Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Tyler Robinson Files Post-Preliminary Hearing Status Report on Discovery (Part 2) (8/30/26)

Transcript

Tyler Robinson Files Post-Preliminary Hearing Status Report on Discovery (Part 2) (8/30/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the program. In
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: this episode, we're going to pick up where we left
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: off with Tyler Robinson and his latest filing in regards
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: to discovery to digital evidence requiring specialized processing and analysis.
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: The discovery produced in this matter includes a substantial volume
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: of digital evidence that requires forensic processing before substantive review
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: can be completed. Specifically, on March 13, 2026, the defense
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: received a hard drive containing approximately 12.1 terabytes of digital
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: forensic data, with 6,425 folders and 613,023 files. This production
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: includes extractions of six mobile devices, 14 forensic images of
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: computer hard drives, and seven warrant returns or account records
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: produced by third-party service providers. Before reviewing these data, each
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: data source must first be imported into an appropriate forensic
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: analysis platform and processed so that the underlying files, databases,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: application records, system information, and metadata can be identified and
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: made available for examination. Depending upon the source and format
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: of the evidence, this work is performed using forensic tools
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: including Celebrite, Physical Analyzer, Magnet, Axiom, Forensic Toolkit, and other
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: specialized software. The mobile device extractions contain approximately 2,915,822 individual
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: artifacts generated by the devices and their applications, including text
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: messages and other communications, call records, contacts, photographs and videos,
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: internet activity, application data, location-related information, files and attachments, system records,
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: deleted or partially recovered data, and associated timestamps and metadata.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: The forensic software parses the underlying device database and file
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: systems to organize this data into a form that can
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: be searched and reviewed. The computer hard drive images contain
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: approximately 4,887,847 individual artifacts associated with user activity, applications, operating systems,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: and other data stored within the image file system. The
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: forensic images of the computer's hard drive require a comparable process.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: As part of the processing workflow, each image must be
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: verified against its hash value to confirm the integrity of
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: the forensic copy and then ingested into forensic software. The
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: initial service provider returns the Apple, Google, Discord, AT & T,
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: and Verizon amount to approximately 183 GB. These third-party returns
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: constitute a separate category of digital discovery. Additionally, on August 18, 2026,
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: the defense received another return from Apple totaling approximately 170 GB,
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: which has not yet been processed or reviewed. Returns from
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: providers such as Apple, Google, and Discord contain account information, communications, attachments,
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: activity logs, metadata, and other records and formats specific to
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: each provider. The Discord return alone contains over 1 million communications.
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: Returns from carriers such as AT & T and Verizon
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: contain cell site location information. In this case, there are
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: at least 25,253 location records. These records are either processed
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: into report format or mapped, then organized, reviewed, and where
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: appropriate compared with evidence obtained from the relevant devices, computer images,
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: or other sources of similar data. The review therefore proceeds
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: in stages 1. Verifying and organizing the source data, 2.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: Importing and processing the data with appropriate forensic platforms, 3.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: Identifying and categorizing potentially relevant artifacts, 4. Conducting targeted searches
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: and substantive review, and 5. cross-referencing information among the devices,
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: computer images, and provider returns. The forensic processing and substantive
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: review is ongoing. The following chart indicates the current stage
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: of review for each type of data described above. Mobile
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: device extraction stage 2. Computer hard drive extraction stage 2.
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: Returns from service providers stage 1. Additionally, on July 20th, 2026,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: the defense received a hard drive containing approximately 660 gigabytes
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: of FARO 3D data. Unlike the device extractions and provider
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: returns described above, these data are not communications or user files.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: They are high density spatial measurement data files that must
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: be processed and registered into a navigable 3D representation before
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: they can be examined or interpreted. This FARO production includes
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: the raw scan data rather than a finished report or
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: exported images, possession of the raw data therefore does not,
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: standing alone, permit counsel to meaningfully assess the scene, reconstruction
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: or any measurements, representations or conclusions derived from it. Reviewing
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: the raw FARO 3D data requires both specialized software capable
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: of processing, registering and displaying the individual scans, and resulting
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: point cloud data such as FARO Scene and Zone 3D
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: and technical expertise necessary to operate that software and evaluate
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: the resulting reconstruction and measurements. Meaningful review of one party's
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: thorough representation requires the other party to identify and retain
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: a qualified expert with the appropriate software and training to
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: process the data and assist counsel in evaluating both the
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: underlying scans and any reconstruction, measurement, or conclusions derived from them.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: That work constitutes a separate technical review process which is
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: qualitatively different from and in addition to the forensic processing
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: and substantive review of the mobile devices, computer images, and
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: third-party provider data described above. 3. Forensic Discovery Disputes and
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: the Forthcoming Motion Attached to the defense's motion to continue
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: the prelim hearing was a March 25, 2026 second request
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: for DNA and other forensic discovery following the defense's September 30,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: 2025 formal request for discovery pursuant to URCP 16 and
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: request for 404B, notice Docket 61. The state responded to
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: the second request for discovery by providing the defense cover
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: letters and other material from the FBI and the ATF,
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: which indicated that some, but certainly not all, of the
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: material requested in the second request was being provided prior
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: to the prelim hearing. In addition, in its opposition to
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: the defense's motion, to continue the prelim hearing, the state
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: took the position that because the expert notice requirements, including
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: discovery of foundational material, are expressly excluded from the prelim
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: hearing by the expert notice statute, defendant has no basis
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: for seeking a continuance on the grounds of allegedly inadequate
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: expert discovery, docket 467 at 10. During the prelim hearing itself,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: when the defense sought to question the FBI's DNA expert
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: about the reliability of her results, THE STATE OBJECTED CLAIMING
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: THAT STUDIES SUPPORTING THIS SCIENCE, STUDIES OPPOSING THIS SCIENCE, TESTIMONY
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: FROM THIS EXPERT OR THAT EXPERT ABOUT WHAT IS RELIABLE,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: WHAT IS NOT, WHAT'S MORE RELIABLE, WHAT'S LESS RELIABLE, FACTORS
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: THAT AFFECT ALL THOSE DETERMINATIONS, THOSE ARE ALL VERY COMPLEX DECISIONS.
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: THERE WILL BE PROBABLY MULTI-DAY HEARINGS DEALING WITH THAT, AND
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: A PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATION IS NOT THE PLACE TO CONDUCT
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: THAT KIND OF THOROUGH, IN-DEPTH AND SEARCHING ANALYSIS. Preliminary hearing
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: transcript July 7th, 2026 at 172. In preparation for this
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: extensive reliability hearing that the state alluded to, the defense
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: is in the process of working with its retained experts
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: to prepare expert declarations which will be filed in support
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: of a motion to compel the forensic discovery that the state,
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: through the FBI and the ATF, has refused to provide.
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: The discovery litigation is the necessary next step to moving
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: the case forward. At the hearing on September 1, 2026,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: the defense will request that the court set a briefing
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: schedule for the filings and hearing of a discovery motion
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: addressing these issues. Conclusion Now that Mr. Robinson's defense team
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: has had an opportunity to prepare this comprehensive and up-to-date
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: status report on discovery, it will, if requested by the court,
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: to do so, provide the court with regular written updates
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: in advance of future hearings in this matter. Respectfully Submitted
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: this 28th day of August, 2026. And this was signed
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: by Kathy Nestor, Richard Novak, Michael Burt, and Stacey Visser.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: All the information that goes with this episode can be
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: found in the description box.