Latest / Honey Badger Radio / UN Women: All your nations are belong to us | HBR Talk 374

Transcript

UN Women: All your nations are belong to us | HBR Talk 374 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three seventy four. You
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: and women, all in your nations are belonging to us.
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: I'm your host, Hannah Wallen, here with nonsense. Well nonsense
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: annihilator Lauren B. Might not be here yet, and we
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: don't know if she is unable to be here. Sometimes
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: she gets stuck in traffic. So we hopefully nonsense annihilator
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Lauren B will be here shortly. But if not, we
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: do have Mike Stevenson, the the personification of perceptivity, our
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: own doctor Randam mccam, who likes to tell you he's
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: not a real doctor, but I don't know. I think
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: it is better than what.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: I'm not even a real perceptor of perceptivity. Sorry, break
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: the illusion.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: Whatever, Nah, I think you might be better than real doctors.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: I've gotten better medical advice from you than real doctors
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: of late.
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: I cannot confirm this without breaking you. I'm afraid.
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: Oh, I know, I know. But in any case, so
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: we also have the doge in charge in the background
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: making things happen that I still don't haven't haven't taken
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: the time to figure out how to make happen. So uh,
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: but I am I am stepping into the twenty first century. Now.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: I I just replaced my computer. I haven't gotten it
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: set up yet for the show because I have like
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: twelve years worth of stuff that I got to transfer
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: from this this old computer. When you when you let
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: your equipment get really outdated, one of the drawbacks of
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: that is if I buy, say a a drive to
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: transfer everything too from the hard drives on the desktop
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: computer that I have that is so old that I
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: can't upgrade from System eight, they won't work with it.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: The drivers that won't run the drivers, So I have
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: to have an older drive because the newer equipment will
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: work with some of the older drives. I have to
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: go through and possibly even try attaching the laptop directly
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: to the computer instead of attaching a hard drive, because
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: it's been a pain in the butt. I've tried with
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: two and they won't It won't boot them up because
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: it's too old and they're too new.
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: Why do we even need Windows eleven? Like, are they
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: going to be viruses that only target Windows ten and below?
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: I don't think so, that's that's not how viruses work.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: They specifically attack the latest technology. So why do we
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: need Windows eleven? Is it because Windows ten or below
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: would just stop working for the particular fucking reason. Ah
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: hey you.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: All, yeah, well we know the answer to that, right,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: because Windows eleven makes your compute not your property anymore.
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: But yeah, so, uh well this is this is what
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: I used.
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: To say about Max, that the reason they're not called
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: PCs is because they're not personal computers. They don't belong
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: to you. They belonged to Apple. But the same applies
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: to PCs. They're not personal computers anymore. They belonged to
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: Bill fucking Gates. Yeah.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: Apple was doing that all along, and and it was
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: very profitable for them, and I think Bill Gates kind
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: of looked at that when I could be making more money.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: You know, a lot of a lot of software does
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: the same thing. Like when I started learning to use Photoshop.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: You bought Photoshop, you registered it, it worked on your computer.
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: You you installed the application on your computer, and it
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: ran on your computer. You did not have to have
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: an online connection to use it or anything. And now
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: a lot of software you buy the software and it
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: gives you access to a server where the software, where
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: the application is and you can't you can't use it
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: now without an Internet connection, which is, in my opinion,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: is pretty bogus. Sorry to go all gen X on you,
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: but that's no.
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: Everyone in our audience knows what we're talking about because
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: we're all techno nes. I have a ten year old
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: Surface Pro three, which is a Microsoft computer, and a
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: ten year old MacBook and it's a race against time
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: to see which one of them just breaks down first
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: from not being able to have the new technology. And
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: you know, my money's on the Surface Pro three breaking
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: down first. But we'll see, we'll see what happens. We'll
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: see which one of these companies is going to screw
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: us over the first and force us to buy new hardware.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: And I hope it's not fucking Apple, because because my
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: MacBook like costs a grand and and and and my
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: surface broke Cross cost three hundred quid I think it
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: was like ten years ago, neither of which I can
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: afford to replace. So please give me money, folks, or
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: I will be broke forever. There's no links on this
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: channel to how you can pay me, but fucking find them, please,
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: because I'm gonna fucking I'm gonna fucking die several deaths.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: That is it is, It is important, and actually I
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: think on Feed the Badger. We have a link for
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: tipping mic So if you get the opportunity that would
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: be that would be much encouraged and and there would
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: be much gratitude. But let me get into our spiel
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: so you know what I'm talking about for anybody who
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: hasn't already listened to the show and heard that a
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: million times. As always, Honey Badger Radio dishes out as
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: morgas board of thought provoking discussions and as experiences both
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: recent and a long past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: are fighting back. They've made it clear that for people
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: like us, relying on third party payment platforms like Patreon
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: to fund our work is treading on thin ice or
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: building our house in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: In light of this, we strongly encourage our supporters to
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: switch at least their support for us to Feed the
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: Badger dot Com the most stable way to help us out,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: And if you want to tip us directly instead of
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: relying on any social media platforms, tip jar. The link
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: for that is Feed the Badger dot com slash just
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: the tip. And as always, the same risk applies to
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: our social media platforms, which is why you should further
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: on Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where you can find your
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: way to all of our content, as well as a
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: link to feed the Badger dot com in the drop
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: down menu at the top of the page. And with that,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: I'm going to close that window so I don't have
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: to look at it anymore so I can see more
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: chats from you guys. I have three chat windows open
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: on this on my desktop because restream can't show the
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: vertical chat and it doesn't show the rumble chat. We
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: also got a super chat already from Meredith G. For
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: five dollars and she says, HBr Talk three seventy four
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: Honey for the Badgers, thanks for the thought provoking discussion
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: or conversation and creating a record of how long all
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: the feminist bullshit has been going on? And yeah, it's
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: been been going on for quite a while, even before
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: I had my first computer. We've been talking about, you know,
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: the the headaches of modern computers. It actually miss makes
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: me miss the day when the time period when you know,
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: I used to I used to use a Commodore sixty
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: four and you had to have six different discs to
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: run a program. All some programs, games in particular, took
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: to have six different floppies.
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: And one remembers when discs were actually.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Floppy floppy yeah and big too, like they were they were.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: They were way bigger than the the much later like
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: harder versions. It was really hard for me to call
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: those floppies once they were encased like that. I understand
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: why they did it, Okay, So I uh. I had
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: a teacher at a a summer camp, day camp that
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: I went to for for nerds, that was trying to
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: explain to all of us, who many of us actually
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: already had computers at home and were using floppy discs.
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: Here's how you insert that. She she was like, it
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: even has a convenient spot for your thumb and finger,
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: and she put them over that little window where the
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: disc is exposed, uh, and to hold the disk. And
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: half the room just went, oh no, because you know
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: you can damage it doing that, and she did. The
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: program didn't run, and they they ended up having to
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: do something else with the with class.
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: But in the meantime, we talked, we talked amongst ourselves.
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: I remember those days when when the program was trying
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: to load and then it didn't load. But we can
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: get all that annoyed. We just talked, talked amongst ourselves,
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: whereas nowadays, if the internet is like half as slow,
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: like half as fast as it should be, we all
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: kind of sit there and co going, motherfucker, come the
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: fuck on. And it's like it's like kids who are
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: addicted to TV when the TV gets turned off, No, no,
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: make it start. Yeah. Back in those days, we did
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: have those problems, but you know, we still had we
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: still had the other end where we could be like, oh, yeah,
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: there is a world outside computers. If the computers not loading,
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: we can do something else. We're playing fucking scrabble or triple.
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: And and by the way, if this woman's hands had
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: been clean, she wouldn't have done any damage. But you just, yeah,
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: you just can't. You can't get goo on a like that.
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: That's the bad thing. That's one of the reasons why
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: my hands are such a mess. I wash my hands
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: a lot, and always have been, because I've always handled
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: stuff like that, or I've handled film for cameras. Thirty
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: five millimeter film did a lot of darkroom development when
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: I was younger and such handle the equipment, which you
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: always want your your hands clean when you're handling any
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: kind of photography or video equipment because anything that gets
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: inside all the little mechanisms in there are very small
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: and hard to clean. I've opened them up and cleaned them,
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: so I know, and so therefore you really want to
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: keep your hands clean, and that that that's part of
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: what caught me labeled o CD Bye Bye Bye doctor,
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: was that I'm meticulous about keeping my hands clean and
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: i absolutely hate having anything on them because I'm afraid
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: I'm going to get it on important stuff when I
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: touch it. But it's different when you're handling things that
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: get ruined if you get dirt on them even once,
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: like photographs and film and you know, floppy disks and
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: sometimes cameras and stuff like that a computer. But yeah,
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: in any case, we will get to the meat of
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: the discussion. Hopefully Laura will get here. Lauren comes here
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: straight from work and she does commute in an area
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: where traffic just sucks bigger.
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: Two hours earlier on Thursday. Yeah, and yeah, so I'm
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: gonna start getting worried quite soon.
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: She's had this happen before, where traffic sucks on a
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: particular day and it actually takes her more than two
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: hours to get home. So I'll get worried. If it's
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: you know, later in the show and we can't get
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: a hold of her or something, then that'll be a
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: different story. But I've seen her have this problem before
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: in like traffic in the in between the two states
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: that she goes between is just it can be a nightmare.
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: It's the outskirts of New York traffic. So I'm always worried.
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: Maybe she's dead. She's probably dead. I should probably not
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: making plans for if she's dead.
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: Oh God, yes, she's not all it. All it takes
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: is for her to get stuck in the line of
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: traffic but behind somebody else's fuck up, and and it
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: takes it takes three times as long to get home.
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: I mean, I'm in Dayton, which is like tiny in
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: comparison to New York. Right, it's a it's a city,
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: and it's considered a big city, but it's not considered
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: a big city if you put it next to New York.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: And we have that happen with traffic here sometimes, especially
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: around a malfunction junction, which is like basically the section
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: of I seventy five that runs through the Dayton metro area.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: All it takes is one car to break down on
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: the road, and traffic is immensely slow down, and you know,
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: you don't even there doesn't even have to be an accident.
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: All there has to be is somebody stalled out and
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: you get the rubberneckers slow everybody else down. So yeah,
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: it's there's a there's a thousand reasons why Lauren could
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: be late that don't involve any any anything bad for
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: anything bad for Lauren, just annoyances. But in any case,
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: we won't find out until we talk to her when
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: she gets home, which she will. So in any case,
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: what we've been talking to up to this point, we've
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: been talking to Oh yeah, iss Night Motorcyclists. ICE is
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: starting to operate in New York City. Well, they're gonna
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: know Lauren's in America in the minute that they hear
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: her accents, so she does not sound like she came
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: from South America. But we've been going over started started
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: with the n Women article what is the Manisphere and
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: why should we care? And their discussion on dang it.
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: Sometimes my computer likes to put the window behind the
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: window I'm using in front of the window. I'm using
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: really annoying, and that window was discord so I didn't
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: accidentally just grab something and move it. But this is
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: where we started, right, just just to remind you guys,
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: this is where we started. We went through uh, the
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: the research from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue mentioned at
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: the bottom, and we went through the brochure on the
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: Act to End Violence against Women. We looked at this
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: right and we are currently looking at Protocol on the
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: Rights of Women, which is the I believe this one
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: is the African Protocol and the Rights of Women. We
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: also have the other one open, but I haven't gone
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: into this. And we had talked about their reason reasoning
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: that they gave here right there, things about the African
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: Platform for Action, the the car Declaration of nineteen ninety four,
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: so all the reasons why feminism has already should have
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: already accomplished the things that this Act is supposed to accomplish,
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: like they've had they've been doing this for thirty years.
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: We've established they've been doing this for thirty years with
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: the support of the entire world's national governments in a
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: unified effort. And then on top of that they've had,
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: you know, previous experience doing this without necessarily network support,
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: and they have achieved nothing. Are they're claiming they've achieved nothing.
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: So now we're going to look at what they believe
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: our rights that are specific to women. And the reason
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: I'm putting it that way is because these are things
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: that they are demanding that I want to see what
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: whether men feel like those rights are respected in their lives.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: Does the government, the federal government, the world government, your
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: state government, your local government, the people around you, even
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: do they afford you these rights or not? So Article
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: two Elimination of discrimination again women. It says states parties
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: shall combat all forms of discrimination against women through appropriate legislative, institutional,
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: and other measures. So they want systematic institutionalized protection from
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: discrimination for women. And first of all, they want included
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: in their national constitutions and other legislative instruments, if not
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: already done, the principle of equality between men and women
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: to ensure its effective application, meaning they want the ra
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: the Equality Act in the United States. I don't know
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: if the UK has a similar proposed piece of legislation,
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: but the Equality Act the Equal Rights Amendment in the
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: United States that has been proposed for years and years.
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: The history of that is, initially it was written to
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: state that the sexes would be treated equally under the law,
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: which it's already kind of covered by the fourteenth Amendment,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: but apparently feminist thought they needed another amendment to make
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: it to make it stick.
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: But it's always a very similar formula. Do women have
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: these rights, No, they don't. Somebody should give women these rights.
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: And then someone from the background goes, do men have
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: these rights? Well, that doesn't matter what you're talking about.
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: What does it even matter if men have these rights? Well,
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: as it happens, men don't have these rights, but that's
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: not important. Women need these rights because they've never had
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: these rights. But men have never had these rights either.
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: What the fuck you? Women should have all of these rights.
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: And this is what gets me so pissed about these
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: fucking traditionalists who are always saying that the problem with
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: modern society is all these human rights that ever since
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: the Enlightenment, it's been less about god given rights about
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: and more about government given rights, and that we should
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: give human beings all these rights. And I'm like, men
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: have never been given these government given rights like this
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: has been this has been the aim of these I
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: don't even know what adjectives you use, but the thing
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: we've called communists all these years is that governments have
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: been trying to give rights to people they think have
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: never had these rights, well, ignoring the fact that other
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: such people have never had these rights. And in what
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: we think of as the original communist type thing, they go, well,
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: poor people have never been given the rights that rich
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: people have. And this was extended to men and women,
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: claiming that women have never been given these rights that
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: men have never been given either. And like you had
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: a point when it was the rich and the poor,
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: because the rich tend to be able to pay for
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: these rights because they're rich in the way that the
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: poor haven't. And that's kind of almost a good point,
• 21:46
  Speaker 2: but not quite. But now you've extended it to men
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: and women, as though men have always been given these
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: rights just because they're men. No, they haven't. Rich men
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: have and rich women have. But that's not that's not
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: to say that men are given these rights just because
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: they're men, and they never have. And then you have
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: the vote and all this bullshit, as though as though
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: men were given powers that meant that women weren't given
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: for the longest time, but no women were advanced in
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: the vote far more accelerated than men were ever given
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: these rights. And I know, the problem isn't this haphazard
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: application of rights. It's that they were never given to men,
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: certainly never given to native men. And yes, it does
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: go back as far as the Enlightenment. It was never
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: about giving everyone rights. It was about giving rights to
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: the perceived neglected. And yes, we'd like to think it
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: started with the poor, and that's what we call communism,
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: giving rights to the poor that we think were never
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: given to them in the first place. And yeah, that
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: was arguable, But then it extended to giving women rights
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: that they were never given. But men were never given
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: these rights either. The kings were, but most men are
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: not kings, as politicians were, like leaders of men were,
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: but men were not. In fact, men who were not
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: leaders were very much as made munitions in the capricious
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: desires of men who were given these rights. And now
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: women who are given these rights. And I think if
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: and it's only got work since then, because obviously it's
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: only been extended from the assumption that women don't have
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: rights to the assumption that racial minorities don't have rights,
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: and the assumption that sexual orientation people do not have
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: do not have these rights. And now any given immigrants
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: does not have these rights. And so everyone should have
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: these rights except men, except the men we're supposed to
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: be serving. And yeah, it's left. It's it's the it's
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: the case of advancing the human rights of everyone except
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: native men, except the very people who are in place
• 24:53
  Speaker 2: to advance these societies in the first place, The very
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: the very people who are integral to upholding everyone else's
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: rights end upholding the advancement of civilization.
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: Often at the cost of some of their lives.
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: And this is why we call it communism. But it's
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: so much broader than the idea of communism, the idea
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: of of of giving automatic rights to people who don't
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: have to work for them. And and you know, the
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: people who don't have to work for these rights have
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: always been everyone except the men who act as workhorses.
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: And yes, that includes slaves, that includes all the people
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: that that that you'll pretend to activate for. And yeah,
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: that's that's been the case ever since. It doesn't matter
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: who's working for things. It's it's a case of giving
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: free gimmes to anyone who isn't working for it, and
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: that's and that was women, and then minorities, and then
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: bla blah, it's everyone except the the native men who
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: have actually had to break their backs this whole time.
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: And yes, it did start with men, because I mean,
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: we a lot of us like to act like it
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: started with feminism one hundred years ago, but it started
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: with romantic chivalry a thousand years ago. A thousand, yes,
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: a thousand years ago. That's how long it's been going on.
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: It's only been politicized for the last hundred years, but
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: it's been socialized for the last thousand years ever since
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: romantic and that's I don't have time to get into that,
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: although a lot of you already understand what I'm talking about.
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and we didn't do an episode, and I believe
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: on on the history of that through we went to
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: guynocentrism dot com, which has a great article on the
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: history of romantic chivalry. And actually, if you haven't visited
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: that site, you really should because there's a lot of
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: interesting information on there about the dynamics between men and women,
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: and in particular, you know, romantic chivalry, the history of ginocentrism,
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: and how it's manifesting today. Right now, mister Wright is
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: focused a little bit on hypergamy, which is the practice
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: of women marrying up, which has been a confounding factor
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: in the dating world lately because women have simultaneously striven
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: to increase their incomes significantly and out earned men, but
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: then also uniquely in terms of money, still want to
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: marry up. But if you're making more money than the men,
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: you cannot find somebody very easily who makes more money
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: than you to marry You're mad. You've made it a
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: goal to eliminate the fact that they make more money
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: than you. So you're you're you're essentially reducing your dating
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: pols significantly, your dating pools significantly. If you hold those
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: two standards simultaneously, I must earn a great deal of money,
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: but he still has to earn more. And what's happened then,
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: as women have ended up, a lot of women have
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: ended up unable to find a partner because of their
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: conflicting standards, and they have been that there's now this
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: epidemic of female loneliness that women are blaming on men.
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: Why aren't these men earning more money? They're they're just
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: as their their jobs are just as lucrative as they
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: always were. You're just earning more than you were earning before.
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: And so therefore the idea that you should be depending
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: on him financially has become obsolete. And if you feel
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: like you need to marry up financially, so are you.
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: I haven't heard of this female loneliness epidemic.
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we hear all about the male loneliness. Yes, And
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: I will be honest and in my opinion, the primary
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: cause of the male loneliness epidemic is the female bitchiness epidemic.
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: It's not the same factor.
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: So it's easy to it's easy to solve the female
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: loneliness epidemic. Just be nice to men. I mean, not
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: overly nice to men, just like don't portray them as
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: eternal oppressors of women. Just understand that they are your
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: fellow human beings and they want to be nice to you,
• 29:53
  Speaker 2: so maybe you should be nice to them. Because if
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: you're honestly, if ladies, if you're are nice to men,
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: they will bend over backwards and pull the stars from
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: the skies for you. That's that's all you need to do.
• 30:10
  Speaker 2: Just be nice to men. We don't need you to
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: be the world changing scientists and doctors and engineers. Just
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: be nice to us, and we will make sure you
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: will you are never lonely again. But then this idea
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: of the male lonely loneliness epidemic introduced itself to women
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: in the past couple of decades, and their reaction is, well,
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: fuck you, you don't deserve a fucking cookie. Yeah, they say,
• 30:41
  Speaker 2: be nice to you. No, we're already nice to you,
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: We're already beyond nice to you. And they're just going, well,
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: we don't give a fuck if you're lonely. Work yourselves
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: to death, and then you still don't deserve any of
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: our niceness. Fucking die a bunch of sorry that I
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: used a game of word. I couldn't help myself, but
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: that's basically what they're saying to us.
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: It's a sad situation because when you look at the
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: history of relationships, marriage didn't used to be a thing
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: that happened because two people fell in love with each
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: other and wanted to be together, right. It happened because
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: two people's families decided that it was economically advantageous to
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: them to connect their their business dealings, and to seal
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: that connection, they would they would marry off one of
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: their sons and one of their daughters, you know, from
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: the opposing families to each other, Or because a father
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: had decided that this guy or that guy would effectively
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: provide for his daughter so that he would not have
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: to provide for her in his old age. Or a
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: particularly wealthy individual, high status individual had decided that he
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: wanted to father children and made a deal with a
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: family that one of their daughters would be his bride
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: and bear his children. It didn't. It didn't happen because
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: romance and you learned to bond with the individual that
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: you were sort of stuck with, and you know, or
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: you you courted with a lot of chaperoning in events
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: where the two families mingled, and if everybody agreed that
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: the match was a good match, then you know, then
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: the marriage would happen. But it wasn't.
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: He asks you out in some creative manner that appeals
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: to your sensibilities without offending you, you know, approach and
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: does his particular special spider dants, and you choose to
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: go out with him instead of eating his head. That's
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: not the way it used to work. And you know,
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: I honestly, I think that in some ways that was
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: better because instead of acting on impulse the way that
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: women do today so often, and then getting divorced five
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: to ten years later, depending on whether they're waiting for
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: eligibility for alimony, because some states still provide alimony, and
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: some of those states only provided if you've been married
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: for ten years. So there are women who stay in
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: a marriage that they're not happy in and that they
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: plan on leaving for extra years in order to get
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: that alimony. But women will marry, they'll date on impulse,
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: they'll marry based on pure in the moment lust, and
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: then when they discover that they've actually married a human
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: being and not a storybook character, they get mad. They
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: don't work on the marriage, they don't put effort into
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: the relationship, and they leave. And seventy percent of divorce
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: today seventy to eighty percent depending on where you look,
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: is initiated by women. And the reasons that many women
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: give involve things like, you know, the guy isn't doing
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: enough housework, or they don't feel like they're still being wooed,
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: like they're still being courted after they've said their vows,
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: you know, and so on when historically it wasn't the
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: male obligation to continuously court a woman like that. And
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: I don't understand why other women feel this is necessary.
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: I find that kind of thing exhausting. Like I enjoy
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: quiet time with my husband where we're just sitting together
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: and enjoying an activity together, you know. Not that not
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: that sex isn't fun too, right, Like clearly everybody that
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: participates and that enjoys that. But it's fun to sometimes
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: just sit and play a game together, or sit and
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: watch TV together, or go walk around and look at
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: stuff that you're not going to buy today in a
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: store together. No, it would be nice to have that
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: when we, you know, get to this point of conditions
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: that make it a thing for us, you know, and
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: stuff like that. But this idea of he has to
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: bring you flowers. I'm allergic to flowers, by the way,
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: So that's not not a not a thing in our house,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: or or candy or you know, any you know, it
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: has to make you fat. It's all bullshit like and
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: it's it's exhausting. And it's one thing like if you're
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: out somewhere and your partner really really likes a particular character,
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: you know, their favorite video game character or their favorite
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: movie character. Like my husband's a big fan of the tick.
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: If I find something that I think he'll particularly like,
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: it doesn't have to be his birthday coming up or
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: Christmas coming up. I just get it and like, look
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: what I found. I knew you would like this. You know,
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: it's not about romance. It's about making each other happy
• 36:46
  Speaker 1: and getting to see each other smile and enjoying each
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: other's just experience of life and personality and everything. You know,
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: And we do stuff like that for each other. But
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: this whole idea of uh, men have to bend over
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: backwards to make women happy. Honestly, I think that that
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: perception is the biggest cause of female misery right now,
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: uh in in the world, outside of things that people
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: can't do anything about, like uh, like famine and natural
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: disasters and stuff and like that, that women cannot make
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: their own happiness and have to wait for men to
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: make it for them is it's a huge weakness in women,
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: and and it's historically there's not a support for it.
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: Like historically that was not a thing women. Women did
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: the same thing that men did. If you want to
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: be happy, you decide what Your conditions for happiness are
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: based on things that you can achieve, and then you
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: work toward those and you make them happen, even if
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: you have to work around all kinds of other conditions
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: and situations that make it more difficult, and in fact,
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: the harder you have to fight for it, sometimes the
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: bigger the happiness is when you get to it. But instead,
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: women create shit like this, right, including their national constitutions
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: and other legislative instruments, have not already done the principle
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: of equality between women and men and ensure it's effective application.
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: So you look at the United States, for instance, we
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: have that already. We have had that. Let's see, what
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: year was the Fourteenth Amendment past? I have to look
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: at if I have anything in the history of this,
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: because I've got a bit of the transcript here. I'm
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: gonna have to I'm gonna actually have to look that up.
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: It was the year six sixty six. Yeah, no, I
• 39:13
  Speaker 2: hear by said this, I refuse to elaborate, and I leave.
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified on July ninth, eighteen sixty eight.
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: So we've had this for almost like it's it's over
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: one hundred years. It's almost two hundred years and and
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: that's equality between the sexes. It says in the fourteenth Amendment. Well,
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: it doesn't specify all the factors, right, it prohibits the
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: states from denying any person equal protection of the laws,
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: and the courts have consistently interpreted it to include things
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: like sex and race. So you cannot the government cannot
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: discriminate against people by denying them equal protection under any
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: law on the basis of their sex. Women cannot be
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: denied equal protection under the law. But an Equal Rights Amendment,
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: which was first proposed in nineteen twenty three and had
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: a completely different wording than it does now.
• 40:37
  Speaker 2: But.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: It states that equality of rights under the law shall
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: not be denied or abridged by the United States or
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: any state on account of sex. And that is completely
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: unnecessary because it's already in the Constitution. But the second
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: section says Congress shall have the power to en forced
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article, meaning that
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: this gives Congress the ability to pass new laws with
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: the explicit purpose of imposing equality of the sexes in
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: some way or another. Well, we already know that feminists
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: have switched from the idea of equality to the idea
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: of what they call equity. They are not talking about
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: the value of your property holdings if you were to
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: sell them. They're talking about equalizing people's outcomes, regardless of
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: the effort that they put in, their circumstances, their choices,
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: and so on. So two people start out with an
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: equal right to non discrimination in the say, the process
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: of apple cation to university, say, since the universities receive
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: financial backing from the from the federal government, and so
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: they both apply. They both get into university, they both
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: take the same classes, the same course of study, they
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: both graduate, and at at the end of their graduation,
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: they're both licensed registered nurses. Right, And Bob goes to
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: work for a medical center that is part of a
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: medical network, large medical network, and it gets gets his
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: salary as commensurate with the nurses that work at this
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: large medical network. And Julie goes to work for a
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: private practitioner that is not part of a large medical network,
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: but maybe as treatment rights, you know, to go into
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: the hospitals or that medical network. So they run into
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: each other at some point, and Julie finds out that
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: she's making less money than Bob. She assumes that it's discrimination,
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: but actually private practitioner, doctor Jones pays all of her
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: nurses what Julie is getting paid, the males and the females.
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: It's just that, despite having credentials from the same university,
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: Bob and Julie did not choose to go into the
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: same work environment, and so there's no discrimination there, right.
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: But under the er, there could be laws passed by
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: Congress that would force that practitioner to increase her wages
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: for her nurses because women who work for her are
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: not getting paid the same as men who work for
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: some other company, and that it could be said to
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: be discrimination. As a result, she has to fire some
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: of her nurses because she doesn't have the budget.
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: As I've often expressed, women are the nucleus of society
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: and men are the outer cytoplasmic albumen of society's It's
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: like an egg, it's like a cell. It's like a
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: celestial body that has a core and an outer mantle.
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: And in all of these situations, women occupy the middle
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: of it because they are protected by the outer shell
• 44:44
  Speaker 2: of men. That that does not suggest that women cannot
• 44:51
  Speaker 2: be ambitious, even though it's men that are on the
• 44:56
  Speaker 2: outside and women that are on the inside. If anything,
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: as I've often said, women are often more ambitious than men,
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: and I often cite Lady Macbeth as an example of this,
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: even though that's fiction. These fictions are often presented as
• 45:22
  Speaker 2: reflections of what's really going on in the real world.
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: And what's really going on in the real world is
• 45:30
  Speaker 2: women support men as men expand those boundaries, and Lady
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: Macbeth is a cautionary tale as to when women can
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: express too much of their ambitions and expressions of that
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: ambition on men. Women push their ambitions on men, and
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: that's okay because men are already appointed as the sentinels
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: of the outside, of of the human condition, never mind
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: the human society or the human civilization. And it's never,
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: it's never been beyond the possibility, beyond the possibility of
• 46:28
  Speaker 2: women's power to push men outwards. I mean, they're in
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: the exact position to do that, because women on the
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: are on the inside, and what better position can you
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: be than from the inside to push men further to
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: the outside. And that's I think that's largely been what
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: has pushed the human race to expand our horizons. Women
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: are more ambitious than men. But women use men as
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: their agents of this expansion and and and and this
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: has always been the case. But if you if you
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: appoint women to push themselves through this agency, through this
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: albumen through this cytoplasm, then you don't actually accelerate their influence.
• 47:29
  Speaker 2: You you only blend them together. And and until this,
• 47:35
  Speaker 2: this dynamic of nucleus and cytoplasm, this dynamic of yolk
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: and egg white, if you will it only it only
• 47:50
  Speaker 2: blends the two together and undermines the influence of both.
• 47:56
  Speaker 2: Women have always been the force that pushes men outwards,
• 48:01
  Speaker 2: while men have always been the force that uh is
• 48:07
  Speaker 2: thereby push outwards and thereby, to some degree by their
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: own elements, pushes themselves outwards into the outside world. And
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: this is how humans became the dominant species on Earth,
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: because we have this dynamic where men, where women push
• 48:27
  Speaker 2: men outwards and and men expand on on this outward
• 48:35
  Speaker 2: pushing and that and this has worked for us for
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: the longest time. But like I said, if if you
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: pretend that this dynamic doesn't exist, then you're only going
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: to blend the yoke and the album went together, the
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: the the nucleus and the cytoplasm together, and that's not
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: and that's not going to help with the outward pushing,
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: and it's only going to render us as uh a
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: a generalized blob that no longer has this outward push
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: and and and that, and that's feminism in a nutshell,
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: that's communism in a nutshell. Well, if you try to
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: equalize everyone, then you'll undermine this dynamic of inward core
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: and outward mantle that are both pushing out against each other.
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: I did, I did that video all this time ago
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: called I can't forget what you remember the one it was.
• 49:56
  Speaker 2: But the get the reason we've got this far a
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: dominant species on this earth is because we have this
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: perfectly balanced dynamic between this core of women and this
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: outer mantle of men that are both able to push
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: out into the outside world and dominate it. And if if,
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: if we're just going to deny this and pretend that
• 50:25
  Speaker 2: men and women are the same, then we're just going
• 50:30
  Speaker 2: to end up with this amorphous blob where there is
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: no core, and there is no outer mantle, where there
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: is no nucleus and there is no cytoplasm. And yeah,
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: we just this seems like something that wouldn't happen in nature,
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: And yeah, normally it doesn't, this abstract dynamic between men
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: and women, and it can be manipulated in this artificial,
• 51:05
  Speaker 2: abstract way that we can only we can only push
• 51:10
  Speaker 2: it back on ourselves, where we become this thing that's
• 51:13
  Speaker 2: not even an egg. Imagine an egg that isn't that
• 51:19
  Speaker 2: has no yolk and no egg white. Imagine this this
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: cell that has no nucleus and no cytoplasm. Imagine a
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: planet that has no core and no outer mantle, like
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: it wouldn't exist. The reason these things exist with these
• 51:41
  Speaker 2: separate layers. It became this way through well gravity in
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: the sense of planets and biology in the sense of eggs.
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, I'm not a biologist and I'm not uh
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: astronomer or whatever it takes to figure out what the
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: folk planets are doing. But yeah, it's the only reason
• 52:11
  Speaker 2: we've been able to deny these obvious differences and these
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: obvious dynamics when it comes to gender is because of
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: the last century. Again, dare I say the last millennium
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: of this denial of human nature are indeed natural nature,
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: any of any kind of nature? Again, the only reason
• 52:35
  Speaker 2: it's worked when it comes to the dynamics between men
• 52:38
  Speaker 2: and women. Is because is because we've persisted in this
• 52:44
  Speaker 2: outright denial of the obvious difference between men and women.
• 52:49
  Speaker 2: And it is an obvious difference, Like it can be
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: more obvious. Men and women are different, Males and females
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: are different, and they've been different for fucking a billion
• 53:00
  Speaker 2: years or so ever since single celled organisms. Like it's
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: diverged into the into into this brave new world. Dare
• 53:11
  Speaker 2: I say, where where where there are actually two different
• 53:15
  Speaker 2: kinds of organisms and they can and they can develop
• 53:21
  Speaker 2: there Again, I say diversity, Yeah, and yeah, yeah, diversity
• 53:28
  Speaker 2: is important when it comes to men and women. And
• 53:33
  Speaker 2: it's very ironic, isn't it that the very people who
• 53:38
  Speaker 2: try to enforce diversity don't mean the diversity between men
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: and women. Well, the while they're telling us that it's
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: important that we have black and white and brown and
• 53:50
  Speaker 2: yellow people all together in the same society, it's not
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: important that we have men and women in the same
• 53:55
  Speaker 2: society because now men and women are not an important
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: different Now we can just smooh those things together. So
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: until we have a society where there's no this thing
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: as men and women, but there's definitely a difference between
• 54:11
  Speaker 2: black and white and brown and yellow people, and and
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: and they should all be smashed together. Well, yes they can,
• 54:19
  Speaker 2: they can in theory, they can, but men and women
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: will never be smashed together, like it's physically impossible, it's
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: genetically impossible. And yet that's where it started, and and
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: and that's why everyone's so obsessed right now about immigrants
• 54:37
  Speaker 2: and about the racial replacement and such, because after feminists
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: tried to completely delete the difference between men and women
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: and they couldn't quite make it happen because it's fucking impossible.
• 54:57
  Speaker 2: But once they've got enough power, they while they were
• 55:01
  Speaker 2: trying to pretend that men can become women and women
• 55:06
  Speaker 2: can become men, to no avail because it's impossible, they
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: moved on to, well, white people and black people and
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: brown people and the other people can be smash together. Well,
• 55:17
  Speaker 2: yes they can, and yes that is possible, but it's
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: not necessarily a good idea. Maybe you should walk your
• 55:27
  Speaker 2: theories back to where you thought you could just abolish gender,
• 55:33
  Speaker 2: because you can't abolish gender. I mean, I know you
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: like to pretend that you could like redefine gender as
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: sex and redefine sex as gender and go, well, we're
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: calling these things different things now, so men can become
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: women because men and women are things that we now
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: define as different things. But at the same time, they're
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: still pretending that white people are evil and brown people
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: are good, like.
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: They can become the same.
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, they have it, they have it all backwards. They're
• 56:11
  Speaker 2: they're they're like, they're trying to pretend that men can
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: become women and women can become men, but they're still
• 56:17
  Speaker 2: not on board with the idea that white people can
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: become brown people and brown people can become white people,
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: but they can Like ironically enough, uh I, Let's say
• 56:29
  Speaker 2: Russians and Indians are both Caucasian because they're both descended
• 56:34
  Speaker 2: from the proto Indie European peoples of the Caucasus Mountains.
• 56:39
  Speaker 2: Some of them went north to Russia and some of
• 56:41
  Speaker 2: them went south to India. And the only reason that
• 56:45
  Speaker 2: they are different colors is because of climate. Like race
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: actually is a spectrum, like it absolutely is, like the
• 56:55
  Speaker 2: further north you go, the paler your skin becomes, and
• 56:59
  Speaker 2: the further south you go, the further towards the equator
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: you go, the dark uar skin becomes. So that actually
• 57:07
  Speaker 2: is a spectrum. But these fucking deceptive bastards are here
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: pretending that you can't change from one racetra or another. No,
• 57:16
  Speaker 2: that's that's an inherent property. But you can change from
• 57:19
  Speaker 2: one sex to another because we don't call it sex,
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: we call it gender, but there's not it's because gender
• 57:27
  Speaker 2: isn't sex. But by the way, sex is gender. You
• 57:31
  Speaker 2: can actually change your sex because sex is gender. They
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: can't keep up this fucking with these fucking lies. And
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: I don't even know where it began or where it's
• 57:41
  Speaker 2: even gonna end, but you know what I'm saying, right, Yeah,
• 57:46
  Speaker 2: we're just being fucking terrorized by these liars who will
• 57:53
  Speaker 2: pretend that you can change things that you can change,
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: but but you can't change things that can't be changed.
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: It's it's designed specifically to exhaust you. The arguments that
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: are made are often convoluted, manipulative use, rely on logical fallacies,
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: and uh you know, are are just enforced through consistent
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: repetition rather than debate, actual debate. When you have somebody
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: who goes through with you a series of logic and
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: reason in which you knock down every argument they have,
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: and you point out the reasons why their argument is wrong,
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: and you provide solid information, solid evidence, solid facts, and
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: connect them with solid logic, and they come back with,
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: I just don't believe that's true, or you're you're just mad,
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: or you know, it's weak of you to think that way,
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: which is what feminists do with just about every masculine argument.
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: And you know, there's a whole set actually we went
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: through these in one show as well, a whole set
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: of shaming tactics. They use, Uh, you're you're scary, you're angry,
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: Uh stop whining, you know, and and so on your selfish.
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: They they have all these different charges that they they
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: will lob at you for. And what it is is
• 59:30
  Speaker 1: they're engaging in a Darvo attack, which is a manipulation tactic.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: Most rhetorical fallacies are manipulation tactics. You know, when somebody
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: uses a Mott Bailey argument, which is when they they
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: hide a harder to defend argument behind and easier to
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: defend more mild claim. Feminism is about equality. Therefore, you know,
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: if you're against feminism, you're against equality of the sex
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: is treatment under the law. And then as soon as
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: you say, okay, okay, I'm not against feminism that, well,
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: then you can't be against what feminists are lobbying for.
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: So when feminists lobby against equal parenting rights, that's for equality,
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: like we said, and therefore you can't oppose it. Right,
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: that's your mott Bailey, And that's a manipulation tactic. It's
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: a tactic to keep you from defending yourself and defending
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: your sex against these types of arguments. This is being
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: pushed as something that will be protected under national legislation
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: in every country by by this particular effort, and this
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: this specific manifestos for Africa, right, But the organization that
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: that produced this is a world organism. It's not just Africa.
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: They want to do this in your country wherever you live,
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 1: whether you're in the United States, whether you're in one
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: of the South American countries, whether you're in Europe, whether
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: you're in Asia, they want to do this in your country.
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: So they want to have an equal rights amendment or
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: an equal rights clause that says something to the effect
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: of the government's going to enforce these equal rights, the
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: government's going to enforce equal treatment. And they're not just
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: talking about equality of opportunity genuinely equal treatment. They're talking
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: about equality of outcome, regardless of opportunity, action, or aptitude.
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: And so, for instance, you have two people running a race.
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: One of them has better coordination and is able simply
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: able to move their legs at a higher speed than
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: the other one. And you know they maybe they even
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: have a better stride, maybe they got longer legs. Right,
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: that person is going to win the race. They start
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: out with the same they're behind the same starting line,
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: they're running on the same track, they have the same
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: signal to start running. It's not an equality that one
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: of them loses. It's not an equality that one of
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: them is faster. But feminists want to treat it as
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: inequality if they don't cross the same finish line at
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: the same time. And the issue is much more complicated
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: when you have two different people that choose to run
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: two different tracks, two different courses, and they're not crossing
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 1: the same finish line, and one of them has chosen
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: a long looping track and the other one has chosen
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: a more direct or out And then they want to
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: complain that the person who chose the long looping track
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: is being discriminated against because they had more difficulties in
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: reaching their goal and their goal didn't take them to
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: the same place as the person who chose the more
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: director out. You know, that's aptitude versus attitude or action.
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: Both of those things can interfere with your result, and
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: you don't have a right to have someone else's result
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 1: mitigated or your result handed to you because your choices
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: made your result different from someone else's. But under an
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: equal Rights Amendment, Congress would have the power to enforce
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: through legislation those changes. Someone in the chat a while
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: back pointed out, like where I said, you know, they
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: might force the small employer to raise their wages to
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: suit the to to fit in with the big employer,
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: or you know, they might force the big employer to
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: lower wages to match with the smaller employers is paying.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: Both of those could happen, and anytime the government interferes
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: with wages, it interferes with the relationship between the business
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: and the worker, and the business doesn't end up at
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: the losing end, the worker usually does.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: For instance, Ohio raised its minimum wage. It's it's state
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: minimum wage above the federal minimum wage, and it's not
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: a huge difference in federal minimum wage is seven something
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 1: and the state minimum wage is ten something an hour.
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: It's not like the California fifteen dollars an hour, but
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: it's still a significant difference, right, And this was supposed
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: to like take fast food workers out of the poverty level.
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: So one of the things that I've noticed, and it
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: took a while, because we don't we don't need a
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 1: lot of fast food like one we will when we
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: there have been instances where we just don't have time
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: because like I said, I've been averaging about eighty hours
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 1: a week, and so that that does take away from
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: time to prepare meals. And we don't always go to
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: like we don't necessarily go to places that have a
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: lot of fried foods and everything because we're old. So
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: you know, like we go to subway places, sub sub
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: sandwich places and there's a bunch of different stuff like that,
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: or you know, there's a local deli and everything. A
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: lot of these places have started allowing their workers to
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: accept tips, and it's it's not even like it used
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: to be that that fast food workers didn't get tips.
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: Fast food is is food that's available pretty much instantly
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: after you order it, as opposed to you order and
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: then the food is prepared. So a lot of these
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: sub sandwich places, you know, you go in and you
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: select your bread, and you select your meat, and you
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: select your toppings and they put it together. And delis
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: are similar. They'll have certain types of sandwiches, but they
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: they they are only assembling pre prepared food as opposed
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 1: to cooking, which is, you know, takes takes more time,
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: and you sit and you wait in between when you
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: order and when you receive your food. And the difference
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: in tipping used to be if there were people waiting
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: your table. So you you sit down, you order, the
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: waiter goes, the server goes, and and you you get
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: your food from the server, not at the counter. And
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: so you know, even like even places that cook things
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: that are available really fast, like if you go uh
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: some some places like turger joints, you know they don't
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: necessarily have it all pre prepared. They might pre prepare
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: their most popular stuff. But if you order something that
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: people don't usually order, they're going to cook it after
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: you order it. It might take a minute or two,
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: but a server is not bringing it to you. You
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: wait at the counter to get it. So a lot
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: of these places are now when you pay, it offers
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: you the option of tipping, and it offers you the
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: option of you know, the fifteen percent percent, some of
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: them go up to thirty percent. Now for fast food workers,
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: why would these places start offering you the ability to
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: tip after they're they just had to increase, you know,
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: after they've had to increase their workers' pay. What would
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: they would they want to make your stay more more
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: expensive for? And if I started looking into it, and
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: then of course, if you can accept tips, then you're
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: a tipped worker. And if you work in the restaurant
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: business or some of the other industries where tipping is allowed,
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: a tipped worker does not get the same minimum wage
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: that a worker that doesn't get tips, that cannot accept
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: tips receives. And I know this because when I worked
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: at I used to work at a gas station. We
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: worked hard, but we didn't work as hard as like
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't have put my job on the same level
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: as say, construction workers and stuff like that. But they
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: would come in and they would get food and they
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: would see us working, and people would try to tip us,
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: and we couldn't accept it because if we could accept tips,
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 1: it would reduce the amount of pay that would be
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: our minimum wage. And so it was illegal for our
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: employer to allow us to accept tips because we were
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: being paid as regular minimum wage workers, not tipped workers.
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: A tip worker can get less than the federal minimum wage.
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: The federal minimum wage for tipped workers is fairly low,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: and the Ohio minimum wage for tipped workers is in
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: the five dollars and some change range. So to get
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: around the requirement that they increase the pay of these
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: minimum wage workers, more and more fast food joints are
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: giving you the opportunity to tip, which makes their employees
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: tipped workers. And if they can establish that their employees
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: are tipped workers, they can almost cut their pay in half,
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: which saves the company quite a bit of money and
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: completely makes it a moot point that the minimum wage
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: has gone up. Pretty sneaky, huh. So when people do
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: these things, they don't they don't think about the consequences. Right,
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: minimum wage goes up, Okay, these changes take place in
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: your workplace. Okay, now your pay has gone down, or
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: the other end of it. When I was working at
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 1: the gas station, the minimum wage went up, and it
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: was it was a pretty big hike. And you have
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: to realize when I first started working, the minimum wage
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: was less than four dollars an hour. I've been working
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: for a long time. But in any case, and I
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: know other people that started working when the minimum wage
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: was it was like less than two dollars an hour.
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: So that's not right the prevailing wage because there wasn't
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: a minimum wage, but the prevailing wage was less than
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: two dollars an hour for the types of jobs that
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: are considered minimum wage now. But in any case, you
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: have these intentions, you know, and what you end up
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: with is my employer, when they had to increase their wages,
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: they added to the number of tasks we were expected
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: to do during a shift, which effectively took away smoke brakes.
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: We weren't allowed to eat anything when we were in
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: the front store, only when we were in back room.
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: So if you didn't have time to go into the
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: back room away from the customers and spend a few
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: minutes not working, your eight hour shift had no breaks,
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: no lunch, no smoke brakes, no nothing. You didn't get
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: to eat in between when you arrived at work, when
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: you went home. So that's that's essentially what they did,
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: was they eliminated breaks. And similarly, you know, some some
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: places switched full time jobs to part time jobs so
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: that they didn't have to pay for benefits. And some
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: places just eliminated positions and divided the work from those
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: positions among the other employees, so your workload increased and
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: your your your hours did not so it it. And
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: then shortly thereafter it also became more expensive to get
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: stuff because everybody was raising their prices because they had
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: to pay their workers more. And therefore you just bless
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: the benefits of the increase in pay so you know,
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: you had you had quite a variety of ways that
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: employers get around these things. But women put these laws
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: in place so that women can sue employers. And when
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: the individual that works for the family practitioner that's making
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 1: is paying their employees less sues to you know, or
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: files for a legislative change, they usually sue somebody, and
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: they usually get a settlement or an award, and while
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: everybody else suffers changes in their workplace, that litigant goes
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: home with a settlement, you know, like any anywhere between
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: fifteen and fifty thousand dollars, just depending on or more,
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: depending on what they can say they were denied. So
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: then you know this. The second b is is that
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: sort of stipulation. Congress shall have the power to enforce, enact,
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 1: and effectively implement appropriate legislative or regulatory measures, including those
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: prohibiting and curbing all forms of discrimination. And then this
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: part's important, particularly those harmful practices which endanger the health
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: in general well being of women. Right, So, you have
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: workplaces where there's heavy lifting to be done, or there's
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: work that's particularly dangerous or dirty, and you know, in
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: a lot of instances, women will pawn tasks off on
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: men that involve heavier lifting, more strenuous physical labor or
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: or use of strength, more more dangerous measures, things that
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: are more unsafe, like working on the night shift at
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: a gas station as opposed to working on the day
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: shift at a gas station in a neighborhood in an
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: urban area, or in a neighborhood where if something happened
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: to you at the gas station, it's so sparsely populated
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: that nobody would know until the next day, or in
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: a neighborhood where you take in a lot of money
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: and there's not a lot of security, or driving driving
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: a truck transporting money. You know, things like that where
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: you might get robbed a handling equipment that is dangerous
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 1: or difficult to control all these things. I used to
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: have a manager at the gas station. If something was
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: needed out in the back shed. We had cups and
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: stuff like that for the pop and everything that we
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: stored out there. She would send the male employees to
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: go get them. She would not send the female employees
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: out there to go get them, especially if it was
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: not yet light, or if it was after dark and
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: she had to turn off the back door alarm to
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: let somebody out it was. It was never a female.
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: She always sent a male out there because there was
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: risk involved, and sometimes the things that were being carried
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: in were heavy. And I called her on it once.
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: I was like, why don't you ever send us out there?
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: And you know, she's like, he's a man, he can
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: do it. He's he's big and strong, you know. And
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: then of course, the guy involved, the guy that was
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: being sent out at the time, you know, he was
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: he was like, I can do it, it's not a
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: big deal. I don't mind. But the reality is he
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: didn't get paid extra for that. He didn't get paid
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: extra for being the person who had to take a risk.
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: Probably the worst example of this that I've seen was
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: an ex of mine, an ex ex boyfriend in of
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: mind before I got married, worked at a hospital in Lima,
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: and there was a shooting victim that came in for
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: emergency treatment and his carotid artery, I believe it was
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: his carotid artery, not as jugular, was punctured by the bullet,
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: was ripped by the bullet, really to the degree that
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: to prevent it from leaking that he had they literally
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: had to squeeze it closed because it wasn't just a
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: little You couldn't just cover it, you know. So this
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: was an execution style assault, and this young man did
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: eventually die. They could not save him, and he was
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: too far gone when he arrived, and the injury was
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: too bad for them to repair it in time for
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: him to recover from from the blood loss. And it
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: was a horrific situation. But it was made worse by
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: the fact that he was a member of a gang
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: and they got his family and their families all riled up,
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: and there was a protest outside of the hospital. They
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: accused the hospital of killing him, and so there was
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: kind of a race riote out there where when when
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: you looked outside the hospital, the building was surrounded by
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: angry yelling people. And they put the men in the doorways, right.
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: They put male orderlies, which is what he was. Male
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: nurses and even some of the doctors had to guard
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 1: the doorways if they were not in treatment with a
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: patient in order and then the women did. They didn't
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: take their breaks, they just went you know, on with
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: their work and everything, and now was to keep people
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: from coming in and attacking the hospital. So they were
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: doing security work even though they were not hired as
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: security workers. And it was an incredibly stressful event for
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: this guy. He was ex military, so he fully understood
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: the situation he was in. He didn't have any kind
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: of weapon, he didn't have any way to defend himself.
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: He was just asked to stand there in a doorway
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: and look intimidating so people didn't try to get in
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: past him, which is a horrible position to put somebody
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: in during an you know, protest, and that that was gendered.
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: Not one woman was asked to do that. Only the men,
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: and not one of them got a bonus for it.
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: High risk, low pay.
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 2: This is what we mean when we call people communists.
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 2: Because I really have to address this because so many
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 2: of our distractors call out call us fascists, and then
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 2: we ask them, what do you mean by fascist? I mean,
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 2: particularly the people who turn up to these protests, And
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 2: then they're calling us all fascists, and well, what do
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 2: you mean by fascists? And they go, well, I don't,
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: I don't really know. I wish I was more educated
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: on this subject. Behind I don't, I don't really understand,
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: but I'm just gonna turn up and call you fascists.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: But and yeah, the the the flip side of that
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 2: coin is, well you all call us communists, So what
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: does that mean? And yeah, what Hanna just said is
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: is is what we're talking about, Like, even if you're
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: less capable of doing the job, you should be paid
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 2: just as much. And yeah, that is what it has
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: always been entailed in this communism. It doesn't matter how
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 2: how much merit you have. Everyone should be paid the
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: same thing, no matter how much merit they have. And
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: that's that's whether it's class or gender, or sex or
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: race or whatever. That's that's always been what communism has
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 2: been about. Everyone should get the same outcome, regardless of
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 2: how good you are at the task. And it goes
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 2: all the way down into education, like everyone, if there's
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 2: any disparity between the genders or the races or whatever,
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 2: everyone should have the same outcome, even if it sound
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 2: to how you perform in your job. And we're like, no,
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 2: that's not that's not how it should work. But anyone
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 2: who says such a thing is called a fascist. And
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 2: then we ask, well, what do you mean by fascist?
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 2: And they go, we don't really, Oh, it's just anyone
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: who's not on board. But this fucking communism ship, Yeah, no,
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 2: we're we're not. We're not the thing that you call
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: us just because we're not communists, just because we don't
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 2: think that everyone should be given the same outcome, just
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: for any given fucking reason. And yes, it started with
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 2: the class, or it started with it, whatever the it was,
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 2: it's been lost to the annals of history before that
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 2: and and and whatever it's developed into. In terms of
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 2: men versus women, why versus blacks, fucking sis versus transfer,
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 2: that's that's never been the point. We've always been about,
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: like do you have the merit to do the thing?
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: And that's not that's couldn't be further from fascism because
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 2: because fascism has always been that along the lines of
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 2: I think, not even nations in terms of state, and
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 2: state's not the same as nation. State is the authority
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 2: that that has declared itself the authority over the nation.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: And that's not what any of us have ever been
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: talking about. You know, I'm trying to centralize myself on
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 2: what I'm talking about. But this is why we because
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: it resembles communism just along various different lines that everyone
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 2: has to have the same outcome. And this is why
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 2: feminism is just communism in panties, and BLM is just
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 2: communism in black panties or whatever we.
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: Can we can add, it's communism. It's communism that has
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: dressed itself in black issues.
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we can describe what communism is. We can pinpoint
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 2: the fundamental ethos of what communism is, and it's everyone
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: should have equal outcomes, regardless of how shit they are
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 2: at their jobs. Y'all have never been able to pinpoint fascism.
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: And when I say y'all, I mean you know what
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: I mean, most of us, That's what I mean. They've
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: been turning up to these protests. You're a fascist, you're
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: a Nazi, And we're like, what does that mean? What?
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 2: What is a fascist? And they can never tell us.
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: Interesting a fascism. They don't accept it because it's they
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: like to call non interference by government fascism instead of exactly. Yeah,
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 1: so that's kind of an interesting They had this kind
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: of interesting life lack of knowledge. But I wanted the questions.
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: I wanted the men, in particular the chat to consider.
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: We have the statement here that these feminists want law
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: and regulatory measures. That's policy prohibiting and curbing all forms
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: of discrimination, particularly those harmful practices which endanger the health
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: in general well being of women. So think about this.
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 1: How many other instances like the one I described a
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: few minutes ago can you think of that you know
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: about in your life where you or another man you know,
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: has had a higher expectation of manual labor or a
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: higher expectation of risk imposed on him in the workplace
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: without an increase in pay, because the women cannot be
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: expected to do it because they're protected because they're women,
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: and he's not because as he's a man. Right, this
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: is something that women expect protection from. Women expect to
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 1: not be discriminated against in such manners. But when men
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: face this type of discrimination, will you have to stand
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: in the doorway and keep these people out because you're
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: a man and you're stronger. When that's really a job
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: for the police, right, there's really a job for people
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: who have taken on certain security roles, not just like
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: the person who sits in a guard shack and lets
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: people in, but armed security whose job it is to
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: deal with threatening situations such as in a prison, you know.
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: But they didn't, they didn't bring in anybody like that,
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: and the police were outnumbered, so you know. Uh, it's
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: not just the amount of work, the amount of labor.
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: It's not just the hours work. It's not just like
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: those things are problems as well. It's not just what
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: shift you're on, what might happen on that shift. It
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: was on the night shift at the gas station where
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: I worked that twice we had people come in and
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: hold employees up at gunpoint. Twice we had people come
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: in and hold employees up at knife point. Once we
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: had an employee who was robbed digitally using a combination
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: of very sophisticated attack actually a combination of attacks on
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: our computers and on our on her intellect and uh.
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: And then once we also had a distraction attack where
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: one person came in and got the loan employee away
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 1: from where the registers were and and into the cooler
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 1: where she couldn't see the register. And the other person
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: then got into the change maker, which wasn't locked, and
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: took all the quarters, which added to, you know, a
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: couple couple bucks, But it was still a theft. And
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: these are all things that happened on the night shift,
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 1: and in every instance, the employee suffered some sort of consequence,
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: whether it was trauma from the attack or in the
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: case of the digital robbery and the the trick played
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: on the employee that the the individual distracting her. That
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: employee was held accountable for that theft because she wasn't
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: watching the register and she should have said, you know,
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: I'm not I can't go back there. But so that situation,
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: usually you see men in that situation because employers like
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: that will not put women on that shift, or men
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 1: are in a financial situation where they can't turn that
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: shift down, they can't afford to turn that shift down,
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: and women are usually in more of a financial situation
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: where they can be pickier about what shift they take,
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: and so they are not as likely to be present
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: in the store and alone in the store when someone
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 1: decides to target it with a robbery. And this is again,
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: you know, discrimination that particularly involves harmful practices that endanger
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: the health and general well being of the employee. Women
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: are to be protected from that, But how much protection
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: have men had from that? Is that a right that
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 1: has been protected for men throughout history or is that
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: something women are demanding that hasn't been done for men?
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: You know, and to me, I see that as something
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 1: women are demanding that hasn't been done for men. Similarly,
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 1: they want want a gender perspective in policy decisions, so
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 1: they literally are asking for discrimination here. Having a gender
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: perspective in policy decisions is different than having a gender
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: blind perspective, where you say, is this enforcement should not
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: be affected by the sex of the individual it's affecting. Here,
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: they're saying it should be affected. Women are supposed to
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 1: get special treatment. And then the next one take corrective
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: and positive action in those areas where discrimination against women
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: in law and in fact continues to exist. So, in
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 1: other words, they're going to go through various areas of
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: government and employment and so on and look for problems
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: where nobody is complaining and make changes. And then finally
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: they're saying they want it supported locally, nationally, regionally, and continentally.
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: They want the entire continent to be on board with us.
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: They want initiatives, which means feminists getting paid to give
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: advice and create materials and make proclamations and do pretend
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: research that isn't real research directed it eradicating all forms
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: of discrimination, but only against women. They don't want to
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 1: put any effort into eliminating areas such as where men
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: are asked to take higher risk, or men are asked
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: to work through to your jobs, or men are the
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: only people who get drafted, or men don't benefit as
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: much from social services because you have to have custody
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: of children and men are discriminated against in custody court.
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 1: Then we have this one really struck me, not this part.
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: This is again, this just kind of a repetition. States
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: shall commit themselves to modify the social and cultural patterns
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: of conduct of women and men throughout public education, information, education,
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 1: and communication strategies with a view to achieving the elimination
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: of harmful cultural and traditional practices. So they want to
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: They're coming after the culture and traditions in Africa, the
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: way that families interact with each other the way that
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: people relate to each other. They want the law to
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 1: interfere in those relationships based on the idea of the
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: inferiority or superiority of either of the sexes, which is
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: again weasel words, because we do recognize that men and
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 1: men and women are different. For instance, under domestic violence law,
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: right as soon as you're talking about violence in the home,
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: even when it goes two ways. One of feminists first
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: arguments is that men are stronger and therefore they're more
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 1: accountable for their violence than women should be for theirs.
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 2: Except in sports except his worries.
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, then it's okay for women to sue to get
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 1: positions on men's athletic teams, but not the other way around,
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 1: all right, And and again, stereotyped roles for women and men.
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: So they refer to traditions, long standing traditions that evolved
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: out of natural human behavior, as stereotypes. But this one,
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: every woman shall have the right to dignity inherent in
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: a human being, in the recognition and protection of her
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 1: human and legal rights. So, guys, when when the state
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 1: interacts with you, do you feel like the state is
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: recognizing your right to dignity inherent in a human being.
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: The first thing that I think.
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: Sounds like some in cell ship, doesn't it. I mean,
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 2: I want the right to dignity, and that means I'm
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 2: being recognized as someone with with with sexual dignity something. Yeah,
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 2: that means you can't just treat me like I'm some
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: kind of sexual vagrant or now, how very dare.
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: You people who can act like you're a threat because
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: they had to step over you on the street since
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: you had no place else to go. I want, I
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: want the right to dignity inherent in a human being
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 1: recognized by the federal government for women, for women right
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: when the when the police come to your house because
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: your neighbor hed heard your television too loud and they
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: think there's a domestic violence incident taking place in there,
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: and that they have the right to come in because
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: the the complaint was a domestic violence complaint and they
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: have the right to go through your your home and
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: make sure that nobody is in there has been abused
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 1: by you, and the right to accuse you of having
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: harmed someone, And you don't have the right to freedom
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: from having your place examined and have and and have
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: being treated like a likely criminal. Is your dignity inherent
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: and a human being, and your your human and legal
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 1: rights being recognized in that moment.
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 2: This is what I mean about rights. I mean, I mean,
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 2: I know the the idea of a right can be corrupted,
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 2: especially within the legal system, but we have a way
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: of drawing this line. A right is is your ability
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 2: to do your own thing as long as it does
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 2: not detract anyone else's legal thing. As long as you
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 2: can live your life without killing anyone else's life, as
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 2: long as you can UH build your wealth without without
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 2: detracting from anyone else's wealth through UH means that are
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 2: in some way unfair right, But dignity UH can't be
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 2: can't be pinned down in this way. Dignity is it's
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: like so many other things, like it can be pushed
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 2: one way or another. Like it's like offense. It's like
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 2: the difference between harassment and disagreement. Anyone can say that
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 2: you have offended my dignity, and offense is just as
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 2: subjective as dignity, Like anyone can say that their dignity
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 2: has been offended, like men can do this, women can
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 2: do this, but thanks to the UN and other such institutions.
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 2: The very idea of dignity has been the market has
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 2: been cornered by women, like, you can't offend a woman's dignity,
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 2: but there's no such thing as offending a man's dignity,
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: because women have dignity and men do not. And that's
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 2: really all itt to what is dignity. It's it's it's subjective,
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 2: and it's given only to those whom the authorities have
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 2: given it right yeap.
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: And what the authorities have done in in Western States,
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: Europe and Canada the United States to a degree is
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: alter the legal landscape so that all a man has
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: to do is be accused of offending a woman's sensibilities
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 1: by his very presence or non action, non decision and
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: and and he is on his back foot legally. In
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 1: some instances, he's already broken the law. Uh and And
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 1: an example of this is misogyny laws that are passed
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 1: in some places and being proposed in others, where all
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: it takes is for a couple of guys to be
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 1: having a conversation with each other at a bus stop
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: about their wives, their girlfriends, or women that they might
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: be considering dating, and some other woman is offended by
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: something they said, or takes it in an offensive manner,
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 1: even if it's not an offensive statement, and all of
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: a sudden, they're in violation of the misogyny law. Women
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: have accused men of harassment for allegedly following them by
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: not crossing the street. When the woman comes out of
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: a building and the man is walking on the street
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: behind her. You're walking from your workplace on that side
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: of the street to your apartment on that side of
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: the street, several blocks away, where there's no turns in
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: your walk, and there's no reason for you to be
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: on the other side of the street. But if she
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: comes out of a building on that side of the
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: street and is also walking on that side of the street,
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: and you're behind her, God forbid, she decides that that's creepy. Right,
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: you certainly must not catch up and pass her, walk
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: past her, because you're sneaking up behind her, even if
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: you were there first, even if you don't interact with
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: her at all, And if you do interact with her,
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: just saying hi can get you accused of harassment or misogyny. Right?
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: Is that dignified for men? Does that respect a man's dignity?
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: Or is that the presumption of dastardly intentions and being
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: treated like trash. Right, the next one, every woman shall
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: have the right to respect as a person into the
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: free development of her personality. Doesn't give any specificity of
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: you know, having a decent personality. Right, So, a woman
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: could be lecherous, she could be a herodine, she could
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: be a criminal, she could be anything. She could be
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: the best of the best or the worst of the worst.
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. She has the right to respect as
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 1: a person and to develop the free development of her personality.
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: What about men, You know, we brought up in cells
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: a little bit ago. And what if somebody has a
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: socially awkward personality, has difficulty connecting with the opposite sex,
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 1: is unattractive in some way, or has a disability that
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: people find unappealing to to try to engage with. Does
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 1: does he have the right to free development of his personality?
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: Does he the right to be curmudgeon?
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: We often we often portray this as that women generally
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 2: do have respect for men, and men are generally nice
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 2: to women. And then we have to unpack that difference.
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: That women respect men because men are stronger than them,
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: and men are nice to women. Well, I was going
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: to say, because they're we but then you then you
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 2: have to unpack the difference between respectful and nice, and
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 2: there really isn't much difference. It's just that women are
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 2: generally afraid of men and men are generally not afraid
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: of women. And that's not for any particular good reason. Well,
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 2: maybe it's for an evolutionary reason, because we are all
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 2: built for the Stone Age, for an age before there
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: was any such thing as a government, before there was
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 2: any such thing as the police or what have you.
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 2: But when you when you draw all that down, if
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 2: you can imagine men and women living with each other
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 2: in the Stone Age, we generally respected each other and
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 2: we were nice to each other. And in the case
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 2: of women, it was because they knew that men were
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 2: stronger than them, and in the case of men, it
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 2: was because they knew that women were generally nice to them.
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 2: Now that might be an oversimplification, but I say this
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 2: as though none of these authorities existed in the Stone Age.
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 2: But they did. As long as men and women existed.
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 2: It was understood that men were stronger than women, and
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 2: evolution had loaded us with these neurological pathways that it
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 2: kind of taught us that it had toss us along
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 2: in advance, that men who were disrespectful to women would
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 2: get the ship being out of them by other men
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 2: if they were ever disrespectful to women, Like we act
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 2: like this is something that men only do to women,
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 2: like like like, men are always disrespecting women, but if
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 2: they ever did it in public, other men would beat
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 2: the ship out of them. And it still goes on
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 2: even in this age of multiculturalism. And I you know it,
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 2: your love to suggests that I do not need to
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 2: elaborate on what I'm talking about. But in the same way,
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 2: women were generally nice to men, because if they were
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 2: not nice to men, then they would suffer similar consequences.
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 2: And so this this idea that respect and niceness at
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 2: all different, not that women in the modern age have
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 2: any idea of what it means that men are generally
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 2: nice to women in the same way that men women
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 2: are generally respectful to men. I mean it's the same thing.
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 2: It's that you understand the powers that one another have
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 2: liked you. After after a century or so of a
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 2: feminist indoctrination, we're given the idea that that there are
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 2: different things that that women are respectful to men. But
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 2: men are not nice to women. No, they are. We
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: both have the same respect and niceness to each other.
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 2: I mean that. Like I said, they're the same thing.
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 2: It's it's just that this mutual respect and niceness have
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 2: been unraveled over the last years, indeed, the last thousand years.
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: Blah blah blah, romantic chivalry. Yeah no, we've always respected
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 2: this idea of being respectful and nice to one another
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 2: as genders. Why wouldn't we'd be. This is how we
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 2: got this far in the evolutionary ladder, by men and
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 2: women being nice and respectful to each other in ways
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 2: that no other species is, because no other species has
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 2: these various layers of intelligence of understanding each other's intelligence.
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 2: This is how we got this far because we are
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 2: because because we're able to understand that there's no real
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 2: difference between niceness and respectfulness. Like we we can imagine
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 2: each other's brains. We can we we we can understand
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 2: that we can understand each other's brains, and that we
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 2: can understand each other's understanding of each other's brains. And
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: that's I'm gonna have to defer you to home math again.
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 2: Because he did a brilliant video yesterday. It's fucking subscribed
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 2: to home math. He's got he's he's a fucking genius,
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 2: and he's got this way of explaining these levels where
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 2: you understand other people's understanding and then you are the
• 1:48:33
  Speaker 2: and then you understand other people's understand understanding of other people,
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 2: and then you understand other people's understanding of other people's
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 2: understanding of other people's and it's yeah, well it's a
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 2: fucking ancient Greek philosophers have figured this out a long
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 2: time ago.
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 1: But yeah, yeah, the video title that you'll be looking for,
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 1: it's its whole underscore math. By the way, there is
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 1: the name on YouTube. The chair in the video is
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 1: titled the High Levels of Thinking and then in brackets
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: and how they make things better sometimes. So it is like, again,
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 1: this does have quite the handle.
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 2: He is one hundred and fifty arc at least the
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 2: man's a little But again that people have understood this
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 2: since the ancient Greek days. We're just we've just forgotten
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 2: all of this, especially in the advent of Fromato Chivalry.
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 2: The ship has just rotted our brains to the point
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 2: where we've forgotten to understand things we should have understand
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 2: it understood, Sorry since fucking thousands of years ago.
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: God, And actually, if you're a young woman and you
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 1: are internally tough enough to do this, you should listen
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: and watch the videos on home Math's channel and consider
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: if you might be able to make your life easier
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 1: by taking the advice and incorporating understanding of the information
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 1: that he's conveying. Because if I'd had something that blunt
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 1: and explained, like you're five, you know, in a high
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 1: school about all of the ways that women self sabotage
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: and sabotage their relationships and behave stupidly. There are multiple
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: instances where I put myself through the school of self
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: inflicted hard knocks that I wouldn't have had to pay
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: that tuition because I'd have already had the lesson and
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 1: I have already altered my behavior accordingly, and I would
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 1: have had better outcomes for me and the people around me.
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: So y'all are lucky that he's around now, because there
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: really wasn't anybody doing that that women could listen to
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 1: in the in the eighties that that women were interested
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: in listening to. Like, you know, I listened to Rush Limbaugh,
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 1: and I got a little bit of good advice on
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 1: acting like an adult from Rush Limbaugh. But Rush was
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: more of a provocateur, like a shock jock than anything.
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: And of course I listened to my minister, but my
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 1: minister was far more gentle and diplomatic, and that's not
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: what women need. And women need to be bluntly told
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 1: how to be adults instead of modern women, because you
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: can't be both. And they be there, you know, we're
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: we're doing that, but home math is doing it on
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: a whole other level, with a whole other level of explanation.
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 1: And if you are tough enough to listen and not
• 1:52:03
  Speaker 1: take it personally, it's excellent advice and excellent information. It's
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 1: difficult for women to not take stuff like that personally,
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 1: but the effort, like I said, your life will be
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: significantly easier if you are able to overcome that hurdle
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 1: and actually listen to the information on an intellectual level.
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 1: And I'll go on to We'll do one more of these,
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 1: because I find it interesting we might do both of
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 1: these two. I think, yeah, the last two here because
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 1: they are the last two. States parties shall adopt and
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 1: implement appropriate measures to prohibit any exploitation or degradation of
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 1: women and state party shall adopt and implement appropriate measures
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: to ensure the protection of every woman's right to respect
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 1: for her dignity and protection dignity and protection of women
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 1: from all forms of violence, particularly sexual and verbal violence.
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 1: Verbal violence. I love that term, like that doesn't exist.
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: That's like online gender based violence. Verbal violence is not
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 1: a thing. The verbal rudeness is a thing. Verbal abuse
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 1: is a thing. But not all abuse is violent, just
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 1: like not all violence is abuse. Defending yourself against somebody
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 1: else's violence is not abuse. And you know if it's
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 1: if it's not a physical assault on your body, it's
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 1: not violence. You're not physically injured by it. You do
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: have emotional responses to it. Verbal violence you can just
• 1:54:01
  Speaker 1: walk away from. So in any case, I want you
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 1: to think about this because these two things are kind
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 1: of related, especially in the context of the previous women.
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 1: Free development of your personality. Women are entitled, according to this,
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 1: to free development of any type of personality. It doesn't
• 1:54:25
  Speaker 1: say any limitations there. So a woman can be an
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 1: absolute fucking cunt, right and just just treat you like
• 1:54:35
  Speaker 1: absolute shit, engage in verbal violence towards you according to
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 1: what they would call verbal violence if you did it
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 1: to them, talk down to you, treat you like presumed
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: predator or threat, and or like you're dirty and beneath them,
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: not respect your right to dignity, can can exploit you
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 1: for unpaid labor, can degrade you. And this is this
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: is an INTERESTINGMN prohibit any degradation. There are things that
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: we do in my industry. I'm I'm a caregiver. I've
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: been a state tested nurses aid before that worked in
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 1: nursing homes, and I'm currently a direct support professional for
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: intellectually disabled adults. And in both of those industries, there
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: are some people who do not have bladder controller They
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 1: have varying degrees of incontinence, and they have to wear
• 1:55:40
  Speaker 1: protective undergarments for bladder leakage or incontinence, depending on what
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: level they have. And when you provide this type of
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 1: protection to an infant who has not developed control over
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: their urination or defecation, it's called a diaper. And diapers
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: are for babies, right, So, if you work in a
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 1: nursing home or care home and you have similar adult
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 1: sized protective undergarments, we don't call them diapers because diapers
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: are for babies, and to protect the dignity of adults
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: who are in that circumstance their health has deteriorated or
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 1: they never developed continence. They they they're called various things
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: like briefs or protective undergarments, or other terms that essentially
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: described them as just undergarments that people are wearing, and
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: a lot of times standard of undergarments will be worn
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: over them if they love to diperish so that the
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 1: individual doesn't feel treated like a baby, and a lot
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 1: of these garments are now made to look more like standard,
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: non protective undergarments, and in fact, there are now washable
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: cloth ones that are made specifically to be worn just
• 1:57:27
  Speaker 1: like any other undergarment in order to protect the dignity
• 1:57:33
  Speaker 1: and to make the individual not feel degraded simply because
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 1: they have a health condition. Right, But when society deals
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 1: with men and women on something like this, they deal
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 1: with them differently. So we'll switch from incontinence to insolvency
• 1:57:55
  Speaker 1: economic insolvency. So if a woman is insolvent and she
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 1: comes homeless as a result, everything in the world is
• 1:58:06
  Speaker 1: done to protect her dignity. She's offered space in shelters
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 1: and there are services to try to find her a job,
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: to try to assist her in getting disability if she
• 1:58:19
  Speaker 1: can't get it, can't can't work if she has a
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 1: mental illness, to get her into rehab if she has
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 1: an addiction, and to generally get her out of that
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 1: situation in the case of women that simply cannot be
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 1: removed from that situation, to protect them from harm while
• 1:58:40
  Speaker 1: preserving their dignity. But if men are in that situation,
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 1: they are criminalized, they are demonized, they are stigmatized, and
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 1: they're often ignored. People will literally step over them in
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 1: the street. People will assault them for being in the way,
• 1:59:03
  Speaker 1: or assume that they are a threat and assault them preemptively.
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 1: People will steal from them. People will give them half
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 1: eaten food that you know they couldn't finish, and like,
• 1:59:20
  Speaker 1: while you're homeless, go ahead and eat after some stranger
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: that already took bites out of this sandwich. If they
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 1: want shelter, they have to hope that there's not so
• 1:59:33
  Speaker 1: many women with or without children, or men with children
• 1:59:40
  Speaker 1: wanting use of that shelter that there's no room for them.
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 1: If they have an addiction, it's treated as willful. If
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 1: they have any kind of criminal background, or any mental
• 1:59:50
  Speaker 1: health condition. It's treated as a reason why they should
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 1: be kicked out of whatever neighborhood they're in and sent
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 1: somewhere else but not you know, to have their their
• 2:00:03
  Speaker 1: health care covered, or to receive disability acquirement assistance and
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 1: things like that. It's just you know, this, this guy
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 1: has to be dealt with, disposed of very much. They're
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 1: degraded and dehumanized. If a guy is a social reject,
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 1: like he's maybe awkward, maybe he has unattractive looks, maybe
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 1: he has a disability that makes him unattractive, he doesn't
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 1: earn very much money whatever, and he speaks to women.
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 1: You know, he gets degraded by being treated as trash
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 1: under their feet. He gets degraded by being lumped in
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 1: with violent people that he has no association with. He
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 1: gets degraded by being treated as a disposable human being.
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 1: And uh, you know, have you ever seen a dignified
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 1: looking purp walk? Have you ever seen a dignified looking
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 1: uh treatment? Treatment of a man who is being removed
• 2:01:18
  Speaker 1: from some place because other people are uncomfortable to be
• 2:01:22
  Speaker 1: around him. A man being thrown out in a dignified manner,
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 1: his his his uh, mugshot was dignified. His mugshot was stellar. Right,
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: But when you when you have a situation, for instance,
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: where you know, people decide that some guy has to
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 1: be thrown out of a park because he smells bad,
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 1: because he hasn't had an opportunity to bathe no access
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 1: to a shelter, no access to any kind of bathing
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 1: facilities beyond being able to wash up in a public
• 2:02:05
  Speaker 1: bathroom for weeks or months, Like, it never looks dignified
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 1: when the cops come and you know, pressure him to leave. Right,
• 2:02:22
  Speaker 1: But women have a right to dignity and freedom from degradation,
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 1: respect for her dignity, protection from all forms of violence,
• 2:02:32
  Speaker 1: all forms? Do men have protection from all forms of violence?
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 1: How many of you have a Selective Service card? If
• 2:02:43
  Speaker 1: you're from the United States and you're an adult, you
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: probably do. If you're male, Like, are you protected from
• 2:02:50
  Speaker 1: all forms of violence? If the government can yank you
• 2:02:53
  Speaker 1: out of your life at any moment because they decided
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 1: to go to war, you protected from all forms of violence?
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 1: If you're with your girlfriend in a theater and some
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 1: nutjob comes in and starts shooting up the place, whose
• 2:03:10
  Speaker 1: job is it to protect your girlfriend? At the risk
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 1: of his own life, who will be publicly shamed by
• 2:03:19
  Speaker 1: the entire nation, no matter what the circumstances, if he
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: fails to protect a woman in danger and the news
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 1: reports on it.
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 2: The guy who shut up the place, Heaven's No, Heaven's
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 2: to Betsy, No, Heaven's to Murgatroyd.
• 2:03:34
  Speaker 3: No.
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 1: And how often when a male educator, or a male
• 2:03:45
  Speaker 1: mentor in an organization, or a male authority in an
• 2:03:52
  Speaker 1: institution sexually exploits or assaults a female underling, inmate student,
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: someone under his authority, someone under his influence. How often
• 2:04:09
  Speaker 1: do you hear people respond to that news story by
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: going nice? Never?
• 2:04:21
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 1: I've never heard a single instance. Even if the assailant
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 1: or exploiter is attractive conventionally, at the minute that someone
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 1: reports this individual sexually exploited, even an adult woman under
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 1: his authority or under his mentorship, he's definitely persona no gradis.
• 2:04:54
  Speaker 1: But what do we hear over and over again when
• 2:04:59
  Speaker 1: it's a a female teacher in her twenties sexually exploiting
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 1: a junior high school boy.
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 2: Nice?
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, oh, I wish I had teachers like that when
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 1: I was in school. Dude, No, you do not You
• 2:05:14
  Speaker 1: don't want to be fourteen times more likely to commit
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: suicide or forty four times more likely to abuse illicit substances.
• 2:05:25
  Speaker 1: You don't want to be more likely to get confused
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 1: about your sexuality and not be sure if you're gayer straight.
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: You don't want to be more likely to engage in
• 2:05:37
  Speaker 1: criminal activity, more likely to sexually assault someone when you
• 2:05:40
  Speaker 1: grow up. You don't want to be more likely to
• 2:05:43
  Speaker 1: fail at your relationships. Right, but we hear that all
• 2:05:47
  Speaker 1: the time. Oh, that kid was lucky. No, No, that
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 1: kid is a rape victim.
• 2:05:54
  Speaker 2: That kid has his boundaries crossed. And then he goes
• 2:05:59
  Speaker 2: on to wonder, what if I crossed some boundaries myself,
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 2: I am in solitary confinement for the rest of my life. Oh, well,
• 2:06:12
  Speaker 2: it's hamoring. I wasn't. Or I would go on to
• 2:06:16
  Speaker 2: become one of those infamous, fucking serial murderers that Netflix
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 2: seems so obsessed with at this point.
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, or he grows up to be somebody's pay pig
• 2:06:27
  Speaker 1: for the rest of his life because he doesn't know
• 2:06:30
  Speaker 1: how to defend his boundaries and he doesn't know how
• 2:06:33
  Speaker 1: to relate to women other than in a transactional manner.
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: You know, there are a lot more pay pigs out
• 2:06:41
  Speaker 1: there than there are rapists. And yeah, how many forms
• 2:06:48
  Speaker 1: of violence are men protected from? Oh, you know what
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 1: depends on whether or not there's a woman around when
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 1: the violence is happening. If there's a woman around when
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 1: the violence is happening, the answer is none. Zero. He
• 2:07:00
  Speaker 1: can't even run away, he can't leave, right. And if
• 2:07:06
  Speaker 1: if there's any kind of legal action in response to
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 1: the violence, the victim of that violence, Even if the
• 2:07:16
  Speaker 1: violent assailant attacked the man and he defended himself and
• 2:07:23
  Speaker 1: the woman, and he was the one who suffered all
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 1: the injuries, she's the victim, right, Even if he ends
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 1: up in the hospital, he might be the hero, but
• 2:07:40
  Speaker 1: he never is treated like the victim. Yeah, Richard Bierre,
• 2:07:46
  Speaker 1: that's a great example. Mary Kayla Turno married her victim,
• 2:07:51
  Speaker 1: and it wasn't until after she had passed away that
• 2:07:54
  Speaker 1: he started to realize just how fucked up their relationship
• 2:07:58
  Speaker 1: was and how it might have affected him. It takes
• 2:08:08
  Speaker 1: years sometimes for victims of childhood sexual assault to come
• 2:08:15
  Speaker 1: to terms with the full nature of what happened to
• 2:08:20
  Speaker 1: us and how it changed us. And a lot of
• 2:08:24
  Speaker 1: us go through that period of trying to trying to
• 2:08:31
  Speaker 1: justify what happened or rationalize it wasn't that bad, or
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: I'm not a victim, or I had agency, when no,
• 2:08:42
  Speaker 1: you did not. You were underage. You were like, in
• 2:08:46
  Speaker 1: my case, I was five, in his case, he was
• 2:08:49
  Speaker 1: like thirteen. The worst time for a boy, because everything
• 2:08:53
  Speaker 1: is all out of whack. Your hormones have gone off
• 2:08:57
  Speaker 1: the charts. You have no idea what you're what you're
• 2:09:00
  Speaker 1: dealing with in life, and everything. The way that everything
• 2:09:07
  Speaker 1: in your body works has suddenly started changing, and it's
• 2:09:11
  Speaker 1: all very confusing. And that's what that woman stepped into
• 2:09:15
  Speaker 1: and took advantage of.
• 2:09:17
  Speaker 2: Maybe this is a good time to finally say our
• 2:09:24
  Speaker 2: rips to Aaron Pitsy, who, well, we've been told in
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 2: the last day or so has finally been arrested at Peace.
• 2:09:37
  Speaker 2: But we were told this a few days ago, and
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 2: we weren't sure. We were sure it was true at
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 2: the time, and now we're being told is the case.
• 2:09:51
  Speaker 2: So I don't know if it's true or not, but
• 2:09:53
  Speaker 2: I guess given the timeline of things, we might be
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 2: a to say RP Aaron Pitsy and and to pay
• 2:10:05
  Speaker 2: a tribute to what she's been trying to tell us
• 2:10:10
  Speaker 2: as a civilization across the atgosphere and indeed the world, Yeah,
• 2:10:19
  Speaker 2: that these things happen generally. Generationally, these things happen from
• 2:10:27
  Speaker 2: household to household, and they will keep happening from household
• 2:10:32
  Speaker 2: to household until we recognize that the women are just
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 2: as prone to violence as men are, and until we
• 2:10:45
  Speaker 2: acknowledge this pretty obvious fact, it's going to keep happening.
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 2: As long as we only punish men for what women
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 2: have done to them, while well well neglecting to punish
• 2:11:09
  Speaker 2: women even in the advent of what men have done,
• 2:11:16
  Speaker 2: it's just gonna keep it's just going to keep getting.
• 2:11:18
  Speaker 1: We don't even help men get out of those situations
• 2:11:21
  Speaker 1: like No, in fact, when men try to get out
• 2:11:24
  Speaker 1: of those situations, they get punished for that too, So yeah,
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 1: they're they're unable to. Like when a woman wants to
• 2:11:32
  Speaker 1: get out of an abusive situation and she is the victim,
• 2:11:36
  Speaker 1: the state bends over backwards, or even if she says
• 2:11:39
  Speaker 1: she's the victim, even if she's not, state bends over
• 2:11:41
  Speaker 1: backwards to make sure she has custody to the children,
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 1: she gets child support, she gets property. Uh in the
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 1: division of marital property, that she isn't economically disadvantaged in
• 2:11:54
  Speaker 1: any way, that they can prevent her from being economically
• 2:11:57
  Speaker 1: disadvantaged by her her obllegation to extract herself from the
• 2:12:03
  Speaker 1: abusive relationship. But when a man tries to extract himself
• 2:12:07
  Speaker 1: from an abusive relationship, the state bends over backwards to
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 1: give his abuser custody of the children, to make sure
• 2:12:16
  Speaker 1: that his abuser is not economically disadvantaged by his extraction
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 1: of himself from her abusive environment that she's created for him,
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 1: and that his abuser gets property from the division of
• 2:12:32
  Speaker 1: property in the marital dissolution. They don't do anything to
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 1: protect the abuse victim. He doesn't even have a protected
• 2:12:43
  Speaker 1: right to see his children, he doesn't have a protected
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 1: right to any defense against economic hardship, and can be
• 2:12:55
  Speaker 1: forced to pay support to his abuser after he is
• 2:13:00
  Speaker 1: left the relationship. So it is, it is quite a
• 2:13:04
  Speaker 1: terrible situation for ment.
• 2:13:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the next thing on the agenda. Next thing on
• 2:13:11
  Speaker 2: the agenda, gentlemen, what once you're quite done with the
• 2:13:16
  Speaker 2: immigrant problem, can we do away with the Duluth model.
• 2:13:22
  Speaker 2: This might sound like something that only effects Duluth or
• 2:13:25
  Speaker 2: something that only effects Illinois. Is that where is something
• 2:13:30
  Speaker 2: that only affects the USA, Minnesota, something that only affects
• 2:13:36
  Speaker 2: the entire Western world as it's infected all of it.
• 2:13:41
  Speaker 2: Can we do away with that?
• 2:13:43
  Speaker 3: I again, like we it seems like we're only clipping
• 2:13:50
  Speaker 3: the leaves of this poison ivy when we could be
• 2:13:54
  Speaker 3: clipping the seeds.
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 2: And it started, it didn't start. I guess it did, but.
• 2:14:01
  Speaker 1: Well, it didn't start into lu. The luth is what
• 2:14:03
  Speaker 1: made it. Made it policy, and the fact that it
• 2:14:07
  Speaker 1: was policy started into.
• 2:14:09
  Speaker 2: Luth indeed, and that's a policy that we should really
• 2:14:13
  Speaker 2: rip out at the fucking roots, Yeah, because that's where
• 2:14:17
  Speaker 2: so much of this ship is. Yeah.
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: The other thing is before there was research, uh that
• 2:14:25
  Speaker 1: that demonstrated this. Aaron Pitsy recognized the fact that being
• 2:14:32
  Speaker 1: subjected to abuse and like childhood violence, like in a
• 2:14:37
  Speaker 1: in a in an abusive environment, violent environment, growing up
• 2:14:41
  Speaker 1: in an environment like that changes your uh, your your
• 2:14:46
  Speaker 1: structure of your brain. That it affects your your hormones
• 2:14:50
  Speaker 1: and your neurochemicals, your neurotransmitters. And she recognized, uh, oh, Mike,
• 2:15:01
  Speaker 1: your microphone is staticky. All of a sudden, there we go.
• 2:15:08
  Speaker 1: But she recognized that it does physical damage, not just
• 2:15:13
  Speaker 1: in the moment where there are bruises there. It goes again,
• 2:15:17
  Speaker 1: so it's like it's not plugged in properly or something.
• 2:15:22
  Speaker 1: But she also recognized that it ages you, that it
• 2:15:27
  Speaker 1: causes permanent like the stress causes permanent problems. And it
• 2:15:35
  Speaker 1: was years later actually when they started recognizing that when
• 2:15:40
  Speaker 1: you are raised in an environment like that where you
• 2:15:43
  Speaker 1: are scared all the time, that cortisol, the stress home hormone,
• 2:15:48
  Speaker 1: causes a bunch of changes in your system, and that
• 2:15:52
  Speaker 1: then later on there was another recognition that the cushy
• 2:15:59
  Speaker 1: in of your your chromosomes, when they you know, you
• 2:16:05
  Speaker 1: have your souls replicate and they copy the DNA the
• 2:16:10
  Speaker 1: little bits of the cushy ends drop off as and
• 2:16:13
  Speaker 1: that's part of how you age as part of what
• 2:16:15
  Speaker 1: causes aging. Abuse shortens those do you have less cushion
• 2:16:21
  Speaker 1: so it ages you. These are all things that Aaron
• 2:16:26
  Speaker 1: explained in less scientific terms years before they were explained
• 2:16:32
  Speaker 1: in scientific terms. She observed these things in real life
• 2:16:38
  Speaker 1: and tried to warn people, and it took that long
• 2:16:44
  Speaker 1: for you know, the rest of the world to catch up.
• 2:16:47
  Speaker 1: She was ahead of the curve on things like this
• 2:16:50
  Speaker 1: what we're talking about tonight. She was talking about you
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 1: in the UN and in particular you and women well
• 2:16:59
  Speaker 1: before any of the rest of us were.
• 2:17:03
  Speaker 2: Like.
• 2:17:04
  Speaker 1: She really was ahead of the curve on everything. And
• 2:17:08
  Speaker 1: you know, as I said on Tuesday, if you haven't,
• 2:17:13
  Speaker 1: you should look up her name on YouTube and watch
• 2:17:20
  Speaker 1: watch videos of her interviews and videos historically historical videos
• 2:17:27
  Speaker 1: of her working at the refuge that she started.
• 2:17:35
  Speaker 2: There.
• 2:17:36
  Speaker 1: It goes okay, I like that just keeps going off,
• 2:17:40
  Speaker 1: but you have to you have to see for yourself
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 1: or you know, if you're if you follow me on
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 1: X scroll back through my my posts on my main
• 2:17:51
  Speaker 1: page and you should be able to see my posts
• 2:17:55
  Speaker 1: of YouTube videos of Aaron. Just avoid posts by the
• 2:17:59
  Speaker 1: ex Patriarch. I repost any of those, but like that
• 2:18:02
  Speaker 1: guy's full of shit and nothing that he has to
• 2:18:06
  Speaker 1: say is of any value. But everything else, like the
• 2:18:10
  Speaker 1: the direct videos of Aaron speaking and Aaron working, and
• 2:18:16
  Speaker 1: the women that Aaron worked with talking about their experiences
• 2:18:20
  Speaker 1: and about the refuge and everything that that information is
• 2:18:25
  Speaker 1: something that should not be lost. So I would love
• 2:18:28
  Speaker 1: to see people, you know, go and watch those and
• 2:18:32
  Speaker 1: learn about her. And there was also a website I
• 2:18:41
  Speaker 1: believe it was called honest Ribbon dot org that was
• 2:18:45
  Speaker 1: created to correct some misstatements by White Ribbon dot org
• 2:18:52
  Speaker 1: because Aaron Aaron looked through that and their stuff is
• 2:18:57
  Speaker 1: absolutely not factual. So yeah, Aaron was a hell of
• 2:19:03
  Speaker 1: a woman. Uh And yeah, our man mentioned Man Woman
• 2:19:07
  Speaker 1: Myth the Man Woman Myth documentary on on YouTube is
• 2:19:11
  Speaker 1: amazing that that was a great place to start. I
• 2:19:17
  Speaker 1: know we had her on a fireside chat. I tweeted that,
• 2:19:19
  Speaker 1: I posted that on x as well, so uh And
• 2:19:23
  Speaker 1: and she's had a lot of videos where she was
• 2:19:26
  Speaker 1: talking to dian Esme when he was involved with a
• 2:19:28
  Speaker 1: Voice for Men. And she did a lot of work
• 2:19:32
  Speaker 1: with a Voice for Men, a lot of work with
• 2:19:33
  Speaker 1: the National Coalition for Men, a lot of work in
• 2:19:37
  Speaker 1: UH Canada with men's organizations. She did work with Cafe.
• 2:19:42
  Speaker 1: She did anything that she could to to try to
• 2:19:47
  Speaker 1: get people to understand. Yeah, Teleomere's Richarder, I didn't know
• 2:19:52
  Speaker 1: if I said that, but to get people to understand
• 2:19:57
  Speaker 1: what really needs to happen in order to reduce and
• 2:20:00
  Speaker 1: maybe ultimately eliminate the phenomenon of domestic violence like that
• 2:20:09
  Speaker 1: that would if people had listened to her, that would
• 2:20:12
  Speaker 1: already be well on its way. So in the meantime,
• 2:20:17
  Speaker 1: let me see if we have I don't know if
• 2:20:18
  Speaker 1: we've had any super chows since Meredith. I don't think
• 2:20:21
  Speaker 1: we have so and I didn't see any super chats
• 2:20:25
  Speaker 1: go through or any rumble oriants. So I'm gonna call
• 2:20:28
  Speaker 1: it we are at the end of the episode. Next
• 2:20:32
  Speaker 1: week will start in we'll look at some of the
• 2:20:36
  Speaker 1: other rights that these women think that men already have
• 2:20:42
  Speaker 1: and and women don't. So just just on your own,
• 2:20:49
  Speaker 1: you know, maybe comment under the video ways in which
• 2:20:54
  Speaker 1: some of these rights that we talked about tonight that
• 2:20:56
  Speaker 1: women are demanding that if you've got examples demonstrating that
• 2:21:02
  Speaker 1: men don't have those rights or that those rights are
• 2:21:05
  Speaker 1: not protected, go ahead and share them. Things that have
• 2:21:09
  Speaker 1: happened to people, you know, things that have happened to you,
• 2:21:13
  Speaker 1: things that you've witnessed, like the things that I talked about.
• 2:21:19
  Speaker 1: You you can always respond to that, especially like I'm
• 2:21:22
  Speaker 1: curious to hear what other guys think of that that
• 2:21:25
  Speaker 1: incident at the hospital, because the day that I heard that,
• 2:21:29
  Speaker 1: the day that he came in and you know, he
• 2:21:31
  Speaker 1: was traumatized, and we just sat and talked. H There
• 2:21:37
  Speaker 1: wasn't really much else to do about that, And I
• 2:21:42
  Speaker 1: was just completely floored. Nobody ever has asked me to
• 2:21:47
  Speaker 1: do anything even remotely like that, because I'm a woman,
• 2:21:50
  Speaker 1: and I can't imagine what it must have been like
• 2:21:52
  Speaker 1: for him standing in that doorway, looking out at an
• 2:21:57
  Speaker 1: angry outburst from the community in the form of dozens
• 2:22:02
  Speaker 1: of people flocking around just that one doorway, and and
• 2:22:07
  Speaker 1: the whole building being surrounded by yelling, angry people, and
• 2:22:14
  Speaker 1: knowing that the only thing that he had in his
• 2:22:17
  Speaker 1: possession to stop anyone from getting past him if they
• 2:22:21
  Speaker 1: were to break in through that door, were his bare hands.
• 2:22:26
  Speaker 2: If anyone's wondering if we're going to keep doing UN
• 2:22:29
  Speaker 2: women forever, I mean, as long as U and women exist,
• 2:22:34
  Speaker 2: that's a very real possibility.
• 2:22:37
  Speaker 1: It could be. We were we were going to be
• 2:22:40
  Speaker 1: doing you know, women's suffrage history forever too, and we
• 2:22:44
  Speaker 1: have we're on a break from that. We were going
• 2:22:47
  Speaker 1: to be doing federal funding forever, and we were on
• 2:22:52
  Speaker 1: a break from that. We don't keep doing we should.
• 2:22:55
  Speaker 2: Keep doing this until we should keep doing this until
• 2:22:59
  Speaker 2: both of these things stop existing. I mean, the UN
• 2:23:03
  Speaker 2: in general should stop existing, but it should start with
• 2:23:06
  Speaker 2: UN women, and hopefully, once UN women stops existing, the
• 2:23:10
  Speaker 2: UN and itself will disintegrate and collapse, as it very
• 2:23:15
  Speaker 2: well probably would and probably should, because that's always been
• 2:23:19
  Speaker 2: what it's about. The devil presents itself with a pretty face.
• 2:23:24
  Speaker 2: That's that's the warning with which we've presented with which
• 2:23:29
  Speaker 2: has been presented this whole time, and that's why so
• 2:23:33
  Speaker 2: many people think the UN is the devil, because it is.
• 2:23:37
  Speaker 2: And that's why so many people think that the devil
• 2:23:41
  Speaker 2: will present itself with a female face, because the female
• 2:23:46
  Speaker 2: face is the most neot Is that right? You know
• 2:23:51
  Speaker 2: what I mean?
• 2:23:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah? In any case, thanks everybody for listening, Thanks Mike
• 2:23:59
  Speaker 1: for go through this with me, and Brian for working
• 2:24:03
  Speaker 1: in the background to make sure that we're able to
• 2:24:05
  Speaker 1: do this, and everybody else that works to make HBr
• 2:24:08
  Speaker 1: Talk happen. Remember next week, due to circumstances in my life,
• 2:24:14
  Speaker 1: HBr Talk will be on Tuesday night and HBr News
• 2:24:20
  Speaker 1: will be on Thursday night, So it'll be the show
• 2:24:26
  Speaker 1: will be at seven pm on Tuesday and six pm
• 2:24:30
  Speaker 1: on Thursday Eastern Standard time. And I can't remember what
• 2:24:33
  Speaker 1: that is GMT, so what it is in the UK,
• 2:24:37
  Speaker 1: because that's the one that it's.
• 2:24:39
  Speaker 2: Either eleven or twelve something like that.
• 2:24:43
  Speaker 1: So well, what time was it when we started? What
• 2:24:47
  Speaker 1: time was it where you were?
• 2:24:48
  Speaker 2: Is midnight usually.
• 2:24:50
  Speaker 1: Okay Thursdays, so midnight GMT for HBr Talk on Tuesday,
• 2:24:58
  Speaker 1: and then it will be eleven pm g MD for
• 2:25:02
  Speaker 1: HBr News on Thursday, so that's two different times there
• 2:25:06
  Speaker 1: we go, so you guys, guys have it and then
• 2:25:09
  Speaker 1: the following week we'll go back to normal. But that way,
• 2:25:13
  Speaker 1: it just just a bunch of stuff has has occurred,
• 2:25:18
  Speaker 1: including mandatory training that I go through. That's just an
• 2:25:21
  Speaker 1: annual thing. Uh, if you work in my profession, and
• 2:25:27
  Speaker 1: it's limited when when it can be done. So thanks
• 2:25:32
  Speaker 1: for all of that and good night all.
• 2:25:35
  Speaker 2: See your next cunt.