Latest / Reformed Thinking / Kiss the Son: A Call to Yield to Christ (Psalm 2)

Transcript

Kiss the Son: A Call to Yield to Christ (Psalm 2) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today we're going to be doing a
0:02
really concentrated analysis of the source material around one
0:06
of the most foundational texts for Christology, Psalm 2.
0:10
On the surface, you see 12 verses.
0:12
It's short, it's poetry, but when you get into it, for anyone
0:16
doing serious theological reflection that is, well, it's
0:19
something so much bigger. It really is.
0:22
We're treating this text as really a definitive statement
0:26
from God about Christ's sovereignty.
0:28
It's laying out a prophetic blueprint that just anchors our
0:31
whole understanding of his rule. So for this deep dive, what's
0:34
our mission? What are we trying to pull out
0:36
of the sources for you? Well, our goal is to really
0:39
isolate and show why this Psalm, even though it's so brief, is
0:43
seen across, you know, centuries of Christian tradition and even
0:47
pre Christian tradition as the description of the Messiah's
0:49
Christocracy. His divine government.
0:51
Exactly. We're going to try to unlock
0:53
that prophetic structure by setting up this really dramatic
0:57
contrast you see in the text, this chaotic, almost irrational
1:00
human rebellion on one side, and then on the other, the serene,
1:05
completely unshakable certainty of God's sovereign decree.
1:09
We want to show why this text is just it's absolutely vital to a
1:14
Reformed understanding of Christ as King.
1:16
And we can actually just state the conclusion right at the top.
1:19
The sources are so clear on this, there's no need to build
1:22
up to it. No, not at all.
1:23
The core finding that comes through again and again is this.
1:27
The direct messianic interpretation is the only
1:29
coherent way to understand this Psalm.
1:31
It's the only framework that can handle the claims being made.
1:34
Yeah, any other reading just falls apart.
1:36
Because the scope of the King's authority described here, I mean
1:40
his decreed sonship, his worldwide dominion, his absolute
1:43
power to judge, it's just far too vast for any earthly
1:47
monarch. You can't fit it on to David.
1:49
You can't fit it on to Solomon. No.
1:51
Or any later king of Judah. It just doesn't work.
1:54
This Psalm is demanding a divine person.
1:56
It's demanding Christ. So let's start at the beginning.
1:59
That first trophy, The futility of earthly rebellion.
2:03
Versus 1 to 3? Right.
2:04
And it opens with this immediate trauma, this rhetorical question
2:08
that's just full of, well, astonishment, but also a kind of
2:12
mocking tone from the psalmist. Yeah, almost a derision.
2:16
Why do the nation's rage and the people plot a vain thing?
2:19
It just plunges you right in. There's no gentle introduction.
2:22
You're immediately in a political world that is defined
2:25
by its hostility toward God. And that opening question, it
2:27
really sets the whole trajectory for the song.
2:30
It gives us a picture of the world in active rebellion
2:34
against God, and it gets the very structure of his
2:37
government. Let's talk about those verbs,
2:38
because the source has spent a lot of time on them.
2:41
Rage. What does that actually mean
2:43
here? It's critical when the psalmist
2:46
asks why the nation's rage. The Hebrew reviews there rogue
2:49
gash doesn't mean you know a battle has already started or
2:52
that an insurrection is complete.
2:53
OK, so it's not the war itself. No, it's the agitated
2:57
preliminary state. It's the mood before the March.
3:00
So it's the noise. It's the noise.
3:02
It's the sound in the movement of agitated anticipation.
3:06
You can almost picture these vast crowds surging, filled with
3:10
what the sources call gloomy and confused resentments, murmurs
3:14
and alarms. That's a great phrase.
3:16
Isn't it? It captures that feeling of
3:18
dissatisfaction boiling over right before it becomes an
3:21
organized result. It's loud, it's irrational, it's
3:24
disorganized, but it has this powerful collective motion to
3:27
it. So as a raging, they're also
3:29
plotting A vain thing so that emotional energy is being
3:32
channelled into some kind of intellectual effort.
3:34
Well, an anti intellectual effort maybe, but yes, the verb
3:37
for plotting or imagining it carries a specific weight in the
3:41
older English the sources use. It means to scheme, devise,
3:45
plot, and specifically it suggests meditating on evil,
3:49
planning these rebellious undertakings.
3:51
It's the same verb you see used elsewhere to describe the
3:53
deceitful plans of a wicked heart.
3:55
It's a calculated effort aimed at destruction.
3:58
But the psalmist judges the outcome before it even begins.
4:01
He calls it a vain thing, a foolish device.
4:03
Why is it foolish right from the start?
4:05
Because the effort is logically doomed, the outcome will prove
4:09
it to be idle. The sources are clear on this.
4:12
The Rebellion is destined to completely fail simply because
4:16
of who they've chosen as their opponent.
4:17
They're plotting against the Almighty.
4:19
Exactly. So all the energy they pour into
4:21
it, all the raging and the scheming, it's just going to
4:24
vanish like smoke. So we have the emotional state,
4:27
this raging tumult, and we have the intellectual effort, this
4:31
vain plotting, but who's actually directing this
4:34
rebellion? It's not just a chaotic mob, is
4:36
it? No.
4:37
Verse 2 gives us the command structure.
4:39
It's the kings and the rulers, the leaders, the leaders.
4:41
They're described as sitting together, deliberately
4:45
consulting that phrase. Sitting together becomes this
4:48
technical term for deliberation and conspiring.
4:51
So this is organized, it's statecraft.
4:52
It is. This is organized hostility,
4:54
It's statecraft being deployed against the Kingdom of God.
4:57
And the psalmist describes this plotting as if it's already a
5:00
done deal, an accomplished fact, even before they actively set
5:04
themselves against the Lord and His anointed.
5:07
Let's get into their motivation, because this is where the
5:09
theology of rebellion really comes into focus.
5:12
They're using figurative language, but the thing they're
5:14
trying to break free from God's ordinances are actually for
5:18
their own good. And that's the great
5:20
contradiction, isn't it? The sources point this out so
5:23
clearly. Their language reveals their
5:25
carnal love of liberty and their unruliness.
5:29
They see God's laws, his decrees, the whole moral and
5:33
governmental order he's established.
5:35
They see it as nothing more than a yoke of compulsion, a fetter
5:39
to their freedom. So the.
5:41
Very structure that provides peace and order they perceive as
5:44
a cage. Precisely.
5:45
The sources call God's ordinances holy bands of moral
5:48
communion, cords of love even that are thrown out for their
5:52
salvation. But the rebels, from their
5:54
perspective, see it as a point of honor based on their own
5:57
supposed right to sovereignty, to tear away and strip off these
6:01
cords. It's an attack on their
6:02
autonomy. It's a personal insult to their
6:04
autonomy. They believe divine sovereignty
6:06
isn't an ordering force for good, it's an attack on their
6:09
natural rights as rulers. And if you look at this through
6:12
a reformed lens, this is just a perfect picture of original sin,
6:16
isn't it? The creature trying to throw off
6:18
the Creator's rule seeing obedience of slavery.
6:22
It's a classic picture. Their unsubdued natural heart
6:25
just cannot accept that these chords of grace being woven
6:29
around them could be anything other than an oppressive yoke,
6:32
so they want to tear them away. And yet the Psalm's verdict is
6:35
immediate. Their rebellion is just
6:37
condemned from the get go as miserable, abject and totally
6:41
ineffective. They spit all this energy, they
6:43
consult, they conspire, and nothing comes of it.
6:46
Nothing except, as the sources say, self excitation toward
6:50
wicked and pivotin pretensions it.
6:52
Seems like the core agreement among the world's leaders is
6:54
that God's rule, his extension into their world, needs to be
6:58
limited, yes? And they feel the presence of a
7:00
God whose rule is absolute, a God who is world embracing and
7:04
that threatens their own local temporary claims to authority.
7:08
And that shared agreement, all of them raging in the same
7:10
direction, just highlights how absurd the whole situation is.
7:14
It does. There's a wonderful quote from a
7:15
Latin commentator in the source material.
7:17
He says Fioret in Unum Populus at Miseratur Omnium Christus,
7:23
which means the people rage in One Direction and Christ pities
7:26
them all. And that thought immediately
7:29
shifts our attention, doesn't it?
7:30
From all this chaotic energy on earth up to the serene divine
7:34
response from heaven. Which takes us right into
7:37
strophy 2 verses 4 through 6. And this is maybe one of the
7:41
most dramatic instantaneous contrast you'll find in all of
7:44
Scripture. It is you set the chaotic rage
7:46
and exertion of the enemies against the silent, powerful
7:50
action of Jehovah. The scene just shifts entirely.
7:52
We go from the tumultuous earth to the calm of the heavens.
7:55
And right up against the fury of the world, the psalmist sets the
7:58
laughing quiet of God, who is just sitting securely on his
8:01
throne. This is a highly dramatic
8:04
expression because it shows that God can, with just a single
8:07
word, bring all of their rioting to nothing.
8:10
And it's important to see that this laughter isn't passive.
8:13
It's a very deliberate response, and it comes in stages.
8:16
There's this graduation in the divine reaction, moving from
8:20
serenity all the way to a crushing judgment.
8:23
That's a great way to put it. There are three stages.
8:25
So what's the first stage? The first stage is that laughing
8:28
quiet. He that sitteth in the heavens
8:31
shall laugh, and this expresses God's absolute feeling of
8:35
security, his consciousness of his own superiority.
8:38
He's looking down on their frantic, pathetic undertakings
8:41
with what with indignation, knowing that the fear they
8:45
should be feeling is completely misplaced on their part.
8:48
The laughter is 1 of utter contempt for their impotence.
8:51
They're acting like they're equals in a power struggle, but
8:54
God's silent amusement already tells you how it's going to end.
8:57
So what's the second stage? The second stage is agitated
9:00
scorn. The Lord shall have them in
9:02
derision. This derision is an emotional
9:05
reaction that rejects their presumption.
9:07
It's deserved contempt that publicly reveals just how weak
9:11
and foolish they are. So it moves from silent
9:13
amusement to audible pointed mockery.
9:16
It does. The silent laughter turns into
9:19
vocal derision, and from there it intensifies even further.
9:25
Into the third stage. Which is wrath and terror.
9:28
The scorn then intensifies into active wrath, which breaks out
9:32
in Word and act. And this is where the divine
9:34
declaration becomes, you know, physically manifest.
9:38
Jehovah speaks real words. Real words.
9:41
And the sources describe these words in such a vivid way, they
9:44
say they whiz and roll along like Thunder and lightning.
9:47
So that's the mechanism of his judgment.
9:49
The rebels wanted to break the bands of moral communion, and in
9:52
response, God's speech is something that physically breaks
9:55
them. Exactly right.
9:56
This terrifying speech causes what the Hebrew calls behall
9:59
terror, a terror that confuses the rebels, drives them into a
10:03
mad flight, and ultimately to their destruction.
10:06
The ungodly can storm and rage, but the sources have this
10:09
beautiful image for it. Their efforts are like stormy,
10:11
swollen waves that rush along as if they're going to destroy the
10:14
shore. But they never do.
10:15
They never do. Before they even reach the
10:17
shore, they quiet down, they vanish into themselves, or they
10:20
just break up into a little bit of foam.
10:22
God's speech is the barrier. Their rebellion is the foam.
10:27
So once their vain plot has been dismissed with divine scorn,
10:30
Jehovah then states his definitive positive action.
10:35
He contrasts their chaos with the establishment of his king.
10:39
Yes, this is the great counterpoint, he declares so
10:42
emphatically. Yet have I set my king, and that
10:46
pronoun I is heavily stressed in the Hebrew.
10:49
So it's God's action versus their action.
10:51
It's his sovereign decision, standing in sharp, unyielding
10:55
contrast to the King's vain earthly pretensions.
10:58
This isn't a human coronation ceremony.
11:00
This is divine appointment. And this appointment is anchored
11:03
to a physical place, a place that becomes the spiritual seat
11:06
of global government, Zion. Yes, the location of the throne
11:10
is explicitly Zion, the Holy Mountain, and this is a really
11:13
important distinction the sources make.
11:14
Zion isn't designated here as the place of the King's
11:17
anointing, that was typically done somewhere else.
11:19
No, Zion is the seat of government for the Anointed, for
11:21
the Messiah. So why is Zion so central to
11:25
this decree? Because Zion, which includes
11:28
Mount Moriah, the site of the Temple, the seat of the
11:30
historical theocracy, is the place of the divine presence.
11:35
So by setting the messianic throne there, the Psalm elevates
11:38
this King's rule above all earthly heights.
11:41
It's signaling that this government is inseparable from
11:44
God's immediate presence in holiness.
11:46
This establishment on Zion is Jehovah's decisive, absolute
11:50
answer to all the world's plotting.
11:51
So it declares that the Kingdom being set up is absolute,
11:55
universal and righteous, a true Christocracy.
11:59
It's the moment where the local and temporal aspects of the
12:01
Davidic covenant are just. They're swallowed up.
12:04
They're superseded by the universal and eternal
12:06
sovereignty of the Messiah. God has made these eternal
12:09
preparations in history against the world's destruction, and
12:11
those preparations are all contained in the messianic
12:14
institutions of salvation. And that takes us to the
12:16
theological heart of the Psalm Strophy 3.
12:19
Verses 7 to 9. The narrative voice makes
12:21
another dramatic shift here. We've heard from the psalmist,
12:24
We've heard from Jehovah. And now, now we hear from the
12:27
anointed of Jehovah himself. The Messianic king, he appears
12:31
dramatically as a personal being, and he's here to address
12:34
the decree. And this is the moment that
12:36
confirms his identity. The sources are so insistent
12:39
that this is not David speaking. It's not some personification of
12:43
the Kingdom. No, it is the personal being
12:45
promised by God the Messiah, who steps forward to proclaim and
12:50
explain the decree of Jehovah. And he appeals to a specific
12:54
historical mandate, an ordinance, a cock to justify his
12:58
status. This isn't something new.
12:59
It's a pre-existing definite declaration.
13:02
That's right. He appeals to a cock which the
13:04
sources define as an express, inviolable and peculiar
13:07
declaration of Jehovah of a historical kind.
13:10
So it's a legal or governmental arrangement, yes.
13:13
And to understand the King's authority, we have to find the
13:16
historical root of this civic declaration.
13:19
And the sources are very restrictive about where we can
13:21
look. They are.
13:23
They say it is found alone in Nathan's promise to David about
13:26
his successor. You see it in Second Samuel
13:29
7.12. Nathan delivers the message that
13:33
Jehovah will be his father and he shall be my son.
13:37
That promise, given specifically about David's seed, is the
13:40
original source for all the biblical prophecies about the
13:43
line of David standing in this unique relationship of sonship
13:46
to God. And that link is just so vital
13:48
because it separates this sonship from, say, the general
13:52
sonship of all pious Israelites, or even of kings in general.
13:56
This is a special unique ordination it.
13:58
Establishes the legal and historical foundation for the
14:01
Messiah's rule. This is the backdrop for the
14:04
most quoted line from this Psalm in the entire New Testament.
14:07
Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.
14:09
That's the one. This phrase is foundational to
14:11
Christology, so we have to spend some real time on what it means
14:14
according to the sources. Specifically, what does this day
14:18
hayom signify? This distinction is absolutely
14:21
critical. The sources stress it heavily
14:23
because it defines the Messiah's role without contradicting his
14:26
preexistence. The phrase today hayom has to be
14:30
understood in its historical meaning.
14:32
Not a poetical 1. Not a metaphysical 1.
14:34
So this is not a reference to the eternal generation of the
14:37
sun from the Father within the Godhead as we see defined later
14:40
in Nicene Christology. Correct.
14:42
The sources agree it is not Speaking of an eternal
14:45
generation, nor is it about the first moment of this person's
14:48
existence. If it were, it would completely
14:51
undermine the sun's pre existence, right?
14:54
Instead, the King is talking about a specific, identifiable
14:57
historical event. So what is actually being
15:00
declared on this day? The personal being who already
15:03
existed, the sun was declared to be the sun at that time.
15:06
It's a historical recognition. It's made by a word of
15:09
revelation upon a historical day.
15:11
So it's a public inauguration. A public inauguration.
15:14
The decree doesn't make him the Sun for the first time.
15:17
Yeah, it publicly recognizes and installs him as the Sun, with a
15:21
specific title and capacity to govern.
15:23
It's a declaration of his functional sonship of the
15:26
Messiah taking up his office and authority, even though he is on
15:29
to logically the Son for all eternity.
15:31
Exactly. This declaration made in time,
15:35
demonstrates the King's personal capacity for the government in
15:39
question, which was to overcome and embrace the world.
15:43
It's his public title deed to the throne, confirmed and
15:47
implemented by Jehovah. And Jehovah immediately confirms
15:50
that authority in the very next verse by promising this
15:53
universal Commission. He just says to the Messiah, Ask
15:56
of me, and I will give thee. And that ask and receive.
16:00
It's a political figure, of course, but it represents God's
16:03
absolute willingness and certainty in delivering the
16:05
kingdoms of this world to His anointed.
16:07
And the grant is universal completely.
16:10
The heathen for line inheritance and the uttermost parts of the
16:13
earth for his possession. Which makes it clear that the
16:15
Messiah's rule is fundamentally different from David's or
16:18
Solomon's. Their dominion was regional, his
16:21
is global. It reaches the uttermost parts.
16:23
And this is the moment we understand that this messiah's
16:26
power isn't just destined to embrace the world through, say,
16:29
peaceful expansion. It's destined to conquer the
16:32
world. He's commissioned in a dual
16:34
role. He is both judge and savior.
16:37
And that dual role is illustrated so graphically by
16:40
the promise of the rod of iron and the verb used to describe
16:44
his action. Yes, he is commissioned to break
16:46
the rebellious nations. The verb in the Septuagint, the
16:50
Greek translation, is poi main. It usually means to rule or to
16:55
shepherd. OK, like a gentle shepherd.
16:57
Right, but here it's linked with a rod of iron, which totally
17:00
shifts the meaning. The gentle guidance of
17:03
shepherding is transformed into ruling with irresistible,
17:06
crushing force. So the Messiah is a shepherd
17:09
king, but for those who rebel, the shepherd's crook becomes a
17:13
scepter of iron used for breaking.
17:15
Precisely. The imagery asserts that he will
17:17
shatter the rebellious nations with little trouble and to
17:20
entire destruction. It compares them to a Potter's
17:23
vessel. Fragile.
17:25
Clay vessels are fragile, easily fragmented, so this guarantees
17:28
that all earthly efforts against his established Kingdom are
17:31
completely vain. The rod of blessing for
17:33
believers becomes the rod of iron for the rebellious.
17:36
And that imagery is picked up later.
17:38
It is. It's directly referenced in the
17:39
Book of Revelation, which confirms the Messiah's
17:42
invincible world conquering judicial authority.
17:46
So the claims made here in Strove 3 the Divine King, the
17:50
Unique Sonship, Universal Dominion, this crushing judicial
17:53
power, they're so immense that it forces us back to the
17:57
question of interpretation, right?
17:59
We have to turn now to why the sources insist the Psalm has to
18:03
be directly about Christ and why they reject all the other
18:06
competing views. This is where it all comes
18:08
together theologically. If this Psalm were about any
18:11
earthly king, it would just be absurd hyperbole.
18:13
It would. The sources are unanimous on
18:15
this. The prophetic or direct
18:17
Messianic explanation is the only coherent solution, and this
18:22
view has the support of all the ancient Jewish and ancient
18:25
Christian traditions, even when they disagreed on who the
18:28
Messiah actually was. So let's walk through that claim
18:30
by showing why the alternate views just don't hold up.
18:33
Let's start with the historical view.
18:35
Why does trying to pin the Psalm on the reign of David or Solomon
18:38
or Hezekiah fail? It fails because of scope.
18:42
Primarily scope. The circumstances described
18:46
here. Universal dominion over all
18:47
nations, crushing judgement, The eternity duration of the rule.
18:52
That specific declaration of unique sonship just doesn't fit
18:56
any known historical reality. Take Solomon for example.
19:00
If you look at Solomon, his reign was famously peaceful.
19:04
The sources state plainly that the circumstances here do not
19:07
fit the peaceful government of Solomon, which we know from
19:10
other texts had clear boundaries.
19:11
So the earthly limitations of David and Solomon proved the
19:14
negative case. They were limited by geography
19:17
and by time. Yes, David's rule was constantly
19:20
being challenged by the nations around him.
19:22
Solomon's Kingdom fractured right after he died.
19:24
No Jewish monarch was ever given the uttermost parts of the earth
19:27
for his possession. So the words are just too big
19:29
for them. The words are simply too great
19:31
to have all their meaning exhausted in David, Solomon or
19:34
Ahaz or any other Jewish monarch.
19:36
The moment a commentator has to start looking beyond the
19:39
immediate history to find a fit, the argument for a purely
19:42
historical reading just collapses.
19:44
The only subject big enough is the Messiah.
19:45
OK, So what about the typical view, the idea that a historical
19:50
king like David was a type A foreshadowing of Christ?
19:54
We see typology all over the Old Testament.
19:57
The typical view is more sophisticated, but it runs into
20:00
a very specific structural problem within the Psalm itself.
20:04
David cannot be the speaker in verse 7.
20:06
It's impossible because the ordinance of sonship, the coke
20:09
that's appealed to there, well, it refers, according to Second
20:13
Samuel 7.14, to David's son. Not to David himself.
20:18
David is the one who receives the promise about the son, but
20:21
he isn't the son who then speaks the decree.
20:23
That internal logic makes it impossible for David to be the
20:27
one speaking the central decree of the Psalm, and that shatters
20:30
the foundation of a typological argument applied directly to
20:33
him. If the king can't speak for
20:34
himself in the text, he can't be the primary type.
20:37
Correct. The text isn't about the type,
20:38
it's about the anti type. It's about the ultimate
20:40
fulfillment, the decree, the dominion, the judgment.
20:43
They all point past the temporal Kingdom to the everlasting
20:45
universal one. All right.
20:47
And finally, there's the political view that the king is
20:50
just a general poetic glorification of the Kingdom,
20:53
not a specific person. And this view fails because it
20:57
ignores the specificity of the revelation.
20:59
It just brushes past the appeal to a precise historical divine
21:03
ordinance that tohawk in verse 7.
21:06
The text describes the King as a personal being who is promised
21:09
by God and is surely coming. He's not just a poetical figure.
21:13
Reducing it to a general theme disregards the legal, historical
21:17
and dramatic particularity of the Messianic decree.
21:20
So the messianic interpretation isn't just one option among
21:23
several, it's the only one that is exegetically viable.
21:26
And that brings us to the New Testaments confirmation of this
21:29
How did the earliest followers of Christ use this text to build
21:32
their arguments about Jesus? The New Testament writers
21:35
treated Psalm 2 as a historical source of revelation about
21:38
Christ's identity, his authority, and his destiny.
21:42
They didn't cite it as poetry. They cited it as authoritative,
21:45
legal, prophetic bedrock that was fulfilled in the person of
21:48
Jesus Christ. And one of the most powerful
21:50
examples is Paul's argument about the resurrection.
21:52
Oh yes, the resurrection proof. In Acts 13.33, Paul uses Psalm
21:58
2.7 to establish the propriety and the reasonableness of
22:03
Jesus's resurrection as the Son of God.
22:05
Paul treats the resurrection as the actual fulfilment, the thing
22:09
that happened on that historical day of the declaration of
22:12
sonship now. That's a sophisticated move.
22:14
If this day have I begotten thee is a declaration of existing
22:18
sonship for the purpose of government, why does Paul apply
22:21
it to the resurrection which happens long after Jesus's
22:24
birth? This is such a critical point.
22:26
The sources suggest that Paul sees the resurrection as the
22:29
public the final and the most forceful recognition of Christ's
22:32
capacity to execute the full scope of that decree.
22:35
That is universal government, right?
22:37
The resurrection demonstrated that the Son who already existed
22:41
was indeed the one designated by that ordinance to overcome and
22:44
embrace the world. It was the ultimate inauguration
22:47
day for his Christocracy. The Psalm also establishes his
22:50
divine rank, which the New Testament writers used to argue
22:53
for his superiority over all of their beings.
22:55
Absolutely. In Hebrews 1.5, Psalm 2.7 is
22:59
quoted directly to prove the solemn recognition of Christ's
23:02
sonship and authority, and this citation forms the entire basis
23:05
of the argument for the Super angelic nature and rank of
23:08
Jesus. No Angel was ever addressed this
23:10
one. Never.
23:11
No Angel was ever addressed with this specific language of unique
23:15
decreed sonship, and it goes further.
23:19
The title of first born, which had previously been given to
23:21
Israel, is transferred to the Messiah, typified by David in
23:24
Psalm 89, and then applied directly to Jesus.
23:28
This links his eternal birth from God before creation to his
23:31
relationship with the Church through his resurrection.
23:34
And the New Testament writers, they don't shy away from the
23:36
violent judicial aspects of the decree.
23:38
They don't ignore the rod of iron.
23:39
Not at all. The judicial reign is confirmed
23:42
repeatedly in Revelation, especially in chapters 12 and
23:45
19. The apostle John directly
23:47
references the Messiah's judicial activity, ruling the
23:50
nations with the rod of iron. This confirms His invincible
23:53
world conquering authority. The sources even note that
23:56
Revelation 12.5 views the Messiah's entrance upon His
24:00
world sovereignty when He is snatched away to God and His
24:03
throne as a kind of birth from the Church.
24:05
So it connects that final judicial triumph all the way
24:08
back to historical declaration of sonship right here in Psalm
24:11
2. So, taken together, the New
24:13
Testament authors used Psalm 2 as a kind of comprehensive legal
24:17
brief. It defines his nature, it proves
24:20
his resurrection, and it establishes his final
24:23
authoritative reign as judges. It's the bedrock.
24:27
Every aspect of his mediatorial rule is traced back to this
24:30
prophetic blueprint. It confirms that the scope of
24:33
authority described isn't metaphorical hyperbole.
24:36
It's literal truth above the ultimate king.
24:38
Which brings us to the end Stir 4.
24:40
We've seen the futility of rebellion, the certainty of
24:43
God's decree, the universal nature of the sun's authority,
24:46
and it all culminates in a direct, urgent call for
24:49
allegiance. This final strophy is the
24:51
application, It's the So what, and the warning is directed
24:55
emphatically at the powerful and those in I positions, the very
24:58
same kings and judges we met back in Strove 1.
25:01
They're the ones in special danger of overrating their own
25:03
temporary authority, so they're urged to be wise and to receive
25:07
instruction. And the central command is that
25:10
famous line Kiss the Sun. It's such a concise summary of
25:14
the required allegiance. It's an exhortation to those
25:17
previously rebellious Princess and leaders.
25:20
It's a demand that they submit and pay homage to the Messianic
25:23
king. The language itself is so
25:25
significant. The phrase uses the Aramaic word
25:27
for sun bar instead of the more common Hebrew Ben.
25:31
Why the sudden switch to Aramaic for the word sun right at the
25:34
end? The sources confirmed that using
25:36
bar here suits entirely the messianic interpretation.
25:40
It acts as a kind of transitional form, almost like a
25:42
proper noun. The Sun, using Aramaic, also
25:46
emphasizes the universality of the King's claim.
25:49
It extends beyond the Hebrew world to the Gentile world where
25:52
related Semitic languages were spoken.
25:54
And what does the act of kissing represent in that ancient
25:57
context? It's the required public sign of
26:00
reverence and submission. It was typically done on the
26:03
hand or the clothing or even the feet of a superior.
26:07
It signifies both political allegiance, acknowledging the
26:11
King's sovereignty, and religious submission, converting
26:13
to Jehovah. And the warning is immediate.
26:15
The warning is immediate. They must convert and submit
26:18
before the crushing judgement from Stroh 3 is fulfilled.
26:21
The sources also talk about how some have tried to interpret
26:25
Kiss the Sun differently. Right, seeing bar as meaning
26:28
pure or something else? That's right, Some historical
26:31
translations rendered it as a door purely or lay hold of
26:35
purity. But the sources state that this
26:38
kind of interpretive evasion only happens when you reject the
26:41
direct messianic character of the Psalm.
26:44
The context demands a person. The context, A warning to
26:47
Rebellious kings, demands homage to the person of the king, not
26:51
to an abstract concept. And this submission isn't meant
26:54
to be just a grudging political act.
26:56
It requires a specific spiritual state of being.
26:59
Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
27:02
This creates that necessary theological balance.
27:05
The sources call it a sacred compound.
27:08
Kings and judges aren't just submitting to a bigger political
27:11
power. They're entering into a
27:12
relationship defined by both awe and delight.
27:15
Let's break that compound down. Why is trembling necessary if
27:18
you're also rejoicing? The sources note that the
27:21
trembling is necessary so that rejoicing doesn't turn into
27:24
security and pride. You have to remember that our
27:26
God is a consuming fire. This requires what's called the
27:31
indelible trembling of the creature before the Almighty and
27:34
holy God. If your joy pushes out awe, it
27:37
just becomes presumption. And on the other side, why must
27:39
fear be balanced by joy? Because fear without joy is just
27:43
torment. It's despair.
27:44
It would make the service slavish, not the service of the
27:47
sun. The submission required here is
27:49
a sincere self-discipline reverence that combines
27:51
religious and political allegiance into one act within
27:54
the Christocracy. This blend ensures holy all
27:57
alongside sacred joy. It reflects that new covenant
28:00
instruction to work out your salvation with fear and
28:03
trembling on one side and sacred joy and assurance on the other.
28:06
And the Psalm ends by emphasizing the two possible
28:09
outcomes of this choice of allegiance.
28:12
The final warning and the declaration of blessedness are a
28:15
sharp contrast. The warning is simple but stark.
28:19
If God's wrath is kindled but little, just a little bit, those
28:23
who refused allegiance will perish.
28:25
The rebellion will be annihilated.
28:27
The speed and ease of the destruction is emphasized by how
28:30
little effort it requires from God.
28:32
And yet the blessing is just a certain.
28:34
Just as certain, conversely, those who take refuge with God
28:38
and His anointed are declared blessed ashrae they find
28:42
deliverance and security. The Messianic Kingdom holds both
28:45
the means of grace for those who willingly submit and
28:48
overwhelming judicial destruction for the rebellious.
28:51
So blessedness is only found in taking refuge in the Christ, not
28:54
in trying to establish your own Kingdom.
28:56
The implication for any listener, especially Reformed
28:59
listener, is clear. The only appropriate response to
29:02
the absolute sovereignty of Christ, which is established by
29:04
divine decree, is immediate and joyful submission.
29:07
It confirms the doctrine of Christ's mediatorial reign.
29:10
The rule is already established. The rule is established, the
29:13
decree has been spoken, and the only choice left for humanity is
29:16
allegiance or annihilation. Christ's sovereignty is an easy
29:21
yoke to believers, providing those holy bands of moral
29:24
communion, but it is the rod of iron to the rebellious.
29:28
So to close this out, we've really seen the dramatic
29:31
precision of how Psalm 2 unfolds.
29:33
We have from that chaotic, irrational human plotting in
29:37
Strophy 1 which is immediately dismissed by the serene and
29:40
powerful divine establishment in Strove 2.
29:43
Which then gave way to the detailed declaration of the
29:45
King's unique sonship and his Commission for universal
29:48
conquest in Strove 3. Culminating in that urgent
29:51
demand for immediate allegiance and refuge in Strove 4.
29:54
The key take away here isn't just about prophecy, it's about
29:57
a present reality, the messianic institution of salvation.
30:01
This Christocracy is God's historical preparation and His
30:04
ultimate solution against the world's tendency towards self
30:07
destruction. And that act of rebellion, that
30:10
attempt to tear away the cords of moral governance, it's
30:14
condemned from the start as futile and without effect.
30:18
The sovereignty of Christ is guaranteed by divine ordinance.
30:21
It's absolute. And recognizing that is the only
30:24
path to deliverance. This Psalm really is a
30:27
declaration of divine authority. It's a definitive blueprint for
30:31
the structure of Christ's Kingdom.
30:33
And it compels every single person, but especially those who
30:36
hold any kind of earthly authority, to recognize their
30:38
absolute accountability to the heavenly king and judge the true
30:42
scope of this decree. It really demands personal
30:45
reflection and submission far beyond the kind of technical
30:48
analysis we've done here today. And we can close the Latin
30:51
phrase that's often associated with commentary on this text.
30:54
It urges that kind of personal contemplation over any external
30:57
discussion. Epiphanima Dignias umediteres
31:01
Kwam UD Amet Tractor tour. A commentary more worthy that
31:04
you should meditate upon it than that it should be handled by me.
31:08
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive into the decree
31:10
of the Messianic King.