.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: And well, you know, I think that I think that
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: what seems to be happening is they're tightening their grip,
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: you know, on anybody who was dissenting because.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: They really want to win.
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: And I don't I don't know, I feel like they're
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: really afraid, Like they're really afraid that if the Orange
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: Man gets in office, they're gonna be in a lot
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: of trouble. And so they're doing everything they can. They're
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: watching anybody who disagrees with them. They have overplayed their hand.
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: I think it was good. It started back during the coup.
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: That was what really drove people like they were like,
• 19:54
  Speaker 2: what the heck's going on? That was when Tulsea started
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: to question them, so, you know, and what was the who?
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: I mean?
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: I think it was just like, oh, we're going to
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: take control of the of the economy, We're gonna take
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: control of people's businesses.
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: We're gonna lock people in their homes, we're gonna.
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: Separate kids from you know, from their socializing that that
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: is important socialization. And some people were like, no, that's
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: not okay. And then Tulsi was also, I mean, I
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: guess she had questions about the Maui fires. That was
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: like a big thing. That also because they still haven't
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: like given us any updates on that and she still
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: isn't getting it. She was like, you know Hawaiian. So essentially,
• 20:32
  Speaker 2: I think that they're afraid and they're becoming more authoritarian
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: because of it. And I think that that is what
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: it means to say, you know, weak men create hard
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: times because they're they're cowardly, and they're trying to hold
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: on to what they have or their power or get
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: more power, and they're willing to do terrible things to people.
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: I'm not saying that what's happening to Tulsa is necessarily
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: a terrible thing, but it's a bad thing for sure.
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: It's certainly unethical, it's you.
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: Know, but this is this is the way the United
• 21:06
  Speaker 3: States manifests or puts into place the credit system that
• 21:11
  Speaker 3: China has, right, they don't have. The credit system that
• 21:14
  Speaker 3: China has based is based on it's similar to your
• 21:19
  Speaker 3: credit score, which your credit score is a bogus thing too,
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: by the way. That is that is simply the way
• 21:26
  Speaker 3: that financial institutions control your choices so that your spending
• 21:31
  Speaker 3: habits and your borrowing habits can make the most money
• 21:35
  Speaker 3: for them at your expense. Obviously, that your social credit
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: score in China. That is essentially about the government controlling
• 21:45
  Speaker 3: its micromanagement, right. It's about the government controlling the individual
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: in such a way that the individual's time and energy
• 21:54
  Speaker 3: is almost exclusively dedicated to government purposes. So where can
• 22:00
  Speaker 3: paying taxes, maintaining order in their neighborhood, and keeping people
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: loyal to that government, those are going to be the
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: types of things that they're dedicated to. Well, the US
• 22:10
  Speaker 3: doesn't have a credit system like that, but we have
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: this uh end all, not end all, be all, but
• 22:18
  Speaker 3: sort of cover all terminology around terrorism that allows for
• 22:22
  Speaker 3: the same thing to be done, except it's labeling people
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: as scary and dangerous to the community by using the
• 22:33
  Speaker 3: terminology for people who blow things up and capture people
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: and keep the hostage and behead people that disagree with them,
• 22:41
  Speaker 3: to describe people to say things online, to describe people
• 22:46
  Speaker 3: who say things online that challenge the platform of the
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: people in power, right, just stating your disagreement, just having
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: a different set of ideas about how people should should
• 23:01
  Speaker 3: be treated by the government and what's effective policy in
• 23:04
  Speaker 3: terms of handling something like a virus or handling how
• 23:08
  Speaker 3: kids go to school and things like that. Like that,
• 23:11
  Speaker 3: that is being equated to kidnapping people and cutting their
• 23:16
  Speaker 3: heads off. Yeah, that is the social credit score in
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: the United States. Like, nobody should believe that, and we
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: all know it's bullshit, right, But They can't just enact
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: a social credit score, right, people would object to that.
• 23:35
  Speaker 4: So what do they do? Oh well, if you disagree
• 23:37
  Speaker 4: with us, you're a terrorist.
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, well, I mean, look look at what's happening
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: in the UK, which we're going to get to next,
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: in Europe, in Canada, all of the it's like it's
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: the same kinds of actions, but they're at different stages.
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: The US is still like.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: Not as bad as Canada or the UK is because
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: we still have a constitution and they can't flagrantly you know,
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: it's just like oppose it. But they're working on it.
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: Like we're a few steps behind. So if you want
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: to know like where the US is headed, look at Canada,
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: look at the UK. You know, like they're they're I mean,
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: we're going to get to the UK thing, but like
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: they're already arresting people for you know, saying mean things
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: on Facebook.
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: They're talking about.
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: Extra witing Americans who say the mean things about Kier
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: Starmer and I don't want to like get you know,
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: because we're getting to that. But like they're talking about
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: extriting Americans for essentially insulting the British government. You know,
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: you know if you insult she Jingping. Remember that whole
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: thing where if you call them Winnie the Pooh like
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: you can get arrested in China. It's the same thing. Like,
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: so we're not that far off.
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: It's like, what do you.
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I think Disney will probably come after you.
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: Well, they you know, winned the public domain.
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: Well yeah, technically, but Disney will probably figure it out.
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: I mean they some some Disney like they they have
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: a clause in their like terms and conditions for Disney
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: Plus that says like you can't sue them under like
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: I don't know, some it's like some weird loophole. And
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: this guy who took his wife to a like a
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: restaurant at Disneyland and she has like a she had
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: a severe peanut allergy, and the chef assured them that
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: there was not going to be a problem, and she
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: ate food that had peanuts in it and died. And
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: and he he's he was trying to sue Disney, and
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: they're like, you can't.
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: You can't sue us because of this clause.
• 25:40
  Speaker 4: So I think I don't think they have one very.
• 25:44
  Speaker 5: Misinformed person on their on their legal team who thought
• 25:47
  Speaker 5: they could they could use that as as as some
• 25:50
  Speaker 5: kind of it's not working and it's it was it
• 25:52
  Speaker 5: was never viable, and now it's gone viral and it's
• 25:56
  Speaker 5: been an absolute disaster. And yeah, they're probably gonna settle
• 26:01
  Speaker 5: out of court for it.
• 26:02
  Speaker 3: Yeah, your terms of service cannot have we can we
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: can kill you, we can commit crimes against you, we
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: can do bad things against you, we can violate your
• 26:14
  Speaker 3: rights and so on, and there's nothing you can do
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: about it because we have this clause.
• 26:18
  Speaker 4: That can't be part of your terms of service. It's
• 26:21
  Speaker 4: not it's not legally binding.
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: Well, I'm just saying, you know, like I got that's
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: a little bit of a tangent, but yeah, this is
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: like what's happening to Tulsi. I mean, like look.
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: At the January sixth protesters.
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: They were put into prison without without a trial, and
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: some of them in solitary confinement. And Rigo Tario went
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: to jail for He's basically sentenced for thirty years, and
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: like people are acting.
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: Like, well, you know, that's the way it goes like that.
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: There has to be like and this is one of
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: the main reasons, by the way, that I support Trump
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: going into the White House, because there are a lot
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: of people that need to be pardoned and set free.
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: And that's the only way it's going to happen is if.
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: Somebody like at the top basically says, look, all these people,
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: they didn't break any laws. They should be free. And
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: I think that that's important. And a lot of those
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: were men, because there were a lot of men at
• 27:18
  Speaker 2: those protests. So anyway, that's a bit of a divergence.
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: So we're gonna bring it home. And all I would
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: say is, you know, good luck to Tolsy Gabbard. I
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: think that we should understand that our governments and especially
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: the media, you don't hate them enough. You don't hate
• 27:37
  Speaker 2: them enough. Okay, so let's get into the next one.
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: I want to play this clip to start off because
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: it was relevant. So this is from End Wokeness and
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: it shows here he writes, holy shit, the UK is
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: releasing five thousand prisoners to make room for anti immigration protesters.
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: So they're letting violent.
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: Criminals out of prison so they can make more room,
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: or like Native Britons who have an issue with immigration.
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: All right, let's play this clip.
• 28:15
  Speaker 5: Obviously, they're already repeated already their crimes and they're going well,
• 28:21
  Speaker 5: where do we put them We just filled the prisons
• 28:23
  Speaker 5: with with British men who.
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: Yelled at a police dog.
• 28:28
  Speaker 5: Or we're just going to have to let these murderers
• 28:32
  Speaker 5: and rapists just wander the streets because you've got no
• 28:35
  Speaker 5: prison space left. Oh someone, all right, so someone tweeted
• 28:39
  Speaker 5: Rule Britannia, we have to Okay, we'll put two of
• 28:42
  Speaker 5: them in a per cell.
• 28:44
  Speaker 2: From double the space at a bunk and a bunk bed.
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: All right, let's play this clip. We will not read
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: the things.
• 28:53
  Speaker 6: We will make sure that those people who need to
• 28:55
  Speaker 6: be in prison will be in prison, not necessarily in
• 28:58
  Speaker 6: the area where they live. They may be two three
• 29:01
  Speaker 6: hundred miles away from home, but we will guarantee people
• 29:04
  Speaker 6: at prison cell.
• 29:05
  Speaker 5: With the numbers are so tired, how can you make
• 29:08
  Speaker 5: that guarantee?
• 29:09
  Speaker 6: They are tight, And that's why we've initiated Operation Early Dawn.
• 29:13
  Speaker 6: So basically the easiest way to describe it is one in,
• 29:16
  Speaker 6: one out. So as people get released, we can then
• 29:20
  Speaker 6: pick up people from police cells and take them to
• 29:22
  Speaker 6: court and we will triage that three times a day.
• 29:25
  Speaker 6: We will guarantee a prison cell.
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: We will.
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: All right, So let's get into the article and I
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: just want to add on that, what according to this
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: like operation, they're going to be releasing people who have
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: served forty percent of their sentence. So if you have
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: you know, that would include I guess violent criminals. I mean,
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: there's no there's nothing that says it isn't. But let's
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: get into this because this is where it really matters.
• 29:48
  Speaker 4: So I'm sure we get into this. So I just
• 29:51
  Speaker 4: want to say.
• 29:51
  Speaker 3: One thing, Right, if they have to take measures like
• 29:54
  Speaker 3: that to make room and they're anticipating having to take
• 29:59
  Speaker 3: measures like that to make room for the number of
• 30:02
  Speaker 3: people they are anticipating that they're going to arrest because
• 30:05
  Speaker 3: of these laws.
• 30:08
  Speaker 4: That's the purpose of these laws. The laws are basically
• 30:12
  Speaker 4: to create an excuse to arrest mass quantities of people. Right.
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: There is no there is no objection to the behaviors
• 30:23
  Speaker 3: that they're they're going to be arresting people for. Among
• 30:26
  Speaker 3: the people that are doing the arresting or passing the
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: laws or anything like that, or even most of the public.
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: They're going to be doing this specifically for the purpose
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: of acclimating people to the idea that you can just
• 30:39
  Speaker 3: come and get them and lock them up for something
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: that they said It has absolutely nothing to do with safety.
• 30:46
  Speaker 3: It really has absolutely nothing to do with women other
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: than the fact that women are facilitating this.
• 30:51
  Speaker 4: Right. This is about training.
• 30:53
  Speaker 3: You to be afraid that your government is going to
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: come and take you away and put you in a
• 30:58
  Speaker 3: cell for talking.
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the okay, so let's get into.
• 31:04
  Speaker 4: The field the story.
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah, So the UK government is set to treat extreme misogyny,
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: which of course is undefinable as a form of terrorism,
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: under new plans spearheaded by Home Secretary Yvett Cooper. The
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: initiative will involve a review. I think is that the
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: same Evet Cooper that couldn't define what a woman was.
• 31:26
  Speaker 2: The initiative will involve a review of the counter terrorism
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: strategy to address violence against women and girls and identify
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: gaps in current legislation. Teachers may be legally required to
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: report students exhibiting extreme misogyny to the Prevent program, which
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: counters radicalization. The review, expected to be completed by autumn,
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: claims to create a new strategic approach to counter extremism,
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: with a focus on addressing emerging ideologies like the Inceell movement, because.
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: That's like in cell movement. Of course, there isn't any people.
• 32:01
  Speaker 4: Are becoming in cels on purpose.
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: That takes the in out of it, considering it stands
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: for involuntary.
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: I'll share them, I'll share my thoughts at the end,
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: but like after you guys have your say. Influencers like
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: Andrew Tait have been cited as potential sources of radicalization
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: according to these people, again particularly amongst young men. This
• 32:22
  Speaker 2: move underscores the government's concern over their growing influence of
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: misogynistic ideologies online and their impact on society.
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: Go ahead, so you want to know why the government
• 32:36
  Speaker 3: is scared of insults. You want to know why because
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: this is the first time ever in the history of
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: the world that the group that every government throughout all
• 32:48
  Speaker 3: of human history has exploded as canon fodder in every
• 32:52
  Speaker 3: war they've ever.
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: Fought, knows about it, talks.
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: About it, knows about their situation, talks about their situation,
• 33:01
  Speaker 3: and has decided to not put up with that shit
• 33:04
  Speaker 3: and turn their backs and be at least pseudo going
• 33:08
  Speaker 3: their own way. That terrifies governments. They are terrified that
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: they might lose their biggest group of exploitable canon fodder.
• 33:19
  Speaker 3: That's why they hate in cells. They don't hate in
• 33:22
  Speaker 3: cells because in cells are dangerous to anybody they hate
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: in cells because they might have to stop being dangerous
• 33:29
  Speaker 3: to in cells. I'll hold the rest until after everybody
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: else talks.
• 33:36
  Speaker 5: Yeah, it's well, it's been an interesting month to be
• 33:40
  Speaker 5: an Englishman, albeit an Englishman in reasonably close.
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: To New York.
• 33:46
  Speaker 5: It's an exceptionally strange time to be an Englishman in England.
• 33:50
  Speaker 5: For a couple of weeks there, everyone was calling us racist,
• 33:53
  Speaker 5: so we just needed to We needed a quick reminder
• 33:56
  Speaker 5: that we're also sexist, that the foreigners have been the
• 34:00
  Speaker 5: victim DuJour of late, and so the ladies were feeling
• 34:04
  Speaker 5: all left out.
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: Don't forget us.
• 34:06
  Speaker 5: We're also being oppressed by all the white men who
• 34:10
  Speaker 5: we're putting in prison for tweeting. And it's simply outrageous
• 34:14
  Speaker 5: that we that we can't do it even more than
• 34:17
  Speaker 5: the than we're already doing it. So we're officially gonna
• 34:20
  Speaker 5: do it even more. Extreme misogic what does that mean? Like,
• 34:26
  Speaker 5: misogyny is okay, but only when it's moderate hatred of women.
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: Extreme misogyny, Mike, is when you're doing misogyny while like,
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: you know, snowboarding or doing like rollerblading upside down or
• 34:41
  Speaker 2: doing like a yeah kickflip or the max misogy.
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: Extreme misogyny.
• 34:49
  Speaker 5: So if you say I hate women, all right, that's
• 34:52
  Speaker 5: perfectly legal. But if you say I hate women a lot,
• 34:56
  Speaker 5: that's that's that's terrorism. That No, you do not have
• 35:00
  Speaker 5: a license for that superlative qualifier. You're nicked, Sunshine. I
• 35:05
  Speaker 5: think it's called extreme misogyny. So they can differentiate it
• 35:09
  Speaker 5: from traditional like systemic segregation like.
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: They're doing masques.
• 35:17
  Speaker 5: Yes, if you're if you're ever able to press one
• 35:20
  Speaker 5: of these government issue Karen's on that subject, you might go,
• 35:25
  Speaker 5: isn't that kind of sexist what they do in the
• 35:29
  Speaker 5: mosques and all that? But no, they can just go Wow.
• 35:32
  Speaker 5: The point is it's not extreme.
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: So extreme, okay? So what is extreme?
• 35:38
  Speaker 5: Facebook posts? Facebook posts yes, and tweets something something, Elon
• 35:44
  Speaker 5: Musk something something. Andrew fucking Tait Allison's doing this thing
• 35:49
  Speaker 5: on Twitter that she calls the tape challenge. You take
• 35:53
  Speaker 5: a statement about men made by any online rando, and
• 35:58
  Speaker 5: you examine it and ask, has hate ever said anything
• 36:02
  Speaker 5: as bad as that about women? And the answer is
• 36:06
  Speaker 5: is always, I don't know, because no one could give
• 36:08
  Speaker 5: any examples of anything that said, they're not very memorable.
• 36:13
  Speaker 2: Quote.
• 36:13
  Speaker 5: He's not exactly the most profound of thinkers, after all,
• 36:17
  Speaker 5: But they just know, they know he's the big, big, bad,
• 36:21
  Speaker 5: end of level boss of misogyny, and everyone's supposed to
• 36:24
  Speaker 5: hate you because of the things he says. What things
• 36:27
  Speaker 5: we don't know, But a cursory glance at everyday casual
• 36:33
  Speaker 5: social media feeds and you'll find stuff like quote, the
• 36:38
  Speaker 5: state of men today is so sad. They deserve their
• 36:40
  Speaker 5: suicide rates and virginity end quote. I pray for male
• 36:46
  Speaker 5: loneliness epidemic. You'll need to actually suffer. I hope it
• 36:50
  Speaker 5: kills your clap emoji holler emoji end quote. Fucked hey,
• 36:56
  Speaker 5: I hope that cocksucker ruts in prison and fuck you two,
• 36:59
  Speaker 5: you ugly cunt ps. Put some makeup on, sweetie.
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: You have the face of a dog.
• 37:04
  Speaker 5: Dog emoji dog emoji. And that that was just someone
• 37:08
  Speaker 5: responding to Alison on the subject of the Tate challenge.
• 37:11
  Speaker 5: It's a phenomenon that permutates within itself. It's fascinating, and
• 37:17
  Speaker 5: you find this everywhere, not just online, everywhere. You know,
• 37:23
  Speaker 5: how they say in cities, you're never more than ten
• 37:25
  Speaker 5: feet away from a rat. It's the same with misinterests.
• 37:29
  Speaker 5: You're never more than ten feet away from someone who
• 37:31
  Speaker 5: openly and viciously hates men, far more than the world's
• 37:37
  Speaker 5: worst misogynist hates women, and they're not particularly nice to
• 37:41
  Speaker 5: women either. If you're a woman who doesn't hate men,
• 37:45
  Speaker 5: you two are a pick me cunt. If they posted
• 37:49
  Speaker 5: that tweet in Britain, would they get charged with a
• 37:51
  Speaker 5: terrorist offense because someone pick no? Of course, not pick
• 37:57
  Speaker 5: me isn't an insult to women men. It's an insult
• 38:01
  Speaker 5: to women who don't hate men, and fuck them right,
• 38:05
  Speaker 5: they're traitors. It's just like it's okay to call someone
• 38:07
  Speaker 5: a coconut, as in brown on the outside, white on
• 38:11
  Speaker 5: the inside, even though it's explicitly a racial slur. It's
• 38:15
  Speaker 5: not insulting to brown people. It's only insulting to brown
• 38:18
  Speaker 5: people who don't hate white people, and fuck them right,
• 38:21
  Speaker 5: they're traitors. There are no principles at play here. We
• 38:24
  Speaker 5: know that the government doesn't give a shit about foreigners.
• 38:27
  Speaker 5: They just pretend to. They don't give a shit about women,
• 38:31
  Speaker 5: They just pretend to so women and foreigner foreigners can
• 38:34
  Speaker 5: fight over the scraps of concrete sympathy, while Daddy government
• 38:39
  Speaker 5: focuses on what it's truly passionate about. The merciless hatred
• 38:44
  Speaker 5: and denigration of Native British men and boys. They're not
• 38:50
  Speaker 5: even pretending to give a shit about us.
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: They don't have to.
• 38:54
  Speaker 5: They don't want to give a shit about us. It
• 38:56
  Speaker 5: would be a political faux pas if they did.
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: No mistake.
• 39:00
  Speaker 5: They don't just hate us.
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: It's worse than that.
• 39:02
  Speaker 5: They see us as their property. They're pets, their slaves.
• 39:08
  Speaker 5: They see all other peoples as honored guests in their home,
• 39:12
  Speaker 5: not theirs. But Native men and boys are just the help,
• 39:18
  Speaker 5: the guard dogs. Jeep plastic tool for opening jars.
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: That's sort of thing.
• 39:24
  Speaker 5: If foreigners fuck with women, or women fuck with foreigners,
• 39:28
  Speaker 5: that's fine, you're both guests, but please do it outside
• 39:31
  Speaker 5: when no one can see you. But if a Native
• 39:34
  Speaker 5: man comes up from the basement to serve the champagne,
• 39:37
  Speaker 5: he'd better not make eye contact with anyone or he's
• 39:40
  Speaker 5: getting a kicking and the scuffs on his master's shoes
• 39:45
  Speaker 5: will come out of his paycheck and then they'll throw
• 39:48
  Speaker 5: them in jail. I'd love to know all this means
• 39:51
  Speaker 5: for the legal status of the phrase Islam is right
• 39:55
  Speaker 5: about women. It's fascinating what that phrase does of the
• 40:00
  Speaker 5: woke mind. They're not sure who or what to point
• 40:03
  Speaker 5: the finger out, so they're just short circuit. I think
• 40:07
  Speaker 5: it's probably racist or something.
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure. I guess it depends, and yes it does.
• 40:14
  Speaker 5: That's the point. If a Muslim says Islam is right
• 40:18
  Speaker 5: about women, that's perfectly fine. You can emblazon it on
• 40:21
  Speaker 5: the front door of a mosque and it's fine. They
• 40:23
  Speaker 5: probably do sometimes. And if a woman says Islam is
• 40:27
  Speaker 5: right about women, that's fine too. If a Muslim woman
• 40:30
  Speaker 5: says it, why wouldn't she, but it makes perfect sense
• 40:34
  Speaker 5: for her to say it. But if a sign, just
• 40:37
  Speaker 5: a random sign on a lamppost, says Islam is right
• 40:41
  Speaker 5: about women, people lose their fucking minds because if it
• 40:45
  Speaker 5: was posted by a native man, then it must be
• 40:49
  Speaker 5: some kind of hate campaign.
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 40:52
  Speaker 5: We can't figure out if it's racist or sexist or both.
• 40:55
  Speaker 5: But someone needs to go to jail for this sentence
• 41:00
  Speaker 5: unless they're a Muslim or a woman.
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: Yes, of course, unless they're a Muslim.
• 41:04
  Speaker 5: When that goes without saying that, yeah, that's this whole
• 41:07
  Speaker 5: debacle in a nutshell. A phrase can be free speech
• 41:11
  Speaker 5: when said by group A, but a hate crime when
• 41:15
  Speaker 5: said by group B the exact same phrase. This isn't
• 41:19
  Speaker 5: an attack on free speech, It's an attack on group B.
• 41:24
  Speaker 5: These speech laws are deliberately vague so that the miss
• 41:28
  Speaker 5: andric eukophobes who run our government can always find an
• 41:31
  Speaker 5: excuse to prosecute native men, and always find an excuse
• 41:35
  Speaker 5: not to prosecute foreigners or women. And yes, you can
• 41:38
  Speaker 5: stand there bleeding, but women and girls getting raped, and
• 41:40
  Speaker 5: bean men and boys are also getting raped and beaten,
• 41:43
  Speaker 5: and nobody cares. Not the right, not the left, not
• 41:46
  Speaker 5: the mainstream media, not the alternative media, nobody except a
• 41:50
  Speaker 5: few isolated space leffers like us. So I don't give
• 41:54
  Speaker 5: a shit about the straws you, dickhead, are clutching at
• 41:56
  Speaker 5: the top of the progressive pyramid as you jockey for position.
• 42:00
  Speaker 5: All of this is built on the foundations of missionry
• 42:04
  Speaker 5: and eucophobia in that order, And if you're not pointing
• 42:09
  Speaker 5: firmly away from these things, you're only worsening the situation.
• 42:15
  Speaker 5: And God bless America for allowing me to say these
• 42:18
  Speaker 5: things without arresting me, so that I will drink in
• 42:22
  Speaker 5: simultaneous commiserations and celebrations.
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: Uh then yeah, I'll say something, Okay, So what I
• 42:39
  Speaker 2: get from this is this isn't a very good example
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: of what of what I mean when.
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: I talk about how.
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: Terms like racism and homophobia and Islamophobia are used to
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: hide missonry and what I mean.
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: Let's let's let's look at what's happened here.
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: So the UK has allowed innumerable amounts of people, mostly
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: men fighting age men in fact from like other countries
• 43:17
  Speaker 2: that do not share the same values or culture as
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: the Britits. The British do themselves and that's just what
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: it is. People in Africa have a different culture than
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: you know, people in Europe, okay.
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: And those men are you.
• 43:34
  Speaker 2: Know, like some of them form grooming gangs, which is
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: something we know happens. It's there are men capable of evil,
• 43:39
  Speaker 2: and there are men who are capable of working together
• 43:42
  Speaker 2: to do that as well as women. And it's not
• 43:45
  Speaker 2: necessarily limited to any particular group, but it is something
• 43:49
  Speaker 2: that manifests when you have third world people living in
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: the first world, okay, and they're going to create problems.
• 43:55
  Speaker 2: And so what's happened is women voted for this probably,
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: or at least they they were a part of, like
• 44:01
  Speaker 2: welcoming it in, like oh yeah, let them in, right,
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: let's let's help them out whatever they And so they
• 44:08
  Speaker 2: come in and now women are feeling unsafe, but they
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: can't say it's because of the you know, the religion
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: of Islam or the culture of these people or where
• 44:21
  Speaker 2: they're from or whatever. They can't say that because that
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: would make them look like bad people.
• 44:26
  Speaker 1: So what they what.
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: They have to do is they have to say, we
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: have a misogyny problem. And then what happens is it
• 44:31
  Speaker 2: doesn't become a thing about specific groups of people with
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: a specific background and a specific uh you know, place
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: of origin that that has an effect on how they
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: behave around people who have a completely different culture with
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: different norms and different limits. It's not it can't be
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: that because that would be bigoted, and they and women
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: like the people who promote this stuff, they're good people.
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: They can't be biggoted. So instead they just say, well,
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: it's a it's a misogyny problem. It's a problem with
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: men in general.
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: And now they have because that's the one thing you
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: can do.
• 45:05
  Speaker 2: You can blame men for stuff, and nobody calls you
• 45:08
  Speaker 2: a you know, prejudice. They can't call you a bigot,
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: they can't call you any of that because that is
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: a black category. They can just they can just use
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: that and say, well, we have a problem with men.
• 45:18
  Speaker 2: And there was even like a PSA that the UK
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: put out which showed like men that were, like, you know,
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: making excuses for harassing women.
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: I should have looked it up. I did watch it.
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: But the funny thing is is that they're they're PSA
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: was all white guys and the But but we know
• 45:36
  Speaker 2: that's not what's happening. I mean, like, I'm not gonna
• 45:39
  Speaker 2: lie about what's happening. It's not like Native Brits that
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: are doing this. It's just not because that's not in
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: their culture to do that. So what are they doing, Well,
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: they're they're they're saying, well, okay, there's a problem. We
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: can't ignore it because women are complaining. But we can't
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: blame specific groups of men. We have to blame all men,
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: because if we blame all men, then no one, like
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: no one feels uncomfortable by it. And then they take
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: it further. They basically make it about in cells and
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: Andrew Tate, which why is that because in cells and
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: Andrew Tate are really really easy targets.
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: That's the only reason.
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: So when they say, well, it's an in cell problem,
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: oh and now we can crack down those guys, and
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: we're still ignoring the real problem. We're still ignoring the
• 46:26
  Speaker 2: fact that you have people that are in this country
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: and it's a completely different culture, and it's a completely
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: different like in many ways, they probably don't even speak
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: the same language, right, and they're causing problems.
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: And it's not just problems for women.
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: By the way, I think that men are actually more
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: likely to get assaulted by these by these people anyway.
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: But of course, again because.
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: Men are in a black category, we don't even see
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: the violence against men. We pretend like it doesn't exist,
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: and so it just gets worse until women complain. And
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: then when women complain, we have to like try to
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: address the problem without looking like biggots, because the women
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: don't want to look like bigots. It's like, you know,
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: the viral videos of the women were like, I was
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: walking around New York and some random guy punched me
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: in the face, and they none of them offer a
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: description because it's.
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: A black guy. That's it.
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: It's it's women doing everything they can to try to
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: address something that's really happening without looking bad because they
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: can't tell the truth about it.
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: And that's what's happening.
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: That's and so like what is gonna come out of this,
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: in my opinion is they're going to crack down on
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: the wrong people. They're gonna crack down on white guys,
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: they're gonna crack down on in cells. And they're probably
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: gonna use this to like further drag Andrew Tate's name
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: through the mud and that, and they're not gonna address
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: the problem.
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: The problem is immigration. It just is everyone knows it.
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: Nobody wants to say it, or they can't because you know,
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: the ker starmer like Stalin is.
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: Gonna kick their door down and take them to jail
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: and let a bunch of killers out. You know.
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: So like this, this is this is what happens when
• 47:56
  Speaker 2: you are so concerned that people might think that you
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: have prejudice, that you're willing to let people's lives be destroyed.
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: Just be prejudiced.
• 48:07
  Speaker 2: Everybody is prejudiced. Everybody is. It's just a human natural thing. Sorry,
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: just accept it and live with it anyway.
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: That's it for me. That's all I gotta say.
• 48:19
  Speaker 3: So I don't know if people fully understanding are fully
• 48:23
  Speaker 3: understanding what's happening here, but I'm gonna link this story
• 48:26
  Speaker 3: to the last story. All right Fulsea Gabbard is on
• 48:31
  Speaker 3: a government watch list because she said the current administration
• 48:36
  Speaker 3: is doing a bad job. And she's right, the current
• 48:40
  Speaker 3: administration is doing a bad job. And there are probably
• 48:44
  Speaker 3: many many other people besides her who are on watch
• 48:48
  Speaker 3: lists for saying that. We're on watch list for saying that.
• 48:52
  Speaker 3: And I mean, I've said that about every administration, like
• 48:56
  Speaker 3: there isn't at least every administration that's taken place during
• 49:00
  Speaker 3: my lifetime. You know, there's not really a great job
• 49:04
  Speaker 3: been done by the federal government that I've seen happen. Ever,
• 49:12
  Speaker 3: the least bad job was still a bad job because
• 49:17
  Speaker 3: it was still totalitarian in a lot of ways. And
• 49:21
  Speaker 3: I'm not even going to say who it was, because
• 49:23
  Speaker 3: it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter which party it was,
• 49:26
  Speaker 3: it doesn't matter which politician it was. Right, and when
• 49:29
  Speaker 3: you put that bad job together with social guynes centrism,
• 49:36
  Speaker 3: you get this tolerance among the general public for the
• 49:40
  Speaker 3: government taking measures.
• 49:43
  Speaker 4: Doing things to the.
• 49:44
  Speaker 3: Public, restricting you stealing from you, right, engaging in attacks
• 49:54
  Speaker 3: on your independence and your life in women name, so,
• 50:05
  Speaker 3: women should be mad about this. Women should not be accepting. Oh,
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: you know, we are the victims of this extreme misogyny.
• 50:14
  Speaker 3: Therefore it's a good thing if the government's protecting us.
• 50:17
  Speaker 4: No bullshit.
• 50:18
  Speaker 3: You are being exploited and you are going along with it. Right,
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: You get paid for it in terms of government benefits.
• 50:28
  Speaker 3: You get paid for it, whether it's money or social benefits.
• 50:31
  Speaker 3: You feel like you have some power that you don't
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: actually have because if you don't stay in line, you
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: end up like Tulsa Gabbard and you're not going to
• 50:41
  Speaker 3: be protected by this extreme misogyny terrorist act.
• 50:44
  Speaker 4: You're going to be on the other side of it. Right.
• 50:48
  Speaker 3: So it's no different to go along with something like
• 50:51
  Speaker 3: this than it is to maybe, you know, sell sex
• 50:54
  Speaker 3: for money, except at least when you sell sex for money,
• 50:59
  Speaker 3: you're admitting that you're a whore. Instead of pouring yourself
• 51:07
  Speaker 3: out for for social power, pouring your your dignity out
• 51:13
  Speaker 3: for social power, pouring your ethics out for social power,
• 51:19
  Speaker 3: you're you're horring your you're pussy out for social power,
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: for for for money and social power, like, at least
• 51:25
  Speaker 3: you can be honest about it if you're going to
• 51:27
  Speaker 3: do that. But no, women can't do that. You want
• 51:31
  Speaker 3: to know why, because women are stupid? Yeah, good God,
• 51:41
  Speaker 3: I am to talk.
• 51:42
  Speaker 4: About and being stupid.
• 51:47
  Speaker 3: So one of the things I figured out recently, and
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: this is going to seem completely unrelated.
• 51:52
  Speaker 4: But it's not. If you look at inheritable genetic.
• 51:58
  Speaker 3: Uh intellectual disabilities, the majority of those are actually attached
• 52:06
  Speaker 3: to the X chromosome. It doesn't mean that women are retarded, right,
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: It's not a direct thing where you have this attached
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: to your X chromosome, it makes you retarded.
• 52:18
  Speaker 4: What ends up happening actually is if.
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: A couple gets together and the father's maternal genetic history
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: has this, and the mother's genetic history also has this,
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: then there's a very high chance that it's going to
• 52:38
  Speaker 3: affect the children, or if they have a son, he
• 52:43
  Speaker 3: has a much higher chance of being affected by it
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: if the mother has it in her history. So a
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: woman can carry this, she can be the trojan horse
• 52:53
  Speaker 3: for these terrible ticking time bombs that affect people in
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: very profound ways to make their lives much harder than
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: they would have been if they were born with a
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: healthy genetic state instead of an unhealthy genetic conditions. It's
• 53:12
  Speaker 3: a struggle to be born with these disabilities. It doesn't
• 53:15
  Speaker 3: matter whether you're a legitimate person or not. It doesn't
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: matter whether you're prejudiced against people with disabilities or not.
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: The bottom line is women carry these disabilities without knowing it,
• 53:30
  Speaker 3: pass them on to their children, and it does hit
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: boys more than girls because boys don't get an X
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: chromosome from their dad, so they don't have a chance
• 53:41
  Speaker 3: that the gene isn't going to be forefront. It's that
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: it isn't going to be active.
• 53:46
  Speaker 4: Right. You would think.
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: That this would be a reason why men should have
• 53:56
  Speaker 3: to be more picky than women about their partners. You
• 54:01
  Speaker 3: would think that in a society where we have a
• 54:06
  Speaker 3: history of if the mother has a family history of
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: weaknesses and disabilities and so on, that that would clue
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: a man in maybe we shouldn't have kids together because
• 54:22
  Speaker 3: you might pass something on to my children and my
• 54:24
  Speaker 3: grandchildren that will make their lives harder than they have
• 54:30
  Speaker 3: to be. But instead, we have this massive tolerance for
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: weakness and stupidity in women. We're not allowed to call
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: women stupid when women make stupid choices, and we're not
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: allowed to call women weak when women can't do things
• 54:48
  Speaker 3: that every man can do if he hasn't profoundly disabled.
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: That weakness in our social fabric, that big gaping hole
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: in our shield against self sabotage as a species, allows
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: for what I'm about to describe here. Okay, the government
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: doesn't give a rats fucking ass about misogyny. The government
• 55:19
  Speaker 3: does not care about women. The people who work in
• 55:23
  Speaker 3: government do not care about women. They are not doing
• 55:27
  Speaker 3: this because they are benevolent toward women, and they're not
• 55:32
  Speaker 3: doing it because they hate men. They're not doing it
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: because misondry. They're not doing it because of anyism or
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: any benevolence, any well wishing anything. They are doing it
• 55:46
  Speaker 3: because it gives them power. It gives them one more
• 55:51
  Speaker 3: thing they can arrest you for. It gives them one
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: more way that they have control over micro areas of
• 55:59
  Speaker 3: your life. That's the only reason for this. Anything else
• 56:06
  Speaker 3: that you might apply to it, any other political mumbo
• 56:10
  Speaker 3: jumbo that you would apply this, it's all bullshit. This
• 56:14
  Speaker 3: is strictly about being able to come into your your
• 56:20
  Speaker 3: house and tell you what you can and can't do.
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: What you can and can't say, what you can and
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: can't want, what you can and can't like, how to work,
• 56:30
  Speaker 3: how to live, how to have a hobby, how to
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: not have a hobby. Where you spend your time, how
• 56:35
  Speaker 3: you spend your time, who you spend it with. All
• 56:37
  Speaker 3: of that, that's what this is about. This is about
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: controlling people to better exploit them in every human, humanly
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: possible way. But mostly it's about making money for prison
• 56:58
  Speaker 3: or for profit prisons, new government jobs. There's gonna have
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: to be a shitload of paperwork attached to this. There's
• 57:08
  Speaker 3: gonna have to be a shitload of people working day
• 57:11
  Speaker 3: and night to make this happen. And they are going
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: to be loyal to the people above them. They are
• 57:19
  Speaker 3: going to be loyal to the politicians that run the show.
• 57:23
  Speaker 3: That is what this is about. So you can take
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: your little magic eraser and wipe away all of the crap,
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: all the bullshit about what prejudices the government should be controlling,
• 57:37
  Speaker 3: what political opinions the government should be controlling, any of that,
• 57:42
  Speaker 3: because none of it matters, none of it. It is
• 57:47
  Speaker 3: all about controlling you. And the only reason people aren't
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: seeing it is because it's being done in the name
• 57:58
  Speaker 3: of protecting women and of all people. You know, women
• 58:03
  Speaker 3: should be able to see someone is blowing smoke up
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: their asses, all right. Women should be able to see
• 58:10
  Speaker 3: that somebody is pissing on them and telling them it's rain,
• 58:15
  Speaker 3: but they're basking in it. This is all for us,
• 58:20
  Speaker 3: isn't it wonderful? This huge, stinking fly attracting pile of
• 58:26
  Speaker 3: bullshit is it's our bullshit. It's special bullshit. This is
• 58:30
  Speaker 3: the golden bullshit. We love this bullshit. Give us more bullshit.
• 58:34
  Speaker 3: Because women are stupid, they're ruled by their egos. How
• 58:40
  Speaker 3: can you not see what is going on here? If
• 58:46
  Speaker 3: some guy tells you that you're beautiful after you gain
• 58:49
  Speaker 3: twenty pounds and you feel fat and ugly, you don't
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: buy that. But your government comes along, your impersonal government
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: that will take everything you own because you misfiled your
• 59:05
  Speaker 3: taxes and paid five cents two less, comes along and says, oh,
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: we love you so much, We just want to keep
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: you safe and protect you. Here, have some bubble wrap, No,
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: don't pop it, put it around your shoulders so nobody.
• 59:18
  Speaker 4: Can touch you. And you you fall for that shit?
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: What the fuck, ladies, are you really that dumb, and
• 59:28
  Speaker 3: the answer has to be yes. This isn't even the
• 59:33
  Speaker 3: first time. They've been doing this to you over and
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: over again, and you've been buying it, and you're eating
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: that bullshit. It's all over your teeth, it's all over
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: your face, and there you go sitting there. Probably Matt
• 59:48
  Speaker 3: has hell at me for saying this. This is misogynistic.
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: We should call the cups.
• 59:54
  Speaker 4: You can't because I'm in America. Well you can call
• 59:57
  Speaker 4: you can go on one. Yeah, it's extreme, right, it's extreme.
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 4: And this is why I'm on a list.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: This is why I'm probably on a bunch of lists,
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 3: because I recognize that this is bullshit. Now, I'm not
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 3: the woman that falls for it. I'm not the woman
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: that says, yes, go ahead and take everything away from men,
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 3: take their money, take their their freedoms.
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 4: Impose more labor requirements.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 3: On them, accuse them of things they didn't do. Because
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 3: my ego, now, this is bullshit, and I cannot imagine
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: how stupid women have to be to fall for this
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 3: shit and put up with it and say.
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 4: Yes, yes, I agree with this. Let's talk about the bear.
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 3: Let's talk about how ninety nine percent of this crime
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: that is defined to exclude female perpetration is done by men.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 3: How could that possibly have happened?
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 4: No, and and honestly I wouldn't.
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 3: I don't blame men for turning around at and forming
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: not movements but phenomena like men going their own way in.
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 4: Response to shit like this. I'm disgusted, and I am
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 4: a woman. I can't imagine.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: How much more disgusting this must be the men, and
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: and and.
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 4: Before you say, well, this is this is a one off, right,
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 4: this is this is uh just uh.
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: Women, women being flattered and being snowed by things that
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: make sense. You know, they all know that that misogyny
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: is dangerous. They all know that misogyny is deadly, and
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 3: therefore it's perfectly acceptable for them to fall for this
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 3: ship because misogyny is being used. Well.
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 4: No, hell.
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 3: Back in the nineties, some dumb fucks came up with
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: the idea that if you cut part of your dick off,
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 3: it'll protect you from AIDS, and a bunch of women,
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 3: the majority of women in my generation, went oh, yeah,
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 3: that makes perfect sense and went right out.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 4: And did it to their children. So uh, it's not
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 4: a one off, right, it's a habit. Like women, women
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 4: are gullible. You flatter their egos.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: Oh, you're such a good parent, protecting your child by
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 3: cutting off part of his genitalia.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 4: Oh you're you're such a victim of misogyny.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 3: You really need the government to protect you from everyone
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: and everything. Let's take away free speech in your name.
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 3: Just give it up, give it up completely. Oh yes, okay,
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 3: our our ego needs the feed.
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 4: Women are stupid. I can't it's embarrassing. M h shape up, ladies.
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 4: I got one more thing to say about this. I'm
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 4: gonna read a prediction.
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 3: I was gonna this is something that we've been looking
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: at an HBr talk and I was gonna bring this
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 3: up on Thursday, but it needs to be brought up today.
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 4: This is.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 3: A statement by missus Arthur M. Dodge from back in
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 3: the suffragette days about how women's suffrage is actually an
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 3: opposition to women's rights because women are too stupid to
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 3: figure out when the government is using women to take
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 3: people's rights away. And she said equal suffrage awaits a trial. Now,
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 3: remember this is before universal voting rights in the United States. Right,
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 3: equal suffrage waits a trial. Women's suffrage has tried in
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 3: the United States is the most unequal division of responsibilities imaginable.
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: The voting woman has retained most of the special rights
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: and exemptions accorded to her under man made laws, while
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 3: she has failed to discharge the obligations which the voting
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: man assumes. With the elective franchise. The vote of the
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 3: man is a sort of contract to support the verdict
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 3: of the ballot box, if need be, by jerry box,
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: the cartridge belt, or the sheriff's summons. The woman is
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 3: exempt from these obligations. She is a privileged voter. While
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 3: she may have political power, she does not have political control.
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 3: Stability of government demands that the control of government should
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: remain in the hands of those who can be held
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 3: responsible for the results. And there's the prediction. Prediction Stability
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 3: of government demands that the control of government should should
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 3: remain in the hands of those who can be responsible
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 3: for the adults or.
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 4: For the results.
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: Frederick Harrison cautions us that men and men only are
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 3: entitled to political control, since in the last resort, it
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 3: is their muscular force which has to make good.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 4: And defend it.
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 3: What happens with women voting, what happens with men women
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 3: taking part in a political process without the obligation to
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 3: stand up and pay the tax and defend with their
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: lives if need be, the freedoms of their country.
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 4: They stop.
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 3: They don't value those things. They don't value the earnings
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 3: of others. They don't value the lives of others. They
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 3: don't value the peace that preserves those lives, and they
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: don't value the careful budgeting that preserves that income. And
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: so they vote for shit like this. They vote for
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 3: politicians that do shit like this. Take away your freedoms,
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: take away your money, take away your peace, send you
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 3: to war, send you to the poorhouse, and send you
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 3: to the grave. Extreme extreme misogyny doesn't exist. Maybe those
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 3: are just people who understand women a little too well.
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 7: Oh all right, Hannah will thank you for that.
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: I got not much else to add. Let us know
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 2: what you guys think about this one. In the comments,
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 2: I'm I was having a laugh at all of the
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: different ways people were like demonstrating extreme misogyny, as you know,
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: guys on doing tricks on BMX bikes and then saying
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 2: something like cat calling women or saying, you know, women
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: belong in the kitchen while doing a kickflip, just.
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: Trying to have a chuckle.
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 4: But I got a couple.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: It's like the condition to two degrees bungee jumps.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 4: Crying, Yes, just telling you right now.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 3: My air conditioners at sixty five degrees so I can breathe.
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: So I like it cold. But okay, anyway, I got
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: some super.
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: Islamis right about women, funny bungee jumps. All right, So
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 2: I got some super child to read and then we're
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 2: gonna move on to the last story. So great Indoors
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 2: gave with ten dollars earlier and said anybody in the
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 2: group signed the Hope Accord and if not, why not not?
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 2: Many people have signed it, mostly scientists, and there seems
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 2: to be little publication about it, obviously due to the
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 2: obvious media slash journalism related reasons, but even in alternative
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: circles there has been little attention given to it. Maybe
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: most common people fear some sort of retaliation by signing it.
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: I don't even know what it is. Does anyone here
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: know what the Hope Accord is? The show?
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 4: I've heard about it a couple of times.
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 3: There's a there is a guy on YouTube, doctor John Campbell,
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 3: who has talked about it. He's in brief, Doctor John Campbell,
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: His YouTube channel was prior to COVID, was just about
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 3: like if you were a doctor or a med student
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 3: or anybody interested in like anatomy in physiology or different
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: types of different things about medicine. His channel was really
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 3: good with explaining this disease or this anatomy of the
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 3: this one part of the heart, or you know, things
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 3: like that, this new thing has come up and it's
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: in medicine and it's really interesting, they're going to be
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: able to do this, or we just found out this
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: bad thing. Right during the COVID crisis, you could watch
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 3: in real time as this great practitioner who was educating
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 3: the public on medical knowledge and issues lost his faith
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 3: in humanity, or at least in in uh in medicine
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 3: and and in government and oversight and so on, and
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 3: he sort of had he's sort of got black pilled
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: in real time.
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 4: And he's been.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 3: He's been, you know, talking about that this this whole time.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: And I've seen him mention the the Hope Accord a
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 3: couple of times and in relation to that, but I
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 3: really haven't had a lot of opportunity to actually read
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: about it and find out the full story what it
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 3: is and what its implications are and everything, and I.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 4: Just know that it's he's what he's.
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 3: He's exposed about how the vaccine works and how the
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 3: virus works, and and how what medical mistakes were made,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 3: and what things the governments did that were uh ill
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: advised and so on. I would say, if you're going
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 3: to trust a source on it, he's a good one
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 3: to trust. Obviously, there is no infallible person, so you
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 3: always want to trust, bit verify right in terms of
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 3: when I say someone's trustworthy. But just the fact that
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 3: he has has brought it up a few times indicates
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 3: that it's probably something that we ought to take a
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 3: look at.
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, oh oh kay was I thought I was.
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: I thought I was muted, all right, So we're gonna
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 2: I'll look into it. Thank you Great Indoors for that.
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 2: And then I got another one from Great Indoors which
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: is currently displayed here on the screen. He says, for
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 2: ten dollars, thank you sir. In the news today was
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 2: the reveal of an internal report produced by Roger Damn
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 2: Police Force regarding the apparent extensive amount of sexual and
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: racial misconduct done by police members towards their colleagues.
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: It sounded to me like they are go in and.
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 2: Make sure that all capable police agents are going to
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: be replaced by woke feminists, male or female, white pill
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: In this regard, their increase in the level authoritarianism will
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: be met with an even decrease inability to effectively do
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: their jobs. Governments will slowly lose their stronghold by which
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: they can carry out they're newly made up totalitarian laws
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 2: and rules. Thank you for that. That could be a
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 2: good news story for next week.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: We'll see.
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: Oh, you know, that's kind of like what's happening in
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: the US as well, Like after the Summer of Love,
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 2: a lot of cops resigned, and that I think that
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: it's probably like it's stochastically speaking, it's probably the good
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: ones that left because they didn't want to put up
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: with it, and they knew that there was an that
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 2: cops were being treated unjustly. Most likely, and I'm not
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: talking about cops that were fired. I mean cops that resigned,
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: that left the police force. But the cops that remained
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: were probably okay with it, and they probably brought on
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: a number of police officers that may actually be you know,
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: more likely to engage in corrupt behavior or power trip
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: on people, and so like you're making the police force
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: worse by driving the good ones away and the ones
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 2: that want to take advantage or you know, use the
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: system or whatever, or maybe they're they're like not quite
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 2: meeting the quota because there's a lot more women cops now,
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 2: then you're you know, that's going to change things.
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: And of course it feeds back into.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: The narrative about cops. So and ultimately the point is
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: to call for a federal solution to the cops shortage problem,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 2: which of course the government is more than happy to provide.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 2: Thanks BLM. Anyway, thank you for that for that super Child.
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 2: And then I got one from kech Women who gives
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 2: us five dollars. Where is it right here and just
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 2: says sip and I think he wants me to play
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: this clip for him women. Okay, so thank you for that,
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: and let's see.
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: I think that's it.
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: I got all the super Child's and there's no rumble
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 2: rants I don't see them, so let us move on
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: to the last story.
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: So all right, I'm sorry to tell you.
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 2: Guys this, but it looks like sex robots are gonna
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 2: be turning you down. So Samantha A well known sex
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: doll has been upgraded with a new dummy mode feature
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: designed to address issues of aggression and user behavior. When
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: Samantha detects aggressive or boring behavior from her user, she
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: enters dummy mode, where her motorized functions such as movement
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: and speech shut down. This feature was introduced by her inventor,
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 2: doctor Sergei Santos, who added it at his wife's request.
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 2: While the feature is intended to mimic consent, it has
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 2: been criticized for not fully engaging with the complexities of
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: the issue. Critics argue that users might exploit the feature
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 2: to seek out non responsive, lifeless robot, undermining the purpose
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: of promoting respectful behavior. Doctor Santos had created Samantha partly
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 2: because his wife couldn't fulfill in sexual needs. Okay has
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 2: controversial views on sex, believing that men have different sexual
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 2: designs from women. The impact of sex robots like samanthon
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 2: society and sexual behavior is still largely unknown, though experts
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 2: worn that they may reinforce harmful stereotypes about body image
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: and attractiveness. Despite claims that sex robots could help curb
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 2: sex trafficking or promote healthier sexual practices, no evidence currently
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: supports these benefits. Santos's sex dolls sell for around seven
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: thousand dollars, which is probably still cheaper than a real woman,
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: which features like non toxic skin and reduced smell. So
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 2: now that sex robots can say no.
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: All right, well fine, if if that's what p are
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 3: going to insist on, then that.
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 4: Should also work with vibrators.
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: Right, They're never going to do that. Vibrators are nothing.
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 3: It's this is the thing. It doesn't matter how humid
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 3: it looks. And you know, girls grow up playing with dolls.
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 3: It's obviously not sexual. But girls grow up mimicking motherhood
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 3: with dolls.
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 4: And some of them are electronics. Some of them talk.
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 4: They're scary as fuck in my opinion, but they do talk,
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 4: you know.
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 3: And and they all are made to look vaguely human,
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 3: some more than others. The more human they look, the
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 3: more they hit the uncanny valley for for some people
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 3: like me. But I don't like dolls. We'll just we'll
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 3: just leave it at that.
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 2: Oh man, Hey, remember that horror movie that came out
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 2: called Dolls, And it was about the It was it
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 2: was a very it was a B movie, but I.
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 4: Kind of love it.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: It was about creepy dolls that were like, my.
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: Fear of dolls and it is a bit of a phobia,
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 3: like I will not be alone in a room with
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 3: a doll in the dark.
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 4: Came from the oddest source, all right.
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 3: When I was really little, I used to sneak out
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 3: of my room at night when my parents were watching
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: TV and hide behind somebody's chair, mom or dad, and
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: until I would get caught, and they would put me
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 3: back to bed and watch whatever they were watching. And
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 3: one night they were flipping through channels and ran across
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 3: that scene in Barbarella where she's tied to a pole
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 3: and the robots are riding through her pantyhose and they
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 3: look like they look like kind of like porcelain dolls,
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 3: the kind that their eyes open and close. Instant phobia,
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 3: Like right there, the rest of my life, man, My
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 3: my first super bad nightmare was about dolls after that. Okay,
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 3: so just for people who think, oh, you know, Hannah
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 3: is invested in this because she wants a sex doll.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 4: Fuck no, no.
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 3: Keep anything that looks human and isn't away from me.
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 3: But here's the thing, right, it's an ananimal object. Well,
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 3: it's it's maybe animate, but it's not alive. It is
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 3: not a living thing. It is not human. It is
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 3: not a person. It doesn't have personhood, it doesn't have intelligence,
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: it doesn't have feelings. Attributing feelings to it is bullshit. Right,
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 3: It has a physical appearance. It is a sex toy.
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: It is no different in terms of being a sex toy.
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 3: It is no different than a dick shaped vibrator, except
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 3: that it's not a disembodied genital Men like to have
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 3: something that at least looks like a woman. Women don't
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 3: have to have anything that even looks like a man,
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 3: and women have been condemning men for this ever since
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: these things came on the market and before, right.
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 4: Which is which is insane?
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 3: Given that, yeah, given that, given the fact that a
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 3: woman substitute for a man when she just wants to
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 3: get off and doesn't want companionship, doesn't look like a
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 3: whole man. It just looks like his genitalia. It's literally
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 3: objectifying masculinity, whereas you know men men at least want
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 3: the illusion, and that's one of the reasons why men
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 3: like poorn more than women too. So this isn't really
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 3: about consent, and it isn't about protecting women. It isn't
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 3: about preventing men from using something as a substitute in
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 3: order to avoid women's women's idiosyncrasies. And we'll put that
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 3: as nicely as possible. It is once again about control,
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 3: and once again, women are stupid.
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 4: All right, You buy this song and dance that.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 3: Taking away men having equal choices when it comes to
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 3: satisfying their sexual needs in a moment where companionship is
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 3: not part of the agenda, and you take away men's
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 3: ability to have some sort of release, and men do
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 3: have bigger sexual appetites than women. They're programmed that way.
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 3: All right, You take that away on the idea that
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: you're doing something for women. It's not because you care
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 3: about women. It's because you're too stupid to figure out
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 3: that once again, using the mechanics of authoritarianism to control
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: this in women's name creates a pathway for those same
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 3: mechanics of authoritarianism to be used.
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 4: For other reasons.
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 3: And if it wouldn't be legitimate in terms of whether
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 3: you like to drink water or soda, pop or beer
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 3: or wine, it's not legitimate in terms of whether you
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 3: like to to fuck an inanimate object that looks like
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: a disembodied genital or an inanimate object that looks like
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 3: a whole disembodied person, and what you do with it,
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 3: because it's not somebody else's business. It's not anybody's business,
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: you know, aside from the people that are getting paid
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 3: to provide you with the object. That's their business. So
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 3: so yeah, we're we're right back to women are stupid.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: We're right back to women are allowing themselves to be
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: exploited by authoritarians. And the gullibility of this is it's again,
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 3: it astounds me. How can you not see what you're
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 3: collaborating with?
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 4: All right, you're being.
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 3: Exploited as the vehicle for bringing in authoritarianism as the norm.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 4: Are you really? You really are that stupid? Stop it?
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: All right, Well, I don't know what else to say
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 2: except if any of you guys own any sex dolls,
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: make sure they don't get the latest patch because it
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: might be like it might be the last, So be
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 2: sure to like, you know, yeah, yeah.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: Don't don't don't leave them open to get the match patch.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 4: It's the virus.
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 5: Can you go to jail raping a sex robot?
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: Is that extremes? Probably in the UK. Yes, all right,
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: all the.
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 3: Way around the track on just two tires while raping
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 3: a sex robot.
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 4: Yes, that's right out the windows so everybody.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: Can see guy pairasales.
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 4: Pairsales, Yeah, right right.
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: Into the sex robot. All right.
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: Anyway, Yeah, so that was kind of fun. Actually, thanks
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 2: guys for the show. I you know, it's it's dark stuff,
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 2: but like we deal and you got to right.
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: We got to persist.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: So and I think that like we have, once you
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: like understand the reality of the world we live in,
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: it actually does make it easier to just carry on
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 2: because you're just like, okay, I know what's going on,
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 2: and you try to tell other people if they're willing
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 2: to listen.
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: Most people probably.
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 2: Aren't going to until they're like personally impact and they're like,
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: how did that happen? I'm like, well, let me tell
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: you something, you know. So, oh, I got a super
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 2: no sorry, a rumble rant. So I got a rumble
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 2: rant from Nova Fan twenty one. He says, careful with
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 2: your comments on women. Now, he calls that scapegoating women.
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 2: I'm not gonna I thank you for telling me. Yeah,
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: so I'm thank you for the for the rumble rant.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: We're gonna head into the Patron show. We might talk
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 2: a little bit about the fireside chat I did yesterday there,
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 2: but we are definitely gonna be looking at this article
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 2: or not article. But it's like a Twitter post by
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 2: this woman named Ali who is basically saying that, you know,
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: men shouldn't have had hobbies because it is women the ick,
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: and we're gonna look at that in the Patron. So
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 2: if you guys want to join us again, become a
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 2: badgery yourself by going to Feed the Badger dot com
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 2: ford slash subscribe and then you'll be able to watch
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 2: the additional content if you join us. And also, we
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 2: are still doing our monthly fundraiser. I think we're gonna
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 2: get there, and there's still a little bit of time left,
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 2: but if you want to, you can support us by
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 2: going to feed thebadgeer dot com ford slash support And
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: if you want to send us a message after the
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: show has ended, we'll be sure to read it on
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: the next show that we do, which we're doing a
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: show tomorrow. I think Karen and I are going to
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 2: be talking about Kamala Harris, So yeah, maybe you want
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 2: to be there for that and come on to do that,
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry. Go to feed thebadgel dot com forward slash
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: just the tip and send a message and feed us
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 2: and hopefully we'll see you all there. So anyway, with
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: all that said, I want to thank Hannah and Mike
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 2: for coming on the show and giving us their two
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 2: cents and I look forward to seeing your comments so
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 2: that we can get your two cents. So, if you
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 2: guys like to be please smash like, subscribe if you're
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 2: not already subscribe to develop notifications, leave us a comment.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: Let us know what you guys think about what we
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 2: discussed on the show today. And please please please share
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 2: this video because sharing is caring. Thank you so much
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 2: for coming on today's episode of HPR News and we
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 2: will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 8: Yes are machines, dude, Okay, they are literal machines. They
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 8: are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking deal with,
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 8: especially if you have like especially if you have like
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 8: a couple of dudes who have good memory. On top
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 8: of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked