Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Media Tries to Frame Sound of Freedom Donor, This isn't Anita's Final Form | HBR News 417

Transcript

Media Tries to Frame Sound of Freedom Donor, This isn't Anita's Final Form | HBR News 417 · Honey Badger Radio

0:01
This is HBr News number four seventeen. Media tries to frame Sounder Freedom donor
0:07
this isn't Anita's final form where we discuss the news of the week and give
0:11
it the Badger treatment. Hello, everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
0:18
My name is Brian and I'm joined by Mike uh. Mike J is
0:23
not here yet. Hannah Wallen is not going to be she's taking a break
0:27
because she's a little overworked and stretched too thinly, so she probably won't be
0:33
back on the news show until September. But in the meantime, you'll have
0:36
the rest of us and I don't know where Mike J is. Hopefully he'll
0:40
show up later, but we can't wait any longer. So anyway, with
0:44
that set, I'm here. Lauren is also here, but on account oh
0:53
you can see the theme. We are a little we're all a little stretched
0:59
thinly here, so but it's okay. The show must go on and we
1:04
will go on with the show. So if you guys would mind sticking around,
1:10
it's gonna be a good time and we're gonna be discussing the news topics
1:14
of the week. So this week we're gonna be talking about a funder for
1:19
the crowdfunded film Sound of Freedom Fabian Marta, who was arrested for child kidnapping
1:25
according to the media, and what there's a little bit more to the story
1:30
than that, though Anita Sarkisian shuts down her old channel Feminist Frequency or her.
1:34
I guess it was a nonprofit or something, And what does that mean?
1:41
NASA loses contact with its Voyager two probe due to a mishap and which
1:47
we will also go into. And more so, stick around, it's going
1:49
to be a good time and be sure to join us afterwards or the patron
1:53
only show. So you guys might have heard about a little oh I don't
1:57
have my websites. Hold on a second. You might may have heard of
2:00
a little film called Barbie and we apparently it made It made a billion dollars
2:08
in the box office, because of course it did. And there are articles
2:15
coming out now that are saying what people are mad, but they don't get
2:20
what the movie is really trying to say. And so we have this article
2:23
from screen Rant the Barbies, Barbie Movie's biggest backlash misses what the film was
2:28
really trying to say. Guys, So if you you know, if you're
2:31
If you're too dumb to see that it's actually not what you think it is,
2:35
even though we don't know what you think it is, then clearly you
2:38
need to read this article. Read this article to make it all better.
2:44
It's annoying when this happens to a movie that you wouldn't think it would happen
2:46
to, Like, people have genuinely different interprets. Much liked The Tale of
2:52
Scroti Muckabooga bulls on the peep that date It's on poop, which I believe,
2:59
bleish it was n obvious parody of Catcher in the Right. When when
3:02
people have such different interpretations of the movie, where one faction of people could
3:07
be like this is right wing and the other faction is like this is left
3:10
wing, and they're having a genuine argument argument that over it. I mean,
3:19
do you have to ask yourself either this is a more nuanced movie than
3:23
we think it. If I think it is, well, people are even
3:28
stupider than we thought they were. Well, yeah, we'll see what screen
3:34
Rent has to say, so we'll look at it in the Patron Show.
3:37
I don't think how it's interpreted is as important as what the takeaway is for
3:45
the average viewer, and I think the takeaway despite everything, is in my
3:51
opinion, absolutely devastating. But we will see. I will go through.
3:55
I don't know what argument they're going to make, so I haven't looked at
3:59
it or anything, but we will see in the Patron Show and respond hopefully
4:02
accordingly. And also, if you want to make sure that we don't get
4:06
heated from the internet, or if you find that we have been and you
4:09
want to be able to be able to continue to follow us, please go
4:12
to badger feed dot com. That's Badge your feed dot com and also follow
4:17
us on Rumble. We are HB Radio on Rumble. I do see that
4:23
rumble chat is there, so shout out to the Rumble gang. And then
4:30
yeah, so I see Betty Adams and OI can woe whose name I can
4:33
never get and I never will. Sorry, but that's just the way it
4:38
is. Yeah, so yeah, follow us on Rumble, follow us on
4:42
Twitch. It's also HB Radio there, and follow the gaming channel which is
4:46
honey Badger Arcade on YouTube. We're just putting out content, content, content,
4:53
so you know, come check it out whenever you get a chance.
4:56
Appreciate the support, Please subscribe if you haven't already and hit the like.
5:00
But now with all that out of the way, and I know I did
5:02
this in a really roundabout way, let's get into today's story. So normally
5:09
Mike Ja helps do the write ups where he could have summarizes a story,
5:14
but I haven't heard from him yet, and I hope that he's okay,
5:16
So if anybody has any way of reaching him, that would be great.
5:20
But the first story we have to talk about. And I wasn't going to
5:25
talk about this one originally until I learned some of the interesting details about it.
5:30
So according to most of the media, Fabian Marta, who is a
5:40
donor like a funder for the movie the Sounder Freedom. So if you guys
5:45
don't already know, Sounder Freedom is a film about sex trafficking children and it
5:51
was crowdfunded by Angel Studios because Disney sat on it, and I think there
5:57
was like another big studio that sat on it and they never right ended up
6:00
releasing it, and so they did release it by crowdfunding for it and everything.
6:04
So a lot of people donated, average donation about five hundred dollars.
6:10
This guy donated about five hundred dollars, so he was an average level donator.
6:15
But the way that they're framing it makes it sound, you know,
6:17
like he's just like some monopoly man throwing money at stuff. Whatever. But
6:24
anyway, so here's what happened, or here's the story. According to Newsweek,
6:27
this is like the popular narrative. Okay, Fabian Marta, one of
6:30
thousands of patrons of the crowdfunded anti child trafficking film Sounder Freedom, was arrested
6:36
and charged with accessory to child kidnapping. According to a Missouri court filing,
6:41
the class A felony carries a penalty of ten to thirty years in prison or
6:45
life imprisonment. That sounds really serious, right. Since removed Facebook posts appear
6:50
to show the same person revealing their pride in funding the film, MARTA's name
6:56
appears in the movie's credits, along the investors who helped bring Sounder Free to
7:00
theaters. Sounded Freedom dramatizes the story of anti child sex trafficking organization Operation Underground
7:05
Railroad and its founder Tim Ballard, who was played in the film by Jim
7:10
Caviezel. This is a picture of Fabian Martha kind of reminds me of,
7:15
uh, well, sort sort of like the do you remember the GQ photos
7:19
of Paul Elam and Saint Gerard. I don't know if you guys have got
7:25
to beheads to remember that, but yeah, oh oh yeah, they were
7:28
professionally grotesque. Yeah, they weren't even hiding it. It was it was
7:32
like waking CG from the early nineties. Yeah, like you couldn't you couldn't
7:39
even pretend it wasn't doctored as as would get fact checked by today's general media.
7:46
Yeah, all right. So Saint Louis Metropolitan Police confirmed to Newsweek that
7:54
Marta, fifty one, from Chesterfield, Missouri, was charged on July twenty
7:58
three, following an incident reported on July twenty first. Newsweek approached Marta via
8:03
Facebook direct message for comment on Friday. Police also provided a booking photo of
8:09
Marta, which appears to show the same person picture on a Facebook account of
8:11
the same name. Screenshots have since removed. Posts from multiple online sources seen
8:16
by Newsweek, but which could not be independently verified, show Marta speaking about
8:20
his involvement with the film. So that's the general gist of the way it's
8:28
reported and the idea and what you're supposed to take away from this is that
8:31
despite the movie being about child sex trafficking. There is a person who funded
8:37
the movie that apparently is in favor of child sex trafficking because he was charged
8:43
with what is it, accessory accessory, Yeah, accessory to a crime class
8:52
a felony, right, accessory to child kidnapping. And the truth is a
8:58
bit different. So this is from deadline, it says here, So again
9:03
take this with a grain of salt because it's deadline. But sound Freedom's Angel
9:07
Studios responded to reports of Pick crowdfunders arrest on child kidnapping. Accused attorney says
9:13
charges are unfounded. There was a lot of noise surrounding the Red State beloved
9:18
one hundred and thirty six million dollars grossing summer surprise hit Sounder Freedom this morning,
9:24
with Newsweek reporting that one of the Picks six thousand, six hundred and
9:26
seventy eight crowdfunders, one out of six thousand, six hundred and seventy What
9:31
percentage is that if anybody can do the math on that really quick, was
9:35
arrested for child kidnapping by the Saint Louis Metropolitan Police. Not just to be
9:39
clear, we're talking about one person who contributed an unidentified amount, So we
9:43
don't really know how much they gave of money to the five million dollars p
9:46
and a crowdfunding campaign put together by Angel Studios. The person charged, fifty
9:50
one year old Fabian Marta at Chesterfield of Chesterfield, Missouri, on July twenty
9:56
three, was not a financier of the actual feature production. They have to
9:58
say that because it's the truth. Deadline confirmed the arrest with the Saint Louis
10:03
Metropolitan Police per case number, and then they give it the case number.
10:07
So what is the response? Angel Studios says they have no knowledge of the
10:15
background of as crowdfunders. Well, of course not because we get crowdfunded.
10:18
We don't know the history of the people who contribute to us, right,
10:22
just like IBM or any other publicly traded company doesn't have any idea of who
10:26
their minor shareholders are. The Newsweek article reports that Marta took to Facebook to
10:31
post their excitement about proudfunding Sound Freedom, posts which have since been removed.
10:37
Neil Harman, CEO of Angel Studio, said in the statement quote Angel Studios
10:41
adhere to the requirements of federal and state laws and regulations and allowing six thousand,
10:45
six hundred and seventy eight people to invest in average of five hundred dollars
10:48
each. So this is just them averaging it out, okay, into the
10:52
launch of Sound or Freedom. Just as anyone can invest in the stock market,
10:56
everyone who meets the legal criteria can invest in Angel Studios objects. One
11:00
of the perks of investing was the ability to be listed in the credits.
11:03
Those credits is as seen in the social media posts below, reveals Fabia Marta
11:07
and family as one of several contributors to the Jim Caviezel trailer. So Deadline
11:15
reached out to let me just say so, yeah, they talk about the
11:20
thanks they're giving. Deadline reached out to the attorney of Marta, Scott Rosenbloom
11:26
of Rosenbloom Shorts and Fry in Saint Louis, who calls the criminal charges against
11:30
his client unfounded. Quote. I don't understand how they're charging him with this,
11:33
Rosenbloom told Deadline he has nothing to do with kidnapping anyone. Marta is
11:39
a landlord to a woman who was involved in a custody dispute with her aunt.
11:43
Marta was allegedly providing living arrangements to said woman and her child, the
11:48
former who was involved in rehabbing the rental property. So now that you look
11:54
at the story, the man did not like the way that the way that
11:58
the me and it's not just Newsweek, okay, it's basically all of the
12:01
mainstream media. They are they clamored at the opportunity to spin or tell this
12:09
story of the hypocrisy of a guy that funded a film tracts about sex trafficking
12:16
children himself kidnapping children, or at least being an accessory. Yeah. Yeah,
12:24
and so I go ahead, Michael, you seem to be in the
12:30
middle of a thing. Yeah, it was just so this is this is
12:33
just more evidence that what this film has to say seems to be really important
12:41
because and and the media, the mainstream whatever you want to call it,
12:45
right, they they are doing everything in their power to stop this film from
12:50
having any credibility. And that means if they can find one guy, and
12:56
they can find that he did something that could discredit the whole thing, basically
13:01
putting it in a black category, like they did when they said, oh,
13:05
this is what do they say for QAnon conspiracy theorists, or this is
13:11
for dads with brainworms or like all these things right, what are the names
13:16
are dropping QAnon? You're supposed to turn off your brain. Oh I don't
13:20
want to watch that? Right? This is what they say the Red State
13:22
loving like, you know, movie like, because they're just the assumption is
13:28
people who live in Red States will want to watch this because they tend to
13:31
be QAnon or MAGA and January six. They's gonna throw these things at you,
13:37
and you're supposed to be like, oh my god, that's evil.
13:39
I'm not gonna watch this. That's the whole reason they're doing it. And
13:43
so like they have to. And again this is this guy is charged but
13:48
not convicted. So how do you charge someone? Will you basically call the
13:52
cops on them, and then the cops say, well, we gotta take
13:54
you, you know, we gotta get your information or whatever. But that
13:58
doesn't mean you did anything. It just means you're charged with something. It's
14:01
like being indicted. You know, we got him this time, boys,
14:03
we indicted him three times. It doesn't mean anything. It just means everybody
14:07
agreed that that person should go to jail or whatever lose their job. Right,
14:11
So all this and I gotta tell you, I want to tell you
14:16
a little bit. Did I tell you Mike that I tried to go watch
14:18
Sound Freedom over the weekend to happen. So something happened in the movie theater,
14:26
so like on Sunday. I know it's super weird, right, but
14:30
totally totally happened. I can I can show you guys the vouchers. So
14:35
Lindsay and I I told her, you know, we have a neighbor that's
14:39
willing to watch Jojo for us, so we can go out, we can
14:43
do things. We didn't have anybody to help us when we first came here,
14:46
and we've been living here. This is like a third year I think
14:48
in Virginia, So you know, it's kind of tough because we don't know
14:52
anybody. We kind of like keep to ourselves and sometimes you feel like pretty
14:56
like unsocialized, especially after the COVID thing and all of that. So we
15:01
got a neighbored I will watch the dog for us, a really nice lady.
15:05
So we left Jojo with her, and I said, we're gonna go
15:07
to the movies. And we went to the local theater and I bought tickets
15:11
for a matinee at like one twenty or something. We get in. I
15:16
haven't been to a theater since I saw a joker. That's how long it's
15:18
been. Okay, so I'm super excited because I used to go to the
15:22
theater all the time, Like me and my boys, we used to go
15:24
every weekend all the time. And we go. We're sitting there, the
15:30
movie starts. It's very well made, like it looks like a professionally made
15:33
movie. Angel Studios is going places, I promise you. And even though
15:39
there obviously it's sort of like a Christian company. It's in the name.
15:43
But but the movies are not like those cringe e you know, like religious
15:48
movies that you see. You know, they look like really good, well
15:52
made films that are not preachy. They don't quote scripture, they don't do
15:56
any of that, you know, and I've so far, I've they've done
16:00
good stuff. I mean, it's a it's a good studio. I hope
16:03
that they go places. And anyway, we're sitting there and we're watching this
16:07
movie and like twenty minutes into the movie, when things are when the second
16:11
act is about to start, you know, the second act starting, the
16:15
alarm goes off and the lights, you know, there's sirens and loud noises
16:19
and they had to stop the film and everyone had to leave. Now they
16:22
had to empty the whole theater. And so people were there to watch Barbie
16:27
and Ninja, Turtles and Mission Impossible and other stuff, right, Oppenheimer,
16:34
But we all had to leave, and I was like, I was.
16:37
I looked at Lindsay and she's like, Oh, we don't want to like
16:41
jump to any conclusions, and I'm like, come on, like one of
16:45
the odds. You guys know that this was going on all over the internet
16:48
right, like people were posting. I mean, sure, there is there
16:51
is always that odd chance. But in all the years I've been going to
16:53
the movie theater, that's never happened to me. I've never had an alarm
16:57
go off. But to be fair, when we were leaving, there was
17:00
a massive thunderstorm outside, and being that this is a smaller city, I
17:07
noticed that we have power outages a lot more frequent than I did in Chicago.
17:12
So it certainly could be that. I'm not gonna necessarily claim that,
17:18
you know, does some foul play, but it is a really weird coincidence,
17:22
a really weird Well, yeah, that totally happens. So we have
17:26
vouchers. I'll try again, maybe next weekend. We'll see if it works
17:29
out, if it happens again, though, I call it bulletit. But
17:33
yeah, that's I was gonna say that, Mike. So I don't know
17:36
if you wanted to go ahead and say your thing, because I wanted to
17:37
say more, but I can wait. Yeah, I think regarding the tracking
17:45
down of this man like it's a fugitive, I think we can mark this
17:51
on our calendar, ladies and gentlemen. The me too movement, the me
17:56
too phenomenon, the me too hashtag whatever, lasted no more than six years.
18:03
Evidently, any lesson that we might have learned about Hollywood and it's depraved
18:07
nature has now been chemically flushed down the memory hole and there's nothing left,
18:15
with a few historians scratching their heads going, what even was that? My
18:21
dudes? Do you have any idea how many movies have been funded entirely,
18:26
almost entirely by Harvey Weinstein, which is to say nothing of all the other
18:33
presumably similar scumbags who were not thrown under the bus, but, just to
18:38
take the fall Guy as an example, Gangs of New York, Shakespeare in
18:44
Love, Goodwill, Hunting Sin City through Romance, the English Patient a lot
18:48
of our skates going on so far. By the way pulp fiction Jackie Brown
18:52
killed Bill Wanted two year obvious seeing the pattern there scream scary movies by kids
18:59
also of things. And that's to say nothing of the Weinstein company who took
19:03
over. After all, that might descend into indirect guilt by association, and
19:11
that's what I'll be going to address. Quite surely, those films were principally
19:15
or entirely funded by Harvey Weinstein himself, the poster boy for institutional sexual exploitation.
19:25
Are any of those films getting boycotted, let alone getting attempted cancelation via
19:32
some desperate scrambling media hit piece, No, they never have. The subject
19:37
of the movie is all that matters as well as so when it comes to
19:42
Sound of Freedom, they found a thunder. They found a backer. That
19:51
means one person out of thousands of voluntary donors who had no influence over the
19:59
movie. And it turns out he rented a property to an alleged criminal.
20:07
And that's that's That's the worst they could find. These these ghouls, these
20:11
vultures in the legacy media, have gathered their research teams around the task of
20:18
investigating every individual involved in funding Standard Freedom, and they scour every inch of
20:25
their social security profile looking for a juicy scrap of a scandal, and in
20:30
what may be thousands of people, the worst thing they could find was a
20:36
guy who rented property to an alleged criminal. Again, Harvey Weinstein, the
20:44
prime suspect in a global moral panic and witch hunt, dozens of movies funded
20:52
by him. I sleep too. Yeah, but thousands of the people who
21:00
paid a dollar or more to produce Standard Freedom, and you dog swipe the
21:04
area in a twenty square mile radius looking for a nickel that might have been
21:11
tossed in their direction by anything resembling a criminal, and the worst you can
21:17
find is someone who is an accidental accessory to an alleged crime. It's like
21:22
when you investigate Trump a million times and you can't find Jack Ship. He's
21:26
actually done wrong. All you're doing is proving just how squeaky clean he is.
21:33
But you're run with it anyway, You print it anyway, because enough
21:37
of your soft headed NPC audience really will gladly uninstalled the previous thing chip and
21:45
install the current thing chip in record time every time. It's Moore's law at
21:52
work, folks, in the human psyche. By twenty twenty five, the
21:56
average boomer will have the long term memory of a slightly retarded goldfish. The
22:03
TV will spend a day telling them the sky is green, and they will
22:07
believe it for a day, and then they will forever deny, remembering that
22:14
one time the TV convinced them that this guy is green for a day,
22:18
or that you can prevent a common cold with a serum that does not prevent
22:22
the common colds. I'm just, folks, I'm just fucking sick of it,
22:29
and no one's even trying anymore, so neither am I. This is
22:33
some bullshit and you can piss about your ass. That's all I have,
22:38
all right, I got, I got I. Mike Jay did finally get
22:41
back to us. I guess his internet connection in Arizona is not good,
22:45
so he sent me the write ups. I asked him if he can jump
22:48
in here, so hopefully he will pop in. But I'll read his write
22:51
up in the meantime, just because we don't want to make so I might
22:53
have to like rehash some old ground. But you guys get like what's happening
22:57
here, So if you were to google the movie Sound of Freedom, there
23:03
is only one story. You will see the news discussing you will likely be
23:06
met with the booking photo of a disheveled looking, balding man in a blue
23:10
gray T shirt. That's the one that's pictured here. That man is fifty
23:12
one year old Fabian Marta, and he has been charged by the Saint Louis
23:15
Metro Police for accessory to child kidnapping. This is where most of the useful
23:19
information ends with these articles. They make note that Marta was also one of
23:23
several thousands, like over six thousand people of people that donate it to the
23:29
funding for the movie Sound of Freedom, which some outlets going as far as
23:32
to call them call him a financier that sounds really fancy and elite, despite
23:38
having only donated somewhere between one hundred and five hundred dollars. Certain publications have
23:44
even give the very second in the film where his name can be seen in
23:48
the end credits in an ocean of other names, as if that adds anything
23:52
to the subject. These articles also drone on and on about how the movie
23:56
is a QAnon conspiracy theorist right wing fantasy and that most child trafficking doesn't happen
24:03
as shown in the film, as if to imply it isn't something to concern
24:06
yourself with. But none of them seem to be interested in the context behind
24:10
or the nature of MARTA's charges. In reality or the reality of it is
24:15
that Marta is a landlord who rented a room to a woman and a child
24:18
involved in a costage dispute with the woman's aunt. After being arrested, Marta
24:22
pled not guilty to the charge of accessory to child kidnapping and is currently out
24:26
on a fifteen thousand dollars bond. MARTA's lawyer, Scott Rosenblaum said in a
24:30
statement regarded the situation, quote, the charges aren't founded. Mister Marta had
24:33
nothing to do with custodial kidnapping. He was essentially a landlord. Despite the
24:38
media greatly wanting to tie this case to the movie, almost out of a
24:41
manufactured sense of irony or hypocrisy, there is simply no link. Only sad
24:47
pathetic journalists angry about an anti child trafficking movie. And I think it's also
24:53
really interesting to point out that the actual like dispute is between two women,
24:57
a woman who has the child and the woman's aunt who wants custody of the
25:02
child. But the person that we're actually you know, mud slinging at is
25:07
a man who and I know why because it's a man. So we we're
25:12
just gonna have less sympathy. And they got this picture and they make it
25:17
as unflattering as possible so that some person with god awful instincts goes, oh,
25:22
he looks like a child kidnapper. I mean, that's the and of
25:26
course that means, oh, now I don't want to watch the movie that
25:29
supposedly, you know, makes the outrageous claim that there are children being trafficked,
25:36
and because one of the guys is accused of trafficking children, but that's
25:40
solely not happening. Guys, don't don't be concerned. I have, like,
25:45
as an aside, I think the media is so upset about the fact
25:52
that this film exists and the fact that a film because I think what it
25:56
comes down to is there's a film that's that exists and it's in a public
26:00
eye and it's not like isolated to some corner of YouTube or rumble or or
26:06
cozy or whatever that's talking about an issue that does not have the oversight of
26:11
people in the entertainment industry, where as a Hollywood or the BBC or whatever,
26:15
the fact that it's happening without their oversight drives them insane because they don't
26:21
get to control what the story is or elements of it. And I hadn't
26:26
gotten to the end of this yet, Like I said, I tried to
26:29
watch it got interrupted. But it looks like the main antagonists, at least
26:33
one of them is a woman of color, So that could be a problem
26:38
because it doesn't again because of the overly simplistic way that these people see the
26:45
world, this really ridiculous, overly simplistic way that they're they're you know,
26:49
they're not gonna go with it. I mean, God anyway. So but
26:56
here's the here's my really conspiratorial take. Okay, and you know, take
27:00
it with a great insult. It's just me speculating. But I think I
27:03
may have said this on a show before. When Sound of Freedom came out
27:07
on July fourth, the media was in a absolute tizzy, like they were
27:11
going crazy. And the thing is, if they hadn't gone crazy, it
27:15
probably wouldn't have made that much money. Like honestly, like you know,
27:19
Peterson brought Tim Ballard, the person the films like, you know, experiences
27:26
are based on and Jim Caviezel on his show to talk to him and Peterson's
27:30
got a significant amount of reach. But I think that the reaction from the
27:36
media probably prompted more people to take interest. Oh you guys don't like this,
27:40
Okay, well I kind of want to see what this is about.
27:42
But then something interesting happened. After the first week of this film, Suddenly
27:49
there was a new meme all over the internet, the Barbieheimer mean right,
27:56
Oh are you gonna watch Barbie or Oppenheimer this weekend? It seemed to me
28:00
extremely phony, like like absolutely astroturft meme comes out of nowhere, Because I
28:06
know, we know that these marketing people, they know how to use memes,
28:08
right, and they already, like us marketing to lie about the contents
28:14
of the Barbie film to make a big opening weekend. So I think that
28:19
the Barbie Heimer meme is not organic. I think it's something that was manufactured
28:26
by the entertainment industry or people in the journal. I know that these are
28:29
different studios and they have every reason to compete with each other whatever, but
28:33
I don't think I think that this is completely constructed so that people would stop
28:37
talking about Sounder freedom because as soon as the Barbie Heimer meme came out,
28:41
everybody was involved. They were doing funny trailers and the images and all these
28:45
other things, and now and then the movie the movies came out and all
28:49
of a sudden, we've moved on to something else. Right now, everybody's
28:52
talking about April O'Neill or whatever. So I think it served its purpose.
28:56
It was intended to distract, and it works. People just got and now,
29:00
you know, women are just sharing the fucking speech at the end of
29:04
Barbie and nobody's talking about Oppenheimer because it's like three hours long and nobody's got
29:08
time for that shit. So I think it that's what I think. That's
29:12
you know, you guys don't have to agree with me. You can say
29:15
I'm crazy in the comments whatever, but that's what I think. I think
29:17
that was completely inorganic and and people just ran with it. And you know,
29:22
when it when it comes to getting a meme started, you just need
29:25
to get like a couple of viral posts and then the people will just take
29:29
it and run with it because they think it's funny. And now you've got
29:30
something that takes on a life of its own. So those are my thoughts
29:36
about that. Do you have anything else you want to add? Mike?
29:42
Yeah, is Lauren still sleeping? Yes? Okay, if she wants,
29:48
if she wakes up and wants to say some stuff, she can. But
29:51
anyway, yeah, I'm sorry, go ahead, yes, yes, that's
29:57
under Sorry. Oh no, it's fine. I just wanted to Okay,
30:03
So all right, So anyway, let us know what you guys think about
30:08
this in the comments? Uh, why what do you think? And let's
30:12
let's look at it from because I know that like some people, you know,
30:17
they don't think that this is relevant, or there's like atheists and in
30:21
the chat or whatever. Don't look at it that way. Look at it
30:23
as why is the media trying to hide this? Why are they so opposed
30:29
to this? Why are they pulling so much out of their ass to like
30:33
make this this film irrelevant? Are you a father of children or a mother
30:37
of children? What do you think about that? Right? Is that disturbing?
30:41
What do you think about my experience when I when the theater had an
30:45
emergency like twenty minutes in and everybody had to wait for the ambulances to come,
30:51
and then they just gave out vouchers and I have them, so I'm
30:53
gonna try going back. What do you think about that? Is that strange
30:56
to you? Because it's strange to me. Let us know in the coms.
31:00
Okay, I got a bunch of super chows, so I'm gonna read
31:03
through those really quick. So thank you for that, all right? So
31:07
Meredith ge gives us five dollars and says, HBr News for seventeen and sounder.
31:14
Freedom was made by Fox. When Disney bought Fox, they shelved the
31:17
project along with others. The producers spent years trying to find a distributor.
31:22
While the movie costs fourteen point five million dollars to make, Angel Studios crowdfund
31:27
about five million dollars to buy the distribution rights. Yeah, because they wanted
31:32
the movie to get out there. I mean I knew that. I think
31:36
yeah, Fox and Disney they were holding on Twitter, they were shelving it,
31:38
but I wasn't sure who specifically was like involved with bringing it, you
31:45
know, making it happen, because the film was done for like seven years
31:47
or something. So thank you, Meredith for that. Kind of makes you
31:51
wonder how many such movies have been successfully shelved forever, but somebody made them,
31:59
but someone else in Hollywood was like, noah, yeah, I'm doing
32:01
that. That's going on the shelf. However, whoops, it got burned.
32:05
Oh well hey yeah yeah. How many unsuccessful sound of freedoms have been
32:14
have been shelved and burned before well, we finally got actually happened yep.
32:20
And how much other like art like like animations and all kinds of other good
32:25
stuff that we're not seeing because it got shelved, And like the excuse or
32:30
reason is, oh, you know, we're not ready for this yet or
32:34
whatever it is, right, because I don't see any reason why Fox would
32:36
shelve it unless they were like, oh no, we can't put that out
32:38
there, right, So anyway, thank you. And the movie's like,
32:40
look, it's not explicit, it's PG thirteen. There's a very little,
32:45
like even foul language. I didn't get very far, so I don't know,
32:47
like, you know, how how how bad it gets. But I
32:51
don't even think there's anything like edgy. I mean, seven was a big
32:53
hit. I think it's a great movie, but it's certainly it's certainly not
32:58
for you know, it's not a PG thirteen filmed by any stretch. So
33:01
okay. So that was Meredith g thank you so much for that. Next
33:07
week got He's John Cena by Richard Beer is John six okay, and he
33:19
gives us five bucks and says, this is why anonymity is so important for
33:22
donors in any cause, or for it to any cause. Imagine if the
33:27
crowdfunders for Cassie Jay's The Red Pill were gone after in this way. Were
33:30
those were those donors anonymous? I think they were, And you're right,
33:34
I mean they would have they would have done anything to expose those people anything,
33:40
So thank you, Richard. Let me continue. And punishing a landlord
33:45
for the actions of a tenant might be a precursor to fair housing law violations,
33:50
as landlords aren't allowed to even ask about legal quagmires that any tenant might
33:54
be involved in. That's it. I don't know what the laws of Missouri
33:58
are, but that's a good point. Thank you, Richard Zarens because there's
34:01
ten bucks and here you get a giggle and says, the same way they're
34:07
trying to smear the sounder freedom is the same way people tried to smear the
34:12
Red Pill. So it's the same argument we say these people are bad and
34:15
they are associated with this project. Don't patronize it. In this case,
34:20
it's despicable that these people have the wherewithal and ability to encourage how people view
34:24
the movie and anything connected to it. What's worse is that their efforts have
34:29
worked in the past, so they make the attempt again to deflect away from
34:32
the film and taint it with potential tangential fringe figures around it. They're pure
34:38
evil, absolutely pure evil. Like I. You know, I would have
34:44
been hesitant to say the word evil the years ago, but I have no
34:47
problem saying it now. That is evil. And I heard some of the
34:53
horror stories I heard from Tim Ballard, like he didn't go into detail,
34:58
but the stuff that he said that actually happened that he had to see when
35:02
he was doing his job. I'm sorry. I have another really really messed
35:08
up conspiracy theory, Mike. Do you want to hear my really messed up
35:13
conspiracy theory about child trafficking? I mean I do, but I don't think
35:16
YouTube does well well. I can be I can do it clean, I
35:21
can do it clean, but I do have I thought about this when I
35:24
was when I after we had left the sound of Freedom, and we were
35:29
home and we were sort of discussing, you know, like what had happened
35:32
and like our theories about stuff and the whole child sex trafficking thing, okay,
35:38
and I watched Blair White. She did Blair White did a video on
35:40
it, and she said that she was so distraught that she couldn't finish the
35:45
movie. She had to walk out about halfway through. I thought it was
35:47
because something offended her, but it's not. She was actually like saying that
35:52
this is like really heavy stuff, right, And I was thinking about the
35:54
Tim Ballard thing, and I was thinking, what if Okay, let me
36:00
set up the pretext. Okay. A couple of years ago, we did
36:02
a story on a camp in I think it was in Nevada, where a
36:10
group of Muslims were breeding children to be child soldiers. Do you remember that,
36:16
Mike, do you remember when we covered that? No, I would
36:22
erase, no, it's really it's really messed up, but it's true.
36:27
Like there were there was like four women or something, and then there were
36:30
a couple of men. One of the men was like he was tasked with
36:36
going to get supplies like food and stuff and bringing it back. And it
36:39
was like this encampment they made and they were breeding children for terrorism to be
36:46
training them to be terrorists. Okay, I don't know if you guys remember
36:50
that. I thought about that and I said, wow, like and of
36:52
course, like the reason why we brought it up was because of women's involvement
36:57
in it, because they were the ones having like getting pregnant. There were
37:00
a few women, and they'd be getting pregnant, having a baby, and
37:04
then like you know, they had like a system, right, like a
37:07
woman would give birth to a child and another woman would get locked up,
37:12
and then the other women would like take care of them and raise them and
37:14
teach them how to shoot and all that. That was the idea, right.
37:16
There were a lot of really young kids, so they didn't really get
37:20
very far. But apparently it was shut down I think by you know,
37:23
like homeland security or something. But the point is I thought I couldn't have
37:30
conceived that something so barbaric could be going on, and especially in this country.
37:36
Okay, but these were like Muslim Muslims right from like some third world
37:40
country I can't remember, I don't want to say, but it was they
37:44
were definitely Islamic terrorists in the States having children specifically for that purpose. And
37:51
then I said to Lindsay, I said, what are the odds that there
37:55
are children being bred for well, other uses specifically, what are the odds
38:05
of that? And she said that is like beyond the pale. And I
38:07
said, well, wait a minute, wait a minute. If we don't
38:10
value the life of we don't value the lives of the unborn, it's not
38:16
really that far of a stretch. And there are people who push for that
38:20
right to devalue that, and then they're, well, it's not that much
38:23
of a stretch to have children specifically for like physical gratification, because and and
38:31
the fact that the stuff that that Ballard was saying that he saw, I
38:36
mean, it makes you, it makes you question, like you know,
38:38
the how how depraved human beings can be. But I'm like, it's possible,
38:45
am I? Am I wrong? But go ahead? What's what's what's
38:49
the sex trafficed equivalent of a child soldier? Well, just because we told
38:53
about that children that get abused in the system of Hollywood or whatever, and
39:00
that that shown chick, but what happens when those children grow up? M
39:07
we don't hear about that generally, we don't we don't care. I mean,
39:12
if you're willing to braid, if if you're willing to breed people just
39:16
to use them as disposable soldiers, right like, you're not You're you're not
39:22
attaching yourself to them. And if we're will if women are willing to kill
39:28
their babies after they're born because they don't want to deal with the inconvenience,
39:30
would you've done countless stories on how far of a stretch is it? Like,
39:36
how much would could a woman like if if if the if the price
39:39
is right, how willing would you be to be like, well, I
39:43
guess I'll have a baby for you to use in whatever way you want.
39:45
I mean, it's it sounds really messed up. I have no doubt about
39:50
it, but I don't think it's Uh. People generally give a shit about
39:55
child victims and in victims. So when a child has a victim, we
40:05
give a shit about them, and if they grow up to be a woman,
40:07
we still give a shit about them. But if a male child is
40:10
a victim of this kind of system, this trafficking system, this the mass
40:16
non sorry system, while he's a boy, we give a shit about him.
40:21
Yeah, but what what what happens if he if he if he grows
40:24
up and I don't mean he becomes Corey Feltman or you know, the kind
40:30
of here's what happened to me? Works on being silenced? I mean,
40:32
what what what happens to the people who just go along with it? Well?
40:37
Hurt people, hurt people? Yeah, what's this? Is what I
40:42
mean? What is the equivalent of a child soldier in in Coney's whatever African
40:51
country it was, the Cardy was you remember the cardy thing? Yeah,
40:53
what's the equivalent of someone who grows up in that in that Hollywood non system,
41:00
grows up to be an adult, doesn't doesn't ever acknowledge what happened to
41:06
him or her, but I and and just upholds the soldier code code that
41:15
was almost literally drilled into him. I mean, he becomes some kind of
41:22
weaponized nons and it becomes second nature for him to hide his nonswery, gaslight
41:30
his nonsery, well, the exacting his NONSWERI on whoever on whatever he can
41:34
do or her nonswery. I don't even I don't even know where the divide
41:38
is here. I don't even I don't even know who's more dangerous female Hollywood
41:43
nonswers or male Hollywood answers. I don't know who's more psychopathic or who gets
41:47
away with more. I just I just I just want to tear down now.
41:57
And I don't know why anyone wouldn't. Oh absolutely absolutely, like they're
42:00
not getting a cent of my money anymore. But anyway, like, I
42:06
know that that for some of you might see that as pretty extreme, but
42:10
I think that if I can conceive a bit and I'm you know, then
42:15
that means somebody else could have conceived of it and been depraved enough to actually
42:19
try to get it done. And then there's probably women out there willing to
42:22
do it, willing to breed babies for that use. So I know it's
42:27
fucked up, no doubt about it. But I'm I have a feeling that
42:32
if I learned that that was happening, it wouldn't surprise me. So thank
42:36
you how much. Thank of how much influence the church had over people in
42:42
previous generations, and now think of how much influence TV has and movies have
42:46
over this generation. It's at least equivalent to the influence of the Church had.
42:52
Like people people cling religiously and pseudo religiously and have everything religious adjacent to
43:01
what the TV tells them and to what movies tell them. They don't just
43:06
turn up to the TV every Sunday. They turn up to the TV every
43:09
day. They've been doing it for the sixty years of their boomer lives.
43:16
And and you're gonna tell me this isn't a religion, Like, I don't
43:22
know what a religion is, but if it's what if it's when you turn
43:24
up somewhere once every Sunday to listen to some guy drawn on about share,
43:30
then what the fuck is people to the television every fucking day for at least
43:37
four hours a day while they while they chant this dooma apocalyptic nonsense out of
43:44
them, like this is more religious than any organized religion let's ever existed.
43:52
Yeah, all right, Uh, let me finish the super childs because despite
43:58
it's just you and me, we're actually was talking a lot. But anyway,
44:00
I thought that was important. I just wanted to get that out of
44:02
there, so let me see, Zapierre says, for five bucks, thank
44:09
you. Zapierre gives credit to people who say apartheid zionist Israel runs the US
44:15
government, media and all Western entertainment Harvey Weinstein, theaters. Epstein linked with
44:21
Israel, blackmail billionaires, world leaders, and celebrities. Lay Maxwell. Epstein's
44:25
main link to Zionist Israel. Her father was an Israeli agent. Boy,
44:30
they shut it down. Talk about Zionism and we'll lock you out of your
44:31
bank and all your money. Kanye West, Okay, I just avow YouTube.
44:37
Please don't come after us for this. I'm just reading the super child's
44:40
guys, Okay, So thank thanks for that. Though, thank you for
44:45
the donation. I appreciate it seriously. All right. Richard Bierre again with
44:51
another cash. Well that's the wrong one, but I'll take it. Says
44:59
for five dollars. These same journalists will praise those who will smuggle underage kids
45:02
into jurisdictions that are sanctuary states, the gender affirming care if the parents are
45:08
opposed to it, yes, of course. Again, if you're if you're
45:13
okay with those things, I think that it's it's not it's not crazy to
45:17
presume that these journalists don't really have a lot of care for human life,
45:24
especially the lives of the young and the unborn. So uh, Barbieheimer was
45:30
Astroturft gives us five dollars thank you, and says I think Brian is probably
45:37
right. I don't think the Barbie versus Oppenheimer meme never was funny enough to
45:40
spread across the internet. Yes, that's right. It's not right, it's
45:45
not I'm not sure if I went through a Mandela effect moment, but I
45:49
think Barbieheimer started before Sounder Freedom's release, but the meme was co opted by
45:53
the propaganda machine. I don't you know. I might be. I think
45:57
it came afterwards because no did. Because Sound of Freedom came out July.
46:01
The fourth Barbie came out two weeks ago. That would have been like mid
46:07
July, because we're in August now, so I think it was like literally
46:12
the week or two weeks after Sound of Freedom came out. And I think
46:15
again, I think that the because the simple like slander against the studio,
46:21
against the film, against all of the things that can associate with the film.
46:24
Men qan on dads like they literally dads are in that category. I
46:30
think no matter what film was called, set of films were competing with Sound
46:36
of Freedom. The only live stream legacy media would have gone along with it
46:40
if it if it was some light of action version of fucking Tailspin or Dark
46:49
Wing Duck. They would have pushed that as as a feminist absolutely well,
46:54
because it would have been Disney, so it would have been a feminist movie.
46:59
So yeah, please don't do Dark Weeking Duck that light that way.
47:01
Don't don't do it. They'll never find Dark Ring Duck. That's two upsco.
47:07
That's just for us. Yeah, okay, thank you for that.
47:12
Barbieheimer was Astro Turfs and then Zarens again for five dollars. Gives says,
47:17
I have a story idea that involves some vampires realizing it's easier to breathe their
47:22
slaves. I don't think it's a stretch that such a thing can happen for
47:25
any use determined by those employing the program. Yeah, yeah, you know.
47:30
There's this movie that I saw that I like. Actually it, oops,
47:35
that's wrong. There's this movie that I saw called what was it called?
47:39
It was about vampires and they and they run everything and it's like Sam
47:45
Neil and Ethan Hunt. Do you guys remember it? Dark Dark Night Walkers
47:51
or Day It's something dark Water. I don't know, but I have it
47:53
on DVD. I just don't want to go look at the title. I
47:55
watched it not long ago with Lindsay and it was actually we thought it was
47:59
pretty good, but it also didn't make a lot of daybreakers, thank you.
48:02
Yeah, so we thought it was kind of stupid because I was like,
48:06
why would they go out and capture all the humans and then drink all
48:10
of their blood when they could just bread humans and then drink their blood.
48:15
That way, they never run out, they have a supply that doesn't end.
48:19
I thought it wasn't very well planned out, but I don't know,
48:22
maybe things were moving too fast. But encounter the same problem as the thermodynamic
48:27
concept of the matrix. But you try to turn humans into batteries, but
48:31
the energy you need to put into humans in order to get energy out as
48:37
diminishing returns you have. And I guess it's the same with vampires. I
48:42
mean, you can suck their blood, but you have to put energy into
48:45
those humans before you can get that energy out, and it all has tominishing
48:47
returns. And the Fox sex study thermodynamics is stupid. Counts well again,
48:53
if they can come up with that concept for a story, why couldn't they
48:58
try to do it in real life? So all right, thank you guys
49:01
so much. For the super childs I'm just gonna put it done in there
49:05
so I don't get lost, And then I did get a rumble rant too,
49:07
So I also appreciate that NOBA fan gives us a dollar and says,
49:12
isn't the media praising cutis for showing how young girls get exploited by the industry.
49:16
If they call sounder freedom QAnon, then the idea that they want to
49:20
exploit kids is making them look very suss. Definitely sus my dude. But
49:25
Quti's is good because uh it because it is so it empowers. Yeah,
49:37
quties is nonsore done right, all right, But anyway, thank you so
49:43
much for the support and feedback. It's really really cool. Let us know
49:46
what you guys think about this in the comments. I look forward to seeing
49:49
what you guys have to say. I'm gonna be there's always there's somebody asb
49:54
I think they're always like putting in like the time codes. I love it.
49:58
Thank you so much for that. I really appreciate it because sometimes these
50:01
shows go along and people don't want to watch it, and I think it's
50:05
a shame. So all right, anyway, moving on to the next story.
50:09
So last week Anita's Sarkisian dropped a bombshell, Feminist Frequency is no more
50:17
after somewhere between ten and fifteen years, Anita is hanging up the flannel,
50:22
button down and hoop earrings for good. When asked as to why by Polygon,
50:25
Anita responded, quote, I'm ending feminist Frequency because I'm extremely burnt out.
50:30
I can't vacation that off I can't offload that anymore. End quote Feminist
50:35
Frequency. And Anita will be fondly remembered for the time they neglected to pay
50:39
her transgender cohorst all while raking in thousands in Patreon bucks, the time she
50:45
needed twenty five grand to open a free discord server, and the time she
50:49
freaked out on Carl Sargon of a cod Benjamin at VidCon. We were there
50:52
for that, calling the man all sorts of names, like a garbage human
50:57
while he stayed totally silent. I can't help but one if any of her
51:00
Kickstarter supporters ever got those DVDs that they were promised. So okay, go
51:05
ahead, before anyone celebrates anything. Let's be clear. This does not mean
51:13
that Anita Sarkasian is going to disappear from the limelight or just take the money
51:19
and run and go home and be a family man. As Guy All would
51:24
say, Oh hell no. Not only is she already sort of highly sought
51:30
after consultant of some descriptions for any game devs who are determined to pump up
51:38
the ESG score, but she gets paid like a jillion dollars just to turn
51:45
up at somebody's private function and read a script for five minutes. She's never
51:51
killing that cash cow. Sukesm is like the glorious Steinham of the twenty first
51:57
century. She's going to carry on walking across those red carpets, having her
52:01
ass kissed by powerful people, and getting paid for having her ass kissed by
52:07
powerful people, all along the while complaining about all the men who kept her
52:13
down. Meanwhile, she's a millionaire, and she became a millionaire by deep
52:19
demonizing those hypothetical men. And she'll keep riding this wave until she's too old
52:27
and too seen all to you and walk to and from the limousine. The
52:32
death of feminist the death of feminist frequency. The entity known as feminist frequency
52:40
just means her team, the people she was paying to make her famous or
52:49
not paying a prop and organization. They no longer have jobs that. That's
52:57
about it. She used to have kind of what Twitter. He used to
53:00
have a team of spoiled it girls who got paid to drink, you know,
53:06
gri jo and eat sushi all day. But it's no longer economically viable
53:12
for Psyche Eastern to pay other people to establish her brand, given that at
53:16
this point she is the brand. No one remembers Faminist frequency, but everyone
53:21
remembers him. It's He's is. All she needs at this point is an
53:25
agent and a person or assistant, and she's good to go. Maybe she
53:31
could employ the ex boyfriend of her as a personal super wars his name I
53:36
can't remember either. I know, I know Jonathan McIntosh, right, Oh
53:40
yeah, you remembered it. Well, don't you want to what he's doing?
53:45
He's just bad. He had like a channel cop pop culture Detective.
53:50
It was Yeah, it took it took off because YouTube wanted it to take
53:52
off. They tried to make a take off, but it didn't despite all
53:58
their efforts. And but yeah, best of luck to him, and best
54:01
of luck to her. Honestly, if a grifter is a thing, and
54:09
despite the cliche it has become, it is a thing. Then, and
54:14
it's just Psychesian is a grifter part excellence. She has every blessing from the
54:20
Grifter's Guild if the Grifters Guild were to ever be a thing, because she
54:24
has stuck to the principle if you're gonna do it wrong, do it right.
54:30
Yeah. She found a way to appeal to the lowest, the lowest,
54:37
basest human instinct, gynocentrism, and she milked it for all she for
54:44
all it could possibly be worth. She's like, she's like a confectioner like
54:49
Ben and Jerry's. She knows people crave sugar. She knows she's making people
54:54
fat and unhealthy and addicted to her low quality, but by golly, it's
55:00
what she does. It's not illegal to do, but she does. Nor
55:06
should it be illegal. If you want to get rich making people fat and
55:09
stupid, then by Jupiter, you do it. It would just be nice
55:15
if us folks in the periphery could go ahead and inform people that sugar in
55:22
excess is perhaps not so good for you, and that we could do so
55:28
without being called keto supremacists or some shit, and people being throttled and shadow
55:36
band from ever attempting to get this cross. But hey, it's a dog
55:39
eat dog world and Grifter is gonna grift, so yes, it's a dog
55:45
eat grift, to eat grift, to eat dog world. It's like rock
55:49
paper, says us, except to make it's even less sense. But life
55:53
making sense is like food making music. It's not even and nor can I
56:02
It's not just like not in the ballpark. It's not even the same sport.
56:08
I have a couple of things I wanted to say about this. I'm
56:12
glad that you said that, Mike, because I saw a lot of people
56:14
on YouTube celebrating this. You know, oh my feminism BTFOD it's over,
56:20
like they're We're never gonna hear from them again, like all this stuff like
56:22
like like you know, like they threw the ring into the into Mount Doom
56:27
and the and the Eye of Sauron collapse and everything is good in the world.
56:30
Absolutely not. The only reason why Anita is closing it down is because
56:37
she doesn't need it anymore. She basically used it to get her foot in
56:39
the door in all of these uh consulting and doing consulting for video game companies.
56:45
I've said this many times already. I'm just gonna say it one more
56:49
time on this show. I probably have to say it again in the future.
56:52
Anita got what she wanted. She's getting she's working directly with developers.
56:57
And by the way, it's not just her, because it's not that,
57:00
you know, she's like the single she's not the Thanos that can do this.
57:04
It's like a cult a feminists in all corners of our culture that are
57:09
doing this, and they're just using the same you know, talking points on
57:14
rhetoric that she does. So it's like she could have a heart attack and
57:16
die tomorrow. I wouldn't want that for her, but I'm saying it could
57:20
happen. It wouldn't change anything. So the problem is the ideas, and
57:23
this is the thing, you know what for me anyway, I know people
57:27
had different takes on gamer Gate. My whole thing was if you don't defeat
57:30
feminism and all this like woke shit, it's gonna get worse. It's not
57:34
about like you can't get the journalists to be like ethical if they have no
57:39
interest in it, because they're true believers. And I think that's the issue,
57:43
right. So, Anita's already worked with various larger companies. She's worked
57:49
with Ubisoft, she's worked with the guys that developed that. I don't know
57:54
the Dishonored she worked on that or Dishonored too, I think, and and
58:00
a number of other games. Blizzard, you know, I remember Blizzard just
58:04
had this whole firing thing where they claimed that there was all this sexual harassment
58:07
going on and a bunch of guys lost their jobs. Interesting that, and
58:09
then Blizzards games got extra woke. That's weird. It's kind of like what
58:14
happened in the animation industry. So this isn't something that one woman did.
58:20
And just because she closed on her little pet project and left the door still
58:24
crying victim because she said, I'm ending feminist frequency because I'm extremely burnt out.
58:29
I can't vacation that off, I can't upload that anymore. That is
58:32
her just saying I'm a victim of this, even though people stopped giving a
58:37
shit about my content years ago. I think the last Thunderfoot video was like
58:42
right before Brexit, and then Brexit happened, and he hasn't been able to
58:45
just turned into Sam Harris. He was just like lost it, not responding
58:49
to any of that anymore. Because you know, England wants to be independent
58:52
and Trump got elected and the climate and Elon Musk is evil and all of
58:57
this other shit. So yep, but thunder Foot it I you know,
59:00
I wish that he'd made feminist prequency videos, although I do think that he's
59:04
extremely repetitive. But whatever, it was good stuff while it lasted, But
59:07
that doesn't change anything. So that that was I wanted to say that.
59:13
I think that she got away with with probably millions. I'm sure that she's
59:15
absolutely loaded. She was charging a shit ton to make appearances and essentially regurgitate
59:22
this BS. And the last thing is, I don't you know the grifter
59:25
thing. I mean, I want to say, yeah, but I wonder
59:29
if you're a true believer, like if you really believe this stuff, is
59:32
it a grift? And I mean, you know, because I would think
59:36
that a grifter is somebody who doesn't really believe what they're saying, but they
59:38
know it works and it can get the money. Like if I decided tomorrow
59:43
to make feminist content because I want to make money, I could do that,
59:45
and I think that would be a grift because I'd be lying. I
59:47
wouldn't I wouldn't believe it myself. But I think the need of a belief
59:52
I think does this he can kind of harfaly believe what you say. I
59:58
know, we think of a belief. It's like whether you believe something or
1:00:00
you're done or you don't. But a half belief it's something you that you
1:00:07
only believe because it's never been challenged, because you've never been cornered with that
1:00:13
challenge. If you believe, if you believe something and someone says, well,
1:00:16
hey, that's not true, and you just go, well, this
1:00:20
is hate speech. You're victimizing me and you should be censored, and then
1:00:23
you never actually hear that end of the argument. Then you I mean to
1:00:30
what to Greek and you say you actually believe that thing because you can't.
1:00:36
You can't. You kind of do as long as it's never challenged. And
1:00:39
a belief that you only believe as long as it's never challenged, is that
1:00:45
really a belief? It's kind of this. It's it's it's this weird thing
1:00:50
that's between a belief and not a belief. It's I don't know. Comment
1:00:57
below, Well, you think the word for that is? It could be
1:01:00
because like I have a relative that is a what do you call it?
1:01:07
He can't stop lying and he lies so often and so frequently that he believes
1:01:10
his own lies. So it could be that it could be like a pathology,
1:01:15
Yeah, pathological life. Yea pathological liar. Yeah, that's that's the
1:01:20
word I was looking for. Yeah, And and I agree that Anita did
1:01:23
lie about being a gamer because then later she revealed she wasn't. But I
1:01:28
think that in terms of like, I think that maybe what it is.
1:01:31
I'm okay with calling your a grifter. I'm not like making this into a
1:01:34
big thing. But she believes she believes her own lies, but that doesn't
1:01:38
make her not a grifter. Yeah, yeah, that's that's what I'm saying.
1:01:42
If I belief in your own lies is the most important strategy for a
1:01:47
grifter. Yes, yes, I don't disagree. And I think that uh
1:01:55
sorry, hold on a second, I gotta find something. I'm getting ready
1:01:59
for the next story. I think that you can definitely like like you like.
1:02:06
She believes in the theories that she puts out there, and then she
1:02:09
wants that to be the conclusion, so she just makes whatever it is she's
1:02:13
criticizing fit her conclusion. So that does require dishonesty. So yeah, I
1:02:19
think that, And that's basically how most feminists work, right, So uh
1:02:22
and all least this woke shit, that's how it works. So thank you
1:02:28
for that. Let me know what. So basically what I'm saying is is
1:02:30
that like feminism has not been defeated. Anita's like doing fine. She's probably
1:02:37
very very well off financially, and she can just keep on doing this.
1:02:42
And she's been she's she works in the gaming industry, so she's gonna have
1:02:45
influence on it. And what I'm asking is I know that people say,
1:02:50
oh, Gamergate loss or whatever, it hasn't ended. It's it's ongoing.
1:02:52
This is not one of those things that you can just crush with one argument
1:02:57
or or even like a series of arguments. It's an ongoing struggle, right,
1:03:00
So can we get can you get lost? I'm gonna I'm gonna go
1:03:05
right here and say it's tiny twenty three And now we've got turfs warring against
1:03:09
intercession lists. Yeah, you've got You've got you've got feminists who want to
1:03:15
raise male identities, and you've got feminists who want to eraised. Its Like,
1:03:21
in what world is this a victory? But anything anything anything about feminism.
1:03:27
This is when like Islam dominate, invades and dominates the country, and
1:03:31
then they start arguing about do we do Sunni or Shia. Yeah, you
1:03:38
can't sit here arguing what we do about feminist It's fucking one and now and
1:03:44
now it's just a schismatic war between two different kinds of feminists. That's true.
1:03:50
Don't tell me feminist hasn't won. That's exactly what happens when feminism wins.
1:03:54
Well, we are up against the monolith. So and I think that
1:03:58
even like we have to like, let they're basically two kaijus, the intersectionals
1:04:03
and the turfs, Like I don't like to say turfs, just the regular
1:04:08
feminists. I guess the intersectionals there there. It's like Godzilla versus King Kong.
1:04:14
So we just we we we were always smaller. So all right,
1:04:20
but anyway, uh I think, oh yeah, so anyway, so yeah,
1:04:27
she she's not going anywhere, and and that's it. So all you
1:04:30
can do is like look into if you're looking to buy anything or or give
1:04:34
your harder in cash to anybody, you should probably know exactly what they stand
1:04:39
for and make a decision based on that. And hopefully we will see alternatives
1:04:44
because there are more and more of those we just talked about Angel studios and
1:04:47
and other sort of like you know, people in the media space. So
1:04:51
I don't know what else to do. I mean, like, we only
1:04:54
have so much power, and that's I think what we should do. So
1:04:58
hopefully they'll just eat each other. But I think that there will be a
1:05:01
winner in that too at some point. All right, so let us know,
1:05:06
you guys think about that. In the comments, I do have more
1:05:10
super chows. So yet another one from was this Richard Berreo. So Richard
1:05:26
gives us five bucks and says, do you really think that Anita is going
1:05:29
to quietly fade away with just consulting work. I highly doubt that she's willing
1:05:32
to let Laura Bates become the dominant voice of feminism without her putting her two
1:05:36
cents in, because somehow there are many forms of misogyny and no single feminists
1:05:42
can focus on. Maybe ye, yeah, he's gonna be seeing her on
1:05:48
television for the next forty years. Like when whenever there's like a compilation show
1:05:56
about the history of comedy or the history of TV or the history of especially
1:06:02
video games, they're gonna they're gonna get Sarcasian to come along and say,
1:06:08
well, here's how it was sargilistic, but and here's how it's better since
1:06:13
I took over and started changing things. And this, yeah, like I
1:06:16
said, Glory sign them is still turning up and in the legacy of lamestream
1:06:21
media and talking about how important it was that she that she imposed patriarchy theory
1:06:29
on everyone, and and people are still lapping it up. So so I
1:06:33
mean, no me telling me that the same isn't gonna happen with Anita Sarcasian
1:06:39
unless something very very serious happens in the meantime where we finally get over this
1:06:44
ship. Yeah, yeah, maybe maybe Laura Bates and Nita Sarkisian will do
1:06:51
the fusion dance and become like Laurta beats Kisi and I don't know, all
1:06:59
right, so thank you for that. And then we have one from Anonymous
1:07:04
and they say, for five bucks, those human batteries must have been genetically
1:07:12
modified humans or the machine is feeding off the potential of humans mental abilities,
1:07:16
intelligence and create things that can surpass nature. That's the lore I used to
1:07:20
justify the matrix spot. Yeah, I don't know, I don't I mean
1:07:25
I used to think that it was really like really well made and smart and
1:07:29
stuff. But now I question that I happened at wich Houses. Maybe they
1:07:33
dove they dove too, they dug too greedily and too deep, and they
1:07:38
awaken something in them shadow and flame. Anyway, let us know you guys
1:07:44
think about this in the comments. I'm gonna move on to the next story.
1:07:47
This one is These last two are not like as big. I think
1:07:51
the first two other really big ones, but kind of interesting. So ESRB
1:07:56
the Entertainment Software Ratings Board. They're the ones that put like the on video
1:08:00
games. They put like the age you know rating on there. Whether this
1:08:04
is for a mature or for teens or for everyone that kind of thing.
1:08:09
I don't know that they have that in the UK. I think you guys
1:08:12
have a different system. Like it turns up on YouTube every now and again.
1:08:17
Mild lyrics is my favorite. I use you for one of my videos.
1:08:24
You can just have a side that says mild lyrics, which apparently is
1:08:29
a warning as opposed to lyrics. Lyrics is not a warning, but mild
1:08:33
lyrics mild sauce it is. Yes, yeah, so I know, because
1:08:42
I it's like some other countries use different rating system. But this is basically
1:08:45
like the ratings system, so it's suggesting is blasting recent reports that suggest the
1:08:54
organization is planning to use facial recognition technology on children, adding that it has
1:08:59
no intention of using the technology to take or store selfies of its users.
1:09:03
Yesterday, reports surface that the ESRB was partnering with YOT, a digital identity
1:09:09
firm, to use facial estimation technology to check the ages of users. The
1:09:15
news quickly spread to multiple outlets, with some worrying that the facial age technology
1:09:18
would be used to store photos of underage users. The source for this,
1:09:21
by the way, is IGN, so take it with a grain of salt,
1:09:26
because they're obviously going to put a little spin on it. I think
1:09:29
that this is very fishy. That's why I'm reporting this, Okay. So,
1:09:32
however, in a heated statement sent to IGN, and ESRB spokesperson clarified
1:09:39
that the technology is not intended to stop children from purchasing or downloading restricted games.
1:09:44
Well, first and foremost, this application is not to authorize the use
1:09:46
of this technology with children, full stop. Nor does this software take and
1:09:50
store selfies of users or attempt to confirm the identity of users. And quote
1:09:56
the ESRB told ign in an email, and they continue quote furthermore, this
1:10:01
application makes no mention of using age estimation to prevent children from purchasing and or
1:10:05
downloading restrictively rated video games, nor do we intend to recommend its use in
1:10:11
that way. And quote the application for approval. The ESRB is referring to
1:10:16
pertains to privacy protective facial age estimation. This new verifiable parental consent mechanism uses
1:10:23
facial age estimation technology that analyzes the geometry of a parent's face to confirm that
1:10:30
they are an adult. Facial age estimation technology is used to estimate a person's
1:10:34
age based on a selfie taken by the user, but it does not determine
1:10:39
or learn the identity or name of that individual. It is not the same
1:10:43
as a facial recognition system which matches a human face using a digital image or
1:10:46
a video still that it cross checks for the database. All right, So
1:10:54
while you were talking, right, I came up with this brilliant idea.
1:10:57
I've devised this system to prevent children from using harmful online or offline content.
1:11:05
This is some blue sky thinking. You know that technology where you can recognize
1:11:12
a child by their eyes and their facial structure and their voice. Well what
1:11:18
if, right, what if instead of installing that technology into the telephone,
1:11:26
we install it into the parents. Now I know this sounds like some crazy
1:11:32
transhumanist, luxury gay communist cyborg utopia. Share by I think not too far
1:11:40
into this invision. I think we can develop some kind of emergent technology that
1:11:45
allows a parent right to recognize the distinguishing features of their own child and thereby
1:11:54
instigate some kind of parental lock of some sort, whereby they can have in
1:12:00
some way prevent their child from even accessing a smartphone or mobile device in the
1:12:10
first place. Now I know realize that this just sounds like some kind of
1:12:15
digital pie in the sky to those who aren't as forward thinking as I am.
1:12:20
But I really think I need a dev team of at least thirty people,
1:12:26
some of whom will be unpaid interns, who can help me work on
1:12:30
this project. Who's up for it? How do we get parents too?
1:12:36
Shall we say, adopt responsibility for that which we might otherwise be outsourcing to
1:12:45
any given evil bastard who might be spy wearing their way into your child's brain.
1:12:50
Am I am I too far outside the box? Am I? Too
1:12:56
far inside the box? Where even is the box really? Mind of the
1:13:01
box is called the books? Is the box the opposite of the box?
1:13:05
What's in the box if you puts it in the box on me, I
1:13:11
think I'm having a sock as I'm honey, this actually hurts. It hurts
1:13:15
my spleen right where I think my spleen ish er, don't go down there,
1:13:21
California, John got the hand. Oh yeah, I mean it's funny
1:13:31
that they had to do this kind of like damage control because like, I
1:13:35
don't know, I can see how parents of children will be concerned, but
1:13:40
like, if you have a webcam, it's probably already looking at you.
1:13:44
If you have a phone, it's already listening to you. Like there,
1:13:47
this is sort of like, you know, the problem already exists. And
1:13:51
I understand there are parents they want to protect their children. So there are
1:13:56
parents, Like more and more parents are not letting their kids have phones because
1:14:00
they don't want them, even like on social media, because it's so much
1:14:03
of it is so easy to access and they don't want them getting involved with
1:14:08
that stuff before their time. It's probably a good idea, especially when it
1:14:12
comes to things like TikTok and Instagram and Twitter or whatever whatever. I think
1:14:16
the kids are using TikTok. Now, I wouldn't. I wouldn't do it.
1:14:19
Like there's a lot of there's a lot of creeps on there, and
1:14:24
there's a lot of thoughttery that goes on on TikTok as well. So but
1:14:29
yeah, nonetheless, we're already being monitored by our devices, So I can
1:14:33
understand that the sort of futility of that. But at the same time,
1:14:39
if you are a parent or a person I know people like Dave Cullen,
1:14:43
a good friend of mine. You might know him his old channel of Computing
1:14:46
Forever or the Dave Cullen Show. He is like going super low tech.
1:14:50
He's got like which is ironic because his whole channel was about computers. But
1:14:55
but he's got a flip phone. He doesn't really do any anything much except
1:15:00
occasionally make a video, and even he's probably being monitors to some degree.
1:15:04
But I can understand the concerns, and I think when the ESRB comes out
1:15:09
and says we're totally not doing that, I think that just makes it look
1:15:12
really fishy. So so yeah, like just just like if you have kids,
1:15:17
to be careful, you know, we we just talked about the media
1:15:23
reacted to Sound of Freedom. So maybe I'm a little bit biased by the
1:15:27
work that I'm doing, But I wouldn't want my kids like faces all over
1:15:31
the internet, so some in some part of the dark web. All right.
1:15:36
So that is that story. It was just a short one. Let
1:15:42
me know what you guys think about this one in the comments. I do
1:15:45
have some super chows. Again, I think, did I read these already?
1:15:51
Uh no, I already read those. Sorry, Yeah, we're gonna
1:15:55
move on to the next story. I know why. I it's still telling
1:15:59
me that it's new, but it's not new, all right, So we're
1:16:01
gonna get into the last story. I'll let us know what you think about
1:16:04
this one in the in these in the comments. So in July, a
1:16:10
wrong command was made to a spacecraft that was sent to explore space that was
1:16:15
sent out in nineteen seventy seven. That was like the the probe. I
1:16:19
think it was, uh, let me see here, yeah, Voyager two,
1:16:26
Okay, and it was they lost contact with it because of a command
1:16:31
and it got And this was shortly after what wife, I think this is
1:16:40
kind of funny. This woman was brought on as the head of the team.
1:16:45
So Liz Fuller right office communications the twin So so this this probe was
1:16:54
out forty some odd years. I think, is it is it's you know,
1:16:58
mission forty six year old. Mission NASA accidentally lost contact with the Voyager
1:17:02
two. A signal was picked up on Tuesday, but thanks to an interstellar
1:17:09
shout, because it was it changed direction and they lost contact for a few
1:17:15
for a number of day, like thirty seven hours. It looks like once
1:17:19
they found it again, they send out what's called an interstellar shout, and
1:17:25
its antenna is now back facing Earth, which is how they are able to
1:17:29
send out signals to it. NASA had originally pinned hopes on the spacecraft resetting
1:17:32
itself in October. It took thirty seven hours for mission controllers to figure out
1:17:36
if the interstellar command had worked. As a Voyager too is billions of miles
1:17:41
away from Earth. Staff used the highest power transmitter to send a message to
1:17:45
the spacecraft and timed it to be sent during the best conditions, so the
1:17:49
antenna lined up with the command. Voyager project manager Suzanne Dodd, pictured here,
1:17:55
told the AFP after communications were lost, the probe had been unable to
1:18:00
see commands or send back data to NASA's Deep Space Network, an array of
1:18:03
giant radio antennas across the world. But the Space Agency confirmed of on the
1:18:08
August the fourth that data had been received from the spacecraft and it was operating
1:18:13
normally. NASA expects the spacecraft, laden with science instruments, to remain on
1:18:16
its plan trajectory through the universe, So for a while we lost contact with
1:18:21
the Voyager two. What we're gonna say, tempting, though it is,
1:18:28
to blame this on diversity, bas think is what is why it's turned up
1:18:35
on our desk. This thing's fifty years old. They weren't even privy to
1:18:43
a three eight six processor. It can't even run doom. And that is
1:18:49
and that is saying something because pregnancy tests can run doom, but two cannot
1:18:58
run doom. That's how yeah, this technology is. And I won't even
1:19:01
let you into have the Royal air Force some of its aircraft us still running
1:19:08
on three eight six processes. Maybe maybe it didn't respond to her commands because
1:19:14
it was pro explaining to her. That's saying that, hey, I've been
1:19:17
doing this for forty six years. I know what I'm doing. But yeah,
1:19:21
no it's I mean, Alison gave it this story and at the time
1:19:26
that they thought we'd we lost it, but it turns out that they did
1:19:30
recover it, like just like the other day, and so everything. I
1:19:34
mean, I looked into it today and I was like, oh, they
1:19:35
got it. They got it back online. So that's good. It's good.
1:19:40
But maybe we shouldn't just be celebrating like women in positions for the sake
1:19:45
of it. So so so I'm just saying, you know, it's like
1:19:54
this, this is the thing, like, because if you if you put
1:19:57
all this focus on oh we got a woman on the job, people will
1:20:00
they will put too much emphasis on that for good or ill, because like
1:20:08
oh queen you know, slay or whatever, instead of just saying, well,
1:20:11
okay, fine, like we don't have to make a big deal out
1:20:14
of it. If she's qualified, she's qualified. So and I just think
1:20:18
we can't trust computer technology from fifty years ago. Yeah, it was all
1:20:24
sold bullshit. No, I agree. I remember computing technology from thirty years
1:20:29
ago, and lord knows that was all bullshit. You'll remember dops can.
1:20:33
Can you all imagine running a fucking voyager pro satellite thing on a computer from
1:20:44
the early nineties. Yeah, and would you be in the least bit surprised
1:20:48
that it got behind you given that it takes ten years to communicate with it.
1:20:57
I mean, I'm trying to work out the speed of light versus where
1:21:00
voyage or is that because it's beyond Pluto at this point, I don't know.
1:21:05
I think so that's that's that's a lot of nothing. Oh, this
1:21:10
is voyager two, so I guess maybe not. Maybe it's halfway through the
1:21:14
Solar System at this point. But yeah, this is this is some I
1:21:17
don't know if you call it a paradox, but any anything we send out
1:21:21
of the Solar System is going to have the available technology of the time,
1:21:29
and so it's going to be traveling so slowly that the advancement of our technology
1:21:38
well outpace the speed of the last thing we sent out. So if there
1:21:44
is a voyage of three, then it will overtake voyage of two almost as
1:21:49
soon as it overtakes voyage of one. I think Voyager one is the one
1:21:56
that is Transpluto at this point. And this is this is why I call
1:22:00
it a paradox. And though I'm not sure it's the right word, every
1:22:04
time we invent new technology, it will be able to outpace the previous technology,
1:22:12
which which makes all the previous technology redundant, Which makes you why we're
1:22:18
doing anything in the first place, because the next thing we develop will do
1:22:26
a better job than the previous thing, and we'll never even get information back
1:22:30
from the previous technology because of the speed of light in time for it to
1:22:35
even inform what we should do with the next wave of technology. So it
1:22:42
all does seem kind of pointless. And I would like Elon Musk. I
1:22:45
would like Elon Musk to explain to us why we're even doing any of this.
1:22:51
Yeah, that's a good question, but yeah, I mean I would
1:22:57
like NASSA to explain it. I mean, I'm not putting all of this
1:23:00
on e La Musque's shoulders. I want to know, well, NASA has
1:23:02
even been doing this most time. Yeah really, okay, so yeah,
1:23:08
let us know what you guys think about that. In the comments, out
1:23:10
of curiosity, I did get so that's it for us. But I did
1:23:13
get a couple of super chows and there's one apparently that I didn't read.
1:23:15
I thought I did, but I'm sorry. I will read them all now.
1:23:20
So first I'll read the one that I skipped, sadly my mistake.
1:23:27
From he's John Cena about Richard Bierre. John six okay, and he gives
1:23:38
us five bucks and says, do you really think that Anita is going to
1:23:40
quietly fade away with just consulting work. I highly doubt that she's willing to
1:23:44
let Laura Bates become the dominant for I thought I read this one. Did
1:23:46
read that one? Oh? Okay? Because somebody said they sent me a
1:23:49
super chow and that it was about Anita, and I thought it was that
1:23:55
one. But I feel like I did read that one. Did I miss
1:23:58
another one? Then? No? I think I read these, So I'm
1:24:02
gonna go on to the next one. But thank you, Richard, I
1:24:04
apologize. Maybe you missed it when I read it, okay. Then another
1:24:12
from Richard Beer again for five dollars, and he says, your Yoti,
1:24:20
your online trusted ID requires the creator of an account to take a picture of
1:24:25
a government issued photo ID on both sides so they will have the bar code
1:24:29
on file. They claim to only release only relevant information to a requester of
1:24:32
identification information. Your Online Trusted I d well, that sounds sketchy to me,
1:24:41
but okay. And then I got a five dollars super child from anonymous.
1:24:46
They say I did send a super child, but you didn't read it.
1:24:48
It was about Anita. I think that is the one I read.
1:24:51
I don't see something else here unless for whatever reason it didn't come in to
1:24:58
our super child list here, So apologize for that. But that's all those.
1:25:01
And then I got a rumble rant from OIK and woee, I'm never
1:25:09
gonna pronounce that, right, I don't think. And they give us one
1:25:11
dollar and they say, if you control the technology, it's a tool for
1:25:14
your benefit. If someone else controls the technology, it's a tool to someone
1:25:17
else to control you. Thank you for that, really appreciate it, guys.
1:25:23
You guys are awesome, nice on all of the donations. I'm sure
1:25:28
Alison will make good use of that stuff. And now we are done.
1:25:32
So Mike, we did gwell where at seven we're right there on the money.
1:25:38
So we're gonna head into the Patriot Show and we're going to be looking
1:25:42
at this article from screen rant, the Barbie Movie's biggest backlash misses what the
1:25:45
film was really trying to say. I can't wait to get enlightened about this.
1:25:51
So if you guys want to join us in the octure, you it's
1:25:53
to become a badgerty yourself. I going to feed the Badger dot com five
1:25:56
bucks a months. We'll get you into our discord and you'll be to watch
1:26:00
all the after show content. And if you give it higher levels, you
1:26:01
have more access, like he'll be able to participate in the discussions like that
1:26:05
we're going to do. After this, you can be in the chat with
1:26:09
us in the discord chat and then where you can give us your two cents
1:26:13
and school us on all things everything. So please consider doing that at feed
1:26:18
the Badger dot com and also follow all of our alternate channels. We were
1:26:24
on Twitch, HB Radio, We're on Rumble HB Radio. We're on Twitter.
1:26:29
It's at Honey Badger Bite. I'm on Twitter now it's called Badger Arcade.
1:26:32
It's just my Twitter for now while I'm waiting for my original one to
1:26:35
come back, which is Dog in Charge. I don't know when that's gonna
1:26:41
happen. But I got a guy that has the inside mojo and and has
1:26:46
like the ear. He says he has the ear of Elon Musk. I
1:26:49
I'll believe it when I see it. It sounds a little a little bit
1:26:53
too good to be true, but I don't know, maybe it's possible.
1:26:56
He's got connections. So and yeah, and follow all of our alternate YouTube
1:27:00
channels. We have honeybadgeer Radio, which is our main channel, and we
1:27:03
have a Honey Badger Arcade, which is the gaming channel. So please check
1:27:08
us out there. Go to Doctor Random mccam's channel as well. It's just
1:27:11
it's still Doctor Random mccam, right, yes, yes, but if you
1:27:15
go there, if you go there, come back here because that's where I
1:27:18
am. Yeah. Yeah, but you can check it out. There's like
1:27:20
music videos and stuff. It's fun. It should be a much bigger channel,
1:27:25
That's what I'm saying. It was at first it was it was growing
1:27:29
pretty good, but that was that was years ago. Oh sad. All
1:27:38
right, So anyway, we're gonna head out now. Thanks so much for
1:27:42
joining us on this week's HBr News. If you guys liked this video,
1:27:45
please hit like subscribe you're not already subscribed, hit to bell for notifications,
1:27:47
leave us a comment. Let's when you guys think about what we discussed in
1:27:50
the show today, and please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
1:27:55
Thanks so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and we will
1:27:57
talk to you all in the next video. They issued in Viduation and Visible