Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / How to watch Unknown Serial Killers of America Season 2 in Canada

Transcript

How to watch Unknown Serial Killers of America Season 2 in Canada · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Imagine knowing you were going to be murdered. Oh god, right,
• 0:04
  imagine that visceral just suffocating terror of that realization dawning
• 0:09
  on you.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that is I mean, that's unimaginable.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: And realizing the only thing you can possibly do in
• 0:14
  that moment is like quietly whisper a warning.
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: To a friend, just hoping someone listens.
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: Exactly hoping someone someday will actually listen. And that is
• 0:23
  exactly what a woman named Linda Price did just one
• 0:27
  night before she vanished.
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: Wow, one night.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, she told a close friend very clearly, uh not
• 0:34
  to let a man named Glenn Rodgers get by with
• 0:36
  it if anything happened to her.
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: So she essentially left the only clue to her own demise.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: She did, and that chilling reality is basically the anchor
• 0:43
  for what we are exploring today on this deep dive.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: Is a heavy one today, it really is.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: So we are unpacking a highly specific guide that was
• 0:50
  published today August nine, twenty twenty.
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: Six, right by Mike Smith yeah.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: On Real Goods Up Next blog. And on its surface,
• 0:57
  the source material looks, I mean, it looks like a
• 1:00
  pretty straightforward logistical roadmap, a TV guide basically exactly a
• 1:04
  TV guide. It covers everything you need to know about
• 1:07
  navigating the release of a documentary series called Unknown Serial
• 1:10
  Killers of America Season two.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: But it is so much more than that, right.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: Because as we dig into this text, it becomes incredibly
• 1:17
  clear that we aren't just looking at a TV schedule, No,
• 1:21
  not at all. We are looking at this fascinating, almost
• 1:24
  like jarring collision of two completely different worlds.
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the analog and the digital.
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: Yes. On one hand, we have this terrifying, completely analog
• 1:34
  reality of cold case murders, crimes committed by people who
• 1:37
  just vanished into the physical American landscape.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: Just ghosts.
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: And then on the other hand, we have this highly technical,
• 1:44
  modern day reality of trying to track down and consume
• 1:47
  this media across you know, invisible digital borders.
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: Which is an entire ordeal in itself.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: It really is. Okay, let's uncack this because to understand
• 1:56
  how we watch these stories today, we really have to
• 1:58
  understand the fundamental shift and the kind of stories we're
• 2:01
  actually choosing to tell.
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: And the shift and focus here is h I mean,
• 2:06
  it's what makes this source material so compelling to analyze. Definitely,
• 2:10
  Because Mike Smith's article outlines a very clear synopsis for
• 2:14
  this second season, and the title really does all the
• 2:17
  heavy lifting upfront.
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: Right, unknown serial Killers.
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: Of America exactly. We are focusing strictly on lesser known
• 2:25
  serial killers.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: The text explicitly defines these as offenders whose crimes remained
• 2:31
  hidden for years before investigators finally uncovered the truth.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: So they weren't exactly making headlines in real time.
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: No, not at all. These are individuals who avoided capture
• 2:41
  and left behind trails of unsolved murders across the United States.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: Just a completely different breed of offender.
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we are actively stepping away from the spotlight of
• 2:50
  like true crime infamy.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: Which is huge for this genre.
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: It is we aren't discussing the theatrical, you know, taunting
• 2:56
  killers who sent encrypted ciphers to major newspapers.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: The ones who wanted the attention exactly, the.
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: Ones who desperately sought the spotlight to feed their own grandiosity.
• 3:06
  We are dealing with individuals who successfully weaponized obscurity.
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: Weaponize obscurity, that's a great way to put it.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: They utilize the vastness of the country to stay entirely
• 3:17
  off the radar.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think about how the true crime genre
• 3:21
  usually functions, and it almost always leans on familiarity.
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: You know absolutely the big names, right.
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: You have your dark pop culture icons, you know their childhoods,
• 3:30
  you know their specific methods, and most importantly, you know
• 3:33
  exactly how they were caught.
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: It's a closed loop.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. The monster is safely behind bars or they're deceased.
• 3:42
  But these lesser known killers operate entirely.
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: Differently, very differently.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: If you think about it, it's like driving across the
• 3:49
  country using cash instead of a credit card.
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: Oh that's a perfect analogy, right, Without.
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: The digital footprint of the swipe, you just disappear from
• 3:56
  the grid the moment you hit the.
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: Highway, you're just gone.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: And these unknown killers operated in that cash only space
• 4:03
  of human existence. You couldn't see them in the headlines
• 4:06
  for years, but the damage they left behind was.
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: Monumental, cruelly monumental.
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: But I do have to push back a little on
• 4:12
  the core appeal of this premise, Okay, laid on me, like,
• 4:15
  why focus on the unknown? Because if we look at
• 4:18
  the massive true crime industry, isn't the primary appeal dissecting
• 4:23
  the big name monsters we all recognize.
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: I see what you're saying.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: I would argue the audience inherently wants the spectacle of
• 4:30
  the recognizable villain because there's I don't know, there's safety
• 4:34
  and familiarity, right, you know how the story ends exactly,
• 4:37
  So why would a viewer want to spend five hours
• 4:40
  with a ghost they've never even heard of.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: What's fascinating here is I would actually look at it differently. Okay,
• 4:46
  how so when you consume a documentary about a world famous,
• 4:51
  infamous killer, you are afforded a tremendous amount of psychological distance.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: Interesting because you already know.
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: The beats exactly. The story is told so many times
• 5:01
  it almost crosses over into mythology.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: It's like sulklore.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: Right, the ending is etched in stone, and as you mentioned,
• 5:06
  the loop is closed. But by focusing on the hidden
• 5:09
  for years aspect these completely unknown offenders, the narrative fundamentally
• 5:15
  shifts the spotlight.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: It moves off the killer.
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: Yes, it moves away from the spectacle of the killer's
• 5:21
  ego and shines a harsh, glaring light directly onto the
• 5:25
  blind spots of society and law enforcement.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: Oh wow, so it's not about them, It's about.
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: Us, precisely. The appeal isn't the spectacle. It's the autopsy
• 5:34
  of our own vulnerability.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: That is terrifying.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: It really is the true terror for the viewer in
• 5:40
  a series like this lies in the realization of how
• 5:43
  easily an offender can slip through the cracks of a
• 5:45
  system we all assume as designed to catch them.
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: So it's not about how loud the killer was, It's
• 5:50
  about how deaf the surrounding environment was to the crimes
• 5:54
  being committed.
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: That is the absolute crux of it, yn because when
• 5:58
  you watch a show about an unknown serial killer who
• 6:00
  avoided capture while leaving a trail of unsolved murders across
• 6:04
  the country, you aren't just analyzing a monster. You're analyzing
• 6:09
  a systemic failure. You are looking at the negative space
• 6:12
  of justice.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: A negative space. I like that.
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: The terror isn't just the brutality of what they did.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's the aftermath.
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: It is the fact that they got away with it
• 6:19
  for so long, living among us entirely undetected, which forces.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: You to look over your own shoulder exactly.
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: It forces the audience to confront the extreme fragility of
• 6:31
  the safety nets we rely on. We like to think
• 6:33
  that if someone does something heinous, a metaphorical alarm.
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: Bell rings and the police just swoop in, right.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: The authorities converge. But this series, based on the synopsis provided,
• 6:43
  is built entirely on the premise that the alarm bell
• 6:46
  is often broken.
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: Or disconnected entirely exactly. But and I have to ask,
• 6:51
  is it really a systemic failure?
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: What do you mean?
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Or is it just the harsh reality that in a
• 6:56
  country of over three hundred million people, a transi person
• 7:00
  is incredibly hard to track. That's a fair point, Like,
• 7:03
  are we expecting too much from local police departments, especially historically?
• 7:07
  Speaker 2: A context is important.
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, if you have a drifter moving constantly, blending in,
• 7:12
  keeping their head down, is it fair to call it
• 7:15
  a failure of the system or is it just the
• 7:17
  terrifying reality of human movement in a massive geographical space.
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: That is a highly debated tension in criminal justice, And honestly,
• 7:26
  it's exactly the tension this documentary aims to explore.
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Okay, so it tackles that directly.
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it is both a failure of localized systems and
• 7:36
  a reality of the geographical scale of the United.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: States, because it's a huge country.
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: Massive and to address that tension, you have to look
• 7:44
  at how these coal cases are actually broken down. Tracing
• 7:47
  something that was intentionally hidden for years across a massive
• 7:51
  landscape requires a deeply coordinated effort.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Which brings us back to the real good article.
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: Right. Mike Smith's article features this FAQ section gives us
• 8:00
  a really clear glimpse into the methodology of the series.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, the interviewees exactly.
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: The text outlines the specific roster of interviewees featured in
• 8:09
  the documentary. We're talking detectives, investigators, friendsic specialists, journalists.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: And people personally connect it to the original cases.
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: Right. And furthermore, the article knows the geographical spread of
• 8:19
  these investigations. We are looking at cases taking place across Florida, Arizona,
• 8:24
  Maryland and the Midwest.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: Wow. That list of voices is fascinating because it implies
• 8:29
  that no single entity had the whole story.
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: They couldn't have, right.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: You need a journalist to explain what the town was feeling,
• 8:36
  a forensic specialist to explain what the microscope was seeing,
• 8:40
  and a detective to explain what the law was doing.
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: It's a patchwork quilt.
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: Let's dig into the mechanics of that geographical spread, though,
• 8:47
  because Florida Arizona, Maryland, the Midwest. We are talking about
• 8:52
  thousands of miles, thousands. Why couldn't a police department in
• 8:56
  Florida talk to a sheriff's office in Arizona back when
• 8:59
  these cold cases were actually active.
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: That's the million dollar question, right.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: We hear the term jurisdictional nightmare thrown around a lot
• 9:07
  in true crime, But how does that nightmare actually function
• 9:10
  on a day to day basis for a detective trying
• 9:13
  to catch one of these guys?
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: Okay, to really understand the nightmare, you have to mentally
• 9:17
  strip away almost every technological convenience we take for granted today.
• 9:21
  So no iPhones, no iPhones, no Internet. We are talking
• 9:25
  about cases that remained hidden for years, many originating in
• 9:29
  eras before integrated digital databases.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: That's hard to even picture now it is.
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: Back then, criminal records, missing persons reports, fingerprint files. They
• 9:39
  were largely analoged, just paper, literal physical pieces of paper
• 9:43
  sitting in manila folders inside metal filing cabins, inside local precincts. Wow,
• 9:49
  if an investigator in a small town in Maryland found
• 9:52
  a fingerprint at a crime scene, they could just scan
• 9:54
  it into a magical cloud that immediately cross referenced every
• 9:58
  fingerprint in America see on TV now Exactly. The system
• 10:02
  was fragmented by design, right.
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: Because law enforcement in the US is intensely localized, very localized.
• 10:08
  A town police department answers to the mayor, a sheriff
• 10:11
  answers to the county, and state police answer to the governor.
• 10:15
  They aren't all one.
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: Big team, and that localized structure creates intense informational silos.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: Okay, how so.
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: Well, if that Maryland detective wanted to see if their
• 10:25
  fingerprint matched to suspect in Arizona, they had to actively
• 10:29
  know to call that specific precinct in Arizona.
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: Which they'd have no reason to do exactly.
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: And even if they did, they'd have to request the
• 10:36
  physical fingerprint card and have it mailed across the country.
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: Mailed literally, put in an envelope with a scamp.
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: But why would they ever think to call Arizona unless
• 10:45
  there was a highly specific lead pointing them to the Southwest.
• 10:49
  They wouldn't.
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: They're just looking in their own backyard.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: They were looking for local problems. They were investigating the
• 10:54
  disgruntled ex husband, the local petty thief, the known troublemaker
• 10:59
  in the neighborhood visual suspects. Right, they were not conceptually
• 11:02
  prepared for a ghost who just drove in on the
• 11:05
  interstate from one thousand miles away, committed an atrocity, and
• 11:09
  left before the sun came up.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: So the killers were essentially exploiting the physical friction of
• 11:14
  sharing information. Yes, like the time it took to mail file,
• 11:17
  the cost of long distance phone calls, the sheer bureaucratic
• 11:21
  ego of different departments not wanting to share their case files.
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: They absolutely exploited it. The series highlights individuals described.
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: As drifters, right, the drifters, and a.
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: Drifter's greatest weapon against the justice system isn't a knife
• 11:34
  for a gun. What is It is the jurisdictional border.
• 11:37
  Oh wow, By simply crossing a skate line, a serial
• 11:42
  offender could effectively wipe their slate clean.
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: Just by driving an hour down the road.
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They could start over in the Midwest with zero
• 11:50
  institutional memory of what they had just done in Florida.
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: That is deeply frustrating.
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: It is, and that's why the documentary series acts as
• 11:58
  a retrospective synthesis.
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: Putting the pieces together.
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: Yes, it is doing the work today that was physically
• 12:05
  and technologically impossible back then. Utilizing all those different voices,
• 12:10
  the detectives looking at the old files, the forensic supplying
• 12:14
  modern DTA tracing, the journalists providing the timeline.
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: You can finally see the whole picture right.
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: The series connects the dots that local departments couldn't possibly
• 12:23
  have connected in real time. They are finally assembling the
• 12:27
  complete puzzle from pieces that were scattered across four different
• 12:31
  time zones.
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: It gives you a profound respect for the sheer scale
• 12:34
  of the historical problem.
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: It was immense.
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: They were working with a handful of puzzle pieces, but
• 12:39
  they didn't even know how big the puzzle was, let
• 12:42
  alone have the picture on the front of the box.
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: That's a great way to describe it.
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: And we don't have to speak in hypotheticals about how
• 12:48
  these transient killers operated because the guide gives us a
• 12:51
  terrifyingly concrete example right out of the gate.
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: It really does.
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: The article breaks down the episodic structure, and episode one,
• 12:58
  which premiered just a week ago on August two, twenty
• 13:01
  twenty six, focuses entirely on a man named Glenn Rogers, and.
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: This premiere really sets the thematic tone for the entire season.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, because the synopsis for this first episode describes
• 13:13
  Glenn Rodgers as a charismatic drifter.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: There's that word again.
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: Right, and it details how four women are murdered across
• 13:21
  four distinct states, with investigators racing to identify this transient
• 13:25
  figure believed to be responsible for the deadly crimes break
• 13:28
  across four states, which goes right back to the border jumping.
• 13:31
  But this brings us back to the chilling detail I
• 13:33
  brought up at the very beginning of our.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: Discussion, Linda Price.
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: Yes, under the preview section of the guide, there is
• 13:39
  an embedded tweet from Oxygen True Crime dated July thirty. First,
• 13:43
  it previews the case of Linda Price. Just one night
• 13:47
  before she disappears, she quietly warns a close friend not
• 13:50
  to let Glenn Rodgers get by with it if anything
• 13:52
  happens to her. It just gives you chills, it really does.
• 13:55
  Here's where it gets really interesting though. Her premonition is staggering.
• 14:02
  It's like a real life horror movie where the victim
• 14:04
  leaves the breadcrumbs because she knows the police won't find
• 14:08
  them in time.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: She knew she was on her own exactly.
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: But what I want to explore is the dissonance between
• 14:13
  the description of Rogers and Linda's reaction to him. The
• 14:17
  text calls him a charismatic drifter, right, how does a
• 14:21
  victim sense the mortal danger hidden beneath the charisma.
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: That dissonance is the core of predatory psychology.
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: Okay, unpack that for me.
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: That specific word charismatic used in the text to describe
• 14:33
  Rogers is not a compliment. It sounds like one, though
• 14:37
  it does. But in the context of an unknown serial killer,
• 14:39
  charisma is a highly refined tool.
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: Oh like a weapon.
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: It is a cloaking device. Yeah. We tend to think
• 14:45
  of monsters as looking like monsters.
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: Right, hurking in the shadows.
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, socially awkward, visibly threatening. But a drifter who survives
• 14:54
  by moving from town to town, infiltrating new social circles,
• 14:58
  finding new places to sleep, and identifying.
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: New victims, they can't look like that.
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: No, they cannot afford to look like a monster. They
• 15:05
  have to look like a friend.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: Yamn.
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: Charisma is what gets them invited through the front door.
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: It bypasses the community's immune system. Exactly, because if you
• 15:13
  are charming, funny, and agreeable. People don't ask for your
• 15:16
  references or you know, run a background check on you.
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: They don't. People naturally want to trust charisma, right, human nature,
• 15:23
  but human intuition, that deep, primal gut feeling, is constantly
• 15:28
  processing micro expressions, body language and inconsistencies that our conscious
• 15:33
  brain might ignore because we are charmed.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: So Linda subconscious was waving a red flag.
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: Yes, Linda Price clearly saw the mask slip. She perceived
• 15:42
  the lethal threat operating beneath the.
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: Charm, which is terrifying to think about. What did she see?
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: We might never know. Perhaps there's a look in his
• 15:49
  eye when he thought no one was watching, a sudden
• 15:52
  shift in tone, or a boundary he crossed that triggered
• 15:56
  her survival instincts.
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: And what is so deeply tragic in some multaneously heroic,
• 16:01
  is how she handled that realization the warning right. In
• 16:05
  issuing that quiet warning to a close friend, she essentially
• 16:09
  became the first investigator on her own murder case.
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: She opened the file before the crime even occurred.
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: She really did.
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: She essentially bypassed the Florida police, the Arizona police, all
• 16:19
  the way down the line and went straight to the
• 16:22
  only person she could trust.
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: She recognized on some level that the systems designed to
• 16:26
  protect her were blind to the threat posed.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: By this man because he was a drifter right.
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: He was charming, he was transient, He had no roots
• 16:34
  for the local police to investigate. So she took the
• 16:36
  only action available to her. She created a verbal.
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: Record, a message in a bottle.
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: Exactly, she planted a flag in the ground for the truth,
• 16:44
  knowing she might not be there to see it uncovered.
• 16:46
  That is just so brave, it is, and her tragedi
• 16:49
  foresight is what ultimately gave the professional investigators, the forensic specialists,
• 16:54
  and the journalists a thread to pull on years later,
• 16:57
  a place to start. Without that quiet warning to a friend,
• 17:01
  Glenn Rogers might have remained just another ghost on the highway.
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: It adds such a devastating human layer to the story.
• 17:07
  We talk about systemic failures and jurisdictional borders as these grand,
• 17:11
  abstract concepts, but the reality is Linda Price sitting in
• 17:15
  a room, realizing she is trapped and trying to leave
• 17:18
  a message in a bottle.
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: The human cost is staggering.
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: It really is. And the fact that we are sitting
• 17:23
  here in twenty twenty six talking about a documentary dissecting
• 17:27
  this case. Means her warning did eventually echo into the future.
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: She was heard.
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: But taking all of this in absorbing that kind of dark,
• 17:35
  heavy material, listening to the final quiet warnings of victors
• 17:39
  who are left unprotected, it requires a tremendous amount of
• 17:43
  emotional stamina from the audience.
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: Oh, the psychological weight of this specific type of true
• 17:48
  crime is significant.
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: It's not a beat read, not at all.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: It is not escapist entertainment. It is an immersion into
• 17:54
  trauma and vulnerability.
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to a highly strategic aspect of Mike
• 17:59
  Smith's guide, the Cadence of Consumption.
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: This is a really interesting point.
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: The article lays out the release schedule for Unknown Serial
• 18:05
  Killers of America Season two with extreme precision. Right as
• 18:09
  we noted, episode one premiered on August two. Episode two
• 18:13
  drops today Sunday, August nine, twenty twenty six.
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: So we are right in the middle of it yep.
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: And then episodes three, four and five follow on a
• 18:21
  strict weekly basis August sixteenth, August twenty three, and August thirty.
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: A very traditional rollout.
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: And alongside the schedule, the article highlights a very explicit
• 18:31
  rating warning It states clearly that the show is strictly
• 18:35
  for mature audiences older teens and adults, specifically due to
• 18:39
  disturbing true crime material.
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: And that mature rating is not just standard boilerplate text. No, no,
• 18:45
  it pairs inextricably with the structural release format the network
• 18:48
  has chosen.
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: And that release format is exactly what I wanted to
• 18:51
  dig into, because look at the media landscape we live
• 18:54
  in today.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: It's all about the binge.
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: We are completely conditioned to the binge model. Platforms draw
• 19:00
  an entire season of television on a Friday, and the
• 19:03
  expectation is that the cultural conversation will be entirely over
• 19:06
  by Monday morning.
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: You're supposed to consume it in one gulp, exactly.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: The algorithms encourage rapid fire consumption to keep you on
• 19:13
  the platform. So why for a show like this drag
• 19:16
  a tight five episode series out over an entire month?
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: It feels slow?
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: Doesn't that archaic weekly release model kill the momentum? Doesn't
• 19:26
  it risk the audience simply losing interest or forgetting the
• 19:29
  intricate details between August two and August thirty.
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: It might seem counterintuitive in the streaming era, but if
• 19:36
  we connect this to the bigger picture of media consumption
• 19:39
  and audience well being. The weekly release schedule is incredibly deliberate, deliberate,
• 19:44
  how in fact, it is arguably a psychological necessity for
• 19:47
  this specific subgenre of true crime.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: Walk me through the mechanics of that. Why is it
• 19:52
  a necessity here but not for like a high stakes
• 19:55
  fictional drama.
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: Think about the explicit warning provided in the text disturb
• 20:00
  being true crime material.
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: We just spent a significant amount of time discussing the
• 20:04
  immense emotional weight of Linda Price's story. We analyze the
• 20:08
  dread of a woman predicting her own murder, the systemic
• 20:11
  failure of law enforcement across state lines, and the predatory
• 20:14
  nature of a charismatic killer.
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: It's heavy stuff.
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: Now mentally multiply that. Imagine consuming five consecutive hours of
• 20:22
  stories exactly like hers. Oh wow, unrelenting accounts of unknown killers,
• 20:28
  brutal murders across multiple states, devastated families, and adjustice system
• 20:33
  that was fundamentally unequipped to stop the bleeding.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: It would be entirely suffocating. Yes, you would become completely
• 20:38
  desensitized to the horror by hour three, or you would
• 20:41
  spiral into a profound state of paranoia.
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: Both outcomes are highly likely. Binge watching trauma creates a
• 20:47
  massive cognitive load.
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: A cognitive load, Yeah, when you drop.
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: An entire season of deeply disturbing factual material at once,
• 20:54
  the viewer often isolates themselves in a marathon.
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: Of darkness, sitting in a dark room for six hours.
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: Right, They absorb the horror continuously without any structural space
• 21:03
  for reflection, processing or emotional regulation.
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: Just back to back tragedy.
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: But by spacing the episodes out on a weekly basis,
• 21:10
  the network is artificially enforcing a period of decompression. It
• 21:15
  acts as a necessary pressure valve.
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: They are forcing the audience to come up for air,
• 21:19
  whether they want to or not exactly.
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: It gives the viewer's nervous system time to return to baseline.
• 21:25
  It allows the heavy information to settle and contextualize.
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: That makes a lot of sense.
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: But beyond individual mental health, there is a sociological function
• 21:33
  to the weekly release. Okay, sociological how it encourages communal processing.
• 21:38
  When an episode airs on a Sunday night, people have
• 21:40
  the entire week to talk about it with their peers,
• 21:43
  to dissect the jurisdictional issues at the water cooler to
• 21:46
  reflect on the victims stories on social media before the
• 21:49
  next wave of heavy information hits.
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: So you aren't carrying the weight alone, right.
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: It transforms the viewing experience. Instead of a solitary, isolating
• 21:58
  plunge into human depravity, comes a shared, measured exploration of
• 22:02
  history and.
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: Justice that reframes the entire experience. For me, the enforced
• 22:07
  pause is in't a limitation of the network. It's a
• 22:10
  feature of the storytelling.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: A protective feature.
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: It respects the gravity of the real world material and
• 22:16
  protects the mental health of the viewer. It's the difference
• 22:18
  between drinking from a fire hose of tragedy and taking
• 22:21
  time to actually examine.
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: The water exactly.
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: I agree that taking those structural breaks is healthy. However,
• 22:27
  the guide by Mike Smith points out that for some viewers,
• 22:30
  specifically the Canadian audience this particular article is aimed at,
• 22:35
  just getting initial access to the show requires its own
• 22:38
  kind of technical stamina.
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: O logistics are wild.
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: You have to jump through a ridiculous amount of digital
• 22:43
  hoops just to press play.
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: The logistical mechanics detailed in the latter half of the
• 22:48
  article are just as intricate and arguably as fraught with
• 22:52
  invisible barriers as the cold cases themselves.
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: The guide is essentially a manual for bypassing the invisible
• 22:58
  walls of the modern Internet.
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: It really is.
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: The text lays out the streaming logistics with exhaustive clarity.
• 23:04
  In the US, the path is simple. The show airs
• 23:07
  on the Oxygen True Crime Network on Sundays at one
• 23:10
  on nine Central, and it streams on Peacock. Easy enough,
• 23:13
  But for the listener in Canada, the path fractures. The
• 23:17
  article provides two distinct, highly technical options.
• 23:20
  Speaker 2: The authorized native route and the geographical bypass route.
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: Let's look at the bypass route first, because the guide
• 23:27
  goes into granular detail. It involves using a VPN. The
• 23:32
  article specifically instructs the reader to subscribe to NordVPN, install
• 23:36
  the application on their device, and crucially, connect to a
• 23:40
  server physically located in the United States.
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: You have to trick the system exactly.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: Once you have digitally spooked your location and convinced the
• 23:48
  Internet you're sitting in Chicago or New York, you can
• 23:50
  then navigate to the Peacock website, log in or sign up,
• 23:54
  and finally start watching the documentary.
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: What's the other option?
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: The second native route is to watch it on Crave,
• 24:00
  which requires a separate Canadian subscription, as Crave holds the
• 24:03
  regional distribution rights.
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: The irony embedded in these instructions is profound.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: It is a massive paradox. Think about the physical borders.
• 24:11
  We spent the first half of this deep dive discussing lines. Yes,
• 24:16
  we have these killers, these charismatic drifters crossing physical state
• 24:20
  lines from Florida to Maryland to the Midwest, specifically exploiting
• 24:25
  those jurisdictional borders to avoid detection.
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: They use the borders as a shield.
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: They weaponize the map to maintain access to their victims
• 24:32
  and evade the police. And now, decades later, we have
• 24:36
  digital content about those exact killers, locked behind invisible regional.
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: Borders, which require highly specific tools to.
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: Cross exactly, tools like VPNs. Just as a serial killer
• 24:48
  crossed a physical border to remain unseen, a modern viewer
• 24:52
  has to digitally cross a border, effectively masking their own
• 24:55
  identity and location, just to finally see the truth about
• 24:59
  the killer.
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: It is a brilliant parallel. The concept of borders completely
• 25:03
  dictates the narrative of this show, both internally in the
• 25:06
  lives of the subjects and externally in the lives of
• 25:09
  the audience. It's borders all the way down.
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: But this complex digital choreography raises an important cultural question,
• 25:15
  don't you think, is why is an audience willing to
• 25:17
  go through this?
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: That's a good point. Why is there a dedicated step
• 25:20
  by step article on a major entertainment platform like Real
• 25:23
  Goods up Next Blog explicitly teaching Canadians how to digitally
• 25:28
  circumvent regional blocks just to watch a documentary about American
• 25:32
  cold cases.
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: Well, the simplest answer is that the demand for the
• 25:35
  content vastly outweighs the friction of the technology.
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: People just want to see it.
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: People want this specific genre so badly they will learn
• 25:43
  basic networking just to access it.
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: That speaks volumes about the globalization of true crime as
• 25:48
  a cultural phenomenon.
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: It really does. It's everywhere now.
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: The crimes depicted in the series were intensely local. They
• 25:54
  were singular tragedies in a specific Midwestern town, a quiet
• 25:59
  murder in an Arizona suburb.
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: Very isolated events.
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: But the psychological intrigue surrounding them has become entirely.
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: Universal because the fear is universal.
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: Exactly the corporate reality is that streaming rights. The massive
• 26:12
  legal contracts between networks like Oxygen, Peacock, and Crave are
• 26:16
  intensely regionalized.
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: They're territorial.
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: They are fighting over geographical territories and subscription dollars. But
• 26:23
  human curiosity, the fundamental desire to understand the darkest aspects
• 26:28
  of human nature, and the urge to see justice applied even.
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: Retroactively, that doesn't stop at the border.
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: Those impulses do not recognize international corporate borders. A viewer
• 26:39
  in Toronto is just as invested in unraveling the mystery
• 26:42
  of a drifter in Florida as a viewer sitting in Miami.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: True crime has become a borderless cultural currency, and platforms
• 26:49
  like VPNs are just the crowbars that allow that universal
• 26:53
  curiosity to pry open the regional corporate restrictions.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: Is a constant cat and mouse game of content delivery.
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: It really is say you do it. Let's say you
• 27:01
  successfully navigate those digital borders.
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: Okay, you're in.
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: You can figure your VPN for Peacock, or you pay
• 27:06
  the subscription and fire up Crave. The next choice the
• 27:09
  viewer makes, according to the final section of Mike Smith's guide,
• 27:13
  is surprisingly intimate.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: You're referring to the hardware the physical medium of consumption.
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: Because it's one thing to figure out how to access
• 27:21
  the digital file across the border, but it's another thing
• 27:23
  entirely to decide what physical screen you will use to
• 27:27
  invite these unknown serial killers into your home.
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: And there are so many options.
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: The article provides an exhaustive, almost dizzying list of devices
• 27:35
  that Crave supports. Doesn't just say available on most devices,
• 27:40
  it lists them out with surgical precision.
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: The text covers almost every conceivable modern screen currently available
• 27:46
  on the consumer market.
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: The sheer variety is staggering, and I want to summarize
• 27:50
  the scope of it. We are talking about everything in
• 27:53
  your pocket iPhones and androids right, everything in your backpack, iPads,
• 27:57
  Android tablets, Mac and Windows computers too, and then the
• 28:00
  entire ecosystem of the living room smart TVs from Samsung, LG, Visio,
• 28:06
  alongside streaming devices like Roku, Amazon, fireTV, Apple TV and
• 28:11
  Chrome Cast.
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: It just keeps going.
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: And if that wasn't enough, it lists TV platforms like
• 28:15
  Android TV, Xfinity Flex and the Zuomo stream box, plus
• 28:19
  every major web browser. The article is making a very
• 28:22
  clear point. You cannot escape the availability of this content.
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: It represents absolute technological ubiquity.
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: Ubiquity is the perfect word.
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: The content is optimized to be beamed onto the smallest
• 28:34
  screen in the palm of your hand, all the way
• 28:36
  up to the largest screen mounted on your wall.
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: But this list forces a deeper question. We look at
• 28:42
  this massive array of hardware and we have to ask,
• 28:45
  does the medium change the impact of the message?
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a great question.
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: You can watch a gritty, deeply disturbing documentary about a
• 28:53
  brutal serial killer on a massive seventy inch surround sound
• 28:57
  LG smart TV in the comfort of your living room
• 29:00
  cinematic scale right, every detail of the crime scene, every
• 29:03
  tier on the face of the victim's family is blown
• 29:06
  up to larger than life cinematic proportions. Or conversely, you
• 29:10
  can watch that exact same horrifying content on a tiny
• 29:14
  iPhone screen while sitting on a public bus, surrounded by
• 29:17
  strangers with earbuds crammed into your ears.
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: A completely different experience.
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: Does the device dictate the emotional resonance of the true crime?
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: It is a phenomenal question that media theorists have debated
• 29:27
  for decades, and it cuts to the core of how
• 29:30
  modern technology recontextualizes trauma.
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: Like Marshall McLuhan.
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: Yes, Marshall mclenn famously argued that the medium is the message,
• 29:37
  and that applies perfectly here. Let's look at the justa
• 29:40
  position between the extreme lethal gravity of the content four
• 29:44
  women murdered across four states by a charismatic drifter, and
• 29:48
  the casual consumer nature of the technology used to view it.
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: Right, Because an Exfinity flex or a Roku box isn't
• 29:54
  designed for consuming trauma.
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: No, not at all.
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: It's designed for convenience, for light entertainment, for quickly browsing
• 30:01
  through sitcoms, cooking shows, or live sports. It is an
• 30:05
  appliance of leisure.
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: Exactly when you watch a meticulous forensic analysis of a
• 30:09
  cold case on a large smart TV via one of
• 30:13
  these streaming boxes, you are making the horror highly accessible,
• 30:17
  but you are also turning it into a cinematic event.
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: You're almost glorifying it visually.
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: You are placing the investigation on a grand, brightly lit
• 30:24
  stage in the center of your home in a way
• 30:27
  that clinical theatrical presentation perhaps honors the immense scale of
• 30:31
  the investigative effort required.
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: To solve these crimes because it demands your attention.
• 30:35
  Speaker 2: It demands your full visual attention. But watching it on
• 30:38
  a smartphone creates an entirely different, arguably much more unsettling
• 30:43
  psychological dynamic.
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: Because it forces a strange intimacy with the horror.
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: Precisely, when you watch a documentary about a serial killer
• 30:51
  on a phone, the killer and the victims are literally
• 30:55
  in the palm of your hand.
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: That's creepy image.
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: The physical distance between you and the horrific reality is
• 31:01
  reduced to a few inches of illuminated glass. It becomes
• 31:05
  a deeply private, internalized experience. Even in public, Even if
• 31:09
  you are sitting in a crowded public space, the earbuds
• 31:12
  and the small screen isolate you entirely with the narrative.
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: You are holding Linda Price's final desperate warning in your
• 31:18
  hand while commuting to work or waiting in line for coffee.
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: It's jarring.
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: It takes the expanse of geography of a multi state
• 31:24
  manhunt and shrinks it down to a deeply personal, almost
• 31:27
  claustrophobic interaction.
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: But if we step back from the individual experience, there
• 31:32
  is a broader, almost poetic significance to this vast exhaustive
• 31:37
  list of supported devices detailed in the guide.
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: Okay, poetic, how.
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: Think back to how we started this discussion. We defined
• 31:44
  these killers as the unknown individuals who relied on the shadows,
• 31:48
  who depended on the lack of communication, the lack of databases,
• 31:52
  and the lack of visibility to remain hidden for years.
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: They relied entirely on the absence of screens, the less
• 31:58
  people could see the for they were.
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: They thrived in the dark spots of the map, in
• 32:03
  the gaps between jurisdictions. But this technological ubiquity, the fact
• 32:08
  that this documentary their exposure could be beamed onto iPhones, iPads,
• 32:13
  rocus and LGTV simultaneously across millions of homes. Oh wow.
• 32:18
  It ensures the exact opposite of their goal. It ensures
• 32:21
  that the stories of these victims, victims like Linda Price
• 32:24
  who tried to leave a warning, reach absolute maximum visibility.
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: It is the ultimate retroactive reversal of the killer's intent.
• 32:31
  Speaker 2: It is the killer's entire methodology was predicated on making
• 32:34
  sure the crimes were ignored and.
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: Forgotten, buried in Manila folders.
• 32:38
  Speaker 2: Exactly the sheer ubiquity of modern streaming ecosystems insure as
• 32:41
  they are remembered everywhere on every conceivable device across international borders.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: There's no real left for them to hide.
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: The technology we use to watch these smart TVs and
• 32:51
  smartphones serves as a massive, inescapable floodlight, illuminating the very
• 32:56
  corners the killers tried to keep dark for so long is.
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: That's a profoundly powerful way to look at it. The
• 33:03
  technology isn't just a neutral pipe delivering the content. It
• 33:06
  is actively participating in a form of retrospective justice. Beautifully put,
• 33:11
  it guarantees that the victims who are silenced in the
• 33:13
  analog age are finally seen and heard on a massive
• 33:17
  global scale in the digital age.
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: It's a full circle moment.
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: It really is. And this has been a truly expansive
• 33:23
  journey based on what initially seemed like a simple, utilitarian
• 33:26
  how to watch guide by Mike Smith on Real Goods
• 33:29
  Upnext blog.
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: Who knew a TV guide could be so deep?
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: Right? We started by exploring the unique, unsettling hook of
• 33:35
  the unknown killer, understanding why. Focusing on the systemic blind spots,
• 33:39
  the analog failures of early law enforcement, and the dark
• 33:42
  matter of true crime is often more terrifying than analyzing
• 33:46
  the infamous monsters whose stories have already been.
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: Closed, we moved from that abstract terror into the concrete
• 33:52
  historical reality, examining the necessary network of voices, the journalists
• 33:57
  tracking the timeline, the forensics tracking the science, and the
• 34:01
  families holding the emotional weight required to synthesize crimes spread
• 34:05
  across vast, disconnected geographies like Florida, Maryland, and the.
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Midwest, and we felt the heavy, chilling emotional reality of
• 34:13
  the micro analysis, specifically looking at the case of Glenn
• 34:16
  Rogers in episode one and the devastating foresight of Linda Price.
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: Her story is just unforgettable.
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: Her quiet warning to a friend essentially made her the
• 34:25
  lead investigator of her own tragedy, proving that human intuition
• 34:28
  can sometimes see through the cloaking device of predatory charisma.
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: We analyze the media psychology behind how networks respect that trauma.
• 34:36
  Utilizing a weekly released schedule, dropping episode two today August nine,
• 34:41
  and the rest throughout the month. We saw how avoiding
• 34:43
  the binge model acts as a vital psychological pressure valve
• 34:46
  from mature audiences, allowing time for committal processing.
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: And finally, we unpacked the incredible logistical gymnastics outlined in
• 34:53
  the source text. We explore the deep irony of audiences
• 34:57
  using VPNs like NordVPN to bypass digital borders just to
• 35:02
  watch a show about killers who exploited physical borders.
• 35:05
  Speaker 3: The irony is just staggering, and we marveled at how
• 35:08
  the sheer, overwhelming ubiquity of modern screens, from the iPhone
• 35:12
  in your pocket to the massive smart TV in your
• 35:14
  living room, serves as the ultimate countermeasure against killers who
• 35:18
  desperately wanted to remain hidden in the dark.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: It really is a testament to how complex and multi
• 35:23
  layered the consumption of true crime has become in twenty
• 35:25
  twenty six.
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: It is a deeply complex ecosystem intertwining psychology, history and technology,
• 35:32
  and it requires a thoughtful, conscious approach from the viewer.
• 35:35
  But as we wrap up this analysis of the source material,
• 35:38
  I want to leave you the listener with a final
• 35:40
  thought to mole over I'm ready a thought that builds
• 35:42
  directly on the core premise of Unknown Serial Killers of America.
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: The floor is yours, the entire.
• 35:48
  Speaker 2: Foundation of this documentary series, and the reason this strikes
• 35:51
  such a nerve rests on the terrifying reality of charismatic drifters.
• 35:56
  These were individuals who successfully left a trail of hidden
• 35:59
  crimes across multiple states, operating completely undetected for years, simply
• 36:06
  because they understood how to blend in.
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: They look like everyone else.
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: They understood how to charm, how to mirror what people
• 36:12
  wanted to see, and how to weaponize the gaps in
• 36:15
  our awareness. The technology has changed, the databases are connected,
• 36:20
  but human nature has not.
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: So what's the question?
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: So I post this chilling question to you as you
• 36:27
  navigate your day today, as you seamlessly move across city
• 36:30
  limits or state lines, going about your normal routine, encountering
• 36:34
  strangers whose smile, make small talk, and hold the door.
• 36:37
  Who else is currently drifting out there?
• 36:40
  Speaker 1: Oh wow?
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: Who is perfectly blending in right now, exploiting the modern
• 36:43
  blind spots we haven't even realized exists yet, just waiting
• 36:46
  for a future true crime documentarian decades from now to
• 36:50
  eventually uncover their hidden trail.
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: That is a genuinely unsettling thought to carry out into
• 36:54
  the world. It completely rewires the way you look at
• 36:56
  the mundane interactions and the crowds around you. It does,
• 36:59
  and that is exactly why we do these deep dives
• 37:02
  to take a piece of source material and find the larger,
• 37:05
  sometimes uncomfortable truths hidden inside it. Thank you so much
• 37:09
  for joining us as we unpacked Mike Smith's Guide and
• 37:12
  the dark realities it points toward.
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: Thanks for listening.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: We hope we've given you a new lens through which
• 37:17
  to view not just this specific documentary series, but the mechanics,
• 37:21
  the psychology, and the technology of how you consume all
• 37:24
  true crime media. Stay curious out there, keep analyzing the
• 37:28
  structures and the screens around you, and above all else,
• 37:31
  stay safe as you explore these sources for yourselves.