Latest / Honey Badger Radio / News No One Saw Coming! You'll Be SHOCKED At These Twists! | HBR News 451

Transcript

News No One Saw Coming! You'll Be SHOCKED At These Twists! | HBR News 451 · Honey Badger Radio

0:02
This is HBr News Number four fifty two or No. Four fifty one.
0:06
Sorry news no one saw coming. You'll be shocked at these twists where we
0:11
discuss the news of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody,
0:19
and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. Hope you guys are doing well this
0:22
week and that you're laughing at all this absurdity so that you're not consumed by
0:25
it. I'm your host, Brian Martinez, and I'm joined by, as
0:28
always, my lovely co hosts, Doctor Rennemercam and Hannah Wallin. We have
0:33
a great show lineup for you guys today, so please be sure to continue
0:36
the conversations both in the chat as well as the comments section on this week's
0:39
HBr News show. It just so happens to be kind of a special show.
0:43
We're gonna be looking at five stories that are so shocking that you won't
0:47
believe it, and one of them that's like, I mean, they're gonna
0:50
be completely like out of left field things, oh news regarding Yeah, they're
0:54
gonna be what those are the stories of the week. News regarding the Scotland
1:00
hate crime law, gender firming, care for his children, women in stem
1:04
and more so, stick around, it's going to be a good time and
1:07
be sure to join us afterwards for the Patron only show. This week's PATI
1:12
On the show, we're going to be continuing from where we left off on
1:15
our previous great article from Business Insider, which is about the death of the
1:19
traditional American or typical American nuclear family and why that's a good thing. So
1:26
if you want to join us for that it is it is pure cancer,
1:30
but like we have to like look at it because it sort of like gives
1:34
us an idea of where some of some people in our population want our society
1:38
to go, and so we should probably know what our neighbors are up to,
1:44
or perhaps our teachers and politicians and media figures and so on. So
1:49
if you want to join us, I was told that cancer was caused by
1:53
nuclear power. It's funny the curve balls that life throws on you. So
2:02
anyway, if you want to join us, you have to become a Badger.
2:06
You can do so by joining up at feed the Badger dot com to
2:08
set up a subscription five bucks a month. We'll get you into our discord
2:12
where you'll be able to enjoy all of the additional content which includes bonus shows
2:16
as well as lots of stuff in the community workshops for writing and gaming and
2:23
movie nights and all that good stuff. So yeah, please consider doing that
2:27
by going to feed the Badger dot Com slash subscribe, and you can also
2:31
support our monthly fundraiser just keeps us going so we can keep on bringing you
2:37
this interesting content with unique perspectives that you don't get in a lot of other
2:43
places, and that would be at feed the Badger dot Com for slash support
2:46
to do that, and also be sure to feed our Badger by going to
2:52
feed the Badger dot com forward slash just the tip. You can give badger
2:55
Chan a tip and we will read your comment or her on the show.
3:00
So that is all of those things. And shout out really quick to the
3:04
Rumble Gang for joining us and supporting us on Rumble. We do want to
3:07
make that. I would like to see that become our primary platform in the
3:12
near future. It is growing and we were just talking about that a little
3:15
bit before the show, so so yeah, please consider doing that. Okay,
3:19
without further adua, let us get into today's story. So first we're
3:23
going to be looking at Scotland. You guys are remember we covered a hate
3:28
crime law that was passed in Scotland a while back. Turns out there are
3:34
some outcomes, I guess so ski. Scotland's new hate crime law, introduced
3:43
by the Scottish National Party and voted for by SNP, Labor, Libdem and
3:49
Scottish Green MSPs, has led to a staggering eight thousand complaints in the first
3:54
week, overwhelming police. Scotland critics argue that the law, aimed at addressing
4:00
hate speech and discrimination, is overly broad and being exploited by political activists and
4:06
the public for personal or political vendettas. This has sparked a debate on the
4:11
law's effectiveness, which calls for it to be scrapped as it diverts resources from
4:15
more serious crimes. Despite the controversy, the Scottish government defends the law,
4:20
stating and is not impacting community policing. My gosh, it's amazing that something
4:27
like this would happen. Nothing like this has ever happened before in all of
4:32
human history. Over and over again, every time, the people that never
4:40
grew up from kindergarten tattling on other people in order to get them in trouble.
4:45
For things that aren't even bad, or paint them as having the wrong
4:50
things. No, never happened before. Nobody was ever executed for things like
4:58
this in the past or anything like that. There's not a huge historical example
5:06
from from a religious perspective in the past. There's there's definitely not a huge
5:14
historical example of people being silenced for political perspectives in the past. No,
5:19
No, this is brand new. I'm shocked, completely completely unique. You
5:26
definitely couldn't compare it to the Starzi. In fact, I think it's a
5:29
hate crime for me to have done that or even to have mentioned the word
5:32
Starzi within four hundred miles of Scotland. By the way, your boy Hums
5:40
the user, First Minister of Scottistan was asked about this whole debacle in a
5:48
fairly recent interview in the last few days. I think partly it partly in
5:56
reference to the hundreds of hate report filed about him and his famous wait Wait
6:03
Waite speech from twenty twenty when he turned up in Parliament and said everyone in
6:12
the government is wait. That's person wait, that's person wait. And I'm
6:15
not exaggerating. He went on for like five minutes just listing off all these
6:19
people who want wait, that's your taxpayer dollars, Laddie Jim. Yeah,
6:25
and arguably the most nakedly racist thing anyone has ever said in any parliament possibly
6:33
ever. And yes, I include all those people you're talking about, even
6:39
though he didn't just go as far as calling them a brood of vipers who
6:43
was like, he went on for five fucking minutes saying you can't get more
6:48
racist than that? Can you guess what his defense was in this interview?
6:55
You probably can quote the description of the of the to reference that speech as
7:00
hatred. I've not even seen anybody who has described in that way that doesn't
7:06
frankly part of the far right. Oh of course, of course, of
7:14
course. Now I'm not sure what he means by anybody who is described in
7:19
that way. Does he mean that any anybody who he was describing as white
7:25
in that speech is frankly far right? Would he be so brazen as to
7:31
say the quiet part out loud that all white people are far right? Yeah,
7:35
if anyone is that brazen, he is. But I don't think I
7:39
think he was just saying anyone who criticized me, anyone who criticized that speech,
7:45
is far right either way, does that not count as hate speech?
7:51
Calling anyone who disagrees with you far right? I realize the far right are
7:58
not a protected group under this law, or under any law, but neither
8:05
are men, and you can indeed be charged with under this a crime law
8:11
for calling someone amen because it's considered an insult, you see, as is
8:18
calling people far right, but if he wasn't using it as a derogatory term,
8:26
but as a descriptive one. If you deliver a speech proclaimed proclaiming that
8:33
there are far too many white people around here, and anyone who disagrees with
8:37
it is by definition far right, then does it not necessarily follow that the
8:43
speech itself is far left or at the very least considerably left of center,
8:52
which you would think would be an odd stance for an as sensibly nationalist party
8:56
to take. Or have I just committed the hate crime by claiming humsy Yusef
9:01
is far left or even left. Given that the far left is not just
9:09
a protected group, it is a wholly normalized group, you will never hear
9:16
the term far left even uttered in Britain by a politician or by anyone in
9:22
the legacy media. As far as there they're concerned. There is no such
9:26
thing as far left, let alone such a thing as Ikov Hoby. All
9:33
there is is the right answer, as dictated by our goodly government. Everything
9:39
else is dismissed and demonized as far right. The moral of the story is
9:46
our nation is being tyrannized by communist revolutionaries. It's not just happening, it
9:50
has already happened. If if you hate the majority of the white people,
10:00
or indeed the non majority in his men, if you hate men or or
10:05
white people, you can get them imprisoned for up to seven years just because
10:09
you feel like it, because you perceive that you can do that, or
10:16
the very least, you can get them put on a list. And anyone
10:20
who doesn't like it, anyone who doesn't approve of this state of affairs,
10:26
you can complain about it, Sure you can. You can file an official
10:31
report with the government in the same way. But if you do, they'll
10:37
just call you far right. Therefore you are far right, and then you're
10:41
the one who gets put on a list. By that was the use of
10:46
himself if necessary. It's it's like he mailed a sting letter to everyone in
10:52
the country saying, have you disapproved of the government recently. Congratulations, you've
10:58
won a Please send your name and social security number to this address number six
11:05
six six, my ass care of HUMS and USAF. You know, the
11:11
craziest thing, People in Scotland are still going to vote s MP in the
11:16
overwhelming majority, and you might as well, because there really is no alternative
11:22
anyway. We have in any any given region of the UK. We have
11:26
like five or six different parties to vote for and every single one of them
11:31
is run by bitch made lap dogs of this communist revolution. Mm hmm.
11:37
There's with not even a two parties system when you functionally are but we you
11:41
know, it's just you have a unarty like we do. Yeah, it's
11:46
getting it's getting drawn down to a one party system which is nothing but labor.
11:50
But at least there are you know, five or six different parties that
11:54
aren't even intended and they're all on the ballot, but it doesn't matter because
11:56
because because they're all under the thumb of of of these formulist revolutionaries. Next
12:03
time I come to the US, can I claim asylum? Please? You
12:07
should? I'm genuinely seeking it at this point. No, can I not?
12:11
Does that not? That's weird? Well, all I have to say
12:18
about that is about this story and what should be done, hopefully by the
12:22
Scottish people. First of all, you'll need to find out who the descendants
12:26
of William Wallace are. And then what you need to do is just just
12:54
get out, get them out. They are not you're they're not your your
13:01
brother in or whatever. They are not your countrymen. And you know,
13:05
y'all need the Constitution. Everybody needs to have a First Amendment. I would
13:09
I offer that we share the First Amendment with the rest of the world.
13:13
Like I'm talking to you Brazil, I saw, I know what's going on
13:16
down there. I'm talking to you UK and Europe and Ireland. I mean,
13:22
Jesus, you know. That's the really sad thing is the First Amendment
13:28
came from the concept of freedom of speech in parliament. Yeah, so it
13:35
just spread it to the common man and the aristocracy, the elite, the
13:43
self prescribed better than yous have been enraged and outraged. So they've got their
13:50
ins and outs going ever since. Yeah. Yeah, Well, like I
13:58
said, well, you know what I think it is too, is like
14:00
if the if the people of the country don't believe strongly in the freedom of
14:05
speech as a just as a philosophical concept, then you're going to lose it.
14:11
Like, if Americans stop believing that freedom of speech is important, we
14:16
will lose it because it will be it's being attacked all the time. Right,
14:22
So it's it's only because some Americans, because there's lots of Americans that
14:26
are like, oh, well, I don't know, I'm you know,
14:30
I draw the line of hate speech or whatever, right, And uh,
14:33
I think that that is a growing number because people are being educated to think
14:39
that there is such a thing as hate speech and that it should be stopped.
14:43
Meanwhile, other parts of the world, probably every other country does have
14:46
a concept of a limit on speech, and it always ends up creeping.
14:52
Like look at Canada, you can't misgender your own kid and before they take
14:58
your kids from you, right, I mean, don't you don't want to
15:01
get close to that. God knows what happens in countries that we you know,
15:05
we're not allowed to like actually see what's going on, you know,
15:09
Like, uh, I think that like in one of the Nordic countries,
15:13
I'm not sure which one, it's, uh, it's you're not you're it's
15:16
illegal to criticize the royal family of that country. There's like a you know,
15:22
a monarchy, and I mean people don't criticize them because I guess the
15:24
monarchy is pretty cool. But the fact that there is a law against criticizing
15:31
that royal family is it's you know, it's like to me, that's that's
15:35
unheard of, but it's not uncommon, you know. So if you're American,
15:39
don't take that for granted, but realize that it is constantly under threat,
15:43
constantly under threat, and as soon as you give a little bit it
15:46
won't stop. They're going to grind away at our freedom until we don't have
15:50
any That's why. That's what all of that's about. That's what them coming
15:54
after our guns is about. That's what them trying to change demographics is about.
15:58
It's all of that about taking away like our humanity at the end of
16:03
the day. So anyway, that's all I wanted to say about that.
16:07
Scotland creates law, law backfires, Scotland pretends like that's not happening. What
16:14
will happen next? I wonder the dumb thing about hate speech laws is this
16:18
the best way to get rid of something that is ignorant and stupid is to
16:25
put it on blast right, and then make fun of it, ridicule the
16:30
fuck out of it, and make it so embarrassing for people to believe and
16:37
say that nobody does. You can do that if you're right about it being
16:45
ignorant and stupid, and if you're wrong about it being ignorant and stupid,
16:49
you know, the best way to get to the bottom of it and actually
16:53
get to logical conclusions about the information is to actually investigate it and discuss it
17:00
and debate it and hash it out so that the smartest idea has come to
17:04
forefront while making fun of the stuff that is ignorant and stupid, if people
17:10
keep repeating it because they like it better after it has been debunked, right,
17:15
and that has worked for centuries, and unfortunately, the effort at controlling
17:23
thought and beliefs by the elite has resulted in not only centuries of death,
17:33
pain and suffering, fear and so on, but also centuries of ignorance and
17:40
stupidity, because when the good ideas are ignorant and stupid, right the idea
17:47
is that they approve of the right thing. You can't get rid of it
17:53
by making fun of it, because you go to jail or you get in
17:59
further trouble depending on the severity of the Yeah, the elite and their their
18:10
behaviors, their opinions. So it's it's having hate speech laws does nothing but
18:17
deter advancement in getting rid of ignorance and stupidity. Mm hmm, all right,
18:25
well, anyway, let us know what you guys think about this in
18:26
the comments. I look forward to your thoughts. We do have like quite
18:30
a few stories to get through and they're all great, but let us know
18:33
what you guys think. I got a super chat here from Albert Nata retro.
18:37
He says, for five dollars Canadian the government already ignored the fourteenth Amendment
18:41
when it can to the ncfm's case against selective service, the first Amendment isn't
18:47
far behind. Oh well, they're going to keep trying. Yeah, not
18:52
always sure, not National Coalition for Men, but the government. The judges
18:56
chickened out. What they did was they said, well, Congress is currently
19:00
debating a law about this right now, so we want to wait and see
19:03
what they're doing. So we're going to toss it back to Congress, which
19:06
they've done before with other things. And it's the court has a tradition of
19:12
not usurping the power of Congress. But I think if another case is reintroduced,
19:18
they go back and say, well, actually, Congress did nothing about
19:22
this, then the court will have to address it now because they tossed it
19:26
back to Congress, and Congress wift. Yeah, you know, Albert,
19:33
there is one way to fix the fourteenth and it's actually got nothing to do
19:36
with the fourteenth Amendment. We can just do something about the nineteenth Amendment.
19:38
Then, yeah, the fourteenth Amendment won't be a problem. Now. I'm
19:44
not suggesting anything in particular. I'm just saying we could look at number nineteen
19:48
and see if there's any way that nineteen will make fourteen more palatable, considering
19:55
that there is a solid history of and it is solid. We've been looking
20:02
at it. In HBr. Talk of suffrage men's suffrage in particular being attached
20:08
directly to your military service. The concept of military service. In fact,
20:15
taxation is attached similarly directly to the concept of military service. It started as
20:26
not a or involuntary thing, but as a sort of dues in a club,
20:36
except that the club was the country, and the leader of the club
20:38
was the king, and the people who paid dues were the other nobles,
20:45
and then they charged the people that they had under them as they saw necessary.
20:52
But yeah, it also started out as a means of handle military service
21:00
as kingdoms expanded, and you couldn't just report in person rapidly because cars didn't
21:08
exist yet, so you sent money on the regular. And then if you
21:14
couldn't send troops or go yourself, the king could hire mercenaries in his area
21:19
to do the same thing. And yeah, it's all it's all about military
21:26
service. It's all about national defense essentially, and certain people have been exempt
21:33
from that the entire time and still got the benefits, yep. And in
21:40
fact, to encourage them to only sort of like you know, pull the
21:44
lever, let's say, in their own personal interests is opposed the interests of
21:49
nation. All right, well, anyway, let us you guys thinking about
21:52
this in the comments. We're going to move on to the next story.
21:56
And in other shocking news that you probably never saw coming, it turns out
22:00
that gender affirming therapy is not beneficial according to pediatrics. I know, the
22:07
American College of Pediatricians issued a policy statement opposing gender affirming therapy that surgeries and
22:15
pills and stuff for transgender or gender non conforming children and adolescents, citing lack
22:21
of evidence for its effectiveness and potential risks. Doctor Jane Anderson, the vice
22:26
president of the group, emphasized the importance of addressing underlying mental health issues rather
22:32
than affirming gender identity. She argued against social affirmation and puberty blockers, urging
22:37
parents to seek mental health therapy instead. The group recommends allowing adolescents to experience
22:42
natural puberty, which combined with counseling, often leads to comfort with their biological
22:48
sex. Anderson highlighted research showing high rates of depression, anxiety, and trauma
22:53
among adolescents with gender incongruence, suggesting that these issues should be address by mental
23:00
health professionals for you know, good parenting. It's important at least, I
23:04
don't I don't want to fall into the trap of saying, look, it's
23:10
the science. Now now that we've finally seen for science, we have to
23:15
follow it. Now that these people have said that they think this is what
23:18
the science, as though we ever needed to wait until there was a study
23:22
in order to demonstrate that it might not be a good idea to you know,
23:27
abolish adulthood, to use irreversible hormone scrambling programs and barbaric surgical procedures to
23:37
keep people trapped in their childhood indefinitely. There are some things for which we
23:44
really don't need the input of so called experts. The burden of proof is
23:51
and always should be, and always should have been on those who propose such
23:56
procedures in the first place. But it did some reason it never was.
24:00
And it's a scandal of biblical proportions that this ship ever even began to happen
24:07
without this kind of you know, double blind, peer reviewed process. Like
24:15
the Island of Doctor Moreau right was a tale that could only have taken place
24:22
in fiction, and only on a remote, lawless island within the framework of
24:26
that fiction. But here we are in reality, and it's as though we
24:32
found ourselves with clinics all across the Western world that specialize in amputating the body
24:37
parts of animals and humans and sewing them together to create real life man bear
24:45
pigs called camaras, chimeras crimeras and basilisks and manticores and actual blazard people and
24:55
human centipedes and clownfish babies and army of marauding shrimpanzees or whatever. And imagine
25:03
if this was going on for years and it was promoted in the media and
25:08
in the education system before anyone stirred up and went, oh, hey,
25:15
it's terribly sorry to interrupt this compassionate endeavor that you call species affirming care.
25:23
But the thing is, we've conducted a study, and believe it or not,
25:32
we think it might actually be detrimental in some way, and they're still
25:37
couching it in these secondary tertiary terms of the long term health of the subjects.
25:45
They're still not even allowed to say. By the way, you're not
25:51
actually changing anyone's species by sewing bits of chickens onto bits of beavers. You're
25:59
not even creating hybrids. You're literally just making unspeakably gruesome art collages of bits
26:07
of mutilated animals. Why in the name of fuck were you ever allowed to
26:15
do this, even in some kind of sealed chamber that you dug out under
26:19
the basement of an abandoned warehouse in the desert with a sign on the door
26:26
saying beware of the leopard, let alone in state funded medical facilities across the
26:33
country. You should have been arrested by a swat team A long ass time
26:38
ago and placed in a padded room in a strait jacket while you wait patiently
26:45
to see what comes first, your trial or the ten part Netflix series Something's
26:51
going to make about you, right jam right away. All of this sounds
26:56
absurd to anyone who cares to listen, and it is because no one's out
27:00
here. There's no real Dr Moreau out here trying to take the concept of
27:06
species and socially engineer it out of existence. The only reason it's happening with
27:11
biological sex is because there are millions of people out here who have gone unchallenged
27:18
for over a century in their experiment to socially engineer the concept of biological sex
27:25
out of existence. These people exist, and they are called feminists. Really,
27:32
you're talking about the flies. Shockafucker. Stop pretending that they're not.
27:36
Stop pretending that this isn't because of it's a feminist. Stop getting distracted by
27:40
all the splinter groups that have spawned from it. This is all happening as
27:44
a direct result of the nonsense conspiracy conjecture we call patriarchy theory, the as
27:51
yet unchallenged assertion that women are eternal victims and men are eternally to blame for
27:56
everything it is already ever long since become far stranger than fiction, far more
28:04
sickening than any horror writer waking up from a fever dream could even bring themselves
28:11
to translates the paper. This will keep happening, and it will keep flabbergasting
28:17
you in the furthest reaches of its lovecrafty and tendrils, until you start to
28:22
cull it at the roots. Wake up, sheeple, before you literally become
28:29
sheeple. You know. The interesting thing about this is it kind of relates
28:33
to the story above in that the thing that protected it from from enough public
28:41
criticism and scrutiny to actually get it stopped, get it nipped in the bud
28:48
is the maybe not outlining, but verbotness, if you could, if you
28:57
would say, of insulting women, because this this whole thing, you had
29:04
obviously a multitude of Frankenstein's trying to do this, but they they prayed on
29:14
the one group of people who will agree to stuff like this, you know,
29:19
because it's politically correct, and that is women. And even though there
29:25
were women fighting back about against it, the majority of people who just went
29:30
right along with it, who insisted that well, you know, these people
29:36
know what they're talking about, and they must be right, and so on
29:38
women, mothers. But Hannah, you're scapegoating women. We can't stay.
29:45
I'll tell you bad, wrong, and it's wrong and bad. There should
29:49
be a word for that. But dong escapegoating women because it was women who
29:56
had fathers pushed out of children's lives for a poet using it. It was
30:00
women who fought custody battles and took their kids out of state to avoid having
30:10
the father have any input on this with their children. It's women who created
30:18
social media forums to discuss how to coerce their young children into identifying as the
30:26
opposite sex so that they could humble brag about how politically fucking correct their parenting
30:33
was. It's women who have had their children drugged and mutilated, and whose
30:41
children then later have come back and said, gosh, I wish my parents
30:47
had stopped the doctor from doing this to me. Yeah, and Jazz Jenning's
30:52
mother. When yes, when women are above criticism and women are too compliant
31:02
and too vain, too fucking vain to challenge this shit and instead will go
31:11
along with it because it gives them bragging rights, then yeah, it's time
31:15
to scapegoat women. Well, it's not even scapegoating. You're just placing the
31:21
blame like we don't have a problem. For the record, guys, men
31:23
can also be evil sometimes, I know we don't say that enough for some
31:27
people. Evil, but isn't perpetuated by men. No, the doctors that
31:34
are that are out there talking about this and telling the public how great this
31:38
is appear to all be women. I haven't seen very many men out there
31:42
going, yeah, we need to keep doing this. There are a lot
31:45
of kids that are are trands and they don't even know it, and so
31:51
on. Who else is perpetuating this Teachers who are mostly women. It started
31:56
in the school systems with gender iety e e. Being substituted for sex education
32:02
when they should be teaching little girls that you know, this is how your
32:09
body works, and here's how to avoid outcomes that you don't want. They're
32:16
teaching them, well, you might be boys, and instead of teaching little
32:19
boys, this is how your body works, and here's how to avoid outcomes
32:22
that you don't want. They're teaching them to be girls, and they're also
32:27
teaching them that they're fundamentally evil if they're not girls. Right, So yeah,
32:36
I blame women. I absolutely blame women for this, and I shouldn't
32:39
even have to say not all women, because you can see very clearly the
32:44
women who are standing up against it. Some of them have gone to jail,
32:47
yeah, for standing up to their school boards in meetings and objecting to
32:53
this. So yeah, you know the women. I commend the women that
32:59
have the gut to stand up against this simply because uh, other women will
33:05
will will destroy their lives for it, right, But but the overwhelming majority,
33:10
unfortunately hasn't stood up against it. And again, this all goes back
33:17
to vanity. When our whole society is geared in terms of its relationship with
33:24
women around catering to women's narcissism also known as guyness centrism. When when it
33:32
comes to the female side of of the uh uh phenomenon of the attitude feminine
33:40
guyness centrism is female narcissism, Well then then we we fuck up everything and
33:49
especially our kids. Everything else gets sacrificed to it. I mean, probably
33:54
one of the most brilliant lines I've seen in a movie relates to this in
34:00
The Advocate, where the devil constantly is reminding the advocate that vanity is his
34:06
favorite sin. Like whether you believe in sin and devils or not, vanity
34:12
is one of the most self destructive and socially destructive things out there. If
34:15
you tolerate it, if you condone it, if you cater to it,
34:22
if you revel in it, you lose everything and you take everything away from
34:25
everybody else because it has no benefits. Having some product maybe does. Having
34:35
some self respect maybe does. But vanity and self respect have no relation to
34:38
each other, you know. So, Yeah, if you can't criticize women,
34:46
if you can't question women, if you can't offend women, if you
34:52
have to cater to women's vanity, then your society falls apart. When women
34:59
have self respect, self respect enough to have some humility, to be prepared
35:05
to be wrong, to be prepared to be disliked for having the wrong thinks
35:10
and the isms and the phobias. Right, when women can step up and
35:21
you know, fight back against stupid ideas instead of being gutless, thoughtless,
35:30
lacking in self respect, and stupid about it, then our society will advance.
35:37
And yeah, these are women, these are adults. There is no
35:44
excuse. They do not have the excuse of being under age. They do
35:47
not have the excuse of lacking intellectual capability. They are responsible for what they
35:53
did and they should be accountable for it. Yep. So before we go
36:02
on to the next story, I do have a super chat, but before
36:05
that, I wanted to show you guys something you may have heard of.
36:08
The high Priestess of queer theory, Judith Butler, feminist kind kind of well
36:15
known to share this. This is a video of her on Twitter saying that
36:20
lesbians who don't want to expand their category to include trans identified males are filled
36:24
with hatred and phobia. This this is to show that there's a lot of
36:30
supposed second wave feminists like Julie Bindle, for example, that reject this notion
36:37
that transgenderism emerge from feminism, which we're saying it has and it always did.
36:42
They're trying to claim that queer theorist types like John Money and Kinsey I
36:47
forget his first name, that they were not feminists, but it was all
36:52
of the same movement, all of this stuff in like queer theory is an
36:57
off shoot from feminist theory. It's like it's almost like the logical conclusion.
37:02
So here's a short clip of her saying this what's the into lesbianism? Really?
37:09
If the category of women is expanded to include trans women, what stuff?
37:16
Where? How do any people, any of the people who live in
37:21
that category, how are they actually suffering? It seems to me that what
37:24
they're suffering from is a kind of hatred or phobia that is overwhelming to them.
37:32
So, I mean, if they're men, it's okay to hate them.
37:38
But if they become women, then you know what's wrong with you?
37:42
If your masculinity is entirely excised from from your mind and your soul and indeed
37:50
your body in the form of your fucking genitals. Where's the wound? I
37:53
can point you to the fucking wound. It's between that nigger's legs, hideous
38:00
wound that you can possibly imagine. We're not even allowed to show that wound
38:05
anywhere in social media, and with good reason because it's it's incalculatively hideous.
38:13
That's where the fucking wound is. Jude, have you seen it? Well,
38:15
here's have you seen the wound? Mike? No, I'm wondering if
38:21
if Lauren's has Lauren shown you a picture? Did she like call you in
38:24
the other room and say, look, check this out? You want to
38:27
see what if I've ever seen it, I've bought it out of my memory.
38:30
Oh my good reason. Yeah, probably, Okay, Here's why it
38:35
doesn't matter, all right, if this originated from feminism or not. Feminists
38:39
embraced it before they rejected it, and they embraced it and pushed it on
38:45
society until it started to come back and bite them in the ass. It
38:52
doesn't matter if this was strictly invented for money. It doesn't matter if it
38:58
was if it came out of the fact that our psychological end of medicine has
39:07
been whistling in the dark for like a thousand years, and instead of actually
39:15
progressing much and throwing like there are our institution of psychological medicine in the world
39:22
is still experimenting on people today with new drugs and such that you know,
39:31
well, we don't we don't know exactly how this works or exactly what it
39:37
does, but we're going to prescribe that you take it every day, perhaps
39:43
multiple times, to to cure something that if it doesn't cure it, you
39:46
know, you might self destruct. But we're going to try that instead of
39:53
you know, trying any of the things that we've noticed actually work. At
39:58
least a little bit, uh, throughout throughout history. So it's it's I
40:04
mean, it's not surprising that surgery for something that that maybe has other avenues
40:14
of treatment that might be more successful is being done, right. Yeah,
40:21
Like they they broke people's brains on purpose, they did, you know,
40:27
the surgery that broke people's brains on purpose with an ice pick. By the
40:30
way, the surgical instrument wasn't a scalpel, it was an ice picky.
40:35
They yep, shocking the brain to kill parts of it, as as ay.
40:42
And there's still still that's that's still being done, you know. So
40:45
between and and when the drugs that were supposed to stop depression caused suicide,
40:54
they denied it for twenty years before finally coming out and saying saying, well,
41:00
maybe we should be a little bit more careful, careful about this one
41:02
type of drug. And now they've come out with a drug whose existence is
41:08
strictly for the purpose of treating the side effects of other drugs that may or
41:15
may not work. So you go from having this mental health condition to being
41:22
drugged for the mental health condition into having having parts of your brain not work
41:27
right, and then you start having movements that you didn't tell your body to
41:32
do, and you can't help them, and they give you another drug to
41:37
help get that under control, in addition to the drugs that are used to
41:43
treat the stomach side effects, right, and some of the other things that
41:49
happened from these drugs. So it's not shocking. The thing is this is
41:54
the one thing that feminists latched and started shoving into society's face and down society's
42:05
throats. You have to accept this. You don't accept this, Your your
42:08
suffering from the isms and the phobias. You are infected with wrong thinks,
42:14
and now you must be you know, persona no gratis for the rest of
42:17
your life. Yep. And again you know, all goes back to you
42:23
can't offend women, you can't question women, you can't challenge women. Yeah,
42:30
we can, and we should and we must or society will fall apart.
42:36
Yep. All right. So I got a super chat from Albert Nita
42:39
retro for five bucks in eighty and he says, check Mark, here's to
42:44
that idea, Brian, I just for somebody would bring back John daefen Baker's
42:47
Bill of Rights. Asked Karen about that sometime. All right, thank you
42:52
for that. And I don't see any super Oh you know what, I
42:54
bobably got super Child's and I didn't. I wasn't looking at super child.
43:00
Let me see if I missed any. I am sorry, guys, let
43:01
me just double check it. Yes, I did get some, so let
43:07
me see. This is today at six seventeen. Richard Bierre. I can't
43:13
put on the screen yet, but I will read it out and give you
43:15
Badger chan. Richard br gave us five bucks and says, I wonder what
43:19
the correlation is. But countries that use the metric system and countries that embrace
43:22
communist ideology, I don't know. Meredith g gives us five dollars and says,
43:29
HBr news four or five to one honey for the badger. Super childs
43:31
are better than super chats. Overwhelming the police maybe the only way to get
43:36
the current legislation to overturn the speech law. If they stop the government,
43:39
we'll leave it in place. Everyone should complain about everything. Yes, absolutely,
43:45
this has been in reference to the Scottish bill. Richard Bierre then gives
43:49
us five bucks and says, I wonder if prescribing psychotropic medications like candy was
43:54
an on ramp to this thing, have you Yeah, I bet it was.
44:00
You heard aboutations? Yeah, everybody acts like the science is like the
44:02
only way, but I think that it comes with its own problems, and
44:06
I think that anybody who's been paying attention to the last five years should be
44:09
extremely skeptical of the science in general. So yeah, I think that's a
44:15
good idea. Have you heard about the school where the students of a particular
44:19
marginalized demographic were bullying the students who are gender confused? The progressive left is
44:23
eating itself as a result. No, but not a surprise that was going
44:28
to happen, because these the the purse puppies of these people. They're they're
44:32
they're not they don't always play nice, you know. So and then so
44:38
thank you for those superchows and I'm sorry for not explaining them, but I
44:44
will be able to do that now. And then I got one more from
44:45
Albernidez is one more thing catch up women most Affected two dollars Canadian Thank you
44:51
sir for that. And I think I played the Julie Bindle thing. I
44:54
wanted to say one more thing about this, but I can't. Was it
44:57
Julie Bendel is that whatever? Yeah, so we already mentioned all that.
45:01
So let us tell me you guys think about this one. In the comments
45:05
section. Speaking of the medical field, we have another shocking thing that you
45:08
probably did not know, and now you are know. You only hear this
45:13
here, guys, only here where you learn these these far flung, insane
45:17
facts about reality. Did you know that women are not actually discraded against in
45:22
stem so? The study conducted by researchers Stephen J. Seci, Oh my
45:35
God, Shula meat Kahan, and Wendy M. Williams from Cornell University and
45:38
Boston University, provides insights into the state of gender bias within academia's tenure track
45:45
positions, particularly in STEM fields. The research, published in Psychological Science in
45:52
the Public Interest, reveals significant progress toward gender equality in areas such as grant
45:58
funding, publication acceptance, and letters of recommendation. However, disparities persist in
46:02
teaching evaluations. The salary indicating the nuanced nature of progress is, according to
46:07
the article, which is probably not true. While women are now as likely
46:13
as men to secure great grant funding and publish research, they may still face
46:17
challenges in teaching evaluations and salary equality. The study highlights the importance of considering
46:23
all evidence and acknowledges limitations, and its focus on tenure track positions and its
46:30
exclusion of historical data. So I gotta hone in on the teaching evaluations thing
46:35
really quick, because think about that. What is that? That is your
46:40
boss, Your evaluation is your boss criticizing your work. Yep. And so
46:49
what they are saying is by saying they face challenges in teaching evaluations, is
46:55
that it's okay to criticize the work of your employee as long as the employee
47:02
is not a woman. That's that's translation. Criticizing the performance of a female
47:10
employee, regardless of whether your criticism is legitimate or not, counts as discrimination.
47:17
So we will just portray it as bad regardless, and that probably affects
47:27
salary even taking on both this idea that women still face challenges, maybe even
47:36
unique challenges. I mean, this is all as a result of the push.
47:45
I mean, it sounds like someone has encountered the jarring reality that when
47:49
you try to fill a hole, some of the shit ends up at the
47:54
bottom. Indeed, the first of the shit remain at the bottom of the
48:01
hole. You're trying to fill as an attempt to fill it to the top.
48:07
Which is not to say that women are shit. Women have existed in
48:13
academia for the longest of times, but such women were never shoveled into a
48:20
hole. They were always part of the structure. There just weren't as many
48:25
of them for whatever reason. The structure that the necessary structure of academia was
48:32
comprised of whosoever presented the necessary merit. That's the difference between a structure and
48:38
a hole. Indeed, the most important part of a structure is its foundations,
48:46
whereas there is no most important part of a hole, as you attempt
48:52
to fill it. Herein I introduce you to the concept of filling a much
48:58
needed hole. It's it's a it's a phrase you have to think about for
49:04
a few seconds before the penny drops. And that it's not just a sexual
49:07
reference. I mean, if a hole of any kind is a needed hole,
49:14
then one should not fill it. And that's that seems to me,
49:19
the paradox we're talking about. Moreover, there never was a hole. There
49:24
was only a tract of flat land at the front of the structure, on
49:30
which was installed a landfill of useless, fucking women. As as in so
49:38
many walks of life, what starts in the education industry has bled out into
49:45
every other industry. This story reminds me of that that female pilot, that
49:53
airline pilot you may have seen the viral video who recently stepped into the place
50:00
of which she was ostensibly in charge without her pilot's uniform, just standing standing
50:07
in the back dress stupidly and looking stupid and in full she like sweatpants and
50:13
ugs, and I say, she's running a dress something. In full view
50:17
of the cabin and many of the passengers. She got on the intercom and
50:23
began to berate everyone preemptively, just in case they felt like judging her for
50:30
being so unprofessional. I mean, I don't know about you, but I've
50:34
never even seen the pilot of any plane I've ever bought it, and I'm
50:39
quite happy for them to just quickly toddle off to the cockpit and do their
50:45
fucking job. But this is what DEI gets you. It gets you women
50:52
with a Costco sized bag of chips on their shoulders who can't even be bothered
51:00
proving themselves worthy of the job they are. They're only interested in these vulgar
51:05
displays of power, which they broadcast to the largest possible audience, possibly for
51:10
the very purpose of some kind of viral video, in which case well done.
51:16
But then they wonder why on earth women could possibly be subject to any
51:22
level of scrutiny, And yeah, it's it's. It's not because of the
51:27
patriarchy, Mike Darling, it's because of patriarchy theory, which I remind you
51:35
is in regard to an imagined conspiracy. But it's not even a theory.
51:39
It's not even a hypothesis. It's barely even a conjecture. It's it's as
51:46
demonstrated in that video. It's it's it's the banging of a fist on a
51:52
table. The idea that it could ever get you a job is laughable,
51:58
let alone that it could, and respect for you as you rot yet another
52:05
institution from the inside. But here we are, with this menagerie of chimeric
52:12
abominations that we thought were the stuff of fiction. I repeat myself. I
52:19
have no choice but to repeat myself, because I'm in hell, and that's
52:23
what hell is. Is it too late to repent? No? Actually no,
52:31
no, the thief on the cross of the repentant thief, he was
52:36
dying and he asked Christ for forgiveness, and Jesus said sure, So there
52:39
you go. It's like, okay, buddy, Hannah, do you have
52:45
anything else you want to add to this? There was something from the previous
52:46
story I wanted to mention that I forgot to mention. But well, in
52:52
regard to the type of research and everything that the really interesting thing about this
52:59
is I don't really uh believe in the methods uh that that we're used to
53:14
quote proof that women were getting discriminated against in the first place, because the
53:20
original there have always been female doctors. Well it's it's not just doctor stimmy,
53:25
like you know, like engineering mathematics. Right. The the original research
53:31
that supposedly proved that women were being discriminated against in this field was about whether
53:38
or not women were getting positions, women were getting funding and so on based
53:45
on applications. And the masure was done by sending individual applications to different departments
53:54
in different schools and then comparing this school's respond to that school's response to the
54:01
proposal. And they didn't send identical proposals to the same school, they sent
54:08
them to other schools. So if they sent one proposal to each to you
54:16
know, five hundred schools, and a number of the schools sent back.
54:22
You know that the male name got picked, and a number of the schools
54:28
sent back to the female name got picked, and some of the schools picked
54:34
candidates other than these fake resumes. Then they said discrimination. But since they
54:43
didn't send identical resumes with a male name and a female name to the same
54:49
school, they had no way of genuinely measuring that. They don't know if
54:55
somebody else sent a better resume, and they don't have they can't prove that
55:04
the gender of the individual was the reason why the resume didn't stand out or
55:10
the reason that the resume was not picked. Yeah, So whatever they've done
55:15
in this current research, all it proves, you know, is that this
55:22
was never valid claim in the first place. That's right. Okay, So
55:30
I got a super chow thank you from anonymous and they say for ten bucks,
55:37
clickbait me, not clickbait me, not clickbait me, not clickbait me,
55:40
not clickbait me not thank you for that. I'm sure that that I'll
55:45
have to ponder that one for a while and get back to you on it.
55:51
But I appreciate it. And the thing I was going to mention is
55:52
that, you know, what we were talking about, like how feminists sort
55:55
of embraced, if not promoted, transgender. I think it's partly because they
56:02
they have often talked about wanting men castrated. And I have this study here.
56:08
I'm gonna share it really quick. We won't go through it today,
56:12
obviously, but this is from PubMed Central Choosing Castration. A Thematic analysis of
56:16
the perceived pros and cons of genital injuries and ablation by men who voluntarily sought
56:22
castration. And I don't think this means, uh, you know, guys
56:28
who like get vasectomies per se, although like I said, the term castration
56:34
is pretty specific. Yeah, yeah, so that we don't get that twisted.
56:39
So what I think is going on is that, uh, what I
56:45
think is what I think is going on is that they're like essentially the things
56:49
that feminists have like pontificated on men being castrated men, you know, being
56:55
like sort of like population controlled, eradicated, and it reduce the population to
57:00
ten percent, like this kind of thing. I think that these are there
57:05
are ways to do it, and one of them is to convince boys that
57:07
they're girls. And I know that it's happening the other way too, and
57:10
that that number is going up. But I think that's kind of like an
57:15
unexpected side effect of what the original goal was was to essentially get men to
57:20
be the majority. It's it's not it's the women that are being The girls
57:24
that are being targeted with this are girls who are autistic for the most part,
57:31
and there used to be in the seventies and eighties, this theory that
57:37
autism was a form of extreme male intelligence. It's that's been sort of confounded
57:46
by the fact that autism can appear comorbid with extreme or severe intellectual disability,
57:58
so it doesn't always come with a high IQ. High functioning autism does not
58:02
always, but often come with a high IQ. But yeah, yeah,
58:10
it's very possible that there was a long game to get rid of women who
58:15
have the ability to not not to exhibit the feminine narcissistic tendencies that lead women
58:28
to embrace feminism. Yeah all right, well, let us one of you
58:34
guys think about that one in the comments. We're going to move on to
58:36
the next story. And another shocking bit of a revelation that we're getting.
58:42
Turns out that preachy females run the Democrat Party. I tell you, I
58:51
had no idea. This has like really upset some people, namely preachy females
58:55
and the Democrat Party like AOC. But you were already upset. Yeah,
59:00
they're always up there, Wake up that way. Democratic strategist James Carville expressed
59:07
concerns about the Democratic Party's messaging, suggesting that it might be too focused on
59:12
issues perceived as feminine and not addressing the concerns of male voters. Carville highlighted
59:16
the need for consideration of male voters' perspectives and criticized the party's emphasis on women
59:22
and women of color in shaping elections. He also commented on President Biden's low
59:28
approval ratings, likening them to a jarring image that cannot be forgotten. Despite
59:31
his worries, Carville expressed admiration for Biden's background accomplishments, particularly benefiting Black America,
59:37
while the Biden campaign is attention simplifying efforts. Still no, Well,
59:43
isn't James Carville? The rage isn't that? The rage and Cajun The rage
59:46
and Cajun guy. He used to be like a commentator or something. Essentially,
59:52
he is a man surrounded by herodins saying Ooh, I don't like all
59:58
the herodins and now realizing that, like they've essentially driven what whatever masculinity was
1:00:06
in the Democrat Party or like you replace that with what party of your choice
1:00:09
from your respective country, because it's basically the same shit everywhere. I don't
1:00:14
want to make this America centric, but that's just what happens to be the
1:00:16
story, you know. I think that, Yeah, like it's just pushing
1:00:21
men out, and I'm I'm okay with that. We're probably in the future
1:00:27
going to end up, especially if we look at where millennial politics seems to
1:00:32
be going, where there's we're going to end up with a men's party and
1:00:37
a women's party, and the men's party is going to be right of center
1:00:43
and the women's party is going to be left of center, and there will
1:00:46
be women in the men's party and men and the women's party. But that's
1:00:52
basically where it looks like we're headed. Well at any generation. Yeah,
1:00:58
I mean, like, well, definitely, I think that the wings have
1:01:02
always been in my mind for many years more of a like say, they're
1:01:08
they expressed. They're typically occupied by certain sexes, so men tend to be
1:01:15
more oriented towards freedom, and women tend to be more oriented towards security,
1:01:20
and that comes out in their voting patterns. But when women are married to
1:01:23
men, then they tend to vote in the best interests of their men because
1:01:29
the you know, that's going to affect the family a unit. But the
1:01:31
single women, which is like like Alison calls a party of single women,
1:01:36
they're the ones that are the preachy females that this guy is concerned with.
1:01:40
So and that's yeah, it comes out in jail. I had a debate
1:01:44
with a guy. He's like a libertarian Canadate in Canada, which is it
1:01:49
seems sounds really lonely, but anyway, he was like a libertarian, like
1:01:53
you know, politician in Canada and I and I spoke with him a few
1:01:58
times and I told him that like the uh you know, because he was
1:02:01
always like saying, oh, well, you know, libertarianism is like it
1:02:05
doesn't exist on the on this left right spectrum. And I was like,
1:02:08
no, no, no, you don't understand, Like you're masculine, that
1:02:12
is a wing and the other wing is feminine. Like that's what it is,
1:02:15
like you're you're you are not on the fifth plane in another dimension.
1:02:20
You are a man on this side, and most men, if you talk
1:02:23
to them about what you believe, they'd probably agree with you, like nine
1:02:27
times out of ten. So that yeah, so like that's how it comes
1:02:30
out. So as we Alis and I were looking at this really great substack,
1:02:37
this guy called the vibe shift, and he was talking about how you
1:02:43
know, everybody's been talking about how like you know, the as it's framed.
1:02:46
Because I don't think this is correct. We looked at the actual data
1:02:51
as it's framed. Women are moving further left and men are moving further right,
1:02:54
and like zoomers right, and generation alpha is likely going to follow suit
1:03:00
and go you know more in that direction. But what's really that's not really
1:03:04
what's happening. What's happening is that women have completely gone insane and men want
1:03:08
to like they're basically done pretending and they've essentially stayed relatively stable, maybe maybe
1:03:15
move slightly, you know, right to put it in a frame that makes
1:03:19
sense, But women have completely lost the plot, like they're just like way
1:03:22
out there, they're full on like stalinists, like whatever, right, And
1:03:27
you can see it in the data. And that's what's happening with zoomer women.
1:03:30
So when this guy says too many preachy females are dominating the Democrat Party,
1:03:36
you know it's there's a little bit of political lingo in there. But
1:03:37
if you peel back the layers, you just look at what is being expressed.
1:03:42
Essentially, women have gone like one hundred percent like I want the state
1:03:45
to take care of me. I want like I'm mad at my daddy and
1:03:49
I want the state to replace him kind of a thing. Yeah. So,
1:03:53
so, James Carville, is it If you're really to go down this
1:04:00
avenue, have you considered repealing the Violence Against Women Act, or at least
1:04:06
balancing out with a Violence Against Men Act? Might well, I could just
1:04:12
revert to the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of nineteen eighty four. Yeah,
1:04:15
that might fall under the rubric of addressing what you call too focused on
1:04:23
issues perceived as feminine and not addressing the concerns of male voters. End quote.
1:04:28
But yeah, this is not going to happen as far as the Democrat
1:04:31
Party, let alone the Biden regimes consent. Have you considered rolling back,
1:04:36
for instance, the delute model, maybe arresting men when they get domestically assaulted
1:04:43
by women. Is perhaps not in the interests of the male voters. But
1:04:48
yeah, nothing remotely like that is ever going to happen, because that would
1:04:53
actually improve the quality of life for the average American. That has never been
1:05:00
in the interests of the Democrat Party or did fucking Rhinos or the Republicans.
1:05:04
The government in general. The purpose of the system is to enslave the people
1:05:11
incrementally, one bill at a time, one law at a time. This
1:05:15
is this story goes to show you that they're only interested in getting votes,
1:05:20
and they don't do that by working in the best interests of the people doing
1:05:25
the voting. The best we can do is empty promises, and that's all
1:05:30
you're going to get. Ever, that's that's why they inexorably trend towards making
1:05:35
empty promises to minorities, because those are easier to obfuscate than empty promises to
1:05:44
the majority. They're only interested in stealing, and there's more to steal from
1:05:49
the from the majority than from the minority. And until the groups of demographics
1:05:58
twist around on that, on that helical vector, that's all. That's also
1:06:04
why they pander to women and not men, even though women are not a
1:06:09
minority. For for whatever reason, women are more susceptible to empty promises.
1:06:19
You can fall for chains of silver, you can fall for chains of gold,
1:06:24
you can fall for pretty strangers and the promises they hold. You promise
1:06:29
me everything, you promise me thick and thin. Yeah, now you say,
1:06:31
oh Romeo, Yeah you know, I used to have a scene with
1:06:33
him Julia keep singing that Diastrat song where they oh, yeah, yeah,
1:06:42
I got that. Yeah. Well there's a whole math video about that.
1:06:47
But uh, let's is there any anything else about this that we Okay,
1:06:53
we're gonna go into the next story. Then we're on good time. Let
1:06:56
us know what you guys think about this in the comments, and be sure
1:06:58
to send a super chow and I will I'll be sure to read it out.
1:07:02
Okay, so we're gonna move on to the last story. This is
1:07:06
a bit of good news, I have to say. And I covered this
1:07:10
on a not a rent circle but it was like a fundraising stream. But
1:07:13
I was like this, this is too good to pass up. This is
1:07:15
too good to pass up. So Abby and Brittany Henzel, conjoined twins famous
1:07:20
for their TLC reality series, have recently made headlines for transitioning from duo to
1:07:26
a trio. Abby, the left side twin, is married to Josh Bowling,
1:07:30
a nurse and Army veteran. In twenty twenty one. A couple resides
1:07:34
in Minnesota, where the twins were born and raised, and both work as
1:07:39
fifth grade teachers. I mean, I assume that they have the same job,
1:07:42
but the marriage was kept private until twenty twenty three, when they shared
1:07:46
photos of the wedding ceremony on TikTok. A refer surface clip from the wedding
1:07:50
reception shows an intimate moment between the couple. Abby and Brittany were born with
1:07:56
a rare condition known as dicephalus, conjoined twins, sharing a body and two
1:08:00
heads, two hearts, and one genital system. They have face challenges but
1:08:05
have achieved milestones like passing their driver's tests, graduating from college, and traveling.
1:08:11
While they have discussed the possibility of children in the past, Abby's husband
1:08:15
already has a child from a previous relationship. A blended family often shares moments
1:08:18
together, often as seen on social media. And I guess what I okay.
1:08:24
First of all, it is kind of sweet. But second of all,
1:08:28
ladies, y'all don't have no excuse, I'm sorry, but like,
1:08:32
no, there is no such thing as a woman that can't get a man.
1:08:36
But I don't know who's the winner here, So anyway, I just
1:08:39
wanted to this is I thought it would be nice to end on something lighter,
1:08:45
so you guys can give me, you know, double the comments.
1:08:50
This is the only instance ever where the pronoun they is applicable to one and
1:09:00
it's because the one body has two people sharing it. That's that's all I
1:09:08
gotta say. All I can think of is very inappropriate jokes which already been
1:09:15
done. Some people dream of one day having a you know, uh manatos,
1:09:20
this guy has committed to only ever having a threesome for the rest of
1:09:26
his life. He's gonna be sneaking away to have sex with a woman with
1:09:30
no heads. Just about it. Uh. Somebody said I thought that they
1:09:36
only had one heart. No, she has two hearts that beat as one.
1:09:42
You know the song one vagina before you ask, yes, only one?
1:09:47
So he can't cheat? Really, I mean, but what again?
1:09:51
So again, you know, they are gonna be women like You're gonna see
1:09:56
it all over the internet, and they're gonna gonna be bad looking. They're
1:09:59
gonna be in the is they gonna say, why can't I find a man?
1:10:02
And this guy is not a bad looking guy like he's and he looks
1:10:05
happy as shit too, So like men don't have crazy standards, ladies,
1:10:11
I'm sorry they don't. You know, you're making excuses. I have to
1:10:15
wonder if this guy does have crazy stundards. I want something from mythology,
1:10:27
and I will not stop until I find it. That's like a unicorn or
1:10:32
like an eton, I don't know. But anyway, so, but they
1:10:38
do have to have the most interesting life, because I mean you would you
1:10:42
would have to learn to cooperate this These are the only women in the world
1:10:45
that have learned to each cooperate with another woman because they have no choice.
1:10:53
They like they And I imagine that these did, these two ladies, because
1:10:58
I've read a little bits about them in the past, so it's fascinated by
1:11:00
their condition. But I imagine that they probably have unique characteristics in their personalities
1:11:09
just from the fact that they did have to grow up learning to cooperate with
1:11:15
each other. You know, like you can't stalk away from somebody angrily,
1:11:20
if you get into a fight, if you have to share the same body
1:11:24
with them. You know, like all of the issues that came up in
1:11:28
All of Me the movie All of Me would have happened here, except they
1:11:33
could have said them out loud, and and you know, except for maybe
1:11:40
not the I don't know how much difficulty they had physically coordinating the body,
1:11:45
whether you know, yeah, I think one head controls one half the body
1:11:48
and the other head controls the other hand. Yeah, I don't care.
1:11:51
If you grow up with that, it probably it probably wasn't that much more
1:11:59
difficult and learning to walk for a child trying to coordinate a left brain in
1:12:03
the right brain. It's just the left brain and the right brain are in
1:12:06
two separate heads. But yeah, like they probably have personalities that are particularly
1:12:19
particularly good at negotiation and particularly good at handling circumstances where there are different interests
1:12:30
that need to be accommodated in the same circumstance, because they would have had
1:12:35
to have done that their whole lives. And I mean people who grow up
1:12:41
with siblings maybe have that already to an extent. But again, like you
1:12:48
know, I mean I grew up with the little brothers. Sometimes we wanted
1:12:54
to hang out together and watch the same programs and do the same things,
1:12:59
and sometimes one of us wanted to watch TV and the other one wanted to
1:13:01
go do something in another room, you know, read a book or play
1:13:05
game or whatever, and we could do that. These guys couldn't. So
1:13:11
that's that's kind of an interesting you know that that now they're married, the
1:13:16
really rough thing would be that it'd be difficult for them to have two different
1:13:25
husbands, one one for each person. Yeah, yeah, because I think
1:13:30
one of them is going to be may resigned to just being like, have
1:13:34
you had I don't know what you're talking about. Nobody does that. I
1:13:44
you know, it would be a challenge though, unless they were you know,
1:13:48
unless they found somebody who, Yeah, how would you deal with the
1:13:55
fact you know that your your wife and your wife sister shared the same body
1:14:01
and your wife's sister wanted to have a husband also, Like that would so
1:14:08
there's a lot of sacrifice that has to take place there for somebody either yea
1:14:13
has to also love him or you know, she has to put up with
1:14:17
being there for the experience without being the main character in the experience, you
1:14:29
know, Like that's it. I don't know very many women who could handle
1:14:32
that, And I don't know very many, very many men who could handle
1:14:38
another man having sex with their wife's body on the basis that it also is
1:14:43
shared by another woman and it's not their wife that's that's having the sex like
1:14:47
that would that would be difficult? Maybe, Well, Mike, go ahead.
1:14:54
Well I just have to wonder how this works legally, how and how
1:14:59
it relates to polygamy law. Has this guy married? I think he only
1:15:04
he's only married to one of them, so that I think that's is.
1:15:08
Is he married to one and a half women or point zero point seventy five
1:15:12
women? I don't understand how that works. Yeah, he's married to one
1:15:16
of them. But I'm gonna guess that there was a legally like a special
1:15:21
exception. But my guess is that he's getting like a buy one, get
1:15:26
one free kind of a deal, like you know, like they're all I
1:15:30
don't I don't know, like they didn't go into his detail, but I
1:15:32
think he's effectively marrying both women. She's I say she. I don't know
1:15:38
if she or they, but they're not two women and they're not well they
1:15:41
have made somewhere in between the two. Yes, yes, this is this
1:15:45
is the kind of exception. This would be perfectly fine in a Muslim country
1:15:48
where you're allowed two or more wives, but or maybe in Utah where it
1:15:55
is allowed. It kind of happens. But how I mean, if they
1:16:00
ever get divorced, then some lawyers are going to get fucking rich off of
1:16:04
this. Yeah, oh my god, if she divorces him, they're gonna
1:16:11
take three quarters of his shit. I hope it works out, though it
1:16:16
should be a good idea for anybody in the situation. No, no,
1:16:21
no, I hope it works out, though. Honestly, I think I'd
1:16:26
love to see it like go as long as it could without any issues.
1:16:30
Plus, I don't know if I could handle twice the nagging, So there's
1:16:34
also that. Anyway, somebody in the chat in the rumble chat said,
1:16:40
don't tell me you're a Gemini Like that was his pickup line. H Okay.
1:16:47
I thought I would end it on something kind of light and funny,
1:16:49
but I do. I actually like, you know what I am. I'm
1:16:53
glad to see that she found somebody and that there was somebody for them for
1:16:58
her. I don't know. A conjoined twin Abby and Brittany secretly tied the
1:17:03
knot with army veteran. That's another thing too. He's like ex military,
1:17:09
he's probably seen some shit. He's like, you know what is okay?
1:17:13
But anyway, so any final thoughts on this story? All right, So
1:17:18
we're gonna wrap it up. Then we're gonna be looking at the remainder of
1:17:23
this other article that is sort of like celebrating what might be the collapse of
1:17:29
the nuclear family, or at least like pushing for it. So if you
1:17:32
want to join us, you have to become a Badger yourself. I'm going
1:17:34
to Feedbadger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription five bucks a month will
1:17:39
get you into the discord. Will you'll be able to consume all of the
1:17:41
additional content that we have, like the patron only shows and all of the
1:17:45
stuff that's going on in the community. So please consider doing that. And
1:17:49
again, if you want to send us on a message after this is over,
1:17:53
you can send it to feed thebadgel dot com forward slash just the tip
1:17:57
and we will endeavor to read it on the next show. And one other
1:18:01
thing is that we are still doing, or we are currently doing, our
1:18:03
monthly fundraiser, and that is at Feedbadge dot com Forward slash support. So
1:18:10
with all that said, thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
1:18:13
of HPR News. If you liked this video, please smash like subscribe.
1:18:15
If you're not already subscribed, hit the belt notifications, leave us a comment,
1:18:18
let us know what you guys think about what we discussed on the show
1:18:20
today, and please please please share this video because sharing is caring. And
1:18:27
thank you so much. Have a good night, and we will see you
1:18:29
next Tuesday.