Latest / Ryder Lee / Jim Carrey, Britney Spears, Madonna

Transcript

Jim Carrey, Britney Spears, Madonna · Ryder Lee

• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Well, there is one, but not in the context of
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: current affairs and politics. I've been doing a lot of
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: research into the true nature of this reality. What is
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: this place? You know? What force or entity created it?
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: To what end? What we might call God? What is
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: the true nature of this entity or force called God?
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: What is this place in which we find ourselves? Isn't
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: it absurd that at some point in early childhood we
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: become vaguely conscious of the fact that we exist and
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: there's a world that we live in, But beyond that,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: there are no clear answers as to what we're doing here.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: I mean, lots of people claim to have the answers.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: You'll get one religious minister that will say, my holy
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: book has all the answers, My messianic figure is the
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: one to revere and worship. And then immediately you'll have
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: another religious minister who will pop up and say, no, no, no,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: you're a heathen. That's blasphemy. Religious figure is the one,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: and my religious text is the one to go with.
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: And then a third guy will pop up and say,
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: you're both wrong, you're both wrong. It's my faith, Mine
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: is the one, and you're supposed to make sense of
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: all of this somehow, there's no manual, there's no guidebook.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: You're just stumbling around in the dark and left to
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: make the best of it. So I've been asking these
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: big questions, which I think any human being owes it
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: to themselves to ask. Well, they've got the opportunity within
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: these lives. I'm not claiming that you're going to get
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: the answers, but you can at least ask the questions.
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: So there's one movie that I've been revisiting which somebody
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: directed me to just recently, which is The Truman Show,
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: which I think is a really great allegory for the
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: human condition these lives. So, if you think about it,
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: Jim Carey's character is representative of all of us, of
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: people humans because he finds himself in this reality where
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: he realizes he's being monitored and surveiled, and that could
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: be a metaphor for perhaps the way we're watched by
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: entities I don't know, you know, in unseen realms. And
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: he gradually comes to realize that the people around him
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: are all actors playing roles. So this fits the idea
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: of NPCs that we hear about, you know, non player characters,
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: these normy figures who seem to just float through life,
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: and they don't seem to ask these big questions that
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: many of us do, and many of them don't seem
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: to have the full range of emotions within their you know, capabilities.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: And gradually the Jim Carey character comes to realize that
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: this world in which he lives is nothing like he
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: thought it was, and it's actually illusory and it's not
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: the real it's not real life. It's not the real world,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: and so he attempts to escape from it all. I mean,
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: there are Gnostic overtones to this, so many people have
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: interpreted it as a Gnostic allegory, so it kind of
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: sits in line with many Gnostic teachings as to what
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: the nature of this realm is. And you've got the
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: christoph character who's the handler, the controller played by Ed
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Harris in that film, and within this metaphor, he's representative
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: of what, in Gnostic terms was described as the Demiurge,
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: this entity known as yelderbey Off, which was like a
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: lesser God, a pretender God, a usurper who has somehow
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: hijacked this reality and made it its own, or created
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: it in the first place. And the Ed Harris Harris's
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: character in the film seeks to maintain that sort of
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: control over Truman because he's like his creation, his pet project,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: and he doesn't like the fact that Truman is starting
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: to question where he is and what the true nature
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: of his life is. So that's one movie that springs
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: to mind in terms of asking big questions or possibly
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: are in them as to what the nature of this
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: reality is. Because I think when you've been in conspiracy
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: research for long enough a number of years, like as
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: many years as I have, all roads eventually converge at
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: one singular point. So you can look into secret society networks,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: and you can look into the New World Order master
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: Plan and the methods and tactics that are used to
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: control and surveil us and enslave us. You can look
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: into the banking and financial scams, and you know, the
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: builder Berg Group and the Trilateral Commission, all of these.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: But there comes a point where all of that just
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: becomes information and data and names and places and dates,
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: And what's really important is going beyond that several levels
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: to ask what is the nature of a reality in
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: which any of that sort of stuff can take place.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: In the first place, you know that facilitates these kind
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: of activities playing out into apparently physical manifestation. So that's
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: where I am at asking those kind of questions at
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: this point in my life, having done the conspiracy thing
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: for many years, and that movie speaks a lot to
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: me in that regarding in terms of considering these very
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: big questions in life.
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: Have you seen the controversy that's surrounding Jim Carrey at
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: the moment when he showed up to the Paris Awards
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: show last week and he looks completely different. He looks
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: like his face has had a bunch of work done
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: and a bunch of plastic surgery, which doesn't make a
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: lot of sense based off of the things that he
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: has said up into this point, that it doesn't seem
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: like he would be the person that would want all
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: of that cosmetic surgery, which has allowed people to believe
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: that that's not really Jim Carrey, that he's somebody else,
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: that someone's impersonating him, or that he's been cloned and
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: all of that. But what is really strange about that
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: entire scenario is that he does look like a different person.
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: He's obviously had work done if it really is him,
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: But what's the most odd about it was at the
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: end of his speech at the awards ceremony, he says
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: the ending line that he says at the end of
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: the Truman Shop in case he doesn't see you, good evening.
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: And good night, In case I don't see you, good afternoon,
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: good evening, and good night.
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: In case I don't see you, good afternoon, good evening,
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: and good night. And I'm like, wow, if that's not
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: really Jim Carrey, what a play that you just did
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: in front of everyone. It's like a metaphor within a
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: metaphor within a metaphor.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Right, I mean anything as possible. Could Jim Carey have
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: been replaced. Sure, they've done it before. Did it with
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: or McCartney. They did it for a period with Madonna
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: in round about twenty twenty one, or starting in twenty
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: twenty one, where they wheeled out to my thinking, at
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: least three different Madonnas. So there was a young one.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: I can't remember if we talked about this on the
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: show last time, but there was a young one who
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: looked no more than about thirty with pink hair, and
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: that quite obviously was not the real Madonna, who by
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: that point was supposed to be about sixty five years
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: of age sixty three. I think. Then there was another
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: one who was short and fat and dumpy as she
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: appeared on stage in a dance routine in Columbia, and
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: she could barely pull any dance steps and looked completely
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: out of shape, so that clearly was not the original Madonna.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: And then there was a sort of older, grizzled, haggard
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: sort of one, and it was much more plausible that
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: that could be the real Madonna, but it still wasn't.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: And then the real one appears to have come back.
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: She's got this very distinctive gap in her teeth, so
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: when she smiles, you know it. So we appear to
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: have the original Madonna back. But they played complete mind
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: fuck games on us by putting out these three replacements
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: for a period, And who knows why they did that.
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: Maybe it was to see how many people would notice,
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: whether they could get away with it, whether the fans
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: would call it out, how many truth researchers would draw
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: attention to it. Maybe it was a little social experiment
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: in that way. Who knows. And I hear all these
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: claims that famous people have been replaced by clones or
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: doubles or whatever, I've heard it about Jim Carey, and
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: sure those pictures that surfaced recently do not look like
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: the original Jim Carey. But for every person you'll get
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: who claims that he's been replaced, somebody else will pop
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: up and say, oh, come on, Jim Carey is in Hollywood,
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: and in Hollywood there's plastic surgery, there's all kinds of
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: work you can have done, there's makeup that gets applied
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: in film type scenarios, and that's just Jim Carey trying
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: to stave off aging. So it just goes to show
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: that they were never any clear answers to anything. Nothing
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: is ever clear cut because somebody is always going to
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: pop up and be contrary and oppose any kind of
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: claim that you might choose to make. So it just
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: makes this work very, very difficult. You've got to have
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: a lot of time on your hands. You've got to
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: be pretty good at forensic analysis and comparing facial structures
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: and distances between eyes and ears and ear shapes and
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: things like this to be able to make sense of it.
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: I mean, with some it's easier than with others. As
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned with Paul McCartney, it's a clear cutcase.
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: There have been at least two individuals playing the public
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: role of Paul McCartney. You can see they're very different
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: in photographs and film footage. You don't need to be
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: a forensic expert to see that. But with some of
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: these others, I think it requires a much deeper level
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: of expertise if you're going to come out and make
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: bold kind of claims like that, because when you make
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: a bold claim, people require bold evidence to back it up,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: And like I said, you've got to have a lot
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: of time and a lot of resources on your hands
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: to be able to back up these kind of claims
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: when they get made.
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: I think that they did the same thing with the
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: Britney Spears that you just explained that they did with Madonna.
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: I'm convinced that the Britney Spears we see right now
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: that just got arrested apparently. I don't know if you
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: saw this, but she just got arrested for a DUI
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: I believe is what it was. I don't believe that
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: that's the same Britney Spirits, and I don't believe that
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: that has been the same Britney Spears since around two
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: thousand and eleven't.
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well that's quite possible. Like I say, I can't
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: rule it out. Another thing is that during the COVID
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: era they started using a double for Prince Charles or
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: King Charles as he is now. It quite clearly was
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: not him. He appeared on a Sky News broadcast in
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: the middle of COVID and it was so obvious it
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: was an actor, but most people within the British public
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: didn't notice or didn't care. Like George Carlin once said,
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: nobody seems to care. Nobody seems to notice. They got
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: away with it. It's just incredible to me. I mean,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: somebody like Madonna. You could argue that not many people
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: pay attention to Madonna, or you know, she only appeals
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: to certain demographics or whatever. But this is the frigging King.
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: Not that I'm suggesting people should pay attention to the King,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: but you know, he's a pretty public figure, a pretty
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: important figure within the United Kingdom, and they got away
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: with using a double for him, no explanation as to
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: why it was done. And then the original Prince Charles
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: popped back up again, to my thinking, that's him, We've
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: got him back. So this double was put in for
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: a period and I don't know where they getting their
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: mind control topped up in a lab somewhere and they
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: need to put somebody out there. Do they have a
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: bad reaction to certain chemical compound that they may have
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: been ingesting, or is it a simple social experiment? Like
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: I said, Are the social engineers doing this to see
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: how many people notice and what they can get away with,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: or is it to make those who do observe the
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: change and draw attention to it look crazy. So if
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: they try and tell friends and family that's not the
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: original Prince Charles, they've replaced him, that's a double, that's
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: an actor, And then the original pops back up and
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: you can see that's the original. Your family and friends
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: are going to say, you're crazy. Of course that's him.
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: Look there, he is right there. What have you been drinking?
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: What have you been spoken man,