Latest / The Science of Leading / Work Motivations: A Practical Framework to Improve Employee Motivation and Satisfaction

Transcript

Work Motivations: A Practical Framework to Improve Employee Motivation and Satisfaction · The Science of Leading

• 0:00
  So Edwin, I hear this from HR leaders all the time: "My people just aren't
• 0:04
  motivated." And it's usually said like that's a permanent personality
• 0:08
  trait.
• 0:08
  You push back on that pretty hard,
• 0:10
  right?
• 0:10
  I do.
• 0:11
  When you say "they're not motivated," you've already given up.
• 0:14
  Motivation at work is mostly a system outcome.
• 0:17
  It's shaped by the environment,
• 0:19
  the role, the manager, the incentives.
• 0:22
  Not by whether someone was born pep-talk-ready.
• 0:22
  So instead of asking "what's
• 0:27
  wrong with this person," HR should be asking... "what in our system is making
• 0:31
  effort feel like a bad deal?"Exactly.
• 0:34
  And it helps to separate a few concepts that get blended together.
• 0:38
  In HR language: motivation is "I want to do this work and I'll invest
• 0:43
  effort." Engagement is "I'm mentally present,
• 0:46
  not checked out." Satisfaction is "I'm okay with the conditions-pay,
• 0:51
  workload, manager, environment."Right,
• 0:54
  and you can have weird combinations.
• 0:56
  Like someone who's satisfied but not motivated-steady,
• 0:59
  not rocking the boat, but not exactly pushing the needle.
• 0:59
  Or the opposite:
• 1:03
  highly motivated but dissatisfied.
• 1:05
  They perform, they care, and then they leave because pay,
• 1:08
  fairness, or growth don't line up.
• 1:10
  If HR doesn't separate those three,
• 1:13
  they run the wrong interventions and wonder why nothing changes.
• 1:13
  Let's
• 1:18
  anchor this in drivers.
• 1:19
  You talk about six core levers for workplace motivation-walk us through
• 1:22
  them in plain HR terms.
• 1:22
  Sure.
• 1:25
  First, Meaning: people understand why the work matters and who it helps.
• 1:31
  Second, Autonomy: they have real control over how they execute,
• 1:36
  within clear boundaries.
• 1:38
  Third, Mastery: they can build skills and see progress in their competence.
• 1:44
  Fourth, Fairness: pay, workload,
• 1:48
  opportunities feel equitable and predictable.
• 1:51
  Fifth, Belonging and safety: they can speak up,
• 1:56
  ask for help, admit mistakes without social punishment.
• 2:00
  And sixth, Clarity: expectations are explicit,
• 2:05
  priorities are stable enough to execute,
• 2:07
  and feedback is usable.
• 2:07
  So if I put my "former HRBP" hat on,
• 2:12
  that lines up pretty neatly with that Self‑Determination Theory idea-autonomy,
• 2:17
  competence, relatedness-just translated into everyday work language.
• 2:17
  That's
• 2:22
  right.
• 2:22
  Autonomy maps directly.
• 2:24
  Mastery ties to competence.
• 2:26
  Belonging and safety map to relatedness.
• 2:29
  The research is elegant, but leaders don't need the jargon.
• 2:32
  They need a checklist: where are we starving people of control,
• 2:36
  progress, fairness, or safety?
• 2:36
  Okay,
• 2:39
  but this is where HR gets stuck.
• 2:41
  They walk into a leadership meeting and someone says,
• 2:43
  "I feel like this team just isn't a good fit." That's pure vibes.
• 2:47
  How do we get out of diagnosing by vibes?
• 2:47
  You add structure.
• 2:52
  Two layers in particular.
• 2:53
  One: measure the drivers with short,
• 2:56
  repeatable questions-"I understand what's expected of me," "I have enough
• 3:00
  control over how I do my work," "I can raise concerns without negative
• 3:05
  consequences." Now you can see which levers are actually weak.
• 3:05
  And the
• 3:10
  second layer?
• 3:10
  Role fit.
• 3:12
  A lot of so‑called motivation problems are really misfit problems.
• 3:18
  The role demands behaviors the person finds draining,
• 3:22
  or the pace and ambiguity don't match their natural style.
• 3:25
  If you keep calling that a motivation issue,
• 3:28
  you'll coach forever and still be frustrated.
• 3:28
  So that's where something
• 3:31
  like OAD comes in-structured assessment,
• 3:34
  not horoscope‑style personality labels.
• 3:36
  You compare the role's requirements with a person's trait pattern and
• 3:39
  work motivations, and you can say,
• 3:41
  "this is a mismatch," versus "this is a solvable motivation issue."Exactly.
• 3:47
  Tools like OAD give you data on how someone prefers to work,
• 3:51
  what actually drives them, and how that lines up with the job.
• 3:55
  Then HR can choose the right lever: redesign the role,
• 3:59
  redeploy the person, or adjust how you manage them.
• 4:03
  You stop guessing based on who's loud,
• 4:06
  who's charming, or who's having a bad week.
• 4:06
  So step one for HR leaders
• 4:11
  is almost philosophical: stop labeling people as "motivated" or "not,"
• 4:15
  and start asking, "What did we design that makes sustained effort feel
• 4:19
  like a smart choice-or a stupid one?"Well put.
• 4:22
  Once you see motivation as a design problem,
• 4:25
  not a personality flaw, you finally have levers you can pull.
• 4:25
  Let's get
• 4:30
  into the levers.
• 4:31
  You draw a sharp line between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
• 4:35
  Can you define those in a way HR can actually use with managers?
• 4:35
  Sure.
• 4:39
  Intrinsic motivation is when the work itself pulls effort out of someone-because
• 4:44
  it hits meaning, learning, autonomy,
• 4:46
  mastery, pride.
• 4:47
  Extrinsic motivation is everything around the work-pay,
• 4:51
  bonuses, perks, status, praise,
• 4:54
  and also penalties.
• 4:54
  And they're not interchangeable.
• 4:58
  I hear leaders say, "We'll just add a bonus." But if the work is empty
• 5:02
  or chaotic, that doesn't magically create internal drive.
• 5:02
  Right.
• 5:07
  Intrinsic motivation sustains performance-especially under ambiguity
• 5:12
  and setbacks.
• 5:13
  Extrinsic motivation stabilizes behavior,
• 5:16
  signals fairness, and answers,
• 5:18
  "Is this worth it?" and "Is this fair?" You need both,
• 5:22
  but they do different jobs.
• 5:22
  Can we make that concrete by role?
• 5:26
  Like, what does intrinsic motivation look like for,
• 5:28
  say, an engineer versus a salesperson?
• 5:28
  For engineering,
• 5:32
  it's solving hard problems, building clean systems,
• 5:35
  having autonomy in implementation choices,
• 5:38
  and seeing their mastery progress over time.
• 5:41
  For sales, it's winning, refining their craft,
• 5:44
  learning what works in the field,
• 5:46
  and earning status through competence-being on the "closers" list
• 5:46
  because
• 5:50
  they're good, not just loud.
• 5:50
  What about customer support or ops?
• 5:55
  Those are the roles where leaders sometimes assume "motivation isn't
• 5:58
  really a thing."In support, intrinsic motivation is about helping someone,
• 6:03
  closing a loop, seeing a frustrated customer turn around-and improving
• 6:07
  systems so fewer people suffer next time.
• 6:09
  In operations, it's reducing chaos,
• 6:12
  increasing reliability, and watching metrics improve because of process
• 6:16
  changes they designed.
• 6:16
  Okay, now the extrinsic side.
• 6:20
  When does that go wrong?
• 6:22
  Because HR is often asked to "fix motivation" by tweaking comp plans
• 6:26
  or launching recognition programs.
• 6:26
  Extrinsic systems backfire when they
• 6:31
  reward the wrong metric-speed over quality,
• 6:34
  activity over real outcomes.
• 6:36
  Or when they feel unfair or opaque,
• 6:38
  so people assume favoritism.
• 6:40
  Or when they turn everything into a transaction: "I only do this if I'm
• 6:45
  paid extra," and you accidentally kill the meaning that was there.
• 6:45
  And
• 6:49
  the gaming behavior-optimizing the score instead of the mission.
• 6:49
  Exactly.
• 6:53
  You see that with sales comp, with ticket quotas,
• 6:57
  with "utilization" metrics.
• 6:58
  People learn the game you designed.
• 7:01
  They don't wake up and decide to be bad people; they respond to the system.
• 7:05
  So HR's first audit should be: What are we paying for?
• 7:09
  What are we praising?
• 7:11
  And where are we ignoring quality or long‑term impact?
• 7:11
  Flip side-when
• 7:15
  do extrinsic levers work well?
• 7:15
  When they're tied to outcomes people can
• 7:19
  actually influence.
• 7:21
  When rules are transparent enough to feel fair.
• 7:23
  And when there's a quality guardrail-"you don't get the reward if quality
• 7:28
  drops or if rework explodes." Also,
• 7:31
  when basic fairness is covered: competitive pay,
• 7:35
  sane workload, decent tools.
• 7:37
  If pay feels like a black box,
• 7:40
  motivation leaks out no matter how pretty the mission statement is.
• 7:40
  I'm
• 7:45
  thinking about alignment here.
• 7:46
  This is where OAD‑style insights can be powerful for HR.
• 7:49
  If you know a person's natural drivers and trait pattern,
• 7:52
  you can design incentives and growth paths that don't fight their psychology.
• 7:52
  Yes.
• 7:57
  For example, if assessment data says someone is naturally energized by
• 8:02
  complex problem‑solving and autonomy,
• 8:04
  but you park them in a tightly scripted,
• 8:06
  repetitive role, you'll forever chase them with bonuses and pep talks.
• 8:10
  Better to shift their role or their scope to match those drivers,
• 8:14
  and align rewards to the outcomes they care about.
• 8:14
  So HR can use something
• 8:19
  like OAD in three places: selection-"who is built for this role?";
• 8:19
  development-"what
• 8:25
  actually motivates this person?"; and incentives-"will this plan energize
• 8:29
  them, or just feel like pressure?"Exactly.
• 8:32
  Align the role, the extrinsic system,
• 8:35
  and the person's intrinsic drivers.
• 8:38
  When those three line up, motivation feels natural.
• 8:41
  When they fight each other, HR ends up running a permanent motivation
• 8:45
  repair shop.
• 8:45
  Alright, let's get operational.
• 8:48
  HR leaders listening are probably thinking,
• 8:50
  "What can I actually implement in the next 60 to 90 days?" Can we sketch
• 8:54
  a basic motivation playbook?
• 8:54
  We can.
• 8:57
  Start with a simple measurement stack.
• 8:59
  Monthly pulse surveys-5 to 8 questions,
• 9:03
  tops-focused on key drivers: motivation and energy,
• 9:07
  clarity, autonomy, psychological safety,
• 9:10
  growth, and maybe fairness of recognition or workload sustainability.
• 9:10
  So
• 9:15
  questions like, "I understand what's expected of me," "I have enough control
• 9:19
  over how I do my work," "I can raise concerns without negative consequences,"
• 9:24
  "I see opportunities to grow." Short,
• 9:26
  the same every month, so you can see trends.
• 9:26
  Exactly.
• 9:30
  Then, put that onto a very small motivation dashboard.
• 9:34
  Six to eight metrics max: those driver scores,
• 9:38
  plus a few outcomes-quality or rework rates,
• 9:41
  maybe cycle time, and retention or early voluntary turnover.
• 9:45
  The goal isn't a fancy cockpit; it's one page that answers,
• 9:50
  "What changed, and where do we need to act?"And you mentioned triangulation
• 9:54
  earlier.
• 9:54
  So if clarity scores drop and rework goes up,
• 9:57
  that's a pretty strong signal the system,
• 9:59
  not the people, is failing.
• 9:59
  Right.
• 10:02
  Survey data is perception, performance data is output.
• 10:06
  Together, they tell a story.
• 10:08
  If motivation and safety scores slide while output looks fine,
• 10:12
  you may be looking at quiet burnout or flight risk.
• 10:15
  Don't wait for the turnover spike to "confirm" it.
• 10:15
  Okay,
• 10:19
  let's walk through a 60-90 day pilot HR can run with one team.
• 10:22
  What's step one?
• 10:22
  Pick a pilot team that's big enough for signal and stable
• 10:26
  enough for a 2-3 month experiment.
• 10:28
  Then choose one or two drivers to target-clarity and autonomy are great
• 10:33
  starting points because they're very fixable at the manager and process
• 10:37
  level.
• 10:37
  So for clarity, you might lock weekly priorities-"these three things
• 10:41
  will not change this week"-and define what "good" looks like for key tasks.
• 10:46
  For autonomy, you spell out decision rights: who decides,
• 10:50
  who's consulted, who executes.
• 10:50
  Exactly.
• 10:53
  Add one lightweight ritual: a 15-20 minute weekly retro that asks,
• 10:58
  "What created friction this week?
• 11:01
  What blocked real progress?
• 11:02
  What one change will we try next week,
• 11:05
  and who owns it?" That's it.
• 11:07
  You're removing one blocker at a time.
• 11:07
  And HR's role in that pilot?
• 11:07
  Two
• 11:12
  things.
• 11:12
  First, set up the measurement: baseline pulse scores,
• 11:16
  baseline quality or rework metrics,
• 11:19
  maybe overtime or escalation rates.
• 11:21
  Then track those at 30, 60, 90 days.
• 11:24
  Second, partner with the manager using structured assessments and coaching
• 11:29
  basics.
• 11:29
  This is where OAD or a similar tool comes back in.
• 11:32
  You can look at role requirements and each person's profile and say,
• 11:36
  "Okay, who is in a role that constantly fights their natural drivers?"
• 11:40
  Then your interventions get more concrete: redeployments,
• 11:43
  scope adjustments, clearer expectations.
• 11:43
  Yes.
• 11:47
  Instead of telling the manager,
• 11:49
  "Motivate your low performers," you might say,
• 11:53
  "These two people look misaligned to the role's pace and ambiguity-let's
• 11:57
  explore a different seat for them.
• 11:59
  These three are a good fit but starved of clarity and recognition-let's
• 12:03
  fix that."And coaching basics are critical.
• 12:06
  Things like: ask before telling-"What options do you see?"; give specific,
• 12:12
  timely feedback-"Here's what I observed,
• 12:14
  here's the impact, here's what good looks like next time"; and follow
• 12:18
  up consistently so it feels safe,
• 12:20
  not like a random inspection.
• 12:20
  Exactly.
• 12:23
  When managers coach that way, they increase competence,
• 12:26
  autonomy, and trust at the same time.
• 12:28
  That's intrinsic motivation fuel.
• 12:31
  HR can reinforce it with simple habits-one specific recognition per
• 12:31
  manager
• 12:36
  per week, visible updates on "blockers we removed," and clear criteria
• 12:41
  for growth or internal moves.
• 12:41
  So if I summarize the 90‑day playbook for
• 12:46
  HR: define a tiny measurement stack,
• 12:48
  pick one pilot team, target one or two drivers,
• 12:51
  stabilize priorities and decision rights,
• 12:54
  add a light retro, and use structured assessments to separate misfit
• 12:58
  from motivation issues-and then coach and recognize in very concrete ways.
• 12:58
  That's
• 13:04
  it.
• 13:04
  No grand transformation program.
• 13:07
  Just disciplined experiments that change the system so motivation has
• 13:11
  somewhere to land.
• 13:11
  Edwin, this has been really grounding.
• 13:14
  I feel like we just took motivation from this fuzzy,
• 13:17
  emotional topic to something HR can actually design and measure in quarters,
• 13:21
  not years.
• 13:21
  That's the goal.
• 13:22
  When you treat motivation as an operating system,
• 13:25
  not a mood, you give HR and managers real power to improve it.
• 13:25
  Alright,
• 13:31
  we're gonna leave it there for today.
• 13:33
  For those listening: pick one team,
• 13:35
  one driver, one simple change,
• 13:38
  and start there.
• 13:39
  Edwin, thanks for walking us through this.
• 13:39
  Always a pleasure,
• 13:42
  Claire.
• 13:42
  And thanks to all of you for joining us.
• 13:45
  If you want to move from "diagnosing by vibes" to real data on role fit
• 13:50
  and work motivations, you can test OAD for free at OAD.
• 13:50
  ai and see how
• 13:55
  it separates motivation problems from misfit problems in your own teams.
• 13:59
  We'll be back with more on building systems that actually support people
• 14:03
  at work.
• 14:03
  Talk to you next time.