Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What is SignalGate? A New Day for Women! | HBR News 537

Transcript

What is SignalGate? A New Day for Women! | HBR News 537 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five thirty seven. What is
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Signal Dates? A New Day for Women where we discuss
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: the news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. How
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: I hope you guys are doing well this week and
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: that you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: you are not consumed by it. I'm your host, Brian.
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: I am joined by, as always, my lovely cost Hannah
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: Wallin and doctor renmckham. Hello, Yes, Hello Mike. I just
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: want to point out the title. Those two things are
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: not related. Those are two separate stories, but it does
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: sound like they're basically related. I mean they kind of
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: are too.
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: We know what happens when there's a new day for women,
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: they find some reason to bitch about it.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Well, this week, guys, it's gonna be a pack show.
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: I had to leave some things out. We will be
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: talking about the latest breaking news in Minnesota. Regarding this
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: leaked signal chat, scientists have possibly created a way to
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: make eggs without the need for women and all trans
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Stepford Wise Wives movie is in development, and more so
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: stick around. It's gonna be a good time. And we
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: should have joined us afterwards for the Patron only show.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: So you guys know that this there's this trend or
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: this thing going around called looksmaxing. I know it kind
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: of came out of I mean I think it kind
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: of came out of the in cell community. Yeah yeah,
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: but like it's kind of going mainstream. I mean when
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: the when the Guardian picks it up, you know it's mainstream, right,
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: it's not new, Yeah it's not. No, it's not a
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: new thing.
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: But but as you the Guardian is uncharacteristicly making a
• 1:45
  Speaker 3: good point, it came out from culvicula. This fucking moss
• 1:49
  Speaker 3: had agent. Yes, I'm going with that. He came out
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: of nowhere and now he's suddenly a celebrity. There's some
• 1:56
  Speaker 3: shenanigans going on there. Yeah, this Dave shilling focus saying
• 2:01
  Speaker 3: being uglier is a lot easier, and yeah, it is
• 2:03
  Speaker 3: a lot easier than hitting yourself with a hammer. It's
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: got to be said. I mean, girls don't even like
• 2:10
  Speaker 3: looks as much as as much as boys do. They
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: like money. So put the hammer down and.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: You well, we're going to be looking this article from.
• 2:22
  Speaker 3: Must fucking nails with it and get a job.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Honestly, the biggest problem is that women are all around,
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: way way more judgmental than men when it comes to
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: their partners.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: Women will bitch about any little thing. Men tolerate all
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: of the little things and don't complain until stuff is
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: really bad, and then they get treated like they're being
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: emotionally abusive for for dispend defending what little space they
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: have in a relationship. I would not want to be
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: the man in a relationship even so.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: The Patron Show is this article from the Guardian looks
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: maxing young men are carving up their faces. Being ugly
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: is a lot easier. We're gonna be looking at this
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: potentially actually like decent article from the Guardian that I
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: think pigs are flying. But yeah, there's probably something misandrists
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: inside the article if we read it, so I'm guessing
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: that there it's gonna be like some kind of other subversion,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: another layer of it. But we're gonna be looking at
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: this in the Patron Show. If you guys want to
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: join us for that, you have to become a Badger
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: yourself by going to Feed the Badger dot com forward
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: slats subscribe and starting a monthly subscription five bucks a
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: month will get you into our discord server, where you'll
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: be able to watch all of the additional content and
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: even hang out with us and chat with us yourselves,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: and give us your two cents, because all of our
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: two senses are worth the same, which is almost nothing,
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: but at least we all have it. If we put
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: all of our two senses together, we might be able
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: to buy, you know, like a lollipop at the corner store.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: But anyway, and if you don't want to wake up
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: the morning to find it, huh, now.
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: That they has been discontinued, we could start earning.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, And if you don't want to wake up
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: one morning to find that we've been yeeded from the internet,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: but go to Badger feed dot com or honey Badger
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com to find all of our archived content
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: because that is where in fact it lives. And let
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: me see here before we get let let's get in
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: today's stories. But before we do, unfortunately, there is no
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: h what's the word I'm looking for? There's there's no
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: vertical chat today, and the reason is because there was
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: an update on my software to stream and it all
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: just disappeared like it was all gone, and I got
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: I guess I have to figure out something else. So anyway,
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: we're gonna get into today's stories.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: So that's fun. This work, This works, therefore we need
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: to fix it.
• 5:05
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, it's a plug in that I use, and
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: the company that made are the people who made the
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: plug in decided they're going to do some overhaul on
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: the plug in. But it's no longer the same plug in.
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: It's like a whole overhaul plug in, like a like
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: a mod for it instead. And I guess they just
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: removed the old plug in and replaced it with this thing.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: And I didn't realize it until I opened OBS and
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: and then I was like, oh, so I can't. I
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: don't have time to like set it up. But anyway, yeah, yeah,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: So with all that said, let us get into today's stories.
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: We're gonna be talking about signal Gate. And I got
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: quite a bit. It's a lot, so I'm gonna have
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: to go through quite a bit here to look at this.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: So the story behind signal gate, So what is signal
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: gate and what's the story? Refers to a controversy exposed
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: just this past week and evolving leaked encrypted chats from
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: a messaging app called Signal. I don't know if any
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: of you guys ever used Signal. I guess it's like
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: WhatsApp or Skype or something.
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: No. Really, a lot of government officials use it. And
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: this seems like it's signal Gate too, because we were
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: talking about a different Signal Gate.
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: Earlier.
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: This this last month.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so okay, so this this in in there were
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: leaked encrypted chats from the Signal messaging app UH used
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: by far left activist networks in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to coordinate
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: efforts to track, obstruct, and protest against US Immigration and
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Customs Enforcement operations or ICE operations. These chats were infiltrated
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: and leaked by independent journalist Cam Higbee, revealing organized activities
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: that describe as a or that are described as a
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: low level insurgency against federal immigration enforcement under the current administration.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: The scandal emerged amid escalating tensions in Minnesota over mass
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: deportation policies that were voted for by American citizens. Activists
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: were reportedly mobilizing to shadow ICE agents, block vehicles, and
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: disrupt arrests of undocumented of undocumented immigrants. A key incident
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: tied to this was the shooting death of activists Alex
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: Pretty or pretty I'm not really sure how you say
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: it in Minneapolis.
• 7:33
  Speaker 3: And Pretty, but apparently CNN doesn't find him pretty enough.
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: So yeah, right, they up with some AI.
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: Cleaned it up real nice in Minneapolis who confronted ICE
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: agents during Operation. Leaked chats suggest he and others were
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: actively involved in these obstruction efforts. The leak show structured
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: roles like admins and dispatchers in the chats, with discussions
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: about real time tracking of ICE movements. This is distinct
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: from an earlier signal gate in March twenty twenty five,
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: which is I think the one you're talking about, Hannah,
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: which involved Trump administration officials like Pete Hegseth Tulsea Gabbage,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: a d Vance and others using signal for sensitive discussions
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: on military strikes, violating federal records policies. That one led
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: to lawsuits and investigations, but isn't connected to the Minnesota events.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: Who is implicated The leak's point to a network of
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: activists with potential ties to democratic officials in Minnesota. Here's
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: a breakdown based on reports. So we have Cam Higbee,
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: who is an independent journalist and political researcher. He's the
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: guy who infiltrated and leaked all these chats, and you
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: can find all of his posts on x where he's
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: sharing he shared all this news. Basically, he described the
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: groups as highly organized for anti ICE actions. Alex Pretty
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: was also one of the people or Pretty was also
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: one of the people involved, and he was the guy
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: who was killed in a confrontation with ICE, which I
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: did not make a story because I think that you
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: can get too caught up in every little interaction. And
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: the truth is is that.
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: There's gonna be one of these every week.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Like the truth is is that ICE is
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: operating all over the country. In most states, the governments
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: are working with them to get this done, and in
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: Minnesota in particular, but also like blue areas like Chicago, California,
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: and New York, they're doing everything they can to disrupt
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: and oppose ICE and like basically make their jobs as
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: hard as possible. So when you have that, then you
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: have a higher likelihood of confrontations and escalations and arrests
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: of people who are not you know, illegals that are
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: not there specifically to get arrested. And the media is
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: in a feeding frenzy over all of those incidents. So
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: I think that to talk about every single time there's
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: a confrontation or altercation, especially because it's outside of this
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: wider context of like a essentially, this is a thing
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: happening across the country, but it's only creating problems in
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: you know, cities like Minneapolis, which also happens to be
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: under investigation for billions of dollars in fraud. But you know,
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: those things are probably not related. But anyway, so that's
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: why I'm not talking. I'm not talking about the pretty
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: shooting in this show. In this show, and I think
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: it's basically like open and shut anyway. But anyway, all right,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: chat suggests he was actively participating in tracking ice had
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: prior altercations with agents. Then you have Amanda Kohler, former
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: campaign advisor to Governor Tim Wallas. I believe that's the
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: woman on the thumbnail.
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: What, yeah, that's the biggest.
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's a big one, right, identified as an
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: admin or dispatcher in the chats of somebody of higher
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: rank within their little chat hierarchy, which is weird because
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: I thought these people didn't believe in hierarchy. But okay,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: at least it's two unnamed Minnesota state officials. Democratic politicians
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: in Minnesota allegedly admins in the chats that have ties
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: to state government. Katie Wilson and Bob Ferguson mentioned related
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: posts which possibly which Wilson is possibly in Minnesota related.
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: Ferguson is Washington AG so that's like attorney general linked
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: to anti ice insurgency chats. Though Ferguson is from Washington State,
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: so like, this is obviously not limited to Minnesota. This
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: is like all over the country and they're all talking
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: to each other, and there are broader activist groups, far
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: left groups in Minneapolis organized obstruction, including real time databases
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: and mobilization, and the FBI is announcing an investigation into
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: the chats for a potential federal obstruction and risk to
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: law enforcement. More than that, though, Tom Homan, the Borders
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: are proposed a public database to make them famous by
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: exposing participants' identities to employees and communities. And if I
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: am correct on this, Tom Holman is in Minneapolis or
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: on his way to Minneapolis. I think he's there though,
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: and he's basically looking into this. What does this mean
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: from Minnesota to do it? Yeah? Do it? What? Does
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: this mean from Minnesota and the involved government. This scandal
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: has amplified chaos in Minnesota amid Trump's deportation push, leading
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: to protests, violence, and political fallout. For Minnesota situation, it
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: highlights organized resistance to ICE, contributing to incidents like Pretty's
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: death and ongoing unrest in Minneapolis. Border Control chief Greg
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: Bovino and some agents are leaving the state citing risks.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Governor Tim Wallas, after initially resisting, is supposedly now cooperating
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: following a call from Trump, deploying local police to support
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: ICE and avert federal takeover. This has drawn criticism from
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: Democrats like Senator Patty Murray, who praised pushback against ICE.
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: It also ties into prior Minnesota scandals like you know
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: the billion dollar fraud scheme enabled by lax oversight under walls,
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: where DEI fears allegedly stifled in investigations for the government involved. Federally,
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: it underscores challenges and enforcing deportations, with the FBI probing
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: for systematic organization behind behind the riots. It could lead
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: to charges for obstruction or conspiracy. Broader resistance is emerging,
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: like California Democrats proposing bills to limit skate state cooperation
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: with ICE in response to the Minneapolis events, and critics
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: argue it exposes a collapse of leadership in blue states,
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: while supporters see it as valid protests against aggressive policies
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: overall at risks escalating state federal conflicts with potential for
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: more investigations and policy clashes. And I just wanted to
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: add to like before we get I get give it
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: to you guys to comment on. Oh, I should open
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: up the discord because I want to make sure I
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: can get the superchows. I forgot to do that. Yeah, So,
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: like Tom Homan is down there right now. And the
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: other thing is is that Keith Ellison could also be implicated.
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: He was like the the what do they call him there?
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: The attorney, district attorney, the DA.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: For the state level, for the state level.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: Yes, he's the guy who basically like made sure that
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: Jaric Chauvin went to jail. These are people that were
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: hold over from the George George Floyd's the same state.
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: What if he's for the state level, that's the attorney general.
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: If he's for the local level, then it's district attorney.
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: Oh, it's it's a Oh I have to look it up.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: Keith Ellison, I think he I think he might be
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: district a while. I don't.
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: I don't remember either.
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: It doesn't it doesn't matter whether he was a.
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: Small fry or a big fry.
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Uh, I'm looking to see what he is. He's
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: the attorney general of Minnesota.
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, he's a big attorney genital attorney chital. Yeah.
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: So the other thing too, is that today, after I
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: did this rite up, I didn't watch it until after
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: James O'Keefe and the O'Keefe media group and they're these
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: like kind of like command like gorilla journalists guys. They
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: go under cover. They do a lot of really good
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: exposing of various things, like they exposed you know, the
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: agendas at Disney and all this other stuff. And they
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: went to Minnesota and when they were there, they were
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: just kind of like hanging out with the protesters, and
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: he tried to blend in and he you know, got
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: a sense for what kind of people. They were, mostly women,
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: and that's kind of like one of the things that
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: I think makes this conversation interesting. And it's always it's
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: always women, so it's not like we're exposing something new
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: but it's almost always that and they're like true believers.
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: And that was one thing that he discovered is that like, well,
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: most of the people out here are drew believers, like
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: they really think they're doing, you know, something like good
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: and that they're fighting against evil. And it's a lot
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: of women out there. But well, one thing that happened
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: that he thought was really interesting that I've been trying
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: to communicate is that they he decided to come out
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: and tell them that he was press okay and that
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: but that he has no political agenda other than what
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: the truth is. And they confirmed that he was a
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: political right because, I mean, despite the fact that the
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: stuff that James O'Keefe exposes tends to be like against
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: the left, he's never taken a political stance. He's only
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: ever done his journalism and stay very focused on that.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: So when when the protesters, the mob that he was
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: hanging around with, discovered that he was a political so
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: they were like, this guy does not have a political leaning,
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: he became their enemy. He even said that, he said,
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: I thought that that was a good thing and it's not.
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: And they were throwing ice bricks and like frozen like
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: bottles of water but frozen ones because it's like, you know,
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: fifteen below up there. It's in Minneapolis, right and he
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: had to like run to his car, and they were
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: like some one of his security guards got hit in
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: the back of the neck with an ice brick basically,
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: and I just I'm just I want to point that
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: out because there's no neutrality, guys, there isn't. It doesn't exist.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: And I'm just I need you to understand this, Okay,
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: these people have created a line of the sand, and
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: if you're not on their side, you're the enemy. It
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter how centrist you are, it doesn't matter how
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: moderate you are, it doesn't matter. So you have to
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: like understand that. I'm not saying you have to pick
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: a side, but understand that if you're not on their side,
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: you're their enemy. And that's what they're doing. And it
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: is it is a woman thing. But anyway, so right
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: now things are ongoing. You know, no arrests are being
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: have been made yet on this particular front. Some people
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: by the way that like you know, protests that the
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: church have been arrested or at least charged with a crime.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that they're convicted of anything. I get
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: that these things take time, but in this case, we're
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: just learning about this signal chat thing. It's blowing up
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: up everywhere. So anyway, I give it to you guys.
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: Well, there could be arrests, There could be There could
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: be depending on the degree of violence, individuals can be
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: proved to have engaged. In US Code, a Statute one
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: one one makes it a federal crime to forcibly assault, resist, impede, oppose, intimidate,
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: or interfere with a federal officer or employee while they
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: are engaged in or on account of the performance of
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: their official duties. And it doesn't matter whether you do
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: that to Ice, the taxman or some dipshit who is
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: just measuring whether your fence is on your property, or
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: the next person. I don't even think that's federal, but
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: the least or the greatest of federal employees. It doesn't
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: matter the person that writes the dear Colleague letter. If
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: you were to engage in a harassment campaign like they've
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: been doing to Ice against any other federal employee or
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: any federal employee during a Democrat administration, you would have
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: seen mass arrests. And if you commit minor violence, you
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: know even even minor violence carries uh a misdemeanor Class
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: A punishable by up to a year in prison and
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: finds up to one hundred thousand dollars. It gets longer
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: after that. So essentially that's the that's just with no
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: physical contact. You show up with a gun like the
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: one guy, did you take a pass at somebody with
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: your car and don't even hit them, You've already committed
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: enough of a crime no physical contact to go to
• 19:54
  Speaker 2: prison for a year. You you you do engage in
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: any kind of physical contact, you fire a weapon at somebody,
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: you throw a brick at somebody and hit them, You punch,
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: you grab, you do any of those things right, and
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: then it goes up to felony assault or aggravated felony,
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: and at that point you're looking at eight to twenty
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: years and up to a quarter of a million in fines.
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: So they don't this isn't a minor thing. This isn't
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: something that you know, they're like not not messing around,
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: They're not fucking around. Uh, They're they're actually putting themselves
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: in a great deal of finding out danger. And that's
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: one one law they're violating. They could be arrested for
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: obstructing justice because this is considered the due administration of justice.
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: When you when I shows up to take out somebody
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: that is here illegally and take them out of the country,
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: deport them from the country. If you interfere with that,
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: you are are engaging and obstructing. And that can be
• 21:10
  Speaker 2: the secondary crime that takes your simple assault and makes
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: it felony because if you engage in or intend to
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: commit a second felony while you commit the first felony,
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: that that escalates it to the second level. Or they
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: could actually just convict you of a violation of that felony,
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: which is the minimum sentence for that's five years and
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: the maximum is twenty. And then then there's like for this,
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: the list of things that they have that they've done here,
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: that they've engaged in and in obstructing this activity and
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: trying to obstruct this activity is six items long, the
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: list I found, and all of them carry those kinds
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: of heavy penalties. The penalties get worse as you go
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: down the list. So yeah, it's there could be arrests,
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: and they could if the government, the current administration, really
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: wanted to shut this down, if they really want to
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: do something about this, and they really want to protect
• 22:28
  Speaker 2: their workers who are engaging in lawful actions. All they
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: have to do is get their hands on some people
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: who can be proved to have engaged in these acts.
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: And I believe this signal chat constitutes at least a
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: conspiracy to commit the first two that they the first
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: two things that I read there, and you know, we're
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: talking several people who could be in very deep shit.
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: They don't even have to have engaged in any kind
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: of violence. All they have to do is plan it out.
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: Conspiracy to commit a crime could be considered just as
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: bad as committing the crime itself. And it is one
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: way that the state uses when you have one group
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: of people that's organizing the individuals who do the assaults
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: and the interference and obstruction that they've used all these
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: other people, and then they think they're going to get
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: away with it. Well, if they get convicted of a
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: conspiracy to commit these crimes, engaging in a conspiracy to
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: commit these crimes, then no, they won't get away with it.
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: And that's what really needs to happen. It's what they
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: tried to do falsely to the Trump administration. But it's
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: what the Democrats have actually engaged in. And if we
• 23:59
  Speaker 2: don't want this kind of thing to be the way
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: politics is done in the US, if we don't want
• 24:06
  Speaker 2: bricks through store windows and government officials getting a ship
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: beat out of them, people trying to shoot them or
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: hit them with cars, or throw rocks and bricks and
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: frozen water bottles at them, then it's time to start
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: prosecuting the people that are doing that. And I don't
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: care if they're college students that people think don't know
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: any better. If you're eighteen years old and you drive
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: drunk and you hit somebody with your car and that
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: person dies, you get convicted of the crime, the same
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: crime that you would be convicted of if you were
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: fifty five and driving drunk and hit somebody, You would
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: get the same punishment, and you might get the same
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: treatment from your whole community, depending on how well that
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: person was known and how small that community is. And
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: I've heard of people having to move because they've made
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: a stupid mistake on prom night as an eighteen year
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: old high school senior and never being able to live
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: it down right. So there is no excuse for this,
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: and the people that are engaging in it really shouldn't
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: be getting a pass just because they have feelings about
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: this subject and it's political. In fact, at this point,
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: their feelings about it, the fact that they are acting
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: on feelings about it, and the fact that it is
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: political is just another reason why they absolutely have to
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: be held accountable for their actions from the bottom all
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: the way up to the top. Every single person involved
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: that gets caught really needs to be charged with every thing,
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: every crime that they've committed, and tried for every crime
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: that they've committed, penalized, and their sentences need to not
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: be commuted or otherwise terminated early. It's basically time to
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: legally post a few heads on posts outside the White
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: House because otherwise American politics is going to be violent
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: forever and we won't be able to maintain a system
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: that we can trust ever. Again.
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm kind of amazed that it's taken this long
• 26:50
  Speaker 3: for quote unquote leftists to have finally flown so close
• 26:55
  Speaker 3: to the sun that their wings might finally be melting.
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: The twentieth century, ever since the war was an exercise
• 27:06
  Speaker 3: in normalizing micophobia, and they were always pushing on an
• 27:12
  Speaker 3: open dog because no one knows what that is. It's
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: been granted the euphemism of communism, and indeed the even
• 27:20
  Speaker 3: more nerfed euphemism of leftism. And yeah, the twentieth century
• 27:25
  Speaker 3: saw the long slow march through the institutions to the
• 27:30
  Speaker 3: point where it's not even cold anything anymore, and it's
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: just considered zero normal. This ugly, degenerate, deliberate subversion of
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: your country and its people. The twenty first century has
• 27:45
  Speaker 3: been an exercise in exponentially escalating that cultural self destruction
• 27:51
  Speaker 3: to whatever heights they can get away with it. It's
• 27:54
  Speaker 3: no longer a long slow march. It's a rapid sprint
• 27:59
  Speaker 3: through every institution's still left over. And at this point
• 28:05
  Speaker 3: they're just going can we get away with this? Holy shit,
• 28:08
  Speaker 3: Yes we can. We're going to tell everyone there's no
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: such thing as prejudice against straight white males, while we
• 28:15
  Speaker 3: push the most blatant, unapologetic policies against explicitly against straight
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: white males. We're going to turn women against them. We're
• 28:24
  Speaker 3: going to flood the country with foreigners. We're even going
• 28:27
  Speaker 3: to insist that we can change the sex of humans
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: just by saying so. And on those grounds, we're going
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: to amputate entire body parts of miners. We're going to
• 28:39
  Speaker 3: encourage children from an early age to get their body
• 28:42
  Speaker 3: parts amputated. Wait, have we gone too far? Surely we're
• 28:46
  Speaker 3: not going to get away with this. No one in
• 28:48
  Speaker 3: their right mind would let us get away with this.
• 28:51
  Speaker 3: Oh shit, would you look at that? We're even getting
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: away with this? Is there anything we can't do? This
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: chophobic travesty we call the left has for the last
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: few decades faced the dilemma of a spoiled child, and
• 29:08
  Speaker 3: infinitely spoiled child. It's in their nature to push boundaries
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: and push them and push them and push them until
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: someone finally tells them no. But they've never been told no,
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: not substantially enough, so they just keep pushing those boundaries.
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: What if we ban everyone from leaving their houses and
• 29:28
  Speaker 3: we force insane medical procedures on them, Surely someone's gonna
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: stop us. No, that's fine too, to keep on going.
• 29:38
  Speaker 3: So it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that they
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: think they can overthrow the federal government by misinforming useful
• 29:47
  Speaker 3: idiots into hassling armed agents in the streets. Everything they've
• 29:52
  Speaker 3: done so far they've got away with, and just like
• 29:55
  Speaker 3: spoiled children, they don't understand that the higher you fly.
• 29:59
  Speaker 3: The further you fall, and the harder you fall, your
• 30:04
  Speaker 3: devouring mother will let you get away with anything. But
• 30:07
  Speaker 3: at some point you're gonna go out into the real
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: world and you're gonna bump into a twitching psycho who's
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: not gonna take your shit. You're like a bad tempered,
• 30:19
  Speaker 3: your sche terrier starting a fight with a pitbull who's
• 30:23
  Speaker 3: been waiting his whole life for this moment. And I'd
• 30:28
  Speaker 3: like to think that's where we are now. I'd like
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: to think it was always inevitable that if they kept
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: pushing their luck, that they'd run out of that luck. Eventually.
• 30:38
  Speaker 3: You actually can't conspire to overthrow the federal government. You will,
• 30:44
  Speaker 3: in fact find yourself quadraspased with your head on a
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: pig pole if you do that. And this is just
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: me hoping, this is just me praying that we finally
• 30:57
  Speaker 3: reached that point where these bratty fucks will actually get
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: what's finally coming to them. But we've been here before.
• 31:05
  Speaker 3: With all the things I've just described. There's always a
• 31:09
  Speaker 3: libtad judge who will save these spoiled, small yuppy dogs
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: from the jaws of the pit bull every time, and
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: maybe the myth of Icarus is just that a myth.
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: Maybe these fuckers will actually fly all the way to
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: the Sun and then they will destroy the Sun. They
• 31:31
  Speaker 3: will bring about the eternity of all William darkness. I
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: don't fucking know. I try not to black pill people,
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: but every time I try to white pill people, every
• 31:42
  Speaker 3: time I express a modicum of hope and optimism, it
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: gets dashed on the rocks. So I don't know what
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: to predict anymore. I don't know how to predict anything.
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: So I'm just gonna sit here and bark at the moon,
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: hopefully in an entertaining way. Maybe we're doomed, maybe we're
• 32:02
  Speaker 3: not doomed. Either way, we might as well enjoy ourselves
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: as best we can. And that's why I drink. Why
• 32:08
  Speaker 3: you should drink too. Yes, this is doctor's advice. Do
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: with it as you will read my handwriting.
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: All I'll say is that we don't have to white
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: pill people to not black pill people. We can just
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: tell them to like, stay steady, don't let them turn
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: you into a nihilist. But that doesn't mean that you
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: have to embrace false hope, just like you know, be
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: realistic and pragmatic. And that's it. Just so protect yourself
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: if possible. I just want to also add about the.
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: This question, how many shades of gray are we talking here?
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: What do we have a specific number for these shades
• 32:48
  Speaker 2: of gray that we're talking here?
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: No, no, I'm not, I'm not. I'm not offering any pills.
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: We already had the red one. That's enough to deal with. Yeah,
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: But I wanted to say about a word about the
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: James o'keef thing. I have some quotes from the things
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: that we discovered about the signal chat. This is an
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: it like running here on cam Higbee's X page. He's
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: got lots and lots of information of like the things
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: that they're doing. One of the things that they're doing
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: is they are sending each other if they like, come
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: across a vehicle that's unfamiliar, they will get the license
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: plate and they'll share it with everybody, and they'll track
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: track the license plate. So they're I guess is you
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: could say doxing people to some degree, right, And they're
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: also telling each other not to drive SUVs because SUVs
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: are what they're targeting. So if you're in the area
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: and you're not part of ice, but you're driving an SUV,
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: you will be targeted because you're an outsider. They're telling
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: people to drive different kinds of vehicles, like buying different
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: kinds of vehicles. These are not actually like really low
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: income areas. These are areas where people can buy a
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: car so that they don't get singled out when you know,
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: when these people are marching in the streets. But here
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: are some things that James o'kiev also said. He said, Uh,
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: this is according to Eric Dawherd T. Doherty. Whatever, Yeah, Doherty,
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: you know who I'm talking about. He so, okay, So
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: when they saw his vehicle, this network immediately ran his
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: license plate and interrogated him demanding ID, which is when
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: he basically like said, I'm press within seconds.
• 34:35
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: And this is what James. These are quotes from his video.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: He says, I've never seen anything like this. Every vehicle
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: downtown they're able to track, run the plates, confirm who
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: they are, get their identification, like they did in my
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: case they ran my license plate. We're trying to figure
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: out how they're able to do that where they have
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: someone on the inside of a rental car company, et cetera,
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: and communicate with each other about it. Because he rented
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: a car to uh to do this. And when I
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: got out of my vehicle, this is like eleven thirty
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: in the morning, just after the shooting and before the
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: autonomous zone. Within seconds there were five of them standing
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: outside of relatively inconspicuous vehicle, interrogating me, asking to see
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: my identification. So I got to give him credit. I've
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: never seen anything like that in my life. I don't
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: think any of us have ever seen a group of
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: people more organized. And then he also said it's a
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: loose network and there's government funding too for these people
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: in the signal chat. Okay, there's NGOs, some of which
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: indirectly get funds from our government, so they're not really NGOs,
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: but like a lot of NGOs get government funding. So
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: NGO is just kind of a lie of a term
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: because it means non governmental. But anyway, but the people
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: actually really believe in their cause, Like these people are
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: true believers, and it's a cause that it appears to
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: me that they're willing to live and die for, which
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: is I think more terrifying than one guy funding them
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: in a transactional way. So just like adding a little
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: bit more to this story because I think it's imp
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: important to note so well.
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: It is, especially the running license plate thing is a
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: little creepy because that is something you can't just not
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: everybody can do that. You have to have access to
• 36:12
  Speaker 2: you have to have official authorization and access to a
• 36:16
  Speaker 2: certain set of systems in order to do that, and
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: you're supposed to have certain legitimate legal reasons, like you know,
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: you're an officer and you pull them over, or your
• 36:30
  Speaker 2: private investigator and you're investigating on someone's behalf and have
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: gotten leave. You know, there's certain things you have to
• 36:38
  Speaker 2: have in place. You can't just randomly get online and
• 36:42
  Speaker 2: find out who owns a vehicle based on their license number,
• 36:45
  Speaker 2: at least you're not supposed to be able to. And
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: if you do that, if you're capable of doing that
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: and you do it without a legitimate legal reason, you're
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: actually violating The Drivers Privacy Protection Act goes back to
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: nineteen ninety four and it is a protection of the
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: privacy of personal information in motor vehicle records and it
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: is a criminal violation and a civil violation. So if
• 37:20
  Speaker 2: they find out who's doing this without a legit legal
• 37:24
  Speaker 2: reason for doing it, that person that can again get
• 37:28
  Speaker 2: into legal trouble. But Also, everybody who's whose license that
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: they've they've run can actually sue them and possibly get damages.
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: And you don't have to have had very much expense
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: to do that. It can be at least twenty five
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: dollars per violation. So I hope they catch who did that,
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: and I hope everyone whose life has been run is notified,
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: and I hope that there's a class action suit against
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: the entity that did it, because there could be. It's
• 38:08
  Speaker 2: a possibility, it's a thing that could be done.
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: All Right, I got a superchow and we're gonna let
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: me know, let us know what you guys think about
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: this one. In the comments, we're gonna read the super
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: child and then move on. So, but this is still ongoing.
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: And again it is like that there is a thing
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: with women. They're just straw to this stuff. They basically
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: treat these I don't know, people like their kids or something.
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: But anyway, mereth g gives us five dollars. Thank you, Meredith,
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: and says HBr News five point thirty seven, Honey for
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: the Badgers. Yes, Hannah is correct. If you are the
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: top prosecutor for the state, your attorney general AG oftentimes
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: stands for aspiring governor. City level top prosecutors are district attorneys.
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: The tragedy of the second shooting is that a protester
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: are convinced that putting their lives at risk and dying
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: is just the thing. And Christy nom was warned this
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: was a problem and that ice rads should avoid blue
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: state strongholds and focus on prosecuting the NGOs and other
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: actors in the state who are complicit in the activities.
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: But no, she had to put agents at risk. Tom
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: Homan didn't want these operations where protests were going to happen,
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: but he was overruled by his incompetent female boss.
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and there are now people dead because of it, yea,
• 39:21
  Speaker 2: and yeah. Ags often do end up running for governor.
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: In fact, the current governor of Ohio was our ag.
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: Before he was he was governor, he has been a
• 39:34
  Speaker 2: county prosecutor. He has been a senator at the state level,
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: he has been a lieutenant governor, he's been a senator
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: at the federal level, and he has been the Attorney general.
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: And now he's the governor. So he's been a career politician.
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: But and that happens with a lot of these guys.
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: That are in state or higher level positions that they
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: they just their career politicians. And I have actually worked
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: with him in the past. We did photography for his
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: ice cream socials for years, my family did. But and
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: so I know that he has a certain specific set
• 40:19
  Speaker 2: of values. I don't agree with him on everything, but
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: there are some things that I very strongly agree with
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: him on, and and that's why he's been a career politician,
• 40:29
  Speaker 2: has been trying to He did his own long march
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: through the institutions. But that's pretty standard. Like if you
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: look at any big name in politics, it's incredibly rare
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: for somebody to come out of nowhere and then become
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: a federal senator and then run for president after a
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: few terms like Obama did and win like that's he's
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: the only person that could do that in a modern setting.
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: And for the most part, you would see somebody like
• 41:09
  Speaker 2: like Mike DeWine that you know, they work in every
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: area of state government, they can in some areas of
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: federal government, become a governor. I don't know if he'd
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: ever run for president, but it's always possible, and you
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: know that that's essentially how politics in America works for
• 41:33
  Speaker 2: the most part. But in terms of yeah, in terms
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: of Christinom and her orders and everything, it is true
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: she should not have sent them into the Blue States
• 41:44
  Speaker 2: like this. This was to cause conflict, and it did.
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: They played right into her hand. In terms of bad behavior,
• 41:54
  Speaker 2: the big question is does a woman in office have
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: the balls to uphold the law now that we know
• 42:03
  Speaker 2: who is breaking it, because otherwise she did all that
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: for nothing. She overrode the man who was correct for nothing.
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: If she doesn't have a long game in doing this,
• 42:15
  Speaker 2: then she was just being belligerent and bitchy. And that's
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: one of the reasons why we shouldn't have women in
• 42:24
  Speaker 2: these positions. So if she's not taking this opportunity to
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: start start making sure that everyone involved in this signal
• 42:36
  Speaker 2: gate and the people that they have persuaded to attack
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: ICE agents are prosecuted. If she's not doing that, then
• 42:47
  Speaker 2: all of this was just an exercise in being being
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: a girl boss, which essentially means being bossy and pushy
• 42:57
  Speaker 2: and bitchy. It does not mean the same thing is
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: being leader. And it'll become pretty obvious if she fails
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: at this, but it won't be a big surprise.
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you for that, Meredith. I also wanted to
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: let you all know that all this information was uploaded
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: to a proton drive in case it gets like taken down,
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: So it's been archived. Here's a copy of you can
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: look at all of their campaigns and where they're getting
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: their money from and CSB files and stuff. So if
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: you want that, I'll put it in the discord. You
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: have to go into the discord to look at it.
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: I might send it to Hannah. Maybe you want to
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: cover it up a show or something at some point.
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: Another thing is one of these websites that's involved with
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: this is called Chuffed and it's a social justice website.
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: And you know not that we don't know that this
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: is the case, but if you look here, they're featured movements.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: We have Palestine, Climate, Animals, First Nations, Sudan. I didn't
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: know that was like a new thing, workers rights, a
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: Polish ice, trans rights, thirteen more. What else we got?
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: Health and medical, social welfare, development, enterprise, environment, schools, women
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: and girls, sports, lgbt IQ, volunteers, politics, community. What's missing?
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: So is there anything missing from this list of various causes?
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: I wonder what they're not covering. But yeah, I mean again,
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: not surprising, just the usual you know stuff. But let
• 44:26
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one in
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: the comments. We're gonna move on to the next story.
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: Really quick, Yeah, really quick. David low Boy says this BONDI,
• 44:36
  Speaker 2: which we'll have to do the prosecuting, and it seems
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: equally useless. Yes, because that's another woman. So my point,
• 44:43
  Speaker 2: you know, I rest my case. But the other thing
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: is could be communicating with her and saying you've got
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: to do something about this. This you can see the
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: violence is taking place, you can see the death that
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: is happening, you can see the chaos in the streets.
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: Here are the people who are violating these laws. We
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: need prosecutions. And and then it's on Bondie whether she
• 45:06
  Speaker 2: says yes or no. But uh, if if Gnome isn't
• 45:10
  Speaker 2: pushing for full on prosecution as a result of this,
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: and then then again it's just it's just a woman,
• 45:19
  Speaker 2: uh being bitchy. You know you said not to go
• 45:22
  Speaker 2: in there, Well, damen, I'm gonna go in there. I
• 45:25
  Speaker 2: swear I want to make a horror film, you know,
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: where where all of the people who are victims of
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: the scary monster get killed because they're they're women who
• 45:37
  Speaker 2: get mad when something someone tells them don't go in there.
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: There's a monster in there, and and I do what
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: I want. You can't tell me what to do. And
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: then then they go in there and they get ripped
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: to shreds. Because that's essentially life. That's that's women in
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: a nutshell.
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: Yep uh okay. So let us know what you guys
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: think about this one in the comments. I look forward
• 45:59
  Speaker 1: to your thoughts. We're gonna move on to the next story.
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: So we have a breakthrough, well, it's potential breakthrough in science,
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: something that's being worked on. So scientists at Oregon Health
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: and Science University, led by Chowkrat Mitalipov, announced a significant
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: breakthrough in late September of last year. They successfully created functional,
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: fertilizable human eggs using DNA from adult skin cells. This
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: process builds on somatic cell nuclear transfer, similar to the
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: cloning technique used for Dolly the Sheep. Researchers remove the
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: nucleus from a donor egg, replaced it with the nucleus
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: from a skin cell containing the full set of forty
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: six chromosomes, and developed a new cell division method called
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: mimiosis to reduce the chromosomes to the correct twenty three
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: needed fertilization. They produced eighty two such egg like cells,
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: which were then fertilized with sperm via IVF. Some developed
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: into early embryos, reaching the blastocyst stage, which is about
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: six days old or six days in ticket gestation. Though
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: efficiency was low, only about nine percent succeeded. Many showed
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: chromosomal abnormalities, and none were cultured beyond six days per
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: ethical guidelines. As of January twenty twenty six, there are
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: no new major developments or follow up studies reported beyond
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: the original proof of concept publication in Nature Communications. This
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: work remains in the early lab stage, with experts estimating
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: at least a decade of refinement, safety testing, and regulatory
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: slash ethical reviews before any potential clinical trials. Challenges include
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: improving chromosome accuracy, boosting success rates, and addressing ethical concerns
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: around designer reproduction or scenarios like same sex male couples
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: having genetically related children. Discussions on platforms like X continue
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: to highlight the implications for infertility treatment, parenthood definitions, and
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: future reproductive technology, but no breakthroughs in human applications have
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: emerged since the initial announcement, and I just wanted to
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: say for this, I'm not for this. I don't think
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: this is good. I know a lot of people talk
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: about artificial wombs and all that. I think it's generally
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: like not good in my opinion. But that's not I'm
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: not telling people how to live their life or anything.
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: But I do want to say that I think this
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: is essentially the endpoint of female liberation. The endpoint of
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: this is not something that is happening because men want it.
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: This is something that's happening because women are basically more
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: and more asking to be liberated from the like essentially
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: their biology, the biology of of of gestating babies and life,
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: and they want they want something like this. Now there
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: are the fact that this was going on in the
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: Pacific Northwest suggests also that there could have been like
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: other interests, like for example, they are a lot of
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: trans women that want to be able to carry babies,
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: and that this is like another thing that could be
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: a factor. But I think that they're of such a small,
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: you know, proportion of the population that this is I
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: think the like, this is essentially the logical end point
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: of female liberation, Like there is that that's where, or
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: at least a point. It's not necessarily the end, but
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: it's like a destination, a singularity that female liberation points
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: us towards. This isn't to say this is what all
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: women want. I'm talking about the ideology itself. So I
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: think that it's just something that is interesting. Now women
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: will probably oppose this if it's if it becomes viable
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: and men start to use it, but I don't think
• 49:58
  Speaker 1: it was essentially put into practice with men in mind.
• 50:02
  Speaker 2: So something that something that I got to say about this,
• 50:06
  Speaker 2: because this really okay. I understand there are people that
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: want this, and I understand that their their research goes
• 50:17
  Speaker 2: where the funding is probably more rich. People want this,
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: then want what the other applications of this are. But this,
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: this pisses me off in the same way that learning
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: about adult stem cell successes pisses me off. For years,
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: part of the abortion argument was that you can get
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: embryonic stem cells without creating embryos to destroy them, if
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: you just can use the stem cells from aborted embryos.
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: And uh, I think it was George Bush Senior. It
• 50:55
  Speaker 2: might have been George Bush Junior, but it was one
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: of the Bushes who outlawed that it so you couldn't
• 51:00
  Speaker 2: just take stem cells from every aborted fetus and use
• 51:05
  Speaker 2: them for for whatever research purposes and so on, and
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: that in fact, I think you made it so that
• 51:13
  Speaker 2: you couldn't create new sets of stem cells to do
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: that with UH embryonic stem cells. And then you find
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: out later you know, all this all this argument that
• 51:25
  Speaker 2: it's important to be able to do that because MS
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: can't be cured, and cancer can't be cured, and name
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: a illness that's that's either genetic or caused by dysfunction,
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: and human cell reproduction can't be cured without without UH
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: embryonic stem cell research. Suddenly all of the other methods
• 51:48
  Speaker 2: that they've been using. So it was w Zer says
• 51:51
  Speaker 2: it was w uh So that was senior think I
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: got that right, No, that was that was junior. Uh. Anyway,
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: you can't can't do any of the other elements of
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: research because we've we've shut this one off. We're gonna
• 52:07
  Speaker 2: have a temper tantrum as a scientific community and not
• 52:11
  Speaker 2: care anything. Fuck you guys, you can all die. And
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: that that went on for decades. That's gone on for
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: a long time to two decades, and people have died
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: waiting for research to be done on on their on
• 52:30
  Speaker 2: their particular ailment that was killing them. They've died waiting
• 52:35
  Speaker 2: for treatments to become affordable. There are stem cell treatments,
• 52:41
  Speaker 2: for instance, for kidney failure, but if you're not exceptionally wealthy,
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: you can't get it done. Your insurance company probably won't
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: cover it, but you can get it if you pay independently.
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: In the United States because uh, you know, they don't
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: they don't want people receiving medical care if we're not
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: going to allow them to use aborted fetuses to make
• 53:07
  Speaker 2: it happen. And if they can make advancements like this
• 53:14
  Speaker 2: where they can they can create an entire an entire
• 53:19
  Speaker 2: donor egg, can create an entire human from a donor
• 53:30
  Speaker 2: egg and the nucleus from a skin cell. If they're
• 53:34
  Speaker 2: capable of doing that, they are capable of all of
• 53:38
  Speaker 2: the advancements that they've declined to make in the last
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: twenty to thirty years because they're mad about embryonic stem cells.
• 53:51
  Speaker 2: And we know that they can take your stem cells
• 53:54
  Speaker 2: from cartilage in your ankle or your nose, your heel,
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: or your nose, your ear and and actually use them
• 54:02
  Speaker 2: in the manner that we were told they needed embryonic
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: stem cells for now we know that they actually can
• 54:11
  Speaker 2: create human life doing this. They could be growing organs
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: for people who need donor organs. They could grow them
• 54:22
  Speaker 2: from your own tissue, and they're not choosing to use
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: that to help people. They could be repairing organs that
• 54:32
  Speaker 2: have failed or are damaged. They could be repairing hearts,
• 54:36
  Speaker 2: they could be repairing kidneys. They could be repairing livers
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: people who are dying from cancers of organs that you
• 54:44
  Speaker 2: can't survive without solid function, like liver or lung or
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: pancreatic cancer, things like that. They're not using this type
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: of research. They're not using their capabilities to make medical
• 55:05
  Speaker 2: care for people available in those areas. Instead, they're trying
• 55:10
  Speaker 2: to make it so that trans women can have babies.
• 55:17
  Speaker 2: And I, you know, I do care about the issue,
• 55:23
  Speaker 2: the gender issue in this, it's just not that far
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: up on my list in comparison to helping people not
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: die before their time. And there's all kinds of other things,
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: you know, that I could be talking about with regard
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: to this. They could There are advancements that have been
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: made that I have read about you know, we always have.
• 55:56
  Speaker 2: They just said on the news last night, in fact,
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: that there's a shortage of blood owners right now. Know
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: they could they could make it so that we don't
• 56:04
  Speaker 2: need blood donors, but they're not doing that. They're doing this.
• 56:12
  Speaker 2: They could make it so that we don't need organ donors,
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: but they're not doing that. They're doing this. They could
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: make it so that degenerative birth defects that you know,
• 56:24
  Speaker 2: start out not so bad and then kill you in
• 56:27
  Speaker 2: four or five years, don't do that anymore, but they're not.
• 56:33
  Speaker 2: They're doing this. Like I I wish I could say,
• 56:44
  Speaker 2: I hope they're proud, but I don't. I hope they
• 56:48
  Speaker 2: end up embarrassed as fuck. You know, at least the
• 56:53
  Speaker 2: company that is trying to figure out how to regrow
• 56:59
  Speaker 2: foreskin for men is working on something that they have
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: said they know will have multiple applications, including regrowing skin
• 57:08
  Speaker 2: for burn victims. That it won't just be one thing
• 57:14
  Speaker 2: that it'll be across the board. There will be all
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: kinds of things that they can do for people. Because
• 57:18
  Speaker 2: of that, these guys don't seem to care about that,
• 57:24
  Speaker 2: and that's sad, and I wonder, you know, are they
• 57:29
  Speaker 2: getting funded by federal money. It's your tax money going
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: into this, and then they're not doing anything for you.
• 57:37
  Speaker 2: And if you have kidney failure, you're you're just shed
• 57:41
  Speaker 2: out of luck. Or are they getting privately funded and
• 57:50
  Speaker 2: zombie Cartman not yet, but they're getting closer. They're in
• 57:56
  Speaker 2: the last I saw, they were in animal trials and
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: they were preparing for human trials. So this is a
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: thing that is going to happen and and they will
• 58:06
  Speaker 2: be able to regrow foreskin once this is once that
• 58:10
  Speaker 2: research is done, the company is called Foraging and uh,
• 58:18
  Speaker 2: but it'll also you know, be able to regrow your
• 58:21
  Speaker 2: skin if you get burned or if you're in an
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: accident like on a motorcycle and you lose a lot
• 58:29
  Speaker 2: of skin from that. It's it's got a lot of applications.
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: So it's really going to be very valuable research and
• 58:40
  Speaker 2: and it'll be valuable in multiple ways. So you can
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: look forward to that. That one is up and up
• 58:48
  Speaker 2: and coming pun intended research. And the other one is
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: plan A that's that's supposed to be happening this year,
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: I think, which is a male birth control and it
• 59:04
  Speaker 2: is it's not a hormonal thing. It's not gonna interfere
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: with your hormones. It's not gonna interfere with your any
• 59:12
  Speaker 2: of your bodily functions in any way that makes you know,
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: puts chemicals through your system. It's a polymer that that
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: goes into the vast deference that shreds the sperm. It
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: doesn't even force you to reabsorb the sperm like a
• 59:30
  Speaker 2: vast sectomy does. And it can be it can be
• 59:36
  Speaker 2: essentially be dissolved using another It's an injected polymer into
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: the vast deference at last ten years and it can
• 59:43
  Speaker 2: be dissolved using another injection. And so it's it's another
• 59:49
  Speaker 2: up and coming bit of research that's going to pan
• 59:53
  Speaker 2: out for men. And I think that once that happens,
• 59:57
  Speaker 2: it won't matter women come up with. They're really they
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 2: can make all the eggs they want, but if they
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: if they can't go more than Yes, it's called vassaltel
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 2: plumb daddy, that's correct. But they won't be able to
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: use this to gain independence because most of them depend
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: when on. What they depend on when they become single
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 2: moms is getting child support from the father of the baby.
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 2: So they're not gonna want this and they're not This
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 2: is not gonna end up making a whole lot of money,
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 2: but I think those two other things will, and I
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: think those are much better.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: All right, Mike, do you have any thoughts on this?
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 3: I do.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: I do.
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 3: Again. I don't want to toy with optimism too much,
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 3: not just because I don't plunging myself into yes, another
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: pit of disappointment, but because I don't want to lead
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 3: anyone else astray with any false sense of security. This
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: story seems to be a breakthrough. This seems like, if
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 3: it comes to fruition, we could theoretically maintain the human
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 3: race without women, without having to give a shit about
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 3: women or they're increasingly unsustainable demands. This might mean we
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 3: could have the Warhammer forty thousand future where we don't
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 3: even have to bother arguing about the nineteenth Amendment. We
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 3: could just make women obsolete altogether. But like I said,
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: we've spent the past century dreaming of making communism obsolete.
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 3: I mean, it always has been obsolete from its inception,
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 3: because it's a fucking stupid idea. But the problem is
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 3: communists and feminists are extremely ruthless as long as as
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: we exist in this decadence afforded to us by labor
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: saving technology. There will always be board housewives who create
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 3: imaginary problems out of nothing because they can't live without problems,
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 3: and they will pursue those imaginary problems to the ends
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: of the earth because it's all they have, it's the
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: only thing that gives them going. We're not going to
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 3: get rid of this missandric ecophobia until society has retrograded
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 3: back to the Stone Age, where we have no choice
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: but to put men in charge, otherwise we'll all die.
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: And so the cycle continues of empires falling and rising.
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: There is no way in hell that feminists are going
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: to allow this asexual reproduction to exist, because if it does,
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 3: it will represent the unthinkable. In the event that such
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 3: technology exists, will have a right to access it. We've
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 3: seen what happens when men want rights, especially rights to
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 3: something that doesn't necessarily involve women our feminist led governments,
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 3: I don't even want us to have fucking video games
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 3: that aren't tailored specifically to women's wants and needs. Do
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 3: you think they'll ever let us have access to reproductive
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 3: options that aren't tailored specifically to women's wants and needs.
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 3: If you thought gamer Gate was something of a fuffle.
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: Wait till you see egg Gate. It's got three g's
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 3: in a row. Three. Once egg Gate rears its ugly head,
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 3: you'll never hear about ice again. That Femi communists will
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 3: turn away from all those secondary and tertiary distractions, and
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: they will land right back where they were in twenty fourteen,
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 3: focusing every particle of their energy on bringing down men's rights.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: Imagine men's right to exist without women, not just in
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: the lifetime of an individual male, but men's right to
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: exist in a community where they can reproduce indefinitely without women.
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 3: That will be the catalyst that combines men's rights and migtaw.
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 3: That will be a new horizon. It'll be men's rights
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: going their own way. It will be unstoppable if it's
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 3: allowed to happen, and so the feminists who run our
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 3: government will not allow it to happen. They will ensure
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: that it is stoppable. Pick up artists won't like it either,
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: because they'll be out of a job. Imagine a world
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 3: where men don't have to simp for women. They can
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 3: perpetuate the species by themselves. Women will have to simp
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 3: for men. They'll have to make it worth our while.
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 3: Imagine that a world where women can't just be the table,
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: there would be no Andrew te or at least our
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: schools would have to shut the fuck up about him,
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 3: and they'd have to teach girls that if they want
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 3: a place in the future of the human race, maybe
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: they should try not being complete and utch a cunts again.
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 3: I don't know if it's going to happen. As long
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 3: as we're being ruled by feminists, it's not gonna happen.
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 3: They'll do everything they can to bury it, just like
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 3: they've done everything they can to bury male contraceptives over
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: the years. But it's much like the commie's flying too
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 3: close to the sun. I don't know how insane they
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 3: can go before they get mauled by a pit bull.
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 3: I don't know if there's any limit. I don't know
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 3: what lies at the end of the rainbow. It could
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 3: be utopia, it could be a dystopia. Or maybe it's neither.
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 3: Maybe there is no end of the rainbow. I mean
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 3: there literally isn't. A rainbow is a circle, It has
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 3: no end. I would hope that the future is neither
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: utopian nor dystopian. It ought to be a series of
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 3: compromises where we do the best with what we've got.
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 3: I would like a future where men and women both
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 3: exist and they get along with each other like we
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 3: have for all of history. But something's something's got to give.
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 3: Something in the current paradigm has to get the fuck
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: out of the way, and it's got to be this
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: fucking Femi communism, Miss sandric oucophobia to give it is
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: non euphimistic name. The future will never be perfect, but
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 3: we can keep steering the car in the general direction
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: of the road as long as we can stop this
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 3: insane purple head bitch in the passenger seat from grabbing
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 3: the steering wheel and bearing us off to the left.
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: You know, boy can dream, and I will dream. And yeah,
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 3: fuck Amelia, not literally she's seventeen, but proverbially fuck her
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 3: your bunch of thirsty cents.
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you for that. Let us know what
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this one in the comments. I
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: did get a super child from Zarynx. Think he zaranks
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: he gave us five dollars and says when Project Veritas
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: was under O'Keefe's control, I think they revealed that there
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: was DSA members in government who could get addresses, hence
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell's house being visited by leftists. Yeah, I think that. Well,
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: I think that it's it's clear that they work with
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: people in government obviously, and those people are well connected.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: So yes, that's that's that's why I.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: Think the information. Yeah, but it's only legal to snoop
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: for that information under certain conditions. And if those conditions
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: are not met and they're in violation and they do
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: that a bunch of times, you know, they they still
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: can be prosecuted and penalized for that, and they still
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: can be sued for it. So I'm hoping that the
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 2: doctors get docked in that instance and it becomes public
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 2: information exactly who was doing that, because I would love
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: to see everybody that got their license run their license
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: plate run by that individual or group to to go
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: back and just class action lawsuit the ship out of them.
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you for that, ZARANX. Okay, we're going to
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: move on to the next story. So this one I
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: found thanks to James Nuzzo. James Nuzzo was a guest
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: on a fireside chat a while back. He does a
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: lot of research into un funding and things like this,
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: and women are getting another day. Guys that get another day,
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: of course, So let's take a look at it.
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: Really, how long is it going to take for him
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 2: to bitch about it?
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah? So. International Day of Women in Multilateralism The International
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: Day of Women in Multi Lateralism is observed every year
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: on January twenty fifth, which was two days ago, having
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: been established by UNESCO's General Conference through Resolution forty one
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: C fifty seven on November twenty third, twenty twenty one.
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: This day recognizes the essential contributions of women to the
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: multilateral system what is that, but particularly in advancing human rights, peace,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: sustainable development, and global governance. It highlights the historical and
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: ongoing roles of women in shaping international cooperation, while advocating
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: for greater gender equality and multilateral institutions, such as increased
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: representation in decision making positions and the integration of gender
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: transformative policies that ensure multilateralism benefits women and girls worldwide.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: The observance serves as a platform to address persistent challenges,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: including underrepresentation of women in key multilateral roles, and to
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: inspire future generations through intergenerational dialogues and focus themes. For example,
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: past editions have tackled online gender disinformation, online gendered disinformation,
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: hate speech, climate action via women in science and the
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: future of multilateralism. It complements related UN days like the
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: International Day of Women in Diplomacy that's a thing too,
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: but specifically emphasizes women's impact within broader multilateral frameworks like
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: the United Nations, UNESCO and other global bodies. Events often
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: include panels commitments to gender equality and calls for action
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: to build more inclusive international systems. And James Nuzzo shared
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: this image with us and I want to I'll make
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: my comments about this brief because I think that's a
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: real This is an important point to make. So this
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: is him saying something of the UN is considering adding
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: another day to his list of days observances for girls
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: and women. And here's like the United Nations days of
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: observance for women and men, women have thirteen different days.
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: You notice how also like the LGBTQ groups have multiple days.
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: There's like the Coming Out Day and trans Awareness Day
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: and trans Sacrifice Day, et cetera. The women get the
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: most days, obviously, but the reason for this has nothing
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: to do with honoring women. The reason for this is
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: to create a distinction between women and men, full stop.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: It's to position women as uniquely politically oppressed, uniquely in
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: need of recognition, in need of some support and advocacy,
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: even though nobody really benefits. They spend a bunch of money,
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: they have conferences, they have talks, they do like announcements,
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: they post online social media. But every little one of
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: these things nudges women more and more towards radicalizing them
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: against men, period. Like that's why it exists, and this
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 1: is why they don't give anything to men. First of all,
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: men don't want days like we're like, it doesn't do
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: anything for us. But women they seem to really eat
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: this shit up. So they do this. But they and
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: they're gonna keep doing this. So the United Nations and
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: all these like globalists or organizations, they have no interest
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: in human rights. They only exist to create a constant
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: bombardment of divisive let's say, I don't want to say rhetoric,
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 1: but like these divisive statements or divisive like proclamations that
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: exist specifically to keep women in a state of anxiety
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: about like, because if you keep hearing about you getting
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: another special day because of your unique victimhood, then it's
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: going to affect them. And it also is created or
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 1: is done specifically to further socialize like and I say socialized,
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 1: I don't mean like going out and meeting people. I
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: mean like creating a socialist way of viewing relationships by
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: pushing that on women as a group, treating them like
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: a collective all the time, treating them like a group
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: all the time. It's like reinforcing the sisterhood all the time.
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: That's why they do this stuff. So they have another day.
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: It doesn't even mean anything like when you think about it.
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: It's literally a day for women who advocate for global
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: homo gay race communism. That's what it is. That's what
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: it is. It's it's and if you do that, then
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: you're the right kind of women because those women get
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: a day. And if you're not doing that, then you
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: don't get a day. You see what I'm saying. So anyway,
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: I leave it to you guys.
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 2: It's specifically for female bureaucrats too. That's that's another thing
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: people I don't realize, like UNESCO is it stands for
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 2: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, and it makes
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 2: it sound all hoity toity official, like this is very
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: important stuff. We're working on, guys. But it is essentially
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: just an international bureaucracy to interfere with various cultures methods
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 2: of doing these things. So your local education system is
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: now going to be interfered with by this world government bureaucracy.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 2: Your scientific community is now going to be pressured to
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 2: follow the belief systems that are espoused by this world
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: government bureaucracy. And by the way, your culture is going
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: to be under pressure to change based on the belief
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: systems of this world government bureaucracy. And so this day,
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: this International Day of Women in Multilateralism, is actually just
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 2: the international day for female world government bureaucrats who put
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: pressure on various nations around the world to abandon their
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: long standing cultures to participate in like Brian said, this
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 2: gay communism, this fake gay communism, it's it's clowns. It's this.
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 2: This is an international female clown Day for bureaucrats, and
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 2: and that's all it is. And women will be all
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 2: pandered to by it, and they'll think that this is
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: something great and they're being seen and recognized and blah
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: blah blah. But in reality, it's about giving women more
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 2: control through this systemic exercise of pressure over cultures all
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 2: over the world. And it's also about money laundering. Almost
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 2: everything that you see that is for women, where you know,
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 2: you're told that women are getting the short into the
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: stick and we're going to fix that. It's it's all.
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 2: It's the bigger the organization doing it, the more money
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 2: laundering is involved. And so they get these these people
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 2: that want to make a lot of money doing absolutely nothing,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: but they want to have some political influence and they
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: want to take money from wealthy people. You know, because
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 2: they have that political influence, they can get it. So
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 2: they organize conferences and uh, board meetings and so on. Right,
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 2: they organize marches and other bullshit, and they get paid
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: big bucks to be administrators of these organizations that that
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 2: are doing this. Uh. They don't actually do anything for women.
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 2: They might change the language of some some laws or
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 2: some you know, various various policies, uh, the way that
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 2: nations describe things they are doing and so on, But
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 2: when it comes to the practical application, uh, they're not
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: benefiting women at all. But they are harming men in
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 2: a lot of ways. And uh, and they get big
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: bucks for it. And then they they turn around and
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 2: complain more we need another day. It'll become uh, some
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: some dipshit thing like International Day of Women in World Government,
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 2: multiculturalist efforts or something. They'll start having it uh longer
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 2: and longer in the in the name, and uh more
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 2: and more specificity. And you know, International Day for women
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: who cut their fingernails short, International Day for Women without freckles,
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 2: you know, International Day for women who did their hair
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 2: straight this morning. Like it'll it'll get more and more bullshitty,
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 2: and there will be more and more reasons why they
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 2: need your money to support these organizations and these international
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: days and the efforts that they're made to highlight, and
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 2: they'll have less and less reasons why you should fund them,
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 2: and they'll be more and more likely to use all.
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 2: You're a misogynist if you argue against it. It's it's
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: good that we stopped funding many of the UN organizations,
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 2: and I hope that the Trump administration continues removing funding
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 2: as best it can from the UN and everything connected
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 2: with it, because all of this is that that grade
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: of bullshit where you're being lied to first about what
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 2: the initiative is about, and also about any need for
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: the initiative also about what the initiative is supposed to
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 2: accomplish and what it actually is accomplishing, and where the
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 2: money is going. And in the meantime, you're being demonized
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 2: in the course of promoting it. We don't need to
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 2: celebrate bureaucrats. We need to give them term limits and
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 2: eventually eliminate their jobs. This is disgusting.
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. The general war cry of the political feminist is,
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 3: look what men have done to the world. Men have
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 3: been in charge for x amount of time, and look
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 3: how terrible everything is. And I'm like, compared to the wall,
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 3: you all seem to be insane that men have always
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 3: been in charge throughout all of human history. Has everything
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: got worse in the period of all of human history?
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 3: I mean, in the Stone Age, people will get eaten
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 3: by saber toothed cats and they die from a multitude
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 3: of incurable diseases. So what did men do? What they
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 3: started by killing all of the saber tooth cats. You're welcome.
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: Are you pleased about that?
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: No?
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 3: You appear to be complaining about all the various species
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 3: that men are killing so as to keep you safe. Also,
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 3: men have made leaps and bounds in curing this multitude
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 3: of wants incurable diseases. Are you grateful for any of that? No,
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: you're complaining that the world is overpopulated with humans who
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 3: are no longer dying from these diseases. Well, arguably it
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: is of the populated. But you surest not going to
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 3: fix that problem by siphoning endless hordes of people from
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: the human factories in the Third World to the First
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 3: World countries whose native populations would otherwise be in decline.
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 3: This problem has only got worse in the past century,
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 3: by the way all manner of problems have only got
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 3: worse in the past century. What happened a century ago?
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: We agreed to put women in charge in terms of
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: voting and in terms of the people they're voting for.
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 3: So if anything's got worse in the last century, you
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 3: have all your work ahead of you to convince us
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 3: that it's somehow men's fault. If we are to agree
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 3: that men have always been in charge up until the
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 3: twentieth century, and I don't agree. By the way, men
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 3: have been in charge of tribes and countries, but women
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 3: have been in charge of children, and the men and
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 3: women those children become as such, I think men and
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 3: women can go ahead and pat themselves on the back
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 3: for how much our quality of life has improved from
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 3: the Stone Age until the Modern Age. Yes, there have
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 3: been wars all the way back to ancient times, but
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: the face that launched a thousand ships was named Helen
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 3: of Troy. The thousands of people who died in that
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 3: war were all men. That doesn't appear to have changed
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 3: in the past century. When we gave women the executive
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 3: power to launch a thousand ships, Margaret Thatcher did a
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 3: bunch of times, and that's okay. Sometimes it's a reasonable
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 3: thing to do to defend your territory. Angela Merkel didn't
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 3: launch a thousand ships because she wasn't allowed to, but
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 3: she did continue the conquering of Europe under the auspices
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 3: of the EU. And now if a war sparks up
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 3: between Russia and Ukraine, we have to fund both sides
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 3: of that war, whether we like it or not. We
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 3: could argue about what might have happened if Hillary Clinton
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 3: or Kamala ARUs were ever in charge of the United States,
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: and I guess that leaves us speculating what exactly was
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 3: so crap about the world before women were in charge,
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 3: And how the fuck has the world got got in
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: any way better since they were put at least partially
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 3: in charge. Technology has sure as fuck got better, but
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: that's not thanks to women. Women don't invent shit when
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 3: it comes to technology. They don't invent shit when it
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 3: when it comes to anything. All we can do is
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: give them political power. What exactly has improved politically since
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 3: we did that? As far as I can tell, national
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 3: and international politics have been the things that have only
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 3: got worse and worse in the century since since women
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 3: were given political power. We're living in all wells nightmare.
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 3: Aren't we all well predicted it in nineteen forty eight
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 3: because it was already happening, And now it's happening par excellence.
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 3: The world is being disarmed and infantilized and terrannized and
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 3: arrested for saying hearty words. Please explain to me how
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 3: the fuck that has an improvement. I'll wait. I will
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 3: continue to wait. Please someone else talk.
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: Okay, Yes, while we're waiting, we're gonna move on to
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: the next story. Let's see if we can get through
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: this and not have and have a decent sized sausage.
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: So let us know what you guys think about this.
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: One in the comments all you know, really good points
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 1: all around. Yes, the un needs to go. We need
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 1: to legally and financially and administratively crush them, so like
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: peacefully but absolutely. And I think that a lot of
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 1: people waking up to that. You know, what we used
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: to say, what people used to think of as a
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: general good is we're realizing it's just not all right.
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: So next story, I don't well, I'll use this as
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: the image, but it's not quite right. So I just
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: thought this really interesting. Again, this is sort of like
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 1: another one of these things, is like the endpoint of
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: female liberation is almost like the endpoint of the liberation
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: of gender itself in a way. I mean not for
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 1: men that, let's get that straight, but in general. So like,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: all right, you might have heard of this movie called
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: The Matrix, And in The Matrix it was directed by
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: two brothers who are at the time brothers, and after
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: that they suddenly transitioned. I mean, like it was kind
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: of inexplicable, but they both did at the same time,
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: and just a strange thing, but it's true. So Lily Wachowski,
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: formerly known as Andy Wachowski and one half of the
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 1: former Wachowski brothers, the same ones who brought us the
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: Good the Good Matrix movie, The Good One, the first
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: one is set to produce a reimagining of The Stepford Wives.
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: So if you guys don't know, The Stepford Wives was
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: a kind of dystopian science fiction movie that came out
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: in the I think there was the sixties and or
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: the seventies, and it was basically supposed to portray like
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 1: housewives that are you know, good to their children, love
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: their husbands and serve them and all that as basically
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: like artificial human beings that were robots that were programmed
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: to serve men. And it was a feminist kind of anthem, right,
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: and the film.
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, in fact it was. It was made to portray
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 2: husbands as abusive enough to have their wives essentially killed
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 2: and replaced by robots, yes, or androids, yes.
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: And the the thing is too about this movie, Stepford Wives.
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: It was not successful in the theaters. It did not
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: make money. It flopped because feminism at the time was
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: still really unpopular, even with women. But it became like
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 1: a let's say, like a mental virus that sort of
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: stuck around and so like the the concept of the
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: Stepford Wife, even in a movie that really didn't people
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: didn't really watch it, did not it was not very
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 1: well received. But everyone knows what a Stepford Wife is.
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 1: It's basically like what they would call today a pickmy
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: or a handmaiden of the patriarchy or something like that. Right,
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 1: So the Stepford Wives themselves were essentially, like I said,
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: these androids that were institute women, and it was a
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: feminist movie intentionally, and uh, the they're gonna remake it,
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: but they're doing it with a twist. This solo project
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: is called Dolls, and it will feature a cast, director,
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: and producer that are all transgender. Wachowski states that he's
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 1: so proud to be part of this beautiful, weird, striking debut.
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: There is no release yet for this stunning, embrave film,
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: but he I think it's really interesting that they're doing
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 1: a remake of Stepford Wives with trans women, Like are
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: all trans cast I mean so, so it's just it's
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: just weird because it's like, is this is the end?
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: The end state of women's liberation? Like it's it's and
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: the thing is, too, how are feminists going to feel
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 1: about this? Like, I think they're gonna be very upset
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 1: because the Stepford Wives was their movie, even though no
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: one watched it, and they made a remake of it too,
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: which I don't think anyone watched. Although again, the sentiment
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: behind it, the message is actually everywhere, and it's it's
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: more impactful than the film itself. It's in the consciousness,
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: it's in the zeitgeist, right, And so that you have
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: this person who I would assume is probably a feminist.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna put it out there. I'm guessing the Wachowski's
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 1: they're they're both trans and all that that they're that
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: they're feminists, and yet they're going to co opt this
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: movie and make it about trans women, trans everything. Actually,
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: like everyone in it's going to be trans apparently, So,
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 1: uh it should be interesting. It's a short film, probably
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: because they couldn't find that many qualified transactors, and uh yeah,
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: this is like this is sort of what I would
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: have ended on. I just think it's interesting as a
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: you know, commentary on where the culture is going. But anyway,
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: there is some other things we could get into. Mike Jay,
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: who did the write up for this, he kept it
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: really short, but he did mention that we could talk
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 1: about some more stuff relating to how did the Wachowskis.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: How is it that they both transitioned after the Matrix?
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: And it's interesting because there is an interesting story behind it,
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 1: which they admitted to, or at least one of them,
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 1: Andy or Lily Wachowski. But we can talk about that
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 1: in the Patron Show. So I don't know if you
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: guys want to give your thoughts on this. I think
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: it's hilarious.
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 3: There you go, it might be a pretty good movie. Yeah, whatever,
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 3: You could do what you like with your own movie,
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 3: at least in theory. I mean, it would be nice
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 3: if anyone could cast and stuff their entire movie with
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 3: straight white males in the event that they happened to
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 3: be the most qualified candidates. John Carpenters, the thing was
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 3: an entirely male cast, and it was great. I'm struggling
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 3: to think of any movie that's entirely female cust that
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 3: a lot of entirely females soft. I'm sure they're out
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 3: there somewhere, but whatever they are, they obviously didn't get
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 3: very far. And to be fair, this doesn't count either.
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 3: It looks like the closest you can get to an
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 3: all female production team is to pretend that all the
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 3: men are women. I'm sure there are some ftms in
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 3: there somewhere, but at the end of the day, ftms
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 3: are just women, so they suck at their jobs too long.
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 3: But like I said, fine, whatever, it's your movie. If
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 3: you want to restrict the talent pool to less than
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 3: one percent of the population, bully for you. Fill your boots, mate.
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 3: We'll see what happens. We'll see if you come up
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: with a banger, or we'll see if everyone gets hormonal
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 3: and emotional and catty and they all end up tearing
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 3: each other's eyes out. I hope you film that. By
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 3: the way, even if the movie doesn't get made in
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 3: the end, the behind the scenes footage. Yeah, even if
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 3: the movie doesn't get made in the end, the behind
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 3: the scenes footage will be gold from start to finish.
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 3: Maybe someone will make a movie about how hilariously terrible
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 3: y'all are at making movies, like Edwood or The Disaster Artist.
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 3: I have high hopes, and I have popcorn.
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: Get the guys that did spinal Tap to do it.
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: That's not gonna happen too soon.
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 2: Okay, you could make You could get the makers of
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 2: the two thousand and four remake, directed by Frank oz
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: that was sort of like almost a parody of the original.
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 2: See that's the thing. The original was and stupid to
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: a degree that while it was not a popular theater movie,
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: there's a there's a degree to which it became useful
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: as a pseudo cult classic, not because anything and it
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 2: was really believable, but because it It's said a lot
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: about the writer who wrote it. The movie itself, the
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: original Stepford Wives movie. The plotline of that movie was
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 2: that there was a community where all of the husbands
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 2: had this conspiracy to make their lives easier by replacing
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 2: their wives with exact replica robots that sort of had
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 2: the wife's original personality except if she was on a
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 2: behavioral leash that you know, she couldn't argue back against him.
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: She would be the perfect wife and mother, She would
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 2: support the advancement of his career and so on, like
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 2: all the things that feminists hate when women do it
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 2: in real life. And and of course, you know, the
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 2: idea was that you couldn't find a female partner that
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 2: would be on the same page as you are, that
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 2: you would be happy with, that you wouldn't want to
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: kill and replace with a bot. So feminists essentially communicated
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 2: that women are so bad at marriage that their husband's
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: only solution was to kill them and make bots out
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: of out of the parts of them that they liked,
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 2: you know, essentially, and and discard the parts they don't like.
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 2: And it I think people laughed at it from the beginning.
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 2: It was an unintentional self parody, as Murder of Crows
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 2: had pointed out, but it did take itself seriously, and
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: the people involved took it seriously. Feminists took it seriously,
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 2: and it was supposed to be a terrifying horror film
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 2: and not a comedy originally, and then they followed it up.
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: That was. It came out in like seventy five, and
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 2: I remember seeing it when I was homesick from school
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: sometime in junior high, which is like ten years later.
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 2: And then a couple of years after that, there was
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: another movie that came out, The Stepford Children, where the
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 2: same men's association from the Stepford Stepford wives, and it
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 2: is an association they like are all in business together
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 2: and everything, and if you want to be part of this,
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 2: you have to do that to your wife. They do
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 2: the same thing to their children. And so it's the
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 2: teens go from being normal teens that push back now
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 2: and then and have their own interests and so on,
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: to these you know, robot kids. And the guy that
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 2: brings his kids back in that one doesn't do it
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 2: right away, and his kids show up at the problem
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 2: with like a boom box playing rock and roll and stuff,
• 1:36:26
  Speaker 2: and the rest of them were all doing ballroom dancing.
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 2: And as soon as they the non changed kids walk in,
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 2: the other kids all literally start short circuiting they they are.
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 2: They start not knowing how to dance, and they start
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 2: You could almost see sparks coming out of them. I
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 2: can't remember there were actual sparks, are not, But in
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 2: both of those two like bits of continuity. In in
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 2: the various Stepford Wives movies, there was a common link,
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 2: and that was there was a villain, there was a
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 2: bad guy, and a bad guy was the husbands. So
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 2: men were the bad guys in those movies. Biological men
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: were the bad guys in those movies, and in the
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: other movies that had been made Revenge of the Stepford
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 2: Wives and the two thousand and four version that that
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 2: retained that continuity, it still was women against men. Men
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 2: were the bad guys and the female reporter in the
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: nineteen eighty Revenge of the Stepford Wives, and you know
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 2: the women in the two thousand and four Stepford Wives movies,
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 2: they were either victims or heroines depending on how they
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 2: came out of it. And then there was a gender
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 2: reverse to see if it made a point to men.
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 2: In nineteen ninety six that also came out and it
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: was also shit. Like every single one of these movies
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 2: has been ship right, They've been campy, be quality, the
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 2: kind of movies like I watched that kind of movie,
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: but usually I like that kind of movie, and these
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: are not. These are good meme worthy movies, but not
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 2: movies that you would like because the story sucks and
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 2: the characters aren't believable and so on. Right, who are
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 2: they going to make the villains in this movie? If
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 2: this isn't all trans cast, who's going to be the
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 2: bad guy? Who's going to be the one bringing them
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: back to a community to uh turn them into bots.
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 1: That behave the white ones.
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 2: Or appropriately like that. It's a really serious question because
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: if they're all trans you know, who's who's gonna be
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 2: the villain in the movie. I'm not quite sure that.
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 1: That's that's a good question. I think I think that
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 1: they might. They might do progressive stack stuff.
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: Kind of a weird thing, or they might not do
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 2: the villain aspect.
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: They might, Yeah, it might, it might. There might not
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: be a villain aspect, but that's uh, yeah, it's a
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: good question. How are you going to send your message
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: if everybody is on the oppressor in the Impression Olympics
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: and they're all in the same.
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 2: Position position it it'd be like if they said we're
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: going to do a movie about the Indianapolis five hundred,
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 2: but actually they just played some footage of traffic on
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 2: Interstate seventy five going between you know, Canada and Florida,
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: and it was like, yeah, you know, sometimes these people
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 2: past each other and sometimes people drive way above the
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 2: speed limit. It's not the same story, and I have
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 2: a feeling that's going to be what happens here. They're
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 2: not going to be they're not going to be portraying
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 2: partners as villains. They're not going to be portraying family
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 2: members as villains. They're going to be portraying society or
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: social norms or people who are not trans you know, anybody.
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 2: But the way that the original story portrayed things and
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 2: they could have just without mentioning the Stepford Wives at all.
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 2: They could have just explored the themes that they've talked
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 2: about exploring with this movie, which you know, obviously have
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 2: to do with gender norms and being dealing with dysphoria
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 2: and meeting people's expectations and how society has responded. They
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 2: could have made a movie exploring that without ever mentioning
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 2: the Stepford Wives. But if they mentioned the Stepford Wives,
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 2: they might piss off the turfs. And if they piss
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 2: off the turfs, they'll get a lot of press, And
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 2: if they get a lot of press, more people might
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 2: watch the film to find out what the big deal is.
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 2: And I think that's the real reason why they mentioned
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 2: Stepford Wives here. I don't think it has anything to
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 2: do with the original movie. I think this was kind
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 2: of their way of turning coverage of their movie into an.
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 1: Ad, trying to create buzz and response.
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 2: To their movie into an ad trying to create us exactly.
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's fair, all right. I got a super chat
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: from Zarynx, who gives us I think it's five. I
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: don't know why it's not showing up on here. Let
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: me see, Oh, it's a membership. That's why, and he says,
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: I'm imagining the Wachowski's taking over the Stepford Wives, like
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: Loki's reaction to Whole Thumping thor in Thor Ragnarok. Yes,
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: that's how it feels. I remember when those movies were Okay, okay.
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna go now into the Patron show and
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: talk about looksmaxing with Dave Shilling here. And if you
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that, you have to
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: become a Badger yourself by going to feed the Badger
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: dot com Ford slash subscribe to join us five bucks
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: a month. We'll get you into discord where you'll be
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: able to watch all the additional content that we have,
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: particularly all of our Patron shows, and if you give
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: a higher levels, you can even be a part of
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 1: the discussions. There's also a really great community there. Alison
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: currently has a podcast that she does. She talks about
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: movies and books and stuff, and all the people that
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 1: are in there are patrons, so you know, maybe you
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 1: can even like just hang out with Alison and talk
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: about nerdy shit. That's something that you can do. We
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 1: also have game nights and such as well, so please
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: consider joining us at feed the Badger dot com, forward
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 1: slash subscribe. All right, So with all that said, thank
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 1: you Mike and Hannah for your input always lovely, and
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: thank you guys most of all for watching. If you
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 1: guys like this video, please hit like, subscribe if you're
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 1: not already subscribe, hit the BELF notifications, leave us a
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 1: let us know you guys think about what we discussed
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: on the show today, and please please please share this
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 1: video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 1: for coming on today's episode of HBr News and we
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: will talk to you guys in the next one. See
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 1: you next Tuesday. Machininges