Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Education Sucks for all kids, boys most affected | HBR News 538

Transcript

Education Sucks for all kids, boys most affected | HBR News 538 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five thirty eight, Education Sucks
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: for All Kids, Boys Most Effective, where we discussed the
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: news of the week and.
• 0:11
  Speaker 2: Give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Hello everyone, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio's news show.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: I am your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always,
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: my lovely co host Hannah Wallen and doctor randamercam Hello.
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: On today's HBr News show, we're gonna be discussing the
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: arrest of former CNN anchor Don Lemon, boys failing in
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: education and the data that has recently been released on
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: that and more so. Stick around, it's going to be
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: a good time and be sure to join us afterwards
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: for the patron only show.
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: So this has been doing.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: The rounds and I thought it might be interesting because
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: well we have Piers Morgan.
• 0:56
  Speaker 3: Okay, look at this soggy puddle of a man. I
• 0:59
  Speaker 3: know we're this is a China where we're supposed to
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: be compassionate to men of all kinds, but I have
• 1:05
  Speaker 3: to make an exception for pas Morgan. Look at him.
• 1:10
  Speaker 3: He's he's he's not a human. He's yeah, he's a
• 1:20
  Speaker 3: stain on the carpet of a human. H M.
• 1:26
  Speaker 4: Well she did promise to love, honor, cherish, and obey
• 1:34
  Speaker 4: in sickness and in health, unless you know, she's one
• 1:37
  Speaker 4: of those women that had the vows altered because she
• 1:41
  Speaker 4: couldn't handle the marriage version of marriage.
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: She is a modern woman, I think, and modern meaning
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: like in the last fifty years.
• 1:52
  Speaker 4: But yeah, raise your hand in the chat if you're
• 1:55
  Speaker 4: a gen xer and Brian just got a song stuck
• 1:57
  Speaker 4: in your head.
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: So Peer's Morgan had a bit of an accident. He
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: fell and broke his hip. Now, when you get to
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: this age and you break your hip or you have
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: some kind of hip injury, it's usually a bad sign.
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: Like people who break their hips in their sixties or
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: whatever his age is, and these in his sixties, that
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: usually means that they're like nearing the end for whatever reason.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: That's like the thing that you know, you don't really
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: recover from. But he's been hospitalized and his wife is
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: taking care of him. But she is apparently it seems
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: as though, because some people are saying they're just banting
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: together like they're an old couple and they mess with
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: each other a lot. But it might be the case
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: that she's fatigued from having to actually care for her husband.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: So she wrote this op ed in the Telegraph that
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: kind of shames Piers Morgan for I guess daring to
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: get hurt. And it's by h Celia Walden, who didn't
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: even take his name, which is kind of weird. Caring
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: for my invalid husband, Peers is the biggest test of
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: our wedding vows. I signed up to in sickness and
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: in health. But it's almost two weeks since he broke
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: his hip, and my patience with my patient is wearing thin.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: So two weeks, two weeks, yep, two weeks, two weeks
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: like that?
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: How long? How long are you gonna be in Mars
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: for two weeks?
• 3:23
  Speaker 4: Just a thing, all right? When I say it's a
• 3:25
  Speaker 4: serious injury, it's not. I'm not being hyperbolic here, Like
• 3:30
  Speaker 4: a third of people over fifty who break a hip
• 3:35
  Speaker 4: die within the next year. Yeah, okay, it's it's really bad.
• 3:43
  Speaker 4: And he's he's well over fifty.
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So we're we're gonna be reading this article in
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: the Patron Show and getting in a sense of of
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: you know what this is all about, and if we
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: get to it, we we often don't finish articles.
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: In the Patron Show we're gonna try. I always try.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: So if you want to join us for that and
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: you want to talk, huh.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: I don't.
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: I don't wish ill on Pace Morgan, but if ill
• 4:07
  Speaker 3: happens to happen to him, I'm like anyway.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: The funny thing about this too is that Piers Morgan
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: has been very concerned with, you know, like the Zoomers
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: and Zoomer men in particular, and their concerns or criticisms
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: for women and the feminist movement, et cetera and its consequences.
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: And he's been one of these kind of like man
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: up and deal with it kind of people. And now
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: he's in He's he's potentially on the receiving end of
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: this of this reality.
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: So anyway, if.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: You guys want to join us for the Patron Show
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: where we'd like read through this article and discuss it,
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: you will have to become a badgery yourself at going
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com and setting up a
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: monthly subscription.
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: Five bucks a month will get you into the Discord.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Server, where you'll be able to watch all the additional
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: content like all of our other Patron Shows shows, as
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: well as sort of like previewing things that we're working on.
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: Allison has little groups that she does. We also have
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: game nights, movie nights, et cetera. I think they're usually
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: playing games after the shows today, including after the Patron show.
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: So you know, lots going on in the server and
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: it is a positive community. And yeah, so please consider
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: joining us. And if you don't want to wake up
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: one morning to find that our content has been erased,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: you know, redacted from the Internet like the Epstein files,
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: then please go to badgerfeed dot com or Honeybager radio
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: dot com to find where our content lives. That's Feed
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com, not feed the Badroom. Sorry, badgerfeed
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: dot com or honey Badger Radio dot com. And with
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: all that said, let us get into today's stories. So
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: worst journalists of the Year twenty fourteen, according to the
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: Columbia Journalism Review, Don Lemon, may be facing jail time
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: over his participation in an anti ice disruption event. Lemon,
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: famous for suggesting that the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight three
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: P seventy could have been sucked into a black.
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: Hole, which would have been really cool if it was true.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Was one of the many mentally unhinged losers that crowded
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: into Saint Paul's City's church mid service and began harassing
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: and screaming at churchgoers and clergy. The group did so
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: after being tipped off that one of the church leaders
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: may have been a white supremacist. The church leader was
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: not present at the time. Lemon, along with eight others
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: present at the disruption, have been indicted each on one
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: count of conspiracy against religious freedom at a place of
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: worship and injuring, intimidating, and interfering with the exercise of
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: the right of religious freedom at a place of worship.
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: Lemon was arrested while covering the Grammys, but was shortly
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: released on his own recognissance and with no bond.
• 7:00
  Speaker 4: Nobody recognizes him.
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: Recognizance is what I meant to say.
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: I'm sorry, So what do you reckon? Do we think
• 7:09
  Speaker 3: he's going to prison? I guess it depends on what
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: kind of judge he gets. Any given libtard judge anywhere
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: in the country can veto anything the president tries to do,
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: so they can sure as hell get Don Lemon off.
• 7:23
  Speaker 3: They're very much in the habit of sending dead to rights,
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: guilty murderers and rapists back onto the street. Seventy two times,
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: especially if they are of a certain racial persuasion. And
• 7:39
  Speaker 3: that's just in you know, low profile cases. At least
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: they are low profile until they commit a crime against
• 7:46
  Speaker 3: a woman. Then people start giving a shit. I mean,
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: if Minnesota was putting its criminals in jail, they'd be
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: nineteen billion dollars better off, and Ice wouldn't need to
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: be there in the first place. So yeah, no, for
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: Don Lemon to end up in prison, he would need
• 8:05
  Speaker 3: to be found guilty by a jury of his peers.
• 8:10
  Speaker 3: Then he'd need to face a judge who's not a
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: flaming bender of a leftist or otherwise neatly tucked into
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: the pockets of flaming leftist benders. Both the judge and
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: the jury would have to face the implicit threat of
• 8:26
  Speaker 3: violent retribution and nationwide race riots, much like in the
• 8:31
  Speaker 3: in the Derek Chauvin trial, it's hard to get anything
• 8:34
  Speaker 3: done when you're being held hostage by racist mobs in
• 8:39
  Speaker 3: the government and the racist mobs they're commanding in the streets.
• 8:44
  Speaker 3: Lady Justice is supposed to be blind, and she is
• 8:49
  Speaker 3: because the mob came and threw acid in her face
• 8:52
  Speaker 3: the last time she tried to punish a gay black
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: man for a crime he was caught committing on camera.
• 9:00
  Speaker 3: Don Lemon is not going to prison, not a snowballs
• 9:03
  Speaker 3: chance in hell, And even if he did, he'd probably
• 9:05
  Speaker 3: enjoy it. There's not much you can do but threaten
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: him with a good time, if you know what I mean. Yeah, No,
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: he'll he'll get off scot free, and he'll continue terrorizing
• 9:16
  Speaker 3: churches and getting away with it. Probably, I'm not one
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: hundred percent. I mean, this time two weeks ago, I
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: didn't think he'd even get arrested. But here we are.
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: Maybe this administration will surprise us again and actually enacts
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: some law and order. Although if they did that, Tim
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: Walls would be in Guantanamo Bay yesterday getting water boarded
• 9:43
  Speaker 3: with mashed up bananas and rice. Get back to me
• 9:48
  Speaker 3: when that shit starts happening. And remember, it's not about
• 9:52
  Speaker 3: the bananas and rice. It's about the bananas and rice.
• 9:56
  Speaker 3: I think you understand, yep.
• 10:03
  Speaker 4: One thing that you know, you could tell that he
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: was trying to prove something when he went in there.
• 10:09
  Speaker 4: He was trying to prove something. Don't know exactly what
• 10:14
  Speaker 4: he was trying to prove, but there was something that
• 10:17
  Speaker 4: he did helped to prove. There's been a few things
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: that have come out since. A few other not directly
• 10:27
  Speaker 4: related events, but related events that have come out since.
• 10:31
  Speaker 4: The parent that had to confront her school, for instance,
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: her kids' school because they sent children out to protest
• 10:42
  Speaker 4: with anti ICE protesters, not before the two incidents that
• 10:50
  Speaker 4: have been so controversial, the two shooting incidents, not before
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: those two happened after after Liberals have been running aroun
• 11:00
  Speaker 4: online for the last couple of weeks screaming that Ice
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: shoots innocent people without provocation wherever they go. They sent
• 11:11
  Speaker 4: children to protest against a group of people, they were saying,
• 11:15
  Speaker 4: does that right? And here he is going into a
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: church full of people that are not the individual that
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: he's wanting to expose, and when that guy's not there,
• 11:30
  Speaker 4: he terrorizes the people in the church, including children, including children.
• 11:37
  Speaker 4: And of course it has come out that tens of
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: thousands of children that the Biden administration lost have been located,
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: and many of them were human trafficking victims. And if
• 11:53
  Speaker 4: it wasn't for Ice, they still would be. They still
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: would be boys and girls, little boys and little girls
• 12:01
  Speaker 4: who have been ripped away from their parents and sold
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: into slavery. But the biggest issue on this guy's plate
• 12:11
  Speaker 4: was I got to prove this one person at this
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: one church is maybe a white supremacist, and like that's
• 12:21
  Speaker 4: their priorities, and they will trample children on their way
• 12:26
  Speaker 4: through the left. You know, the right may not be
• 12:32
  Speaker 4: your best friend. Right. We know that the man up
• 12:38
  Speaker 4: mantra is on both sides. We know that right wing
• 12:45
  Speaker 4: politicians don't treat fathers with very much sympathy, and they
• 12:50
  Speaker 4: don't give a shit about your due process rights unless
• 12:52
  Speaker 4: you're a politician. We know that there's been a serious
• 12:57
  Speaker 4: issue on both sides of the political fence of treating
• 13:02
  Speaker 4: men like perpetual bad guys anytime there's a conflict between
• 13:07
  Speaker 4: any male entity or organization and any female entity or organization.
• 13:14
  Speaker 4: But the left has proved during this past month that
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: they are evil. They're not just trying to make a
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: point right, They're not just trying to protect some people.
• 13:30
  Speaker 4: They don't care about people. They care about winning, They
• 13:36
  Speaker 4: care about loading the poles. They care about replacing you
• 13:40
  Speaker 4: because you won't do what they want, and they can
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: more easily enslave populations from other countries that come here
• 13:47
  Speaker 4: out of desperation or to commit crimes. So they're perfectly
• 13:54
  Speaker 4: willing to go into a church and scare the fuck
• 13:58
  Speaker 4: out of a bunch of little kids who are just
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: there with their parents singing Jesus Loves You, who don't
• 14:06
  Speaker 4: really maybe even understand what's going on or why these
• 14:10
  Speaker 4: people are in there yelling at them. And they're perfectly
• 14:14
  Speaker 4: willing to send children, young teenagers, junior high school kids
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: into an environment that they just spent the last two
• 14:24
  Speaker 4: weeks telling you is deadly for the side that they're
• 14:28
  Speaker 4: sending them in to march on. They're perfectly willing to
• 14:33
  Speaker 4: let children be trafficked as long as they win. So
• 14:39
  Speaker 4: I don't feel bad about calling them evil at this point.
• 14:42
  Speaker 4: That's evil. That's not just run of the mill selfishness.
• 14:47
  Speaker 4: And that's not just run of the mill self important.
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: Oh we're so important that nobody else matters. That is
• 14:54
  Speaker 4: downright demonic evil, And they'll probably get away with it
• 15:02
  Speaker 4: because nobody else wants to say that right, nobody else
• 15:06
  Speaker 4: wants to come down that hard. Oh you can't call
• 15:08
  Speaker 4: the other side evil, That makes you just as bad
• 15:11
  Speaker 4: as they are. It doesn't matter if they're selling children
• 15:13
  Speaker 4: to be raped and enslaved It doesn't matter if they're
• 15:18
  Speaker 4: terrorizing children. It doesn't matter if they're Uh, it doesn't
• 15:26
  Speaker 4: matter what they're doing. If that doesn't matter, if they're
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: sending children into an environment they told you was deadly,
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: you're the bad guy if you call them out on it, right,
• 15:35
  Speaker 4: because you say the same things, even if you don't
• 15:38
  Speaker 4: do the same things. Well, you know, I'm done. I
• 15:43
  Speaker 4: don't care if people say you're just as bad because
• 15:47
  Speaker 4: you say the same things. Fuck, call me just as bad.
• 15:51
  Speaker 4: Just let the trafficking of children be stopped, right, Let
• 15:59
  Speaker 4: the the replacement of nations full of people be stopped,
• 16:05
  Speaker 4: Let the theft of elections be stopped, and let dipshitty
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: like what Don Lemon did, like going into a church
• 16:13
  Speaker 4: and terrorizing a group of people, has nothing to do
• 16:16
  Speaker 4: with what you're mad about. Let that be stopped. You
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: wouldn't put up with it if he had a different
• 16:23
  Speaker 4: reason for doing it. You wouldn't put up with it
• 16:27
  Speaker 4: if he hated them for the color of their skin,
• 16:30
  Speaker 4: especially if they were black or Latino. So you shouldn't
• 16:35
  Speaker 4: put up with it now. And uh, and that's it.
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: But see, what what Don Lemon did was just a misdemeanor.
• 16:45
  Speaker 3: And that's not a crime.
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: Ye, Well, on the border illegally is not a crime.
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: It's it's just against the law.
• 16:54
  Speaker 4: If I was convicted of one, I could never work
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: in my field again. But you know, nobody stops journalists
• 16:59
  Speaker 4: from being criminal, sir, criminals journalists for that matter, I
• 17:03
  Speaker 4: guess my field has more integrity.
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: All right, Well, let us want you guys think about
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: this in the comments.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: I was gonna mention the irony of the thing that
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: basically the law that he broke was under something called
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: the FACE Act. The FACE Act is the Freedom of
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: Access to Clinic Entrances Act, also known as the Access Act.
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: It is US federal law and acted in nineteen ninety four,
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: signed by President Bill Clinton. It was passing response to
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: escalating violence and blockades against abortion clinics in the early nineties,
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: including murders of providers and large scale protests that obstructed access.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: But there was also an act that was meant to
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: keep the clan out from like harassing black churches and
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: so the AK.
• 17:56
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and the worst part of it is those people
• 17:58
  Speaker 4: probably would never have gone in if they didn't think
• 18:01
  Speaker 4: they were getting publicity from that fuck nut. And you know,
• 18:06
  Speaker 4: the dumbest people on the left are the ones that
• 18:08
  Speaker 4: are going, Oh, he didn't do anything wrong. He was
• 18:10
  Speaker 4: just there as a journalist. No, no, no, he was
• 18:13
  Speaker 4: there to feed the fire. He's a bellows. It's not
• 18:18
  Speaker 4: his job to promote this shit by giving it press.
• 18:24
  Speaker 4: That's not how that works. Right. In fact, if you
• 18:30
  Speaker 4: find out something like that's going to happen, being a
• 18:33
  Speaker 4: journalist doesn't stop you from being responsible to report it
• 18:38
  Speaker 4: to police. If I find out a robbery is going
• 18:41
  Speaker 4: to happen in my neighborhood and I find out ahead
• 18:45
  Speaker 4: of time, and maybe I find out a group of
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: women's going to do it, and I want to get
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: I want to get video of women committing a robbery
• 18:53
  Speaker 4: so I can show that Look, women commit crimes too,
• 18:57
  Speaker 4: and I try to hide behind Oh well, I'm a
• 18:59
  Speaker 4: journal list, so I just wanted to record the event.
• 19:03
  Speaker 4: You can damn well bet my ass of be in
• 19:05
  Speaker 4: jail for conspiracy to commit that crime because I knew
• 19:08
  Speaker 4: about it ahead of time, and I'll let it happen.
• 19:11
  Speaker 4: And I organized with them so I could be there
• 19:13
  Speaker 4: and take pictures or film them. Yeah, that would that
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: wouldn't go over well here. And he shouldn't get away
• 19:21
  Speaker 4: with it either.
• 19:22
  Speaker 3: And imagine if you did it in a synagogue, you'd
• 19:26
  Speaker 3: be fucking hanging from a rope in a torture garden, yep,
• 19:30
  Speaker 3: or a.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: Mosque or a mosque.
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: All right, well, let us know what you guys think
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: about this. One of the comments, I'm gonna read your
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: super child, So I'm gonna move on to the next story.
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: My guess is that he's not going to like serve
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: any serious time. He's well connected, and I think that
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: depending on the amount of reaching has he could get
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: a pretty light sentence, if anything at all. He said
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: he's looking forward to his day in court. I don't
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: know what's gonna happen, but we'll follow up. We'll see.
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: I mean, like, ultimately this comes out to how much
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: cloud do these people have and we have to look
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: at it on a case by case basis. So but
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: I think that he is extremely unpopular at this point
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: and I'll take it.
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: You know, that's all his career for sure. Yeah, I mean, yeah,
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: he's done. He's like Joy Reid finished.
• 20:21
  Speaker 4: Yeah, he's He's going to become kryptonite to any respectable
• 20:25
  Speaker 4: news organization. Like I've worked with people like this that
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: they made themselves the story they wanted to be, you know,
• 20:34
  Speaker 4: the guy that got you know, the big story, and
• 20:36
  Speaker 4: they they did things that are unethical and ridiculous. And
• 20:44
  Speaker 4: not only did they not get hired by other, uh
• 20:49
  Speaker 4: other other respectable publications, but they did get penalties. They
• 20:55
  Speaker 4: did get into trouble, and I have seen people get
• 20:59
  Speaker 4: into trouble for everything from minor crimes to actual assault
• 21:04
  Speaker 4: in the course of I'm a journalist, so I'm above
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: the law. It doesn't work that way. The only thing
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: that is protected is you can't be. You can't be.
• 21:19
  Speaker 4: Your reporting of something that is not classified cannot be criminalized.
• 21:26
  Speaker 4: The fact that you published it cannot be criminalized. But
• 21:29
  Speaker 4: conspiring to make something happen or allow something to happen
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: without notifying police, if it's criminal, you're not protected. And
• 21:41
  Speaker 4: you know, if you participate in a crime in order
• 21:44
  Speaker 4: to get that, you're not protected. If you go someplace
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: where you're not legally allowed to go, if you trespass,
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: you're not protected. If you harass people, if you commit
• 21:55
  Speaker 4: some kind of crime in the process of getting your coverage,
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: you're not protected. Free speech isn't a free pass to
• 22:04
  Speaker 4: commit crimes. Against other people. It doesn't erase other people's boundaries.
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: People who think that deserve their consequences. He's probably not
• 22:15
  Speaker 4: going to face those consequences, but he should.
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: And yeah, he hasn't destroyed his career. You'll notice as
• 22:22
  Speaker 3: soon as he got out of custody, he was invited
• 22:25
  Speaker 3: onto the Jimmy Kimmel Show.
• 22:27
  Speaker 4: Oh god, so the least respectable outlet on all of television,
• 22:34
  Speaker 4: the guy that made out with a monkey on television.
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: I'm not kidding, Well, chimpanzee, not actually a monkey, but
• 22:41
  Speaker 4: still Jimmy Kimmel made out with a chimpanzee on television.
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: I remember it from The Man Show. But he'll get money,
• 22:53
  Speaker 4: he'll still be able to make money, and he'll still
• 22:55
  Speaker 4: be able to go on. He'll still be going to
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: go into was like Jimmy Kimmel.
• 23:01
  Speaker 3: Yeah, he'll be treated like the Rosa Parks of his generation.
• 23:04
  Speaker 4: Oh yeah, if he actually.
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: Goes to jail, he'll be treated like the fucking Malcolm
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: X of his generation.
• 23:11
  Speaker 4: Because nobody with any yeah, nobody with any credibility, nobody
• 23:17
  Speaker 4: that people really listen to, nobody that anybody takes seriously,
• 23:23
  Speaker 4: is going to give him the time of day for
• 23:25
  Speaker 4: a while.
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: Okay, so I got some super chows to read out.
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: Let's do that.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: First of all, we got one yesterday at one am
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: from art fors Thank you, and he gives us sixty
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: dollars and says, tricksy tricksie time zones. I imagine I
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: was trying to get in before the end of the fundraiser,
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: So thank you art fours. Now today we got one
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: from here Gen for five dollars and she says, HBr
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: News five thirty eight. You all realize that Don Lemon
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: could be prosecuted under the Clan Act. This pulls it
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: into federal court. But everyone should be concerned about Bondi
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: prosecuting this case. That woman is the dangerous combination of
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: corrupt and competent. Yeah, we want we want scam Bondy
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: out of there. If hopefully that will happen, what we'll
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: have to see. And then I got one from Zarenx
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: for five and he says Don Lemon infringed on religious
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: rights covered by the First Amendment in our Constitution, and
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: attempted to utilize the right to a free press, also
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: covered by the First Amendment, as cover thereby corrupting the
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: First Amendment. Overall, he proved that it's not just government
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: that can threaten constitutional rights. I say, Don Lemon attacked
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: a piece of the foundation for these United States, so
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: we attack the country itself. Contrary to comedian Dave Smith's
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: issue that going after Lemon makes him bigger, what I've
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: tried to lay out is too big to leave Don
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: Lemon alone. He's committed treason as those who'd benefit our
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: current and would be enemies of the United States?
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: Am I wrong?
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: I think that you're right about all that stuff, and
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: I guess we'll see what the courts say.
• 25:06
  Speaker 4: You know, a lot of the way people is reacting
• 25:08
  Speaker 4: to this indicates that they never should have stopped teaching
• 25:14
  Speaker 4: about civics and civil rights and the interaction between you
• 25:21
  Speaker 4: and government in general in schools like people don't understand
• 25:28
  Speaker 4: the difference between the free ability to discuss and describe
• 25:33
  Speaker 4: things versus getting in someone's face, trespassing on their property,
• 25:39
  Speaker 4: imposing yourself against their will, and so on. The ability
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: to speak. The freedom to speak does not guarantee you
• 25:48
  Speaker 4: an audience. You can say anything you want. People have
• 25:52
  Speaker 4: the right to walk away from you. You don't have
• 25:54
  Speaker 4: the right to corner them You don't have the right
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: to grab them. You don't have the right to invade
• 26:01
  Speaker 4: their property and shout at them, and you don't have
• 26:04
  Speaker 4: the right to make them afraid to leave so that
• 26:09
  Speaker 4: they will listen to you. You simply don't. And it
• 26:13
  Speaker 4: isn't about speech at that point. It's about taking away
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: someone else's freedom of movement. And you don't have the
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: right to take away someone else's freedom of movement in
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: order to exercise your right to free speech.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: M Richard Bierre gives us five dollars and says, these
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: are the same kind of people who would be accusing
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: random people of witchcraft a few centuries ago. All right, yeah,
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: thanks guys for your thoughts on that. Like I said,
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: we will see. But at least we're seeing like the
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: beginnings of consequences, or at least like a recognition that
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: there should be consequences coming from you know. I think
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: the a lot of the people who are not a
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: part of the machine definitely waking up to this stuff.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: So all right, let us know what you guys think
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: about this one. In the comments. I see the Special
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: Chat is alive and well and they are active, So
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: welcome to the stream. People in the vertical watching on
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: your mobile devices, Pink the Landingly, Robobi, Matt Tellis and others.
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: I see you all, Sputnik Jay, welcome to the stream.
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: So all right, let us know what you guys think
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: It's time for us to move on to the next story.
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna be talking about boys and education really important.
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: So American students reading performance has declined overall, So like
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: education has been crap for all kids of all ages,
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: in all grades, but in particular for boys. Okay, so,
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: with test scores reaching historic lows and fewer completing entire books.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: A January twenty twenty six New York Times analysis drawing
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: on Stanford's Educational Opportunity Project led by Sean Reardon, shows
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: boys lagging significantly behind girls in reading across nearly every
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: US district and grade level, a persistent global pattern that
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: has widened since the mid twenty tens. Boys trailed by
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: about three quarters of a year in fourth grade, so
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: that's like almost the whole year in fourth grade and
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: roughly a full year by twelfth grade on assessments like
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: state tests and NAFP or sorry NAEP. Unlike targeted efforts
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: that narrowed girls gaps in math and science. So like,
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: there have been efforts to raise girls' grades that are
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: targeted at girls. For the desire to raise girls up
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: to lift them up in specifically math and science. Boys
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: reading challenges have seen limited focus intervention i e. None
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: contributing to their lower school engagement, reduced college attendance, and
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: broader academic difficulties. As strong reading skills underpin success across
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: subjects and higher education, this gap arises from minor biological elements.
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: This is according to the study that was done Girls'
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: earlier language development, Boys's higher cases of yslexia and ADHD
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: amplified by social factors like stereotypes, parental biases favoring girls, literacy,
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: teacher perceptions and classroom norms rewarning attentiveness more typical in girls,
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: experts stress. These disparities are malleable, evidenced by girls' math
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: improvements through societal changes, and recent.
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: Data from the NAEP trends from.
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: Twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five confirms this reading
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: gender gap favoring girls remains robust, though pandemic effects sometimes
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: widened other disparities such as lower income areas or in
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: certain subjects. Solutions include early kindergarten, small group tutoring benefiting boys,
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: notably evidence based phonics, whole book assignments, cross subject literacy,
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: student book choice, and male role models. Reading for pleasure
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: to build interest, confidence, and long term success in education
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: and beyond.
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: And before we get.
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: Much more into this or like hand it off to
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: you guys, I want to add that we've been watching
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: this problem grow over basically since I've been working at
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: this channel, like ten twelve years ago, since like twenty fourteen.
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: I think I started doing this twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen.
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: And there's a number of reasons this is not working out.
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: And I've done teaching a bit on the side of
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: its substitute teaching for a year, and I noticed, and
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: I knew about this already. The books that boys are
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: reading in school or that children are reading in school
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: are not books that boys are interested in. So the
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: problem is that they treat boys and girls the same.
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: They think that they they both would would take equal
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: interest in something if you encourage both of them to
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: do it. But the stories or the books they choose
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: are the kinds of books that girls tend to like.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: And what I mean is boys want to read about adventures,
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: they want to read about action. They want to read
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: about nonfiction, maybe something historical, something, maybe something that's about
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: you know, science, or something that is fascinating to them.
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: I know, when I was growing up, I liked dinosaurs,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: I liked the Solar system, I like space stuff. I
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: like science fiction. I liked horror and things like that,
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: you know, and these there were these classical literature books
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: like Red Badge of Courage, like you know, All's Quite
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: on the Western Front, like Ketcher and the Rye, like
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: Huckleberry Finn like all these other you know, Mark Twain,
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: and kids don't read any of these. Now, all the
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: books that they're reading in school are modern books. They're
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: not challenging for boys or of interest to them. They're
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: not getting the time Machine, they're not getting you know,
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: these kind of like interesting stories. They're getting books about relationships.
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: They're getting books about you know that are social dynamics.
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: You know, they're not reading nineteen eighty four getting pornography
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: or yeah, or they're getting pornography exactly. So the but
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: the the what I'm saying is the content is not
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: the stuff that gets boys' imaginations going. So they're not
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: drawn to it, and then when they don't take an interest,
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: they blame it on ADHD or dyslexia. But this is
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: something that didn't exist when I was a kid. So
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: I think it really comes down to a couple of things.
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: The stories are not what boys want to read. The
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: other thing is that there are no male teachers. So
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: they keep saying there should be male role models. But
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: why are there no male teachers. Well, because male teachers are.
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: They have a harder time getting a job in education,
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: and a lot of it has to do with the
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: way that men in general are treated in the workplace.
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: So you're not gonna get as many male teachers. You're
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: not gonna and you're not gonna get the kinds of
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: stories that boys want to read. And they're not teaching
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: boys in a way that boys learn, so they're going
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: to fall behind. They have been falling behind, and we're
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: getting the data on this now. You have boys that
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: are reading at boys and girls, by the way, are
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: both doing poorly, but boys are doing way worse than
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: girls are. And they're still not calling it a gendered issue.
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: They're calling it, well, you know, we need to work
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: on education, But boys are just failing. We don't understand
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: why haven't they cashed in on their male privilege to
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: just read better, you know.
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: So this is a problem.
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: And by the way, just as an aside, it's not
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: just a public school problem.
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: This is a.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: Problem in charter schools, private schools, Catholic schools. The problem
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: is they all are getting their their curriculums or where
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: they take it from, from the same places, and so
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: there has to be something done at another level beyond that.
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: So it's not simply a matter of school choice or
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: you know, sending your kids to charter schools. I think
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: homeschooling is probably the best thing. But the other thing
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: is the other challenge with that is that isn't really
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: practical for a lot of people. It's not something they
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: can do. So this is something that has to basically
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: be discussed and we need to look at the way
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: that boys are learning. We have to undo this myth
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: that boys and girls learn the same way and we
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: have to start fresh with something brand new.
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: But anyway, well, I want to say about that.
• 34:26
  Speaker 4: There's another thing about this. The feminization of the public
• 34:30
  Speaker 4: school system has really destroyed boys' education in a lot
• 34:34
  Speaker 4: of ways. There's a type of learning called discovery learning
• 34:39
  Speaker 4: that well, let me put it this way, probably that's
• 34:43
  Speaker 4: how most of you learned how to whistle. Like if
• 34:46
  Speaker 4: you remember learning how to whistle, nobody can Like people
• 34:52
  Speaker 4: could try to explain it to you, right, but it's
• 34:57
  Speaker 4: something that doesn't happen until you figure gear it out
• 35:00
  Speaker 4: for yourself. It's how you learned how to walk. It's
• 35:04
  Speaker 4: how you learned how to speak. It's how you learned
• 35:08
  Speaker 4: how to pick up a spoon and use it to
• 35:11
  Speaker 4: pick up your food and carry the food to your mouth.
• 35:14
  Speaker 4: It's it's your way of learning almost everything that you learn,
• 35:20
  Speaker 4: and it is the most discouraged method of learning in
• 35:25
  Speaker 4: the public school system. Private schools aren't a whole lot
• 35:28
  Speaker 4: better because they all start from this position that you
• 35:34
  Speaker 4: cannot learn without instruction, when actually your teacher is supposed
• 35:40
  Speaker 4: to be there to guide your discovery and just sort
• 35:44
  Speaker 4: of nudge a little bit as you're needed and give
• 35:48
  Speaker 4: you some parameters. Let's discover some things about this specific topic.
• 35:54
  Speaker 4: And you know, in different subjects it there are different
• 36:00
  Speaker 4: ways to do that, but in reading, it really relies
• 36:07
  Speaker 4: on practice like out loud and the individual being able
• 36:13
  Speaker 4: to choose subjects that the individual is interested in, and
• 36:18
  Speaker 4: teachers don't make room for that if they're female. And
• 36:22
  Speaker 4: my dad used to tell the story of one of
• 36:26
  Speaker 4: his students that was failing in reading in high school,
• 36:33
  Speaker 4: and he he had this kid. He's trying to get
• 36:37
  Speaker 4: this kid to at least do the assignment of read
• 36:42
  Speaker 4: something and then explain it back so that you, you know,
• 36:48
  Speaker 4: you can prove that you understood the content of what
• 36:51
  Speaker 4: you read and the context that you were able to
• 36:55
  Speaker 4: at least practically apply it in your head. And he
• 36:58
  Speaker 4: couldn't get him to do it. But then he noticed
• 37:01
  Speaker 4: that this kid always had like muscle car magazines and
• 37:06
  Speaker 4: stuff like that. He started asking him about him. Kid
• 37:09
  Speaker 4: wanted to be a mechanic, and so he started giving
• 37:13
  Speaker 4: him assignments about cars and motorcycles and stuff like that.
• 37:19
  Speaker 4: Explain to me, you know, how to repair this type
• 37:24
  Speaker 4: of problem with this type of engine. And it took
• 37:28
  Speaker 4: a little bit, but the kid started becoming better able
• 37:34
  Speaker 4: to finish the assignments, read something and then explain it
• 37:39
  Speaker 4: back to him in a manner in which, you know,
• 37:44
  Speaker 4: the reader of his writing could understand. And he went
• 37:50
  Speaker 4: from failing to getting above average grades in one classroom year.
• 37:59
  Speaker 4: This was and you know, it seems like it's a miracle,
• 38:04
  Speaker 4: but it was basically just you know, tailoring to the
• 38:07
  Speaker 4: kid's needs. And he looked like he was going to
• 38:11
  Speaker 4: be all right. And the next year he had all
• 38:14
  Speaker 4: female teachers and they wouldn't let him do that, and
• 38:18
  Speaker 4: he ended up flunking out of school and he ended
• 38:21
  Speaker 4: up in jail. He ended up going down the wrong path.
• 38:27
  Speaker 4: And it always that always broke my dad's heart. He
• 38:29
  Speaker 4: had him started, and he had demonstrated what the kid needed,
• 38:35
  Speaker 4: and because it wasn't the rules. The rules are, the
• 38:38
  Speaker 4: kid has to read this material. The rules are the
• 38:41
  Speaker 4: kid has to be interested in whatever we say he's
• 38:44
  Speaker 4: got to be interested in. He has to be able
• 38:46
  Speaker 4: to do what do that with stuff that has no
• 38:49
  Speaker 4: application to his life whatsoever. And that's that's how that
• 38:54
  Speaker 4: ended up with him. He didn't make it. That is
• 39:00
  Speaker 4: the feminization of the education system. Women deem rules more
• 39:08
  Speaker 4: important than the things they exist to facilitate, whether it's
• 39:14
  Speaker 4: safety or success, carefulness, mindfulness. They don't care about that part.
• 39:23
  Speaker 4: They just care about the letter of the law, not
• 39:27
  Speaker 4: the spirit of the law, the spirit of you know,
• 39:31
  Speaker 4: you need to see this through to the end and
• 39:35
  Speaker 4: figure out what the goal is. Right, you can't teach
• 39:42
  Speaker 4: kids in an environment like that and have them reach
• 39:46
  Speaker 4: their greatest potential. When you do that, what you do
• 39:52
  Speaker 4: is stifle everything about them that isn't about obedience. And
• 39:58
  Speaker 4: that's that's pretty much what a femin school system is
• 40:01
  Speaker 4: designed to do. Stifle everything in your child except for
• 40:08
  Speaker 4: the part about being obedient. And unfortunately, because we are
• 40:16
  Speaker 4: quick to accuse we as a society now we personally
• 40:20
  Speaker 4: because don't look at me, but because we are quick
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: to accuse male teachers of being dangerous to children and
• 40:31
  Speaker 4: then ignore it when one after another female teacher makes
• 40:36
  Speaker 4: the news for molesting her children, and schools often just
• 40:41
  Speaker 4: move them on to another system rather than dealing with
• 40:45
  Speaker 4: what they've done. And we have a feminized school system
• 40:51
  Speaker 4: and it's not getting better. We're not getting more male teachers.
• 40:56
  Speaker 4: Guys aren't going to go into that they're not going
• 40:58
  Speaker 4: to go into that profession, and they know that all
• 41:02
  Speaker 4: they have to do is sneeze and somebody is going
• 41:04
  Speaker 4: to make a sexual allegation. They can't even teach in
• 41:08
  Speaker 4: their classroom with the door closed, with a classroom full
• 41:11
  Speaker 4: of kids. They have to worry that everybody's you know,
• 41:15
  Speaker 4: looking at them as a potential threat, and they have
• 41:21
  Speaker 4: to worry that all they have to do is make
• 41:24
  Speaker 4: one person angry, and they're going down. So until that changes,
• 41:32
  Speaker 4: until we start holding female teachers who engage in sexual
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: misconduct accountable and false accusers accountable, in addition to holding
• 41:45
  Speaker 4: male teachers who engage in actual sexual misconduct accountable, this
• 41:50
  Speaker 4: is this is the environment your kids are going to
• 41:52
  Speaker 4: learn in.
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: I would have.
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: Thought reading comprehension has gone down in general in this
• 42:08
  Speaker 3: age of technology. Reportedly, in the UK, a third of
• 42:14
  Speaker 3: children starting school are not only can they not read,
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: they are unable to quote unquote use books correctly, meaning
• 42:29
  Speaker 3: they don't even know how to turn the page of
• 42:31
  Speaker 3: the books. They try to swipe them or tap them
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: because all they know is that child friendly tablet their
• 42:41
  Speaker 3: parents gave them when they were three. Now that sounds
• 42:47
  Speaker 3: of sad, kind of tragic, like if for whatever reason,
• 42:54
  Speaker 3: this technology becomes no longer available, these kids will be
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: adrift on an ocean of low stimulation and they'll go
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: just fucking stir crazy. But you know, once upon a time,
• 43:11
  Speaker 3: books were the emergent technology. Books were the new vangled
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: high falutin fancy pants way of communicating. Maybe parents back
• 43:22
  Speaker 3: then were worried that the children weren't proficient at talking
• 43:29
  Speaker 3: or memorizing information because all they did was read that
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: information directly from books. What are you going to do
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: without a calculator? What are you're going to do without Google?
• 43:43
  Speaker 3: I would imagine people used to say, what are you
• 43:46
  Speaker 3: going to do without books? The next one will be
• 43:51
  Speaker 3: what are you're going to do without AI? Right? These
• 43:55
  Speaker 3: are all good questions, But it turned out books never
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: went away. There was never any shortage of paper or
• 44:04
  Speaker 3: printing presses or people to operate them. And maybe the
• 44:08
  Speaker 3: same goes for the emergent technology of the third millennium.
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: Maybe we don't need to read anymore, just like the
• 44:18
  Speaker 3: people of the second millennium didn't need to memorize information anymore.
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: But there is always the question of when has it
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: gone too far? And yes, maybe it's reasonable to say now.
• 44:32
  Speaker 3: Now is when it's gone too far. If we're relying
• 44:36
  Speaker 3: on electronic technology, that could all disappear in the event
• 44:42
  Speaker 3: of a rather nasty solar flare, or it could all
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: disappear in the event of our infrastructure simply collapsing because
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: the men who maintain that infrastructure are all dead or
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: destitute or have come women. Then it'll be handy if
• 45:05
  Speaker 3: people can can fall back on the old school technology
• 45:08
  Speaker 3: of just you know, reading and writing, otherwise will be
• 45:13
  Speaker 3: in a failed state of people who can barely enough communicate,
• 45:20
  Speaker 3: never mind look after themselves. I'd say it's like getting
• 45:26
  Speaker 3: plunged back into the Stone Age, but people in the
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: Stone Age relied on memorizing things and living off the land.
• 45:36
  Speaker 3: When a Space Age civilization collapses, it's like being plunged
• 45:43
  Speaker 3: into the Arkaan era, where there's nothing but bacteria mindlessly
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: wandering the sea looking for other bacteria to eat. It'll
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: be it'll be grim to say they were released. But yeah, no,
• 46:04
  Speaker 3: Evidently this isn't an issue of technology making children illiterate.
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: Evidently girls are mostly unaffected. It's an issue of schools
• 46:17
  Speaker 3: just not giving all that much of a fleeting fuck
• 46:20
  Speaker 3: about boys. The lockdowns didn't help, obviously, but schools are
• 46:28
  Speaker 3: willing to help girls through those bad times, but they're
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: not willing to help boys unless those boys get their
• 46:38
  Speaker 3: fucking dick's cut off. Shit like that. And yeah, ladies
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: and gentlemen, as I alluded earlier. This is why society
• 46:48
  Speaker 3: is going to collapse, because all this technology that makes
• 46:52
  Speaker 3: our lives so easy and so convenient is maintained by men.
• 46:58
  Speaker 3: And if the men of the future are the boys
• 47:02
  Speaker 3: of the present, who are being quietly shunted out of
• 47:06
  Speaker 3: society for being evil oppressors, there will be no one
• 47:13
  Speaker 3: to maintain anything. And then we're folks. Then we're just apes,
• 47:19
  Speaker 3: which is chimpanzees with the applied intelligence of bacteria and
• 47:25
  Speaker 3: the survival skills of I don't know, fucking dead bacteria.
• 47:31
  Speaker 3: We might want to sort it out, folks, We might
• 47:34
  Speaker 3: want to at least get back to say twenty sixteen,
• 47:39
  Speaker 3: where we were discussing the fundamental problem of the rift
• 47:44
  Speaker 3: between men and women and not getting distracted by all
• 47:48
  Speaker 3: this grief about race and immigration and other such goy
• 47:54
  Speaker 3: slop speaking of guys and how much we're hated by
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: certain and international villains. I guess we're not speaking about
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: that next time.
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: Well, I thought I would say it more when we
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: had more information. I think it's still too early to
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: like get too into but yeah, I mean, and not
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: like a lot of what you're suggesting is I knew
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: all that anyway, it's not news to me. But okay,
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: so are you done. I'm sorry, Mike gotting me to
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: cut you off. Okay, so we are.
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: So, like I already said at my piece about the
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: education thing, but Mike is correct, if we don't do
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: something about the growing riff between men and women, none
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: of this other shit that people are arguing about is
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: going to matter.
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: It really isn't. And I don't know why.
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: People either have a really hard time making peace with
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: this reality or they don't want to so they're afraid
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: or they like that things are getting worse or whatever.
• 49:05
  Speaker 2: It is.
• 49:06
  Speaker 4: The bigger the cleanup task, the more people, Okay, people
• 49:10
  Speaker 4: become with living in the mess. Yeah, that's that's essentially
• 49:14
  Speaker 4: the quarters orders almost almost exactly the same thing. Yeah,
• 49:21
  Speaker 4: in politics and social.
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: Just like social things like it's not even political per se.
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: It's like something that we as individuals could like work out.
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: We don't need the government to do it. But people
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: don't want to face this reality. They're they're fine with
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: calling out you know, this or that ethnic group or
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: that race or this class of people, but man, women,
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: oh boy, oh boy, nobody wants to do that.
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: That is terrifying and yeah.
• 49:50
  Speaker 4: As part of it is it's there. They won't call
• 49:53
  Speaker 4: women out because they're afraid that it hurts women. Yes,
• 49:58
  Speaker 4: but if you're trying to to achieve success at anything
• 50:04
  Speaker 4: and you're doing an important part of it wrong and
• 50:07
  Speaker 4: you don't you don't see it yourself, or you're you know,
• 50:11
  Speaker 4: coming up with excuses to ignore it. Anybody who can
• 50:16
  Speaker 4: see it and doesn't tell you is hindering your success,
• 50:22
  Speaker 4: even if they don't want to feel bad about telling you.
• 50:26
  Speaker 4: You know, the reason that you're failing at this is
• 50:30
  Speaker 4: because you've missed a step or you're doing it wrong.
• 50:35
  Speaker 4: You know, if you do it this way, it'll be
• 50:37
  Speaker 4: better and you'll have a higher level of success. Because
• 50:44
  Speaker 4: you can't say that to women. Women fail at things,
• 50:48
  Speaker 4: or fail to reach their potential at things that they
• 50:53
  Speaker 4: could do much better, much more effectively, much more painlessly,
• 50:58
  Speaker 4: even things that women have been doing since the dawn
• 51:03
  Speaker 4: of humanity, like parenting. Women are failing at parenting because
• 51:10
  Speaker 4: nobody will say, love your children before you conceive them.
• 51:14
  Speaker 4: Plan ahead, don't screw around like a dumbass, and don't
• 51:20
  Speaker 4: choose a deadbeat and think that he's going to become
• 51:24
  Speaker 4: a better person just because you made him a dad.
• 51:28
  Speaker 4: But if people can't be blunt with women and people
• 51:32
  Speaker 4: can't tell women, you know, the rules only exist to
• 51:36
  Speaker 4: achieve an end. They are a means to an end.
• 51:39
  Speaker 4: If you use them to prevent that end from being met,
• 51:45
  Speaker 4: then you are in effect breaking the rules yourself. You're
• 51:50
  Speaker 4: essentially acting like an idiot. If you can't tell women
• 51:53
  Speaker 4: things like that, you can't criticize women. If you can't
• 51:56
  Speaker 4: hold women accountable, women will never reach their potent. So
• 52:01
  Speaker 4: to protect women, you're hurting women.
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: It's not being kind, it's being nice.
• 52:09
  Speaker 4: People don't reckomond.
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: Being kind or being good doesn't mean that you always
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: say what is going to make people feel good. It
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: means you tell them the truth and that hurts, but
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: it's necessary, right, It's to protect them the long run.
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: So all right, anyway, let usone guys think about this
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: one of the comments, let me read your super chats
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: and such, and we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: So ZARAANX gave us five and says, what Hannah's talking
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: about is similar to what John Taylor Gaddie used to
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: do when he was teaching in New York City. I
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: think he since passed on.
• 52:41
  Speaker 4: Yeah, thank you identify the student's learning style, and you
• 52:46
  Speaker 4: figure out how to best lead them on their path
• 52:51
  Speaker 4: to self actualization, to success, to developing their reading skills,
• 52:56
  Speaker 4: to developing their math skills, and if that's how they
• 52:58
  Speaker 4: get good at it, then and that's what they should do.
• 53:01
  Speaker 4: It doesn't matter what the norm is.
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, let us know what you guys think
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. We're going to move on.
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: To the next story.
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: So, the US Supreme Court has denied Miami Township's petition
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: for a writ of sirtior sertiorari, refusing to review a
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: forty five million dollar federal jury verdict awarded to Dean
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: Gillespie in November of twenty twenty two, the largest wrongful
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: conviction judgment in the history of Ohio. Gillispie from Fairborne, Ohio,
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: spent over twenty years in prison after a nineteen ninety
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: one conviction for rape and kidnapping crimes that he did
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: not commit. He was exonerated and released in twenty eleven,
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: found following intervention by the Ohio Innocence Project, with charges
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: dropped in twenty seventeen and official recognition as wrongfully imprisoned.
• 53:59
  Speaker 1: This civil lawsuit, filed in twenty thirteen, alleged constitutional violations
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: by former Miami Township detective Matthew Scott Moore, who suppressed
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: exculpatory evidence, including reports on an alternate suspect of alternative suspect,
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: and used unfair lineup procedures leading to the wrongful conviction
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: with no biological evidence linking Gillespie to the crimes. A
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: federal appeals court, the Sixth Circuit Court upheld the full
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: forty five million dollar award in May of twenty twenty five,
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: rejecting the township's arguments to reduce it, despite claims it
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: could financially ruin the community with an annual budget around
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: twenty million, and conflicts with Ohio's indemnification laws capping certain liabilities.
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: Miami Township appealed to the Supreme Court, citing excessive damages,
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: lack of direct responsibility, and potential bankruptcy risks, but the
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: high court declined to hear the case. Around January twenty
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: sixth of twenty twenty six, Gillespie's attorneys expressed gratitude, calling
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: it the end of the township's legal maneuvers after decades
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: of injustice and urging prompt payment. The township expressed disappointment
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: and intends to protect residence's interests. Excuse me, sorry, I
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: to sneeze protect residents' interests, leaving enforcement of the judgment ongoing.
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: All right, Hannah, you gave us.
• 55:30
  Speaker 4: This, Yes, I did. And in the comments section of
• 55:36
  Speaker 4: I believe it was Steve Lato's video about this, there
• 55:39
  Speaker 4: were some people going, you know, the worst thing about
• 55:42
  Speaker 4: this is that the local people's taxes are going to
• 55:46
  Speaker 4: go into paying for this. No, no, that is not
• 55:48
  Speaker 4: the worst thing about this. The worst thing about this
• 55:51
  Speaker 4: is that a man was wrongfully arrested, wrongly convicted, wrongly imprisoned,
• 56:00
  Speaker 4: and spent over twenty years in prison for crimes that
• 56:05
  Speaker 4: he didn't commit. That's the worst part of it, right,
• 56:09
  Speaker 4: And then of course people being upset about you know,
• 56:11
  Speaker 4: the locals Simon, and I want to tell you how
• 56:16
  Speaker 4: things go locally in elections for prosecutors because I live
• 56:22
  Speaker 4: in the area. I don't live in Miami Township. I
• 56:25
  Speaker 4: live in Dayton. But uh, and before anybody goes stop
• 56:30
  Speaker 4: talking yourself, there's like one hundred plus thousand people in Dayton,
• 56:35
  Speaker 4: so you're going to have a hard time locating where
• 56:39
  Speaker 4: I am at any given moment. But in any case,
• 56:43
  Speaker 4: local prosecutors run on being tough on crime. They don't
• 56:48
  Speaker 4: run on being just right. They don't run on coming
• 56:52
  Speaker 4: to the correct conclusion and ensuring that they only prosecute
• 56:56
  Speaker 4: people after being reasonably certain that those individuals are of
• 57:00
  Speaker 4: a crime. They run on being tough on crime. They
• 57:03
  Speaker 4: run on the number of convictions they get, and the
• 57:06
  Speaker 4: local people eat that up and elect them without ever
• 57:10
  Speaker 4: considering that encourages this kind of behavior. And sure, I
• 57:17
  Speaker 4: feel sorry for people who didn't vote for that prosecutor
• 57:20
  Speaker 4: and still have to to pay. You know, there's they're
• 57:25
  Speaker 4: still dealing with being taxed for this. Probably there's all.
• 57:31
  Speaker 4: There's a little bit more to this story, by the way,
• 57:33
  Speaker 4: that I don't think I made in But part of
• 57:35
  Speaker 4: the argument that that these this city made, that these
• 57:41
  Speaker 4: officials made was that they didn't have insurance for this
• 57:46
  Speaker 4: because the company that they were insured with for this
• 57:51
  Speaker 4: went bankrupt in the nineties due to this practice, due
• 57:56
  Speaker 4: to this type of case. In other words, this has
• 57:59
  Speaker 4: been going on for decades and the behavior has not changed,
• 58:05
  Speaker 4: which means the government hasn't been held accountable for this
• 58:11
  Speaker 4: even though they've been doing it over and over the
• 58:15
  Speaker 4: entire time. And it's not just Miami Township. It's all
• 58:22
  Speaker 4: of Ohio. It's all of the Midwest, it's all of
• 58:29
  Speaker 4: the West, it's all of the East and the South
• 58:32
  Speaker 4: and the north. The entire country does this in response
• 58:37
  Speaker 4: to the Violence Against Women Act. Prior to the Violence
• 58:41
  Speaker 4: Against Women Act, we had the Family Violence Prevention and
• 58:44
  Speaker 4: Services Act of nineteen eighty nine I'm Sorry nineteen eighty four,
• 58:49
  Speaker 4: signed into law by Ronald Reagan. It gave us twenty
• 58:56
  Speaker 4: four hour hotlines. It gave us the recognition that crimes
• 59:01
  Speaker 4: like assault and battery are not suddenly legal just because
• 59:07
  Speaker 4: they take place in the home. It gave us women's shelters,
• 59:13
  Speaker 4: which actually were just domestic violence shelters back in the day,
• 59:16
  Speaker 4: and the funding was for both sexes, not just women.
• 59:22
  Speaker 4: And that was what we needed. That was all we
• 59:24
  Speaker 4: needed for addressing domestic violence. We didn't need something that said,
• 59:30
  Speaker 4: if a woman makes an allegation, you're not allowed to
• 59:32
  Speaker 4: treat her like she might have lied. If she fingers
• 59:36
  Speaker 4: a particular guy as the perpetrator, you shouldn't doubt what
• 59:41
  Speaker 4: she says. We didn't need something that does that. We
• 59:46
  Speaker 4: didn't need something that provides training for judges, prosecutors, and
• 59:52
  Speaker 4: police to always believe the woman and to do everything
• 59:59
  Speaker 4: they can to take a way to do process rights
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 4: of the accused. We didn't need representatives for women to
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 4: be able to take with them to court to stifle
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 4: the prosecution of processed crimes where the accuser goes in
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 4: and the actual allegation is the lie. But we got
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 4: all of that with the Violence Against Women Act, and
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 4: as a result, we got a system that is geared
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 4: toward getting convictions come hell or high water in every
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 4: case that the prosecutor brings, regardless of whether the accused
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 4: did anything, and regardless of whether the accusation was true
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 4: or false. That is quite a departure, quite a departure
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 4: from our constitutional rights, and it is quite a departure
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 4: from the purpose of laws against intimate partner and sexual violence.
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 4: They're just supposed to be there to stop intimate partner
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 4: in sexual violence by discouraging people from engaging in it
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 4: and helping people who don't seem to be able to
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 4: stop themselves to learn better ways of handling conflict than
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 4: to engage in intimate partner and sexual violence. And unfortunately
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 4: the situation that you're seeing here, this guy managed to
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 4: triumph out of the entire state. He's the only one
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 4: I know about that has had a result like this.
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 4: But I know, just from people that I've worked with
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 4: after I got involved in the movement, dozens of men
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 4: who have done time in jail for crimes they didn't commit.
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 4: And I personally have no men who have been arrested
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 4: and been through ordeals because they have been falsely accused
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 4: of crimes, including one of my childhood friends who went
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 4: through a twenty year ordeal that I can't even write
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 4: about because it was so crazy that I can't get
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 4: my hands on all the documentation I need. There's a
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 4: lot of stuff that's been suppressed. So yeah, I hope
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 4: that this stands. I hope that no further appeals can
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 4: be made. I hope that the community survives it. But
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 4: I really hope that every prosecutor everywhere is put on
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 4: notice that if you suppress exculpatory evidence in a case,
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 4: if you engage in behavior to try to make an
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 4: innocent man look guilty just so you can pad your record,
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 4: that this could happen and general public, every single one
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 4: of you out there when you are going to the
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 4: polls and you are looking at who to vote for,
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 4: and you see this prosecutor is tough on crime. This
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 4: prosecutor has a win rate of xyz. That's the surface.
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 4: You need to look beyond the surface, because what you're
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 4: looking at might actually be somebody who does this instead
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 4: of somebody who is actually putting people in jail for
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 4: crimes they committed. Frankly, there's not enough. There's not enough
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 4: money in the world to make up for what was
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 4: done to this man. But forty five million at least
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 4: is enough to maybe deter other cities and other prosecutors,
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 4: other court systems from being quite this corrupt.
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 3: I'm reminded of the first story we covered today. Imagine
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 3: how many lives could be saved if judges actually sent
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 3: obviously guilty violent criminals to prison, not just on their
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 3: seventy second offense, but on their first offense. And think
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 3: of how much damage you could avoid to a person
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 3: and property if judges weren't quite so viciously racist in
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 3: the direction we're not allowed to recognize. I realized lives
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: are the most important and sacred commodity, and the health
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 3: and safety of those lives. But at the same time,
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 3: imagine how much money you could save if instead of
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: releasing those bulls back into the china shop, you could
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 3: you could put those bulls in some kind of facility
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 3: where there's nothing they can smash except other bulls. And yes,
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 3: it sucks if you're an innocent man trapped in a
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 3: box with hundreds of bulls, But imagine a world where
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 3: those innocent men are not subjected to that kind of treatment.
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: And imagine how much money you could save by not
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 3: having to fork out millions of dollars to the innocent
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 3: men you subjected to this inhumane treatment. Oh no, we
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: can't afford these multimillion dollar payouts to men we wrongfully convicted. Yes, yes,
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 3: that does sound like it sucks, But see how this
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 3: almost never happens with female convicts. Women almost never have
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: to be wrongfully subjected to twenty years in a room
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 3: with a moose, because the state is very careful not
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 3: to do that so a woman unless they are sure
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: beyond a reasonable doubt that those women are innocent. Don't
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: get me wrong, it would be nice if the state
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 3: actually clamped down on female criminals, just like it would
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: be nice if they clamp down on men of a
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 3: certain racial persuasion if and when they commit seventy two crimes.
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 3: But at the end of the day, there's a reason
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: we have the standard of innocent until proven guilty. Alas
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 3: evidently this standard is subjected to failures in the system,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 3: and these failures will only get more skewed and more
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 3: numerous as long as we have fucking libtard judges in charge.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 3: I keep saying we as though I get to speak
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: for America, but we have the same problem in Britain
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: to a far greater degree of anything, But we generally
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 3: don't get to hear about it in Britain because everything
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 3: is clamped into an NDA. We in these h MRA
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 3: circles have often compared the plight of men to the
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: plight of black men. Ostensibly, these are both demographics who
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: face disproportionately lenient charges and disproportionately unlenient verdicts and disproportionately
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 3: un lenient sentencing for the same crimes. And it's not
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: like the wage gap. The wage gap is an evaluation
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 3: of outcomes. The legal gap is an evaluation of opportunity.
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 3: If anything. Now, at this point is pretty obvious that
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 3: no one is given less lenience than the unterments of
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 3: the woke regime men of European descent. And it's not
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 3: just in the last ten years, it's in the last
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 3: thirty years, as evidenced by this story. For every Dean
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 3: Gillespie who had the fortune of being exonerated, there are
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 3: x amount of men who will never enjoy such fortune
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 3: and will die in prison for crimes they did not commit.
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 3: And yes, there are men of every race who faced
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 3: the same hopeless absence of exonerating evidence. I just I
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 3: think we should find a middle ground between throwing innocent
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 3: white men into prison for half a lifetime and releasing
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 3: non white men into the wild seventy one times before
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: shit happens. And you know where we could locate that
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 3: middle ground? Where we could look for that model. Maybe
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 3: it's how women are treated in the legal system. If
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 3: they're clearly guilty, they go to prison. If there is
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 3: what it's called reasonable doubt, we set them free. I mean,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: it's pretty fucking obvious that the law is too lenient
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 3: when it comes to female criminals. They get to walk
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 3: free because of hormones or because of systemic oppression or
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 3: some shit like, regardless of their race, So maybe we
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: could find a middle ground just below where women are.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: Men have hormones too, That doesn't excuse anything, so it
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 3: shouldn't excuse anything for women either. Men can be oppressed too,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: even white men. But what what does that mean? I
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 3: guess it means being convicted and sentenced disproportionately for the
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 3: same primes as other people. So maybe don't do that.
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 3: Maybe don't cite oppression as a mistigating factor while you
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 3: apply the very discrimination that you call oppression. I don't
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 3: think I've said anything that any midwit couldn't have thought of.
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 3: That's what's so annoying. This shit is obvious, and it
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 3: should be obvious, but to the average midwit it is not,
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 3: because the average midwit has been brainwashed into the progressive stack,
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 3: where people are punished not because of their actions but
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 3: because of their skin and their genitals. And unfortunately, the
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 3: average judge is an average midwit, and the average juror
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 3: is an average midwit. We live under the tyranny of
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: the average ladies and gentlemen, and that's what needs to change.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 3: Not because the average are evil, but because evil praise
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 3: on the average. The devil invades not from the top
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 3: or from the bottom, but into the middle, into the
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 3: soft underbelly of humanity. And yes, women are more average
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 3: than men. Women are less diverse than men on every
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 3: graph that you would care to sight. I said what
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 3: I said, and you know what I mean, doctor randomccammunted news,
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 3: honey dge, radio.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: Sharing is caring.
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: Okay, let us know what you guys think about this one.
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: In the comments, I gave that one that was for Hannah.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 4: But I think there is a way to achieve what
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 4: Mike was talking about. So right now, under the system,
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 4: the accountability for judges that are corrupt is just very low.
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 4: I mean, you can impeach, but it's very difficult to
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 4: hold a judge accountable if they engage in any kind
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 4: of corrupt practices. And prosecutors the same way. If a
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 4: prosecutor is found to have deliberately hidden or suppressed excuse me,
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 4: suppressed exculpatory evidence, you know, they can get in some
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 4: professional trouble. But you know what doesn't happen. They don't
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 4: go to jail. Right And if we changed the laws
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 4: so that in a a in a court case, a
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 4: defendant has the right to submit their evidence and judges
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 4: and prosecutors cannot legally suppress it, and then they do
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 4: it anyway. If they do it anyway, they go to jail.
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 4: That might change quite a bit in terms of how
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 4: frequently innocent people get sent to jail. You know, the
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 4: law could simply say that, yeah, the prosecutor can make
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 4: any argument to the judge or the jury that he
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 4: or she wants to make about this evidence, but it
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 4: cannot be suppressed if the defense enters it as exculpatory evidence.
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 4: It is entered, and if the prosecutor cannot argue as
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 4: to why it should not be considered, or it does
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 4: not prove what the defense is trying to use it
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 4: to prove, then the prosecuter does not deserve to win
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 4: the case. That would be a very simple way of
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 4: protecting against wrongful conviction. And if if you run into
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 4: a case where a judge or prosecutor does uh engage
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 4: in shenanigans to keep that evidence out of the courtroom, uh,
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 4: then and and it can be proved that that evidence
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 4: could have made a difference in the case, then that
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 4: individual should go to jail. That should be an offense
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 4: that leads to imprisonment equal to what was faced by
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 4: the individual they were prosecuting or who was on trial.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 4: That would fix the problem. I think that would fix
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 4: the problem.
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 2: All right, Wise, words once again from the pun master
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: in chief, Hannah Uh, Let's do you guys think about
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: this one of the comments. Let me just see I any.
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: Super chats or chows this time. Man, you guys have
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: been sometimes it's just kind of front loaded. So let
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one in
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: the comments. We're gonna move on to the final story,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: which could be a little bit of a good news
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: I guess. So it's always good to see that. Let
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one of
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: the comments. All right, So, the US Federal Trade Commission
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: the FTC under Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson issued warning letters
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: on January thirtieth. Hopefully they were sternly worded to forty
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: two major US law firms regarding their participation in Diversity
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: Lab Labs Mansfield Certification program. The program, active since around
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, certifies firms that ensure at least thirty percent
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: of candidates considered for leadership roles, promotions, and sometimes hiring
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 1: come from underrepresented groups, often defined by their race, gender,
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: or other characteristics I eed, not straight white men with
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: a plus level for meeting concrete benchmarks. The FTC described
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: this as potentially unfair and anti competitive under antitrust laws,
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: alleging that firms' involvement, including knowledge sharing calls with competitors,
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: could constitute collusion that distorts labor market competition in the
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: legal profession, affecting hiring, pay, promotions, and talent allocation based
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: on DEI metrics rather than merit alone. Ferguson emphasized that
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: such coordination harms workers by reducing independent decision making and
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: potentially lowering wages or opportunities. The action aligns with broader
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: Trump administration's security or I'm sorry. The action aligns with
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: broader Trump administration's scrutiny of DEI initiatives, including prior executive
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: orders targeting firms like Paul Weiss, Wilmer, Hale, Perkins, Cole, Scattin, Arps,
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: and Latham and Watkins, some of which settled by pledging
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: pro bono work or faced successful legal challenges. The letters
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: sent to prominent firms such as Covington and Burling, Gibson, Dunn,
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: Latham and Watkins, Paul Weiss, Perkins, Call, Scadden, Sidley Austin
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: and others, collectively employing tens of thousands of attorneys, serve
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: as a reminder of potential liability without alleging specific violations
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: or launching enforcement. Yet no immediate responses from the firms
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: were detailed in reports, and the move reflects ongoing regulatory
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: pressure amid rollbacks of corporate DEI programs, though a prior
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: federal ruling had upheld the Mansfield program as non discriminatory
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: and without quotas. So obviously, the Trump administration, being a
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: government institution, cannot you know, put this on privately owned institutions,
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: but they can essentially make suggestions. So it's sort of
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: like changing the climate so that other organizations might respond,
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: and it may I think it may have an effect.
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think that we are obviously like feeling
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: the effects of DEI in a number of ways because
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: essentially in the cases where people who are unqualified, let's say,
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: start to affect it. And you know, Helen Andrews, who
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: I often bring up on this on this channel and
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: my channel, who wrote the piece for Compact I believe
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: called the Great Feminization, explain that when you have an
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: overly feminized workplace. It's going to, like you reach a
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: critical mass of women in any given field, it's going
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: to affect the way that business operates. And her primary
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: concern was that it was going to be a really
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: big problem if you have too many women in law,
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 1: because especially if they're not there because they're good at
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: their job, and this is actually affecting law firms.
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 2: And I think that it's.
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: True, right because, like judges were usually started off as lawyers.
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: So we're we are looking at this from the systemic
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: level and trying to at least this is trying to
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 1: address that. So anyway, those are my thoughts on that.
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: You guys, go ahead and give your thoughts.
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: If you're if your criterion is underrepresented, and your numerical
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 3: market is thirty percent, then surely your aim is to
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 3: make sure that whoever makes up thirty percent of the
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 3: population makes up thirty percent of the workforce. Now, this
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 3: undercuts women, and it overcuts black people, who I believe
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: are fourteen percent of the US population. So what exactly
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 3: are you working towards the If if you've got a
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 3: hard thirty percent, then I mean, if you employ black people,
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 3: then you're you're over representing black people because they're only
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 3: fourteen percent. But even if if you're getting women on board,
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 3: I mean, you would have to go to fifty percent,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 3: wouldn't you, because women are well fifty one of the population.
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 3: And so how I mean, you're not going to stop
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: until you get fifty percent of your workfoot of your
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 3: workforce being women. And none of this makes sense. Everything
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: was operating just fine when when you did things meritocratically,
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: when when you put white males in charge, because whites
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 3: are the majority of the population. It depends on whether
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 3: or not Hispanics counters white, and to be honest, I
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: think they fucking do. But then then then you have
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 3: to factor in the degree to which women count as
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 3: part of the population. But if women don't want to
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 3: do that job, then why the fuck would you enforce
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 3: this policy where where thirty percent of the workers have
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 3: to be women and that will never be enough. You'll
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: keep going until they are fifty of the workforce, and
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: that's not going to work because even though women make
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 3: up fifty one of the population, it doesn't necessarily follow
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 3: that women are going to be just as good at
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: the job as men. Nor does it follow that non
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 3: white men will be just as good at the job
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 3: as white men. And yeah, I'm struggling as to how
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: to get this idea across without sounding racist and misogynists.
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 3: But here I am trying trying to get this.
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 2: Across face to face. A couple of silver spoons.
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 4: Don't do that. There's another issue with this that people
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 4: rarely consider when it comes to women.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: Women.
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 4: The percentage of the female population, the adult female population,
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 4: let's say adult being fifteen and up, because I think
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 4: you can work with your parents' permission at age fifteen
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 4: and without it at age at age sixteen. But so
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 4: let's say the percentage of the adult female population age
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 4: fifteen and over that wants to work, that that seeks jobs,
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 4: that goes out and applies and takes takes jobs and
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 4: actually you know, shows up and does that does some
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 4: degree of work is not as high as the percentage
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 4: of the male population that goes out looking for jobs
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 4: and seeks them right as fills out applications or sends
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 4: out resumes, whatever, and then fills a position and does
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 4: the job. And the reason for that is because it
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 4: is more socially acceptable, and it is also more natural
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 4: for a woman to feel comfortable making raising children her
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 4: her full time job until they're of a certain age
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 4: and running a household, and and maybe she'll work part
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 4: time after her kids are a certain age. And that
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 4: is that has been historically normal, uh, you know, throughout
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 4: the entire industrial age prior to that, when more people
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 4: were you know, the the uh the person who shod
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 4: your horses did so in his own barn, at his
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 4: own home, and the person you went to if you
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 4: didn't bake your own bread was running the bakery out
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 4: of their home, and the whole family was part of it.
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 4: You know, you'd see more, uh, more family participation in work, right,
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 4: But it's always been a thing of like women of
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 4: the lower income ranges, women and families that were too
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 4: poor to just have one income and survive. They're the
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 4: ones that have gone out out and sought jobs because
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 4: they had to. But you don't see as you get
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 4: up into the higher echelons of income where the husband
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 4: earns quite a bit of money, you don't see as
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 4: many women who feel obligated to contribute to the household
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 4: finances so much that they go out and get a job. Now,
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 4: that has to a degree changed in the last couple generations.
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 4: But it's changed out of necessity in what you end
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 4: up with is because of DEI policies, more men are
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 4: giving up on being able to find gainful employment or
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 4: find gainful employment that is sufficient to support their family,
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 4: and more women are ending up filling the void. And
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 4: sometimes it's because because they're this is what they want
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 4: to do. Sometimes it's because they like to work and
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 4: they prefer to work. Sometimes it's because the dad is
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 4: the better nurturer. In my household, right, my husband is
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 4: the better nurturer. Even though I can, I can do
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 4: it very well. He thinks the things that I don't.
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 4: Right when it comes to raising our kids. Uh, he
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 4: was the better nurturer and there's a lot of stuff
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 4: I learned from him. But I don't think that that's
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 4: always the case. Where you have, you know, one one
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 4: sex being the better nurturer in the other sex being
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 4: the better suited to just not be there. And when
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 4: it comes down to it finding a fifty to fifty
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 4: ratio in your workplace of women to men, it's it's
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 4: made more difficul cult by the fact that you don't
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 4: have a fifty to fifty ratio of applicants. Now, what
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 4: DEI does is it comes in and says, it doesn't
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 4: matter whether they want to work or not. It doesn't
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 4: matter whether they're good at the job or not. It
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 4: doesn't matter whether the company benefits from hiring this person
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 4: or not. If you don't have that fifty to fifty ratio,
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 4: we're going to penalize you. We're going to treat you
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 4: like you're not doing things right, you have screwed up,
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 4: you have failed, when in reality, let's say your goal
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 4: is to sell things, and you have a company where
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 4: half of your applicants are really really good at selling
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 4: things and half of them suck at selling things. You
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 4: want the ones that are really really good at selling things,
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 4: regardless of whether they're male, female, black, white, tall, short, ugly, pretty,
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 4: It doesn't matter. As long as they're good at selling things.
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 4: That's who you want to hire. You don't want to
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 4: have to focus on whether they're male or female. You
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 4: don't want to have to focus on whether they're one
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 4: ethnic background or another, what their religion is, anything like that.
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 4: You just want to focus on are they going to
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 4: bring in customers? Are they going to get those customers
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 4: to buy things? Are the customers going to come back?
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 4: And buy things the next time they need those things.
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 4: And unfortunately, what DEI says is, we don't care if
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 4: you make money, and we don't care if your company
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 4: is successful. We don't care if you sell things. We
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 4: care if you have an equal number of men and
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 4: women working for your company. We care if you have
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 4: an equal number of men and women on your board
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 4: or better yet, women should outnumber men. That's more equality, right,
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 4: because women out number men isn't about business, it's not
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 4: about common sense, it's not about doing things with success
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 4: in mind. It's just about rules and imposing those rules
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 4: and enforcing those rules, and it's almost designed to destroy
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 4: your company. So yeah, it really doesn't matter if half
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 4: the population is this or half the population is that.
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 4: All right, If half the population isn't applying for your company,
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 4: it's unfair to tell you to get a fifty to
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 4: fifty ratio. And it's similarly, if half the population was black,
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 4: but half the population didn't want to go into car
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 4: sales because maybe they were maybe they were interested in
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 4: some other career. Your car place shouldn't insist that half
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 4: your car salesman have to be black. It's it's not
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 4: common sense if it was common sense. People would have
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 4: understood this back in the back in the nineties when
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 4: they were calling it. Oh shoot, I can't even remember
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 4: affirmative action when they were calling it affirmative action. But
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 4: you know, even then people thought, oh, we're making up
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 4: for discrimination. But you're not, because you can't make up
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 4: for what happened to people fifty years ago, which pretty soon,
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 4: keep talking about this, the nineties will be fifty years ago.
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 4: But you can't make up for what happened to people
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 4: fifty years ago by doing things to people today, other
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 4: people that didn't have anything to do with it. So
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 4: maybe the government's not the best way to achieve this.
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 4: Maybe the government's not, you know, the best vehicle for
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 4: imposing the end of the Obviously the shoppers are the
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 4: public is. But the one thing that we can ask
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 4: is that the government get the fuck out of the way.
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, fair enough, I mean, as usual, that's true. I
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: think that the article is trying to make the case
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: that there should be some may I mean, perhaps implying
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: that the government's actions should affect like private people. But
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: I think that the problem is is that people are
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: influenced by the things the government does.
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: So I'm not saying it should be that way.
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 1: I don't I think that people should exercise free will
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: because they have it, But it seems like people are
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: moved by what It's like they're waiting for the state
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: to give them permission to act a certain way, and
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 1: they're basically following that lead, even though the state isn't
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: passing any law. They're not sending guys with guns down
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 1: to the law firms to tell them to do this.
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: They're just they're just denouncing it publicly and loudly. Trump's
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: critical of DEI loudly, and so companies are like, oh,
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: I guess this isn't cool anymore, and they're basically like thinking,
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: if he says this and the people voted for the
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: guy who says this, then we probably should consider changing
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 1: our approach or at least look into it, because it's
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: going to affect us. So it's not to say that
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: there's like hard power.
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 4: There and this story is different and then a little
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 4: bit different. There are laws in place. There are anti
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 4: discrimination laws in place. They have been in law in
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 4: place for a long time, and like what they mentioned here,
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 4: not monopoly laws, but it was something similar anti trust laws.
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 4: So it is monopoly laws. But yeah, it's unfair and
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 4: anti competitive basically under anti.
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what I saw, I know.
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 4: But what we're talking about is using existing law and
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 4: enforced science existing law in a way that hasn't been
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 4: previously enforced when the people facing discrimination are not the
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 4: people that are historically deemed minorities, which is fair, and
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 4: I think the best thing that the government can do
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 4: is essentially not pass any new laws, not take any
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 4: new policies into consideration or anything like that, other than
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 4: take the laws that already exist and enforce them without
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 4: regard to any historical this group was discriminated against where
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 4: this one wasn't, and simply say if if a form
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 4: of discrimination is prohibited under that law, or a form
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 4: of preferential treatment is prohibited under that law, it doesn't
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 4: matter whether it's a protected demographic or not. Just eliminate
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 4: the concept of protected demographics altogether. And if the law
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 4: becomes ridiculous under the circumstances where you've eliminated protected demographics
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 4: versus unprotected similar demographics, then that law needs to go away.
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 2: I agree.
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: I don't think that I think that there shouldn't be
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: any any discrimination laws at all, but if they're going
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: to exist, I think the best way for them to
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: disappear is to apply them equally and then maybe people
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: will think about them in terms of just principle and
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: then eliminate it because I think I believe in freedom
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: of association one hundred percent, and if you want to
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: be you know, if you only want to hire a
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: certain group or you want to exclude people, you go ahead.
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: But it can affect your bit, it can affect your
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: bottom line. But I think that it's the best way
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: forward because otherwise it will be used in slanted ways,
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: which is how it's been used for probably for as
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: long as it's existed. So yeah, so like I that's
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: what I'm saying, Like I don't, I fundamentally don't think
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: the state should be doing it. I think they're just
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: going to take what already exists and they're just gonna
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: apply it in the way it probably should have always
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: been applied, which is universally, which essentially just creates a
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: situation where, you know, going forward, people are gonna have
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: to choose between one of two things. They're either gonna
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: you know, ensure that we enforce anti discrimination laws, but
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: we graduate across the board right, which kind of like
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: eliminates the point of having them in the first place,
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 1: because I'm I believe that most anti discrimination policy or
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: law was passed not specifically to avoid some kind of
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: like bigotry, but rather to essentially, like you know, be
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: able to put people in positions that are undeserving or
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: give them additional help because they're trying to get to
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 1: this and that's, if I'm being very charitable, They're trying
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: to achieve some kind of sense of equality. But it's
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: it's not how it goes, I mean. And and the
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: thing is too, is that even if you get rid
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: of all that, you're not going to eliminate inequality anyway.
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: And even like unfair kinds of inequality, like like there,
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: women are probably gonna be more favorable hires simply because
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 1: companies can pay them less and you know, and they'll
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: just take it right, So like there, there is still
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: going to shake out in certain ways regardless. But I
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: think the ultimate goal in the long run would be
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: to eliminate anti discrimination laws altogether. But I know that's
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: a pipe dream because most people would take issue with that.
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: But maybe maybe that's changing anyway.
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 4: I will say this when it comes to law firms
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 4: as opposed to say, oh I don't know the fire department.
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 4: I'm more more military of women working in that field
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 4: because because bitches do like to argue, I mean, look
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 4: at me.
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but uh.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 4: Then I am of women. I like, I've met one
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 4: female firefighter that I'm like, Okay, I would trust this
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 4: person to carry me out of a building. And that
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 4: that woman was as big as a man. You could
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 4: tell she was definitely female. She wasn't trans like, she
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 4: was definitely biologically female. Uh, but but she would you
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 4: know if if if you couldn't look at her and tell,
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 4: if you looked at her from behind, you would have
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 4: thought that was a dude with a ponytail. And uh
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 4: and that's it, you know, Like, I'm that the whole
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 4: thing about DEEI is that it doesn't care about the
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 4: goals of the job. It cares about giving government or
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 4: giving woke ideologues control over your company. That's all. It's
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 4: really about. Control.
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see I got another super chat and
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 1: then we're gonna go into the Patron show. So Senior
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: Stick says, for five dollars, thank you, Senior Sticks. As
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 1: DEI benefits white Western women the most. Is it time
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 1: for white Western women to step aside and give up
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: their position?
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 4: So let me remind you what I said earlier about
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 4: lack of accountability for preventing people from meeting their full potential.
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 4: DEI needs to be eliminated because of the discrimination against men,
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 4: But there isn't this silver lining in it for women.
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 4: It just keeps women from working hard enough and being
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 4: self critical enough to reach their potential. So there isn't
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 4: even a good excuse, or even a mediocre excuse for
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 4: why we should keep it. It's shit all the way through.
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 3: Yeah, as much as I hate white women, right, let's
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 3: let's not forget for a moment that women in general
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 3: are like this. Like people keep saying that this is
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 3: all the fault of of of white Western women. Bitch,
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 3: have you met women from anywhere else? They're the fucking same, right, Yeah,
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 3: let's let let's let's let's not fall into this trap
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 3: of blaming everything on white people. Like women are assholes,
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 3: white women, black women, yellow women, fucking Jewish women, especially
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 3: Jewish women. There they're like, let's let's let's not let's
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 3: not fall into this trap, like it's it. It's women
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 3: like Nick Fuentes said to Tucker, it's just it's the women.
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 2: Honestly, it's the women.
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 4: As long as female accountability is not a thing that
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 4: will continue.
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: Yep, that's all we gotta do is just treat them
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: like adults and then and that'll be it. But like
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: too many people are afraid to do that. Okay, anyway,
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: thank you for the super chat, Senior.
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 2: Sticks.
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: Now we're gonna head into the Patron Show and look
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: at this article from Piers Morgan's wife who apparently can't
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: stand the idea of having to take care of the
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: man she married. I mean, I get it, it's Piers Morgan,
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: but you married him. So we're gonna be looking at
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: this in the Patron Show. Hopefully we'll see you guys
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 1: there and again. If you want to join us for that,
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: you become a Badger, go to feed the Badger dot
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: com and start a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: will get you into the Discord where you'll be able
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: to watch all the additional content and like this video
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: that we're about to start after this is over. So
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Mike and Hannah for their lovely
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: commentary on today's stories. I want to thank you guys
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: most of all for watching, and thanks to Mike Jay
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: for helping me with the write ups for today's show.
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: All Right, with that said, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: please hit like, subscribe if you're not already subscribe, hit
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 1: the BELF notification, leave it's comment, let us know what
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: and please please please share this video because.
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 2: Sharing is caring.
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: of HBr News and we will see you next Tuesday.