Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Ryan Bridge: Wouldn't we all be better off if the violent repeat offender was in jail?
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Three strikes update for you. This morning, Nicole McKee's put
- 0:03Speaker 1: out a statement. The government's basically lowering the threshold you
- 0:06Speaker 1: have to meet in order to be hit with the
- 0:09Speaker 1: new three strikes law. Originally, for the law to kick in,
- 0:13Speaker 1: for you to get a strike, you had to commit
- 0:15Speaker 1: a crime with a prison sentence of twenty four months
- 0:18Speaker 1: or more, and it was the same for each of
- 0:20Speaker 1: the three strikes strike one, two, and three. Now it's
- 0:24Speaker 1: being lowered to just twelve months for the first offense.
- 0:28Speaker 1: So basically more criminals will be captured by the first strike,
- 0:30Speaker 1: and if they go on to commit more serious crimes,
- 0:33Speaker 1: it could mean they're locked up for good or there's
- 0:36Speaker 1: an increase in their minimum sentence. It's taking away the
- 0:39Speaker 1: power from the judges and the discretion that they have.
- 0:42Speaker 1: They say the law doesn't work, this three strikes law,
- 0:45Speaker 1: because we have had it before. It's not proven to
- 0:47Speaker 1: reduce offending or reoffending. It's not right, it doesn't rehabilitate criminals.
- 0:53Speaker 1: And yet somehow I don't mind it. If you can't
- 0:56Speaker 1: sort yourself out after warnings one and two, then why
- 1:00Speaker 1: would you miraculously stop offending after the third warning? You
- 1:03Speaker 1: probably wouldn't so wouldn't we all be better off if
- 1:06Speaker 1: that serious, violent, repeat offender was rather than living next
- 1:11Speaker 1: door to you in jail. For more from Early Edition
- 1:15Speaker 1: with Ryan Bridge, listen live to news Talks it'd be
- 1:18Speaker 1: from five am weekdays, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio