Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / Scientists Discover Particles That Break Newton’s Third Law
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration
- 0:05Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
- 0:27Speaker 2: Imagine you are standing right in front of a heavy,
- 0:31Speaker 2: solid brick wall.
- 0:32Speaker 3: Okay, I'm picturing it right.
- 0:33Speaker 2: So you plant your feet, you know, place your hands
- 0:35Speaker 2: flat against the rough clay, and you push as hard
- 0:37Speaker 2: as you possibly can. Yeah, and you'd probably remember from
- 0:40Speaker 2: your high school physics class, what is happening in that exact.
- 0:44Speaker 3: Moment Mutant's third law exactly.
- 0:47Speaker 2: Newton's third law dictates that for every action, there is
- 0:50Speaker 2: an equal and opposite reaction.
- 0:52Speaker 3: Right, So the wall is pushing back against your hands
- 0:55Speaker 3: with the exact same amount of force you are applying
- 0:58Speaker 3: to it.
- 0:59Speaker 2: Yeah. It is a foundational rule of how our universe operates.
- 1:02Speaker 2: It's symmetric, it's predictable. I mean, it just makes sense,
- 1:06Speaker 2: it does. But I want you to consider a completely
- 1:09Speaker 2: bizarre scenario today. What happens if you can find a
- 1:12Speaker 2: way to.
- 1:12Speaker 3: Cheat cheat physics?
- 1:15Speaker 2: Yeah, what happens if you can find a loophole in
- 1:18Speaker 2: the fabric of physics and break that symmetry entirely.
- 1:21Speaker 3: I mean, bending a fundamental law of physics sounds like
- 1:24Speaker 3: science fiction when you frame it.
- 1:26Speaker 2: Like that, it really does.
- 1:27Speaker 3: We completely rely on that symmetry to build bridges, fly airplanes,
- 1:31Speaker 3: and basically just understand reality. Right.
- 1:33Speaker 2: Finding a situation where an action does not have an
- 1:36Speaker 2: equal reaction is rare, but when it is achieved, the results, well,
- 1:41Speaker 2: they completely shatter our traditional understanding of how matter is
- 1:45Speaker 2: supposed to behave.
- 1:46Speaker 3: So that brings us to our mission for today's exploration.
- 1:49Speaker 2: I'm ready.
- 1:49Speaker 3: We are going to understand how tiny, completely lifeless particles
- 1:54Speaker 3: are somehow successfully defying this action reaction symmetry to stay
- 1:58Speaker 3: in constant, life like motion.
- 2:00Speaker 2: It's a huge deal.
- 2:01Speaker 3: And even better, we're going to understand how this seemingly
- 2:05Speaker 3: impossible behavior is laying the groundwork for a complete revolution
- 2:09Speaker 3: in how we understand matter itself.
- 2:11Speaker 2: To really appreciate the sheer strangeness of this, we first
- 2:14Speaker 2: need to establish a concept known as active matter. Okay,
- 2:18Speaker 2: because when you hear the word matter, your brain defaults
- 2:20Speaker 2: to passive things, right.
- 2:21Speaker 3: Like a rock on the ground, exactly.
- 2:23Speaker 2: A rock, a wooden chair, water just sitting still, in
- 2:26Speaker 2: a glass. Unless an outside force pushes them, they do
- 2:29Speaker 2: absolutely nothing. Active matter, on the other hand, refers to
- 2:33Speaker 2: systems that continuously consume energy from their environment to generate
- 2:37Speaker 2: their own motion. Oh so, like a massive school of
- 2:40Speaker 2: litch moving in pervic synchronized unison to evade a predator. Yes.
- 2:44Speaker 3: Or think of a flock of birds like starlings, swooping
- 2:48Speaker 3: and diving across the evening sky forming those giant shifting clouds.
- 2:52Speaker 2: Right, those formations almost look like a single giant organism
- 2:55Speaker 2: thinking for itself. You can watch them for hours and
- 2:58Speaker 2: never see the same shape twice.
- 3:00Speaker 3: Every individual bird or agent in that flock is burning
- 3:04Speaker 3: energy to fly, and they are constantly interacting with the
- 3:07Speaker 3: environment and the birds immediately next to.
- 3:09Speaker 2: Them, which is incredibly complex.
- 3:12Speaker 3: It is scientists and engineers have been completely captivated by
- 3:15Speaker 3: this for decades. The ultimate goal has been to recreate
- 3:19Speaker 3: this kind of collective spontaneous motion in a laboratory.
- 3:23Speaker 2: But using synthetic, non living.
- 3:25Speaker 3: Materials right exactly, And that pursuit leads us directly to
- 3:29Speaker 3: the core mystery we are unraveling today. It's a phenomenon
- 3:32Speaker 3: known in physics as non reciprocal interactions.
- 3:35Speaker 2: So just breaking down that term non reciprocal, it basically
- 3:38Speaker 2: means a relationship that is not returned equally.
- 3:41Speaker 3: That is really the defining feature here. It's an interaction
- 3:44Speaker 3: where the influence one particle has on another is well,
- 3:48Speaker 3: it's just drastically lopsided.
- 3:50Speaker 2: Like a one way street sort of.
- 3:52Speaker 3: Particle A might exert a massive pull on particle B,
- 3:55Speaker 3: but particle B barely affects particle A at all.
- 3:58Speaker 2: Okay, let's unpack this because if I'm tracking with the
- 4:01Speaker 2: logic here, this is the exact moment the rule gets bent. Yep,
- 4:05Speaker 2: we are talking about the deep mechanics of breaking an
- 4:08Speaker 2: undeniable physical law. I mean, to comprehend how macroscopic active
- 4:13Speaker 2: matter works, like those giant flocks of birds you mentioned,
- 4:17Speaker 2: we have to zoom all the way in, all the
- 4:18Speaker 2: way down to the micro level, right. We have to
- 4:20Speaker 2: look at these individual microscopic interactions between two single entities
- 4:25Speaker 2: and how they basically start chasing each other.
- 4:27Speaker 3: Because understandard physics, I mean, under the strict enforcement of
- 4:31Speaker 3: Newton's third law, two passive objects cannot continuously push or
- 4:36Speaker 3: pull one another in the same direction forever. If you
- 4:38Speaker 3: roll two billiard balls into each other, they collide and
- 4:41Speaker 3: bounce apart. The forces cancel out.
- 4:43Speaker 2: Yeah, they definitely don't touch, stick together and suddenly start
- 4:46Speaker 2: accelerating across the table as a team.
- 4:48Speaker 3: No, they absolutely do not. But non reciprocal interactions create
- 4:52Speaker 3: a loophole.
- 4:53Speaker 2: So, to make this a bit more concrete for you listening,
- 4:56Speaker 2: imagine holding two magnets. But imagine we've somehow the rules
- 5:00Speaker 2: of physics for these specific.
- 5:02Speaker 3: Magnets, okay, rigged.
- 5:03Speaker 2: How So the first magnet pulls incredibly strongly on the
- 5:07Speaker 2: second one, but the second magnet is practically a dud.
- 5:11Speaker 2: It barely exerts any pull on the first one at all.
- 5:13Speaker 3: Got it.
- 5:14Speaker 2: So what happens when you put them near each other
- 5:16Speaker 2: on a slick table. The first one aggressively yanks the
- 5:20Speaker 2: second one toward it, but the second one doesn't pull
- 5:23Speaker 2: back fast enough to balance the equation.
- 5:25Speaker 3: Which means it just gets dragged along exactly.
- 5:28Speaker 2: It's like a microscopic game of tag where the rules
- 5:30Speaker 2: are completely rigged. One is perpetually chasing the other across
- 5:34Speaker 2: the table.
- 5:35Speaker 3: What's fascinating here is that the particles themselves, the theoretical
- 5:39Speaker 3: magnets in your analogy, are not actually self propelled. Wait really, yeah,
- 5:43Speaker 3: they don't have tiny internal motors or microscopic propellers or
- 5:48Speaker 3: hidden batteries. They are entirely passive, lifeless lumps of material.
- 5:53Speaker 3: The energy in their surrounding environment is what forces them
- 5:56Speaker 3: into this perpetual chase.
- 5:58Speaker 2: So the environment is doing all the heavy life exactly.
- 6:01Speaker 3: The environment facilitates this broken symmetry, and that imbalance generates
- 6:06Speaker 3: entirely new forms of collective motion and self organization that
- 6:10Speaker 3: we simply do not observe in normal passive matter.
- 6:13Speaker 2: Conceptually, I love it. It's like tricking nature into creating
- 6:16Speaker 2: a localized version of perpetual motion, or at least the
- 6:20Speaker 2: illusion of it, by unbalancing the scales. It really is,
- 6:23Speaker 2: But I mean drawing this on a chalkboard is one thing.
- 6:25Speaker 2: Actually building it forcing a non reciprocal interaction to happen
- 6:29Speaker 2: to the real messy world. That seems like a total
- 6:32Speaker 2: logistical nightmare.
- 6:33Speaker 3: And historically it was. Experimental realizations of this phenomenon have
- 6:37Speaker 3: been severely limited.
- 6:38Speaker 2: I would imagine.
- 6:39Speaker 3: Scientists might coax a tiny handful of particles to do
- 6:42Speaker 3: this for brief moments, forming very small, unstable clusters at best.
- 6:46Speaker 2: So it's just a fleeting thing.
- 6:48Speaker 3: Right, but that bottleneck has finally been shattered thanks to
- 6:51Speaker 3: a recent groundbreaking experiment by a research team at the
- 6:54Speaker 3: Tokyo University of Science.
- 6:56Speaker 2: And this wasn't just a theoretical gas either, No, not
- 6:59Speaker 2: at all. It was a massive team effort led by
- 7:01Speaker 2: Professor Yutakasumino and assistant Professor Kiwamo Yoshi, along with a
- 7:06Speaker 2: whole crew of researchers.
- 7:08Speaker 3: Right, people like Sho Mahara, Keisuke Kataka, Hiroaki Shikawa, and Masazumiyokata.
- 7:14Speaker 2: Yeah, and this was published on August sixth, twenty twenty
- 7:16Speaker 2: six in Physical Review.
- 7:18Speaker 3: Letters, a very prestigious journal, definitely.
- 7:20Speaker 2: And they actually build a physical test bed to expose
- 7:23Speaker 2: this exact loophole in Newton's third law. And the ingenuity
- 7:27Speaker 2: of the setup is what really caught my attention.
- 7:29Speaker 3: It's brilliant and its simplicity.
- 7:31Speaker 2: Yeah, they didn't use exotic sci fi materials or anything.
- 7:33Speaker 2: They used polystyrene colloidal particles.
- 7:35Speaker 3: Which, for anyone unfamiliar, polystyrene colloidal particles are essentially just
- 7:40Speaker 3: microscopic solid beads of plastic.
- 7:43Speaker 2: Right.
- 7:43Speaker 3: The genius of the Tokyo team wasn't in the material itself,
- 7:47Speaker 3: but in the specific sizing they used.
- 7:49Speaker 2: Ah, the sizes.
- 7:50Speaker 3: Yeah, they deliberately avoided using a uniform set of beads.
- 7:54Speaker 3: They chose particles of two distinct sizes.
- 7:57Speaker 2: Okay, Well were the sizes.
- 7:59Speaker 3: So one set was exactly one micrometer in radius and
- 8:02Speaker 3: the other set was one point five micrometers in radius. Wow,
- 8:05Speaker 3: that is small, incredibly small. To give you a mental
- 8:09Speaker 3: picture of that scale, a single human hair is roughly
- 8:12Speaker 3: fifty to one hundred micrometers thick. So we are dealing
- 8:16Speaker 3: with objects that are virtually invisible.
- 8:18Speaker 2: So they have two different sizes of microscopic plastic beads.
- 8:22Speaker 2: I'm assuming they couldn't just leave them sitting on a
- 8:24Speaker 2: dry table.
- 8:25Speaker 3: No, definitely not.
- 8:26Speaker 2: They had to introduce an environment that would facilitate that
- 8:28Speaker 2: rig game of tag we.
- 8:29Speaker 3: Just talked about, right, They suspended these microscopic beads in
- 8:32Speaker 3: a very thin layer of water. Then they can find
- 8:35Speaker 3: that water between two transparent electrodes okay, and these electrodes
- 8:39Speaker 3: were coated with indium tin oxide. This created a sort
- 8:43Speaker 3: of microscopic sandwich electrode on the bottom water and beads
- 8:47Speaker 3: in the middle, electrode on top.
- 8:49Speaker 2: Sounds like a tiny battery cell exactly.
- 8:51Speaker 3: And once everything was sealed in there, the researchers applied
- 8:54Speaker 3: an alternating electric field across the entire system.
- 8:57Speaker 2: Okay, wait, I need to pause here because this is
- 8:59Speaker 2: where my intuition it's a wall.
- 9:00Speaker 3: Sure, what's up?
- 9:01Speaker 2: So the particles themselves aren't doing anything right, They are inert, plastic,
- 9:06Speaker 2: they don't have little engines. So how does zapping the
- 9:09Speaker 2: water with an electric field cause the chasing dynamic we
- 9:14Speaker 2: just talked about? I mean, electricity doesn't just magically make
- 9:17Speaker 2: plastics start swimming.
- 9:18Speaker 3: That is the crucial mechanical question of the entire experiment.
- 9:21Speaker 3: You are completely correct that the beads are doing absolutely
- 9:24Speaker 3: nothing on their own. Okay, The magic happens in the
- 9:26Speaker 3: fluid itself, the water. Yes, When you apply an alternating
- 9:30Speaker 3: electric field to water, it interacts with tiny naturally occurring
- 9:34Speaker 3: electrical charges ions floating in that water.
- 9:37Speaker 2: Oh.
- 9:37Speaker 3: I see the alternating field rapidly pushes and poles on
- 9:40Speaker 3: these ions back and forth, and that rapid movement causes
- 9:44Speaker 3: the fluid itself to start churning and swirling around any
- 9:47Speaker 3: solid obstacles in its path.
- 9:49Speaker 2: And the beads are the obstacles.
- 9:50Speaker 3: Precisely, Those swirling, churning currents in the water are called
- 9:54Speaker 3: electro hydrodynamic flows, or EHD flows.
- 9:57Speaker 2: For sure, EHD flows, okay.
- 9:59Speaker 3: Basically it is electricity directly causing fluid dynamics.
- 10:04Speaker 2: Let me see if I can visualize this using a
- 10:06Speaker 2: real world equivalent. It's kind of like putting a massive
- 10:09Speaker 2: cargo ship and a tiny canoe in the same narrow canal.
- 10:13Speaker 3: I like where this is going.
- 10:15Speaker 2: If both of them have some mysterious force pushing the
- 10:18Speaker 2: water around their hulls, the massive cargo ship is going
- 10:21Speaker 2: to generate a giant churning wake right, oh, absolutely, and
- 10:25Speaker 2: that massive wake will violently pull the tiny canoe along
- 10:29Speaker 2: for the ride. But the tiny canoe's little ripples aren't
- 10:32Speaker 2: going to do absolutely anything to the giant cargo ship.
- 10:34Speaker 3: The physics operate on a remarkably similar principle. The strength
- 10:38Speaker 3: of those EHD flows depends entirely on the size of
- 10:41Speaker 3: the object they're swirling.
- 10:42Speaker 2: Around, So the size difference is the key.
- 10:44Speaker 3: Exactly, The larger one point five micrometer particles generated a
- 10:48Speaker 3: much stronger, more turbulent flow around themselves than the smaller
- 10:52Speaker 3: one micrometer.
- 10:53Speaker 2: Particles did because they're bigger.
- 10:54Speaker 3: Right, So, because the larger particle is acting like that
- 10:57Speaker 3: cargo ship churning up a stronger current, it exous. It's
- 11:00Speaker 3: a massive physical pull on the smaller particle and a
- 11:02Speaker 3: smaller one. The smaller particle, generating only a weak flow,
- 11:06Speaker 3: exerts almost zero pull on the big one.
- 11:09Speaker 2: Oh wow, so the action is no longer met with
- 11:11Speaker 2: an equal reaction. The symmetry is broken.
- 11:14Speaker 3: Yes, the attraction becomes completely asymmetric. The big particle pulls
- 11:18Speaker 3: the small one hard, the small one barely pulls back.
- 11:21Speaker 2: That is wild.
- 11:22Speaker 3: This creates spontaneous pairings in the water. A big bead
- 11:26Speaker 3: and a small bead lock into each other's fluid wakes,
- 11:28Speaker 3: and because the forces are unequal, they form a paired
- 11:31Speaker 3: structure with a distinct front and a distinct back.
- 11:35Speaker 2: And because the big one keeps pulling the small one
- 11:37Speaker 2: in and the small one keeps perpetually falling toward it
- 11:40Speaker 2: without slowing the big one down, the entire pair starts
- 11:44Speaker 2: moving through the water as a single self propelled unit. Exactly,
- 11:48Speaker 2: They're zooming around like little two piece vehicles, all powered
- 11:51Speaker 2: by the swirling water.
- 11:52Speaker 3: They are sitting in and every bit of that motion
- 11:54Speaker 3: is a product of the non reciprocal interaction. The beads
- 11:58Speaker 3: remain entirely lifeless, but they are now acting like tiny
- 12:01Speaker 3: biological microbes swimming through the fluid.
- 12:04Speaker 2: It is genuinely mine bending. But earlier you mentioned that
- 12:07Speaker 2: scaling this up was the historical bottleneck.
- 12:09Speaker 3: It was.
- 12:10Speaker 2: I mean, getting two beads to do a microscopic square
- 12:13Speaker 2: dance is a great party trick, but it doesn't really
- 12:15Speaker 2: give us a flock of birds, does it.
- 12:17Speaker 3: No, it doesn't. But the researchers at the Tokyo University
- 12:21Speaker 3: of Science didn't stop at just two particles now. They
- 12:23Speaker 3: went bigger, much bigger. They scaled this up to an
- 12:26Speaker 3: observation of more than ten thousand individual particle ten thousand. Yeah,
- 12:30Speaker 3: and they watched this massive swarming system operate continuously for
- 12:35Speaker 3: over an hour.
- 12:36Speaker 2: Picture ten thousand of these microscopic pairs zooming around, bouncing
- 12:40Speaker 2: into each other in this tiny arena.
- 12:41Speaker 3: It's a lot of chaos.
- 12:43Speaker 2: My immediate assumption is that eventually they would just cause
- 12:46Speaker 2: a massive traffic jam, like they would all crash together
- 12:49Speaker 2: in the center of the water and form a giant,
- 12:51Speaker 2: solid lump of dead plastic.
- 12:53Speaker 3: Well, here's where it gets really interesting, because that traffic
- 12:55Speaker 3: jam never happens.
- 12:56Speaker 2: Hey it doesn't.
- 12:57Speaker 3: No, the clusters of particles in the experiment actively resisted,
- 13:02Speaker 3: forming one giant static mass.
- 13:05Speaker 2: Oh. I think I have a good analogy for this.
- 13:07Speaker 2: Think about a really great networking event or a lively party.
- 13:11Speaker 2: People naturally form conversation circles. Right, a group of five
- 13:15Speaker 2: people gathers, they chat animatedly for a few minutes, Someone
- 13:19Speaker 2: gets distracted and walks away, The circle breaks apart.
- 13:22Speaker 3: Yeah, that happens all the time, and.
- 13:23Speaker 2: Then those individuals mingle and form totally new conversation circles
- 13:28Speaker 2: across the room. It is a state of constant flowing movement,
- 13:33Speaker 2: gathering and splitting, gathering and splitting. Compare that to a
- 13:36Speaker 2: terrible party where everyone just crowds into the small kitchen
- 13:40Speaker 2: and gets physically stuck there for the rest of the night,
- 13:42Speaker 2: unable to move.
- 13:43Speaker 3: The gathering and splitting analogy captures the exact dynamic of
- 13:46Speaker 3: what the research is documented. Really Yeah, because the self
- 13:50Speaker 3: propelled pairs within these groups were continuously generating their own motion,
- 13:54Speaker 3: they introduced a constant, low level chaos into the system.
- 13:58Speaker 2: Ah, so it couldnt settle to exactly.
- 14:01Speaker 3: The clusters would grow to a certain size, but the
- 14:03Speaker 3: internal motion made them inherently unstable. Before they could lock
- 14:07Speaker 3: into a permanent dead lump, they would fragment, rearrange, and
- 14:11Speaker 3: reform into new clusters. In physics, the process of particles
- 14:16Speaker 3: clumping together until they stopped moving is called coarsening, but
- 14:19Speaker 3: as Professor Sumino noted, things that attract each other usually
- 14:23Speaker 3: just gather into larger and larger clumps. The Tokyo team, however,
- 14:27Speaker 3: observed what they termed arrested coarsening. The continuous motion literally
- 14:34Speaker 3: stopped the system from dying.
- 14:35Speaker 2: So the non reciprocal interactions are essentially the heartbeat keeping
- 14:39Speaker 2: the whole system alive and preventing it from freezing out.
- 14:42Speaker 3: They are, and the researchers actually proved how vital this
- 14:45Speaker 3: was by running a brilliant control experiment.
- 14:47Speaker 2: Oh what do they do?
- 14:48Speaker 3: They took the exact same setup the water, the electrodes,
- 14:51Speaker 3: the alternating current, but they used a suspension that contained
- 14:55Speaker 3: particles of only one single size.
- 14:57Speaker 2: Ah. So if they are all the exact same size,
- 15:00Speaker 2: they all generate the exact same wake in.
- 15:02Speaker 3: The water exactly.
- 15:03Speaker 2: The cargo ship and the canoe become two identical speedboats.
- 15:07Speaker 3: That's a great way to put it. The interactions revert
- 15:09Speaker 3: to being reciprocal, the forces balance.
- 15:11Speaker 2: Out perfectly, and then what happens.
- 15:14Speaker 3: When action equals reaction again? The system immediately loses its
- 15:17Speaker 3: lifelike qualities.
- 15:18Speaker 2: It just dies.
- 15:19Speaker 3: Basically, the particles simply attract each other, clump together, and
- 15:24Speaker 3: gradually form static, motionless crystalline aggregates. They just freeze into
- 15:29Speaker 3: a permanent solid.
- 15:30Speaker 2: Structure, just like normal matter, right.
- 15:32Speaker 3: Like sand or powder. The size difference between the beads
- 15:36Speaker 3: and the resulting non reciprocal interactions where the absolute minimal
- 15:40Speaker 3: mechanisms required to keep the system dynamically alive.
- 15:43Speaker 2: Okay, so we've established how they pulled this off, and
- 15:46Speaker 2: we've established how they prevented this system from dying into
- 15:49Speaker 2: a solid lump. Yes, So what does this all mean
- 15:52Speaker 2: for you? I mean, why does a chaotic, microscopic square
- 15:55Speaker 2: dance of electrified plastic beads in Japan matter to someone
- 15:59Speaker 2: going about their daily life.
- 16:00Speaker 3: Well, if we connect this to the bigger picture, we
- 16:02Speaker 3: have to look far beyond plastic beads and look at actual.
- 16:05Speaker 2: Life life itself.
- 16:06Speaker 3: Yeah, the continuous gathering and splitting, the breaking of symmetry
- 16:10Speaker 3: to maintain dynamic motion. These are believed to be the
- 16:13Speaker 3: exact same underlying mechanical principles occurring in living biological systems.
- 16:18Speaker 2: Wait, we aren't just talking about a loose metaphor anymore.
- 16:21Speaker 2: You mean the physics driving the beads is mathematically mirroring
- 16:25Speaker 2: biological processes very much.
- 16:27Speaker 3: So. Consider living cell colonies migrating across a petrie dish
- 16:30Speaker 3: to heal a wound. Or consider the complex tissue formation
- 16:34Speaker 3: that happens during embryonic development, where cells must constantly organize, shift,
- 16:39Speaker 3: and restructure themselves. Oh wow, Or even the massive animal
- 16:42Speaker 3: groups we started with. Living systems are fundamentally out of equilibrium.
- 16:47Speaker 3: They are constantly burning energy and interacting asymmetrically with the neighbors.
- 16:51Speaker 2: But biology is notoriously messy. It is incredibly difficult to
- 16:56Speaker 2: isolate a single variable inside a living cell because there
- 17:00Speaker 2: are you know, thousands of chemical reactions happening simultaneously.
- 17:04Speaker 3: Exactly, And that's why this is so important. By building
- 17:07Speaker 3: the system out of simple, inert plastic beads, the researchers
- 17:11Speaker 3: have effectively built a clean mathematical sandbox to study life.
- 17:15Speaker 2: Oh that makes so much sense.
- 17:17Speaker 3: It provides a highly controllable physical framework. It gives scientists
- 17:21Speaker 3: an isolated environment to study the fundamental rules of collective
- 17:25Speaker 3: behavior without the messy complications of actual biology.
- 17:29Speaker 2: Is incredibly useful.
- 17:30Speaker 3: The Tokyo team even reproduced their experimental observations using complex
- 17:35Speaker 3: numerical simulations, confirming that the specific non reciprocal pair propulsion
- 17:40Speaker 3: is a universal underlying mechanism.
- 17:43Speaker 2: A universal rule for lifelike order.
- 17:45Speaker 3: Exactly.
- 17:46Speaker 2: The biological insights are staggering, but my mind immediately jumps
- 17:49Speaker 2: to engineering, oh totally, because if we understand the exact
- 17:52Speaker 2: mechanism of how to make dumb matter self organized and
- 17:55Speaker 2: stay dynamic, we don't have to wait for nature to
- 17:58Speaker 2: do it. We can just design it ourselves.
- 18:00Speaker 3: And the applications in material science and engineering are immense.
- 18:03Speaker 3: I mean, the EHD flow was just the specific tool
- 18:06Speaker 3: used in this experiment, but the underlying design principle intentionally
- 18:10Speaker 3: breaking action reaction symmetry to generate collective motion, can be
- 18:14Speaker 3: applied to entirely different mediums. This paves the way for programmable.
- 18:18Speaker 2: Material Programmable materials. Imagine buying a product made of a
- 18:23Speaker 2: material that can just change its physical properties on command.
- 18:26Speaker 3: It sounds like magic, but its physics right.
- 18:28Speaker 2: It could alter its shape, its density, or its flexibility
- 18:31Speaker 2: just by applying an external field to it, causing the
- 18:34Speaker 2: molecules inside to suddenly chase each other into a completely
- 18:38Speaker 2: new configuration.
- 18:39Speaker 3: It also revolutionizes how we approach microrobotics, particularly in medicine.
- 18:44Speaker 3: Oh how so, usually when we imagine a medical nanobot,
- 18:47Speaker 3: we picture a microscopic machine with tiny gears, complex circuitry,
- 18:53Speaker 3: and a microscopic battery.
- 18:54Speaker 2: Yeah, tiny submarine from a.
- 18:56Speaker 3: Movie, right, But building something that complex at a microscopic
- 18:59Speaker 3: skins is incredibly difficult and expensive, not to mention batteries
- 19:04Speaker 3: run out of power.
- 19:05Speaker 2: But with this non reciprocal mechanism, you don't need any
- 19:07Speaker 2: of that internal hardware.
- 19:09Speaker 3: None of it. You could manufacture thousands of incredibly simple, cheap,
- 19:13Speaker 3: asymmetrical particles. You inject them into the bloodstream.
- 19:16Speaker 2: And they do nothing on their own, right.
- 19:18Speaker 3: They do absolutely nothing. But when a doctor applies an
- 19:21Speaker 3: external magnetic or electric field, perhaps using an MRI machine,
- 19:26Speaker 3: the environment provides the energy.
- 19:28Speaker 2: Oh, this is brilliant.
- 19:29Speaker 3: The particles spontaneously pair up, self organized into a swarm,
- 19:33Speaker 3: navigate to a specific blockage and a blood vessel clear
- 19:37Speaker 3: it out and then immediately disassemble back into harmless individual
- 19:41Speaker 3: particles the second the external field is turned off.
- 19:44Speaker 2: Allowing the body to just flesh them out normally.
- 19:46Speaker 3: Exactly, you are outsourcing all the complex thinking and the
- 19:50Speaker 3: power supplied to the environment, making the robots themselves beautifully simple.
- 19:54Speaker 2: It completely shifts the paradigm. Instead of trying to build
- 19:58Speaker 2: one incredibly smart, complex machine, you build thousands of dumb
- 20:02Speaker 2: particles that act brilliantly when they are together.
- 20:04Speaker 3: It really is a complete shift.
- 20:06Speaker 2: We have covered an a regretful amount of ground today.
- 20:08Speaker 2: We started with the comfortable, predictable symmetry of Newton's third law,
- 20:13Speaker 2: the brick wall right, and then we saw how a
- 20:15Speaker 2: team of researchers shattered that symmetry simply by mixing two
- 20:19Speaker 2: different sizes of microscopic plastic beads in electrified water, creating
- 20:24Speaker 2: a lopsided fluid wake that turned passive matter into self
- 20:28Speaker 2: propelled chasing pairs.
- 20:30Speaker 3: A tiny game of tag.
- 20:31Speaker 2: Exactly. We saw how this rig system prevented ten thousand
- 20:35Speaker 2: particles from freezing into a solid lump, resulting in a chaotic, breathing,
- 20:39Speaker 2: lifelike state of continuous gathering and.
- 20:42Speaker 3: Splitting the arrested coarsening yep, And we.
- 20:45Speaker 2: Looked at a future where this loophole in physics could
- 20:48Speaker 2: give us shape shifting programmable materials and medical microrobot swarms
- 20:53Speaker 2: that operate without a single battery.
- 20:55Speaker 3: It highlights just how many secrets are still hiding inside
- 20:59Speaker 3: the foundational laws of face physics, just waiting for someone
- 21:01Speaker 3: to look at them from a slightly different angle.
- 21:03Speaker 2: It really does.
- 21:04Speaker 3: It also leaves us with a profound puzzle to consider
- 21:06Speaker 3: on our own.
- 21:07Speaker 2: Oh was that well?
- 21:08Speaker 3: If simply tweaking the size of passive, utterly lifeless plastic
- 21:12Speaker 3: beads in an electric field can so perfectly mirror the dynamic, clustering,
- 21:17Speaker 3: movement and organization of living biological cells, at what point
- 21:21Speaker 3: does the rigid distinction between a dumb material and a
- 21:24Speaker 3: living system completely disappear?
- 21:27Speaker 2: Man? That is the kind of thought that fundamentally changes
- 21:30Speaker 2: how you look at the world around you.
- 21:31Speaker 3: It really blurs the line.
- 21:32Speaker 2: It does the dividing line between cold physics and living
- 21:36Speaker 2: biology might just come down to a clever bit of
- 21:38Speaker 2: asymmetric engineering. Absolutely, thank you for joining us today to
- 21:42Speaker 2: explore these bizarre and beautiful boundaries of science, keep questioning
- 21:46Speaker 2: the established rules, keep an eye out for those broken symmetries,
- 21:49Speaker 2: and we'll catch you next time.