Latest / Investor Exchange / CH Offshore Ltd: Half-Year Financials 2025

Transcript

CH Offshore Ltd: Half-Year Financials 2025 · Investor Exchange

• 0:00
  Music.
• 0:14
  They're a pretty important name in the offshore oil and gas support world. Yeah, definitely.
• 0:18
  And we've got their latest numbers, the unaudited financials for the first half
• 0:21
  of 2025, ending June 30th.
• 0:24
  Exactly. So our mission today is to sift through these figures,
• 0:27
  figure out what they really mean.
• 0:28
  You know, the story behind the numbers. We'll look at how they performed,
• 0:32
  why things look the way they do, and maybe get a sense of where they might be headed.
• 0:36
  It's always fascinating how these, well, seemingly dry reports can actually
• 0:41
  tell you so much about a company's health.
• 0:43
  Absolutely. We'll connect the dots for you, see how all the pieces fit together. All right.
• 0:47
  Ready to dive in. Let's start with the big one. Revenue.
• 0:51
  Navigating the numbers. Performance overview. 1H, 1H, 1H, 25 versus 1H, 20, 24.
• 0:56
  So the top line. For those first
• 0:58
  six months of 2025, CH Offshore reported revenue of U.S. $10.82 million.
• 1:04
  How does that compare? What's the first impression? Well, right away,
• 1:07
  that's a noticeable drop. It's down 27.0% compared to the first half of 2024,
• 1:11
  where they pulled in U.S. $14.82 million.
• 1:14
  Okay, 27% is pretty significant.
• 1:17
  Do we know why? What's driving that decrease? Yeah, the report points directly to one main reason.
• 1:23
  Less revenue coming in from vessels they charter from third parties.
• 1:26
  Ah, okay. Yeah. So not necessarily their own ships, but ones they bring in for specific contracts.
• 1:31
  Exactly. It's just maybe a shift in strategy or perhaps just less demand for
• 1:36
  those particular kinds of arrangements in the market right now.
• 1:38
  It's a key change in their operations. All right. So revenue is down quite a bit.
• 1:42
  Logically, you then look at costs. Did they manage to cut back their spending
• 1:46
  to match that lower activity?
• 1:47
  And this is where it gets quite interesting, actually. Their cost of sales,
• 1:51
  the direct costs of generating that revenue dropped even more dramatically. Really?
• 1:56
  By how much? It came in at U.S. $4.49 million for the half year.
• 2:00
  That's down a huge 51.5% from U.S. $9.27 million the year before.
• 2:06
  Wow, over 50%. And that lines up with the lower third-party charters.
• 2:09
  Perfectly. Lower charter fees were the main driver. So they reacted very strongly
• 2:14
  on the cost side to the lower revenue stream.
• 2:16
  And that, you know, had a positive knock-on effect.
• 2:19
  Right, because if costs fall more than revenue...
• 2:22
  Your gross profit should improve. Precisely. So even with that revenue dip,
• 2:26
  their gross profit before depreciation actually went up by 14.0% to U.S. $6.33 million.
• 2:32
  Okay, that's impressive. And even after accounting for depreciation? Still up.
• 2:36
  Gross profit after depreciation increased by 11.8% to U.S. $3.64 million.
• 2:42
  It really shows they got a handle on those direct operational costs relative
• 2:46
  to the business they were doing.
• 2:47
  That sounds like a definite positive sign in terms of efficiency,
• 2:50
  doesn't it? It really does.
• 2:52
  Now, you mentioned depreciation. That part actually did go up.
• 2:55
  Yeah, direct depreciation rose by 17.1% to U.S. $2.68 million.
• 3:00
  The reason given is higher dry docking
• 3:02
  costs. Dry docking. It's like major maintenance for the vessels, right?
• 3:05
  Expensive, the necessary stuff. Exactly. It's a significant investment to keep
• 3:09
  the fleet safe, compliant, and running well for the long term.
• 3:12
  So an understandable increase there, even if it hits the profit line.
• 3:15
  Two, the bottom line, profitability and contributing factors.
• 3:19
  Okay, so we've covered the top line and gross profit. Let's move further down
• 3:23
  the income statement. What else influenced their overall profitability?
• 3:27
  Other income, other expenses. Yeah, there were a few other moving parts.
• 3:31
  Other income took quite a hit, down nearly 68% to just U.S. $69,000.
• 3:37
  Small numbers, but a big percentage drop. Okay, what about expenses?
• 3:40
  Well, other expenses basically vanished. They went from U.S.
• 3:44
  $159,000 last year down to zero this half. zero.
• 3:48
  That's quite a swing. Any reason given for that? Yes. The notes say it's mainly
• 3:52
  because they reduced the allowance for expected credit losses.
• 3:56
  Ah, OK. So basically, they felt they needed to set aside less money for potential
• 4:00
  bad debts, customers not paying up. Exactly.
• 4:03
  It suggests maybe their customers are paying more reliably or they've tightened
• 4:06
  up their credit management.
• 4:08
  Either way, it's a positive signal about the quality of their receivables.
• 4:11
  Got it. What about administrative costs, the day-to-day running of the business? Those are up slightly.
• 4:16
  Adam expenses rose 2.9% to U.S. $1.83 million, mostly due to normal salary increases,
• 4:24
  annual increments, that kind of thing. Pretty standard.
• 4:26
  And finance costs, borrowing costs. It actually came down a bit,
• 4:30
  decreased by about 20% to U.S.
• 4:32
  $137,000, so maybe less debt or better rates, perhaps. Okay,
• 4:36
  so putting all that together.
• 4:38
  Where did that leave their profit before tax? With all those movements,
• 4:42
  their profit before income tax actually increased by a healthy 19.7 percent,
• 4:47
  landing at U.S. $1.63 million.
• 4:50
  So underlying performance pre-tax looked pretty good.
• 4:53
  Right. Sounds positive. But then we get to income tax. And you flagged this
• 4:57
  earlier. What happened there?
• 4:58
  Yeah, this is where the picture gets, well, complicated. The income tax expense
• 5:02
  surged. It jumped 131.9 percent to U.S.
• 5:06
  $589,000, way up from U.S. $254,000 in the first half of 2024. Whoa, wait.
• 5:12
  Pre-tax profit up about 20 percent, but tax expense up over 130 percent.
• 5:16
  How does that work? That seems way out of proportion.
• 5:19
  It does, doesn't it? The explanation is twofold. First, yes,
• 5:21
  higher tax provision just because they made more profit before tax.
• 5:24
  That's normal. But the critical factor, the one that really drove that huge
• 5:28
  percentage increase, was the non-recognition of tax benefits for tax losses.
• 5:32
  Non-recognition of tax benefits. Can you break that down for us?
• 5:35
  What does that mean in plain English?
• 5:37
  Sure. It basically means they had some losses, maybe from previous periods or
• 5:41
  certain parts of the business, that normally you could use to reduce your current taxable profit.
• 5:47
  Think of it like a credit against your tax bill. But for various technical reasons,
• 5:51
  maybe those losses expired or regulations changed or they weren't in the right
• 5:55
  part of the company structure, they couldn't use those benefits this time around.
• 6:00
  I see. So they had to pay tax on more of their profit than they might have otherwise expected.
• 6:04
  Precisely. It resulted in a much higher effective tax rate and it significantly
• 6:09
  ate into the pre-tax gains they'd made.
• 6:12
  It's a really important point for you, the listener, because it shows how tax
• 6:16
  rules can really impact the final number.
• 6:18
  So after that big tax hit, what was the final result, the actual profit for the period?
• 6:23
  Well, the profit for the period, their total comprehensive income ended up slightly down.
• 6:28
  It decreased by 5.9 percent, landing at U.S. $1.04 million compared to U.S.
• 6:34
  $1.11 million last year.
• 6:36
  So that pre-tax gain was more than wiped out by the higher tax.
• 6:40
  OK, so small dip overall.
• 6:42
  But what about the profit that
• 6:44
  actually belongs to CH Offshore's own shareholders? The equity holders.
• 6:48
  Because that's often the key number investors track. And that's where the story takes another turn.
• 6:53
  That figure, the profit attributable to the equity holders of the company, dropped sharply.
• 6:57
  It was down 57.4% to just U.S. $236,000.
• 7:02
  Wow, 57.4%. That's a huge difference from the overall profit figure.
• 7:08
  Why such a big drop for the shareholders specifically? It's because a much larger
• 7:12
  slice of the profit pie went to what's called non-controlling interests.
• 7:16
  Their share of the profit actually increased by 45.3% to U.S. $808,000.
• 7:22
  Non-controlling interests. So that's profit going to partners in joint ventures
• 7:25
  or subsidiaries where CH Offshore doesn't own 100%. Exactly.
• 7:29
  So while the group made about a million in profit overall, most of it in this
• 7:32
  period was allocated to these external partners, leaving much less for CH Offshore's
• 7:37
  own shareholders. Which explains why the earnings per share also dropped significantly,
• 7:40
  right? From U.S. eight to three cents.
• 7:42
  Absolutely. That's the direct impact on a per share basis for the owners of the company.
• 7:46
  It highlights how the corporate structure can really influence shareholder returns.
• 7:51
  Three, strengthening the balance sheet, cash and equity dynamics.
• 7:55
  Okay, let's shift gears from the income statement to the balance sheet.
• 7:57
  Their financial position at the end of June 2025 compared to the end of last year.
• 8:02
  What stands out there? Any big changes? Oh, definitely.
• 8:05
  Three things really jump off the page. First, their cash and cash equivalents,
• 8:09
  basically. The money in the bank dramatically increased. Increased. By how much?
• 8:13
  It went from U.S. $7.85 million at the end of 2024 to U.S.
• 8:18
  $17.27 million by June 30th, 2025.
• 8:22
  More than doubled. Wow. Okay, that's significant. What else?
• 8:25
  Total assets also saw a healthy rise from about U.S.
• 8:28
  $54 million up to U.S. $66 million.
• 8:31
  And importantly, total equity, the net worth of the company,
• 8:34
  increased substantially two from U.S. $41.6 million to U.S. $53.4 million.
• 8:39
  Okay, wait. Cash more than doubled?
• 8:41
  Assets up. Equity up. But we just talked about profit being slightly down overall
• 8:46
  and shareholder profit being way down.
• 8:49
  So where did all this extra cash and equity come from? It doesn't sound like
• 8:52
  it came purely from operations.
• 8:54
  You're absolutely right to ask that. The cash flow statement tells the story
• 8:57
  here, and it's not what you might initially think. How so?
• 9:00
  Well, cash generated from operating activities actually detreased.
• 9:03
  It was U.S. $2.74 million in the first half of 2025.
• 9:08
  Down from U.S. $5.83 million in the same period last year. So less cash coming
• 9:13
  in from the day-to-day business.
• 9:15
  Okay, so operations were at the source. What about investing?
• 9:18
  They actually used more cash in investing activities, about U.S.
• 9:21
  $3.08 million, up from U.S. $2.61 million.
• 9:25
  And that was mainly, as we discussed, for buying fixed assets related to that
• 9:28
  vessel dry dock. Right, putting money into maintaining their assets.
• 9:31
  So if operations brought in less cash and investing used more cash.
• 9:36
  Where did the huge increase come from? It must be financing activities.
• 9:40
  Bingo. That's the answer. There was a massive swing in financing activities.
• 9:44
  In the first half of 2024, they actually used about half a million dollars in financing activities.
• 9:50
  But in the first half of 2025, financing activities generated U.S. $9.5 million in cash.
• 9:57
  Nine and a half million dollars. OK, what drove that huge inflow?
• 10:00
  It lines up perfectly with something specific they did, a rights issue.
• 10:04
  Ah, the rights issue we saw mentioned.
• 10:06
  So they sold new shares to raise capital. Exactly.
• 10:09
  They completed what's called a renounceable, non-underwritten rights issue back in June.
• 10:14
  They issued over 1.4 billion new shares at Singapore, 0.011 cent.
• 10:19
  One Singapore cent per share? That sounds low, but 1.4 billion shares is a lot.
• 10:24
  How much did that bring in? It raised gross proceeds of $14.1 million,
• 10:28
  which works out to roughly U.S.
• 10:30
  $10.77 million. That's a huge injection of capital. Okay, can you quickly break
• 10:35
  down renounceable non-underwritten rights issue for us? What does that mean
• 10:38
  for shareholders in the company?
• 10:40
  Sure. Rights issue means existing shareholders get the first opportunity,
• 10:44
  the right, to buy new shares, usually at a discount.
• 10:48
  Renounceable means if an existing shareholder doesn't want to buy the new shares,
• 10:52
  they can sell that right to someone else. It adds flexibility.
• 10:55
  Got it. And non-underwritten.
• 10:58
  That means the company didn't hire an investment bank to guarantee that all
• 11:02
  the shares would be sold.
• 11:03
  They took the risk themselves, essentially betting that enough shareholders
• 11:07
  or buyers of the rights would subscribe.
• 11:09
  So it was a success then, given the amount raised. Absolutely.
• 11:13
  And that rights issue is the main reason their cash balance shot up so much
• 11:17
  and why their total equity increased significantly.
• 11:19
  It was a strategic move to bring in substantial capital from their owners,
• 11:24
  strengthening their balance sheet considerably, even while operational cash flow was a bit weaker.
• 11:29
  All right. So we've got the picture for the first half. Lower revenue,
• 11:33
  but better gross margins, a big tax hit impacting shareholder profit,
• 11:37
  but a much stronger balance sheet thanks to that rights issue.
• 11:40
  What are they saying about the future?
• 11:41
  What's the outlook? Well, they paint a picture of a pretty challenging external environment.
• 11:46
  They specifically mention ongoing uncertainty around U.S. tariffs.
• 11:50
  How does that affect them? It creates knock-on effects globally.
• 11:53
  Messing with supply chains, increasing prices, and ultimately hitting their
• 11:57
  own costs makes things more expensive to run. Okay, that makes sense.
• 12:02
  Anything else? They also point to dampened global trade and shipping activity
• 12:06
  overall. And crucially for their business, they see this weakening global oil demand.
• 12:12
  And that's obviously key for a company supporting the offshore oil and gas sector. Yeah.
• 12:16
  Less oil demand generally means less exploration and production activity. Exactly.
• 12:21
  It directly impacts the need for their vessels and services.
• 12:25
  So these are significant headwinds they're acknowledging. It's a tough macro
• 12:29
  picture for their industry.
• 12:30
  So given these challenges, the cost pressures, the potentially weaker demand,
• 12:36
  what's their stated strategy?
• 12:38
  How are they planning to navigate this? There were choices quite clear.
• 12:41
  They say the group will continue to manage its operations conservatively.
• 12:45
  Conservatively. So no big risky expansion plans right now. More about protecting
• 12:50
  what they have. That seems to be the message.
• 12:53
  Adapting cautiously to what they call a rapidly evolving environment.
• 12:56
  Focus on stability, efficiency, writing out the uncertainty rather than aggressive growth.
• 13:02
  And that conservative approach probably explains why they didn't pay out any
• 13:05
  dividends, right? They're holding onto their cash.
• 13:07
  Precisely. They stated they need to prioritize operational and financial cash
• 13:11
  needs in this environment.
• 13:13
  Preserving capital makes sense if you're expecting turbulence ahead.
• 13:16
  Now, about that capital, they raised a net amount of $13.89 million from that
• 13:23
  rights issue after costs.
• 13:25
  That's a lot of money just sitting there. Have they actually used any of it
• 13:28
  yet? As of the date of this report, no.
• 13:30
  The net proceeds hadn't been utilized yet. Interesting. Do they say what it's for?
• 13:35
  What are the potential uses for that cash pile? They've given themselves quite a bit of flexibility.
• 13:39
  The plan allows for anywhere between roughly S2.8 million dollars and the full
• 13:44
  S13.9 million dollars to be used for general working capital,
• 13:48
  you know, day-to-day operational needs.
• 13:50
  And the rest. And up to 11.1 million dollars could potentially be used for acquiring
• 13:55
  new vessels or enhancing their existing ones.
• 13:58
  Ah, so they do have the option to invest in growth or upgrading their fleet,
• 14:03
  even with a conservative stance.
• 14:05
  Exactly. It gives them a significant war chest options on the table.
• 14:09
  But it does raise that interesting question, doesn't it? How do you deploy such
• 14:13
  a large amount of capital effectively if you're committed to being conservative
• 14:17
  in a challenging market?
• 14:19
  So wrapping this up, what's the main takeaway from this deep dive into CH Offshore's first half?
• 14:24
  For me, it's that real contrast, the struggle on the shareholder profit line
• 14:28
  because of taxes and structure, but at the same time, this major strengthening
• 14:32
  of their financial foundation through the rights issue.
• 14:35
  I agree. It's a story of navigating choppy waters.
• 14:38
  Revenue challenges met with pretty good cost control, leading to better gross
• 14:41
  profit. But then external factors like tax rules and internal factors like profit
• 14:46
  allocation really impacted the net result for shareholders.
• 14:49
  The rights issue, though, is a big vote of confidence or at least a successful
• 14:52
  move to build resilience. Definitely gives them more stability.
• 14:56
  Which leads to a final thought for you, our listener, to ponder. Go on.
• 15:00
  CH Offshore says they're managing conservatively due to all the uncertainty
• 15:04
  trade issues, weakening oil demand.
• 15:06
  Yet they're sitting on nearly S-14 million dollars in fresh cash,
• 15:10
  specifically earmarked for working capital or even buying or upgrading vessels.
• 15:15
  Right. Big potential firepower there. So the question is, how will they balance
• 15:20
  that conservative stance with this significant pile of unutilized cash?
• 15:24
  Will they stay cautious and just use it for working capital as needed?
• 15:28
  Or will they see an opportunity, maybe a distressed asset, and make a bold move
• 15:32
  to acquire or enhance their fleet despite the headwinds? What strategic play
• 15:36
  makes sense for them next? Something to think about.
• 15:39
  Music.