Latest / The conspiracy / JUDGE EXPOSES ELITES_ Then DISAPPEARS_ The Neringa Venckienė Story

Transcript

JUDGE EXPOSES ELITES_ Then DISAPPEARS_ The Neringa Venckienė Story · The conspiracy

0:00
Speaker 1: Neringa Thanking may not be a name you've heard before,
0:03
Speaker 1: but it is a name that you'll never forget once
0:04
Speaker 1: you hear the story. Neringa's story involves impeachment, political asylum, extradition,
0:10
Speaker 1: disturbing murders, a custody battle, and a good versus evil
0:14
Speaker 1: fight against Nringa used to be a judge and parliamentarian
0:18
Speaker 1: in Lithuania. Her career as a judge lasted thirteen years.
0:22
Speaker 1: Beginning in two thousand and eight, she began seeking justice
0:25
Speaker 1: for her own niece, who was allegedly by two different
0:29
Speaker 1: government officials. After Nringa's quest for justice began, so did
0:33
Speaker 1: her persecution. You heard that right. For trying to expose
0:37
Speaker 1: this and corruption in the Lithuanian government, Neringo was targeted
0:41
Speaker 1: by authorities in her own country. On today's episode, we're
0:44
Speaker 1: diving deep into another dark and deeply disturbing story of
0:48
Speaker 1: government corruption that has run unchecked and attempting to show
0:52
Speaker 1: you guys that things like this aren't conspiracies, they aren't
0:55
Speaker 1: things that happen in foreign countries, and they don't touch America.
0:57
Speaker 1: This story ends up in America, and yeah, it's it's unbelievable.
1:01
Speaker 1: You're gonna see what I'm talking about in a moment.
1:03
Speaker 1: As always, I'm not going anywhere and I'm not planning
1:06
Speaker 1: on doing anything to myself. All parties are presumed innocent
1:09
Speaker 1: until proven guilty in a court of law. If you
1:11
Speaker 1: want to check the resources and gather information for it
1:14
Speaker 1: yourself and see that I'm not just making stuff up,
1:16
Speaker 1: head to the resources document that I'm posting in the
1:19
Speaker 1: description of this show. And also, if you want to
1:21
Speaker 1: watch this episode completely uncensored, please head over to my Patreon.
1:25
Speaker 1: There is a link in the description end in a
1:27
Speaker 1: pinned comment. This episode is on there, and I post
1:30
Speaker 1: all episodes of the show early, ad free and uncensored.
1:33
Speaker 1: So if you love the show and you want to
1:35
Speaker 1: help support what we're doing here, that's a great way
1:37
Speaker 1: to do so. Anyways, y'all, my name is Colin Brown.
1:39
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Conspiracy Files. So right now, I'm just
1:49
Speaker 1: getting back from a twelve day trip in America with
1:54
Speaker 1: my entire film crew for my production that I've been
1:57
Speaker 1: self funding and financing and you know, producing, directing, putting
2:01
Speaker 1: together over the past seven months or so. Following that
2:07
Speaker 1: existed in America that was larger and deeper and more
2:11
Speaker 1: complex than you could possibly imagine. I just spent the
2:14
Speaker 1: last week sitting down with victims of these crimes, crying
2:17
Speaker 1: with them, hearing their stories, documenting their stories, interviewing family
2:21
Speaker 1: members of children that were infamous murders, getting to know them,
2:27
Speaker 1: talking to family members of a woman it was their
2:30
Speaker 1: mom who is allegedly to protect this ring. So it's
2:34
Speaker 1: been a long, dark and heavy week. But the series
2:37
Speaker 1: that we are shooting, we have a team of five
2:39
Speaker 1: people that are all deeply invested in this story. People
2:43
Speaker 1: from film backgrounds who've worked huge shows before that have
2:46
Speaker 1: partnered with me to make this thing a reality, And
2:48
Speaker 1: we're fighting endlessly and tirelessly to bring these people to
2:52
Speaker 1: justice and to try and expose these things that have
2:54
Speaker 1: happened that as you're seeing in the news right now,
2:56
Speaker 1: are continuing to happen. So yeah, I've already had a long, tedious,
3:00
Speaker 1: exhausting week. I just got back from my trip last
3:03
Speaker 1: night at around eleven thirty. Here I am in the
3:05
Speaker 1: studio the next morning. So it's just it's crazy. But
3:08
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, guys, I'm dedicating my life to this stuff.
3:11
Speaker 1: I know people about Why am I talking about this
3:13
Speaker 1: so much? Why are you bringing this stuff up? But
3:15
Speaker 1: not only is it my passion, but it's just crazy
3:18
Speaker 1: once you go down the rabbit hole opening up to
3:22
Speaker 1: these things and you realize that this wasn't a one
3:25
Speaker 1: off case. These rings of criminals existed for decades unchecked,
3:31
Speaker 1: and to this day they still exist. So raising awareness
3:34
Speaker 1: around this history that I feel has been completely hidden
3:37
Speaker 1: and covered up is imperative. If we're going to try
3:39
Speaker 1: to stop this stuff, we have to at least inform
3:42
Speaker 1: people to show them this stuff is real. I mean,
3:44
Speaker 1: look at even the coverage of some of the Epstein stuff.
3:47
Speaker 1: I've seen hundreds thousands of people denying that this could
3:49
Speaker 1: be a reality, That Epstein was children essentially two powerful individuals.
3:55
Speaker 1: They just flat out deny it, like it's not possible.
3:58
Speaker 1: Not only is it possible, but it's documented that this
4:00
Speaker 1: stuff has happened before. And I don't know what it is.
4:02
Speaker 1: I had a lot of talks with a lot of
4:03
Speaker 1: people this last week. Is it when these people get
4:05
Speaker 1: to these positions of power, they're just given whatever they
4:08
Speaker 1: want and the darkest sides of these individuals come out.
4:11
Speaker 1: Is it blackmail? Are these sorts of people that want
4:14
Speaker 1: to attracted two positions of power so that they can
4:17
Speaker 1: do sorts of things like that. I don't know what
4:19
Speaker 1: it is, but there is a definite pattern here. And
4:22
Speaker 1: once again, I'm not talking total zany far out conspiracy
4:26
Speaker 1: like which I personally feel was, you know, a misinformation machine.
4:30
Speaker 1: I know people are going to think that's a controversial take,
4:33
Speaker 1: but I want to make a whole video about that
4:34
Speaker 1: and the tenuous beginnings of that entire theory. But when
4:37
Speaker 1: you say stuff you know like this to people, they
4:40
Speaker 1: immediately label you as somebody like that. That's why I
4:42
Speaker 1: personally feel like something like that was created so that
4:46
Speaker 1: people who question these narratives and try to talk about
4:48
Speaker 1: this stuff can be delegitimized immediately, like, oh, he's just crazy,
4:51
Speaker 1: he's a guy. This stuff is very real. Unfortunately it's
4:56
Speaker 1: just crazy. It's crazy. But without further ado, I know
4:59
Speaker 1: there's gonna be some in the comments who says timestamp
5:02
Speaker 1: whatever this is when the episode really begins. People want
5:05
Speaker 1: to skip my little intro, but I feel like it's
5:07
Speaker 1: important to keep you guys updated and to tell you
5:09
Speaker 1: how I really feel, and because this stuff is important
5:11
Speaker 1: to me. I feel like I've been called by someone
5:14
Speaker 1: or something to expose this stuff. And when you guys
5:16
Speaker 1: see what we've been working on, you will understand this
5:19
Speaker 1: isn't a YouTube video that we've been doing. Like this
5:22
Speaker 1: trip and this project has taken us overseas to Amsterdam, Germany, India,
5:27
Speaker 1: knocking on the doors of these people, trying to get
5:29
Speaker 1: answers and justice, tracking down the ghost of this guy
5:33
Speaker 1: who was hopping country to country, who left a trail
5:35
Speaker 1: of tears and horrible, horrible and potentially murder in his wake.
5:39
Speaker 1: Today's episode goes right along with all these other stories
5:43
Speaker 1: we've talked about. So I guess let's go back to
5:45
Speaker 1: the beginning and figure out what started all of this. Well,
5:49
Speaker 1: it was somebody named Diamante Kenite now Demante Kenite, Naringa's
5:54
Speaker 1: five year old niece, claimed that government officials and her
5:57
Speaker 1: mother's friend her while she was staying with her mother.
6:01
Speaker 1: She visually demonstrated to the authorities exactly what these people
6:04
Speaker 1: had done to her in very graphic detail, and told
6:07
Speaker 1: Nerringa where the that she had been were using her
6:11
Speaker 1: body and demonstrating what they were using her five year
6:14
Speaker 1: old body for now. Diamante said that when she visited
6:17
Speaker 1: her own mother, she alleged that she had been by
6:20
Speaker 1: three men. The men were later determined to have allegedly
6:24
Speaker 1: been Andreas Usas, a businessman and advisor to the Speaker
6:28
Speaker 1: of parliament, Judge Jonas for Mountavicius, and Idis, a man
6:32
Speaker 1: that has only ever been identified by his first name.
6:35
Speaker 1: So right there, you've got an advisor to the speaker
6:37
Speaker 1: of parliament in Lithuania, a judge, and a guy only
6:40
Speaker 1: identified by his first name but claimed to be involved
6:42
Speaker 1: in the government. Now, the young five year old girl's
6:45
Speaker 1: claims were evaluated by court ordered psychologists and psychiatrists. They
6:49
Speaker 1: had a whole team that were looking into this and
6:52
Speaker 1: pressing her to see if she was telling the truth.
6:54
Speaker 1: And all the teams, all the individuals, found that she
6:57
Speaker 1: was telling the truth, that her claims were credible. But
6:59
Speaker 1: this most likely happened. Though. I should put it in
7:01
Speaker 1: here that some people who didn't believe the young girl
7:04
Speaker 1: claim that she may have been coached by her father.
7:06
Speaker 1: I don't believe that, but it is something that people
7:08
Speaker 1: say about this whole thing. Because Diamante's father, Dracius Kettis,
7:12
Speaker 1: sent more than two hundred requests for an investigation into
7:16
Speaker 1: his daughter's claim Narringa, the judge petitioned with her own
7:19
Speaker 1: brother for a full investigation. They were all on board
7:23
Speaker 1: with this and they wanted an investigation opened into what
7:26
Speaker 1: happened to their loved one, now Naringa Dracius. They reached
7:30
Speaker 1: out to law enforcement and the courts, begging them to
7:32
Speaker 1: investigate these claims, but all parties involved felt that the
7:35
Speaker 1: investigation was rushed and deeply negligent. In fact, Ketis, the
7:39
Speaker 1: girl's daughter, sent over two hundred DVDs containing recordings of
7:44
Speaker 1: his daughter's testimony. The DVDs went to some members of
7:47
Speaker 1: the Simus Lithuanian MEPs, media outlets, foreign embassies, and even
7:52
Speaker 1: the Lithuanian Ministry of Justice. Diamante, the young girl's father,
7:56
Speaker 1: also spoke to national media outlets and asked for help
7:59
Speaker 1: from local politicians. Nobody wanted to help the family, it seemed,
8:03
Speaker 1: and help wasn't coming. On October fifth, two thousand and nine,
8:07
Speaker 1: Judge Jonas for amount of Vicius and a woman who
8:10
Speaker 1: wasn't Dimante's mother were murdered. So the judge that was
8:13
Speaker 1: accused of the young girl and another woman who was
8:17
Speaker 1: not the young girl's mom were killed. At the time,
8:19
Speaker 1: Lithuanian police said that the shots had been fired from
8:22
Speaker 1: a white VW transporter van, which was allegedly owned by
8:26
Speaker 1: the company that Ketis worked for at the time. One
8:29
Speaker 1: of Ketis's former friends. Keep in mind Ketis is the
8:32
Speaker 1: five year old girl's father. Mindaugas Zelimas, a former police informant,
8:36
Speaker 1: stated that the police knew that the killings had been
8:39
Speaker 1: planned and they did nothing to stop them. They allowed
8:42
Speaker 1: these murders to happen. It's alleged that this statement, talking
8:45
Speaker 1: about the fact that the police allowed these murders to occur,
8:48
Speaker 1: caused the resignation of one of Lithuania's highest police chiefs.
8:52
Speaker 1: One of the highest ranking officers in Lithuania. Diamante, the
8:55
Speaker 1: young girl's father, disappeared the day that the murders occurred,
8:58
Speaker 1: and obviously a metiately became the prime suspect. It was
9:01
Speaker 1: announced by prosecutors via the media outlets throughout the country
9:05
Speaker 1: that Diamante's father's DNA was found on the murder weapon,
9:09
Speaker 1: and they then confirmed that Diamante's father committed the crime
9:13
Speaker 1: sort of a revenge my daughter. You got away with it.
9:16
Speaker 1: I'm going to keep However, later on prosecutors retracted those
9:20
Speaker 1: statements and claimed to the public they had made a
9:23
Speaker 1: big mistake, as as it turned out, no DNA evidence
9:27
Speaker 1: was found. There was zero DNA. However, they made this
9:29
Speaker 1: big announcement saying that DNA was found on the murder weapon,
9:33
Speaker 1: clearly linking the father to the murders. But then all
9:35
Speaker 1: of a sudden, there was no DNA to begin with.
9:38
Speaker 1: And this is just the tip of the iceberg, the
9:40
Speaker 1: very start of where this thing becomes incredibly bizarre. Now,
9:43
Speaker 1: when Diamante's father disappeared, the father of the victim, she
9:47
Speaker 1: the victim was placed in a psychiatric hospital Nuringa. The
9:51
Speaker 1: judge was then granted custody of Diamante and took her home.
9:54
Speaker 1: April twenty ten, Ketis, Diamante's father, the man who was
9:59
Speaker 1: accused of carrying o those murders, who wanted justice for
10:01
Speaker 1: his baby girl, was found dead. A gun was found
10:04
Speaker 1: near his body, a gun which, according to prosecutors, was
10:08
Speaker 1: allegedly used in the October two thousand and nine double murder.
10:12
Speaker 1: Kettis's death very suspiciously, according to the authorities in Lithuania,
10:17
Speaker 1: was caused by vomiting due to some individuals who have
10:22
Speaker 1: studied this case, including some close to the case actually
10:25
Speaker 1: on the ground in Lithuania, have stated that this manner
10:28
Speaker 1: of death, this reason why he died, was completely fabricated,
10:31
Speaker 1: It was invented by authorities, and that in reality, after
10:34
Speaker 1: looking at the body, it appeared that he was actually
10:38
Speaker 1: to death. The injuries on his body were so severe that, yeah,
10:41
Speaker 1: I mean, it just did not line up with the
10:43
Speaker 1: official story whatsoever. Now, Nirringa, who was in custody of
10:48
Speaker 1: the victim, she's her aunt, remember, began to speak out
10:51
Speaker 1: immediately against the corruption that she was seeing take place
10:54
Speaker 1: in the Lithuanian courts. And Nringa was actually a pretty
10:58
Speaker 1: powerful woman in the country. She was a judge herself.
11:00
Speaker 1: She wanted justice for her niece, that's all that she wanted,
11:04
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, her brother's dead under suspicious circumstances.
11:08
Speaker 1: One of the persons that her niece accused of her
11:11
Speaker 1: was dead in a very suspicious, unsolved if you want
11:14
Speaker 1: to call it that homicide. And also of note in
11:17
Speaker 1: June of twenty ten, just around that same time, Andreas Usus,
11:21
Speaker 1: one of the other people who was accused of diamante
11:24
Speaker 1: of the young girl. He was also found dead. The
11:26
Speaker 1: government of Lithuania stated that Andreas who Remember, was deeply
11:31
Speaker 1: involved in state and national politics. They stated that he
11:34
Speaker 1: had died of natural causes, even though his body was
11:37
Speaker 1: found laying in a few inch deep puddle of water
11:40
Speaker 1: right near his four wheeler. His helmet wasn't on his head,
11:43
Speaker 1: it was found near him. So, all of a sudden,
11:46
Speaker 1: in this case, out of nowhere, people start dropping dead.
11:49
Speaker 1: First it's one of the accused, then it's the victim's father.
11:53
Speaker 1: Then all of a sudden, it's another one of the accused,
11:55
Speaker 1: and they're all dying in these really bizarre ways. I mean,
11:59
Speaker 1: you have a random targeted hit assassinated with gunfire. Then
12:03
Speaker 1: you have vomiting to death, vomiting because of alcoholism, You
12:08
Speaker 1: vomit yourself to death, even though people claim he was
12:10
Speaker 1: covered in you know, bruises and injuries like he was.
12:13
Speaker 1: Then you have another of the accused who's suddenly dead
12:16
Speaker 1: from natural causes, even though he's laying in a puddle,
12:19
Speaker 1: face down near a four wheeler. His helmet isn't on him,
12:23
Speaker 1: It would have been on him if he had been riding.
12:25
Speaker 1: None of it really makes sense. Interestingly, a social research
12:28
Speaker 1: company conducted a poll in Lithuania from November twenty first
12:31
Speaker 1: to twenty second, twenty eleven. The topic of the poll
12:35
Speaker 1: was whether or not the public believed the official versions
12:38
Speaker 1: of the deaths of Ketis, the victim's father, and uses
12:41
Speaker 1: the accused, and if they believe the government was being
12:43
Speaker 1: truthful and this was crazy. Only four point four percent
12:47
Speaker 1: of Lithuanians believe that the results were truthful. Only four
12:51
Speaker 1: percent four point four percent of people living in Lithuania,
12:54
Speaker 1: according to this sample, believed that the government was telling
12:57
Speaker 1: truth about these deaths. The results were then published Invite
13:00
Speaker 1: Us a magazine. But we have to go back in
13:02
Speaker 1: the story for a second. So remember the young girl Diamante.
13:06
Speaker 1: She claimed that when she was brought over to her
13:08
Speaker 1: own mother's house, that's when those men from the government
13:11
Speaker 1: were brought over, who are in extremely graphic and disturbing ways.
13:15
Speaker 1: But her mother was never indicted for her part in
13:18
Speaker 1: this of her own daughter, even though in two thousand
13:21
Speaker 1: and nine a district court ruled that there was more
13:24
Speaker 1: than enough evidence to indict her, Which is strange. You
13:27
Speaker 1: have this victim claiming that her mother facilitated this stuff
13:30
Speaker 1: and potentially joined in. You have a district court looking
13:33
Speaker 1: through the facts of the case and determining they have
13:35
Speaker 1: more than enough to bring this woman in who essentially
13:40
Speaker 1: her own daughter out to and yet they do nothing.
13:43
Speaker 1: They don't indict her, they don't ask her anything. In
13:45
Speaker 1: twenty ten, the Lithuanian Parliament deemed the investigation into young
13:49
Speaker 1: Damonte's deleegations was negligent. They found that things had been
13:53
Speaker 1: covered up, things had been disappeared, evidence had gone missing.
13:56
Speaker 1: They found that the negligence itself had compromised the case
14:00
Speaker 1: against the two public officials. So there you go. The
14:03
Speaker 1: Lithuanian Parliament is saying that the investigators and the people
14:06
Speaker 1: looking into this case had fitted up so badly that
14:09
Speaker 1: the case against two government officials that were allegedly that
14:14
Speaker 1: this little girl couldn't go through. The court also accused
14:17
Speaker 1: Diamonte's father, the man who died from vomiting, of making
14:21
Speaker 1: up the allegations in order to harm his ex wife.
14:25
Speaker 1: So they also determined that, you know, this thing was
14:28
Speaker 1: just a fabrication, It was a fantasy. Never mind the
14:30
Speaker 1: multiple people that died all of a sudden and the
14:33
Speaker 1: evidence that the court found was enough to actually indict someone,
14:36
Speaker 1: never mind all that it was just some sort of
14:38
Speaker 1: lie that the husband invented to get back at his
14:40
Speaker 1: ex wife. After this, a few individuals working on this
14:43
Speaker 1: case were fired. They included the prosecuting attorneys due to
14:47
Speaker 1: their negligence in the investigation and their lack of coordination
14:51
Speaker 1: with one of the suspects, which resulted in lost evidence
14:54
Speaker 1: and the child's rights on budgment. Other individuals involved in
14:57
Speaker 1: the case were forced to resign and included Gamontes Valentinas,
15:01
Speaker 1: the Attorney General of Lithuania, and multiple prosecutors. So they
15:05
Speaker 1: determined that this case was completely botched and said, you
15:09
Speaker 1: guys were deeply negligent in all of this. You did
15:12
Speaker 1: not do your job, You did not get to the
15:14
Speaker 1: truth in the situation. You let justice escape. And we
15:17
Speaker 1: also have the evidence in order to indict the mom,
15:20
Speaker 1: and obviously you're being negligent because the evidence was never
15:22
Speaker 1: collected or gathered. But then at the same time they're saying, eh,
15:25
Speaker 1: but we also think that the dad just made it up,
15:27
Speaker 1: So that doesn't track. That doesn't make sense to me.
15:29
Speaker 1: How do you determine that all these people prosecutors, attorney general,
15:33
Speaker 1: prosecuting attorneys, how are they negligent in a case and
15:38
Speaker 1: it's deemed a complete But in the same breath, there
15:41
Speaker 1: wasn't a case in general, because according to them, these
15:44
Speaker 1: allegations were all fabricated. In May of twenty ten, the
15:47
Speaker 1: courts determined that Damante's mother, the victim, should have custody
15:51
Speaker 1: of her daughter, even though this case against her hadn't
15:55
Speaker 1: been concluded at the time. Damante, the victim, five years
15:58
Speaker 1: old at the time of the was testifying against her
16:01
Speaker 1: own mother at the time for facilitating the for allowing
16:06
Speaker 1: the pu to come, and yet the court said that
16:09
Speaker 1: the mom should have her narringa the judge and the
16:11
Speaker 1: girl's aunt was ordered to give her niece back to
16:14
Speaker 1: her mother. Damante refused to return to her own mom,
16:18
Speaker 1: stating that she was afraid of being again. It was
16:21
Speaker 1: obvious she was deeply afraid of her own mother. She
16:25
Speaker 1: had been, and yet the courts are saying, even though
16:28
Speaker 1: we have a case and we're interviewing you about this case,
16:30
Speaker 1: you need to give the daughter back, and the person
16:33
Speaker 1: who's geting you needs to bring you back into that home.
16:36
Speaker 1: During this time, hundreds, possibly thousands of Lithuanians kept vigils
16:41
Speaker 1: outside of Narringa's house to prevent the government from taking Diamante,
16:45
Speaker 1: her niece, away from her. Narringa was a savior here.
16:49
Speaker 1: She was fighting for justice, she was fighting for the light,
16:52
Speaker 1: she was fighting for the good, trying to protect her niece,
16:54
Speaker 1: and yet the government, for some reason, in the midst
16:57
Speaker 1: of all of this, said we need to rehome your
16:59
Speaker 1: own niece back with her accused. People were pissed, though
17:04
Speaker 1: they were having these vigils, hundreds of thousands of people
17:07
Speaker 1: standing outside of Ringa's house saying, you know, we're praying
17:10
Speaker 1: for you and we're hoping this turns out differently, but
17:12
Speaker 1: it didn't. Nringa's own son, Carolus Venkas, made a statement
17:16
Speaker 1: regarding his cousin's state of mind at the time, saying, quote,
17:19
Speaker 1: my cousin, he's talking about Diamante, the young girl. At
17:22
Speaker 1: this point, the victim developed PTSD from attempts to return
17:26
Speaker 1: her to her mother, and her doctors issued an order
17:28
Speaker 1: against further traumatizing attempts end quote. A few years later,
17:32
Speaker 1: on May seventeenth, twenty twelve, the government of Lithuania sent
17:36
Speaker 1: more than two hundred police officers to Narringa's house to
17:40
Speaker 1: take her niece, Damante the victim, away from her more
17:43
Speaker 1: than two hundred police officers to confiscate a girl who
17:46
Speaker 1: had accused her own mother and others to return her
17:50
Speaker 1: to that home. The officers during this used force to
17:54
Speaker 1: take Diamante, the young girl from her aunt, it said,
17:57
Speaker 1: and it was reported that the child was ripped from
17:59
Speaker 1: Nearinga's arms. She was desperately not wanting to go back
18:03
Speaker 1: to her mother. They literally ripped this child out of
18:05
Speaker 1: her aunt's arms and she was carried away from her shrieking, crying, screaming, thrashing.
18:10
Speaker 1: Caroless Venkas, the girl's cousin, stated in twenty eighteen that
18:13
Speaker 1: he hadn't seen his cousin since she was taken away. Now.
18:16
Speaker 1: The actions taken by the government in removing that young girl,
18:20
Speaker 1: the victim, from her aunt's custody resulted in massive protests
18:24
Speaker 1: against the Lithuanian government, both in Lithuania and at Lithuanian
18:28
Speaker 1: embassies all across the world. These events set off an
18:31
Speaker 1: absolute firestorm, kind of like the White Marches in a way.
18:35
Speaker 1: In the Mark de True case in Belgium, Naringa, the
18:37
Speaker 1: girl's aunt and the judge resigned from her position as
18:40
Speaker 1: a judge and founded a new political party. This party,
18:44
Speaker 1: she said, was to focus on anti corruption and anti
18:48
Speaker 1: It was called Way of the Courage. The party elected
18:51
Speaker 1: Naringa to the parliament in the year twenty twelve. They
18:55
Speaker 1: were able to harness this horrible situation and turn it
18:57
Speaker 1: into something that they thought would be positive, and interestingly
19:00
Speaker 1: they won seven seats in the parliament even though they
19:03
Speaker 1: had zero funding. This was entirely grassroots and they were
19:06
Speaker 1: essentially running on messaging saying, you know, we don't have
19:10
Speaker 1: the money, we don't have the big powerful political backers
19:13
Speaker 1: and donors, we don't have all the lobbyists and people
19:16
Speaker 1: behind us. We essentially have these thoughts, no more corruption,
19:21
Speaker 1: no more in our government. Naringa promise that she was
19:24
Speaker 1: going to reform the court and political system and her
19:27
Speaker 1: main aim that she talked about all the time was
19:30
Speaker 1: to enforce stricter punishments on citizens for corruption charges and
19:35
Speaker 1: anything related to or the of children. And in the
19:39
Speaker 1: wake of all this, obviously in the country, some people
19:42
Speaker 1: came up out of the cracks like they always do,
19:44
Speaker 1: and started claiming that she had facilitated the exploitation of
19:47
Speaker 1: her own niece in order to win her some sort
19:49
Speaker 1: of political power or sway give her a backstory as
19:52
Speaker 1: to why she was doing this. But obviously when you
19:55
Speaker 1: look at the facts of this case, that's just not true.
19:57
Speaker 1: Those are just people once again, that exist everywhere on earth.
20:00
Speaker 1: They come out, you know, when they see a little
20:02
Speaker 1: weakness or a crack and try to exploit that crack
20:05
Speaker 1: for their own personal gain, because they think that they
20:07
Speaker 1: know more than other people do. Twenty twelve. That same year,
20:10
Speaker 1: Narringa authored a book titled Way of Courage, which discussed
20:14
Speaker 1: in detail her niece's ordeal, the perceived cover up, and
20:18
Speaker 1: the government's failure to thoroughly investigate and prosecute the case
20:22
Speaker 1: that they had that was handed to them against public
20:24
Speaker 1: officials and people in the government who were allegedly However,
20:28
Speaker 1: this new change almost like Obama in America. It was
20:31
Speaker 1: a new era. It was exciting, it was people had
20:34
Speaker 1: something to look forward to. This new era in Lithuania
20:37
Speaker 1: wouldn't last for long. After the election in which Naringo
20:40
Speaker 1: won a seat in parliament, the following actions were taken
20:43
Speaker 1: by the government. The Prosecutor General asked the parliament to
20:47
Speaker 1: remove Nringa's legal immunity April ninth, twenty thirteen Liberals, Socialist
20:52
Speaker 1: and Conservative parties all voted in favor of removing Narringa's
20:56
Speaker 1: legal immunity prior to any evidence of wrongdoing that she
21:00
Speaker 1: was allegedly involved in ever being presented. Also before the
21:04
Speaker 1: ruling of the parliamentary Commission that was supposed to investigate
21:08
Speaker 1: this matter, eighty different MPs government officials in Lithuania supported
21:12
Speaker 1: the removal of Naringa's legal immunity, twenty three were against,
21:16
Speaker 1: and fifteen abstained. So they immediately once she got in
21:20
Speaker 1: with this messaging and this goal that changed the government,
21:24
Speaker 1: all these officials flipped on her. They opened investigations. They
21:27
Speaker 1: wanted to take away her legal immunity that she had
21:29
Speaker 1: been granted in the past, and they were doing so
21:32
Speaker 1: so that they could essentially prosecute her, silence her, and
21:35
Speaker 1: stop this anti anti corruption movement from taking hold in
21:40
Speaker 1: their government. In fact, after all this was said and done,
21:43
Speaker 1: once Naringa's political immunity, whatever you'd call it, was removed,
21:47
Speaker 1: more than thirty five charges criminal charges were filed against her.
21:52
Speaker 1: Here are just a few of them. They claimed that
21:54
Speaker 1: Naringa filed petitions on behalf of Diamante her niece with
21:58
Speaker 1: Lithuanian's courts and the child's rites on budsmen, which I
22:01
Speaker 1: guess is crime or something. They said she was making
22:04
Speaker 1: statements critical of the investigation to journalists, which is horrible.
22:08
Speaker 1: You should not do that. You should never be critical
22:10
Speaker 1: of the investigation. They said that she had described in
22:12
Speaker 1: her book case and had named the public officials involved,
22:16
Speaker 1: even though they were, according to them, completely innocent. They
22:19
Speaker 1: said that Nringa had been involved in unauthorized protests, that
22:22
Speaker 1: she had been involved in humiliating the courts, that she
22:25
Speaker 1: had been involved in desecrating the national anthem, that she
22:28
Speaker 1: had been conducting her own investigation into her niece's case,
22:31
Speaker 1: which I guess for some reason wasn't allowed. They obviously
22:34
Speaker 1: said she failed to turn over Diamante, her niece, to
22:37
Speaker 1: her mother, who was accused of They accused her of
22:41
Speaker 1: bruising an officer and even kicking at Diamonte's mother when
22:45
Speaker 1: the mother tried to remove diamante from Narringa's care. So,
22:49
Speaker 1: as you can see here she runs on this platform.
22:52
Speaker 1: She's trying to expose these her own niece and oh,
22:56
Speaker 1: we can't have that. We have a government thing here,
22:58
Speaker 1: we have a setup. We have a way that we
22:59
Speaker 1: like behind the curtain. There are a lot of allegedly
23:03
Speaker 1: in Lithuania. We can't have someone coming in here and
23:06
Speaker 1: opening that curtain and showing the world how sick us
23:10
Speaker 1: really are. So let's just throw the book at her.
23:12
Speaker 1: Let's give her any charge bruising an officer, desecrating the
23:16
Speaker 1: national anthem, doing her own investigation. Let's just look into
23:19
Speaker 1: every single thing that we could throw against this woman
23:22
Speaker 1: in order to silence her and stop her from speaking
23:25
Speaker 1: out against these crimes. Nuringa, when all this was happening,
23:28
Speaker 1: made the following statements regarding why she believed the government
23:32
Speaker 1: made the case against her. She felt as though the
23:34
Speaker 1: government wanted to silence her and had been unable to
23:37
Speaker 1: do so until this case. Nringa claimed that the government
23:41
Speaker 1: of Lithuania wanted to quote misguide and confuse end quote
23:45
Speaker 1: the public. They wanted to detract attention from the quote
23:48
Speaker 1: real criminals end quote. She stated in her statement that
23:51
Speaker 1: the case would prevent her from running in parliamentary elections
23:55
Speaker 1: and this might sway her supporters to not come and
23:57
Speaker 1: vote for her, and in doing so, in stopping her
23:59
Speaker 1: from being elected and being able to spread this message
24:02
Speaker 1: it would stop them all from carrying out real justice
24:05
Speaker 1: in the country. She was essentially saying, you know, they're
24:07
Speaker 1: trying to deflect an act like she's a criminal for
24:10
Speaker 1: trying to protect her own niece and trying to get
24:12
Speaker 1: justice for her own niece and her brother who was killed,
24:15
Speaker 1: and trying to make her look bad while protecting the
24:17
Speaker 1: people who had initially at the very beginning been named
24:20
Speaker 1: as and you know, as it always goes, when one
24:23
Speaker 1: domino falls, so does the entire train or whatever you'd
24:26
Speaker 1: call it, the line of dominoes. So as you can
24:28
Speaker 1: see here, in my opinion, Lithuania, these authorities, these crooked
24:32
Speaker 1: people that were in there, were simply trying to stop
24:34
Speaker 1: that first domino from falling over because it's like Epstein.
24:38
Speaker 1: Why do you think they're silent about Epstein? If you
24:41
Speaker 1: get one person in there, I don't know what the
24:43
Speaker 1: system's like over in Lithuania, but here in America you
24:46
Speaker 1: bring one person in for questioning. Maybe it's I don't know,
24:50
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton, Trump, anybody who's involved in Epstein who might
24:54
Speaker 1: know something. I mean, you could even go through the celebrities,
24:56
Speaker 1: all the politicians, Les Wexner, any of them. If you
24:59
Speaker 1: bring them in and charge them with taking part in
25:02
Speaker 1: Epstein's crimes, well then all of a sudden you have
25:04
Speaker 1: discovery and you have all this that would emerge showing
25:09
Speaker 1: that both parties were involved in this blackmail operation. That's
25:15
Speaker 1: how I view this. Even if it's just two government
25:17
Speaker 1: officials that were accused initially of you know this girl,
25:21
Speaker 1: this five year old girl. If one of them is
25:23
Speaker 1: brought in in question and starts talking, maybe they stop
25:26
Speaker 1: giving a and they out everybody. It's just one of
25:29
Speaker 1: those things where they, I'm assuming wouldn't want that to happen.
25:32
Speaker 1: Naringa believed that parliament members didn't work for the benefit
25:36
Speaker 1: of Lithuania, and she stated that interstatement, if there was
25:39
Speaker 1: a case against her, then all the officers who used
25:42
Speaker 1: force to take her niece away would not end up
25:44
Speaker 1: in jail. That's right. The officers who used brutal force,
25:47
Speaker 1: who came to her house and ripped her niece out
25:50
Speaker 1: of her arms, clear overuse of police force. I don't
25:53
Speaker 1: know what you caught police brutality. None of them we're
25:55
Speaker 1: gonna have to pay for doing that. And she stated
25:57
Speaker 1: that eighty eight percent of Lithuanians at the time time
26:00
Speaker 1: did not trust the country's judicial system. She said, quote,
26:03
Speaker 1: the case against me is desperately needed for those dark
26:06
Speaker 1: powers that got rid of my brother and eight more people.
26:10
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure if they do not have a
26:11
Speaker 1: ticket to the other side ready for me too, for
26:14
Speaker 1: all my pursuit of the truth end quote. But things
26:17
Speaker 1: were about to change, so all this was coming to
26:19
Speaker 1: a boiling point. The young girl's case went nowhere. The
26:23
Speaker 1: girl who was five years old at the time that
26:25
Speaker 1: she was by these three all done under the eyes
26:29
Speaker 1: of her own mother, who allegedly was involved to a degree.
26:32
Speaker 1: She's put back in the home with her mother, Naringa.
26:37
Speaker 1: She tries to speak the truth, She tries to get
26:39
Speaker 1: into the government to run on this anti anti corruption party.
26:43
Speaker 1: She actually gets in there and then all of a sudden,
26:45
Speaker 1: they throw the book at her. They tell her, you know,
26:47
Speaker 1: we're bringing this huge case against you. You might end
26:49
Speaker 1: up in prison for ten twenty fifty years. She didn't
26:52
Speaker 1: know what was going on, She didn't know what would
26:54
Speaker 1: really happen. And on May nineth, twenty thirteen, Nringa went
26:58
Speaker 1: missing in Lithuania, and this they alay County Prosecutor's office
27:02
Speaker 1: announced that they had begun the search for her. However,
27:04
Speaker 1: there were people who knew where Naringa was, and that's
27:07
Speaker 1: because she had requested political asylum in the United States
27:10
Speaker 1: after fleeing there in twenty thirteen. As it turns out,
27:13
Speaker 1: Naringa fled to the United States in twenty thirteen for
27:16
Speaker 1: at least three documented reasons that she's spoken of. A.
27:20
Speaker 1: She was receiving death threats, there were people calling her,
27:23
Speaker 1: threatening her, She believed she was being followed. B She
27:26
Speaker 1: also believed that there was an attempt on her life
27:28
Speaker 1: at a political rally. Someone had already tried to kill her.
27:31
Speaker 1: And see, the Lithuanian government had essentially voted to remove
27:35
Speaker 1: from parliamentary immunity and were filing all those charges against her,
27:38
Speaker 1: so she didn't know how long she could have ended
27:41
Speaker 1: up as a political prisoner there for trying to talk
27:43
Speaker 1: about the truth. While in the United States, Naringa was
27:46
Speaker 1: able to obtain documents in order to allow her to
27:48
Speaker 1: work legally in the US. First, she worked as a
27:51
Speaker 1: nursing home aid and then as a florist in a
27:54
Speaker 1: small town here in America. Once she found out that
27:56
Speaker 1: there was a warrant out for her arrest on charges
27:59
Speaker 1: in Lithuania. She turned herself in in the United States
28:02
Speaker 1: on February thirteenth, twenty eighteen, and was jailed in March
28:06
Speaker 1: of that same year. As part of the extradition treaty
28:09
Speaker 1: that was signed between the United States and Lithuania in
28:11
Speaker 1: two thousand and one, people who are accused of crimes
28:14
Speaker 1: in Lithuania are not allowed to offer counter evidence in
28:17
Speaker 1: the United States courts regarding any of the charges by
28:20
Speaker 1: Lithuania or make a case for Lithuania's political motivation. So essentially,
28:25
Speaker 1: according to this agreement, if you're wanted in Lithuania, you
28:28
Speaker 1: have a warrant, you're in America, and they're essentially trying
28:32
Speaker 1: to extradite you. According to this agreement, you cannot offer
28:36
Speaker 1: any counter evidence that refutes the charges in Lithuania against you,
28:40
Speaker 1: and you can't even explain to authorities in the United
28:43
Speaker 1: States why Lithuania would have been wanting to make this
28:46
Speaker 1: case against you in the first place. Like if you're
28:48
Speaker 1: being politically persecuted, they do not allow you here in
28:52
Speaker 1: the US to explain to the officers, to the authorities
28:55
Speaker 1: why a country would be doing this to you. It's
28:58
Speaker 1: really bizarre the Statute of Limitations. As it turned out,
29:01
Speaker 1: on Naringa's charges had expired, but the Lithuanian government still
29:06
Speaker 1: called for her extradition back to the country, which was
29:09
Speaker 1: incredibly unusual. In October of twenty seventeen, a Lithuanian prosecutor,
29:13
Speaker 1: Namdeed Jacurtis stated that political charges against Naringa were removed
29:18
Speaker 1: from the extradition request so that United States authorities wouldn't
29:22
Speaker 1: reject it. He also stated that if Naringa returned to Lithuania,
29:26
Speaker 1: old charges in the case that were never added in
29:28
Speaker 1: the first place could be slapped on there. Individuals in
29:31
Speaker 1: Lithuania who reached out to the United States government and
29:34
Speaker 1: writing stated that the Lithuanian government's charges against Naringa were
29:38
Speaker 1: indeed politically motivated. The people who wrote to the US
29:41
Speaker 1: government after finding out that she had been arrested and
29:44
Speaker 1: would potentially be deported extradited to Lithuania included former political prisoners,
29:50
Speaker 1: current and former government officials, and prominent members of society.
29:54
Speaker 1: All these people were lobbying and saying Naringa should not
29:57
Speaker 1: be sent back to Lithuania. She did not thing wrong.
30:01
Speaker 1: This is political fervor. This is absolute insanity that you're
30:05
Speaker 1: even considering this, And yet the Lithuanian government, as skeasy
30:09
Speaker 1: as they are, worked together to figure out a plan
30:12
Speaker 1: on how they could get her back to the country
30:14
Speaker 1: by kind of going around the rules. You know, Oh,
30:17
Speaker 1: the old charges statute of limitations is up. We can't,
30:20
Speaker 1: you know, have her go to prison on these charges.
30:23
Speaker 1: But they told the people in the United States, when
30:25
Speaker 1: she gets back, we might throw on old charges from
30:27
Speaker 1: the same crimes that we never tacked on to her
30:29
Speaker 1: in the first place. So they were being very sneaky.
30:31
Speaker 1: Additional evidence that Naringa's extradition was politically motivated are the
30:35
Speaker 1: following statements regarding Naringa made by a former chairman of
30:39
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court of Lithuania named Jinaris Chris Vicious. This
30:43
Speaker 1: former chairman of the Supreme Court of Lithuania referred to
30:46
Speaker 1: Naringa and her case as quote an absess in the
30:49
Speaker 1: legal system and an absess in the political system end quote,
30:53
Speaker 1: and also stated that this case in Naringo was quote
30:56
Speaker 1: the trouble of the whole state end quote. April of
30:58
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, US Magistrate judge approved extradition for the charges
31:03
Speaker 1: of hindering the activities of a bailiff, failing to comply
31:07
Speaker 1: with the court's decision, not associated with the penalty for
31:10
Speaker 1: causing physical pain, for resisting against a civil servant or
31:13
Speaker 1: a person performing the functions of public administration. So that
31:17
Speaker 1: was it. She refused to comply with some sort of
31:20
Speaker 1: government charges, she hindered the activities of a bailiff, that
31:24
Speaker 1: she caused physical pain, and you're going to extradite her
31:26
Speaker 1: for this. All charges approved for extradition were then related
31:30
Speaker 1: to Diamonte, the young girl. And it should be noted
31:33
Speaker 1: that all these charges that they filed against her, all
31:36
Speaker 1: these things that they said that she did, were related
31:39
Speaker 1: to that incident when Narringa refused to give up her
31:42
Speaker 1: niece and refused to hand the niece over to the
31:44
Speaker 1: police officers. It was all stemming essentially from that one
31:48
Speaker 1: event when the over two hundred police officers went to
31:51
Speaker 1: the house of a judge who was keeping a hold
31:54
Speaker 1: of her niece who had accused her a mother of
31:58
Speaker 1: forcibly removed that victim so that she she could be
32:00
Speaker 1: re homed with the mother who would And in twenty eighteen,
32:05
Speaker 1: Nringa was arrested in Chicago at Vinuys's request. December sixth,
32:09
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, Judge Virginia Kendall declined Nringa's motion to stay
32:14
Speaker 1: while her asylum case proceeded. The motion was filed in
32:16
Speaker 1: the US Federal Court. Judge Virginia Kendall stated that Nringa
32:20
Speaker 1: had not satisfied her burden of proof. She also said
32:23
Speaker 1: that the court must respect quote the right of sovereign
32:25
Speaker 1: nations to enact and enforce their own criminal laws end quote,
32:29
Speaker 1: and sadly, even though she'd fled the country under fear
32:32
Speaker 1: for her life and knowing that she was being persecuted
32:36
Speaker 1: for her outspoken views on being anti and anti corruption, Naringa,
32:41
Speaker 1: after being in the US, was extradited before her scheduled
32:45
Speaker 1: asylum hearing could take place. If she would have been
32:48
Speaker 1: allowed to attend her asylum hearing, she would have been
32:50
Speaker 1: able to present evidence of Lithuania's political motivation of the
32:54
Speaker 1: charges against her. She was never given that chance, though,
32:57
Speaker 1: and in November of twenty nineteen, Naringo was extradited back
33:00
Speaker 1: to Lithuania. She was airlifted practically back to a pit
33:04
Speaker 1: of vipers, to the mouth of Hell, where tons of
33:07
Speaker 1: people wanted her silent, According to a news agency in Lithuania,
33:11
Speaker 1: she was immediately detained for a number of minor offenses,
33:14
Speaker 1: including hitting a person, refusing to obey a court order,
33:17
Speaker 1: and resisting a police officer. Originally, Neringa had thirteen criminal
33:21
Speaker 1: charges against her, but due to differences between the US
33:24
Speaker 1: and Lithuanian legal systems, nine of the charges were dropped.
33:28
Speaker 1: Doctor Vitautis Matulavicius, a supporter of Nringa's, thought that the
33:32
Speaker 1: judge who approved the extradition, did not know the quote
33:35
Speaker 1: specifics of all post communist countries end quote and probably
33:39
Speaker 1: thought that Nringa would receive an opportunity to defend herself
33:42
Speaker 1: once she was back in the country, but that never happened.
33:45
Speaker 1: November eighteen, twenty nineteen, Naringa was released from custody on
33:49
Speaker 1: a ten thousand euro bail, but remained under government supervision.
33:53
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, pre trial investigation of Naringa was completed,
33:57
Speaker 1: A formal accusation was drawn up by the prosecute us
34:00
Speaker 1: and her status in the case changed from suspect to defendant.
34:04
Speaker 1: The case was then handed over to the Countess Regional Court.
34:07
Speaker 1: The court refused to satisfy the request of Nirringa's attorney,
34:10
Speaker 1: but stated that the charges should be dropped as the
34:13
Speaker 1: statute of limitations had expired. In any other normal case,
34:17
Speaker 1: these charges would have been dropped. They wouldn't have even
34:19
Speaker 1: been a thing resisting of police officer's demands. You're going
34:22
Speaker 1: to extradite someone from another country for that. The court
34:25
Speaker 1: claimed that the charges were against Narringa before she left
34:28
Speaker 1: for the US, and that at the time she had
34:30
Speaker 1: known about the charges, so she had been hiding from
34:33
Speaker 1: Lithuanian justice and the system. The prosecutor eventually accused Naringa
34:37
Speaker 1: of four different crimes. I'm saying that in quotes obstructing
34:40
Speaker 1: the activities of the bailiff, resisting a public servant, inflicting
34:44
Speaker 1: blows or slight, health impairment, and failure to comply to
34:47
Speaker 1: a court decision not related to punishment. Nringa said that
34:51
Speaker 1: she did not admit guilt and exercised her right to
34:53
Speaker 1: testify after all the witnesses alleged witnesses provided testimony a
34:58
Speaker 1: request by Diamonte's mother, the young girl. The victim's mother,
35:01
Speaker 1: Laimut asked that Narnga paid twenty thousand euros to her
35:05
Speaker 1: and fifty euros to her daughter for non pecuniary damage compensation.
35:10
Speaker 1: Lawsuits were filed by an officer and the bailiff for
35:13
Speaker 1: the damage inflicted on them by Naringa. July of twenty
35:16
Speaker 1: twenty one, Nringo was found guilty on all charges and
35:19
Speaker 1: sentenced to one year and nine months in prison. She
35:22
Speaker 1: was released as time already served under arrest exceeded the sentence.
35:26
Speaker 1: She was ordered to pay six thousand, eight hundred euros
35:29
Speaker 1: to the government for extradition expenses, six thousand, three hundred
35:32
Speaker 1: euros to stank A Knight to Monte's mother, the victim's
35:35
Speaker 1: mother who allegedly and three thousand, five hundred euros to
35:40
Speaker 1: the officer and bailiff. So not only had she tried
35:43
Speaker 1: to raise the alarm about this of her own niece,
35:46
Speaker 1: now she was tried, arrested, convicted by those people that
35:50
Speaker 1: were enabling that same system of which the were apart,
35:53
Speaker 1: and she's now forced to pay money to the victim's mother, who,
35:57
Speaker 1: according to the victim, facilitated so for by at least
36:01
Speaker 1: three different men. Neringa appealed and lost her appeal case
36:04
Speaker 1: in January of twenty twenty two, and she appealed to
36:07
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court of Lithuania in May of twenty and
36:10
Speaker 1: twenty two. And that's really kind of where the whole
36:12
Speaker 1: thing stands. There haven't really been any major updates at
36:15
Speaker 1: this point. But what happened to Dimante, the young girl,
36:17
Speaker 1: the five year old at the time, who had been
36:20
Speaker 1: by those Where is she now and what does she
36:22
Speaker 1: have to say about this? Well, according to information from
36:25
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, Dimante the young girl is registered in the
36:29
Speaker 1: United Nations as missing in Lithuania. Lithuania did not respond
36:34
Speaker 1: to the UN's inquest regarding the location of Diamante or
36:37
Speaker 1: whether she's alive or not. The United Nations included her
36:41
Speaker 1: in their international search for missing persons, but no one
36:45
Speaker 1: knows if she's alive or dead. So take that information
36:48
Speaker 1: however you'd like to. Do you really think that she's
36:50
Speaker 1: just missing or do you think she was made missing
36:53
Speaker 1: by certain bad actors in certain governments or organizations. Here
36:57
Speaker 1: you have a girl that started this entire thing with
36:59
Speaker 1: her testimony. She's the reason why this judge is extradited
37:03
Speaker 1: from the US, her life is threatened. She's the one
37:06
Speaker 1: that holds all the accusations and all the knowledge about
37:09
Speaker 1: what happened in her head, and she's missing and nobody
37:11
Speaker 1: in Lithuania has even tried to track her down. The
37:14
Speaker 1: Lithuanian government, though, prosecuted other individuals involved in this whole
37:18
Speaker 1: thing for various crimes, including making false statements. These individuals
37:23
Speaker 1: that were prosecuted by the Lithuanian government for reporting on
37:26
Speaker 1: Dimonte's initial accusations and the murders and suspicious deaths that
37:31
Speaker 1: occurred surrounding them included journalists who covered the story in
37:35
Speaker 1: local press, a medical professional, Diamante's own grandparents, Narrenga's neighbor,
37:40
Speaker 1: members of the Way of Courage party, which, let me
37:43
Speaker 1: remind you, was a party founded against corruption and against
37:48
Speaker 1: They prosecuted people who had attended Way of Courage rallies,
37:51
Speaker 1: attendees who agreed with the message, who just attended, and
37:55
Speaker 1: they also prosecuted others that provided evidence that supported Dimonte's
37:59
Speaker 1: claims of so they actually went completely on this thing,
38:05
Speaker 1: and they prosecuted people who gave evidence showing that the
38:09
Speaker 1: young five year old girl at the time hadn't been
38:12
Speaker 1: lying about being by these men and now by her
38:15
Speaker 1: own mother. But of course, instead of listening to the
38:18
Speaker 1: stories and listening to the evidence, hearing it out, they
38:22
Speaker 1: prosecuted those people and silenced them. Here in the United States,
38:26
Speaker 1: United States Representative Chris Smith, a Republican from New Jersey,
38:29
Speaker 1: made an appeal to the Lithuanian government to end the
38:32
Speaker 1: prosecution of Nringa. February seventh, twenty nineteen, he introduced a
38:36
Speaker 1: bill in the US government called the Give Judge vin
38:39
Speaker 1: Ken Her Day in Court Act. Its purpose, as stated
38:42
Speaker 1: in the document was quote for the relief of Judge Naringa,
38:45
Speaker 1: who the Government of Lithuania seeks on charges related to
38:48
Speaker 1: her pursuit of justice against Lithuanian public officials accused of
38:53
Speaker 1: her young niece end quote. The bill requested the following
38:57
Speaker 1: actions for Niringa. They wanted her excluded from e x
39:00
Speaker 1: tradition under the treaty between the US and Lithuania. They
39:03
Speaker 1: wanted to permit her to remain in the US until
39:05
Speaker 1: a final order was received regarding her pending application for asylum.
39:09
Speaker 1: They wanted her to have free movement and not to
39:11
Speaker 1: be held in federal or state detention for any immigration
39:14
Speaker 1: related or extradition related defense. And they wanted to allow
39:17
Speaker 1: her to work, but that never happened. There's also doctor
39:20
Speaker 1: Vtautis Matulavicious. On September twenty seventh, twenty eighteen, doctor Vitautis
39:25
Speaker 1: testified on the judge's behalf at the Commission on Security
39:28
Speaker 1: and Cooperation in Europe us Helsinki Commission politically motivated injustice
39:33
Speaker 1: the extradition case of Judge Van Kim. Doctor Matulavicius made
39:37
Speaker 1: a point in his testimony to show the link between
39:40
Speaker 1: how the Lithuanian government was similar in causing obstacles of
39:44
Speaker 1: crimes by individuals in the public eye, just like the
39:46
Speaker 1: governments of the United Kingdom with the Elm Guesthouse and
39:49
Speaker 1: Belgium with mart Te true Head in the past. This
39:52
Speaker 1: doctor stated that Lithuania still had not eliminated the corrupt
39:56
Speaker 1: practices of the communist era, which is one of the
39:58
Speaker 1: reasons why Naringa was targeted. She had spoken out against
40:02
Speaker 1: the crimes of those in the public eye. She had
40:04
Speaker 1: spoken out against those people in power, and she was
40:07
Speaker 1: punished for it. He also pointed out to the Commission
40:09
Speaker 1: that there were violations of the norms of international law
40:12
Speaker 1: if she was extradited to Lithuania. He claimed her life
40:15
Speaker 1: would be in danger. You see at least six people
40:18
Speaker 1: who had been involved in the case had died, some
40:21
Speaker 1: had been murdered, and others had died under extremely suspicious circumstances. Quote.
40:25
Speaker 1: According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, every person
40:29
Speaker 1: has the right to affair and impartial court hearing end quote.
40:32
Speaker 1: Nringa would not receive a fair trial based on actions
40:35
Speaker 1: and statements that were taken by the Lithuanian government. Another
40:37
Speaker 1: defender of Nringa's was Abbi Jolis, an international human rights litigator.
40:42
Speaker 1: On September twenty seventh, twenty eighteen, Abbi testified on Naringa's
40:46
Speaker 1: behalf at the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
40:49
Speaker 1: us Helsinki Commission politically motivated in justice the extradition case
40:54
Speaker 1: of Judge Vinkna. Like Nringa's other supporters, she stated that
40:57
Speaker 1: she felt Naringa's life would be in danger if she
41:00
Speaker 1: was sent back to Lithuania. She also pointed out that
41:02
Speaker 1: the allegations that Neringa punched a federal officer when they
41:05
Speaker 1: were trying to take her niece away, this is one
41:08
Speaker 1: of the charges that Naringa was being extradited for. She
41:11
Speaker 1: noted that in places like the US if someone assaulted
41:14
Speaker 1: a federal officer, they would immediately be jailed. This casts
41:17
Speaker 1: out immediately on whether the assault was as serious as
41:21
Speaker 1: they had claimed. If she really had brutally physically assaulted
41:25
Speaker 1: a police officer and caused pain that day, why wouldn't
41:27
Speaker 1: they have arrested her right then? Like others, Jellis believed
41:31
Speaker 1: that Naringa's extradition was politically motivated. There was also Mary
41:34
Speaker 1: grat Leary, a professor of law, who testified the same
41:38
Speaker 1: commission on behalf of Naringa. Leary brought her knowledge, especially
41:41
Speaker 1: on the subject of child to the forefront of their conversation.
41:46
Speaker 1: The United Nations Convention against Transnational Crime defines as quote
41:51
Speaker 1: the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or receipt of persons by
41:55
Speaker 1: means of the threat or use of force or other
41:57
Speaker 1: forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of
42:01
Speaker 1: the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability,
42:04
Speaker 1: or of the giving and receiving of payments or benefits
42:06
Speaker 1: to achieve the consent of a person having control over
42:09
Speaker 1: another person for the purpose of exploitation end quote. She
42:12
Speaker 1: noted that quote internationally, when one with control over a
42:16
Speaker 1: child receives a benefit in exchange for consenting to the
42:19
Speaker 1: child's occurs. This language encompasses intra familials, which is a
42:26
Speaker 1: significant problem throughout the world. End quote. As Diamante's mother,
42:30
Speaker 1: the victim's mother was complicit in allowing her own daughter
42:34
Speaker 1: to be If it became known that her mother received
42:38
Speaker 1: any kind of benefit or something of value from the
42:40
Speaker 1: people that had been her daughter, the case might actually
42:43
Speaker 1: have turned into a case. But yeah, that never happened
42:47
Speaker 1: because it was never formally investigated. And remember, way back
42:51
Speaker 1: at the beginning of this, the courts actually claimed that
42:53
Speaker 1: there was deep corruption throughout this entire thing from the
42:56
Speaker 1: very beginning, and tons of evidence that was never uncovered.
42:59
Speaker 1: It's also important to note that several countries have refused
43:02
Speaker 1: to extradite individuals to Lithuania because of conditions in the country.
43:06
Speaker 1: These countries include Finland, Ireland based on the fact that
43:10
Speaker 1: Lithuanian prisons do not meet international standards, Northern Ireland, Denmark,
43:15
Speaker 1: who refused to extradite there because they believe there's a
43:18
Speaker 1: risk individuals would be tortured upon their return to Lithuania, Israel, Germany, Austria,
43:24
Speaker 1: Malta based on the fact that Lithuanian prisons do not
43:27
Speaker 1: meet international standards Ukraine and Russia. So as you can see,
43:32
Speaker 1: there's some supervillains of the world on that list that
43:35
Speaker 1: will not extradite people to Lithuania because they're so hardcore
43:39
Speaker 1: and because there's torture and corruption. And we did why
43:42
Speaker 1: did we do that? We should have had her here,
43:45
Speaker 1: and we should have had her talk and tell the
43:46
Speaker 1: story of what she knew about the high places in Lithuania.
43:51
Speaker 1: But we went, as always right along with the cover up,
43:54
Speaker 1: and Nringa was technically silenced based on the amount of
43:58
Speaker 1: documentation and Naringa's support. Everything in this case points to
44:02
Speaker 1: the Lithuanian government trying to cover up and protect those
44:05
Speaker 1: in high positions that commit acts. So many things point
44:09
Speaker 1: to the corruption that ran rampant in the government at
44:12
Speaker 1: the time. The fact that a number of individuals in
44:14
Speaker 1: the case wound up dead in a short time period
44:17
Speaker 1: is a big clue that something was going on behind
44:19
Speaker 1: the scenes. Some people say it's six people that died,
44:21
Speaker 1: others say it's eight, But yeah, there were a lot
44:24
Speaker 1: of deaths connected to this whole thing. A number of
44:26
Speaker 1: things weren't taken into consideration in the case of Naringa,
44:30
Speaker 1: liked that the statute of limitations was up or the
44:32
Speaker 1: fact that being extradited to Lithuania may have caused a
44:36
Speaker 1: threat to her own life. And yet for some reason,
44:38
Speaker 1: we the people here in America are public servants, sent
44:41
Speaker 1: her over there to swim with the fishes. It seems
44:44
Speaker 1: like the government really went out of their way to
44:46
Speaker 1: get her extradited, and the US government really didn't do
44:49
Speaker 1: much to help stop them. Even with the statements given
44:52
Speaker 1: and all the evidence presented. You really have to wonder
44:55
Speaker 1: how deep this all goes. I think personally, to end
44:58
Speaker 1: all this that Nringa herself some died it all up
45:01
Speaker 1: best quote. While witnessing and living through all of this,
45:04
Speaker 1: I realized one simple thing. Those who fight for the
45:07
Speaker 1: truth follow in its footsteps. They need to be ready
45:10
Speaker 1: for anything and everything. They need to be ready to
45:12
Speaker 1: survive at all, even if it is one hundred times
45:15
Speaker 1: more than one can bear, and then continue on their way.
45:18
Speaker 1: So as we all know, these people in high places
45:21
Speaker 1: are often involved in these crimes against children, and you
45:25
Speaker 1: can see right here a clear example of a cover up.
45:27
Speaker 1: You can see corruption in every part of this case
45:30
Speaker 1: from the people dying, to the evidence going missing, to
45:33
Speaker 1: the judges or whatever, the court's finding that there was
45:36
Speaker 1: corruption and failures, but then at the same time saying
45:38
Speaker 1: it never happened. Rehousing a child with the woman their
45:42
Speaker 1: mother who take them to government. I mean, it's an
45:46
Speaker 1: insane and then the judge who's fighting for the truth
45:49
Speaker 1: flees to another country because she's afraid for her life,
45:52
Speaker 1: and they ship her right back there, literally to the
45:54
Speaker 1: danger zone. I don't know what's going on here, but
45:57
Speaker 1: it's really suspicious all the way around. And there are
46:00
Speaker 1: definitely some people in the government in Lithuania that got
46:03
Speaker 1: away with some crimes against kids. I mean, who's to
46:05
Speaker 1: say that it's just Dimante of the young girl who's
46:08
Speaker 1: to the government. I know for a fact these rings
46:10
Speaker 1: exist in every country, so I know that it wasn't
46:13
Speaker 1: just this one victim. There are probably so many more
46:15
Speaker 1: victims that have never spoken up or are too afraid to,
46:18
Speaker 1: especially in a country like that. I mean, look at
46:20
Speaker 1: Diamante herself, the victim. She's missing. Nobody knows where she is.
46:23
Speaker 1: The Lithuanian government is not looking for her, the UN
46:26
Speaker 1: couldn't track her down. They were looking for her. The
46:29
Speaker 1: United Nations and she's gone. But yeah, please let me
46:33
Speaker 1: know what you thought of this story in the comments
46:35
Speaker 1: on YouTube. If you're watching, it helps so much to
46:38
Speaker 1: actually leave a comment like the video, subscribe to the channel.
46:41
Speaker 1: If you're listening to the show on Spotify or Apple
46:43
Speaker 1: Podcasts or wherever, please take ten seconds and go leave
46:47
Speaker 1: me a five star review. It would make my day.
46:49
Speaker 1: I love hearing from you guys. But yeah, I'll be
46:52
Speaker 1: back next Wednesday with another episode of The Conspiracy Files.
46:56
Speaker 1: Keep that tinfoil hat on, always question everything in Stacy's issues.
47:00
Speaker 1: I'll see you guys next week.