Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Vrt LIVE Fundraiser Stream With Bryrony Cringe, Brian, Alison, & Beat Saber _ HBR Stream

Transcript

Vrt LIVE Fundraiser Stream With Bryrony Cringe, Brian, Alison, & Beat Saber _ HBR Stream · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: And we're live. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: you may be, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: My name is Brian, I'm here with Allison, and this
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: is our monthly fundraising stream.
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: What? Is or was or will be.
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: Did I say was?
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: No, I'm just, you know what, I'm just basically trolling,
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: just keep going, sorry. I throw a monkey wrench in
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: the works.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, though this is the fundraising stream. where we're
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: going to be, I guess it's sort of like a two-part,
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: a split thing. We're going to do a video reaction
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: to Briar and Eclair, and then we're going to do
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: some Beat Sabering, because we are not at our goal yet,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: and we're trying to get that done.
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: We need to get there.
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: So, yes.
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: We're trying to get that bag. Is that a bad
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: way to put it? I think, maybe.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Maybe.
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: All right, so before we get into Byron Eclair, I
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: just want to remind everyone again, it is the monthly fundraiser.
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: We are at $ 2, 200 to the goal, so please do
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: help out. We are doing this Beat Saber, which means
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: you can send your requests in at feedthebadger.com slash justthetip.
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: I think it might be a very slow day because
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: of the meetup, which maybe you should, after I'm done,
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: maybe you should tell us about it. But anyway, get
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: those songs in. We'll do five. Feedthebadger.com slash justthetip. Make
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: sure the songs are available by going to Beat Saber
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: and looking to find your song because the Beat Saber
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: modding community has its own very rarefied tastes. and your
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: song may not be available. So check to make sure
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: your song is available at besaver.com. Then send that song
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: to us at feed the badger.com slash just the tip.
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: You can also use super chat. It's just a little
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: more difficult because Brian has to read it out to
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: me and then you get to watch me attempt to spell.
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: So feed the badger.com slash just the tip for those
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: song requests. We'll, and we'll take those requests in as
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: we're responding to Byron E. Claire. And, um, If you
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: would just like to directly support the show, you can
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: do so at FeedTheBadger.com slash support. That's FeedTheBadger.com slash support.
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: Very much appreciated. A big thank you to Telomar for
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: putting $ 500 in before the beginning of the show. So
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: thank you, Telomar. And yeah, so I heard that you
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: guys had the mixed up meetup. Brian, how did that go?
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it was cool. Lindsay couldn't go. She was
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: really sick still. So she's just staying behind with the dog. Yeah.
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: And I went because I had already committed and I
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: already like reserved the hotel. But it's fine, you know,
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: and drove down there. I got there after they went
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: to the museum. So I don't know what that was like,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: but they met up at the I think it's like
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: an aeronautical museum, like with a bunch of airplanes and
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: jets and stuff. I don't know. I've never been to it,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: but they started off there. I think that was like
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: half the day. And then I met them for the
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: other half, which was at, I want to say, it
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: was at a barcade called DK something. I can't remember.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: And it's basically like a bar with a retro arcade inside.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: We went in there. We had pizza. We had a
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: few drinks, chatted. It was a little noisy inside the arcade, obviously.
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: There was loud music playing. So we went outside and
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: sat on the benches. There's a little patio area. We
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: hung out there. And we talked until late at night
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: about all kinds of things. It was nice. There was
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: a modest gathering of people. I got to see Lauren
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: and Mike and Hannah and some of our patrons were there.
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: So that was cool. DK Effect is what it was called.
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: DK Effect.
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So yeah, it was nice.
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: That's good.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: You know, turned in around like 930 or so. And
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: then I had to go back to bed and come
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: right back for this. But it was cool. I'm not complaining.
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: Because Lindsay was sick, I didn't really want to stay
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: out there too long anyway. So I felt like I
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: had to come right back.
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: Well, that's understandable.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: I bet Jojo missed you. Or maybe he doesn't. He's
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: fine with Lindsay.
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: No, no. He was really happy to see me. But
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: he wasn't as... I guess Lindsay told me that in
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: the past, if I leave for extended periods, Jojo will
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: lay down by the front door waiting for me to
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: come back. And just sort of stare at the door.
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: But today, this time, he was with Lindsay. So I
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: think he's like, we're trying to get him accustomed to
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: being alone. Because we do have to go places sometimes
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: without him. It's hard. All right. Yeah, we did it.
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: Sorry. That's okay.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a lot of driving. Hannah said she's going
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: to do it again, I think. I think next time
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: I was like, we should we should like go to
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: a karaoke bar or something. And like, you know, some
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: like where there's like a little room for just those
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: like a group of like a private area for us.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Because it was it was I think that would have
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: been more fun. So it was fine, though. It was nice.
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: Do some karaoke.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I could sing with Mike. Mike and I sing
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: together all the time. So why not? So yeah. And Lauren. Yeah.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: Yes. Well, maybe next year.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Hannah says she's going to try and be better
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: about planning it ahead and setting something up.
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 5:42
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: It was a little difficult. The one week notice. Yeah.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: Still, though, still had a turnout. So, you know, I
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: made the effort. I predicted a mixed up meetup. So
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: I was like thinking I had it in my mind
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: before Hannah started talking about it.
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Yeah, definitely. Definitely. All right, so let's get
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: the Byron-y thing sorted.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: Sure, so this Byron-y Claire video is called When She
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Outshines Him, He Takes Her Down, and it's basically her
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: claim ultimately is that men can't stand to be with
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: women who are more successful than them, and therefore men
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: will try to sabotage those women. That is her claim.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: And that's the whole video's argument. Men are bad because
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: they can't stand that women are able to do better
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: than them. And men are always trying to... I don't know.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: What's the word I'm looking for? Kill their shine? Take
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: them out of the limelight? Destroy their potential? Whatever. And
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: she makes the argument... Two ways. One is to bring
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: up statistics and studies, which I have time codes for.
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: That's what I got time codes for. Because most of
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: the video, as you all know, Brian and Claire, she
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: always makes the same arguments and arrives at the same
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: conclusions and uses the same tactics, which is to bring
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: up celebrity gossip and reality TV Which is all fake.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: And then she points to that. Celebrity gossip news. Literally,
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: I think one shot shows her showing a cover of
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: Us magazine to make an argument. And then she tries
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: to back that with statistics. So I figure the stronger
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: part of that is statistics. I don't give a fuck about,
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: you know, Jessica Simpson's relationships or Sonny and Cher's relationship
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: or Tina Turner and Ike Turner, which those are all
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: of her examples. It's all like, high profile, like Jay-Z
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: and Beyonce, high profile, very famous celebrity couples, always in
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: the limelight and whatever drama comes out of it. And
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: that's what she uses to effectively propagandize her audience. So,
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: I mean, I could go on and on about how
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: poor that is to like use as an, as an example.
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: Why don't we just, why don't we actually look at
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: a couple of those examples? And then we can go
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: into the statistics because I have looked into the statistics
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: she's using. But I do want to see what I
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: want to see what her argument is.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: Well, she's going to open with her conclusion. So as usually. Sure.
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: Let's let's let's let's as she does. Let's let's let
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: her set the stage, shall we say.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: All right, let's do it.
• 8:52
  Speaker 4: She's everything, he's just Kim. What's a guy to do
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: when she's the star? When she's the breadwinner? When she's
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: the one getting all the accolades? When she's more famous
• 9:01
  Speaker 4: than him? Time to take it down, of course. Even
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: if it drags him down too. Like, do you remember
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: when Hailey Bieber made the cover of Vogue magazine? And
• 9:07
  Speaker 4: then Justin directed the attention back onto himself on Instagram,
• 9:10
  Speaker 4: reflecting when in a fight he said Hailey would never
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: be on the cover of Vogue. Yeah, that kind of behaviour.
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: Jen Hamilton, labor and delivery nurse with over 5 million
• 9:18
  Speaker 4: TikTok followers, a New York Times bestselling author who has
• 9:21
  Speaker 4: been helping women for years with their health, recently went
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: viral because of her heartbreak, announcing the divorce from her
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: husband with a joint statement on the 15th of June saying,
• 9:29
  Speaker 4: this comes with enormous pain for both of us, but
• 9:31
  Speaker 4: also gratitude for the- So.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: A feminist is divorcing her husband. What is this?
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: She's divorcing her husband.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So this is a, this is some internet influencer
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: lady- that is going through a divorce. And of course
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: it's being framed as they're going through a divorce. What
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: it's right. It's highly likely she's divorcing him for some reason.
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: So I don't know the story, but if briar and
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: eclair is my filter to the truth i'm just going
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: to reject it outright i'm just not i'm just not
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: expending my energy to entertain liars and manipulators.
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: So The 15 years of shared history, love, and friendship.
• 10:12
  Speaker 4: This wasn't some amicable split of two people growing apart
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: as can happen. Because she found out that not only
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: was she the sole breadwinner because life was too stressful
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: for him, he was allegedly leading a full-on double life.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: So now you see that she's the sole breadwinner. Remember,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: she already said that this woman was highly successful online,
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: wrote a book, all of that. So she was probably
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: making a lot of money. And I guess he was
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: not able to keep up for whatever reason. Hey, reverse trad,
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: what do you think about this? This is reality, okay? Women,
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: they're fucked, okay? They don't want to be the boss babes.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: They don't. They will resent men that can't keep up.
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: That's the reality.
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: We married.
• 10:57
  Speaker 5: Everyone in the situation knows who I am. A direct
• 11:01
  Speaker 5: quote that I got was, I knew about you. He
• 11:05
  Speaker 5: talked about you all the time. But I didn't know
• 11:09
  Speaker 5: you had so many followers.
• 11:11
  Speaker 4: And was 21 years older than her. As Jen said,
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: old enough to know better. And if you kind of
• 11:16
  Speaker 4: recognize her face, Jen is that iconic woman who quoted
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: scripture back to MAGA people in order to prove them wrong.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: I was sick and you cared for me.
• 11:24
  Speaker 5: I was in prison and you visited me. When you
• 11:26
  Speaker 5: refused to help the least of these, my brothers and sisters,
• 11:32
  Speaker 5: you were refusing to help. I don't know, sounds pretty liberal.
• 11:39
  Speaker 4: Great person, awful thing that's happened to her. Even during
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: this terrible time.
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: What?
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: How does that sound liberal?
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: She's, it doesn't, Allison, she's just framing it that way.
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: She reads from the Bible and says, ha, you guys
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: are hypocrites. That's all. Why don't you, why don't you
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: embrace full status socialism because Jesus said something about sharing.
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: Like that, it's just like this common bullshit tactic these
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: people pull. And all it is is to get clicks.
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: She's obviously not trying to change the world anyway. She
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: wants people to say, wow, that chick is awesome. Did
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: you see what she did on the internet with words?
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: So yeah, Bryony Claire is like, she's amazing. And that's
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: exactly what this chick is trying to get. She's trying
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: to get other people to tell her she's awesome. So
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: she does low effort videos where she reads scripture and
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: then claims that what she's doing is exposing her enemies.
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: This is what I mean.
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: And this is the one that got divorced.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: And she's part of the publishing industry?
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: You mean the publishing industry that's currently a smoking crater?
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: And the only reason why they have any relevance and
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: any financial standing at all is because they have a
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: gigantic backlist of books made or printed during the time
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: they weren't completely dominated by white liberal... the offals, affluent, female, liberal, urban, whatever, right?
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: That industry, that industry that is done, it's cooked, put
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: a fork in it. And women like her drove it
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: into the ground.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: So she's successful in an industry that's manifestly not successful
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: and can only claim any kind of success because of
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: the work of majority men 20 to 30 years ago. Well,
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: 50 60 to 20 to 30 years ago like okay
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: all right a little bit of over claim there but
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: yeah that's uh that's that is interesting so we sort
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: of know the ideological basis she's in and her husband
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: is 21 years older um is she like in her
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: 30s 20s i don't know I don't know who this is.
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: No, I don't follow these.
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: I'm just sort of decomposing this because she's the one
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: that chose him. You know, this was something that really
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: struck me during the whole Calgary Expo fracas or disaster
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: or whatever you want to call it when I was
• 14:17
  Speaker 2: kicked out for simply questioning feminism. Evicted, rather. And I
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: noticed that the ringleader, which the woman who I'm pretty
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: sure was the ringleader, the mean girl in charge of
• 14:29
  Speaker 2: all of that, Sam Maggs. So in the process of
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: trying to research what had happened, you pick up some
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: biographical detail. And I noticed she was paired up with
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: a man who was big in the industry and well
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: older than her. And I was looking at that and
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: I was just thinking, wow, you liberal women, that's... That's
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: really interesting. So you're still playing the game, right? You're
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: still playing the game to win. And yet you insist
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: that you have all of these virtues that direct your
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: actual choices. And yet when you look at your lives,
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: you're married to men who can provide money and status. Huh?
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: Gives you a really big think, doesn't it? About how
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: much these so-called virtues are meaningful. I'm in an argument
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: with a liberal or a far-left woman in the comments.
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: I saw that.
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: But anyway, the overall point is that these women don't
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: put their money where their mouth is, or rather that
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: they're putting their mouth on a lot of money, let's
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: just say. So these liberal women do not live their
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: virtues well. In any sense. And I'm just like this.
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: Maren E. Clare brings up this man being 20 years old,
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: 21 years older than Jen. Yeah, but she chose him.
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: And I wonder if she's working in the publishing industry,
• 15:59
  Speaker 2: if that 21 years older doesn't come with, you know,
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: like five times the median income for an average man
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: and some serious networking clout for her. I'm just wondering.
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: Just having a thunk about that. Why is she making
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: this all public?
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: Why is who? This author lady?
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah, author.
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: I thought she was in the publishing industry. She wrote
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: a book.
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: Oh, she did. I shall have to take a look
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: at that.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: This chick. Her name is Jen Hamilton. Jen Hamilton.
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: Hamilton.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, apparently she wrote some book. Jen Hamilton, yeah. So anyway, yeah,
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: so God, you guys in the comments, you're being ridiculous.
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: Nothing.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: We got ridiculous stuff in the comments.
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: No, no, serious. What did they say? Let's hear it.
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: Or is it too ridiculous for words?
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: You can go look at it. It's in the vertical chat.
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: You can just look at it.
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: I'm like doing all kinds of research here i'd if
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: you relay it i will respond to it but if you.
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: Think it's it's not it's not directed at anybody they're
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: just they're just being ridiculous they're just calling each other
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: names that's all so okay.
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: Typical all right let's let's i guess um listen to
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: a bit i i i have i don't i've never
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: heard of this jen hamilton thing I don't know why
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: anyone needs to hear about it. Why can't she just.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: She's probably not that big. I mean, she just, like,
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: she uses the internet to sell her book. So she
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: wrote a book called Birth Vibes. Stories and Strategies of
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: an Empowered Birth. Jen Hamilton. It's called Birth Vibes. It's
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: like a, you know, get self-help or something.
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: But anyway, let's keep going. Okay, so she.
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: Cheated on her... And that's the evidence that he was
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: engaging in a backlash against her.
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: He cheated on her?
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah, because that's what she meant by the double life, apparently.
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I didn't see that explicitly said. But
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: I didn't hear anyone explicitly say that. But maybe they
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: drifted apart. Maybe she pushed him away. I don't know.
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: Maybe she girlbossed too close to the sun. And he
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: was like, I don't want to do that with this.
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: But you know what? Like, why am I, I don't,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: why am I, why do I have to answer for
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: what some other dude did in some relationship with some
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: random chick? Like, why does that matter? See, my, this
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: is my thing. Okay. I don't care if that guy
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: was a bad guy or a good guy or a
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: neutral guy. I care that bribery Claire is trying to
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: use this one instance to make a blanket statement about
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: all men everywhere. That's the problem. It's not that, I don't,
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: that guy could be a piece of shit. He could
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: have beaten the shit out of her. He could have
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: attempted to kill her. Okay. It wouldn't change the fact
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: that she chose to be with him and things are
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: just going to go however they're going to go. You know,
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: if that's the case, then I hope that he goes
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: to jail, whatever. But what I don't want is for
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: people to come over here and start going, and this
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: is the problem with men. Shut the fuck up. Okay.
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: That's the problem with that man. That's my point.
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah. No, that's a good point. That's a good point.
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: So I guess we got the thesis here, guys. Um,
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: apparently she also uses, um, well, Haley and Justin Bieber,
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: which we've already mentioned.
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Huh?
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: Just Justin Bieber did something mean. He said that, that
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: Haley would never be on the cover of Vogue and
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: no context to that.
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: Statement, but yeah i mean it looks like he was
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: just messing with her in that in the clip like
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: he's smiling so he could have just been fucking around
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: and again this is on the internet like what does
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: that change well i mean wasn't justin bieber himself going
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: through a whole bunch of like problems with like you
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: know i don't know being uh preyed on or abused
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: by other starlets? Didn't he essentially get sexually assaulted by
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: fucking Jenny McCarthy? Like on stage in front of everybody?
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: That doesn't warrant a Brian E. Clair video because he
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: said something mean. He said something mean on the internet.
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: I'm going to use this to make an example. So stupid.
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: Brian E. Clair is so fucking stupid, dude. Why does
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: she have 230,000 subscribers? What does that say about her audience?
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: Why don't people think anymore? Do you allow yourself to
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: be manipulated by this shit? This is trash. This is
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: such trash. I'm sorry. Go ahead, Allison. We're going to
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: go through the... The strongest arguments are probably still really weak. So, but... Oh, yeah.
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: Misreadings of statistics as usual.
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: Or just using badly sourced statistics that are, like, biased
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: right off the bat. I mean.
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: Like, most of the time when these people get... Like,
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: when Bryony gets statistics, she's just getting feminist statistics. So
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: it's a bunch of statistics by people who already agree
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: with her. It's like listening to her own asshole for
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: an opinion. It's like, oh, what do you think? Oh, well,
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: I guess we all agree. It's like you're part of
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: the same organism. So of course you're going to get
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: the answer you want.
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: Of course, you're going to be a beneficiary of all
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: the massaging that these people do of the statistics. And
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: they did massaging on that one, let me tell you. Yeah,
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: I'm sure they did. All right, so Jen Hamilton. Husband
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: is Brian Hamilton, right? Okay, that makes sense. 15-year marriage,
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: joint statement, June 15, 2026. Brian has said nothing publicly
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: beyond it. Everything else is Jen's TikToks. Guys, you've got
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: to stop this. Right. Why are you not?
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: I have data. What is it? It's tick tock.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: No, but but also why is Brian Hamilton? I hope
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: that this is being this somehow affects the divorce. If
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: it's if it's contested, the fact that she's she's smearing
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: all of this all over the public. Everything else is
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: Jen's tick tocks. A man I was loyal to for
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: 15 years who wanted everyone but me. He's 21 years
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: older than you. He probably just wants to get to
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: bed by nine and have some, a nice soup.
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: What?
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: Well, you know, like, yeah, he's, he's, she's probably in
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: her twenties and thirties. Right. And, you know, apparently he's, well,
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: I guess he could be in his 40. No, probably not.
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: He's probably in his fifties. I'm just saying that maybe
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: he just wanted peace. Um, I've never been enough for him.
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: You know what? I bet, I bet the more accurate
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: answer is that you were too much. While I was
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: at the hospital taking care of people, he found the
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: time to have a whole other life. That's where the
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: affair comes in. Of course, you know, the way that
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: women phrase things, they.
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: Do it in ways.
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: I mean, she said another life. I don't, I don't like,
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: if I don't hear them explicitly say he was cheating,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: who knows what that means? He was hanging out with
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: his friends all the time. He started a different job. I.
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: You know, Taking care of puppies at the SPS, PSP, CA,
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: you know, that kind of thing.
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: You don't know. He didn't return my call in five minutes.
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: He's living a double life.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah. And that he lacks sexual interest in her. He's
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: 20 years older than you. Maybe he's just, you know,
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: having issues.
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: Maybe. Who knows? Maybe she's sick. That's the thing. Like,
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: we just get, we just get the... They just put
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: this stuff out there and they just want you to
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: fill in the blanks. And then, of course, people like
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: Briarwood and Claire fill in the blanks with, you know,
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: men are trash. That's the blank. I'm going to fill
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: that with that.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, despite being married to one.
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: If their partner, quote, matches the specimen's relay. Still entirely
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: single partner. Okay, so this is just her. And still,
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: you're right. There is no clear statement that he was
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: cheating on her. Only that he supposedly didn't have a
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: sexual interest in her. Which, you know, you married a
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: man 20 years older than you. That may become an issue, right?
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: Maybe you're not, maybe you're not fun. Maybe he's turned
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: off by you. Maybe you're being a cunt. Like, I
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: don't know. Like, well, there's a number of reasons why
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: you could just, you know, it may, it may not
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: be some, what I'm saying is, is that it's not
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: always because the man is experiencing some kind of hormonal issue.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: It could be that the woman is no longer turning
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: him on for one reason or another. Maybe she's not
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: being nice to him. I don't know.
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: That's entirely possible. I went with the option where no
• 24:50
  Speaker 2: one is to blame. But on the other hand, this
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: does look like a situation where there's a lot of
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: blame to be had for the woman. But nothing has
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: located Jen attributing his conduct to her success. So Byrony
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: is reading into something that we already have to read
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: into to find malfeasance for the man. The backlash framing
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: pre-exists the specimen as a fan theory. So this is
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: a fan theory. Cafe Mom quoting the Reddit thread, the
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: current theory is that her husband became intimidated by her success.
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: This is the second nurse influencer whose husband initiated a
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: divorce after she had a best-selling book. Oh, so she
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: doesn't work in the publishing industry. She was a nurse,
• 25:39
  Speaker 2: you say. A nurse who had a best-selling book. I'm
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: going to find out if it really was a best-selling book.
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: But a nurse. I don't know. Yes, I'm sure that
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: as a nurse you were just... Just the picture of
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: wifely fidelity. Okay, the specimen's classification of the case is
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: an important for an import of circulating audience speculation. I
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: call Byrony the specimen, or I've got, I trained Punished
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: Claude to call these women specimens. Consistent with the video's
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: disclosed method. Patrons nominate, the corpus confirmed. So everything is
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: cherry picked, basically. All right. So, okay, so actually the infidelity...
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Fans reference a prior separation over Brian's infidelity from since-deleted videos. Okay,
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: if the infidelity pattern predates the bestseller and the follower growth,
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: the success backlash sequence fails on chronology. The behavior existed
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: before the thing it supposedly reacts to. So basically what
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: we have is an enclave of hens pecking at this
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: and churning up all kinds of nonsense about what might
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: have happened. And guess who scooped up the tea? The rancid,
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: moldy tea to spill it to her followers. Alright. Okay,
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: so let's do we want to listen to them more
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: or do you want to get to the.
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: We want to get to the arguments? What? I can
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: play the.
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: Rest of this open, I guess, but Sure, play the
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: rest of the opening.
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: Let's just play the rest of the intro and then
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: we'll do the time codes.
• 27:25
  Speaker 4: Person, awful thing that's happened to her. Even during this
• 27:28
  Speaker 4: terrible time, she has launched a fundraiser to help other
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: women who are in terrible situations but don't have the
• 27:33
  Speaker 4: sort of funds that she has to be able to
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: get out of it. She's raised over $ 150, 000 so far.
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: I've got her TikTok link for you down below. As
• 27:40
  Speaker 4: we've discussed before, it is incredibly hard.
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: For- So that's a chick that's pretty well off and
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: she started a fundraiser, which means she's not actually spending
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: her own money. She's just getting other people to give
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: their money. But now she's a hero. So easy to
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: be a hero when you're a woman, isn't it?
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: People in abusive situations to be able to leave those relationships.
• 27:58
  Speaker 4: But there's been a bunch of weird victim blaming happening
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: and people really angry that Jen is talking about this
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: at all. I mean, you should keep matters private. The
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: thing is, that's exactly what she was doing before for
• 28:08
  Speaker 4: the good of the family.
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: Like, why are we so quick to please- I don't know,
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: is there- There's a bit of an echo going on.
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: Oh, wait a minute. Why is it coming out of Discord? Interesting.
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: It's like.
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: Hold on a second. Might be like a sound issue here.
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: I'll try putting my headset on and see if that
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: does anything.
• 28:32
  Speaker 2: Alright, but here's the thing. So it sounds like she's
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: actually resentful of him because he didn't work. What a surprise.
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: Let me test something. Yeah, that's why I was saying.
• 28:45
  Speaker 4: Didn't do the breaking.
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: Okay, that seems better. So I'll just wear the headphones.
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: Okay, so prior marital crisis for Jen, in her own words,
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: predated her 2026 book, Birth Vibes. So the fan theory
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: he turned after the bestseller already has a timing problem
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: in her own record. Okay, so yeah, this has nothing
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: to do with her success. It probably has more to
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: do with her resentment that apparently her husband... Sounds like
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: he has anxiety disorder, if she's to be believed and
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: that he isn't working. So I guess, you know, if
• 29:26
  Speaker 2: you have a disabled husband, you're totally entitled to your
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: resentment because anxiety disorders can be really debilitating. I know
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: that from personal experience. And they can be bad in
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: to be disabling. And if the man isn't working, it
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: probably is a disabling situation, right? So yeah, that's all
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: we really have to go on is Jen's stated opinion
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: that her husband doesn't work because he is too stressed
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: out by life. which implies a severe mental health condition, right?
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: Because generally, you don't just casually start excluding yourself from
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: big aspects of living unless there's a problem, at least
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: in my mind. And because her husband is disabled, she's
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: resentful that he doesn't work, and they divorced. But Byron E.,
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: feeding off of the hen whisper network, decided that he
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: felt resentment with no evidence, not even from Jen's own statement,
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: about her success, which I'm going to determine if there
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: was any. And that's why they got a divorce. That's
• 30:36
  Speaker 2: why he supposedly cheated on her, even though the infidelity
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: is a real connect-the-dots situation from what she's saying. And yeah,
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: so Bob's your uncle. It's all bullshit. Brian was right
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: to just ignore it on its face.
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: Okay. Okay.
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: I mean, but again, it doesn't matter. She's weaved her.
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: She's weaved her tail. And now all of her women
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: audience are captured. And now they're just going to believe whatever,
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: whatever she concludes from it. So this has happened. So
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: now we're going to tell you how this thing, which
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: is really awful. You should feel really bad for this
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: woman because she was helping other women. She was a
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: hero to other women. She wrote this book. She liked,
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: she raised money. She has a, there's a GoFundMe in
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: the description. Now I'm going to tell you how men
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: are the problem. Even though we don't even know that
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: that man was a problem. We don't. No. We don't
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: even know that.
• 31:30
  Speaker 2: You know, and here's the other thing. Like, anxiety disorders
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: can have a huge impact on sexuality. Right? So, all
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: we know is this man probably has an anxiety disorder.
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: Maybe unemployed. Right?
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: She's making some... We don't have time for men's anxiety disorders.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: We have to keep talking about postpartum depression. You married him.
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: Being the thing that.
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: That's insane. Like postpartum depression.
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah.
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: She, she killed her kids. I mean, she brought them
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: into the world.
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah. But let's raise for a million. Let's yeah. Let's
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: raise a million dollars for that chick. Not the guy
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: who has anxiety and maybe like needs a break from
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: his wife sometimes or something. No, no, that one. We
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: got to make a video condemning all men everywhere.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. Men with potential anxiety disorders having trouble dealing
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: with social situations and may have some sexual issues. My God,
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: let us all pile on him.
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: No, not him. All men everywhere, Allison. All men.
• 32:29
  Speaker 2: First we pile on him, and then we pile on
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: all men. Because some dude somewhere has an anxiety disorder.
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: But we can't condemn a woman For whatever she does
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: and result to her mental health issues. Even if it's
• 32:46
  Speaker 2: strangling her kids to death with exercise bands. Couldn't she
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: have at least given them some kind of sleeping pills?
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: Could she have fucking.
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: Oh, okay.
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: No, no.
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: Not going there.
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: Okay. So, let's play the rest of the intro.
• 33:05
  Speaker 4: It's almost over, I think, and then we'll situations to
• 33:08
  Speaker 4: be able to leave those relationships. But there's been a
• 33:11
  Speaker 4: bunch of weird victim blaming happening and people really angry
• 33:14
  Speaker 4: that Jen is talking about this at all. I mean,
• 33:16
  Speaker 4: you should keep matters private. That's not victim blaming.
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: No, everything is victim blaming if it makes women uncomfortable.
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: People saying that you shouldn't talk about your personal stuff
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: online is victim blaming.
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, wait, what is she a victim of? Um.
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: Not getting absolute unquestioned praise all the time. That's what
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: she's a victim of.
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, all right. I feel like this is the central
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: pillar of Byrony's analysis, is this particular incident. Maybe I'm wrong.
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: Let's keep going.
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: Well, it escalates, because this isn't like... This is not.
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: The way that she does, the tactic is this, okay?
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: You start off with something that is benign. This is
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: the most benign story because there's no evidence of any
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: kind of abuse, okay? All we know is that there's
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: a divorce and she made a tearful video about it
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: and probably blamed him. I mean, when people get divorced,
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: they often blame each other for it because most people
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: are generally allergic to responsibility, but... She's the one who
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: made a video and put it on the internet. I
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: don't think that her ex-husband did that. I don't think
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: there's a video of Brian Hamilton crying and talking about
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: how manipulative or narcissistic his ex-wife is. But she's doing it.
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: So because she's the squeaky wheel, she's going to get
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: the grease. And people are just going to take her
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: side because it's the only side they hear. And they're
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: not going to really think about the other side. And
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: that's just the way that goes. But ultimately, though, if
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: you look at brass tacks, there's no evidence of abuse.
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: There's no evidence of anything, but even if there was,
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: like say he cheated on her, that's still mild compared
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: to her other examples. Because so all of the other examples,
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: which are high profile celebrity examples, are escalating levels of
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: man bad until you get to like the most, the
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: worst cases, which are like John DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe,
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: which she basically claims he beat her. We don't know
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: this for sure. People have written stuff about it, whatever.
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: And again, it's irrelevant because all men are not John DiMaggio. Like,
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: John DiMaggio is John DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe is Marilyn Monroe.
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: And she chose him at the end of the day.
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: And she was a train wreck of a woman anyhow.
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: But that would be victim blaming for me to say that,
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: even though it's true. Well, I mean, a.
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: Train wreck means that there's a high probability that he
• 35:57
  Speaker 2: wasn't the only one throwing hands.
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: No, probably not. And also, she had a lot of problems.
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: She was like, She was a mess of a human being.
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: That's all it was, right? So, Joe DiMaggio, is that
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: what I not said? Okay, whatever. But my point is,
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: is that this is how she, this is the structure
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: of the video. You give an anecdote and then you say,
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: this is a thing that happens everywhere. here's my evidence,
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: and you bring out a study. Then you bring out
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: another anecdote, and the next anecdote's a little bit more
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: extreme than the last one, or it's a different kind
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: of abuse. You move the pieces around, and you ever
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: escalate with more intense examples until you land on the
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: most extreme. So she couldn't just start with Marilyn Monroe
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: and Joe DiMaggio. She had to work up to it, basically,
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: so that the audience is primed for it. Like, oh
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: my god, I can't believe they would do that. And Also,
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: sprinkle in any other ways that you can sort of
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: like say, you know, communicate to the audience that we
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: live in a patriarchal society where women are second class
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: citizens and men hate them. And it's always been the case,
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: even if I'm bringing up examples from like the 40s
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: or the 50s. Like you have to also contrast it
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: with the modern day so you can say, look, things
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: have not gotten any better. They haven't changed much. Maybe
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: they've gotten worse. I mean, if you look at interviews
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: with like radfems from the 60s and they ask them later,
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: do you think things are better now than they were?
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: They'll always tell you, no, they're worse now.
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: Why?
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: Because they need to keep getting paid. They need to
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: keep making money. They need to keep doing talks. They
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: need to keep grifting. And so in order for the
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: grift to continue, you have to continually find more and
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: more examples of oppression and abuse against women. And they're
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: really good at it because they always find it. They're
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: the best at it. They're the best at finding it.
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: And she's just playing the same game. She probably knows
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: how much those bitches made. Like, doing that stuff. And
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: she's probably doing very well. She probably makes more than
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: her husband, to be honest. And she probably is starting
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: to resent him for that. So... What? Byron-y? Yeah.
• 38:02
  Speaker 2: Oh, God.
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: Yeah? Well, I mean, these women are incredibly fucking greedy.
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: That's the ultimate thing that, um... Uh.
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: The ultimate thing that I found, the more left a
• 38:19
  Speaker 2: woman gets, the higher the bar a man needs to
• 38:21
  Speaker 2: have in terms of money to clear. And that doesn't
• 38:24
  Speaker 2: mean that liberal men make more money than conservative men
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: or that married liberal men make more money than married
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: conservative men. It means that less of them clear the bar.
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: So they have to have additional factors. Like, so for example,
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: if you're in the, in the, the median quartet court, uh, median, um,
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: income as a liberal man, you better be jacked and
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: a six foot at least, or you're not going to
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: make it married, right? You have to have considerably more
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: additional factors to average out and compensate for, um, being
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: a liberal man. Like, uh, and the, what it is
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: is that, um, Liberal women, the premium that they get
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: is they don't have to be decent partners. They basically
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: punch well above their weight in their dating landscape. Well
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: above their weight. So they can be a horrible sea
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: witch of a human being and still command agency. fourth
• 39:31
  Speaker 2: quintile income man. Right? That's how it works.
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: And the ladder is not higher, but they can force
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: themselves further up it, shall we say. And yeah, it's not.
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: It's more of a bucket of crabs kind of situation.
• 39:52
  Speaker 2: But yes, the greed and the further right or the
• 39:55
  Speaker 2: further left you are, the greedier these women are. The
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: more they expect a man to earn to overcome the
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: detriment of being a man. So once you're in like
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: the Che Guevara fangirls area, a man literally has to
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: be like, get, let's see, eight figures to be worthy
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: of marriage. Which is funny, because then all of their
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: virtues are just a way of, of coping, or not coping,
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: but hiding just how fucking greedy they are. And how irrationally,
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: irrationally entitled they are. Right? So, oh, I'm a communist. Winston,
• 40:37
  Speaker 2: a woman says, oh yeah, I'm a communist. You can
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: expect her to only want to date millionaires. Yeah.
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: Well, probably.
• 40:47
  Speaker 2: It's... Oh, man. And if she's like, I'm an anarcho-capitalist,
• 40:55
  Speaker 2: she's probably dating some dude who works at 7-Eleven. That's
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: how it works. Politically. That's how it plays out, guys.
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: Let's finish this.
• 41:08
  Speaker 4: He was doing before for the good of the family. Like,
• 41:11
  Speaker 4: why are we so quick to police a person who
• 41:13
  Speaker 4: didn't do the breaking? Jen is not the only person
• 41:15
  Speaker 4: this has happened to. When she outshines him, he finds
• 41:18
  Speaker 4: a way to lash back against her. This appears in
• 41:20
  Speaker 4: celebrity relationships, in workplaces even. When girls and women do
• 41:24
  Speaker 4: better than boys, there is a mission almost to take
• 41:26
  Speaker 4: them down. Now, first off, all genders can cheat. But
• 41:29
  Speaker 4: when you're looking at shining stars who got cheated on
• 41:31
  Speaker 4: by their partners, the gender split usually goes only one way.
• 41:35
  Speaker 4: As you can see, we've got a lot to get
• 41:36
  Speaker 4: into with this phenomenon.
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: And it's my- So, so, okay. So she uses celebrity
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: breakups to make her arguments because gossip rags only report
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: on them if they're salacious enough and there's often- a
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: lot of hyperbole exaggeration and falsehoods because celebrity, you know,
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: we already know celebrity gossips and tabloids are generally fake.
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: Even the ones that are not trying to make claims
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: about aliens or Nostradamus. I mean like the ones about
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: celebrities going through things, right? Because we, we talked to,
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: I will never forget Lisa Brighton was on the show
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: and she, she used to work for, she was a
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: journalist for Hollywood. And she said that in the entertainment industry,
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: there is no, paparazzi doesn't sneak up on people. They
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: call them and they say, I'm going to be doing
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: this on this day so you can come and get
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: some pictures. And the reason why is because if they're
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: in any news, then they're going to be talked about.
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: If they're being talked about, then they're more likely to
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: get work. That's why. So everything that she's going to
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: report on Probably fake, like in terms of, you know,
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: at least like the stuff that she has to like
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: extract meaning from. That's why the anecdotes are not that useful.
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: Allison's internet dropped. So I'm here by myself right now
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: or her internet crapped out. No, I'm back.
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: I think I'm back. All right.
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: Okay. You're back. All right. Yeah.
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm, I'm, I'm having a storm. Just, just,
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: I need to get this out.
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: Oh, there it goes. There's a storm going over Allison
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: right now, guys. So. I'm going to, I guess I'll
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: look at your chat in the meantime. And we'll wait
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: until Austin comes back. Plenty of female celebs cheat, but
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: the TMZ guys side with women. Yeah, of course. Well,
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: they side with whatever's going to get them ratings, right?
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: they know whether they're aware of gynocentrism or not, which
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: they're likely not because most people are not, they're going
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: to side with whatever is going to push them rating.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: So it's not, it's not because they hate men. It's
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: because they like money. So that's all it is. Um,
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: liberal women are gold diggers. Got it. Well, not, it's
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: not liberal women. It's leftist women that, There's a difference.
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: Those are not the same thing. The woman Allison's arguing
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: with said to her, I'm not a liberal. I'm a leftist.
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know why people struggle with this. Leftists are
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: not liberals. Liberals are not leftists. There are different things. Now,
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: liberalism leads to leftism a lot of the time, but
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: they're not the same. Liberalism is individualistic. Leftism is collectivist. Yeah, uh,
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: And conservatism is communal. Those are the differences. Okay, Allison's back.
• 44:44
  Speaker 2: Hello?
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: Okay. It's okay, I'm just talking. I don't know how
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: long I'll be back for.
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a storm hitting us right now.
• 44:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, so I may get knocked out. So what I
• 44:54
  Speaker 2: was going to say is just continue on without me.
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: Okay. What about the Beat Saber stuff? If that happens.
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 45:06
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: Alright, Allison's not talking right now. She might be dropping again.
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: Let's look at the time codes then. I don't have
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: the studies, but we'll look at this real quick. So
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: she goes into a couple of examples of celebrity shenanigans.
• 45:28
  Speaker 4: Patrons who are the ones that voted for this video topic.
• 45:30
  Speaker 4: They always vote for my video topics and have a
• 45:32
  Speaker 4: lot of input in there. So if you ever want
• 45:34
  Speaker 4: to participate, be sure to join my Patreon. It's always
• 45:36
  Speaker 4: linked in the description box down below.
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: I want to see her Patreon real quick. I want
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: to know how much money this bitch makes. Where is it?
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: She also likes shills, jacks, and cats. I don't see
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: the Patreon here. Where is it? Oh, there it is.
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: Brian and Clara Patreon. Okay.
• 45:58
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: Let me see. Alright, we're just going back to this.
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: I'm going to see because I'm curious. Alright, join for free.
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: Hello? Yeah.
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: Hello?
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: I think that this is going to be a problem. Yeah?
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: Are you okay?
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm fine. I'm not... This isn't... It's just a
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: really pretty heavy storm. We'll see what happens. It's just
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: that I'm going to be dropping in an Oh, we'll see.
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: It's completely out of my control. I know.
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: I got it.
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: Unfortunately, when you're this rural, you know, it doesn't really
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: work very well with the internet, shall we say. Okay,
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: so where are we at?
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: I was just getting ready to start the first clip.
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: Okay, do it.
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: All right, so I'm going to the first time code
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: that you put down. So we'll see how we do here. Okay.
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: So you said 12, 1242. Um, all right, let's see.
• 47:09
  Speaker 4: Unable to do paid work that men didn't really mind.
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: Let me go back a little bit. Okay.
• 47:14
  Speaker 4: Higher likelihood of emotional and physical abuse.
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: So, okay. These are some of her claims and this
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: is all like stuff she's getting.
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: I can't hear it.
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: You can't hear it.
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: I can't hear it.
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: Are you looking at the door? You left. Wait, Allison.
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, I left.
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: I left. You left the video. That's why.
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: Okay, thank you. I'm glad you're keeping track of these things.
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: You got to look at the video. There we go.
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: I have to actually, yeah, okay.
• 47:39
  Speaker 4: Increased contributions to house.
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: So she's quoting from a book called The Ambition Penalty,
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: How Corporate Culture Tells Women to Step Up and Then
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: Pushes Them Down by Stephanie O'Connell. Not biased, I'm sure.
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: And then an article entitled domestic violence increases in heterosexual
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: couples when the woman earns more money. So apparently she's, yeah,
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: it's just called domestic violence. Like it's not set, like
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: it's not gendered. It's just domestic violence. Yeah, no, it isn't. No,
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: it isn't. Yep.
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: You know, please guys know what it's actually saying. Domestic
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: violence increases in relationships where the woman earns more. They
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: want you to immediately associate the terms domestic violence with men.
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: That is incorrect.
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: Well, and the reason I can deduce why it's not
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: correct without even knowing the stats, because if it was men,
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: it would just say men because it would be a layup.
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: But they're not saying men. So why wouldn't you? Like,
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: if you want to drive home, men beat their wives
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: when their wives make more money. And you had the
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: data that proved that men beat their wives when their
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: wives make more money. the title would be men beat
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: their wives when their wives make more money. But they
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: don't say that. They say domestic violence increases in heterosexual couples.
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: That's what they're saying. So that means it's not men.
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: Or at least it's not the majority men. There you go.
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: And we already know that most domestic violence is bi-directional.
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: Like if there is any in the home, both parties
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: are engaging in it.
• 49:21
  Speaker 2: So.
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: And women initiate more often, too.
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: So let's keep going.
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's keep going. All right.
• 49:31
  Speaker 4: Work in addition to the higher likelihood of emotional and
• 49:34
  Speaker 4: physical abuse. As discussed in this piece.
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: By The Conversation, There's a from the conversation, which is
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: also like a woke ass website. Here's another article claiming
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: most couples are less satisfied when the woman earns more.
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: Most couples are less satisfied when the woman earns more.
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: So most likely to get divorced.
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: Most likely it's the women that are dissatisfied because the
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: men are not keeping up or whatever.
• 50:06
  Speaker 2: And ironically, ironically, I'm going to make an inference based
• 50:13
  Speaker 2: on my work into the General Social Survey. And also,
• 50:16
  Speaker 2: it's the ACS, not the ACW. I don't know where
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: I was getting W from. Probably from the CDOM app.
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: But anyway, my work into the statistics on American marriage, again,
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: I discovered that the more left a woman is, the
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: more she demands greater income. So a higher income, men
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: on the left have to have to be equivalently married
• 50:44
  Speaker 2: as conservative men, which is the thing that determines whether
• 50:52
  Speaker 2: a man is married, is his income. It's not for women,
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: just for men. So left women demand more, or at
• 51:00
  Speaker 2: least demand more compensatory factors Right. Even to be married. Right.
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: So when you're looking at this, when you're looking at
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: this situation where divorce confers like men who don't earn
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: get divorced more than or lose their job, get divorced more.
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: I would infer from the statistics I'm seeing that this
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: is worse on the left. So not only do leftist
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: women demand more money from men in order to marry them.
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: They likely also hold them to a higher standard for
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: not earning. So they're more likely to divorce them. Now,
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: don't quote me on that. That's just an inference from
• 51:45
  Speaker 2: what I'm saying. But if the left left women on
• 51:48
  Speaker 2: the left are so mercenary and so materialistic, I can't
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: imagine that wouldn't also impact their behavior when the men
• 51:58
  Speaker 2: they're married to or partnered with lose their job.
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: Okay. Or they're not as ambitious or whatever, right?
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, if money is the primary lever for marriage for
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: the left, or a much more important one, then I
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: can't imagine that they don't also divorce men a lot
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: quicker if they lose their job. So, and again, this is,
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: based on their behavior, the left is not what you
• 52:29
  Speaker 2: would say. It a set of virtues, like, or a
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: set of beliefs about the world. Like, I think this,
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: at some point, some woman said, you know, women on
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: the left, or this is a, this is a short,
• 52:42
  Speaker 2: they were taught, oh yeah, she was quoting to this conservative,
• 52:46
  Speaker 2: it's about caring about people, right? As if her group
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: actually has those virtues. But if you look at their behavior,
• 52:56
  Speaker 2: women on the left are not, they don't have any virtues,
• 52:59
  Speaker 2: not even the ones they say they do. They've just
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: developed a method of mate suppression and social climbing and
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: extracting more resources or moving up. They're moving their relative
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: position up. So they don't extract more resources overall, but
• 53:20
  Speaker 2: they move their relative position up. So it's basically social
• 53:24
  Speaker 2: climbing and mate suppression. And they have the audacity to say, oh,
• 53:28
  Speaker 2: these are our virtues. No, they aren't. Based on your behavior,
• 53:33
  Speaker 2: your virtue is money and envy. Well, that's a vice.
• 53:36
  Speaker 2: It's greed and envy.
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: They're not virtuous. They're full of vice.
• 53:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but they're driven by greed and envy.
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, vices.
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: And they wear the vestments of virtue.
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah.
• 53:51
  Speaker 2: In order to hide the fact.
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: Because another vice they have is pride. They want to
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: be liked for being that way.
• 53:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah. So there's nothing... Like, this is... Maybe I'm repeating
• 54:02
  Speaker 2: this over and over again because I find it so astounding.
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: There is no actual... Everything they say is a signal
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: and has no actual weight or worth behind it. They
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: don't care about minorities. They don't care about trans women.
• 54:24
  Speaker 2: They might care about trans issues insofar as they can
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: get attention and clout from them. They don't care about
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: gay people. They don't care about immigrants. Every view of
• 54:34
  Speaker 2: these women that thinks that it's based on the idea
• 54:38
  Speaker 2: that they care about anything, aside from how it increases
• 54:42
  Speaker 2: the attention, their clout, their social standing, and their ability
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: to extract more resources from men, none of it. It's
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: all empty signaling to hide their greedy, grasping, selfish, avaricious, destructive,
• 55:05
  Speaker 2: probably every single ist that they accuse other people of,
• 55:10
  Speaker 2: they are themselves. They are racist, sexist, homophobic. They just
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: want to signal all of this because it allows them
• 55:18
  Speaker 2: to climb socially and mate suppress. Now, I'm not here
• 55:23
  Speaker 2: going to say, oh, well, conservative women are lovely. They're
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: also going the same direction, just more timidly. Yeah. They're
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: just a little more timid about it. That's it. So
• 55:35
  Speaker 2: I'm like, you think I'm going to bat for any
• 55:38
  Speaker 2: group of women? No, not at all. Not even men's
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: rights women, because apparently there's plenty of them who just
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: seem to turn at a dime, too. But, you know, like,
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: this is insane. Do women understand what virtue and morality is?
• 55:55
  Speaker 2: This is my standing question at this point. Or are
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: these simply signals, positional signals, to facilitate their social climbing
• 56:04
  Speaker 2: and the extraction of resources for themselves?
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Right?
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: I don't think Byrony believes anything. Like the whole, one
• 56:13
  Speaker 2: of her videos, she's like, oh, women, patriarchy makes the
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: women wear pink. I'm like, Byrony, If you could tattoo
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: your skin hot pink, I think you would. What are
• 56:24
  Speaker 2: you even talking about? She's dressed head to toe in pink,
• 56:27
  Speaker 2: saying patriarchy forces women. What, is pink only for you, Byrony?
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: Because you've got the magic feminist spell to make it
• 56:34
  Speaker 2: non-patriarchal to wear pink? Right? Is femininity only for you, Byrony? Yeah.
• 56:42
  Speaker 2: And it's like, this is mate suppression. This is these
• 56:48
  Speaker 2: women feeling free to use all of the things that
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: they tell other women. Oh, don't wear makeup. That's patriarchy.
• 56:56
  Speaker 2: Don't shave your legs. That's patriarchy. Oh, you can be
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: 300 pounds. It's patriarchy to say that you should stay slim.
• 57:05
  Speaker 2: And don't be feminine. That's patriarchy. And I'm like, so
• 57:10
  Speaker 2: this isn't mate suppression? This isn't the destruction of the
• 57:13
  Speaker 2: mate value of other women? Like... Honestly. And here's Byrony
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: in her little sundress with her gigantic eyes made even
• 57:25
  Speaker 2: bigger by filter and her demure little appearance. Oh, don't
• 57:29
  Speaker 2: be like me. Be a grotesque orc. You deserve it.
• 57:38
  Speaker 2: That's self-love. Byrony married, doing everything she says other women shouldn't.
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: Yep. Right?
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: It's true. But that's not men's oppression, guys.
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: Well, but see, Briarty, she's also basically said, well, you know,
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: she's like really lucky because she found like the one
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: good man. So no other woman could possibly find the
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: man she has. That's why they should probably just avoid men.
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: But she's doing just fine. She pulled it off. She's
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: flexing on them and they don't know it. They're just
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: paying her like $ 2, 000 a month. to spew this at them.
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: Cause I looked at her Patreon. She makes about two
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: grand a month.
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: Oh my God.
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: No, like two something, almost three actually. Um, yeah, it's
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: like 2,800 a month. That's more than me. Plus, plus, uh, plus, uh,
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: whatever YouTube gives her.
• 58:28
  Speaker 2: Cause she doesn't like, whatever YouTube's give her. Yeah.
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: She's probably doing fine. She makes, she's got 230,000 subs. Yeah,
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: for sure. Um, anyway, and she's got sponsors too.
• 58:38
  Speaker 2: Everything we have on YouTube, everything we have on YouTube,
• 58:41
  Speaker 2: no sponsors. Um, No real advertising income. Everything comes from
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: you guys. So if you want to support the show, feedthebadger.com
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: slash support. We do have two song requests, and Telomar
• 58:55
  Speaker 2: also got me this ambition penalty. Thank you, Telomar, for
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: getting me the book. I shall force Henthwith, go through it,
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: and see if there's anything interesting in it. We have
• 59:05
  Speaker 2: three more songs, guys, so get those in, please. Get
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: to them. in.
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: Alright, let's, uh, look, so this is the timecode that
• 59:13
  Speaker 1: you sent me, so we're listening to this now.
• 59:15
  Speaker 4: Most heterosexual couples are less satisfied when women earn more.
• 59:19
  Speaker 4: The study found that when women were unable to do
• 59:21
  Speaker 4: paid work, that men didn't really mind as much in
• 59:23
  Speaker 4: terms of their relationship satisfaction. But when men were unable
• 59:26
  Speaker 4: to do paid work, it brought women's relationship satisfaction down.
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: Oh, is that so? So when men are not making
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: as much money, women are less satisfied. When women are
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: not making as much money, men don't mind. Isn't that interesting?
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: How are you going to make this men bad? How
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: are you going to do that? We got a third request.
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: It was just through Super Chat.
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: Gabriel?
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it was Gabriel. How is she going to make
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: this men's fault? Because like you've already said, this is
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: exactly what I've been saying when people, you know, they're like, well,
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: why can't women make more? It's like, well, I mean, sure,
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: women could make more. But the problem is, is that
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: those women are going to be upset with the men
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: because they don't want to make more. And ultimately, that
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 1: is what's happening. So look, here we go. Here's the graph.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: You can see it. I mean, I don't know how
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: they're measuring happiness. That's a whole other conversation. But when
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: women earn more, but both are employed, men and women
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: are both unsatisfied or less satisfied with that situation, but
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: women are more dissatisfied. So men don't like it when
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: women make more, but women really don't like it when
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: women make more. But when men are unemployed and women
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: aren't working... Women dislike it almost three times as much.
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: And men are also still highly dissatisfied. So those men
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: want to work. Oh, interesting. Yeah. A man that's unemployed
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 1: is also dissatisfied. Do you see that?
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 2: Yeah. But interestingly enough, woman-employed man homemaker isn't that bad.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: I guess that's what she's hanging this all on. Um,
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: I'm guessing that that's an active choice though.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: Wait a minute though. But why would, what is the
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: difference between a man homemaker and a man that's unemployed?
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: Why wouldn't he just do stuff at home?
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: Probably an active choice. Like it's probably something that they chose.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 2: So it, uh, I don't know.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: I'd have to look at that.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 2: I don't know why they aren't classifying. Yeah. Look at
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 2: that study carefully. I mean, I'm not going to say
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: that that's not possible.
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: Um, But it's going to require, honestly, I don't think
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 2: it would be a lip for, for.
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: You know, I'm going to say, what about a man
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: that works from home and a woman that goes to
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: a workplace?
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 2: That's probably fine. I, you know, I would have to, to, to,
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 2: to clarify what's going on with this study. I'd have
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 2: to figure it out.
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 2: I'd have to figure out what's going on here.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Um, Somebody in the chat, Bayava Aurora says, how
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: do I request music? There's a link in the description.
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: Go to.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: FeedTheBadger.com forward slash just the tip to make a request.
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: You go to a website called BeSaver.com, which is down
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: in the description.
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but before you make a request, just so you know,
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: after I finish the request, on your honor, $ 25 in
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: the hat. for our, our, uh, for our fundraiser at
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: feed the badger.com slash support. Cause that's what we're, we're
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: doing right now. And if you just want to support,
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: you can do so feed the badger.com slash support, um,
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: man employed woman homemaker. So this is, I would honestly
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: say that I think this is just a situation where
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: they chose it for whatever reason, like to have a
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 2: man stay at home. Yeah. And it, if it's not chosen, it's, it's,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: I guess more stressful. Like, um, I don't want to like,
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 2: I personally don't care if, if a family wants the
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 2: father to stay at home and take care of the
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 2: kids that I don't think that's going to cause everything
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: to implode. Um, as long as the woman remains satisfied
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: with it.
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah. That's what it hinges on though. That's what it
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: hinges on.
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah. That's what it hinges on.
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: I mean, if it works for you, I don't have
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: a problem with that. But the thing is, is that
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: I'm just saying like, I think that that will remain
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: an outlier. Not impossible, but probably an outlier. That's all
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 1: I'm saying.
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes. But again, that almost makes it worse that
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 2: these women are so dissatisfied when a man either loses
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: his job or doesn't earn as much. It's like, yeah,
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 2: that's probably out of his control. If your preference, lady,
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: is for him to earn more... That's probably his preference, too.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: So that's that is that is really unfortunate. But yeah,
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: I'm I'm interested now. How does she make this? How
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: does she make this?
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I want to know how this is like men's fault.
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 4: Not for the reasons that you're thinking of, because I
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 4: know there's going to be a whole lot of hypergamy
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 4: comments coming in. The women who weren't able to work
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 4: are taking care of the unpaid labor at home. The men, however,
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 4: when women are the breadwinners, are not picking up that slack.
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 4: In fact, when a man is a homemaker, the relationship
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 4: satisfaction is similar to when a man is employed and
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 4: the woman is a homemaker. In fact, when women are
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 4: the breadwinners, they do more.
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: Actually, the satisfaction is higher when a woman is the homemaker, but.
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 4: Unpaid labor. It is higher.
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it is.
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 4: They were surprised to me that they'd be less satisfied
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 4: with their relationship when they are exhausted from working for
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 4: long hours doing like- Who?
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: Wait, wait, who's exhausted? I wanna hear that.
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: Oh, the women apparently also do more domestic labor.
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: That's what she's saying, I think.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 4: Who weren't able to work or taking care of the
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 4: unpaid labor at home. The men, however, when women are
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 4: the breadwinners, are not picking up that slack. In fact,
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 4: when a man is a homemaker, the relationship's- Is that true?
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 1: What?
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: What kinds of domestic labor do these people track?
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: Well, that, yeah. I mean, like, are the men, are
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: the women like cleaning out the gutters and, you know,
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: mowing the lawn and, uh, I don't know, like do
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: like doing like work around like actual work, work around
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: the house or is it just like the vacuuming and
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: the sweeping and stuff? Um, a woman wishing her man
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: more money saving. So yeah, go ahead.
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, because, all right, I'm just wondering because I'm just
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 2: thinking about my own house. And in the last year,
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: Jonathan has fixed the on-demand water heater, the refrigerator, the furnace,
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: the AC, all of which would cost several thousand dollars
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: to fix each if we had to bring somebody from
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 2: the city because we live rurally. So do these domestic
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: tasks include that kind of stuff? Not to mention just
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: general maintenance on the car because he's replaced brake pads.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: He has to regularly change the tires, plus all the
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 2: maintenance that's required for a place in Saskatchewan, which is
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 2: a really rough location. Not rough as in crime-ridden. It's
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: just rough in terms of weather. Like you have, there's
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: snow removal every year, which is pretty difficult. And then
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 2: there's also all the mowing and cleaning. Like you said,
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: cleaning the gutters, fixing the roof. If there's storms that
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: cause damage to the roof.
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, doing repairs around the house or whatever. Yeah, sure. Yeah.
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 2: And, you know, like a couple of days ago, he
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 2: spent half a day removing a stump. Right. So we
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 2: could put in a garbage bin. And then, like, all
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: of this is a considerable amount, plus some carpentry work
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 2: and painting, stuff like that. All of this is, like,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: a substantial amount of work. Does it show up on
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: any of these domestic chore lists? Any of it, right?
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: Pouring cement pads for generators, fixing satellite dishes. Okay. Let's
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: see what anything else that I can think of off
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: the top of my head.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: The other thing is that these male, like male homemakers
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: could be like well-to-do men that don't, that they, they
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: can hire people to do this stuff and they're just
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: sort of overseeing it. Like it could be some other,
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Like we'd have to see the specifics, but.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: So no, I just found out. I just, it's the
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: Hilda instrument first order. 2024 Statistical Report. Answer, domestic labor
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: is measured in separate boxes, and the box called housework
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: is the female-type task by construction. Housework, preparing meals, washing dishes,
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: cleaning the house, washing clothes, ironing, sewing, six-name task, all routine, indoor,
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: all female typical. Household errands, shopping, banking, bills, financial records,
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: explicitly excludes driving children anywhere. Outdoor tasks, home maintenance, repairs, improvements,
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 2: Are booked as a separate variable. Care items separately. Own children,
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 2: others children, disabled, elderly, relatives, volunteering. All right. So women
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: do 59 hours and men do 57. That's really a
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: very minor difference to compare. about.
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: What if men are just more efficient and that's why
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: they do it a little faster?
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 2: So men aren't doing domestic labor as generated by an
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: instrument whose housework item enumerates only female typical tasks. A
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 2: separate ledger for line for male typical tasks that the
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: headline may or may not include. So when they say
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: household work, they may only be talking about what is
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: literally called housework, which is female typical tasks, not outdoor tasks.
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: I don't know how they classify fixing a on-demand water
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: heater or a natural gas water heater or the fridge.
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: And that's in addition to just generally fixing the computers.
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 2: And doing carpentry, electrical work, roofing. I mean, like, and
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: then the groundskeeping stuff. So it's like all of that
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: is nil. And yeah, he could be rich and get
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: some other man to do that. But then, I don't know.
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: You're right. It might be a situation where a guy,
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 2: he's independently wealthy or he's a stockbroker and he works
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: like six minutes a day. Or he's a swing trader
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 2: and he works six minutes a day. So he still
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 2: makes quite a bit of money. But none of that,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 2: none of that is entered into the ledger here. None
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 2: of it. And I don't think they would classify that
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: as domestic tasks, even though it's literally keeping a household running.
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: You can't have hot water without a heater. You can't
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: have perishable food without a refrigerator. You can't have a
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 2: living space without a heater, right? Or an AC because
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 2: it does get hot here too. So none of that
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 2: would be classified as domestic work, even though it supports
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 2: everything domestic. Yeah, this is nonsense. All of it. All
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: of it is nonsense. All right. All right.
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: Next time code, I think. All right, well, let's finish. Yeah,
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: this is a little bit more left in this.
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 4: Is similar to when a man is employed and the
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 4: woman is a homemaker. In fact, when women are the breadwinners,
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 4: they do more unpaid labor. So it zero surprised me
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 4: that they'd be less satisfied with their relationship Or, alternatively,
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 4: they just report more.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So it says here, research shows Australian women do,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: on average, about 70% of unpaid domestic labor in couple households.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: Previous Australian research, also using HILDA, shows women who earn
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: 75% or more of household income spend 40 minutes longer
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: doing domestic labor than women who were more equal earners.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: That's what they're claiming.
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: Okay. Zeroing in on the finding that women who do
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: more paid work do also do more household chores.
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: Women do more work, women most affected.
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 2: But, but again, if you don't, if you don't actually
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: track repair and outdoor work, there is no category for
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: repair where like between let's look at the, for in this,
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: in this survey, the, the categories are household work, right?
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 2: All routine indoor, all female typical, so preparing meal, washing dishes,
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 2: cleaning the house, et cetera. Household errands, right? Shopping, banking, bills,
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: et cetera. Indoor tasks, home maintenance, repairs. Okay, I guess
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: outdoor tasks is home maintenance. Repairs, improvements, painting, car maintenance
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 2: and repairs and gardening. And it's a separate variable. So
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 2: the headline housework is done more by women It doesn't
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 2: include outdoor tasks. It may not even include repairing indoor
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 2: stuff at all. I guess repairs might be there, like
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: appliance repair at all. But anyway, so again, these statistics
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 2: lie by omission.
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, of course.
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 2: And when I actually tried to repair, I've gone through
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 2: and tried to figure out what's going on with these statistics.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: and try to put back in is kind of, um,
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 2: more irregular type of work, but nevertheless takes a lot
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 2: of effort. And not to mention the fact that, um,
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: men are able to fix these things because they have
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: a general mechanical knowledge that they maintain, right? This doesn't
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: come out of nowhere. And I'm not saying all men
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: have this, but it doesn't come out of nowhere. It's
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: a general interest that's maintained, um, by hobbies and other
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 2: stuff that doesn't count at all. So what I'm saying
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: is that men have hobbies that tend to support their
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: mechanical skills, which then are useful during these periods where
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 2: things break. So it's not just the moment that the
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 2: thing breaks that he's acting or moving towards fixing it.
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: It's all the other stuff that isn't counted at all
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 2: or is just seen as a hobby. Acquiring skills, maintaining
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: those skills. And when you add in all of that,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 2: Men actually pull out further than women in terms of
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 2: their household work.
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: Okay. I can hear the thunder, so the distant thunder
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: that could.
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 4: Be destroying my- They do more unpaid labor. So it's
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 4: zero surprise to me that they'd be less satisfied with
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 4: their relationship when they are exhausted from working for long hours.
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: Doing like really- Sitting at a desk, doing emails and
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: Xerox copies.
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 4: Stressful work to then come home is.
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: It stressful work you're just like no i'm not going
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: to accept this because we know that there are women
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: at work but bribery is trying to like paint a
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: picture like oh they're like they're going to the coal
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: mines and they're coming back with black lung and the
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: husband hasn't done anything well that's probably not the case
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: that's they're probably have like a air-conditioned office job or
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: something right or you know maybe they work If the
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: worst thing is, maybe they work in retail. And, you know,
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: I can see how that can be stressful and tiring.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: But to paint it like, you know, they're out there
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: on the fucking oil rig and they're coming home and
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: the husband, like, hasn't done anything. He's eating bonbons and watching,
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: you know, all my children. That's, no, I'm not letting
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: her do that. That's a manipulation.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 4: And their partner has done absolutely nothing.
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: See? Absolutely nothing. Not that he's not doing enough. She's
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: just saying he's not doing anything. Just like I predicted.
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 4: When they're capable of doing stuff. His feelings of emasculation
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 4: for not being able to meet patriarchal standards means that he.
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: Oh, it's patriarchal. It's patriarchy's fault.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: It's patriarchal's fault, Allison. So what's actually happening? So let's
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 2: decompose the problems with statistics here. One, Every study in
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 2: this line, so every study that's involved in this assertion,
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 2: including the one the feminist relay rests on, agrees that
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 2: a woman's household... So the relay is feminist telling feminist
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: telling feminist. Agrees that a woman's housework falls as her
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 2: earnings rise from zero up to a 50% income share. Brian's... 1994, Bittman, England, Sayre, Fulber,
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: and Matheson, 2003. Women decrease their housework as their earnings
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 2: increase up to the point where both spouses contribute equally.
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 2: So women who do more paid work also do more
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: chores as false as a within-woman standard. Paid work and
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 2: own work buy housework down in the exchange theoretic direction.
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 2: So up to half Women who work more do not
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 2: do more housework. They do less. The upper tail. So
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: this is a claim about the upper tail. So women
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 2: who are the primary breadwinners up to the exclusive breadwinners.
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 2: But here's the issue. This is a group that includes
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 2: men who are unemployed, men who are unemployed due to disability,
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 2: and likely men who are retired and their wife still works. Okay?
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 2: Um, Bitman's 2003 same as result among the small percentage
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 2: of couples where she provides 51 to 50, 100% of income,
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: the division turns more traditional compensatory conformity. This is the,
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 2: the classic, the, they find a result and they have
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: to call it something or they have to infer something
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: or over claim. Uh, and then later it was called
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: gender deviance neutralization. Again, these are phrases made up by
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 2: these researchers who, to start to operationalize their finding in
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 2: terms of the overarching theory of patriarchal dominance. Now, get
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: rid of the overarching theory of patriarchal dominance and you
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 2: might find something else. Maybe the men are disabled, right?
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 2: Maybe they are dealing with mental health issues. Maybe they're retired,
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 2: not considered. This tale is what became Hewitt's 40 Minutes
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 2: line and the specimen's 1302. So what de Byron is
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: saying in 1302. The household tracks, housework tracks her own
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 2: absolute earnings only, not her husband's and not the ratio.
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 2: The displaced findings are simply explained in terms of women's
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 2: absolute rather than relative earnings. Oh, okay. But this is
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 2: actually about a group of people who are really low earners. right?
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Mechanism.
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 2: High earners outsource. Female breadwinner households are disproportionately low total
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 2: income households. How much of this is welfare, too.
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: I wonder.
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: Okay. She's the breadwinner because he earns little or nothing,
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 2: often through unemployment or disability, and those households can't outsource.
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 2: So we're also comparing women in households where they can outsource.
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 2: So usually if she's a stay-at-home, she might have a nanny,
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 2: she might have people who help with the gardening, the housework,
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 2: et cetera. If you're a woman with an unemployed man,
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 2: you're more likely to be poor, and you can't outsource
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 2: because you can't afford it.
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 2: Um, do its own, um, article, uh, composition, not gender penance.
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 2: Women were least satisfied when bread winning with, when bread
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: winning because the partner couldn't work. Right. So this is, um,
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 2: this is, these are people who've fallen on hard times.
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 2: There's probably a reason why the man can't work either.
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 2: It's a completely like an area where there's nothing, um,
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 2: for him to do, or he has a disability, or
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 2: maybe he's retired, right? And she does more household labor
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: because they can't afford to outsource it. That's it. And
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 2: we don't even know if he's doing outdoor, if he's
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: doing what is classified outdoor work, which includes indoor repairs,
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 2: which incidentally creates difficulty when answering these surveys for men.
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: Is repairing a fridge really outdoor work? Because that's what
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 2: it's classified as.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 3: Right?
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: If you don't specify, how would you know? That becomes
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 2: a methodological issue of how they acquired this data. Okay.
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: In couples, and one forced order counter is already in hand.
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: The 2024 HILDA report, in couples where she is employed
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 2: and he is not, her household share is 46%. He
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: does the majority of the housework in that configuration. Her
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 2: care share is 55%. Against the Byronys, their partner does
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 2: absolutely nothing. The current Australian data shows the non-employed male
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 2: partner doing 54% of the housework. Right? So it's not
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: even true on the face. And again, housework, 54% of
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 2: the housework is female-coded tasks. This may not include at all,
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 2: and probably doesn't, any male-coded household tasks. How did we
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 2: do this? How did we create this situation where household
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: tasks are universally seen as female? When there's all kinds
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 2: of repairs that happen, renovations, and maintenance that happens that's
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 2: mail-coded that happens within the house that is... We don't
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: even know if it's being captured by these surveys. How convenient, huh?
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 2: Very convenient. All right, let's go.
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: Let's finish this clip.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 4: That has done absolutely nothing, even when they're capable of
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 4: doing stuff. His feelings of emasculation.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: Oh, his fears of emasculation.
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 4: For not being able to meet patriarchal standards means that
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 4: he lashes out at her by undermining her in all
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 4: sorts of ways. Of course, this is not all men.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 4: It's a well-studied pattern, though.
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 2: Okay. Oh, for God's sake.
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah.
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 2: No, actually, it's not. It's not a well-studied pattern. These
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: are all inferences. All of this stuff, like she's basing
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 2: this on, I wish these researchers would do this. She's
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 2: basing this on all of this compensatory conformity, gender deviance
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 2: neutralization bullshit that these researchers beak off about because they're
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: trying to massage their findings into the dominant paradigm of
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: male dominance. I wish they wouldn't do that because it
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: gives these women a lot of surface to start planting
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 2: their bullshit. But all of this, everything that she said
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 2: is not supported by the evidence. It is conjecture, and
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: it's just a way of undermining men as partners. That's
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: what it is. That's what she's doing. She's undermining men's
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 2: product value in the marketplace. Everything out of her mouth
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 2: is doing that. You notice that, guys? Why does she
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: do that? Because she wants to browbeat women into withdrawing
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: their bid. So that her bid has more value. That's it. Okay. Again,
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: if it wasn't it, if it wasn't it, women on
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 2: the left wouldn't treat being a man on the left
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: as a deficit in the marriage market. That has to
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: be compensated for with money. Sorry, Brian.
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: No, it's fine. We got another request. So we got
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 1: four now. We're almost there. Okay, so let's do the
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: next time code, the third one. So the first one
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: we just did, the second one we covered in the
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: beginning because it was part of the intro. So we're
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: in the third one now, okay? So this is about
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: Tina Turner and Ike Turner.
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 4: I love abuse. Meanwhile, in 1986, Tina met music executive
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 4: Erwin Bach, and they fell in love, saying, He has
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: never been the least bit intimidated by my career, my talents,
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 4: or my fame. He shows me that true love doesn't
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 4: require the dimming of my light so that he can shine.
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 4: On the contrary, we're the light of each other's lives,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 4: and we want to shine as bright as we can together.
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 2: Okay, I don't think we need to go much further
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: into this time code. I don't see it on my list, but.
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: Oh, you sent this to me.
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the 35% backlash study, load-bearing number, delayed via O'Connell's book,
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: primary never touched, not present when roles reversed. Does the
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: instrument measure female perpetrated abuse of male breadwinners at all
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: or only ask women? Yeah, so 11-11 to 12-20. So
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: I was just playing. I don't know why that's where
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: the time goes.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 2: So she begins this with Ike Turner? Okay, she begins
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 2: with Ike Turner.
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: Okay, but I do have a statement. Okay, go ahead,
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: go ahead.
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 2: Well, the man that replaced Ike Turner. How about that?
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 1: Or not.
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 2: No, that was Tina Turner.
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: Tina Turner, yeah. The man who replaced... Well, no, the
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 1: man who replaced Ike Turner in Tina Turner's relationship, yes.
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 2: We are talking about Turner, not Cher, right?
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Cher's later.
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: Sonny and Cher's later. I just want to point.
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 2: I just want to point something out. So why doesn't
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 2: this man reflect all men?
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: Well, because he allows her to shine, Allison. He, like,
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 1: basically gave her the spotlight. Now... he's like a producer
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 1: or something. I think he's like a music mogul.
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 1: So it's his, his interest to like boost her, but like, whatever,
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: he said a nice thing on an interview. So that's
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: what matters, Alison. It's like Mariah Carey, right? When she
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: like blew up and she married a producer, um, like,
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: you know, we, nobody knows the guy's name. He doesn't
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: care because men are not interested in fame. You know,
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: I mean, not as much, I don't think it's not
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: like as big of a deal, but, But, of course,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: that doesn't... I don't know, like, what that... Like, I
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: think that kind of stuff happens all the time. So,
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: I don't know why she's acting like this is... I
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: don't know, Allison. I don't know. The guy is okay
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: until he's not. That's all I can say. Like, the
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: man's quality is under constant surveillance by people like this.
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: And so, all it takes is for him to, like,
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: say something that she could interpret as bad. And he's
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: just going to be the same as Ike Turner. You know? So...
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: It's a short trip. I think she also mentions Chris
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: Brown comes up, who I believe hit Rihanna. I think
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: that she brings that up. It's basically like every celebrity
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: example we can come up with.
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I can give you a full list.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: The Hailey-Justin Bieber-Jen Hamilton divorce, which I don't even know
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: why that's in here, but whatever. Shakira Peek. I probably
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: mispronounced that. Sandra Bullock, Jesse James, Hale Berry, Eric Bennett,
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 2: Monica Bellucci, Holly Berry, Eric Bennett, Monica Bellucci, Vincent Casiel, Beyonce, Jay-Z,
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 2: Tina Turner-Ike, A Star is Born, Stanwyck Faye, Gazelle Bundchen,
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 2: Tom Brady, the well-trained wife author, Nara Smith, Ballerina Farm.
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: They divorced? Oh no, she mentions them.
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: She probably.
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 2: Mentions them. Go to 1753. Go to 1753. Let's see
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: what she has to say about them. Probably it's a
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 2: thorn in her side, I would imagine.
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, perhaps. 1753.
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 4: Audiobooks and I literally stopped in my tracks. Like my
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 4: heart rate was just pounding. As she talks about in
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 4: this reel.
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 3: And when they ascribe all of their self-worth to what
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 3: they bring to the table and what they earn, and
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: then she starts to earn more. or come up to
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 3: his level or anything like that, he immediately feels that
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 3: his sense of safety and self-worth is threatened. I'm not
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 3: a therapist. I haven't studied that, but I have experienced it.
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 3: And I think that we see this pattern again and
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 3: again in patriarchy.
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 4: There's a future video topic I want to do on
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 4: the trad wife life crumbling and like the whole scheme.
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: Wait wait wait wait so it's about the trad wife
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: thing I guess so yeah so this woman this this
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: woman who's speculating um obviously a feminist because she uses
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 1: patriarchy to make her argument uh And that was, I think,
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: on the Ballerina Farms thing. I mean, do you want
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: me to go back a little bit more? Well, no wonder.
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 2: I would actually say that a man is very perceptive.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Here it is. There's a book. The woman
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: wrote this book called A Well-Trained Wife. It features a
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 1: woman with like a, what do you call them, like
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: a wind-up key in her back. And it says, My
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 1: Escape from Christian Patriarchy by Tia Levings. Yeah. Another best-selling book. Yay. Yay.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: You have no idea how much I hate you. I
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 1: hate how successful you're going to be. I hate how
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: bright you're going to shine because people love you and
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: want to hire you and of course our children will
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: choose you even if those even those damn dogs choose you.
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: I again this is all we just have to I
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: guess we just have to accept this as truth I guess.
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: I don't know.
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 4: So people love you and want to hire you and
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 4: of course our children will choose you even those damn
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 4: dogs choose you. You're a talented Jezebel who always wanted
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 4: to outshine me damn you and then he left she
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 4: quickly gathered up their five children got into the car
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 4: and was trying to escape as quickly as possible and
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 4: when she was leaving.
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 2: Wait wait wait he left and she was trying to
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 2: escape uh yeah.
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: I guess so that's what she said I mean I don't.
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 2: Know that no that doesn't Okay, if I'm hearing this correctly,
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: he left and then she's trying to escape.
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: Should I go back again and play it?
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 4: No, no, that's okay. And then he left. She quickly
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 4: gathered up their five children, got into the car, and
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 4: was trying to escape as quickly as possible.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: She was trying to escape a guy that left her?
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 2: Apparently. Okay.
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 1: I guess we're just gonna accept that. Yeah, we're just
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 1: gonna accept that. New reality, guys. A new reality just dropped.
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 1: When you leave someone, you're actually chasing them. And then
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: they have to escape you.
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 2: Yes. I certainly believe that whatever comes out of this
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 2: woman's mouth and is in her book is not a
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 2: self-serving lie after that demonstration.
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 1: Got our fifth request.
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 2: Well, yeah, we probably should do.
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: Anyway. Sure.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 2: Let's let's finish the one this one off. I'm curious
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 2: to see what she has to say about traditionalists.
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, sure.
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 2: Which I doubt she. But what I was going to
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: I was going to conclude what I was going to say. OK,
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 2: if you're with a liberal woman and you feel like
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 2: she starts to, quote, unquote, outshine you and you're like, oh,
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: there it comes. I hear I'm going to be replaced.
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 2: You're probably 100 percent accurate. How is it that she
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: shows the stats of women being dissatisfied when their partners
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: lose their job or become unemployed or earn less than them,
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: and you see the gigantic freaking bar of women's dissatisfaction,
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 2: and then she has the audacity based on that evidence
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 2: to say it's men. who get dissatisfied. Okay, Brian, I'm
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 2: just going to express kind of an existential defeat here.
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: What do you do with this? When this woman brings
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 2: you evidence of the exact opposite of what she's asserting,
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 2: women are twice or three times more dissatisfied and probably
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 2: contemptuous of their partner when he earns less or is unemployed. Okay.
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 2: And she shows it to you. She shows it to
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 2: her audience. She, she must see it herself. And then
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: from that, she concludes that the problem is that men
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 2: is men's dissatisfaction when their woman earns more.
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: And you look at this and you're like, so obviously
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 2: what we have to conclude from this is that no
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 2: amount of evidence matters when Your assertion is completely impervious
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: evidence because you have provided evidence that refutes your assertion
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 2: on every single level. And yet you continue not just
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 2: to assert what you're saying, but you don't have the
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: brick and decency Byrony. Bryony, you don't have the freaking
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 2: decency to hide the evidence that you are wrong. Instead,
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 2: you show it to everyone as if it's evidence you
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 2: are right. I mean, that's audacious lying. That's a level
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 2: of lying that is like it's. I mean, it should
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: be an Olympic sport at this point, and it should
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: be marked like out of 10. How, how, how astoundingly
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: audacious was this lie that Byron, he just tried to
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 2: deliver amazing. Like, it's just like, okay, here's the evidence.
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: It completely refutes everything I'm about to say, but I'm right.
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: I'm going to show you the evidence that I'm wrong
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 2: as evidence that I'm right. And, and, and her audience
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: of clapping seals, just like, I give it a perfect 10.
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: This is the most magnificently horrifying lie I have seen yet.
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying, Brian.
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: Brian's like, yeah.
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: I got a rumble. No, I got a rumble rant
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: for a fan for a dollar who gives a says, Alison,
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: what you just described is why I prefer to say
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: patriarchy is good. Clearly logic will fail the brainwashed masses.
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: So why use facts and logic on them without also
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 1: adopting might makes right. That's his super child or rumble rant.
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but it's not might. It's just women need to
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 2: accept the fact that they apparently don't have the mental
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: tools to live in reality.
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: Well, maybe they're living in the reality that they think
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: that they perceive, but it's like a reality that is
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: false because they're so safe. Because men have basically made
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: them so safe that they're like, they experience the world differently.
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 1: I don't know. All right. So let's see what she says.
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 4: When she was leaving, she saw him coming back. He
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 4: had gone to his workplace to pick up his gun.
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 4: You know how I read this with audio books and
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 4: I literally stopped in my tracks. Like my heart rate
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 4: was just pounding.
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you just accepted that, huh? He just, he was
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: coming back with his gun. And nothing happened. Meanwhile, Lindsay
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: Clancy killed three kids. Her own kids. That's not a
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: conversation we're going to have. Notice, notice, Briarney Clare has
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: not done a video on Lindsay Clancy.
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 2: Matt Festel has, though.
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: She has, I know. I'm not sure I want to
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 1: crack that open.
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure I want to crack that seal open, Brian.
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: I think the silence is deafening, but what I'm guessing
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: is that she's going to wait until the verdict is out,
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: and then she's going to use whatever to construct her tail.
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: And we will get a video from her, but she
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: has to work really, it's going to take a lot.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: It's going to take like a long high level spell
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: to like, you know, to, um, to like make this
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: work to blame men and patriarchy. So she needs to
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: take time, higher level space spells take longer to cast.
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: So she's got to wait until all the information is out.
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 1: And then she's got to get the fucking candles out
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: and the, you know, and the, the incense and, the
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: crystals and then start praying to her moon goddesses and
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: the spirit of Lilith so that she can get the
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: script for her video defending this. But this clip or
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: this bite from the audio book that she listened to
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 1: where the ex-husband left and came back with a gun
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: and didn't kill anybody is proof that he might have
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 1: done something.
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but he usually keeps his gun in the office.
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 1: I don't know. This is just what the, like the, again,
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: the audio book is written from the perspective of the
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: feminist woman that wrote it. So we just have to
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: take her out her word, Alison. Briarty's just sourcing other
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 1: feminists to get her arguments. What's wrong with that?
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 4: As she talks about in this reel.
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 3: And when they ascribe all of their self-worth to what
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 3: they bring to the table and what they earn, and
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 3: then she starts to earn more or come up to
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 3: his level or anything like that. he immediately feels that
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 3: his sense of safety and self-worth is threatened. I'm not
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 3: a therapist. I haven't studied that, but I have experienced it.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 3: And I think that we see this pattern again and
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 3: again in patriarchy.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 4: There's a future video topic I want to do.
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: There you go.
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 4: On the trad wife life crumbling and like the whole
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 4: scheme of it crumbling, like we've recently seen with Nara Smith.
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 2: Okay. So, um, all right now the, you're a fucking
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 2: talented Jezebel whore. Who always managed to outshine me. that's
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 2: said no man ever.
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah somehow i don't think he said that like that's
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 1: a weird word to bring up jezebel like he did
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: he dug that up from somewhere you get like a
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 1: thesaurus like is that what you say when you're impassioned
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: and angry you call somebody a a trollop You dig
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 1: into the old Victorian insults? Is that what you do?
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 2: But you proceeded by saying you're fucking talented. Jezebel whore. Well, lady,
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: don't marry drag queens that have been weaned off a lemon.
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: Maybe that was your first mistake. You shouldn't have got
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: them from the gay club drag queen hour. she's a
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 2: victorian the bitchy victorian the catty victorian yet men are
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 2: definitely known for the catty victorian insults yes yes but
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 2: also i just want to point out you're slattering he
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 2: wasn't he wasn't so angry he didn't acknowledge the fact
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: that she was talented.
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: Yes yeah he saw the He had to give her
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: the compliment sandwich where he like says a nice thing
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: and then a mean thing and then ends it with
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: a nice thing.
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: Who always wanted to outshine me. He says in a
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 2: mist of glitter as he trounces off. And then five,
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 2: apparently he, she, he drives. He's, she was already driving
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 2: through town when his car passed her at the second
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 2: traffic light without seeing her.
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: Uh-oh, I think I'll see.
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 2: No, no, I'm still here. I'm just trying to parse this.
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 2: And he had gone to his workplace to pick up
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 2: his gun as Tia's in-the-moment inference. When I remembered his gun,
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 2: he'd left to get his gun, which he kept at
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 2: his workplace. Is this something common in the U.S.
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: Because that's illegal in Canada. I'm sure it's common, but
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: I mean, it depends on what his job was. Maybe
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: guns were part of his job.
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but he left to get his gun. It's a
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 2: complete inference from her.
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, of course. Maybe he left to just have.
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 2: A moment of not Tia, right? I need to get
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 2: away from this woman. Right? That's when I remembered the gun.
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 2: He left to get the gun. Oh, God. So she
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 2: has absolutely... She didn't see the gun. She just assumes
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: he went to work. She doesn't even know he went
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 2: to work. God knows he could have just driven through
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 2: a park or something to clear his mind. Right? The
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 2: timing reframe. Same structure as Jen. The outside accusation predates everything.
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 2: During their engagement before the marriage, blog, income, any success differential.
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 2: Alan says, you are always trying to outshine me. Followed by,
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 2: I'll train you.
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: Oh, God.
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: This is all bullshit. Mm-hmm. I mean, maybe she found
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 2: an incredible freaking narcissist because that's the kind of personality
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 2: type most women seem to be attracted to. But again,
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 2: that's just one man. And you also have to believe
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 2: that this terrible fan fiction is someone's life. The grievance
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 2: is a fixture of his psychology at time equals zero.
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 2: Her later blog earnings merely gave it a content, gave
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 2: it content. So the memoir supports this man raged to
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 2: being outshone and simultaneously undercuts her success caused the backlash.
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 2: The disposition precedes the success it supposedly reacts to. An
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 2: abusive man's pre-existing grievance attaches to whatever she has. So
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 2: this is, like Jen, this is the second one. Somehow
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 2: the grievance went back in time, guys. It's a time-traveling grievance.
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 2: that travels through time to support this woman's argument. He
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 2: was both angry at her because he felt like she
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 2: was outshining him from the beginning and then backlashing because
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 2: she eventually did. The memoir's own operative system is the
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 2: church apparatus, Jezebel preaching, pastoral validation. The pastor was right,
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 2: you're a Jezebel. elders surveilling her blog. Allen's authority claims
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 2: scaffolded by doctrine. The book frames the abuse as church
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 2: scaffold and husband executed. Wow, she must have really searched
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 2: far for a church that still enforces the whole idea
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 2: that women should submit to their men. That's a pretty
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: rare church nowadays. Specimen then extracts the husband and generalizes
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 2: to men. Folding the scaffolding into patriarchy is ambient male property.
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 2: Rather than the name institutional machinery, the memoir actually indicts.
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: And of course, she's completely blameless in all of this.
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 2: She got called a Jezebel by a church for no reason. Brian, none.
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 2: Because she had a blog, apparently.
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 1: Right, right.
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 2: It's, it's, this is, I don't know.
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 1: Hmm.
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 2: I think it's all nonsense. Okay, but let's find out
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: how she's going to throw shade at Ballerina Farm. So
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 2: let's finish this.
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: Oh, well, I'm trying. Yeah, so I guess, okay.
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 4: Actrons also brought up that this reminded them of Hannah Neilling.
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 4: You know, Ballerina Farm. She's living out his dream and
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 4: gave up her own in order to do so. But
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 4: she is the face of everything, right? She is the
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 4: one with the accolade. She's the one that everybody wants
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 4: to see. Nobody wants to see him. But women are
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 4: the PR reps of the home. So if she shows
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 4: any of the cracks... She'll be a bad person for
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 4: airing dirty laundry. She'll be a useless wife and mother.
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 4: This is the exact thing that got weaponized against Jen Hamilton,
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 4: like I brought up earlier.
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: So, so there's no, there's no, nothing's actually happening at
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 1: Ballerina Farm? Nope. She's just saying, oh, look, there's parallels, guys.
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 1: You see the patterns? This could happen again, but I'm
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 1: not going to say it will because if it doesn't,
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: then I'll look stupid. So I'm not going to say that.
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: I'm going to say, Ooh, this is similar to this.
• 1:44:46
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there's no actual reason to believe it would, though.
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: This is like so low IQ. It's trash. This is
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: feminist slop.
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there's no reason to believe it would.
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: It's slop.
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there's no reason to believe it would. Yeah, it's
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: all slop.
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 2: Unless you believe this of all men. And there's no
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 2: reason to believe it. And she gave up her dream
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 2: for him.
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 1: She just.
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 2: So, that's her choice. Right. And the thing is that
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 2: did he ask her to do it or did she
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 2: just decide to do it? Right. You know, a woman
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 2: can decide that she'd rather have the man in whatever
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 2: configuration that she wants. Well, this is this is just
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 2: they really hate the ballerina farms woman.
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, because she's happy and is married. That's. And she's
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: also got money and she's living, I guess... I mean,
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: she's obviously monetizing her family and her relationship and her lifestyle.
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 1: I guess I can't hate on that. It's a hustle, whatever.
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: But the problem is that she's not doing it hating men.
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: She's doing it while loving being a wife and a mother.
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 2: So... Yeah, the problem is that she might convince women.
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 2: She might convince women that they too want to be
• 1:46:05
  Speaker 2: a wife and mother... The fact is that their hatred
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 2: is reserved for these women that might convince other women
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: that being a wife and mother is actually a good
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 2: thing and a source of.
• 1:46:21
  Speaker 1: Satisfaction with your life.
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 2: You notice how much they absolutely hate that. They absolutely
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 2: hate it. I don't know how many times Byrony has
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 2: brought up the ballerina farms woman.
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: Actually, I don't know that Byrony has. I know Manifestel
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: made a bunch of videos on her.
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: Okay, Manifestel. Okay, fair enough. Yeah, yeah. But they bring
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 2: it up quite a bit.
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 1: They do.
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 2: These women who are trying to convince other women not
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: to take their bid out of the dating marketplace, right?
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 2: That this is their big thing that they seem to
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 2: be doing. Take your bid out, ladies. don't look behind
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 2: the curtain where I'm married to a man take your
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: bid out men aren't worth it ladies and then this
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 2: one lady who's sort of convincing women hey maybe I'd
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 2: like to be married they all hate her I wonder
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 2: why because they're like she's basically opposing the thing they're
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 2: actually really about which is mate suppression I mean like
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 2: I'm not a traditional woman I don't care The Ballerina
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 2: Farms woman is selling women on a traditional lifestyle? Hey,
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 2: as long as they're happy, right? I don't think that any...
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 2: I don't think the common narrative that feminists use to
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 2: try to dissuade women from pursuing wife and motherhood, that
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 2: men are just going to just suddenly turn into mutant
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 2: orcs and start savaging them because... Because they are dependent
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 2: on those men for some reason?
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 2: I think that that's bullshit. I don't think that the
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 2: Ballerina Farms dude is ever going to do anything to her.
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 1: Probably not.
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 2: I don't think he's choking her life off. You know, he's,
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 2: I don't think he's making.
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 1: Her exercise bands or something. Yeah. Yeah.
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 2: I don't think that he's resentful of her attention. I
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 2: don't think any of that. I think he's probably just
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 2: a normal guy.
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 1: Men are not, not interested in attention the same way
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: that women are. So like, yeah, why would he like, I.
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 2: Don't think he's a narcissist. Unless he's a narcissist, but
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 2: that is like, what, 2% of the male population.
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 1: Okay?
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 2: Even sociopaths aren't really that much interested in attention. Narcissists are.
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 2: They're a huge part of the population of men. And
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 2: I doubt this guy is one. Because, you know, he
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 2: probably would have preferred her to stay a ballerina if
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 2: he was. Let's be honest. Okay, so... what last one? Um,
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 2: I don't know if we have to do the time
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 2: code for it. The, uh, the whole thing about, um, the, uh, the, the,
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 2: the abuse, I guess we could, if you would, if
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 2: you like, if you, if you want to do.
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 1: The full suite, you want to do, what do you
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 1: want to do? Do you want to look at Marilyn Monroe?
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 1: Is that what you're saying?
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 2: Well, the, she does a, she does a citation or
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 2: she does a statistic on.
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: Oh, where is that?
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 1: Just, just, yeah. Just tell me where it is.
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 2: Okay, that might take a little time for me to
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 2: find it. So I need some music for this.
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: Let me see. I have something here. Let me see.
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 1: So he's an APA. He's trying to men interpret the
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: part of success. No, that's not. Threatened egoism. Explaining that
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 1: violence is often caused. 19 minutes about, maybe?
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 2: No.
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: No, that's not it. 35% what?
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 2: 35% that violence increases 35% when a woman is the
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 2: one who earns most.
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 1: Okay, but I don't see where that is. Yeah, that's
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 1: what I'm trying to find.
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 2: Okay, 11-11 to 12-20, I think.
• 1:50:25
  Speaker 1: Oh, I think we... Yeah.
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 2: Did we do that?
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we did, because that was part of the Ike
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 1: Turner thing. Yeah, we did do that one. Yeah, domestic
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: violence increases in heterosexual couples when the woman earns more money.
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: We did that one.
• 1:50:42
  Speaker 2: The actual finding is this. First of all, the male
• 1:50:45
  Speaker 2: sample was smaller, so there's not as much certainty. It's
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 2: harder to make assumptions based on it. But what they
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 2: found from the male sample is that when the woman
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 2: earns more, The abuse increases 1.2%. So it goes from 2.2.
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 2: So 2.2% of men revealed that they were abused in
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 2: the relationship. When the woman earns more, it goes to
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 2: something like 3.4, which is a 50% increase. Guess what
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 2: she doesn't mention? Now, the caveat is that number is
• 1:51:28
  Speaker 2: much less secure. I'm sure it's probably the wrong way
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 2: to put it because it's based on fewer men, which
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 2: is the trick that they do is they sample fewer
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 2: men so that the, the actual results from the men
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 2: can be seen. Don't have to be, don't have to
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 2: be reported because they have lower probability of being correct.
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 2: Are you still there, Brian?
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 1: Or have I, yeah, I'm here. No, I'm, I'm here. Yeah.
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 2: Yes. But, but that's it. So the result for women
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 2: is that they're there 33% more domestic violence when the
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 2: woman earns more. The result for men is 120% more
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 2: of domestic violence when the woman mourns more, or 1.2% more.
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 2: Okay. She's muddling up percentages and actual points difference. All right.
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 1: I love that they also frame this as only heterosexual
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 1: couples are looking at. Interesting that, too.
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah. The difference is The difference is that women go
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 2: up 0.33% and men go up 1.2% in terms of
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 2: the increase in domestic violence. So it's substantially more for men.
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 2: That's 50% versus 33%, I think. It's substantially more for
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 2: men in terms of relative numbers. And she doesn't report
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 2: on that. And how much of that do you want
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 2: to bet is bi-directional with the women?
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: Sure.
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 2: Right. Right. So it's, it's, it's a woman hitting a
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 2: man and then a man eventually hitting her back. And
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 2: then it's a lot of women being the only ones hitting. Right.
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 2: So that's probably what's happening there. There's a lot of
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 2: family stress. The woman is starting to hit the man.
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 2: Some men will hit back. Most men will take it.
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 2: So you can end up with those numbers. And, of course,
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 2: she's presenting it as some kind of backlash by men
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 2: generally against women. All right. That's, I think, all that
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 2: really is worth covering with this.
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Everything else is, no, it's all just stupid. Like,
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 1: it's all looking at, it's just like, it's annoying because
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: they use the spaces that women travel in. which is
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: like gossip and celebrity drama and stuff like that. She
• 1:54:01
  Speaker 1: uses that, turns it into a weapon to make those
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 1: women like basically view their, the husbands and the men
• 1:54:08
  Speaker 1: in their life with suspicion. Like that's what it's doing
• 1:54:11
  Speaker 1: instead of just, I think that, I don't know. Like,
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: I think that there was a reason why gossiping was
• 1:54:19
  Speaker 1: like considered, um, I don't know, like sinful. Yeah, it
• 1:54:25
  Speaker 1: was considered a sin. It was basically like wasteful speech
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: because you lie about people, you manipulate things, your biases
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 1: start to creep in, you start, you know, enhance, you exaggerate,
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: you try to destroy people's reputation. And she's using that
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: to get women to do that to their own lives,
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: like to throw a grenade into your marriage because... you
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 1: start making more money than your husband. And even if
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 1: your husband says, I don't care, it's fine, Briarney Clare
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: is making those women think that, oh no, actually, I
• 1:54:58
  Speaker 1: don't think he is fine. I think he's actually really
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 1: jealous because I'm shining now. You know? I think he's
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 1: going to kill me. He just went to his job.
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 1: He might come back with a gun.
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 2: Literally, it's revealed by their hatred towards the Ballot Arena
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 2: Farms woman.
• 1:55:14
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 2: They hate the idea of another woman modeling... Being happy
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 2: with a man because their entire shtick is trying to
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 2: convince other women that they can't be happy with a
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 2: man because it's mate suppression. All right, so these are
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 2: the allegations towards men that Byrony makes, each with its
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 2: defective basis. One, when she outshines him, he finds a
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 2: way to lash back. There's a mission almost to take
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 2: them down. Universalized male pattern with intent language. Basis? Patron
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 2: nominated confirming anecdotes, so people sent stuff in through her Patreon.
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 2: And the opening case, Jen Hamilton, doesn't instantiate the mechanism
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 2: and imports it from a Reddit theory. So she basically
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 2: bases that one off of a hen whispering network. Two,
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 2: cheating on high-achieving partners goes only one way. Basis, a
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 2: sample constructed one-directionally, presented as a directional finding. So presumably
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 2: what that means is they only asked the women again. Three,
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 2: men attempt to reinstate their power and dominance in the
• 1:56:22
  Speaker 2: home when out-earned. Male backlash is a motive. Basis, a
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 2: cross-sectional victimization data carrying a motive claim, not present when
• 1:56:32
  Speaker 2: worlds are reversed, is a reference category conflation. The male
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 2: victimization arm, point estimate, 50% relative, omitted. That's what I
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 2: was just talking about. She makes this assertion based on
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 2: a study that is omitting the factors found for men,
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 2: that men suffer 50% more domestic violence when the woman
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 2: earns more. And it's presented as that that's just completely,
• 1:56:59
  Speaker 2: let's just render it invisible. out-earned men respond with higher
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 2: rates of sexual infidelity and decreased contributions to house housework
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 2: basis munch 2015 and brines to 1994 the contested tale
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 2: came the settled portion of that literature runs the other
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 2: way so this what she's basing it on is a
• 1:57:23
  Speaker 2: contested claim and also there's counter evidence Five, breadwinner women's
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 2: partners do absolutely nothing, even when able and capable, and
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 2: men not picking up that slack. Refuted in strong form
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 2: by the same data set that she uses current year.
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 2: Non-employed male partners do 54% of the housework. Six, male
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 2: dissatisfaction equals feelings of emasculation, causing him to lash out
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 2: at her by undermining her in all sorts of ways,
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 2: a well-studied pattern. pathology engine applied to men only female
• 1:57:59
  Speaker 2: dissatisfaction in the same data gets a structural excuse the
• 1:58:02
  Speaker 2: source's own controls rule out right so basically what she's
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 2: saying she's giving men women a structural excuse for their
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 2: dissatisfaction which again is two to three times greater than
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 2: men's in the same situation while saying that men's dissatisfaction
• 1:58:19
  Speaker 2: equals feelings of emasculation so they don't get an excuse
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 2: seven men interpret their partner's success as their own failure
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 2: subconsciously feel worse lose confidence that wife's win self-esteem hits
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 2: lowered relationship satisfaction and it isn't because men manifestly observe
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 2: that at least liberal women will divorce them if they're
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 2: not more successful because they're the most status conscious greedy
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 2: women on the planet eight men associate power with control
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 2: power over versus power to leave's Two, leaves men more
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 2: susceptible to zero-sum thinking. Basis, a woman's advancement programs piece.
• 1:59:04
  Speaker 2: No primary research. Nine, threatened men feel like women have
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 2: taken something from them and they are ripe for retaliation.
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 2: They check out, forget the trash, forget dates, watch TV. Basis,
• 1:59:16
  Speaker 2: a single clinician's quote? Class level characterization, no study. Boy,
• 1:59:22
  Speaker 2: this is really solid evidence to indict an entire half
• 1:59:25
  Speaker 2: of the human race on, isn't it, guys? Ten. Outshone
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 2: violent men have grandiose unstable self-esteem. Threatened egotism. Concept applied
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 2: to the class immediately after disclaiming diagnosis of strangers. I'm
• 1:59:40
  Speaker 2: not a diagnostician and I'm not going to impugn the
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 2: motives of strangers. No case level evidence.
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 1: Eleven.
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 2: Men need to step up and do better to break
• 1:59:50
  Speaker 2: this intergenerational cycles with boys framed as the perpetrator class
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 2: and girls, the victim class basis that eight 48% tend
• 2:00:00
  Speaker 2: to men figure an extreme category contrast on a paternal
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 2: affection received, i.e. a father presence finding converted into a
• 2:00:08
  Speaker 2: male obligation claim. So basically boys without fathers tend to
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 2: be more violent. Therefore, boys are to blame and also men.
• 2:00:18
  Speaker 2: Not the fact that society doesn't respect and value the
• 2:00:23
  Speaker 2: relationship between a man and his children based on the
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 2: way laws are presented, based on feminist DV advocacy that
• 2:00:32
  Speaker 2: almost explicitly targets male victims of domestic violence and makes
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 2: it so that they have no chance whether or not
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 2: they have children. But the reason why they're doing that
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 2: is because they want to give women the opportunity to
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 2: use claims of domestic violence to get the kids. Like
• 2:00:49
  Speaker 2: all of this is targeted at men being fathers and
• 2:00:54
  Speaker 2: women don't respect or care about the relationship between the
• 2:00:59
  Speaker 2: father and their children because they routinely deprive their children
• 2:01:03
  Speaker 2: of their fathers through divorce. Okay. All right. So how
• 2:01:10
  Speaker 2: are we expecting men to step up to a plate
• 2:01:14
  Speaker 2: that's constantly pulled out, been pulled out from underneath them?
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 2: Jen's husband is backlash case. Non-earning plus an offense implied
• 2:01:25
  Speaker 2: but never stated. Classified as status retaliation. Conduct and marital
• 2:01:31
  Speaker 2: crisis predate the success it supposedly reacts to, which is
• 2:01:34
  Speaker 2: the same thing that happened with the book. If she
• 2:01:39
  Speaker 2: cheated on him, the public would be truly outraged. This
• 2:01:41
  Speaker 2: is number 11. Uncontested counterfactual asserted as fact. The public
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 2: isn't even outraged. When she kills their kids. Fourteen. Like
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 2: every other man that came upon her. Joe DiMaggio wanted
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 2: her to be his perfect little housewife. Men prefer modest clothing.
• 2:02:01
  Speaker 2: Equals red flags going off all around. Universal qualifiers and
• 2:02:07
  Speaker 2: a class level suspicion generated from one abusive case. Exactly
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 2: what Brian is saying. The closing frame. Fifteen. Jealous controlling
• 2:02:16
  Speaker 2: men try to dim that sparkle and shine. The generalization
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 2: restated is the video's takeaway, resting on the whole chain above. Okay,
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 2: so I think in conclusion, Byrony is full of crap.
• 2:02:31
  Speaker 2: Let's do some Beat Saber.
• 2:02:33
  Speaker 1: Okay, go ahead and set it up. Yeah, she is.
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 1: I got one more request, so we got six now.
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 1: Should I say no requests? Turn that light on?
• 2:02:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so. Otherwise, we're going to be here forever.
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah. uh okay so let me move this here and.
• 2:02:52
  Speaker 2: I'm not like i i can hear this this thunder thunder.
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah i don't know how long this is gonna last okay.
• 2:02:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah we'll see how much we can get through yep
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 2: all right.
• 2:03:02
  Speaker 1: All right allison's gonna go set up the beat saber
• 2:03:04
  Speaker 1: i'll read the super chow in the meantime official reverse
• 2:03:07
  Speaker 1: trad i'm just gonna read it uh gives us 50
• 2:03:10
  Speaker 1: thank you and he's uh offers a request for two
• 2:03:15
  Speaker 1: things so it's two requests actually So that's two more songs.
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 1: Sonic the Hedgehog, Green Hill Zone, and Koji Kondo Slider,
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 1: a Super Mario 64 soundtrack, and said, just because the
• 2:03:29
  Speaker 1: male homemaker studies came up, stay-at-home dads don't have it
• 2:03:33
  Speaker 1: as easy as stay-at-home moms in the family courts, but
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 1: they do basically have it easier than any other kind
• 2:03:38
  Speaker 1: of father. So if women really are more likely to
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 1: divorce in that one specific kind of relationship, that sounds
• 2:03:44
  Speaker 1: like a woman logic moment to me. But they are
• 2:03:48
  Speaker 1: more likely to divorce. Yeah, I know what he means
• 2:03:53
  Speaker 1: is that men have a better chance of keeping their
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 1: kids in that instance and doing better in the divorce,
• 2:03:59
  Speaker 1: but women are still more likely to divorce. So what's
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: the tradeoff? Just like how the DV stats on female
• 2:04:06
  Speaker 1: breadwinners do seem to be the good stats outside the
• 2:04:09
  Speaker 1: justice system and adjusting for leverage salience, But it's kind
• 2:04:14
  Speaker 1: of telling that the one combination of relationship where the
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: woman might actually be more likely to be abused than
• 2:04:19
  Speaker 1: a man is the one feminists and trad cons both
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 1: have a problem with. And they don't like the logic
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: of shifting the abuse to the gender the justice system
• 2:04:27
  Speaker 1: will take seriously. I used to know traddies, Tony Soprano
• 2:04:31
  Speaker 1: wannabe bank executives who used to make their wives bank
• 2:04:35
  Speaker 1: tellers after their kids were in school so their wives
• 2:04:38
  Speaker 1: wouldn't cheat on them because they understood women calm down
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 1: when you give them something to do.
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 2:04:46
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 2: I don't have a problem with men staying at homes.
• 2:04:51
  Speaker 2: I have no problem with that. You do have to
• 2:04:53
  Speaker 2: be careful with the greater risk with a divorce. You
• 2:04:55
  Speaker 2: do get a little bit more security should it happen. So,
• 2:05:00
  Speaker 2: I mean, like, I don't know. Like, Brian is right.
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 2: It's more likely to be a divorce.
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 1: I don't have a problem with it. I just don't
• 2:05:07
  Speaker 1: think it's like, I don't think it's a fix.
• 2:05:09
  Speaker 2: The answer.
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't think it's the answer. That's what I'm saying.
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: There's like a lot of other factors to consider, primarily
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: the fact that women generally are not interested in that setup.
• 2:05:20
  Speaker 1: And if you say, well, here's all the data that
• 2:05:22
  Speaker 1: shows they don't care. Women don't generally like that setup.
• 2:05:26
  Speaker 1: And I think a lot of men don't either. And
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 1: that's kind of the issue is that we're, we have
• 2:05:31
  Speaker 1: to like, change people's preferences. I would like to just
• 2:05:35
  Speaker 1: change the courts so that people can, like, make it
• 2:05:37
  Speaker 1: work whatever their setup is. So I think it's easier
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 1: to change the laws than it is to change the
• 2:05:44
  Speaker 1: preferences of men and women individually. So... Yeah.
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 2: Well, I think if everybody had their preferences, probably both
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 2: men and women would just have, like, home-based businesses.
• 2:05:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, probably. All right, this is from somebody named... It
• 2:06:01
  Speaker 1: was a comment on a short about the Lindsay Clancy thing.
• 2:06:06
  Speaker 1: The Monster Feminist Built. That's what the name of the
• 2:06:08
  Speaker 1: video is. Lindsay Clancy, The Monster Feminist Built. And Ania
• 2:06:13
  Speaker 1: Kubilas said, Buckle up, because it's a long one. Channels
• 2:06:18
  Speaker 1: like this, which I also noticed they look sort of
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 1: AI in their animations, which are also sometimes furries. Okay,
• 2:06:25
  Speaker 1: so now we just got like triple accused. are so
• 2:06:29
  Speaker 1: focused on hating feminists when they don't know what feminism
• 2:06:32
  Speaker 1: is about. They think feminism.
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, which is one of that fleet of AI furry
• 2:06:38
  Speaker 2: anti-feminist chaps.
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes. They think feminism is misandry when it's about
• 2:06:45
  Speaker 1: giving women the same reality men have. Freeing child brides,
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 1: fighting for victims of rape, helping girls, boys, women, men
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 1: who are sold into sex trafficking, helping the women across
• 2:06:55
  Speaker 1: strict patriarchal societies like those in Afghanistan in the West.
• 2:06:59
  Speaker 1: It's giving women the same privileges of men.
• 2:07:02
  Speaker 2: You didn't do anything.
• 2:07:03
  Speaker 1: No, you didn't. Lady.
• 2:07:06
  Speaker 2: Yo, you didn't. Feminism didn't do fucking all. Like a
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 2: whole bunch of American and also Canadian soldiers went over there,
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 2: attempted to bring women's rights. And most of them were men,
• 2:07:16
  Speaker 2: by the way. And almost entirely all of the people
• 2:07:19
  Speaker 2: who died in the endeavor were men. So, interesting fact.
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 2: And you did nothing. And feminists did nothing. Aside from
• 2:07:28
  Speaker 2: probably alienating a whole bunch of people with their nonsense
• 2:07:32
  Speaker 2: over there. But do go on.
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 1: It's giving women the same privileges a man has socially, economically, politically, etc.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: Lindsay Clancy was a monster, but she was not fueled
• 2:07:44
  Speaker 1: by feminists. She was understood because she suffered from postpartum psychosis.
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 1: And exactly as this short states, no one took her
• 2:07:51
  Speaker 1: word seriously, which then brought up objectively... Which when brought
• 2:07:56
  Speaker 1: up objectively is a topic that men slash people who
• 2:07:58
  Speaker 1: defend horrible men use as an excuse to allow their
• 2:08:01
  Speaker 1: own actions or a common argument i see when men
• 2:08:04
  Speaker 1: talk about mental health so it's really just a double
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 1: standard when it comes to women channels like this are
• 2:08:09
  Speaker 1: so blind and brain i don't know it's we apparently
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 1: nobody took her seriously even though that no No, I'm
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 1: not even going to go there because that's going to
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 1: take too long. She was, in fact, taken seriously by
• 2:08:22
  Speaker 1: everyone around her, including her husband. Full stop. Period. Shut
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 1: the fuck up. You don't know what you're talking about. Like,
• 2:08:29
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to go into the details. It'll take
• 2:08:30
  Speaker 1: too long. What?
• 2:08:32
  Speaker 2: And also, nobody is defending male family annihilators.
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: Nobody. No, nobody.
• 2:08:37
  Speaker 2: Nobody is giving millions of dollars to men who kill
• 2:08:40
  Speaker 2: their children.
• 2:08:41
  Speaker 1: Nobody. Yep.
• 2:08:43
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 2: Even if he was depressed.
• 2:08:46
  Speaker 1: Nobody. Nobody. No. Channels like this are so blind and
• 2:08:50
  Speaker 1: brainwashing you with their agenda that they fail to mention
• 2:08:53
  Speaker 1: monsters like Christopher Watts, Chris Benoit, Kobe Bryant, Ronaldo, Chris Brown,
• 2:08:57
  Speaker 1: Johnny Depp, Jared Leto, amongst many others. Oh, so now
• 2:09:00
  Speaker 1: Johnny Depp and Chris Benoit are the same thing. She's
• 2:09:05
  Speaker 1: demonstrating her bias, by the way, but whatever. They also
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 1: fail to include.
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 2: Johnny Depp, guys. We do bring up Johnny Depp, but not.
• 2:09:13
  Speaker 1: As a monster. This person doesn't watch our videos, obviously.
• 2:09:17
  Speaker 1: They've just decided a bunch of stuff. They also failed
• 2:09:20
  Speaker 1: to include real data. When I came across this video
• 2:09:24
  Speaker 1: and researched on my own, guess what results I got?
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: Overwhelmingly linked to make perpetrators? And I also saw its
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: relation to sexual abuse of which men make up the
• 2:09:37
  Speaker 1: majority regardless of the victim's gender.
• 2:09:39
  Speaker 2: Nope.
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 1: No, they don't. Feminism is equality, not misandry. And if
• 2:09:42
  Speaker 1: you're too stupid to deny this because you as a
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: man think equality is oppression or as a woman you
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: think you'll be picked easier by conservative men, seek mental
• 2:09:50
  Speaker 1: help because why are you as a woman rejecting a
• 2:09:53
  Speaker 1: movement that gave you the right to speak your thoughts freely?
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 1: Do your research before listening to propaganda like this. You know,
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 1: it's really funny. Yeah, go ahead.
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 2: It's really funny because she says, oh, you'll be more
• 2:10:03
  Speaker 2: likely to be picked by conservative men. First of all,
• 2:10:08
  Speaker 2: I'm not really... You know what? Politics isn't important enough,
• 2:10:12
  Speaker 2: like conservative versus liberal, to make a decision like that on.
• 2:10:15
  Speaker 2: I hope you wouldn't be completely crazy in the theoretical
• 2:10:20
  Speaker 2: situation that I wasn't already married, right? But the other
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 2: thing is that that's not how it's working. Okay? It
• 2:10:30
  Speaker 2: is not... Like, it's liberal women who aren't picking their men. Right?
• 2:10:38
  Speaker 2: It's just... Actually, conservatives, well, they don't have exactly the
• 2:10:44
  Speaker 2: same amount of marriage formation as used to be just normal,
• 2:10:49
  Speaker 2: but at least it's a little closer than the liberals are. Basically,
• 2:10:55
  Speaker 2: what she's saying is you want to be part of
• 2:10:56
  Speaker 2: a marriage formation regime that actually works. Yes, but also
• 2:11:04
  Speaker 2: the conservative one doesn't work enough. It's also infested with
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 2: whatever absolutely turned the liberal people into a smoking crater
• 2:11:18
  Speaker 2: that can't pair up. Like, liberalism destroyed human pair bonding.
• 2:11:22
  Speaker 2: And then whatever toxin it was leached over into conservatives.
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 2: And that didn't used to be the case. Well, I mean, no, actually,
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 2: it didn't used to be the case. It used to
• 2:11:32
  Speaker 2: be a lot closer to... A liberal man with a
• 2:11:36
  Speaker 2: median income could actually get a wife. Now, yeah, good luck, guys.
• 2:11:42
  Speaker 2: The sexlessness epidemic among men might as well be called
• 2:11:45
  Speaker 2: the liberal male sexless epidemic. Honestly. Uh, but anyway, let's just, yeah,
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 2: go on with your bad self. So just see what, just,
• 2:11:59
  Speaker 2: just read what I responded to. Cause I know yet.
• 2:12:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this is, well, okay. I'm just going to read
• 2:12:05
  Speaker 1: the rest of this comment. Cause this is the one
• 2:12:07
  Speaker 1: you responded to update. Yep. Some of their thumbnails are
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 1: AI generated. Look at their live pretty contradictory for someone
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 1: who made a video about talking to a feminist AI
• 2:12:16
  Speaker 1: chat bot and rambled about it on the internet. Honey,
• 2:12:19
  Speaker 1: has a man picked you yet? And also, if you're
• 2:12:21
  Speaker 1: so anti-feminist, literally shut up because you wouldn't be able
• 2:12:24
  Speaker 1: to speak. Oh, my God. Does this not get boring?
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 1: Does this not get boring, this line of argumentation? It's
• 2:12:30
  Speaker 1: so lame. And then, this part I actually kind of appreciate.
• 2:12:34
  Speaker 1: So you said, did you respond with this? Because YouTube's
• 2:12:37
  Speaker 1: being weird about how it shows the comments. Maybe I
• 2:12:40
  Speaker 1: should just go to the link here. Hold on a second.
• 2:12:43
  Speaker 2: If it's not like complete spaz out, it's probably me.
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 1: No, I know. But the way that they display the
• 2:12:49
  Speaker 1: comments is ridiculous. It's ridiculous. You can't really see them.
• 2:12:54
  Speaker 1: That's my point. Like there's a chain. Okay. You said
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 1: go ask two, three, go ask 2.3 times more money
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 1: from liberal men just to marry you because your virtues
• 2:13:04
  Speaker 1: are so important to you. Allison. And then this person said,
• 2:13:07
  Speaker 1: I'm not a liberal and I'm not into liberal men.
• 2:13:10
  Speaker 1: I'm a leftist and I aspire to be a revolutionary
• 2:13:13
  Speaker 1: like Shea. My goal in life is to destroy the
• 2:13:16
  Speaker 1: capitalist system, which liberals support. If you haven't achieved class consciousness,
• 2:13:20
  Speaker 1: that's on you. You're a lost cause and you seek attention.
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 1: I'm also already married. By definition, you're closer to being
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 1: a liberal than I ever will. There's a difference, Allison.
• 2:13:30
  Speaker 1: I doubt you even knew. So, Allison, this is what
• 2:13:33
  Speaker 1: I've been trying to say forever. Liberals are not leftists.
• 2:13:39
  Speaker 1: Leftists are not liberals. Leftists hate liberals. Okay? They hate them.
• 2:13:44
  Speaker 1: I'm quite aware.
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 2: Okay. But the thing is, what's hilarious to me is
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 2: that she's obviously part of the I hate men party.
• 2:13:52
  Speaker 2: By the way, I finished all the songs. She's obviously
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 2: part of the Iron Man party. She's married to a guy.
• 2:13:58
  Speaker 2: And then she deflects. When I get a poke at
• 2:14:03
  Speaker 2: the greedy, avaricious monster underneath the virtue, guess what? She
• 2:14:08
  Speaker 2: vomits out. Oh, no, I'm really a commie. I don't
• 2:14:12
  Speaker 2: really want money. Yeah, that's been reaction to me getting
• 2:14:17
  Speaker 2: a hit on what she's actually about. But continue. Continue
• 2:14:22
  Speaker 2: with my response and then her response.
• 2:14:25
  Speaker 1: I only see, again, I can't, well, I see, I
• 2:14:28
  Speaker 1: read that and I don't see, oh, show more replies. Okay.
• 2:14:31
  Speaker 1: Hold on, hold on, hold on. Oh, a leftist. Go
• 2:14:34
  Speaker 1: ask 3.5 times more money from leftist men just to
• 2:14:37
  Speaker 1: marry you because your virtues are so important to you.
• 2:14:39
  Speaker 1: Can you read typical from right-wingers? I'm married, bud. I
• 2:14:42
  Speaker 1: don't want money. I seek freedom. Also, aren't your, what's,
• 2:14:46
  Speaker 1: what does that mean? Also, aren't your virtues important to
• 2:14:49
  Speaker 1: you as well? Are you married? And if you are,
• 2:14:51
  Speaker 1: why are you still seeking attention from men? Are these
• 2:14:54
  Speaker 1: questions hurting you or are you avoiding them because you
• 2:14:56
  Speaker 1: can't think of an answer? Also, I have a request.
• 2:14:58
  Speaker 1: Can you do a review on Denisha Carter's video on
• 2:15:01
  Speaker 1: anti-feminist women? Because you look exactly the woman she's talking
• 2:15:04
  Speaker 1: about in her video. Just privileged and greedy. Why are
• 2:15:08
  Speaker 1: right-wing women so misinformed? You didn't even try to mention
• 2:15:11
  Speaker 1: anything I said in my original comment. Just some statement
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 1: about money.
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 2: And being married. There's no point mentioning anything that she says.
• 2:15:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:15:19
  Speaker 2: She's a greedy fucking bitch. And she doesn't want to
• 2:15:24
  Speaker 2: be called out for her greed, so she invents a
• 2:15:26
  Speaker 2: whole bunch of virtues and moralizing positions. And Bob's your uncle.
• 2:15:32
  Speaker 2: There you go. I responded to that as well. It's
• 2:15:34
  Speaker 2: only a couple of response terms.
• 2:15:36
  Speaker 1: No, this is long. Are you sure?
• 2:15:40
  Speaker 2: Just ignore Spewart. Because he just loses his shit.
• 2:15:44
  Speaker 1: No, no, no. I'm not looking at that. I'm looking
• 2:15:46
  Speaker 1: at just between you and this other person. But it
• 2:15:49
  Speaker 1: goes back and forth a lot. No, it shouldn't go
• 2:15:52
  Speaker 1: back much more. Well, let me read it. It could
• 2:15:55
  Speaker 1: be the way YouTube is displaying the comments, okay? So
• 2:15:58
  Speaker 1: she said, can you read typical from right-wingers? I read
• 2:16:01
  Speaker 1: that part. Why are right-wing women so misinformed? Then you said,
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 1: looking bad for you, just ran your specific ideological numbers.
• 2:16:07
  Speaker 1: It's actually 7.3 times more income than a conservative woman.
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 1: How wealthy is your partner, Ania? And then she said,
• 2:16:14
  Speaker 1: when did I mention anything economical about my partner and
• 2:16:17
  Speaker 1: why does... that even matter to you? Well, you're a communist,
• 2:16:19
  Speaker 1: so you actually do care about the material, like you're
• 2:16:22
  Speaker 1: a materialist. I clearly stated I want freedom and not money,
• 2:16:27
  Speaker 1: and that I strive for a classless society.
• 2:16:31
  Speaker 2: Notice what she didn't say. She didn't deny anything about
• 2:16:38
  Speaker 2: the potential wealth of her partner. She just deflected again
• 2:16:42
  Speaker 2: because she is greedy. is an avaricious and ironically the
• 2:16:48
  Speaker 2: the more communist these women are like the more they
• 2:16:51
  Speaker 2: spout off about communism you you better be a millionaire
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 2: or you're never going to crack that they are the
• 2:16:59
  Speaker 2: the more avaricious they are the more they they drape
• 2:17:04
  Speaker 2: the vestments of piety and poverty upon their shoulders this
• 2:17:09
  Speaker 2: is what i've noticed i'm i'm guessing this chick's married
• 2:17:13
  Speaker 2: to a millionaire maybe it wouldn't and wouldn't accept anything
• 2:17:18
  Speaker 2: less well if he was poor he would have she
• 2:17:22
  Speaker 2: would have said it.
• 2:17:22
  Speaker 1: By now yeah um so she says and why would
• 2:17:29
  Speaker 1: my why wouldn't my personal income matter at all why
• 2:17:32
  Speaker 1: are you so focused on men and avoiding the questions
• 2:17:34
  Speaker 1: i make and more importantly where is your partner if
• 2:17:36
  Speaker 1: you care so much about being conservative You're not even
• 2:17:39
  Speaker 1: trying to make sense. You're a funny one disregarding what
• 2:17:42
  Speaker 1: I said originally because you have no real argument against it.
• 2:17:44
  Speaker 1: Are you triggered because I'm a happy i'm in a
• 2:17:47
  Speaker 1: happy relationship regardless of whether we're doing well economically is
• 2:17:50
  Speaker 1: that something you lack looking even worse for you bud
• 2:17:53
  Speaker 1: i like how they like put words in your mouth
• 2:17:55
  Speaker 1: and then respond to them like they're winning an argument
• 2:17:58
  Speaker 1: against themselves and they're i demolished you that's why they're
• 2:18:03
  Speaker 1: look that's that's basically just a leftist meme i drew.
• 2:18:06
  Speaker 2: You as the pick me Yeah. And me as the
• 2:18:09
  Speaker 2: girl boss.
• 2:18:12
  Speaker 1: You lose. Go away, virgin.
• 2:18:14
  Speaker 2: You lose.
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 1: Incel.
• 2:18:17
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 2:18:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Anyway, that's it. That's it.
• 2:18:20
  Speaker 2: Yep. Well, I don't know. Maybe I'll respond to her.
• 2:18:22
  Speaker 2: Maybe I won't. But anyway, I did the five songs.
• 2:18:27
  Speaker 2: So now I shall look and see. Give the thank yous. Okay. Yep.
• 2:18:36
  Speaker 2: Let me see where we're at. And if I did
• 2:18:42
  Speaker 2: do your song, please do put $ 25 in the hat
• 2:18:46
  Speaker 2: for the fundraiser so we can get that done for
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 2: the month. And I'm just loading it up right now. Oh,
• 2:18:54
  Speaker 2: Meredith G put in $ 100. Thank you, Meredith G. Thank you, Meredith.
• 2:18:57
  Speaker 1: Amazing. And Graydon Doors put in.
• 2:19:10
  Speaker 2: What? 300, do you think?
• 2:19:12
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 2:19:13
  Speaker 2: Okay, you are just trolling me now. No, it's 320.
• 2:19:19
  Speaker 2: I have to subtract 1350 from 338.50. Just say, look.
• 2:19:26
  Speaker 2: All right, all right, all right.
• 2:19:28
  Speaker 1: I need to go. I just got back from a
• 2:19:31
  Speaker 1: six-hour drive, and then I had to do this. We're
• 2:19:33
  Speaker 1: not doing math right now. We're wrapping this up.
• 2:19:36
  Speaker 3: Okay, all right.
• 2:19:37
  Speaker 2: Okay, so thank you to Granted Doors for $ 325, I think.
• 2:19:43
  Speaker 2: And thank you to Caleb for $ 100. Thank you, Caleb.
• 2:19:48
  Speaker 1: Amazing!
• 2:19:50
  Speaker 2: I'm going to apply these, and then I'm going to
• 2:19:53
  Speaker 2: see where we're at, and then we're going to say
• 2:19:58
  Speaker 2: good evening. Okay. I know you probably want to go eat.
• 2:20:08
  Speaker 2: All right. So we have two. Oh, wow. Two thousand
• 2:20:17
  Speaker 2: and fifteen. One hundred and fifty left to go. And
• 2:20:21
  Speaker 2: that seems wrong somehow. But anyway, so yeah, if you
• 2:20:25
  Speaker 2: would like to support, please go to feedthebadger.com slash justthetip.
• 2:20:30
  Speaker 2: That's feedthebadger.com, oh, sorry, support, feedthebadger.com slash support. If you
• 2:20:33
  Speaker 2: want to send a message at any time after the
• 2:20:35
  Speaker 2: show is over, go to feedthebadger.com slash justthetip and send
• 2:20:40
  Speaker 2: us a comment with that tip. And if you want
• 2:20:43
  Speaker 2: to join us in our community, badgernation.online. There you go, Brian,
• 2:20:46
  Speaker 2: take us out.
• 2:20:47
  Speaker 1: All right, so with that said, if you guys like
• 2:20:50
  Speaker 1: this video and you're watching on YouTube, you can probably
• 2:20:55
  Speaker 1: hit like, but definitely do it on rumble. So do the,
• 2:20:57
  Speaker 1: do all these things for rumble. Okay. Like comment, subscribe
• 2:21:02
  Speaker 1: and subscribe to our YouTube channel. But this is, this
• 2:21:06
  Speaker 1: has music in it that might, you know, not be
• 2:21:08
  Speaker 1: good for our channel. So don't share the video, uh,
• 2:21:12
  Speaker 1: around cause I don't want to take any risks with that. Um,
• 2:21:15
  Speaker 1: thank you guys so much though for your support and
• 2:21:18
  Speaker 1: helping us to keep doing this work. And we'll talk
• 2:21:20
  Speaker 1: to you guys in the next one. Have a good
• 2:21:22
  Speaker 1: rest of your weekend.