Latest / Stuff You Should Know / 10 Scientists Who Were Their Own Guinea Pigs

Transcript

10 Scientists Who Were Their Own Guinea Pigs · Stuff You Should Know

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: It's ready. Are you welcome to stuff you should know
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: from House toff works dot com. Sometimes science goes too
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: far dog matters twisted but true. Wednesday's attend on Science. Hey,
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark with me
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: at long last is Charles W. Chuck Bryant. And this
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: is special like eight ways from Sunday? This episode is,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: isn't it. I've changed my name over the weekend. Yeah,
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: I've changed the jan Michael Vincent finally. All right, you've
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: been talking about that forever, Chuck. I'm glad you finally
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: did it. And you showed me your driver's license and
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: it's official. Pretty neat. And what's cool is, um you
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: did your hair for the photo. It looks kind of
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: like the air Wolf Airwolf era, Jane Michael Vincent. Is
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: there any other era the Mechanic? That's true? That those
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: are his two eras Hooper. Was he in that? Yeah?
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: He was the young buck stuntman to Burt Reynolds's aged veteran.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: Really he played that role a couple of times. Then
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: I guess, huh, okay, Well, that's enough for the Jim
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: Michael Vincent shout outs. Is he around still? Uh? I
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: mean I haven't seen him in a decade and he
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: was in pretty bad shape a decade ago. Was he
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: really Yeah? From the from what I think drugs, I
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: might be wrong though, or maybe he was not. He
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: was injured or something. Do you just told everybody Jim
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Michael Vincent likes drugs. He's self experimented. Great one, Thank
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: you very much for that. Um. This is a special
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: episode because we are good good friends of the Science
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: Channel and they have a very very cool show that
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: an ad played for at the beginning of this episode,
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: Dark Matters. It comes on. It premiered last Wednesday. It
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: comes on tomorrow Wednesdays at ten pm. Have you have
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: you looked at the episodes? Have you seen any of
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: the video? It's pretty awesome. It is UM and I
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: was going through the episode guide of the stuff they
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: have coming up. It's like, um, really like a dark
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: version of Unsolved Mysteries? Remember that? Yeah? Yeah? So UM.
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: The A couple of the episodes have stuff that we've covered,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: like Einstein's brain, c I A lsd UM, and then
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: they have a bunch of stuff we have. I didn't
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: get that impression, but it's it's possible. They can do
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: anything they want. But imitation is the greatest form of flighters, right,
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: And that's actually we get asked to do stuff sometimes
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: and you'll know if we really want to do it
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: because we do it. And we did this one. Like
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: this is literally being recorded today. Yeah, Like that's crazy.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: That is definitely different. Yeah, Jerry's turning this one around
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: like hours later. Yeah, or earlier. We recorded this. It
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: is as fresh as it gets. It still has the
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: peach fuzz on it. Depeche Mode. By the way, de
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: pech Mode is in no way related to a rare
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: the founding He was a founding member of the h
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: Mode and later went on to Founderation. Really Vincent Clark really, yes, wow,
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: I knew there was some tie. I had no idea
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: we're talking about this because we were having rarely do
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: we let you in on our pre record conversation. But
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Josh went saw Ratio this weekend and I knew it
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: was awesome and it was great, and there was some
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: tie to another band. I couldn't remember it, and it
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: was depeche Mode. Well, it was either depeche Mode or
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: the pet Boys, probably, but I had cheez Did I
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: just say that that? He said the pet Boys, which
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: is an auto part score. They're really good on the
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: keyboards and they had these gigant or heads and bodies.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: All right, So Chuck, you're ready ready. We're talking about
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: scientists who self experiment and we've talked about UM crazy
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: experiments before. So this UM episode actually forms a trifecta
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: with two other previously released episodes that if you haven't heard,
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: you should go listen to. What's the third UM? There
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: is the human Experimentation sure episode, and then five Crazy
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: Government exp Oh yeah, all those are pretty pretty well
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: mixed together. So if you listen to that the if
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: you listen to those two and self Experimentation, you're gonna
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: have a very robust understanding of just how nuts some
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: scientists are. You know what they call that around here?
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: What a bucket? Yeah, they do a bucket of content. Heck,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: that's almost channel. That's right. Ah, this is good man.
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: You threw this together like lickety split last week and
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: found some really cool things. I think. Yeah, there's there's
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: UM you could do way more than ten Yeah, sure, UM,
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: like the guy who cracked his own knuckles for thirty years,
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: just in his left hand. I believe he found nothing right.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: It does not cause arthritis. Um. We've talked before about
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Albert Hoffman, the Swiss chemist who um took the world's
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: first acid trip that's on purpose, Um, on a bike.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: But can you imagine like never having known anything about it,
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: Like I think generally when people do that kind of
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: thing these days, you've heard of it and you know
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: what's coming. But for it to be this brand new thing,
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: he was probably like I bet there was along bike crack. Yeah,
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: like kids, kids grew up on the Great Space Coaster,
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: so they know it's coming, you know. Um, But yeah
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: he said that. Um. He he laid down at home
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: and UM, these these bizarre but not altogether unpleasant visions
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: started coming to him and yeah, he was whacked out
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: for many hours. Um. But we've talked about him before. UM.
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: A guy who we haven't talked about who I find
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: just fascinating. His name Santorio Santorio. It's the the researchers
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: so nice. They named him twice, Sordio Sthordio. Yes, yes,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: take a check. Well, he was a self experimenter and
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: one of the earlier self experimenters. Um, we're talking sixteenth
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: century style. And uh, what he did is he wanted
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: to find out about and I guess they didn't call
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: it metabolism at the time, did they, No, he he
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: later ending the study. Okay, yeah, back then they had
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: no I But basically that's what he was doing, was
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: kind of learning about the human metabolism. And he did
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: so by h being very meticulous about recording what he
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: eat eated, what he ate and what he drank, and uh,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: weighing his stools and his urine. And I guess he
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: formed some equation what comes in what goes out? Well,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: he found that it doesn't equal. And you you can't
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: take into account the weight you put on. There's still
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: some um difference. And he wanted to figure out where
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: that went. And he came up with the idea of
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: insensible perspiration, which I thought was going to be all
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: about sweat. So I was a little disappointed. Well it is, yeah,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: but really, I mean it's just like constant, little sweat
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: weight like that. But the cool thing about Santorio Squared
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: is that, um, he lived for thirty years chuck essentially
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: every every day, every every single day for thirty years,
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: and he basically lived on this machine. It was like
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: a huge beam scae and he constructed like a little
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: chair and like a work table and all that. And
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: he weighed all the food and drink that came on,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: and he weighed all the poop and urine that went off.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: But he lived on this thing. Well. And what's sad
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: is that he did all this and it really wasn't
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: super useful, no, but it opened the doors though for
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: things like that. It definitely did. And um, one of
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: one of the other things that did was, um, he
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: had the idea of insensible perspiration before he did this,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: so he was one of the first people to say,
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: you know what, I'm not just gonna say something. I'm
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: gonna subject this to scientific rigor. I'm gonna put my
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: money where my mouth is. I'm gonna scale and weigh
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: my pooop. Yeah, he's like a stockbroker in the eighties
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: looking for brand, you know. So that's number one. Uh,
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: number two, we come to eighteen o three is a
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: little bit of a jump there to Frederick Wilhelm Adam
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: Certnir and Um, what he ended up doing was actually
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: pretty useful for everyone even today, because he did he
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: discover morphine he isolated did it isolated it from opium? Yeah,
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: and through two steps got a few friends together. Well,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: at first he tested it on animals until they started dying,
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: sleeping and dying, right, and then he was like, well,
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: maybe I should try to some people and see what happened.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: Because he said, um that animals do not give exact results.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: I guess that's true, right, So he and his seventeen
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: year old friends give exact results. Also, dying is a
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: pretty exact result. Yeah, So he ouedied a bunch of
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: animals and he got three uh you pointed out seventeen
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: year olds plus himself, and I think he was like
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: twenty at the time he was, so that's like right
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: in the wheelhouse. Still today, I think he's a middle
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: age back then though, yeah. Uh. And so he dosed
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: himself and his friends on a low dose at first,
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: about a half a grain of morphine, which is thirty mgs.
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: It's a comparatively low dose to what he took, right,
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: and that produced a little flushing. He was like, hey,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: this is kind of neat, but I'm I'm looking for
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: more than flushing, so let me take a little more more.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: After about fifteen minutes, took a similar dose, started feeling
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: a little queasy and faint and sleepy, of course, and
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: to the point where I guess he thought it might
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: be getting a little dangerous, so he threw up, made
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: all his friends throw up to get it out of
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: their system. Well, yeah, he started to get a little
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: worried that they were all gonna die because they've taken
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: ninety milligrams of morphine in less than an hour, which
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: today we realized is ten times recommended us. So yeah,
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: he he um, he gave everybody like eight ounces of
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: vinegar to drink and made him throw up and save
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: their lives. Yeah, imagine they probably huh. Yeah. And then
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: he did another experiment later because he had a toothache,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: and he found that if he just took opium for it,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: the toothache wasn't cured, but if he took some morphine
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: it was cured. Oh, I thought he discovered that by accident,
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: Like he was like, wait a minute, my toothache. You know,
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: he kept going, this is the only experiment, Like he
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: had like many many brushes with death. As far as
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: self experiment any scientists go, he was probably one of them,
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: one of the toughest ones, or at least or the
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: most as the one most addicted to morphine. That's right, Yeah,
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: but that was a pretty big contribution to humanity. I mean,
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: that's still like the go to um pain killer today,
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: I imagine or not imagine, I know this to be true.
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: Uh up next, Josh, we have Henry Head, Sir Henry Head,
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: and he got together with his buddy w HR Rivers
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: and um they this one's a little crazy to meet.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: They knew at the time that nerve damage can repair itself,
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: but what they didn't have was uh documentation, right, because
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: people couldn't describe it. Good night. They'd be like yeah,
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: I guess that kind of hurts, yeah, and like yeah,
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: so what they needed at the time there was no documentation.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: So they were like, well, let me cut out a
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: sliver of my nerve on my arm and sew it
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: back together. Unless since I can talk about this stuff intelligently,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: just I'll do it myself and not just any nerve.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: This is a radial that his the radial nerve in
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: his left arm. Right, he was right handed, which is
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: why he did this to his left arm because he's no,
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: he's no dumb right, Um and he had it surgically
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: removed and the radial nerve, dude goes to the spinal
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: calm and then all the way down branches all the
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: way down to the hand, so it's like a major nerve.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: And he had a section cut out and then tied
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: back together with silk and then said, Okay, I'm just
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: gonna spend the next five years paying attention to how
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: the um sensation uh semantaception comes back. That's right, and
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: not only that, chuck. So, dude, I got a root
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: canal the other day, as you know, he said, it
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: wasn't too bad. Huh, No, it wasn't. But I was
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: thinking about Henry Head because while it was going on,
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: I kind of went off to my happy place. I
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: just like left my body as much as possible in
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: case any pain did come along, it would be kind
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: of muted. What Henry Head did that work? Was it did? Yeah?
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: You know, like you're not looking for the pain, You're
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: trying to avoid it mentally. Yeah, and it definitely makes
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: it worse if you're attention, yes, he But what Henry
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: Head did was create this kind of trance like state
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: called negative attitude of attention, where he focused his attention
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: inward on pain, looking for it, so he could, you know,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: I guess, experience it more fully and pay attention to
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: the type of pain it was. This guy went on
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: this journey of pain, excruciating pain at times. Yeah. What
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: was his quote to his wife? He said, I shall
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: know a great deal about pain by the time this
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: experiment is over. And he was right, yeah, whatever, But
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: he was a bad dude. She's like, what's this bringing
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: in this eternal pain? But he, uh, you know that
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: documentation was important because they've never been able to describe
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: for they probably didn't follow patients up like they do now,
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: you know, like five years later, right, Well, and this
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: was over the course of five years, so like they
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: they basically documented how sensation returns after a major nerve damage.
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: And he also contributed a lot to experimental psychology with
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: the negative attitude of attention. UM. Basically, there's this whole
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: thing of reverie where you're just basically zoned out, like
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: Ralphie in um a Christmas story like that that was
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: never documented before. And basically what Henry Head did was say, oh,
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: here's a way to explore that. I don't get the Ralphie.
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: Remember where they're like Ralphie and he like comes to
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: remember his his little daydream about getting the A plus
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: plus plus plus plus. That's Reverie. Yeah, that's good. Family
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: comedy is number four in our list. Josh, I could
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: like to call the dude who loved drugs Alexandra Shulgin.
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: We talked about him before, and he was a chemist
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: for doll in the sixties. We talked about in the
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: can Psychedelics treatmental Illness, that's the one he showed up in. Right.
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: He was basically um toying with with mescaline and and
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: compounds that later became ecstasy M D M A M
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: D M A. I have a hard time saying that.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: And he and his wife took a lot of these
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: psychoactive drugs, had parties and the Martini as the usual
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: method of the sixties, put a little drugs in there,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: and uh, you know, that's basically his story. He he
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: liked the drugs, and I guess he documented all this stuff, right, Yeah,
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: he went just partying, was he? I don't know if
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: partying is the right word, But I don't know that
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: he was always documenting. I don't know if it was
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: always scientifically rigorous how many did he take here? So
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: there's like an estimated three hundred psychoactive compounds in the world,
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: and he estimated that he sampled between two hundred and
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: two and fifty of them. So he liked the psychedelics
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: a lot. He put into the dead Simothy Learry to shame,
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: didn't he They were probably buddies? Was he American? Yeah? Okay,
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: So let's go back a little bit from the drug
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: adult sixties to nineteenth century. Yeah, eighteen nineteen, Right, there's
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: a Czechoslovakian monk who um at age thirty two, became
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: a doctor because, um, he didn't think that the whole
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: recommended dosage thing that was being doled out at the
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: time was he called it nothing but mysticism. He thought
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: it was way too low and basically, um was homeopathy.
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: I think he had a problem with homeopathy. His name
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: is yam Per Kenny, and he uh, he basically said, Okay,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna become a doctor so I can learn more
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: about this, and then I'm gonna take as many drugs
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: as I can get my hands on, and um overdose
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: and then pay attention to what happens to me, because
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: I want to figure out what the recommended dosage should be. Yeah.
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: The coolest part about this guy's story, I think is
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: that after he started doing this, like taking things like
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: fox glove to blur his vision and then writing about
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: that night shade Ah, the word got out and people.
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: I got the sense that other doctors were like, Hey,
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: there's this dude that you'll let you do anything. Do
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: it right, He'll take anything, So they started doing that. Yeah.
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: One of his teachers, UM at med school, said Hey,
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: I've got these three different extracts of epocac, and I
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: need to find out which one's best. So what do
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: you think which one? Is there anything that that does
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: besides make you vomit? Nope, Okay, that's it's sole purpose
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: as far as I know, that's it. Have you ever
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: ever heard of it used for anything else? No? I
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: haven't either. No, I don't ever want to have it,
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: but um, I want to try it this, so yeah,
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: PERKINI UM conducted a three week trial of these three
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: extracts of ipecac, and by the end of the trial,
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: he'd conditioned like a vomiting response whenever he saw like
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: a brown powder that looked like iocac. Again, this life's
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: like you want some cinnamon TOAs well. You know, it's
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: interest seeing his wife died and he became um in
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: charge of raising his three boys, and he said, okay,
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: I'm not a self experimenting anymore. I gotta I have
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: to stick around and take care of these these jokers. Yeah,
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: it was pretty cool. He said he was leaving it
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: to the younger generation. But he's been doing it for
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: twenty years already. And um, not just ipecac and uh
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: fox glove, but also um nightshade. We now use atropine,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: which is the active ingredient night shade to dilate pupils
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: thanks to him, because he overdosed on night shade to
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: find out what would happen. And he would also make
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: himself very dizzy to study vertigo on carousels. Yeah, there's
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: the type of vertigo named after him. Yeah, because he
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: he studied it and figured it out. So he would
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: just like get on the carousel until it and then
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: stand up and yeah. But rather than this is a
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: common thread in in self experimentation, like with my root
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: canal or if you're dizzy on a carouself, you go inward.
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: You you you shy away from it. You don't want
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: to pay attention to any details. You just want everything
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: to end right with self experimenting researchers do is throw
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: themselves into the experience and pay attention and gain all
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: that knowledge from it that you know, any one of
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: us could do if if we were good at describing
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: things scientifically, but we don't because we want to avoid
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: pain and discomfort. Guys did it for us, they did, thankfully. Yeah,
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: well that's why we're doing this one too. It's like,
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: hats off to him. If you haven't gotten that impression yet,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: thank you, hats off. What if I just did that
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: and I had like a reversal and I like, you
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: couldn't say anything about it, all right? George Stratton is next,
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: and he uh did something a little crazy. You know.
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: He wore reversing lenses in the nineties. So he learned
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: that our visual information comes in in an inverted manner.
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: We all know this, right, well, he knew that, but
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: there were theories that said this, that's how it has
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: to be, and he wanted to find out if that
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: was true, Like, does visual information have to be inverted
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: for us to see upright? Because you know that it
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: flips over in the brain exactly right. So can you
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: imagine what he did to his brain by doing this? Yeah,
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: it's pretty crazy. He wore these reversing lenses, which basically
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: presented the visual information right side up, um, and were
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: them for eight days straight. So it provided it right
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: side up to the brain. But if we wore that,
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: everything would look upside down. And he did. He like
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: you said, eight days straight, unbelievable. He said. The thing
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: that got him the most was like he would put
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: his hand out moving right. Well, he had to just
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: sit there for like the first four days. He couldn't
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: move at all. Yeah, but um, he would put his
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: he would stretch his hand out and it would come
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: in from the top rather than the bottom. He said,
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: everything was just like a dream. Um, I'd like to
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: try that out for like a second, you know, I'd
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: just like to put some on and be like, oh right,
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: that's weird. Let me take them right back off exact,
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: not leave them on for eight days. Apparently, by the
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: fifth day, everything started to um show up as upright again. Yeah,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: and then if you really concentrated on it, it would
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: go back to being upside down. But so did he
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: rewire his brain? Yeah, he proved that the visual information
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: doesn't have to be inverted to be seen upright, um,
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: and that the brain is really capable of adapting in
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: a fairly short time to basically the most radical changes
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: in in the stations it is presented. So I guess
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: that's sort of helped. I mean, it's not like that
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: led to any huge breakthrough that I think it probably gave. Yeah,
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: I would think that it probably formed the basis of
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: like neural plasticity surely, all right. Yeah. Plus also, I mean,
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: anybody who does that, that's mind bending. You know, he
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: gets a he gets a pat on the back for that,
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: no matter what. Well. And he also found too that
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: after taking them off that it took a little while
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: to get back to normal, which the process something too
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: about your brain unlearned and his brain was. Yeah. He
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: said that he had like glasses at first, and he
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: said it was just too much. He couldn't do it.
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: So he blindfold of one eye for eight days and
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: had like basically a monocle like a little yeah, just
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: single lens and that's the one he wore for eight days.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: He said it was just too much to have two lenses.
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: So you want to do Carl lon Steiner. Uh yeah,
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: he he actually did do a lot of good work.
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: He was Viennese and he was a physician, and he
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: basically came up with the blood typing system, the A
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: B O blood typing system, because he noticed that red
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: blood cells and some people clump in the presence of
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: the fluid component, which is serum, but not everybody. So
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: we thought it's almost as if their blood is a
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: different type from one another. Well, at the time, like
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: they knew that that would happen because you give people
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: blood transfusions and then they die and um they because
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: BO was clumped. Yeah, but at the time everybody thought
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: it was because those people had some unknown disease. And
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: lon Steiner was like, I think that people just have
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: different types of blood. So he used his own blood
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: in some of his colleagues, we should do one on
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: blood type. I think we should. Is that true? Like
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: your body cannot literally cannot accept another blood type. It
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: depends I think, oh is the universal type, so you
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: can um except but if you have like A can
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: you can't have B at all because the red blood
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: cells clump and your blood doesn't flow and you die.
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: So it's like putting diesel in a very much in
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: a regular very much. So yeah, um so what like
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: you said, what Lon Steiner did was a huge contribution
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: because he showed, you know, there's different anigens in different
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: types of blood, and that creates this different blood type
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: a bo or a b um. And when you when
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: you if you tell if you test people first and
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: say oh, they're a type and we've got some a
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: type blood over here, a blood transfusion will work, and
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: so will oregan donation and all the other huge. Yeah,
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: it was enormous. I bet doctors were like, oh, well
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: that's good to know in these people. Um. So yeah
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: he won the Nobel Prize in ninety that rightly, so yeah,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: he should win it every year. But what's crazy is
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: you know he he just he experimented on himself. It's
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: kind of cool. Um. But what's nuts is that he
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: also uses colleagues blood. And it just so happened that
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: out of like five people, they all had different blood types,
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: like types were present. It could have gone the exact
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: opposite way and just everybody had a type and then
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: he said no, they're the same, yeah exactly. So I
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: thought that was pretty cool and it was almost providence
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: well and he he led that led to Dr Jack
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: Goldstein UM in the nineteen eighties to do He was
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: a biochemist that did more experimenting and this one confused
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: not confused me. But he found out that an enzyme
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: and coffee, when injected into BE blood removes anigin and
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: basically makes it the universal blood type. How did he
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: figure that out? I don't know. The coffee, I don't know,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: but he figured it out. But I just injected coffee
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: one day to see what that would do and in
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: my blood. Right, So he he had O type blood,
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: so that that this enzyme changes B type blood O
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: type blood. UM, and he had O type blood. So
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: to prove that this worked, he got a blood transfusion
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: of this treated B blood that was ostensibly now OH blood.
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: So he got a blood transfusion, a small one, but
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: he did it himself, UM to see if you know,
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: his arm would fall off or something like that, or
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: if his blood would clump. And it worked. And it's
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: still being worked out. But apparently, UM, you know that
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: opens up like the donation pool. If you can just
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: take all this B type blood and you need OH,
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: which is the universal type. Just injected with this enzyme,
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: and I wonder how much blood you have to have
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: transfused before it, Like how much diesel can you put
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: in there? I don't know, Like if you if they
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: just did like a vial with that, like what would
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: that do to your body? I don't know, because Goldstein
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: did like eleven billion, eleven and a half billion red
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: blood cells, and I don't know if that's just a
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: few drops or if that's like half a pine or
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: a pine or what. Yeah, well we'll have to find
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: that out in the blood typing episode. Okay, well I
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: have I've been wanting to do the blood one for
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: a while, but it's just like, let's do it right now.
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: It's tough. I'm gonna need a little while on that one. Okay, Okay,
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: do we have a blood typing article? Well, we have
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: an article on blood that's like really dense. Oh yes,
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: we started to do that when we're like, yeah, we're
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: not doing this right now. It was I thought I
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: think it was written by an M. D. Wasn't it.
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: It read like it. Yeah, So look for the revised
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: version coming in the future. All right. I like number
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: nine Erman is it Herman or Erman Ebbing? House. I
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: don't think he's Portuguese. He was a German. Would Airman Portuguese? Yeah, Erman,
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: I don't know he's Herman. Then let's just call him Herman.
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: He was German. And uh he was the first guy
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: to really study memory and a really maybe at all,
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: but in a really scientific way, which was which was
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: unusual at the time to apply scientific research principles to
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: psychological matters. Right that it was like basically taking the
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: way the hard science is doing and applying it to
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: the soft science of psychologists. But he formed the methodology
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: that's still in use today and proved that it can work. Like, yes,
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: you can study you know, cognitive faculties like memory in
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: a science way, in a science way, science e way. Um,
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: so what he did was pretty cool. He created Uh,
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: the first thing he did was he created these non
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: syllable nonsense syllable of them with two consonants with a
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: vowel in the middle, like nog this is one example
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: you used. And he had to make them nonsense because
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: there had to be like no so ciation with like
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: previous words that he had learned that had to be
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: brand new things in his brain because I mean, if
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: you if you have a previous association with a syllable,
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: right like SKay. Okay, and you have a great memory
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: of ice skating as a child, and SKay brings that
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: to mind. Of course you can remember SKay. I'm surprised
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: he came up with I would that'd be tough for me. Uh.
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: So what he did was he basically, over the course
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: of a year, uh learned these words and then to
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: the point where he could recall them perfectly, and then
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: recorded how long it took for him basically to forget
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: them and then relearn them again. And that taught us
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: all sorts of cool things about memory. Yeah. He he
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: figured out that um and a lot of this stuff
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: you know is so commonplace. We we know it, we
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: take it very much for granted. But this guy is
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: the one who figured out that UM, meaningless stuff is
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: harder to learn than meaning full stuff. Um. He gave
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: us the idea of the learning curve. The more stuff
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: you have to learn, the longer it's going to take
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: to learn it. Yeah. I think he was the first
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: person actually name it to the learning curve. I think
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: so it's possible. I believe so Okay, um and uh
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: forgetting happens most rapidly right after learning and then kind
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: of evens off and slows down. Um. And he taught
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: us that cramming doesn't work, that learning is best when
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: it's done over a longer time than you know, a
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: single Yeah, because boy, I used to cram pretty well.
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: Did you stunk at it? I was good at it?
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: I was not. I just I would just be too
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: stressed out. Well, and I short changed myself though, because
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: I would do well in the test and then forget it,
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: which was I mean, I wasn't doing myself any favors
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: as far as gaining knowledge. You know, I took Italian
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: um in college, and it was the only language that's
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: ever clicked for me, Like I got a town in
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: on a fundamental level. Yeah, and just aced the class
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: until the final, and I studied for the final. I
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: don't think I crammed it, just you know, I didn't
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: take it for granted that I was gonna ace the final.
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: But I for some reason I got there and forgot
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: everything when I sat down, and well then I panicked, Yeah,
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: but it wasn't panic until I realized that I had
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: forgotten everything. And I still did this day. Don't understand
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: what happened, and I don't remember. It's not like it
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: came back after the test. It just went away right
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: before the final. You know what happened? What Centorio Sordio,
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: That's what happened. I started, I started weighing my feces,
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: and it chased away all my understanding of battalion, and
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: I stopped after one trial. Did you? I'm just saying,
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: I've waited my feces once, and I know you gotta
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: do it more than once. He also created the ebbing
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: House illusion. Have you ever heard that? That's that thing?
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: Right there? Is that the same size that is not
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: the same size, It is not the same side. It's
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: a very famous illusion where there are two same sized circles,
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: they're not the same size. And then the one on
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: the left has these very large circles around it and
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: the one on the right has very small circles around it,
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: and it gives the appearance that they're different sizes, but
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: they are not so. Eving House is a pioneer in
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: experimental psychology, which is pretty cool, absolutely, and in experimental
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: psychology still today. Self experimentation is um fairly commonly used
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: UM because it's not nearly as dangerous as it is
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: in say medicine. For that reason, science today is basically
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: like you can't self experiment. That's so nineteenth century. Well,
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: and beyond the dangers of it, there's something called double
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: blinds and placebos that you know, if you know, if
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: you're self experimenting, then there that's going to affect the
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: outcome of the experiment almost time with the double blind
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: is like a hallmark of science, the inquiry, and you
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: it's impossible with when you're experimenting on yourself. So, uh,
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: if you're looking for grant funding and you're saying, well,
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: I'm just gonna try this drug on myself and see
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: what happens, You're not gonna get that funding, but probably
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: won't get published either, right, Well, it depends. There's this
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: guy named Seth Roberts who published a paper about his
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: twelve years of self experimentation. And he's a psychologist, um,
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: but the paper that he published was about the self
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: experimenting he did in his spare time. So if you're
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: not an experimental psychologist, um, probably if you're into self experimentation,
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: you're either um some sort of pro scientist doing it
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: in your spare time, or you're an amateur. There's a
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: there's a been a movement called an equals one, which
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: is you know, in his scientific notation for the study
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: sample size or population size, didn't called quantified self though.
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: That's a movement. Well, that's the um, that's the website.
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: There's like a group where it's kind of like this
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: hub of like, hey, I want to figure out why
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: I had migraine. So I started tracking like my food
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: and they were wired editors. I think, yeah, yeah, I
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: did not know that. Yeah, yeah, So there's a quantified self.
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: Dot com is basically this awesome place where you can
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: go see how other people are carrying out their own
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: self experiments and gets a little wacky. Yeah, there's just
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: one lady that drinks her first yurine of the day
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: each day she records all that. Are you sure you
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: saw that? I read it. I didn't see her do that. Well,
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: but he didn't click on the YouTube. Know, there's all sorts.
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: There was a big Forbes. Forbes had a big article
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: on this movement, which is some people call it naval
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: gazing at its finest. Other people think it's valid. Well
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: that's the point that Seth Roberts made. He was saying like,
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: I don't need funding for this because I'm just doing
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: it my spare time. It costs like basically no money.
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: Get off my back. I just pay attention. But he
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: also said that, um, he was motivated. He had the
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: motivation of a person looking to solve a problem, like
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: he wanted to control his weight or mood or make
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: himself a happier person, um, get better sleep. So he
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: just carried out all these self experiments and he could
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: conduct more than one at a time. So yeah, he
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: was like, get off my back. I think it's kind
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: of cool though, Like I have lactose issues and I
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: could see myself getting into um eating to tracking that
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: and and isolating exactly which foods. I mean, that's basically
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: all it is. That's it's kind of cool. And drinking
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: your own urine type will draw the line there. So, UM,
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: we should probably say thanks to some of the sources
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: that helped us with this podcast Clark Oscillatory Thoughts Blog. Um,
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: let's see Tiffany Watt Smith wrote Henry Head in the
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: theater of Reverie. Scientific American had a cool article self
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: experiment and step up for science. Alan Neringer had a
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: paper from one called self experimentation a call for change.
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: Lawrence kay Altman literally wrote the book on this. Um
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: who goes First? The Story of Self Experimentation in Medicine? Yeah, exactly.
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: Um A. Cohen wrote an article in the British Journal
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: of Clinical Pharmacology about UM Sara Turner's experiments. He in
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: his good Time Buddies. Um Salvatore Kurri did he rideout sad?
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: He wrote about George Stratton. Uh, the University of Indiana
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: has a cool human intelligence department quantified self dot com.
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: If you want to get into self experimentation and don't
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: feel like suing us for mentioning it, it's interesting to
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: look at at the very least. Yeah, I agreed, and
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: then Seth roberts the unreasonable effectiveness of my self experimentation
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: is the name of the paper. So those are all
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: the ones, and then pretty soon there'll be a list
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: top ten list on the site. It's not published yet,
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: it's practically done. I would assume, and Chuck, if you
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: forgot the name of the show that we were promoting
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: on sign channel, why don't we do a little ad
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: for it? That's true? Yeah, um chuck. A couple more
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: shout outs are good, good friend Wyatt Senak. Yes, his
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: stand up special Wyatt Sanak Comedy Person is out on DVD,
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: very funny stuff and if you've only seen why it
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: on the Daily Show he is. Uh, he's great on
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: the Daily Show. But his stand up is hysterical and
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: different than you would think it would be. It is.
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: He's much more like lively and animated and he's awesome.
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: He's a good guy too. Um. And we have a
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: happiness audio book out, that's right, the Grammy nominated nominated
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: Happiness Audio book, The super Stuff Guide to Happiness. That's right. Um,
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: it's up on iTunes for three nine nine. You're gonna
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: end up selling out more if you're in Australia. We're sorry.
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: Um let's see what else. Oh, it's got all sorts
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: of great sound design interviews. It's just cool. We've got
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: some experts on the horn. Ye, my niece, yes, starts
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: it out. Um and uh, yeah, it's up on iTunes.
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: Just search for super Stuff Guide to Happiness and that
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: will also bring up, um, the super Stuff Guide to
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: the Economy, which is still evergreen and good. Are we
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: gonna do any more of those? I think we should
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: just I mean I would feel like I just we
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: should okay, we would it feel like a quitter if
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: we just had to. Yeah, we need at least three.
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: I would like four at least okay, okay, and then
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: one more administrative detail. We have a cool little thing.
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: If you text um s y s K to eight
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: zero five six five, it texts you back a link
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: to listen to the podcast on your iPhone without going
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: through iTunes if you're not in the mood. Is that
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: what it did? Yeah, it's cool. It brings up our
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: r S speed and you can just listen to it.
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: I think it's quick time, so it'll work on your
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: iPhone or your droid or whatever. That's our latest marketing invention. Yeah,
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: it's pretty cool. So UM just text s y s
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: K two eight oh five six five. If you ever
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: are having a stuff, you should know Jones. It's right.
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: Friedrich's turners not around. Yeah. By the way, we're we're
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: working on there's been some issues with the apps, I
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: think refreshing the podcast less lately, and we are working
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: Our tech department is working on that. So keep your
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: pants on, as they say, so this will be up eventually.
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: You can look for UM ten ten scientists who were
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: their own guinea pigs love it. In the search bar
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: at how stuff works dot com, you can also type
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: in human experimentation and five crazy government experiments and they'll
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: bring up those articles. Um, and I said, handy search
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: bar finally somewhere in there, which means it's time. We're
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: a listener, man, Josh, I'm gonna call this, uh well,
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: first of all, quickly, if you're from Berkeley, California and
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: you went to UC Berkeley, we had a slight slip
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: of the tongue. Seriously, we said, U C l A Berkeley.
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: We know it's UC Berkeley, we know you see l
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: A is in Los Angeles. Yes, it was just a
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: little slip of the dog. That's it. We're not dummies.
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: And sometimes if you live in or have been to Netterling, Colorado,
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: and are a fan of the Frozen Dead Guy Days
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: and are mad we didn't bring it up in our
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: Cryonics episode, go listen to ten odd town Festivals. It's
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: in there. It's in there, all right. So back to
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: the listener mail. This is from Stephen H. And this
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: was just cool information. I'm a huge fan of the show. Guys,
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: loved the depth and breadth of the presentations. I'm not
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: sure how far I uh I am from this week.
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: He's pretty far, but I just listened to the Black
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: Death episode. I thought you might be interested to know.
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: While the plague was a horrible affair with millions of
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: deaths and an interesting effect on our language today, many
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: scholars of the history of the English language, myself included,
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: hold that the plague in England is a major reason
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: why we write in English today. You see, after the Normans,
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: which were French vikings, took England at the Battle of
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: Hastings in ten sixty six, Anglo Norman, French and Latin
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: became the two major languages of administration and literature because
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: all the important rich folks were chum. However, for reasons unknown,
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: the plague seems to have hit the mid range nobility
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: harder than other groups, resulting in a desperate need for administrators.
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: The only people left to fill the jobs were regular
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: joe's who only spoke English. So the theory goes, because
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: of the plague, the nobility was forced to learn English
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: to communicate with their administrators, resulting in the re emergence
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: of English as the language of law, administration, and literature
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: from Stephen h pretty neto. Yeah, I love supplemental information.
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: That's those are my favorite ones. So thanks a lot,
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: Stephen h um and since chucks such a big fan
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: of supplemental information. UM, if you have any supplemental information
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: about experimentation, specifically self experimentation, we want to hear it. Yeah,
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: if you've done this yourself, I'd like to hear about it. Yeah,
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: but don't do it yourself just to tell us about it, No,
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: because we don't want even get hurt. That seems like
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: in the gray area that I'm not comfortable with it.
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: If you've done like your own lactose study on yourself,
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: something like that, sure, something harmless, Yeah, like you didn't
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: inject lactose. Um. You can tweet to us at s
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: y s K podcast UM. You can go onto Facebook
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: dot com slash stuff you should know that's our page, UM,
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: or you can send us a plain old fashioned email
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: to stuff Podcasts at how stuff works dot com. Be
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: sure to check out our new video podcast, Stuff from
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as we explore
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow, brought to
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera, it's ready.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: Are you