Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / Episode 72: The Cash Flow Statement (Profitable and Bankrupt)

Transcript

Episode 72: The Cash Flow Statement (Profitable and Bankrupt) · How Canadian Markets Work

• 0:00
  So imagine you're looking at the year -end reports
• 0:02
  for a manufacturing business that you own. OK,
• 0:06
  always a good time. Right. And you look right
• 0:08
  at the bottom of the income statement, and there
• 0:10
  it is, an $18 million profit. I mean, that's
• 0:14
  a fantastic year. Exactly. Based on that incredible
• 0:18
  number, the board goes ahead and approves a $5
• 0:21
  million dividend payout to the shareholders.
• 0:24
  Oh, wow. OK. Yeah. So you're probably mentally
• 0:27
  popping champagne. Feeling like an absolute titan
• 0:30
  of industry. But, and here's the catch, if you
• 0:34
  turn the page and you look closely at the cash
• 0:37
  flow statement, you might discover a completely
• 0:39
  terrifying... counterintuitive reality, which
• 0:44
  is that your business is literally burning millions
• 0:46
  of dollars, and you are surviving entirely on
• 0:49
  borrowed time. Yeah, it's the ultimate financial
• 0:52
  illusion, honestly. It really is. A company can
• 0:55
  literally run completely out of money and face
• 0:57
  bankruptcy while reporting record -breaking profitability.
• 1:01
  Which just sounds impossible to most people.
• 1:04
  Right, but it's because the... The mechanisms
• 1:07
  of accounting allow management to legally separate
• 1:11
  the sort of economic theory of a business from
• 1:14
  the actual physical reality of its bank account.
• 1:17
  And that separation is exactly what we are decoding
• 1:19
  in today's Deep Dive. Welcome to the show. We're
• 1:23
  looking at a stack of corporate financial documents
• 1:25
  today for a Canadian manufacturer called Meridian
• 1:29
  Tool Works. Yeah, they're going to be our main
• 1:31
  case study today. Right. We're using their numbers
• 1:33
  to really understand the architecture of the
• 1:35
  cash flow statement. We're going to explore why
• 1:38
  working capital acts as this silent trap for
• 1:41
  fast -growing companies. Which is a huge issue.
• 1:43
  It really is. And we'll get into how the mechanics
• 1:46
  of debt -funded dividends actually work, and
• 1:48
  ultimately how you can use the cash flow statement
• 1:50
  as just a ruthless diagnostic tool. Because if
• 1:53
  you're relying solely on the income statement,
• 1:55
  I mean, you are essentially flying blind as an
• 1:58
  investor. Yeah, you're trusting a narrative.
• 2:00
  Exactly, a narrative constructed by management.
• 2:03
  To truly understand if a business has the capacity
• 2:05
  to survive, you absolutely have to look at the
• 2:08
  three core sections of the cash flow statement,
• 2:11
  which are operating, investing, and financing.
• 2:14
  Right, so let's focus on that tension between
• 2:17
  the income statement and the cash flow statement
• 2:19
  first. Because I always think of the income statement,
• 2:21
  you know, where that $18 million profit lives.
• 2:24
  It operates a lot like a heavily curated social
• 2:27
  media profile. I like that analogy. Right, like
• 2:30
  technically true, but management chooses the
• 2:33
  angles. They decide how fast to depreciate a
• 2:37
  multi -million dollar piece of factory equipment.
• 2:40
  Or, you know, they make these judgment calls
• 2:41
  on when to recognize revenue. Right, from like
• 2:44
  long -term contracts and stuff. Exactly. Whereas
• 2:47
  the cash flow statement... That's just your actual
• 2:49
  unfiltered bank statement. Yeah, because accrual
• 2:52
  accounting, which is what they use to build that
• 2:53
  income statement, it's inherently subjective.
• 2:56
  I mean, it exists for a good reason, right? Like,
• 2:58
  if you buy a $10 million factory today and it's
• 3:02
  going to last you 20 years, cash accounting would
• 3:04
  say you just lost $10 million this morning. Which
• 3:06
  makes your business look terrible today. Right.
• 3:09
  And it doesn't reflect the long -term economic
• 3:11
  reality of the business. So accrual accounting
• 3:14
  smooths that out. It attempts to... match revenues
• 3:18
  with the expenses that created them, regardless
• 3:21
  of when the cash actually changes hands. Okay.
• 3:24
  But because it relies on all those estimates,
• 3:27
  profit is fundamentally just an opinion. Cash,
• 3:30
  however, is a fact. An opinion versus a fact.
• 3:33
  I love that. And because there's so much, you
• 3:36
  know, subjective judgment involved, you could
• 3:38
  have two totally identical businesses that report
• 3:42
  completely different profit numbers simply because
• 3:44
  they chose different depreciation schedules.
• 3:47
  Exactly. Or different revenue recognition policies.
• 3:49
  Which means, as an investor, you have to bridge
• 3:52
  the gap between that filtered profit and the
• 3:54
  unfiltered cash. So we have to, like, reverse
• 3:57
  engineer the income statement to find out what
• 3:59
  actually happened. in the real world. And we
• 4:01
  do that by starting with the very first section
• 4:03
  of the cash flow statement, which is operating
• 4:05
  cash flow. This is the core engine of the business.
• 4:09
  It's the selling widgets, paying the utility
• 4:13
  bills, cutting payroll checks. To find the cash
• 4:16
  reality, we start with management's stated net
• 4:19
  income, and we systematically strip away the
• 4:22
  accounting magic. Starting with non -cash expenses,
• 4:24
  right? Right. So, OK, looking at our source material
• 4:27
  for Meridian Toolworks, they reported that headline
• 4:30
  net income of $18 million. But if you look closely,
• 4:34
  buried in their expenses is a $12 million charge
• 4:38
  for depreciation and amortization. So that expense
• 4:42
  reduced their profit, but nobody at Meridian
• 4:45
  actually wrote a $12 million check to a vendor
• 4:47
  named Depreciation. No, of course not. It's purely
• 4:50
  an accounting allocation. It just represents
• 4:52
  the wear and tear on their heavy machinery. OK,
• 4:54
  so what do we do with it? So on the cash flow
• 4:56
  statement, we take that $18 million profit, and
• 4:58
  we add back the $12 million non -cash expense.
• 5:02
  Oh, so we add it back. OK. Which brings the theoretical
• 5:04
  operating cash up to $30 million. Right. Which
• 5:07
  seems fantastic. I mean, $30 million is great.
• 5:09
  Until you hit the working capital changes. Right.
• 5:12
  This is where it gets scary. Yeah. This is where
• 5:14
  the physical lifecycle. of a product completely
• 5:18
  derails the accounting narrative. Let's trace
• 5:21
  the physical journey of a Meridian tool, right?
• 5:23
  OK, that's good. To manufacture anything, cash
• 5:26
  has to leave the building long before a sale
• 5:28
  is actually made. So Meridian's inventory increased
• 5:31
  by $22 million this year. Wow. Yeah. That's raw
• 5:35
  metal, components, finished tools just sitting
• 5:38
  on warehouse racks. And under accrual accounting,
• 5:40
  Building that inventory doesn't hit the income
• 5:43
  statement as an expense until the moment those
• 5:46
  tools are sold, right? Exactly. The profit number
• 5:48
  is completely blind to it. But out in the real
• 5:50
  world, Meridian had to pay its suppliers and
• 5:53
  its factory workers actual dollars to forge that
• 5:56
  metal. So they spent that cash. Right. So we
• 5:58
  have to subtract $22 million from our running
• 6:01
  total. OK, so we're down from $30 million to
• 6:04
  $8 million. Then we have to consider what happens
• 6:06
  when they finally make a sale. Right. because
• 6:08
  Meridian's accounts receivable spiked by $20
• 6:11
  million. They ship the tools to these major retailers,
• 6:16
  but those retailers, you know, they demand 90
• 6:19
  -day payment terms. So Meridian gets to book
• 6:23
  that revenue on the income statement immediately,
• 6:25
  which boosts that $18 million profit. But the
• 6:28
  money isn't there. Right. The money is just sitting
• 6:30
  on the balance sheet as this, like, paper IOU.
• 6:33
  The cash is basically trapped in a state of limbo,
• 6:35
  so we have to subtract another $20 million. Ouch.
• 6:39
  Yeah, and the final working capital piece is
• 6:41
  accounts payable. Meridian owed its own suppliers
• 6:45
  more money at year end, meaning their accounts
• 6:47
  payable actually went up by $4 million. They
• 6:50
  just didn't pay their bills right away. Essentially,
• 6:52
  yeah. They forced their suppliers to finance
• 6:54
  a tiny fraction of this operation by just holding
• 6:57
  onto the cash longer. Oh, I see. So since the
• 7:00
  cash didn't leave the building, we add that $4
• 7:02
  million back. OK, so let's do the final math
• 7:05
  on this operating engine because it paints a
• 7:06
  pretty grim picture. We started with the $30
• 7:09
  million in profit plus depreciation. We subtract
• 7:14
  $22 million for the inventory buildup. We subtract
• 7:17
  $20 million. for the uncollected receivables.
• 7:20
  And we add $4 million for the stretch payables.
• 7:23
  That means Meridian's $18 million profit actually
• 7:27
  translates to negative $8 million in operating
• 7:30
  cash flow. Yeah. Working capital acts like the
• 7:33
  clutch in a manual transmission. You know, the
• 7:36
  engine of the business is revving. They are recognizing
• 7:38
  record sales and boasting these massive profit
• 7:40
  margins. But the car isn't actually moving forward.
• 7:44
  The cash is entirely trapped, completely trapped
• 7:46
  in the friction of unsold inventory and uncollected
• 7:49
  invoices. But, you know, here's where I want
• 7:52
  to push back a little or at least clarify, because
• 7:54
  this reveals a fascinating paradox about business
• 7:57
  expansion. Oh, totally. The cash flow statement
• 7:59
  isn't necessarily penalizing Meridian. Right?
• 8:02
  It's just exposing the physics of growth. Like
• 8:05
  growing a physical product business just consumes
• 8:07
  a massive amount of cash before it ever returns
• 8:09
  a dime. That's exactly it. What's fascinating
• 8:11
  here is that if a company grows its receivables
• 8:14
  and its inventory balances at a faster rate than
• 8:16
  its top line sales, it will eventually choke
• 8:19
  on its own expansion. Wow. Even if they're profitable.
• 8:23
  Even if... Every single invoice represents a
• 8:26
  highly profitable sale on paper. The delay between
• 8:30
  cash going out to suppliers and cash coming in
• 8:32
  from customers, it creates this fatal liquidity
• 8:36
  gap. So if Meridian's core operations are bleeding
• 8:39
  $8 million, how are they physically keeping the
• 8:42
  lights on? I mean, they aren't just running a
• 8:44
  deficit. They're also expanding. Right, which
• 8:46
  requires looking at the second major section
• 8:48
  of the cash flow statement, investing cash flow.
• 8:51
  OK. So Meridian spent $25 million on capital
• 8:54
  expenditure or CAPEX. They bought new automated
• 8:58
  milling machines, they expanded the factory floor,
• 9:00
  all to keep up with this booming demand. So we
• 9:03
  take the negative $8 million from operations
• 9:05
  and we subtract another $25 million for investing
• 9:07
  activities. Yep. Which means Meridian has a $33
• 9:10
  million hole in its bank account for the year.
• 9:13
  OK, so that brings us to the third section, which
• 9:15
  is financing cash flow. Because the only way
• 9:17
  to plug a $33 million hole is to go get outside
• 9:20
  capital. Precisely. And the documents show Meridian
• 9:24
  went to their lenders and secured $30 million
• 9:28
  in new bank debt. $30 million. $30 million. And
• 9:31
  incredibly, right alongside taking on that massive
• 9:34
  leverage, they paid out a $5 million dividend
• 9:38
  to their shareholders. This is just wild to me.
• 9:40
  This is where understanding fungibility becomes
• 9:43
  just paramount. Because tomorrow morning, financial
• 9:47
  news outlets, they're just going to read the
• 9:48
  press release. Oh, absolutely. They're going
• 9:50
  to highlight the $18 million net income. They're
• 9:53
  going to applaud management for rewarding shareholders
• 9:56
  with that $5 million dividend. But cash is completely
• 9:59
  fungible. A dollar is a dollar, regardless of
• 10:02
  where it came from. Since the core operations
• 10:04
  generated negative cash, there were zero organic
• 10:07
  profits available to distribute. None at all.
• 10:10
  So that dividend was essentially a direct transfer
• 10:12
  from the bank's loan facility straight into the
• 10:15
  shareholders' brokerage accounts. Meridian basically
• 10:18
  borrowed money strictly to hand it out, projecting
• 10:21
  this illusion of health. And the irony of all
• 10:24
  this is that the bank is perfectly willing to
• 10:26
  lend them that $30 million because the loan is
• 10:29
  collateralized against the very things draining
• 10:31
  the cash. Wait, what do you mean? Well, the bank
• 10:34
  looks at the massive $22 million inventory pile,
• 10:38
  the $20 million accounts receivable ledger, and
• 10:41
  all that new $25 million factory equipment. Oh,
• 10:45
  I see. They see hard assets they can liquidate.
• 10:48
  if Meridian defaults. So the working capital
• 10:51
  trap actually creates the collateral for the
• 10:54
  debt that funds the illusion. Yes, that is wild.
• 10:57
  So the company is taking on interest bearing
• 10:59
  debt, which, by the way, is just going to drag
• 11:01
  down future operating cash flow even further
• 11:03
  just to keep up appearances. Yeah. And perhaps
• 11:06
  trigger management bonuses that are tied to,
• 11:08
  you know, net income and dividend payouts. Right.
• 11:12
  Because their bonuses are based on the accounting
• 11:13
  opinion, not the cash reality. Exactly. It is
• 11:16
  a house of cards. But the good news is You don't
• 11:18
  need a forensic accounting degree to spot it.
• 11:20
  Thank goodness. The source material outlines
• 11:23
  what we can call the two -minute test. It is
• 11:25
  probably the highest signal diagnostic check
• 11:27
  available to any normal investor. OK, how does
• 11:30
  it work? You simply plot net income against operating
• 11:33
  cash flow over a rolling five -year period. Why
• 11:37
  five years? Because I guess a single year of
• 11:40
  negative operating cash flow might just be noise,
• 11:42
  right? Yeah, exactly. Like a company might have
• 11:45
  executed a strategic temporary inventory buildup
• 11:47
  ahead of some massive product launch or maybe
• 11:50
  a major client payment simply cleared on January
• 11:53
  2nd instead of December 31st. Right, just a timing
• 11:56
  issue. But over five years, all that accounting
• 11:59
  noise cancels out. and the physical reality emerges.
• 12:03
  For a healthy, mature enterprise, operating cash
• 12:06
  flow must consistently exceed net income. Because
• 12:08
  of the depreciation. Yes, that depreciation add
• 12:10
  back provides a natural floor. And the working
• 12:13
  capital cycle should eventually stabilize as
• 12:15
  a percentage of revenue. OK, so if you see a
• 12:17
  multi -year trend where net income is just soaring,
• 12:20
  but operating cash flow is flatlining or even
• 12:22
  turning negative, that divergence is a massive
• 12:25
  siren. It's a huge red flag. It tells you the
• 12:28
  profit is tied up in aggressive accounting assumptions
• 12:31
  or maybe permanently bloated inventory or clients
• 12:35
  who simply aren't paying their bills. OK, so
• 12:37
  the two minute test establishes the baseline.
• 12:40
  But the sources say the ultimate metric you want
• 12:42
  is free cash flow. Yes, free cash flow is the
• 12:46
  gold standard. And you calculate this by taking
• 12:49
  the operating cash flow. and subtracting capital
• 12:51
  expenditures, right? That's correct. So for Meridian,
• 12:53
  that's negative 8 million from operations minus
• 12:56
  25 million in CapEx. Yielding a free cash flow
• 12:59
  of negative 33 million dollars. Exactly. Free
• 13:02
  cash flow is the true measure of what a business
• 13:05
  can actually sustain without external help. Like,
• 13:09
  what can they pay in dividends or buybacks without
• 13:11
  borrowing? But here's a question. The cash flow
• 13:13
  statement itself doesn't explicitly break out
• 13:16
  the nuance of that CapEx number, does it? Like,
• 13:18
  it usually just lists one lump sum for purchases
• 13:21
  of property and equipment. That's true. It's
• 13:23
  usually just one big number. So how do you distinguish
• 13:26
  between, you know, good growth capex, like expanding
• 13:29
  the business, and bad maintenance capex, where
• 13:32
  you're spending heavily just to stand still?
• 13:34
  Right. Well, if a company spends 10 million to
• 13:37
  build a new facility that doubles output, obviously
• 13:40
  that's growth. If they spend 10 million constantly
• 13:43
  repairing 20 -year -old machines just to maintain
• 13:45
  their current sales volume, that's maintenance.
• 13:49
  But you're right, that split isn't on the primary
• 13:51
  statement. So I assume an investor has to dig
• 13:53
  through the management discussion and analysis
• 13:56
  footnotes or listen to quarterly earnings calls
• 13:59
  to see if management transparently breaks it
• 14:01
  out. You do. Or alternatively, you could look
• 14:04
  at the relationship between CapEx and baseline
• 14:06
  depreciation. Oh, that's clever. Yeah. If CapEx
• 14:09
  massively exceeds depreciation year after year,
• 14:12
  like we saw with Meridian, they are aggressively
• 14:15
  expanding their asset base. If CapEx barely covers
• 14:18
  depreciation, they are probably just replacing
• 14:20
  what's That makes a lot of sense. Now, while
• 14:23
  you're analyzing these metrics, there are two
• 14:26
  major structural traps in how these statements
• 14:28
  are assembled that can heavily distort your analysis.
• 14:31
  Okay, traps. I'm listening. The first involves
• 14:33
  the fundamental construction of the operating
• 14:36
  section itself. Almost every publicly traded
• 14:39
  company uses what is called the indirect method.
• 14:42
  Which is that reverse engineering process we
• 14:44
  just did, right? Starting with accrual net income,
• 14:47
  adding back non -cash items, adjusting for working
• 14:49
  capital. Exactly. But the alternative would be
• 14:52
  the direct method, which just acts like a literal
• 14:55
  bank ledger, like cash collected from customers
• 14:58
  minus cash paid to suppliers. That seems infinitely
• 15:02
  more transparent for the investor. Why don't
• 15:04
  they just use that? It is much cleaner to read,
• 15:06
  but it is an absolute administrative nightmare
• 15:09
  for a corporation to produce. Really? Why? Because
• 15:11
  modern enterprise accounting systems are built
• 15:14
  from the ground up on accrual principles. They
• 15:16
  are designed to track invoices, purchase orders,
• 15:19
  complex revenue recognition schedules, to use
• 15:22
  the direct method. A company would essentially
• 15:24
  have to run a completely parallel shadow accounting
• 15:27
  system dedicated exclusively to tracking the
• 15:30
  exact second the cash transfer clears the bank.
• 15:33
  OK, so rather than doubling their accounting
• 15:35
  overhead, standards allow them to just work backward
• 15:38
  from the accrual net income to reconcile the
• 15:41
  cash balance. Yeah, exactly. The second and arguably
• 15:45
  more dangerous trap involves international accounting
• 15:48
  jurisdictions. Oh, I've heard about this. Yeah.
• 15:50
  Under U .S. gap rules, things are relatively
• 15:52
  rigid. Interest paid on debt is strictly classified
• 15:55
  as an operating cash outflow. But under IFRS,
• 16:00
  the international financial reporting standards
• 16:02
  used in most of the rest of the world management
• 16:04
  is granted significant flexibility. Flexibility
• 16:07
  meaning they can reclassify certain cash flows.
• 16:10
  to make their core operations look stronger.
• 16:13
  Precisely. So if a European company is paying
• 16:15
  massive interest on its debt, they can choose
• 16:17
  to dump that expense down into the financing
• 16:20
  sections to the operating section. Yes, they
• 16:22
  absolutely can. They have to declare their policy
• 16:25
  in the footnotes, and they must apply it consistently
• 16:27
  year over year. But the initial choice is entirely
• 16:30
  theirs. They can argue that since debt is a financing
• 16:33
  decision, the interest paid on it belongs in
• 16:35
  the financing section. Wow. Which... artificially
• 16:39
  inflates their operating cash flow compared to
• 16:42
  an identical American competitor. Exactly. So
• 16:44
  if you blindly run like a stock screen or filtering
• 16:48
  for high operating cash flow, you might accidentally
• 16:50
  favor a heavily indebted IFRS company simply
• 16:53
  because they shifted their interest payments
• 16:55
  out of the operating section. You absolutely
• 16:57
  have to read the policy notes to ensure you're
• 16:59
  comparing apples to apples. That is wild. But
• 17:02
  understanding these jurisdictional quirks, the
• 17:04
  nature of the indirect method, and the lethal
• 17:06
  drain of working capital, it transforms you from
• 17:09
  a passive reader of financial press releases
• 17:11
  into an active investigator. Yeah, because profit
• 17:14
  provides this vital theoretical framework for
• 17:19
  understanding the long -term unit economics of
• 17:22
  a business, right? It tells you if the core idea
• 17:24
  of the company actually makes sense. Right. But
• 17:27
  cash flow is the brutal, immediate reality of
• 17:30
  survival. Meridian Toolworks just proves that
• 17:33
  rapid expansion can be just as deadly as declining
• 17:36
  sales if that working capital friction isn't
• 17:39
  managed. You are basically looking for businesses
• 17:41
  where the gears of sales and cash collections
• 17:45
  sync up smoothly, where the cash flow statement
• 17:47
  validates the income statement rather than contradicts
• 17:50
  it. And we've seen how easy it is for a profitable
• 17:53
  company to disguise a debt -funded dividend,
• 17:56
  and we've walked through the tools to detect
• 17:58
  it. The ultimate lesson here really seems to
• 18:00
  be never celebrate a headline profit number until
• 18:03
  you have checked the actual bank statement. Very
• 18:06
  true. But before we wrap up, consider this one
• 18:09
  final puzzle. We have established that profit
• 18:11
  is an opinion and cash is a fact. But if cash
• 18:14
  is a factual, audible reality, can management
• 18:18
  still fake the photograph? Wait, really? How?
• 18:20
  Well, imagine a scenario where a company is approaching
• 18:23
  the final weeks of its fourth quarter and management
• 18:25
  realizes their operating cash flow is looking
• 18:27
  disastrously low. What happens to the cash flow
• 18:31
  statement and the company's bank balance? if
• 18:34
  management simply unplugs the accounts payable
• 18:36
  phone line and completely stops paying their
• 18:39
  suppliers for the last 20 days of December. Oh
• 18:41
  my god. A sudden, miraculous spike in operating
• 18:45
  cash flow right at the reporting deadline, driven
• 18:48
  entirely by a massive surge in accounts payable.
• 18:51
  Exactly. The cash is technically sitting in the
• 18:53
  bank on December 31st. So it looks perfect for
• 18:56
  the year -end audit. It does. But what happens
• 18:59
  on January 1st when the suppliers realize they've
• 19:01
  been used as a short -term financing facility?
• 19:04
  Does the photograph reflect the reality of the
• 19:06
  business, or just the reality of a single, highly
• 19:09
  manipulated day? That is, wow. It's a posed photograph.
• 19:13
  We'll leave you to mull over how to spot that
• 19:14
  specific illusion. Unbelievable. Well, thank
• 19:17
  you for joining us on this deep dive. Take these
• 19:19
  concepts, open up the latest financial filings
• 19:21
  of a company you own, and run the two -minute
• 19:23
  test. Calculate their free cash flow. Map out
• 19:27
  their working capital. You might uncover a machine
• 19:29
  running perfectly, or you might find a Meridian
• 19:31
  Toolworks burning through borrowed time.