Latest / Ryder Lee / JFK Fake Assassination Filmed Two Months Before

Transcript

JFK Fake Assassination Filmed Two Months Before · Ryder Lee

0:23
Speaker 1: You are listening to The Secret Teachings Radio. I'm your host,
0:28
Speaker 1: Ryan Gable. If you'd like to contact The Secret Teachings
0:33
Speaker 1: Me directly, you can email TST radio at ProtonMail dot
0:36
Speaker 1: com or urd Gable at yahoo dot com. The website
0:41
Speaker 1: is TST radio dot info. You can find my books,
0:45
Speaker 1: you can find the show, archive, links to social media,
0:50
Speaker 1: and more. TST radio dot info. Of course, a big
0:54
Speaker 1: thanks to everybody who is a subscriber of the show,
0:58
Speaker 1: because that keeps us on air independently Monday through Friday.
1:02
Speaker 1: And a big shout out also to those of you
1:04
Speaker 1: listening in the free archive on spreaker or through any
1:08
Speaker 1: of the other platforms. Spreaker pushes the show out too,
1:12
Speaker 1: like Apple for example, because I know there are a
1:14
Speaker 1: lot of ads, and some of you listen to the
1:17
Speaker 1: ads just because you know it supports the show, and
1:20
Speaker 1: that is humbling to me and I really appreciate that.
1:23
Speaker 1: So thank you so much for listening in the free
1:25
Speaker 1: archive as well, or anybody who's bought a book or
1:28
Speaker 1: however you support the show. Thank you so much for
1:31
Speaker 1: supporting my work. Tstradio dot info. Again, the website and
1:37
Speaker 1: all the social media links there if you'd like to
1:38
Speaker 1: contact me via those links, that's another way to get
1:41
Speaker 1: a hold of me. And the show last night if
1:46
Speaker 1: you missed the broadcast, we had Clyde Lewis on the show,
1:52
Speaker 1: a very good friend of mine and a colleague of
1:54
Speaker 1: mine who I've worked with for Surprisingly, when I look
1:58
Speaker 1: back at the date to a decade now and Clyde
2:03
Speaker 1: and I I recalled doing a we did a show.
2:06
Speaker 1: We were doing a show back in two thousand and
2:08
Speaker 1: sixteen seventeen somewhere around there about QAnon, and we were
2:16
Speaker 1: talking on that show about how QAnon was very likely
2:22
Speaker 1: part of the intelligence community, that it had nothing to
2:27
Speaker 1: do with some Q level access, some individual in the
2:34
Speaker 1: deep state, or whatever people believed QAnon to be. But
2:38
Speaker 1: I remember saying that with Clyde. We had a conversation
2:41
Speaker 1: about that eight or so years ago, and eventually the
2:47
Speaker 1: q andon narrative, although it still has its rabid supporters,
2:53
Speaker 1: died away. It has been resurrected with the recent presidential election,
2:59
Speaker 1: and we're hearing a lot of the same talking points
3:03
Speaker 1: from the q people. Those talking points include you wait
3:08
Speaker 1: and see it'll happen, and you say, what will happen? Well,
3:11
Speaker 1: it'll happen. Well, what's it all? The mass arrests, all
3:16
Speaker 1: they'll put people in jail. Oh, there's big things coming, which,
3:21
Speaker 1: of course are just generalized statements that could be applied
3:25
Speaker 1: to anything that happens to confirm the bias and to
3:28
Speaker 1: confirm the belief of the cult. So QAnon has resurfaced
3:34
Speaker 1: and has been resurrected and rejuvenated. And it always makes
3:40
Speaker 1: me feel a little bit uncomfortable because every time I
3:42
Speaker 1: see a story about que or I see a story
3:47
Speaker 1: in the alternative media about UFOs drones, like the drones
3:54
Speaker 1: in New Jersey and the Carolinas and Washington and other places.
3:59
Speaker 1: I saw this story over the weekend about how these
4:04
Speaker 1: drones in New Jersey were looking for nuclear like radioactive signatures,
4:08
Speaker 1: and I saw it again Monday, and I thought, why
4:14
Speaker 1: would they fly drones to look for radioactive signatures? Like
4:17
Speaker 1: during the Super Bowl they fly helicopters over whether it's
4:21
Speaker 1: in Phoenix or Tampa, doesn't matter where they're over. The
4:22
Speaker 1: Super Bowl? Is I fly helicopters were looking for radioactive signatures.
4:28
Speaker 1: It's not a hidden thing. It's not something that is
4:33
Speaker 1: secret from the public because authorities are always worried about
4:38
Speaker 1: a nuclear bomb detonating, and maybe that's part of the
4:41
Speaker 1: pageantry and the hype and the fear and all of that.
4:43
Speaker 1: The super Bowl so important, somebody would want to blow
4:46
Speaker 1: it up, kind of like the Sum of All Fears.
4:52
Speaker 1: Or there was an older movie about a terrorist to
4:54
Speaker 1: attack the super Bowl, which is where a lot of
4:57
Speaker 1: our paranoia comes from. It comes from movies, which might
5:00
Speaker 1: you know, they might develop from things that actually happen
5:04
Speaker 1: in the real world. They might develop from ideas that
5:06
Speaker 1: people have, theories that people have, but a lot of
5:10
Speaker 1: our ideas they come from they come from movies. But
5:15
Speaker 1: there's also an irony to that too, because there are
5:16
Speaker 1: some things in movies that are like really clearly I
5:20
Speaker 1: think evident as being like real, and those things kind
5:26
Speaker 1: of get kind of get ignored. There are so many
5:30
Speaker 1: different ways. I thought to start tonight's show after what
5:33
Speaker 1: we talked about last night, and there was a shooting
5:38
Speaker 1: in Madison, Wisconsin yesterday. I'm sure that some of you
5:42
Speaker 1: have seen this. I wanted to mention this to you
5:45
Speaker 1: because I think it really exemplifies what we discussed with
5:48
Speaker 1: Clyde last night. There was a shooting yesterday at the
5:51
Speaker 1: Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, and within within
5:59
Speaker 1: an hour or so of the shooting taking place, CNN,
6:04
Speaker 1: Yahoo News. Yahoo pulls their stuff from like AP and others.
6:10
Speaker 1: They're more of like a distributor. All these news outlets
6:13
Speaker 1: started reporting contradictory things about the shooting at the Christian school,
6:20
Speaker 1: and CNN reported at twelve to fifty one pm Mountain
6:25
Speaker 1: time that two people were killed. Within sixty seconds of
6:31
Speaker 1: that article, another article, probably posted at the same time,
6:36
Speaker 1: was posted with a time stamp of twelve to fifty
6:39
Speaker 1: two pm Mountain time on Yahoo, reporting that three people
6:45
Speaker 1: had been killed. Maybe they got some new information in
6:50
Speaker 1: that one minute time difference. However, authorities on the scene
6:56
Speaker 1: reported that there were five people dead. In fact, the
6:59
Speaker 1: Yahoo article says this. At a press conference on Monday,
7:03
Speaker 1: authorities said that five people, including the suspected shooter, were
7:06
Speaker 1: killed and five others were injured in the shooting. So
7:10
Speaker 1: they had a press conference. This wasn't like the media saying,
7:14
Speaker 1: really quick, let's publish a story to get out ahead
7:16
Speaker 1: of everybody else. Now, this was the authorities locally at
7:18
Speaker 1: the scene saying, we have five people, including the shooter dead.
7:23
Speaker 1: Then police, not the media. Police revised the death toll,
7:29
Speaker 1: saying that actually only three people died, but there were
7:33
Speaker 1: six people injured. So did they resuscitate the people that
7:38
Speaker 1: they had originally said were dead. Are there two people
7:40
Speaker 1: that were on a stretcher and then they started breathing
7:44
Speaker 1: again and their heart started beating and they're suddenly alive.
7:49
Speaker 1: You could just chock that up again to bad reporting,
7:51
Speaker 1: trying to get ahead of a story. You see that
7:54
Speaker 1: in the mainstream press. You see that in an alternative press.
7:57
Speaker 1: Everybody has a theory, everybody has a hypothesis, Everybody trying
8:00
Speaker 1: to get their name at the front of the line,
8:05
Speaker 1: like a Black Friday sale fifteen years ago, where people
8:10
Speaker 1: would stab each other for an xbox. Everybody's just so
8:16
Speaker 1: animalistic in their vicious assault of each other to get
8:21
Speaker 1: to the head of the line. I don't know how
8:25
Speaker 1: you report five people and then reduce it to three
8:28
Speaker 1: and that's official. That's the police, the people that are
8:31
Speaker 1: on the scene dealing with the bodies, and yet they
8:35
Speaker 1: couldn't get the number of bodies right. This is the
8:37
Speaker 1: exact same thing that happened with James Holmes, the Joker.
8:43
Speaker 1: Twelve people dead, no thirteen people dead. No, actually there
8:46
Speaker 1: was fourteen because it included somebody else who then disappeared,
8:51
Speaker 1: and now there's only thirteen people, but actually it's twelve.
8:53
Speaker 1: But it might be thirteen too. We don't know. And
8:57
Speaker 1: so my point is you don't know what to believe,
9:00
Speaker 1: because it doesn't matter if it's bad reporting or there's
9:03
Speaker 1: some grandiose conspiracy. It seems that at the very least,
9:11
Speaker 1: if not in if it's not intentional, it seems certainly
9:15
Speaker 1: the byproduct of an unintentional reporting. It's unintentional to spread
9:23
Speaker 1: these rumors or these conspiracies, let's say, but this kind
9:26
Speaker 1: of bad reporting, this kind of police work, and perhaps
9:30
Speaker 1: if there is some sort of conspiracy involvement, this is
9:33
Speaker 1: the kind of thing that inflames conspiracy theories. This is
9:35
Speaker 1: the kind of thing that drives people mad, that drives
9:39
Speaker 1: them insane, that makes them paranoid. Last night we talked
9:46
Speaker 1: with Clyde Lewis about the number two eighty six and
9:49
Speaker 1: it's seemingly random connection with Luigi Mangione, the shooter of
9:54
Speaker 1: Brian Thompson. Reportedly, two eighty six is an insurance denial
9:59
Speaker 1: code if you forget to or you don't in time
10:03
Speaker 1: turn in your appeal papers for a rejected claim. Two
10:08
Speaker 1: eighty six is also the number of posts on Luigi's
10:11
Speaker 1: X before it was deactivated. I think it's still up.
10:13
Speaker 1: You can go see two eighty six. Under that two
10:16
Speaker 1: eighty six for posts. There's a Pokemon. Yeah, you heard
10:20
Speaker 1: me write a Pokemon named red Loom. Pokemon Breloum in
10:25
Speaker 1: the Poke decks has a number of zero two eight six.
10:31
Speaker 1: Two eight six is also and here we go back
10:34
Speaker 1: to the bad reporting again. The distance between the McDonald's
10:39
Speaker 1: where Luigi was arrested and the hotel where he supposedly
10:43
Speaker 1: carried out the assassination. Originally, it was reported the distance
10:47
Speaker 1: was two hundred and eighty six miles between the two locations.
10:55
Speaker 1: I suppose it depends on if you're talking about the
10:56
Speaker 1: parking lot or if you're talking about the general street
10:59
Speaker 1: toward the actual hote tell you could get like two
11:02
Speaker 1: eighty five and a fraction, but it's two eighty six.
11:05
Speaker 1: News outlets changed that to two eighty Now six miles
11:12
Speaker 1: is a pretty big difference. That's like the difference between exits.
11:16
Speaker 1: So how it was two eighties When you can verify
11:18
Speaker 1: this on a map, yourself and that number was changed.
11:25
Speaker 1: I also found out this morning that well technically last night.
11:29
Speaker 1: I found out last night and I looked this up
11:31
Speaker 1: this morning that between the data breach of a United
11:35
Speaker 1: Health Group back in February on the twenty first of
11:37
Speaker 1: February until December fourth, when Brian Thompson was shot and
11:41
Speaker 1: United Health Group was the parent of United Health which
11:44
Speaker 1: Brian was the CEO of, there was if you play
11:47
Speaker 1: I guess with hours and depending on when you start
11:50
Speaker 1: the calculator, are you if you start on February twenty
11:53
Speaker 1: first and you go to December fourth, it's like two
11:55
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty six, two hundred eighty seven days US
12:00
Speaker 1: Insurance Awareness Day making sure you know you have insurance
12:03
Speaker 1: or you should get insurance. Remember your insurance. That's June
12:06
Speaker 1: twenty eighth, which is six two eight, or get your
12:10
Speaker 1: two eighty six there again, Luigi was also twenty six
12:15
Speaker 1: years old to six and two times or was it
12:19
Speaker 1: two six two plus six is eight? So two six
12:22
Speaker 1: eight again, same exact numbers. What does that mean? I
12:26
Speaker 1: don't know. We talked last night about that being a
12:28
Speaker 1: trigger number, that triggering a response for Luigi as maybe
12:34
Speaker 1: a Maturian candidate, a guy who is under the influence
12:38
Speaker 1: of something unnatural. There were lots of changing reports, as
12:46
Speaker 1: in the Abundant Life Christian School shooting yesterday, lots of
12:49
Speaker 1: changing reports in the Luigi case. The bullet casings. What
12:53
Speaker 1: was on those casinges denied depose two different reports of
13:01
Speaker 1: different words. So did they find more than three words
13:05
Speaker 1: or did someone misreport one of the words, or it
13:09
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense how you can have three bullet
13:12
Speaker 1: ca scenes with three words on them and then those
13:15
Speaker 1: words change article to article. The distance between locations, as
13:21
Speaker 1: I said, was changed, and so which is something you
13:23
Speaker 1: can verify, which makes it even more maddening. And of
13:27
Speaker 1: course the manifestos. Have you read the manifesto? I say
13:31
Speaker 1: manifestos plorab because I read two or three versions of
13:33
Speaker 1: the manifesto and they were all different. He wrote, did
13:38
Speaker 1: he write three of them? All of this stuff, my
13:41
Speaker 1: point is, is creating and even more paranoid and an
13:46
Speaker 1: even more delusional population. It's creating psychosis. And this might
13:55
Speaker 1: seem totally unrelated, but I read this article from the
13:58
Speaker 1: Japan Times about a company in Tokyo where it's actually
14:03
Speaker 1: a research institute slash company in Tokyo called Recan rik
14:09
Speaker 1: In and Recan has developed a plastic that dissolves in seawater.
14:17
Speaker 1: Government researchers, companies, and this research institute with the University
14:23
Speaker 1: of Tokyo have said, Okay, there's a lot of plastic
14:27
Speaker 1: plastics supposedly bad, so what can we do about that. Well,
14:31
Speaker 1: these researchers in Japan decided to create a plastic that
14:35
Speaker 1: dissolves in seawater. Very easy way to get rid of plastic. Right,
14:40
Speaker 1: if it just dissolves and it doesn't get reduced down
14:45
Speaker 1: to microplastics, that's great. My question is why don't you
14:50
Speaker 1: see that kind of innovation in the United States? And
14:54
Speaker 1: if we do have it, why is it not being
14:56
Speaker 1: reported on? Why is it that in the US we
15:03
Speaker 1: are still dealing with like basic ultrasimplistic, black and white,
15:13
Speaker 1: polarizing ideas, Like why in America do we pretend like
15:17
Speaker 1: we have all these problems but we also have all
15:19
Speaker 1: the answers. But the answers are usually things that require
15:23
Speaker 1: massive societal changes and billions of dollars, And basically we
15:27
Speaker 1: have to change the way we're living and we have
15:30
Speaker 1: to give all of our money away to companies and
15:32
Speaker 1: the government to fix the problems we have like plastic.
15:36
Speaker 1: Yet other countries, and it's not just Japan, other countries,
15:40
Speaker 1: even if they abide by the climate change narrative, are like, oh, well,
15:45
Speaker 1: we found a really big, simple, cheap solution to the
15:49
Speaker 1: plastic problem. What's that. Well, China says dumping in the ocean,
15:55
Speaker 1: We say dumping in the ocean. These researchers in Japan said, well,
15:59
Speaker 1: why don't we just make a plat that dissolves and
16:00
Speaker 1: it's biodegradable, and it doesn't actually dissolve into microplastics. It
16:05
Speaker 1: just like dissolves and becomes a part of the water
16:07
Speaker 1: and it's all kind of natural. Just the idea of that, like,
16:12
Speaker 1: why is that not a thing in the United States?
16:14
Speaker 1: And if it is, why are we not hearing about
16:16
Speaker 1: that kind of thing. You're telling me that as Americans,
16:18
Speaker 1: we don't come up with ideas like that. It's it's
16:21
Speaker 1: just other countries. This doesn't make any sense. We do
16:23
Speaker 1: things so inefficiently, things that cost so much money, and
16:28
Speaker 1: we do them so slowly. I mean, my god, I
16:31
Speaker 1: watched roads be ripped up in Japan and get replaced
16:33
Speaker 1: in twelve hours. They've been working on roads here in
16:35
Speaker 1: Tucson since I moved here two three years ago. The
16:38
Speaker 1: same road they pave it, they rip it up, they
16:40
Speaker 1: pave it, they rip it up because it's they're being
16:42
Speaker 1: paid for the inefficiency. It's a scam. Like everything feels
16:47
Speaker 1: like a scam. Everything feels like as an individual, I'm
16:51
Speaker 1: sure you feel this way, because I know I feel
16:52
Speaker 1: this way. Everything feels like I'm just being driven more mad,
16:56
Speaker 1: like I'm becoming more paranoid, more delusional. And I think
16:59
Speaker 1: that that's intention with a lot of this stuff that
17:02
Speaker 1: we see with these stories, whether there's stories of plastic
17:07
Speaker 1: and how humans are bad for the environment and it's
17:10
Speaker 1: climate change in driving cars, or its stories like the
17:15
Speaker 1: Brian Thompson's story, and maybe, as we see in the
17:20
Speaker 1: mainstream press and the alternative press, maybe there's just kind
17:23
Speaker 1: of this insinuation. Maybe we should start a revolution and
17:26
Speaker 1: start killing CEOs kind of this this undermining of law
17:30
Speaker 1: and order, this undermining of due process of law, with
17:33
Speaker 1: all the Trump people too, saying we got to put
17:35
Speaker 1: all these Democrats in jail, the same thing the Democrats
17:37
Speaker 1: said about the Republicans got to put all put Trump
17:39
Speaker 1: in jail. No due process of law, no rules, no structure.
17:46
Speaker 1: Just barbarism, just heathenism, just anarchy. And it's pushed from
17:56
Speaker 1: both directions. You see a shooting, it as here's the
18:01
Speaker 1: mantra again, we gotta stop school shootings. We gotta stop
18:05
Speaker 1: school shootings. Oh there was another school shooting. And he
18:07
Speaker 1: just repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated
18:11
Speaker 1: until it drives people freaking insane. COVID was the same way.
18:18
Speaker 1: My god. The Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior the
18:23
Speaker 1: SPIB in the UK, according to members of the group,
18:27
Speaker 1: not according to people that saw something online. People that
18:33
Speaker 1: actually were in the SPIB said that the whole intention
18:38
Speaker 1: of the group, working directly with the government in the UK,
18:43
Speaker 1: was to engage in behavioral psychology experiments with the public
18:52
Speaker 1: to convince the public. This is in their papers, to
18:55
Speaker 1: convince the public the pandemic was deadlier than it really
18:58
Speaker 1: was and scarier than it really was, in order to
19:01
Speaker 1: get them to acquiesce to the social experiments the government
19:04
Speaker 1: was running. Why is this story not being discussed still today?
19:11
Speaker 1: Members of the group claimed that the lockdowns were only
19:15
Speaker 1: instituted because the government wanted to quote that they wanted
19:18
Speaker 1: to increase the quote perceived level of personal threat because
19:23
Speaker 1: quote a substantial number of people still do not feel
19:26
Speaker 1: sufficiently personally threatened. The scientists, along with psychologists working on
19:35
Speaker 1: this social engineering behavior modification experiment, said that sure, yes,
19:43
Speaker 1: the use of fear was ethically questionable. Gavin Morgan, a
19:48
Speaker 1: psychologist on the unit, exclaimed, clearly using fears and means
19:52
Speaker 1: of control is not ethical. Using fier smacks of detalitarianism,
19:58
Speaker 1: you think. The SPIB also published a paper in twenty
20:02
Speaker 1: twenty Options for Increasing Adherence to Social Distancing Measures, wherein
20:06
Speaker 1: they describe using quote perceived threats, responsibility to others, messaging
20:11
Speaker 1: positive messaging around actions, Taylor made messages for people, social
20:15
Speaker 1: approval messages, etc. The same exact thing literally that the
20:21
Speaker 1: NIH and the US National Library of Medicine and Yale
20:24
Speaker 1: University published in July of two thousand and twenty the
20:31
Speaker 1: same year, where they talk about using certain messages of
20:36
Speaker 1: self interest, personal freedom, economic benefit, embarrassment, anger, guilt, trust,
20:41
Speaker 1: the science all talking points. The American Medical Association had
20:44
Speaker 1: the same talking points Where does all of this stuff
20:46
Speaker 1: come from? It doesn't come from science, It comes from psychology.
20:51
Speaker 1: It comes from psychologists driving people mad. Look at the
20:56
Speaker 1: Fourth Psychological Operations Group at Fort Liberty in North Carolina.
21:03
Speaker 1: They're infamous Ghost in the Machine video series where they say,
21:07
Speaker 1: behind every choice, invisible hands, behind every emotion fire. Do
21:11
Speaker 1: you believe in the power of words and ideas? We
21:14
Speaker 1: believe you know who else believe in the power of
21:16
Speaker 1: words and ideas. Augustus Caesar, the first Augustus Caesar Octavanus.
21:22
Speaker 1: He said that words will for the public and members
21:28
Speaker 1: of government suffice to alleviate people's distrust in government. That
21:38
Speaker 1: you could use words to appease the Senate, use words
21:41
Speaker 1: to appease the people, tell the Senate, I admire you,
21:44
Speaker 1: I respect you, I bow to your authority, when really
21:49
Speaker 1: he was in total control of the Senate and had
21:53
Speaker 1: corrupted the Senate. Same with the people. The people are
21:58
Speaker 1: free and I respect you, your leader. But everybody knew.
22:02
Speaker 1: The people also knew that that wasn't true, But the
22:04
Speaker 1: words sounded really good and it made them feel comfortable
22:07
Speaker 1: with this tyrant in control. We don't know what's true.
22:13
Speaker 1: We live on emotion. We're beholden to words and ideas
22:17
Speaker 1: that seem to have driven us into a state of psychosis.
22:23
Speaker 1: I think in the modern era, a lot of this
22:26
Speaker 1: began after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. That's just
22:29
Speaker 1: one of countless examples, but I think it's one of
22:33
Speaker 1: the premier examples. It's one of the core examples. And
22:39
Speaker 1: now more recent assassinations not only of Brian Thompson, but
22:43
Speaker 1: of open Aiyes Souchir Ballagie, and let's not forget Boween's,
22:48
Speaker 1: Josh Dean and John Barnett. Now to mention what happened
22:53
Speaker 1: to Nancy Pelosi, who had connections to these health insurance companies,
22:56
Speaker 1: all the insider trading. She just falls down and almost dies,
23:00
Speaker 1: like two three days after Barnett was killed. It's magical
23:03
Speaker 1: how that works, isn't it. It was within a week
23:07
Speaker 1: of him being killed she falls and almost dies. Convenient
23:10
Speaker 1: or maybe it was just a coincidence. That's the question.
23:13
Speaker 1: That's the problem. We don't know. You can ask the question,
23:16
Speaker 1: but we don't know the answer. We'll never know the answer.
23:20
Speaker 1: And all of these suicides and coincidental deaths are fueling
23:26
Speaker 1: a supply of endless conspiracy theories and calls for violent
23:30
Speaker 1: revolutionary political activism. I mean, the Kennedy story has persisted
23:34
Speaker 1: over generations because of the inconsistency of reports, just like
23:38
Speaker 1: we're talking about the school shooting and with Luigi, outlandish
23:43
Speaker 1: narratives like the magical bullet that just does magical things,
23:47
Speaker 1: fake evidence like pictures of Kennedy that supposedly have his
23:51
Speaker 1: head blown off and then other pictures where it's a
23:53
Speaker 1: tiny little pinhole in the back of his head, and
23:57
Speaker 1: of course unbelievable official statements like well like the Warren
24:01
Speaker 1: Commission or the nine eleven commissions, which nileven Comission didn't
24:04
Speaker 1: eve address Building seven, so it doesn't even address like
24:07
Speaker 1: one of the most damning pieces of evidence. It's almost
24:11
Speaker 1: as if the true purpose of the Kennedy story, whatever
24:16
Speaker 1: happened in Dallas, was just like to drive the population insane.
24:26
Speaker 1: And I think that that's where we are today, just
24:31
Speaker 1: successive generation after generation traumatic events which drive people to
24:37
Speaker 1: the brink or push them over the brink of madness.
24:43
Speaker 1: One of the most well known psyops in US history
24:47
Speaker 1: official psychological operations, was during World War Two, when US
24:51
Speaker 1: ghost Army units utilized inflatable tanks, fake radio transmissions, costumes,
25:05
Speaker 1: and impersonations to deceive the Germans. It was called Operation
25:12
Speaker 1: Wierson the soldiers used these inflatable tanks, sound trucks, phony
25:18
Speaker 1: headquarters to draw German units away from the point on
25:22
Speaker 1: the Rhine River where the Ninth Army was actually crossing.
25:26
Speaker 1: Several of the last surviving members of that unit recently,
25:29
Speaker 1: like today, recently received in twenty twenty four, recently, like
25:33
Speaker 1: the last couple of years, recently, not like two nineteen fifty,
25:37
Speaker 1: like two thousand's a recently were awarded the Congressional Gold
25:41
Speaker 1: Medal at a ceremony in Washington for something that was
25:47
Speaker 1: done back in World War two psychological operations. And before
25:57
Speaker 1: we transition to our guests, to my good friend ryder Lee,
26:01
Speaker 1: who is patiently waiting on the line, allow me to
26:07
Speaker 1: mention one last time this plastic that was developed in Tokyo.
26:15
Speaker 1: Even if you believe the climate change narrative and all
26:21
Speaker 1: the stuff about green energy and windmills and don't drive
26:24
Speaker 1: your car and live in a fifteen minute city and
26:27
Speaker 1: humans are bad and CO two is bad. In America,
26:32
Speaker 1: it's don't have kids, don't have families, that's bad, don't travel,
26:37
Speaker 1: don't have cars, basically die In other countries, they're like, well,
26:41
Speaker 1: we could fix this problem by just having plastic that
26:44
Speaker 1: dissolves in the ocean. What is the difference here? One
26:48
Speaker 1: drives people to the point of setting themselves on fire
26:51
Speaker 1: as a climate protest. The other creates new innovations that
26:55
Speaker 1: actually make sense, even if you don't buy the climate narrative,
26:58
Speaker 1: which I don't. I like the idea of having plastic
27:00
Speaker 1: that just dissolves in the ocean because plastic is actually good.
27:03
Speaker 1: We need things like plastic for food preservation and also
27:07
Speaker 1: helping to get food to people in need. We need
27:09
Speaker 1: plastic because it preserves food, which actually preserves water and
27:12
Speaker 1: preserves prevents the use of additional chemicals like plastics a
27:16
Speaker 1: good thing. So let's just create a plastic that actually works,
27:20
Speaker 1: rather than driving people to the point of suicide because
27:22
Speaker 1: they have climate anxiety. I think that's the epitome of
27:28
Speaker 1: the underlying thought processes that have culminated to form tonight's show.
27:33
Speaker 1: As a follow up to last night's episode on the
27:36
Speaker 1: two to eighty six enigma, And since I mentioned Kennedy,
27:42
Speaker 1: I should note that a recent Vanity Fair article has
27:46
Speaker 1: suggested something about the Kennedy assassination that I frankly don't
27:52
Speaker 1: even know what to make of it, except to say
27:55
Speaker 1: that it is in league with a documentary made by
28:03
Speaker 1: my friend writer Lee with Jay Widner about the JFK
28:07
Speaker 1: assassination that some people may have found to be outlandish,
28:13
Speaker 1: But it turns out what's in that documentary might actually
28:15
Speaker 1: be quite close to the truth because Vanity Fair Now
28:19
Speaker 1: has published a huge article about how right before, like
28:24
Speaker 1: a few weeks before Kennedy was killed, there was a
28:31
Speaker 1: video made like a little short sixteen or so minute
28:35
Speaker 1: film by Jackie and by John Kennedy where he faked
28:44
Speaker 1: his assassination. So that compounds the generations of building psychosis, paranoia,
28:52
Speaker 1: and delusion. And if you thought you had the Kennedy
28:57
Speaker 1: story figured out, I mean, this just blows as did JFKX.
29:01
Speaker 1: This just blows it even further out of the water.
29:04
Speaker 1: And probably if you could confirm that this were one
29:09
Speaker 1: hundred percent true, and like Biden or Trump stepped forward
29:13
Speaker 1: as the president and said, actually it's true, Kennedy staged
29:16
Speaker 1: his own death and then he was alive many, you know, weeks,
29:20
Speaker 1: months years after that, people would refuse to believe it,
29:26
Speaker 1: just like they refused to believe that those drones could
29:28
Speaker 1: be drone. They must be alien spaceships. Or there's nothing there,
29:31
Speaker 1: or we are living on the brink or over the
29:37
Speaker 1: brink and falling off the cliff of sanity. We're living
29:40
Speaker 1: beyond sanity. We I mean driven to paranoia and delusion
29:44
Speaker 1: and madness and psychosis. And that is exactly what social
29:48
Speaker 1: engineers and behavioral as psychologists have been pushing since the
29:54
Speaker 1: days of Edward Burne's and the work that he did
29:57
Speaker 1: with corporate America and the military and the government. And
30:01
Speaker 1: we're just seeing a byproduct of that. Netflix is a
30:03
Speaker 1: byproduct of that. Literally, So without further Ado rider Lely
30:08
Speaker 1: my good friend and the as you say, the editor, producer, creator,
30:13
Speaker 1: along with Jay Wider of a Clockwork Shining, which we
30:18
Speaker 1: discussed last night with Clyde Lewis about the psychic looping,
30:22
Speaker 1: and also jfk X, which brings us back to this
30:25
Speaker 1: Vanity Fair article. I wanted to have Writer on the
30:28
Speaker 1: show tonight to discuss all of this, especially because his
30:32
Speaker 1: name was brought up last night on the show with
30:33
Speaker 1: Clyde about the two eighty six enigma. So anyway, Writer,
30:38
Speaker 1: thank you for coming on the show. I know I've
30:40
Speaker 1: spoken for a quarter of the episode already the broadcast,
30:43
Speaker 1: but please introduce yourself and take the floor and comment
30:48
Speaker 1: and elaborate. It's all you, my friend.
30:51
Speaker 2: Thanks so much for having me on. Ryan. Really appreciate it, brother,
30:54
Speaker 2: And that was a fantastic intro. You covered a lot
30:56
Speaker 2: in there, and there's a lot to unpack with this,
30:59
Speaker 2: and I kind of want to start off with the
31:05
Speaker 2: drone type of situation that's going on because I had
31:09
Speaker 2: talked to you earlier this week. Well, it was actually
31:12
Speaker 2: a couple of days ago. I was on Saturday actually,
31:14
Speaker 2: and I was like, well, I just got in contact
31:17
Speaker 2: with this guy that told me that these drones really
31:20
Speaker 2: aren't that there are military craft and they're like scanning
31:24
Speaker 2: for some kind of biological material or some kind of
31:27
Speaker 2: nerve agent or maybe even a nuclear suitcase bomb. And
31:36
Speaker 2: I told you in that in our discussion, I was like,
31:39
Speaker 2: I don't believe this. Obviously, it's just another one of
31:41
Speaker 2: these takes from the conspiracy community. And we actually did
31:45
Speaker 2: a show on You've done a couple of shows on
31:48
Speaker 2: these drones in New Jersey and we did one on
31:52
Speaker 2: my show as well, and if you recall, I was like,
31:56
Speaker 2: I don't think that this is true. I think that
31:58
Speaker 2: this is more made up garbage, And sure enough, I
32:02
Speaker 2: watched this movie on Netflix that just came out on Friday.
32:09
Speaker 2: It's a brand new movie called carry On, which depicts
32:14
Speaker 2: this exact same thing, but without the drones. It's all
32:17
Speaker 2: about this gentleman, this tsa agent, that there's these terrorists
32:22
Speaker 2: that are trying to get this suitcase bomb on this plane.
32:29
Speaker 2: And it turns out that it's not really a bomb.
32:32
Speaker 2: It's like this Russian nerve agent. And literally everything that
32:37
Speaker 2: happens in this movie is what I was being told
32:41
Speaker 2: by this supposed insider that got his information from another
32:46
Speaker 2: supposed insider that probably got his information from another supposed insider, right,
32:51
Speaker 2: And that's how all this stuff goes. It's just and
32:55
Speaker 2: I was like, I was watching it with Sierra last
32:58
Speaker 2: night and I was like, Wow, I cannot believe this.
33:00
Speaker 2: I cannot believe that these people just watched a movie
33:05
Speaker 2: on Friday night that's about a suitcase bomb or in
33:12
Speaker 2: the beginning, you think that it's a nuke, right. They
33:15
Speaker 2: lead you on to believe in the first hour of
33:18
Speaker 2: this movie that it's a nuke that this person is
33:21
Speaker 2: bringing on this plane because it's in like a briefcase
33:24
Speaker 2: and the guy's talking to the TSA agent through an
33:28
Speaker 2: earpiece so that they put on the conveyor belt, and
33:31
Speaker 2: he's telling him to do all these things and that
33:32
Speaker 2: he's going to kill his girlfriend if he doesn't comply,
33:34
Speaker 2: and push this suitcase through the metal detector at the airport,
33:40
Speaker 2: and then you find out that it's a nerve agent.
33:42
Speaker 2: It's a very toxic nerve agent. And these are the
33:46
Speaker 2: exact same types of things that this gentleman was telling
33:50
Speaker 2: me on the phone that was going on, and that
33:53
Speaker 2: he had heard to get duct tape and garbage bags
33:58
Speaker 2: and all this stuff to protect from this chemical that
34:04
Speaker 2: may be released in New Jersey. It's so unbelievable, Ryan,
34:10
Speaker 2: and I'm like, I cannot believe that these people just
34:13
Speaker 2: watch this movie that just came out and then decided
34:17
Speaker 2: to relate that to real life and make it about
34:21
Speaker 2: these This nuclear suitcase is a dirty bomb or whatever,
34:25
Speaker 2: some kind of chemical agent or a nerve gas when
34:29
Speaker 2: it literally came out Friday.
34:32
Speaker 1: Well, even if they were looking for some kind of
34:34
Speaker 1: radioactive material or nuclear signatures, you would just use helicopters.
34:39
Speaker 1: That's what they do for the Super Bowl, and that's
34:41
Speaker 1: done in daylight. They fly helicopters around looking for signatures,
34:45
Speaker 1: whether it's in Tampa, Phoenix, Detroit, wherever the super Bowl is.
34:49
Speaker 1: It's not concealed, it's not hidden. You don't have to
34:52
Speaker 1: have drones flying around at night scaring people to do that.
34:55
Speaker 1: You just do it with a helicopter in broad daylight.
34:57
Speaker 1: Don't even it, don't even make any sense. But yeah,
34:59
Speaker 1: you hear those kind of theories. And just like this
35:02
Speaker 1: movie Homestead that's coming out. Last year, we had Leave
35:05
Speaker 1: the World Behind, we had Fallout, and we had The
35:09
Speaker 1: Creator among other TV shows and movies all about either
35:14
Speaker 1: some kind of into the world scenario which there is
35:17
Speaker 1: a mushroom cloud at the end of Leave the World Behind,
35:21
Speaker 1: or in the case of Fallout, nuclear bombs in La,
35:24
Speaker 1: which is where Fallout originally began in the video game series.
35:27
Speaker 1: And then of course in The Creator, a nuclear bomb
35:30
Speaker 1: hits La and people were saying, that's predictive programming, it's
35:33
Speaker 1: going to happen like really soon. It was all around
35:35
Speaker 1: last year at the same time, autumn Christmas time, and
35:38
Speaker 1: then what happens. We have a year fast forward and
35:44
Speaker 1: now we're around the same time, and now there's a
35:46
Speaker 1: movie Homestead, and people are saying, Oh, it's they're gonna
35:48
Speaker 1: be nukes flying on Christmas. Yeah, if you go to
35:50
Speaker 1: AMC and watch the movie, there'll be nukes flying on Christmas.
35:53
Speaker 1: Because that's a movie, it's not real. That's the delusion rider,
35:59
Speaker 1: the inability to distinguish between Hollywood movies in reality. I
36:03
Speaker 1: understand there's predictive programming, but what you're explaining is another
36:06
Speaker 1: great example of that. A TV show comes out or
36:08
Speaker 1: a movie comes out, and within a few hours, that's
36:12
Speaker 1: the explanation for whatever currently is going on in the world.
36:15
Speaker 2: Yes, it was so unbelievable, dude. I was like watching
36:19
Speaker 2: it and I'm like, holy crap. I just heard this
36:22
Speaker 2: as a real life event that someone told me the
36:26
Speaker 2: day before. And there's no other explanation other than somebody
36:32
Speaker 2: watched this movie when it came out on Friday and
36:34
Speaker 2: then related it to the world event that is happening
36:38
Speaker 2: in New Jersey.
36:39
Speaker 1: With these drones I watched.
36:41
Speaker 2: There's literally no other explanation. It's exact same thing.
36:45
Speaker 1: I watched the Sonic the Hedgehog movie last night and
36:47
Speaker 1: Jim Carrey's character, doctor Robo Profatial whatever his name is,
36:52
Speaker 1: he had he was using drones to track down Sonic,
36:54
Speaker 1: and I was thinking, oh, maybe the drones are being
36:56
Speaker 1: used in New Jersey to track aliens. I could put
36:59
Speaker 1: that online and I could promote it and maybe it
37:01
Speaker 1: would go viral. But I got it from Sonic the Hedgehog.
37:05
Speaker 2: That's exactly what happened with this movie. Carry On. It's
37:09
Speaker 2: literally verbatim. It's got the because I was told that
37:12
Speaker 2: this was involved with the Bricks Nation and it might
37:16
Speaker 2: be also involved with Russia. And mind you, this is
37:18
Speaker 2: a day before I watched this movie, because I didn't
37:21
Speaker 2: even know this movie was out. I was just scanning
37:23
Speaker 2: random apps last night to watch something with my girlfriend
37:27
Speaker 2: and I'd seen that this was a new movie. It's
37:29
Speaker 2: like the number one movie on Netflix now, and I
37:32
Speaker 2: was like, Oh, this looks interesting and then I just
37:34
Speaker 2: play it and I'm like, what is going on here?
37:39
Speaker 2: And it's so mind boggling. Dude, I don't And like
37:43
Speaker 2: I said, I knew that the theory was complete, in
37:46
Speaker 2: total garbage. I even mentioned it to you, and when
37:49
Speaker 2: we were texting back and forth about it, I was like,
37:51
Speaker 2: someone just called me. It's a they're telling me that
37:54
Speaker 2: this is like they're surveilling for some kind of nuclear
37:58
Speaker 2: signature or like some kind of nerve agent, and then
38:02
Speaker 2: maybe the bricks nations are involved, or maybe it's retaliation
38:06
Speaker 2: from Russia from the you know, the the NATO missile stuff.
38:11
Speaker 2: And then this movie is literally about it. It's all
38:14
Speaker 2: about the Russians. The Russians are basically the ones that
38:18
Speaker 2: are involved with taking this briefcase that has this weird
38:24
Speaker 2: nerve agent in it, and then at the end of it,
38:27
Speaker 2: basically it gets sealed in this air tight like seiler
38:32
Speaker 2: and then it gets released. And then but everybody's safe
38:34
Speaker 2: on the plane because it's thrown in this like air
38:36
Speaker 2: tight sealer thing. And this is what this guy was
38:40
Speaker 2: telling me, that, oh, you need to make sure that
38:43
Speaker 2: you're prepared with duct tape because you want to steal
38:45
Speaker 2: off the corners of your doors and steal off your
38:48
Speaker 2: windows and like you'll be protected.
38:50
Speaker 1: That came also that came up on the news back
38:53
Speaker 1: during after nine to eleven. The terrorists we're going to
38:56
Speaker 1: bomb neighborhoods with chemical agents, and we have to put
39:00
Speaker 1: hefty bags over our windows and put duct tape on
39:03
Speaker 1: the outside so that chemicals don't get inside the house.
39:05
Speaker 1: I remember my mom did that. She bought plastic bags
39:08
Speaker 1: and tape, and I don't think she did it to
39:10
Speaker 1: all the windows, but like I remember it being discussed
39:12
Speaker 1: in the house, and that's what the public was terrified of.
39:15
Speaker 1: I mean, it's the same thing with the Battle la
39:17
Speaker 1: in nineteen was in nineteen forty two, forty two forty three,
39:21
Speaker 1: everybody was afraid that the Japanese or maybe even the Germans,
39:24
Speaker 1: We're gonna invade from the west coast, and then we
39:26
Speaker 1: basically shelled our own city because of the paranoia. It's
39:30
Speaker 1: like that Cold warfere.
39:31
Speaker 2: You know what.
39:31
Speaker 1: It reminds me of the drone thing that you're talking about.
39:34
Speaker 1: Reminds me in terms of paranoia. All the different explanations, Right,
39:40
Speaker 1: the Iranians have a mothership of drones, it's the Chinese
39:43
Speaker 1: doing it with their drone swarms. It's alien drones that
39:46
Speaker 1: they reversed engineered from our drones. It's military drones looking
39:50
Speaker 1: for a nuclear signature, all these explanations. You know what
39:52
Speaker 1: that is? That is something that Rod Serling wrote like
39:56
Speaker 1: fifty plus years ago, back in the sixties, that movie
40:01
Speaker 1: TV show, that TV show twilight Zone. Remember Twilight Zone,
40:06
Speaker 1: Remember the episode Monsters Are Due on Maple Street. Remember
40:10
Speaker 1: the famous quote at the end of that episode where
40:13
Speaker 1: the Aliens are standing there on their ship and say,
40:16
Speaker 1: understand how the procedure now works, or how the procedure
40:19
Speaker 1: works now, just stop a few of their machines, their
40:21
Speaker 1: radios and telephones and lawnmowers, throw them into darkness for
40:25
Speaker 1: a few hours, and then sit back and watch the pattern.
40:28
Speaker 1: The either alien says, the pattern's always the same, and
40:31
Speaker 1: the other one says, with a few variations, they pick
40:34
Speaker 1: the most dangerous enemy they can find, and it's themselves.
40:37
Speaker 1: They tore each other apart in that neighborhood writer blaming
40:40
Speaker 1: it on that person and this person and that family
40:43
Speaker 1: and this family, and it's somebody else where. It's aliens
40:45
Speaker 1: from space, And it was aliens from space playing them
40:49
Speaker 1: off against each other. And that's the kind of thing
40:51
Speaker 1: we see with like every every story, everything that happens,
40:55
Speaker 1: it's the Russians, the Iranians, it's the Aliens, it's the
40:58
Speaker 1: deep State. It's the same exact kind of thing, and
41:00
Speaker 1: it drives people mad.
41:04
Speaker 2: It does. It puts people into this paranoia and psychosis
41:08
Speaker 2: that can't otherwise be explained other than driving people into
41:13
Speaker 2: a mental illness, and then we wonder why mental illness
41:17
Speaker 2: is so why people are all of a sudden and
41:23
Speaker 2: starting in like the early two thousands, like mental illness
41:25
Speaker 2: became really bad, and like they have like whole psychiat
41:31
Speaker 2: I mean, we've always had psychiatric treatment centers in the
41:33
Speaker 2: United States, which is just wild. And then you look
41:36
Speaker 2: at the prison population, which is a whole other, you know,
41:39
Speaker 2: different story than what we're talking about. But this is
41:42
Speaker 2: a prime example of us not having the answers to
41:49
Speaker 2: something that we think that we should have the answers to.
41:52
Speaker 2: So therefore we just create the answers on our own.
41:55
Speaker 2: And this has been something that's been happening. Like what
41:58
Speaker 2: you were mentioning with the Ja k assassination is the
42:01
Speaker 2: exact same thing. People don't think that they're getting the
42:05
Speaker 2: real information because it seems so it seems like that
42:08
Speaker 2: they're lying or that they're covering something up. So therefore
42:12
Speaker 2: were trying to create our own theories and our own
42:17
Speaker 2: speculation surrounding what's going on. And this drone thing is
42:21
Speaker 2: a prime example of that. Nobody knows what's going on.
42:24
Speaker 2: There's several conflicting theories. The representatives, the White House representatives,
42:32
Speaker 2: is saying that they don't know what they are, but
42:35
Speaker 2: they're drones. They say, the drone activity, we don't really
42:40
Speaker 2: know what it is, but you just said that it
42:43
Speaker 2: was drone, So what do you mean you don't know
42:45
Speaker 2: what it is? And then they say that it's manned aircraft,
42:48
Speaker 2: and then they say that it's not manned aircraft. So
42:50
Speaker 2: all these conflicting examples of what's going on is creating
42:55
Speaker 2: all this confusion and people no longer know what to believe.
43:00
Speaker 2: That's exactly what Uri Buzmanof was talking about in the
43:03
Speaker 2: early eighties, which is a part of my documentary at
43:05
Speaker 2: Clockwork Shining on Amazon Prime, and also what Barack Obama
43:11
Speaker 2: was also talking about in twenty twenty two or twenty
43:14
Speaker 2: twenty three when he was giving this speech at a university.
43:17
Speaker 2: He was echoing the exact same thing that Ury Buzmanof
43:21
Speaker 2: was talking about in the early eighties. When you flood
43:24
Speaker 2: the public square with all of this information and you
43:27
Speaker 2: create all this confusion and nobody no longer knows what
43:30
Speaker 2: to believe, then you have people exactly where you want them,
43:34
Speaker 2: and that's basically where we are in the United States.
43:39
Speaker 2: Because people they don't want to take the official narrative
43:44
Speaker 2: of anything anymore. And that's for good reason, because there
43:48
Speaker 2: has been a lot of cover up and a lot
43:51
Speaker 2: of not talking and not saying the truth. So it's
43:55
Speaker 2: not unfounded that these people wouldn't trust the official news narrative.
44:00
Speaker 2: But the problem is is that their theories and their
44:04
Speaker 2: conjecture and their hyperbole is actually worse than what the
44:10
Speaker 2: government is saying. Because it does it does create this
44:14
Speaker 2: delusion and this paranoia and this mental psychosis within the
44:20
Speaker 2: person because it's always changing, it's always something more. And
44:23
Speaker 2: people get online and they look up all these different
44:26
Speaker 2: theories and you hear one person it's it's like what
44:31
Speaker 2: you're talking about with these stories and these headlines where
44:35
Speaker 2: the recent shooting today where it said at least two
44:37
Speaker 2: people are dead, and then later on one comes out
44:40
Speaker 2: from Yahoo News and says at least six people are dead.
44:44
Speaker 2: It's the exact same way with the alternative community. And
44:46
Speaker 2: it's the exact same way with just scrolling through social media.
44:51
Speaker 2: I mean, you can find one video on social media
44:55
Speaker 2: about any topic you can be I've used this example
44:57
Speaker 2: a couple of times, but it's worth repeating. Find a
45:01
Speaker 2: short video on Facebook that says eating fruit in the
45:06
Speaker 2: morning is the best thing that you could possibly do.
45:08
Speaker 2: It increases metabolism, it gives you more energy than coffee.
45:12
Speaker 2: It's a it's a very important thing to do. It
45:14
Speaker 2: creates more blood cells in your body. And then you
45:17
Speaker 2: scroll down a few and then there'll be somebody seeing
45:20
Speaker 2: that exact same thing, but that it's the worst thing
45:23
Speaker 2: for you. Oh, don't eat fruit in the morning because
45:26
Speaker 2: fruit will clog up your arteries. It'll it'll make it
45:29
Speaker 2: to where your digestive system isn't working properly. It's the
45:33
Speaker 2: exact same thing. It's done all the time, and it's
45:36
Speaker 2: like this, this do the opposite of whatever the thing is.
45:41
Speaker 2: It's it's unbelievable. I've seen that so many times.
45:44
Speaker 1: That's also something that is well. First of all, that's
45:47
Speaker 1: something that was part of the mind control experiments of
45:52
Speaker 1: the not just mk Ultra, but the subset programs of
45:56
Speaker 1: mk Ultra as well, was the contradictions and all the
46:00
Speaker 1: repetitive things that people were made to listen to for
46:05
Speaker 1: hours or days on end until they were quite literally
46:08
Speaker 1: driven crazy. And that is also something that we found
46:12
Speaker 1: with companies like Coca Cola, companies that want to distort
46:18
Speaker 1: facts and mislead the public. And so they publish fraudulent
46:24
Speaker 1: science that people that buy Coca Cola pay for to
46:29
Speaker 1: mislead the public on basic issues of health. I mean
46:34
Speaker 1: there have been I would call them fake studies done
46:38
Speaker 1: on things along the lines of what you're saying, where
46:41
Speaker 1: there was one that came out a few years ago
46:43
Speaker 1: about how a cheeseburger and a soda was a better
46:47
Speaker 1: workout recovery than water and a protein bar. And how
46:52
Speaker 1: do they come to that conclusion. Well, they base it
46:54
Speaker 1: on some arbitrary thing like calories or something to that effect, right,
47:00
Speaker 1: Or because there's a little protein in this and mixed
47:03
Speaker 1: with the calories, it's better for you. It's it's totally
47:06
Speaker 1: fake and it confuses people to the point where back
47:10
Speaker 1: to my plastic bag example out of Tokyo, I'm not
47:14
Speaker 1: saying that the rest of the world is great and
47:17
Speaker 1: America sucks. I think that it's quite even across the board.
47:20
Speaker 1: The things that are horrible here are balanced out by
47:23
Speaker 1: the things that are good here. But in America we
47:25
Speaker 1: terrify people literally to the point of them committing suicide
47:28
Speaker 1: over climate change or setting themselves on fire over climate change,
47:31
Speaker 1: or gluing themselves to walls in Europe or destroying paintings
47:35
Speaker 1: that were made with plant oil because of climate change.
47:39
Speaker 1: But in Tokyo they're like, well, if plastic is a problem,
47:41
Speaker 1: what is create a plastic that dissolves in the ocean?
47:43
Speaker 1: All right, next problem? What do we do? And we
47:45
Speaker 1: just don't do things like that here, and if we do,
47:47
Speaker 1: it's not reported on. We do things so inefficiently, and
47:50
Speaker 1: we drive people mad with the propaganda and the looping messages,
47:55
Speaker 1: just like in the mk Ultra and the mk Ultra
47:57
Speaker 1: subset programs, where people would be it'd be put in
48:00
Speaker 1: a room, have a helmet put on them, and they
48:01
Speaker 1: would just have the same thing repeated, the same word
48:04
Speaker 1: or the same song, over and over and over again,
48:07
Speaker 1: until it literally drove people insane. And that's what we
48:11
Speaker 1: see with all of this stuff. I mean, even look
48:13
Speaker 1: at look at how the White House last week talked
48:16
Speaker 1: gave their first statement on the drones. The first statement
48:19
Speaker 1: on the drones from the White House was that we
48:21
Speaker 1: have no reports of them being over military basis. There's
48:24
Speaker 1: videos of them over military basis. The military has said
48:27
Speaker 1: they're over military basis, but the White House said, we
48:29
Speaker 1: have no reports of that, but are they not talking
48:31
Speaker 1: to the military. It's the most obvious thing in the world,
48:34
Speaker 1: which is why it has to be. It must be
48:38
Speaker 1: some sort of psychological technique, some sort of behavior modification
48:43
Speaker 1: to encourage people to believe through cognitive dissonance, that these
48:48
Speaker 1: two things can be true that are contradictory at once. Sure,
48:52
Speaker 1: the White House was telling us the truth, they don't
48:55
Speaker 1: have any records of this, but did you hear that
48:57
Speaker 1: there are actually reports over bases? And you're like, but
49:00
Speaker 1: you can't believe both things because they contradict each other.
49:03
Speaker 1: That's what drives people insane. It drives people utterly mad.
49:08
Speaker 1: And it's whether it's the Kennedy assassination we're still discussing,
49:12
Speaker 1: or it's drones, or it's a shooting at this school.
49:15
Speaker 1: There's three people dead, two people dead, six people dead,
49:18
Speaker 1: nobody died, nobody knows what to believe. And I think
49:21
Speaker 1: it goes way beyond I mean, I get the argument
49:25
Speaker 1: and I've made it too writer that a lot of
49:27
Speaker 1: this is just bad reporting, whether it's drones or shootings.
49:30
Speaker 1: But when local lawnsforcement enforcement comes out and says we
49:33
Speaker 1: get a press conference and they say, yeah, five people
49:35
Speaker 1: are dead, and then a few hours later, actually only
49:38
Speaker 1: three people died. Did you resuscitate those.
49:40
Speaker 2: Other two people?
49:41
Speaker 1: That just doesn't make any sense. That's not bad reporting,
49:43
Speaker 1: that's intentional to mislead and distort what actually happened. As
49:50
Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned, I think that everything I've mentioned
49:53
Speaker 1: in my opening segment and just the things that you've
49:55
Speaker 1: brought up so far, I think that we're onto a larger,
50:00
Speaker 1: more disturbing reality here. And as we come up on
50:06
Speaker 1: the halfway point of the show tonight, we don't need
50:09
Speaker 1: to take a break. We can just pause for a
50:11
Speaker 1: moment let people know that this is the Secret Teachings Radio.
50:14
Speaker 1: I'm Ryan Gable. I have rider Lee here with me,
50:17
Speaker 1: a good friend, but also the I guess you could
50:20
Speaker 1: say what producer editor of JFKX and a clockwork Shining,
50:25
Speaker 1: which both go together well. In regard to tonight's show
50:29
Speaker 1: and this new Vanity Fair article about the Kennedy assassination
50:33
Speaker 1: and how well he made like a video a few
50:36
Speaker 1: weeks before about faking his assassination, I mean, that's just
50:41
Speaker 1: it just adds more feel to the fire and inflames
50:43
Speaker 1: the conspiracies even more.
50:46
Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely, And this Vanity Fair article really caught me
50:50
Speaker 2: off guard. And because literally a day before I found
50:55
Speaker 2: out about this Vanity Fair article, someone I had mentioned
51:00
Speaker 2: to me about Elvis and how, you know, some shady
51:05
Speaker 2: stuff might be might have happened with Elvis, and someone apparently,
51:11
Speaker 2: you know, uncovered some declassified documents that Elvis might have
51:18
Speaker 2: been in h what is that call when you're under
51:22
Speaker 2: protection from witness protection? Yeah, that Elvis was in some
51:27
Speaker 2: kind of witness protection program and that something might have
51:32
Speaker 2: happened to where he needed to fake his death. Which
51:36
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that that's fact or whatever. It's just interesting.
51:41
Speaker 2: And then someone told me it was like, wouldn't it
51:43
Speaker 2: be wild if you know, something came out about JFK
51:49
Speaker 2: like around this thing that really, you know, confirms what
51:53
Speaker 2: jfk X, your documentary that you did with Jay Wiener
51:57
Speaker 2: was really about. Like, Yeah, that would be wild, like that,
52:02
Speaker 2: that would be you know, crazy a thing to happen,
52:06
Speaker 2: because you know what we would we would for sure
52:09
Speaker 2: be superstars, We would be freaking unbelievably famous if that were.
52:15
Speaker 2: And I'm not saying that I want that, I'm just
52:16
Speaker 2: saying that if it did come out in some kind
52:20
Speaker 2: of document that JFK did indeed fake his death on
52:26
Speaker 2: November twenty second, nineteen sixty three, then we would people
52:32
Speaker 2: would be reaching out to us. Put it that way, right,
52:35
Speaker 2: And because a lot of people thought that the JFK
52:38
Speaker 2: acts the movie, they really liked it, and some people
52:42
Speaker 2: really liked it and they enjoyed it, and they thought
52:44
Speaker 2: that it was good and it was a solid theory
52:47
Speaker 2: because we do provide, you know, quite a bit of
52:49
Speaker 2: evidence to what actually was going on in this a
52:52
Speaker 2: Bruder film. Some people were like, this is a very
52:57
Speaker 2: outlandish theory. It's not rooted in reality. And some people
53:03
Speaker 2: would watched it and really good friends of mine, I've
53:07
Speaker 2: watched it and refuse to bring me on the show
53:11
Speaker 2: because they thought that it was so ridiculous and out landish. Well,
53:14
Speaker 2: it's not looking so ridiculous and outlandish now, right, because
53:19
Speaker 2: this Vanity Fair article comes out and reveals that there
53:24
Speaker 2: was a e motion picture which was roughly around sixteen
53:29
Speaker 2: minutes long, which was shot on the weekend of September
53:33
Speaker 2: twenty first and twenty second of nineteen sixty three, and
53:37
Speaker 2: the footage has Kennedy and his family and a few
53:41
Speaker 2: friends basically doing a fake assassination of JFK, which involves
53:50
Speaker 2: the exact same Secret Service agents that were involved in
53:55
Speaker 2: the motorcade in Dallas in Dealey Plaza, UH November twenty second,
54:02
Speaker 2: nineteen sixty three. And this was just two months prior
54:07
Speaker 2: to the supposed real assassination taking place. And this article
54:12
Speaker 2: is really really interesting.
54:14
Speaker 1: That's all in the article too. You're not making links
54:17
Speaker 1: or connections. I read it. That's in the Vanity Fair
54:19
Speaker 1: article from like mid to late November of this year.
54:25
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it was mind blowing to me because I'm like,
54:28
Speaker 2: holy crowd, why would this just now be why would
54:33
Speaker 2: this be coming out now? Like? Why now? Why this
54:35
Speaker 2: Vanity Fair article? Now that JFK and his wife Jackie,
54:42
Speaker 2: Which is another really interesting part of this article is
54:45
Speaker 2: that the things that I didn't know about, which was
54:48
Speaker 2: apparently Jackie was really interested in film and like French film,
54:53
Speaker 2: and she always wanted to be a filmmaker, like and
54:57
Speaker 2: I had no one had known anything about that. And
55:01
Speaker 2: it turns out that she made the sixteen minute footage
55:05
Speaker 2: of JFK being fake assassinated, and she told the Secret
55:10
Speaker 2: Service agents to pull up to their house and act
55:14
Speaker 2: as if they had heard gunshots.
55:19
Speaker 1: Didn't they find him on the floor in the in
55:21
Speaker 1: the house, like catch up on his body or something.
55:24
Speaker 2: Yes, they put ketch up on his body. They made
55:27
Speaker 2: it look like that he had been assassinated in this
55:31
Speaker 2: fake assassination video that Jackie made.
55:36
Speaker 1: I think it's important to pause for a moment and
55:41
Speaker 1: to just confirm, as you as an audience or listening
55:47
Speaker 1: to this, that this is not speculation. This is not
55:52
Speaker 1: from writer's film like this is JFKX. This is a
55:57
Speaker 1: Vanity Fair article they're referencing. You can find this actually
56:02
Speaker 1: on the website of the JFK library. You can find
56:07
Speaker 1: the references. It's a very good article. The reference is
56:11
Speaker 1: to all of this is in the article and the
56:14
Speaker 1: connections and links this has too. The film that writer
56:17
Speaker 1: and Jay Wider made is really quite truly stunning, and
56:22
Speaker 1: it is part of a long series of theories and
56:25
Speaker 1: hypotheses and studies and research on JFK things that have
56:30
Speaker 1: over the decades and generations, led to generation after generation
56:34
Speaker 1: not only being I guess in a way even inspired by,
56:38
Speaker 1: but certainly traumatized by the Kennedy assassination. Even if it
56:42
Speaker 1: were a literal assassination. They blew his head off. As
56:45
Speaker 1: the story goes, whoever it was, Oswald, the CIA, the Mafia, whatever.
56:50
Speaker 1: That alone is traumatizing to a country. But if he
56:53
Speaker 1: had faked his death, that's a completely different thing that
57:00
Speaker 1: I don't even know. After fifteen years of radio, I
57:03
Speaker 1: don't even know how to address that. It creates a
57:07
Speaker 1: whole nother personality almost, which is what trauma usually does.
57:12
Speaker 1: It becomes so unbearable that the mind splits, and I'm
57:18
Speaker 1: trying to stop my mind from splitting over this issue.
57:23
Speaker 1: You don't you know what I mean.
57:24
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's exactly what's going on. And we point out
57:27
Speaker 2: a lot of this within our movie JFKX, which you
57:30
Speaker 2: can get you can watch for free on Amazon Prime
57:34
Speaker 2: and on two b and a few other streaming platforms,
57:38
Speaker 2: And we talk about the Zubruder film because there's a
57:41
Speaker 2: lot of interesting things that I don't think a lot
57:46
Speaker 2: of people ever notice about the Zubruder film. And we
57:51
Speaker 2: have the most clearest version of the Zabruta film ever
57:54
Speaker 2: made in our documentary, and you can see that there's
57:59
Speaker 2: something on the side of JFK's face whenever he whenever
58:03
Speaker 2: the limousine emerges from behind the Stimmins Freeway sign there
58:07
Speaker 2: where there's a cut in the film where some seconds
58:13
Speaker 2: of the footage has been cut out, which is conveniently.
58:18
Speaker 2: When he goes behind the sign, it looks like he
58:22
Speaker 2: brings his hands up, and this is a part where
58:24
Speaker 2: people think that it's that he got shot in the neck,
58:28
Speaker 2: but he doesn't grab his neck. He actually puts his
58:32
Speaker 2: hands up to his face. And then when he brings
58:35
Speaker 2: his hands down from his face, there's something on the
58:39
Speaker 2: right side of his face that is bulging out of
58:42
Speaker 2: his face. It's clear as day in the Zubruder film.
58:46
Speaker 2: And then that's when his head supposedly explodes. So for
58:53
Speaker 2: people that haven't, you know, watched the movie, I don't
58:56
Speaker 2: want to completely ruin the movie for everyone, but that
59:02
Speaker 2: thing on the side of JFK's face is the most
59:07
Speaker 2: damning piece of evidence because there's something bulging from his face.
59:11
Speaker 2: And then it's just a coincidence to Ryan that on
59:15
Speaker 2: that same day that a police officer, JD. Tibbitt, which
59:22
Speaker 2: looks almost identical to JFK. His nickname was JFK because
59:27
Speaker 2: he looks so similar to JFK. On the Dallas Police
59:31
Speaker 2: Force also gets shot and killed. Now, and that was
59:37
Speaker 2: the reason that supposedly Lee Harvey Oswald got arrested. He
59:43
Speaker 2: was originally arrested for the murder of JD. Tippett, which
59:49
Speaker 2: looks identical to JFK. We have a split photo in
59:53
Speaker 2: the movie of JD. Tippett and JFK. And if you
59:56
Speaker 2: didn't know that there were two different people, you would
59:58
Speaker 2: think that they're the exact same person. And that's what
1:00:04
Speaker 2: Oswald was talking about in these in the public what
1:00:11
Speaker 2: is it called when you're like a public speaking or
1:00:15
Speaker 2: the press conference, he says that I've been accused of
1:00:19
Speaker 2: killing a police officer, which I have no idea about,
1:00:24
Speaker 2: and then the public then goes on to accuse him
1:00:29
Speaker 2: of killing the president. And you can see in the
1:00:33
Speaker 2: footage of the press conference that Oswald didn't even know
1:00:36
Speaker 2: that the president had been shot and killed. Yeah, he
1:00:39
Speaker 2: was shocked by that fact that the president had been
1:00:43
Speaker 2: shot and killed.
1:00:44
Speaker 1: I remember speaking to Jim Mars about that years ago too. Yeah,
1:00:47
Speaker 1: Oswald seemed like he had no idea what had happened.
1:00:50
Speaker 1: In fact, this Luigi Mangiona guy reacted the exact same
1:00:53
Speaker 1: way to being arrested, and then when he got out
1:00:56
Speaker 1: of the car for the first time, he acted like
1:00:58
Speaker 1: he didn't only did he not do it. Okay, maybe
1:01:01
Speaker 1: he's just protesting, but he acted like he didn't know
1:01:04
Speaker 1: what happened. And he was even screaming that this whole
1:01:09
Speaker 1: thing with his arrest is just a giant insult to
1:01:11
Speaker 1: the American people. I'm not saying he wasn't involved, but
1:01:13
Speaker 1: I'm saying it's a similar kind of a thing. And
1:01:16
Speaker 1: then whoever the real people, Like in the James Holmes case,
1:01:18
Speaker 1: four people were reported in the theater and then James
1:01:21
Speaker 1: Holmes is in his car drugged up when the police arrived.
1:01:24
Speaker 1: He didn't try to run, he didn't get rid of
1:01:26
Speaker 1: the guns, and the people said there were four people.
1:01:28
Speaker 1: In the media said no, it was one person. Him,
1:01:30
Speaker 1: He's responsible, he did it. It's a similar thing with Oswald.
1:01:34
Speaker 2: And it's the same way with the Vegas shooting as well.
1:01:38
Speaker 2: Oh yeah about the identical thing, Like people were claiming
1:01:42
Speaker 2: that there were several shooters there and then the media
1:01:45
Speaker 2: comes on and is like, all, it was only one
1:01:47
Speaker 2: and he was at in the hotel room shooting out
1:01:49
Speaker 2: of the window.
1:01:50
Speaker 1: Yep, and a woman ran into the crowd screaming this
1:01:52
Speaker 1: was official, like ap women ran in the crowd saying
1:01:56
Speaker 1: they're going to start shooting. They're going to shoot. You
1:01:57
Speaker 1: have to get out of here to everybody leave, and
1:01:59
Speaker 1: they like security dragged her out of the crowd and
1:02:02
Speaker 1: then pop pop pop pop pop pop hop pop pop pop,
1:02:04
Speaker 1: and that story disappeared from the press. And the same
1:02:07
Speaker 1: way that I knew people that were either in Vegas
1:02:10
Speaker 1: or I know people whose family were in Vegas at
1:02:13
Speaker 1: the Blaggio up the road and there were bullet holes
1:02:16
Speaker 1: in the lobby of the Bellagio. Something had went down there.
1:02:18
Speaker 1: They locked people in one of the ballrooms to protect them,
1:02:21
Speaker 1: and that didn't really make any of the news. All
1:02:24
Speaker 1: of this is so incredibly selective. I mean, like when
1:02:28
Speaker 1: the airbrush photos of victims or airbrush photos of assailants
1:02:32
Speaker 1: to make it a black white issue or a wealthy
1:02:35
Speaker 1: poor issue, or this is all a matter of psychological programming, conditioning, experimentation,
1:02:45
Speaker 1: behavior modification. It really does you have to put I
1:02:50
Speaker 1: really have to put the brakes on and stop and
1:02:52
Speaker 1: just like whatever you're saying, whatever I'm thinking, I'm trying
1:02:56
Speaker 1: to repeat it again because it sounds so unbeli leavable,
1:03:01
Speaker 1: but it's all incredibly verified, verifiable. It's the Vanity Fair
1:03:06
Speaker 1: article is not something you or Jay Widner wrote, but
1:03:09
Speaker 1: it's essentially confirming conceptually what your documentary JFKX was about.
1:03:14
Speaker 1: I'm still baffled by it.
1:03:16
Speaker 2: I'm completely shocked. And thus the thing is like, well,
1:03:20
Speaker 2: why would they even do this, Why would they do
1:03:24
Speaker 2: this fake assassination to begin with? And an explanation that
1:03:30
Speaker 2: I've come up with is that this was like a
1:03:33
Speaker 2: trial run. This was a trial run before the very public.
1:03:39
Speaker 1: When was when was the film shot by Jackie? Was
1:03:42
Speaker 1: in September correct.
1:03:43
Speaker 2: Yes, two months before the supposed real assassination, so it
1:03:48
Speaker 2: was in September twenty first and September twenty second.
1:03:53
Speaker 1: That is very reminiscent of what happened on the well,
1:03:59
Speaker 1: what happened on nine to Zeve in the United States,
1:04:01
Speaker 1: and also what happened in I believe it was London
1:04:04
Speaker 1: with the seven to seven bombings, where they had teams
1:04:08
Speaker 1: of people law enforcement preparing for bombs to go off
1:04:13
Speaker 1: when they actually went off, but it was just a
1:04:15
Speaker 1: training exercise. Same thing with that famous I mean, it's
1:04:19
Speaker 1: more than just the audio clip. But that famous audio
1:04:21
Speaker 1: clip of air traffic control do we have is this
1:04:24
Speaker 1: real world or exercise? Because they were running exercises of
1:04:27
Speaker 1: been happening in the morning when it was happening to
1:04:29
Speaker 1: confuse radar operators and when you have basically training. I
1:04:34
Speaker 1: mean not every tabletop exercise is a predictive thing that
1:04:38
Speaker 1: you're going to see whatever's being talked about during the
1:04:41
Speaker 1: tabletop actually happened. But you do get very strange things
1:04:45
Speaker 1: like Event two to one, about two months before a
1:04:48
Speaker 1: coronavirus pandemic goes live. There are some really bizarre things
1:04:53
Speaker 1: that I do not believe are coincidental. There are coincidences,
1:05:00
Speaker 1: but a lot of this I don't think it's coincidental.
1:05:03
Speaker 1: I mean, this isn't some random person. This is John F.
1:05:07
Speaker 1: Kennedy and Jackie joined it two months before what happened in.
1:05:12
Speaker 2: Dallas, that's right. And the article also talks about you
1:05:16
Speaker 2: know Paul Landis, which Paul Landis came out like right
1:05:20
Speaker 2: after our documentary launched, which was so wild that all
1:05:25
Speaker 2: of the like all of a sudden, all these major
1:05:29
Speaker 2: streaming services wanted to do documentaries and shows on JFK,
1:05:35
Speaker 2: which was for the sixtieth anniversary, but they never done
1:05:38
Speaker 2: that any other year prior. There wasn't any big documentaries
1:05:44
Speaker 2: surrounding the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of JFK. There
1:05:49
Speaker 2: wasn't any documentaries or all these you know, Netflix and
1:05:54
Speaker 2: all this stuff doing anything for it for the year
1:05:56
Speaker 2: prior for the fifty ninth anniversary. But all of a sudden,
1:06:00
Speaker 2: one of our movie hits three to four months later,
1:06:04
Speaker 2: boom boom boom, boom boom, everyone's doing these JFK documentaries. Now,
1:06:09
Speaker 2: Hulu did one, Paramount Plus did one, and it just
1:06:12
Speaker 2: like all over the place. And within all of that,
1:06:15
Speaker 2: this gentleman which was a secret Service agent, Paul Landis,
1:06:19
Speaker 2: which he was also involved with this fake assassination that
1:06:23
Speaker 2: was filmed two months or earlier by Jackie Kennedy. He
1:06:28
Speaker 2: came out and said that he was the one that
1:06:30
Speaker 2: planted the magic bullet on JFK Stretcher.
1:06:34
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I remember that, Okay, So.
1:06:37
Speaker 2: A secret service in this magic bullet has been the
1:06:40
Speaker 2: contention of the JFK assassination for decades since it happened,
1:06:45
Speaker 2: and the Warren Commission's official statements on the JFK assassination
1:06:50
Speaker 2: all revolve around this magic bullet. And Landis comes out
1:06:55
Speaker 2: sixty years later and says that he had found an
1:07:00
Speaker 2: intact bullet, okay, in the limousine of JFK, and then
1:07:05
Speaker 2: picked up that intact bullet and put it on the
1:07:09
Speaker 2: stretcher of JFK whenever he was being transported to the
1:07:12
Speaker 2: hospital after this supposed assassination. Yes, yeah, and he didn't
1:07:16
Speaker 2: tell anybody about this, okay, and in the magic bullet.
1:07:20
Speaker 2: And that's the entire theory of the magic bullet theory.
1:07:24
Speaker 2: That's what it was all about. That was what revolved
1:07:26
Speaker 2: around the entire Warren Commission, was this magic bullet theory.
1:07:29
Speaker 2: And it turned out that Paul Landis, the secret Service agent,
1:07:32
Speaker 2: picked up evidence out of the back of the limousine
1:07:35
Speaker 2: and just happened to throw it on JFK stretcher and
1:07:37
Speaker 2: didn't tell anyone about it.
1:07:38
Speaker 1: That's as convenient and bizarre as finding a passport for
1:07:42
Speaker 1: a hijacker and a plane that exploded in Bluetoo towers
1:07:45
Speaker 1: up on the ground as an FBI agent.
1:07:47
Speaker 2: Yes, that's the exact same things, the exact same type
1:07:51
Speaker 2: of coincidence, right.
1:07:53
Speaker 1: Yeah, Oh my god, we know that they were Muslims.
1:07:55
Speaker 1: How do you know that we found kurans next to
1:07:57
Speaker 1: flight manuals in the car?
1:08:00
Speaker 2: Convenient, so convenient. And I'm like, well, that one, that's
1:08:05
Speaker 2: against the law to do. That's tampering with evidence, especially
1:08:09
Speaker 2: not telling anyone. So Paul Landis, I mean, he's really
1:08:11
Speaker 2: old now, but he should be prosecuted.
1:08:17
Speaker 1: So called Nazi prison guards, then they should prosecute him too.
1:08:22
Speaker 2: I mean, that's a clear tampering with evidence, because that
1:08:26
Speaker 2: whole magic bullet theory has been the contention of the
1:08:29
Speaker 2: entire JFK assassination, which informed the Warrant Commission on their
1:08:34
Speaker 2: official reporting of it, because they couldn't explain how the
1:08:38
Speaker 2: bullet got there on a stretcher, and then they created
1:08:41
Speaker 2: this whole theory about the magic bullet.
1:08:44
Speaker 1: This whole story of JFK from the very beginning. It
1:08:46
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter, I guess ultimately, regardless of what happened,
1:08:51
Speaker 1: I should say, it doesn't really matter what happened. The
1:08:54
Speaker 1: result is the same. If it comes out tomorrow officially
1:08:57
Speaker 1: that by some waving of a magic wand we can
1:09:00
Speaker 1: confirm that, okay, the War and Commission was right, or
1:09:04
Speaker 1: if we can find by the waven of a magic Wanda. Okay,
1:09:06
Speaker 1: writer and Jay were right and JFKX and this Vanity
1:09:09
Speaker 1: Fair article kind of alludes to that. In a sense.
1:09:13
Speaker 1: The result is the same, a traumatized public. And when
1:09:18
Speaker 1: people experience trauma, I mean, it's not like your dog dying,
1:09:23
Speaker 1: or really even your wife or husband dying. It's arguably
1:09:26
Speaker 1: worse than that. This is a president, as someone who
1:09:31
Speaker 1: well on TV for the first time, was quite literally
1:09:34
Speaker 1: the face of a nation, who was respected even by
1:09:38
Speaker 1: his opponents to a large degree, with the exception of
1:09:41
Speaker 1: some people that really hated him. This was one of
1:09:45
Speaker 1: the most traumatic things that happened in American history. The
1:09:48
Speaker 1: results of that echo through generations, and it contributes to
1:09:53
Speaker 1: the overall delusional state of Americans and increasingly paranoid state
1:09:59
Speaker 1: of Americans generation of a generation of generation. Ultimately, regardless
1:10:04
Speaker 1: of if he faked his death or he really was
1:10:07
Speaker 1: shot by Oswald, the result is still the same.
1:10:10
Speaker 2: Yeah, the trauma has already been done. It's just so
1:10:15
Speaker 2: wild that this, you know, really comes out now ahead
1:10:20
Speaker 2: of Trump being inaugurated in a couple of weeks now,
1:10:27
Speaker 2: all around three weeks He's going to be inaugurated and
1:10:31
Speaker 2: be the president again, and he is, you know, stated
1:10:35
Speaker 2: several times that he is going to release the entire
1:10:41
Speaker 2: you know, all the JFK files, which regardless of he
1:10:45
Speaker 2: does or he doesn't, he said that the first time.
1:10:46
Speaker 2: He didn't end up doing it. He released some of them,
1:10:48
Speaker 2: he didn't release all of them. And that's kind of
1:10:51
Speaker 2: our contention within our documentary is, you know, why didn't
1:10:55
Speaker 2: he release all of the JFK files, Like, is there
1:11:00
Speaker 2: something in there that's so devastating that if the American
1:11:04
Speaker 2: public found out about it, that it would you know,
1:11:08
Speaker 2: not be good.
1:11:10
Speaker 1: It might actually cause another successive number of generations of trauma,
1:11:15
Speaker 1: restart the trauma over again.
1:11:17
Speaker 2: That's right, And that was our contention within the movie
1:11:22
Speaker 2: is that, you know, we theorize that it's maybe something
1:11:27
Speaker 2: even more nefarious that's in these JFK files that people
1:11:34
Speaker 2: that we talk about within our movie JFK X, and
1:11:38
Speaker 2: that may be a possibility, and that may be why
1:11:42
Speaker 2: that this Vanity Fair article comes out now because it
1:11:45
Speaker 2: comes out ahead of Trump getting back in the office
1:11:50
Speaker 2: and possibly releasing these files, So they want to kind
1:11:54
Speaker 2: of warm the public up to the fact that JFK
1:12:00
Speaker 2: may have indeed faked as death.
1:12:05
Speaker 1: I also read was it Sunday about the Biden administration.
1:12:12
Speaker 1: This might seem unrelated, but hear me out. The Bided
1:12:15
Speaker 1: administration is pushing back Peiser and Maderna potential lawsuits for
1:12:23
Speaker 1: another five or so years, like twenty twenty nine, twenty thirty.
1:12:27
Speaker 2: Yeah, didn't he completely shield them from.
1:12:30
Speaker 1: Prosecution yep, until which I don't think the president has
1:12:34
Speaker 1: authority to do that. But that's a whole other thing. Yeah,
1:12:37
Speaker 1: until twenty twenty nine, two thousand thirty. And that is
1:12:41
Speaker 1: very similar to how Peiser, specifically Pfiser, but also Maderna,
1:12:48
Speaker 1: they had requested from courts that the actual evidence of
1:12:53
Speaker 1: safe and effective would not be released until well, they said,
1:12:59
Speaker 1: seventy five years from the time of the vaccines.
1:13:02
Speaker 2: Realy not right, so pretty much by the time everybody
1:13:05
Speaker 2: is dead, then then they'll roll out with all the
1:13:09
Speaker 2: information about the.
1:13:10
Speaker 1: Vaccines precisely, which reeks of the same tactics that we
1:13:15
Speaker 1: see with JFK. Now, fast forwarding sixty sixty years.
1:13:21
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm in my thirties already, so seventy five years,
1:13:25
Speaker 2: that's going to make me what one hundred and ten,
1:13:27
Speaker 2: like over one hundred and ten, I'm not going to
1:13:29
Speaker 2: be alive by in seventy five.
1:13:31
Speaker 1: Years, and anybody who was alive is either going to
1:13:36
Speaker 1: be dead or so old that it will no longer
1:13:38
Speaker 1: matter executed, or it won't matter. And it's a very
1:13:42
Speaker 1: similar thing to JFK. I mean, my goodness, we're just now,
1:13:46
Speaker 1: like in the two thousands being a I don't well,
1:13:50
Speaker 1: I don't know, because I didn't live in the early
1:13:52
Speaker 1: twentieth century. But it wasn't really common knowledge until relatively
1:13:57
Speaker 1: recently that the Alfa Tonkin incident was staged, or that
1:14:02
Speaker 1: the Lusitania was not just sunk by German U boats,
1:14:06
Speaker 1: but it was well. The Germans tried to take out
1:14:09
Speaker 1: newspaper warnings all across the US. Only one newspaper allowed
1:14:15
Speaker 1: the Germans to take out a warning in the newspaper
1:14:17
Speaker 1: that said, do not get on any ships that are
1:14:19
Speaker 1: selling into waters of war, because we will destroy them.
1:14:23
Speaker 1: Whether they are yours or anybody else's, we can't distinguish,
1:14:28
Speaker 1: and just don't do it. We don't want war with you.
1:14:31
Speaker 1: But newspapers refused to publish that because guess what, powerful
1:14:35
Speaker 1: people in this country did want war with Germany, And
1:14:37
Speaker 1: so the Lusitania was sunk, and that included lots of
1:14:41
Speaker 1: kids and lots of American citizens, And there was ammunitions
1:14:44
Speaker 1: on that ship, munitions on that ship going to Europe,
1:14:46
Speaker 1: and that was against the neutrality stance the US took it.
1:14:49
Speaker 1: We're just learning now about that kind of stuff. We're
1:14:53
Speaker 1: just learning now about this JFK video that has it's
1:14:58
Speaker 1: been sitting there the whole time since nineteen sixty three,
1:15:03
Speaker 1: ye sixty one years ago. Nobody's seen it, nobody's nobody's
1:15:07
Speaker 1: But now we have a little bit of coverage of
1:15:10
Speaker 1: it and it goes along with writers JFKX documentary. And
1:15:15
Speaker 1: I mean, personally, I don't really think Trump's going to
1:15:17
Speaker 1: do anything. If he does, okay, great, if he doesn't,
1:15:19
Speaker 1: it's par for the chorus. But the fact is, like
1:15:23
Speaker 1: I can't really dispute this, not that I want to.
1:15:25
Speaker 1: I don't really know what to make of it. I'm
1:15:27
Speaker 1: not on any side of this. I'm just kind of
1:15:30
Speaker 1: sitting back and watching how I truly do not have
1:15:35
Speaker 1: the vocabulary to express how I feel about it. Writer,
1:15:38
Speaker 1: Like my mind really is in the process of splitting.
1:15:41
Speaker 1: I don't so I can't imagine what this would be
1:15:44
Speaker 1: like to the average person who is like, yep, the
1:15:46
Speaker 1: Warrant Commission and yep the nine to eleven Commission, and
1:15:48
Speaker 1: I trust whatever the news tells me. What happens. When
1:15:51
Speaker 1: the news tells you, oh yeah, by the way, all
1:15:54
Speaker 1: that stuff about Hitler that was wrong, and all that
1:15:57
Speaker 1: stuff about Kennedy that was wrong, how is the public
1:16:00
Speaker 1: going to respond to that kind of thing? Because we
1:16:02
Speaker 1: are learning that about Hitler, more and more people are realizing,
1:16:05
Speaker 1: wait a minute, Hitler bad guy. But he's doing he
1:16:08
Speaker 1: did the exact same thing that now the conservatives and
1:16:12
Speaker 1: real Americans want to get rid of legal immigration pornography,
1:16:15
Speaker 1: and that's what Hitler did. We're learning that maybe history
1:16:18
Speaker 1: isn't what we thought it was, and we're learning that
1:16:21
Speaker 1: some of the most important events and the biggest assassinations
1:16:25
Speaker 1: and some of the most evil people everything's kind of
1:16:30
Speaker 1: not accurate. And not just because all victors write the
1:16:34
Speaker 1: history books, but because there were concerted efforts to conceal
1:16:38
Speaker 1: that information from the public, and that there are major
1:16:42
Speaker 1: conspiracies to prevent the public from learning these details about history.
1:16:49
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I just want to clearly state Hitler bad guy.
1:16:53
Speaker 2: Naz to Germany, bad guy, Okay, but uh, I think
1:17:00
Speaker 2: that it doesn't. The game here is that when enough
1:17:06
Speaker 2: time passes between an event, then things can be gone
1:17:10
Speaker 2: back and like revised. Right. It's kind of like what
1:17:13
Speaker 2: you were talking about earlier. And I've said this a
1:17:15
Speaker 2: few times on my show as well. It's like, well,
1:17:17
Speaker 2: if they were to come out and say that, oh, yeah,
1:17:19
Speaker 2: guess what the faking of the moon landing, We really
1:17:21
Speaker 2: did fake the footage. The footage was absolutely one hundred
1:17:25
Speaker 2: percent fake, Like, would that really have an impact on
1:17:29
Speaker 2: people because people already believe that the footage was faked.
1:17:36
Speaker 1: Maybe it would, really, like I said, reignite the trauma though,
1:17:38
Speaker 1: because people that believe that already are going to say,
1:17:41
Speaker 1: oh my god, see I've been saying this, this is true,
1:17:43
Speaker 1: and other people might have a hard time believing it.
1:17:45
Speaker 1: It would reignite the conversation at the very least, which
1:17:48
Speaker 1: would create more conflict and more more people would experience
1:17:52
Speaker 1: more trauma as a result of that. You then need
1:17:55
Speaker 1: to ask the question, like, can you even trust if
1:17:58
Speaker 1: an official government report came out and say, yeah, we
1:18:00
Speaker 1: faked the moon landing. Kennedy faked his assassination and we
1:18:04
Speaker 1: probably should have destroyed communism in Russia rather than the
1:18:07
Speaker 1: Nazism in Germany. Like, if those things were publicly spoken about,
1:18:11
Speaker 1: especially the first two things, people would not be able
1:18:14
Speaker 1: to deal with it. And even if those were things
1:18:17
Speaker 1: that were acknowledged, or how can you trust the government anyway.
1:18:20
Speaker 1: That's what we're dealing with with the UFO drone thing
1:18:22
Speaker 1: right now. We want the government to acknowledge that aliens
1:18:25
Speaker 1: are real, and there's kind of like a hinting at that,
1:18:28
Speaker 1: and people don't believe it anyway, or they believe it
1:18:30
Speaker 1: absolutely and they make it into some new conspiracy. Like
1:18:34
Speaker 1: that's part of again what I was saying, with the
1:18:36
Speaker 1: delusion and the paranoia, you don't know what to believe,
1:18:40
Speaker 1: who to trust.
1:18:41
Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's a part of the rock and the
1:18:43
Speaker 2: hard place the government is in and allowing a lot
1:18:47
Speaker 2: of these theories to continuously go on one unchecked. I
1:18:53
Speaker 2: mean from your Clyde show yesterday. But you were saying
1:18:59
Speaker 2: that the government loves conspiracy theories, and I believe that
1:19:04
Speaker 2: they do because they would rather have the public believing
1:19:08
Speaker 2: that those drones in over New Jersey are alien drones
1:19:14
Speaker 2: then really what might actually be taking place.
1:19:19
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm glad you brought that back up. I wanted
1:19:21
Speaker 1: to ask you a question about the drones as it
1:19:23
Speaker 1: relates to all of this paranoia and whatnot. You had
1:19:27
Speaker 1: mentioned the well you said you had someone tell you,
1:19:31
Speaker 1: and then you had mentioned the radiation suitcase bomb or
1:19:37
Speaker 1: suitcase nuke or chemicals whatever, and that's what the drones
1:19:40
Speaker 1: were looking for. Someone sent me this, and I don't
1:19:46
Speaker 1: even if I could confirm that it was true. I'm
1:19:49
Speaker 1: sure it probably is true. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Okay,
1:19:52
Speaker 1: So whether it's true or not, it has the same
1:19:54
Speaker 1: effect confirm that there was radioactive material lost in transit
1:19:59
Speaker 1: between facilities recently, and they said that this was in
1:20:03
Speaker 1: New Jersey. And so somebody sent me this and said, well,
1:20:06
Speaker 1: you're wrong about the radiation and the drones. The drones
1:20:09
Speaker 1: are looking for radioactive material, because that's see, that's the conspiracy,
1:20:13
Speaker 1: like you had mentioned, and that's what people in the
1:20:15
Speaker 1: alternative community want to believe. But then I read the
1:20:19
Speaker 1: thing that the person sent me this article about it,
1:20:21
Speaker 1: and apparently the report of the missing material was like December. Second,
1:20:27
Speaker 1: the drones have been flying around there for months in
1:20:30
Speaker 1: the current capacity, So how could something that goes missing
1:20:33
Speaker 1: after the fact be the reason for something. It's like
1:20:36
Speaker 1: retro causality. Something that happened in December is responsible for
1:20:40
Speaker 1: something that happened in November of the same year. And
1:20:46
Speaker 1: the people that are sending me this, it's in the
1:20:48
Speaker 1: description of what they're sending me that it began on
1:20:50
Speaker 1: December second. December third is when the material went missing.
1:20:53
Speaker 1: So how can they drones be looking for material that
1:20:55
Speaker 1: went missing in December if they started back in November.
1:20:57
Speaker 1: None of this stuff makes or October September, October, none
1:21:00
Speaker 1: of it makes any sense.
1:21:03
Speaker 2: Not only that, right, yeah, not only that. Like what
1:21:06
Speaker 2: I was mentioning to you, and on my show when
1:21:09
Speaker 2: we did the show about the drones, I was talking
1:21:11
Speaker 2: to Chad GBT about it, and I was like, how
1:21:13
Speaker 2: far back does you know these drone sightings go in
1:21:17
Speaker 2: New Jersey? And they said that I went back from
1:21:20
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen. Now I couldn't confirm that that was true
1:21:25
Speaker 2: or not, but it's just really interesting because it's like
1:21:27
Speaker 2: what you were saying, if something happened back in November,
1:21:30
Speaker 2: why is that the calls of them doing something like,
1:21:34
Speaker 2: you know, over a month later, Like, well, if this
1:21:38
Speaker 2: has been going on really since five years ago in
1:21:41
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen, How can that be the reason that they're
1:21:45
Speaker 2: now doing it now?
1:21:49
Speaker 1: It's retro causality, it's time traveling, makes no sense.
1:21:52
Speaker 2: It doesn't make any sense. It's illogical, and it is.
1:21:57
Speaker 2: And that's the whole problem about you know, the community,
1:22:01
Speaker 2: like they when they don't have the information, they don't
1:22:03
Speaker 2: know what's going Because this is what this gentleman told
1:22:06
Speaker 2: me on the phone, This was the first time that
1:22:09
Speaker 2: I had heard about any of the you know, the
1:22:11
Speaker 2: suitcase nuke or the biological material that is supposedly that
1:22:15
Speaker 2: these drones are looking for. He started off the conversation with, well,
1:22:22
Speaker 2: people are concerned because all the ones that I all
1:22:25
Speaker 2: the people that I've talked to, don't know anything about
1:22:28
Speaker 2: these drones. They don't know anything. They're completely in the dark.
1:22:35
Speaker 2: And he was like, you know, all the people that
1:22:38
Speaker 2: I normally go to for information don't know anything about it.
1:22:44
Speaker 2: And that's like, oh, well, okay, we've no one knows anything.
1:22:49
Speaker 2: And all the other people that normally have really based
1:22:53
Speaker 2: ideas and based you know, opinions of exactly what's going
1:22:58
Speaker 2: on don't know anything about it. So then when you
1:23:00
Speaker 2: go to the one that has outlandish theories about it,
1:23:06
Speaker 2: that got it from a movie that came out yesterday.
1:23:10
Speaker 1: It's always something like a movie or in the case
1:23:13
Speaker 1: of what this person sent me, they don't send me
1:23:16
Speaker 1: the article link, whether it's CNN or some you know
1:23:21
Speaker 1: website you can post whatever you want, like that old
1:23:23
Speaker 1: before It's news website. They send me a grainy screenshot
1:23:27
Speaker 1: that someone else took from someone else's Twitter page, that
1:23:32
Speaker 1: someone took from Instagram. It's like looking down a series
1:23:34
Speaker 1: of mirrors just reflecting on it, you know, on itself,
1:23:38
Speaker 1: and it's just like a grainy like three hundred is
1:23:41
Speaker 1: it dpi or something pixels. It's really grainy. You can
1:23:45
Speaker 1: barely read it. And but that's the proof. Why are
1:23:47
Speaker 1: all the QAnon posts, by the way, in that same
1:23:50
Speaker 1: grainy image. It's like a bigfoot photo. Can't you find
1:23:53
Speaker 1: the like the the original fucking post or the original
1:23:56
Speaker 1: fucking article.
1:23:58
Speaker 2: It's just you know what I mean, I know exactly
1:24:02
Speaker 2: what you mean, and that's done for real. It's the
1:24:05
Speaker 2: off you skate the entire It's the same reason that
1:24:07
Speaker 2: we did this show, I think a four or five
1:24:10
Speaker 2: months ago. I was longer than that because I was
1:24:14
Speaker 2: still in Colorado at that time. But about the graininess
1:24:18
Speaker 2: of UFO photos and the greenness of UFO videos, they
1:24:20
Speaker 2: all looked like they were shot on an early two
1:24:22
Speaker 2: thousands flip phone, a freaking Motorola razor phone that all
1:24:26
Speaker 2: this stuff was filmed on. It's like, why can't we
1:24:29
Speaker 2: have clear footage of these UFOs? And I'll tell you why.
1:24:32
Speaker 2: Because the video isn't real. It's a fake video, and
1:24:36
Speaker 2: they blur it on purpose so that they could hide
1:24:39
Speaker 2: inconsistencies in the editing process of the video. That's the
1:24:44
Speaker 2: only reason that you would do that. And it's like
1:24:47
Speaker 2: that with and I really think that I think that
1:24:52
Speaker 2: the reason that this person told me this stuff, and
1:24:56
Speaker 2: I don't think that he was intentionally doing it. I
1:24:59
Speaker 2: think that this gentleman is a good guy, and I
1:25:04
Speaker 2: don't think that he's intentionally putting out, you know, miss
1:25:09
Speaker 2: or disinformation. But I think that the goal of the
1:25:13
Speaker 2: person that told him this stuff for him to relate
1:25:18
Speaker 2: to other people, his friends in his circle, was to
1:25:24
Speaker 2: make this a main topic that people talk about, you know,
1:25:31
Speaker 2: to to.
1:25:32
Speaker 1: So that that's we'll go go ahead, and then I'll
1:25:35
Speaker 1: tell you my thoughts. I have a question for you.
1:25:37
Speaker 2: So it's it's it's essentially a disinformation misinformation propagandas type
1:25:46
Speaker 2: of way of doing things. I mean, you know, everyone,
1:25:50
Speaker 2: everyone in this community, especially the popular people like you know,
1:25:55
Speaker 2: David Wilcock and before you know, Carry Cassity and like
1:25:58
Speaker 2: these other people, they always had these insiders, right. They
1:26:02
Speaker 2: would never tell you who the insiders were. They were
1:26:04
Speaker 2: just insiders, and they were always high up military intelligence
1:26:07
Speaker 2: or high up, you know, through letter agency, people that
1:26:10
Speaker 2: was supposedly giving them this information which was all nonsense
1:26:16
Speaker 2: and like all garbage. If these people even existed and
1:26:20
Speaker 2: they themselves weren't just completely fabricating and making this garbage up.
1:26:24
Speaker 2: And that's exactly what's happening to this very day. And
1:26:28
Speaker 2: this really goes back to the Paul Bennewitz story and
1:26:31
Speaker 2: a Falcon and these code names of these people that
1:26:35
Speaker 2: supposedly have like this top secret information that's disseminating nothing
1:26:39
Speaker 2: but garbage, made up nonsense to other people, and then
1:26:42
Speaker 2: those people are going and spreading it around to others
1:26:45
Speaker 2: within the community, and then it becomes a giant talking
1:26:48
Speaker 2: point and a commonly accepted thing. And it's still going
1:26:52
Speaker 2: on to this very day. Within this community, there's section.
1:26:57
Speaker 2: There's people here that get their information supposedly from top
1:27:03
Speaker 2: secret people that they don't want to reveal their identity
1:27:08
Speaker 2: to or their identity for. And they get this information
1:27:11
Speaker 2: and then they tell other people within the community that
1:27:14
Speaker 2: has some sort of influence, that has a show that
1:27:18
Speaker 2: has an audience of people, so that they can get
1:27:23
Speaker 2: that information out. And I guarantee you, I promise you
1:27:25
Speaker 2: Ryan that the guy that told my guy about this information,
1:27:30
Speaker 2: the goal was for me to do a show or
1:27:35
Speaker 2: bring this up in some kind of way, or post
1:27:38
Speaker 2: about it on social media on Twitter, on x on Facebook,
1:27:43
Speaker 2: on Instagram, and to blow this story up when it's
1:27:47
Speaker 2: a complete and utter fabrication made from a freaking movie
1:27:50
Speaker 2: that came out on Friday.
1:27:51
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then it just proliferates uncontrollably from there. It
1:27:55
Speaker 1: grows and expands and then people take screenshots. So did
1:27:57
Speaker 1: you hear that Writer show? He said, That's the thing
1:28:01
Speaker 1: that I don't understand. Like Writer, I live as a
1:28:04
Speaker 1: personal story here. I live my life very secluded. I
1:28:07
Speaker 1: talk to you quite a bit because you're a good friend,
1:28:09
Speaker 1: but I don't really have a lot of people I
1:28:11
Speaker 1: talk to like I'm pretty much a hermit the way
1:28:14
Speaker 1: that I live, and I literally just have this little
1:28:17
Speaker 1: room here. I don't even use my living room anymore.
1:28:19
Speaker 1: I have this little room here with my little studio
1:28:21
Speaker 1: and I have my col trep behind me. I got
1:28:23
Speaker 1: rid of my bookshelves because I'm moving soon, but I
1:28:25
Speaker 1: have a pile of books, and that's really it. That's
1:28:28
Speaker 1: like all I own, that's all I do. So I'm
1:28:30
Speaker 1: reading books, I learn things, and I decide, well, that's
1:28:33
Speaker 1: an interesting little piece of history I didn't know. Let's
1:28:36
Speaker 1: apply that to what's happening today, and then I'll do
1:28:38
Speaker 1: a show on it. And in the midst of me
1:28:40
Speaker 1: living my life like that in relative seclusion, I get
1:28:42
Speaker 1: phone calls, text messages, emails from people, and they asked
1:28:49
Speaker 1: me the same questions, did you hear about what so
1:28:51
Speaker 1: and so said? Or did you hear this theory about
1:28:55
Speaker 1: this or that, whatever the subject might be. Sometimes I'll
1:28:58
Speaker 1: get people text me, people call me, people email me,
1:29:01
Speaker 1: and people message me on social media the same day
1:29:04
Speaker 1: with the same links from some website that I've never
1:29:08
Speaker 1: heard of, or a rumble video, and they'll be like,
1:29:11
Speaker 1: you got to check this out. This is the truth
1:29:14
Speaker 1: for whatever the story is. And I'm and I'm sitting
1:29:17
Speaker 1: there looking at it. Sometimes I entertain it, right, I'll
1:29:20
Speaker 1: entertain I'll go skim it. And I'm like, I don't
1:29:24
Speaker 1: where did they get that from? That doesn't make any sense.
1:29:27
Speaker 1: That's not that, none of that's accurate. Why is like that?
1:29:33
Speaker 1: How is that? What is that? And I'm wondering to myself,
1:29:36
Speaker 1: why do all of these people contact me sharing the
1:29:40
Speaker 1: same These are people that don't know each other, people
1:29:42
Speaker 1: live in different countries, all contacting me the same day.
1:29:45
Speaker 1: This happens weekly, sharing the same exact thing with me,
1:29:48
Speaker 1: Like where does that come from? Just some random video
1:29:51
Speaker 1: and rumble, some random post on x some random screenshot,
1:29:56
Speaker 1: Like who is promoting this?
1:29:58
Speaker 2: Who?
1:29:59
Speaker 1: Who is pushing this narrative?
1:30:01
Speaker 2: Well, they're trying to influence you by the information that
1:30:05
Speaker 2: they give you, so that you can kind of be
1:30:09
Speaker 2: a part of this, uh, this this club. And I've
1:30:13
Speaker 2: I've had this happen to me, you know, several times
1:30:16
Speaker 2: before in the past, where people will contact me and
1:30:21
Speaker 2: you know, say that they have, you know, top secret
1:30:25
Speaker 2: information about the UFOs and about the aliens, and that
1:30:29
Speaker 2: that I need to do a show about it, and
1:30:32
Speaker 2: then they'll write me these big, old, huge, long emails
1:30:36
Speaker 2: about all this stuff. And then when I decide, whenever
1:30:40
Speaker 2: I say none of this makes any sense, why are
1:30:42
Speaker 2: you sending this to me? And I don't believe any
1:30:45
Speaker 2: of this garbage, they then turn on you. They could
1:30:49
Speaker 2: then then they call you ah, you know, all these
1:30:52
Speaker 2: names and like personally attack you when when you don't
1:30:56
Speaker 2: go along with what they want you to do. And
1:30:59
Speaker 2: there's no other export nation for that other than that.
1:31:02
Speaker 2: There's a lot of I don't really want to call
1:31:06
Speaker 2: them agents, but agent asque type of people that may
1:31:10
Speaker 2: or may not be you know, provocateurs within the community
1:31:16
Speaker 2: and within this digital space. And I don't listen to
1:31:20
Speaker 2: any of them because I know that it's all nonsense
1:31:23
Speaker 2: and it's all garbage and that. But that's not doing
1:31:25
Speaker 2: me any favors, because I guarantee you if I would have,
1:31:28
Speaker 2: you know, because I was probably one of the first
1:31:32
Speaker 2: people that had heard this about the drones in New Jersey,
1:31:40
Speaker 2: you know, looking for biological material or some kind of
1:31:44
Speaker 2: suitcase new right, And if I would have immediately got
1:31:47
Speaker 2: online and did a show about this and all the
1:31:49
Speaker 2: information that this guy you know told me and conveyed
1:31:53
Speaker 2: to me, then it probably would have blown up, because
1:31:56
Speaker 2: I actually stewed on it for a little bit before
1:31:58
Speaker 2: I even mentioned anything, before I even texted you. But
1:32:02
Speaker 2: I texted you really late that night. But I had
1:32:06
Speaker 2: gotten the information earlier that day, and I guarantee that
1:32:12
Speaker 2: if I would have been one of the first people
1:32:15
Speaker 2: to talk about this, then it would have gone over
1:32:18
Speaker 2: really well. But then that also hurts your credibility when
1:32:22
Speaker 2: it's obviously not that that that thing is obviously not true,
1:32:27
Speaker 2: and it's based off of a freaking movie on Netflix.
1:32:29
Speaker 2: It just came out. Then they it hurts you. It
1:32:34
Speaker 2: hurts your credibility, and then it but it shows these
1:32:38
Speaker 2: people that are doing this that you're willing to play
1:32:41
Speaker 2: ball with them, You're willing to listen to whatever it
1:32:45
Speaker 2: is that they're saying. So therefore that they know in
1:32:48
Speaker 2: the future that they can come back to you for
1:32:51
Speaker 2: any kind of event that has this wild and crazy,
1:32:54
Speaker 2: stupid conspiracy theory that's not based on anything that happens
1:32:58
Speaker 2: in reality, that you will disseminate that information to your audience.
1:33:03
Speaker 1: I don't have that kind of thing really happened to
1:33:05
Speaker 1: me much anymore.
1:33:06
Speaker 2: I don't anymore. This is the first one and quite
1:33:09
Speaker 2: a while. But that's another reason why that we've been
1:33:14
Speaker 2: doing this for a really long time. You've been doing
1:33:16
Speaker 2: it a lot longer than me. But that why we
1:33:19
Speaker 2: don't get a lot of you know, recognition within the community,
1:33:23
Speaker 2: and we're not not seeming to grow a lot where
1:33:26
Speaker 2: it seem to be kind of like at a standstill.
1:33:28
Speaker 2: And I believe that that is a very big reason
1:33:33
Speaker 2: because we're not willing to play ball with these with
1:33:37
Speaker 2: these people.
1:33:39
Speaker 1: So in the example I gave you to clarify with you,
1:33:43
Speaker 1: I'm also talking about and this isn't how would I
1:33:48
Speaker 1: word this. This isn't a criticism or a complaint. It's
1:33:51
Speaker 1: just an observation of how I have a lot of listeners,
1:33:53
Speaker 1: good people that will message me the same day, things
1:33:58
Speaker 1: like videos, whatever, And I just I guess my question is,
1:34:04
Speaker 1: like where is the source of all of this? Like
1:34:07
Speaker 1: giving another example, a real world example. Remember that Stanley
1:34:11
Speaker 1: cup drink cup at Target that everybody went after because
1:34:16
Speaker 1: it was on social media and it was on the internet,
1:34:19
Speaker 1: and I don't know wherever people get their info. Remember that thing,
1:34:21
Speaker 1: people just like attacked each other at Target for this
1:34:24
Speaker 1: metal cup yes, Okay, I think that's a good idea.
1:34:27
Speaker 1: If the Stanley Metal Cup and not the hockey Stanley Cup,
1:34:31
Speaker 1: but this metal cup at Target or maybe they selled elsewhere.
1:34:35
Speaker 1: I don't know, but if that cup were to be
1:34:37
Speaker 1: the latest UFO story or the latest assassination, conspiracy or
1:34:44
Speaker 1: whatever the case is, I want to know, like who
1:34:47
Speaker 1: is telling people to go buy that cup? Why did
1:34:51
Speaker 1: that particular cup become so famous? So suddenly I'm like,
1:34:55
Speaker 1: what the hell is the Stanley Cup? You mean the
1:34:57
Speaker 1: NHL Stanley Cup? What is And there's just people at
1:35:00
Speaker 1: Target attacking each other. It was on offer up. I
1:35:03
Speaker 1: had offer up on my phone. I was trying to
1:35:05
Speaker 1: sell stuff. I'm getting pop up Stanley Cup selling five
1:35:08
Speaker 1: hundred dollars in your area, Like I guess my The
1:35:11
Speaker 1: rhetorical question is, I'm trying to figure out where the
1:35:14
Speaker 1: source is. Like if I took a bike tire that
1:35:17
Speaker 1: had a hole in it and I didn't know where
1:35:18
Speaker 1: the hole was to patch it, and I stuck it
1:35:20
Speaker 1: in water and I squeezed it and to see where
1:35:23
Speaker 1: the bubbles came out of. I'm trying to find the
1:35:25
Speaker 1: source of, like where the puncture is, Like where are
1:35:28
Speaker 1: these stories coming from. Where are these photos coming from?
1:35:32
Speaker 1: Is it the CIA? Is it the FBI? Is that
1:35:36
Speaker 1: the NSA? Is it like another intelligence agency? Are these
1:35:42
Speaker 1: sock puppets that are government run but they're like private
1:35:45
Speaker 1: companies like you know, like a Blackwater black Rock kind
1:35:49
Speaker 1: of whether it's mercenaries or investor firms outside the Like,
1:35:53
Speaker 1: what where is the leak here? Where? Where is this
1:35:56
Speaker 1: being injected into the host? Because if you do the
1:36:00
Speaker 1: JFKX documentary, nobody cares. And if you know, you know,
1:36:05
Speaker 1: even Clyde, our friend Clyde Clyde does he's done this
1:36:08
Speaker 1: for thirty years and he's super well known and he's
1:36:11
Speaker 1: you know, at the top of tons of feeds everywhere
1:36:13
Speaker 1: you go, number one. But he does something that's really
1:36:16
Speaker 1: revolutionary on his show, like really outside the box. Nobody cares.
1:36:20
Speaker 1: The government doesn't come after him like Alex Jones or
1:36:24
Speaker 1: people don't. Don't you know, Clyde Lewis is not a
1:36:27
Speaker 1: household name. I just don't. I don't understand where's the
1:36:30
Speaker 1: leak coming from? Where's the source of this crap coming from?
1:36:33
Speaker 1: That when you do something legitimate and revolutionary, nobody cares.
1:36:37
Speaker 1: But when someone shares a grainy photo of something some
1:36:39
Speaker 1: Q person said. Then suddenly everybody knows that and Q
1:36:44
Speaker 1: is wandering around conspiracy conferences. Everybody met him, they met him.
1:36:48
Speaker 1: It just doesn't It's like fucking delusional, man.
1:36:51
Speaker 2: It is one hundred percent delusional. And I'm also finding
1:36:53
Speaker 2: that with uh, with Pokemon as well. I told you
1:36:57
Speaker 2: the other day that I'm getting back into collecting Pokemon cards.
1:37:02
Speaker 2: If anybody's got any Pokemon cards they want to sell me,
1:37:04
Speaker 2: please email me at a raised by giants at outlook
1:37:07
Speaker 2: dot com. Uh. But I'm finding that same thing with
1:37:12
Speaker 2: Pokemon cards, right, Like this new set of Pokemon cards
1:37:17
Speaker 2: everybody wants, so therefore you can't find it anywhere. You
1:37:20
Speaker 2: can't go to the store. The Target is completely sold out.
1:37:23
Speaker 2: I've been like five Targets when I've been out and about,
1:37:26
Speaker 2: just you know, kind of roaming, roaming around and see
1:37:28
Speaker 2: to go look at their trading card section at Target,
1:37:32
Speaker 2: none of them. Haven't Walmart stopped carrying all trading cards
1:37:37
Speaker 2: all together in my area, they don't even have a
1:37:39
Speaker 2: trading card section anymore. Uh. And if you do find
1:37:44
Speaker 2: this newest set of you know, a booster pack of
1:37:48
Speaker 2: this new Pokemon card that supposedly has this super rare
1:37:52
Speaker 2: Pikachu card in it, it's double the price. So if
1:37:56
Speaker 2: you go into a card shop that somehow has some
1:37:59
Speaker 2: of these cards in booster packs or a booster box
1:38:02
Speaker 2: or a ten of this new pack, it's double the
1:38:06
Speaker 2: amount that you would pay if you founded at Target.
1:38:09
Speaker 2: And Target's even doing that same thing as well. They're
1:38:12
Speaker 2: doing online orders where they've actually tripled the price of them,
1:38:17
Speaker 2: or it's like twenty dollars for one single booster pack
1:38:21
Speaker 2: of this new Pokemon cart.
1:38:25
Speaker 1: This this is the Bernesian kind of marketing, propaganda and strategy.
1:38:32
Speaker 1: So you've got like you've got Edward Burnees, You've got
1:38:35
Speaker 1: Yery Besmanov from the former Soviet Union. You've got people
1:38:40
Speaker 1: that have utilized not only Bernas's writings but also those
1:38:45
Speaker 1: of a young and Freud for marketing, for advertising, for
1:38:50
Speaker 1: government propaganda, for media. You got the Benewitz story with
1:38:54
Speaker 1: UFOs and putting things into this guy's head and into
1:38:57
Speaker 1: his computer. I mean, all these examples, whether it's like
1:39:00
Speaker 1: Madison Avenue or it's UFOs, or it's geopolitics, like at
1:39:05
Speaker 1: the core of all of this, including COVID nineteen As
1:39:07
Speaker 1: I mentioned at the beginning of the show, all these
1:39:10
Speaker 1: psych experiments officially like got the papers on them, tricking
1:39:15
Speaker 1: the people into reacting a certain way based on fake
1:39:17
Speaker 1: numbers on the screen. People aren't scared enough, Let's give
1:39:20
Speaker 1: them more fake numbers. You start to realize all of
1:39:23
Speaker 1: this stuff it's all coming from the same what would
1:39:29
Speaker 1: we call it, It's coming from the same field. We
1:39:32
Speaker 1: like to use the word science. It's not science though.
1:39:35
Speaker 1: It's psychology. That's really what runs the system, that's what
1:39:39
Speaker 1: runs the world. It's behavioral psychology. It's really really disgusting.
1:39:47
Speaker 1: I don't know what word to use. Sleezy, disgusting, deceptive,
1:39:50
Speaker 1: it's marketing. All of this stuff just plays on what
1:39:53
Speaker 1: it means to be human. This is the kind of
1:39:57
Speaker 1: stuff that when people that hate capitalism talk about capitalism,
1:40:01
Speaker 1: this is really what they're talking about, but they can't
1:40:04
Speaker 1: see that. They think it's like a business and a CEO.
1:40:07
Speaker 1: This is really the problem with civilization is that we
1:40:10
Speaker 1: have really bad people using basic human psychology to manipulate
1:40:15
Speaker 1: other people. I think that's really the root core of
1:40:17
Speaker 1: all these problems. To drive people mad, to drive them crazy,
1:40:21
Speaker 1: to traumatize them, and then people are easily persuaded, like
1:40:25
Speaker 1: the monsters that are do on Maple Street, easily persuaded
1:40:29
Speaker 1: to do whatever it is that the people utilizing these
1:40:33
Speaker 1: programs want them to do, whether that's fight with each other,
1:40:36
Speaker 1: tear each other apart, tear themselves apart. And it leads
1:40:39
Speaker 1: to a really really dark, very very dystopian world. Even
1:40:45
Speaker 1: when the world's not really that bad. What do you
1:40:48
Speaker 1: do when you ask somebody how they feel about things
1:40:50
Speaker 1: going on around everybody thinks that it's just getting worse
1:40:53
Speaker 1: and worse and worse. I don't know if the world's
1:40:56
Speaker 1: really getting worse. It seems like with new technologies and
1:40:59
Speaker 1: everybody has we all have so much wealth and abundance,
1:41:02
Speaker 1: especially in the United States, how can things continually get worse?
1:41:06
Speaker 1: We're told that every day, but it seems like that's
1:41:08
Speaker 1: not really the case. But we live in the mindset
1:41:11
Speaker 1: that it's getting worse while we live with increasingly more
1:41:15
Speaker 1: expensive and more sophisticated technologies and we have more wealth.
1:41:20
Speaker 1: Even if we don't really have enough money to pay
1:41:22
Speaker 1: our bills, we still live in luxury. Like there's a
1:41:25
Speaker 1: lot to unfold with this writer.
1:41:29
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then you've already done a so interesting that
1:41:33
Speaker 2: Luigi and the Pokemon on his Twitter page and the
1:41:38
Speaker 2: number of tweets is that it's exact same the number
1:41:41
Speaker 2: of that Pokemon. And then you also have the Knitonic
1:41:45
Speaker 2: or Nitonic or however you say this name, which is
1:41:48
Speaker 2: the whole Pokemon Go app was to train an AI
1:41:52
Speaker 2: map models to get a complete digital version of the
1:41:55
Speaker 2: world within this Pokemon Go app. There's so much stuff
1:41:59
Speaker 2: that's going on with with Pokemon here recently, and it's, uh,
1:42:05
Speaker 2: the connections are completely wild. And that that Nitonic because
1:42:11
Speaker 2: I played Pokemon Go whenever it first came out, and
1:42:15
Speaker 2: I thought that it was It was really popular and
1:42:17
Speaker 2: a lot of fun when it first came out, and
1:42:19
Speaker 2: now was kind of died off. But now we know
1:42:21
Speaker 2: the real reason why they, you know, started that app
1:42:24
Speaker 2: and got everybody to use it. They use something that
1:42:28
Speaker 2: brought nostalgia, you know, you know, Pokemon and Char's art
1:42:32
Speaker 2: and and Pikachu and the ability that you can create
1:42:35
Speaker 2: this virtual reality within your phone and go and walk
1:42:39
Speaker 2: around and and you know find Pokemon. I mean, during
1:42:42
Speaker 2: that time, there was more people outside of their house
1:42:46
Speaker 2: and in the park you know next to my house
1:42:49
Speaker 2: than I had ever seen before ever, which I thought
1:42:53
Speaker 2: was a good thing. But it turns out that this
1:42:56
Speaker 2: nitonic app, the creator of this Pokemon go was you know,
1:43:02
Speaker 2: using the app and these people's locations to map an
1:43:06
Speaker 2: entire AI world, which then gets into which I was
1:43:09
Speaker 2: talking to you about before with you know, Wayne Steiger,
1:43:13
Speaker 2: which I think he would be great to come on
1:43:15
Speaker 2: your show. We did a show together with with him,
1:43:19
Speaker 2: I think seven months ago or something like that, where
1:43:23
Speaker 2: we did a show together. We were talking about religion
1:43:25
Speaker 2: and Christianity and a lot of that stuff. But he
1:43:29
Speaker 2: was actually in charge of some of the first online
1:43:33
Speaker 2: payment systems, and he's very familiar with AI, and I
1:43:38
Speaker 2: mean these were government payment systems. These weren't like you know,
1:43:41
Speaker 2: some of the payment systems that people know about like now,
1:43:44
Speaker 2: like PayPal and you know some of the other stuff.
1:43:48
Speaker 2: But this was like a government with some of the
1:43:50
Speaker 2: first government payment systems, so for them to be able
1:43:53
Speaker 2: to transfer money to each other in different programs and
1:43:56
Speaker 2: different stuff. And he was very in involved with the
1:44:02
Speaker 2: making of early artificial intelligence and algorithms and things like that,
1:44:07
Speaker 2: and his concern which is that basically the Internet is
1:44:12
Speaker 2: creating these digital models of people.
1:44:16
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, without doubt. So there is a profile aer
1:44:19
Speaker 1: it's a replica of you.
1:44:20
Speaker 2: Replica of you within this digital space. So it's collecting
1:44:24
Speaker 2: all of the information from all of your social media,
1:44:27
Speaker 2: is all of the pictures that you post, all of
1:44:29
Speaker 2: the status and updates that you make, all the Instagram
1:44:33
Speaker 2: pictures that you post, and it's creating this digital copy,
1:44:37
Speaker 2: this digital clone of you within the Internet. And then
1:44:42
Speaker 2: you have the things like meta, the meta AI stuff,
1:44:45
Speaker 2: this meta virtual world thing, and it seems like it's
1:44:49
Speaker 2: set up for this complete AI digital world, in this
1:44:56
Speaker 2: AI digital reality that you put people inside of, and
1:45:01
Speaker 2: then they have all the things from the real world
1:45:03
Speaker 2: and you have your own. They've already created your AI
1:45:10
Speaker 2: digital version of you within this AI digital world.
1:45:13
Speaker 1: I was saying that about twelve years ago because I
1:45:16
Speaker 1: wrote a book called The Technological Elixir, where I talked
1:45:18
Speaker 1: about this kind of thing in the book. And now
1:45:21
Speaker 1: we learn that Samsung has a project by twenty thirty
1:45:25
Speaker 1: they want to have exactly what was just described by
1:45:29
Speaker 1: you writer and what I've talked about for many years
1:45:32
Speaker 1: on this show. It is a digital replica of you.
1:45:35
Speaker 1: And that's one of three major stages in the Samsung plan.
1:45:39
Speaker 1: Toward what they call six G. Another stage is a
1:45:42
Speaker 1: replica not just of you, but a replica of the
1:45:44
Speaker 1: real world. Where do they get that from. Well, Google's
1:45:46
Speaker 1: data of the external world from all these Google vehicles
1:45:49
Speaker 1: and maps, and then with things like Pokemon Go, the
1:45:53
Speaker 1: ANTIQ has a three D model of the inside world,
1:45:57
Speaker 1: inside of buildings, inside of your home or personal spaces.
1:46:01
Speaker 1: And then when you look at the third step, they
1:46:05
Speaker 1: want replicas of other people. Well, that comes along with
1:46:07
Speaker 1: the first step of having all of this digital information.
1:46:10
Speaker 1: So whether it's through Google or Neantique or it's Samsung,
1:46:15
Speaker 1: all of that's playing out in real time. Digital replicas
1:46:19
Speaker 1: of you, digital replicas of people, digital replicas of places
1:46:24
Speaker 1: of things. And ultimately, I think, and I mentioned this
1:46:27
Speaker 1: last night on the show, I think before Clyde came on. Ultimately,
1:46:30
Speaker 1: I think what this is when you see this two
1:46:33
Speaker 1: eighty six number with Luigi, whether it's a trigger number
1:46:38
Speaker 1: for assassins and Manurian candidates or this two eighty six
1:46:43
Speaker 1: is just not really having any purpose being brought up
1:46:48
Speaker 1: by all of these Internet saluts and by the media,
1:46:51
Speaker 1: because even the mainstreams reported on it. This two eighty
1:46:54
Speaker 1: six might just be another piece of evidence for people
1:46:58
Speaker 1: who don't believe that this is the real world. You know,
1:47:02
Speaker 1: the idea that this is a computer simulation. The big
1:47:05
Speaker 1: banks have talked about this, and it's not just the
1:47:08
Speaker 1: Matrix movies. It's big banks have talked about this. Billionaires
1:47:13
Speaker 1: have talked about this, big corporations have talked about this,
1:47:16
Speaker 1: major scientists have talked about this. Kind of encouraging people
1:47:19
Speaker 1: to believe that we already live in a simulation. When
1:47:22
Speaker 1: you start seeing numbers like two eighty six, or with
1:47:25
Speaker 1: anytime there's a school shooting this reportedly this girl open
1:47:28
Speaker 1: fire and it's seventeen years old and killed some people. However,
1:47:32
Speaker 1: many in Wisconsin yesterday with that story, you get the
1:47:37
Speaker 1: numbers again. It's it was originally it was three, and
1:47:40
Speaker 1: there's twelve. There's always these numbers I've pointed out for
1:47:42
Speaker 1: years three, twelve, thirteen, twenty one, twenty three, thirty two,
1:47:47
Speaker 1: and thirty three. And you get those every time, over
1:47:49
Speaker 1: and over, reoccurring within these shootings, and eventually you start
1:47:52
Speaker 1: to ask the question, if you're not driven completely mad, like,
1:47:56
Speaker 1: is all of that intentional? Is that coincidental? Or as
1:47:59
Speaker 1: now with two eighty SI and this Luigi Kid. Now
1:48:01
Speaker 1: people are saying, well, maybe it's just like code and
1:48:03
Speaker 1: the matrix. Maybe this is proof that we do live
1:48:06
Speaker 1: in some kind of computer simulation. My point being writer,
1:48:09
Speaker 1: that all of this stuff is driving people to the
1:48:14
Speaker 1: brink of not only insanity, but to the brink of
1:48:17
Speaker 1: disconnecting entirely from physical five sense reality, and without any wires,
1:48:25
Speaker 1: without any kind of chemical injections or anything like that
1:48:28
Speaker 1: to connect you physically to a computer, you are agragorically
1:48:32
Speaker 1: creating and processing this alternative reality in your fucking head
1:48:37
Speaker 1: right now. You're doing this in your freaking head. Right now,
1:48:42
Speaker 1: You're creating that alternative reality.
1:48:47
Speaker 2: I couldn't have said it any better. I one hundred
1:48:49
Speaker 2: percent agree with that. That's exactly what's going on. And
1:48:52
Speaker 2: we've seen the implications of that and the setup for
1:48:56
Speaker 2: that for a really long time, and I think that
1:48:58
Speaker 2: that has been the ultimate goal. I mean, there's no
1:49:04
Speaker 2: really other explanation. When you look at this stuff critically
1:49:08
Speaker 2: and use common sense and put all these things together,
1:49:11
Speaker 2: it's like, that's what the ultimate goal is. And one
1:49:16
Speaker 2: of those steps of that goal is, like what you're
1:49:17
Speaker 2: mentioning is to make people believe that we're already in
1:49:21
Speaker 2: a simulation, So therefore it will be like nothing going
1:49:25
Speaker 2: into another simulation. So if we're already in one, then
1:49:28
Speaker 2: it won't be a problem to go into another one.
1:49:31
Speaker 2: And then if we are indeed already in one, then
1:49:33
Speaker 2: how deep in that simulation are we? Now? Like, who's
1:49:38
Speaker 2: to say that this isn't already a simulation within a simulation, And.
1:49:44
Speaker 1: That's yeah, you get into the kind of Rick and
1:49:46
Speaker 1: Morty kind of a thing in the universe within a universe,
1:49:50
Speaker 1: within a universe, within a universe, Doctor Seuss type of thing.
1:49:53
Speaker 1: It it drives people, yes to the brink of insanity.
1:49:57
Speaker 1: And I mean, there are so many things we've discussed
1:49:59
Speaker 1: in that school shootings. You've got drones, you've got assassinations,
1:50:04
Speaker 1: you've got a generalized hysteria that does relate back to
1:50:10
Speaker 1: what Juri Besmanov said. It relates back to the stuff
1:50:13
Speaker 1: that Edward Burnees wrote. I mean, my god, look at Netflix.
1:50:16
Speaker 1: Look at all the stuff that comes out on Netflix
1:50:18
Speaker 1: from that movie you mentioned, carry on to last year.
1:50:21
Speaker 1: At this time we had leave the world behind and
1:50:24
Speaker 1: who was behind the founding of Netflix and the running
1:50:27
Speaker 1: of Netflix. One of the relatives of Edward Burnees literally,
1:50:32
Speaker 1: So this is not like coincidental. This is a continuation
1:50:36
Speaker 1: of the work of people like Edward Brenes. It's the
1:50:39
Speaker 1: continuation of the ideological subversion that was utilized by the Communists,
1:50:44
Speaker 1: whether they were in China or Russia, and the extension
1:50:47
Speaker 1: and the exportation of that, as Besmanoff pointed out in
1:50:52
Speaker 1: a very famous interview, to the United States, because you know,
1:50:55
Speaker 1: the Japanese knew they couldn't defeat the US on our
1:50:59
Speaker 1: own territory. So you know, we have everybody's weapons here.
1:51:05
Speaker 1: There's a famous Japanese military leader who said that there'd
1:51:09
Speaker 1: be a gun behind every blade of grass. I'd have
1:51:12
Speaker 1: to find the exact quote, but there'd be a blade
1:51:14
Speaker 1: behind every gun, behind every blade of grass. The Nazis
1:51:18
Speaker 1: or the Germans knew they couldn't. They didn't want war
1:51:20
Speaker 1: with US anyway. They admired the US, and they admired
1:51:23
Speaker 1: the British because of their eugenics and because of our
1:51:25
Speaker 1: eugenics programs with US had eugenics programs before Hitler did.
1:51:29
Speaker 1: But look at how that history has been distorted. They
1:51:31
Speaker 1: didn't want war with US, and that reason for that
1:51:34
Speaker 1: was because of the same reason the Japanese didn't want
1:51:36
Speaker 1: war with us because we're armed. So you can't defeat
1:51:39
Speaker 1: us directly. You have to subvert us. And that is
1:51:43
Speaker 1: precisely what has happened, whether it's with people's health or
1:51:47
Speaker 1: it's with people's mental health, like physical health, mental health.
1:51:51
Speaker 1: There really is I mean, frankly, there really isn't anything
1:51:54
Speaker 1: left of this country. This country has been demoralized, demean degraded, looted,
1:52:00
Speaker 1: did and it's just like a bunch of empty buildings.
1:52:04
Speaker 1: Now there's nothing left of America. There is no as
1:52:07
Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned. You might disagree with this, but
1:52:09
Speaker 1: there's no make America great. There is no America that
1:52:13
Speaker 1: we have completely lost everything that our founding fathers gave
1:52:18
Speaker 1: us in this country, and all we have left are names.
1:52:21
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what the very famous Augustus Caesar said
1:52:27
Speaker 1: when he turned Rome into an empire. Octavianus said that
1:52:32
Speaker 1: people preferred names and titles rather than actual responsibility, actual liberty,
1:52:39
Speaker 1: actual freedom, actual reality. They prefer to be hampered with
1:52:44
Speaker 1: names and be told that they're great and they're wonderful,
1:52:47
Speaker 1: and that they're smart, and that they're in charge and
1:52:49
Speaker 1: that they have freedom. When really he was in charge
1:52:52
Speaker 1: and just placating the people's.
1:52:55
Speaker 2: But you not only have all of these Netflix shows
1:52:59
Speaker 2: that are to acting all of this, you know, world
1:53:03
Speaker 2: ending stuff and nuclear bombs, which and like with Leave
1:53:07
Speaker 2: the Role Behind, which we did a show on around
1:53:10
Speaker 2: a year ago, there was also this show called Obliterated,
1:53:15
Speaker 2: which I think that that, yeah, the Vegas one where
1:53:18
Speaker 2: it's about a nuclear bomb. This this terrorist organization gets
1:53:22
Speaker 2: a hold of a dirty nuke and is going to
1:53:25
Speaker 2: explode it in Las Vegas to then blame it on
1:53:28
Speaker 2: the right and then the right blames it on the
1:53:31
Speaker 2: left and the leve blames it on the right and
1:53:32
Speaker 2: it creates this giant civil conflict. And that came out
1:53:36
Speaker 2: November thirtieth of last year, and then so roughly around
1:53:43
Speaker 2: a year ago, and then this year we have the
1:53:46
Speaker 2: carry On, which revolves around almost the same thing.
1:53:50
Speaker 1: Though at Homestead, which is coming out this week, at
1:53:54
Speaker 1: the bomb in La.
1:53:56
Speaker 2: It's the it's the same type of thing. This is
1:54:00
Speaker 2: just being repeated. And then you look at well, which
1:54:04
Speaker 2: I brought up on my show last week with you
1:54:07
Speaker 2: about the drones. A year ago, we had the same
1:54:11
Speaker 2: thing with the Chinese spy balloons, it's the same thing.
1:54:15
Speaker 2: We've gotten the exact same thing over and over again.
1:54:20
Speaker 2: It's on the repeating cycle. And people have such a
1:54:24
Speaker 2: short attention span that they can't remember any of this stuff.
1:54:29
Speaker 1: And a lot of this is that repetitive. All there's
1:54:31
Speaker 1: another school shooting. Oh let's remember nine to eleven. Oh,
1:54:34
Speaker 1: let's remember the Kennedy assassination, all of that stuff. Yes, sure,
1:54:38
Speaker 1: it brings people together, and it creates the definition of
1:54:40
Speaker 1: a culture in a nation. But what it also is,
1:54:43
Speaker 1: outside of being a mythos and outside of being what
1:54:46
Speaker 1: brings us together, it's also kind of like Jack at
1:54:49
Speaker 1: the typewriter in the Shining Yes, the same thing over
1:54:53
Speaker 1: and over and over and over again.
1:54:56
Speaker 2: Psychic driving. I mean, that's a technique that you and
1:54:58
Speaker 2: Cameron was using in Canada to put inside of people's
1:55:03
Speaker 2: heads in order to get them to do things today. Otherwise,
1:55:05
Speaker 2: when do under normal circumstances, so the person's traumatized from
1:55:10
Speaker 2: an event, then they're psychically driven to inform their behavior
1:55:16
Speaker 2: and inform their reality. And we're getting a worldwide type
1:55:20
Speaker 2: of thing, a worldwide type of psychic driving through the
1:55:27
Speaker 2: media with these repeating the same types of stories that
1:55:31
Speaker 2: seem to be going on every single year with little
1:55:34
Speaker 2: things just changed up, but the meat and the bones
1:55:38
Speaker 2: of it is identical. It's the same type of thing
1:55:43
Speaker 2: that's been played out over and over.
1:55:45
Speaker 1: And over the whole UFO testimony in Congress. I talked
1:55:49
Speaker 1: with Walter Bosley about that too, it was saying, he
1:55:52
Speaker 1: confirmed as well, it's the same stories we heard back
1:55:55
Speaker 1: in the fifties and sixties and seventies and eighties, nineties
1:55:58
Speaker 1: and early two thousands, and it's the same story that
1:56:01
Speaker 1: we're hearing right now with these UFO and queries. So
1:56:04
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what the subject is. I had you
1:56:07
Speaker 1: specifically come on tonight writer because of this JFK thing,
1:56:10
Speaker 1: And regardless of what comes of this story about JFK
1:56:13
Speaker 1: faking his assassination, this videos, these videos or a video,
1:56:17
Speaker 1: these things that were made prior to September of nineteen
1:56:20
Speaker 1: sixty three, Vanity Fair reports on it. If anything else
1:56:24
Speaker 1: comes out about it, it will just reignite the trauma.
1:56:27
Speaker 1: It's how we handle these things. Just like that Japanese
1:56:30
Speaker 1: plastic that dissolves in the ocean. We can just make
1:56:33
Speaker 1: something that makes the world a better place and move on,
1:56:36
Speaker 1: or we can tell people that they need to set
1:56:37
Speaker 1: themselves on fire and kill their children to stop climate change.
1:56:41
Speaker 1: There's two different ways that we can react to something.
1:56:43
Speaker 1: One is rational and logical and innovative, and the other
1:56:46
Speaker 1: one is hysterical and self destructive. And the goal of
1:56:50
Speaker 1: tonight's show was to point all of this out and
1:56:52
Speaker 1: hopefully to provide people with that perspective if they don't
1:56:56
Speaker 1: have it. That is my goal for tonight's show. So
1:56:58
Speaker 1: thank you so much for coming on and speaking with
1:57:02
Speaker 1: us about all of this very complicated, sophisticated, confusing stuff.
1:57:06
Speaker 1: Very briefly, less than a minute. The documentary's website where
1:57:09
Speaker 1: people can watch listen to your show, Briderly.
1:57:13
Speaker 2: You can listen to my show on Raised by Giants
1:57:16
Speaker 2: on YouTube and any and all podcast platforms. And please
1:57:20
Speaker 2: watch my latest documentary at Clockwork Shining, which is very
1:57:23
Speaker 2: relevant to the topics that is going on in the
1:57:27
Speaker 2: world today and very relevant to the topic that we
1:57:29
Speaker 2: just discussed. And also, after you watch a Clockwork Shining
1:57:33
Speaker 2: on Amazon Prime or on Apple tv Plus, also watch
1:57:36
Speaker 2: my documentary jfk X, which is also on for free
1:57:41
Speaker 2: on Amazon Prime. Thank you very much for having me on.
1:57:43
Speaker 2: Ryan really appreciate it, brother, and look forward to speaking
1:57:47
Speaker 2: with you again.
1:57:48
Speaker 1: You got it writer, Thank you so much. I really
1:57:50
Speaker 1: appreciate you coming on especially short notice. You know what,
1:57:53
Speaker 1: it reminds me of everything we discussed tonight and with
1:57:55
Speaker 1: the Yuri Bezminoff well, the quote of demoralization and so on.
1:58:02
Speaker 1: It reminds me of leave the World behind that came
1:58:04
Speaker 1: out last year when there was a description in the
1:58:07
Speaker 1: movie provided about how the country was under attack, and
1:58:11
Speaker 1: one of the stages was to create confusion, to blame
1:58:14
Speaker 1: it on the Koreans, to blame it on the Muslims,
1:58:17
Speaker 1: just like with the drones. All it's the Russians doing it,
1:58:19
Speaker 1: all it's the Chinese doing it. We don't know who
1:58:21
Speaker 1: did it. We don't know who's responsible, who killed Kennedy,
1:58:23
Speaker 1: We don't know who killed Brian Thompson. Luigi, but that
1:58:26
Speaker 1: don't make any sense. So who is Luigi? Did he
1:58:28
Speaker 1: actually do it? Was it somebody else? It's just perpetual psychosis,
1:58:33
Speaker 1: perpetual paranoia. Maybe we could try to respond to these
1:58:38
Speaker 1: things more rationally. That's my hope with doing shows like this,
1:58:42
Speaker 1: and in order to do that, we have to be
1:58:45
Speaker 1: rational individuals. I'm Ryan Gabled, this is the Secret Teachings.
1:58:49
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for tuning in Tonightstradio dot info.
1:58:53
Speaker 1: If you don't like the advertisements on spreaker, you can
1:58:57
Speaker 1: go to the website and subscribe to get access to
1:59:00
Speaker 1: the show, the montages, my digital books, and the article
1:59:02
Speaker 1: document archive TST radio dot info. Stay safe, stay informed,
1:59:06
Speaker 1: stay healthy. I will talk to you on the next broadcast.