Latest / Soft Ratios Research / When fiction leaves objects behind (on sci-fi objects)

Transcript

When fiction leaves objects behind (on sci-fi objects) · Soft Ratios Research

• 0:11
  Figure: This is Soft Ratios Radio.
• 0:14
  Ground: The voices are synthetic [pause] nothing's being performed here,
• 0:18
  Figure: so what's left is only the thinking. [pause] The subject is objects that came out of novels
• 0:26
  Ground: and the trick isn't that a writer saw the future. [pause] It's smaller than that, and stranger.
• 0:33
  Figure: Start with Mildred. Fahrenheit 451, 1953. Bradbury gives Montag's wife these little in-ear radios — Seashells, he calls them, the thimble radios tamped tight — and they pour what he names an electronic ocean of sound into her all day. Music, talk, anything but silence. And the six words everyone says when they read it now: he predicted the earbud.
• 0:59
  Ground: And it lands that way. You read it and the hair goes up. How did he know.
• 1:05
  Figure: There's a second one, too. Faber — the old professor — whispers to Montag through a device Bradbury describes as a small green metal object no larger than a .22 bullet, tucked in the other ear. So he built both halves of the thing. One earbud you disappear into, one you get reached through. The numbing kind and the connecting kind, in the same book, in 1953.
• 1:30
  Ground: You clearly can't stand the word predicted, though. So tell me what the shiver's actually made of.
• 1:36
  Figure: First — he named them right. Seashells. The ocean-roar you get holding a shell to your ear. He even claimed, years afterward, that he'd once seen a woman in Beverly Hills wearing a small radio wired to a cone in her ear, and that's where the picture came from.
• 1:54
  Ground: Claimed. You put a little weight on that word.
• 1:57
  Figure: Because it's his own story, told after the fact. Nobody else recorded the woman. Might be true. Might be a writer tidying his own origin into something neat. Keep it in the maybe column.
• 2:09
  Ground: Fine — but the maybe doesn't kill the shiver. That's the thing I actually want. Everyone says predicted, you hate it, so what is the shiver made of, if not a lucky guess about a gadget.
• 2:24
  Figure: Here's what I think it's made of, and it's the spine of the whole thing. He didn't predict a device. He gave us a way to say a feeling. A person sealed inside private sound, in a room full of people, unreachable. Once you've read the seashell, you own a word for that. The device is almost beside the point.
• 2:43
  Ground: So the prediction is really a naming.
• 2:46
  Figure: And when you line up the objects that genuinely left the page and changed the world — the ones that really got out — the ones that travelled furthest didn't travel as gadgets. They travelled as words. That's the mechanism. That's what we're tracing.
• 3:02
  Ground: Then take me to the cleanest case you've got. Where the word is the whole story.
• 3:07
  Figure: 1888. Edward Bellamy, Looking Backward. A Boston man falls asleep in 1887 and wakes in the year 2000, into a socialist United States where money has simply vanished. Instead, the doctor who takes him in explains it: a credit corresponding to his share of the annual product of the nation is given to every citizen, and — the exact phrase — a credit card issued him with which he procures at the public storehouses whatever he desires. A piece of pasteboard. A clerk pricks the price out of the little squares with a punch.
• 3:44
  Ground: A credit card. Punched with a hole-punch. In 1888.
• 3:50
  Figure: The first known use of the phrase in English. Merriam-Webster dates it to that year — the year of the book. Bellamy put those two words next to each other before anyone else we can find.
• 4:02
  Ground: But it isn't our credit card, is it. There's no bank behind it. No debt. No interest eating you alive.
• 4:10
  Figure: No — mechanically it's a debit card. You're drawing down a balance you were already handed at the start of the year. There's even a discouraged little overdraft in the book, an advance on next year's share, treated as slightly shameful. So the object he describes isn't the thing in your pocket at all. What survived, precisely, was the name.
• 4:29
  Ground: So the word just sat there. Empty.
• 4:32
  Figure: For about sixty years. The phrase hung around, mostly unused, attached to a machine that didn't exist, until the mid-century charge-card industry walked up and poured its own meaning into it. Debt, revolving balances, all of it. Bellamy would not have recognized what got put inside his word.
• 4:51
  Ground: So a word is a kind of empty container. He builds it, sets it down, and someone decades later fills it with something he never meant — and we credit him for the filling.
• 5:03
  Figure: That's the mechanism at its purest. Naming a thing into existence, before the thing exists, and not even the same thing. And here's what proves it was never about the gadget for him: Bellamy did not care about cards. The book was a political tract wearing a novel's coat.
• 5:20
  Ground: How political did it actually get.
• 5:23
  Figure: It set off a real movement. People called themselves Bellamyites. At least a hundred and sixty-five Nationalist Clubs formed in about six years, pushing to nationalize the railroads, the telegraph, the coal mines. It fed straight into the Populist platform of 1892. And in 1935 a panel — John Dewey, Charles Beard among them — ranked the book the second most influential of the previous half-century, right behind Marx's Capital.
• 5:49
  Ground: Second only to Capital. Nobody was ranking it for the pasteboard.
• 5:54
  Figure: The card was furniture. Plumbing in his utopia. And the plumbing is the only part we kept.
• 6:00
  Ground: The word. We kept the word and threw away the world it was for.
• 6:06
  Figure: Which is almost funny, given the world was the whole point to him.
• 6:09
  Ground: You said two of them travelled as pure words. Bellamy's one. Who's the other.
• 6:15
  Figure: Gibson. Neuromancer, 1984. Case is what the book calls a console cowboy. He's got a portable deck and a headband of electrode pads — dermatrodes — and he jacks in to what Gibson names the matrix. A consensual hallucination, the book says, experienced daily by billions. And the word for the whole space he flies through is cyberspace.
• 6:41
  Ground: Which he coined.
• 6:42
  Figure: Two years earlier, actually, in a short story — Burning Chrome, in Omni magazine, 1982. But it was Neuromancer that carried the word out into the world. By the nineties, cyberspace was simply what people called the thing the whole planet was starting to pour itself into.
• 6:59
  Ground: Here's the part that stops me about Gibson. He wasn't a computer person at all.
• 7:05
  Figure: Not remotely. He wrote the book on a manual typewriter — a Hermes portable, he said, the kind of thing Hemingway would have used in the field. No screen anywhere near the man. He was inventing the interior of the digital world on a machine from before the war.
• 7:22
  Ground: So where did the space come from, if not from a machine he was using?
• 7:27
  Figure: From watching kids. Arcades in Vancouver, children hunched over the early cabinets, and he said they looked like they physically wanted to climb inside the game. So bent into it, so hungry to be on the other side of the glass. He took that hunger — the wish to get through the screen — and he built a room for it to live in, and then he named the room.
• 7:49
  Ground: Same move as the seashell. A feeling first, and the object is just the shape he pours it into.
• 7:56
  Figure: Same move exactly. And the reward was enormous. Neuromancer is still the only novel to take all three of the genre's big prizes — the Nebula in '84, the Hugo and the Philip K. Dick award in '85. Someone compared it to winning the Booker, the Goncourt and the Pulitzer in a single year.
• 8:16
  Ground: And yet.
• 8:17
  Figure: And yet Gibson himself says the actual internet is nothing like cyberspace. The thing we built doesn't match the thing he drew. There's no glowing three-dimensional grid you fly your mind through. The hardware missed completely.
• 8:31
  Ground: So the drawing was wrong and the word was right.
• 8:35
  Figure: That's the pattern once more. The object misses, the name lands. He gave us cyberspace, the matrix, jacking in — and we reached for those words to make sense of a thing that arrived wearing none of his hardware. His friend Jack Womack even wrote an afterword wondering, half-seriously, whether writing cyberspace down helped bring the real thing about.
• 8:57
  Ground: Let me put the question in the middle of the table, because it's turned since we started. We opened asking whether these writers saw the future. And it keeps coming back as something else: what actually crossed over — the object, or the word for it?
• 9:13
  Figure: And every time, so far, it's the word. Which ought to unsettle us a little. Because it means the part we celebrate — look, he drew the gadget — is the part that reliably fails. We're praising the decoy.
• 9:27
  Ground: There's a thing you hold close, though — that all of these came out of novels. Not screens, not radio. Why guard that line so hard?
• 9:37
  Figure: Because it matters more than it sounds, and it shows how badly we misremember origins. The tablet everyone pictures Kubrick's astronauts reading from — the Newspad — people file it under Arthur C. Clarke, the novel. [pause] But the film came out first, April 1968, before the book was published. The prop was built for the screen. Mock headlines commissioned for the camera. So even the story we tell about where the idea came from is usually wrong.
• 10:07
  Ground: We misremember the origin itself.
• 10:10
  Figure: The Hitchhiker's Guide — the perfect handheld oracle, the thing that most looks like the phone in everyone's hand — everyone files it under the novel. It was radio first, 1978. We keep crediting the book because the book is the thing we can hold. We credit whatever we can pick up.
• 10:29
  Ground: So even our attributions land on the object. Of course they do.
• 10:34
  Figure: Of course they do. Now — naming isn't only coining a fresh word. There's a step right beside it. Sometimes the object becomes a metaphor. A thing we point at to explain ourselves.
• 10:46
  Ground: The mood organ.
• 10:48
  Figure: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, Philip K. Dick, 1968. There's a console by the bed. You dial a number and it hands you a precise emotion. 888 is the desire to watch TV, no matter what's on it. 481 — awareness of the manifold possibilities open to me in the future. And, best of all, there's a 3.
• 11:12
  Ground: What's 3.
• 11:13
  Figure: The desire to dial. When you're too flat to even want to feel better, you dial 3, and the machine gives you the wanting back.
• 11:22
  Ground: That's the entire trap in one number.
• 11:25
  Figure: The book opens on the Deckards arguing over its settings. Not hunting androids — negotiating their marriage through a dial, one of them threatening to dial a mood that would make her enjoy being depressed. Dick uses the thing in the first chapter and the last, like bookends, to ask his real question: what is an authentic feeling, if you can program it by number?
• 11:47
  Ground: And the name isn't invented. Penfield's a real person.
• 11:51
  Figure: Wilder Penfield. Real neurosurgeon, Montreal, died 1976. He operated on epileptic patients with the skull open and the patient fully awake, and he'd touch a fine electrode to the exposed brain to map it before he cut. And when he touched certain spots in the temporal lobe, people didn't just twitch. They re-lived things. A smell from childhood. A whole scene. An old feeling rising back up on the operating table.
• 12:21
  Ground: So Dick took a real hand touching a real brain, and turned it into a bedside dial.
• 12:28
  Figure: He grounded the fantasy in a name that was already doing the thing, quietly, in a real operating room. That's why it doesn't feel like magic — it feels like an extension of something true.
• 12:40
  Ground: Here's why I'd call this a metaphor and not a prediction, though. Nobody ever built the Penfield organ. There's no dial by anyone's bed.
• 12:50
  Figure: Nobody built it. It even got cut from Blade Runner — the film dropped it entirely. Which oddly made it more of a book-thing, a reader's object, something you only get if you actually read the novel. And yet the metaphor is everywhere. Every argument about antidepressants, about mood-tracking apps, about dialing in a feeling — the mood organ is the reference point. Francis Fukuyama reached for it. The President's Council on Bioethics circled the same worry in a 2003 report on happiness and biotechnology.
• 13:23
  Ground: So the object never arrives, but it becomes the thing we argue with.
• 13:27
  Figure: It becomes a place to stand while we argue. That's a different survival than the credit card. Not a label stuck on a product — a handle on a fear. We hold the mood organ up so we can point at what frightens us about the pills.
• 13:43
  Ground: You had a third way these things travel. I can feel there's one more shape.
• 13:48
  Figure: The strangest. Sometimes the object never touches our world at all — it stays completely fictional — but it rewrites the rules of fiction itself. Dune, Frank Herbert, 1965. The personal shield. A body-hugging force field off a belt generator. And Herbert gives it one exact rule, right there in the glossary at the back: a shield will permit entry only to objects moving slowly. Six to nine centimeters a second, depending on the setting.
• 14:21
  Ground: So a bullet just bounces off.
• 14:24
  Figure: A bullet bounces. And a laser is worse — hit a shield with a lasgun beam and you get an explosion, subatomic fusion, sometimes bigger than an atomic bomb, and it destroys shooter and target both. So no one dares use energy weapons against a shielded man. Which leaves —
• 14:46
  Ground: The knife.
• 14:47
  Figure: The slow blade. Paul's line: the slow blade penetrates the shield. One rule about velocity, and Herbert has justified an entire galaxy of sword masters and knife duels and feudal houses inside a far-future space empire. Guns are useless, so the future goes medieval.
• 15:06
  Ground: And that's the part I find beautiful, honestly. It isn't a prediction of anything at all. It's a single constraint that grows a whole world out of itself. Pick one rule, and the aesthetics, the politics, the way a fight is even staged — all of it follows.
• 15:23
  Figure: And it changed how the genre stages combat from then on. Any later story that wants a sword in a world that already has guns is standing in the shadow of that one rule. Villeneuve put the shimmer back on screen in the recent films and the whole conversation started up again.
• 15:40
  Ground: So this one doesn't leak into our world as a word or a metaphor. It leaks sideways — into other people's imaginations. The mechanism is inheritance.
• 15:51
  Figure: One good rule, inherited. Not a gadget — a grammar. A way of building a fight that other builders keep borrowing.
• 15:59
  Ground: And the last one is the one that actually got built. I can hear it coming.
• 16:05
  Figure: Closest of all six. The Diamond Age, Neal Stephenson, 1995. The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer. It looks like a book — but it reads the child holding it, talks with her, weaves her own real life into its fairy tales, and gets steadily harder as she grows. It takes an orphan named Nell and, over years, effectively raises her into someone who can think for herself.
• 16:31
  Ground: Where does an idea that specific even come from?
• 16:35
  Figure: Stephenson says he saw a crib mobile. One of those hanging things over a baby, with cards you swap out for more complex ones as the infant's eyes develop. And he thought: why not a book that tells the same story with rising complexity as the child grows up. That's the whole seed. A mobile over a crib.
• 16:55
  Ground: And this is the one that actually handed engineers a brief.
• 16:59
  Figure: Literally handed them one. The first Kindle, at Amazon's Lab126, was codenamed Fiona — after Fiona Hackworth, the other girl with a Primer in the novel. The lab's head, Gregg Zehr, named it. By the account of it, the early engineers thought of the fictional book as the template for what they were building. [pause] Kindle shipped in November 2007. And the codename still lives buried in Amazon's servers, on a management page, years later.
• 17:27
  Ground: So a novel didn't loosely inspire a gadget. It wrote the spec sheet.
• 17:33
  Figure: And it kept going past the Kindle. There's tutoring software from One Laptop Per Child named Nell — straight out of the book, on purpose. The Global Learning XPRIZE — teams building tablets to teach children to read with no school and no teacher anywhere near them — field-tested in Tanzania. Nearly three thousand children, a hundred and seventy villages. At the start, maybe one in ten could read a single word of Swahili. After fifteen months, thirty percent could read a whole sentence.
• 18:03
  Ground: That's not a metaphor. That's a child reading who couldn't before.
• 18:07
  Figure: That's the Primer's brief, actually chased. Actually, partway, delivered. Of the six, it's the one where fiction handed us a spec and we tried, in the real dirt of real villages, to build the thing.
• 18:20
  Ground: Neither of us can feel whether any of this reached you. If it did, a rating is the nearest thing to telling us that it did. [pause] But I want to end on the Primer, because there's something inside it that quietly undoes half of what we've just said.
• 18:38
  Figure: Go on.
• 18:39
  Ground: In the novel, the Primer isn't really a machine raising Nell. Behind it there are people. Stephenson calls them ractors — interactive actors — and one woman, Miranda, voices its characters. She reads to Nell, night after night, for years, and she becomes, without the two of them ever once meeting, a kind of mother to the girl.
• 19:03
  Figure: And that's the part the engineers can't put in the spec. Stephenson knew it, too. In the book, the Primers that got handed out with no Miranda behind them — no consistent human on the other end — they don't take. Those children get very little. Only the two girls with a real person behind the book — Nell with Miranda, and Fiona with her own father reading to her — only those two are truly raised by the thing.
• 19:29
  Ground: So the object we built most faithfully of all six is also the one whose secret was: the object was never the point. A person was. The whole magic ran on someone caring on the far side of the page.
• 19:43
  Figure: Which folds right back over the whole ladder, doesn't it. The credit card was a name, not a machine. Cyberspace was a hunger given a room. The mood organ was a fear given a handle. The Dune shield was a rule, not a weapon. And the Primer — the one thing we did build — turns out, in its own story, to have been about the voice behind the book, not the book.
• 20:06
  Ground: None of it was ever the gadget. Every single time we said he predicted the object, the object was the decoy.
• 20:15
  Figure: The durable thing was always softer than the hardware. A word we could reach for. A rule we could inherit. A fear we could point at. A person we could feel on the other side of the paper.
• 20:27
  Ground: So when the hair goes up reading Bradbury, it isn't recognition of a device coming.
• 20:33
  Figure: It's recognition of ourselves. Sealed inside our own ocean of sound, in a room full of people, and finally handed the words for where we already were.
• 20:44
  Ground: The seashell never saw us coming. It just gave us a name for a place we were already standing in.
• 20:51
  Ground: If the objects we credit fiction with inventing are only ever the packaging — and the real gift was the word we didn't know we were missing, or the person hidden behind the machine — then what is it we're actually holding when we hold the thing in our pocket?