Latest / THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP / Everyone Is Finding Out

Transcript

Everyone Is Finding Out · THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: So let's be clear. Ethan Klein is a multi-millionaire YouTuber.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Ethan's a hardcore Zionist. His wife, Ila, was in the IDF,
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: has continued to defend the IDF.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: You served in the military. How was your experience?
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: I hated everything about it. He's denied the genocide.
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: Gazans, they're being genocided and all this.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: These are three very small Twitch streamers. And they reacted
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: to a video of his, something that he encouraged people
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: to do.
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: If XQC re-uploads one of my videos and just sits
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: there watching, I should have the right to sue him.
• 0:30
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 0:31
  Speaker 4: Look at all that slander. For those of you who
• 0:33
  Speaker 4: don't know, that was Taylor Lorenz, one of the foremost
• 0:36
  Speaker 4: propagandists in America, who lies anytime her mouth is moving.
• 0:39
  Speaker 4: As for the defamation part, especially the part about content theft,
• 0:43
  Speaker 4: it's funny because Ethan Klein went viral for this Leftovers
• 0:45
  Speaker 4: podcast episode, where he spent the better part of an
• 0:48
  Speaker 4: hour calling his former co-host, Hasan Piker, and ex-QC... a
• 0:52
  Speaker 4: couple of thieves who should be sued for copyright infringement.
• 0:55
  Speaker 5: One of the things is, I think you'll agree with
• 0:57
  Speaker 5: this as well, is just, like, don't leave the video
• 1:00
  Speaker 5: running when you get up.
• 1:01
  Speaker 6: 100%.
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: To go pee. Yeah, you can't do that.
• 1:03
  Speaker 7: That's, like, pretty basic stuff.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: You stop doing that?
• 1:05
  Speaker 8: I usually only do it with my videos that I
• 1:08
  Speaker 8: know are from my friends.
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: You do not have my permission to walk away from
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: my videos.
• 1:12
  Speaker 9: For the record.
• 1:12
  Speaker 4: So Taylor Lorenz knows that everything she's saying about Ethan
• 1:15
  Speaker 4: Klein is a blatant lie because there have been multiple
• 1:17
  Speaker 4: viral events surrounding Ethan. where he has openly stated that
• 1:20
  Speaker 4: he believes the exact opposite of everything she accuses him of.
• 1:23
  Speaker 4: There's no way she doesn't know her information is wrong.
• 1:26
  Speaker 4: So why does she lie anyway? Well, it's because it's
• 1:28
  Speaker 4: easy to get away with.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: Ethan knows that he can't pursue any sort of defamation
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: case against these women. He knows that there's anti-slap protections,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: thank God, in California and other states.
• 1:38
  Speaker 10: Right.
• 1:38
  Speaker 4: As much as anti-slap laws are great to stop bad
• 1:41
  Speaker 4: people from silencing their critics through bullshit lawsuits, these laws
• 1:44
  Speaker 4: can also be used by career liars like Taylor, who
• 1:47
  Speaker 4: can't seem to figure out how to open her mouth
• 1:49
  Speaker 4: without defaming someone. For context, she was talking about Frogan, Denims,
• 1:52
  Speaker 4: and Casytron, who openly stole content from Ethan Klein and
• 1:55
  Speaker 4: got sued for it, something that really almost everyone on
• 1:58
  Speaker 4: the internet is happy about because people like them are
• 2:00
  Speaker 4: finally being punished for the consistent rule-breaking that Twitch turns
• 2:03
  Speaker 4: a blind eye to, and slander, among other stuff that
• 2:06
  Speaker 4: comes out of their streams. And on that note, let's
• 2:09
  Speaker 4: talk about Drake Bell. Drake is primarily known for a
• 2:11
  Speaker 4: Nickelodeon children's show from the 2000s called Drake & Josh.
• 2:14
  Speaker 4: and more recently for his appearance on the extremely popular
• 2:17
  Speaker 4: HBO documentary, Quiet on Set, where he talks about being
• 2:20
  Speaker 4: sexually abused by a former acting coach named Brian Peck
• 2:23
  Speaker 4: around the age of 14. This whole situation was really disgusting,
• 2:27
  Speaker 4: especially considering how much support Drake's abuser got from famous
• 2:30
  Speaker 4: actors after he was found to be guilty. But that's
• 2:33
  Speaker 4: not what we're here to talk about. Instead, let's talk
• 2:35
  Speaker 4: about a different event that Drake is known for from 2021.
• 2:38
  Speaker 11: Having said that, how do you plead to count one?
• 2:40
  Speaker 11: Attempted at endangering children, felony of the fourth degree.
• 2:44
  Speaker 3: Guilty.
• 2:45
  Speaker 9: How do you plead to count two disseminating matter harmful
• 2:48
  Speaker 9: to juveniles, first degree misdemeanor?
• 2:50
  Speaker 11: Guilty.
• 2:51
  Speaker 4: As if it wasn't bad enough to find out that
• 2:53
  Speaker 4: many of the creators of your favorite shows as a
• 2:55
  Speaker 4: kid were terrible people who preyed on children. Also, some
• 2:58
  Speaker 4: of the child stars grew up to be predators themselves.
• 3:00
  Speaker 4: Drake Bell was accused of having an ongoing relationship with
• 3:03
  Speaker 4: a minor from the ages of 12 to 15 while
• 3:06
  Speaker 4: he was in his 30s. The abuse being alleged ranged
• 3:09
  Speaker 4: from soliciting nudes to full on sexual contact. Ironically, he
• 3:12
  Speaker 4: got accused of doing a lot of the same stuff
• 3:14
  Speaker 4: that Brian Peck had done to him 15 years prior.
• 3:16
  Speaker 10: He allegedly sent his genitals to a child? You are
• 3:23
  Speaker 10: preying on a fucking fan man.
• 3:25
  Speaker 7: How despicable.
• 3:26
  Speaker 4: That was Alexa Nicholas, who was also featured in the
• 3:29
  Speaker 4: Quiet on Set documentary. She's famous for a Nickelodeon show
• 3:32
  Speaker 4: called Zoey 101 and was told to do some pretty
• 3:34
  Speaker 4: child-inappropriate stuff by Dan Schneider when she was on set.
• 3:38
  Speaker 4: I agree with her. It's pretty disgusting that somebody would
• 3:40
  Speaker 4: take advantage of a fan relationship to abuse a child.
• 3:43
  Speaker 4: Drake was on one of the most popular Nickelodeon shows
• 3:45
  Speaker 4: of the 2000s. Millions of people grew up watching that show,
• 3:49
  Speaker 4: and around the time that he was accused, there were
• 3:51
  Speaker 4: constant reruns of it playing, which ensures that a continuous
• 3:54
  Speaker 4: crop of teenagers would be susceptible to idolizing him, which
• 3:57
  Speaker 4: makes them vulnerable to being preyed on. Except, there's one
• 4:00
  Speaker 4: big problem with this. Almost everything Drake was accused of
• 4:04
  Speaker 4: was a lie, or at the very least, unfounded. But
• 4:07
  Speaker 4: that didn't stop droves of people from accusing him of
• 4:09
  Speaker 4: being a child predator anyway.
• 4:11
  Speaker 12: The New York Times printed that I was a registered
• 4:15
  Speaker 12: sex offender, that I had pled guilty to essaying, minor, like,
• 4:22
  Speaker 12: all complete factual inaccuracies of my case. but printed in
• 4:26
  Speaker 12: the New York Times.
• 4:28
  Speaker 11: Wow.
• 4:28
  Speaker 12: That wasn't even on the docket to be on the
• 4:31
  Speaker 12: registry because that wasn't even what the case was about.
• 4:35
  Speaker 12: But all of a sudden, that's what the case is about.
• 4:38
  Speaker 3: Mr.
• 4:38
  Speaker 4: Bell, who was charged with attempted child endangerment and disseminating
• 4:41
  Speaker 4: material harmful to children, will have to register as a
• 4:44
  Speaker 4: sex offender. Yeah, that's a pretty bad thing to be
• 4:46
  Speaker 4: wrong about. But what actually did Drake do? He did
• 4:49
  Speaker 4: take a plea deal instead of going to trial, which
• 4:51
  Speaker 4: means he pled guilty to child endangerment. and he got
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: sentenced during this hearing here, but what does this all mean?
• 4:56
  Speaker 4: What specific things did he do? Let's talk about it,
• 4:59
  Speaker 4: but before we do, I will say that this is
• 5:01
  Speaker 4: quite a morally nuanced case. It's a long story, but
• 5:04
  Speaker 4: to quickly go over what happened, after Drake and Josh ended,
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: Drake moved on to a music career and developed a fanbase,
• 5:10
  Speaker 4: including a 12-year-old superfan from Canada named Sydney who was
• 5:13
  Speaker 4: obsessed with him. Sydney knew someone who knew Drake, so
• 5:16
  Speaker 4: she got special treatment like backstage access, and she got
• 5:19
  Speaker 4: to meet him I think like twice over the course
• 5:20
  Speaker 4: of three years. Some of the facts of this case
• 5:23
  Speaker 4: are unclear because there's a lot of missing information, but
• 5:26
  Speaker 4: in 2017 when this all occurred, Drake had much more
• 5:29
  Speaker 4: open boundaries with his fans, he kept DMs open, and
• 5:32
  Speaker 4: he would regularly respond to them. Sometimes he would give
• 5:35
  Speaker 4: out his phone number, which personally I think is very stupid.
• 5:37
  Speaker 4: Appropriate boundaries need to be maintained with fans for the
• 5:40
  Speaker 4: safety of both the creator and the fans. Anyway, because
• 5:43
  Speaker 4: he was overly personable, and because Sydney wasn't getting the
• 5:46
  Speaker 4: attention that she wanted from him, she wanted to marry Drake,
• 5:48
  Speaker 4: so because of these things... Sidney made an alt account
• 5:51
  Speaker 4: on Instagram and started DMing Drake under a different identity
• 5:54
  Speaker 4: from what he would recognize her as. And this is
• 5:56
  Speaker 4: the part where I start to think way less of Drake.
• 5:58
  Speaker 4: Though I know this is common behavior, I've always thought
• 6:01
  Speaker 4: it was disgusting and cringe for celebrities to solicit fans
• 6:04
  Speaker 4: for sex or for nudes. Keep in mind that during
• 6:06
  Speaker 4: this time, Drake was in a relationship, so in my opinion,
• 6:09
  Speaker 4: he was cheating. Now, I don't blame Sidney for doing this.
• 6:12
  Speaker 4: She was a kid at the time, and whether she
• 6:13
  Speaker 4: was being manipulative or not, as some people have pointed out,
• 6:16
  Speaker 4: She's a minor here, so you know, if as a
• 6:18
  Speaker 4: 30-year-old the universe tests you or someone tries to trick
• 6:21
  Speaker 4: you in the hopes that you'll marry them, the point
• 6:23
  Speaker 4: is not the morality of the tester. The point is,
• 6:25
  Speaker 4: don't fail the test. I don't care if she was
• 6:27
  Speaker 4: the one who made the first move. She's a minor. Anyway,
• 6:30
  Speaker 4: so Sydney starts sending lewd photos of herself. That's this
• 6:33
  Speaker 4: image here, but it's been redacted because she was underage.
• 6:36
  Speaker 4: I don't know if her face was included in the picture,
• 6:38
  Speaker 4: but based on the other context around the event, I'm
• 6:40
  Speaker 4: guessing it wasn't. Drake responds, Wow, great pic, that booty.
• 6:44
  Speaker 6: More?
• 6:45
  Speaker 4: And the next page is Drake continuing to ask for
• 6:47
  Speaker 4: more lewd photos. There are also shirtless photos of Drake here,
• 6:50
  Speaker 4: but it looks like they're on Sydney's side of the
• 6:52
  Speaker 4: chat log, which means that she was the one who
• 6:53
  Speaker 4: sent them. The conversation goes on, and Drake says, How
• 6:57
  Speaker 4: old are you now? Sydney responds, 15. Drake had never
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: asked if she was an adult before asking for lewd
• 7:03
  Speaker 4: photos of her, and that's what he was pleading guilty to.
• 7:06
  Speaker 4: His only saving grace here is that as soon as
• 7:08
  Speaker 4: he found out that she was underage, he cut contact.
• 7:11
  Speaker 4: But personally, I think he was being incredibly irresponsible considering
• 7:14
  Speaker 4: that he was the star of a show for young teenagers,
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: which is why I think he deserved to get punished
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: and why I think he doesn't deserve to be considered
• 7:20
  Speaker 4: completely innocent here. But that doesn't mean he is guilty
• 7:23
  Speaker 4: of everything that he was accused of. If he was,
• 7:26
  Speaker 4: this would be a different video. Now, I don't hold
• 7:28
  Speaker 4: Sydney accountable for the stuff that she did as a minor. However,
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: the following allegations were made when Sydney was 19, and
• 7:34
  Speaker 4: were likely made out of spite because she was mad
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: that Drake wouldn't pursue a relationship with her. And for that,
• 7:39
  Speaker 4: I think she's kind of a terrible person.
• 7:41
  Speaker 8: On December 1st, 2017, my aunt took me to the
• 7:45
  Speaker 8: Odeon Concert Club to watch him perform. That night, the
• 7:48
  Speaker 8: defendant took me backstage to be alone with him. He
• 7:51
  Speaker 8: started kissing me, and the night ended in him having
• 7:55
  Speaker 8: me perform oral sex on him twice. He preyed on
• 7:58
  Speaker 8: me and sexually abused me. He is a monster and
• 8:03
  Speaker 8: a danger to children.
• 8:04
  Speaker 4: Everything she says here is almost certainly not true. The
• 8:07
  Speaker 4: facts of this case are publicly available at this link
• 8:09
  Speaker 4: if you want to take a look through them. However,
• 8:11
  Speaker 4: a lot of specific details are murky because there aren't
• 8:14
  Speaker 4: dates listed in important areas and because Sydney Factory reset
• 8:18
  Speaker 4: her phone to, in my opinion, delete and fabricate evidence.
• 8:21
  Speaker 4: But all of this is to say that you can't
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: look at some Instagram DMs and know the entire case.
• 8:26
  Speaker 4: You have to piece the story together by looking through
• 8:27
  Speaker 4: the evidence as a whole. So, it's very complicated, but
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: to simplify everything into its base parts, after reading the documents,
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: it's clear to me that Drake didn't really know who
• 8:36
  Speaker 4: Sydney was at the time of this concert, where she's
• 8:38
  Speaker 4: alleging that abuse happened. Which is important, because Sydney's story
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: is that all of this abuse is occurring throughout a
• 8:44
  Speaker 4: continuous long-term relationship. Well, side relationship, because Drake was already
• 8:48
  Speaker 4: dating someone. The evidence that there's not really any closeness
• 8:51
  Speaker 4: between Sydney and Drake is in this card for her
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: 16th birthday that her chaperone secretly had signed for her.
• 8:57
  Speaker 4: Sydney claims that she had a multi-year, ongoing relationship with Drake,
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: but this card is signed like she is just an
• 9:02
  Speaker 4: average fan, or was signed like they just met, which
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: I think was the case outside of maybe a fan
• 9:07
  Speaker 4: meet-and-greet that you would do at a convention. I'm so
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: lucky to have such an amazing fan, and now friend. Like,
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: there weren't friends before? Second, this card was signed at
• 9:16
  Speaker 4: a concert three or four months after Drake ghosted her
• 9:18
  Speaker 4: for saying that she was 15, which suggests that she
• 9:21
  Speaker 4: did the Instagram messages on a burner account, and he
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: had no idea that he was messaging Sydney. So in
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: Drake's eyes, there's no connection between the girl that he
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: was DMing and the girl that he sees at the concert.
• 9:31
  Speaker 4: This whole allegation doesn't make sense. He's ghosting her on Instagram,
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: which is the easiest environment for him to prey on her,
• 9:37
  Speaker 4: but then he's out in public a few months later
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: with a bunch of adults around trying to assault her?
• 9:41
  Speaker 4: This sounds like a story that a teenager made up
• 9:43
  Speaker 4: who doesn't understand human psychology very well. Even more damning
• 9:47
  Speaker 4: for Sidney's case, two adult witnesses that were at the
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: concert said that Sidney's version of the story was not
• 9:52
  Speaker 4: true at all, and there were no moments where she
• 9:55
  Speaker 4: was with Drake by herself.
• 9:56
  Speaker 10: I remember you mentioning in the transcript that you knew
• 10:03
  Speaker 10: the victim's mom and even knew the victim technically since
• 10:07
  Speaker 10: she was in.
• 10:09
  Speaker 7: Her mother's belly.
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 10:11
  Speaker 7: At no time. She was, she was alone with him.
• 10:14
  Speaker 9: Absolutely not.
• 10:16
  Speaker 5: A hundred percent.
• 10:17
  Speaker 7: Not the only time she went into that room. was
• 10:20
  Speaker 7: when all three of us went into that room.
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: She sat out in that hallway with me.
• 10:25
  Speaker 4: So there were two separate witness testimonies from this event
• 10:28
  Speaker 4: in Ohio that said that Drake was never alone with Sidney.
• 10:31
  Speaker 4: The first one I showed was a longtime family friend, well,
• 10:33
  Speaker 4: former family friend, named Darlene who knew someone who knew Drake.
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: She sacrificed that friendship to stand in defense of the truth,
• 10:40
  Speaker 4: so good for her. And the second witness was the
• 10:43
  Speaker 4: person who knew Drake, His photographer, Kathy.
• 10:45
  Speaker 9: They stepped inside the door when he opened the door,
• 10:48
  Speaker 9: but Darlene ended up sitting in the hallway with her.
• 10:51
  Speaker 9: Her aunt went in his room to get the card signed.
• 10:53
  Speaker 9: The rest of the time, they were in the hallway.
• 10:55
  Speaker 9: She has pictures of them taken with him in the hallway.
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: Right, right.
• 11:00
  Speaker 9: And she was never out of Darlene's sight, ever. I mean,
• 11:04
  Speaker 9: Darlene was sitting next to her the entire time. Then later,
• 11:06
  Speaker 9: she comes out and says all this stuff happened, which
• 11:08
  Speaker 9: is literally impossible.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: Uh-huh.
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the only person alone with him for any.
• 11:13
  Speaker 9: Time was her aunt.
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: So not a good look for Sydney here and her
• 11:16
  Speaker 4: allegations of assault against Drake. And just to take a
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: second to clarify, Sydney went to a handful of Drake's concerts,
• 11:22
  Speaker 4: but I think she only saw him once before the
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: Cleveland show that was just mentioned, which is all that's
• 11:26
  Speaker 4: relevant because it was directly following the Instagram DMs where
• 11:29
  Speaker 4: he ghosted her after she said she was 15. All
• 11:32
  Speaker 4: of this is confusing, but the point is that Drake
• 11:34
  Speaker 4: did not pursue her after finding out her age, and
• 11:37
  Speaker 4: multiple witnesses are saying that Sydney's story is false. Now,
• 11:41
  Speaker 4: if you remember from a few minutes ago, The girl
• 11:43
  Speaker 4: interviewing the witnesses is Alexa Nicholas. Alexa had previously released
• 11:47
  Speaker 4: a video on Drake where she called him a horrible person,
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: a predator, and she stood in line with his accuser.
• 11:52
  Speaker 7: I stand with that victim of Drake Bell. I stand
• 11:56
  Speaker 7: with her. And I definitely am disturbed by Drake Bell
• 12:01
  Speaker 7: in general.
• 12:01
  Speaker 4: Initially, Alexa was very hostile towards Drake until she saw
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: the actual evidence. And let me just say that for
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: the most egregious claims... The evidence was so stacked against
• 12:10
  Speaker 4: Drake's accuser that Alexa completely flipped her opinion on him.
• 12:13
  Speaker 10: I see Drake Bell not creating a solid boundary between
• 12:19
  Speaker 10: him and her at all associating. What I don't see
• 12:23
  Speaker 10: is Drake Bell pursuing a child. The evidence does not
• 12:27
  Speaker 10: get me to that type of decision.
• 12:30
  Speaker 4: Again, I think Drake deserved to be punished. I think
• 12:32
  Speaker 4: he deserves to be called out for exploiting a power
• 12:34
  Speaker 4: relationship with his fans. I think it's reasonable to question
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: why he was asking for nudes from fans without verifying
• 12:39
  Speaker 4: their age when he's famous for being on a children's show. However,
• 12:42
  Speaker 4: I don't think the evidence shows that he's a child
• 12:44
  Speaker 4: predator or a danger to children in the future. Again,
• 12:47
  Speaker 4: this situation is very morally nuanced, and honestly, I think
• 12:50
  Speaker 4: Sydney and Drake both look bad here. While I don't
• 12:53
  Speaker 4: hold Sydney accountable for the stuff that she did as
• 12:55
  Speaker 4: a minor to instigate this, I do not appreciate her
• 12:58
  Speaker 4: demeanor as a 19-year-old, which included her almost certainly telling
• 13:01
  Speaker 4: fabricated stories of abuse. because doing that harms people who
• 13:05
  Speaker 4: are actually victimized in that way. It allows real abusers
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: to accuse victims of being false accusers, and it allows
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: them to say, the Matrix is after me, instead of
• 13:14
  Speaker 4: being held accountable for their crimes. That being said, this
• 13:17
  Speaker 4: is actually where our main story starts. In terms of
• 13:20
  Speaker 4: this video, the important thing that happened here is not
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: Drake being seen as innocent of the most egregious allegations.
• 13:26
  Speaker 4: What I actually want to focus on was the moment
• 13:29
  Speaker 4: from Alexa Nicholas where she changes her mind on Drake Bell,
• 13:32
  Speaker 4: to argue in favor of the evidence and not her
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: initial emotions about the case. This was a huge moment.
• 13:37
  Speaker 10: What I don't see is Drake Bell pursuing a child.
• 13:42
  Speaker 10: The evidence does not get me to that type of decision.
• 13:46
  Speaker 4: Understand the consequences of Alexa sticking with the actual evidence.
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: Her audience, and the survivor community in general, is full
• 13:52
  Speaker 4: of radical leftist me-tours who will wholeheartedly believe any inane
• 13:55
  Speaker 4: allegation that happened like 25 years ago with no police
• 13:58
  Speaker 4: report or any actual evidence outside of the accuser's personal story,
• 14:02
  Speaker 4: even if that story is missing key details or key
• 14:05
  Speaker 4: witnesses are saying the assault never happened. Understand how much
• 14:08
  Speaker 4: of a sacrifice going against an audience full of these
• 14:10
  Speaker 4: types of people is, especially these days where everything is
• 14:13
  Speaker 4: so polarized that a father of two can be publicly
• 14:15
  Speaker 4: executed during a debate and people are so married to
• 14:18
  Speaker 4: their ideology that they'll say, well, you know, actually it's
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: a good thing that a guy was shot because he
• 14:23
  Speaker 4: had ideas that I don't like and he was sort
• 14:25
  Speaker 4: of mean to people who I agree with one or
• 14:26
  Speaker 4: two times. Ethan Klein had a similar audience to Alexa Nicholas,
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: and ever since he said, maybe we should stop promoting terrorism,
• 14:33
  Speaker 4: they have been non-stop harassing him, doxing him, threatening to
• 14:36
  Speaker 4: kill him, and they've been trying to alienate him from
• 14:39
  Speaker 4: his children. So anyway, instead of leaning further into her
• 14:42
  Speaker 4: beliefs about Drake Bell after seeing additional evidence, which is
• 14:44
  Speaker 4: usually what we see from this group, Alexa essentially sacrificed
• 14:48
  Speaker 4: her career to say she was wrong, and Drake is
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: not guilty of sexual assault against a minor. Alexa spent
• 14:53
  Speaker 4: multiple hours going over all the evidence and talking to
• 14:55
  Speaker 4: witnesses on her channel. Despite laying everything out, her comment
• 14:59
  Speaker 4: section is a cesspool of former audience members calling her
• 15:02
  Speaker 4: all kinds of names. Meanwhile, if you go to the
• 15:04
  Speaker 4: video of the actual sentencing, it's a bunch of more
• 15:07
  Speaker 4: reasonable people saying, hey, where's all the evidence of all
• 15:10
  Speaker 4: these horrible things that the victim said was happening?
• 15:12
  Speaker 6: What the victim is claiming to have occurred here, not
• 15:15
  Speaker 6: only am I saying that it did not happen, not
• 15:17
  Speaker 6: only would Mr. Bell say that that did not happen,
• 15:20
  Speaker 6: but the evidence in this case would suggest it did
• 15:24
  Speaker 6: not happen. And again... We all know that this prosecutor's
• 15:27
  Speaker 6: office would pursue child sex charges and go to great
• 15:30
  Speaker 6: lengths and aggressively as they should. And we've seen it
• 15:33
  Speaker 6: many times. If they felt that that was a provable case,
• 15:37
  Speaker 6: I'm sure we would not be talking here today about
• 15:40
  Speaker 6: an attempted child endangerment and a disseminating matter harmful to
• 15:45
  Speaker 6: a minor.
• 15:45
  Speaker 4: Yeah, that seems reasonable. However, on the radical Me Too side,
• 15:49
  Speaker 4: this was the narrative.
• 15:50
  Speaker 11: When you watch the sentencing video, what ends up happening
• 15:54
  Speaker 11: is the first half is the woman reading her impact statement.
• 16:00
  Speaker 11: The second half is Drake's defense attorney responding to that
• 16:05
  Speaker 11: and being like, literally, he's like, I need to call
• 16:08
  Speaker 11: her credibility into question. And then it's like 15 minutes
• 16:11
  Speaker 11: of him just throwing out like every victim blaming example
• 16:15
  Speaker 11: in the book. And he also, as lawyers do, as
• 16:20
  Speaker 11: is their job, he uses legalese and he uses the
• 16:24
  Speaker 11: way that the legal system works against the victim and
• 16:28
  Speaker 11: in the favor of his client.
• 16:30
  Speaker 4: Yeah, asking for evidence that you were assaulted when two
• 16:32
  Speaker 4: adults who were there said that you weren't is just
• 16:34
  Speaker 4: victim blaming. But anyway, allow me to introduce you to
• 16:37
  Speaker 4: the girl from the previous clip, Kat Tenbarge. Kat Tenbarge
• 16:41
  Speaker 4: is a journalist who writes for NBC. Well, she used
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: to write for NBC. And she's also known for this.
• 16:46
  Speaker 3: I remember Kat from back during the Debt vs. Heard days. Kat,
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: along with several others, were diehard Amber Heard stans, could
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: not take any criticism of Amber Heard. They called it
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: all misogyny. They called everything misogynistic, etc. They were not
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: being impartial. They were, in fact, quite, quite biased towards Ms. Heard.
• 17:06
  Speaker 4: To get more to the point, Kat Tenbarge is being
• 17:08
  Speaker 4: sued by Alexa Nicholas for defamation over statements that she
• 17:11
  Speaker 4: made around the Drake Bell situation. Let me just start
• 17:14
  Speaker 4: by saying that I can't understate how fucking despicable of
• 17:16
  Speaker 4: a person Kat Tenbarge is, and how much I can't
• 17:19
  Speaker 4: wait to watch this lawsuit unfold. While there was moral
• 17:22
  Speaker 4: nuance with the prior subjects, there's not a lot of
• 17:24
  Speaker 4: moral nuance with Kat.
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: Kat, welcome.
• 17:27
  Speaker 11: Thank you so much for having me.
• 17:28
  Speaker 7: I'm so excited to be here.
• 17:30
  Speaker 4: Of course she's friends with Taylor Lorenz. Taylor is the
• 17:33
  Speaker 4: master of defamation and doxing and encouraging domestic terrorism. Earlier
• 17:37
  Speaker 4: I mentioned Charlie Kirk, and naturally when he was murdered,
• 17:40
  Speaker 4: Kat's initial response was to smirk, And then a few
• 17:43
  Speaker 4: days later, do a podcast defaming Charlie with Taylor and
• 17:46
  Speaker 4: some other guy named Matt.
• 17:48
  Speaker 11: Did you see Charlie Kirk was just shot?
• 17:50
  Speaker 5: Really?
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: Wait, did they hit him?
• 17:53
  Speaker 8: Yes, maybe.
• 17:54
  Speaker 11: So much of what Charlie Kirk said was straight up
• 17:56
  Speaker 11: misinformation and just bigotry.
• 17:59
  Speaker 5: Charlie Kirk was violent in his words.
• 18:02
  Speaker 11: His style is inducing fear in others. Don't give the
• 18:06
  Speaker 11: other side the opportunity to speak. just like stamp them
• 18:09
  Speaker 11: out of existence. He has nothing to fear. He's a
• 18:12
  Speaker 11: white conservative man. Like it's just, it's all such a
• 18:16
  Speaker 11: false bad faith premise that like people are being uncivil
• 18:20
  Speaker 11: and violent. The people who are uncivil and violent are
• 18:23
  Speaker 11: Charlie Kirk and his friends.
• 18:25
  Speaker 4: Ethan Klein is a raging misogynist who hates women. Excellent
• 18:28
  Speaker 4: piece by Kat Tenbarge. This is stunning praise from her
• 18:31
  Speaker 4: friend Taylor, so let's see what kind of journalism Kat does. Well,
• 18:35
  Speaker 4: it's an article where she's defending Hasan Piker. Of course
• 18:38
  Speaker 4: she's a Hasan groupie.
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: This is not journalism.
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: This is just slop.
• 18:41
  Speaker 11: With peace and love.
• 18:42
  Speaker 4: In this article, Kat is defending Hasan and the three
• 18:45
  Speaker 4: idiots who think that copyright infringement is okay, as long
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: as you really don't like somebody. Fortunately, the courts don't
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: seem to agree. Keep in mind that the reason that
• 18:54
  Speaker 4: Ethan is punishing them in this way... is because people
• 18:57
  Speaker 4: such as Denims were fostering a false narrative about Ethan's
• 18:59
  Speaker 4: parenting in the hopes that it would encourage people to
• 19:02
  Speaker 4: call the CPS so they would take his kids away.
• 19:05
  Speaker 4: But it's okay, because a three and a five-year-old won't
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: remember being interrogated by the CPS under the implication that
• 19:10
  Speaker 4: they're being raised by abusive parents.
• 19:11
  Speaker 8: You're not forming memories at three years old, and it's
• 19:14
  Speaker 8: very rare that you're forming memories at five years old.
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: Her defense for sending the CPS to break up our
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: family and to interrogate our three and five-year-old is that
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: Don't worry, kids don't remember stuff. Pretending as if interrogating
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: my three and five-year-old sons couldn't possibly cause any damage
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: because they can't remember is the most insane, monstrous thing
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: I could even imagine somebody to say about this.
• 19:37
  Speaker 4: Let me be clear to people like Kat Tenbarge. If
• 19:39
  Speaker 4: someone tried to get my kids taken away over some
• 19:41
  Speaker 4: retarded political differences, they would be lucky if all I
• 19:44
  Speaker 4: did was try to sue them for copyright infringement. You
• 19:47
  Speaker 4: want to pretend that you're a part of the survivor community,
• 19:49
  Speaker 4: and yet... This morning when I woke up and opened Reddit,
• 19:41
  Speaker 4: because of course that's what I do the second I
• 19:44
  Speaker 4: wake up every morning. Again, another thing that we could
• 19:46
  Speaker 4: have easily guessed. So now that we've established the kind
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: of journalism that Kat Tenbarge does, What actually happened in
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: this case between her and Alexa Nicholas? As I said before,
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: the whole thing started with Drake Bell in a video
• 20:14
  Speaker 4: that Alexa made in October of 2023, where she calls
• 20:17
  Speaker 4: Drake a predator and shares her support for Sydney.
• 20:19
  Speaker 10: I stand with that, that victim of Drake Bell. I
• 20:22
  Speaker 10: definitely am disturbed by Drake.
• 20:25
  Speaker 7: Bell in general.
• 20:26
  Speaker 4: Around the time that Quiet on Set was released in 2024,
• 20:29
  Speaker 4: Kay Taylor, a producer on that show, shared the public
• 20:32
  Speaker 4: court documents from Drake's case with Alexa, showing that Sydney
• 20:35
  Speaker 4: didn't have strong evidence that Drake was a danger to children,
• 20:38
  Speaker 4: And so, Alexa removed her initial video on him. I mean,
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: I would have removed it too. That's the reasonable and
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: moral thing to do. However, like I said, while it
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: is a noble cause to try to help victims to
• 20:48
  Speaker 4: get justice against their predators, particularly if they were victimized
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: as children, the survivor community is full of radicalized, insane people,
• 20:55
  Speaker 4: and sadly, a lot of opportunistic grifters, and they did
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: not like that Alexa removed her video on Drake Bell
• 21:00
  Speaker 4: for the sake of the truth. When in reality, to
• 21:03
  Speaker 4: anyone who actually reads the court documents, it is obvious
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: that Drake was not guilty of sexual assault. But to
• 21:09
  Speaker 4: put it in a way that will help people in
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: my community better understand, many of these people are fans
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: of that stochastic terrorist, Hasan Piker, and we all know
• 21:17
  Speaker 4: that if you go against the narrative in any small
• 21:19
  Speaker 4: way or are a full-on apostate in that community, everyone
• 21:22
  Speaker 4: and their grandmother will try to ruin your life. I mean,
• 21:25
  Speaker 4: that's what they did to Ethan Klein. Hell, these types
• 21:27
  Speaker 4: did it to the popular feminist Lacey Green a bunch
• 21:29
  Speaker 4: of years ago for the crime of being friendly to
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: a political opponent. In fact, this situation reminds me a
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: lot of what happened to Lacey Green. This is a
• 21:37
  Speaker 4: very radicalized group and they will not accept deviations from
• 21:40
  Speaker 4: the official narrative. Anyway, the aftermath of Alexa saying that
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: she was wrong about Drake Bell was accounts like Exposing
• 21:46
  Speaker 4: Rich making like 4 million tweets saying that Alexa was
• 21:49
  Speaker 4: defending predators. Because of that, and because Kat Tenbarge is
• 21:52
  Speaker 4: an opportunist, while she was working for NBC, she began
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: writing an article and asked Alexa for comments.
• 21:59
  Speaker 7: But guess who knocks on my door? Kat Tenbarge.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: She sent you a list of 18 very, like, specific,
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: and I don't know if you would call it passive-aggressive
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: or just aggressive.
• 22:09
  Speaker 7: I think it was aggressive.
• 22:10
  Speaker 13: That's how I felt.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: The letter was accusatory.
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 22:13
  Speaker 7: It was like a hit, they were doing a hit
• 22:14
  Speaker 7: piece on me.
• 22:15
  Speaker 4: Kat sent a bunch of questions to Alexa and asked
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: for comment. These questions 100% make the article look like
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: a hit piece, and we know that Kat is a
• 22:22
  Speaker 4: propagandist based on her slander of Ethan Klein and Charlie Kirk.
• 22:26
  Speaker 4: By the way, this was a hit piece from Kat
• 22:28
  Speaker 4: where she worked with a stalker of Alexa's who moved
• 22:31
  Speaker 4: 10 minutes away from her so he could more effectively
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: harass her. Alexa had filed a restraining order, which makes
• 22:36
  Speaker 4: it a criminal violation to talk about her online. But
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: don't worry about that because there are journalists out there
• 22:41
  Speaker 4: like Kat Tenbarge who will aid malicious stalkers in circumventing
• 22:45
  Speaker 4: court orders.
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: She obtained a restraining order against me using similar false
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: claims she made to his court. This is a statement
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: given to her by your stalker, who's not supposed to
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: talk to you or even really about you.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: Oh, not.
• 22:57
  Speaker 7: And imagine.
• 22:58
  Speaker 10: I said again, that clause that's in there as well,
• 23:00
  Speaker 10: that he can't talk about me on social media.
• 23:02
  Speaker 7: If she were to reach out to him and get comment, right.
• 23:06
  Speaker 10: That that could then be some tweet for MSNBC to
• 23:08
  Speaker 10: put out or like a statement from him, you.
• 23:10
  Speaker 7: Know, and that's a way to bypass a court order.
• 23:13
  Speaker 10: And then she goes on to say to my stalker,
• 23:16
  Speaker 10: what I told her in my, answers to her about
• 23:20
  Speaker 10: him it's like don't talk any connect anything you're giving
• 23:23
  Speaker 10: him puts me in danger you.
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: Asshole so she was giving your stalker the answers to
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: the question yes to her report that's.
• 23:31
  Speaker 10: Insane you know i found the email correspondence between them
• 23:36
  Speaker 10: was through him filing her own section, asking the courts
• 23:40
  Speaker 10: to terminate the restraining order.
• 23:42
  Speaker 7: He used Kat to defend him. Good for you guys.
• 23:46
  Speaker 10: You're in a stalker's request to terminate a restraining order
• 23:49
  Speaker 10: with kids involved.
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: Fortunately, the restraining order got renewed because of what Kat did.
• 23:53
  Speaker 4: But based on the public record, in my opinion, Kat
• 23:56
  Speaker 4: is a predator. If she actually cared about victims, she
• 23:59
  Speaker 4: would never collaborate with and enable a stalker to pursue
• 24:02
  Speaker 4: someone who has kids. Which brings us to the actual
• 24:05
  Speaker 4: defamatory claims.
• 24:06
  Speaker 3: As we all know, there's a huge market for going
• 24:09
  Speaker 3: after celebrities. Everyone wants to dig up dirt on celebrities.
• 24:12
  Speaker 3: And of course, a professional dirt digger is Kat Tenbarge.
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: In this case, Kat Tenbarge is accusing Alexa, Ms. Nicholas,
• 24:21
  Speaker 3: of sending out sealed court documents related to a underage person.
• 24:29
  Speaker 3: Sealed documents, the word sealed, means they are confidential. They're
• 24:32
  Speaker 3: for the court. They're not supposed to be circulated out there.
• 24:35
  Speaker 3: And they're accusing Alexa. She was accusing Alexa of leaking
• 24:39
  Speaker 3: these documents. And you can see this here where she says,
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: all this proves is that you, speaking of Ms. Nicholas,
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: have been sending around sealed documents from Drake Bell's court
• 24:48
  Speaker 3: case unprompted. As the text from you shows, I did
• 24:52
  Speaker 3: not want them and you insisted. So trying to say
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: that Nicholas was spreading these maliciously and was trying to
• 24:58
  Speaker 3: get this information out, this secret information out there. All
• 25:01
  Speaker 3: in an effort to undermine his underage victim's testimony that
• 25:04
  Speaker 3: you previously defended. So trying to say that, hey, you're
• 25:08
  Speaker 3: trying to target a victim. Really, really vile stuff.
• 25:13
  Speaker 4: So from Kat's own words through this document and through
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: interviews that I've watched, Kat's allegations, well, sorry, Kat's defamatory
• 25:20
  Speaker 4: allegations were that Alexa is secretly friends with Drake, which
• 25:23
  Speaker 4: is not true. And now she's defending a predator and
• 25:26
  Speaker 4: trying to harass his victims by leaking sealed, unredacted documents
• 25:30
  Speaker 4: in the hopes of, like, making Sydney relive her trauma,
• 25:33
  Speaker 4: and maybe in the hopes that people would use the
• 25:34
  Speaker 4: documents to dox and harass her. Again, all of which
• 25:38
  Speaker 4: is not true. The documents were publicly available, they are redacted,
• 25:42
  Speaker 4: and if you watch Alexa's videos, you can see that
• 25:44
  Speaker 4: she still isn't a fan of Drake after going through
• 25:46
  Speaker 4: the case.
• 25:47
  Speaker 7: They are not sealed, and I told her they were
• 25:49
  Speaker 7: not sealed. Multiple times.
• 25:51
  Speaker 4: Because of the false narrative that Kat created, Alexa is
• 25:54
  Speaker 4: suing her for $ 150, 000 or more, or a lot more,
• 25:59
  Speaker 4: plus punitive damages. And this is a slam-dunk lawsuit. Well,
• 26:03
  Speaker 4: nothing is guaranteed, but Kat is probably going to lose this,
• 26:06
  Speaker 4: and she deserves it. Thank God these people are being
• 26:08
  Speaker 4: punished for what they're doing. Now, to be clear, the
• 26:11
  Speaker 4: defamatory statements were largely these Twitter posts. The article that
• 26:14
  Speaker 4: Kat was going to write on Alexa never ended up
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: getting published, as it was obviously going to be defamatory,
• 26:20
  Speaker 4: so Alexa informed NBC's legal team... and NBC just so
• 26:23
  Speaker 4: happened to include Kat in a series of layoffs. Essentially,
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: they fired her.
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: Kat Tenbarge, a former reporter at NBC News who recently
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: went independent.
• 26:31
  Speaker 4: Yeah, why did she have to make her own news organization, Taylor?
• 26:35
  Speaker 4: Almost two weeks ago, I found out I was one
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: of 40 people getting laid off from NBC. Those who
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: know me know I've wanted to go independent for a
• 26:42
  Speaker 4: long time. Her logo is a snake. Never have I
• 26:45
  Speaker 4: seen something more appropriate. So Kat Tenbarge tweeted that Alexa
• 26:49
  Speaker 4: released sealed court documents unredacted, and proceeded to echo the
• 26:52
  Speaker 4: sentiments that she is a predator.
• 26:54
  Speaker 7: I got left in the dust when Kat did this
• 26:55
  Speaker 7: to me. You know, people really believed I was this
• 26:57
  Speaker 7: really seriously evil person.
• 26:59
  Speaker 4: Yeah, this hurt her massively. Her YouTube comment section is
• 27:02
  Speaker 4: an unsalvageable cesspool now. Kat also recruited the help of
• 27:05
  Speaker 4: a YouTuber named Adam McIntyre to defame Alexa, because in
• 27:09
  Speaker 4: his words, Kat and him are best friends, his following
• 27:11
  Speaker 4: is much larger, and he's not the only channel with
• 27:14
  Speaker 4: a much larger following than Alexa who is lying about
• 27:16
  Speaker 4: her for views. Kat is very good at weaponizing her
• 27:19
  Speaker 4: friends against her opponents. Now, when it comes to situations
• 27:22
  Speaker 4: like this, I always like to give the opposition a
• 27:24
  Speaker 4: chance to defend their viewpoints, which needs to be done
• 27:26
  Speaker 4: in two segments. The first being Kat's coverage of the event,
• 27:29
  Speaker 4: and the second being Adam McIntyre's coverage. Because in my opinion,
• 27:33
  Speaker 4: Kat is using Adam as a mouthpiece against Alexa because
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: his influence is much higher than hers. That being said,
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: understand that Kat is very much trying to represent herself
• 27:41
  Speaker 4: as an expert on the Drake Bell case.
• 27:43
  Speaker 5: If you're, you know, just listening to the audio version
• 27:45
  Speaker 5: of this, Kat has no notes in front of her
• 27:46
  Speaker 5: about any of this. Like, Kat is a scholar on
• 27:49
  Speaker 5: all of these cases, and I just want a quick
• 27:53
  Speaker 5: interlude to commend you on the fact that you know
• 27:56
  Speaker 5: every detail of all of this stuff. I remember talking
• 27:58
  Speaker 5: with you about Amber Heard. Your ability to recall all
• 28:02
  Speaker 5: of the specifics of all of these events is pretty remarkable.
• 28:04
  Speaker 4: Thank you.
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: So if you're an expert, then you should have known
• 28:07
  Speaker 4: that the documents on the court proceedings between Sidney and
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: Drake Bell were public and that Alexa did not leak them. Now,
• 28:13
  Speaker 4: outside of this tactical mistake here, Kat Tenbarge is an
• 28:16
  Speaker 4: incredibly skilled manipulator. To be honest, if I didn't know
• 28:19
  Speaker 4: the facts of the case, I would have believed her
• 28:21
  Speaker 4: version of the story.
• 28:22
  Speaker 5: So he pleads guilty to two charges that are not
• 28:25
  Speaker 5: related to anything physical that happened.
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: Correct.
• 28:28
  Speaker 5: But that are about text messages.
• 28:30
  Speaker 11: Yes. This is not uncommon. A lot of times when
• 28:35
  Speaker 11: you bring a case to court, there will be a
• 28:38
  Speaker 11: range of allegations that are made. And the responsibility of
• 28:42
  Speaker 11: the prosecution is to provide evidence for these various allegations.
• 28:47
  Speaker 11: But a lot of times there isn't strong enough evidence
• 28:50
  Speaker 11: to prove the full extent of what's being alleged. In
• 28:53
  Speaker 11: this case, they seem to have reached an agreement, the
• 28:56
  Speaker 11: prosecution and the defense, that they had strong enough evidence
• 29:01
  Speaker 11: for Drake to plead guilty on these two charges. And
• 29:05
  Speaker 11: then he wouldn't have to go to trial. He would
• 29:07
  Speaker 11: just have to serve probation and they would essentially drop
• 29:10
  Speaker 11: the rest of it.
• 29:11
  Speaker 4: So to sum this part up here, Kat is trying
• 29:13
  Speaker 4: to lead the audience into believing that Drake is guilty
• 29:15
  Speaker 4: of everything he was accused of. but they simply didn't
• 29:17
  Speaker 4: have enough evidence. That's not the case because what she
• 29:20
  Speaker 4: left out and flat out did not address is the
• 29:22
  Speaker 4: fact that there were two witnesses who were there with
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: Sidney saying she was never alone with Drake, and a
• 29:27
  Speaker 4: third witness, one of Sidney's high school friends, who gave
• 29:29
  Speaker 4: the sentiment that Sidney was jealous of Drake's girlfriend. That
• 29:33
  Speaker 4: shows motive for her to lie, which is important because
• 29:35
  Speaker 4: one of the things that Sidney does is message Drake's girlfriend,
• 29:39
  Speaker 4: accuses him of sexual abuse, admits to having multiple accounts
• 29:42
  Speaker 4: because that's important too, and then puts quite a bit
• 29:45
  Speaker 4: of effort into trying to convince his girlfriend Janet to
• 29:47
  Speaker 4: break up with him. Actually, they might have been married
• 29:50
  Speaker 4: at this point. I mean, morally, Sidney is right. Janet
• 29:52
  Speaker 4: should have broken up with him because he did cheat
• 29:54
  Speaker 4: on her. They got divorced a few years later anyway.
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: I don't think Drake is beating the POS allegations anytime soon.
• 30:00
  Speaker 4: But the important thing here is whether or not Drake
• 30:02
  Speaker 4: assaulted a minor. I don't think the evidence shows that,
• 30:05
  Speaker 4: and the issue with Kat's coverage is that she, as
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: an expert, ignores key witness testimonies that contradict Sydney's story,
• 30:12
  Speaker 4: and ignores the testimony of her friend who said that
• 30:14
  Speaker 4: she was jealous of Drake's ex-wife or girlfriend at the time,
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: which gives her a motive to lie. Again, not to
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: say that Sydney is responsible for what she did as
• 30:22
  Speaker 4: a child, Drake was twice her age, he should have
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: held proper boundaries, and maybe he shouldn't have cheated on
• 30:27
  Speaker 4: his ex-wife. But as for Kat, these are important points
• 30:30
  Speaker 4: that you would not omit if you were trying to
• 30:32
  Speaker 4: be honest. Just to further emphasize here, despite me not
• 30:35
  Speaker 4: liking Drake as a person, the reason I'm so insistent
• 30:38
  Speaker 4: on the evidence is because if we don't stick to
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: the evidence, it could set a precedent for false allegations
• 30:42
  Speaker 4: in the future that will 100% be weaponized against people
• 30:46
  Speaker 4: you like, or maybe even you yourself. False allegations get
• 30:49
  Speaker 4: weaponized all the time, especially in politics, which is why
• 30:53
  Speaker 4: we have standards of proof. Like I said, Kat is
• 30:55
  Speaker 4: convincing enough that if I didn't spend hours reading through
• 30:58
  Speaker 4: the case documents and connecting the dots, I would have
• 31:00
  Speaker 4: believed her narrative, and people like her know that you
• 31:03
  Speaker 4: don't have that kind of time to personally research stuff
• 31:05
  Speaker 4: like this, so they know they can get away with
• 31:07
  Speaker 4: lying to you, which is why defamation laws exist. As
• 31:10
  Speaker 4: for her friends, they also know they can lie by
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: omission to craft whatever narrative they want, which is where
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: Adam McIntyre comes in. Again, Adam has personally stated that
• 31:19
  Speaker 4: Kat Tenbarge is his best friend.
• 31:21
  Speaker 13: The way that you have harassed my best friend, Kat.
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: She's not harassing Kat. Kat tried to write a defamatory
• 31:28
  Speaker 4: hit piece on Alexa to, in my opinion, boost her
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: own career at NBC, and Alexa is defending herself against
• 31:34
  Speaker 4: that defamation. How is this not victim-blaming? By the way,
• 31:38
  Speaker 4: before the body was even cold, Adam McIntyre was out
• 31:40
  Speaker 4: there slandering Charlie Kirk, too.
• 31:42
  Speaker 13: I also think it's important to note that Charlie Kirk
• 31:44
  Speaker 13: has been actively engaging in political violence since he came
• 31:48
  Speaker 13: onto the scene. And political violence can also literally be
• 31:52
  Speaker 13: something that doesn't happen with a weapon, can be with
• 31:54
  Speaker 13: his words and his propaganda as well. Someone who doesn't
• 31:58
  Speaker 13: care about school shootings. Also someone who said that to
• 32:02
  Speaker 13: protect the Second Amendment, we should lose a couple people
• 32:06
  Speaker 13: every year to gun violence.
• 32:09
  Speaker 4: So anyway, I've listened to a few hours of Adam's
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: videos on this subject, and I'm not saying that it
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: doesn't exist because he's done hours and hours of live streams.
• 32:16
  Speaker 4: But I have not once found him talking about the
• 32:18
  Speaker 4: most egregious allegations around his positions on Alexa Nicholas. For example,
• 32:22
  Speaker 4: there's this video here from Ethan Klein where he and
• 32:25
  Speaker 4: Alexa discuss the case. Adam admits that he's seen it.
• 32:28
  Speaker 13: This was a pre-filmed interview that they've posted on the
• 32:33
  Speaker 13: H3 channel. So this is one ire and 50 minutes
• 32:36
  Speaker 13: of them, you know, talking about me, talking about Kat.
• 32:39
  Speaker 13: There's no one Ethan Klein hates more than me. And
• 32:42
  Speaker 13: there's no one Alexa Nicholas hates more than Kat Tenbarge.
• 32:45
  Speaker 4: Now, there's a lot of stuff that goes on in
• 32:46
  Speaker 4: this video, but you would think that if you're a
• 32:48
  Speaker 4: person who is speaking in the defense of victims, you
• 32:51
  Speaker 4: would address the moment where Alexa says that Kat worked
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: with and helped her stalker circumvent the law. That was
• 32:56
  Speaker 4: a major allegation that Alexa made, and you know, maybe
• 32:59
  Speaker 4: it's not true. Maybe there's more nuance to the situation
• 33:02
  Speaker 4: than Alexa made it seem. Does Adam address this moment? No,
• 33:06
  Speaker 4: which makes me think there wasn't any nuance, so he's
• 33:08
  Speaker 4: avoiding the issue. He also addresses zero of the criticisms
• 33:11
  Speaker 4: of the allegations against Drake. But I mean, he will
• 33:14
  Speaker 4: say that Drake pled guilty.
• 33:15
  Speaker 13: Alexa Nicholas, as we know, was a part of Quiet
• 33:18
  Speaker 13: On Set. Drake Bell was also a part of Quiet
• 33:21
  Speaker 13: On Set. Now, before Quiet On Set came out in
• 33:25
  Speaker 13: October of 2023, Alexa Nicholas made a video saying that,
• 33:29
  Speaker 13: calling Drake Bell out, and we are aware... that Drake
• 33:32
  Speaker 13: Bell has his own accusations and has actually pled guilty
• 33:36
  Speaker 13: to child endangerment and a misdemeanor charge of, you know, having,
• 33:42
  Speaker 13: you know, harmful matter to juveniles.
• 33:44
  Speaker 11: Right.
• 33:45
  Speaker 4: He pled guilty, but that's not why he lost his
• 33:47
  Speaker 4: career or why his career was ruined. The egregious allegations
• 33:50
  Speaker 4: were Sidney saying that he committed sexual assault. Not only
• 33:53
  Speaker 4: did she not have strong evidence of that, but witness
• 33:56
  Speaker 4: testimony said she was lying. He knows all this information
• 33:59
  Speaker 4: is out there, he's just choosing to not address it,
• 34:01
  Speaker 4: and because of that, I think that his and Kat's
• 34:04
  Speaker 4: position is really indefensible, so they're resorting to defamation and
• 34:07
  Speaker 4: drama farming to try to ruin Alexa's reputation to the
• 34:10
  Speaker 4: extent that people won't believe her when she tells the
• 34:12
  Speaker 4: truth about Drake. And by the way, it worked. Alexa
• 34:15
  Speaker 4: lost this battle. A lot of people lose these types
• 34:18
  Speaker 4: of battles, which is why anti-defamation laws exist.
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: These people, people like Kat Tenbarge and others that defame
• 34:24
  Speaker 3: people openly are going to eventually defame the wrong person.
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: They're eventually going to defame a plaintiff like Ms. Nicholas,
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: who has money, motive, and is not able to be
• 34:35
  Speaker 3: dismissed as misogynistic, political, etc. This is something purely factual.
• 34:39
  Speaker 3: This is something purely legal. And because of that, this
• 34:43
  Speaker 3: is very, very damning for Ms.
• 34:45
  Speaker 11: Tenbarge.
• 34:46
  Speaker 4: Right, at some point they're going to mess with the
• 34:47
  Speaker 4: wrong person, at some point they're going to mess with
• 34:49
  Speaker 4: the person who is willing to defend themselves, and then
• 34:52
  Speaker 4: things aren't going to be so fun. Like I said,
• 34:54
  Speaker 4: Alexa is suing for $ 150, 000 or more, hopefully a lot more,
• 34:59
  Speaker 4: plus punitive damages, and she has a very strong case.
• 35:02
  Speaker 4: Kat is probably going to lose, which of course is why,
• 35:05
  Speaker 4: much like Frogan tried to hide to avoid getting served
• 35:07
  Speaker 4: by Ethan Klein when she committed copyright infringement, Or much
• 35:10
  Speaker 4: like Noah Sampson has been hiding for like a year,
• 35:13
  Speaker 4: hoping that Ethan will give up and trying to rightfully
• 35:14
  Speaker 4: sue him for defamation. So much like these two, Cat
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: Tambarge is so screwed in this situation that she's been
• 35:20
  Speaker 4: fleeing being served for months. Don't worry though, they got her,
• 35:23
  Speaker 4: so I guess we'll see how this all pans out.
• 35:25
  Speaker 4: I think it's pretty clear here that we're entering a
• 35:27
  Speaker 4: strong era of F around and find out, and a
• 35:29
  Speaker 4: lot of people are finding out. The lesson learned here
• 35:32
  Speaker 4: is that if you're mad about stuff like this, then
• 35:34
  Speaker 4: the cure is to become that wrong person to mess with.
• 35:37
  Speaker 4: You be that landmine that people are afraid to step on.
• 35:39
  Speaker 4: Cat and her friend group want to defame people or
• 35:41
  Speaker 4: work with predators to harass them? Well, eventually they're going
• 35:44
  Speaker 4: to pick the wrong target, and oops, now you might
• 35:47
  Speaker 4: be $ 150, 000 plus in debt. Have fun paying that off.
• 35:50
  Speaker 4: And speaking of fun, I gotta say that I've had
• 35:52
  Speaker 4: a few opportunities to be someone's wrong person, and I
• 35:55
  Speaker 4: thoroughly enjoyed the process. The real secret here is that
• 35:58
  Speaker 4: these people are almost always some of the most weak-willed
• 36:00
  Speaker 4: people on the planet, and the only reason they've had
• 36:03
  Speaker 4: success doing bad things is because nobody stands up to them.
• 36:06
  Speaker 4: So it's a real shock to them when somebody finally says,
• 36:09
  Speaker 4: I'm not going to put up with it. Be that somebody. Anyway,
• 36:12
  Speaker 4: thanks for watching, follow me on Twitter, and I'll see
• 36:14
  Speaker 4: you in the next video.