Latest / BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast / California Vehicle Code 22350 (Basic Speed Law) Defense - Ticket Crushers

Transcript

California Vehicle Code 22350 (Basic Speed Law) Defense - Ticket Crushers · BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast

• 0:00
  California Vehicle Code 22350 (Basic Speed Law) Defense A speeding ticket under California Vehicle Code 22350 is not simply about exceeding a number on a sign — it is a claim that your speed was unreasonable or unsafe for the exact conditions at that moment.
• 0:20
  Unlike an absolute speed limit, the Basic Speed Law requires the prosecution to connect your measured speed to specific factors like weather, visibility, traffic density, road surface, and roadway design.
• 0:32
  California Vehicle Code Section 22350 prohibits driving faster than is reasonable or prudent given weather, visibility, traffic, and highway conditions, and also prohibits any speed that endangers people or property.
• 0:48
  This means a driver can be cited while traveling below the posted limit if an officer believes fog, rain, pedestrians, or a blind curve made that speed unsafe under the circumstances.
• 0:59
  Conversely, a defense may present competent evidence that a speed above a prima facie limit was still reasonable and prudent and did not endanger anyone.
• 1:09
  The phrase 'reasonable and prudent' is not a fixed number — it asks what a careful driver could reasonably do on that specific roadway at that specific time.
• 1:19
  The same speed that is perfectly safe on a dry, open road with light traffic can be unreasonable during heavy rain or near a crowded school crosswalk.
• 1:28
  Under Section 22351, driving at or below a prima facie limit is generally lawful unless the prosecution clearly proves the speed violated the Basic Speed Law.
• 1:41
  Driving above a prima facie limit is prima facie unlawful, but a driver may still offer evidence that the speed was reasonable and did not endanger people or property.
• 1:51
  It is also important to distinguish prima facie limits from California's absolute maximum speed laws under CVC 22349 and CVC 22356, because evidence of clear conditions alone does not rebut an absolute maximum limit violation.
• 2:09
  Officers may use radar, lidar, pacing, visual estimates, or a combination of methods, and each of these approaches carries its own set of evidentiary questions that can be challenged.
• 2:20
  A radar beam can cover more than one vehicle at a time, making the surrounding traffic, vehicle size, and relative position of nearby cars all relevant to whether the correct vehicle was actually identified.
• 2:32
  A pacing case depends on whether the officer maintained a reasonably constant distance for a sufficient period, since accelerating to catch up is meaningfully different from conducting a true steady-speed pace.
• 2:44
  Even a fully accurate speed reading does not automatically prove that the speed was unreasonable — the prosecution must still connect that number to the specific conditions that existed at the time.
• 2:54
  Weather records, dashcam footage, sight-distance evidence, traffic-flow data, and engineering and traffic surveys can all help test whether the officer's conclusion fairly reflects what was actually happening on that road.
• 3:08
  California Assembly Bill 43 updated speed-limit rules to allow local jurisdictions to lower limits in safety corridors, school zones, and business districts regardless of 85th-percentile traffic averages, so matching surrounding traffic flow is not an automatic defense.
• 3:25
  An attorney representing a driver under CVC 22350 should examine the whole record — including roadway design, collision history, land use, short speed-limit zones, and sign placement — rather than treating the citation number as the end of the analysis.
• 3:41
  The law firm Ticket Crushers, A Law Corporation, with San Francisco speeding ticket attorney Adam Cohen, defends drivers cited under the Basic Speed Law with flat-rate pricing starting at one hundred forty-nine dollars and a full review of officer observations, speed measurements, and road conditions.
• 3:59
  Call Ticket Crushers, A Law Corporation, at 628, 203, 1868, located at 350 Rhode Island St #240, San Francisco, CA 94103, United States, to schedule your consultation and start protecting your driving record today.