Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Rumble Rumbles With the Fascists, Ray Epps Charged, Coach Red Pill Imprisoned | HBR News 424

Transcript

Rumble Rumbles With the Fascists, Ray Epps Charged, Coach Red Pill Imprisoned | HBR News 424 · Honey Badger Radio

0:01
This is HBr News number four twenty four, Rumble Rumbles with the Fascists,
0:06
Ray EPP's charged coach, Redpill Imprisoned, where we discuss the news of the
0:11
week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey
0:18
Badger Radio. I hope you guys are doing that well this week and that
0:21
you're laughing in all of this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it.
0:25
My name is Brian Martinez, a producer at HBr, and I'm joined by
0:29
my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen and Mike I'm sorry, Mike Stevenson Stephenson,
0:37
I always get that wrong, Doctor Rando mccam. I'll just say that
0:43
we have a great and Mike Jay is not here. Oh he just showed
0:46
up. Mike Jay is here too as well, I might Jake. We
0:50
have a great show letting for you guys today, so please be sure to
0:52
continue the conversation both in the chat as well of the comments section. On
0:56
this week's HBr News show, we're gonna be talking about the latest development.
1:00
We talked a little bit about Russell Brand's accusations and now we're looking at some
1:04
of the let's say, responses to the allegation, to his responses to the
1:12
allegations, and how Rumble is stepping up, or at least they they last
1:18
time I looked they were. We're gonna be looking at ray Epps, who
1:23
was one of the primary instigators at January sixth, and he has finally been
1:29
charged. And if you don't already know, you're gonna love what happened with
1:33
that. A Gonzalo Lira aka Coach Redpill is rotting in a Ukraine prison and
1:38
more so, stick around. It's going to be a good time and be
1:42
sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show. So I couldn't decide
1:48
whether I wanted to look at Lily Singh's Ted Talk, where she basically blames
1:55
sexism and racism for her failure as a comedian. But then I said,
2:00
of this People magazine thing, whether that could be interesting to go through.
2:02
It's a Celebt divorce lawyer links Barbie Beyonce and Taylor Swift tours to uptick in
2:12
breakups. So yes, in this weekend shit that you probably already knew there
2:20
there is a sentiment that they all share in common that's causing women to dump
2:27
their husbands. So have these women been gas lit or have those husbands and
2:30
boyfriends dodged a bullet? We will learn about it in the patrons show.
2:36
And if you want to join about join us in the Patronoi show, you
2:38
have to become a Badger by going to feed the Badger dot com and setting
2:42
up a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month will get you into the discord
2:45
and you'll be able to watch all the additional content, and if you give
2:47
a higher levels then you can even join in the discussion with us. So
2:52
there's different like tears or whatever, and you can participate in those. Plus
2:58
all of the content that we have put out there that is not available to
3:01
the public already is still available to all of our patrons. It's thousands of
3:06
hours. Why you would want to put yourself through that, I have no
3:08
idea, but maybe you would. We also have a lot of events game
3:13
nights, movie nights, viewings, things like that, so please consider doing
3:16
any and all of those things and joining us and helping us out. We're
3:21
also doing our monthly's fundraiser. If you could support us, go to feed
3:27
the Badger dot com for slash support and contribute whatever whatever you're able to,
3:31
doesn't matter how small, just as we can keep doing this content. And
3:36
I'm I'm not able to do any arm twisting because I have dignity, So
3:39
I'm gonna let Alison do that when the time comes. But just know that
3:44
she would be doing some serious arm twisting right now if she was here.
3:47
And hopefully you guys be able to support us. And also if you want
3:51
to make sure to find our content after the Internet inevitably deletes us, at
3:57
least the mainstream Internet, then please go to badger feed dot com. That's
4:00
badger feed dot com to find all of our stuff, or honey, Badger
4:03
radio dot com. All right, So with all that out of the way,
4:08
let's get into today's story. So I'm gonna start with Russell Brand Part
4:13
two, and there's some follow up news regarding that. So after the UK
4:17
media pim after Russell Brand's reputation with reports of rape and assault by women most
4:24
likely prompted to speak by reporters, there has been a race to cancel any
4:28
forms of his income as a social media personality. YouTube demonetize Brand's channel,
4:34
with some news organizations bemoaning the fact that he can still make money from paid
4:39
promotions. He also had his content removed from the from the BBC and Channel
4:44
four. It has now come out that there has been an effort to course
4:47
Rumble and TikTok to removing Brand from their platform. From Forbes, quote Dame
4:56
Caroline dna Dnah dying Age, I don't know, Chair of the Culture nobody
5:00
knows. It's it's too possh even for English people. Carolyn Denage. Is
5:13
that like it's yeah commercial that the game? Carolyn Denaj Dennaj whatever, Chair
5:26
of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, something that should not exist,
5:30
has asked broadcasters, including the BBC and Channel four to clarify the internal investigations
5:35
they have carried out into Brand's activities during his time working there, and has
5:41
also spread the net to question video platforms TikTok and Rumble while we were just
5:46
completely completely beyond her office. By the way, this is scandaloust. No
5:53
one, no one in the UK should have the political ability to do this,
5:58
not even the Queen King. Sorry. While we recognize that TikTok is
6:04
not the creator of the content published by mister Brand, and his content may
6:09
be within the community guideline set out by the platform, we are concerned that
6:14
he may be able to profit from his content on the platform. Dennaj wrote
6:18
to TikTok's Director of Government Relations Europe, doctor THEO Bertram, We would be
6:26
grateful if you could confirm whether mister Brand is able to monetize his TikTok posts,
6:31
including his videos, relating to the serious accusations against him, and what
6:35
the platform is doing to ensure that creators are not able to use the platform
6:41
to undermine the welfare of victims of inappropriate and potentially illegal behavior. Inappropriate and
6:47
potentially illegal behavior viots of inappropriate and potentially illegal behavior. For those of you
6:56
who haven't noticed the irony, this is what Aim is exactly engaging in.
7:02
Yeah, inappropriate and potentially illegal behavior. A similar letter was written to Rumble,
7:09
where Brand was following has a following of one point four million subscribers,
7:15
with the company describing the move as quote extremely disturbing end quote here we regard
7:23
uh it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous, inappropriate and potentially illegal. Yeah,
7:30
this is a rum run by the way fire right now. Yeah, we
7:38
regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control
7:45
who is allowed to speak on our platform, or to earn a living from
7:48
doing so, it says in a statement on x formerly Twitter. Singling out
7:55
an individual and demanding his band is even more disturbing given the apps is of
8:00
any connection between the allegations and his content on Rumble and Quote. Since the
8:05
Rumble response, Burger King, A Sauce and Hello Fresh have removed adverts from
8:11
the platform. As cited by The Daily Mail, Burger King said it had
8:16
paused advertising with the platform. We're putting a pause, just a pause,
8:20
remember that while investigations continue, while A Sauce said it had manually removed its
8:28
ads from Rumble. One of Brand's podcasts, called Stay Free with Russell Brand,
8:33
can be access on a variety of platforms, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts,
8:37
and Amazon Music. Presumably next on the chopping block. Yeah, I
8:43
hope Russell Black black. I almost said black, didn't. I hope Russell
8:48
Brand and all his COMI followers we're all playing close attention to what's going on
8:54
right now, because, after all, the only thing the government is attempting
9:00
is, you know, taking away someone's right to capitalize. And yes,
9:05
that is a verb, not just an ism. It means to make money,
9:09
to apply your skills in the accumulation of goods, resources, property,
9:16
if you will. And in case it still hadn't occurred to you, what
9:20
life looks like when this simple verb is denied to you. That's right.
9:26
It means poverty, it means starvation. It means death for everyone. Well,
9:33
even rich white men. Yes, especially non rich white men, but
9:39
yes, even rich white men who are famous and beloved by legions of spoiled,
9:46
horny teenage girls. Even then, they can take anyone down, even
9:50
if they've already fled to the sewers of the internet. With the rest of
9:54
us musants and our rat burghers, they will follow you to the ends of
10:00
the earth, and they will eat you alive. And that's what it looks
10:03
like in practice, when you abolish what you call capitalism, that's the verb
10:11
you wish to abolish. By dear comrades, this is what actually happens when
10:15
you attempt to transition into a moneyless communist utopia. They take away the signifier,
10:22
and hey, presto, they've already taken away the signified. And you're
10:26
they're going, well, it's only money. No, no, it literally
10:31
is not only money. The purpose of money is literally to represent something else.
10:37
That's what a symbol is. So a tenor is not just a tenor.
10:41
It's a tenors worth of cheeseburgers, it's a tenors worth of blowjobs.
10:46
It's a tenors worth of home in which to shelter your family. It can
10:52
be anything you want it to be anything you can put your mind to,
10:54
anything too, which you can put your mind. I should say if and
11:00
only if you are allowed to capitalize on your aforementioned mind. Even if you
11:07
ever do reach that moneyless utopia, with a purely resourced based economy that runs
11:15
on cheeseburgers and blow jobs, well, in such a world, there won't
11:18
be all that many poets and playwrights, or musicians or comedians. There will
11:24
be very few people paid for nothing more than voicing their political takes, certainly
11:30
not on a broad scale and an esoteric subject. So there won't be any
11:35
more Russell brands or any more honey Budger radio. Because it's something of a
11:41
logistical nightmare for people all over the world to post cheeseburgers actable cheezburgers to a
11:48
central location, which then redistributes most cheeseburgers to various affiliates who are also scattered
11:56
across the world because because they have all gone a little bit wrong then,
12:00
and none of this is even to mention how the blowjobs would even work.
12:03
In short, I mean diversity itself, and by that I mean even diversity
12:11
of thought necessarily in this way depends on the opportunity to capitalize. And that's
12:20
what I'm going to call it, the opportunity to capitalize. I don't need
12:24
to call it an ism, because it's not an ideology. It's an action,
12:30
and it is expressible as an action, and really is what communism comes
12:33
down to. They wish to abolish the opportunity to capitalize, not just the
12:39
right, by the way, that's right is a controversial word, and I
12:43
don't even need to use it here, because what they want to abolish is
12:46
the opportunity itself to even be able to capitalize on your skills, your your
12:54
abilities, your dare I say talents, And when I say they, I
13:00
mean I'm talking to a great deal of Russell Brown's audience. That's the weirdest
13:05
thing. Of all the commies who followed him into these sewers of ours.
13:11
I'm just hoping this is a wake up call, just like I hoped Brand
13:16
himself would wake up to the evils of feminism that got him into this predicament.
13:22
But yeah, it's probably all in vain. Once someone's fallen that deep
13:28
into the sunken cost you, yeah, you're probably not going to save them.
13:33
So yeah, they don't even try. Trying to save people is what
13:37
got us into this mess. So just just make your case in favor of
13:43
the opportunity to capitalize and then sit back and watch the commies drowning in what
13:50
they've created one one way or another. Italy fun sort of. H Yeah,
14:01
I was gonna say the one of the first things I would I would
14:05
point out is Rumble is not a British company, all right, Twitter is
14:09
not a British company, and TikTok is not a British company. Boot is
14:18
bit shoot bit shoot is. But but Britain doesn't have any say in how
14:26
those companies operate. They are not British companies. They can find a way
14:30
to block them from operating in Britain, but I mean people can use methods
14:35
to get around that if they want to, and and it's done all the
14:39
time, using methods to get around a country's block on a particular a particular
14:48
website, or content on a particular website, and things like that. So
14:52
it's it's really it's really dumb for them to treat this as if they have
14:58
some sort of left ridge against these countries or these companies, and it's it's
15:03
actually quite disturbing to see a foreign country threatening or attempting to control an American
15:13
country or company, you know, especially in terms of a violation of civil
15:20
rights that are protected under the American constitution. This, this company is beholden
15:26
to American law, not British law, and to American standards, not British
15:33
standards. That's the first thing. The second thing is it's it's uh,
15:39
in violation of due process like this He's he's not been convicted of anything.
15:46
He's not even arrested, right, nobody's arrested this man. He's not on
15:50
trial for anything. There's there's a slander campaign. And from what I've understood
16:00
here, because I've I've had people trying to persuade me on on the X
16:07
platform, right that this is definitely a you know, cut and dried case
16:14
and he's definitely guilty and blah blah blah. The persuasion that I've been offered
16:21
has been one competitor gossip, Two how long that competitor gossip has been going
16:30
on? And three a list of names of people who have absolutely nothing to
16:37
do with the case but have been otherwise demonized by the media, one of
16:41
which was actually guilty, and two of which have been found wrongfully guilty,
16:47
and one of which was actually later his case was overturned. So that's bullshit.
16:57
Nobody could give me any actual physical evidence or linked to a description of
17:03
physical evidence. No smoking gun, you know, no non smoking gun like,
17:07
not even a bullet casing like, nothing, Just a lot of gossip
17:15
from competitors, and in a news media smear campaign like that doesn't decide who's
17:22
guilty, and so what they've been doing. It doesn't matter if they hate
17:30
the guy, right, doesn't matter if they're like it does matter that they're
17:33
attacking profits. But even if it was okay to do that, even if
17:38
it was acceptable to say, well, this person has committed this crime,
17:42
he is no longer human and no longer allowed to rehabilitate himself or do anything
17:48
in his life after that except starved to death from a lack of income.
17:53
Right, they haven't proved that that he's deserving of that, even if somebody
18:03
can deserve that. So you have two prongs here. They've attacked somebody who
18:08
had there's no proof that he deserves to be attacked, and they've attacked him
18:12
with a method that is egregious and a human rights violation that should scare the
18:19
crap out of it. And they're going after an actor, not a president,
18:27
not a congressman, not a politician, right not, Not a journalist,
18:34
right not. Not somebody who is who has been influential for a long
18:41
time. Just a guy who says stuff on the internet and some people have
18:45
been listening to him. M that's it. Well, this is this has
18:52
been done before. And you know, it's also worth pointing out that the
18:56
the the thing that they're using to get him is allegations of sexual assault.
19:06
It's like the you know, they they've been but this is not a new
19:08
thing. I mean when I mean, I don't know what the first one
19:14
is, but I remember they they either you know, make these allegations appear
19:18
from somewhere to destroy someone. They did it against Brett Kavanaugh, they did
19:22
it on Donald Trump, they did it on countless others. I mean even
19:30
I think they did it to Bill Cosby, because again it's the time that
19:33
you know, like he Bill Cobby was speaking out. He wanted to,
19:37
you know, make some change in the black population. He had criticisms,
19:41
He was gonna make a whole new show. He was going to basically go
19:44
back to his Cosby show days and try to do something constructive. All of
19:48
a sudden, allegations from thirty years prior come out. They started coming out
19:53
after the infamous pound cake speech where he talked about you know, not shopless.
20:00
Yeah, exactly, and what happened right after that, Yeah, the
20:04
riots and the shoplifting raids that have become so famous now. And this isn't
20:11
just it's not just the allegations of how you get your foot in the door
20:15
if you can't get anything else. They did this to Alex Jones, they
20:18
did this to ifon malin you. They did this to so many countless people
20:22
that were on YouTube making a massive difference. And you know, for some
20:27
like us, maybe we just got we just get throttled, or you know,
20:33
our content just doesn't get into the algorithm or whatever. But a lot
20:37
of people just get out. I slammed Mike Lindell, you know, the
20:41
my pillow guy absolutely slam. Some people just get arrested like Rudy Rudy Giuliani.
20:45
Right, this is not irrelevant. This is all related. These are
20:51
not separate things. They're all connected, you know. And the other thing
20:56
too, is that if they can't get you personally, like if you know,
21:00
like for example with this case where Rumble said we're not doing that,
21:04
then what happens next, Oh, the corporations pull their advertising. So so
21:10
it's not just Brand that's losing money, it's Rumble that's losing money now because
21:15
these and I'm sure it's just started with Burger King and Hello Fresh and the
21:18
other company, but it's probably not going to end there because they're all like
21:22
this is why I called it a fascistic thing, because it's the governments of
21:27
the of you know, of the United States, of the UK, of
21:32
Canada, you know, and they're working in tandem with corporations and big tech.
21:37
This is not like accidental, it's not a coincidence. You know,
21:41
they're working together. So they're not just attacking Russell Brand, They're attacking Rumble.
21:47
And Rumble's gonna need support, They're gonna need our help. So I'm
21:52
gonna ask you guys, And this is not an ad for Rumble, but
21:55
I'm just saying like they're the only ones that told them you can't do this.
21:59
This is on ethic. They're the only ones that said that. I
22:03
mean, TikTok is fine with it. I don't think anybody should be on
22:04
that community app anyways, but Rumble should be. You guys should make an
22:10
account for free. Support them. Watch our content there if you can,
22:14
a lot of people that you guys used to watch are on there too.
22:17
Feeldeers on there, Coal Tane on if you guys watch Coal Tane, but
22:19
he's on Rumble. You know plenty of people. Dan Buggino is on Rumble.
22:25
He left you tube a long time ago. Who knows what we we
22:29
have to do? More than that, there are two other things that people
22:32
can do. One is the companies that have openly boycotted Rumble need to be
22:38
boycotted, and they need to be contacted and told they are being boycotted specifically
22:45
for this reason. And that The second thing is, you know people who
22:51
have like larger incomes, because I think the minimum I looked into it and
22:56
it looks like the minimum that you can invest in this is like a hundred
23:00
dollars at one time. But you can advertise on Rumble. Anybody can advertise
23:07
on Rumble. And it looks like the way they do their advertising might be
23:11
similar to the way Project Wonderful work, which was pretty neat. I used
23:15
Project Wonderful back in the day for some things. It did not require that
23:19
big of an initial investment. But but if you have a business, if
23:26
you have something that you even just want to say and and you know,
23:32
and it's it's something that is legal to say, like, don't don't go
23:37
on there and advertise that, you know, Burger King has shit food.
23:41
Even if you believe that like I do. You know, they'll go on
23:47
there and advertise that Hello Fresh is outrageously expensive for what they offer. Because
23:52
even if you believe that like I do, you can't say it definitively because
23:56
that would be that would be defamation, right. You can only say you
23:59
believe that and feel that way. But but you know, you can advertise
24:03
anything. Hey, You can advertise that you like a particular channel. You
24:07
can advertise that free speech is very important. You can advertise that the the
24:15
standard of du process is indispensable. In a free world anything you want to
24:21
like. So if somebody has a whole lot of extra money, throw out,
24:25
throw them a bone, throw them a buck, make an ad So
24:30
yeah, so I try, let's just do what we can. I think
24:33
that it's it's a I know, it's not gonna stop there. I don't
24:37
even know who a sauce is. Who what is that company? What do
24:38
they make? A s os does they might know? I look, they
24:42
sell clothing. Okay, Well to go to you know, H and M
24:48
or something up or just go I do you know what I do? I
24:52
you know, I go to the the second hand store. So you know,
24:57
yeah, I'm going to drop cash. Oh my god, twenty dollars
25:02
in my pocket. You know, I think it's women's clothing too. If
25:08
this is fucking awesome, Yeah, well it probably is. I mean women
25:14
buy more clothe men. Men are fine shopping at like old Navy and shit.
25:18
So letn't get my burgers second hand there you go, rather go ahead
25:23
and say, I'd rather have second hand burgers than burger king. But but
25:27
women's fast fashion contributes to four percent of the trash in the landfills in the
25:33
United States, just the cloth that's just just just a close four percent.
25:40
Mike Jay, were you going to say something like you were or I heard
25:44
somebody on Paul Nope, okay, what don't you all right? Anyway,
25:49
I think there's not much else to say on the Russell Brand story. But
25:55
again, this is I think for me, this is more about rumble.
25:59
And also, like you know, you guys see this pattern. Do you
26:02
have any other examples of people that were sort of going against the establishment in
26:07
some fashion, they changed gears, they had an awakening, whatever, and
26:12
suddenly every by attacking. I mean, I know that was true of Trump
26:15
because that like the left used to love him before he ran for president.
26:19
I know that that's true of somebody else that came to mind just now was
26:26
Elon Musk. You know, he was like, mister Green, I'm gonna
26:30
make the electric car. Oh, he's so great for the environment. All
26:33
of a sudden he was like, you know, I kind of like free
26:34
speech. I'm gonna buy Twitter. And they were like, this guy's a
26:37
demon. So and they can't take him out because he's too rich, but
26:41
like they're gonna keep They're gonna try and whatever way the just pointed out and
26:45
this is a really important one. Julian Osange. Yeah, Julian Assange,
26:48
Yeah, yeah. I mentioned this last week, and this sort of relates
26:52
to I was gonna talk earlier. I believe it was me who pause?
26:56
How did it mentioned that he's not a journalist, and to some degree he
26:59
has been a journalist like like so many people that crave fame, he was.
27:03
He was climbing those various slimy walls before before he goes to the TV.
27:07
He used to work for various hips to papers and used to do various
27:17
articles along the lines of I wagged off a guy in a pup, but
27:19
here's how it went true story By the way, he used to be a
27:22
heerbin addict. He would do anything for money, including go and wag off
27:26
a guy in a pup with a rubber blurb and see what happened, right,
27:29
a story about it for some hipster magazine. That's what I did.
27:32
And what got him in trouble was journalism. That's I mean, it's it's
27:37
difficult to even defind what journalism is because the word it's so the term itself
27:41
has been so sullied by these communist activists pretending to be journalism. But what
27:48
he's been doing recently, has been talking to the likes of John Gampbell,
27:52
talking to you know, doctors with qualifications who are quite quite happy, will
27:56
not happy, but quite willing to say the things that paid off doctors aren't
28:02
willing to say. And just just sitting there and talking to a doctor about
28:07
his about his findings. That's journalism, and that is what got him in
28:12
trouble. Like like like I've banged on about last week, the the the
28:22
kind of centric accusations of why you hurt women, That's that's what they pull
28:26
on you, whether it's true or not. It's not the reason, it's
28:29
not the reason they're going after you. It's the means by which they go
28:32
after you. And yet the reason they're going after him is his journalism into
28:37
this thing that he's not allowed to do journalism. Yeah, but the means
28:42
by which they're destroying him is is where I think of the women's We've been
28:47
off for this a million times on this channel. You all know, it's
28:48
a lot like if somebody can, like just in the comments after this,
28:52
just give us like a list on the top of your head of all the
28:56
people that have been canceled because they you know, thought wrong or win against
29:03
like, you know, the mainstream in some way and they suffered for it.
29:07
There's plenty, so you know, just give us your thoughts. What
29:10
about Ricky Ricky Vaughan, he was a big Twitter guy, right, didn't
29:15
he get like canceled in a terrible fashion as well? So I don't know,
29:19
let us know in the comments. We're gonna move on to the next
29:22
story speaking of people getting canceled. I guess Ray Epps finally has to pay
29:30
the piper. Mike j if you could give us the skinny on that,
29:34
yeah, I wouldn't be so hopeful of that, Brian. But former marine
29:41
and documented an agitator at the January sixth protest and suspected of federal agent plant,
29:49
Ray Epps has finally been charged. On September eighteenth, the Federal Court
29:56
of DC charged Apps one count of disorderly or disruptive contact conduct within a restricted
30:03
building or grounds. Not much has been heard from Epps in the last several
30:08
months, saved for his filing of a lawsuit against Fox News claiming that comments
30:12
from then Fox News post Tucker Carlson had a negative impact Life Boo several weeks
30:26
ago, when it became apparent that over a thousand people have a thousand Trump
30:32
supporters have been detained without trial because of Jerry of the sixth Did I put
30:37
a question out to those who are drooling for the blood of these infidels?
30:44
Are you happy now? Are you satiated in your lust for this social justice
30:49
of yours? Over a thousand Trump supporters are being basically tortured through human isolation
30:55
for two years and for the indefinite future. Are you yet satisfied? Are
31:02
you yet sufficiently entertained? And of course the answer was no answer, So
31:11
I really hope they're not expecting an answer from me when they go, well,
31:15
are you satisfied? You've been You've been banging aren't about this Ray Epps
31:18
character for years? I mean, whoever he is, We've we've certainly never
31:22
heard of him. You've been you've been demanding he be brought to justice,
31:26
even though he's clearly one of yours. I mean, you should be defending
31:30
him. Why aren't you just blindly defending everyone who's been hastily painted into a
31:36
lazy tapestry of your worldview. We can't understand why anyone wouldn't do that.
31:41
So anyway, there you go, we arrested the guy you wanted us to
31:45
arrest. Are you happy now? And by all accounts my answer should be
31:51
no answer. But I will go ahead and give you a great deal more
31:56
courtesy than y'all would ever give me. Here goes one measly count of misdemeanor
32:02
leading to naught. But a slap on the wrist is at the very maximum
32:08
what eating every one of those thousand plus Trump supporters should have experienced, because
32:15
they did exactly nothing wrong. It is not trespassing if you follow a line
32:21
of people into exactly the place into which the federal police are ushering you.
32:25
A wo coup is a sub category of conspiracy, and that means a multitude
32:35
of people agreeing to embark on a particular goal. And so yes, it
32:39
is indeed a conspiracy theory to suggest that January the sixth was an insurrection or
32:45
coup. The evidence you need in order to call it such would be exactly
32:52
the kind of recorded agitation of such a conspiracy that ray Epps was indeed recording
32:59
recorded agitating so as to accumulate a multitude of people in a trespassing upon government
33:06
property. If we are to call it that, and So if you wish
33:08
to call January the sixth an insurrection or a coup, then you need to
33:13
pinpoint exactly when it became a conspiracy of more than one one or more moments
33:22
when it became clear that someone somewhere wanted to at the very least go into
33:27
the capital building. And if what you're trying to bring justice to it's an
33:34
insurrection, then Ray Epps should be the one languishing in federal jail without trial,
33:40
and those thousand unknown soldiers and those several proud boys based into facto life
33:45
in prison despite not being there should be the ones who got away with a
33:51
misdemeanor and a slap on the wrist for it. The very very most so,
33:58
No, since you ask apathetically, no, I'm not satisfied. Don't
34:04
you even dare comparing these apples and these oranges, these healthy apples left in
34:09
a garbage canter rock, while these already moldy, disease written oranges are left
34:15
three free, free to be thrown in the face of the next powfull We
34:21
locked in the socks for the next five years, cunts, all of you
34:27
something I want to point out the footage that came out recently, the guy
34:31
going his boomer is pissing me off and them talking about Epps being a FED
34:36
and everything. There's a there's a second possibility. And I just want to
34:40
remind everybody of the kid with schizophrenia that the FBI contacted, groomed to commit
34:52
a terrorist act and then purchase supplies for and transported to go get the supplies
35:00
because he physically and mentally wasn't capable of committing the crime himself, and then
35:07
tried to railroad him as as a terrorist after doing so and got caught.
35:14
Right, I don't know how competent app says, but he is a boomer,
35:22
and Boomers have been very naive about their government for a long time.
35:30
And so it's very possible that the reason that he keeps claiming not to be
35:37
a FED was because he was a victim of something like that. Because he
35:42
does sound like somebody that was a FED, but he also sounds like somebody
35:46
that was programmed and somebody that was not all there, kind of similar to
35:53
how you would sound if you had been in a planning session, was somebody
36:00
who's very good at manipulating people with with you know, psychological attacks basically,
36:07
and and then you know, sent sent out to try to persuade other people
36:15
to do what your what's your manipulator wanted and they might try to ignore him
36:24
if they did that, because in the past they have gotten caught. So
36:30
watch for what comes out evidence wise in his case, what his defense is,
36:35
and who he was in communications with, and whether or not the people
36:39
he was in communications with are redacted that we're not allowed to know who he
36:45
was talking to and things like that, because that that that is another possibility.
36:51
Did they manipulate an old man who was past his prime or or had
36:58
other issues into doing something that he wouldn't have done on his own. Was
37:02
he was he a fed or is he just just some crazy guy that really
37:08
thought this was a good idea on his own with no influence from from outside.
37:15
If those things are true, why is he getting the absolute lightest charge
37:20
possible despite the fact that he was there literally telling the crowd to go into
37:24
the capitol, And Enrique Tario, who was nowhere near that place, gets
37:30
like what twenty years and then in the Hope City won't defend against it,
37:37
you know what I mean? Yeah, And the QAnon shaman got like a
37:39
couple of years too, and he was let in, you know, like
37:44
they walked him into the building and he was just they they took some pictures,
37:49
he you know, thanked that, he said a prayer or something,
37:52
and they left and he got like what two plus years? I mean,
37:57
I get you're right, I said, but if they did something like that
38:02
and they didn't charge him, the reason that they wouldn't charge him or would
38:07
would minimize his charges would be to prevent him from raising a defense or to
38:13
make it more attractive for him to not raise a defense, because you remember,
38:19
everybody that has raised a defense, their charges have been become worse.
38:23
Right, they've they've been enhanced. They've punished them for exercising their constitutional right
38:30
to do process. Every single defendant in this in this situation. So if
38:38
they throw just you know, disorderly conduct or disruptive conduct within his restrictive building
38:45
or grounds at him, they can turn around and then tell him, well,
38:47
you know, will enhance the charges if you defend yourself and if there's
38:53
information they don't want to come out that would come out during his defense.
38:59
Do you think they did that to that little old lady with the American flag
39:01
that got like us or something quite possibly, I would, I would imagine
39:09
because didn't she defend herself, didn't she defend against their charges. I don't
39:15
think she did, and maybe you know, I think she did, And
39:19
I think that's where the enhancements came from, because that's that's what's happened to
39:22
everybody else. That's that's why they're getting all those long punishments and all those
39:30
egregious punishments, some of which have actually been challenged and overturned in federal court.
39:35
Now by the way, like they've said, they can't combine long prison
39:39
sentence with probation ordered before the stentants even starts. But a lot of them
39:47
that they've raised a defense in court, and because they raised a defense in
39:54
court, the prosecution enhanced the charges, meaning they added things that they weren't
40:01
originally charged with, or they added details that they didn't say. It's like
40:07
basically, when they enhance a charge, if you rob a convenience store and
40:13
for an amount of money and you get the money and you you get out
40:17
of the store and you get caught and arrested, and they just charge you
40:22
with robbery. But then when you go to court, uh, you know,
40:25
to defend they point out, well, he had a gun, so
40:29
it's armed robbery. We're gonna, you know, make it armed robbery.
40:32
And then then they say, well, you actually you got you know,
40:36
five hundred dollars, and that makes it a higher crime. Or they they
40:40
say that you know, you you hit the cashier with the gun, which
40:45
actually happened in a robbery at the store where I worked. A guy came
40:49
around the corner and smacked the cashier in the head with the gun, which
40:52
is a lot better than getting shot, but it's still terrifying, you know,
40:55
And and they decide that's a crime, or you know, they they
40:59
add in ancements, they add details, they add little you know this this
41:02
this is part of your crime. That's part of your crime. We want
41:06
this many years. You're incredibly dangerous. Oh, we decided that your your
41:09
habitual criminal, you know. And and suddenly instead of looking at so many
41:15
months or or a short number of years, you're looking at a long number
41:17
of years. And and then they say, well, but if you plead
41:22
to these lower charges that we were going to do, then you know,
41:28
will will just go with those. And they do that all the time in
41:32
regular court. We're seeing it happen with these in a more extreme manner,
41:37
and they're asking the court to set fines against these people in the amount that
41:43
they've raised for their defense. It's been very dishonest and very very not not
41:52
American, right, very very Soviet, early Soviet show trial askue Right,
42:00
So like like I like I said, I know it. All signs point
42:07
to Epps being a fed that they're they're slapping on the wrist in order to
42:14
avoid any further criticism. Oh, well, he was charged, therefore he
42:20
must not be a fed. Well that doesn't necessarily mean anything, right,
42:22
especially since he did in comparison everybody else get a slap on the wrist.
42:28
But those some of those same signs can point to him being a manipulated vulnerable
42:32
person. And the same thing would be done if the Feds were worried that
42:38
this manipulated vulnerable person's defense would expose what they did to him. Right,
42:47
Oh, what's possible. I'm I'm pretty firmly on the hees a glowy,
42:53
but I'm I'm I'm open to news changing that, especially he's probably he probably
42:59
got a rebase for whatever the fine was too. They're like, we'll just
43:01
mail this in, but we'll move on to the next story. Let us
43:05
know what you guys think about this and the comments and yeah, just like
43:10
you know, give us your thoughts on that. We're gonna I got a
43:15
super child, so I'm gonna read that real quick and then we'll get into
43:20
the next story. So, oh, this is Richard Bierre. So Richard
43:23
Bierre gives us five dollars and his name is Johnson and says there is the
43:35
possibility that ray Epps was undercharged deliberately to so suspicion that he was involved with
43:40
the government and therefore diverting attention away from other actors, so he would be
43:45
chaff to hide the true actors. That would also make him an actor.
43:51
But yeah, I mean it's possible. It's it's kind of that's a little
43:53
bit of a layers on layers, but yeah, it's possible, I suppose.
44:00
But anyway, let's you can't be both. I mean, they're also
44:05
a professional victim. Yeah, anyway, let's move on to the next story.
44:13
So we're gonna talk about I don't know if you guys heard of Coach
44:16
Red Pill, but Mike j I'm gonna give it to you. I mean,
44:21
it's been a while. Yeah, it's been a while. It has
44:23
indeed been quite some time. The last I remember of Gonzelo Lira aka Coach
44:30
Red Pills when he had this this sort of weird, inexplicable, unexplainable beef
44:37
with Sargon. Did he did it was? It was very very very strange
44:45
several years ago. Maybe he was just trying to well, I don't know
44:49
who was I don't know if he was bigger than the Times. He was
44:52
most definitely not bigger than Yeah, I didn't think his YouTube was as big,
44:58
So maybe he was trying say like like this is you know, this
45:01
is why Carl needs to be involved in politics and and and Sargon was like,
45:07
uh, that's nice, bro, Who the fuck are you? Oh
45:09
yeah, yeah, okay, this deep, this is deep Carl Lore,
45:15
this is this is back like this when he was the Coach red Pill person
45:20
Yeah, this was like the skeptic community. Yeah, he had this this
45:25
weird persona where he's like I always viewed him as like trying to be Kevin
45:30
Spacey. He definitely had that. It is it when he made those videos
45:35
in front of those colored like they hit like multiple cameras and they were like
45:38
he had like yeah, like four or five camera angles and like and he
45:42
was always like in mid mid cameras, mid mid mid video, like you
45:47
know, lighting up a cigarette or pouring a glass of scotch or yeah,
45:52
right right. It was all do you hate? Very very overproduced speaking of
45:57
that, do you guys? I just had this thought, do you remember
45:59
this guy? I can't remember name his channel, but I know when you
46:00
guys knows he used to drink like, you know, like something on the
46:07
rocks, and he was bald and there was like a skull in the room,
46:09
and he has David Serini. Yes, yes, David Serini schools.
46:17
But oh man, I remember that guy. Okay, I'm sorry, go
46:21
ahead for every not just every generation, but every year. There's every every
46:29
entered. The Internet age is about like two years, so we're in the
46:32
fourth age. I think er Erni was the guy who's they were going to
46:38
do the the documentary. Yeah, I still remember. My favorite line from
46:47
that was that he knows all the keyboards? She did she imagine making these
46:52
videos, you know, some bad burritos. The documentary did happen. It
47:02
just a lot of people weren't satisfied with it. David anos all the keyboard
47:06
shortcuts. He didn't finish the documentary, so now that some of you may
47:14
be given a primer on who Gonzillo Lira was too many of us several years
47:20
ago. Gonziller, who many of you may know as his former YouTube name
47:25
Coach red Pill, is currently being held by the Ukrainian military and his whereabouts
47:32
remain unknown. Unknown to many, Lero's ex wife was Ukrainian and he holds
47:39
dual citizenship in both the US and in Chile Church Chile. Lera was living
47:47
in Ukraine in Kharkiev at the time of the Russian invasion there, stayed in
47:53
Ukraine and begin blogging as a citizen journalist. Last May, he was arrested
48:00
by the Ukrainian forces on suspicion of quote producing a pro Russian propaganda as part
48:07
of his YouTube channel. Leo would go silent for two months before resurfacing in
48:12
a series of videos where he discussed how he was out on bail and attempting
48:15
to cross the border into Hungary. He details his time in a Ukrainian prison
48:22
and alleges that the guards outsourced other prisoners to torture him and other inmates.
48:29
He also mentions how the Chilean government did more to protect him than the US
48:32
government did. Leo was recaptured by Ukrainian forces somewhere near the Hungarian border.
48:39
He is currently being charged with quote having a criminal intent aimed at the manufacture
48:46
distribution materials containing justification recognition as legitimate denial of the armed aggression of the Russian
48:55
Federation against Ukraine which began in twenty fourteen, as well as justification recognition as
49:01
legitimate of the temporary occupation of part of ukraine territory end quote. When asked
49:09
for comments concerning the situation, a spokesperson for the US State Department said the
49:15
following quote. We are aware of the detention of mister Gleira in Ukraine.
49:20
We take our role in assisting US citizens abroad seriously and are providing all appropriate
49:24
assistance. We are monitoring the situation, but have no foo the comment at
49:30
this time. We reiterate our message that US citizens should not travel to Ukraine
49:35
due to the active armed conflict end quote. They're gonna do jack and shit
49:42
right. They're certainly not going to trade an international arms deal dealer for him
49:47
or anything like that. Like he didn't he didn't smoke pot. He challenged
49:52
a you know he had an opinion, but he challenged the narrative on a
49:59
war that the US is using to milk the American public, justify a lot
50:06
of profiteering by major companies that contribute to US politicians and increase US power over
50:15
the American people, interference in everyday lives, and so on. So he's
50:21
he's toast. They're they're going to do nothing for him, and I'm not
50:27
surprised that he said that the Chilean government did more for him than the US
50:30
government did. They're they're going to drop him like a hot potato unless they
50:36
get so much criticism and so much pushed back from the American public on this
50:39
that that that they have no choice, and I don't. I don't think
50:45
that's going to happen either, because there's a lot of the American public that's
50:47
snowed in terms of this military action that we're totally not involved in. By
50:55
standing next to the little kid attacking attacking back, you know, at the
51:00
bully and handing him rocks and going here, throw this next, throw this
51:04
next, Yeah, that's that's that's totally not involvement, guys. And we're
51:09
totally not spending billions of your tax dollars on that and then telling you that
51:15
we can't afford to deal with American problems that are taking place in the United
51:22
States, you know, like our government that is that is long term.
51:27
Imprisoning people for stepping inside the Capitol with permission and saying prayers is not going
51:37
to rescue this guy. He should give up on any help from the United
51:42
States and focus all of his effort on getting assistance from the Chilean government and
51:49
just never come back here. Or he can come out as trends and join
51:52
the w NBA. They'll probably trade another weapons dealer for him. Yeah,
51:57
there you go. Anyway, isn't this isn't this what they did to Japanese
52:05
Americans when America was at war with Japan in tournament in this in this case,
52:12
it would make sense that they would do that with Russian Americans. But
52:15
it's what they're doing with Americans who have some connection with Ukraine, which is
52:21
the side that he's originally from. Kin He's he was originally Chile, but
52:27
he moved he went to the Ukraine. Yeah, yeah, all kinds of
52:30
people who have had things to say about the Russia Ukraine conflict. But it's
52:35
it's the idea that he's ever been associated with the Ukraine. I think that
52:38
puts him in the crosshairs, not that he's ever been associated with Russia.
52:43
He's been accused of saying Prosia things, but as we know that just I
52:49
could just mean saying things on the online lines of maybe we should stop killing
52:52
people at the Ukraine Russia border. That's that's you know, maybe maybe we
52:58
should have peace. No, that's what's as Russian as pro pute in propaganda.
53:02
But it doesn't have to be from a Russian American or an American who
53:07
has ties with Russia. It can happen because of an American who has ties
53:12
with Ukraine, which is which just goes to show you like like, don't
53:15
even buddy on the side of the decide the Democrats want you to decide with
53:22
like, the closer you get to the interests of the Democrat Party, the
53:27
closer you get to having a life quote unquote canceled, which which means all
53:32
the things we went through in the first story, like don't like, don't
53:38
become an enemy of the Democrat Party and don't become a friend of the Democrat
53:42
Party. Don't even become prolipheral associate of the Democrat Party because you dead.
53:49
I mean, that's that's how you get Hillary Clinton. After all. It's
53:53
the friends of the Democrat Party will die before the enemies of the Democrat Party.
53:59
I know that's I was counterintuitive, but that's what they eat everything in
54:05
proximity to them. I will set ash what that That at least sounds fun,
54:17
But I gotta clarify one thing. I want people to understand. When
54:23
I said that about the Chilean government, I am fully aware that I said
54:28
he should be pissing into the wind for help. All right. That's that
54:31
is how little faith I have right now in the US government. Yeah,
54:38
it's it's crazy. You know. I picked the story because I knew about
54:44
I knew about this months ago, but it wasn't confirmed confirmed. It was
54:49
a lot of like speculation about it. And then I saw this. I
54:52
put it on the screen for you guys, this transspokesperson. I don't know
54:58
if you've seen videos of this person. Oh fucking fuck this this individual.
55:04
Yeah, like fifty year old American dude who decided to put a wig on
55:08
and then become the spokesperson for Ukraine or the You. Yeah, for the
55:12
so they that this person was the one that declared that they caught this Gonzalo
55:17
Lira who's a Russian asset or whatever. And I was like, that sounds
55:23
so insane that there's like, you know, essentially an American liaison drag queen
55:31
that is announcing the capture of Gonzalo Lira coach redis two degrees of separation away
55:39
from us. Two degrees because he knew people who we knew. It's crazy,
55:45
Like, isn't it crazy? I mean everybody is a Russian asset now,
55:47
Yeah, of course, of course we're gonna say, Mike, I'm
55:51
sorry. This is This is the same person, by the way, who
55:53
in their last like address in their in their last addresses, like a capacity
55:59
of ambassador to the Ukraine said that Ukraine now will turn their focus uh internal
56:07
to external. We will be hunting down those who who who produce propaganda for
56:15
Russia abroad and they will meet swift justice. It's like, that's great,
56:22
Number one, how do you plan to do that? Number two? What
56:25
gives you the fucking right to do that? M It's insane, dude,
56:32
And even Ukraine was like, you know, want you in this position anymore?
56:38
Maybe did take a step back, and they did, you know,
56:43
they did. They did the right thing, they did the rational thing.
56:45
They went ahead and they hired Maria Abramovic to be their news spokesperson right to
56:52
the fucking Obama Clinton Spirit Cooking La, the Spirit Cooking Witch. So that's
56:58
what I don't know if that is that level up is at an upgrade on
57:01
your on your like, uh, companions, They're gonna get rid of the
57:06
you know, the transgender spokesperson, and we're gonna get like the Spirit cooking
57:13
Witch. It's a replacement, you know, this timeline, guys, this
57:17
timeline. What the fuck? So, uh, they're just laughing at us
57:23
at this point. I mean, who's laughing? Who is the demons?
57:30
Yeah? The cathedral. Uh that's cut. Well, I don't I don't
57:37
know, I don't know, Washington. This person, by the way,
57:40
is named Sarah Ashton Cirillo. We probably haven't seen the last of them.
57:46
I'm just telling you we haven't seen the last of who who they are.
57:51
Because even though Ukraine was like, you know, it's you're you know,
57:53
you're making us look a little too bad. We're gonna go for the Witch,
57:59
the Spirit cooking Witch. That probably drinks blood or whatever, and you're
58:04
gonna get like, you know, to do something else. Sarah will find
58:07
something else and we will not well, we'll see that person again because I
58:10
don't know, man, theater kids, something has to be done. Theater
58:15
kids. Oh well, I mean I was. I was an art student,
58:22
so I kind of count myself in that when all degenerate drug using.
58:31
Okay, so I got another super chat or super chow sorry super chow from
58:39
Richard Bier and his name is John six, and he gives us five dollars
58:50
and says, Hannah, don't you know how many meetings are and have been
58:52
held to discuss just how to properly write the strongly worded letter on his behalf
58:59
And if the situation changes in his captivity, then they have to start the
59:02
entire process all over again from square one. They should definitely put like a
59:07
wax seal, like somebody get a signet ring in Chile and put a wax
59:12
seal on it and maybe, like you know, send it be a carrier
59:15
pigeon or whatever their their their travel options are. But thank you for that,
59:22
Richard. And I'm only gonna assume that if you put he's John Cena
59:27
as your name. I'm gonna play that. You want me to play?
59:29
That sound so okay? So yeah, bad news. I you know,
59:37
I don't know what's gonna happen to mister Lera. I hope he manages to
59:40
like hang in there. I you know, when I when I hear these
59:44
stories of people that I know don't deserve it getting thrown into prisons, it
59:47
doesn't matter if it's in the US or in like some Eastern bloc country or
59:52
whatever. I I'm you know, I truly worry about their mental health because
59:55
I think that's the purpose. Like when I heard and Katario was talking about,
1:00:00
well, he was in prison for a while, and then he was
1:00:04
on house arrest and he was like banned from Washington, DC, even though
1:00:07
again anything he did was burn a flag, and then they threw him back
1:00:10
in prison. Before they did though, he was talking about how much he
1:00:15
felt that his mental health suffered while in prison. And I think that incarceration,
1:00:21
especially obviously unjust incarceration of of people is it's I think it's something that
1:00:30
is done to men with more frequency, and it's like something that we have
1:00:34
to talk about, at least at least on that basis, but mostly because
1:00:37
of what you know, what is right and wrong, and I think that
1:00:40
that is just you know, they do this to torture people. It's essentially
1:00:44
torturing people. So this is and it definitely is done to men more often
1:00:50
then it's done to women. Imprisonment in general is done to men more off
1:00:52
and then it's done to women, And then women in general received lenients in
1:00:59
the courts in comparison to men. They're more likely to be complained about.
1:01:05
Men are more likely to be complained about in the first place. When they
1:01:07
commit a crime, they're more likely to be charged and result in response to
1:01:12
that complaint. They're more likely to be arrested and charged and prosecuted on the
1:01:19
basis of those charges, and they're more likely to be convicted and sentenced and
1:01:23
to serve more of their sentence. So it would be ridiculous to think that
1:01:30
they were not more likely to be falsely charged than women, because everything else
1:01:37
that goes along with being charged, they're they're more likely how those things happen.
1:01:42
So, before somebody comes along and says citation needed, citation needed,
1:01:47
is the existing pattern of how men are treated in the court system well as
1:01:55
mister three three and Rumble said, the Ukrainians are the good guys, so
1:02:00
I'm sure that he's safe. So let's let's move on to the next story,
1:02:06
because there's a good guy in this situation. Yeah, there's a good
1:02:10
who they were It was on the TV. The TV guy told us,
1:02:15
all right, anyway, let's move on the nex story. Let us know
1:02:16
what you guys think about this one in the comments, and we got one
1:02:20
more to go. This one is I'm going on a little bit of a
1:02:22
lighter note because we have to have something other than men being thrown in prison
1:02:27
and justustly and bad men being let off the hook, because that's kind of
1:02:31
what the episode turned up to be. But okay, Lift. Do you
1:02:36
guys know about the service Lift? So we had it in Chicago. It's
1:02:39
basically Uber. It was a good competition for Uber. And essentially, you
1:02:45
you know, you get an app, the Lift app, and you need
1:02:46
to ride someplace. You go on the app, you tell them where you
1:02:51
are and where you need to go, and then they send a guy.
1:02:52
You know. It's like a right, a ride sharing thing like Uber.
1:02:57
So Lift has introduced a new feature. It's called Women Plus Connect. It
1:03:02
allows women and non binary drivers to match with women and non binary writers.
1:03:07
This feature aims to enhance safety and increase the number of women and non binary
1:03:13
drivers on the platform, currently accounting for only twenty three percent of the drivers,
1:03:19
so they're trying to get equality. Guys. Users can opt in to
1:03:23
prioritize matching with others of the same gender identity, but it's not guaranteed and
1:03:30
they may still be paired with men if no matches are available nearby. Oh
1:03:34
the Horror. This feature is initially available in select cities including San Francisco,
1:03:39
San Jose, San Diego, Phoenix, and Chicago. I don't know if
1:03:43
you notice a pattern with all these cities that I'm named, but there is
1:03:46
one. Lifts Move comes in response to safety concerns and lawsuits related to passenger
1:03:52
and drivers safety, particularly regarding sexual assaults. The company has faced legal actions
1:04:00
and has implemented safety measures like an emergency call button and trip check in to
1:04:05
address these concerns. Lifts safety report from twenty seven, twenty seventeen through twenty
1:04:12
nineteen revealed thousands of assaults, while at least allegations of assault during lift rides,
1:04:18
including fatal incidents. Lifts rival Uber. Uber has also reported incidents of
1:04:26
sexual assault and misconduct, with writers being accused in a significant percentage of cases.
1:04:30
Human Rights Campaigns has praised lifts new feature as inclusive and essential. That
1:04:39
means that when we lock down next year, they will still be able to
1:04:42
run because they've been called essential, particularly for transgender and non binary individuals.
1:04:47
Amid broader discussions of inclusivity in the corporate world. Two countdowns begin right now,
1:04:56
the first time a female passion accuses a female driver of rape to get
1:05:02
out of paying her her ride share fee, and of course the second one
1:05:09
being the first time a female passenger attacks and beats up a female driver for
1:05:17
some stupid reason during the ride. And the reason I say that is it.
1:05:24
Historically, taxi drivers have had to install cameras in order to deal with
1:05:30
both of those issues. There was a new story about this out of London
1:05:34
with taxi drivers having to install cameras because so many riders were falsely accusing them
1:05:42
of sexual misconduct in order to get out of their fees. And there have
1:05:46
been videos online that that drivers have posted from taxis from lift from What's You
1:05:57
from Uber from from all kinds of uh different different transfer buses, you know,
1:06:03
trains where passengers have been violent, where passengers have gone ballistic over things
1:06:10
that they shouldn't even have been mad about, and so on, where the
1:06:15
driver has been in danger or where other passengers have been in danger. As
1:06:21
night motorcyclist puts it, women are the cause of the surveillance state. At
1:06:27
the very least, women are the excuse for it, right, and it
1:06:31
is needed in in a lot of instances. The part of the reason that
1:06:36
cops have body cams is because of women making allegations of sexual misconduct against cops
1:06:45
arresting them. So so this is this is just one more thing contributing to
1:06:49
that, and and it is female violence and false allegations by women that are
1:06:59
causing this. So when you get into a taxi or on a bus,
1:07:02
or on a train, or or on a jet or you know, in
1:07:08
an in a ride share ride and there is a camera pointing at you,
1:07:12
you know who's faulted it. M H. Why can't men opt out,
1:07:19
like as drivers, because there have been like men get assaulted in lifts by
1:07:25
women like oh, with surprising amount of frequency. Maybe they're drunk, maybe
1:07:31
they're violent, maybe they want to rob them maybe they just believe they lose
1:07:36
control advertise. Remember that time when the when the male, the old man
1:07:41
who was a driver was murdered by teenage girls. Yeah, it's it's for
1:07:46
the same reason. Men don't get as saying whether or not women can come
1:07:49
into their bathroom or their toilet or their restroom, whatever proudish thing we're calling
1:07:56
you. There's a there's a big old stink about whether men should be allowed
1:08:00
in women's toilets because because because men have absolute power over women, everyone knows
1:08:04
that. But it doesn't matter if a woman can come into your male toilet
1:08:10
or into your uber or your lift, because there's nothing a woman can do
1:08:15
to you apart from, you know, dial three numbers on her phone and
1:08:21
have your life ruined for the rest of it. And that doesn't count,
1:08:25
you see, because that's not real power. That's government power. And the
1:08:29
government doesn't have power. The government needs more power so they can crack down
1:08:33
on all these evil men and the things that they always do to women whenever
1:08:39
they are allowed in a space together with them, because everyone knows a woman
1:08:44
and a man in a space together cannot possibly exist without the consent of the
1:08:51
government. Not the government but the government and this this, and I know,
1:08:59
I know they okay oo, but lifts, these these aren't government entities,
1:09:05
private enterprises. They could not possibly be infiltrated by government influence. Oh
1:09:12
oh oh oh you paw carcroach you Paul, Sorry, what's the word?
1:09:15
Crosshoppers? Some of a child? You see some of the child? One
1:09:20
day you will understand, and when you do, it will be too late,
1:09:26
and so on and so forth. Yeah, I will point out,
1:09:30
in conjunction with what Doc said about women in men's restrooms and men and women's
1:09:36
restrooms. You know, I personally would consider a woman deliberately walking into a
1:09:44
place where there are urinals, where where men are necessarily exposed when they when
1:09:50
they go to the bathroom, that in and of itself would be a sexual
1:09:54
assault, similar to what we would call a peeping calm as if women never
1:09:59
do that. Speaking from someone who's caught a woman doing that, but yeah,
1:10:06
uh, it's it's it's the same as peeking into somebody's bedroom window to
1:10:13
catch them naked or what is it? What does it? The feminists call
1:10:15
it upskirting when you when you have a camera on your shoes or shiny shoes
1:10:20
to that that that you can see a woman's panties. Uh, God forbid
1:10:26
that you see a woman's panties. You know, it's not like they're not
1:10:29
on billboards everywhere. But uh, but yeah, it's perfectly acceptable, right
1:10:33
for for a woman to walk into an environment in which a man expects to
1:10:40
be able to have nudity without women being around to see it and and not
1:10:45
not get criticized for that. But the moment a man walks into a place
1:10:50
where there are stalls and nobody is naked in in in a common area that's
1:10:57
exposed to everybody, that's a big deal. So hey, hi guys,
1:11:05
So I wanted to bring something up. So this brings something up very interesting
1:11:10
when uh, public indecency. If men urinate out in public, they can
1:11:15
get arrested for that. So how are they going to square this circle?
1:11:19
How? How are you going to then say that it's all right if men
1:11:23
exposed themselves in front of women in an enclosed area, right, not like
1:11:29
out on a public street, like maybe pissing by a tree where you probably
1:11:32
didn't even see anything really, you know, but but it's just okay,
1:11:39
just you know, it makes no sense what they're arguing for but I would
1:11:45
love to see how this plays out in the legal system if it ever gets
1:11:50
to that, and I'm sure it probably will because we know how litigious women
1:11:55
are. Oh yeah, yeah, they'll use every system, every method of
1:12:00
force possible. I was just going to also add, so this women connect
1:12:03
thing is something that LIFT is putting out. It's their feature and what they're
1:12:08
trying to do. It's not just protect women's from you know, I guess
1:12:13
from men, women drivers and passengers, but it's also because they want to
1:12:17
increase the number of women drivers. They're trying to essentially achieve some kind of
1:12:23
parity between female drivers and mail drivers, and they're using this as a method
1:12:29
to incentivize that. So I want to mention, do you guys think this
1:12:33
is equality of opportunity or quality of outcome at work? Because when we discuss
1:12:39
when people on the internet discuss equality, most of the time the paradigm is
1:12:44
that it is either equality of opportunity or quality of outcome, And the people
1:12:48
that claim to oppose the wokeis will say, well, I'm okay with equality
1:12:53
of opportunity, just not equality of outcome. Even Jordan Peterson has said this,
1:12:57
and this is actually making a point that I have made, which is
1:13:00
neither of these things matter. Equality of opportunity is equality of outcome, because
1:13:06
when people try to create opportunities, they have to somebody else has to lose.
1:13:14
And that means that they're because they're moving, they're still putting their finger
1:13:16
on the scale to adjust things because they are desiring a certain outcome. So
1:13:23
equality of opportunity is still equality of outcome. The only true equality of opportunity
1:13:29
is if you don't do anything and let people decide for themselves. And if
1:13:32
it just so happens that your basketball team is like eighty five percent black guys,
1:13:38
you're not going to complain because they're the ones that want to play basketball
1:13:42
and they're probably better suited to do it. And that also means that if
1:13:45
you're like recruiting for LIFT, and there are more men interested in driving,
1:13:49
and they're more interested in driving for longer hours, and they're more interested in
1:13:53
doing different kinds of shifts than women, then that's not inequality. That's not
1:13:58
oppression. That's people making choices. And so Lift is doing something stupid that
1:14:03
sounds nice, and people might say, well, that's just equality. I
1:14:09
mean, if they don't do it, they don't do it, but they're
1:14:10
gonna say this isn't working because it's not turning out the way we want.
1:14:14
This is what equality of opportunity always shakes out to be is. They'll say,
1:14:17
well, we've we've made it equal an opportunity, and yet it's still
1:14:21
unequal. There must be a problem. Oh, but you're looking at the
1:14:25
outcomes now, because that's how you judge what the success of your equality of
1:14:30
opportunity. So it doesn't work. And I'm just making that point because this
1:14:33
is something that feminists as to say for all the time. It is equality,
1:14:38
and if you press them on it, obviously they prefer equality of outcome
1:14:41
or equity as some people call it. But they will back down, retreat
1:14:46
to the mod as it were, and they'll say, no, no,
1:14:49
no, I just wanted equality opportunity. But they're not actually about that,
1:14:55
because if equality of opportunity does not give them the outcomes they want, then
1:14:59
they will say equality of opportunity is not working. And that's how you get
1:15:02
the situation we're in now. Well, it's it's partly because people don't understand
1:15:09
what equality equality of opportunity means, right, equality of opportunity is not affirmative
1:15:15
action. That's not equality of opportunity. That's equality of outcome. That's equality
1:15:21
of opportunity. Is when the law says you can't discriminate against someone on the
1:15:27
basis of their race and stops there. Yeah. Right, that's equality of
1:15:30
opportunity. That that being from a particular demographic doesn't change your your ability to
1:15:41
get a job based on discrimination. That's equality of opportunity. Is Uh,
1:15:47
there's no interference with your business as as a business because of who you are
1:15:53
or what you're doing. When when you are in a particular community, So
1:15:57
if you open up a store, they don't come along and say, well,
1:16:00
you're this this store is mail runs, so we're going to add extra
1:16:04
taxes and restrictions because you're not run by a woman. Right, that's a
1:16:11
quality of opportunity. Yeah, but I get it. But there's Unfortunately,
1:16:15
what's what you're talking about is how the left, and how in particular the
1:16:21
communist left, likes to twist things like when they say chrony corporatism, which
1:16:29
is which exploits government power to take control over the area of business that they're
1:16:36
they're in in order to create their own cartel. The monopoly which is something
1:16:45
that's been historically done in the United States, and the name of capitalism.
1:16:47
When they call that capitalism, they're lying, right, that is a lie.
1:16:54
Uh. And it's not a free market if you are using government power
1:16:58
to control the market. And the same thing with the equality of opportunity.
1:17:01
Don't let them tell you that things like affirmative action and creating a special environment
1:17:08
for one demographic because they feel threatened by all the other demographics is equality of
1:17:14
opportunity. It's bullshit. They are lying. Call them out on the lie.
1:17:19
M. I guess the only wrinkle with this is because you know you're
1:17:25
right, it should just simply be that you know you you shouldn't be discrimated
1:17:30
against for your race or your gender or whatever. The problem is that it's
1:17:34
very difficult to prove whether or not, like if there was some some there's
1:17:41
a pay disparity, or if someone didn't get the promotion, or if someone
1:17:45
didn't get the job. They're well, seminists tell us that too. But
1:17:48
yeah, I don't think it is. I don't think it's as difficult to
1:17:51
prove as as people think. No, I know, but but it does.
1:17:55
It's hard to prove because you you can be if you are of a
1:18:00
of a certain identity group that is protected and you are denied a job,
1:18:04
and it could be because you suck, but you think that you don't or
1:18:09
whatever. You could build a case because you're operating under the premise that the
1:18:13
only reason why you're being you know, denied something that you feel like you
1:18:16
deserve, is because of this identity marker, your gender, your race,
1:18:21
whatever. And I think that it's not hard to prove. It's hard to
1:18:26
debunk. Yeah, I guess so. Yeah, but it's away it is
1:18:30
unprovable. But go ahead, Mike, I'm meant to be slightly racist.
1:18:35
The best person for the job should get the job. That's racist. I
1:18:40
realize that that's already racist. Yeah, this might result in more black left
1:18:49
drivers than Asian left drivers. Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna go ahead and
1:18:54
say the racist thing that I prepared you for me saying blacks are better at
1:18:57
driving than Asians. If this means that there's disproportionately more more blacks getting jobs
1:19:06
as left or drivers than Asians, and that this is no reason for Asians
1:19:13
to start sucker punching blacks in the street. Do I need to make that
1:19:16
clear. No, apparently, I don't. Apparently they're already down with that.
1:19:23
Asians are not psycher punching blacks in the street for getting more uber or
1:19:27
left jobs than they are. Yeah, and none of this really matters if
1:19:33
if rich, affluent white women are more paranoid about being raped by blacks and
1:19:38
they about being raped by Asians, So I gets none of it really matters
1:19:42
at the end of the day. Well, I'm just gonna leave it there.
1:19:49
Well, we're gonna close the show out, but I want to get
1:19:53
you remember the countdown count Like I said, they countdown to the first female
1:19:57
on female false rape elly gation to get out of a taxicab fee or a
1:20:03
fee or whatever, or female on mail ones since they include a nonbin.
1:20:08
No, it can't be. It can't be the first female on mail because
1:20:11
that's already happened. All right, it's got to be the first female on
1:20:15
female and count down to two news stories coming out about women assaulting other women
1:20:20
in these vehicles. Oh yeah, absolutely, All right, Well, let
1:20:26
us know what you guys think about this in the comments. We're gonna head
1:20:30
out. Now we've gotten through the whole show and it we're right pretty close
1:20:33
to the money. And we're gonna be looking at this article from People magazine
1:20:36
celeb divorce lawyer links Barbie Beyonce and Taylor Swift tours uptick in breakups. Are
1:20:44
these men dodging a bullet? We'll find out? Or you know? Or
1:20:48
or have these women been properly psy ops? I guess I do have a
1:20:55
guest coming on next Monday who as makes the case that women are easier to
1:20:59
probably gand eyes. I think that'll be kind of interesting. Rachel Wilson is
1:21:03
her name. She's made appearances on a big channel called what I Have Learned,
1:21:09
and I think she was on Hents for the Quaintness ones. But but
1:21:15
yeah, Rachel Wilson should be pretty interesting next Monday on the Fireside Chat.
1:21:18
So we're gonna we'll see what's what her what her new book and her research
1:21:25
says about that. So anyway, we're gonna wrap this up. Get into
1:21:28
the After Show. If you want to join us, become a Badger.
1:21:30
Go to feed the Badger dot com. Start a monthly subscription. Five bucks
1:21:33
a month will get you into the discord and you'll be able to watch all
1:21:36
the additional content give at higher levels so you can be a part of the
1:21:40
discussion itself. And please this is for me because I don't really see the
1:21:45
money from the for the subscriptions. The it's the fundraiser to pay me so
1:21:49
I can pay my bills and keep Jojo fed. You can see Jojo needs
1:21:54
food badly, so please go to feed the Badger dot com for s last
1:21:59
support so that my dog and eat something. So okay, we're gonna wrap
1:22:03
it up here. If you guys liked this video, please it like,
1:22:06
subscribe. If you're not already subscribe, hit the belt notifications, leave us
1:22:09
a comment, let us know what you guys think about what we discussed on
1:22:11
the show today. Be sure to subscribe to my gaming channel, Honey Badger
1:22:15
Arcade. That's Honey Badger Arcade, currently going through three games at once,
1:22:20
so I'm doing it in small bits. But in October I'll be doing spooky
1:22:24
games, so scary scary games that I've never played before, like Alien Isolation
1:22:30
and PT which is like nobody can get it anymore. Probably my console's worth
1:22:34
some money, and yeah, just follow me over or there, so hopefully
1:22:39
I'll see you guys next time I do a game stream. Thank you guys.
1:22:43
So much for coming on today's episode, and we will talk to you
1:22:45
all in the next video.