Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Jeff Younger and the Fight for His Son | Rantzerker 237

Transcript

Jeff Younger and the Fight for His Son | Rantzerker 237 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: All right, coming to you live from a blah blah
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: blah blah blah blah. Where are the survivors blah blah
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: blah come and the view the brave, the bitchy. Yeah muddy,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: but well where I am. It's actually nice and sunny,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: a little cool because it's Virginia, which just means we're
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: gonna have a super brutal summer. And yeah, it's with
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Ran Circer number two hundred and thirty seven, Jeff Younger
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: and the Fight for his son. And my name is Brian.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: I'm here with Alison. I mean not Allison. See I
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: always say that I'm so programmed. I'm here with Paren
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: and Hannah. Yeah, I'm here with Karen and Hannah. Alison
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: is not available for this one, but I think we
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: have more than enough mouthed to speak on this topic.
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: And uh, before we get into it, I just want
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: to say that I was looking at a couple of
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: different subjects for potential today, so maybe I'll just drop
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: them so that like Karen or Hannah can drop what
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: they their initial desires to speak to them are before
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: we get into the main which is a really great
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: video that I'm really glad exists. But I almost went
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: with the story of Harry Sisson and the eleven or
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: so women that came out and making allegations against him.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: And I was gonna call it restart the clock, because
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys remember back in the
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: days of Gamergate, all of these guys that were male
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: feminists that were throwing allegations about, you know, impugning the gamers.
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: Toxic masculinity and yeah, yeah, and then it comes out.
• 1:33
  Speaker 3: Yeahs or their lady friends.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: That's well, that's also that's also a problem that Harry
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: system is.
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: I have heard at least two people proposed that this contra,
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: which I consider a nontroversy, right, that this entire Harry
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: Cison controversy is a psyop to con evinced young men
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: that Harry Sisson is straight and so that they can
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: win gen z men who actually have testicles that produced
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: testosterone right to come back to the Democratic Party.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it's what it's going to happen.
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: He's you know.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And speaking of Andrew Tate, the other topic I
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: almost picked was us looking at the talking about this
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: new Netflix theories called adolescents. I don't know if you
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: guys saw, Yeah, and uh yeah. So it's basically it's
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: it's about a boy in in uh Great Britain that
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: stabbed a girl to death, and there's like, it's the
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: investigation around this killing and apparently based on an actual
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: events that happened in Britain. Except they well, because because
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: Netflix does what Netflix does, see, they race swap all
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the characters. So the person who didn't they didn't.
• 3:09
  Speaker 3: There's there's there's a whole big well. Not everybody does
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: know though, like they've come out and they've said we
• 3:16
  Speaker 3: race swapped this, which you know, it makes it sound like, well,
• 3:21
  Speaker 3: the kid that did the stabbing did the stabbing for
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: exactly the same reasons that they applied to this kid. No,
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: in the Britain, Uh, stabbings were a culture clash between
• 3:35
  Speaker 3: immigrants and natives, Okay, And what they made this siap
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: about was this kid is influenced by the manisphere and
• 3:45
  Speaker 3: he thinks things that the public is supposed to believe
• 3:49
  Speaker 3: in cells think yes, and so he stabs. So it's
• 3:54
  Speaker 3: a complet In the trailer that we watched, they specifically
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: cited the eighty percent of girls going for the top
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: twenty yeah, and then said you have to trick them
• 4:12
  Speaker 3: to get with them, and and I'm like, yeah, that's
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: straight out of what these British documentaries are trying to
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: say about in cells. So and they've already taken it
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: into Parliament and they're already trying to make laws basically they.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: Want yeah, and they're trying. They're they're insisting that this
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: be shown in schools. Yeah, like all over the country.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: So yeah, okay, they.
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: Race swapped it. Okay, So what was the race of
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: the original person?
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: Well, he was an immigrant, like from you know, like
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: like yeah, it was a Muslim.
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: I think in Britain they have to say Asian.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and he's he was. He looked African to me,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: but most African Muslims. Yeah.
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 4:59
  Speaker 3: So there's there's there's not just been one. There's been
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: several incidents. And oh there they have been. They have
• 5:07
  Speaker 3: been racial incidents, not not just gender based incidents. And
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: so what they're trying to do is control the narrative.
• 5:15
  Speaker 3: They wanted a particular thing to talk about and it
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: didn't happen, so they made a show about it. Netflix
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: has been doing this. If you want to see more
• 5:24
  Speaker 3: of that, watch Equalizer and you'll see every narrative that
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: the news media has talked about in like the last
• 5:31
  Speaker 3: five or six years, they've done a show where that narrative,
• 5:37
  Speaker 3: they're what they wish was the really real thing that happened,
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: so that they could condemn certain groups of people and
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: make certain groups of people out to be angels. Has
• 5:47
  Speaker 3: been the theme of each episode for at least a
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: few seasons. And they're just they're just trying to use
• 5:55
  Speaker 3: shows to reprogram people's beliefs about what has been, haden
• 6:00
  Speaker 3: happening and what is happening, and it will work on
• 6:03
  Speaker 3: some people.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well go ahead, careen, what were you gonna say anything?
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: Oh, I was, I was just gonna say so, like
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: instead of so, they just basically they changed everything. So
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: they took like probably a Muslim guy right from Africa,
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: from like Somalia or like freaking Eritrea or wherever. Right,
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: they took him, uh, and he like got radicalized on
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: like freaking Muslim radical websites. Yeah, and then they just
• 6:34
  Speaker 2: switched it to like some white kid who was radicalized
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: by like yes or like a f D rather you know,
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: alternative for deutsch Land or whatever, right, like yeah, the
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: Manisphere and Brexit going up to him, Yeah, that's what happened.
• 6:56
  Speaker 3: And he stabs a girl in his class and he's
• 6:58
  Speaker 3: and she dies and he gets basically swatted, which, like
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: the beginning of the show, we were talking about that
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: because getting arrested in Britain apparently is like getting swatted
• 7:11
  Speaker 3: in the US. Yeah, they broke down their door and
• 7:17
  Speaker 3: and like a whole bunch of cops there straight into the.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: Robot like dogs and a robot come in. But anyway,
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: I didn't.
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: You have to do is in online and there there.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: Are I didn't. Yeah, so I didn't go with any
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: of that because what I found was so much better.
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: So what we're gonna be looking at today there's a
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: YouTube channel called soft White Underbelly.
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, okay, so much better in what way is it
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: hard better?
• 7:49
  Speaker 3: And that it's worse.
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: Something that.
• 7:52
  Speaker 4: This well, this is these people are actually making sense
• 7:57
  Speaker 4: because like I'm I don't have.
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: Like we're gonna need to find it Younger talk.
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we're gonna get to hear Jeff Younger's side of
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: the story, which we haven't yet, and the fact that
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: Soffway Underbelly allowed him to tell his I mean, look,
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: his story isn't good it's a nightmare. But the fact
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: that Jeff Younger was allowed to go on this platform,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: which by the way, has six point three million subscribers,
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: so a lot of people are getting to see this.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: That's what I think is good about it. And and
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: we're learning the truth of what's going on here. There's
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: a so it is it is a dark story.
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: I mean, like, I didn't sign on to just agree
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: with everything that's being said in the video.
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: No, I think that it's more about like what we
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: might what might be exposed by this, and maybe there's
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: something you guys can add. I'm sure there is, because
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: that's what you're good at. So Okay, so I got
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: some let's open up with this, and this is really
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: gonna be like about you know, family courts, there's there's
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: it's it's I'm really glad that he got to be
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: on this show. He might get into some legal trouble
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: though over it, because well they will go there was
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: some there was some uh some he had always banned
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: from speaking. Yeah, gag orders on him. So but let's uh,
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: let's listen to the intro part.
• 9:18
  Speaker 5: Okay, the state of California says that I have to
• 9:22
  Speaker 5: pay for the chemical and physical castration of my son
• 9:25
  Speaker 5: as child support. I'm not going to pay that child support.
• 9:28
  Speaker 5: I'm not going to pay anything to hurt my son.
• 9:31
  Speaker 6: And that means what we're going to prison.
• 9:32
  Speaker 7: California is going to send me to prison for that,
• 9:37
  Speaker 7: all right.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: So so there's like, I don't know if did you
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: guys know this in the chat that he has to
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: the child support money he's paying is for the transition
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: surgery for his son, who is now on puberty blockers.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: By the way, he's his son's already absolutely screwed in
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: that front. But this is like, I didn't I didn't
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: know that you could. You could use child support to
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: force this stuff.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you know that, but then use it for anything.
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: In the United States, a judge can order a parent
• 10:16
  Speaker 3: to pay medical bills. He can order him to pay
• 10:21
  Speaker 3: extra for activities that the mother enrolls the child in.
• 10:26
  Speaker 3: He can order him to pay daycare, even if the
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: father would rather that the child come to his house
• 10:33
  Speaker 3: during during the mother's work hours. The judge can order
• 10:38
  Speaker 3: the father to pay anything that the mother hands the
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: court as a bill for the child's care, even if
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: the father doesn't approve. Even if the father objects even
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: if there's not a valid reason why the mother can
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: you know, should be enrolling the child in this and
• 10:57
  Speaker 3: and there's huge contention. And we've seen a judge order
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: a parent to consent, to consent, order consent these things.
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: You should not have the phrase order to consent in
• 11:13
  Speaker 3: the English language. If it's by order, it's not consent.
• 11:16
  Speaker 3: But we've seen a judge order a parent to consent
• 11:21
  Speaker 3: to a child experiencing general mutilation.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: I don't know if you guys remember his name was Chase. Yeah,
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: and the judge ordered this was the mother fighting it
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: in this instance, the judge ordered her to sign papers
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: consenting and ordered her to sign away his right to
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: sue later on as an adult if he objected that
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: at that hat shouldn't have been done to him. And
• 11:48
  Speaker 3: then a few years later.
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: It's like four or five.
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the worst part of it was like he went
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: through that. He was terrified, and he went through that,
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: and then a few years later he coincided, only got
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: leukemia and died. Oh so that was his short life experience.
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: Was this judge forcing him to go through circumcision when
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: he was old enough to consciously remember the recovery and
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: too young to consent, and his mom was actually put
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: in prison for refusing to consent until she like it was.
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: I remember seeing her sobbing on the witness stand in corner.
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah mm hmm, like.
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: And that was Florida.
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's let's listen to this is like the intro
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: bit where he talks to the interviewer on soft white
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: underbelly about essentially like the divorce and everything.
• 12:49
  Speaker 6: So, so, Jeff, you are going through something, you've been
• 12:54
  Speaker 6: going through, something that is probably a father's worst nightmare. Yeah,
• 13:00
  Speaker 6: tell me when this started.
• 13:02
  Speaker 5: Started when my son was about two years old, my
• 13:06
  Speaker 5: ex wife, who's a pediatrician Incapel, Texas, started thinking that
• 13:13
  Speaker 5: he might be a girl and started trying to transition
• 13:16
  Speaker 5: him to a girl.
• 13:17
  Speaker 7: And when I tried to put.
• 13:18
  Speaker 5: A stop to that, she filed for divorce and used
• 13:22
  Speaker 5: her relationships with care providers to force me out of
• 13:26
  Speaker 5: my house.
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: And so she was a pediatrician.
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: Yah yeah, no, no, see, Okay, okay, okay, let's talk
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: about child development here a little bit. Okay, because yes,
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: babies can recognize the difference between adult male and adult
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: female voices on day one. They can on day one,
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: right immediately in the womb, they can recognize the difference,
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: right and respond differently to them. Right. By about three months,
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: they can distinguish between adult male and adult female faces.
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: That doesn't mean they know what gender they are, okay,
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: That just means that they know they respond one way
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: to a female a typically female face, and one way
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: to a typically male face and voice. Right, they don't
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: even start integrated. They don't even start developing a self
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: concept right until they're about three years old, right when
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: they'll go from you know, I have a dog and
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: I like trains, okay, like that, that's like an integration
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: of this is who I am? Right, I have a
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: dog and I like trains. Right, So they you know,
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: as opposed to like just the general frickin' basic shit
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: like I'm hungry, I'm uncomfortable, I'm too hot, I'm too cold, right,
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: I'm in pain whatever, okay, those things, right. So they
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: they're they're starting at age three to develop a concept
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: of who is me? Who is me? Not what am
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: I experiencing in this moment, but who am I? Right?
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: Three years old is when they start, right, and they
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: don't finish that. And when I say finish, I mean
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: it hasn't completely gelled, but it's gelatinous. It's like semi
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: solid right by age.
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: Eight eight mm hmm, okay, yeah.
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: No kid knows what gender they are at age two, right,
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: unless it's because their parents told them, well, girls have
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: a vagina and boys have a.
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: Penis, yep, two year old. A two year old doesn't
• 15:54
  Speaker 3: even always understand that if they do something to another
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: person and it doesn't hurt their body when they do it,
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: that it can still hurt the other person. A two
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: year old and not understand that that hurts you, right,
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: they don't understand it doesn't hurt them, so they don't
• 16:12
  Speaker 3: understand that it hurts you. It's an instinctive behavior. But
• 16:17
  Speaker 3: I remember that conversation with my little brother because I
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: was older than him and he was a little who
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: was slightly under too. But yeah, mom, very very gently,
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: but she's, you know, put her teeth on his wrist
• 16:32
  Speaker 3: and was like, yeah, a little bit, and he goes like, Mommy,
• 16:35
  Speaker 3: don't that hurts and know that you know it hurts
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: hand when when you do it too, No, it doesn't.
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: He didn't understand because it didn't hurt him when he
• 16:46
  Speaker 3: did it to me, so it must not hurt me either, right,
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: Like that was his idea.
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah, my daughter was a biter and like she wasn't
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: a bitter out of like malice. It was almost like
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: giving a hug. Right, she'd like bite my arm and
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: finally I just bit her back and you know, and
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: I said, that's how that feels, right, And I didn't
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: bite her gently. I bit her hard, right, I bit
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: her as hard as she did me.
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah, because my brother was very imagine if you took
• 17:22
  Speaker 3: Elliott from ET and made him cuter, like.
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: Little sip, super fucking my daughter was super fucking adorable
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: and she was super cute, and she was super like
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: quirky and wacky and like you know, and everybody was like,
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: oh what, like what a cool kid. You know, she's
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: so weird and you know and crazy and like you
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: know when she's so adventurous and spunky and yeah, and
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: I was like, yeah, no, wait till she bites you.
• 17:54
  Speaker 3: But but yeah, but yeah, it takes you had to
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: demonstrate things for a two year old. Understand So if
• 18:06
  Speaker 3: if a two year old thinks that they're the opposite sex,
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: the other thing is it's because you've suggested that the
• 18:13
  Speaker 3: pretend with a two year old, and you pretend to
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: be a t rex with a two year old. A
• 18:19
  Speaker 3: two year old will not understand the difference between pretending
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: to be a t rex and being a t rex.
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: They will carry on the pretense all day and then
• 18:30
  Speaker 3: you know, at bedtime it will be you. T Rexes
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: don't go to sleep, you know, and t rexes t
• 18:38
  Speaker 3: rexes get to stay up till midnight.
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I know. And this is this is why you have.
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: You have kids who are like four or five years
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: old who will like literally tell you they want to
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: be a dinosaur when they grow up.
• 18:52
  Speaker 3: And so if you're dealing with a two year old
• 18:55
  Speaker 3: that says I want to be a girl, it's a
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: passing fancy. It's not something that the child believes. It
• 19:02
  Speaker 3: is something that's not going to last. It is not
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: something that the child fully understands. Heck, a two year
• 19:12
  Speaker 3: old doesn't even understand that girls and boys are different
• 19:14
  Speaker 3: from each other in specific.
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: They don't even understand. They don't even understand, like, why
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: can't I.
• 19:19
  Speaker 6: Be a dog?
• 19:20
  Speaker 3: It's already bad enough that because she's a girl is
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: given to boys as a reason at two years old
• 19:30
  Speaker 3: why they can't do this or that, or why she
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: gets to do this or that because they don't understand
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: girl is different from boy. And then they're told, well,
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: she gets to go first, she's a girl, ladies first.
• 19:42
  Speaker 3: Or yeah, she hit you, but you can't hit her back.
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: She's a girl. You're bigger, and they're not bigger at
• 19:50
  Speaker 3: two years old. Yeah, and so it's well, my brother was,
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: but my brother was bigger than the other boys at
• 19:58
  Speaker 3: his age too. He was bigger than the boys my age,
• 20:01
  Speaker 3: but and that that continued all his life. He's a
• 20:06
  Speaker 3: big guy. But in any case, yeah, they don't. There's
• 20:08
  Speaker 3: a lot of stuff that's not cemented. So if you
• 20:10
  Speaker 3: have a girl or a boy thinking he's a girl
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: at two years old, and you.
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: Mean as an adult, it's because an adult in.
• 20:17
  Speaker 3: A position of trust told him yeah, or is playing
• 20:21
  Speaker 3: pretend with him and doesn't understand herself the difference between
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: fantasy and reality. Which, honestly, if my periating pediatrician was
• 20:35
  Speaker 3: doing that with her child, I would go back and
• 20:39
  Speaker 3: re examine every decision that doctor made with my child.
• 20:43
  Speaker 3: I wouldn't consider her a bad parent. I would also
• 20:47
  Speaker 3: consider her a bad doctor doctor, and I would be
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: very concerned about every decision that had been made with
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: my child. I would be looking for any little mistake,
• 20:59
  Speaker 3: because if there was something that I thought was done
• 21:01
  Speaker 3: wrong to my child by a parent that was that
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: bad of a doctor, I might sue.
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, let's play a little bit more of
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: this one, and then we're gonna jump into the legal
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: battles that he got into.
• 21:17
  Speaker 5: And so I moved about a mile up the road
• 21:21
  Speaker 5: from my son's. She filed for divorce formally, and I
• 21:25
  Speaker 5: had fifty to fifty custody of them, and just after
• 21:29
  Speaker 5: his third birthday, you know, I took the first iPhone
• 21:34
  Speaker 5: video had ever taken, and it was him telling me
• 21:37
  Speaker 5: that he thought he was a girl because his mommy
• 21:39
  Speaker 5: tells him a girl. You can go on YouTube and
• 21:41
  Speaker 5: just search for mommy says I'm a girl. You'll find
• 21:43
  Speaker 5: that video. She was telling him things like, you know,
• 21:48
  Speaker 5: she would put him into timeout and say, don't be
• 21:51
  Speaker 5: a boy. The monsters only eat boys, and weird things
• 21:54
  Speaker 5: like this, and she began to then socially transition him,
• 21:59
  Speaker 5: and that led to a titanic battle in the state
• 22:02
  Speaker 5: of Texas that culminated in me getting the procedures outlawed
• 22:06
  Speaker 5: in Texas.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: And oh, yeah, so you got the procedures outlawed in Texas.
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: But that's why they that she took her kid, took
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: the kids to California. Anyway, let's play the rest.
• 22:21
  Speaker 5: Of the c oh yeah, the political establishment, yeah, fishman
• 22:26
  Speaker 5: in Texas allowing her to come to California so she
• 22:28
  Speaker 5: could still castraight him even though I got it outlawed.
• 22:33
  Speaker 6: Had your son?
• 22:34
  Speaker 5: You have two sons, have two sons, James and jud
• 22:37
  Speaker 5: they're twins, they're not identical.
• 22:40
  Speaker 7: James is the one that she's transitioning.
• 22:43
  Speaker 6: And was there any sign in James that he was
• 22:47
  Speaker 6: open to this or showing signs that he wanted to
• 22:49
  Speaker 6: be anything other.
• 22:50
  Speaker 7: Than well, you know, it's interesting, so he was.
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: I'm just pausing there for the banana. I don't know
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: if you want to get into that bit. His mom
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: basically he just like trained him to like be act
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: and dress and behave like a girl when he was
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: with her. But when he was with dad, he would,
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: you know, like his dad would just let him do
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: whatever and he would just be a boy.
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: And yeah, no, dad would probutalize their moms. This is
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: something dad would also idealize their dads And because of that.
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: When mom says this is what I want you to be,
• 23:29
  Speaker 3: that puts uh be in his bonnet. That is enough
• 23:34
  Speaker 3: to make him feel like he has to do it,
• 23:36
  Speaker 3: and they'll please whatever parent they're with at the time.
• 23:39
  Speaker 3: But I think that if his dad had tried to
• 23:45
  Speaker 3: make him be a girl and his mom had been
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: the one objecting, he'd been going to mom for help,
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: and he'd have been fighting with his dad about it,
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: he'd have rebelled a little more. It's more insidious with
• 23:57
  Speaker 3: particularly with little boys, when women do this.
• 24:00
  Speaker 8: Yeah yeah, yeah, well and and and you like when
• 24:07
  Speaker 8: when it's the fact that it's twins, right, Like she's
• 24:12
  Speaker 8: got some kind of plausible deniability going on because she's
• 24:17
  Speaker 8: got twin boys.
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: And she's only trying to transition the one who's actually
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: a girl. She's not trying to transition the other one.
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: And it's just like, yeah, no, so she's makes it seem.
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: Like some kind of Nazi experiment. What happens if we
• 24:33
  Speaker 3: take twins and we transition one of them?
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: Well, uh, by the way, guys, if you want to
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: send us a message, just go to feed the badge
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: of dot com force. That's just a tip that will
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: allow you to send a longer message and it won't
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: be edited or censored by YouTube. Okay, so let's listen
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: to the next bit.
• 24:59
  Speaker 6: And do you have contact with your son's No, No,
• 25:01
  Speaker 6: I'm disallowed all contact with my sons.
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: I'm not allowed to even contact them.
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: No.
• 25:05
  Speaker 5: I'll tell you how this all sort of built up.
• 25:08
  Speaker 5: So she started transitioning him, you know, really hardcore at three.
• 25:14
  Speaker 5: I mean what she presented to the world with a
• 25:17
  Speaker 5: fake girl's name and everything. This, of course, would have
• 25:23
  Speaker 5: been an important component in the divorce that was going on.
• 25:27
  Speaker 5: So we get to twenty seventeen and we have our
• 25:30
  Speaker 5: divorce trial, and we had a custody evaluator.
• 25:35
  Speaker 7: His name is Blake Mitchell.
• 25:36
  Speaker 5: He practices out of Frisco, Texas, which is a suburb
• 25:39
  Speaker 5: of Dallas. And he said, he asked me, what is
• 25:42
  Speaker 5: your top issue? And I said, my top issue is
• 25:45
  Speaker 5: she's tampering with my son's gender identity. So he charges
• 25:48
  Speaker 5: me sixty thousand dollars and does a one year investigation
• 25:52
  Speaker 5: of my family, interviewing my children over and over again
• 25:55
  Speaker 5: everything and determines that she was not transitioning my son
• 25:59
  Speaker 5: to a girl.
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: Oh well, I guess that's it.
• 26:04
  Speaker 3: Then yeah, there's an easy way to make that happen.
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: Though.
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: If you're dealing with a guardian ed item or a
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: friend to the court, all you have to do is
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: hide everything during the process of dealing with that individual.
• 26:21
  Speaker 3: I've seen friends through divorces where a guardian ed item
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: was involved and watched the other side put information where
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: the guardian ad item could not get it, and if
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: we hadn't been able to expose that same information, we
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: would have had a similar result where the guardian ad
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: item said, Oh, she's making stuff up. She's making stuff up,
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: like no, here's our receipts for it, here's our proof.
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: And so this information was hidden from you when you
• 26:57
  Speaker 3: talk to the other side. Well, if it's medical records,
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: it's a lot to do that, right.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: The the.
• 27:04
  Speaker 3: If the mom is taking the kid to a doctor
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: that the dad doesn't know about, if the mom's doing
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: the treatment and just doesn't hand over the records, then yeah,
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: the whether they use. Different terms are used for this
• 27:20
  Speaker 3: position in ohioitz guardian ad litem. In some other places
• 27:24
  Speaker 3: it's friend of the court. There's another name and another
• 27:26
  Speaker 3: in other states, but it's basically the same thing. It's
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: supposed to be an independent party of the court has
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: examined the case from the outside with this is supposed
• 27:36
  Speaker 3: to be the child's advocate, so with the child's interests
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: in mind and a complete lack of bias toward the parents.
• 27:45
  Speaker 3: But often they're biased toward the mother, and oh, here's
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: they all get training to be biased toward the mother.
• 27:53
  Speaker 3: So yeah, it's very possible that all she had to
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: do was hide things in line. And of course the
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: individual wouldn't get the full picture and would say it
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: wasn't happening. But it's been reported in the news enough
• 28:08
  Speaker 3: that it is happening. That person's probably feeling like an
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: idiot now, all right.
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: So the he paid a guy sixty grand to investigate,
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: and he did all these interviews and concluded that the
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: woman was actually not the thing that was happening was
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: not actually happening. So what happened.
• 28:30
  Speaker 5: Next straight up lied to the court and said that
• 28:34
  Speaker 5: I had made a false accusation against her for saying
• 28:36
  Speaker 5: that she was trying to transition my son to a girl.
• 28:39
  Speaker 5: And on that basis I lost fifty to fifty custody
• 28:42
  Speaker 5: and got less than standard possession time. So I basically
• 28:45
  Speaker 5: got you know, four days, four to six days.
• 28:49
  Speaker 7: A month with my sons. So that's how the.
• 28:52
  Speaker 5: Divorce ended, with the psychologists just outright lying. Now I've
• 28:57
  Speaker 5: been lucky with these psychologists that lie. I've been able
• 28:59
  Speaker 5: to prove they've lied. So the court actually set aside
• 29:02
  Speaker 5: his report. But that's what he actually told the court
• 29:06
  Speaker 5: in his report. So she then starts really ramping up
• 29:09
  Speaker 5: it again, and now he's wearing makeup to school. He's
• 29:14
  Speaker 5: using the girls restroom at his elementary school, which was
• 29:17
  Speaker 5: Pinkerton Middle School in Copel, Texas.
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: To elementary school.
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: Girls, apparently kids whose moms don't know the difference between
• 29:32
  Speaker 3: children and purse puppies.
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: Like my parents, like it was middle school. Middle school
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: was the first I was allowed to wear makeup outside
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: the house, right, you know, you could play with mom's
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: makeup in the house. But and on Halloween if you
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: were like going as a princess or something, you know.
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: But but yeah, no, you weren't allowed to wear makeup
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: up to school in like K through six.
• 30:04
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean when I was in school, they would
• 30:05
  Speaker 3: have washed it off, you know, unless you were going
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: to do little girls would sometimes wear lipstick if they
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: were going to be in an auditorium, up on a
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: stage singing for the parents. But yeah, not me though,
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: because I'm allergic to everything good like all the girls.
• 30:28
  Speaker 3: I wasn't allowed to wear makeup until I was I
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: wasn't allowed to wear makeup until I was no years
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: old because the first time I put makeup on my
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: whole face during minefield of hives.
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah sounds about right.
• 30:44
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I tried, though I found I think I
• 30:48
  Speaker 3: was in high school. I did it for like two
• 30:50
  Speaker 3: or three weeks, and it was just like, Nope, this
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: is this is never gonna work. Everything I put on itches,
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: even the hypoallergenic stuff. So I never had to pay
• 31:00
  Speaker 3: for any of that stuff. It saved me like one
• 31:02
  Speaker 3: hundred and fifty bucks a month from yep, standing what
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: girls spend on that shit? Like, why would you inflict
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: that on a boy. He's already spending his money on
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: important things. Why would you talk him into spending makeup
• 31:17
  Speaker 3: on his money on makeup when he gets older? Like
• 31:20
  Speaker 3: what a stupid thing to do to your son. Even
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: if it wasn't stupid to go through all of the
• 31:25
  Speaker 3: other stuff, you know, the sterilization and all that, Like
• 31:31
  Speaker 3: why would you inflict that hardship on him?
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: Well? You know, like this is this is what gets me, right,
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: is that you know when God damn it, when when
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: whenever I talk about these issues, right, I basically say
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: like I would never want any of my kids to
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: be gay. Right. It's not like I would love them
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: less if they were. Right, It's not like like I
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: have something against gay people. Right, it's just because it
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: complicates your life.
• 32:04
  Speaker 3: Right, Like, you're reason people might be mean to them
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: you're dating.
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: Well, yeah, it's it's a reason people might be mean
• 32:12
  Speaker 2: to them, But it's also the reason your dating pool
• 32:17
  Speaker 2: is smaller and family formation is harder, and you're never
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: going to be able to if you marry someone of
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: the same sex, you're never going to be able to
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: have a child that carries both of your genes, right,
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: like it it it complicates your life, right? Well, trans
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: is like that time's one hundred.
• 32:39
  Speaker 3: No, Right, it's medical condition, I mean.
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: Life enough hormone replacement therapy, right, you know, you know,
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: and you've had surgery, you've had top surgery, you've had
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: bottom surgery. So even if you changed your mind and
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: wanted to de transition, you won't be able to like
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: have a baby or breastfeed it. You know, like there's
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: no going back from that, there's no change in your mind. Right.
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: Puberty blockers they're like, well there's a window for puberty. Right.
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: They're like, oh, you know, like they're reversible, yeah, not
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: beyond a certain point. Not beyond a certain point. Right,
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: And and they've got this new thing, which is like
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: a vaginoplast he made out of anal tissue, like out
• 33:27
  Speaker 2: of rectal tissue. It's like a bowel resection, right, that
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: they use to build the neo vagina.
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: Why because puberty blockers don't leave you with enough penis
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: to turn inside out and turn into a vagina. Right,
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: So it's like now they have to like start harvesting
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: portions of your fucking bowel. Well, you have that bowel
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: in your battle for a reason, right, So now you're
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: fucking with your digestive tract, you're fucking with your colon,
• 34:01
  Speaker 2: your fuck and then oh and then oh wow, sometimes
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: you can't get rid of those gut bacteria that live
• 34:09
  Speaker 2: in your colon. So your vagina smells like farts if
• 34:15
  Speaker 2: it even takes and doesn't rot out of you. There's
• 34:19
  Speaker 2: like a fifty seven complication rate with gender transition surgeries, right,
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: where like the surgery didn't take right, the the the
• 34:31
  Speaker 2: vagino plastic didn't take right, You didn't dilate daily often enough, right,
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: three times a day. You got to insert a big
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: dildo into your neo vagina to keep the wound from
• 34:45
  Speaker 2: closing naturally. Yeah, yeah, And and you have to do
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: that and if if you miss a couple of days,
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: well then maybe you're fucked. Right, And this is this
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: is like just why And you can't have kids right
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: because you ripped out your ovaries and your uterus, right,
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: or or you cut off your balls, right, you can't.
• 35:12
  Speaker 2: You can't have fucking kids. You can't breastfeed them because
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: you cut your tits off, Like what the fuck?
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, it's definitely not.
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: Made out of fucking rector.
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: There's a lot of people that don't. The adults that
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: go through gender dysphoria and they transition outwardly, like they
• 35:41
  Speaker 3: dress differently, they might have plastic surgery, right, and they
• 35:46
  Speaker 3: might even have the top surgery, but they don't have
• 35:49
  Speaker 3: the bottom surgery because of that, Like Blair White has
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: talked about that not having the bottom surgery because of
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: how complicated. It is because of how damaging it is
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: and because of much maintenance is required afterward. And you
• 36:04
  Speaker 3: know that's an adult decision right there, right, Yeah, just the.
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: Decision, grown ass, mature adult.
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: The decision wouldn't college is an adult decision. And you
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: can switch universities if you don't like it. You can
• 36:20
  Speaker 3: drop out of college. You can go to a school
• 36:23
  Speaker 3: later if you didn't. You know, if you didn't go
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: to college, Like I could go to college now. I'm
• 36:30
  Speaker 3: going to be fifty three, and if I wanted to,
• 36:32
  Speaker 3: I could go to college now because I didn't finish
• 36:36
  Speaker 3: when I was younger. But you can't do that with
• 36:39
  Speaker 3: with permanent surgery. You can't do that with transitioning. You
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: could do that with getting married, which is an adult decision.
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: We don't let five year olds get married for a reason.
• 36:50
  Speaker 3: I know some countries do, but we do know fteen
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: year olds. Yeah, And in fact, people in our country
• 36:55
  Speaker 3: are outraged that other countries do allow that. Even thirteen years,
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: a fifteen year old generally can't get married. It's very
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: rare thing for you to fifteen year old, even if
• 37:06
  Speaker 3: they get pregnant out of wedlock, to be able to
• 37:09
  Speaker 3: get married, all right, before they're before they're an adult.
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: But yeah, we're letting and make this decision, or rather
• 37:18
  Speaker 3: moms inflict this decision on their kids, because this is
• 37:21
  Speaker 3: a mom thing for the most part, for that part
• 37:25
  Speaker 3: five or a two. And then they're starting to get
• 37:28
  Speaker 3: ready to have surgery. And then when they get into
• 37:30
  Speaker 3: their their early adolescence, they put them through what Karen
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: just described before they're even really old enough to understand
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: well enough. You can't buy a beer at that age.
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: You can't smoke a cigarette at that age.
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: If somebody has a car, You can't volunteer to give
• 37:49
  Speaker 2: your life for your country.
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: If somebody has sex with you at that age, they
• 37:52
  Speaker 3: go to jail.
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 37:55
  Speaker 3: But you can get your genitalia cut off turned inside out.
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: You can have it's it's just as bad for the
• 38:04
  Speaker 3: female to male transition. They take flesh from the arm
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: to males.
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, no, And and they like this. They
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: have like a hydraulic device, right, okay, So they fill
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: your testicles full of like fluid, okay, and then they
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: have like a hydraulic system inside the neophallus okay. And
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: then so when you want to get an erection, you
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: have to squish your balls over and over and over
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: again to pump that fluid like those.
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: Old as that had the pump on them that.
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, like a blue animal. Right, and then and
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: then you know, like when when you when you're done,
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: which who knows when that is? I guess when she
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: gets off, because you're not going to be getting off right,
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: and all these like freaking transitioning doctors and stuff. Right,
• 39:09
  Speaker 2: they're like, oh, you know, we just don't understand why
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: a foulis made out of your armskin doesn't give you orgasms?
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well, let's listen to more. I know it's twisted.
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: Let's listen.
• 39:25
  Speaker 5: More doesn't exists any more. Coppel to shut down, got
• 39:29
  Speaker 5: rid of the principal there. Her name is miss Michelson,
• 39:31
  Speaker 5: who's the one that really transitioned my son. And I
• 39:34
  Speaker 5: found out after two and a half years they had
• 39:37
  Speaker 5: been transitioning my son secretly behind my back. So I
• 39:40
  Speaker 5: would bring my son to Pinkerton Middle School and copel
• 39:44
  Speaker 5: in boy's clothes because he wears boys clothes with me,
• 39:48
  Speaker 5: and they would give him a dress and tell him
• 39:51
  Speaker 5: to use the girl's bathroom. And when I found that out,
• 39:55
  Speaker 5: I fouled grievances against the public school, and of course
• 39:58
  Speaker 5: they exonerate themselves, saying that under their nicknames policy, they're
• 40:03
  Speaker 5: allowed to call him whatever he wants, and they're allowed
• 40:08
  Speaker 5: to put him in dresses because he wants to wear
• 40:11
  Speaker 5: it and it doesn't harm him in any way.
• 40:17
  Speaker 3: Yeah, if you tell him he wants to do something,
• 40:20
  Speaker 3: then you get to say that he wants to do it,
• 40:22
  Speaker 3: because you're the adults.
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: No, I'm just like this. This is infuriating, right, because
• 40:29
  Speaker 2: you know when the NDP, when hell froze over and
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: the NDP won a landslide and Alberta here, which is
• 40:35
  Speaker 2: Canada's Texas right and the NDP are further to the
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: left than the Liberals, but we were sick of forty
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: years of Conservative Party corruption, right, so there was a
• 40:45
  Speaker 2: big rebellion. And May fifth, twenty fifteen, the day after
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: the election, I woke up there was like freaking five
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: inches of snow on the ground. I was like, Oh,
• 40:56
  Speaker 2: Hell has frozen over, And then I checked the news
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: and I was like, oh, it really has. Right. The
• 41:01
  Speaker 2: NDP won in a landslide, right, and they passed a
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: law basically banning schools from notifying parents if their kids
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: came out as good.
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: I remember that. I remember that. And the Canadian government
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: made some policy to so they can take your kids
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: from you if you don't affirm their gender. I think
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: that the state can take your kids from you. Yeah.
• 41:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Oh. And the issue with the Canadian Medical Association,
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: they sent down directives right guidance, they call it right
• 41:34
  Speaker 2: to family doctors in Canada because the waiting lists for
• 41:40
  Speaker 2: trans youth to get gender therapy, gender affirming therapy at
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: actual gender clinics in Canada increased tenfold in ten years,
• 41:52
  Speaker 2: right between twenty and seven and twenty seventeen. So and
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: they were like, okay, so, well, you shouldn't be afraid
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: to to prescribe puberty blockers because because you don't want
• 42:08
  Speaker 2: you want to give the kids some time to make
• 42:11
  Speaker 2: up his mind or her mind, right A.
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: Blockers?
• 42:17
  Speaker 9: Okay, yeah, yeah, me too, But but you need to
• 42:21
  Speaker 9: give the kids some time to make up their mind,
• 42:24
  Speaker 9: right you know, and this will buy them time before
• 42:28
  Speaker 9: any permanent physical changes are made. But in the next
• 42:32
  Speaker 9: fucking paragraph they said, but you should also not be
• 42:36
  Speaker 9: afraid to prescribe cross sex hormone therapy as early as thirteen,
• 42:43
  Speaker 9: because which would cause permanent changes, right, that can't be
• 42:48
  Speaker 9: reversed because kids want to go through puberty at the
• 42:52
  Speaker 9: same time as their peers, and they don't want to
• 42:55
  Speaker 9: be like the odd person out who's not actually going
• 42:58
  Speaker 9: through puberty. So you shouldn't be afraid to do that either.
• 43:01
  Speaker 9: So either we're buying.
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: Times so that no permanent changes take place, or we're
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: rushing in to make the permanent changes based on whim,
• 43:12
  Speaker 2: the whim of the kid who doesn't want to be
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: like the only boy in his class that doesn't have boobs, right,
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: And I'm just like, I'm like, none of this fucking
• 43:25
  Speaker 2: and all it's all there, right, guidance for family doctors
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: because and oh oh, you have to take a gender
• 43:35
  Speaker 2: affirming approach. So if the kid says they're the opposite sex,
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: you don't say, well, let's wait and see. You don't say, well,
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: maybe go to a psychologist. You don't say any of that.
• 43:50
  Speaker 2: You don't question them about it, right, You don't say,
• 43:53
  Speaker 2: well do you really feel that way? You know, do
• 43:56
  Speaker 2: you think you might change your mind something? You don't
• 43:58
  Speaker 2: say any of that. No, No, you immediately affirm right
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: and put them on some kind of fucking treatment. You know.
• 44:08
  Speaker 3: When I was in school, I had a classmate that
• 44:12
  Speaker 3: had what was referred to as early puberty. Early puberty
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: meant for her that she was by several years, Yeah,
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: the first girl in the class to get breasts and
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: a period, and her doctor put her on hormones to delay.
• 44:32
  Speaker 3: But one of the things that was said to her
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: mother was, this is happening more frequently now because we
• 44:40
  Speaker 3: have proper nutrition available, and so girls are going into
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: puberty overall earlier.
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: And proper nutrition.
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: Yes, nutrition. No, he was right, And I'll give you
• 44:52
  Speaker 3: the rest of the story because the rest of the
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: story isn't necessarily about this girl. But certain things get
• 45:02
  Speaker 3: delayed if you are in a in a famine situation,
• 45:08
  Speaker 3: or if you are in a lower nutrition situation. Certain
• 45:11
  Speaker 3: things get delayed when children are growing up. And because
• 45:15
  Speaker 3: it's become easier and easier for humans to feed themselves
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: over the centuries, we do get earlier puberty physically. Obviously,
• 45:25
  Speaker 3: our psychological development has gone in the other direction where
• 45:28
  Speaker 3: we develop a little more slowly than we did historically.
• 45:32
  Speaker 3: And so his solution was drugs. But when I was
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: in high school, the one athletic team that we had
• 45:43
  Speaker 3: a really rough time against my class had a really
• 45:46
  Speaker 3: rough We were a bigger school than they were. The
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: girls on that team were coached by Lenan and Katie Horseman,
• 45:54
  Speaker 3: who was one of the original baseball players from the
• 45:58
  Speaker 3: girls baseball teams back in the day, and in fact,
• 46:03
  Speaker 3: who coached Madonna for the movie A League of their Own.
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: And she actually was kind of funny because she said
• 46:12
  Speaker 3: Madonna worked really hard for that. But so I had
• 46:18
  Speaker 3: to throw some respect that direction because I didn't always
• 46:21
  Speaker 3: really like her very much. But it's good to hear,
• 46:24
  Speaker 3: you know, at least she had some professionalism and worked
• 46:26
  Speaker 3: really hard for that. But Katie Horseman had her team
• 46:30
  Speaker 3: on a diet, and that diet actually delayed. When you're
• 46:36
  Speaker 3: a female athlete in high school, during your puberty, your
• 46:42
  Speaker 3: body shape starts to change. You get round her and
• 46:47
  Speaker 3: so a lot of female athletes in high school will
• 46:50
  Speaker 3: peak like their sophomore year, maybe their junior year, and
• 46:54
  Speaker 3: then they have a really rough time their senior year.
• 46:56
  Speaker 3: And so our senior years when we're competing against seniors
• 47:00
  Speaker 3: from her school, they were some of the hardest girls
• 47:04
  Speaker 3: to compete against because they didn't change as quickly as
• 47:09
  Speaker 3: we did, and they maintained their peak through their senior
• 47:14
  Speaker 3: years in high school and it worked. So there is
• 47:17
  Speaker 3: something to the changes in diet. So I'm not even
• 47:21
  Speaker 3: sure it has to be an extreme case before a
• 47:23
  Speaker 3: doctor should even resort to drugs because there anything like
• 47:30
  Speaker 3: or anything like that. Well, yeah, they can cause cancer.
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: Well there cancer drugs that that are that were developed
• 47:38
  Speaker 2: the on label use, the only on label use of
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: these drugs, right, which is what kisses me off so
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: much about the COVID stuff. Right, And ooh, ivermectans off label.
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: HCQ is off label, right and uh and and it's like, yeah,
• 47:53
  Speaker 2: well puberty.
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: Blockers are off label.
• 47:55
  Speaker 2: They're off label, and there can't they're anti cancer drugs.
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: They're designed to slow the advancement of aggressive sex hormone
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: driven cancers. Yeah so yeah, no estrogen driven breast cancers
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: and you know, testosterone driven penil and testicular cancers and
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: prostate cancers. Right, that's what they're designed aggressive cancers. They're
• 48:21
  Speaker 2: designed to slow down the advancement by blocking the production
• 48:25
  Speaker 2: of those hormones. Right. They've never been there's never been
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: a double blinded clinical trial, randomized clinical trial on teens,
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: you know, and preteens for puberty blockers. And you know
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: why because it would never pass a medical ethics board.
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: Proposing such a trial on randomized young people would never
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: pass an ethics board, right, So instead of going through
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: the ethics board and finding out whether it's ethical and
• 49:02
  Speaker 2: whether it's effective, and whether it's reversible and how it
• 49:05
  Speaker 2: might turn out for people, right under a clinical setting,
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: under a like a trial setting, right, instead of just
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: experiment on the entire fucking population.
• 49:18
  Speaker 3: Yeah, children. And it's again, this is an adult decision.
• 49:23
  Speaker 3: If adults want to go through this and do this,
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: that's their choice, and that's their decision. Then the relationship
• 49:31
  Speaker 3: they end up having with the rest of society, that's
• 49:34
  Speaker 3: that's something that they're choosing to take on. And uh,
• 49:38
  Speaker 3: you know it. If you're going to choose, if you're
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: going to choose to to go down a rough road
• 49:44
  Speaker 3: to ho that's your right right, But to do it
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: to your child, that's not no.
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: All right, I'm going to play more of the next clip. Here,
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: here we go. Let's so you got somebody's trying to
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: call you Karen. Okay, let's play it.
• 50:00
  Speaker 5: And all the time opposing counsel was a woman who
• 50:02
  Speaker 5: was in the room, she threw her pin on the
• 50:05
  Speaker 5: floor and quit the case. She left it was so
• 50:10
  Speaker 5: disgusting and they were not going to put her in
• 50:11
  Speaker 5: front of a Texas jury saying that, so they dropped her.
• 50:14
  Speaker 5: So I won the twenty nineteen trial. I got fifty
• 50:17
  Speaker 5: to fifty custody. I got no child support. But the
• 50:21
  Speaker 5: most important thing is I got a check on all
• 50:24
  Speaker 5: medical procedures so she could not chemically castrate him at
• 50:28
  Speaker 5: age eight or nine. Okay, By a few years later
• 50:32
  Speaker 5: after this, I successfully got a law passed which outlawed
• 50:36
  Speaker 5: these procedures.
• 50:36
  Speaker 7: You could lose your medical license for doing these.
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: Things in Texas, specifically in Texas where this happened.
• 50:43
  Speaker 5: So in that intervening two years in Texas, in Texas,
• 50:47
  Speaker 5: in that intervening two years, the judges, the liberal judges
• 50:51
  Speaker 5: in Dallas County, Texas, got very upset that I got
• 50:56
  Speaker 5: fifty to fifty custody and that James is not going
• 50:58
  Speaker 5: to be transitioned. So they they sue Sponte, moved my
• 51:03
  Speaker 5: case from the two fifty fifth District Court into the
• 51:06
  Speaker 5: three hundred and first District court.
• 51:08
  Speaker 7: Oh, just Mary Brown who all henceforth, Yeah.
• 51:15
  Speaker 2: Means it means nobody filed emotion to move jurisdictions. The
• 51:19
  Speaker 2: judge just decided to do it.
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: Without being by everybody. Oh my god, this is fucking insane.
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: This is insane, and let me see what the fuck
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: my mother in law wants in the middle of the
• 51:38
  Speaker 2: goddamn day.
• 51:41
  Speaker 3: And we've we've been People are probably noticing now that
• 51:47
  Speaker 3: judges are starting to interfere with Trump. But we've been
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: having this problem with judges in the United States where
• 51:55
  Speaker 3: if they if they have a particular political belief or angle,
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: people will go judge shopping. They'll they'll uh move jurisdictions,
• 52:06
  Speaker 3: they'll use you know, they'll they'll go to judges to
• 52:09
  Speaker 3: get specific orders and specific and file with this judge
• 52:13
  Speaker 3: to get this, and file that judge to get that.
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: Vexatious litigans do this and uh, well the seven years
• 52:21
  Speaker 3: in hell case did this. But judges will just been
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: and order things that they have no relationship to prior
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: to the.
• 52:31
  Speaker 2: Nobody nobody asked him. Yeah, nobody asked this judge to
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: do anything.
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: And yeah, they'll step in and write an order. You
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: can't do this or you can't do that because it's
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: in the in the news, And there's been other instances
• 52:46
  Speaker 3: where that's happened that haven't made national news because it's
• 52:49
  Speaker 3: not they're not doing it to Trump. They're doing it
• 52:53
  Speaker 3: to some private citizen. And the only reason we know
• 52:55
  Speaker 3: about this instance is because this case has blown up
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: and been national news.
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, let's listen to some more of this clip.
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: I think kiachoes for a little while longer.
• 53:11
  Speaker 7: Call Bloody Mary Brown. Judge. Bloody Mary Brown.
• 53:16
  Speaker 5: Never gave me fifty to fifty custody, never gave me
• 53:20
  Speaker 5: a check on the medical procedures, and never eliminated my
• 53:23
  Speaker 5: child support. She completely ignored the jury verdict, and over
• 53:27
  Speaker 5: a period of about three years, she systematically stripped.
• 53:30
  Speaker 7: Me of all parental rights.
• 53:32
  Speaker 5: And she used a technique that's very common in family court.
• 53:36
  Speaker 5: First of all, she gave me an order that I
• 53:38
  Speaker 5: couldn't follow.
• 53:39
  Speaker 7: That's what they'll do. They'll give you an order that
• 53:41
  Speaker 7: you just can't follow. So I was running for office
• 53:44
  Speaker 7: in Texas.
• 53:44
  Speaker 5: I ran for a Texas representative at House District sixty three,
• 53:49
  Speaker 5: and I was in the middle of a campaign and
• 53:53
  Speaker 5: she issued a gag order on me, which gave me
• 53:55
  Speaker 5: a lifetime ban on doing any podcast interviews, writing any
• 54:01
  Speaker 5: newspaper articles, doing blog posts, posting videos, appearing in YouTube videos.
• 54:07
  Speaker 5: It's a totally unconstitutional gag order. It also prohibited me
• 54:12
  Speaker 5: from talking about three political topics. I could not talk
• 54:15
  Speaker 5: about transgenderism, gender dysphoria, or gender expansiveness. And I was
• 54:19
  Speaker 5: prohibited in public from telling anyone whether my son was
• 54:22
  Speaker 5: a boy or girl.
• 54:25
  Speaker 3: And again, this is in the United States, where we
• 54:29
  Speaker 3: have a constitutional amendment that says they cannot do that.
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: You cannot interfere with the political speech of an individual.
• 54:39
  Speaker 3: Harassment's not protected speech. You can't call somebody up sixteen
• 54:43
  Speaker 3: times in the middle of the night and cust them
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: out right. That's not protective protected speech. But what he
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: just talked about. If he were to go on any
• 54:53
  Speaker 3: news show and say I disagree with transgender ideology, the judge,
• 55:00
  Speaker 3: that alone, the judge could have jailed him for violating
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: the order. That's unconstitutional because that's who I'm saying. This
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: is my political perspective, and the entire reason for the
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: existence of the free speech part of the First Amendment
• 55:18
  Speaker 3: is to give citizens the right to political speech. It
• 55:23
  Speaker 3: isn't about protecting your ability to cut somebody out It's
• 55:28
  Speaker 3: not about protecting your ability to talk to specific people
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: and make them listen to you. It's about your ability
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: to articulate your political points of view and criticize your
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: government and criticize your government officials and family court judges
• 55:44
  Speaker 3: in particular. And I'm not going to go off on
• 55:49
  Speaker 3: the family court the way that I want to, because
• 55:51
  Speaker 3: that would just be the entire show. But family court
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: judges in particular do have a habit of gag ordering
• 55:57
  Speaker 3: people to the degree that they're not allowed to have
• 56:01
  Speaker 3: any outlet to criticize the official who is affecting their
• 56:07
  Speaker 3: lives and their family, their relationship with their kids. Judges
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: will participate in parental alienation and then order the alienated
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: parent to be silent about the case. They can't talk
• 56:21
  Speaker 3: to friends and family. It interferes with their ability to
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: obtain witnesses for their case. It interferes with their ability
• 56:28
  Speaker 3: to obtain medical services for their case. It interferes with
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: their ability to talk to anybody that might be able
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: to assist with their side of the case outside of
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: their attorney, who they can talk to because they have
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: attorney client privilege, and the attorney cannot then go into
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: the judge and say, we talked about this, yeah, but yeah,
• 56:48
  Speaker 3: they'll order them to be completely silent. And it gets
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: bad enough that the only people that you can talk
• 56:57
  Speaker 3: to are people who are not allowed to close what
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: you said, your attorney, your therapist, and your priest. And
• 57:06
  Speaker 3: then your therapist can't even come into court and talk
• 57:08
  Speaker 3: about how it's affecting you because that breaks your gag order.
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: And it's all bad. And they will give orders where
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: the individual can't comply with the order. Oh, you make
• 57:19
  Speaker 3: sixty thousand dollars a year, you have to pay one
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: hundred thousand dollars a year in child support, yeah, and alimony,
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: and well you don't make that much, get another job,
• 57:30
  Speaker 3: you know. And I've seen people commit suicide because of this,
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: and this this is one of the primary causes of
• 57:39
  Speaker 3: male suicide in the United States.
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, all right, let's listen to more.
• 57:45
  Speaker 5: They let this go for eighteen months, which is a
• 57:47
  Speaker 5: special benchmark in Texas, right, eighteen months with no visitation.
• 57:53
  Speaker 5: And then my ex wife filed to move to California,
• 57:56
  Speaker 5: saying that I had abandoned my sons because I wasn't
• 58:01
  Speaker 5: visiting them. The judge said, well, mister younger. We were
• 58:05
  Speaker 5: perfectly allowed to go visit your sons. There was nothing
• 58:08
  Speaker 5: stopping you from visiting your sons, and you just haven't
• 58:10
  Speaker 5: done it.
• 58:13
  Speaker 7: And I tell her, well, you know, I.
• 58:15
  Speaker 5: Would morally miseducate my son. I would be directly harming
• 58:18
  Speaker 5: my son by using his girl's name and teaching him
• 58:21
  Speaker 5: that he's a girl when he's not. And you would
• 58:24
  Speaker 5: be forcing me to pay five hundred dollars per visit,
• 58:27
  Speaker 5: which is what it costs her visit.
• 58:30
  Speaker 7: So I'd be using my resources to hurt my son.
• 58:34
  Speaker 5: And I've told this court repeatedly those three things I'm
• 58:36
  Speaker 5: never going to do. And she said, well, I conclude
• 58:42
  Speaker 5: that you have abandoned your sons because you had every
• 58:44
  Speaker 5: opportunity to go visit them. This is the game they play,
• 58:47
  Speaker 5: so Judge Bloody Mary Brown's then allowed my ex wife
• 58:50
  Speaker 5: to move my kids to California since I had abandoned
• 58:53
  Speaker 5: them in Texas.
• 58:53
  Speaker 7: Of course, not to let.
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: Me see if that's the rest of the time code. No,
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: it's a little bit more to this. Like another minute.
• 59:02
  Speaker 5: Mentioned that I write them letters all the time, you know,
• 59:08
  Speaker 5: h every time they go into a new school grade.
• 59:11
  Speaker 5: You know, I asked them to tell me what they're
• 59:13
  Speaker 5: studying that I'm you know, I have I have a
• 59:17
  Speaker 5: sub stack and I write letters to them online all
• 59:20
  Speaker 5: the time. None of this stuff is even in the orders.
• 59:22
  Speaker 5: It was it was not even allowed to be entered
• 59:24
  Speaker 5: into evidence. It was all they said. It was all hearsaye.
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: And remember, there's a stat that feminists like to throw
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: around with regards to custody battles. And the stat they
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: like to throw is that very few fathers actually fight
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: for custody, and when they do, they win like ninety
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: something percent of the time.
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah, absolute statistic.
• 59:49
  Speaker 3: If you want to see that stat soundly debunked, go
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: to a breaking this science. Yeah, Breaking this blunt science
• 59:58
  Speaker 3: dot blood spot org is the address Breaking the Science
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 3: dot blogspot dot org and it's the the representation of
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 3: the nineteen eighty nine Massachusetts report. And what what he
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 3: found was that when women fight for custody, they actually
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 3: have a higher rate of success. So when they say
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: that when when men fight for custody they have a
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 3: particular rate of success, that represents only instances where men
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: are fighting for custody because the mother is a bad mother.
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 3: And there's more to it than that, not just not
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: just that the mother is not the mother is not
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 3: fighting back in the well.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: The mother the mother. Okay, So in the initial divorce filing, Okay,
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: who files for custody? When men file for custody or
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: a file for divorce, right, they're less like to initially
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: in that initial filing make a demand for a request
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 2: for custody. Right, then women are Women always include it
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 2: in their initial filing, and women overwhelmingly are the initial filers. Right, Okay,
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: it doesn't say anything about it only looks at the
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 2: initial filings. Right. Men go into a divorce, when they
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 2: file for divorce, they go into it thinking that it's
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: something to be negotiated. Right. They're not going to demand
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 2: full physical custody from the get go unless the mother
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: is abusive, right or unfit.
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 2: Women automatically do that. Women automatically do that. And and
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: so you're and they're only looking at the initial filings.
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 2: They're not looking at like when she filed and for
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 2: divorce and demanded full custody. They're not looking at his
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 2: counter filing right where he was like, actually, no, I
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 2: want some physical custody or I want you know, some
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 2: level of joy. And then they define joint custody as
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 2: you know, like it could be fifty to fifty physical custody,
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 2: or it could be every Wednesday and every other weekend
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: Wednesday evenings and every other weekend. Right, that is also
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: considered to be joint custody. Right.
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 3: For the for the record, it's not a blog spot blog.
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 3: It's breaking the Science dot org. Just breaking the Science
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: dot org. And it's Mark Rosenthal's blog.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, you know. And he does an excellent job
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 2: of breaking down how even even when they ignore these
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 2: glaring biases, right, that they're only counting the initial filing
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 2: by the spouse who initially filed for divorce. Right, and
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: they're not counting any of the counter claims counter filings, Right,
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 2: they're not count any of that. Right, Even when they
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: include all of the biases, they still find that women
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: are sixty percent more likely to get some level of
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: custody some level of custody than men are.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 3: And the article the article is titled Misrepresentation of gender
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 3: Bias in the nineteen eighty nine Report of the Gender
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 3: Bias Committee of the Massachusetts Supreme Court. So what you
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 3: would be looking up would be, uh, breakingthscience dot org
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 3: misrepresentation of gender bias in the nineteen eighty nine report,
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 3: and you would probably find that article just from looking
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 3: that up.
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, I mean his background is like some
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: kind of weird aqua blue.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it is on my screen right now.
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 2: But it's it's yeah, no, the information, like he breaks
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: it down perfectly, Like even if you even if you
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 2: just ignore the biases in the data collection that they
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: you know that they were using, right, it does not
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: say the data that they cherry picked doesn't even say
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: what they claim. It says.
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 7: No.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: And it's actually the people who he had a fight
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: to get this data too, by the way. Oh yeah,
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: but he specifically wrote the rate at which the mother's
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: requests for soul custody were granted was sixty five percent
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 3: higher than the rate at which the father's requests for
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 3: soul custody were granted.
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 3: And the rate at which primary physical custody was granted
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 3: to mothers who sought sol custody somewhere between seventy three
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 3: point eight percent and ninety five percent higher. The bottom
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 3: end of that range is higher than the sixty nine
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 3: point eight percent for fathers. And that's the other thing
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 3: that happens with mothers can go for custody with with
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 3: very few resources, because once there's there's a separation, if
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: they already have custody of the kids, the father is
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: already having a pay child support. Yeah, so are reduced
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 3: and in some states, actually I think in most states
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 3: now they just start garnishing wages. They don't they don't
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 3: mess around, and so his resources are being taken. And
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: I will tell you this for any guy who is
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: not upper class or wealthy, the remainder that's left over
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 3: after the amount the state's allowed to garnish. In Ohio,
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 3: it's like sixty after the state takes it sixty percent,
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 3: and then the state takes out their taxes out of
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 3: the remainder, the taxation on the full paycheck out of
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 3: the remainder of the check, and the federal government takes
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 3: the taxation on the full check out of the remainder
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: at a check and your your medicare costs and everything.
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 3: Out of that you have If you're lucky, you have
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 3: about fifteen percent of your gross pay left. If you
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 3: are not wealthy, fifteen percent isn't even enough to pay
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 3: your water bill, well much less hire a lawyer.
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah. No, with the NBC, they can take eighty percent
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: of everything other than a welfare check. Eighty percent of
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: disability here, yeah, no disability, disability, unemployment insurance right, any
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: kind of anything but an actual welfare check. They can
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 2: take eighty percent of your tax returns, your tax rebates.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 3: They can impute income to increase the amount that you owe.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: So I've I've talked to guys on mine that have
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 3: been jailed because their welfare check or their their disability check.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: And the worst is the disability check was not enough
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: to cover what the judge thought they should be making,
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: and they were ordered to make more money. Go into
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: the courtroom in a wheelchair with oxygen tanks and and
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: have the judge say.
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 2: Well, you must be on a mission boat and make
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: thirteen thousand dollars a month.
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 3: So yeah, no, there must be you can do, sir.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 3: You your your your children need support. There must be
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 3: something you can do, sir. The wife is perfectly able bodied, right,
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 3: it's the twenty first century. But she's not expected to
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 3: do more work, she's not expected to get a better job.
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 3: But if the father has custody and he is asking
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 3: for child support from the mother, I have seen judges tellman,
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: you're a man get another job.
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 3: Right, And and you know if if you have an
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: issue with childcare, well don't you have a wife? They
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 3: don't say to women, don't you have a husband?
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 3: So when they talk about how easy it supposedly is
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: for fathers to get custody and for fathers to manipulate
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 3: the court system, no, they have of judges who are
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 3: to deal with who are biased because of their own ideology.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 3: And then they're also biased because of training they get
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 3: from the court. They're from the court system. They're biased
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: because of training they get that's funded by the Violence
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 3: Against Women Act, and they are also biased because of
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 3: training they get. That is legislated by what what used
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: to be the best or the I can't remember what
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 3: it was called before best interest of the child, but
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 3: it basically then the tender years doctrine. Yeah, and the
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 3: tender years doctrine doctrine was written into all I think
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: it was called the Telford Act that they switch to
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: the best interest to the child later, but there's a
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 3: footnote in the law that says best of the child.
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 3: It's still the tender years doctrine.
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, And it's like, okay, why why was
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 2: that the case. Why was that the case, Well, because
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 2: a husband, a father would have to hire a wettiners, right,
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 2: but the mothers serving the drinks for free, right and well, and.
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the standard was created in law in countries that
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 3: were guided by English common law, which the United States
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: was when it first started because a woman argued to
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 3: the House of Lords that mothers are better parents at
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 3: that age, because God said so, yeah, in a country
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 3: where we are supposed to have freedom of religion, and
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 3: where the church is not supposed to run the state,
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: and the state is not supposed to establish a church,
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 3: we are still using law and policy in our family
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 3: court system that and I'm saying this as a Christian.
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: It is wrong. The church and the state must be
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 3: separated because the state should never be allowed to control
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 3: the church, and the state should never be allowed to
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: impose your denomination, your church, your religion, nothing that should
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 3: be between an individual and God. But the state is
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 3: making these decisions on the basis of God said so.
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, And it's it's infuriating too because it's
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: like you have you have this situation where where in
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 2: a lot of cases, right, so, when when I was
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: with my ex right initially, right, and I was pregnant
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: with my first child, and you know, and my stepsons
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 2: told their mom, right, and then she immediately sued up
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: the child support for her kids. Right. And she was
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 2: living in a three hundred and fifty thousand dollars house.
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: This is like in nineteen ninety four, and and you know,
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: she had just spent her and her new husband had
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: just spent like thirty five thous dollars lifting the house
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: so that they could have a full basement rather than
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 2: just a crawl space. And and you know, like two
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: late model cars parked in the driveway. She had like
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: professional manicures and her hair done and all of that professionally.
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: And here I am like cutting my husband's hair, cutting
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 2: my own hair, right because I can't afford the ten
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: dollars for a haircut. And so she takes us to
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: court to raise the child support because she knows that
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: when that baby's born, right, Okay, Like I had an
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 2: income still, right, and so his income and my income
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: could be rolled together, right, So now he's in a
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: better position to be able to pay a larger amount.
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 2: Even though they don't technically count the new wife sinc,
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: they do consider it in terms of his capacity to pay. Okay,
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: so and that would change the moment the baby was born, right,
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: And so she takes us to you know, to court,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 2: and we managed to get a case conference with a mediator,
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 2: and the mediator looked at her financial statement and our
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: financial statement and said, lady, you've got to be kidding
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: and reduce the child support. Put us on a program
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: to do like back pay, you know, like because he
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 2: was in arrears when he from when he was unemployed,
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: and and you know, got us on a repayment plan
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 2: catch up right, all of that, and and yeah, she
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: was really not happy about that. When my kid was
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 2: five months old, right, she phones, She's complaining that the
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 2: child support is late. Okay. I'm like, well cause your
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: sons are here for fall break. Okay, they're here for
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: like for two weeks, and we have to feed them,
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: and so it's gonna be a little bit late. And
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 2: she says, isn't it time you went back to work.
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: She wasn't even working. I was like, what do you
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 2: need the money for? She says, well, I needed to
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: keep their daycare spots open. I'm like, why are they
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: in fucking daycare?
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, you don't work, you're a standing man. Let's watch,
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 3: it's a little different in the United States. Your judge
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 3: sounded like there was some common sense there, all right. Well,
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 3: my husband was divorced when we got together, and his
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 3: ex wife was allowed to get more child support because
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 3: she quit her job, and then get more child support
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 3: because she had babies with another man. They weren't my
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 3: husband's kids, they were her second husband's kids. And then
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 3: she was allowed to get more child support because I
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 3: brought in more income. And that's the same standard. Yeah,
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 3: and your ability to pay, his ability to pay is increased,
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 3: and therefore and his responsibility for his son goes down
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 3: because my income goes up, so they can take more
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: of his income. And all of that changed. All of
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 3: those changes took place without judge's orders. The Child Support
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 3: Enforcement Agency just makes these decisions and you have to
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 3: sue to get them overturned. And then on top of that,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 3: one year, when we filed jointly for our taxes, I
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: got this letter in the mail that said I had
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 3: to sign that they could take my tax refund for
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 3: the arrears that they had imposed on him because of
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: those changes taking place. You know what they did, and
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 3: let me finish, please, when I continued, you know, communicating
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 3: with them about this, because I'm like, this was we
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 3: were already in financial dire straits because of all of this,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 3: Like literally, I was the only one bringing in money
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 3: and I was the only one paying the bills at
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 3: that point, and I was working three jobs to do that,
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 3: and so I said, I can't afford to give up
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 3: my tax refund. And she said, well, here's how this goes.
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 3: If you don't sign a consent letter, we will come
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 3: and we will take your husband to jail for non
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 3: payment of child support. And I'm like, you're taking it,
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 3: you're garnishing it out of his check. He's paying child support.
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 3: And she said yes, but we have put him in arrears,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 3: and she admitted he wasn't in arrears because he wasn't paying.
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 3: He was in arrears because they decided to increase what
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: he owed based on income that wasn't his and children
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 3: that were not his. And she said, we can do
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 3: that and we can put him in jail if you
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: don't consent, And I asked her, how is it consent
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 3: if you're threatening me. Oh, I'm not coercing you. We're
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 3: not going to put you in jail. You're not under
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 3: any threat at all. No, I'm not under any thread
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 3: at all, just threat of being responsible for a man
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 3: being put in jail that I happen to love more
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 3: than anything in the world. And that's how they do
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 3: this too. So everything that he's going through, everything that
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: mister younger is going through, is consistent with what I
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: have seen with the family courts. Oh, this isn't the exception.
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: This what we're looking at in this video. This is
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 3: the rule. And the only reason people are paying attention
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 3: to this right now. The only reason that the right
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 3: is paying attention to this right now is because it
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 3: involves gender transitioning. Yeah, because now now it's about LGA
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 3: be t issues right now, it's political. But when thousands
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: of men across the country were committing suicide because their
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 3: children were being denied access to their fathers, and they
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 3: were being bankrupted and threatened with homelessness and jail for
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 3: not earning more money than they could earn, or for
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 3: not being able to be the turnip that you can
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 3: squeeze blood out of, right, nobody cared. In fact, part
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: of the reason my husband ended up in arrears in
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 3: the first place was because of the Welfare Reform Act
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: of two thousand, where they decided to go after the
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: ex husband or father of a child if a single
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 3: mother was on welfare. Oh yeah. So as soon as
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 3: that act, they knew that act was in the pipes
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 3: it was going to pass. Ohio passed a law that
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 3: all men who owed child support had to pay through
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 3: the state, and if you didn't pay through the state,
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 3: it didn't count. And then they made it retroactive for
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 3: a year. So all the men in Ohio that had
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: been paying directly with checks to their wives, even if
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 3: it said child support on the check, that money don't count.
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 3: And there was no recourse to prove you like you pay,
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 3: prove you paid that money. Oh well, that was a
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 3: nice gift, and you still owe this money, and now
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 3: you're in arrears for a year. And it took men
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 3: years to pay that back because they were already they
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 3: were paying their child support. But now you're having to
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 3: pay on top of your child support. And there are
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 3: men who's checked. So there were men all over Ohio
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 3: who went through what my husband went through. And we
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 3: wrote to every politician we could think of, explaining it
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 3: is wrong to take a second time from men and
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 3: say you didn't pay this when they actually did, and
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 3: it's wrong for the state to punish them for something
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 3: that is imposed retroactively after they obeyed the law and
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 3: say well, we're going to criminalize you anyway. Yeah, nobody cared,
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 3: not one Republican, not one Democrat, not one independent, None
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 3: of them cared. Nobody cared until it was a gender issue, right,
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 3: Nobody cared until it was feminists pushing too far, and
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 3: that's wrong. Feminists pushed too far when they fought joint
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 3: custody in the first place. Yep, yeah, okay, I got.
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: A super chow. I want to read and then we'll
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: look at some more of this. So great Indoors gives
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: us five dollars and says again, I want to redirect
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: you to the Wikipedia page of a woman named or
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: called Jenna Suggs. Sudds the current Canadian Minister of Families,
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: Children and Social Development, which if you scroll down on
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: that page, contains the following quote. Quote. She supported legislation
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: to ban the practice of conversion therapy, which passed the
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: House of Commons in a unanimous vote end quote. Please
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: click on the hyperlink of the term conversion therapy and
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: read the definition of conversion therapy on the top of
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: that page. So I guess he's asking me to like
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: hijack the show and look this up. So give me
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: a second.
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 3: Here his wife is doing to the child is conversion therapy.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: It's just no, no, no, they're they're basically saying that
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: if you try to talk a kid out of doing
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: something completely fucking stupid and irreversible, you're committing conversion therapy.
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: If you even suggest waiting, you know, just wait a
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 2: little while and see if you feel better. Yeah, right,
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: that's conversion therapy.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I still argue it's conversion therapy. Okay, conversion therapy.
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: Here's what it says the Wikipedia definition of conversion therapy.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: Conversion therapy is the pseudoscientific practice that's already a red
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: flag of attempting to change an individual sexual orientation, romantic orientation,
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: gender identity or CIS general expression to align with heterosexual
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: and CIS gender norms.
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 3: See that sentenced just too long, the last part. They
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 3: can drop that off and then it would be accurate.
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but they don't want to be accurate, Hannah. They
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: want to They want to engineer kids to be gay
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: in trans That's why they're calling it pseudoscientific, but pseudoscientific
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: practice being normal, you know it is.
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 3: It would be pseudo scientific if it was if it
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: was admitted that it wasn't just this didn't just apply
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 3: when they try to teach somebody that they're gay that
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 3: they're not gay, or somebody that's trans that they're not trans,
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: instead of treating the condition of dysphoria. But when they
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: they have.
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: My disappointment is immemorable and my day is ruined.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: When they have somebody that's that's straight or who doesn't
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 3: identify as trands and they try to talk them into
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 3: believing that they're gay or bisexual, or trans or any
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 3: of seventy two other gender identities that are personality quirks
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 3: that have now become identities, that's also conversion therapy. And
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: adding the last bit to that definition to not admit
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 3: that that is also conversion therapy is bullshit. Yeah, what
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 3: we're talking about is gas lighting.
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no, it's it's effectively Okay, if your kid comes
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 2: out as gay, right, you can tell them, Okay, well
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 2: you know that doesn't require medical interventions, So all right,
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 2: you know your life's going to be a little more
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 2: complicated but okay, yeah, no, But the.
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: Same rules apply for dating as if you were straight.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 3: You still have to be just as careful about people.
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: You have to be careful about who, who you sleep with,
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 2: who you date, you know, like as.
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 3: If you were dating the opposite sex.
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, and and like okay, so if if you're
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 2: a gay boy, you don't have to worry about getting
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 2: anyone knocked up, but you do have to worry about
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: like bug chasers and and and you know, like people
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 2: intentionally trying to infect other people with HIV and things
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 2: like that, because that does exist. Right, You warn your kids, right,
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: you warn them of the dangers, right. But trans Yeah, no,
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna need you to like the way while wait,
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: yeah no, we're gonna wait. We're gonna see, We're gonna
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: see if we can talk this through, because you know what, hey, kiddo,
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 2: you're thirteen. Okay, by the time you're eighteen, you might
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: change your mind. A lot of kids who thought they
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 2: were the opposite sex at age thirteen, who thought they
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: might want a transition, change their minds at eighteen or
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: nineteen or twenty or twenty one. Right, they changed their minds,
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 2: and they're like, oh, actually, you know, I'm just gay.
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 3: Some of the actual most heartbreaking videos to watch people
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 3: talk about their their experiences as young people transitioners.
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: Oh god, yeah, and.
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 3: What they what they went through in treatment, and then
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 3: what they went through what they lot transitioning as yeah,
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 3: as they were beginning to understand what was done to them.
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah, and what they can never get back.
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: Ye Chloe cole Cutter, Yeah right, she took testosterone for
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 2: a while. She doesn't know if she's ever going to
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 2: be able to have a baby. She does know she
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 2: won't ever be able to breastfeed it.
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 3: The one that made me cry was she there there
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 3: were girls that have had the whole equipment removed everything, no, uter, no, nothing,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 3: They will never be able to have kids. And then
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 3: there's one that talked about now she has mail pattern
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 3: baldness and she's she's de transitioning, but that's never going
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 3: to go away.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 2: Yeah no. And and then then there's the one with
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 2: oh god, he was on Benjamin Boyce's channel and he
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: took pee rety blockers and got an orchidect to be
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: and you know, like got castrated and and you know,
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: did all of the the estrogen therapy and everything right.
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 2: And and then when he was like I don't know,
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 2: twenty or something, Uh, he changed his mind. And it's like, Okay,
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 2: so now you're in. Now you're on testosterone therapy for
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 2: your entire life. But the window of puberty has closed.
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 3: And there's right, there's no getting it back.
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 2: There's no there's no restarting puberty.
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 3: Anything that's been removed. There's no getting it back.
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there's no getting it. There's no getting your testicles back,
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 2: and there's no turning your neo vagina back into a penis.
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 2: And uh, and you know, like you're going to have, uh,
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 2: you're going to be of short stature for the rest
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 2: of your life. You're going to have a feminine appearance
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: for the rest of your life. Right, You're going to
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 2: look like a kind of awkward young woman for the
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 2: rest of your life. Right, no matter how much testosterone
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: you take, because the window has closed for those changes. Right,
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: for you to actually be able to take the testosterone,
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 2: your voice might get a little deeper, you know, but
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: your skeleton's already formed. It's not going to be changing. Right.
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 2: So I'm just like I was listening to him talking,
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 2: and I was just like, I just felt so unbelievably
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: sad for this young man.
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 3: Right, actually makes me angry about the people in medical
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 3: community that are doing this because oh.
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it makes you mad. It makes me think, you know,
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 2: uh freaking Luigi took his anger out on the wrong
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 2: fucking target.
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 3: It's it's no different really to me than uh what's
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 3: his name from Nazi Germany that expended experimented on children.
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: This is this is the same thing. When they're doing
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 3: this to people who are not old enough to make
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 3: their decision themselves, and they're they're talking them into it,
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 3: they're conning them into it, they're grooming them into it.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: Mm hm.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 3: And then they make this journey, this medical journey that
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 3: involves all this pain and suffering.
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah no, And and they're gonna play off at the end,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: right because you know, like the thing that they always
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: the bargain that they always give the parents is do
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 2: you want a dead son or a living daughter? Right
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: or vice versa?
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 2: Do you want a dead daughter or a living son?
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 2: And and the parents they cave to that emotional blackmail,
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 2: right because they think it's the truth. It's not the truth.
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: Suicide rates increase after transition, right, They.
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 10: Didn't used to be the case when you had to
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 10: like freaking do five or ten years of psychotherapy and
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 10: like be really sure before you actually were allowed to
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 10: medically transition.
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, No, that didn't used to be the case.
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 2: But it's the case now because you got all these
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 2: kids who've been groomed into it, into thinking, oh, well,
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 2: this will be great, you know, like I could be
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: a boy, you know, and I'll be able to do
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: boy stuff. Yeah, you can already do boy stuff.
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: What's stopping you?
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, it's really bad.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's play the next time code. This is him
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 1: talking about another judge in California.
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 5: Out the clerks at the La County Courthouse completely deleted
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 5: all my records. My lawyer could not access them, I
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 5: could not access them. Nobody could access them except interestingly,
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 5: opposing counsel, the one who sent the text could still
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 5: access them.
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 7: So that's the first thing weird that happened. My entire
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 7: record was deleted.
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 5: Not they have a way of keeping it offline, so
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 5: you can only get paper copies. They have a way
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 5: of protecting the paper copies. We have to get permission
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 5: from a judge. They didn't do that.
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 7: They actually deleted it. So that happens.
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 5: Then they collapse all three of those judicial functions into
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 5: one judge, Mark Uhass, who's my trial court judge, So
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 5: now he's the supervising judge, the home court judge, and
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 5: the trial judge.
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: I used to be three different judges. So they basically
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: just gave all this to one judge, an activist judge,
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: if I remember correct. So let's let's keep going.
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 5: He rules that the records are sealed, the case is sealed,
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 5: and no one may enter the courtroom except me, the lawyers,
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 5: and expert witnesses. So the public was denied the right
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 5: to view the trial. No one saw what they did
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 5: to me in there.
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: So they also made it to where the trial no
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: one's allowed to be in there except for the parties involved.
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: So this wasn't a business a public thing.
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Like this is common practice in cases where they
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 3: are going to alienate one of the parents in a
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 3: child custody case, and it's it's usually used when the
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: other parent is alleging abuse where abuse didn't actually happen,
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 3: and they use the excuse that the privacy of the
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 3: child supersedes the right of the parent to a fair trial,
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 3: and so, among other things. In family court, criminal allegations
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 3: can be made that if you were in criminal court,
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 3: you could not be found guilty for those allegations without
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 3: the allegation being proved beyond a reasonable doubt. But in
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 3: family court the allegation has to be made and then
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 3: you prove. You have to prove that you are innocent
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 3: in order for that allegation to not affect your right
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 3: to custody and visitation and how much child support you pay,
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 3: and what you're allowed to talk about, whether your visitation
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: is going to be supervised, and all of that, And
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: that's consistent across the entire country. I believe it's also
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 3: that way in Canada, the UK, mostly.
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 2: The UK, all family court proceedings are private right.
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: And so if an individual goes into court and abuses
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 3: the system by engaging in vexus vexatious litigation where she
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 3: has filed a bunch of false charges against her partner,
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 3: which you don't even have to file in criminal court,
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 3: all you have to do is go in to family
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 3: court and say, you know, he he hit me and
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 3: or he raped me, or or all the time, or
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 3: he's afraid of him. Yeah, you don't even have to
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 3: say he's abusing your kids. All you have to do
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 3: is say you're afraid of him, and he is on
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 3: his back foot. He has to debunk what you said
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 3: or it's it's and he has limited recourse to do that.
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 3: There's a lot of it, and judges won't accept. Judges
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 3: can just refuse to look at his evidence. Judges can
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: refuse to let him talk about it or refuse to
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 3: let him answer those complaints because it's not a criminal case,
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 3: but they can still use it against him. And so
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 3: men are subject to all of this and women are not,
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 3: and women use it. They're actually books that you can buy.
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 3: These have been on the shelves of bookstores since back
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 3: in the day before there was such a thing as
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 3: an online bookstore, right, like you used to be able
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 3: to walk into Walden Books back in the day, and
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 3: and you know, some of the other big changes that
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 3: don't don't exist anymore, and there it would be. I
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 3: even remember the cover had a wine glass and a
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 3: pair of high heeled shoes on it, and it was
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 3: it was called something like the Method or you know,
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 3: and it would had this laid out, this whole thing. Oh,
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 3: if you're going through a divorce and you want property custody,
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 3: you want out of the house. Accuse him of domestic violence,
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 3: and it was specific not violence against the children, violence
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 3: against the mother. Say you're afraid of him, get a
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 3: re straining order, and it laid out this whole. And
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 3: I've seen the method used against men that I know personally,
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 3: and it takes It took seven years to stop a
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 3: woman who was getting frivolous restraining orders and using police
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 3: departments in four different communities in two different counties, over
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 3: and over again, making false allegations that ranged from as
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 3: serious as rape, which was disproved three times before they
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 3: finally dropped it, to accusing him of a drive by greeting.
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 11: Yeah, I remember that, waving menacingly, which I'm assuming looked
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 11: kind of like this, But she wasn't even She had
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 11: told the judge she would be out of town for
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 11: three weeks and couldn't attend to tend to child support hearing.
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 3: And then in the middle of that three weeks, he
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 3: allegedly drove past a bar in town where she was
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 3: and waved menacingly, And you know, like that that kind
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 3: of thing happens. What he's going through is terrible, and
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 3: what he is experiencing is consistent with everything that I've seen.
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 3: The only difference is that it involves transitioning as child.
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 3: And now people are outrage, But I keep saying that
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 3: the groundwork for this was laid by people who treat
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 3: men as always accountable, always responsible, never having any rights,
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 3: never the good guy, always the bad guy, who emphasized
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 3: terms like deadbeat dad when a mother kicks a father
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 3: out of the house, takes all of his money, takes
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 3: all of his property, and then once more and he
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 3: can't give it.
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but they don't.
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 3: They won't use the term deadbeat mom when a woman
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 3: screws around with twenty three different guys and has six
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 3: kids and doesn't have a father at home for any
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 3: of them, and doesn't have a job and is on
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 3: welfare and spends the money on getting their hair and
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 3: nails done instead of feeding her kids. Yep, right, so
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 3: you know.
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 2: The otherly new boots. Yeah.
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 3: The other end of it, the other people that are
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 3: pissed off about this that laid the groundwork is radfems.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 3: You motherfuckers. You laid the groundwork for this when you
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 3: laid the groundwork for girls to get abortions in school
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 3: for their their guidance counselor to take them to get
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 3: an abortion without parental consent, without notification of the parents.
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 3: Now you're mad that girls are being transitioned. This is
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 3: your fault. You did this.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 2: No, no, no, they did it even before that. They
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: did it by basically arguing that gender was a social.
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 3: Cons didn't argue that that was they did. Actional feminists.
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 2: No no, no.
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 3: Radfms argue that women are superior to men.
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah. No, radfems argue that women are a specific biological class,
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 2: and they would be equal to men in every way, right,
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 2: in terms of earnings, career choices, right, all of those things,
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 2: they would be equal. There would be fifty to fifty
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 2: parody in every aspect of society, except for the fact
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 2: that girls are socialized right in a certain way and
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 2: boys are socialized in a different way. And therefore gender
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 2: that genders stopped at the neck.
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 3: That wasn't rad friend Brad films that came up with
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 3: gender as a social construct. They came up with the
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 3: idea that the Y chromosome was a mistake, that that
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 3: gender doesn't maybe stop people from being strong enough and
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 3: valid enough to do everything that men do. Uh, that
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 3: that gender maybe doesn't change what people should earn. But
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 3: then at the same time, they they also argued that
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 3: by just by being biologically male, minimal, more violent, mineral,
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 3: more prone to criminal behavior, Uh, men are less intelligent
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 3: than women, and all kinds of stuff like that. They
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 3: have always believed in. It's intersectional feminists that argued that
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 3: gender was a social construct and you can identify as
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 3: whatever you want to and uh, you know, anything that
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 3: applies to one sex applies to the other sex, and
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 3: so on, and they're they they've hated each other as
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 3: much as communists. Openly communist feminists versus choice feminists who
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 3: don't know that they're part of a communist sigh up
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 3: that the whole time issition and they're just a controlled opposition. Yeah,
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 3: choice feminists, your feminism isn't even real.
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah right, But I got a I got a super
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: chow I should read and then we got to look
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: at the next time code. But Zara ANX gave us
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 1: five dollars and says, given the story, Hannah just told
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: I am beyond double plus convinced that mere law reform
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: in marriage is a cuckold position. Getting government out of marriage,
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 1: family and children is the only way to go allowing
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: a necessary evil, which is what even the founders of
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 1: the US believe government to be, to have any tendril
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 1: in interpersonal relationships down to the vaginal canal, as the
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: government can force child support on men who aren't even
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: related to the gestation of a pregnancy, as was the
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: case with Carnal Alexander in Michigan. Is unjust finishing superchild
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: Sorry on job site, that was a super chat that
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: was added to the superchowd for another of two dollars.
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: Thank you for that, Zaraanx. Yes, I agree. I think
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: that it's a it's a sacrament and it shouldn't be
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: like a legal thing because that's how you get into
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: this mess.
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 3: So, yeah, the word marriage shouldn't be on any government document.
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the only I guess, I guess.
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 3: That's the word civil The phrase civil union can go
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 3: on a government document. And when you get married, your
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 3: church can call it a marriage, your family can call
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 3: it a marriage, you can call it a marriage, doesn't matter.
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 3: But when you sign a contract with your partner for
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 3: property ownership and custody and stuff like that, Yeah, we
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 3: just need.
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: We just need to figure out a new way to
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: do it when it comes to immigration.
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 3: Well, go ahead, Yeah, I was gonna say that should
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 3: be something that up front, you know, you should be
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 3: able to determine what you agree on and then your
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 3: held to the contract. And being females shouldn't get you
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 3: out of the contract. Alleging abuse shouldn't get you out
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 3: of the contract.
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 3: Nothing that wouldn't get you out of a contract that
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 3: you signed with somebody to fix the roof on your
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 3: house should get you out of the contract that you
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 3: signed to jointly own property and to jointly take financial
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 3: responsibility for your children. Yeah, and as far as authority
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 3: over your children, there should be no contract you can
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 3: make to take away somebody's authority. A parent should have
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 3: to go through a criminal case in order to have
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 3: their custody taken away, all right. A government should have
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 3: to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a parent is
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 3: harmful to the child before they can take custody.
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 1: M All right, let's place more of this.
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 7: And this is really important.
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 5: And the judge probably had to do this to prevent
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 5: himself from being prosecuted. So there's a whole network of
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 5: court watchers and family court and here's.
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 7: What we found some of them will secretly record.
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 5: They're not supposed to, but they'll secretly record the proceedings.
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 5: Then we get the court reporter's record and it doesn't
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 5: match the audio recording. Yeah, and it happens all the time.
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 5: Happens all the time. The judges are instructing the court
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 5: reporters to alter the record to prevent an appeal. And
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 5: a lot of times these judges are committing felonies on
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 5: the bench by violating criminal statutes.
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 7: That won't be in the record. One of the things in.
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 5: My written record, that's a lot they'll just they just
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 5: put three dots and say they couldn't hear me.
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 7: They couldn't hear me.
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 5: So I made objections which were important from an appeal,
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 5: but they don't show in the record because the court
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 5: reporter couldn't hear me.
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 7: So that's why he had.
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 5: To keep people out of the court to prevent illicit recording,
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 5: because he knew very.
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 7: Well what he was going to do.
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 5: And sure enough, right off the bat, he denies me
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 5: an independent medical exam. So the medical status of this
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 5: child is the fundamental issue, right, the medical and psychological
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 5: status of the child. He denies me an independent medical exam.
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 5: He denies me an independent psychological exam, and the other
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 5: side didn't even have to give me evidence in discuss,
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 5: which violates the Discovery Act in California, and his grounds
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 5: for disbarment.
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 7: I didn't get any discovery.
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 3: In the Red Pill movie, who was it whose son
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 3: wanted to lose weight?
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 1: And he was.
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 3: You remember what happened in that case where he was
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 3: he was losing weight at dad's house and gaining it
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 3: back at mom's house. And so the judge, seeing that
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 3: that the child was having unhealthy practices at the mother's
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 3: house and healthy practices at the father's house, ordered that
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 3: the father stopped weighing the child.
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep. He couldn't, he could no longer track it.
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: He finished this clip off like one minute left in
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: this case.
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 5: But I had to provide discovery. I provide over a
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 5: thousand pages of discovery. That's a lot of work, you know,
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 5: a week's worth of work. So right off the bat
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 5: he goes down this road. Then I noticed the change
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 5: in him, and I think somebody on the pellet court
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 5: got to him and said, you know, you're being so
• 1:45:09
  Speaker 5: unfair to the guy. I don't know that we if
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 5: he comes up here, we'll have to rule for him
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 5: because it looks so bad right now. So then he
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 5: became scrupulously fair after that, and let me make my case.
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 7: I destroyed their witnesses.
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 5: Then when he comes out with his ruling, he basically
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 5: removes the gag order, the illegal gag order, because in California,
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 5: apparently in the Pellet Court, that's just not going to
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 5: stand here.
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 7: They don't they allow free speech here. So that's it.
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 5: I even, in a very funny moment, the court forced
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 5: him to admit that right wing speech was free speech.
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 7: Well, he really didn't want to do that. That was
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 7: pretty fun.
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: Can you can you imagine the right wing speech is
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 1: also free speech? Like what does it even mean? Like
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 1: what does it even mean? Right wing speech? Right? But
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 1: like that was like where we are. That's where we are.
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 1: Now we have to make the case for that. Okay, sorry, funny.
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 7: So he takes that gagoder off.
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 5: Then he still keeps me on supervised visitation, but he
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 5: now says phone calls have to be supervised. So a
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 5: phone call to my kid's gonna cost me five hundred bucks, right,
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 5: He says, she doesn't have to give the kids your
• 1:46:38
  Speaker 5: letters and if you send presents, she doesn't have to
• 1:46:42
  Speaker 5: give them.
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 7: To the kids.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 3: That's legalized parental alienation, by the way. Yeah yeah, good lord.
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, that's twenty seconds left in this clip, I think.
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 5: And she doesn't have to tell you anything about their
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 5: medical or educational or anything.
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 7: You don't get any notifications at all. So that's what happened.
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 5: So we go through some post trial litigation after they're
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 5: trying to get me to pay I think ninety nine
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 5: thousand dollars in legal fees and all stuff. It's a
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 5: really it's really about the family. Corn is really about
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 5: getting the father to fund all the litigation. Yeah, because
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 5: they want the father to go away, right, So that's
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 5: that's that.
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 2: Clip about the court. He's got to pay his fees
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 2: and her fees, yep.
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 3: And they'll they'll do that for everything from litigation that
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 3: was initiated by the mother because she wanted more child support,
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 3: to litigation that that was initiated by the father because
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 3: he wanted more custody. It doesn't matter who's at fault
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 3: for the court case, and it doesn't matter who is
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 3: decided in favor, even when there were times when when
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 3: she went through things and was denied. They wanted my
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 3: husband to pay extra for her her troubles, like he
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 3: didn't even initiate the case, right, So it's it's insane.
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 3: They just assume that women are inept in in family
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 3: court when it comes to anything financial, and they just
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 3: assume that men are inept when it comes to anything
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 3: to do with child rearing. All right, all right, so
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 3: let's okay, So that's.
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: How much time do you have? Okay, we got more sound, Okay,
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 1: we got enough time. Let's just keep it simple that
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: this is the good stuff though. Okay, So he's going
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: to talk about some things that were revealed regarding the
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 1: funding towards the transgender movement. So here we go.
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 6: What he's discovered, at least legally, Are there things that
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 6: are reercussions for you?
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 7: Yeah?
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 5: So what happened was the case got moved to La
• 1:48:59
  Speaker 5: County and I wound up in Department sixty three under
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 5: Judge Mark Uhas and knew right from the very beginning
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 5: some very strange things happened in this case. So I
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 5: had a federal case going on, and it was just
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 5: just to seek declaratory relief to relieve me of the
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 5: unconstitutional gag order. There was a mistake made.
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 7: You know, the MOFO law firm, Marice Forster. They are
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 7: the most powerful law firm in California.
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 5: They represent Google, Facebook and all those people. That's the
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 5: law firm I was facing. Their retainers are astronomical. So
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 5: I've always known that my wife was getting help from somewhere,
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 5: but because it's so much money, Like, how can she
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 5: afford the retainers on the lawyers in Texas?
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 7: It's the law firm is Coon's Fuller.
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 5: They are minimum retainers one hundred and seventy five thousand
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 5: dollars minimum, and they triple that going to trial. So
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 5: she's she's spend half a million dollars every time she
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 5: sues me, and she sued me over and I've been
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 5: in continuous lawsuit for eleven years.
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 7: So imagine she spent millions of dollars. Where's this money
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 7: coming from?
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: So his wife just had millions of dollars she's getting.
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 1: Well that's not all I mean, it's probably not going
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 1: to be surprising, but let's let's listen where she's getting
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: this money for these massive lawsuits to afford these extremely
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: high profile firms. Over this particular case.
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 5: Well, I learned this in the federal lawsuit. Once I
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 5: had moved to California, I file in the Central District
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 5: with the federal court to get rid of skag order.
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 7: And the MOFO lawyer MOFO is mars Ford.
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 5: So that's that's actually their website, muff dot com. So
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 5: sends an email, and I think there were a number
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 5: of lawyers copied in the Sea money.
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 7: I think those lawyers should have been in the BCC.
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 5: Field, the blind copy field, but they were in the
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 5: c C field, and I think it was a mistake.
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 5: And they were lawyers from uh nonprofit NGOs that are
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 5: funded by.
• 1:51:04
  Speaker 7: U s a I D and George Soros.
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 3: Oh yep, all those activist organizations U s a I D.
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 3: The U s a I D system, which I like
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 3: to call us AIDS, has done stuff like this all
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 3: over the United States, all over Europe, all over Africa, Canada,
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 3: I was, America has been. There's not a nation in
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 3: the world that has not been infected with us AIDS.
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 2: Okay, I I was expecting sorrows. I was not necessarily
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 2: expecting U S a I D.
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 3: Oh my gosh, you haven't been following the U S
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 3: a I D.
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 12: Actually there's more I have, But I thought I thought
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 12: there was more, Brian, I thought that they were just
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 12: about foreign.
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 3: Oh no, no, no, no, no no. And then on
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 3: top of USAID's there's also do J funding, Department of
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 3: Justice d D funding that is targeting the people of
• 1:52:15
  Speaker 3: the United States with social stuff like that, DHS, the
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 3: Department of there's two DHS and DHHS. So the Department
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 3: of Health and Human Services is doing it, and the
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 3: Department of Homeland Security is doing it. Every three letter
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 3: agency is getting funding to target the people of the
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 3: United States and every other nation in the world with
• 1:52:39
  Speaker 3: this kind of propaganda and SIA and so on like
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 3: this has been our tax dollars here in the United States,
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 3: and our children's tax dollars, future tax dollars, and our
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 3: grandchildren's and our great grandchildren's have all been dedicated to
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 3: this shit for as long as gen xers has been alive.
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 3: There have been organizations that have been doing this for
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 3: longer than gen xers have been alive.
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 1: MM, and there's more. So let's let's say a listen.
• 1:53:10
  Speaker 7: So it became very apparent to me at that point why.
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 5: It was so politically difficult to get the law passed
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 5: in Texas and so forth.
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 7: So let me now.
• 1:53:21
  Speaker 5: Explain a little bit of the background about how Republicans
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 5: actually started the Trenchender movement.
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 1: Yes, there are Republicans that started this as well. Not
• 1:53:32
  Speaker 1: Trump Republicans, not MAGA people.
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 3: But like neo con Republicans.
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, let's listen.
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 5: So the largest donor to the Republican Party today is
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 5: a guy named Paul Singer. And Paul Singer founded the
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 5: Human Rights Campaign, you know, the yellow Equal sign. Yeah,
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 5: a Republican founded that, not a Democrat. And he also
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 5: runs the Manhattan Institute, completely funds it, which is a
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 5: prominent conservative think tank.
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 7: He funds the Claremont Institute.
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 5: And is a substantial donor to the Heritage Foundation, so
• 1:54:03
  Speaker 5: he has a lot to say over what these people do.
• 1:54:08
  Speaker 5: He's deeply committed to the transgender issue and funded lawsuits
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 5: for it all over the country. Created the framework for
• 1:54:18
  Speaker 5: corporations to the scoring system for gay and transgender people
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 5: that are used for investments, you know, like Vanguard and
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 5: all these big investment things, whether they're going to invest
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 5: in buy your stock or not.
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 1: He and ESG like that, So you know, the whole
• 1:54:35
  Speaker 1: esgd I thing that they're the scoring system that these
• 1:54:40
  Speaker 1: like Giant what is what even is black Rock? Like
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: you know, they just they just hold your money. I
• 1:54:46
  Speaker 1: guess if they're.
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 3: Like a bank, you know they invest your money.
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, So anyway.
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 7: Invented all that, all that stuff.
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 5: So he's the largest donor of the Republican Party. He's
• 1:54:59
  Speaker 5: the largest out of state a donor to politicians in Texas.
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 5: So that's what I'm actually fighting here.
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: That's so that that I just I thought that was fascinating.
• 1:55:14
  Speaker 1: I don't if you guys want to say anything about this,
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 1: I'd have one more clip and then we're done. So okay, doys,
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 1: have any go ahead? Now do you want me to
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 1: just jump to that? Okay, so let's go one hour
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 1: and three minutes in. Uh yeah, like right here, start
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 1: from here.
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 5: If if I could ever agree to any transgender operation,
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 5: it would be to cut the cut Wiener out of
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 5: the California Senate. That guy needs to go. He's he's
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 5: going to be our main obstacle. And he's politically powerful
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 5: because he's a donation magnet for big donors who want
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 5: to push this stuff, Guys like Paul Singer and guys
• 1:55:56
  Speaker 5: like George sorows I do think I got benefit from
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 5: President Trump's executive order. I was working with his staff
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 5: and was in contact with them about this, and they
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 5: promised me that he would do it in the first month,
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 5: and they did it in the first three weeks. That's
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 5: the first time elected officials ever kept it promise to me.
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 5: And I do think James is not on cross sex
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 5: hormones yet.
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 1: So James Younger, James is his son, James Younger, the
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: kid that his mom put on puberty blockers. So he's
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: not on cross sex hormones yet. Maybe Okay yet as
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 1: far as he's.
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 3: Legally, he's not supposed to be. In other words, so yeah,
• 1:56:44
  Speaker 3: if she was doing it, she'd have to be doing
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 3: it behind us back.
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 5: And Children's Hospital has said after Trump's order that if
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 5: you're already on a treatment plan, we'll keep doing it,
• 1:56:56
  Speaker 5: but we're not putting any new kids on it. So
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 5: it may prevent my son from getting cross sex hormones.
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 7: And why is that important?
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 5: If you look at the statistics, every child that goes
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 5: into cross sex hormones, one of them go to surgery.
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 5: It alters the brain and it alters things sufficiently that.
• 1:57:21
  Speaker 3: All of them go to surgery, and also keeping my
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 3: son off in cost fallacy. We've gone this far and
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 3: we have.
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 2: So might as well go the whole ninety yards.
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yep.
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 5: Cos Sex hormones is my main focus right now. I'm
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 5: going to also work with two senators who have already
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 5: introduced bills to allow children who have been victimized by
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 5: these procedures with a thirty year statute of limitations because
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 5: we don't know the long term effects of this stuff
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 5: to sue the clinics. That long statute of limitations would
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 5: be enough for most clinics to shut it down because
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 5: it's too risky legally. I'm trying to get Senator Hawley
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 5: to modify his bill in the Federal Congress to allow
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 5: parents to sue as well. Yeah, and that's what Trump's
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 5: executive order calls for.
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 7: So the the.
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 5: Trump has directed the agencies to work with the Congress
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 5: to make that happen. So all the agencies will assist
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 5: me in doing that, and I'll be I'll be there
• 1:58:27
  Speaker 5: next month in DC working on that.
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 1: That's the clip.
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 3: So all right, well, we're what we're seeing. What we're
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 3: seeing happen now is the beginning of the cure for
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 3: US AIDS. Yeah, like so it's this is a serious
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 3: worldwide epidemic. Yeah, I explained this.
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 2: It's gonna a little need a little more than easy too.
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 3: But it's now under under the Humanity Initiative VEIL so HIV.
• 1:59:03
  Speaker 3: The US federal bureaucracy has attacked various nation systems of
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 3: immunity against foreign cultural evasion, invasion and damaging exploitation intended
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 3: to stifle healthy economic growth, damaging family and therefore cultural stability,
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 3: and divert natural national resources for the use of the
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 3: invasive parasite nation and its subsidiary organizations. It would be
• 1:59:26
  Speaker 3: the United States and the other corporate entities, because every
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 3: nation is a corporate entity that are exploiting the US
• 1:59:36
  Speaker 3: taxpayer and the federal government and its power. When that
• 1:59:42
  Speaker 3: exploitative system becomes established and entrenched, symptoms may include sudden
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 3: depletion of local resources, rashes of organizational activity within local communities,
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 3: diversion of public services to serve the purposes of the
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 3: invading parasite nation, corruption of existing cultural no lesions upon
• 2:00:01
  Speaker 3: family relationships, sterilization of local men and children, increase in
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 3: mental illness, woke syndromes among local populations, and chronic pain
• 2:00:14
  Speaker 3: in the neck behavior by foreign nationals whose organizations have
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 3: entered your nation to repurpose your social services systems as
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 3: a tool of social manipulation against your people. Any of
• 2:00:25
  Speaker 3: these symptoms is evidence that your infection via the US
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 3: Humanitarian Initiative VEIL has become active, manifesting as full blown
• 2:00:34
  Speaker 3: USAID system or USAIDS. Currently, the only in treatment for
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 3: this infectious attack seems to be populist therapy at the
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 3: source US federal bureaucracy, which is currently being administered. It's
• 2:00:48
  Speaker 3: going to be a long course of treatment which will
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 3: require a lot of work, but we have hope that
• 2:00:53
  Speaker 3: a cure for this terrible infection is forthcoming. And this
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 3: is what we're seeing right now.
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 2:01:01
  Speaker 4: Well, Karen on on that note, I think I think
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 4: that was that was kind of a mic drop and
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 4: uh and I don't.
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 2: Care to follow it. This this guy is uh, you know,
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 2: like he's he's been in the trenches for years and uh,
• 2:01:25
  Speaker 2: and I wish him every if I was a praying sort,
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 2: I would be praying for him. Yeah, And uh, and
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 2: I I just I just wanted to stop. I just
• 2:01:39
  Speaker 2: want children to stop being intentionally made mentally ill and
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 2: physically physically non viable. Yeah, right, Like I said, I
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 2: have told lots of you know, radio show hosts and stuff. Right.
• 2:02:04
  Speaker 2: If you know I was a tomboy when I was
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 2: growing up. If an adult in a position of trust
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 2: had come up to me at age five and said,
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 2: I see you really prefer the Legos to the Barbie dolls, right,
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 2: Have you ever thought that maybe you're actually a boy,
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 2: Maybe I wouldn't have three kids right now, three kids
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 2: that I love right now, right, Maybe I would have
• 2:02:33
  Speaker 2: gotten so confused and so messed up. It might have Actually,
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 2: even just that suggestion of it being an option might
• 2:02:44
  Speaker 2: have given me gender dysphoria. Even though my parents were
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 2: perfectly happy buying me legos and dinky cars, right, and
• 2:02:57
  Speaker 2: letting me wear jeans instead of dresses. Right. They were
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 2: perfectly happy with me wanting to help Dad fix the
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 2: car rather than mom baked bread. Right, They were perfectly
• 2:03:08
  Speaker 2: happy with all of that, and and but but just
• 2:03:13
  Speaker 2: because I was that way, maybe some fucking adult in
• 2:03:19
  Speaker 2: my school, in my kindergarten class might have come up
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 2: to me and made a suggestion to me that would
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 2: have made me think, oh, well, maybe I actually am
• 2:03:29
  Speaker 2: a boy, and maybe I should become a boy, and
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 2: there's something wrong with the body I was born in
• 2:03:34
  Speaker 2: and now I'm all fucked up.
• 2:03:40
  Speaker 3: So yeah, I guess the bottom line here is Jeff
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 3: Younger really loves his son and he doesn't want that
• 2:03:49
  Speaker 3: to be done to him. He doesn't want his son
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 3: to be medically abused.
• 2:03:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, So anyway, we're.
• 2:03:56
  Speaker 1: Gonna wrap it up.
• 2:03:57
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 1: I will go ahead and take us out now. So
• 2:04:01
  Speaker 1: thanks guys for coming on the show. Thank you to
• 2:04:04
  Speaker 1: Karen and Hannah for joining me. And I wish Jeff
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 1: Younger all the best, and I hope he continues to fight,
• 2:04:11
  Speaker 1: and I'm really happy to see that he's got some
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: some people like Trump's cabinet and Josh Holly in his corner,
• 2:04:18
  Speaker 1: and I just want to see, you know, him win
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 1: for a change. And I hope you guys enjoyed this conversation.
• 2:04:26
  Speaker 1: You're gonna watch the full video. I put a link
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 1: to it in the description. Consider subscribing to our channel
• 2:04:31
  Speaker 1: as well as Soft White Underbelly. It is a pretty
• 2:04:33
  Speaker 1: good channel. They do lots of interviews with people that
• 2:04:37
  Speaker 1: you know, you normally don't get to hear from and
• 2:04:39
  Speaker 1: you get to see some unique perspectives. But anyway, with
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 1: all that said, if you guys like this video, please
• 2:04:46
  Speaker 1: hit like, subscribe. If you're not already subscribe, hit the
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 1: BELF notifications, leave us a comment, let us know what
• 2:04:50
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 1: and please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 2:04:56
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 1: of The Ranzirker and we'll talk to you guys in then.
• 2:05:00
  Speaker 2: Sto