Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 17th June 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 17th June 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. Today is Monday, the seventeenth of June twenty twenty four,
0:13
just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News. I'm your host,
0:17
Brian Gerrish and I'm delighted to have Diane rasmuson mcaddy with me in the studio.
0:22
Diane, welcome, so good to see you against the backdrop of a
0:27
very blue sunny hoe that's the green area that our viewers can see and we're
0:34
looking out over Plymouth Sound there. But today is a lovely day. We're
0:38
going to keep our fingers crossed that the weather is going to stay that way.
0:43
Well, we're going to kick straight off with the tragic subject of the
0:47
ongoing war in Ukraine, because of course it's very clear that UK, the
0:51
US, the European Union have no intention of calming things down, and a
0:59
peace agreement without Russia or peace discussions without Russia in Switzerland of course, and
1:03
utter failure. But the aim of the game is to keep the bloodshed going,
1:08
and so the US, UK European Union powers doing everything that they can
1:15
to try and keep the flow of munitions munition going into Ukraine. But of
1:22
course no war can be fought without money, and the BBC crowing in this
1:29
little video clip which we'll just play there in the background as the US and
1:34
Ukraine sign an agreement for more money into the war. So this was the
1:42
text here that some three hundred and fifty three hundred and twenty five billion worth
1:49
of assets were frozen by the G seven. That of course is Russian assets,
1:53
and that's accruing interest at about three billion a year. Under the G
2:00
seven plan, the three billion will be used to pay off the annual interest
2:05
on the fifty billion loan that's been cooked up for the Ukrainians taken out on
2:10
the international markets. The money is not expected to arrive until the end of
2:15
the year. Was seen as a longer term solution to support Ukraine's war effort
2:20
and the economy. Now, this is some pretty fine manipulation of money,
2:24
because at one stage there were many calls for the whole of those Russian assets
2:30
to simply be seized by the US and the West. But even the Western
2:36
banking system started to get squeamish when it realized that this meant that no other
2:40
nation in the world could trust the Western banking system, as if you invest
2:46
your money, it may well be stolen by those very same Western bankers.
2:52
Now the BBC article talked about this lady Christine Legarde. I've just chosen a
2:58
Politico article here which were emphasizing what she said back in April twenty twenty four.
3:05
But let's bring that on screen. She said, moving from freezing the
3:09
assets to confiscating the assets disposing of them is something that needs to be looked
3:15
at very carefully because it would start breaking the international legal order that you want
3:22
to protect and you would want Russia and all countries around the world to respect.
3:28
And what the BBC was using Leguard quote was to say that basically they
3:35
realized that well, maybe Russia wasn't too impressed on what was happening, but
3:39
of course the aim was let's just take the interest off the money, and
3:46
that is okay. Now, if we look at how this woman works,
3:50
she's there ahead of the European Central Bank, and it doesn't take much of
3:54
an investigation into that particular website to see that there's been a declaration by the
4:01
bank that they absolutely stand alongside Ukraine, so Ukraine can do no wrong.
4:06
And the agenda is to actually get the money in to keep the war and
4:12
the conflict going. And I'll just follow through on this, because if you
4:16
have looked at recent speeches that she's done Tobrovnik here the fourteenth of June,
4:23
policy making in a new risk environment, you might be led to believe that
4:28
she's going to be talking about the risks of instability and war throughout the world.
4:33
Well, that does get a mention, But actually the key thing she's
4:38
worried about is climate change. And as we've said, they're more climate change.
4:43
And I'll just mack this up by saying that if you go through to
4:46
the Bank of International Settlements, the big beast of the banks that striving much
4:50
of the world's economic policy, what we see is their innovation hub putting out
4:58
Project Viridice climate risk platform for financial authority. So there's money for climate change
5:06
and there's also money for war. But of course the one thing we're not
5:11
talking about at the moment is the actual casualties in the war. Sorry,
5:15
that's the final label on that one, the climate change. But the key
5:20
bit for the BBC is they've suddenly woken up to the horrors of the Ukrainian
5:26
conscription squads sending men into hiding. And I was particularly taken that the BBC
5:31
doesn't use the horrors of the war to emphasize what's going on. We use
5:36
a wedding photo, but behind it is absolute tragedy. We'll just play this
5:42
script, this clip on screen as these very brutal groups in Ukraine are literally
5:47
hunting not only young men but men of mature years and old men because they're
5:55
desperate to get more troops in on the front due to the horrific losses that
6:00
they've suffered in the war. Today picture on screen really brutal action. As
6:04
a young man is forced into one of the recruitment vehicles, he's going to
6:10
be taken off for minimal training and probably he's going to be dead within a
6:15
few days or a few weeks of reaching the front line. So I'll just
6:19
put this last one up here. The BBC has had to admit that even
6:26
the Ukrainians now say that people don't want to volunteer to fight on the front.
6:32
As I've just said, the BBC doesn't want to talk about total dead
6:38
in this war. We don't have an accurate an accurate number for this,
6:44
but the figure of five hundred thousand dead is certainly somewhere in the bracket.
6:48
But the main point is there's plenty of money to keep the war going.
6:54
And on that note, time, I'm going to welcome Mark Anderson in.
6:58
Mark, if we could deal with the and the international monetary system, we
7:01
would have the means to constrain wars, if not closed walls down, because
7:06
there would be no money for the munitions and ammunition that always keep the walls
7:13
going. Good day, Diane and Brian and listeners and viewers. That's exactly
7:19
right, Brian. In fact, if you look over the decades, you'll
7:24
see that when you want to run the regular, everyday economy, money is
7:30
in short supply. But when it's time for war or some other big messianic
7:34
task, suddenly we have unending credit and money that just comes out of nowhere.
7:41
And this is largely through the banks and their machinations. Now, what's
7:45
interesting. I talked with a guy named Conrad Lebaux last night at length on
7:49
the phone. I've known him casually for a few years in my various coverages
7:55
of monetary issues and other issues. He's a retired author, among other things,
7:59
lives in Wisconsin. He is gearing up, apparently for a lawsuit against
8:03
the Federal Reserve system. Now that might sound like a spit wat against the
8:07
side of a battleship. But he's got an interesting tactic, and this slide
8:11
here it gets into a little bit of it. There'll be more down the
8:13
road as this heats up. But this is just sort of to wet our
8:18
appetites about different possibilities in the monetary reform area. What he says here probable
8:24
lawsuit against the FED. The Feeder Reserve Board has sent me a letter acknowledging
8:28
my acknowledging receipt of my first FOYA Freedom of Information Act, containing five questions,
8:35
but no answers were offered yet, nor did I expect an answer this.
8:39
Soon later, I mailed the FED a second Foyer request freedom of information,
8:43
asking for seven different sets of documents and files on the issue of what
8:48
I suspect the banks are doing after they buy tnotes, treasury notes and bonds,
8:52
and that is to borrow up to the full value of the tnotes or
8:56
bonds in actual cash, interest free, using that as a basis for the
9:03
borrowing, and then to deliberately not repay these loans of cash loans to member
9:07
banks of the FED. If what I suspect is true, that would be
9:11
double dipping and This is by Conrad Lebou, the Wisconsin based monetary reform activists
9:16
whose intent on sending a third round of questions to the Federal Reserve, the
9:20
privately owned and controlled central Bank of the US since nineteen thirteen. And for
9:26
the record, Conrad Lebou's website is Keephope Alive dot org. There's different things
9:31
there, not just monetary matters. This is a little bit more from Conrad
9:37
against this probable lawsuit against the Fed. Quote. I believe that the Federal
9:41
Reserve would certainly want to keep this a secret. What we just talked about.
9:46
In his book Money Questions and Answers, published in the early twentieth century,
9:50
Father Charles Coglin, the famed radio priest and monetary reformer from Michigan,
9:56
reported that banks were borrowing cash interest free based on their bond holdings and at
10:01
the same time collecting interests from US taxpayers on the same bonds from the total
10:07
value of the bonds. And I have that very book, Money Questions and
10:11
Answers. It's very interesting written by a priest. No less going on.
10:16
This could turn out to be more double dipping, Conrad wrote, it could
10:20
be money laundering and racketeering as well. We will find out together what the
10:24
facts are as they develop. I feel I'm now laying the groundwork to possibly
10:28
take the FED to court and hopefully have some parts of the Federal Reserve Act
10:31
of nineteen thirteen overturned by a federal court. This action, he admits,
10:37
is in slow motion. I've asked the FED for the files and docks.
10:39
Let's see what they produce. And I can mention too, Brian, that
10:43
so far he's been almost totally stonewalled on any important information from the FED,
10:50
which states on its website that it's willing to share and divulge information under the
10:56
law to a certain extent. Now, moving on and broad the discussion a
11:01
little bit about monetary reform over the years, going back to two thousand and
11:05
eight in Chicago, that's when I first learned about and covered some events by
11:11
the American Monetary Institute. And I just happened to get a email from them
11:16
the other day the other day, and this was in there. They're having
11:20
their next conference, the twenty twenty four International Monetary Conference, is typically in
11:26
Chicago, and it's going to be not until September twenty seventh through twenty nine
11:31
there'll be more information on this. That was founded by Steve Zerlanga, who
11:35
passed away in twenty seventeen. I got to know Steve at a program Brian
11:41
and Diane in Washington, d C at a cafe, and the noted Democrat
11:46
populist Congressman Dennis Kucinach was there, who was recently rfk's campaign manager but stepped
11:54
down anyway, the American Monetary Institute has basically, and this is their own
11:58
literature, they've basically advocated the nationalization of the FED, not necessarily getting rid
12:05
of it all together, but supposedly changing its nature. Private commercial banks and
12:11
financial institutions would no longer issue the nation's money by making investments or loans.
12:16
All legal tender money is issued through the government, which captures the full use
12:22
of the signiorage benefit, you know, signorage basically being the national money and
12:26
the benefits that stem from that. So that has some connection, Brian,
12:31
at least generally with the Bradbury Pound. And what I'm getting at in a
12:35
broader sense is these are some ideas that I'm bringing up today where you might
12:41
take the Bradbury Pound concept and you might find a path from that and where
12:45
to go with that. The list today and what I'm covering is by no
12:50
means all inclusive, but it's a start. As if we had the Bradbury
12:54
Pound situation, the government producing its own monetary unit, where would we go
12:58
with it? So moving on, another interesting website that has a long legacy
13:05
to it is the Australian League of Rights and it has a famous quote from
13:09
the British statesman Edmund Burke. All this necessary for the triumph of evil is
13:13
that good men do nothing. And one of the things, one of many
13:16
things at alor dot org is Operation bank Watch, many things that have been
13:22
enacted and considered over the years, and this has governments of all persuasions and
13:28
politicians in particular absolved themselves entirely from such responsibility in these financial matters, add
13:35
to why our financial system and economy has collapsed and is not being regenerated and
13:41
refused to apply themselves to this vital situation. So it's pointing out the basic
13:46
dilemma, the basic problem, and it goes on to say the truth is
13:48
the present impasse has actually been created by the actions and neglect of our federal
13:54
politicians over a long period of time, with the blessing of acts quiescing state
14:01
governments. The responsibility is now entirely with these very same politicians are duly elected
14:07
representatives, to see that changes are made, in this case to Australia's financial
14:11
system. Very interesting stuff, and we'll keep moving on. And to allow
14:18
unpayable debt to be accommodated. That is, that's the goal and written down
14:22
in some way. A lot of people would completely erase debt from the books,
14:28
calling it fraudulent. Anyway, that's been brought up. The situation must
14:31
be addressed as a matter of urgency. Otherwise this casualty lists among industry and
14:37
farmers will grow and grow till Australia itself destructs economically and socially. So we'll
14:41
keep going. I've got some miscellaneous items. This is another program going on
14:46
a little sooner in mid July, based on the writings of C. H.
14:52
Douglas, who was a British engineer and helped with the London Tube system,
14:58
among other things, a book called Economic Democracy that was promoted in a
15:03
lot of the Crown dependencies in the early twentieth century. The CH. Douglas
15:09
Seminar will be in Adelaide Australia in mid July, and I can talk about
15:13
how to learn more about it. This talks about basically that the speakers will
15:20
list the speakers there and the topics include the rise of useless work, an
15:26
outline of corrective economic approaches, elective dictatorship or constitutional monarchy, Why Australia has
15:33
become an elective dictatorship, Douglas social credit, untying the Gordian nod and so
15:39
on and so forth. The right to cash is another one, and we'll
15:43
go from there as we wind up. This is from socred dot org by
15:50
the author Oliver Haydorn, who I interviewed a couple times over the last ten
15:56
years, and it quotes Douglas. The twin evil common more or less to
16:00
all existing organized society of servility is poverty. Poverty is in itself a transient
16:06
phenomenon, but servility, not necessarily of course of manner, is a definite
16:11
component of a system having centralized control of policy at its apex. And the
16:17
website socred dot org has these articles by Oliver Haydorn, a noted author and
16:23
doctor. He has a doctorate. The Right to Cash and Douglas Social Credit
16:27
untying the Gordian knot, and I believe we're near the end. And this
16:33
is another website that also gets into the Douglas economic democracy, the People's Credit,
16:38
a new economics for human flourishing. People can check that out as well.
16:44
And I believe there's been a lingering question about Douglas social credit and the
16:49
difference between that and universal basic income. I can get into that now,
16:53
Brian or in Extra. I believe there's a video up. It's your call
16:57
if you want me to explain that now or do the video first. I
17:02
think just give us a very brief explanation. But we will talk about this
17:06
a lot more in UK column Extra. It's a subject worthy of discussion.
17:11
I think the thing is that many people need to understand that we've got the
17:17
globalists trying to bring in social credit where effectively people can be forced to live,
17:22
as I see it, on a minimum wage, and therefore we've got
17:26
to be very careful in our descriptions of this sort of monetary assistance. But
17:32
what's your response, Well, first of all, the Douglas Social credit goes
17:37
back to nineteen eighteen or so and vastly precedes that Chinese system and has no
17:42
resemblance to it whatsoever, and I've looked at that very very closely. Oliver
17:48
had and has some videos posted, kind of animated videos that explain it.
17:52
And it's also notable that the vast difference between that and UBI Universal Basic Income
17:59
is that with a social credit dividend, which would supplement working income, it's
18:03
distributive. In other words, new money is created on an occasional basis to
18:08
fill an actual defect that's been identified in the economy, so it's a necessary
18:15
corrective measure, whereas UBI is redistributive. They take the money from one class
18:21
of people and transfer it to another redistributed so that's more socialistic. That in
18:26
a nutshell, is the very important difference. And one is a dividend based
18:32
on everyone being a capitalist in a commonwealth. The other is simply a socialistic
18:37
transfer of wealth. One distributive, the other redistributive. So we'll leave it
18:41
at that for now, and if you want to get into it more later
18:44
we can. But that's what I've learned very carefully over the years. Okay,
18:48
Mark, thank you very much for that. Let's say, for UK
18:51
column members, join us for a UK column extra and we will be discussing
18:56
the money, monetary system, the economic system and doan wlcome and what have
19:02
you got for us? Thanks Brian. So I'd like to cover since it
19:06
is Pride Month and not to be confused with trans dative Visibility or LGBT HISTORYLA
19:11
through any of the other celebrations that we have for the LGBT community throughout the
19:15
year, I wanted to cover a little bit about libraries and the agenda being
19:21
pushed within libraries which has ultimately led to my cancelation as someone in the library
19:26
profession. So first, I've got a pure tweet that I posted a few
19:30
days ago, and again please follow me at DIA and e ukc on X.
19:33
I've got a lot going on there I hope to talk about, in
19:37
this case, a scavenger hunt that was put out for children to find these
19:41
different kinds of flags that they needed to find in the library as part of
19:45
a Pride Month activity. And this is what happened to me was I was
19:48
opposing things like this and I said this isn't appropriate for children, and so
19:52
I got mobbed and canceled and thrown out of my professional body for doing so.
19:57
So I just want to take you through some examples and some research that's
20:00
going on to show you what's really happening in libraries. And those of you
20:03
who have children or grandchildren who are of school age in early years ages,
20:07
you really want to pay attention to. This STILLIP, which is the organization
20:11
that I was forced to resign from, is the Association Frontfation Professionals and Librarians
20:18
in the UK at as a chartered institute. Previously the patron was the Queen
20:22
herself. This is the LGBTQ plus network that's on the next slide here that
20:26
we can see an example of their website. It's fine if people are LGBT
20:32
and they want their own community, and it's fine if you want to provide
20:34
sources for grown ups who are in this particular category. But I want to
20:38
focus on what they're doing with children, because to me, this is the
20:41
real danger. And just to give an example of some of the resources that
20:45
they point librarians to, this is one for teachers and librarians for early years
20:52
and they're already teaching them the rainbow, and they're talking in specifically specifically about
20:57
showing you these are gender stereo types. How to avoid gender stereotypes, how
21:02
to break them and making children from the very very beginning aware that there are
21:07
differences and looking for differences and trying to point them out, to make them
21:11
see that people are different, which children don't really see anyway, but if
21:17
we look here. This was an article from April and gb News which is
21:21
starting to uncover more and more about the charity called LGBT Youth Scotland, which
21:25
I'm familiar with ordinarily I'm up in Scotland, and what they've been talking about
21:30
is the amount of money that the Scottish government has been providing to LGBT Youth
21:33
Scotland over the years, which is a so called charity. They have been
21:37
doing things that are absolutely outrageous. Mike and Brian and everyone here today,
21:41
I want everyone to be aware of this. Making children as young as four
21:45
years old identify if they are trans or buy or lesbian or gay, children
21:52
who are not going to have any idea of us are talking about, and
21:55
making them be representatives to these communities. LGBTU Scotland was talking about say well,
22:03
we're not responsible for this, but their former coordinator chief executive is in
22:08
prison for or was in prison. He might be out by now. I'm
22:11
not sure, but he was in prison for running Scotland's largest pedophile network and
22:17
there's some terrible descriptions of the abuse that he inflicted on children during this time.
22:22
It's absolutely disgusting what he did, obviously, and LGBTU Scotland continues to
22:27
deny any association with us, but there are people now who are in their
22:33
twenties who said, well, I was still abused when I was younger,
22:36
when I was working with this organization, and if I may just come in
22:41
there, Diane, the name is James Rennie is at the bottom of the
22:45
screen that I can see. And of course UK column I think was one
22:51
of the initial reporters on the fact that he carried out horrific abuse of very
22:56
young children. He was also a Common and Purpose graduate at the time,
23:02
which we found significance. Is it meant to be working in secretive networks around
23:07
that organization, So lots of questions to be asked here. Yeah, and
23:11
what happened was his since was reduced by half, which is why I'm not
23:15
sure if he's still if he got out early, which has raises even more
23:18
questions there, I think as well. So lgbt U Scotland again promoted by
23:23
STILLIP, and the Scottish section of that LGBT EU Scotland promoted by STILLIP,
23:29
still UP Scotland and associated organizations within this professional body. So when I raised
23:33
questions like this, I was put under a range of disciplinary matters, said
23:40
you know, you can't do this, this isn't inclusive, this isn't fair
23:42
to the LGBT community, and so on. And this is not just limited
23:47
to the UK. Of course, we can see examples in America. So
23:51
on the next slide we have from the American Library Association, which is the
23:56
sort of the child or not the Child the sister organization, And to SYLLIP
24:02
where they're twenty twenty four conference, which I was supposed to be at this
24:04
year until I was rejected from the organization. But I'm here instead at the
24:08
UK column, so it's a much better option. This is on their program
24:12
just as an example on how to support transgender students. Practical tips for librarians,
24:17
educators and allies, presented by Alex Myers. He him his who does
24:22
identify as trans if you read the biography there? And what could I do
24:25
to support transgender students? And what's really scary about this are the pieces of
24:30
the agenda that go forth and talk about how we provide these services without consulting
24:36
parents, that we don't even want to consult them, that we shouldn't consult
24:38
them at all whatsoever. Because they say that children have the right to privacy,
24:44
and this is also covered in the SILLO conferences here as well. Children
24:48
have the right to privacy digital rights of children. So therefore those rights are
24:51
more important than what could possibly be protected by the parents or the families that
24:56
care for them. So just here at the end, I have just one
24:59
more slide will cover here, which is all about, well, just very
25:03
quickly, a couple of things. This is a comic book that was exposed
25:07
in Edinburgh School for Girls, and we also have on this flip side of
25:11
this here as well. If you look at this next slide, we have
25:15
issues of censorship and book banning where they're complaining about LGBT and materials for children
25:22
for LGBT as well as biracial or people of color, all these sort of
25:26
marginalized anti racist materials which we know are actually racist materials. American Library Associations
25:32
Center for Intellectual Freedom complaining about that. But then again they also complain about
25:37
having books available in libraries and in bookshops in Scotland. So if you look
25:42
at the next slide on the issues around people who can provide books that are
25:48
LGBT is nice, but things that are turf is not allowed right, So
25:53
we have some issues there of what it's considered to be censored, what is
25:57
considered to be use full, and what we should include or not include.
26:03
So a lot of issues going on there. So here's a bit of academic
26:06
research here at the very end Drake's Drag Preen's story Time in libraries. This
26:11
was written by a former student I believe it was at City LAS in London,
26:15
which was the library science program there around how Drake Green's Storytime is so
26:21
good for developing empathy, multi literacys inclusion and this is for early years children,
26:27
for Drake Queen's to go in front of them and provide story time to
26:32
them. And so when I said that this is an issue, and when
26:34
I said why are we promoting LGBT books and saying gender critical books or trans
26:38
exclusionary radical feminist books are bad and should be hidden, which is what's covered
26:42
here. This is an article from the Free Speech Union which I belong to
26:45
you, by the way, and I asked these questions, why is this
26:48
happening? That was kind of the demise of my involvement in my professional body,
26:55
And this is what happens in today's world when you speak out about which
26:57
you know is right. Diane, thank you very much for that. This
27:02
is an incredibly important subject because it is an attack on the minds of our
27:07
children, the attack on the minds of young people. And somebody in our
27:11
chatbox just now said, well, actually, what you're describing is a war
27:15
against normality. And I'll just add that we do get support from the gay
27:22
and LGBT community because there are people who are now seeing through these policies and
27:29
they realize that if this continues to grow, that nobody will be safe from
27:33
the next new agenda that will come through so grooming by the government, but
27:40
of course it's powerful lobbying groups that sit behind that. Thank you very much.
27:45
Now, if you like what the UK column does, then please support
27:49
us. We'd really like people to join us with a membership because that keeps
27:55
us operating financially and we can only do what we do with your finalual support.
28:00
So five pounds a month huge amount of material from the UK Column we
28:06
think is good value for money. Have a look on site and see if
28:10
you can manage to support us in that way. We also encourage people to
28:15
share our material. Please give the UK Column mention. As we've said now,
28:19
for quite some time, we're stuck on Facebook. We seem to have
28:23
been banned or blocked on that, but we're trying to see whether we can
28:27
free it up. You can also help us go by going to the UK
28:30
Column shop and making a purchase. And I'll say the water bottles are extremely
28:37
popular and hopefully if we get some hot sunshine, they will be a very
28:42
good bye for you. Now, I just want to mention that yesterday or
28:48
the weekend, the UK Column team was in the studio preparing for the UK
28:52
Column Live event which went out yesterday. We thoroughly enjoyed it. It was
28:59
great to be a to put all of our presenters on screen in front of
29:03
the audience to tell their own personal stories as to how they woke up,
29:07
how they got involved with the UK Column, and we were also able to
29:11
give our viewers and listeners information about how the UK Column got it started itself
29:18
and ultimately we talked about where we wanted to go. Now, the day's
29:23
events are being edited as we speak, and we look to have a video
29:29
of the whole day up on the UK Column website as soon as possible.
29:33
But just bear with us because Monday today is another day and here we are
29:38
doing the news now. We did get some lovely comments back. Kenny was
29:44
kind enough just to choose a few of them. There were a lot of
29:47
them, so people thanking us for what we did. Charles and Ben both
29:52
got praise in the ones I've selected, but there was praise for all the
29:56
presenters and this is really encouraging for us to get this sort of feedback back
30:02
from our audience. We are doing more of this, so we'll keep you
30:07
posted as and when that comes up. Now Tomorrow Tomorrow, Tuesday, the
30:12
eighteenth of June, at one o'clock, Debbie is interviewing Adam Rowland, who's
30:18
a vaccine injured person. We've spoken to him before. Very emotional but very
30:25
informative interview, so log on to have a look at that. And then
30:30
also big thanks to Colin Buchanan here who actually sent me an email talking about
30:36
what's going on in the world. He's talking about NATO ramping up the conflict
30:40
with Russia. He's talking about the merciless Israeli assault in Gaza and what he
30:47
says is we've got to stand up and do something to challenge this, particularly
30:52
as we now see a focus on the danger of militarism and conscription. And
30:57
I totally agree with what he said here. But what he's also put through
31:02
is the Rally for Peace and Freedom which will be on Glasgow Green Nelson Monument
31:07
one pm Saturday, the twenty ninth of June. So if you can get
31:12
to that, that would be really excellent. And of course we've also got
31:17
the Sounds Beautiful Festival coming up that's in Dorset during the twenty seventh to the
31:23
thirtieth beautiful fifteen acre site and the UK Column team looks forward seeing you there
31:32
now. Of course, it was only a couple of weeks ago that the
31:33
UK Column was also out on the ground a festival and we had the opportunity
31:40
to talk with the Freedom Alliance and we're going to put out that little interview
31:45
tomorrow evening at seven pm. It is audio really worth listening to, as
31:52
I was able to talk to Catherine Evans and Allan McManus here at the festival
31:56
in the luxury of a dry tent. Join us for that. This is
32:01
really the big date for your diary is Saturday, the nineteenth of October twenty
32:06
twenty four, when UK Column will be in a very good venue. More
32:10
details all this will come up in Bristol and this is the opportunity to not
32:15
only meet the UK Column team live in person, but we also have some
32:21
really good speakers. Now, Mark, I'll just bring you back in because
32:27
you've got an update on AI, no doubt. Recall last Monday I did
32:35
a report on Sam Altman, the head of open Ai, and of course
32:40
Sam has been a regular Builderberg attendee, and I noted that Builderberg connected media
32:45
such as Axel Springer and it owns Politico, especially News Corp and others.
32:52
Financial Times is very ubiquitous, are making deals with open Ai to use the
32:58
news content and re engineer that. You might say, well, in this
33:02
case we have Edward Snowden calling out what's going on and excuse me, I
33:10
have the glow from my desktop computer here to be able to better read what
33:15
you're showing on the screen. Bear with me and basically in this update to
33:21
what I reported last week Edward Snowden, the known high tech dissident. He
33:27
eviscerates open AI's decision to put a former National Security Agency director on his board,
33:34
saying, quote, this is a wilful, calculated betrayal of the rights
33:37
of every person on Earth end quote, and he goes on to say,
33:44
do not ever trust open ai or its products. The NSA employee, Edward
33:50
Snowden turned whistleblower, wrote on x recently after the company open ai announced retired
33:58
US Army General Paul Knakis Zones appointment to the boards open ai boards new Safety
34:04
and Security Committee, and Snowden went on to say, Brian, there's only
34:08
one reason for appointing an NSA director to the board. This is a wilful,
34:14
calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth, and Snowden added,
34:19
you have been warned. So this is a very important and brief for
34:24
now update on that, and we'll keep following the meaning and substance and outcome
34:30
of these marriages of elements of the mass media cartel to open AI, which
34:37
is considered the leading ar excuse me AI firm on Earth and very very connected
34:43
with Bilderberg directly and indirectly through these media outlets. So there'll be much more
34:47
on this and we'll see where this thing goes and how it grows back to
34:52
you. Okay, Mark, thank you very much for that. Well,
34:55
let's turn to the election. And a few days ago I was talking about
34:59
the real power behind the political puppet show, which is the elections about to
35:04
take place in UK. Obviously the team players in inverted commas Rishi and Keir
35:09
Starmer, but what I was emphasizing here is that we have to look around
35:15
the party to see where the power base is. And I'm going to talk
35:20
today about the funders, and strangely enough, I ended up going to look
35:24
at Open Democracy. Now, if you look at their information, this is
35:30
very good information and they're talking accurately about what's happening on what's happening. But
35:37
I think you also need to remember the Open Democracy itself is a political and
35:42
social change agent. I'll just put that on screen so that there's no misunderstandings
35:47
with my view of what Open Democracy is up to. However, good article
35:52
from them, with a lot of information. So it's saying that the Conservatives
35:57
received the most donations by far forty four and a half million, compared to
36:01
Labor at twenty one point six six million for the Lib Dems and a mere
36:07
six hundred and ten thousand for the Green Party and two hundred and fifty five
36:10
thousand for Reform. And the important thing about that is when you get into
36:20
this bit on labor, it says of the twenty one and a half million
36:22
in cash received by the Labor Party in twenty twenty three, just five point
36:29
nine came from the trade union movement compared to fourteen point five million from companies
36:35
and individuals. And they write, now, the author of the article rightly
36:38
describes it as a huge increase in the previous year, and this has all
36:44
happened around Keir Starmer's leadership. So it says that as trade union contributions have
36:50
dipped slightly from around six point nine million in twenty twenty to five point three
36:54
and twenty twenty two, donations from businesses and individuals have soared, totaling two
37:00
point three million in twenty twenty and seven point six in twenty twenty two before
37:07
nearly doubling last year. And if we just bring in a bit more detail,
37:13
this is where it gets interesting because around ten million of the total comes
37:16
from just four sources. Gary Lupner four point six million, David Sainsbury three
37:22
point one, Fran Perrin a million, and Eco Tricity one million. And
37:28
that last one is the green energy firm owned by prominent eco activist Dale Vince.
37:35
A bit of highlighting here. This means that just two individuals gave the
37:40
Labor Party more money last year than all the trade unions combined. So is
37:45
labor to do with the ordinary working man and woman. I don't think so.
37:51
But if we get into the Tory Party, it says that of the
37:53
forty four and a half million in cash received for the Tories, more than
37:58
twenty million came from just two sources, John Sainsbury and Frank Hester, an
38:02
IT entrepreneur from Leeds who's given five million personally and another five million through his
38:08
firm, the Phoenix Partnership, which has benefited from public sector contracts. So
38:15
this really, in my opinion, needs to be shut down. This is
38:20
a bit more detail on other funders. We've got Mohammed Mansour, Egyptian born
38:24
billionaire billion five million. Graham Edwards, co founder of the largest private company
38:30
in UK to real trillion, which is two million, amit Sire two million,
38:37
Christopher barry Wood one point three and Alan Howard Hedge front Manager one million.
38:45
So who really controls the Tory Party? The Tory Party or the Funders?
38:49
In my book it is the funders. But let's have a look in
38:52
a different direction, and let's highlight the subject of Israel, which I am
38:59
not shy of talking about, because of course there is huge lobbying power coming
39:02
directly into British politics from Israel. But if I go back to the UK
39:08
column from twenty fifteen, we were starting to warn about people who were dismantling
39:15
the idea that UK was a Christian country. So the Telegraph here Britain is
39:22
no longer a Christian country and should stop acting as it is. And I'm
39:28
highlighting here the Commission on Religion and Belief in Public Life has been convened by
39:34
the Wolf Institute, Cambridge to consider the role of religion and belief in contemporary
39:38
Britain. Now, this was a very big issue for the Jewish press because
39:44
the Jewish Chronicle here heaped glowing praise on the work of the two top judges
39:50
Wolf and butlersch Loss. But what were they actually doing. They were demoting
39:53
Christianity, and the UK Column did a lot of research into the work of
39:59
the Warl Institute, which describes itself as independent, but in reality it seems
40:07
to us that it's anything But you can obviously look in more detail at these
40:12
slides once they're up on the UK Column website. But the Wolf Institute tied
40:19
into the center of a policy in public education formerly the Center for Public Education.
40:24
And what were they doing well, essentially they were attacking Christianity as a
40:29
base to this country. Now it's a complex picture, and the UK Column
40:34
produce what I call a wiring diagram network diagram. Probably to other people that's
40:40
just my little bit of humor, But in it we see that the key
40:45
people of Wolf and butlersh Loss mixed with a whole host of other people to
40:52
unleash this agenda for massive constitutional and religious change in UK. And of course
40:58
i've highlighted top right funding coming in from a number of big institutions such as
41:05
the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and Open Society itself with George Soros, plus the
41:12
Wolf Institute. Now, back in those days, the UK Column did what
41:15
we still do today, and that is we sent an email off asking for
41:20
more details of the funding. That's my original email. Back came this response,
41:27
It is not relevant exactly which organization provided how much money. There is
41:32
full disclosure as to our funders. The Commission was a major undertaking and the
41:37
secretariat was provided by the Wolf Institute, who were there for the main backers.
41:44
Now, my point was that although they did say who had funded,
41:46
they did not say the value of that funding. And of course large sums
41:52
of money equal lobbying power and control to push this issue through. We also
42:00
flagged up this man, doctor Edward Kessler, and we showed that he was
42:06
also sitting on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Advisory Group on Freedom of a Religion
42:10
of belief and he regularly teaches the FCO staff on how and why religion can
42:17
fundamentally affect policy. So here we see a very dark action going on that
42:23
we're mixing politics and religion, but we're using religion to drive the politics.
42:30
And in the mix we also highlighted Justin Welby, who was working in the
42:34
chat in the Shadows we said to destroy his own church because here was the
42:39
Archbishop of Canterbury sitting on part of the Wolf Institute's team of patrons who were
42:46
coming up with the policy that was going to suppress Christianity in the first place.
42:52
So an astonishing situation. Can we trust our parties, I don't believe.
42:58
So we've got to look much to the power of the money supporting them
43:02
and the lobbying groups. Well, let's move on from there, and I
43:07
think Diana on the subject of AMR AMR, thank you. That's oude of
43:14
my head just for a moment. No, actually, thanks Brian. This
43:16
has been a big collaboration between myself and the fabulous w Evans looking at the
43:22
large issue of bacteria, of anti microbial resistance and the larger agenda that's going
43:29
on. And I'm going to give a little bit of my take on it
43:31
and from the perspective of university research supporting this. If you've been watching the
43:37
news at all, recently, the mainstream news has been reporting E. Coli
43:40
outbreaks in the food supply. This has been the most recent thing. Just
43:45
they said, now sort of we don't know what it is, but it's
43:49
maybe potentially some sort of a salid ingredient. As we can see on the
43:52
next slide, there was some information here from Sky News and sort of all
43:58
these mainstream sources that have been saying salad ingredients donate sandwiches. You know,
44:04
we don't really know exactly what the source is, or they're not telling us.
44:07
I'm being very mysterious about it, which I think is a great way
44:09
to increase the fear. They're also saying if you look as well in Virginia
44:14
in the United States, the same strain of E. Coli is apparently spreading
44:19
around. There an outbreak in Virginia. And the problem here is that we
44:23
don't really know what it is, and I personally want to think that it
44:28
is possibly a bit intentional. We also have cryptosporidosis in cryptosporidium, which I'm
44:34
probably not saying correctly. Deb says that better than me. But here the
44:37
issue is if you eat a sandwich, if you eat a salad, you're
44:38
going to get E. Coli. If you drink the water from the water
44:42
supply, you might get cryptospiritosis, which is laced with cryptosporidium, which of
44:47
course is the fault of the water companies, especially Southwest Water, which I
44:52
can say now that I am down here in Devon where I am using Southwest
44:54
Water. Fortunately, yeah, the parent company of Southwest is the Penin Group
45:00
and their twenty twenty four report said that there was absolutely note there was no
45:06
mention of E. Coli or what global heating which was reported in the Guardian
45:10
as being the cause of cryptos perudium potentially spreading around the water supply. They
45:15
don't mention ecola, They don't mention global heating was one mention of cryptos perudium.
45:20
So certainly, and they said it was a lower risk grading than you
45:22
know, current risk grading has gone down, which is really impressive, isn't
45:27
it, Brian? So if we go on as well here here's I looked
45:31
at some academic research to kind of see, hey, what are they saying
45:35
about climate change? Climate change, according to these researchers and others say that
45:39
it has a little overall impact, which in this case was around the runoff
45:45
of cryptos frudium and one other bacteria from lamp between land and surface water.
45:50
So there's a lot a lot of research around cryptos pridium and especially around E.
45:54
Coli that I can't get my head wrapped around. In twenty two,
46:00
our Dame Sally Davies, who according to WI is potentially even more evil than
46:06
Dame Junior. And if that's possible antibcrobia resistance could kill us before the climate
46:12
crisis does so, again increasing the fear. What is the problem here with
46:15
anti microbia resistance, Well, we need antibiotics because antibiotics are what they're going
46:21
to kill the ecoli if it gets into our body or if we get cryptosperidosis.
46:25
So if we don't have antibiotics, then what's going to happen to us,
46:29
Well, we're going to be in a lot of trouble. There's a
46:31
map here which Wie shared last week I believe it was last Friday on the
46:37
news from the WHO around health emergencies around the world that as she's saying,
46:44
it's not going to be this pandemic, this covid that they're going to try
46:49
to scare everyone with. Now it's going to be more localized epdemics And if
46:52
you can see closely, hopefully you can see close enough, put on your
46:55
glasses. If not, Cryptosporidium desperidosis is in the southwest of the UK,
47:00
which is where Brian and I are right now in Plymouth, and E.
47:04
Coli is also in Europe, and they're saying this is all going to increase,
47:07
it's all going to get worse. More and more people are going to
47:09
get sick from these different epidemics that are around the world. Antimcrbler resistance is
47:16
a major major topic of research funding in the UK. This is from the
47:22
UK Research and Innovation Council, which kind of governs the major funding agencies that
47:29
pay for government sponsored research in UK universities and institutions. So we can see
47:35
here that there are all of the major research councils which fall under uk URI
47:40
are covered from this from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty five. As they
47:45
say here, this occurs in pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi or
47:49
parasites stop responding to the drugs used to treat some of this makes infections harder
47:52
to cure. So if we have a problem, if we can't drink a
47:55
glass of water, if we can't eat a salad, and there are potentially
47:59
lives with that materio, what can we do that's safe anymore? That's a
48:02
big question. That's a good question. So the who has this one Health
48:07
the thing which I'm sure has been covered previously, which they define one health
48:13
as an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and we know what
48:16
sustainable means. It means unsustainable because we are living in an inverted world when
48:21
it comes to language and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems.
48:25
So this is linked to the Medical Research Council in the UK because they are
48:30
a partner in this global coordination. This involves twenty nine nations in Europe with
48:35
over on one hundred and seventy million euros invested to curb antimicrobial resistance, huge
48:40
amounts of money, huge amounts of people and resources. So that takes this
48:45
again to Agenda twenty thirty and the UN Sustainable Goals, which we can find
48:51
in the UN Sustainable Goals around E. Coli which is highlighted there at the
48:54
bottom. We have an AMR indicator which is built into sustainable development goals.
49:00
And how are we going to monitor this? What are we going to do
49:04
about it? Well, we have the UN Environment Program which says it is
49:07
an imperative to tackle these environmental dimensions of AMR. So once again leaking together
49:14
climate change with sustainable goals with now anti microbial resistance because we're all going to
49:20
die because we drink a glass of water because we breathe the air, and
49:22
we turn on the air conditioning if it does get hot. Here all these
49:24
things that could be happening and these consuming anti microbills will impact many other sggs.
49:31
So if you do the antibiotics because you got really sick from eating a
49:36
salad, you're going to destroy the climate, You're going to hurt other things,
49:38
You're going to impact education. Who knows what damage you could do if
49:42
you needed a dose of penicillin. So what happens here then is we start
49:47
to get into what the universities are doing. And this is where I want
49:51
to show you some specific examples to show you how this exactly happens. So
49:55
here's a video from the University of Manchester. Apologize in advance for the quality
50:00
of the video, showing how the University of Manchester is enacting the seventeen Sustainable
50:05
Development Goals. So that was just one example from one university showing how they're
51:52
using staff and students sound resources to meet the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals. You
51:59
have here our friend from the past, Professor Chris Whitty, who is involved
52:05
in the London as you see down here. He was professor of the London
52:09
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and of course we all know what he
52:14
does now we won't go any further than that. We have another video to
52:19
show what his school or former school where he is still an honorary professor,
52:22
is doing. So this tithes together as well Mark's earlier segment from AI.
52:28
If we can have that video please. AI is completely changing the world,
52:37
is revolutionizing it, and in my case it will be for microscopy. So
52:42
all the reveloments that have been done in computer division, which is basically you
52:45
have a digital image and you need the computer to understand what is in that
52:51
image, that's now been applied to microscopy. The ambition of our science now
52:55
is just so different than what it was three four years ago, because we
53:00
can test research questions at such a scale that were previously unimaginable. So the
53:08
solution for AMR and bacteria and so on is going to be AI. So
53:14
I don't know about you, Brian, I don't necessarily feel any safer after
53:16
that, not at all, because we're now able to see videos and indeed
53:22
documentation where for example, the MHRA simply discusses the data. It doesn't get
53:28
to the root of the problem of the safety and the damage that's been done
53:31
to people as a result of the vaccine. So the talk is all about
53:35
manipulating numbers and data, and of course if you use an AI system,
53:38
that's just going to be part of that circular pond. Yeah, exactly.
53:45
And so my final slide here in the segment is just to show you in
53:50
case you weren't already Yeah, that's right, if you weren't already scared by
53:54
the idea of eating a salad or a sandwich or drinking a glass of water.
53:59
Three weeks ago. So this was originally on gb News and then funnily
54:02
enough MSN so Bill Gates Microsoft re shared this article saying that the WHO has
54:10
updated the pathogen list as intense antimicrobi resistance sparks fears of a pandemic worse than
54:17
COVID. So this is what they're seeing. They're saying that we will be
54:22
looking to next. So I personally believe that Debbie Evans is right on target
54:27
with this, and I hope this has shown why, and I hope I've
54:30
also shown why the universities are doing their very best to support all of this.
54:34
Brian, Yeah, Okay, thank you for that. Doan well,
54:37
Mark, Let's bring you back on screen. We're going to finish the news
54:39
today with a segment on Africa. And what is in my mind is that
54:45
as we've seen huge amounts of money created and moved around the world to keep
54:51
the wars going, whether it's in the Middle East or Ukraine, we never
54:54
seem to see those same efforts made in order to solve pulvert food or drinking
55:00
water, particularly in Africa. Over to you, Yeah, being a little
55:07
mindful of the time. Thanks Brian and Diane. Good stuff. This is
55:10
an article through the Brownstone Institute website by a Nairobi professor. If I'm saying
55:16
his last name right Oudoir which way Africa. Africa, of course, has
55:22
had many tragedies visited upon it over the decades, colonialism, etc. Of
55:28
the exploitation there has been off the page and moving on from there, we'll
55:34
kind of do a somewhat shorter version of this. Viewers can check out more
55:38
detail as they see fit. Professor Odawar wrote in my April twenty four twenty
55:45
excuse me. In the twenty fourth April twenty twenty four article two twenty fours
55:49
there I pointed out that if the who's Pandemic Agreement were signed into international law
55:54
in its current form in may As schedule, then it turns out that that
56:00
or treaty was not only the international health regulations were passed at the seventy seventh
56:05
World Health Assembly in Geneva. This was written kind of during that assembly.
56:09
Then several of the treaty's provisions would greatly harm the peoples of Africa. So
56:14
this is a bit of a warning if they do, in fact try to
56:16
pass the treaty. Among the harms would be the fact that the sovereignty of
56:22
the continent's states, the African continent states would be greatly eroded by the centralized
56:27
management of public health emergencies. Besides, an unprecedented censorship infrastructure would be put
56:32
in place, thus inhibiting the building of open societies. Now, what the
56:37
professor's talking about there, in part, is the anti disinformation stuff that was
56:44
discussed at length, including at many of the press conferences that I covered firsthand
56:49
for UK column at the WHO. They are absolutely intolerant of anything negative about
56:55
vaccines, no matter how well researched, for example. Anyway, Furthermore,
57:00
the professor wrote, African states would be under the obligation to divert a significant
57:06
proportion of their meager health budgets from immediate health concerns malaria, malnutrition, etc.
57:13
In order to contribute to the global kitty, the Global piggybank on pandemic
57:19
preparedness, and as Diane pointed out, they keep rolling out candidates for what
57:23
might be the next pandemic. We've also heard of the av and flu.
57:28
Moving on from there, doing a somewhat shorter version. This is Reginald Oldowar,
57:32
the Nairobi professor that wrote this. I won't say much about his CV
57:37
except he's an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Nairobi and he's associated
57:44
with the Pan African Epidemic and Pandemic Working Group, so he is involved in
57:51
such matters. And we'll come through just a little bit more, just hitting
57:54
on the highlights, commenting on the potential impact of the Treaty and amendments to
58:00
the International Health REGs. The professors referring to doctor David Bell and another doctor
58:06
and saying that together they reflect a see change the two things, the Treaty
58:13
and the International Health Legs in international public health over the past two decades.
58:17
The two things aimed to further centralize control of public health policy within the WHO
58:23
and based response to disease outbreaks on a heavily commoditized approach, which speaks of
58:30
more profiteering rather than actual, straightforward, honest healthcare, rather than the who's
58:37
prior emphasis on building resilience to disease through nutrition, sanitation and strengthen community community
58:45
based healthcare. Going on from there, we probably won't get into all of
58:51
this, the professor wrote. It seems to me in the field of global
58:54
public health, the Pandemic Agreement, which again hasn't been passed yet, is
58:59
intended to play a role similar to that played by a constitution, while the
59:02
International Health RAGS would have a role equivalent to subsidiary legislation. So one is
59:09
the supporting legislation, the other is the more broad umbrella like a constitution.
59:15
Important to take note of these structural things of great relevance to my reflections is
59:21
the president is a president? Excuse me? Of great relevance to my reflections
59:24
in the present article is Professor A. Kitsch's further observation. Then this is
59:30
probably the last thing I'll cover on this. A Professor A. Ketch that
59:35
Professor Professor Odawar is referring to said the following. The proliferation of international regulatory
59:40
mechanisms over the last two or so decades has created a democracy deficit in the
59:46
international arena. Our interactions across borders have led to a realization that our interests
59:54
grievances cannot be addressed by separate national governance systems. As a result, the
1:00:00
makings of these governance decisions has basically inevitably shifted to global institutions, often without
1:00:07
our national participation or any accountability to national entities. Yet these institutions, the
1:00:15
global ones, exercise immense powers and regulate vast sectors of our social and economic
1:00:21
lives. Their decisions directly affect us. And Diane talked about the machinations with
1:00:25
the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals, in many cases without any intervening role for national
1:00:32
government action. Here as well, a need arises to democratize the exercise of
1:00:39
power. And as I talked about earlier Brian and Diane with monetary reform,
1:00:44
and we might talk about it in extra one way to democratize the exercise of
1:00:50
power is to wrest the control of monetary policy from private central banks and their
1:00:57
usurious ways. That's not the only way, it's a major way, and
1:01:00
we'll leave it at that for now. The interesting update, and I think
1:01:06
it's encouraging to see that we have got people in Africa that are standing up
1:01:10
and warning about the encroachment of these globalist policies and also the dangers of the
1:01:16
World Health Organization and they need all the support they can get. Well,
1:01:22
thank you both very much for joining me for the news today. It's been
1:01:25
most enjoyable. Now before I go, I must hold this up. This
1:01:30
is a UK Column publication which Mike Robinson has brought on stream Agenda twenty one
1:01:37
Your life in their hands now. This is absolutely talking about globalist policy and
1:01:45
how those sustainable goals are being developed. We originally wrote it. This was
1:01:52
originally written by a gentleman called Martin Edwards who has been writing for the UK
1:01:55
Column for a very long time. A really excellent artic call, so much
1:02:00
detail. Mike decided that it should be updated to make it fully relevant to
1:02:06
twenty twenty four and it should be produced in this really wonderful brochure format.
1:02:12
I'm going to encourage people to go to the UK Column Shop to have a
1:02:16
look for this document because it's very very informative and we would really like as
1:02:22
many people as possible to buy it share the information. That helps everybody,
1:02:29
but of course also helps the UK column produce more material. So I'll leave
1:02:35
that with you and we'll say to our audience today, thank you very much
1:02:37
for joining us. We will be back for extra if you're a UK column
1:02:43
member. Otherwise play out at one o'clock tomorrow. The news will be back
1:02:50
on Wednesday at one o'clock. We will see you there. Thank you,
1:02:54
bye bye. He at the empty the