Latest / UK Column Radio / No Smoke Without Fire 8- The Green King (Part 3)

Transcript

No Smoke Without Fire 8- The Green King (Part 3) · UK Column Radio

0:16
Welcome to the UK column. Viewers and listeners, Welcome back to No Smoke
0:21
Without Fire, where Debbie Evans and myself, Brian Gery are going to be
0:27
having a look at the Raal family, King Charles in particular. This is
0:33
episode three of this particular series, and I'm very pleased to say we've had
0:41
quite some interest from our viewers and listeners and some very interesting comments. One
0:47
of the common ones is I never knew that about the raw family. I
0:50
never knew that about Charles. So Debbie, welcome. It seems to me
0:55
that this addition that No Smoke Without Fire has engaged with our audience. Well,
1:03
I'm very pleased to see that it's ignited. See what I did there
1:07
ignited some interest because you know, I've learned so much through doing this research
1:15
and I'm continuing to learn and continuing to be surprised. So let's see what
1:22
people think of what we found out this time, and that like like we've
1:26
always said, Brian, they can make everybody can make up their own minds.
1:30
All we can do is just present the facts and present the evidence as
1:34
we have it, and then everyone makes up joins their own dots and finds
1:38
their own truth well, we're allowed to. We're allowed to ask some questions,
1:42
Debbie. I think questions are always extremely powerful because you asked the right
1:47
question and people answer it. The audience, people watching listening in answer the
1:52
question in their own heads. But I'm going to say, don't be too
1:57
shy because you overwhelmingly doing the research into this. And we'll say to the
2:04
audience this morning that just before we went live, we were having a little
2:07
bit of a giggle because even though some of this subject is very very heavy,
2:15
we know that we have to we have to keep a little bit of
2:17
a balance and a sense of humor. So we were having a bit of
2:21
a joke for the camera started rolling. But we also thought it would be
2:28
a good idea perhaps to kick off with a bit of video, because people
2:31
are keen on video and it does get a lot of information across very quickly.
2:36
What caught your eye, Debbie in the video sense, Well, quite
2:44
a lot caught my eye. It's been a very busy time, hasn't it
2:46
for the royals. A lot of people asking a lot of questions. You
2:51
know, as we're recording this, there's been the controversy over the Princess of
2:57
Wales's photograph that she least for Mother's Day. The King has a diagnosis of
3:04
cancer, so he's not making public appearances, so other members of the royal
3:08
family are stepping in for him. But he has put out a Commonwealth message,
3:16
and there was quite an interesting reaction from some of the public with regards
3:22
to the Commonwealth message. But I feel, you know, when you get
3:25
one of those gut feelings and you see bits of evidence and you think our
3:30
things are starting to fall into place. And I'm hearing the words Commonwealth a
3:36
lot, and I think we're going to be hearing about more about the Commonwealth
3:40
in the future. But I see Commonwealth countries as perhaps being what I would
3:47
describe as a soft target, if you like, for the agenda, or
3:53
certainly for what the King has planned for the planet seems to be centered around
4:00
the Commonwealth, probably because that's very easily accessible to him. So well,
4:06
Deis it's very interesting listening to the Commonwealth speech yesterday, Debbie. The Commonwealth,
4:13
of course, also represents a very large number of people on the globe.
4:18
I can't remember off the top of my head how many people we're talking
4:21
about live within the Commonwealth. But it's not only a soft target. I
4:28
agree with that, but you're also dealing with a huge number of people that
4:32
come under the sphere of influence of the UK and of course very much the
4:39
raw Family because invariably they are still the Royalty for many of the countries within
4:46
the Commonwealth itself. And the other bit that just comes into my mind.
4:50
Sorry to push push in straight away with this, but I didn't want to
4:55
forget about it. Was that many years ago Mike Robinson and I were looking
4:59
at some documents out of the Parliament in Scotland and what we discovered was a
5:09
very strange document. It was very simple, but it was really a document
5:14
from within the Scottish Parliament which was expressing support for the Commonwealth. And we
5:21
were a little bit surprised about this because the sense was that the growing SMP
5:28
at that time was maybe hostile to things south of the border. But here
5:34
was this document which seemed to be amazingly friendly to the Commonwealth. But then
5:40
with it we found another document and it was basically saying which is the best
5:46
route to It didn't talk about global governance. There was another expression used.
5:54
But if I say global governance, just to pin it down, that's my
6:00
words not. In the document, it said what is the best route for
6:04
achieving this world framework? Is it the European Union or is it the Commonwealth?
6:14
And I wished that we had taken a copy of that document on that
6:19
particular day because the next time it came into our heads was months later,
6:25
and of course when we went looking for it it had gone. So I
6:29
know, that's just me, Brian telling the audience what I saw. So
6:33
it's anecdotal, really, but I assure the audience I'm telling the truth.
6:39
And we were just fascinated to see unknown people north of the border looking at
6:45
the Commonwealth as a possible stepping stone for something much bigger. So Debbie Maker,
6:53
that what you like, Well, I think you struck on something else.
6:59
Then don't quote me, but I've got a feeling somewhere in the back
7:02
of my brain. I think it's a third of the world's population is based
7:09
are based in Commonwealth countries. So you're absolutely right. It's a huge amount
7:14
of people to control or to have power over, and a lot of land.
7:20
And I think we're going to see when you say there's a choice,
7:24
you know, Europe or the Commonwealth. I think as we go on,
7:28
we'll see that the Commonwealth is probably where we're heading. Yeah, absolutely,
7:33
Okay, So back on the subject to videos, We've got a video to
7:39
do with the Commonwealth. Yes, well only actually we're recording this a day
7:46
after it was recorded by the King himself, who, of course we know
7:50
has got cancer diagnosis, so he couldn't be present in the celebrations, but
7:57
he's put out a speech and I think we've got a recording of it.
8:01
The seventy fifth anniversary of the Commonwealth is a moment to reflect on the remarkable
8:07
journey that our unique family of free and independent nations has made since nineteen forty
8:13
nine. Last year, the Bahamas celebrated its fiftieth anniversary of independence, as
8:20
Grenada has this year and Papio New Guinea will next year. Each of these
8:28
milestones, and many others like them, represent the fulfillment of countless aspirations and
8:35
the achievement of such remarkable potential, and the Commonwealth's growth with new members continuing
8:43
to join our family of nations, demonstrates clearly that whilst we may not all
8:48
have a shared history, we have common ambitions for a better future. Working
8:54
together to build resilience and respond to global challenges. The Commonwealth family is strongest
9:03
when we are connected through friendship. As I've said before, the Commonwealth is
9:11
like the wiring of a house and its people. Our energy and our ideas
9:16
are the current that runs through those words. Together and individually, we are
9:24
strengthened by sharing perspectives and experiences, and by offering and borrowing the myriad ways
9:31
we have each tackled the challenges of our time. This is true both at
9:37
the level of nations and indeed at the local level. We recognize today that
9:46
our diversity is our greatest strength. The Commonwealth represents a third of humanity from
9:54
all regions of the world, with all the different experiences, knowlige and aspirations
10:01
that this brings. Wherever we live, we are united by the many challenges
10:07
we face, whether it be climate change, the loss of nature, or
10:13
the social and economic changes that new technologies are bringing. Our diversity means that
10:20
these challenges affect us all differently, and that we experience their impacts in different
10:28
ways. Their seriousness, however, is common to each one of us.
10:35
All of this means that we must work together to understand each other's perspectives,
10:41
including the inequalities and injustices which still resonate to this day. We must find
10:50
ways of healing and to support each other to pursue solutions. I cannot say
10:56
often enough that it is by coming together that we create the best chances to
11:01
improve our world and the lives of people everywhere. Indeed, over the years,
11:09
countless people across the Commonwealth have been inspired to form their own Commonwealth associations,
11:16
from lawyers and accountants, to business and trade networks and many more.
11:22
Besides, the work they do is absolutely vital, sharing professional knowledge, experience
11:31
and expertise across the continents for the betterment of each one of us. The
11:37
Commonwealth above all retains a particular focus on our young people, who make up
11:45
two thirds of the entire Commonwealth population, Whether in Kenya or Malaysia, Vanuatu
11:52
or Dominica, Malta or Canada. I never cease to be impressed by their
11:58
creativity, innovative skills and hard work, often in the most challenging circumstances.
12:07
Their energy is transforming approaches to development, technology and preserving and restoring nature and
12:15
will I hope help to shape and safeguard our common future. Having recently celebrated
12:22
my own seventy fifth birthday. It warms my heart to reflect on the way
12:26
that Commonwealth has been a constant throughout my own life, a precious source of
12:33
strength, inspiration and pride. In recent weeks, I have been most deeply
12:39
touched by your wonderfully kind and thoughtful good wishes for my health, and in
12:46
return can only continue to serve you to the best of my ability throughout the
12:52
Commonwealth. My belief in our shared endeavors and in the potential of our people
13:00
remains as sure and strong as it has ever been. I have no doubt
13:05
that we will continue to support one another across the Commonwealth as together we continue
13:13
this vital journey. Well, Debbie, I have not heard that for that
13:18
clip in full before, and I found it absolutely fascinating. We had a
13:22
little bit of discussion before the start of today's No Smoke Without Fire as to
13:28
how long we'd let that clip run for, but I actually feel that watching
13:33
the full five minutes clip is very, very informative. So he's heading for
13:39
our common future. I just wonder who our really is. Well, it's,
13:48
as he said, it's a third of humanity, and it's two thirds
13:54
of that third are the young people. So he's targeting young people, and
14:00
you know, you look back and you think of the Duke of Edinburgh's Award
14:03
targeting young people, the Prince's Trust targeting young people, and you start to
14:09
see, well, you know, was this a good hearted gesture that came
14:13
from all the right places with the right intentions, or was there another underlying
14:18
reason? Has this always been targeting young people? Because I don't know if
14:26
you I didn't count, but the number of times he said common in that
14:31
piece in that speech, whether it was Commonwealth or common ambitions or a common
14:39
love for the planet, he kept using the word common But clearly this is
14:46
a Commonwealth association where he's promoting young people. Lawyers, accountants. It seems
14:56
like it's huge, great, big consortium business. You know, this is
15:01
the Commonwealth is a big industry. It's a business. Yeah, I found
15:07
that. I picked up on that as well. I thought it very strange
15:11
that the first profession he mentions is really doing something to help humanity. Lawyers
15:18
and no general disrespect to people who are in the legal profession. But it's
15:24
a pretty long shout, isn't it to say that this is the profession that's
15:28
going to be helping to save humanity. And then what else is his message
15:33
for the young people. It's about fear because he's talking about the seriousness of
15:39
the situation facing the planet with climate change and the attack on the environment itself.
15:46
So he's very subtly putting out a message of fear to two thirds of
15:56
the Commonwealth popular, which is itself a third of the global population. That's
16:03
some powerhouse, isn't it. Yeah, he's putting pressure, a hell of
16:08
a lot of pressure on young people. You know, he said that it
16:12
was all about preserving and restoring nature and this is for them to do.
16:18
This is their job. This is what he's telling them to do. And
16:22
then to use analogies. I found quite extraordinary the fact that the Commonwealth family
16:30
was like wiring a house and we're the current that runs through the wires within
16:36
the house. You know, this is he's using analogy there as well.
16:41
But this is not a stupid man. You know a lot of people have
16:45
said about Charles as Prince Charles. You know, he's a bit eccentric,
16:52
and I'm not doubting that he is. He talks to plants and I don't
16:56
doubt that he does. But he's switched on he's very astute, he's very
17:03
well read, and he's he's a businessman, and he's had a mission for
17:11
many, many years and he's been accomplishing it. I think very well.
17:17
So I don't think that Prince Charles, now King Charles, is the eccentric
17:23
kind of not so highly intelligent man that we've been led to believe. I
17:29
think he's very switched on, and I think he knows exactly what he's doing.
17:32
Yes, he isn't tim nice, but dim I think was yeah the
17:37
description. No, he's something very different. But I'm also going to say
17:41
it seems to me that he's very switched on within his own frame of reference,
17:45
because there's certainly things that he just does not want to engage in.
17:49
So within his framework view of the world, he's very switched on. But
17:56
he doesn't appear to be able to see the reality for a lot of people,
18:02
you know, even in this country, people who were suffering, people
18:06
who got problems, problems with the churches. None of that he seems to
18:10
see. He doesn't care, Yes, he doesn't care. He just people
18:18
say, you know, he's nobility, he's the king. He's not in
18:22
tune with the people. Well, that's because he doesn't have to be.
18:26
He doesn't particularly want to be either. So you know, when you look
18:32
at it in the in the cold light of day, you think, well,
18:37
I mean, I don't know, Brian, but casting my mind back
18:41
to all of those years that the Queen was on the throne, I never
18:45
saw the British public en mass objecting or protesting. You heard about the odd,
18:52
you know, the odd protest every now and then, but you didn't
18:56
hear about a lot of rumblings of discontent about the monarchy like we do now.
19:03
And as you know, as he was giving that speech yesterday, there
19:07
were protests going on and people chanting not my King, and there was drums
19:14
and all sorts of protests going on that we didn't get to hear about on
19:18
the mainstream media. Of course, should we have a look at that,
19:21
because this is UK column and we should show the audience there. So let's
19:26
see some of this protests, because I think there's quite a lot of points
19:30
to discuss about it. So it's a protest video. Sometimes you can hear
19:36
what people are saying. Sometimes you can't because the volume isn't there or it's
19:41
all a bit muffled. But let's show it raw as it were, and
19:45
then we can have a chat about it for the audience those now with the
20:23
crow cousin hand. What did he costing? Almost? She hasn't a million
20:40
pounds a year? A thousand million mins? Joy by that? Why we
21:45
don't enjoy it so much? I have a lovely afternoon to way head and
21:49
give it the monarchy because he is wrong in principal US institution and because it
21:56
is bad ground democracy, which is why we are standing here. That he's
21:59
not a thing. And then instead of a coronation, we need an election,
22:03
a sort of Charles. We need a choice, and that's why we're
22:06
going to be here. I'm going to be at every pay set which King
22:07
Charles ghasted, asking questions, to find any answers, asking to take part
22:14
of debate and art his critics. Are we going to be asking why dodges
22:18
in hurt tax, Why dodges income tax? Why so secretive? Why those
22:25
done under the bus and protect the frother. We're going to be asking you
22:30
why he thinks he should be at head of state without a single vote past.
22:33
We're supposed to be a democracy. We should not put a king in
22:37
twenty twenty three, we should have an elected for our head of state.
22:42
We're not arguing for us system argue free parliamentary republic. I would argue that
22:48
every man woman in charge of his country to the takings decals in law.
22:52
I would argue for all of us, we have to write both to vote
22:56
for our head of state and to be out head of states if we so
22:59
do well there we are so a couple of questions, I'll throw it at
23:04
you. I don't expect necessarily an answer. But whenever I see people well
23:10
organized in a protest, with the T shirts and the uniform banners, I
23:14
always wonder who they are. So I don't know who the group in Yellow
23:18
is, but I'm very interested in them. And I also noticed in that
23:22
protest there was a lot of drumming, and drumming was very much a feature
23:26
when extinction rebellion was turning up not only to protest as extinction rebellion, but
23:33
they were particularly good at turning up in order to undermine other legitimate protests that
23:41
were taking place, particularly in London. What's your take on the guys in
23:45
yellow? I think I think you make a very good point. We don't
23:52
know who they are. We definitely don't know who they are and their underlying
23:56
motive and their intention. I don't know they answer to that either. But
24:02
what I do know is listening to people on the street. What I hear
24:06
from people on the street, from young people, especially who don't seem terribly
24:11
engaged with monarchy full stop. Actually, they really don't seem to care or
24:18
take much notice. So I don't see that the youngsters are being engaged.
24:22
Perhaps with William and the younger members of the royal maybe they'll encourage more young
24:29
members of the population. I don't know, but I hear my generation,
24:33
our generation, Brian saying not my king. He's not my king. You
24:37
know. I can't say that I've always been a monarchist the more role family,
24:45
I've always been there, and my mother was very much a monarchist.
24:48
So I went to see the state opening of Parliament and stuff. But now
24:55
would I've ever gone sort of something and said not my queen. No,
25:00
probably not. It's not until now that he's taken the throne and all of
25:07
a sudden he really isn't my king. So I feel that they're reflecting I
25:11
think a lot of what the public are feeling, but I'm not sure who
25:17
they are. Does that make sense? Sorry a little bit, It absolutely
25:22
makes sense, And personally, I excuse me, I feel this. A
25:26
lot of people could be very critical about Queen Elizabeth. But if you say,
25:30
okay, come up with the evidence showing well, they might come up
25:34
and say, well, she's immensely wealthy, and that's that's one certainty.
25:41
But she had a calm dignity and she did seem to have an ability to
25:47
actually get on with people. Charles is completely different, and yeah, come
25:52
he's come on to the throne, and this fraua has started. But just
25:56
to be fair to the team in yellow, of course, they're saying he's
26:00
not our king and we didn't vote for him. And I think I'm right
26:06
in saying that. If we go back in English history, it was actually
26:11
the case that the people are qualify that people we're getting into, people with
26:21
some standing in society did at least get a say who was going to become
26:26
king or queen. They actually made a decision as to whether a person was
26:30
suitable to be on the throne. But Charles was anointed and put on the
26:37
throne without any real dialogue with the public. And that's the bit that I
26:41
feel particularly uncomfortable about. So maybe maybe their suggestion in that demonstration that people
26:49
should have a say who becomes their king and queen, perhaps there's some real
26:53
merit in that. Well. I think if nothing else, anybody from outside
27:00
of the UK watching this now should know that King Charles is not loved by
27:07
all of his citizens. Far from it. There are many people in the
27:11
United Kingdom who are saying he's not my king. And I find when I
27:18
look around the Commonwealth, if you like, there's more love and more respect
27:25
I see for the royal family outside of the UK. And I think that's
27:30
an interesting dynamic because I think people from overseas they think that we're all,
27:36
you know, staunch royalists, whereas actually that's not completely the picture. And
27:41
as you say that, Debbie, what comes into my head was the interview
27:48
I did with a lady called Sam from Uganda, and in talking about things
27:52
to do with the family courts and child stealing by the state, but she
27:59
was talking about living in our own country and the image of UK that was
28:03
portrayed in Uganda. And of course one of the things we know is that
28:10
the BBC in particular, which of course has got this audience, this huge
28:15
global audience is remarkably good at selling the message that everything is lovely in UK
28:22
and what a wonderful royal family we have. So I wonder whether some of
28:26
that feeling and loyalty, even love for the Royal family that you see people
28:33
in the Commonwealth expressing is a result of the propaganda that's been pub pushed into
28:40
their own countries via the BBC and other royalty aligned media outlets. Yeah,
28:48
I'm sure, I'm absolutely sure, because when we start to see what King
28:52
Charles has been up to behind the scenes and what he's created for the Commonwealth,
29:00
I'm hoping that people's perspectives change and people start to ask some very serious
29:06
questions because this doesn't just affect the United Kingdom, you know, potentially the
29:11
globe, but for sure everybody that's living in a Commonwealth country should take notice
29:17
of what King Charles is doing. Yeah. Well, and on that wonderful
29:22
comment, I think that's time perhaps to get back into the narrative that you
29:29
were delivering in the previous episode of No Smoke, And of course you were
29:33
showing all of the things that King Charles and Prince Charles as he was,
29:40
what the King was involved in. And the key topic that we really broke
29:45
on at the end of the last episode was Terror Carter and the Sustainable Markets
29:52
initiative. For people who are still thinking, oh well, he's just that
29:56
nice man who's the King. Let's get back into having look at what is
30:00
into the sustainable initiatives. We've all heard of the sustainable goals. So the
30:07
Sustainable Initiatives is this website that King Charles has got, but it's otherwise known
30:12
as Terrakata. So this was established at the World Economic Forum by Charles in
30:21
twenty twenty and he was talking about a one planet. It's been discussed before
30:26
through the One Planets Summit. You can see actually in the next slide what
30:32
the then Prince of Wales said about his new Terrakata. There's the quote there
30:38
from him. The Terrakata Offices offers the basis of a recovery plan that puts
30:45
nature, people and planet at the heart of global value creation, one that
30:51
will harness the precious, irreplaceable power of nature combined with the transformative innovation and
30:57
resources of the private tech to he is talking about global value creation and he's
31:06
talking about the private sector. This is about stripping even more wealth out of
31:12
the globe. This is not about people. He doesn't even put people first.
31:17
Nature comes first. Money. It's all about money. See, there
31:23
we go again. This is the common theme. He's a businessman. This
31:27
is a business This Terra Carta is the trademark. And of course, if
31:33
you think about Magna carta, where the people came first, he's just he's
31:38
just kind of wiped that off the face of the planet literally, and now
31:44
he's installed Terrakata and something else which will come to in a minute, another
31:48
carta. But Terra Carta is the road map if you like, well it
31:55
is. It's the roadmap to what's coming down the line, and it's He
32:01
says that this is going to promote an inclusive, equitable, prosperous and sustainable
32:07
future for the sake of present and future generations. Well, I would say
32:12
his the generations of the nobility, the generations of the globalist, but not
32:17
us. I don't think Terra Carta will serve as the guiding mandate for this
32:23
is the Prince of Wales because it was written a while ago. Sustainable Markets
32:28
initiative. This is about markets. The Terrakarta aims to provide an integrated roadmap
32:34
towards an inspiring, inclusive, equitable, prosperous and sustainable future for the sake
32:39
of present and future generations. Supporting the protection and restoration of a minimum of
32:45
thirty percent biodiversity on land and below water by twenty thirty and fifty percent by
32:52
twenty fifty. Encouraging coordination, cooperation and cohesion with incorporate and public private for
33:02
philanthropic domains. And then it ends by saying that Terrakata is to be a
33:07
living document that will be reported on and updated annually. This will allow the
33:13
Terrakata to keep up with global progress, technology evolution, and a shifting investment
33:20
landscape, while seizing rapidly emerging opportunities developing around the world. This whole language,
33:28
Debbie, You're absolutely right. This is corporate language, markets, developing
33:34
markets, developing opportunities. This is about taking more money out of the earth
33:40
wherever it's possible, public private, philanthropic partnership money money, money, or
33:49
back down to money. But you know what I thought was interesting was where
33:53
it said supporting the protection I mean, let this sink in because it's quite
33:59
extraordinary. Supporting the protection and restoration of a minimum of thirty percent of biodiversity
34:06
on landon below water by twenty thirty. Now that's a thirty percent of biodiversity
34:13
by twenty thirty. That's the Commonwealth, right, that's pretty much that's the
34:17
same sort of land mass as the Commonwealth. But that's not good enough.
34:22
He wants to return the Earth to biodiverse. That's half the planet by twenty
34:30
fifty. I mean, that's enormous, enormous. And then you've got these
34:38
seals that go with Terrakata, and you can see the green one which is
34:45
Terrakata. So that's the sustainable initiatives. And let's not forget you know,
34:50
we've got big players in Terrakarta. We've got people like Unileva, Astrozeneca,
34:55
BP, We've got Bank America, he throw, he throw a reports,
35:00
Ernst Young, they're all involved in Terrakata. And then you've got Astrakata.
35:06
So you've got the crown on one side with butterflies and bees, King of
35:12
the world and people of the people and the planet, harmony and nature.
35:17
And then on the right hand side you've got Astrakata where it says to care
35:22
for the infinite wonders of the universe and it's his crown, so is he
35:30
saying there that he's king of the Earth and king of the universe. Well,
35:37
if you asked me that question, my response is, yes he does.
35:40
This is what I pick up from his whole initiative and his demeanor and
35:46
what comes out of his mouth. Yes, he actually does believe that he's
35:51
the king of the Earth, and to also believe he's king of space is
35:58
just incredible. I mean, all through this in deliberately, is he saying
36:01
he's king of Heaven? Well, well, I guess yes. You know,
36:09
I can't see any other way. This is the question, though,
36:14
isn't it for everybody to answer. It's going to be everybody's own personal opinion.
36:21
It's a difficult one, but yeah, I would say so. And
36:24
this seal, that green seal that you saw, that's really important in the
36:30
big scheme of things, because if you get awarded one of those, then
36:34
it's like receiving I guess the Williwonka Golden Ticket through to the Brave New World.
36:39
And you can see there that that's just another company. Well that's the
36:45
SAP awarded Terra Carta Seal for commitments for to sustainability. So if your company
36:52
is a green company and eco friendly and agrees to of the net zero,
36:59
the climate Agena, etc. You get the Green seal, And if you
37:04
get the Green Seal or the Black Seal, then you know you're doing very
37:08
well for yourself. Thank you for the future. You're pretty much got a
37:12
guaranteed successful company. And we've got companies, I mean sustainable, the sustainable
37:19
initiative restoring the planet to nature. And yet astra Zenica. You know,
37:24
you've got companies like AstraZeneca that are supporting this. So this is this is
37:30
big business and it even spans to America big time. And I was surprised
37:37
to see that this press release came out from the White House last year July
37:44
the tenth, twenty twenty three, and President Biden he was hosted by King
37:51
Charles at Windsor and a lot goes on at Windsor because we were talking in
37:57
the first episode of Green King about Windsor and Windsor House and the laity,
38:01
and a lot goes on at Windsor. But President Biden went off to meet
38:07
with the King and twenty three philanthropists and financiers to discuss this whole net zero
38:16
climate change with Charles. Over recent months, I am watching more and more
38:22
video clips, of course, of President Biden who is stuttering and stumbling his
38:29
way through public speeches and election gatherings, and it's quite clear that the man
38:37
is absolutely past it and is not capable of making any coherent, common sense
38:45
decision. And then my mind says, okay, well, if that's the
38:50
case, why is Biden still in power? Well, he's still in power
38:52
because having a nearly dribbling incompetent president means that the real power base is hidden
39:02
by him. It's the power base under him. So when you talk about
39:07
July the tenth last year, twenty twenty three, when President Biden and the
39:12
team of philanthropists were meeting up with Charles, Biden wasn't putting anything into the
39:19
meeting. He was just there as the rather dozy figurehead. The powerhouse was
39:25
the advisors that came with him, all the corporations that came in with him.
39:30
And the last point I'll make is that no stage of this development of
39:36
Terra Carta or the space or disease I'm going to call it, did Charles
39:42
talk to the people in UK. He didn't call a meeting with his subjects
39:47
and say, look, this is what I think is important. This is
39:52
what I intend to do. He went straight away to these all powerful corporations,
39:59
global companies, and then once he's developed the formula, he's dictating to
40:05
his own subjects, and he's actually dictating to the poor people in the Commonwealth
40:09
because they are being deceived into believing that this is a wonderful man that's got
40:15
their best interests at heart. Yeah. Absolutely, and for sure he absolutely
40:22
hasn't. I mean at the at Windsor Grant Shapps went along, John Kerry
40:30
went along as well, and the whole idea with all of these philanthropists and
40:34
these financiers, the whole idea was basically to kick it up a gear,
40:38
to put your foot back down on the accelerator, literally, to accelerate Terrakata.
40:45
And that's exactly what they were planning. And that's exactly what you've got
40:50
in front of you now. And a lot of people, many people have
40:53
heard of Terrakata, but not many have heard of the Terrakata Accelerator Fund,
41:00
which is the document that's on screen now right, So that's one hundred million.
41:04
But at the bottom it says the members of the Sustainable Markets Initiatives' Financial
41:09
Services Task Force have committed over eight point nine trillion dollars eight point nine trillion
41:19
dollars to support the transition to net zero by twenty thirty or sooner. Well,
41:23
of course that deadline's failed. That's the good news. But these people
41:29
magiced up eight point nine trillion. Meanwhile, in the Commonwealth, let's play
41:36
Charlie's game. In the Commonwealth, we've got people with no fresh water.
41:39
He can't feed themselves, but we haven't got any money for them. This
41:45
I'm going to say it. This man, to me is a complete fraud.
41:51
I can accept that he believes what he believes, but for him to
41:54
claim that he's got the best interests of people in UK and the Commonwealth heart
42:00
this is a fraudulent claim. It's a rich fraud though, isn't it.
42:06
I take it back to money again. Yeah, okay, it's gone back
42:12
to money. And in order to put the foot down on the accelerator with
42:19
Terra Carta, he's had to make some adaptations. So he's employed a company
42:27
called Pollination, a global climate and nature investment advisory firm. So they're going
42:34
to be the general partner of the fund because they've got this funding goal of
42:38
one hundred and twenty five million dollars. And then they've also had to opponent
42:45
a point, a global law firm. You can see their White and Case.
42:50
So this is where the acceleration accelerates even more. And I just started
42:55
to look into Pollination and you can see their Brian that it's a specialist climate
43:00
change investment and advisory firm, right, and it says our people are the
43:07
key to unlocking change. I wondered whether White and Case the law firm that
43:14
he mentions. Is why Charles in his speech that we opened this snow Smoke
43:20
without Far episode, we showed the clip of him talking and the first people
43:24
he mentioned as helping this whole change and improvement and transition of the world were
43:30
lawyers. So do you think maybe he had that firm White and Case in
43:36
his head so that was a little plug to the good job that his legal
43:40
friends had done. Yeah, for sure, And we'll come we'll come on
43:45
to them in a minute. But before we get onto them, and I
43:50
think it's relevant to to what you've just said, is that Pollination, which
43:54
is a specialist climate change investment advisory firm. As we've just said, look
44:00
down at the bottom there and you'll see that we're talking governments, businesses,
44:05
public private capital. So again we're looking at this fusion of public private partnership
44:13
with philanthropists. But I just wanted to see. I mean, we will
44:17
get I promise you we will come to the lawyers. But these are the
44:22
kind of people that are running pollination. You've got Tony O'Sullivan and Martin Wilder,
44:30
and I mean, you know, they've got some pretty pretty strong cvs
44:37
there. You know, they've been around the blook a little bit and you
44:39
can see plenty of names that will pop out to you, like the Australian
44:45
Renewable Energy Agency Arena. We've talked about them before. This is all net
44:51
zero. But then you've got the Serpentine Gallery mentioned there. You've got these
44:58
are people with a lot of money and a lot of power, and they're
45:00
going to be controlling literally trillions of people. This Terrakrta Accelerator that's going to
45:09
be led by those two individuals is a very powerful organization. I mean,
45:16
you might want to read the quote out at the top that King Charles wrote
45:21
about Terrakarta there again. Okay, so Terra Carta offers the basis of a
45:27
recovery plan that puts nature, people and planet at the heart of global value
45:31
creation, one that will harness the precious, irreplaceable power of nature combined with
45:37
the transformative innovation and resources of the private sector. So that comment he was
45:45
pushing out, But I just reinforce your comment on the two men involved with
45:49
pollination, because Tony, what's the gentleman's name, let me just call it
45:55
up. So Sullivan, that's right. If you have a look at his
46:00
CV merchant banker and involved with hedge funds, so you know, if we
46:07
look at the world. I mean, very recently, I did an interview
46:14
with Justin Walker where we were talking about the Bradbury pounds. This is a
46:20
I encourage people to go and listen to that audio discussion. But what we
46:23
were highlighting is how money is created and who creates the money. And what
46:32
we essentially show very easily is the present system of money creation and the control
46:40
of the monetary system is a fraudulent system. Charles leaps straight into bed.
46:47
Now we're obviously not saying that either of these gentlemen are doing anything wrong,
46:52
but what we are saying is that there is a financial system in the world.
46:57
Charles has jumped straight into bed with it as if it's all bona fide
47:01
and has the best interests of the public at heart. I mean for the
47:06
whole of my life, which is getting longer as it were. I haven't
47:13
woken up in the morning thinking to myself, thank goodness for those international bankers
47:17
that are really help me on my journey through life, or thank goodness for
47:22
those hedge funds which are supporting the local hospice, or thank goodness for the
47:28
bankers who are really helping our medical system to survive. I'm not thinking that
47:34
at all. What I'm actually thinking is these are the people who are milking
47:38
every area of human existence. There's nothing that there's nothing that we produce or
47:47
have or grow that these people don't come in and take their financial cut from.
47:53
And Charles leaps straight into bed with them money, you know. And
48:02
the two gentlemen that we've just highlighted, Tonio Sullivan and Martin Wilder, you
48:07
know, there's a big Australian theme going on there. So again we've got
48:10
a Commonwealth creeping in. We're going to see Canada in a bit creeping in.
48:15
You can see where the Commonwealth is. None of it is for us.
48:20
Let's just be clear about that this isn't being done for our best interests
48:25
at all at all. Yeah, we'll pause there. Yeah, because it
48:35
is breathtaking and I mean, you know we're only on part three. We've
48:38
still got a long way to go. But I mean, let's just get
48:42
into the Terra Carta Accelerator a bit, because nobody is really talking about the
48:46
accelerator. You know, accelerator is a powerful word, and this really is
48:52
speeding things up big time. Yeah, So it calls itself an accelerator program.
48:59
It's building capacity, capability and capacity across early stage nature projects and companies.
49:07
Natures not to do with people. We've got a Terrakata Accelerator Fund investing
49:12
globally and this is nature based projects and nature tech companies to deliver commercial returns.
49:22
So your spot on this is about money and making more money. And
49:27
the Accelerator Initiative is a response to His Majesty, King Charles. The third
49:31
challenge to the Sustainable Markets Initiative to develop five land based and five water base
49:39
initiatives per year through to twenty thirty. It's got one hundred and twenty five
49:45
million in the pot. And then it talks about pollination and then it says
49:51
the aim is for the Accelerator program to be launched in twenty twenty four,
49:55
and they are going to be looking at proposals of people. If anybody thinks
50:00
that their local parish council is going to make a proposal to these boys,
50:05
they best think again, because these are going to be proposals that come in
50:08
through the global corporations, and there'll be proposals where those corporations see they can
50:15
make most money. Sorry, getting a bit motivated here, Debbie, but
50:20
we're really into it. We're really into this subject. Now. Well,
50:24
I think you're going to be even more into it when you see who said
50:28
what on the next slide. Well, of course it's Mike Robinson's old friend,
50:34
Mark Carnage as he likes to call him Mark Carney as was governor at
50:40
the Bank of England. But he comes in by saying that the scale and
50:45
urgency of the climate challenge is clear. We need a step change, we
50:50
must act. And then he's saying that four out of five of the top
50:53
G twenty companies now report on climate reported business risks and opportune tees. And
51:00
these are powerful boys because they got combined balance sheet values of one hundred and
51:06
twenty trillion. Then he's onto COP twenty five with six hundred and thirty institutional
51:12
investors managing thirty seven trillion in assets. Momentum is building. We must bring
51:20
together the right combination of ideas, skills and relationship to drive systemic change and
51:27
capital flows. Pollination does that. So there you are. We're talking about
51:32
huge sums of money in order to create even more money. And this is
51:37
all going to be accelerated. And remember that Mark Carney, as Mike in
51:44
particular excuse me reported several times on UK column the Bank of the Governor of
51:50
the Bank of England as he was simply said that if companies do not adopt
51:55
the green agenda, they will be punished, they will be forced out of
52:00
business. So this isn't even something which these boys are going to bring in
52:05
with a carrot to the world to population as something to help them know.
52:10
This is about screwing every every cent, every dime out of the out of
52:16
the global system to make more profit. And if you don't want to play,
52:22
they're going to put you out of business and you can starve. It's
52:27
funny you say that, though, because if you go back to the previous
52:30
slide. You'll see that actually what you've just said is a mark. Conny's
52:37
actually said it, Brian, is the headline I didn't mean. Yes,
52:43
I'm sorry, I didn't like the plain sight right in front of your eyes.
52:46
I'll let you read it out because it's exactly what you've just said.
52:51
Well, that's because I was scanning the small printer as it were. They
52:53
Yeah, so I completely went by the headline. If some companies investors failed
52:59
to adjust to this new world, they will fail to exist. Think about
53:06
what this this this man is saying. You don't play our game, We're
53:12
going to wipe you out. And of course, for some people, if
53:15
you wipe their businesses out, you wipe their lives out, you wipe their
53:21
ability to feed themselves. So I'm going to say, when I look at
53:25
these documentations, these documents, the language is often very measured and it sounds
53:32
reasonable, but the instinct to the people putting this stuff together are killers.
53:38
Yeah, absolutely right. But you know I'm not going to disappoint you,
53:43
Brian, because I know you you never have. Debbie. I don't think
53:49
you've ever disappointed the UK colump with research that you've been doing well I do.
53:54
I do love to deep dive. I think people are starting to call
53:58
me deep dive Debbie. Now I know a couple of our doctor friends are
54:01
anyway. But there's there's the there's the legal firm. So there's white in
54:07
case, the King's legal firm. Who's going to oversee the accelerator Terrakata accelerator.
54:15
Yeah, well, I don't need to say much about the international law
54:19
firm. The Long History is a global firm, and they say they're uniquely
54:23
placed to help our clients resolve their most complex legal challenges wherever they are.
54:30
Now they're not talking about people in the local town who've got a dispute between
54:35
them. These these are people talking about working alongside vast global, global corporations
54:44
to help those corporations win whatever legal battle they need to win in order to
54:50
make even more profit. That's what they're to do with in my opinion,
54:54
Well, we know the Kings interested in lawyers, we know the Kings interested
55:01
in bankers, we know the Kings interested in charities, we know the Kings
55:07
interested in faith. Because money in all of those I mean, you imagine
55:12
we've just mentioned a few little strands. You imagine the huge pot of money
55:16
if you add all of those up together. But let's just look at another
55:22
area, sustainable insurance, because I never knew that existed, but it clearly
55:29
does. A United Nations Environment program Brian Yes, a strategic approach where all
55:37
activities in the insurance value chain, including interactions with stakeholders, are done in
55:44
a responsible and forward looking way. By identifying, assessing, managing, and
55:47
monitoring risks and opportunities associated with the environmental, social, and governance issues.
55:54
Sustainable insurance aims to reduce risk, developing ave solutions, improve business performance,
56:02
and contribute to environmental, social, and economic sustainability. And then I say,
56:08
well, no, it doesn't. Insurance is about making money out of
56:13
fear. People are fearful that their houses are going to burn down, and
56:16
they're prepared to pay a lot of money per year in order to mitigate the
56:22
risk should that happen. So this is insurance companies working alongside big firms.
56:29
It's not to do with them looking after little people. Oh no, perish
56:34
the thought looking after us little people, you know, just to reinforce Really,
56:37
the insurance is a big business when it comes to sustainable goals and sustainable
56:45
development. And you can see there that you've got net zero Insurance Alliance,
56:52
the Sustainable Insurance Facility of the Vulnerable twenty Group of Finance Ministers, the v
56:59
twenty a task Force on Nature related financial disclosures. But it doesn't take long,
57:07
does it, before it all comes back full circle to the king.
57:13
So the King's got his sausage fingers in the insurance pie as well. Yes,
57:22
it's incredible, isn't it. Top insurers joined Prince Charles to fight the
57:25
climate crisis. Yeah, I'd love to know how what are they actually doing
57:30
because we don't believe in the climate crisis anyway, But what do they think
57:35
they're doing? And it goes on. It talks about there was a few
57:37
mentioned. They're Legal and General Alliance, Hiscock's and AXA, and they've all
57:44
pledged support and they say that the Prince. What the Prince is doing is
57:49
helping us convene and galvanize a whole of industry response. So this is where
57:55
everything is drawn into a big network. And the moment you see private partner
58:02
private public partnership initiatives, the moment you're talking about this sort of thing,
58:08
what it's actually doing is dumbing down governance. That's accountable. It disappears into
58:15
a blob. You're not sure whether you're dealing with profit making corporations, or
58:21
you're dealing with a think tank, or you're dealing with the government. It's
58:24
all in a sort of squidgy mass, and the agenda's driven through that opaque
58:31
blob. This has been going on for years, but now this is on
58:37
a global scale where they're calmly saying, well, we've got the odd nine
58:39
trillion to make this happen, nine trillion dollars. Well, you know,
58:45
you think about you've got money, you've got insurance. What else do you
58:51
need? Oh? Weather, you need to have weather. You've got to
58:54
have floods, You've got to have disasters, because that's where you get the
58:59
insurance coming into it. But then you can see there we've moved on now
59:04
from Terrakarta Accelerator to Terrakarta Exchange. And when you see what's in the Terrakarta
59:13
Exchange, and you can see Lloyd's and BP and the sponsors at the top
59:17
there. But when you go and look at what the insurance market is like
59:22
that King Charles has got his fingers into Look, I mean I've only taken
59:28
a tiny selection these are just a few. But if you go onto the
59:34
Terrakarta Exchange website, the amount of insurance companies and insurance insurers like direct line,
59:47
massive companies, they're all involved. They're literally it, as you said,
59:52
it's a web Brian. But it's only when you start to get to
59:55
look into these documents that you can see how big they are. But I
1:00:00
mean the electrical vehicle, the electric vehicle services. You know we're going into
1:00:05
electric cars. Well we know what happens with electric cars, and sadly a
1:00:09
lot of them have been setting alight and they've been on fire. So you've
1:00:14
got the electric vehicle services, We've got carbon offset insurance, you've got hydrogen
1:00:19
insurance. I mean hydrogens meant to be the next big thing coming down the
1:00:23
line, Green endorsements, and like I say, these are just four.
1:00:29
These are just four that I've taken. So there's another funding stream for the
1:00:34
king insurance. Yeah, and the insurance can also be used as a weapon
1:00:37
because of course are a lot of companies, a lot of businesses, a
1:00:40
lot of professions. If you can't get the insurance, you can't actually trade,
1:00:45
you can't function. No, So we know this in the legal world
1:00:51
that if they want to get at a barrister or get at a solicitor or
1:00:55
a law firm, what happens is their insurance is withdrawn and then they can't
1:01:01
practice. So insurers very very powerful. And another example I can give of
1:01:07
that is the horrible case many years ago when there'd been some pretty vile child
1:01:14
abuse in children's homes in North Wales, and when this came to light,
1:01:20
it also emerged that the insurers of that local authority were telling elected members of
1:01:28
the council what they could what they could or could not say in public,
1:01:32
because if they said the wrong things, they could damage the council's defense,
1:01:38
and that means they would have to pay out more money, and that money,
1:01:43
that risk of payout was covered by the insurance companies. So ultimately the
1:01:49
insurance companies this did appear in public reports, the insurance company concerned was working
1:01:57
in the background to close down the exposure of the abuse of the children because
1:02:02
they were helping protect the risk of the council in future compensation payouts. So
1:02:08
if anybody thinks, well, yeah, there are any insurance companies, know
1:02:13
these are very powerful and very dangerous companies because they withdraw their cover you can
1:02:20
shut down whole sections of industry and the public sector, if not just that
1:02:25
too. If you think about, you know, the direction of travel that
1:02:30
we're going at the moment, everything's becoming digital. So if you're not compliant
1:02:36
and you're you haven't got access to your app, to your phone or to
1:02:40
whatever you need to get insurance, you're not going to get You're not even
1:02:45
going to be able to access insurance, let alone get insurance. And if
1:02:49
you're not compliant or you haven't been doing what the government are telling you to
1:02:53
do, you won't even be offered insurance. And let's face it, a
1:02:58
lot of people in this in the world, but especially we're talking about the
1:03:02
UK. Here, I've got mortgages where they need buildings insurance, you need
1:03:07
car insurance. So you're right, this is a very very powerful sector and
1:03:15
it could affect every single one of us. But what really concerns me,
1:03:19
I think more than anything, is when all of this goes digital, because
1:03:22
then some of us are going to be locked out of all of the systems
1:03:25
entirely. Well, let's have a look England, because allegedly King Charles is
1:03:32
supposed to have England within his kingdom he's supposed to be concerned for us,
1:03:37
but what's he doing with Cop twenty eight and nature? This whole natural England
1:03:44
thing. I mean, you know, we haven't even started on his connections
1:03:47
with farming with his younger life. When he was visiting, he was going
1:03:53
off very quietly and he was learning about crofting in Scotland, was going all
1:04:00
over the place actually to learn about organic farming, which is why you can
1:04:02
see what's going on with high grove and organic farming. But Natural England,
1:04:09
I think we've covered Natural England many times. Tony Juniper there the share of
1:04:14
Natural England will come on to him in a minute. But Natural England have
1:04:18
been responsible for snatching farmland from tenant farmers that have been there for generations,
1:04:26
and they've snatched land back and grabbed it. Land grabs back in order to
1:04:30
rewild. And Tony Juniper has been at the heart of this literally. And
1:04:36
Tony Juniper is one of King Charles's closest allies, closest friends. In fact,
1:04:45
they've co written a number of books together, one of which is a
1:04:48
book called Harmony, of which I've got a copy and I've read it,
1:04:54
and you'll see that he calls it actually a new way of looking at our
1:04:59
world, and it's co written by the King as he was then the Prince
1:05:03
of Wales, Tony Juniper and Ian Skelly, and I would say to be
1:05:10
honest that this is the blueprint for what we're seeing now, this whole worshiping
1:05:16
nature, the environment, sustainability. He also talks in the book about transition
1:05:24
towns, which is the I guess just before the fifteen minutes city concept was
1:05:30
really launched. But transition towns and how many places down here in the Southwest
1:05:36
actually have been involved in that totness Falmouth, many places down here in Cornwall.
1:05:45
So a very revealing book and for anybody that hasn't read Harmony, like
1:05:50
I say, it's very revealing. But he's a prolific author. You know.
1:05:55
King Charles has just written another climate change book with the very same gentleman
1:06:02
Tony Juniper again, so climate Change with Ladybird. I believe this one's coming
1:06:10
out. So yeah, I just have that we're not plugging. We're not
1:06:13
plugging Amazon showing the book. That's just one of the one of the places.
1:06:17
But I've got a suspicion does does King Charles do everything he does and
1:06:24
write all these books. I think what happens is he has a well it's
1:06:28
not even a ghost writer. He has a partner that does most of it,
1:06:30
and then he puts the royal pen stroke in all the key expressions,
1:06:35
or he edits the draft. That's how I think it works, because I
1:06:41
don't think he sat there with original stuff coming out of his own head.
1:06:46
No, although although he is very learned and there's a lot of there's a
1:06:53
lot of what's it called sacred geometry in the book, a lot of it,
1:06:59
and he's very knowledgeable on it. He's studied a lot. So whilst
1:07:03
I would say yes, he's got other people to write and contribute to the
1:07:06
book, I think a lot of it is actually penned by him. It's
1:07:13
said that he works until midnight every night. He gets up very early in
1:07:17
the morning. He doesn't stop for lunch. He's pretty much a workaholic,
1:07:21
and he's obsessed, literally driven. He's written a lot of books, He's
1:07:28
read a lot of books, and he says that you know, he likes
1:07:32
nothing more than to sit in one of his beautifully manicured gardens, often manicured
1:07:38
by Miriam Roth's child, but that's for another no smoke, and he reads,
1:07:44
so he is very well read, and he is very learned, and
1:07:47
he's an intelligent man. He's a businessman, and he's got a lot of
1:07:51
money at his hands at his disposal. Okay, I think Debbie weaker manage
1:08:00
another ten minutes. I've said that. I'll see whether there's a shout from
1:08:05
Stephanie that we can't do that. But I think we do another ten minutes,
1:08:10
and that's probably a good episode that we've done today. I know you're
1:08:15
itching because you've got so much stuff to share it with the audience, but
1:08:19
I think it is good to be able to work through it and have some
1:08:23
discussion about it, and you know, to put some context into some of
1:08:28
these things as opposed to just getting you know, raw images through the screen.
1:08:33
So I think the discussion is necessary and you always add some really good
1:08:39
points. So let's squeeze in ten minutes and see where that takes us.
1:08:45
But we are saying to the audience there's tons more to come about this man
1:08:50
and what he's really up to go. Let's give them a little taster.
1:08:56
Brian, I mean, we haven't really looked at the investiture. We haven't
1:09:02
looked at the farming that he's been doing so much of. There's his personal
1:09:10
life, his friends, his associates, you know, these are all the
1:09:15
things that I've been looking into. So there's a lot more to come,
1:09:18
a lot more to come. But I noticed. No, let's go back
1:09:21
to his book, because a King a climate change book for kids and Cambridge
1:09:27
zero. So there you've got the University of Cambridge supporting his majesty talking about
1:09:35
the World Economic Forum as well there and it says his Majesty has been an
1:09:41
environmental leader for over fifty years. This reiterates your point that if people think
1:09:46
this man was just some sort of eccentric sat in the background pontificating on the
1:09:54
beauty of architecture or the right architecitecture. No, this man has been up
1:09:59
to this game, up for this game for a very long time. Yeah.
1:10:03
Absolutely, And he's not done it alone, you know. And we're
1:10:09
just touched. So should we just touch his family. Yeah, we'll just
1:10:14
touch on members of the family because he hasn't done it alone. And you
1:10:16
have to think to yourself, well, who do you trust in your family?
1:10:20
You know, that can bring in the money, that's got a good
1:10:25
maybe a good sociable personality that likes to go out and about. I mean,
1:10:30
he's got the perfect brother, hasn't he, or did have in Prince
1:10:33
Andrew, who was known as you know, very sociable, very gregarious,
1:10:41
a bit of the sales rep. I call him the sales rep of the
1:10:45
Royal family. And you know, what was he doing is UK Trade Envoy
1:10:49
that's going to be kept secret by the British government until twenty sixty five.
1:10:55
We don't know. We don't know what Prince Andrew has been doing, but
1:11:01
we do know that there has been But there's certainly a biographer that wants to
1:11:06
write a book about Prince Andrew, and he submitted a Freedom of Information Act
1:11:16
request to the Foreign Office but got told that all the documents pertaining to Andrew's
1:11:24
role as Trade Envoy we're going to be kept secret until twenty sixty five.
1:11:28
That's one hundred and five years after Andrew's birth. So this is breaking with
1:11:32
tradition completely. So we're never going to know what Prince Andrew was doing,
1:11:38
or where he was getting the money from or where the money was going.
1:11:43
We'll never know. But of course what we do know now is that Prince
1:11:47
Andrew had a lot of dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Gislaine Maxwell, and there
1:11:56
was a lot of money there too, So you have to ask yourself what
1:12:03
kind of money was going to the royal family, and then when it did
1:12:06
go to the royal family, where was it going. Was Andrew collecting on
1:12:11
behalf of his elder brother. I'm not saying that he was. I'm just
1:12:16
throwing it out there for people to ask a question because I don't know the
1:12:23
answer. But what's interesting about Ghislaine Maxwell is we come back to the word
1:12:27
terror again Terra Marh because she founded the Terremarh project in twenty twelve for the
1:12:34
conservation of the seas, and you've just seen in the Terra Carta the then
1:12:41
Prince of Wales now King wants to return thirty percent of the ocean, thirty
1:12:47
percent of the land back to biodiversity, and the Maxwell's were pouring a lot
1:12:54
of money into it. And I went into company's house to look at Terramarh.
1:13:00
Obviously, since the arrest an the imprisonment of Islam Maxwell, it has
1:13:04
been dissolved, but there you can see the company's house entry for it.
1:13:13
So you just The thing is, when you start to do a bit of
1:13:16
research and you start to look at things, you end up with more questions
1:13:20
than you do answers, and you think, well, where is all this
1:13:25
money coming from? Was Prince Andrew fundraising for his brother's empire? This sustainable
1:13:34
initiatives Terra cotta astracata is Charles the Savior of the World. I don't know
1:13:43
that's a good place to end on, Debbie. Let's just put the picture
1:13:46
up on screen so that people know what we're talking about. Apologize for using
1:13:51
a BBC image here, but Prince Charles, the winged hero, is the
1:13:58
winged hero saving the world, and he's going to become the centerpiece as a
1:14:02
giant bronze statue of a remote Amazonian town. And he was actually shown a
1:14:09
picture of this before it was produced and asked whether he was happy with it,
1:14:14
and he said, yees. So it's Prince Charles with what the wings
1:14:17
of an angel. We've actually got some more pictures. Maybe we'll come onto
1:14:23
the pictures in detail next time. But what was said about this Mauricio Bentez,
1:14:29
which was the sculptor who sculpted this angelic statue of Charles, and it's
1:14:38
his face. You know, when you look at it, it is him.
1:14:41
It is his face. And when you see the whole statue, you
1:14:45
see these massive wings, and then he's got a loin cloth on and he's
1:14:50
standing or overarching a hill that's covered in skulls. He dominates it. You
1:15:00
know, it's extraordinary. So one of these statues has been erected in the
1:15:06
rainforest. One was presented to him, a small one was presented to him
1:15:13
by the sculpture, and he was extremely pleased to receive it, by the
1:15:16
way, and delighted with it. And then Tim Cohen, who's done a
1:15:23
lot of work on Charles and the history behind King Charles, he's heard that
1:15:30
there is a life size or even bigger ten cubits I think is the size
1:15:36
another one that's meant to be being put on top of the Third Temple if
1:15:42
it's erected in Israel. So I'm just saying what I've heard, and I'm
1:15:47
just repeating what I've seen. But again, who knows Brian, is he
1:15:54
the savior of the world or does he think he's the savior of the world.
1:15:59
I don't know. I think he's the savior of the world, but
1:16:01
I don't think he's the savior of the world. Derby, let's end there
1:16:06
have been a fascinating chat through just part of the information that you've assembled to
1:16:14
do with King Charles the Third and the royal family. I'm good to say
1:16:19
to the audience thank you very much for joining us. Don't be shy.
1:16:24
If you've got comments, you've got information, or you've got things that you
1:16:28
think that we should Debbie and I should should be interested in, then get
1:16:32
in touch, email it through, and also we'd say to you please also
1:16:36
give us feedback on what we're doing. Do you think it's important? Is
1:16:42
the subject important? We'd really like to know not only from UK column members
1:16:47
whether we're hitting the spot, but we'd also like to know from people who
1:16:51
aren't yet UK column members whether what we're saying is important for the not only
1:16:58
the people in UK, but obviously people in people worldwide. You need to
1:17:05
understand what this man is really up to and what's coming down the pipeline.
1:17:11
Debbie More. Yeah, let's end there. Thank you very much for that
1:17:17
contribution. Thank you very much to everybody who's joined us today for this episode,
1:17:23
and do give us that feedback because that helps us enormously. See whether
1:17:29
we're hitting the right spot, so we leave it there. Thank you.
1:17:32
Bye bye bye bye