Latest / Investor Exchange / The Role Of The iEdge Singapore Next 50

Transcript

The Role Of The iEdge Singapore Next 50 · Investor Exchange

• 0:00
  Time for another Investor Exchange Podcast. Here are your hosts, Matt and Sally.
• 0:08
  Welcome to today's Deep Dive. We are skipping the usual preamble today and getting straight
• 0:12
  into the facts because we have a highly detailed report from capital market veteran Motion
• 0:17
  Aziz.
• 0:18
  Right, yeah. It's a really comprehensive look at a very specific part of the market.
• 0:23
  Exactly. We are focusing on the iEdge Singapore Next50 Index, and we are going to look at
• 0:28
  its performance data from its launch in September 2025 straight through to April 2026.
• 0:36
  Which is a really interesting window of time for this index, honestly.
• 0:39
  It really is. So our mission today for you, the listener, is to analyze the financial
• 0:44
  performance, the liquidity, and the future outlook of this index. We want to break down
• 0:48
  exactly what these metrics mean for an investor.
• 0:50
  Yeah, and to really grasp what the data is telling us, we first have to clearly define
• 0:55
  what the iEdge Singapore Next50 actually is.
• 0:58
  Right, because it's not the main benchmark everyone hears about on the news.
• 1:01
  No, not at all. So if you look at the Singapore exchange, it is historically dominated by
• 1:05
  established giants. You know, the top 30 largest companies get all the attention.
• 1:10
  They absorb all the oxygen in the room.
• 1:12
  Exactly. So this index, the Next50, it tracks the next 50 largest and most highly traded
• 1:18
  companies right below that top tier.
• 1:20
  So sort of like a bridge.
• 1:22
  Yes, a structural bridge. It sits right between the smaller obscure companies and those massive
• 1:27
  top 30 blue chip companies.
• 1:28
  Okay, so it's a transitional layer. But I mean, if you are listening to this, you might
• 1:31
  be wondering, well, why shouldn't I just buy those top 30 giants and, you know, go to sleep?
• 1:37
  Which is the classic investor dilemma.
• 1:39
  So to answer that, we need to look at the bottom line financial performance. And the
• 1:43
  headline data in the report sets up a really interesting tension.
• 1:47
  It definitely does.
• 1:48
  Between September 2025 and April 2026, this Next50 index gained 5.6%. Now, positive growth
• 1:56
  is always great, but...
• 1:57
  But the top 30 benchmark index gained 16.1% over that exact same period.
• 2:02
  Yeah, 16.1%. That is a massive gap.
• 2:05
  It is. And it just illustrates the continuing dominance of large cap money flows. The biggest
• 2:10
  companies are still attracting like the lion's share of global institutional capital.
• 2:15
  Right. It makes me think of, well, it's like watching a minor league baseball team have
• 2:20
  a really good season, but realizing the major league team in the exact same city is still
• 2:26
  selling all the tickets and getting all the television time.
• 2:29
  That is a perfect analogy, actually.
• 2:31
  Because if the big companies are getting all the money flows, why should an investor care
• 2:35
  about this midsize tier?
• 2:37
  Well, the argument requires looking past those headline numbers. You have to look at the
• 2:41
  underlying reality of how these companies are valued.
• 2:44
  Okay, unpack that for us.
• 2:46
  We need to look at a metric called the price-to-book ratio. This simply measures what a stock trades
• 2:51
  at relative to the actual physical asset value of the company.
• 2:56
  Just the physical stuff they own.
• 2:57
  Right. Think of the book value as what would be left over if a company sold all its factories,
• 3:03
  its inventory, property, and paid off all its debts.
• 3:06
  So if a company is trading at a price-to-book of 1.0, you are essentially paying $1 for
• 3:10
  every $1 of actual hard assets. You aren't paying any premium for brand value or future
• 3:17
  growth.
• 3:18
  That is the core concept. Now, the report shows that the aggregate price-to-book value
• 3:22
  for the entire next 50 index remained completely flat from its launch through April 2026.
• 3:29
  It just flatlined.
• 3:30
  Yeah, it hovered right around that 1.0 mark. If you only look at the aggregate index level,
• 3:36
  it looks like absolute stagnation.
• 3:38
  0% growth.
• 3:39
  Right. But the data reveals that while the aggregate index was flat, the typical individual
• 3:44
  stock within the index, the median constituent, actually saw its valuation increase by about
• 3:50
  8% over this six-month period.
• 3:52
  Wait, okay, I am stuck on the math here.
• 3:55
  It sounds contradictory, I know.
• 3:56
  Yeah. How can the average of a group stay completely flat at 0% growth if the typical
• 4:02
  individual companies in the middle of that group are going up by 8%?
• 4:05
  That is the illusion of the index.
• 4:07
  Because that feels mathematically broken. Something massive must be dragging the overall
• 4:12
  average down to wipe out that 8% growth.
• 4:14
  You are hitting on the exact impact of the December 2025 index rebalance.
• 4:18
  Ah, the rebalance.
• 4:19
  Yeah, because an index isn't a locked vault, right? It's a dynamic portfolio that regularly
• 4:24
  changes its roster. And in December, they executed a major structural change.
• 4:29
  I actually have the data on that specific swap. They removed three smaller companies.
• 4:35
  That was Nanofilm Technologies, Samadera Shipping Line, and Aztec Global.
• 4:40
  Right, all relatively small players in the grand scheme.
• 4:43
  And in their place, they brought in three much larger companies, Golden Agri Resources,
• 4:48
  Yangtze Jiang Maritime Development, and Centurion Accommodation Real Estate Trust.
• 4:53
  And to understand that mathematical illusion of the flat index, we have to look at the
• 4:56
  specific profile of those incoming companies.
• 5:00
  Take Golden Agri Resources, for example. It's a massive commodity producer operating in
• 5:04
  a low-margin industry. And at the time it was included in the index, it was traded at
• 5:08
  a really steep discount to its book value.
• 5:10
  How steep are we talking?
• 5:12
  Specifically, 0.52 times its asset value.
• 5:15
  Wow. Okay, wait. So the incoming companies as a whole had an overall price-to-book value
• 5:19
  of just 0.75 times, largely because of that Golden Agri Resources discount. Doesn't bringing
• 5:26
  in such heavily discounted, massive companies artificially drag down the index's overall
• 5:32
  valuation score? Like it just hides the growth of all the other companies.
• 5:37
  That is exactly what happened. In an index, companies are not treated equally. Their impact
• 5:41
  on the average depends on their market capitalization weight.
• 5:44
  Their size.
• 5:45
  Right. So those three departing companies, they were small. They made up only about 1.2%
• 5:50
  of the entire index weight.
• 5:52
  Barely a blip.
• 5:53
  Yeah. But the three incoming companies were heavyweights. They made up a combined 8.79%
• 5:59
  of the index weight.
• 6:00
  So the index replaced roughly 1.2% of its weight with almost 9%.
• 6:04
  It was a massive upgrade in size.
• 6:06
  So it's not that the index diluted its value. It just structurally changed.
• 6:10
  Exactly. The flat line at the index level reflects the addition of structurally cheaper,
• 6:14
  heavier names. It wasn't a loss of value in the existing companies.
• 6:17
  So it's like a major upgrade that makes the whole pool much larger.
• 6:21
  Very much so. By bringing in these heavyweights, the total market capitalization of the index
• 6:25
  jumped from 86.4 billion Singapore dollars to 95.3 billion Singapore dollars.
• 6:31
  That is over a 10% expansion in total value, just from a single rebalance.
• 6:36
  Which makes the index far more robust.
• 6:38
  Okay. So we have a physically larger, heavier pool of assets now. But size on paper is completely
• 6:45
  useless to an investor if you cannot actually easily buy and sell those shares, right?
• 6:50
  Which brings us perfectly to liquidity. Liquidity is the lifeblood of mid-sized markets.
• 6:55
  So let's look at the liquidity data. The report highlights a very clear structural
• 7:00
  step up in average daily trading volume.
• 7:03
  Yeah, the volume shift is undeniable.
• 7:05
  Before the December rebalance, the baseline was about 176 million shares traded per day.
• 7:11
  After that heavy swap, it established a permanently higher baseline of 223 million shares a day.
• 7:17
  That higher baseline proves the upgraded roster is inherently more tradable.
• 7:21
  The rebalance added millions of shares of daily volume just from the new incoming names.
• 7:25
  But those are just the new names, right? The report lists some specific winners
• 7:29
  and losers in terms of volume.
• 7:30
  It did. The increased activity was broad, but with some extreme standouts.
• 7:34
  Yeah, like Keppel Infrastructure Trust. Their trading volume nearly doubled, jumping 96%.
• 7:39
  Huge jump.
• 7:41
  Starhub volume went up 72%. And IFAS Corporation rose 34%.
• 7:46
  All showing massive new interest.
• 7:48
  But then, on the downside, you have Yangzi Jiang Financial Holding.
• 7:51
  They lost roughly half of their daily trading volume. Just dropped by 50%.
• 7:56
  It really highlights how index weighting drives visibility.
• 8:00
  Right. Because why would one company jump 96% and another drop 50% in the exact same index?
• 8:07
  Well, when a company performs well and maintains a strong position in a growing index,
• 8:11
  like Keppel Infrastructure Trust, it acts like a spotlight.
• 8:15
  It prompts institutional algorithms to treat it.
• 8:17
  Okay, but what about Yangzi Jiang Financial Holding?
• 8:20
  Before the rebalance, Yangzi Jiang was actually the largest single weight in the index.
• 8:24
  But when those massive new heavyweights came in during December,
• 8:27
  Yangzi Jiang's relative dominance shrank.
• 8:30
  Ah, so it was a smaller piece of a bigger pie.
• 8:32
  Exactly. With a smaller relative footprint,
• 8:35
  the passive mechanical buying associated with it naturally decreased, pulling its daily volume down.
• 8:41
  Okay, that makes sense. And speaking of mechanical buying,
• 8:44
  the data shows a massive example of investor behavior right around these rebalances.
• 8:49
  March spike.
• 8:49
  Yes. In March 2026, the volume spiked to a massive 577 million shares traded in a single day.
• 8:59
  Which is staggering compared to that 223 million baseline.
• 9:04
  Right. So explain that to us. Why does that happen?
• 9:06
  That massive spike is entirely event-driven liquidity.
• 9:10
  It occurs right before a rebalance takes effect as passive funds reposition themselves.
• 9:15
  Because they have to mechanically match the index.
• 9:17
  Exactly. A passive fund's mandate is to perfectly mimic the index.
• 9:21
  If the index changes its roster tomorrow, the fund manager has to transition their holdings today.
• 9:26
  And they wait until the very last minute to avoid tracking error.
• 9:29
  Right. They execute massive block trades at the closing price.
• 9:32
  That forces hundreds of millions of shares to change hands almost instantly.
• 9:36
  So that 577 million share day is just the passive funds doing their chores.
• 9:40
  Basically, yes.
• 9:41
  But the key takeaway for an investor is that after the dust settles from that spike,
• 9:46
  the daily baseline volume remained higher. It didn't drop back down to 176 million.
• 9:51
  Precisely. It settled back into that new robust 223 million baseline.
• 9:58
  The structural everyday liquidity is building.
• 10:01
  Okay. So given this higher baseline of trading activity and a stronger,
• 10:05
  heavier roster of companies, we need to map out what the future holds.
• 10:09
  The outlook is where things get really actionable for investors.
• 10:12
  The report characterizes this segment as a market information rather than a mature market.
• 10:18
  Right. It's not fully discovered like the top 30 blue chips.
• 10:21
  Institutional money is building gradually. It's not arriving all at once.
• 10:24
  And the main opportunity here lies in finding companies
• 10:27
  approaching what the report calls liquidity inflection points.
• 10:30
  Yes, that is the critical concept.
• 10:32
  So a liquidity inflection point is where trading volume is rapidly accelerating,
• 10:36
  but the stock price is still cheap relative to its asset value, right?
• 10:39
  Exactly. The market is paying more attention, volume is up, but the valuation hasn't popped yet.
• 10:44
  It's like a coiled spring.
• 10:45
  It is the perfect spring loading phase.
• 10:48
  And the report gives examples of this.
• 10:50
  It mentions discounted real estate trusts like Keppel,
• 10:53
  Lendlease Global and Capital and India Trust.
• 10:55
  Right. They are seeing that volume acceleration.
• 10:58
  And industrial companies too, like Franken Group and UMS Integration.
• 11:02
  They have high volume, but cheap prices.
• 11:05
  They are showing those early stage signs.
• 11:07
  But wait, let me push back on this for a second.
• 11:09
  Sure.
• 11:10
  If I'm an investor, why shouldn't I just buy the whole index?
• 11:13
  Because the report specifically notes that
• 11:16
  stock specific dynamics still continue to drive returns.
• 11:19
  And that is the catch.
• 11:21
  Right. Doesn't this mean that while the index provides a nice structured pipeline,
• 11:25
  an investor can't just blindly buy the index and relax.
• 11:28
  They still have to do their homework on individual companies
• 11:31
  to find these specific inflection points.
• 11:33
  I completely agree. And the data validates that.
• 11:35
  The index is highly sensitive to money flows and changes in its roster.
• 11:40
  So you have to be active.
• 11:41
  Yes. The index guarantees these mid-sized companies are becoming more visible and tradable.
• 11:47
  But you cannot blindly buy the basket because the dispersion of returns is so wide.
• 11:52
  So careful stock selection within this mid-sized universe remains vital.
• 11:57
  Absolutely vital.
• 11:58
  If you want to capitalize on those early stage valuation increases,
• 12:02
  you have to find the specific companies hitting those inflection points
• 12:07
  before the broader market fully prices them in.
• 12:10
  Which leaves us with a final, somewhat provocative thought for you to ponder
• 12:14
  based on everything we've covered today.
• 12:15
  It is the big question for the exchange going forward.
• 12:18
  If this next 50 index successfully acts as a structured pipeline,
• 12:22
  preparing these mid-sized companies to graduate into the top 30 blue chip tier,
• 12:27
  what happens to the established giants?
• 12:29
  Right, when the new guys move up.
• 12:30
  Exactly.
• 12:31
  What happens when these newly highly traded,
• 12:33
  undervalued and hungry companies finally break into the major leagues?
• 12:37
  Will they disrupt the large cap dominance that currently controls the Singapore market?
• 12:42
  It is going to be fascinating to watch unfold.
• 12:44
  It really will be.
• 12:45
  Well, that wraps up our deep dive for today.
• 12:48
  This content is intended to serve strictly and only
• 12:50
  as an informational, independent, objective summary of recent events
• 12:54
  and should in no way be interpreted, construed or relied upon by any party
• 12:58
  as inside information or financial advice.