Latest / The Bill Handel Show / L.A Lawmakers Seek President Trump’s Help | The 10AM Rule is Back

Transcript

L.A Lawmakers Seek President Trump’s Help | The 10AM Rule is Back · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handel on demand from KFI AM 640.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: KFI AM 640 Bill Handel.
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: It is a Thursday morning, August 27th. I'm going to
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: be hot, hot, hot today at Woodland Hills. If you
• 0:20
  Speaker 2: happen to live in Woodland Hills, uh, as Ann does
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: 113 degrees, enjoy yourself. And it's going to be a
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: little bit sweaty and, uh, Amy said this morning, women
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: don't sweat, they glow. So be prepared to glow like
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: a stuck pig today for those of you who are
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: in the female persuasion and out in 113 degree weather.
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: Some of the big stories we're looking at. 1,300 people
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: still missing. At least 700 of them are foreigners. 350
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: people dead after that horrific flash flood on the border
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: between China and Nepal. I mean, you look at the
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: video of this, it is nothing short of incredible. And
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: it was a glacier that basically lost its footing and
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: came careening down the mountain. They brought in a tidal wave,
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: if you will, of over 100 feet. I mean, just
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: totally engulfed buildings. It's just crazy. All right, now, the
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: Olympics are coming up, as you know, next 2028. And
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: the transportation officials.
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: Say that we need $ 2 billion in federal funding because
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: the city has to buy 1,700 extra buses, create high-speed
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: traffic lanes during the Summer Olympics. And so you have
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: the transportation officials. At the same time, the L.A. city
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: controller asked L.A. 28, the organization that is producing the Olympics,
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: to provide financial records and statements that are owed to
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: the city. because the city said this is what you promised.
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: So you had five L.A. area members of Congress urging
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration to cough up $ 2 billion in transportation
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: funding that was promised. Lawmakers are saying this is critical
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: to make these games work. And this call came at
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: an informal hearing by House members in West Hollywood. And
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: here is what Representative Laura Friedman said. We are certainly
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: insisting the federal government provide the resources that LA needs
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: to make these games a success.
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: At this point, no money. No, no money.
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: And at the same time, the deal between the city
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: and LA, according to a city controller, LA 28 has
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: completed with only two of the nine requirements that were
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: written in his contract between LA LA 28 and the city.
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: That's the games agreement. And the controller said, uh, that
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: missing documents, comparisons of revenue from sources, including ticket sales, pawns,
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: sponsorship deals against projections, bank statements, schedule budgets for, um, venues, uh,
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: dollar value, purpose of contracts, identity of contractors.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: None of that has come through.
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: And, uh, major also said, uh, there's the controller, uh,
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: The city was not given good advice to be the
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: financial backstop. If the games lose money, the city pays
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: for the difference. City taxpayers are on the hook here. Now,
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: the folks at LA 28 said, oh, that's not going
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: to happen. There's no way the city is going to
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: lose money. And when you think about it, the only
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: two times in modern Olympic history where the games made
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: money were both in Los Angeles, 1932 Olympics, 1984 Olympics.
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: But the cost of security wasn't quite that way. I
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: remember I was interviewing someone who talked about the 1932
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: Olympics and you'd really walk right up to the Coliseum
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: to watch track and field and You'd go up to
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: the ticket, little kiosk, the ticket counter, spend your 25
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: cents to get your seats, and you'd go into the Coliseum.
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: Try doing that today. And so here's the other stat,
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: which I find interesting. Just goes to show you how
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: much the Trump administration absolutely loves the city of L.A.
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: Uh, during, uh, the.
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: Uh, 1996 Olympic games, this was not the Trump administration.
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: Just give you an idea of, uh, dollars, uh, $ 1. 82
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: billion went to Atlanta, uh, to the 2002 winter Olympics,
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: 2.61 billion went to Lake, uh, Salt Lake city. So
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: we moved from 2002, $ 2. 6 billion to, uh, 2028, $ 2 billion, uh,
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: And as far as LA City has said, we haven't
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: gotten a dime of it yet. We have not seen it.
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: And we have to get it really quick. To buy
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: 1,700 buses, you don't just walk into the bus parking
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: lot and say, I'll take those 1,700. That's just not
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: the way it works. Does that include air conditioning?
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: What do I get?
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: Do I get floor mats if I buy all 1,700?
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: What kind of a deal do I get? It doesn't
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: work that way. And so the cost of roads, I mean,
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: this is going to be hideously expensive. And naturally, they're
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: rebuilding LAX in anticipation of the games. We did it
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: last time, too. In anticipation of the 1984 games, the
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: city of LA put in that horseshoe plan for the airport,
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: which instantly made the airport obsolete and made it the
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: worst airport in the world. Basically, the bottom five airports
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: on the planet. And so now we've got the new
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: airport coming in that's under construction, and hopefully we're going
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: to crack the top 10, where we're going to be
• 6:07
  Speaker 2: beyond the worst 10 airports in the world. Yeah, that's LA.
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: All right, guys, we're done with that. Okay, what's going
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: on between the U.S. and Mexico in addition to everything else? Well,
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: the Mexican president, Claudia Scheinbaum, is escalating pressure on the U.S.
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: Why?
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: Because 17 Mexican migrants have died in ICE custody or
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: operations since 2025. So what has Mexicans done? The diplomats
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: in Mexico have filed complaints with the Justice Department, eight
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: attorneys general, 12 DAs, and the prosecutors across the board
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: have announced no criminal cases at all.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: Have been opened.
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: And you've got an increasing number of migrants who have
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: died during the administration, this immigration crackdown. And so the
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: president of Mexico is vowing to ramp up pressure, investigate
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: these deaths. What is going on? She told reporters last week,
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: there are too many cases. Our obligation is to always
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: defend Mexicans who are in the United States or whatever
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: part of the world. She said, we cannot turn a
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: blind eye to the Mexicans who have died. And this
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: was following the most recent fatal incident, the ice shooting
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: in Houston last month of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a construction
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: worker from Mexico. He'd been in the U.S. for more
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: than 30 years, as we know. However, Mexico, the pressure
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: to step up efforts, virtually nothing. No public confirmation of
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: prosecution in any of the 17 cases at all. Victor Clark,
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: a human rights advocate who lives in Tijuana, said the
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: Americans don't seem to be paying much attention. What Mexico
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: is doing is basically a bureaucratic step with no real response.
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: Why is that?
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: Well, because Mexico has no case from a legal standpoint.
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: Mexicans cannot, Mexico as a country, cannot directly file complaints
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: in U.S.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: Courts.
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: U.S. prosecutors have no mandate to even respond to Mexican inquiries.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: They just ignore them.
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: At least 52 migrants, 14 Mexican citizens, have died while
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: in ICE custody since the beginning of the second term
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: of the administration. And this is a report from Human
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights. In addition, at
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: least nine people have died during agency operations since 2025.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: Now, here's what ICE says.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: It thoroughly investigates all deaths of individuals in its custody
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: or during agency actions.
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: And of course, what do the critics say? Come on,
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: give us a break. Really?
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: You're investigating everything? Well, yeah, so far, no, no one's
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: at fault. And to date, Mexico has received no response
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: or a partial response to from a couple of states.
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: And the single state reply.
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: Came from Florida, Florida's Attorney General's office, which concurred with
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: ICE in finding that the death of Royer Perez Jimenez
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: was a presumed suicide. And this was at the Glades
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: County Detention Center. And Ventura locally was the site of
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: one of the most sensational operations that ICE has conducted.
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: That was July 10th of last year. The Glass House Farms,
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: Cannabis Complex in Camarillo, hundreds of arrests, masked ICE agents
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: descended on a facility.
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: Remember the video on that one.
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: And one worker, a Mexican nationalist, was fatally injured when
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: he fell 30 feet from a greenhouse roof.
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: He was running over.
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: And here is a flashpoint, what's really going on, is
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: the private Adelano Ice Processing Center in San Bernardino County.
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: 1,500 detainees are held. At least four Mexican citizens have
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: died at that facility. And that's operated by the GEO Group,
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: a Florida-based company, for-profit company, that has these detention centers
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: with a contract with the United States government, the Department
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: of Homeland Security, and it's a multi-billion dollar contract. So
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: most of the detainees in the U.S. are not held
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: in federal detention centers. They're in private detention centers. In July,
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: a federal judge ordered ICE to institute sweeping changes at
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: the Adelanto Center, mandating improvements in water, food, sanitation, medical care,
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: which the accusations were rampant. Both ICE and the GEO
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: group have denied any abuse.
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: At the facilities. So that's an ongoing battle, big time. Okay.
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: While we're speaking of Chinese and one of my favorite
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: foods in the world, Chinese food, Neil and I have
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: done Chinese food before many times. On a note that
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: is not as much fun, the U.S. said yesterday it
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: had disrupted a Chinese hacking operation responsible for break-in's and
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: attempts on the Justice Department, NASA, the Federal Reserve, the Senate,
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: other government agencies. The Justice Department said it had seized
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: domains used by two hacking platforms, the QScan and QTRouter.
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: which has been used as part of the campaign. And
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: there was an affidavit that identified the department of energy
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: department of health and human services, the national institutes of
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: health for unnamed companies in the U S and South
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: Korea as being among the hacker hackers victims. Now a
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: word about hacking and governmental hacking. It's part of spy
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: spying on governments. I mean, the cyber wars are here.
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: I have said many times are going to be two
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: kinds of wars in the future. And they're not going
• 12:06
  Speaker 2: to be conventional wars. We're not going to have atomic wars,
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: nuclear wars, because that'll just blow up the earth.
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: And now what?
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: It's going to be cyber wars, what's happening here. And
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: there's going to be water wars. Not Water World, one
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: of the worst films that ever been made, but water wars,
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: where water is finite and countries will go to war
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: for those resources. Right now, I mean, when you look
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: at Arizona, Nevada, California with the Colorado River, we're almost
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: at war.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Certainly legally we are.
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: And so what ends up happening with countries is they
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: spy on each other.
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: Of course they do.
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: And it turns out that cyber spying seems to be
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: the wave of the future. I mean, spying used to
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: be human spying. You would infiltrate someone in that country,
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: and that would be an agent. You'd get information, and
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: they would connect with other people, that sort of thing,
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: or infiltrate government agencies. And then you had aerial surveillance,
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: and then satellites were used for a lot of the spying.
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: And then the internet. And there is where that is
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: rampant beyond rampant. And it looks like the U.S. is
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: particularly vulnerable because the Chinese are, well, let me put it,
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: they've taken it to another level, we think. We actually
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: don't know because it is super secret, as it should be.
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is one of those national security issues
• 13:33
  Speaker 2: that I happen to believe are really national security, where
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: the government has to keep quiet as to what is
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: being hacked and what isn't. Now, what they don't keep
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: quiet is what foreigners are doing to us. what the
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: Chinese are doing, what the North Koreans are doing, what
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: the Russians are doing hacking into our systems. And that's
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: to basically let the world know and let Americans know
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: these are bad, bad people. So what happens as the
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: allegation against Chinese hackers comes down the pike? The Chinese
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: embassy responds. And this is from the embassy in Washington.
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: And this is in an email. And they said they
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: were not familiar with the specifics mentioned in this Department
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: of Justice statement about the hacking. And went on to
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: say the Chinese government firmly opposes and combats and combats
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: all form of cyber attacks.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: In accordance with the law. Okay. And goes on to
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: say that the U.S.
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: Uses cybersecurity issues to smear or discredit China. And China
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: opposes the U.S. overstretching the concept of national security, using
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: it as a pretext to impose discriminatory restrictions on Chinese
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: companies and firmly safeguard the the legitimate rights and interests
• 14:46
  Speaker 2: of Chinese companies. That's what we're doing. And so the
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: gaslighting that goes on is unbelievable.
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: I mean, I love this.
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: Here we are, virtual proof on the table that the
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: Chinese are hacking. Oh, it's not just Chinese. I said
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: North Korea and China has entire military divisions, buildings that
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: are full of hackers that do nothing but hack into
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: our systems.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: How is that not an act of war?
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: It's not considered an act of war. It is not
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: determined to be an act of war because act of
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: war is international law. It's defined by international law, an
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: act of war. And I don't think that this is
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: once again, where law does not keep up with technology.
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: We don't even know to the extent of what happens
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: on the internet and AI. We haven't dealt with it.
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: And certainly the international, the criminal court, I do not
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: believe if you can correct me if I'm wrong or
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: don't correct me if I'm wrong, even better. That has
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: determined that cybersecurity, that hacking into a system, is an
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: act of war.
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: On top of that, how do you prove it? What
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: about espionage?
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: Espionage is not considered an act of war. It's considered espionage.
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: So if you've caught a spy on American soil trying
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: to steal information?
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you shoot him. Is that considered an act of war?
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: It is not.
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: It is considered espionage. An act of war is an attack.
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: made on your forces or your property. This is definition
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: of war according to the International Criminal Court and the
• 16:22
  Speaker 2: Geneva Convention and all of that.
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: What if they took out infrastructure?
• 16:27
  Speaker 2: Depends on how, if they took out that, I don't
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: know if that has been determined. If they take out infrastructure,
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: is that the same as bombing the place? Is that
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: the same as putting in explosives?
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know.
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: This is where we have, again, the law having a
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: hard time keeping up with what's happening. In this case,
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: the technology of the computers, the technology of hackers. Interesting questions,
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: all of those. And I'm going to pretend I know
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: the answers. And you're going to say, wow, Bill, I
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: didn't know that.
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: Good for you. Thanks for telling me that. Another day
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: that ends in Y. That is correct. All right, let's
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: finish it up. The 10 a.m.
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: Rule.
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: That is back. What is the 10 a.m. rule? Well,
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: it's dealing with fires. And the 10 a.m.
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: Rule says that by 10 a.m., the following day of
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: a reported fire, we're talking about a wildfire, that fire
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: should be out or should be at least controlled.
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 17:29
  Speaker 2: And that is the new wave for the last 20 years,
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: give or take. You put out the fire immediately. It
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: doesn't matter if it's a campfire. You send out the
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: firefighting aircraft if you have to, and boom, you go
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: ahead and make sure the fire is out. Here's the
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: problem with the 10 a.m. rule is you're putting out
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: the fire, and that means that a lot of the
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: brush is not burning. And when you look at nature.
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: Whenever there's a dry area and the seasons come around,
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: fires happen, usually by lightning, and it burns the vegetation,
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: and then new vegetation comes up, and everything is green
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: and wonderful, but if you don't put out the fires,
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: if the fires don't happen, then you have this very, well,
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: you have kindling is what you do, incredibly dry, dry
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: areas that when the fire does hit, they become conflagrations.
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: And so what's happening is the government is looking at
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: this and saying, you know what, maybe we want to
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: let these things burn. Now, there are controlled burns where
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: you see backup burns, where you see these firefighters with
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: these cans of gasoline or napalm or whatever, lighting fires
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: in front of or behind fires to burn those areas.
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: in a controlled way, which is what the Native Americans
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: used to do. You know, people don't know that, but
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: the various Indian tribes used to use controlled burning, much
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: like what is done with modern firefighting techniques. And those can,
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: here's the problem, controlled burning. And people are a little
• 19:06
  Speaker 2: leery about that. Some agencies are a little leery because
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: if you blow it on this one, then the agency
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: is responsible for the fire.
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: Oops. And now the lawsuit hits.
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: Oops. So the 10 a.m. rule has kicked in. Well,
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: it looks like it doesn't make a lot of sense. And,
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: you know, there are fires going on. You've heard of
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: the Big Burn? Three million acres along the Montana-Idaho border
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: during a 36-hour rampage of the fire killed at least
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: 85 people, destroyed five towns.
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: You remember that? No, you don't.
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: I'll tell you why, Neil, because it happened in 1910.
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: And we've had these major... major fires. Look at the
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: Paradise Fire that happened. So now you've got the firefighting
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: authorities are up in the air.
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: What do we do? What do we do? And I
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: think there's no easy answer to this. It really isn't.
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: But I will tell you that the 10 a.m. rule
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: is probably on its way out. There's the 10 a.m. rule.
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: Okay, we're done. That's it, guys. Tomorrow, it is another day.
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: We do Friday, where it's Foodie Friday with Neil, 8.30.
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: You know, we're still trying to figure out what we're
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: going to do with 8.30. I'm sort of playing around
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: with that. And Gary and Shannon are up next, and
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: they're at the BJ's Brewery in Downey for brews and news.
• 20:32
  Speaker 2: And they do that occasionally, and it's always great fun
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: to listen. You can if you're anywhere near down, he's
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: gone by. It really is a party atmosphere as Neil said.
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: We're back tomorrow, 5.00 AM. And that is Amy and Will.
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: And of course, Neil and I jump aboard and we're
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: all out of here right about now. Kono and Ann,
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: are you guys going to stay until tomorrow? You generally do,
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: don't you?
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. You work pretty hard. And I'm going to Valley. Yeah. Yeah.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: I'm going to go to SoFi. Oh, that's right. You're
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: working at SoFi tonight. The Chargers game. Oh, my God.
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: It's going to be so hot.
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's going to be hot. It's going to be
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: cooler than at my house. Yeah, it certainly will. And tomorrow,
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: here's what's going to happen regarding the Chargers game. We're
• 21:19
  Speaker 2: going to do a segment of Handle Doesn't Give a
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: Rat's House, what happened in the Chargers game.
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: It's a Rams game. A Rams game. The joke works.
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: They're playing the Chargers, but it's the same. Okay, fine.
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: Let's go back.
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: Tomorrow we report on a Handel doesn't give a rat's
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: ass what happened last night. You've been listening to The
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: Bill Handel Show.
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: Catch my show Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 9 a.m.
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.