Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Why Is She on Tinder If She Needs a Job?

Transcript

Why Is She on Tinder If She Needs a Job? · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Okay, good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you may be,
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian,
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: I'm here with Allison, and this is the fundraising stream
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: where we're going to be doing the gamified portion of
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: the monthly fundraiser, which involves Allison dancing like a monkey
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: for your entertainment. And yeah, welcome to the show. So Allison,
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: you want to tell everybody how this works? whenever you're
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: done with the playing with the mute button. All right.
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: So, Oh my God, sorry. I'm yes. That's exactly what
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: the problem was. I had like three dozen tabs and
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: then I had to get back to discord and that's
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: where the mute button was. Okay.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: So if you would like to just support us, you
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: can go feed to feed the badger.com slash support or
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: just feed the badger. The form is the first thing
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: you see on feed the badger. And please do help
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: us out for the month so we can continue to
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: bring you this analysis, which I am increasingly believing is
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: the only source of it, because I don't think anybody
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: else is wading into population surveys to uncover the habits
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: and aggregate of women, let's just say. So anyway, if
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: you want to support us directly, feedthebadger.com slash support, please
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: do so, because I think that what we're doing is
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: very critical to bring attention to. I know it's not
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: the most enjoyable of topics, but it's one that, well,
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: if we can get some eyes on it, maybe we
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: can reverse the course of the end of our civilization.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: So anyway, feedthebadger.com slash support to help us out. And
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: if you want to send a message, feedthebadger.com slash justthetip
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: at any time through the show, and I will tell
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: you what this particular show is about. Twice a month,
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: we do this kind of a fundraiser where we... gamify
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: the fundraiser and uh if you would like me to
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: do a custom level on beat saber you can send
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: those song requests to feed the badger.com slash just the
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: tip and if i get through your song requests on
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: your honor you will put 25 in the hat for
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: myself brian hannah and hbr for the month and um
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: yeah so get those song requests in i know this
• 2:21
  Speaker 2: might be a very slow one We'll see. We'll see
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: if anybody puts in some song requests. Cause I know
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: you're all busy with other things, but anyway, let's, let's see.
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: Let's see if we can continue for another month. All right.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: So anyway, feed the badger.com slash support to do that. Okay.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: So we are streaming. We are streaming in portrait mode.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: I don't know what you're talking about. Beanism is lies.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: It's a, it's you're literally in the portrait mode. Um,
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: stream so and the the horizontal is on rumble only
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: because we are playing licensed music so we're trying not
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: to get our channel completely absolutely obliterated because we want
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: to stay on youtube so um join us on rumble
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: if you want the you know the widescreen version it's
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: uh hp radio on rumble so um anyway go ahead
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: alice and what we're gonna say.
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: Um, just, uh, seeing if you had anything you, you
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: wanted to talk about.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: Uh, well, I mean, no, but, um, I can probably
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: find something. I'm sorry. I'm it's well, I'll just say
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: I'm gearing up for, um, spooky season and I'm going
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: to be so like, I, I did do this one thing. Uh,
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: I don't know if it's, like worth bringing up, but
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: on Rumble, for the same reasons that we're streaming Beat
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: Saber to Rumble, I was able to stream entire movies
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: on Rumble and watch them. Now, I didn't have a
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: lot of people watching. I only had like a couple,
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: but it did work. And I recently streamed one of
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: my guilty pleasure movies, which is a movie that most
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: people don't like, but I don't mind it, Van Helsing.
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: Because it's kind of like a fun Universal Monsters type movie.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: But I plan on streaming some more horror flicks for
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: the rest of September and then going into October. Because
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: I like to start spooky season early. So I have
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: some plans like In the Mouth of Madness and Color
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: Out of Space. Like these kinds of movies. If I
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: can get it to work. So, other than that, I mean,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Like, there isn't a ton going on.
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: I guess I was just looking on X. Sorry, I
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: was trying to remember what the hell it's called. I
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: wanted to say Twitter, but it's not Twitter. I was
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: looking on X to see what people are talking about.
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: And one thing that's been on everybody's lips is the
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: new Wolverine video game that came out. Specifically because of
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: how awful it is and how much they've emasculated Wolverine
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: in it. Like, they completely took... drained every ounce of
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: anything appealing out of it. Like, it's absolutely, like, a travesty.
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: But I knew they were going to do it because
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: the people involved with this, they want to castrate everything
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: male or masculine as often as possible.
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: And.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: People buy into it. They allow it to happen. So anyway. Yeah.
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean, it's the it's the influence of the
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: psychology of men and masculinities field.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: People are thinking, oh, that's just academia.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: Nope.
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: They influence everything. They've even taken over basically Movember. It
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: happened sometime in, I think, 2016. And they switched from
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: actually providing anything with services for men and mental health,
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: and they significantly reduced their donations to prostate cancer and other, well,
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: basically just prostate cancer, in favor of pursuing these kinds
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: of community interventions around teaching men not to man. Have
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: you tried not being a man today in order to
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: increase your mental health stat bar? Just try not being
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: a man. And then they get into all of this media.
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: They even have, through Movember, they've done commissions for YouTubers
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: to do content. Interestingly, once the YouTuber does the content,
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: it becomes a bit less popular. valuable, I guess, to
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: the cause of getting men to renunciate their manhood. Because
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: YouTubers seem to translate it into something that's more human, amazingly.
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: Could you imagine that? YouTubers are actually applying a filter
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: that makes whatever comes out of the psychology of men
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: and masculinity laundered through the Movember movement into something that
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: resembles a human thought, as opposed to just conversion therapy
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: developed by feminists. But anyway, the ultimate goal is to
• 7:33
  Speaker 2: get men to renunciate their manhood. And they inform media.
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: They inform Hollywood. They inform the animation industry. They're pretty
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: much everywhere. Or their graduates do. And yeah, that's their goal.
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: They're going to take everything that men value, every example
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: of manhood, and they're going to get it to renunciate itself,
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: to renunciate its masculinity. And that's what we're going to
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: have in the future. And Wolverine is just the most
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: current victim. But they're coming for everyone, guys. Unbelievable, huh?
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: Anyway, with that cheery thought, I'm going to do another
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: call out for somebody to send us in a request
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: at FeedTheBadger.com slash JustTheTip. We'll do five. I don't know.
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: Maybe I should put it at three because I don't
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: even know if we're going to get any attention on this.
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: It's been so quiet. But anyway, FeedTheBadger.com slash JustTheTip if
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: you care to help us out. And yeah, it is
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: quite the.
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: Endless fight. The endless slog. It can be very depressing
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: at times. And I apologize we aren't more cheery.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah, I get it.
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: I can find something, probably. It won't be fun. It'll
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: be amusing in its tin-earedness. But just give me a
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: moment because I've got to chase it down.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: Okay well in the meantime let me see who's watching
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: so we got 7 here we got 11 on rumble
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: but everyone's really quiet can I ask you guys a
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: question if you're watching it's not working on rumble what
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: do you mean it's not working on rumble why isn't
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: it working on rumble it should be streaming to rumble
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: Jesus Christ hold on a second okay Let me go
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: look and see what the issue is. I have to
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: stop for a moment and redo these links.
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: It should work, but.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: I don't know why it's not.
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: So let's just do this again. I'm going to try
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: and stream it again. It's okay. We just started. Should
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: be all right. It is still streaming to the vertical.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: So there is that. All right. So now I am
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: streaming to Rumble. Let's see. if we get some activity here.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: Pop the chat out. You're out of touch. I'm out
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: of time.
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: Oh, why isn't it working? Oh,
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: let's give it another second.
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: Is Rumble like having issues?
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: Um, it seems to, I don't know why it's like
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: not getting the, like it's not, the stream isn't showing
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: for me, but I'm trying to, maybe it's a little
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: bit lagging behind. Oh, there we go. There we go.
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: We're live. We're on rumble.
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: All right. Excellent.
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: So yeah. And we are getting requests. We just got one.
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: So it's stuck on stream starting. It should be back
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: up now. Check it out. On Rumble, when I looked,
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: it was stuck on the waiting for stream image. Yeah,
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: it should be fine now. I don't know what the
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: deal is, but I changed the stream key and now
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: it's fine. So, no idea.
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: Anyway, get those requests in if you can. Yep.
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: And I also sent Brian something we can cover.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: All right. Let me see what it is.
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: A Turkish dating joke.
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: Got 38.5 million views okay probably should try to find
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: the original let me see if I can.
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: If well I mean I can just open it it's okay.
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: No I mean the original like material this that got
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: circulated because this is like the feminist analysis of it.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: Okay um well oh Let me see. This is from
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: July 14th. Maybe I can search for it. Because I
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: can use the Google account to look at it. Oh,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: here we go.
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: I got it. I'm looking at it. A Turkish dating
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: joke got 38.5 million views. Men around the world recognized it. Oh,
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: this is rage bait, isn't it?
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: Okay. Okay. Um, it's, it's more than rage, but like this, uh, this, um,
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: Luke Olinga is like a anthropologist of the manosphere who is,
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: doesn't get it at all.
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: Of course she doesn't get it. Of course not.
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: He, he, it's the he.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: It's a he?
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: Yes, it's a he. Oh. He doesn't get it. Oh, okay.
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: He doesn't get it at all. Yeah.
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: Well, of course he doesn't.
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: It's the density. The density of his thinking around this
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: joke is actually amusing. But, you know, let's, you want to,
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: we could just read his article. Do you have it up?
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: I can, yeah, I have it up. I have it
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: up on my browser. Do you want me to share it?
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it might be a little bit more useful than
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: what is currently being shared. And again, guys, get those
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: song requests in, feedthebadger.com slash justthetip. Sorry for my despair.
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: I'm just feeling sort of depressed. Oh, we got one more.
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: So we got two. So three more, guys. Three more.
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: It'll cheer me up to go beat on blocks. So feedthebadger.com
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: slash justthetip. Give me the opportunity to take my Gresham
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: out on something. Yes, let's take a look at this absolute...
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: First of all, why don't you just go look at
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: Luke Olinga and see what he has to say for himself.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's take a look here. Luke Olinga, from
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: a Cameroonian shantytown to the Boston Globe, founder of the
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: Manosphere newsletter covering masculinity, AI, power, and culture. He used
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: to work for AFP. What is that? I feel like
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: I know what that is.
• 14:34
  Speaker 2: AFP?
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: AFP, Gizmodo, and The Street. So, basically... Oh, he's a journalist, guys. Yeah,
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: he's a journalist. And he basically uses his journalism to
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: basically put himself among the elites. The intellectual elites. Your
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: intellectual betters. So, we just got another one. Thank you. So,
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: we have three requests in. Um... About, let me see.
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: I tell the stories mainstream media often misses. From the
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: evolving place of black men in America, which I'm sure
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: is framed only around oppression of them because they're black,
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: to the rise of the modern manosphere. I explore identity, power,
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: and belonging through personal narratives and on-the-ground reporting. I track
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: the culture wars, masculinity influencers, and the movements reshaping how
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: men see themselves today. Yeah, I bet you do. He
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: might even be one of these approved men to discuss the,
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: you know, men's issues, which is, it is a thing
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: that exists, but it's very like policed heavily, you know,
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: like Scott Galloway types, Michael Flood types. Like they, you know,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: they're okay as long as they keep the blame on
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: men and continue to pathologize them and demand that they
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: surrender their identity as men, then they'll be okay. Yeah.
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and which is feeding the disease, because the disease
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: is that men have been undercut as partners for women.
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: It's an entire industry just bearing down on men's worth.
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: And when the man isn't a value, like I invite
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: people to go watch noir or movies prior to the 60s, right?
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: Go watch them. the man is often presented as the prize.
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: And this is a time period, and I've looked at
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: the statistics, this is a time period where almost every
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: man had the opportunity to get married. I'm not kidding.
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: You could earn in the Bottom 1% of income and
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: you still could probably get married You still had a
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: better chance of getting married than a man in the
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: 90th percent of income now Just chew that over there.
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: Just chew it over 1% basically In the prior to
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: this the 80s and prior you just had to have
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: a job you just had to be willing to get
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: up and go to work and you were eligible and
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: You are an eligible man. Get up to go to work,
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: comb your hair, wash your shorts, be presentable, do something
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: for somebody else. And a woman out there would be like, yep,
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: that's good enough. And now you have to be in
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: the top 90% to get the same odds as the
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: 1% did in 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950, 1960, 1970, and
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: then the 80s happened. And everything crashed. Oh, and by
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: the way, the numbers that I'm looking back go back
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: to the 1900s. So the end of the 20th century.
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: So it goes back pretty far. Or the end of
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: the 19th century. Sorry. I have 150 years of data
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: on this, on marriage.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: So, yeah, something changed in the 80s. Really accelerated in
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: the early 2000s. And now we're at a situation where
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: you have to earn in the 90th percentile of income
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: to have the same chance of being married as a man,
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: as a man did as a one percenter man, like
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: a one percent income. Because like, I don't know, he
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: earned like $ 300 a year. He had a chance. Literally,
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: the bar was, can you make yourself presentable and do
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: a shift of work? And that was it for women.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: They're just like, yep, he's good enough. And you can
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: feel it. Like you watch those older movies. The man
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: himself was worth it. Was what she wanted. The income
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: assisted in building the life together. You can see the
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: difference in the attitude. And that's women in Hollywood. They're
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: a weird sort. But I really doubt that if the
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: women who are most likely... to reject men. And in
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: the industry that's most likely to want to valorize this
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: social climbing, women still wanted men. I think that the
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: average woman probably also wanted men. They wanted a man,
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: a person who was a man. Now, what the majority
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: of women want is a position. And the man in
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: that position is occupying it illegitimately. So they want a
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: place in the queue. They don't want a man. In fact,
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: the man in the positions is a liability, which is
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: why the man has to have several positions up for
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: him to even justify being considered. And this is an
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: endless upward ratchet for men. But I mean, the numbers
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: are right there. In 1940, A man in the 1th
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: percentile of income, that is the bottom percentile of income,
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: had as much likelihood of being married as a man
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: in the 90th percentile of income does now. How are
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: men supposed to fucking fix this? When the disease is
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: in women, and the disease very much has a specific shape,
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: and that shape is... Men are worthless. Men oppress. When
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: men commit, they are dominating and destroying you as a woman.
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: What does that sound like? Where do those words originate from?
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: And then suddenly, a man goes from being something you
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: want in your life to something you want to eject
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: from the position you want in your life. How many
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: freaking ways do feminists have feminists invented to tell us
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: all how horrible men are and how worthless they are
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: as partners? And of course, that's not even the worst
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: of it, because it is marching upwards monotonically. There are
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: some women in communities that actually shame the women for
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: outrageous acts. Like wanting a position instead of a man?
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: How long have men been shamed for wanting a woman
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: with big boobs? Or a nice butt? Or is younger?
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: Or has a pretty face? You know what these things are?
• 21:46
  Speaker 2: These things belong to people that exist. And we have
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: not a speck of shame for women who basically want
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: men to cease to exist but give them their positions. Like,
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: they don't even want... It's pure instrumentalization of men. And
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: we don't even have a speck of shame for that,
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: except for some small communities that are eroding in this
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: devil's headwind, eroding away. Some small communities that shame women
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: for extravagant, for not wanting the men. You know what those...
• 22:20
  Speaker 2: Those vows are for richer and poorer and sickness and health.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: What does that mean? You want the man, not the
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: position he provides you. That's how you get a biblical
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: marriage or a sanctified holy marriage. You want the man.
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: You want the man's love. Because the man's love is
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: likened to Christ's love. Right? And you don't get any
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: higher than that. You don't get any more benefit than
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: that in your life. At least in the Christian cosmology. Sorry,
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: I'm just analyzing it in terms of its social effects.
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: Sorry to the atheists. I'm not trying to say that
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: you need to be Christian. I'm not. I just recognize
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: what it's done right. And what it's done right is
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: to make men's presence in their women's lives akin to
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: Christ's presence on earth. That's a good sales pitch, eh?
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: Good sales pitch. It really shuts up the women who
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: are like, well, I don't know. I don't want a man.
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: I just want what he can give me. Can I
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: get that thing without him? Which is what the vast
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: majority of secular women, in particularly clustered in the left,
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: want now. That should be shamed. Or at least it
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: should be recognized. You know what? It should be shamed.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: But first we need to recognize it. That this is
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: a disease in women's minds. Men just want an attractive woman.
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: Women want men not to exist. They just want a
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: silhouette of a man. Can I bump a silhouette of
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: a man? Can I go to town like a weasel
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: on a sock? Like, fucking God. All right. Sorry.
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: I may have spent a little too long in the...
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: Staring into the abyss. Abyss of too long. Sorry, guys. Yeah. Yeah.
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: But yeah, let's read the article. Let's see what Luke
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: Olinga has to say about the fact that in the
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: last 150 years, what used to take a 1% income,
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: just having a job, guys, that's basically just, does the
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: guy have a job? He works at 7-Eleven? Ah, he's marriageable.
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: Come on, let's go have kids. He works pumping gas? Yeah,
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: that's eligible too. Let's go have kids. He works mowing lawns. Ah,
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: he's industrious. Let's go have kids. He works as a
• 24:53
  Speaker 2: freaking art writer. That's probably why men who were writing
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: back then could actually have families. Oh, hey, he works.
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: He writes pulp stories. Okay, excellent. Let's go have kids. Right?
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: He drives a taxi. Hey, that's a great provider. Let's
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: go have kids. These were these women's choices then. And
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: then the fucking 80s hit. And the ratchet began. And now,
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: not even an investment banker is sufficient. No, middle management? God, no. Professor? Ew. Incel.
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: Professional athlete? Well, maybe, if he lets me fuck other men.
• 25:39
  Speaker 2: The freaking... Emperor of the universe. Well, possibly. Could he
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: sweeten the deal a little? Just a little, just a tad.
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: I mean, emperor of the universe sounds pretty good, but
• 25:55
  Speaker 2: I think I could do better. And again, I'm comparing
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: this to pre-80s woman.
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: Does he have a pulse?
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: And does he make minimal wage? Fine, we're going in.
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: Family time. Jesus Christ. And the funny thing is they
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: say that this is like the end of patriarchy. You
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: know what patriarchy effectively means? It means valuing men as people, apparently.
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: Just putting value on having a man. That was patriarchy, guys.
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: Women wanting to get married. Women actually desiring a man sexually.
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: That's patriarchy. Goddamn. And I can tell you, I don't
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: know how accurate noir is to reality, but I can't
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: imagine it's that inaccurate since people were paying to watch it.
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: There are a lot of, you know, when women got
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: married and heroines, they had all kinds of different personalities
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: and jobs in noir. You know, some very forceful and
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: all kinds of secondary female. They don't exist anymore. There's
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: just one role for women in media now and for Hollywood.
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: And that is boss babe with a giant chip on
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: her shoulder who has no control of her emotions, yet
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: was always perfectly wonderful and all right and absolutely what
• 27:23
  Speaker 2: was needed. And only the patriarchy told her otherwise all
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: the time. All along. Okay.
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah. All right. So we got, let's see. Uh, we
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: got four songs in right now. So.
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: Okay. I should rant more. Yeah.
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: Um, all right. So the article, uh, well, I don't
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: want to be here.
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah. That thing. Oh yeah. That thing.
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: What?
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: I said, you're like the article.
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. The article that we haven't started yet. Oh yeah.
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: That thing.
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah. That thing. All right. A Turkish dating joke got 38.5
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: million views. Men around the world recognized it. And there
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: is an image. I think the image is the cartoon, maybe? No, no,
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: it's not. No, it isn't. A four-line joke about sex
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: and money traveled from Turkey to China, Japan, Europe, and
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: the United States. The Manosphere didn't create the feeling behind it.
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: It already knew how to use it. That sounds like
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: AI wrote this already, but okay.
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: So, um, maybe it'll, maybe it'll bring, maybe it'll mention Tuesday.
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: And if it's not X, it's Y when it's neither.
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: Well, I just, it just gave us one of those.
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: It said the manosphere didn't create the feeling behind it.
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: It already knew how to use it. Oh yes.
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: So that's not quite, it's not X.
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: It's, it's, yeah, but it's, it's sort of like giving
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: me AI feels, but, This guy probably wrote, but then
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: had AI help him write it. So, all right. On
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: July 9th, a Turkish account posted a joke. Two panels
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: and four lines. Quote, making love in the 90s. End quote.
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: It begins. Man, I'm sexually attracted to you. Woman, me too. Man,
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: let's make out. Woman, yes. End quote. Then, making love
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: in 2026. The man says the same line. The woman
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: answers with a lisp. Rent is due. She needs her
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: hair done. She hasn't eaten since last week. She needs
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: a new bag, new clothes, money for her beauty expenses.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: The man asks if she is a whore. She calls
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: him disgusting, a misogynist, and not a real man. That's
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: the whole bit. As of this writing, it has 38.5
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: million views. And then he includes a link to it,
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: but it's in Turkish, so yeah, I'm not reading that.
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: That's like moon runes. Then the guy continues. I don't
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: cover viral jokes for their own sake. I cover them
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: when the replies start arriving in six languages. Under this one,
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: a Chinese account wrote roughly, ha ha, so true, brother.
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: A Japanese user asked, it's universal, isn't it? A Spanish
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: speaker said, amen, brother. A Brazilian shrugged, if she's worth it,
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: just send the pics, the country's instant payment app. The
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: Pix is the name.
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: Of the brand. Brazilians, what the fuck are you doing?
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: You're not sending your best here.
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: Well, something about Brazilian women, I guess, compared to the others.
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: A Nigerian reply insisted the list was incomplete. Someone in
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: Poland offered his own dark punchline, which, of course, this
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: guy's not repeating here. Another Chinese user asked a question
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: that stopped me. China is like this. Is Turkey too?
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: Strangers on opposite sides of the planet comparing notes on
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: the same wound. Okay, so it sounds like something that
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: is bringing men together of all different kinds of cultures
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: and backgrounds. We got our fifth request, by the way. Yeah.
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: And they're all basically on the same page, and they're
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: all observing the same problem. So is this guy now
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: going to say all men everywhere that acknowledge this reality
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: are actually just sexists and they're delusional, even though what
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: they're all seeing and experiencing... seems to cross all geographic boundaries. So, um,
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: all right, shall I continue?
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: Okay. This is why I say that this is our asteroid. Yeah. If,
• 31:39
  Speaker 2: if this is everywhere guys and notice it's not, it's,
• 31:43
  Speaker 2: it's Spain, Nigeria, Poland, and China, Japan, uh, well, yeah,
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: probably Europe. Europe hasn't chimed in yet, probably because all
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: the European men don't want to speak up. Probably because
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: it's illegal or something.
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: It might be.
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: But yeah, this is everywhere, guys. This is our asteroid,
• 32:08
  Speaker 2: and it's exactly what I was talking about, the ratchet.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: Because men are undercut as persons by feminist conjecture, which
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: basically says they're walking domination sticks.
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: Like, they're walking domination weapons and nothing more for women.
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: It's everywhere. And each of these places has its own
• 32:31
  Speaker 2: particular problem. Spain? Feminism. Right? Spain is really fucked with feminism.
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: Japan doesn't have the same kind of feminism as the West.
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: But it does have feminism. It does have feminism, but
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: it's more... We had a guest that came in 2019
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: to the ICMI, and he came from Japan. And his
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: English was really bad, but he was like... He had, like,
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: Warren Farrell's books and stuff. And he was like, yeah,
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: feminism is very powerful in Japan. So, I mean, it's
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: basically powerful everywhere because it's using the same kind of ammunition.
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: But go on, Allison. I'm sorry.
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and then South Korea... as basically a smoking crater.
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: That's feminism's greatest hit, by the way, guys. But, you know,
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: each of these places had different marriage formation regimes. And,
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: of course, you have the Gulf states that are maintaining
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: something because they have a kinship formation regime where basically
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: your grandma arranges your marriage. They say it's the father,
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: but whenever I hear the actual anecdotes about who arranged
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: the relationship, it's always the grandma. And then the father
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: signs off on it. So you got that happening in
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: the Middle East, and it maintains itself by simply resisting
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: international banking feminism, the industrial feminism that comes in with
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: international banking, which writhes in when you become a creditor
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: nation like South Korea. So they've resisted that, although they're
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: falling too. Every place has this problem. It is our asteroid.
• 34:10
  Speaker 2: Because if we do not fix it, we are done
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: as a species. Okay? We are done. We can't afford this.
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: I mean, before that happens, of course, which is going
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: to happen in like 100 years, the complete death knell.
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: Before that happens, we're going to be cooked economically because
• 34:34
  Speaker 2: we also marginalized men there. And unfortunately, men are the
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: ones who are most likely to go in a room
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: where people are sloshing symbols around, selling symbols of things
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: and say, well, what happens when we have to make them?
• 34:48
  Speaker 2: What happens when we have to make all of these
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: claims whole? So they had to be shuffled out the
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: side door and replaced by men who never ask because
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: they don't care. Because what happens when people start asking,
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: can you make this? I have a claim on this thing.
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: Can I have it? Is that they'll simply use the
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: power of the state to shut that fucker up. You
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: don't need to worry about counterparties. If you can destroy them,
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: that's the economy. But it doesn't work when there are
• 35:24
  Speaker 2: too many counterparties to destroy. which we're probably going to
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: find out shortly. But that's what happened when you marginalized
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: men's custodial sense of responsibility. Men's tendency to be the
• 35:34
  Speaker 2: one guy in the room is like, okay, actually, I
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: think she did it. Wait, does she not have the
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: obligation of responsibility not to strangle her children? I mean,
• 35:45
  Speaker 2: not every man. You're always going to have the two
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: jurors that just bend to the will and the nagging
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: of the women in the room. But usually it's men
• 35:59
  Speaker 2: who will stand up and say, hey, wait, somebody needs
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: to take responsibility here. And that just shuts the whole
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: party down. Who wants that? They're party poopers. So we
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: just marginalize masculinity in the economy. And we'll just float
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: on the ocean of symbols. And we can all eat symbols,
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: don't you know, guys? I mean, not the rich people.
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: They'll actually eat stuff they buy. But the rest of us,
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: we can eat symbols. We can eat claims. We can
• 36:26
  Speaker 2: eat debt. I'm pretty sure that Monsanto and Nabisco are
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: figuring out how to turn debt, right, national debt into
• 36:39
  Speaker 2: food for the poor. And that's what we'll eat. Oh, God,
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: I sound like a real doomer. Anyway, let's continue in
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: the article.
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: All right. So let's get into the article. Where was I?
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: Strangers on opposite sides of the planet comparing notes on
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: the same wound. When I write about the Manosphere, I
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: usually start with the influencers, the podcast, the men selling courses.
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: This joke came from none of that. It came from
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: an anonymous account in Turkey, in Turkish, and it traveled
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: farther in five days than most Manosphere content travels in
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: a year. Nobody had to translate the feeling. The algorithm
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: just carried it to men who already recognized it. So
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: what is the feeling? Read the joke slowly and it
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: gets more complicated than the author probably intended. Yep, go ahead.
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: The algorithm just carried it to men who already recognized it.
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: So men. Yeah. The algorithm. It's a clever, clever algorithm, guys.
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: It's the algorithm creating the manosphere, feeding the resentment, because
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: it's so clever. You know what the algorithm did? It checked.
• 37:49
  Speaker 2: Is this poster a man between the ages of 18
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: and 65? Okay. Serve. And he was like, oh, I
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: recognize this. Damn, it's not the it's not the sneaky
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: sneaky evil algorithm that did this It was men sharing it.
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: I Guarantee it is men in all of these countries
• 38:13
  Speaker 2: being like yup and then sharing to their friends list
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: or sharing on their Twitter account They want to discredit
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: this by saying oh, it's the sneaky sneaky. It's the
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: sneaky spooky algorithm and Yeah, but that algorithm-pushed content doesn't
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: actually get necessarily that far unless it's part of the industry.
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: Unless somebody's paying a whole bunch of crap to YouTube
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: to push it, this is usually word of mouth or
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: just men sharing it, sharing it with each other. Right? Yeah.
• 38:50
  Speaker 2: So you see what he's doing? He's saying, oh, this
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: is the algorithm. No.
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: No.
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: This is something, this hidden note with men and they
• 38:57
  Speaker 2: shared it. That's it.
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. Okay, so let's keep going then. This piece
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: is part of the Manosphere, my reporting series on the
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: online and offline forces reshaping how boys and men understand themselves.
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: Subscribe on Substack to get the next chapter. So he
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: has a substack and he's telling us to go to
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: the substack for.
• 39:27
  Speaker 2: More of this I guess I know what he's not
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: going to report on he's not going to report on
• 39:34
  Speaker 2: the psychology of men and masculinities and what they want
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: to shape men and boys into which is neuters I
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: guess renunciators because and again it fits all very perfectly
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: The original formulation from the Red Stockings Manifesto is that
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: men Use women's dependency, which they induce by protecting and
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: providing for them. You know, and the question of whether
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: or not that dependency is actually biological is verboten. That's
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: what the whole thing is. Like they talk about bio truth.
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: But the frat femme said it is a bio truth
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: that men want to dominate women. And the way that
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: they do it, guys, is by sacrificing for them, which
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: makes them dependent, which earns them man points. And then
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: the psychology of men and masculinity grows out of that.
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: And how do you get rid of men being oppressive? Well,
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: you break their addiction to man points. Right? You break
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: their addiction to man points. And then they no longer
• 40:35
  Speaker 2: subjugate women by sacrificing for them. I'm telling you guys,
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: it's just as stupid as that. 50 years of this stupidity.
• 40:47
  Speaker 2: I wonder if this is like what happened in the
• 40:49
  Speaker 2: Bronze Age. Somebody woke up one day and said, how
• 40:52
  Speaker 2: can we destroy our civilization in the most spectacularly stupid
• 40:55
  Speaker 2: way possible? Oh, why don't we tell the harem girls
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: about equality? Okay, keep going. All right.
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: The obvious reading, the one that most of the replies took,
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: is that modern courtship has become a transaction. The woman
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: in the joke treats desire as an opening bid. The man, humiliated,
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: reaches for the ugliest word available. She reaches back for
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: the vocabulary of the discourse. Misogynist.
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: Huh? Is whore the ugliest word available?
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: No, it's not. And also, it was a question. He
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: asked if she was one. He didn't call her one. So,
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: I don't know if that matters because I... And the
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: other thing, too, is that we're translating from Turkish. Like,
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know if it's, like, a one-to-one, like, you know, correlation, like,
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: in terms of, like, how it's defined. So that's another thing, too. But.
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: But notice the differential. And this is how you know
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: exactly what... luke oliga oliga olinga is actually about right
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: on one side is a man humiliated which we all
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: know we can't you know when a man's humiliated by
• 42:17
  Speaker 2: someone that's his fault for having a sense of self
• 42:24
  Speaker 2: that could be harmed in the first place through humiliation
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: And he's reading the ugliest word available. But look at her.
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: She reaches back for the vocabulary of the discourse. Guys,
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: it's not her being a cunt. It's the discourse acting
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: through her. And notice what she comes back with misogynist,
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: which is the way that feminists, the jargon feminists used
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: to unperson men and not a real man, which is
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: like a direct unpersoning of men, which is funny because
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: misogynist comes from a discourse that says that men need
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: to renunciate their masculinity. So she's basically saying, you're a
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: man who doesn't renunciate your masculinity. Now be a man
• 43:09
  Speaker 2: who does masculinity. So she's unpersoning this person, like through
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: a pincer maneuver, right? On the one hand, if you're
• 43:20
  Speaker 2: a misogynist, and if you decompose what misogynist actually means,
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: it means you're a man who doesn't renunciate being a man.
• 43:27
  Speaker 2: But on the other hand, you have to be a
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: real man. So don't be a man, but be a man.
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: Pinser maneuver, and what do you land on? Just don't exist, guys.
• 43:39
  Speaker 2: Didn't you know that your existence is an offense to women?
• 43:42
  Speaker 2: And also, whore is not the most horrible thing that
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: he could have asked. Because a whore has a trade, right?
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: And she has prices. And presumably, at some point, there's
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: some kind of, at least the ethics of a provider,
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: of a service. This is not. This is more like
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: a sleut. A sleut machine, like a slot machine, except
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: occasionally it cracks its legs open, but not for you.
• 44:15
  Speaker 2: Just keep pushing those coins in. A sleut machine, there
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: you go. Is that more offensive than whore? I mean,
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: I think whores should reclaim that word. They should say, no,
• 44:25
  Speaker 2: these women are not whores, right? Prostitution plus gambling is
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: not being a whore. A whore has her prices out front,
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: deal done, right? This is sleutery. This is gambling. Right?
• 44:44
  Speaker 2: So you don't even know if you're going to get anything.
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: You just put coins in the slot. See if something
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: comes out. That's a completely different order of social degeneracy. Yeah.
• 44:59
  Speaker 2: All right, let's keep going.
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: All right. Let's see. Notice that nobody in the 2026
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: panel speaks like a person. Both of them speak in scripts.
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: He performs the aggrieved man. She performs the offended woman.
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: The 90s couple, by contrast, just wanted each other. That's
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: the nostalgia doing the work. But look at her list again.
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: Rent is due. She hasn't eaten in a week. Half
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: of that list describes a woman who is broke. And
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: in plenty of the countries those replies came from, a
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: woman's economic survival still runs through men. by design, by tradition,
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: by wage gaps nobody chose to be born into. The
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: joke wants us to seek greed. The text, if you
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: read it flat, also shows a precarity. Two readings, one punchline,
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: and 38.5 million people mostly saw the first. Yeah, this
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: is written by AI. This is written by AI.
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: Or a feminist. But can I get in here?
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, sure.
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: Precarity. So essentially, she isn't avaricious. She's a victim, guys.
• 46:08
  Speaker 2: She's a victim of the economy. Strangely, women, when they
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: really had to rely on a man as a provider,
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: didn't do crap like this. They just locked it down.
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: It's like, okay, let's get married. Oh, you work at
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: a gas station. All right, let's get married. Let's have kids.
• 46:26
  Speaker 2: They locked it down. This is not a woman who
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: feels any necessity in locking it down. So this is
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: a direct contradiction to what he's trying to establish. He's
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: trying to say, well, she's forced to ask men for stuff. Okay,
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: that usually in a traditional culture means a marriage. Like
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: you got to marry the man before you ask him
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: for stuff. That's the way it works. This isn't that.
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: This is a woman who has options. Therefore, if this
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: guy says no... He can either walk away to the
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: next guy or she can go to her government mandated
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: job to get money from Ben's taxes. Like this is
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: not the behavior of somebody who has to route their
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: survival through men. Like there's not desperation here. She he's
• 47:16
  Speaker 2: reading that into it. He's reading into it. Desperation. But
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: the other thing is, why is it that women are
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: entitled for a living from men? Because that's the other
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: thing that he's not mentioning, that he's assuming. He's assuming
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: that men should assume a custodial relationship with women. So
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: men are obligated to provide women a living just because
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: they're women. That's the core of what he's saying. At
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: the same time as he no doubt says, oh, equality. Well,
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: you can have equality. Right? But that means no custodial relationship.
• 47:55
  Speaker 2: That's what he wants. He wants both. He wants men
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: and women to be equal, but men also obligated to
• 48:00
  Speaker 2: pay for women's shit. Yeah, there's no such obligation. And
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: in traditional societies, you don't get that obligation as a
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: woman from a man unless you're married to him. That's
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: the point. And no matter how you say... And again,
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: I don't think that he's accurate in saying, oh, she's precarious.
• 48:21
  Speaker 2: She's living at the very end of her means. And
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: even if she is, so what? He isn't obligated to
• 48:27
  Speaker 2: pay for her unless she puts a ring on it.
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: And the fact that she's starting out the gate with
• 48:35
  Speaker 2: the expectation of payment suggests that she's got other options.
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: Because this is what I'm saying, okay? If you're really starving...
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: Do you want to get a meal or do you
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: want to get a consistent source of meals? Because she
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: right here is saying, I mean, I could get a
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: consistent source of meals by actually engaging in a courtship
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: with a man that ends in marriage. Or I could
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: just continue to shop. See if I can get a
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: meal here, a meal there, maybe buy my own meals.
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know. I just I feel like
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: there are too many options to lock down a consistent
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: source of meals. Does that sound like someone who's starving?
• 49:19
  Speaker 2: So her behavior. forecloses his assumption that she's living in
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: any kind of precarity because believe me, if she has
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: a sister who is living in precarity and a man
• 49:28
  Speaker 2: pops up and says, Hey, why don't we pool our
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: resources together to build a life? And maybe you can
• 49:34
  Speaker 2: eat and I can have a partner who makes my
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: life a Just a mutual exchange, not prostitution, because she's
• 49:44
  Speaker 2: expected to have a continuous relationship with a man. How
• 49:46
  Speaker 2: did that end up not being part of prostitution? She's
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: expected to contribute to a household with him. She brings
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: her own stuff, and the further back you go, the
• 49:58
  Speaker 2: stuff she brings becomes even more critical to his survival,
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: as well as her own. So I don't even know
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: what feminists are getting off of saying, men just created
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: dependency on women. Men were also dependent on women. So
• 50:12
  Speaker 2: they become dependent on each other. Thus the relationship. She's
• 50:16
  Speaker 2: not after that. If she was really starving... Why wouldn't
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: she want a consistent source of somebody to help pay
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: the bills? She's shopping. Because she's not starving. Because she
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: lives in a world of plenty. So again, his entire
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: analysis that this woman is somehow a victim of shit?
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: Wrong.
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: Her behavior is not consistent with starvation. It's consistent with gluttony.
• 50:48
  Speaker 2: All right. I'll shut up. We have seven, by the way. What? Yeah,
• 50:55
  Speaker 2: we have seven.
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: We have seven requests now, yeah. All right. Back to this.
• 50:59
  Speaker 2: Any through Super Chat?
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: What?
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: Any requests?
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: Super Chats that are also requests?
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: I got a Super Chow from Dark Kikimora that also
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: has a request folded into it. He says, for $ 25...
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: It's Bisexual Pride Week, according to Social Justice Morons. Does
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: Allison have any more comments for us about how you
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: don't want to really date women when you have both
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: genders as an option? Because I feel that way as
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: a bi man sometimes, too. All right, there you go.
• 51:32
  Speaker 2: Oh, it's Bisexual Pride Week. I hope no bisexuals actually
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: show up. Have they? They're not real ones. Any bisexual
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: that would show up to Bisexual Pride Week is a poser.
• 51:45
  Speaker 2: That's all I have to say. Let's move on.
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: All right. That was it for that. So back to
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: the article then. I was going to comment. There's a
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: lot of assumptions baked into this response, which is, let
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: me just read it again. Her list again, rent is due.
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: She hasn't eaten in a week. Half of that list
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: describes a woman who is broke. And in plenty of
• 52:08
  Speaker 1: the countries those replies come from, A woman's economic survival
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: still runs through men by design, by tradition, by wage
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: gaps nobody chose to be born into. The joke wants
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: us to see greed. The text, if you read it flat,
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: also shows precarity. Two readings, one punchline, and 38.5 million
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: people mostly saw the first. Okay, so what I was
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: going to say is, according to the logic of the
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: author of this article, every country in the world would
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: have those problems for women. So I have a hard
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: time believing that any of that is true. I just
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: don't think, like, I know the wage gap is a
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: lie that will not die here in Western countries because
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: it constantly gets brought up. I don't think it applies anywhere.
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: I don't. And I also think that just because it
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: may have existed, which I don't think it did, doesn't
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: mean that it exists today anyway. So these women are,
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: in fact... acting entitled and that's the one thing you
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: don't want to face because if you do see what
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: he's trying to do is he's trying to say oh
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: mom and dad are fighting I want them to stop
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: fighting so what I'm going to do is I'm going
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: to tell them they're both wrong and here's how but
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: the truth is is that men are not causing this
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: problem they're simply reacting to the problem and it is
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: there and women are causing this problem and the fact
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: that people like the author of this article don't want
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: to acknowledge that reality is the reason why the problem
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: gets worse and Because what they do is they justify
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: women's entitlement even more by telling them, oh, well, you know,
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: you may have overextended, but they're also bad because history something, something,
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: historical oppression. But that's not true. Like, you know, the
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: lie is baked into the foundation, which is the lie
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: of oppression throughout history. It's just not true. The only
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: thing that could even be perceived as oppression, which it wasn't,
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: it's not, is just the reality of the world we
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: lived in. Before we had all of these massive complex
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: systems that allow women to live a life of comfort
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: and relative luxury, everyone was just dying because it was
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: hard on everybody. But now we have to treat the
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: fact that it was hard for everybody as uniquely hard
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: for women and not at all hard for men. It's
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: just ridiculous. So... Anyway, his attempt to say, oh, you
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: guys are just looking at it this way, but it's
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: actually this way. AI comment, by the way. It's wrong,
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: because that's just not the case. Like, men died for
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: women all through history. So, I guess when a man dies, though,
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: it doesn't count as, you know, oppression.
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: Well, he just gets man points, Brian.
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah.
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: It's actually oppressing women. It's taking man points from her.
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: Maybe he does. Maybe he doesn't. Maybe he does.
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: Um, that's their argument. He's getting men whenever he sacrifices
• 55:07
  Speaker 2: his life. Ridiculous arguments, but all right. You're right. He's
• 55:13
  Speaker 2: making a sweeping brush. He's saying that half of these lists,
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: that list describes a woman who is broken. Plenty of
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: the countries, those replies come from a woman's economic survival
• 55:21
  Speaker 2: still runs through men. Okay. In the countries, let's, let's,
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: let's decompose this. Let's kill it.
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: Let's burn it to ash.
• 55:27
  Speaker 2: Let's rip and tear. Okay. Okay. This retarded feminist. And
• 55:33
  Speaker 2: also it's worse than saying mom and dad are arguing.
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: They're both wrong. It's saying mom and dad are arguing.
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: Dad might have a point, but mom's right. She's right.
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: She's the victim. Ultimately, he's landing on the female side.
• 55:47
  Speaker 2: Of course, he composed that. Let's decompose that. All right.
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: In the Far East, which is the marriage. China. Well,
• 55:57
  Speaker 2: Far East, South Korea, Japan, Malaysia, the Far East, right?
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: That's not, I think, not India, basically. China might be
• 56:06
  Speaker 2: the Middle East.
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: The Orient.
• 56:07
  Speaker 2: Well, no, but I mean literally the Far East, okay?
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: I guess we can include China, right? Women have jobs
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: in China. In the Far East, women have jobs. Their
• 56:18
  Speaker 2: survival is not routed through men. All right. Kin selection
• 56:24
  Speaker 2: cultures like India and the Middle East and the more
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: around the Mediterranean, they have custodial expectations written into law
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: regarding women. So even if you don't have a husband,
• 56:39
  Speaker 2: you can be expected to be paid for by your father,
• 56:42
  Speaker 2: by your uncle, by your brother, by your son. Right. So, yes,
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: their survival is rooted through men. But men are legally
• 56:53
  Speaker 2: obligated to give it. You know, it's like saying, well,
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: a master's survival is rooted through his slaves. Therefore, his
• 57:01
  Speaker 2: slaves are repressing him. No! Because the slaves are legally
• 57:07
  Speaker 2: obligated to deliver the goods. Okay, that covers the Far East.
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: They're working. Those women can work. Those women have full
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: ability to do whatever jobs. Right? You got the Middle
• 57:19
  Speaker 2: East and India. Well, that's kin selection where men are
• 57:22
  Speaker 2: obligated to take care of their female relatives, not just
• 57:26
  Speaker 2: their wives. Now we're down to like Europe or actually
• 57:29
  Speaker 2: also in Africa. Same thing. Men are still obligated to
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: maintain their female relatives. But in Africa, there's an additional
• 57:37
  Speaker 2: twist because a lot of the material goods are still
• 57:40
  Speaker 2: produced by the women in household economies. So the men
• 57:45
  Speaker 2: also rely on the women. So, you know, when you're
• 57:49
  Speaker 2: looking at Africa, you're looking at a situation of mutual dependence.
• 57:52
  Speaker 2: Same thing with a lot of what's happening in South America,
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: which women are also working.
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: Mexico, women are also working. There's a lot more home-based
• 58:01
  Speaker 2: businesses and a lot more market gardens that keep families alive.
• 58:06
  Speaker 2: So there's a double dependency there. Just like in the
• 58:10
  Speaker 2: East Bloc countries that survived the fall of Russia because
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: their grandmas grew gardens. I think it's called the dashka system.
• 58:21
  Speaker 2: They had like the babushkas. They had their gardens. They
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: had their goats and their chickens and their turkeys. Maybe
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: not turkeys, but they had their turnips. They kept everybody
• 58:30
  Speaker 2: alive after the fall of the Soviet Union, right? Who's
• 58:35
  Speaker 2: the dependency? Men were being kept alive by women. And
• 58:39
  Speaker 2: she's grouping in all of these cultures, cultures in which
• 58:42
  Speaker 2: women can work for our East, cultures in which women
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: have custodial obligations enforced by law, which is the kin
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: selection cultures, cultures where women currently are important to the
• 58:57
  Speaker 2: survival of their families, which is Africa. You know, he's
• 59:00
  Speaker 2: lumping in all of these cultures and saying, well, so
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: women's survival routed through men in order to justify this
• 59:06
  Speaker 2: woman being a sleut machine. And it's bullshit. You're right, Brian.
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: He's putting this all over the world and you're saying, yeah,
• 59:15
  Speaker 2: I don't believe it. You're right not to believe it
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: because of the stuff I just said. He's lumping in
• 59:20
  Speaker 2: all kinds of different systems, all kinds of different economies,
• 59:23
  Speaker 2: all kinds of different levels of women's so-called ability to
• 59:28
  Speaker 2: work and men's responsibility to support them. And then he's
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: applying it to the behavior of a woman. It doesn't
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: sound like any of these women. Does she sound like
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: a woman who expects to also help her husband survive
• 59:42
  Speaker 2: like in Africa? Does she sound like a woman who
• 59:45
  Speaker 2: has a cultural expectation of being protected and provided for
• 59:49
  Speaker 2: by her male relatives like the Middle East? Does she
• 59:54
  Speaker 2: sound like a woman in the Far East that can
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: 100% have her own job and apartment and whatever? No.
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: She just sounds like a freaking flute. She is a
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: bottom dweller. She's not part of any of these systems.
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 2: She apparently doesn't have a father who pays her if
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: she's in the Middle East. She doesn't have a job
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: if she's in the Far East. She apparently isn't doing
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 2: any kind of home economy if she's in Africa. It's
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 2: just a flute who thinks that being a woman makes
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: her entitled to a living. And then we wonder where
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 2: the wage gap comes from. Well, maybe from this. Maybe
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 2: from the fact that this woman apparently doesn't have to
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: make a dollar to spend a dollar and a half.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 2: Because she can go on, what, Tinder? Hinge? Whatever. Pinterest? Whatever.
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 2: Wherever the sloop machines aggregate. And she can lay out
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: her wares. You know, and say, pull the lever, guys.
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: Maybe you'll get something. Not really. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Like,
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: this is not the behavior of a woman in any
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 2: of the systems in which her survival routes through men.
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 2: Is what I'm getting at. And then there's a whole
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: bunch of countries where that's just not the case, period.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: So this is greed. Like, guys, you are 100% right.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: This is greed. And this guy is full of shit.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: And you shouldn't listen to him. Are you surprised by
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: us landing on that? Probably not.
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: All right. Anyway, so, a few didn't laugh. Transactional love
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 1: won't last, one reply warned. Another Turkish user pushed back gently.
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 1: Real life is more complicated than humor posts. Yeah, I mean,
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: the guy made it as a joke and a lot
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: of guys related to it. I mean, so what? I just,
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 1: I see like at least one post a day that
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: I'm like, that's relatable. And two men independently said the
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: same striking thing. He should have given her all of
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 1: that without her having to ask. Which is its own worldview.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: Provider masculinity offered as the fix. The old contract restated
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: rather than questioned. Even the objection stayed inside the frame. So,
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: I mean, I guess now even if there are men
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: who are like, oh, you should just take care of her.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: Even that is like, oh, that's just, that's provider masculinity.
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: That's a new type of toxic masculinity just dropped, guys.
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: It's provider masculinity. Okay, go on.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: Simping is toxic masculinity now.
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah, simping is toxic masculinity. But you should be simping,
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: but you should be simping a certain way, I guess.
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: Or you should be simping and not expecting anything in return.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: So it should be more than simping. It should just
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: be straight up like supplication.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: Here's the problem, Brian. Brian, the simp still feels masculine
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 2: as a result of his simping. He feels like a
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: real man provided for a woman. That's the problem, the
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 2: man points, right? And it's also the pincer maneuver. You
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: should do it, but you should also not do it.
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 2: So you should do it and immediately forget that you
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 2: have done it because you don't want to feel good
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 2: about yourself, thus give yourself man points, which is oppression
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: of women. So that's how any man who doesn't even
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: wait for her to ask, she just says, hey... And
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: he just immediately just Venmo's her like 2000 bucks or
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: 25 K just immediately. It just drops it on her.
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: Even that man is toxically masculine because he might feel
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: good about it. So he should do it, but he
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: should also not do it. He should erase the record
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: of it from his own mind. So he should do
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 2: it and he should be it, but he should also
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: not be it. Renunciation, guys, it's the only way. You
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: just have to be in a constant state of stripping
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: your skin. You've got skin. Are you trying to enjoy
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: your patriarchal privilege by still having a skin? Still having memories?
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: Still existing as your own being, guys? Strip it all away.
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 2: And then you will be the ideal, well, not man,
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: but ideal spot that women can occupy in their race
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: up the ziggurat.
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: Okay. All right. Back to the article. Our take. The
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: Manosphere did not write this joke. It didn't need to.
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: This is the raw material the Manosphere runs on, a
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: widely shared cross-cultural suspicion among ordinary men that intimacy has
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: been monetized and that they are the ones holding the bill.
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: It's worse than that.
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 1: Andrew Tate built an empire refining exactly this feeling into ideology.
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: When 38.5 million people nod at a four-line gag, the
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: recruiters don't have to persuade anyone. They just have to
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: show up and say, you felt that, didn't you? The
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: men laughing under the post are not villains. Many of
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: them are describing something real in their lives. Dates that
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: feel like auditions. Apps that feel like marketplaces. A sense
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: that they are being evaluated as wallets firsts. And the
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: woman they're joking about are not villains either. In much
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: of the world, asking who pays is arithmetic. Yeah, but
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: that's not... She's not asking who pays. She's demanding they pay.
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: That's very different.
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: Also, that's an AI line. What is this guy? This
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: guy is just basically a comment... kaleidoscope that always lands
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: on defend my woman defend my woman's honor my lady's honor.
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: Okay yeah the 90s panel for the record is a
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: fantasy courtship the 90s had its own money its own
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: dowries it's no what well maybe in other countries its
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: own quiet calculations in yaounde where i grew up in
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: paris where i spent my adult life in new york
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: where i raised my son What people are mourning under
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: that post is the idea that desire could ever be
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: free of the ledger. Maybe it never was, but tens
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 1: of millions of people in a dozen languages clearly wish
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: it could be.
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: Okay, now let's bring in... Okay, sorry, just stop at
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 2: the end of the paragraph. Okay, let's bring... We're almost done.
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 2: There's like one paragraph left.
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: I know, I know.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 2: And we got seven.
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: Um.
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: All right. Let me lay this to rest because this
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: guy is just doesn't want women. He doesn't want women's
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: honor besmirched. Let's be honest. That's what he's here for.
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 2: He's here to defend Mileti's honor. Right. That's it. He's
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 2: always going to land on women's position. But the problem
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 2: is that this is a disease in women's minds. And
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: this disease is our asteroid. So if we can't honestly
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 2: state what's going on and what's happening, we are done
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 2: for as a species. So the first step is to
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 2: be able to say what this is and to blame women.
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 2: And again, I blame women and nobody can stop me.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 2: You can't stop me. He can't stop me. Women can't
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: stop me. I'm going to continue to do so. I'll
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 2: take my knocks for doing it because it's apparently something
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: the algorithm hates and everybody hates and it's institutionally despised.
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: But I'm going to continue to do it because I
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 2: can see the asteroid coming. I can see it. So
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: no matter what the algorithm does, institutional feminism does, YouTube does,
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 2: the academia does, the Canadian government does, the judicial system does,
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 2: I'm going to continue to say this because I can
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: see the fucking asteroid coming. This is a disease in
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 2: women's minds. That's it. And let's bring the statistics in
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: here since it's been very devoid of that. You guys
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: are not wrong. All of you men in Spain, China,
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: South Korea, Japan. I don't know about Africa yet, but
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 2: you're on the way. North America, Europe, everywhere, all around
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: the world. You are not wrong. And you are not
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: wrong that it was easier in the 90s. And I
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: have the stats. In the 90s, the bar was at
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: the 20th percentile of income. which almost feels like it
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 2: isn't happening yet. It's just a niggling feel of something
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 2: is wrong, but the guys who are complaining about it
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 2: are so marginal that the men above them can be like, yeah,
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: you're just bitching. That's the 90s. The bar was at
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: the 20th percentile. Used to be prior to the 90s,
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: it was at the zeroth, the first percentile. But in
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: the 90s is when it started to be a problem.
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: But again, it was happening. to men who were fairly marginal.
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: So everybody, all the other men on top of that
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: could just dismiss them as just, you know, losers. They
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 2: didn't know the bar was coming for them. So it's
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: at the 20th. So dating was a very different situation
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: in the 90s if the bar is at the 20th.
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 2: And I'm using percentiles, not incomes, because all of this,
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: all of what he's saying is predicated on it being
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 2: a material ask. So women want a certain standard of living,
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: they want a certain amount of stuff, etc. No, it's
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 2: not a material ask. It's not a minimum income. It
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 2: is literally a minimum rank. Women are looking at the
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 2: men around them and they want a man ranked next
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 2: to other men in their area. That's what it is.
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. The income is irrelevant. It's the fact
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: that he earns 90% more than the men around him.
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: That's what they're after. But anyway, back in the 90s,
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: that number was 20 because the ratchet hadn't had decades
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 2: to work. So at 20%, the 20th percentile, you had
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 2: a good chance of being married. Even if you got
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: to the 20th percentile, which feels doable. I mean, honestly,
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: it isn't. It should never have gone past the first percentile.
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 2: It should never have gone past a man just demonstrating
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: he's willing to work. But it did. But by the 90s,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: it was only at the 20th percentile. Very different dating
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: landscape than the bar being at the 90th percentile. That's
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: past the 50th percentile. That's now at a situation where
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: the average man is not likely to get married at
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 2: the same rate as the poorest man in 1940, 1950, 1960,
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 2: 1970 did. That's a completely different dating landscape. And again,
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: it's not his entire thesis. It's because women's survival. Bullshit.
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 2: If it was survival, if it was material, it would
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: have been a income level. And it's not. She looks
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: at the men around her and she wants the man
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 2: that ranks in the 90th percentile relative to other men.
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: So if she's in Missouri, right, that's a man who
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: makes like 80,000 a year. If she is in Seattle,
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 2: that's a man who makes $ 250, 000 a year. It doesn't
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: matter the income. Even adjusted for cost of living. It
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: doesn't matter. It is the relative rank. Which means nothing
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 2: men can do can feed this diseased hunger in women.
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: Because let's say, okay... Every man manages to up the
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 2: ziggurat and get into the 90th percentile income. Guess what
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 2: happens then? The disease kicks in. The disease in women's
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 2: minds kicks in and they're like, hmm, hmm. Yeah, but
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 2: what about the top 10% of the men? Again, even
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 2: though every man is earning what the top 10% of
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: men used to earn, there's a new top 10% that
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 2: she wants. But they're not right there. I want the
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: top ranked man, not the top earning man. And so
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: we go. And here's the other problem. The more men
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: submit to this, the worse the ask gets. So let's
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 2: say all men get up into the top 10% of earning.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 2: They manage through some Herculean effort. I've done the calculations.
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 2: It would take American men genociding and enslaving the rest
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 2: of the planet to do it. But let's say they did.
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 2: What's one genocide and planetary enslavement just to feed the
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 2: average liberal woman's hunger for status? Really, guys, why can't
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: you do that? But let's say they do. Once they
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 2: do it and these women are looking at the new
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: group of men, it's not going to be the top
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 2: 10% because men have complied with this shit, thus feeding
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: the disease. It's going to become the top 1%. And
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: then if men do it again, it's going to be
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: the top one-tenth of a percent. Because the disease is
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: in women. And somehow, if we want to continue to
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: exist as a civilization and possibly as a species, we
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: have to tear it out. All right.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 2: Final paragraph?
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So, like, last paragraph. Yep. Let me just make
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: sure I didn't miss it. Okay, that wish deserves a
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: better conversation than a punchline and a slur. So let's
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: have it here. Does dating where you live feel like
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: the second panel? Did it ever feel like the first?
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: Tell me, I read everything. And that's the end of
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: the article. So I don't know if, okay, for the record,
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: I'm 66. That's important because I lived through the changes
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: from the US in the 70s when we were fighting.
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: Not to have everything filtered through a man's hands up
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: to now. Oh, shut up, Elizabeth. Immediately disregarded comment. Well,
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: I was, I lived through the women's lib movement and
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: I saw the, you did not. Because it wasn't there.
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: All you saw were angry women and you just said, well,
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: they're mad. It must be based on something real. So
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: I'm just going to basically say it's true. Oh no,
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: go to the next one. All right. I think, is
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: it rent is due? She hasn't eaten in a week.
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: Half of that list describes a woman who is broke.
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: And in plenty of countries, those replies came from a
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: woman's economic survival.
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, he's just recording.
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's quoting from the article. And then he says,
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: the true nature of the 2026 joke is, man, I
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: find you attractive. Want to make out. Woman, I'd like
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: to not starve or get evicted. How does making out help? What?
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 2: What?
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: And then the author says, exactly. That is why I
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: want readers to look at the list again rather than
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: stop at the punchline. Rent is due and she has
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: not eaten in a week. Yeah, but the guy wrote
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: it as... It wasn't based on an actual woman's experience. Like,
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: if there's an actual woman who hasn't eaten in a
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: week and is homeless, I guess, or about to be homeless,
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: there probably isn't a guy asking her out. The guy
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: who wrote the joke intentionally exaggerated her complaint... which probably
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: wasn't justified in anything. It was probably all an exaggeration
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: on her part too, because again, if you haven't eaten
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: in a week, you're not talking to potential suitors. You're
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 1: scrounging for scraps somewhere. So the guy, remember this, this
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: joke was a joke, which means the people in it,
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: the things that were said, it's all fictional. So the
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: guy who wrote it, whether he came up with it
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: or not, was basically creating a scenario and in order
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: for jokes to work, you have to be hyperbolic, you
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: have to exaggerate the stuff in them. So if you
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: have a woman, they're taking it literally and they're not
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: taking it seriously, even though it's a joke. You're supposed
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: to see it as man wants to court a woman
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: Woman says, well, I need all these things. That's basically
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: what it means. That's what it comes down to. I
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: need these things. And the guy's like, well, I want you.
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: And she's like, well, I don't want you, but I
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: want what you provide. Here's what I want. And that's
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: the joke. That's the joke, okay? But this guy's like, well,
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: she hasn't eaten in a week. She's obviously starving. It's like,
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: but you're, what are you doing? Like, you're not listening
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: to this. You're just looking for stuff that you can
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: pick apart so you can say, ah, this thing doesn't work.
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: Maybe it doesn't. Lots of people tell jokes online that
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: don't work. Most of them probably don't work. But you're
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: completely missing the forest from the trees here, you know? So, anyway.
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: So this guy agrees, the author. That does not erase
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: the experience of men who feel dating has become transactional,
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: but it shows how much interpretation is packed into four lines.
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: One reader sees a gold digger, another sees a hungry woman.
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: The speed with which we choose between those stories tells
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: us something, too.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: Why is she dating, then?
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: How does he know how fast people are?
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 2: Why is she dating if she's hungry?
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, right.
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 2: Like, why isn't she getting a job?
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, why doesn't she have a job?
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 2: What is it? She's dating because she wants to get
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 2: a marriage? Well, then what's the problem? Why is she
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 2: leading with all the stuff that she should get once
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 2: she's put a ring on it? Their interpretation makes no sense.
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 2: And also, I bet it was, I haven't eaten out
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: in a week.
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Here's a reasonable response from an American, a man
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: named Michael. He says, I live in the USA. I'm
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: going to say that I found the joke funny. I
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: find your reality to be mostly incorrect from the USA perspective.
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: She isn't going to starve and she shouldn't be responsible
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: enough or she should be responsible enough to have chosen
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: an affordable option to live in. Pew's research shows women
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: under 35 experience the narrowest gender pay gap in the
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: United States. Even then, it's a lie. With women aged
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: 25 to 34 typically earning 89 to 95% of what
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 1: their male counterparts earn. For the youngest demographic, women to
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: age 16 to 24 earn about 94 percent of what
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: men in the same age group make less problems happen
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: when people choose accountability and finances um yeah then uh
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: uh evan evanna n max said uh it does help
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 1: avion i don't know who avion is but I mean,
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: I said the original comment. My father-in-law had a 1940s saying,
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: men gives love to get sex, women gives sex to
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: get love. Sounds terribly old-fashioned and transactional, but it can work.
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 2: What a bullshit saying.
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 2: What a fucking... Wow, that guy really hated men. So basically, men...
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 2: Give love to get sex. Well, first of all, who
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 2: decided that sex and love are so separable?
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, right.
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: Except, you know, the ones who want to use it
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 2: as a tool for extracting resources. And maybe we shouldn't
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 2: listen to them on what sex or love is.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 2: Anyway, this is a bullshit saying. And it is, maybe
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 2: it's part of the problem. Maybe the fact that there
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 2: existed men in the past who said crap like this
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: is part of the problem. Part of the lack of
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 2: immune response to this situation that women have constructed. Women
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: have constructed. Not men. Women.
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: Okay, let me see what's going on. I think I'm, like,
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: doing the splits.
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: You closed the stream.
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: No, I reopened it.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: I don't see it. I don't see it.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: Oh, you don't see it?
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: No, I don't see it.
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: It looks like I'm good.
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: You stop streaming. You stop sharing your screen.
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: Come on.
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: Oh, I did? Like, it looks okay. Never mind.
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: I don't see it.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: I'll fix it. Just give me a second. Here we go.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: I'm trying to mouse standing up, which is one of
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: the most difficult. Here we go.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: There it is. All right.
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 2: Yes. Okay. So I'm going to need you to give
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 2: me the song names. If it was a material ask,
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: you can continue to go through the comments. I just
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 2: want to... But if it was a material ask, it
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: wouldn't be... It wouldn't, like, position, relative position, wouldn't be
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 2: the variable that actually explains it all. Right? If it
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: was a minimum amount of money to survive, then women
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 2: would be pairing up with men. Like, how did we
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: invert this? This idea that a woman who just gets
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 2: stuff from men for no relationship is somehow... less degraded
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 2: than a woman who's in a relationship building a family
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 2: with a man. You notice that? We've inverted it. The
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: horrors are the ones that aren't degraded. It's the married
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 2: women who are degraded. Yeah. Anyway, can you, but regardless.
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: Yes, I'm going to give it to you. So a
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: Norwegian is first up. He gave us five and he said,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: Ocarina of Time title theme. Ocarina is spelled O-C-A-R-I-N-A.
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 2: O-C-A-R-I-N-A.
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: Of Time. Title Theme. And I think it'll probably, it
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: should have Koji Kondo.
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I got it. All right.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 2: Next one. All right.
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: Next one is from anonymous for five and they request
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: super tramp, the logical song. So super tramp is one word.
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: I think it's spelled exactly as it sounds. Super tramp.
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: And it's called the logical song. Yeah.
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 2: Like don't get this bullshit that this is like a survival. Again,
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 2: like if, if she's really in the point of precarity,
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 2: first of all, He's.
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: Just trying to frame them.
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she's just trying to make women out to be
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: a victim, and it's wrong.
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just framing them in the.
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 2: It's wrong because it's a generalization. Right, in the begging position. Yeah,
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 2: it's flattering to women. Yeah, yeah. But it's wrong because
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 2: it's generalizing all kinds of different legal and cultural and
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 2: economic situations around the world, right? Yeah. It's wrong because
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: she doesn't owe money from a random man. It's also
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 2: wrong because even if the guy gives it to her,
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 2: he's problematizing just provision with no strings attached, except I
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: guess the guy feels good about himself. Simping is still
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 2: toxic masculinity, guys. There is no way that this man
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: could ever blame women for anything if he's saying simping
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: is toxic masculinity. It's not in his vocabulary, which means
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 2: this asteroid is going to hit if these guys are
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 2: the only ones who have any say in the conversation.
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: But also, it's not survival if the dependent variable, if
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 2: the variable that explains it is a man's relative rank.
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 2: Like if it was survival, then marrying a man who
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: can provide basic necessities would be on the table. But
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: she's not acting like that is. That's what's is. She's
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 2: not acting like a woman in precarity. Right? And like
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 2: I said, there are all kinds of regimes that he's
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 2: lumping together. The fact that in Africa, and used to
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 2: be in the East Bloc, there was a... a substantial
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: portion of material living that was provided for by women. Right? So,
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 2: I mean, men rely on women materially, just like women
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 2: rely on men in those areas. He's completely ignoring that.
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 2: He's completely ignoring the fact that in the Far East,
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 2: women have jobs.
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 2: They're doing better than men in many cases. And then
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: he's also ignoring that in other countries with kin selection,
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 2: women are legally, like men are illegally obligated to keep
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 2: women to provide for the women that they're related to.
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 2: He's completely ignoring all of that to construct a victimhood
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 2: that doesn't exist. The woman here is not demonstrating it.
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: If you're in a precarious situation, you want stability. She's
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 2: not demonstrating that. She's demonstrating that she's up at a
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 2: buffet trying to decide what kind of option of simpery
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 2: that she's going to choose for that day. That's not
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 2: the behavior of somebody who's in destitute states. That's the
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 2: behavior of someone with options. And then the other thing
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: is statistically he's wrong. Because if it really was about survival,
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: there would be a minimum income threshold. There isn't. It's
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: about status. It's women's greed for status. They have this
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 2: disease in their head that is removing a man as
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 2: the thing that you want in a relationship with a man...
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 2: Which is like basic human decency. Like if you want
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 2: a relationship with a man, she should want the fucking man.
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: Like the bare minimum. That's the absolute bare minimum. Don't
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 2: you think?
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 2: That's a bare minimum to even have a relationship. But
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 2: they don't. They want the position the man occupies. The
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 2: man should go freaking renunciate himself out of existence. He
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 2: should demand nothing. His very existence is an imposition. It's
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 2: patriarchal privilege, the fact that he breathes. The fact that
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: he didn't just give her the position and let her
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 2: occupy it by doing nothing. These women don't want men.
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: They just want positions and they don't want incomes and
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 2: they don't want survival. They just want social climbing because
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 2: they've been divorced from survival. This woman is, and here's
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: a pro tip, pro gamer tip. If she's telling you
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: to send her money, that means she's completely excluded you
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: from any possibility of even being a position that she
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 2: could occupy. Yeah. The instant she says, give me money,
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: you're done. You're done. Just walk away. It's done. Don't
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 2: give her money. Okay? Because the instant you do that,
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: you make it worse for every other man. Stop. Stop
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 2: the simping. Stop it. If she provides something for you, sure.
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: If she has nothing, and I don't mean a date.
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: Women shouldn't require money for a date. That's a whore.
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 2: You're better off finding a businesswoman who is going to
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 2: square with you, you know, with some kind of ethical
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 2: and honor, like some, at least business ethics, you know,
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: keep the customer satisfied. Don't pay for dates ever at
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 2: this point in time. If you're ever going to find
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 2: a woman who's worth keeping, you should not pay for
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: her at all. She should pay for you. Okay. Next one.
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 1: All right. Next song.
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 2: I'm just, I'm, I'm going a little bit crazy. I'm
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 2: like going into hyperbole, hyperbole land.
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah. All right.
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: Next song.
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: Shadow Wolf gave a 30 and said, Power Wolf, Venom
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 1: of Venus. Power Wolf, Venom of Venus.
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: All right. Next is another anonymous for five, and they
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: say Sinistral Battle, Lufia II. Let me spell this out.
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: Sinistral is spelled S-I-N-I-S. S-I-N-I-S. T-R-A-L. Sinistral. Battle. B-A-T-T-L-E. Battle,
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: not paddle.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 2: Sorry.
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: Lufia. Well, Lufia 2 slash X-Polis. Got it. And Dark
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 1: Kikimora requested Clint Eastwood Gorillas. Clint Eastwood by the Gorillas.
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: Gorillas is spelled G-O-R-I-L-L-A-Z, not S. Clint Eastwood Gorillas. I'm happy.
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: I'm feeling glad I got sunshine. In a bag.
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 2: Next one.
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: Anonymous gave us five and said for the Beat Saber,
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: number one. Special Bleach 2022 trailer version. Just put in
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: number one and see if you can find it. It's
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 1: Special Bleach 2022 trailer version. Do you see that? Maybe
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: put in number one Bleach. Try that. Bleach.
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 2: Special. Okay, number one. There we go. All right.
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: And then lastly.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 2: Download it.
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 1: We got great indoors. Yeah. Great indoors for five. And
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: he says infant and annihilator by swine ecologist. Try infant
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: annihilator and just look that up. Do you want me
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: to put up the no more request sign?
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so.
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 1: All right. No more requests guys.
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 2: Okay. Okay. Alright, let's do it. Alright. I will now
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 2: proceed to take my anger out on the blocks. Okay,
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 2: what's the first one again?
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 1: Back to the top. Ocarina of Time title.
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: Okay, got it. Alright, this is just normal.
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: Is that the only version that's available?
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the only version available.
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: Well, this guy's getting pushed back in the comments. So
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: I guess there's that. I think that's good because that's
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: something that you didn't really see in before. So let's
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 1: see here.
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 2: Look, statistically, this cannot possibly be survival sex or survival relationships. Sure.
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 2: What's happened because it wouldn't be positional. If it was survival,
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 2: there would be a minimum floor like there was. I
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 2: don't even think it was survival even in the past.
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 2: I think women genuinely wanted a man, which is why
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 2: having one wasn't a deficit. You know, they just wanted
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 2: what a man is. It's hard to describe to men.
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 2: And now it's a deficit because a bunch of weak-minded women...
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 2: swallowing feminism whole. You know, it's the herd-minded women who
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 2: don't actually look and research and read before they agree
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 2: with something. And feminism very much is about underselling what
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 2: men are and what men bring. Or not even underselling,
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 2: like completely demonizing it. Turning it from a value to
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 2: a deficit. And so what we're seeing is women not
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 2: selecting based on... And it's not survival, but just the
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 2: ability to build something with a man. So a man
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 2: who is present to build something with. They're not selecting
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 2: on that. They're selecting on men's position relative to other men.
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: And the reason why they're doing that is because they
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: want to make their girlfriends jealous. That's it. But the
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 2: problem with selecting for, well, this current regime is that
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: there's no ceiling.
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 2: There's just the ratchet upwards over time.
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: The minimum income for a man just goes up and
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 2: up and up. So what I did to do this
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: statistical analysis is I looked at marriage rates and I
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 2: normalized it to sex ratio because there's... There are periods
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 2: in time in U.S. history where men substantially outnumbered women.
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 2: And if you look at the marriage ratio at that time,
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 2: it's going to be distorted by that. And so you
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 2: have to basically normalize it to sex ratio of the population.
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 2: And for 100 years, it went between... 77 and 84
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 2: with like an average of about 80%. 80% of men
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 2: at any income level were married. Like the income level
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: that men needed to achieve to get 80% married was one.
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 2: Like the income percentile is one. And then you can
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: watch it march up the ranks starting from the 80s onward. Okay,
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: so you just march up and then it reduces and
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 2: so it goes from one to to 10, to 20,
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: to 40, to 60, to 80, and it probably is
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: even higher now. That a man needs to earn in
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: the 80th percentile to have the same possibility, the same
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 2: percentage of marriage, of potential of being married, as a
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: man who used to have to earn in the first percentile.
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 2: That's not survival. That's not women saying, oh, I need
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: to survive. That's women saying, I want to make my
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: girlfriends jealous. How do I do that? That's what a
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 2: man is for. He's just a status object in my
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 2: relationship with other women. You know what feminists accuse men
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 2: of doing, which I suspect men are categorically incapable of?
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 2: Trophy wives. Basically, we are living in an age of
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: trophy husbands. But also that the trophy shouldn't exist because
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 2: its existence is an offense to the person who gets
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 2: it somehow. All right, next one. I just did it.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: It was very relaxing.
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 1: All right, next song on the list is Super Tramp,
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: The Logical Song. It was a short one, it seems.
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: It was a short one, but it was calm and relaxing.
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: Norwegian says, it says, well, finish the song, I guess.
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: Norwegian says, it says page not found when I click
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: on the Feed the Badger link.
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 2: Oh, God.
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: Try going to the... Is that when you just go
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 1: to the main website or when you specifically try to
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 1: navigate to the.
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 2: Support?
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: Try going to the main website and see if you
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: can navigate to it from there. It's just feedthebadger.com.
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: Give us some more information of how.
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: He says, is Badger Media Blitz the correct one?
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but how... Why are you getting the 404? What link....
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 2: Interesting. My husband was listening to this song yesterday.
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, it's like feminists take everything that men are
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 2: and give it the worst possible interpretation. When you actually
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 2: understand it, it's mostly just adorable. Is that offensive for
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 2: me to say?
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: Feedthebadger.com forward slash convince is where he went.
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's not where you should go. Is that the
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 2: one I'm accidentally... Is that in the low bar, Brian?
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: Let me see. He's looking on Rumble, so... Yeah, there
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: is also feedthebadger.com forward slash support there, too, though.
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah, don't... Go to the events. Go to support.
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: Go to the support one.
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 2: Honestly, all you have to do is go to Feed
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 2: the Badger. Yeah, it's there.
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: You can just go to Feed the Badger. It's there, yeah. Feedthebadger.com
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: forward slash support, okay?
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: I might have to fix the events.
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: Let us know that that worked. Devilface97 says, Man, Gen
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: Z is so corny. Gen Z. Who are you talking about?
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 1: Nobody here is Gen Z.
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 2: Alright, anyway.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 1: Let me read this reaction.
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: I got the tail end of that when the mating
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 2: market was still sane.
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 2: You know what I've noticed? Oh, what? Men who are
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 2: off the cover of GQ and their wives look like
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 2: they rolled out of a fucking... Well, out of a
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 2: McDonald's drive-thru, really. Just... Fucking ugly women. Like, what the hell? Yeah.
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 2: It's just, it's getting a little weird. Like, why men
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 2: are so fit and their wives are so not. I
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 2: assume that's Gen Z, like, it's like the beginning of
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 2: Gen Z and the millennials. I guess that's like, um,
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 2: visual evidence of what's actually going on. My statistical analysis
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: is based on income, which is the primary factor. But
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: having said that, I think what's going on is that
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 2: a woman who's a two is getting a man who's
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 2: a four all the way up, like in terms of looks.
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: So looks are important for men. But all it does
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 2: is give them the best odds, which are still significantly
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 2: worse than they've ever been within their income bracket. Sorry,
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 2: maybe I'm just being confusing. No. What happens is... Hold on. Well,
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 2: I mean, what happens is that men have to be,
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 2: have to try to maximize other factors in order to
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 2: get a woman who, well, before they would have just
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 2: been able to get a woman who was about the
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: same attractiveness at their income level. Now they have to
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: maximize everything to get a woman less attractive to marry them.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 2: All right, let's do the next one.
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: All right, the next song is Powerwolf, Venom of Venus.
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 2: Venom of Venus, doing it right now. We're going to
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 2: totally get... Oh, okay. So, some heavy metal now.
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: All right, so let me read this response. A guy
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: named Daniel Aviola said, number one, he said, one, why
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: did you repeat that this was part of a series
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: on the Manosphere three times? He does in the article.
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 1: I skipped over those bits. Two, I'm glad you lived
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 1: in Africa so I can fully state with all confidence
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 1: that it is extremely misleading, dishonest, and disingenuous to even
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: suggest that women struggle more to earn and sustain a
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: living than men. Your entire article is based on this premise,
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 1: that women only make such demands in exchange for affection
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: because there is a system that financially oppresses them. It's
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: a lie. It's true.
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, that's the other thing. Not only are men
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: still ranked incredibly... Like, the standards, quote-unquote standards, the demands
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 2: on men... And it's not income. It's income is just
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 2: a variable for rank, for relative rank. It has become
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 2: insane and impossible. Meanwhile, the government makes it harder and
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 2: harder for men to go anywhere in their careers and
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 2: earn a living. And the economy, like all the corporate culture,
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 2: makes it even harder still because it disincentivizes the way
• 1:42:08
  Speaker 2: that men approach things. All of this, you know, like positionals,
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 2: like derivatives, all this financial crap, and all these claims,
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: and grants, and all of this kind of fatberg, it
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 2: does not really play to men's strengths, shall we say.
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 2: It plays to women's, and men, the sneaky fuckers that
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 2: can sort of think like women. Their strengths are played to.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: So men are not just marginalized, they're also marginalized in the,
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 2: what do they call it now, a service economy? So
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 2: in every way, it's harder for men to earn money.
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: So men should be like, well, I just need to
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 2: do survival sex, lady. But they don't do that. That's
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 2: not a level of honor. And it would actually be
• 1:42:59
  Speaker 2: more honest for men's position.
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 2: But yeah, he's absolutely right. What? Well, he's right. That
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 2: the idea that men... survival goes through men it doesn't
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 2: it doesn't even like even in traditionally it didn't necessarily
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: go through women or men I mean again the reason
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: why people survived the fall of the Soviet Union was
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 2: because of the dashka because of the babushkas in their
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 2: freaking gardens and goats and then the austerity with Greece
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 2: why did they survive because of grandma's pension Survival often
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 2: goes through women. But men aren't complaining about that shit.
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: They aren't complaining about that in the U.S. In a
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: lot of Western countries, the corporate culture actively discriminates against them.
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: Anyway.
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 2: Okay, done, Powerwolf. What's the next one?
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 1: Uh, let's see. That was a Power Wolf, Venom of Venus, Nexus,
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 1: Sinistral Battle, Lufia 2. No idea what that is.
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 2: What the fuck is... How did I... Yeah. A, I, B? Sinist... Okay,
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 2: here we go. Sinistral. Doing it now. Okay. Okay. Okay.
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 2: So what I'm trying to say is that there are
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 2: cultures where men are socially and legally obligated to the
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 2: upkeep of their women, which is kin selection cultures. Yeah. Yes,
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 2: this is difficult. I'm trying not to die. I'm trying
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 2: not to cry. Can you see how fast this is going?
• 1:45:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I see that. I see that.
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 2: Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: Oh, you failed?
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 2: No, I paused everything to crash.
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 1: Oh, it crashed?
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 2: Oh, shit.
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, I see you're still moving around. It looks
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 1: like you just paused the game.
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 2: No, okay. No, what are you doing? No!
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: Anyway. That was actually kind of a dumb article. Like,
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: you could have picked, because there's jokes all over the internet,
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 1: so that one was cherry-picked specifically to write this piece
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 1: on it. So it's almost like you can just throw
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: it out based on that. Like, There's no civilization that
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: exists today, none, that don't make protecting and providing for
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 1: women a central priority. None. They may have different approaches,
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: but they all, because otherwise they couldn't possibly thrive. They
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: would just kill themselves off. So, I mean, now they're
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: just doing it slow.
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean, survival.
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: Survival is one thing. Because it's almost a necessity, again,
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 2: where you're dealing with the most dependent female mammal on
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: the planet. And in particular, it's not even women's dependencies.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 2: It's offspring. Human offspring? Ridiculous. Human offspring are on nightmare
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 2: difficulty mode for raising. They're the dark souls of evolution.
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, starting a family is the dark souls of living.
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, a human family, yes. The dark souls of living
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 2: throughout our evolutionary history. Just impossible no-do-overs, right? So, yes,
• 1:47:20
  Speaker 2: there's going to be, like most cultures, shovel the resources
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 2: into women and children. Because otherwise we don't survive. But
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 2: what we're doing now is not that. It's not about survival.
• 1:47:33
  Speaker 2: It's about feeding women's status-seeking, this disease that they have.
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 2: That they want to make their... That everything translates to
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 2: a position in the web and not an actual goal
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 2: in reality. And so they've turned their relationships with men
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 2: into basically queuing... So a man just represents a spot
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 2: in the queue for her, not an actual opportunity to
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 2: have a relationship with a living body and a person,
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 2: but just a spot in a queue, which is why
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 2: the only way for men to keep women is to
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 2: make them feel like their spot in the queue, like
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 2: somebody else could get it at any point in time,
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 2: which isn't the basis of a religion. It isn't the
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 2: basis for an actual relationship. It's just a nightmare. An
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 2: endless merry-go-round of trying to induce FOMO in her. Okay,
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 2: I have to do the one I just did again.
• 1:48:33
  Speaker 2: What was it called?
• 1:48:33
  Speaker 1: Uh... Sinistral Battle Lufia 2.
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 2: Okay. Okay. I gotta be on my game. I can't talk.
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 1: Yep, that's fine.
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 2: Just keep reading those comments. I will just keep my
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 2: mouth shut. Two finally can talk, Brian. After a week.
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 1: Alright, hold on. Well, I gotta find it again. Well,
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 1: I closed it, but let me just reopen it. History...
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: Turner stating joke. Here we go.
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 1: Let's look at these stupid gay comments. Let's see. Keith Williams.
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 1: I struggle to see the difference between the manosphere and
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 1: just good old-fashioned patriarchy and sexism. This joke could have
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 1: been written in 1901, crying about how women were no
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: longer your property and you couldn't beat them without getting
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: the law called on you, or in 1926, lamenting how
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: easy dates were before World War I and women getting
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 1: the right to vote and how the wider adoption of
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 1: the car television or telephone, rather, or radio meant you
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: needed to have those things to have a chance with women.
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 1: Or in 1948, lamenting how women in the 1930s were
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: just happy to have a man with any job, now
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: Rosie the Riveter acts like she's too good for the
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: regular guy. Or in 1974, before Jane Fonda burned her bra.
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: Or you get the picture. Take any time period and
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 1: you'll have those members of the He-Man Woman Haters Club
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 1: talking about how hard it is for them to find
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 1: companionship with people they actively hate because they can't treat
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: them with utter contempt and still expect interest without obligation.
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: Cue the world's smallest violin. This guy must be a
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 1: time traveler because he's able to just know exactly how
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: things work. I got 51. Yes.
• 1:50:38
  Speaker 2: I got 51 on there on the leaderboard. So that's
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 2: technically a win.
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 2: Sorry, I didn't give you the asterisk. I'll go through
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 2: it on the highest difficulty. If I get through it,
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 2: on your honor, 25 bucks to feedthebadger.com if you can
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 2: get to it. And if I get within the top 100,
• 1:51:01
  Speaker 2: because if I don't, or if I do get in
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 2: the top 100, if I fail, it's usually because you
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 2: sent an insanely difficult song. And honestly, the reason why
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 2: I failed was because Brian said something, not Brian, he
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 2: relayed something from another person that was so fucking stupid
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 2: that That I lost my focus for a moment on
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 2: the level. And that is this guy's comment. Did you
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 2: want to finish going through it before I rip and tear?
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 1: Going through what? This comment?
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 2: What, that comment? Yeah, that comment. Have you finished your comment.
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: On the comment? Yeah, I finished the comment. I'm just
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: looking at replies.
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 2: To the comment. Let me elucidate this human being. Right? 1910.
• 1:51:50
  Speaker 2: The minimum income a man needed to have to have
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 2: an 80% chance of being married, normalized to sex ratio,
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 2: one percentile. He needed to be the first percentile. 1920,
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 2: first percentile. 1930, first percentile. 1940, first percentile. 1950, first percentile. 1960,
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 2: first percentile. 1970, first percentile. And then 1980s roll around,
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 2: something happened. Right? Something happened. What could that thing possibly
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 2: have been? And we start the upward track. That is
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 2: now at the 90th percentile. Of relative rank of income.
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 2: So everything he mentions. Did not apply. Until the 80s.
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 2: And then accelerating into the early 2000s. Accelerating through 2015.
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 2: Accelerating through now. Right. Something else changed. My friend. And
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 2: the fact is that. I don't think men were complaining
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 2: back then that much. Once men are at the 90th
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 2: percentile to have the same chance of marriage as their
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 2: father did at 20% and their grandfather did at 1%,
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 2: maybe we can start paying attention to their complaints that
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 2: something is wrong. But oh no, oh no! Why can't
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 2: we do that? Oh, because we might have to blame women!
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 2: And who can do that, right? Well, I can. And
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 2: you can't stop me. It's a disease in women's minds.
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 2: It has nothing to do with survival. It has nothing
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 2: to do with cost of living. It has nothing to
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 2: do with the price of a fucking house. It has
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 2: everything to do with a woman wanting to make her
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 2: girlfriends jealous so she does not want any man unless
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 2: he is significantly higher in rank than she would normally
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 2: get in an actual dating landscape. So it's that women
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 2: have turned men from people into positions. That is a disease.
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 2: That is instrumentalizing. That is worse than wanting an attractive
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 2: younger woman with big boobs because at least she's a person.
• 1:54:21
  Speaker 2: This is them wanting a silhouette of a man. A
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 2: position with no man attached. But unfortunately you can't get
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 2: that without a man. What do you do? You get
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 2: the psychology of men and masculinities to make men constantly
• 1:54:37
  Speaker 2: renunciate themselves so they impact the woman who wants the
• 1:54:40
  Speaker 2: position they represent as little as possible. They have no person.
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 2: Read the Ick List. That is that. Essentially the Ick
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 2: List is I want a man, but I don't want
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 2: him to exist as a corporeal being. Like, I don't
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 2: want him to have any interiority, any vulnerability. I don't
• 1:55:01
  Speaker 2: want him to have feet, or drink through straws, or
• 1:55:05
  Speaker 2: fall down, or get sick, or do anything, make any effort.
• 1:55:11
  Speaker 2: All of his position should arrive with no visible effort attached. Like,
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 2: look at that Iclis. It's like, okay... So you want
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 2: to remove man as a category of being entirely and
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 2: just occupy the negative space that's left. I mean, aren't
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 2: we well past objectification with that ask? Aren't we well past,
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 2: I'd like a woman with big boobs and I like
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 2: a big booty Latina. Like, aren't we well past those
• 1:55:40
  Speaker 2: kinds of asks with what women are asking or demanding
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 2: from men? At what point can we start shaming? We
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 2: shamed men for wanting a woman who's not obese. We
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 2: shamed men for wanting a woman who doesn't have a penis.
• 1:55:56
  Speaker 2: We shamed men for wanting a woman who was, you know,
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 2: their race. I mean, how many times, or not old,
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 2: could have children, right? How many times have we shamed
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 2: men for preferences? Is it time to now start shaming
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 2: women for their preference of being in a relationship where
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 2: the other side doesn't exist? has completely renunciated themselves out
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 2: of existence. Can we do a little shaming there? Can
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 2: we point to that and say, no? Okay. What's the
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 2: next one?
• 1:56:29
  Speaker 1: You got the song?
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I need the song.
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 1: The next one is Clint Eastwood, Gorillas.
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 2: Okay, that's good.
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 2: I like that one. It's a good one. Um.
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: Anyway, let's see. Uh, okay. No, that's lame. He met
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: a woman in the haters club. Most of this is
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 1: just really, like, just, like, low IQ, like, ranting.
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 2: It's like.
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 1: Oh, men invented dating apps. Isn't that the irony? You
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 1: guys are, like, mad about being judged? Like, I didn't
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 1: invent dating apps. What are you talking about? And also,
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 1: primarily women benefit from dating apps, so I don't see
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: where the complaint is at.
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, men invented something that primarily benefits women. Wow, that's new.
• 1:57:33
  Speaker 2: Like I said, I, you know, I was screaming about
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 2: this last time we, like, the only thing that men
• 1:57:39
  Speaker 2: care about is women. Can we stop that? Like, honestly.
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 2: Now that you know that caring about women is leading
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 2: to dead children, can we just, not just like abortions,
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 2: actual dead children. Like, three limp corpses on the floor.
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 2: Can we question this level of simpery now? Because I
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 2: got the receipts. Simping is not going to get you
• 1:58:04
  Speaker 2: any closer to the flutes. Yep.
• 1:58:10
  Speaker 1: Alright.
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 2: Um.
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 1: Kaya May Tingley said... Oh, her pronouns are she, her, they.
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 2: Thanks.
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 1: So this should be absolute fucking gold. Modern humans can't
• 1:58:27
  Speaker 1: seem to see the forest for the trees. modern humans
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 1: like you're not one of us what are you like
• 1:58:33
  Speaker 1: an alien like why do you say it like you
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 1: modern humans you don't you are so dumb and silly
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: and I'm over here judging you from the outside as
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 1: an enlightened being of celestial matter of stardust I will
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 1: tell you what the problem is if men feel aggrieved
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 1: at the transactional sensation of relationships then perhaps they should
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 1: consider how they've been trained to purchase the attention of
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 1: women with money When the response to want to go
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 1: out is basically my food and shelter are at risk
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 1: and I can't afford to buy the things that supposedly
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 1: make me a desirable....
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 2: What?
• 1:59:13
  Speaker 1: What the.
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 2: I can't pay for my things. I'm going to date.
• 1:59:20
  Speaker 2: And because I've gone on a dating site, now you're
• 1:59:25
  Speaker 2: obligated to pay for my thing. What? Get a fucking job.
• 1:59:30
  Speaker 2: And the other thing is, men are trained by whom?
• 1:59:39
  Speaker 2: To consider their affection something, or to consider women's affection something.
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 2: And literally, she's commenting on a joke that is expressing
• 1:59:51
  Speaker 2: men's irritation at women expecting money.
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 2: For courtship.
• 2:00:00
  Speaker 1: But you're not supposed to joke about that because it's
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: very serious.
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 2: She's saying, well, men should consider what trains them to
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 2: expect to pay for affection. Bitch, it's the woman. And
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 2: then she's like, oh, but it's patriarchy that makes her
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 2: so desperate for money that she's going on a dating
• 2:00:25
  Speaker 2: site to find a job.
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 2: Isn't that the whole thing? The whole last century was, oh,
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 2: we're going to break down all the barriers for women
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 2: to get a job. Okay, why do you still go
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 2: on gating sites to find jobs then? Huh? Why do
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 2: you go on dating sites to get money then? Why
• 2:00:47
  Speaker 2: aren't you on LinkedIn? Why aren't you driving an Uber?
• 2:00:54
  Speaker 2: Why are you on a fucking dating site to get
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 2: a job? Or because you need money? What's training women
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 2: to think that there's money on dating sites? Okay. All right.
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 2: I did Clint Eastwood.
• 2:01:09
  Speaker 1: What's the next one? Next is... It's fine. Number one
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 1: Special Bleach 2022 trailer version. I got a super... A
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 1: rumble rant from OIC for a dollar, and he says,
• 2:01:22
  Speaker 1: I had zero contribution to the invention of dating apps.
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 1: Who was it that made dating apps required by ostracizing
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 1: every other way of approaching women? Women.
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 2: That's true. Literally made every other way of approaching women
• 2:01:42
  Speaker 2: either criminal or a possible avenue to lose your job.
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:01:48
  Speaker 2: And then they're like, oh, well, men should take responsibility
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 2: for this. that half dozen men who invaded invented dating
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 2: apps yeah that's a good point excellent point sir here
• 2:02:07
  Speaker 2: you can have a not simp.
• 2:02:08
  Speaker 1: Point so thank you for that yeah I was well
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 1: yes of course that's the reason why it exists um
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 1: if men worldwide are triggered by this joke as you
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 1: described they're not triggered it's funny how they try to
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 1: like suggest like more emotional trauma than like literally this
• 2:02:31
  Speaker 1: guy wrote the article or his blog or whatever the
• 2:02:35
  Speaker 1: hell it is based on the fact that there were
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 1: men sharing it saying same same friend and they didn't
• 2:02:42
  Speaker 1: say same because one of them had strangled three children
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: they said same because the joke made a funny commentary
• 2:02:48
  Speaker 1: on how entitled women are modern women have become and
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 1: they're all saying yeah I've experienced this as well then
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 1: that's not being triggered. That's not trauma. That's just a
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 1: guy saying, yeah, I get it. And they have to say, oh,
• 2:03:02
  Speaker 1: you triggered Snowflake? You're so hurt over this. Oh my God,
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 1: you must be an incel. It's so sad. Like this
• 2:03:12
  Speaker 1: is like fucking below room temperature IQ. It's like, it's
• 2:03:18
  Speaker 1: so dumb. And people post with so much confidence, like,
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: oh yeah, this is a banger post right here. No,
• 2:03:25
  Speaker 1: it's retarded. It's really retarded. It's so sad. Anyway, so
• 2:03:34
  Speaker 1: if men worldwide are triggered by this joke, as you described,
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: then perhaps it would behoove them to consider their conditioning.
• 2:03:40
  Speaker 1: Stop treating women like purchasable objects and they will stop
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 1: treating you like the buyer. And more importantly, start treating
• 2:03:47
  Speaker 1: women like fellow independent humans and they might be able
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 1: to return the respect. Put it on a bumper sticker, lady.
• 2:03:54
  Speaker 2: No, that's a good point. No, seriously. Don't interrupt your
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 2: enemy when they're making a mistake, guys. 100%. Stop treating
• 2:04:04
  Speaker 2: women's affection as something that can be purchased. Just stop.
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 2: Stop it.
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 1: But they want that, though. I mean, women do. Like,
• 2:04:11
  Speaker 1: they don't actually... Like, she says, treat us like humans.
• 2:04:14
  Speaker 1: She doesn't mean that. She doesn't mean that.
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but do it.
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: She means give me stuff and stop complaining. That's what
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 1: she means. That's what it always means.
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 2: Of course that's what she means. But do it, guys.
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 2: Take her at her word. Oh, goddamn.
• 2:04:35
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 2:04:38
  Speaker 2: Are you fucking... Who sent this? Grayden Doors.
• 2:04:42
  Speaker 1: Was it Grayden Doors?
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 2: Alright, that's it.
• 2:04:45
  Speaker 1: No, it was an anonymous person that sent it. It
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 1: was an anonymous one.
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 2: Sadistic, okay.
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, you know, you asked for this, Allison. You
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 1: really don't have any place to complain anymore. You said,
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 1: make it hard for me, make me dance like a monkey.
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 1: You know people are going to give you.
• 2:05:11
  Speaker 2: These troll songs. I'm not... Did I complain? I just
• 2:05:15
  Speaker 2: reduced the speed. Oh. It's not a complaint. It's just
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 2: an acknowledgement of limitation. I am not triggered by this song, sir.
• 2:05:26
  Speaker 1: You're not triggered by that? You're not triggered, Snowflake, by
• 2:05:29
  Speaker 1: a song?
• 2:05:31
  Speaker 2: Um... I need to find the pattern here. Good lord!
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, anyway. Yeah, I'm looking and there's like the comments
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: are just not useful. And they're just the same shit. Like,
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 1: I can just... I can just roll, spin the wheel
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 1: of feminist talking points, and I'll land on something that
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 1: somebody here has said. You know, my chattel, my property,
• 2:06:15
  Speaker 1: my wage gap, my male oppression. I don't know, it's pathetic.
• 2:06:25
  Speaker 1: devil face why why are you still here you just
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 1: seem like you just want attention and you think we're
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 1: the pathetic ones isn't that sad you're a sad person
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: you know that very sad what's going on nothing there's
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: a there's somebody in our our special chat being special
• 2:06:44
  Speaker 1: and they've been there since the show started and they're
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 1: trying to say that we're you know something pathetic about
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 1: us for doing a show but they're watching the fucking
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 1: show So I don't know what you think you're doing.
• 2:06:56
  Speaker 1: It's kind of pathetic.
• 2:06:59
  Speaker 2: Argue with statistics.
• 2:07:02
  Speaker 1: Oh, what?
• 2:07:03
  Speaker 2: Argue with statistics, guy. Yeah. Whoever you are.
• 2:07:07
  Speaker 1: Well, you know, he just came in here and saw
• 2:07:11
  Speaker 1: we have cartoon avatars, so he was like, these guys
• 2:07:14
  Speaker 1: must be dumb. So, yeah. I guess that's one way
• 2:07:19
  Speaker 1: to live your life.
• 2:07:22
  Speaker 2: I use the cartoon avatar because I pace when I think.
• 2:07:26
  Speaker 2: And unless you want an entire stream up my nostrils,
• 2:07:31
  Speaker 2: you get the fucking cartoon avatar and you thank me
• 2:07:33
  Speaker 2: for it.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: Anyway. Lordman says, Hi Brian, I want attention. Yeah, that's
• 2:07:48
  Speaker 1: why I'm not giving you any.
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 2: Although I just did. What? You are giving him.
• 2:07:57
  Speaker 1: Oh, good lord. I know.
• 2:08:04
  Speaker 2: This is going so fast, it's breaking my computer.
• 2:08:21
  Speaker 1: Anyway.
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 2: Uh....
• 2:08:28
  Speaker 1: Florida Man wants you to play Pac-Man. I don't know why. Like,
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 1: Allison only plays Beat Saber on these streams. So, unless
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: you want to, like, change the format.
• 2:08:38
  Speaker 2: I play Repo on other streams. What? I play Repo
• 2:08:43
  Speaker 2: on other streams.
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 1: No, he wants you to play Pac-Man on this stream.
• 2:08:49
  Speaker 2: I'm not changing the fucking format, dude. No. Although maybe
• 2:08:57
  Speaker 2: I will after this one. Repo is far less painful
• 2:09:01
  Speaker 2: than this.
• 2:09:08
  Speaker 1: Well.
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 2: Let's see if we can.
• 2:09:13
  Speaker 1: Get through this.
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 2: We?
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's get through this. Well, I'm just... I'm just here...
• 2:09:17
  Speaker 1: making sure that the stream is run correctly. I'm working.
• 2:09:26
  Speaker 2: So, Oh, good Lord. Oh, good. That's like a, that's
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 2: a hundred dollar song there. If I get through it,
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 2: let's see.
• 2:09:37
  Speaker 1: You got through it. That was probably the hardest song
• 2:09:41
  Speaker 1: on the list. So that was, uh, what was that?
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: Was that the number one special bleach thing?
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 2: It was swine.
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 1: It was that swine ecologist.
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Infant annihilator. Okay.
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 1: Okay. That was great. Did you do the number one
• 2:09:58
  Speaker 1: special bleach thing already?
• 2:10:00
  Speaker 2: Yes, I did.
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Well, it must've been short. All right. Well
• 2:10:04
  Speaker 1: then that's all of them.
• 2:10:06
  Speaker 2: Yes. That's all of them.
• 2:10:10
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 2:10:11
  Speaker 2: Whoa, we're done. I'm closing the window. I'm going to
• 2:10:16
  Speaker 2: do my stretches and then we'll do some thank yous
• 2:10:19
  Speaker 2: to see if anybody got through the new comment or the... Okay,
• 2:10:23
  Speaker 2: so feedthebadger.com. Just go to feedthebadger.com now. The form, I
• 2:10:29
  Speaker 2: have assembled it on the top page because thanks to
• 2:10:33
  Speaker 2: Punished Claude, I can now program. I mean, I don't
• 2:10:39
  Speaker 2: program Punished Claude programs. In JavaScript, PHP... Uh, and a
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 2: CSS go figure, huh? Um, anyway, so it's now, and
• 2:10:52
  Speaker 2: we now have the form on the shop page was
• 2:10:54
  Speaker 2: just feed the badger.com. So just go there and it
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 2: will be there. I'm just stretching. That's all.
• 2:11:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's fine. So if I sit, so yeah, go
• 2:11:04
  Speaker 1: to feed the badger.com. That's where it lives.
• 2:11:07
  Speaker 2: Yes. And then put $ 25 to the hat. If I
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 2: got through your song, Holy fuck, Graydon Doors, I should
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 2: just charge you anyway, because that was horrible. Of course,
• 2:11:18
  Speaker 2: it's on your honor, so I can't really charge you anyway.
• 2:11:24
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 2:11:26
  Speaker 2: Okay, do you have any more... One more stupid comment
• 2:11:29
  Speaker 2: from these people?
• 2:11:32
  Speaker 1: I mean, I could find something, but like I said,
• 2:11:35
  Speaker 1: I'm not getting anything of value out of this. Um.
• 2:11:51
  Speaker 1: All right i'll just i'm gonna look for a short
• 2:11:53
  Speaker 1: one because i know your rants are long and we've
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 1: already been doing this for over two hours um of
• 2:12:00
  Speaker 1: course nobody here is fucking can't help but be long-winded
• 2:12:04
  Speaker 1: yeah vienna de vega Quoted from the article, many of
• 2:12:12
  Speaker 1: them are describing something real in their lives, dates that
• 2:12:15
  Speaker 1: feel like auditions, apps that feel like marketplaces, a sense
• 2:12:18
  Speaker 1: that they are being evaluated as wallets first. And then
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 1: Vienna responds to that by saying, back in the 1970s,
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 1: that's 56 years ago, yikes, the Jay Giles band became
• 2:12:28
  Speaker 1: known for the tune, First I Look at the Purse.
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 1: The shoe was very much, and at root quietly still is,
• 2:12:35
  Speaker 1: on the other foot. Here's the last verse and chorus.
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 1: I don't care if you got yourself a wrap. All
• 2:12:41
  Speaker 1: I want is your pretty green cash. Bought me a suit.
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 1: Bought me a car. Want me to look like a
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 1: Hollywood star. Money. I want money. Baby ain't know why.
• 2:12:52
  Speaker 1: Baby money. I need money. First I look at the purse.
• 2:12:55
  Speaker 1: First I look at the purse. First I look at
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 1: the purse. First I look at the purse. And Luke,
• 2:13:05
  Speaker 1: the original author, says that is a great historical counterpoint.
• 2:13:09
  Speaker 1: The song predates the period romanticized in the joke by decades,
• 2:13:13
  Speaker 1: which reinforces something I tried to get at near the
• 2:13:15
  Speaker 1: end of the piece, the supposedly uncomplicated past that probably
• 2:13:20
  Speaker 1: never existed. Men and women have been calculating money, status, beauty,
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 1: and security in courtship for a very long time. What
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 1: interests me about the Turkish joke is why so many
• 2:13:29
  Speaker 1: people across very different countries experience the transaction as something
• 2:13:33
  Speaker 1: distinctly modern and immediately recognizable. The history complicates the nostalgia.
• 2:13:38
  Speaker 1: The 38.5 million views tell us something about the feeling now.
• 2:13:42
  Speaker 1: Even his responses sound like AI. They read like that, absolutely. Oh,
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 1: this is a great historical... Who says that shit? This
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 1: is AI. But, okay. So, and then another thing is
• 2:13:54
  Speaker 1: that it's dumb AI, too. Because it's assuming, again, you know,
• 2:13:57
  Speaker 1: this history that never existed. Alright, so I did get
• 2:14:03
  Speaker 1: a super chow from DarkKigimora for 10, and he says...
• 2:14:08
  Speaker 1: Worse than the fact the hypergamy is relative rather than absolute,
• 2:14:12
  Speaker 1: which would imply survival, are the people who believe that
• 2:14:15
  Speaker 1: nothing a father does can match a woman's contributions in childbirth.
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: We don't have to worry about hypergamy shifting to where
• 2:14:22
  Speaker 1: nobody can afford it. We can just ask people like
• 2:14:25
  Speaker 1: that how they are promoting anything other than slavery after
• 2:14:28
  Speaker 1: they imply maternity has literally infinite value.
• 2:14:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah, not even non-maternity, too. Just the act of having
• 2:14:37
  Speaker 2: a uterus means that the world owes you infinite rent
• 2:14:43
  Speaker 2: from now to eternity.
• 2:14:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:14:46
  Speaker 2: Wear that one, eh? Okay, I'm looking in now. Okay.
• 2:14:51
  Speaker 2: I feel the headache starting. We should have just talked
• 2:14:57
  Speaker 2: about fun stuff we'd watched.
• 2:15:00
  Speaker 1: Say what?
• 2:15:02
  Speaker 2: We should have just talked about fun stuff we'd watched.
• 2:15:06
  Speaker 1: I haven't watched anything, though.
• 2:15:08
  Speaker 2: Okay. So, I'm putting the things through now.
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 2:15:18
  Speaker 2: And then they will pop up. Because GiveWP likes that
• 2:15:25
  Speaker 2: extra step. And when I know what you want to
• 2:15:32
  Speaker 2: be referred to as, I will give you my thanks.
• 2:15:35
  Speaker 2: All right. Good, good, good. Okay. So Anthony gave us $ 100.
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Anthony.
• 2:15:43
  Speaker 1: Thank you. Amazing.
• 2:15:47
  Speaker 2: Caleb gave us $ 100. Thank you, Caleb.
• 2:15:50
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 2:15:50
  Speaker 2: All right, all right, all right. Kenneth gave us $ 25.
• 2:15:53
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Kenneth. Thank you. Excellent. And Alexandria gave us $ 25.
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Alexandria.
• 2:16:05
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Alexandria. I'm trying to find something here that fits.
• 2:16:10
  Speaker 1: I guess I'll... Erotic!
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 2: Erotic!
• 2:16:13
  Speaker 1: Erotic! Erotic!
• 2:16:16
  Speaker 2: That's four. So I think that there's two more or
• 2:16:20
  Speaker 2: three more. Two more.
• 2:16:20
  Speaker 1: Three.
• 2:16:21
  Speaker 2: Wait, four.
• 2:16:22
  Speaker 1: There were seven.
• 2:16:22
  Speaker 2: Three, but I didn't... I know there were seven, but
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 2: there were.
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 1: Oh, some had like... Some had the... I already had
• 2:16:29
  Speaker 1: the cost baked in, though.
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 2: Oh, okay.
• 2:16:32
  Speaker 1: So, like, Dark Iggy Mora's already got, he's already given 25,
• 2:16:36
  Speaker 1: so he just made it part of the thing.
• 2:16:38
  Speaker 2: Okay, alright, fair enough. And Shadow Wolf did, too.
• 2:16:40
  Speaker 1: Shadow Wolf did, too, so. So, I think that's already two.
• 2:16:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 2:16:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:16:45
  Speaker 2: All right, so let me see what the last, okay. Well,
• 2:16:50
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I mean, that's why I say on
• 2:16:52
  Speaker 2: your honor, because it's almost impossible to keep track of
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 2: all this. And Graydon Doors put through $ 100, despite me
• 2:16:58
  Speaker 2: not failing to get through his song.
• 2:17:00
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 2:17:00
  Speaker 2: Good news, everyone. Nightmarish, to be fair. Okay. All right.
• 2:17:07
  Speaker 2: So thank you, everyone. We got another $ 400, about $ 375
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 2: to the goal, or $ 350. So we have around $ 6, 500 left.
• 2:17:12
  Speaker 2: So it's a ways. But we have about 10 days
• 2:17:15
  Speaker 2: to get there. Usually you guys wait until the end anyway.
• 2:17:18
  Speaker 2: So thanks again. for all of that and I will
• 2:17:38
  Speaker 2: if you would like to send a message anytime after
• 2:17:39
  Speaker 2: the show is over interested in anything that we covered
• 2:17:42
  Speaker 2: here it's all a bunch of bullshit people just can't
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 2: blame women that's what they're doing they're just like i
• 2:17:48
  Speaker 2: we can't blame women but if you can't blame them
• 2:17:51
  Speaker 2: and the problem is with women then we're fucked right
• 2:17:56
  Speaker 2: if we can't talk about it okay and talking about
• 2:17:59
  Speaker 2: it doesn't mean the handsmaiden's tale because this is the
• 2:18:02
  Speaker 2: other thing they do they say oh wow if you
• 2:18:04
  Speaker 2: criticize women for having the desire to remove men from
• 2:18:09
  Speaker 2: a relationship, have a relationship with a man, but without
• 2:18:12
  Speaker 2: the man, then what you want is to put them
• 2:18:16
  Speaker 2: in the handmaiden's tail. That's another way of shutting down
• 2:18:21
  Speaker 2: the argument. So don't, don't, don't tolerate it. We can
• 2:18:26
  Speaker 2: talk about what happened. And we don't have to necessarily
• 2:18:32
  Speaker 2: buy into a solution that takes rid of women's right
• 2:18:36
  Speaker 2: to choose men, that is. Right. Because that's ultimately what
• 2:18:40
  Speaker 2: we want to get. We want to get women choosing
• 2:18:42
  Speaker 2: men again, not just a man shaped position. All right.
• 2:18:47
  Speaker 2: So anyway, if you want you want to make commentary
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 2: on any of that, feed the badger dot com slash
• 2:18:50
  Speaker 2: just the tip is where to go. And if you
• 2:18:53
  Speaker 2: want to support the show, FeedTheBadger.com. Just go to FeedTheBadger.com.
• 2:18:58
  Speaker 2: It's right there on the front page. And if you
• 2:19:01
  Speaker 2: want to join us in our community, that's BadgerNation.online. It
• 2:19:04
  Speaker 2: all should be in the low bar. You can select
• 2:19:08
  Speaker 2: your poison there. And I'll hand it back to Brian.
• 2:19:11
  Speaker 1: All right. So this live stream will– did I– yeah,
• 2:19:18
  Speaker 1: I will unlist it on YouTube. So you won't be
• 2:19:21
  Speaker 1: able to watch it on YouTube again unless you have
• 2:19:24
  Speaker 1: the link. But it will stay up on Rumble where
• 2:19:28
  Speaker 1: the full size stream is being shared anyway. And so
• 2:19:33
  Speaker 1: over on Rumble, please consider subscribing to the channel. You
• 2:19:38
  Speaker 1: can subscribe on YouTube as well. Our normal content is
• 2:19:41
  Speaker 1: not this. We normally discuss more, let's say, somber topics
• 2:19:46
  Speaker 1: or serious topics. Not that we didn't hear, but this
• 2:19:50
  Speaker 1: was a little bit more of a game of five. Well,
• 2:19:53
  Speaker 1: I know, but I mean, it's not what you would
• 2:19:57
  Speaker 1: normally come to see on a fundraising stream. But we
• 2:20:01
  Speaker 1: will be resuming our normal content tomorrow. But anyway, with
• 2:20:06
  Speaker 1: all that said, please consider subscribing to the channel. And, yeah,
• 2:20:13
  Speaker 1: that's it. I don't want you to share it or
• 2:20:16
  Speaker 1: anything like that because, again, I don't want to get
• 2:20:17
  Speaker 1: dinged by YouTube. So please consider subscribing to the channel
• 2:20:21
  Speaker 1: and hitting the bell for notifications. Thanks, guys, for all
• 2:20:24
  Speaker 1: your support on the patron support, fundraising, stream, whatever this is.
• 2:20:31
  Speaker 1: And we'll talk to you guys in the next one.
• 2:20:33
  Speaker 1: Have a good rest of your weekend.