Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / The Jeffrey Epstein 50th Birthday Book Has Been Made Public

Transcript

The Jeffrey Epstein 50th Birthday Book Has Been Made Public · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. The Donald Trump 50th birthday card to Jeffrey
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Epstein is one of those pieces of evidence that's so
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: straightforward it cuts through the noise. It's not an anonymous source.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: It's not a rumor. It's not a whisper campaign. It's
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: a physical object, a card with Trump's unmistakable Sharpie scroll
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: sent to mark Epstein's milestone birthday. And yet, instead of
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: simply dealing with what's right in front of them, A
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: loud chorus of defenders has done what they always do
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: when faced with uncomfortable truth. They scream forgery and hoax
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: as though repeating the words enough times will make reality disappear.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: The idea that this card is some kind of fake
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: is laughable on its face. Epstein died in 2019. His
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: reputation was already in flames by then. Are we seriously
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: supposed to believe? He spent years of his life hatching
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: a plan to doctor Trump's handwriting on a Hallmark card,
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: just in case that it would prove useful long after
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: he was gone. That requires a level of foresight and
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: commitment that would make Machiavelli blush. Epstein was many things,
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: but Nostradamus wasn't one of them. And let's not forget
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: Trump's signature itself. It's one of the most recognizable in
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: modern history. A jagged mountain range scrawled across documents, press briefings,
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: and executive orders for decades. The man signs his name
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: like he's electrocuting the page. Everyone knows it. Everyone's seen it.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: And now, when that same signature shows up in Epstein's collection,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: suddenly the skeptics can't recognize it. Suddenly it's too neat
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: or too messy or obviously forged. They can't even agree
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: on what supposedly looks wrong about it. The only thing
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: that's clear is their desperation to dismiss something they don't
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: want to admit. The speed of the denial is also telling.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: The moment the card surfaced, before anyone had time to
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: analyze the handwriting or the providence, the reflexive cry was fake. Yo,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: it's a script we've seen time and time again. When
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: inconvenient evidence appears, the first instinct of those in power
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: is denial. Then come the theories about Photoshop, deepfakes, or
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: elaborate forgeries. Finally, when the evidence holds up under scrutiny,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: the volume of denial lowers, but the admission of error
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: never calms. It's a cycle designed to muddy the waters,
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: not to find the truth. What makes this denial especially
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: rich is the double standard. These are the same people
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: who treat a grainy photo, an unverified memo, or a
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: random screenshot as definitive proof when it implicates someone they
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: oppose politically, Bill Clinton, and his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: That's gospel truth. But Donald Trump's name on a birthday card?
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: Suddenly the bar for evidence is higher than it is
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: for a nuclear treaty. Suddenly it requires chain of custody documentation,
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: multiple independent handwriting experts, and maybe even DNA testing on
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: the ink. The inconsistency is glaring. And yo, let's be honest.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: If this card had been addressed to Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew,
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: or any other figure already associated with Epstein, the very
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: same voices crying hoax would be treating it like some
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: sort of Rosetta Stone of scandal. entire YouTube channels would
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: spring up dissecting the handwriting, the ink color, the type
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: of card, the postmark. The phrase case closed would be
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: plastered across thumbnails. But because the signature belongs to Trump,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: the reaction flips on its head. The evidence is dismissed
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: out of hand, not because it looks fake, but because
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: it's politically inconvenient. Now, the problem for these denialists is
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: that the card doesn't fit neatly into their preferred narrative.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: For years, they've pushed the idea that Trump was one
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: of the few powerful men to distance himself from Epstein,
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: that he bravely cut ties with him when others stayed close.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: The birthday card is a direct contradiction to that story.
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: It shows acknowledgement, and at least a degree of closeness,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: enough for Trump to recognize Epstein's milestone birthday with a
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: personal gesture. That reality is too uncomfortable, so rather than
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: face it, they try to erase it. What they don't
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: realize is that every time they scream forgery, They only
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: highlight how sensitive this evidence really is. If it were meaningless,
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: it would be shrugged off. If it truly didn't matter,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: nobody would need to invent theories about deep fakes or hoaxes.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: The very fact that defenders are working overtime to discredit
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: the card proves they understand its impact. They know it
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: undermines their narrative, and they'll do anything to keep that
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: from sticking in the public's mind. The irony is that
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: their denial doesn't weaken the card's significance, it strengthens it.
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: When you have to go to the absurd length of
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: claiming a decades-old birthday card is fake, you've already lost
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: the argument. You've admitted without saying it directly that the
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: card is damaging enough to warrant desperate measures. In trying
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: to erase its legitimacy, they only magnify its importance. And
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: this is the bigger point. The card matters not because
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: it's proof of a crime, but because it's proof of
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: a connection. It shows Epstein was not a distant acquaintance
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: to Trump, but someone worth acknowledging personally. And it fits
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: into the larger mosaic of Epstein's social acceptance by the powerful.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Pretending it's forged doesn't change that. It just makes the
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: deniers look foolish, untrustworthy, and out of touch with reality.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: So no, the card is not a hoax. It's not
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: a forgery. It's not a Photoshop. It's now a piece
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: of history preserved in black and white that speaks louder
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: than excuses ever could. And every time someone screams fake,
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: all they're really doing is confessing they can't handle the
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: truth That's staring them directly in the face. This article
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: was published by CNN. House Committee Releases Birthday Book Other
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: Records from Epstein's Estate. This article was authored by Annie
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Greyer and Sarah Ferris. The House Oversight Committee released a
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: trove of records Monday evening from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein,
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: including a note bearing Donald Trump's name that was part
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: of a collection of letters gifted to the late convicted
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: sex offender for his 50th birthday. And I think one
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: of the biggest problems here is just the basic lack
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: of candor. Like, if you did send this letter, okay, great,
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: you sent it a bunch of years ago before anyone
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: knew who Epstein was. Why not just say that? Why
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: deny it completely? Especially considering that this letter was in
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: possession of the estate. Do they really think that the
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: estate forged this? What would the estate have to gain?
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: In my estimation, absolutely nothing. because the more scrutiny on
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: the estate, the worse off it is for the executors, right?
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: They have their own problems. In addition to the birthday book,
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: the records included Epstein's last will and testament, entries from
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: his address book, and the 2007 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida,
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: all stuff we've seen before. Now, we haven't seen the
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: birthday book, but the other stuff, the NPA and the
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: last will and testament, Certainly stuff that's been out there
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: for quite some time. Ahead of the public release of
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: all records, Democrats on the committee posted on X an
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: image of the page from the so-called birthday book with
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: Trump's name. The president has repeatedly denied writing the letter
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: and sued the Wall Street Journal, which first reported on it,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: for defamation. Well, look, the letter exists, right? Now, you
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: can dispute if it's real or not, but I think
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: that's a losing battle. Unless, of course, you think that
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: the estate is in on the so-called hoax. Are they
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: working with these Democrats to falsify these documents? Is that
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: what you're alluding to? Because if that's the case, that's
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: a pretty big allegation. And if that's not what you're saying,
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: then your whole entire narrative gets blown out of the water.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Who falsified it? Who faked it? And why? White House
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: Press Secretary Carolyn Leavitt said in a post on X
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: following the release that it's very clear President Trump did
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: not draw this picture and he did not sign it.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: President Trump's legal team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: Now look, I don't know if Trump drew the picture.
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: And hell, I can't confirm that he signed it either
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: if we're being real. But it looks like his signature.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: And it certainly looks like a joke between friends. And
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: for me, if that's all it is, that's all he
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: had to say. Hey, look, me and this dude were friends.
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: I had no idea what he was up to. Now
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: we're not friends. I threw him out of Mar-a-Lago, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: But instead, it's just complete denial, right? A blanket denial.
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: And the gaslighting is not going to work. We're not
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: in the 1940s anymore where you can get away with
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: that shit. We all have the history right in front
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: of us. We all know the story. And now that
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: the estate has turned over this book, I don't think
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: that Trump is going to continue to pursue this litigation.
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Can you imagine discovery? You really think Trump is going
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: to get deposed? He's going to sit there for a
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: deposition with insert lawyer here? Highly doubt it, folks. I
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: highly doubt it. In a separate post, White House Deputy
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: Chief of Staff for Communications, Taylor Budowich, also denied that
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: Trump had signed Epstein's book and shared several images with
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: the president's signature. I mean, when you compare it to
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: the other images of Donald Trump's signature, especially during that
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: time period, it looks very similar to me. So if
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: it is a forgery, who forged it and why? Shouldn't
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: that be an investigation too? If there is this big
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: forgery and somebody's trying to set up the American president,
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: shouldn't there be an investigation into that forgery? There isn't though, right? Well,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: that's because they don't really think that there's a forgery,
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: but they can't admit that. So they just have to
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: run with this narrative. The signature on the document closely
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: resembles images circulating online of Trump's signature on other documents.
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: In particular, when Trump signs only his first name. The
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: panel's been investigating the Epstein case and had subpoenaed the
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: estate for documents as part of its ongoing probe. The
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: investigation comes amid a push, including from within the president's
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: own party, for more transparency around the case and the
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: release of more information. I don't see why anybody would
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: be against the release of information. Unless, of course, you
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: have something to hide. But besides that, why would you
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: be so against releasing documents, especially if there are no
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: ongoing investigations like you said? Shouldn't be a big deal, right?
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: Democrats on the committee also highlighted what they said was
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: another page from the birthday book, A letter with a
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: photo that they described as Epstein and a longtime Mar-a-Lago
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: member joking about selling a fully depreciated woman to Donald
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: Trump for $ 22, 500. Now look, in the vacuum of things,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: just a joke, right? I get it, people make jokes
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: all the time. But when you look at it in context,
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: it's not so funny, is it? Now, of course, people
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: are going to say, oh, come on, it's just a joke.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: No big deal. They're just bringing up Donald Trump's name.
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: And you're right. You can't really take too much from
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: this as a single piece of quote unquote evidence. But
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: when you put it into the overall picture, again, the
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: optics aren't good. The partially redacted photo shows Epstein standing
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: next to several other people holding an oversized check written
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: to appear that it had been made out From Trump
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: to Epstein for $ 22, 500. The committee did not identify the
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: other people in the photo. Below the photo, a handwritten
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: caption states, Jeffrey showing early talents with money and women.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: Sales fully depreciated, redacted to Donald Trump for $ 22, 500. So
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: is all of this a forgery? Is that what they're
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: telling us? All of this is just baked in to
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: try and go after Trump? Some gigantic Democratic hoax? Well,
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: that's kind of weird, right? Because the estate has had
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: possession of the book, not the FBI, not the DOJ.
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: So did they go to the estate and pull out
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: their cricket and start doctoring things up? I don't understand
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: what the narrative is supposed to be here. CNN has
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: reached out to the White House to request comment. In
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: a statement, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer blasted Democrats...
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: for selectively making materials public before he released the entire trove,
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: and added that he would pursue additional Epstein bank records
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: based on what was already turned over. Now look, there's
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: no doubt that the Democrats are getting a bit out
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: over their skis here, and them attempting to use this
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: as a political cudgel is going to backfire. Maybe not
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: right now, because all of the attention, obviously, is on
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: the sitting president, and rightfully so. Most powerful man in
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: the world deserves the scrutiny. But don't think for a
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: minute that people aren't going to start turning the page
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: and looking at other people that were involved. And I
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: think that all these people out here that are so
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: gung-ho about this file being released and that file being
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: released are not going to be so happy when the
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: shoe's on the other foot because there's a lot of
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: people on the other side of the aisle that took
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: a lot of money from Jeffrey Epstein, that spent a
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: lot of time with Jeffrey Epstein, that are going to
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: need to do some explaining as well about their relationship
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein. It's appalling that Democrats on the Oversight
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: Committee are cherry-picking documents and politicizing information received from the
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: Epstein estate today, Comer said. Oversight Committee Republicans are focused
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: on running a thorough investigation to bring transparency and accountability
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: for survivors of Epstein's heinous crimes and the American people.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: President Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing and Democrats
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: are ignoring the new information the committee received today. Well, look,
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: He said he didn't have anything to do with that letter, right?
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: That card? Well, this proves that that narrative is bunk, right? Now,
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: of course, they're going to say it's a hoax, but
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: they're making that extraordinary claim. They got to prove it.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: So prove that it's a hoax. The now famous birthday
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: book is a 230-page collection of photos, yearbook pages, song sheets,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: and other mementos. It was compiled by Epstein associate, Ghislaine Maxwell,
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: who wrote in the prologue that she wanted to gather
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: stories and old photographs to jog your memory about places, people,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: and different events. Isn't that sweet? The bipedal serpent. Wants
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: to hook up her disgusting child molesting buddy. Some of
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: the letters will definitely achieve their intended goal. Some, you
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: will have to read them to see for yourself. I
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: know you will enjoy looking through the book, and I
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: hope that you will derive as much pleasure looking through
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: it as I did putting it together for you. Maxwell wrote,
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: The book's content section, under a header titled Friends, There
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: is a list of more than 20 names, including former
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: President Bill Clinton, Attorney Alan Dershowitz, and Trump. Under a
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: header titled Girlfriends, the names are all redacted. And this
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: is why the whole oversight investigation is garbage. Everything's going
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: to be redacted. That way they can continue to protect
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: their friends. That's what it's all about. And that's why
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: you have these Republicans who don't want to sign the
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: discharge petition that's been put forward by Thomas Massey and
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: Ro Khanna. The trove includes a letter that appears to
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: be from Clinton wishing Epstein a happy 50th. A spokesperson
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: referred to a previous statement that Clinton cut ties before
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: Epstein's arrest on federal charges in 2019 and didn't know
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: about Epstein's crimes. Oh yeah? What about the Florida arrest?
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: You mean to tell me Bill Clinton had no idea
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: that that went down? Good old Bill Clinton, huh? No
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: idea who Jeffrey Epstein was. I'm sure that the Secret
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: Service never ran any kind of background on Jeffrey Epstein.
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: It also includes a note that appears to be on
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: a letterhead from Dershowitz saying, Happy birthday and best regards.
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: For his tribute, Dershowitz appears to have created a fake
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: magazine cover, which he called Vanity Unfair, in which he
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: doctored headlines to fit Epstein's name, including doctoring a cover
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: story about Nicole Kidman. The note states, As a birthday
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: gift to you, I managed to obtain an early version
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: of the magazine. Good old Alan, I kept my underpants
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: on Dershowitz, huh? Okay. CNN has reached out to Dershowitz
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: for comment. Dershowitz told the Wall Street Journal, it's been
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: a long time and I don't recall the content of
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: what I may have written. Oh, of course not. Lawyers
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: speak for Leave Me Alone. The book's content spanned Epstein's
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: life before 50 from birth and Cub Scout documents to
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: photos of art in his expensive private residences and black
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: and white family portraits. It also included extensive notes and
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: photos about private moments and jokes. There are several pages
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: allude notes with titles such as Girls on My Boat,
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: where the names of women appear to be redacted. So
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: we're not going to get anything from this panel. Like
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: I said from the beginning, we're going to get un
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: gots from these people. The records released by the committee
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: include pages from Epstein's address book which contain contact information
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: for many of the wealthy and powerful people in his orbit.
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: A version of the book that redacted phone numbers or
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: email addresses had previously been made public. Attorney Daniel H. Weiner,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: a representative for the estate, confirmed to CNN that an
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: initial document production had been transmitted to the panel. and
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: said the co-executors will continue to produce on a rolling
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: basis documents responsive to the committee's subpoena. Lawyers representing the
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: estate noted in a letter obtained by CNN accompanying the
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: document production that there are certain redactions in the book,
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: which was reportedly compiled by Epstein's associate, Glaine Maxwell, that
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: comprises three volumes. You mean co-conspirator, right? Fellow child abuser,
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: bipedal serpent, all-around scumbag. That's who you mean Ghislaine Maxwell is, right?
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: Please note that in an abundance of caution, we have
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: redacted names and faces of women and minors who appear
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: in the book, other than Ms. Maxwell, public figures, and
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: family or class photos, to ensure that no potential victims
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: are publicly identifiable, Wiener and attorney Daniel Ruzamano wrote. We
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: have also redacted photographs revealing any nudity from the book,
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: they added. In response to the committee's request for a
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: potential list of clients involved in sex acts or sex
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: trafficking facilitated by Mr. Jeffrey Epstein in the subpoena, lawyers
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: for Epstein Estates said they are not aware of the
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: existence of such a list. As CNN previously reported, A
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: bipartisan group of staffers on the committee is expected to
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: travel to New York City later this week to meet
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: with lawyers representing the estate and view unredacted documents related
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: to the investigation. The committee previously released tens of thousands
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: of pages of documents of Epstein's files turned over to
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: the panel by the Justice Department. Democrats on the panel
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: criticized the document production, however, saying that it contained little
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: new information. Well, that's because the vast majority of it's recycled.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: We've seen a lot of it before. I mean, the MPA,
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: the Last Will and Testament. Now, the book is new.
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: We haven't seen that. So that's a nice little addition
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: to go through. But besides that, everything's been seen before.
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: And that's why I said... this committee is a bunch
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: of BS. And I think that the right way to
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: go is the charge petition that's been put forward by
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: Massey and Khanna. And I think with that charge petition,
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: we'll at least get some semblance of transparency. Without it,
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: we'll remain in the dark. But as far as the
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: letter goes or alleged letter, Look, I don't know. I'm
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: not some handwriting expert. I wasn't there. But it certainly
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: looks to me like that letter is real, like that
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: signature is real. Do I know if Trump drew that
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: picture of that weird ass looking lady or girl or whatever? No.
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: But the signature, when matched up to the other signatures,
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: certainly looks authentic. So like usual, I'll leave it up
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: to you to decide. As for me, well, I'll be
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: back in a little bit with some more because we
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: certainly have a lot to get to. All of the
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: information that goes with this episode can be found in
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: the description box.