Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: The USVI And The Amended Lawsuit Filed By The Survivors (9/4/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: The USVI And The Amended Lawsuit Filed By The Survivors (9/4/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
0:06
Speaker 1: As the lawsuit in the United States Virgin Islands continues
0:09
Speaker 1: to make its way through the system, we continue to
0:12
Speaker 1: get updates via court filings. And now the United States
0:17
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands has filed an amended lawsuit against JPMorgan and Chase.
0:24
Speaker 1: So let's get into this article from Kate Bricklett over
0:28
Speaker 1: at the Daily Beast. And let's see what's going on. Headline,
0:32
Speaker 1: JP Morgan executives joked about Epstein's interest in young girls,
0:37
Speaker 1: according to the lawsuit. Well, that should shock nobody. The
0:41
Speaker 1: financial sector is populated with a bunch of scumbags. So
0:45
Speaker 1: it should shock nobody when they're talking about your daughters
0:49
Speaker 1: or your sister or your friends with such disregard. And
0:53
Speaker 1: the sad part is all of these people, the so-called elite,
0:57
Speaker 1: the so-called upper crust, They all feel the same way.
1:00
Speaker 1: All those people that you're out there cheering on and
1:03
Speaker 1: carrying on about and yelling at your family about and
1:06
Speaker 1: your friends over politics. Breaking news, none of those people
1:10
Speaker 1: like you. And it always reminds me of that part
1:13
Speaker 1: in Bronx Tale where Sonny's talking to C about Mickey Mantle.
1:17
Speaker 1: And they're talking about how, you know, C's favorite player
1:20
Speaker 1: is Mickey Mantle and how C was all bummed out
1:23
Speaker 1: because they made Mickey Mantle cry. Well, Sonny says Mickey Mantle,
1:28
Speaker 1: that's what you're upset about? Mantle makes $ 100, 000 a year.
1:32
Speaker 1: How much does your father make? If your dad ever
1:35
Speaker 1: can't pay the rent and needs money, go ask Mickey Mantle.
1:38
Speaker 1: See what happens. Mickey Mantle don't care about you. Why
1:42
Speaker 1: should you care about him? Nobody cares. And that analogy
1:45
Speaker 1: certainly holds true for all of these politicians. In its
1:49
Speaker 1: legal battle with J.P. Morgan, the government of the U.S.
1:53
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands claims the investment bank obstructed authorities investigating convicted
1:59
Speaker 1: sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and says its executives knew more
2:03
Speaker 1: about Epstein's activities than they've previously disclosed. Well, what do
2:08
Speaker 1: you know? What have I been telling you folks for, oh,
2:11
Speaker 1: I don't know, four years now? That the financial sector
2:15
Speaker 1: smells like absolute horseshit. And everything going on in the
2:20
Speaker 1: financial sector that had to do with Epstein should have
2:24
Speaker 1: been under scrutiny. and should have been recode, but they
2:27
Speaker 1: never did it. So now, all of a sudden, we're
2:30
Speaker 1: talking about the financials again, and they're rearing their ugly head,
2:34
Speaker 1: and it's once again shining an ugly light on the
2:37
Speaker 1: SDNY and the prosecutor's office in New York. I mean,
2:42
Speaker 1: how long did Cy Vance have to go after Epstein?
2:45
Speaker 1: How long did the SDNY have to go after Epstein?
2:49
Speaker 1: How long did the New York State's prosecutor's office have
2:52
Speaker 1: to go after Epstein in general? And none of them
2:54
Speaker 1: did it. But now, all of a sudden, this is
2:57
Speaker 1: being disclosed and presented as something new? Everybody who's been
3:02
Speaker 1: following this case knew what was going on as far
3:05
Speaker 1: as the financial sector and the way they were enabling
3:08
Speaker 1: Epstein throughout this whole entire thing. The bank's conduct has
3:12
Speaker 1: led to serious harm for women and girls in the
3:15
Speaker 1: Caribbean territory. The Virgin Islands contend in the suit. On Monday,
3:21
Speaker 1: the territory's attorney general officially asked to amend its lawsuit
3:24
Speaker 1: against J.P. Morgan to include one count of obstruction of
3:28
Speaker 1: enforcement of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. The latest complaint
3:33
Speaker 1: includes new accusations about what the bank and executives, including
3:38
Speaker 1: Mary Erdos, knew about Epstein, though much of those claims
3:42
Speaker 1: are redacted. Erdos? CEO of the bank's asset and wealth
3:47
Speaker 1: management division, was deposed in the Virgin Islands case last month.
3:52
Speaker 1: Jess Daly, Epstein's close friend and J.P. Morgan's former head
3:56
Speaker 1: of private bank, and J.P. Morgan, CEO Jamie Dimon, were
4:01
Speaker 1: also reportedly scheduled for under oath interviews. According to the
4:06
Speaker 1: amended complaint, J.P. Morgan employees and senior executives had emailed
4:11
Speaker 1: internally that Epstein was under investigation, or had been sued
4:16
Speaker 1: for trafficking or sexual abuse during the course of the
4:20
Speaker 1: bank's relationship with the perverted financier. Epstein had a relationship
4:25
Speaker 1: with J.P. Morgan from 1998 to 2013, including the period
4:31
Speaker 1: during which he pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl
4:35
Speaker 1: and served jail time in Florida in 2008. And what
4:40
Speaker 1: those emails show is that the whole entire story about
4:43
Speaker 1: how it was all Jess Staley's fault, how Jess Staley's
4:47
Speaker 1: the only one involved here, well, that story gets blown
4:50
Speaker 1: out of the water when we get these emails. It's
4:53
Speaker 1: kind of like everybody trying to blame Acosta, right? Sure,
4:56
Speaker 1: Acosta shoulders his portion of the blame, but he's not
4:59
Speaker 1: the only guy that should be blamed for what happened.
5:03
Speaker 1: And the same goes for Jess Staley. He is a disgusting,
5:07
Speaker 1: disgusting human being. But... JP Morgan Chase and the bosses
5:12
Speaker 1: over there, they have to take their share as well. What,
5:15
Speaker 1: they're not going to take their lumps? The buck stops
5:18
Speaker 1: with them. They're the ones in charge. Staley wasn't running
5:21
Speaker 1: the whole company, was he? So he has a boss
5:25
Speaker 1: and that guy has a boss and so on. So
5:28
Speaker 1: it has to go all the way to the top
5:30
Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned and going after Jamie Dimon,
5:33
Speaker 1: while I don't think he had anything to do with
5:36
Speaker 1: what was going on with the day-to-day as far as
5:38
Speaker 1: Epstein's concerned. To act like he had no idea who
5:42
Speaker 1: Epstein is is just laughable at best. Internal emails also
5:47
Speaker 1: questioned who Epstein's clients were. The filing states, Indeed, Epstein's
5:52
Speaker 1: behavior was so widely known at J.P. Morgan that senior
5:56
Speaker 1: executives joked about Epstein's interest in young girls. The document
6:00
Speaker 1: cites a 2008 email that Erdos received, though it redacts
6:05
Speaker 1: what the sender had allegedly asked her. JP Morgan had
6:10
Speaker 1: information that it knew was directly relevant to the federal
6:13
Speaker 1: investigation of Epstein's suspected trafficking, including Epstein's payments to Eastern
6:19
Speaker 1: European women, the complaint states, and we know he loved
6:22
Speaker 1: them Eastern European women, going by women from war-torn countries,
6:28
Speaker 1: countries that are poor, you know, anywhere that he could
6:31
Speaker 1: exploit the vulnerable. And unfortunately, there are people on this
6:35
Speaker 1: planet who are so disgustingly gross, They'll sell their own
6:39
Speaker 1: children to people like Jean-Luc Brunel so that they can
6:42
Speaker 1: be gifted to somebody like Jeffrey Epstein. And these bankers
6:47
Speaker 1: think that's funny. The financial sector, they're laughing at you.
6:50
Speaker 1: Not just over this, but over the fact that you're
6:53
Speaker 1: willing to pay 26.5% for that hooptie-ass car you just
6:57
Speaker 1: bought too. They're laughing about that as well. Believe me
7:00
Speaker 1: when I tell you. Meanwhile, the lawsuit alleges J.P. Morgan
7:04
Speaker 1: was well aware that Epstein had pleaded guilty and served
7:08
Speaker 1: prison time for engaging in sex with a minor, a
7:11
Speaker 1: crime closely connected with sex trafficking and violation of the TVPA. J.P.
7:17
Speaker 1: Morgan was well aware that there were public allegations that
7:21
Speaker 1: his illegal conduct was facilitated by several named co-conspirators. The
7:27
Speaker 1: filing continues, but J.P. Morgan, concealed from the federal government,
7:31
Speaker 1: its numerous cash payments to those co-conspirators. And also, let's
7:36
Speaker 1: not forget the structuring. We know that there was a
7:39
Speaker 1: lot of structuring going on within the Epstein enterprise. So
7:44
Speaker 1: I'm guessing that was happening at JP Morgan in some
7:48
Speaker 1: form as well. JP Morgan continued its affirmative conduct of
7:53
Speaker 1: allowing Epstein to access cash so that he could make
7:56
Speaker 1: those cash payments to his co-conspirators with knowledge and that
8:01
Speaker 1: such cash transactions did not produce a clear paper trail.
8:05
Speaker 1: That's the whole point. They want to make sure that
8:09
Speaker 1: this money is untraceable. What, they want to pay taxes?
8:12
Speaker 1: You think they care about April 15th, April 18th this year,
8:15
Speaker 1: but you think they give a shit about tax time?
8:18
Speaker 1: They're not going to have any liability, but you better
8:21
Speaker 1: make sure you report that handbag you sold on Etsy.
8:25
Speaker 1: The U.S. Virgin Islands argues that the investment bank allowed
8:28
Speaker 1: Epstein and his associates to make large withdrawals of cash
8:32
Speaker 1: so that his sex trafficking ring would escape the detection
8:35
Speaker 1: of federal law enforcement and prosecuting agencies. The territory's attorney
8:41
Speaker 1: general sued JPMorgan in December, weeks after two survivors of
8:45
Speaker 1: Epstein filed lawsuits against the financial giant and Deutsche Bank.
8:50
Speaker 1: The plaintiffs in the trio of related cases argue the
8:54
Speaker 1: banks profited off of Epstein's trafficking scheme. Well, they're not wrong.
8:58
Speaker 1: They certainly did. Everybody had their hand in the pie.
9:02
Speaker 1: Everybody was getting rich, and everybody was benefiting off of
9:06
Speaker 1: the ill-gotten gains of Mr. Scumbag McGee. Last week, the
9:12
Speaker 1: Attorney General issued subpoenas to several wealthy men for communications
9:16
Speaker 1: related to the bank and Epstein. The Wall Street Journal
9:20
Speaker 1: reported that the group included Google billionaire Sergey Brin, Hyatt
9:24
Speaker 1: Hotel's executive chairman, Thomas Pritzker, media and real estate billionaire
9:29
Speaker 1: Mortimer Zuckerman, and former talent agent Michael Ovitz. JPMorgan Chase
9:36
Speaker 1: has denied any wrongdoing in connection to Epstein and sought
9:40
Speaker 1: to have the lawsuit dismissed. A federal judge, however, ruled
9:44
Speaker 1: that the cases can proceed. In a motion to dismiss,
9:48
Speaker 1: the bank called the U.S. Virgin Islands complaint a masterclass
9:51
Speaker 1: in deflection, that seeks to hold JPMC responsible for not
9:56
Speaker 1: sleuthing out Epstein's crimes over a decade ago. Yet. USVI
10:01
Speaker 1: had access at the time to the same information, allegations,
10:05
Speaker 1: and rumors about Epstein on which it alleges JPMC should
10:10
Speaker 1: have acted. The bank's attorney stated in the filing, Indeed,
10:14
Speaker 1: as a law enforcement agency, USVI had access to much more,
10:18
Speaker 1: along with the investigative advantage of physical proximity to Epstein's crimes.
10:23
Speaker 1: And look, they're not wrong about that. I've said that
10:26
Speaker 1: from the beginning about the U.S. Virgin Islands. I know
10:29
Speaker 1: there's people out here that think the U.S. Virgin Islands
10:32
Speaker 1: is doing a great job and all of that. And great, fine.
10:36
Speaker 1: I'll certainly acknowledge that getting these people to sit down
10:39
Speaker 1: for depositions is fantastic. But their motivations, let's be clear,
10:44
Speaker 1: are all financial. The U.S. Virgin Islands is hoping to
10:48
Speaker 1: get more money out of all of this. And I
10:50
Speaker 1: would think that if the U.S. Virgin Islands was serious,
10:54
Speaker 1: we would see not just civil charges here, but we'd
10:57
Speaker 1: see criminal charges as well. And so far, we haven't
11:01
Speaker 1: seen any of that. So as far as that's concerned,
11:05
Speaker 1: the bank is not wrong. But two things can be
11:08
Speaker 1: wrong at the same time. And I think that's certainly
11:11
Speaker 1: the case here. And in my opinion, anyway, both entities,
11:15
Speaker 1: the U.S. Virgin Islands and J.P. Morgan, were both complicit
11:19
Speaker 1: in enabling Jeffrey Epstein. All right, folks, that's going to
11:23
Speaker 1: do it for this one. All of the information that
11:25
Speaker 1: goes with the episode can be found in the description box.
11:29
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. The U.S. Virgin Islands
11:35
Speaker 1: is looking to amend their lawsuit against J.P. Morgan. And
11:39
Speaker 1: they're looking to add an obstruction charge to the other
11:43
Speaker 1: allegations that they have already leveled at the banking giant.
11:48
Speaker 1: So today, we have an article from the St. Thomas Source.
11:51
Speaker 1: And we're going to get caught up on what's going
11:53
Speaker 1: on with the lawsuit. So, let's just get right to it. Headline,
11:58
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands Seeks New Charge Against J.P. Morgan Over Epstein Dealings.
12:04
Speaker 1: This article was authored by Cian Cobb. The VI Attorney
12:09
Speaker 1: General's Office is seeking to amend its complaint against JPMorgan
12:13
Speaker 1: Chase to add a charge that the bank obstructed enforcement
12:18
Speaker 1: of the Federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act in its business
12:21
Speaker 1: dealings with the late disgraced financier, pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. Well, yeah,
12:26
Speaker 1: that's exactly what they were doing. Now, are they going
12:29
Speaker 1: to be able to prove it in a court of law?
12:31
Speaker 1: That's debatable, but that's exactly what was going on. The
12:36
Speaker 1: thing is, these guys are well adept at protecting their
12:40
Speaker 1: own interests, right? And they'll make sure that layer after
12:43
Speaker 1: layer of protection is woven into their operation so that
12:47
Speaker 1: they never get nailed. And if they do, they'll have
12:49
Speaker 1: plausible deniability. Just look at what Jamie Dimon's doing right now.
12:54
Speaker 1: Just look at what Jess Daly's doing right now. Nobody
12:57
Speaker 1: ever accepting responsibility when things go left. The strategy is
13:01
Speaker 1: let's just blame everybody else and hope to cause enough
13:04
Speaker 1: confusion that everything just dies down with a fine. Because
13:07
Speaker 1: that's what they're looking for. They want to pay some
13:10
Speaker 1: money and get rid of all of this. That's the
13:13
Speaker 1: end goal for JP Morgan. That's the end goal for
13:16
Speaker 1: Deutsche Bank. And that's the end goal for Epstein's estate.
13:20
Speaker 1: They don't want any of the information to see the
13:22
Speaker 1: light of day. They want to pay out a few
13:24
Speaker 1: bucks and have everything go away. JPMorgan opposed the motion
13:28
Speaker 1: in a response on Tuesday, saying the government missed the
13:31
Speaker 1: court's January 11th deadline to further amend its complaint and
13:36
Speaker 1: lacks standing to do so in its parents' patriotic capacity,
13:40
Speaker 1: under which a state has third-party standing to bring a
13:43
Speaker 1: lawsuit when it implicates its interests for the well-being of
13:47
Speaker 1: its citizens. The V.I. government alleges that JPMorgan's obstruction directly
13:53
Speaker 1: approximately and foreseeably harmed women and girls in the Virgin
13:58
Speaker 1: Islands by directly resulting in them being caused to engage
14:02
Speaker 1: in commercial sex acts and in other ways. The filings
14:07
Speaker 1: are the latest in a flurry of activity in the case,
14:10
Speaker 1: including a third-party suit by J.P. Morgan against its former executive,
14:14
Speaker 1: James Jess Daly, asking the New York court, to make
14:18
Speaker 1: him pay if the plaintiffs prevail in their suits against
14:22
Speaker 1: the bank. And again, look, it's always going to be
14:24
Speaker 1: somebody else's fault. Nobody's ever going to step up and
14:28
Speaker 1: take responsibility for what happened here. It's never going to happen.
14:32
Speaker 1: If you're waiting for people in the financial sector to
14:34
Speaker 1: ever take responsibility for their bullshit, you're going to be
14:38
Speaker 1: waiting for a long time. Staley handled Epstein's 50 plus
14:42
Speaker 1: accounts End is at the center of the government's complaint
14:46
Speaker 1: and another brought by an anonymous Epstein survivor, Jane Doe No. 1,
14:51
Speaker 1: who has also filed a suit against Deutsche Bank, where
14:54
Speaker 1: Epstein took his business after Staley moved on to Blue
14:58
Speaker 1: Mountain Capital in 2013 and then to Barclays Bank in 2015.
15:04
Speaker 1: The cases have been consolidated by U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff.
15:11
Speaker 1: and we know that Judge Rakoff is really not a
15:14
Speaker 1: big fan of Wall Street in the first place. So
15:17
Speaker 1: hopefully his tolerance for shenanigans from J.P. Morgan and Deutsche
15:22
Speaker 1: Bank will be at a minimum. The suits allege that J.P.
15:26
Speaker 1: Morgan ignored red flags concerning Epstein, his accounts, and Staley's
15:30
Speaker 1: close relationship with the wealthy financier, pedophile, a convicted sex
15:35
Speaker 1: offender whose primary residence was Little St. James, his private
15:40
Speaker 1: island estate located, off of St. Thomas. Epstein was found
15:44
Speaker 1: dead by apparent suicide in August of 2019 in a
15:48
Speaker 1: New York City jail cell where he was being held
15:52
Speaker 1: on federal human trafficking charges. Those charges stemmed from investigations
15:58
Speaker 1: into his controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in
16:03
Speaker 1: Florida under which he pled guilty to state charges of
16:08
Speaker 1: soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. despite evidence that
16:13
Speaker 1: dozens more girls were involved. He served 13 months in
16:16
Speaker 1: a work release program at the office of a foundation
16:19
Speaker 1: he started, made payments to victims, and became a registered
16:23
Speaker 1: sex offender. Well, not in New Mexico, he didn't. He
16:27
Speaker 1: certainly wasn't a registered sex offender there. And as far
16:30
Speaker 1: as what went down in Florida, as far as the
16:33
Speaker 1: non-prosecution agreement... Hopefully, we're going to learn a little bit
16:36
Speaker 1: more about that because it looks like the grand jury documents,
16:40
Speaker 1: the transcripts, are going to be released. And that'll give
16:43
Speaker 1: us a window into the process and into what happened
16:47
Speaker 1: inside of that room. Considering they only brought one witness
16:50
Speaker 1: up against Jeffrey Epstein and his friends, I would like
16:54
Speaker 1: an answer as to why. Considering there were dozens of
16:57
Speaker 1: girls who had come forward and brought allegations, why is
17:01
Speaker 1: it that only one girl was brought up as a
17:04
Speaker 1: witness to the grand jury. So there's just so many
17:07
Speaker 1: things that need to be explained still after all of
17:11
Speaker 1: these years that still have not been explained. Staley exchanged
17:16
Speaker 1: approximately 1,200 emails with Epstein from his JP Morgan email
17:20
Speaker 1: account between 2008 and 2013, none of which were flagged
17:25
Speaker 1: in connection with risk reviews of the financier pedophile's accounts,
17:30
Speaker 1: according to the USVI's complaints. The V.I. government has alleged
17:34
Speaker 1: that those emails included photos of young women in provocative poses,
17:39
Speaker 1: discussed Epstein's provision of services to Staley during his travel
17:43
Speaker 1: to Little St. James and elsewhere on dates that closely
17:47
Speaker 1: correspond with Epstein's payments to the same young woman from
17:51
Speaker 1: his J.P. Morgan accounts, and discussed young women or girls
17:55
Speaker 1: procured by Epstein using the names of Disney princesses. As
18:00
Speaker 1: if they couldn't get more vile, right? Let's use the
18:02
Speaker 1: name of princesses from little kid stories, you bunch of sick,
18:06
Speaker 1: disgusting degenerates. For his part, Staley on Thursday filed a
18:11
Speaker 1: motion to have his case heard separately, citing an inability
18:15
Speaker 1: to comply with the court's deadlines for discovery and the
18:18
Speaker 1: trial date of October 23rd. JP Morgan opposed that request
18:23
Speaker 1: in a reply on Friday. And we talked a little
18:26
Speaker 1: bit about that last week and how the U.S. Virgin Islands,
18:30
Speaker 1: they don't want the trial split. They want Jess Daly
18:33
Speaker 1: and JP Morgan on the hook together at the same time.
18:37
Speaker 1: A case for a second count. In an order on
18:41
Speaker 1: March 20th, Judge Rakoff said count one of the Virgin
18:45
Speaker 1: Island government's first amended complaint that JP Morgan knowingly benefited
18:50
Speaker 1: from participating in a sex trafficking venture in violation of
18:54
Speaker 1: the Federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, or TVPA, would remain,
19:00
Speaker 1: but dismiss two counts under the Virgin Islands Criminally Influenced
19:04
Speaker 1: and Corrupt Organizations Act, otherwise known as SECO, and another
19:09
Speaker 1: under the Territories Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
19:15
Speaker 1: In its motion to file a second amended complaint on Monday,
19:18
Speaker 1: the VI government announced Now seeks to add account that
19:21
Speaker 1: the bank obstructed enforcement of the TVPA, noting that the
19:25
Speaker 1: judge in his March order allowed that charge to stand
19:29
Speaker 1: in those suit against JP Morgan. So what they're doing
19:33
Speaker 1: basically is piggybacking off of the other allegation in the
19:37
Speaker 1: other lawsuit. because the judge has already allowed that. So
19:41
Speaker 1: it's a pretty shrewd move from the Virgin Islands and
19:45
Speaker 1: one that is probably going to see them hit some
19:47
Speaker 1: pay dirt because the courts and judges will they love precedent.
19:51
Speaker 1: And with Judge Rakoff already ruling in the other case
19:54
Speaker 1: that it can go forward, it would make sense that
19:56
Speaker 1: he would give the nod here to this amended lawsuit
19:59
Speaker 1: filed by the Virgin Islands. The bank argues that the
20:03
Speaker 1: government is belatedly piggybacking on those complaints. Well, that's how
20:07
Speaker 1: it works. When new information is provided, we go back
20:10
Speaker 1: and we amend our complaint. I don't see JP Morgan
20:13
Speaker 1: having any kind of tenable ground here to defend what
20:17
Speaker 1: they're saying. The USVI's motion for leave to amend comes
20:21
Speaker 1: far too late, according to JP Morgan's reply. It provided 100,000
20:26
Speaker 1: pages of documents in 2021 when subpoenaed in the USVI's
20:31
Speaker 1: lawsuit against Epstein's estate, which was settled in December for
20:35
Speaker 1: 105 million dollars. then was contacted by the government with
20:40
Speaker 1: suggestions the bank may have violated the Territory SECO Act,
20:44
Speaker 1: it said. JPMC was in the process of explaining to
20:48
Speaker 1: USVI why those dismissed allegations lacked merit when it was
20:52
Speaker 1: sued by Jane Doe 1 for alleged violations of the
20:55
Speaker 1: TVPA and now a consolidated case. USVI then followed Doe's
21:01
Speaker 1: lead following suit in this court alleging, for the first time,
21:05
Speaker 1: a TVPA violation. The reply stated now months after this
21:10
Speaker 1: court's January 11th, 2023 deadline to file an amended complaint.
21:15
Speaker 1: USVI once again tries to jump on the bandwagon. This
21:20
Speaker 1: is an inordinate delay for which USVI has not met
21:23
Speaker 1: its burden to satisfactorily explain. The bank stated saying the
21:28
Speaker 1: government had the same facts for its proposed new claim
21:31
Speaker 1: when it filed its initial complaint on December 27th and
21:35
Speaker 1: its first amended complaint. on January 10th. So they're contending
21:39
Speaker 1: that this is just a piggyback, and it is. But
21:43
Speaker 1: I think that Judge Rakoff is going to allow it
21:45
Speaker 1: to move forward. At the very least, USVI should have
21:49
Speaker 1: sought leave to amend immediately after January 13th, 2023, when
21:55
Speaker 1: Doe asserted her claim alleging obstruction of the TVPA. Yet
22:00
Speaker 1: USVI inexplicably waited months while JPMC's motion to dismiss was
22:06
Speaker 1: briefed and argued, before it sought to assert its copycat claim. Indeed,
22:11
Speaker 1: USVI waited to piggyback on Doe's obstruction claim until the
22:15
Speaker 1: court's denial of JPMC's motion to dismiss that count in Doe.
22:21
Speaker 1: USVI has offered no satisfactory explanation for its months-long delay,
22:26
Speaker 1: according to the reply, loopholes and technicalities. That's what it
22:30
Speaker 1: comes down to. These people never want to answer for anything.
22:33
Speaker 1: So it'll be, oh, it wasn't filed correctly. It wasn't
22:37
Speaker 1: filed soon enough. And they'll always tiptoe around the real
22:40
Speaker 1: issue here. And the issue is J.P. Morgan was financially
22:45
Speaker 1: backing Jeffrey Epstein and they were enabling his bullshit. The V.I.
22:50
Speaker 1: government asserts in its 43 page motion that because the
22:54
Speaker 1: additional claim is based on the same alleged facts in
22:57
Speaker 1: its first amended complaint. It does not either require JP
23:00
Speaker 1: Morgan to expend additional resources on discovery or trial preparation
23:06
Speaker 1: or delay the resolution of this action. It also notes
23:10
Speaker 1: that Doe already is litigating the obstruction claim based on
23:14
Speaker 1: the same alleged facts in her case that is scheduled
23:17
Speaker 1: for a consolidated trial with this case. Moreover, the government
23:22
Speaker 1: alleges that within three days of the judge's March 20th
23:25
Speaker 1: order dismissing its SECO claim but upholding Doe's TVPA obstruction claim,
23:31
Speaker 1: it asked JP Morgan's consent to amend to conform its
23:35
Speaker 1: remaining TVPA claim with Doe's remaining TVPA claims based on
23:40
Speaker 1: the same fact allegations. The bank refused, it said, so
23:44
Speaker 1: the USVI has sought leave of the court. The government
23:48
Speaker 1: thus acted with diligence. Moreover, even if it had not,
23:52
Speaker 1: it still should be granted leave to amend because J.P.
23:55
Speaker 1: Morgan cannot show prejudice, according to the government's memorandum of law,
24:00
Speaker 1: in support of the second amended complaint. So it's going
24:04
Speaker 1: to be a back and forth affair here, and both
24:06
Speaker 1: sides are going to look to press the issue, right?
24:08
Speaker 1: The question is, which side is going to press the
24:11
Speaker 1: right issue with the judge? Some new details. The government's
24:16
Speaker 1: latest motion, while still heavily redacted, contains some new information,
24:21
Speaker 1: including J.P. Morgan's 2011 review of Epstein's accounts that noted,
24:26
Speaker 1: A few news stories during 2010 connects Jeffrey Epstein to
24:30
Speaker 1: human trafficking. The coverage team all met to discuss the
24:33
Speaker 1: situation and agreed to enhance monitoring and document a discussion
24:38
Speaker 1: with the client. They called on none other than Staley
24:41
Speaker 1: to do so, according to the motion, who discussed the
24:44
Speaker 1: topic with Jeffrey Epstein, who replied there was no truth
24:48
Speaker 1: to the allegations, no evidence, and was not expecting any problems.
24:53
Speaker 1: We will continue to monitor the accounts and cash usage
24:56
Speaker 1: closely going forward. Yeah, they did a good job at that, huh?
24:59
Speaker 1: Considering all of these alleged victims and survivors got money
25:04
Speaker 1: from Jeffrey Epstein's bank accounts as he was paying them off.
25:08
Speaker 1: So yeah, they did a great job with monitoring what
25:11
Speaker 1: Epstein was up to and what his account was up to.
25:15
Speaker 1: In March of 2011, J.P. Morgan's Global Corporate Security Division
25:20
Speaker 1: reported that numerous articles detail various law enforcement agencies investigating
25:26
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein for allegedly participating directly or indirectly in child
25:30
Speaker 1: trafficking and molesting underage girls. Jeffrey Epstein has settled a
25:35
Speaker 1: dozen civil lawsuits, out of court from his victims regarding
25:39
Speaker 1: solicitation for an undisclosed amount, according to the government's motion.
25:43
Speaker 1: So they all knew, this is what I've been talking about.
25:46
Speaker 1: JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, the government, everybody knew what he
25:49
Speaker 1: was doing and nobody lifted a finger to stop him. Additionally,
25:54
Speaker 1: it claims, the bank's anti-money laundering director in August 2011
25:59
Speaker 1: flagged an account relating to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former companion, co-conspirator,
26:04
Speaker 1: general all around scuzzbag, fellow child abuser and bipedal serpent,
26:09
Speaker 1: who in 2021 was sentenced to 20 years in prison
26:12
Speaker 1: for conspiring with him to sexually abuse minors. Maxwell wanted
26:16
Speaker 1: to set up an account for her personal recruitment consulting business.
26:20
Speaker 1: It says in an internal email, JP Morgan's AML director asked,
26:25
Speaker 1: what does she mean by personal recruitment? Are you sure
26:28
Speaker 1: this will have nothing to do with Jeffrey? If you
26:31
Speaker 1: want to proceed, I suggest that we flag this as
26:34
Speaker 1: a high risk client. They knew she was high risk.
26:37
Speaker 1: They flagged her as high risk and continued to do
26:40
Speaker 1: business with her. Because again, profits over people when it
26:44
Speaker 1: comes to the banks. Despite these communications, the bank did
26:48
Speaker 1: not terminate its relationship with Epstein until 2013, the government asserts.
26:54
Speaker 1: The frequency of Epstein's payments and the fact that the
26:57
Speaker 1: vast majority of account activity was payments to women and
27:01
Speaker 1: cash withdrawals rather than business activity should have been enough
27:04
Speaker 1: to trigger action. The motion states, yeah, there's checks and
27:08
Speaker 1: balances that are supposed to be in place at a
27:10
Speaker 1: financial institution to stop shit like this from happening. But
27:14
Speaker 1: when you have everybody in on it, all the bosses,
27:17
Speaker 1: all the head honchos, well, what are you going to do?
27:21
Speaker 1: Yet even as late as May 2013, mere months before J.P.
27:25
Speaker 1: Morgan terminated Epstein's account, J.P. Morgan provided lines of credit
27:29
Speaker 1: to Epstein of up to $ 50 million, it says. The
27:33
Speaker 1: motion also offers additional details regarding Staley's communications with Epstein.
27:39
Speaker 1: In an email, it says the married father of two
27:41
Speaker 1: daughters sent to Epstein on November 1st, 2009, when Epstein
27:46
Speaker 1: was incarcerated and Staley was presumably visiting little St. James,
27:52
Speaker 1: he wrote, So when all hell breaks loose and the
27:54
Speaker 1: world is crumbling, I will come here and be at peace. Presently,
27:59
Speaker 1: I'm in the hot tub with a glass of white wine.
28:02
Speaker 1: This is an amazing place. Truly amazing. Next time we're together,
28:07
Speaker 1: I owe you much. And I deeply appreciate our friendship.
28:10
Speaker 1: I have few that are so profound. And imagine this idiot,
28:14
Speaker 1: Jeff Staley, is trying to distance himself. Bro, you wrote
28:17
Speaker 1: this email. Nobody snuck into your house, stole your blackberry,
28:21
Speaker 1: and popped off this email. Please stop with the bullshit.
28:25
Speaker 1: On December 4th, 2009, Staley told Epstein via email, I
28:29
Speaker 1: realized the danger in sending this email, but it was
28:33
Speaker 1: great to be able, today, to give it to you
28:35
Speaker 1: in New York City. A long, heartfelt hug, according to
28:39
Speaker 1: the motion. Imagine, I don't know you very well, but
28:41
Speaker 1: I can't wait to come to your island, and I
28:43
Speaker 1: can't wait to hug you, and thank you so much
28:45
Speaker 1: for everything, Jeffrey. Give me a break. The next day,
28:50
Speaker 1: Epstein wrote to Staley, you were with Larry, and I
28:53
Speaker 1: had to put up with, and attached a picture of
28:56
Speaker 1: a young woman. Staley quipped, Don't tell me a French wine.
28:59
Speaker 1: Epstein replied, Always thoughts of alcohol, the motion states. And
29:04
Speaker 1: that's funny he says he was with Larry, huh? I'm
29:06
Speaker 1: guessing Larry Summers. On December 20th, 2009, the government says
29:12
Speaker 1: Epstein sent an email to Staley that was blank except
29:15
Speaker 1: for a picture of a young woman. On January 15th, 2010,
29:18
Speaker 1: Staley emailed Epstein, referring to Little St. James. Arrived at
29:24
Speaker 1: your harbor? Someday we have to do this together, according
29:28
Speaker 1: to the motion. In July 2010, Staley sent an email
29:32
Speaker 1: to Epstein saying, maybe they're tracking you. That was fun.
29:36
Speaker 1: Say hi to Snow White, the motion states. Epstein responds,
29:40
Speaker 1: what character would you like next? When Staley said Beauty
29:43
Speaker 1: and the Beast, Epstein replied, well, one side is available.
29:48
Speaker 1: Both J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank have denied wrongdoing, with J.P.
29:52
Speaker 1: Morgan stating that the V.I. government's claims against it strain credulity. Look,
29:59
Speaker 1: we all know what those emails meant. Come on. And
30:02
Speaker 1: we all know that Jess Daly, according to his own
30:04
Speaker 1: words in these emails, was enjoying the fruits of Jeffrey
30:08
Speaker 1: Epstein's disgusting enterprise. So, Jess Daly, your bitch ass is
30:13
Speaker 1: now on the clock. All right, folks, that's going to
30:17
Speaker 1: do it for this one. All of the information that
30:19
Speaker 1: goes with the episode can be found in the description box.
30:24
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
30:30
Speaker 1: In this episode, we're going to talk a little more
30:31
Speaker 1: about the J.P. Morgan lawsuit down in the United States
30:35
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands and how J.P. Morgan knew that Jeffrey Epstein
30:40
Speaker 1: purchased a 14-year-old girl and paid her 600 grand. Not
30:44
Speaker 1: only that, he also had her housed in the building
30:48
Speaker 1: on 66th Street down in Manhattan. And we all know
30:51
Speaker 1: what was going on in that building from countless people
30:54
Speaker 1: who lived through it. And it doesn't take a rocket
30:57
Speaker 1: scientist To figure out who they're talking about. When they're
31:01
Speaker 1: talking about a 14 year old girl. Who was sold
31:04
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein. We all know that that's Nadia Marcinkova.
31:07
Speaker 1: And we all know the tragedy of her tale. And
31:10
Speaker 1: obviously J.P. Morgan knew as well. So today's article is
31:14
Speaker 1: from the Inside Edition. And the headline. Lawsuit alleges J.P.
31:18
Speaker 1: Morgan knew Jeffrey Epstein. Reportedly bought and housed a 14
31:22
Speaker 1: year old girl. And he paid her 600 grand. This
31:26
Speaker 1: article was authored by Chris. The complaint filed in connection
31:32
Speaker 1: with a lawsuit against J.P. Morgan by the Attorney General
31:35
Speaker 1: of the U.S. Virgin Islands alleges that at least 20
31:39
Speaker 1: individuals paid through J.P. Morgan accounts were victims of trafficking
31:44
Speaker 1: and sexual assault. Well, that was the account that Epstein
31:47
Speaker 1: was using to piece people off their hush money after
31:50
Speaker 1: he was done abusing them, have them sign, you know,
31:53
Speaker 1: maybe an NDA or whatever. But in most cases, it
31:56
Speaker 1: was just a payoff. And then Epstein would use that
31:59
Speaker 1: as his cover. Oh, they were prostitutes. I paid them. So?
32:03
Speaker 1: They were prostitutes. What are you talking about? I didn't
32:05
Speaker 1: traffic anybody. And the sad part is, there's some people
32:08
Speaker 1: out there that actually bought that shit. News articles about
32:12
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein purchasing a 14-year-old girl from Europe were allegedly
32:16
Speaker 1: included in JP Morgan's due diligence reports about the pedophile,
32:21
Speaker 1: according to an amended complaint filed in connection with a
32:24
Speaker 1: lawsuit against the bank by lawyers for the U.S. Virgin Islands.
32:29
Speaker 1: The complaint alleges that executives at JP Morgan should have
32:32
Speaker 1: known that the girl lived in a property owned by
32:35
Speaker 1: the pedophile, It then further alleges that the largest bank
32:39
Speaker 1: in the country transferred over $ 600, 000 from accounts controlled by
32:43
Speaker 1: Epstein into the girl's own personal JP Morgan account. And
32:47
Speaker 1: the reason that her account was at JP Morgan as
32:50
Speaker 1: well is so that they could control what was going
32:53
Speaker 1: on completely. End-to-end encryption, basically, right? From one end to
32:58
Speaker 1: the other, from our bank to our bank, just two
33:01
Speaker 1: different clients, and we'll keep everything nice and uniformed. And
33:05
Speaker 1: for years, they were able to get away with it.
33:07
Speaker 1: They were able to get away with all of these
33:10
Speaker 1: transfers to these different accounts that were being held by J.P.
33:13
Speaker 1: Morgan and overseen by Jess Daly. Like other women who
33:18
Speaker 1: received payments from Epstein, Jane Doe One listed Epstein's apartment
33:22
Speaker 1: on 66th Street in New York City as her address,
33:25
Speaker 1: which should have been a red flag to J.P. Morgan,
33:28
Speaker 1: reads the complaint obtained by Inside Edition Digital. Lawyers for
33:33
Speaker 1: the U.S. Virgin Islands filed a civil lawsuit against JPMorgan
33:36
Speaker 1: last year, writing in their initial complaint that the company
33:40
Speaker 1: turned a blind eye to evidence of human trafficking over
33:43
Speaker 1: more than a decade because of Epstein's own financial footprint
33:47
Speaker 1: and because of the deals and clients that Epstein brought
33:50
Speaker 1: and promised to bring to the bank. The recently filed
33:53
Speaker 1: amended complaint says that despite news reports identifying this woman
33:59
Speaker 1: as a possible victim of sex trafficking, Executives at J.P.
34:03
Speaker 1: Morgan allegedly referred to her in an internal document as
34:07
Speaker 1: Epstein's assistant or young lady he brought over from Prague
34:11
Speaker 1: or someplace like that. And when we're talking about this person,
34:16
Speaker 1: it's rather obvious who it is. I'm not going to
34:19
Speaker 1: state the name here because... It looks like she's the
34:22
Speaker 1: one who is filing this suit as Jane Doe number one. However,
34:26
Speaker 1: we did have a ruling from Judge Rakoff saying that
34:29
Speaker 1: the identity of the accuser will be revealed to the
34:32
Speaker 1: lawyers of J.P. Morgan. So we'll just continue to call
34:35
Speaker 1: her Jane Doe number one until there's something in the
34:38
Speaker 1: public sphere saying differently. That same internal document allegedly describes
34:44
Speaker 1: charges in New York, Palm Beach, and St. Thomas for lingerie,
34:49
Speaker 1: and other sexually explicit material, according to the complaint. Elsewhere,
34:54
Speaker 1: JPMorgan describes media reports referring to the fact that Epstein
34:58
Speaker 1: purchased her at age 14, says the complaint. She remained
35:02
Speaker 1: a customer of JPMorgan, and Epstein paid her more than $ 600, 000
35:06
Speaker 1: from his account at JPMorgan, including more than $ 165, 000 after
35:08
Speaker 1: Epstein's plea. And of course, that's hush money. Right. He
35:17
Speaker 1: has his plea deal, has the non-prosecution agreement drawn up,
35:21
Speaker 1: which really shouldn't even include this person because they were
35:24
Speaker 1: a minor who was coerced into all of this for
35:27
Speaker 1: a long time. But after that, when he has his
35:31
Speaker 1: plea deal and he gets taken care of, he starts
35:33
Speaker 1: piecing people off a few bucks as hush money. And
35:37
Speaker 1: then in turn, he can tell people, see, I paid them.
35:39
Speaker 1: They were prostitutes. And that was all part of his
35:42
Speaker 1: whack ass, bunk ass cover story. In court documents, J.P.
35:47
Speaker 1: Morgan says that it lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
35:51
Speaker 1: form a belief as to the truth of the allegations
35:54
Speaker 1: and therefore denies the allegations, including that any knowledge of
35:59
Speaker 1: the alleged victim residing at an apartment owned by Epstein
36:02
Speaker 1: should have been a red flag. In response to the $ 600, 000 payment,
36:07
Speaker 1: a lawyer for J.P. Morgan states that the allegation characterizes
36:12
Speaker 1: the contents of documents and respectfully denies refers to the
36:16
Speaker 1: court to those documents for a complete and accurate recitation
36:21
Speaker 1: of their contents. The complaint also alleges that top executives
36:26
Speaker 1: at the company were aware that Epstein had been convicted
36:29
Speaker 1: of soliciting an underage girl. Concerns about the risks that
36:33
Speaker 1: Epstein posed were well known, enough that numerous J.P. Morgan
36:37
Speaker 1: senior executives met in various groupings in July and October
36:42
Speaker 1: of 2008, January 2011, August 2011, and July 2013. The
36:43
Speaker 1: complaint claims, So they met all these times about Jeffrey Epstein,
36:53
Speaker 1: but nothing was ever done, and they had no idea
36:56
Speaker 1: who he was. That's what they want everybody to think,
36:59
Speaker 1: and that's the narrative that they're going to try and craft.
37:03
Speaker 1: The problem for them is, well, the problem for them
37:06
Speaker 1: is all of you, and how none of you are
37:08
Speaker 1: going to buy the bullshit that they're trying to sell you.
37:11
Speaker 1: That's what it really comes down to. Nobody's buying the
37:14
Speaker 1: narratives that have been carefully maintained and manicured by these
37:18
Speaker 1: people for all of these decades anymore. The complaint identifies
37:22
Speaker 1: several executives by name but does not elaborate on what
37:26
Speaker 1: each individual allegedly knew or discussed in the meetings mentioned.
37:31
Speaker 1: Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands v. J.P. Morgan, the
37:34
Speaker 1: second amended complaint. The newly amended complaint further alleges that
37:40
Speaker 1: members of the firm facilitated or participated in, directly or indirectly,
37:46
Speaker 1: the trafficking enterprise Epstein-Helmed. The investigation revealed that J.P. Morgan knowingly,
37:52
Speaker 1: negligently and unlawfully provided and pulled the levers through which
37:56
Speaker 1: recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the
38:00
Speaker 1: operation and concealment of the Epstein trafficking enterprise. They're not wrong.
38:06
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of other people who were involved
38:08
Speaker 1: as well. But unfortunately, nobody wants to drop a Rico
38:12
Speaker 1: on these fools and get a full accounting of what happened.
38:15
Speaker 1: Imagine if they did. Can you imagine what that day
38:18
Speaker 1: would look like down at the SDNY? All of these
38:21
Speaker 1: idiots being perp walked in, wearing some handcuffs, some nice
38:25
Speaker 1: sparkly jewelry. And then unfortunately, we'd have to wake up
38:28
Speaker 1: from our collective mushroom trip that we were on because
38:31
Speaker 1: that's never going to happen in the real world. More specifically,
38:37
Speaker 1: the complaint alleges that Epstein paid large sums of money
38:40
Speaker 1: to a number of female victims and enablers through his
38:43
Speaker 1: JP Morgan accounts. That's all factual. The complaint alleges that
38:47
Speaker 1: at least 20 individuals paid through JP Morgan accounts were
38:51
Speaker 1: victims of trafficking and sexual assault in Little St. James,
38:55
Speaker 1: New York, and or other Epstein properties. You notice they
38:59
Speaker 1: never talk about New Mexico? That's a big tell right there, folks.
39:03
Speaker 1: The fact that they never talk about New Mexico means
39:06
Speaker 1: we should be talking about New Mexico. Because 100%, without
39:10
Speaker 1: a doubt, some vile shit happened in New Mexico on
39:14
Speaker 1: the property of that Zorro Ranch. The complaint does not
39:17
Speaker 1: name any of these alleged victims or the alleged enablers
39:21
Speaker 1: who received payments, with the exception of Glenn Maxwell, who
39:24
Speaker 1: the complaint claims received $ 23 million in the span of
39:29
Speaker 1: just four years. from 1999 and 2002. Another woman, identified
39:35
Speaker 1: only as a recruiter given immunity through Epstein's non-prosecution agreement,
39:40
Speaker 1: received more than $ 728, 000 from Epstein's J.P. Morgan accounts, according
39:46
Speaker 1: to the complaint. My guess is Sarah Kellen Vickers. I
39:49
Speaker 1: can't prove that, but that sounds like a nice rounded
39:53
Speaker 1: amount that she'd be asking for, for her bullshit as
39:56
Speaker 1: far as being part of Epstein's scheme. And everybody knows
39:59
Speaker 1: she's living that high life, isn't she? With her race
40:02
Speaker 1: car husband, million dollar condos, and the rest of it.
40:06
Speaker 1: JP Morgan began doing business with Epstein as early as 1998,
40:11
Speaker 1: according to the complaint, managing approximately 55 accounts for him,
40:15
Speaker 1: which were worth hundreds of millions of dollars. JPMorgan parted
40:19
Speaker 1: with Epstein in 2013, keeping him on as a client
40:23
Speaker 1: for five years after he pleaded guilty to soliciting a
40:27
Speaker 1: minor in the state of Florida, according to the complaint.
40:30
Speaker 1: Epstein was arrested in 2019 on federal charges of sex
40:34
Speaker 1: trafficking minors in Florida and New York. He was found
40:38
Speaker 1: dead in a jail cell one month after his arrest.
40:42
Speaker 1: A medical examiner ruled his death a suicide. Yeah, we
40:46
Speaker 1: all have our doubts about that, don't we? JP Morgan
40:50
Speaker 1: facilitated and concealed wire and cash transactions that raised suspicion of,
40:55
Speaker 1: and were in fact part of, a criminal enterprise whose
40:58
Speaker 1: currency was the sexual servitude of dozens of women and
41:03
Speaker 1: girls in and beyond the Virgin Islands, the lawsuit filed
41:07
Speaker 1: by the U.S. Virgin Islands alleges. Human trafficking was the
41:11
Speaker 1: principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JP Morgan.
41:16
Speaker 1: JPMorgan did not respond to Inside Edition Digital's request for comment,
41:21
Speaker 1: but it has denied any wrongdoing and, in an answer
41:24
Speaker 1: to the lawsuit, the bank says it did not have
41:27
Speaker 1: any knowledge, constructive or otherwise, that a person under the
41:31
Speaker 1: age of 18 would be caused to engage in a
41:34
Speaker 1: commercial sex act. That filing... Also states that J.P. Morgan
41:39
Speaker 1: did not have knowledge, constructive or otherwise, that means of force,
41:43
Speaker 1: threats of force, fraud, coercion, or any combination of such
41:48
Speaker 1: means would be used to cause any person to engage
41:52
Speaker 1: in a commercial sex act. So that's what they say.
41:55
Speaker 1: That's what J.P. Morgan says in their answer to this filing.
41:59
Speaker 1: But they're going to have to answer in court why
42:02
Speaker 1: all of these accounts were kept with JP Morgan and
42:05
Speaker 1: why all of these intrabank transfers weren't monitored, flagged, and
42:10
Speaker 1: hit with SARS. They're going to have to answer for
42:12
Speaker 1: all of that. And if they can't, well, it's not
42:15
Speaker 1: going to go well for them. But we still have
42:17
Speaker 1: quite a bit of a way to go before we
42:19
Speaker 1: get even close to that point in this case. So
42:22
Speaker 1: we'll have to see what the new filings are that
42:25
Speaker 1: come in in the future. And we'll have to see
42:28
Speaker 1: how things continue to evolve as we approach the trial
42:32
Speaker 1: date in October. All right, folks, that's going to do
42:35
Speaker 1: it for this one. All of the information that goes
42:37
Speaker 1: with the episode can be found in the description box.