Latest / Masters in Business / Richmond Federal Reserve President and CEO Tom Barkin

Transcript

Richmond Federal Reserve President and CEO Tom Barkin · Masters in Business

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: This week on the podcast, another extra special guest Richmond
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: Federal Reserve President and CEO Tom Barkin. He's been a
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: member of the Richmond Fed since twenty eighteen. He is
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: also on the Federal Open Markets Committee and is responsible
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: for a variety of Richmond Fed technology and bank supervision. Previously,
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: Tom has spent thirty years at Mackenzie where eventually he
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: became chief Risk Officer and then chief Financial Officer. I
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: found this conversation absolutely fascinating. He is a super intelligent,
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: thoughtful guy, very well versed in business economics and monetary policy.
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: I think you will find this conversation to be both
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: timely and fascinating. With no further ado, my conversation with
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: FMC Committee member and President of the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank,
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: Tom Barkin.
• 1:14
  Speaker 3: Very thanks for having me here.
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: What a perfect resume and a perfect person to talk
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: about the state of the world today. Before we go there,
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: let's just dip into your background. You're a triple threat
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: bachelor's MBA and jd ole from Harvard. What was the
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: original career plan.
• 1:33
  Speaker 4: Well, it wasn't that. I grew up in Tampa, went
• 1:35
  Speaker 4: to a public school there, applied to a few Southern
• 1:38
  Speaker 4: schools and Harvard because it had a good name, and
• 1:41
  Speaker 4: I thought it was sort of a neat idea, and
• 1:44
  Speaker 4: then I got in, which was kind of a surprise.
• 1:46
  Speaker 4: And when I went there, I was going to be
• 1:48
  Speaker 4: a lawyer and I was going to major in mathematics.
• 1:52
  Speaker 4: And I took my freshman year math and that all
• 1:54
  Speaker 4: went great, and my software I ended up in a
• 1:56
  Speaker 4: class called basic algebra, one that was not basic and
• 2:00
  Speaker 4: was not in the algebra that I knew anything about.
• 2:02
  Speaker 4: And it turned out that half of that class had
• 2:05
  Speaker 4: been the US National Math team, and they had all
• 2:09
  Speaker 4: competed internationally and they knew stuff I didn't. And I
• 2:12
  Speaker 4: was at the time taking Introductor to Economics, which I
• 2:15
  Speaker 4: really liked because it combined history and politics and math
• 2:19
  Speaker 4: and economics. And so I moved my major into economics
• 2:23
  Speaker 4: and had a great experience as an economics major. Undergrad,
• 2:27
  Speaker 4: I was still going to go to law school, and
• 2:28
  Speaker 4: I applied to law school and got in, but a
• 2:32
  Speaker 4: bunch of my roommates were applying to business school, and
• 2:34
  Speaker 4: it felt to me like that was a neat way
• 2:36
  Speaker 4: to get a master's in something related to economics that
• 2:39
  Speaker 4: I was interested in. And so I applied also to
• 2:41
  Speaker 4: business school and got into that and then started that
• 2:43
  Speaker 4: program once into law school. In business school, I was
• 2:47
  Speaker 4: able to compare two sets of professions, one the law
• 2:51
  Speaker 4: and the second being going into business, and it just
• 2:53
  Speaker 4: felt like the second was much more vibrant, much more interesting,
• 2:56
  Speaker 4: learned a lot more, and so I made that transition.
• 2:58
  Speaker 4: But I wouldn't have made that transition if I hadn't
• 3:01
  Speaker 4: been an economics major. I wouldn't have made that transition.
• 3:03
  Speaker 4: If I hadn't applied to business school, I just wouldn't
• 3:05
  Speaker 4: have the confidence to do it.
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: So I know Wharton has like a joint CPA, JD
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: MBA program. Did you were you enrolled as a full
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: time JD and a full time MBA student at Harvard
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: or were these was this sort of a combined program.
• 3:19
  Speaker 4: It is a combined program. You take a year at
• 3:21
  Speaker 4: law school a year at business school in two years combined.
• 3:24
  Speaker 4: I didn't realize there was a program where you could
• 3:26
  Speaker 4: also get a CPA. Maybe that would have been a
• 3:27
  Speaker 4: third degree just for extra credit.
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: I believe that's Wharton. So you come out of Cambridge
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: with three degrees, what's the first first job you take.
• 3:38
  Speaker 3: I went to work in McKenzie. I mean that was.
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: Literally your first year. So you go to work in
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: McKenzie in eighty seven and you stay for thirty years.
• 3:47
  Speaker 4: Yeah, And I was lucky, lucky, lucky to go there.
• 3:50
  Speaker 4: I joined an office that had about twenty five people
• 3:53
  Speaker 4: in Atlanta. Felt like an entrepreneurial opportunity to build something,
• 3:57
  Speaker 4: made a lot of friends there, enjoyed the work, really
• 4:00
  Speaker 4: enjoyed my clients, and the opportunity to help a bunch
• 4:03
  Speaker 4: of great leaders improve the performance their organizations.
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: Fell in love with.
• 4:07
  Speaker 4: McKenzie people, smart, talented, idealistic, and the combination just worked
• 4:12
  Speaker 4: great for me.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: You've held a number of roles there, eventually becoming a
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: senior partner, but the two that are most fascinating and
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: relevant to your current situation is chief risk Officer and
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: chief financial officer. Tell us a little bit about the
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: career path to two very important roles at a very
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: important company.
• 4:34
  Speaker 4: Well, starting in ninety nine, I started leading the Atlanta office,
• 4:38
  Speaker 4: which eventually became the Southern offices of McKenzie. So from
• 4:41
  Speaker 4: Texas through Virginia. It was sort of our territory and
• 4:44
  Speaker 4: we had I don't remember the number sixty seventy eighty
• 4:47
  Speaker 4: partners plus another several hundred associates and we were serving
• 4:51
  Speaker 4: clients in that geography. So I'll point to that as
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: a role that I really enjoyed it in one where
• 4:56
  Speaker 4: I got to spend so much time with so many
• 4:58
  Speaker 4: business people about what was happening in their business and
• 5:01
  Speaker 4: opportunities for McKenzie to help. We worked our way through
• 5:05
  Speaker 4: nine to eleven. That was a very difficult time for
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: our business, and I think coming out of it, the
• 5:10
  Speaker 4: folks at McKenzie thought, you know, I knew how to
• 5:12
  Speaker 4: manage a bottom line and our office got through quite nicely.
• 5:15
  Speaker 4: And when a new managing partner was named around the
• 5:18
  Speaker 4: financial crisis, they asked me to be the CFO to
• 5:22
  Speaker 4: help navigate mckenzy through that, which I'm very pleased with
• 5:25
  Speaker 4: how well we navigated through that. I did that for
• 5:28
  Speaker 4: six years and then spent three years trying to help
• 5:31
  Speaker 4: institutionalize some risk processes at McKenzie, including a lot of
• 5:35
  Speaker 4: the stuff that has been done to defend against cyber
• 5:39
  Speaker 4: and in whatever role and there are others that I'm
• 5:41
  Speaker 4: not going to bore you with. You know, the opportunity
• 5:44
  Speaker 4: to try to take a partnership and influence it to
• 5:48
  Speaker 4: become better is a challenge and also a lot of fun.
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: That sounds really interesting. So you're at McKenzie for three decades.
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: How do you end up on the Richmond Federal Reserve.
• 6:03
  Speaker 4: First of all, I was very involved civically in Atlanta
• 6:05
  Speaker 4: and in lots of different organizations, and at some point
• 6:09
  Speaker 4: I met the president, my equivalent in Atlanta, who then
• 6:13
  Speaker 4: was Dennis Lockhart, who's a great guy, and Dennis at
• 6:16
  Speaker 4: some point invited me to join his board from so
• 6:18
  Speaker 4: from nine to fourteen I was on the board and
• 6:22
  Speaker 4: then eventually the chair of the board of the Atlanta Fed.
• 6:25
  Speaker 4: And I stepped down term limited, and three years later
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: I was in the process of leaving McKenzie. McKinsey is
• 6:31
  Speaker 4: a mandatory retirement age. I'm very young in my own mind,
• 6:34
  Speaker 4: but not that young at McKenzie, and I had signed
• 6:37
  Speaker 4: the papers and agreed to retire, and I got a
• 6:40
  Speaker 4: call from a head hunter suggesting that I interviewed for
• 6:43
  Speaker 4: the Richmond job, And of course I called Dennis and
• 6:46
  Speaker 4: asked if you thought this made sense, and you know,
• 6:48
  Speaker 4: he encouraged me to do it, and so for me,
• 6:51
  Speaker 4: it just seemed like a great opportunity to, well, let
• 6:55
  Speaker 4: me take something. I've really been impressed with the Atlanta
• 6:57
  Speaker 4: Fed from nine to fourteen, feder Reserve in general, navigating
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: to the financial crisis, all the innovations that happened in
• 7:05
  Speaker 4: the early twenty tens. It reawakened an interest in economics
• 7:09
  Speaker 4: that I'd had since being an undergrad. But I never
• 7:12
  Speaker 4: thought that that's a job I would do. It just
• 7:14
  Speaker 4: didn't occur to me until the combination of the headhunter
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: and Dennis encouraged me to do it, and then I
• 7:20
  Speaker 4: interviewed and was offered the job.
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: So maybe perhaps this is a touch of hindsight bias,
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: But thirty years at McKenzie Cybersecurity, Chief Risk Officer, chief
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: financial Officer, the dot com implosion September eleventh, the financial
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: crisis sounds like your tailor made to be sitting on
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: the Fed that just never popped into your into your mind, Like,
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: what was the moment that you said, oh, I have
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: skills that seemed to apply to this.
• 7:51
  Speaker 4: Yeah, you describe me as a very modest person. I'm
• 7:54
  Speaker 4: not sure, that's true, but I'll just say I'll just
• 7:58
  Speaker 4: say that I was so impressed with the grounding and
• 8:03
  Speaker 4: the experience of the people that make monetary policy that
• 8:08
  Speaker 4: it wouldn't have occurred to me that, you know, I
• 8:11
  Speaker 4: should go stick my hand up and do that. And
• 8:13
  Speaker 4: even when you walk into the room of the FOMC,
• 8:15
  Speaker 4: you've got nineteen people there, they're very impressive. Probably two
• 8:19
  Speaker 4: thirds are academic economists. They've spent their entire career working
• 8:24
  Speaker 4: and studying in that. And of course I had taken
• 8:26
  Speaker 4: four years of economics, you know, forty years well, I
• 8:29
  Speaker 4: guess thirty five years earlier, and so I think it
• 8:32
  Speaker 4: would have been, you know, pretty arrogant to imagine that
• 8:36
  Speaker 4: that would place. That was natural for me, now, you know,
• 8:39
  Speaker 4: when I got into the process and started thinking about it,
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: you know, I was able to articulate a model for
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: how I thought I could add value to the room.
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: And I think, you know, if your performance oriented or
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: even competitive, what you really want to do is add
• 8:52
  Speaker 4: value to whatever job you've got. And so for that job,
• 8:56
  Speaker 4: for this job, you know, I asked myself what could
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: I do that would be valuable? And what I thought
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: I can do and what I spend my days doing
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: is trying to understand what's actually happening on the ground
• 9:06
  Speaker 4: with businesses, because that's what I did for thirty years.
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: I think that's a differential skill within the FOMC, because
• 9:14
  Speaker 4: anyone can tell you they're raising prices or lowering prices,
• 9:17
  Speaker 4: but to understand why and how things are going to
• 9:20
  Speaker 4: play out, and to spend enough time with people and
• 9:22
  Speaker 4: feel comfortable enough with their businesses that you could understand
• 9:25
  Speaker 4: the context that is behind whatever choices they're making. I
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: think that is a place where I can add real value.
• 9:31
  Speaker 4: And I convince myself that, and I guess I convinced
• 9:33
  Speaker 4: the board of that as well.
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: You know, people often talk about how much they wish
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: the government was run more like a business, and for
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: better or worse, that doesn't always apply. But it really
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: feels like the Federal Reserve is sort of halfway between
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: a private sector entity and a full governmental agency, almost
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: has a foot in each camp. Tell us how your
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: private sector your experience helped to drive FED policy, and
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: especially at the Richmond Fed, how it affects just the
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: everyday operation of a large, influential central bank like that
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: regional central bank.
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: Well, let me start by saying. One of the things
• 10:17
  Speaker 4: that was very attractive to me about the Federal Reserve
• 10:19
  Speaker 4: when I got to know it in Atlanta was these
• 10:22
  Speaker 4: banks are private sector entities, which means you have, you know,
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: a value proposition to highly talented people who have freedom
• 10:30
  Speaker 4: to work hard and do what they know is right.
• 10:33
  Speaker 4: But in addition, you've got very mission oriented people. So
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: very talented and very mission oriented. That's a nice combination
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: for something that's working for the public interest. And so
• 10:44
  Speaker 4: that was definitely an attraction.
• 10:47
  Speaker 3: To me.
• 10:48
  Speaker 4: I'm not trying to mess that up, so I'm not
• 10:50
  Speaker 4: coming in and saying all right, now, you know, here's
• 10:52
  Speaker 4: what we're going to do. Because I was in the
• 10:54
  Speaker 4: private sector, you know, I'm actually I respect the institution
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: and trying to figure out how to operate within it
• 10:59
  Speaker 4: as opposed to disrupted and so operationally, the Richmond Fed
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: overseas technology for the system, and I oversely saw technology
• 11:09
  Speaker 4: in my old life, and so, you know, making sure
• 11:11
  Speaker 4: we're better and working better and delivering better. I think
• 11:13
  Speaker 4: we've done a great job in that. I'm also chairing
• 11:16
  Speaker 4: the committee that oversees payments within the Federal Reserve, which
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: is the one business the Federal Reserve runs and trying
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: to make that a good and even better business. Those
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: are there are places I bring my business skills to bear,
• 11:27
  Speaker 4: talent management, all all of that stuff. In addition, as
• 11:31
  Speaker 4: I said, I think, you know, being able to bring
• 11:35
  Speaker 4: some insight, for example, on how businesses are going to
• 11:39
  Speaker 4: behave in the context of volatility and tariff announcements, that's
• 11:44
  Speaker 4: something that I think I can bring. You know, my
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: business experience has a lot of benefit in the room,
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: and that's it's good to just say that you bring
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: that benefit, but I try to reinforce that by spending
• 11:54
  Speaker 4: literally five days a week in the market talking to
• 11:57
  Speaker 4: businesses throughout my district, trying to really dig into what's happening.
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: I think that's a place I can also add value.
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: So you joined the FED in twenty eighteen, and it
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: was a very consequential seven years. Q four of twenty eighteen,
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: people were very nervous about a recession. Market dropped about
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: twenty percent in the quarter, some of which was related
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: to tariff and do slowdowns back then twenty twenty obviously,
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: the pandemic once in a generation, maybe even once in
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: one hundred years event twenty twenty two. First, not only
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: is the fastest rate increase in modern memory. First time,
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: I want to say, since eighty eighty one eighty two,
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: we're both stocks and bonds down double digits. That was
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, and then twenty twenty five. Obviously, all
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: this volatility and Stuerman drang with tariffs. What is the
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: biggest occupier of your mental bandwidth? Is it the day
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: to day operations or is it all of these seemingly
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: unprecedented disruptions that just turn the whole world upside now,
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: whether it's just a quarter like it was in twenty eighteen,
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: or a couple of years like the pandemic.
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: Well, so I joked sometimes.
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: I was on the board of the Atlanta Fed from
• 13:17
  Speaker 4: nine to fifteen, and during that six year period, interest
• 13:21
  Speaker 4: rates did not change once. Nothing happened, right, And look
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: at where we've been here from you know, raising it
• 13:28
  Speaker 4: in twenty eighteen, to lowering it in twenty nineteen, to
• 13:30
  Speaker 4: really lowering it in twenty twenty, then to raising it
• 13:32
  Speaker 4: again in twenty twenty two, and then lowering it again.
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: Are you saying it's your fault since you joined the
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: FED everything went up?
• 13:37
  Speaker 4: Then I'll take whatever credit or fault you want. I
• 13:41
  Speaker 4: would say the thing I've been reflecting on is the
• 13:44
  Speaker 4: question of did we in our working careers just benefit
• 13:48
  Speaker 4: from a period that, with hindsight is an was an
• 13:51
  Speaker 4: unbelievably low volatility period. You know, the wall fell, while
• 13:56
  Speaker 4: there were conflicts globally, there weren't very many. Nine to
• 13:58
  Speaker 4: eleven felt like a big deal at the time, but
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: you know, Lehman Brothers was obviously a big deal.
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: But over a thirty year period, it's pretty calm.
• 14:08
  Speaker 4: And you know stat I like to throw out there
• 14:10
  Speaker 4: is in the twenty tens, inflation was between one and
• 14:14
  Speaker 4: two percent every single cycle.
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: We added jobs every month.
• 14:18
  Speaker 4: In the twenty tens, GDP was in the very narrow
• 14:20
  Speaker 4: range of sort of two to three percent. We just
• 14:23
  Speaker 4: had a very stable, long term expansion with very low inflation,
• 14:28
  Speaker 4: and that was a very friendly environment, you know, i'd
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: say for policymakers. But maybe that if you look at
• 14:33
  Speaker 4: you know, through the sands of time, that kind of
• 14:36
  Speaker 4: stability is not what you should expect. And so we've
• 14:39
  Speaker 4: had significant volatility, the pandemic obviously being example, the inflation
• 14:43
  Speaker 4: episode being another one, and maybe that's going to be
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: more like reality.
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: You know, it's so funny you say that we did
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: a study in house and looked at the fifteen year
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: period from the financial crisis forward. So somewhere in the
• 14:56
  Speaker 2: middle of last year was the third best fifteen year
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: rolling period on record. You have to look at the
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: fifteen years post World War Two and then the fifteen
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: years up until late ninety nine, which were eighteen and
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: seventeen percent a year, respectively. The fifteen year period ending
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: last year was sixteen percent annually. And all anybody did
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: was complain about or at least a lot of market
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: participants complained about the FED, complained about deficits, complained about
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: the economy. It's the single best decade and a half
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: in modern era for asset prices. So in the face
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: of that sort of you know, criticism of the FED
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: and carping about all sorts of policy, how do members
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: of the FMC. How do members of the FED respond
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: when the data says, hey, things are pretty good, but
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: the sentiment, which continues to just get worse and worse,
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: says things are terrible.
• 15:55
  Speaker 4: Well, I'd start, you know, to the people who complain
• 15:58
  Speaker 4: also by saying, we're given a priv by Congress, which
• 16:01
  Speaker 4: is the ability and the independence to set monetary policy
• 16:05
  Speaker 4: on behalf of the economy of this country, and we
• 16:07
  Speaker 4: take that very seriously. I do think part of the
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: trade there is that people on both sides get to
• 16:12
  Speaker 4: critique what we do, and that just is what it is.
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: And I think you just keep your head down and
• 16:18
  Speaker 4: do the job you've been assigned and you don't spend time,
• 16:20
  Speaker 4: you know, worrying about the critiques.
• 16:23
  Speaker 3: So that's that part of it.
• 16:25
  Speaker 4: In terms of uncertainty involved, I think in sentiments quite
• 16:29
  Speaker 4: pronounced now. I think business sentiment and consumer sentiment's different.
• 16:33
  Speaker 4: I mean, business sentiment feels to me like very tied
• 16:36
  Speaker 4: to outcomes. If businesses are highly uncertain, they're not going
• 16:39
  Speaker 4: to invest, they're not going to hire, they're going to
• 16:41
  Speaker 4: defer growth plans. We saw that in twenty nineteen, as
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: you referenced earlier. I think we're seeing that right now,
• 16:47
  Speaker 4: certainly the businesses I'm talking to. I've described it as
• 16:51
  Speaker 4: trying to drive through a really dense fog. It's hard
• 16:54
  Speaker 4: to put your foot on the gas because you don't
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: know where the next cliff is. You don't want to
• 16:58
  Speaker 4: put your foot on the break because you don't know
• 16:59
  Speaker 4: who's on you, and so the only rational strategy is
• 17:02
  Speaker 4: to pull over and put on the hazards. And that's
• 17:04
  Speaker 4: what I hear businesses doing, which is pulling and pulling
• 17:07
  Speaker 4: over the hazards, pulling over and putting on the hazards.
• 17:09
  Speaker 4: Now it's different on the consumer side. Historically, consumer sentiment
• 17:12
  Speaker 4: has been a leading indicator of consumer spending, but we
• 17:16
  Speaker 4: didn't see that two or three years ago when consumer
• 17:18
  Speaker 4: centerment got negative, and consumer centerence has got very negative
• 17:21
  Speaker 4: again recently. I think the reason we haven't seen that
• 17:24
  Speaker 4: is inflation. It turns out, I mean, we all knew
• 17:26
  Speaker 4: this in the seventies, but we've all relearned it in
• 17:28
  Speaker 4: the last three years. It turns out consumers really hate inflation.
• 17:31
  Speaker 4: Now it doesn't stop them from spending. You know, if
• 17:34
  Speaker 4: your wages go up and your prices go up, you
• 17:36
  Speaker 4: have the same spending capability, but you're just much less happy.
• 17:41
  Speaker 4: And that's what we've seen, and I think today we'll
• 17:44
  Speaker 4: see if we have more inflation. But I think the
• 17:47
  Speaker 4: kind of relentless noise about tariffs is leading people to
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: think that that's going to lead to higher prices, which
• 17:53
  Speaker 4: is leading people to be more negative about the expectations,
• 17:56
  Speaker 4: and you can see that in the expectations. Let's say
• 17:58
  Speaker 4: one year price expectations have elevated significantly, and that's what's
• 18:03
  Speaker 4: driving sentiment. But so far that doesn't seem to be
• 18:05
  Speaker 4: affecting spending on the consumer side. I think it does
• 18:08
  Speaker 4: on the business side.
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, very much. Businesses have to plan much longer term.
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: First of all, I love the foggy metaphor. Driving in
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: the fog is really perfect. But you mentioned inflation expectations,
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: and I always wonder does the FED put too much
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: emphasis on expectations, at least in the modern era. If
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: we look at twenty twenty one twenty twenty two, inflation
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: expectations were at their lowest just as inflation spiked, and
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: of course they were at their highest just as inflation
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: peaked in twenty two and began coming down. My experience
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: with sentiment is it's always backward looking. You ask people
• 18:48
  Speaker 2: how they feel about anything, the markets, the economy, inflation,
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: and they're always telling you here's what the past six
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: months have been like. Even if you say, what do
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: you see going forward? How much, how significant, how important
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: are inflation expectations to FOMC policy?
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: Well, I think the theory is very straightforward, which is
• 19:09
  Speaker 4: that if inflation expectations long term in particular, stay anchored,
• 19:14
  Speaker 4: then that means that, you know, businesses will quickly return
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: even after inflationary episode, to prior levels of price increases.
• 19:24
  Speaker 3: I really believe in it.
• 19:25
  Speaker 4: I mean, in my business experience, I think the expectations
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: of what inflation would be absolutely governed how business has behaved,
• 19:33
  Speaker 4: both in terms of their pricing and their wage setting.
• 19:36
  Speaker 4: You know, if you showed up at your retailer with
• 19:40
  Speaker 4: an eight percent price increase and inflation was two percent,
• 19:44
  Speaker 4: they would say, why are you doing that? And if
• 19:45
  Speaker 4: you didn't have the world's greatest reason, you weren't even.
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: Walking in the door.
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: And so I think, I think the concept of inflation
• 19:52
  Speaker 4: expectations is a very powerful concept. I really believe in it,
• 19:56
  Speaker 4: and I believe it's what happens in the world. What
• 20:00
  Speaker 4: I don't believe is that we have any good way
• 20:02
  Speaker 4: to measure it. And so, you know, you talked about
• 20:05
  Speaker 4: market based inflation expectation. There's a lot going on in
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: those market based expectations, including liquidity and a bunch of
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: other things, you know.
• 20:14
  Speaker 3: Survey based expectations.
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: It turns out you know, if you ask someone a
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: survey question and you bias it in any way, then
• 20:21
  Speaker 4: they end up with different biases, and different surveys have
• 20:24
  Speaker 4: different ways of managing that, and so I think it
• 20:27
  Speaker 4: really matters. But I don't think our metrics are very good.
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: And my shorthand, for whatever it's worth, is I think
• 20:35
  Speaker 4: there are two competing things in every business's mind, in
• 20:39
  Speaker 4: every consumer's mind about inflation. One is what is it today?
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: Because the best indicator of tomorrow is today. And the
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: second is do you trust the Federal return it to
• 20:49
  Speaker 4: two percent in the long term?
• 20:50
  Speaker 3: And it's almost that simple of a question.
• 20:52
  Speaker 4: You try And as long as you trust the Fed
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: in the long term and market expectations are reasonable proxy
• 20:57
  Speaker 4: for that, then I think what you should expect for
• 20:59
  Speaker 4: near term inflation is some combination of today versus tomorrow,
• 21:04
  Speaker 4: and you get there over time. And if the if
• 21:05
  Speaker 4: you go back to the eighties and nineties, after Volcar
• 21:07
  Speaker 4: and through green Span, you know, we didn't go to
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: two percent inflation in nineteen eighty six or eighty seven
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: or eighty eight. We were at four, and then we
• 21:14
  Speaker 4: were at three and a half, and then we're at three,
• 21:16
  Speaker 4: and then we're two and a half. I think you
• 21:18
  Speaker 4: get there over time. You don't get there quite as
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: quickly as sort of a purest model would suggest.
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: So let me get a little wonky with you, since
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: you brought up the two percent target. Former Federal Reserve
• 21:30
  Speaker 2: Vice Chairman Roger Ferguson, I believe, did a paper on
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: the two percent inflation target, and he was kind of
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: critical of it, saying it's a made up round number
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: that comes from New Zealand in the nineteen eighties. It's
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: not relevant to a modern era versus it was. But
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: to kind of flesh out his thoughts a little more, Hey,
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: the post financial crisis period, really, the post nine to
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: eleven period was driven in large part by very low
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: monetary policy, very low rates, and then the pandemic led
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: to the single biggest fiscal stimulus at least as a
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: percentage of GDP since World War Two. So we had
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: that regime change from monetary to fiscal. Is two percent
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: still the right target. We couldn't get up to two
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: percent during the twenty tens where deflation was a bigger concern.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: Now you have the Okay, admittedly the pig is mostly
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: through the python, but we still have all this fiscal
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: stimulus around is two percent? Like why two? Why not
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: two and a half or three?
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: So I would ask the first question is is it
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: a good idea to have a target? And I'd want
• 22:41
  Speaker 4: to make the case that it's a really good idea
• 22:43
  Speaker 4: to have a target, because it anchors the public in
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: terms of where you're trying to go, and it builds
• 22:49
  Speaker 4: commitment and credibility among the FMC that you'll take the
• 22:52
  Speaker 4: initiatives you need to take when you're absent from a target.
• 22:55
  Speaker 4: In terms of what should the target be, the original
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: debate in the nine was actually between zero and two.
• 23:02
  Speaker 4: Zero was price stability. That's price stability, right, and two
• 23:07
  Speaker 4: was an alternative that gave you a little bit of room.
• 23:09
  Speaker 4: Eventually they settled on to our predecessors, and as you
• 23:13
  Speaker 4: were suggesting, pretty much every central bank in the world
• 23:15
  Speaker 4: has settled onto and by the way, we've delivered to
• 23:19
  Speaker 4: or just around two for almost all of the last
• 23:21
  Speaker 4: thirty years. And so it doesn't strike me that it's
• 23:23
  Speaker 4: a ridiculous target. Is an achievable target, it's a global target.
• 23:28
  Speaker 4: It makes sense to people. By the way, you know,
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: we're at two point three percent. I think headline right, now,
• 23:34
  Speaker 4: so we're not even very far away from it, so
• 23:36
  Speaker 4: I see no reason to move the target. Of course,
• 23:39
  Speaker 4: you could argue about whether two is the right number,
• 23:42
  Speaker 4: two point two or one point eight or some other number. Also,
• 23:45
  Speaker 4: two things about that one is one of the reasons
• 23:47
  Speaker 4: why you go with two as opposed to zero is
• 23:49
  Speaker 4: you don't like deflation. Deflations when prices go down every
• 23:52
  Speaker 4: year and then no one wants to buy anything is
• 23:55
  Speaker 4: going to be cheaper tomorrow, and two gives you a
• 23:57
  Speaker 4: little bit of room against deflation. It's also the case
• 24:00
  Speaker 4: that there's some mismeasurement. Take encyclopedias for example. Let's assume
• 24:04
  Speaker 4: encyclopedias were in the index in the nineties. Well, they're
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: free today, they're on your phone, and so that's deflation
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: that doesn't show up in the numbers, and so it
• 24:12
  Speaker 4: just gives you a little bit of room there. So
• 24:14
  Speaker 4: that's why too, you know, you sort of said we're
• 24:16
  Speaker 4: not at two today. We weren't at two a decade ago.
• 24:20
  Speaker 4: And I think I personally do think of false precision
• 24:23
  Speaker 4: as being a concept worth considering here, which is I
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: definitely didn't criticize myself that much when we're at one
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: point eight. I mean, you're trying to get to two.
• 24:31
  Speaker 4: The economy is not something that you manage. So finally
• 24:34
  Speaker 4: that in each and every month of each and every
• 24:36
  Speaker 4: year inflation comes in in exactly too. That's something that
• 24:39
  Speaker 4: doesn't exist. Two's a target, and if you're off too
• 24:42
  Speaker 4: on the above or on the below, you try to
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: manage yourself toward it, and you recognize that you're not
• 24:47
  Speaker 4: always going to be right on it right.
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: It reminds me of the old joke economists use decimal
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: points to reveal they have a sense of humor.
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: So something has something has to make that case.
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: So let's pivot a little bit to the Richmond Federal Reserve.
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond District covers South Carolina,
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: North Carolina, Virginia, d C, West Virginia, and Maryland. That
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: seems like a fairly unique group of states, especially with
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: the nation's capital right in the middle. Tell us a
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: little bit about what makes that region so special.
• 25:25
  Speaker 4: So three things I like about it. One is DC
• 25:28
  Speaker 4: Metro unique. There's no other place in the country like that, obviously,
• 25:32
  Speaker 4: and all that's implied there. Second is we have nine
• 25:35
  Speaker 4: or ten i'll call them really fast growth New South regions, communities,
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: cities Charlotte, Greenville, Raleigh, Richmond, Northern Virginia. They're really very,
• 25:50
  Speaker 4: very vibrant, fast growing. You know, North and South Carolina,
• 25:53
  Speaker 4: for example, are two of the four fastest growing states
• 25:56
  Speaker 4: in terms of population in terms of housing growth over
• 25:58
  Speaker 4: the last several years. And then you've got a lot
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: of rural markets, and that would be you know, west
• 26:07
  Speaker 4: of the Appalachian part of the district in North Carolina,
• 26:10
  Speaker 4: West Virginia, and Western Virginia. But that would also include
• 26:13
  Speaker 4: up and down you know, I ninety five. There are
• 26:15
  Speaker 4: a lot of small towns there, and so I kind
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: of think about as three different economies, and I think
• 26:20
  Speaker 4: it's very interesting to be able to represent a community
• 26:24
  Speaker 4: with three so very different economies.
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: You know, you mentioned Charlotte. My office has we have
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: dozens of office across the country, but we have three hubs,
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: New York, Chicago, and Charlotte. And every time I visit Charlotte,
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: it feels like the city is twice the size it
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: was a year earlier. The area it's become a finance
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: center and a banking center. How do you look at
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: such a diverse area where some parts are a little
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: more rural, a little more sleepy, and growth is just
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: normal agricultural progression, and other areas are just absolute boom towns.
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: Well, the biggest thing I try to do is show
• 27:05
  Speaker 4: up in all of them.
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: And so you go to a lot of parts of
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: your district all the time.
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: Right everywhere.
• 27:11
  Speaker 4: And if you're bored on the website, they've even got
• 27:13
  Speaker 4: a map, kind of a ware's waldo. But no every
• 27:17
  Speaker 4: I mean, last week I was in Marion and Roanoke, Virginia.
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: Then I was in Arlington, Virginia. Then I was in
• 27:22
  Speaker 4: d C. And I'm trying to get into the big cities,
• 27:25
  Speaker 4: into the small towns, because you actually do hear about
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: the economy differently in big cities versus small towns. For example,
• 27:31
  Speaker 4: labor markets. You know, the the labor markets in the
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: small towns are unbelievably stressed still, and if you have
• 27:39
  Speaker 4: a national conversation, you say, hey, labor markets sort of
• 27:41
  Speaker 4: in balance unemployment's four point two percent, wage growth sort
• 27:45
  Speaker 4: of moderate. It's still the case in these small towns
• 27:47
  Speaker 4: that they can't find workers at restaurants and certainly in
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: manufacturing facilities. You also hear, you know, you get a
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: lot easier access to small businesses when you're in the
• 27:56
  Speaker 4: small town. So when I was in Marion last week,
• 27:58
  Speaker 4: I actually spent an hour and a half just wandering
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: up and down main Street and I talk to every
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: small business on main street about you know, what does
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: demand look like? Are you seeing any impact from tariffs?
• 28:08
  Speaker 4: What are you going to do with your pricing? So
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: it's a forcing device to help you see that part
• 28:12
  Speaker 4: of the economy, which of course employs so many And
• 28:15
  Speaker 4: so I think if you're on the ground, you'll see
• 28:18
  Speaker 4: and I've got red parts and blue parts and purple parts.
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: Statisticts.
• 28:22
  Speaker 4: You hear what's on people's minds in very different ways
• 28:25
  Speaker 4: based of where you are, and I really appreciate that
• 28:28
  Speaker 4: part of my district.
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: How do you balance the anecdotes you hear from the
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: man or woman in the street, the business owner, the shopkeeper, whatever,
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: with the hard data that you know, both the Richmond
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: Fed and the Federal Reserve proper have an enormous staff
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: of researchers crunching numbers. How do you balance data versus anecdote?
• 28:50
  Speaker 4: Well, so the data is better than the anecdotes because
• 28:53
  Speaker 4: you know it's a bigger sample. It's done in a
• 28:57
  Speaker 4: serious and approach statistically appropriate. It also comes in about
• 29:01
  Speaker 4: six weeks late and is revised three times, and so
• 29:05
  Speaker 4: the data really matters. But if you just count on
• 29:07
  Speaker 4: the data, you're going to miss turning points and you're
• 29:09
  Speaker 4: going to miss explanations. And so I don't make the
• 29:12
  Speaker 4: mistake of talking to one company and saying, oh, okay,
• 29:15
  Speaker 4: everything in the data is wrong. But I do try
• 29:18
  Speaker 4: to understand what the data is telling me by testing,
• 29:21
  Speaker 4: you know, with the conversations we're having in the field,
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: and so you know, a good example would have been
• 29:27
  Speaker 4: May first of twenty twenty when I talked to a
• 29:30
  Speaker 4: real estate developer in western Virginia who was telling me
• 29:33
  Speaker 4: that Tennessee has just opened the malls in Bristol and
• 29:36
  Speaker 4: they're packed, and of course Virginia was still closed down.
• 29:39
  Speaker 4: And that was my first indicator that you're going to
• 29:41
  Speaker 4: see this big wave of spending when the lockdowns started
• 29:45
  Speaker 4: to open up. And so that's a turning point that
• 29:48
  Speaker 4: you wouldn't otherwise have gotten if you weren't in the markets.
• 29:51
  Speaker 4: We heard the same thing with household furnishings. Yeah, there's
• 29:53
  Speaker 4: a big boom and furniture during COVID, but about twenty
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: twenty two, it backed off. We heard that from the
• 29:58
  Speaker 4: furniture manufacturers, we before you saw that in the data.
• 30:03
  Speaker 4: And then I think explanations matter a lot too. And
• 30:05
  Speaker 4: if you're trying to understand how it could be that
• 30:08
  Speaker 4: we've had all this news from Washington, yet the unemployment
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: statistics don't seem to show that much of a tick
• 30:14
  Speaker 4: up in unemployment in Washington, well, there are lots of explanations,
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: including how those programs have been rolled out and what
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: the timing of it is. And so if you're in
• 30:22
  Speaker 4: the market talking about we actually understand the data in
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: a fundamentally more sophisticated way.
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: Since you mentioned the pandemic, let's talk about two issues
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: post pandemic, wages and real estate, and we'll just start
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: with there have been substantial wage gains across every economic strata,
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: and impressively very much so in the bottom half of
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: earners since the pandemic, although that is now starting to
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: slow down. How do you look at the wage situation
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: as part of employment and what's happened with that trend
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: towards wage pressures beginning to ease off.
• 31:03
  Speaker 4: Well, I do think you've described accurately. You know, what's
• 31:06
  Speaker 4: happened to wages. It's definitely bigger increases at the lower
• 31:09
  Speaker 4: end and less at the higher end. You know, I
• 31:11
  Speaker 4: should add that inflation also hits lower income earners the
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: hardest because they spend the greatest amount of their pay,
• 31:18
  Speaker 4: and so nobody has this mental ledger that says, my
• 31:22
  Speaker 4: wages went up x percent, my prices went up y percent,
• 31:25
  Speaker 4: and so i'm you know, it's not like operating margin
• 31:27
  Speaker 4: for a business. Those are two different ledgers in humans minds,
• 31:30
  Speaker 4: And so to a lot of lower income people doesn't
• 31:32
  Speaker 4: feel like their wages have gone up as much because
• 31:34
  Speaker 4: inflation's gone up, and also because they don't they discount
• 31:37
  Speaker 4: the wages when they measured against inflation. You know, going forward,
• 31:41
  Speaker 4: it definitely looks like we've got a labor market that
• 31:43
  Speaker 4: is much more in balance, maybe even starting to loosen,
• 31:46
  Speaker 4: than the one we had a year or two or
• 31:49
  Speaker 4: three years ago. You still hear tightness, as I said,
• 31:51
  Speaker 4: in small towns. You definitely hear it in the skilled trades.
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: I think there are a set of professions out there
• 31:57
  Speaker 4: that used to be a wall with employees that now
• 32:01
  Speaker 4: seem to be systemically short of employees. And you know,
• 32:05
  Speaker 4: a lot of that skilled trades, but I'd also put
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: a lot of the care professions, nurses, teachers, elder care, childcare.
• 32:12
  Speaker 4: A lot of people found those professions to be pretty
• 32:14
  Speaker 4: unattractive during COVID and moved into other jobs, and there
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: hasn't been a way, you know, to replace them. And
• 32:20
  Speaker 4: there's not that much money to available to increase the
• 32:24
  Speaker 4: compensation to account for it. So you hear shortages there.
• 32:27
  Speaker 4: You hear shortages in state and local government still. So
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: there's still places where the impact of the pandemic on
• 32:34
  Speaker 4: the labor market has not yet. We're not back to
• 32:37
  Speaker 4: where we were at the beginning, and you know, some
• 32:39
  Speaker 4: combination of training and development of people and compensation of
• 32:43
  Speaker 4: people is going to have to happen if we're going
• 32:45
  Speaker 4: to staff these appropriately.
• 32:46
  Speaker 2: So let's talk about remote work and both commercial real
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: estate space and residential real estate. The US continues to
• 32:55
  Speaker 2: have a substantial number of workers that are either high
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: or full time remote. I used to be in the
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: city four or five days a week. Now I'm in
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: the city two or three days a week. If you
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: were in Bloomberg today, I would have been in Bloomberg.
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: But it didn't make sense to come in to have
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: a remote conversation, and the US continues to have a
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: higher level of remote work than other similar industrialized societies
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: like Europe. What's going on with remote work? What does
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: this mean for FED policy? What does this mean for
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: a variety of different aspects. It seems to be fading
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: as a topic, but it's still a pretty significant issue.
• 33:40
  Speaker 4: We have flexibility we didn't know we had. That's where
• 33:43
  Speaker 4: I start, and you can't bury that. And so I
• 33:46
  Speaker 4: think there's a whole bunch of workers in a whole
• 33:48
  Speaker 4: bunch of days who found out that, like you and
• 33:50
  Speaker 4: like May, you could work from home this day as
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: opposed to working somewhere else. It's also true that there's
• 33:56
  Speaker 4: a bunch of employees who discovered that they actually prefer
• 34:00
  Speaker 4: to be at home rather than come into the office.
• 34:03
  Speaker 4: By the way, there's another set that would prefer to
• 34:05
  Speaker 4: come in the office. But there's certainly a segment there.
• 34:08
  Speaker 4: And so we're in a marketplace. People will compete it out,
• 34:12
  Speaker 4: and there are executives who believe passionately that their business
• 34:16
  Speaker 4: is not going to deliver unless their people are there
• 34:19
  Speaker 4: five days a week, every week, and their businesses who
• 34:22
  Speaker 4: believe they'll get access to better people if they just
• 34:25
  Speaker 4: allow them to be remote. And those two often those
• 34:28
  Speaker 4: two are in the same sector, and so they'll compete
• 34:30
  Speaker 4: it out. One will have lower property costs, one will
• 34:32
  Speaker 4: have higher collaboration. We'll see what happens. One thing I
• 34:37
  Speaker 4: tried to look at when all this started was how
• 34:40
  Speaker 4: did we ever end up with the five hour, five
• 34:42
  Speaker 4: day a week, forty hour work week. And the answer
• 34:45
  Speaker 4: is that was General Motors and Alfred Sloan back in
• 34:48
  Speaker 4: the mid twenties just decided it, and five or ten
• 34:51
  Speaker 4: years later everybody was doing it. But none of us
• 34:53
  Speaker 4: who were doing it thought that was perfect if we
• 34:55
  Speaker 4: stopped to think about it. It's just what we did.
• 34:57
  Speaker 4: And so you know, different sectors, different businesses, they'll evolve
• 35:01
  Speaker 4: toward different models. I do think their implications, as you say,
• 35:04
  Speaker 4: on real estate, on the residential side, if some set
• 35:07
  Speaker 4: of people are going to spend more of their time
• 35:09
  Speaker 4: in their house, then they're going to value their house more.
• 35:12
  Speaker 4: They're going to value their office, they're going to value
• 35:13
  Speaker 4: their space, their garden, whatever. And so we saw that
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: during COVID, people got shut up in their house, they
• 35:20
  Speaker 4: decided they no longer liked their house. They also decided
• 35:22
  Speaker 4: they didn't like their roommates, and so the economists call
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: that household formation. So you have a lot more households
• 35:28
  Speaker 4: out there for the same amount of houses, and that's
• 35:30
  Speaker 4: what's led to the price increase that we've had in housing.
• 35:34
  Speaker 4: And unless we build a lot more housing, you're going
• 35:36
  Speaker 4: to have that out there for some time.
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: It's a bigger part of the basket.
• 35:40
  Speaker 4: And maybe you know, public transit or parking is a
• 35:42
  Speaker 4: lower part of the basket, but housing will be a
• 35:44
  Speaker 4: bigger part of the basket. On the commercial real estate side,
• 35:48
  Speaker 4: you know, folks are still trying to adapt, and you know,
• 35:50
  Speaker 4: it's much less flexible than the housing side because some
• 35:53
  Speaker 4: of the space is very much built for purpose, built
• 35:55
  Speaker 4: for an institution at least for fifteen years, as you know.
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: And so I think think we're still midway.
• 36:01
  Speaker 4: Through an adjustment process where some amount of that commercial
• 36:04
  Speaker 4: real estate is used more because people come back to
• 36:06
  Speaker 4: the office, some is redeployed into other uses, whether it
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: be anything from data centers to residential, and some has
• 36:14
  Speaker 4: eventually taken off the market. But I think I think
• 36:17
  Speaker 4: we're still very much mid process on that.
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: So let's talk a little bit about real estate, and
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: in particular residential real estate. We seem to have this
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: chicken and egg problem where prices are up because there's
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: so little supply on the market. And while some of
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: that is a little bit of nimbi, and some of
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: that has been post financial crisis builders tilted towards multifamily
• 36:44
  Speaker 2: and apartments versus single family homes. But the largest chunk
• 36:48
  Speaker 2: seems to be the golden mortgage handcuffs. Something like sixty
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: seventy percent of people have mortgages under five percent and
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: some huge, crazy number under four percent mortgage rates. So,
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: on the one hand, if we lower yields too fast, well,
• 37:06
  Speaker 2: that could set off another round of inflation. On the
• 37:10
  Speaker 2: other hand, all of this supply is locked up, and
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: either we're going to wait for those people to age out,
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: or if rates come down enough, they could trade up
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: or trade to a downsize or whatever, but move to
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: a different property. How does the FED think about this,
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: you know, sort of conundrum where damned if you do,
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: damned if you don't.
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: Well, I think I wouldn't I wouldn't buy.
• 37:35
  Speaker 4: I do buy your story that there are a lot
• 37:36
  Speaker 4: of people who have decided not to move because they
• 37:38
  Speaker 4: can't give up their mortgage. But I don't buy the
• 37:41
  Speaker 4: story that if all we did was lower rates, then
• 37:44
  Speaker 4: they would all give up their mortgage and the housing
• 37:46
  Speaker 4: market would free up, because every one of those people
• 37:48
  Speaker 4: who moved is a seller and a buyer, and so
• 37:52
  Speaker 4: they're going to be increasing their demand at the same
• 37:54
  Speaker 4: time that they're increasing supply. So you're still going to
• 37:57
  Speaker 4: have a shortage of supply versus demand. I should also
• 38:01
  Speaker 4: note that just because we raise lower short term rates
• 38:03
  Speaker 4: as necessarily lower mortgage rates, as we learned in the
• 38:06
  Speaker 4: fourth quarter of last year. But I think again, the
• 38:10
  Speaker 4: demand for housing is much higher, and it's much higher
• 38:13
  Speaker 4: because the generations decided they want a house and household
• 38:15
  Speaker 4: formation as I talked about earlier in people valuing their house.
• 38:19
  Speaker 4: As you say, we underbuilt housing for a generation coming
• 38:22
  Speaker 4: out of the Great Recession, and so we have more
• 38:25
  Speaker 4: demand than supply. The answer to that is to build
• 38:27
  Speaker 4: more supply. And as in my district, if you drive
• 38:30
  Speaker 4: down ninety five and you look at Wilson or Smithfield
• 38:35
  Speaker 4: or Clayton or Rocky Mount, you know these are exurban
• 38:38
  Speaker 4: areas that are not Raleigh, but not that far from Raleigh.
• 38:41
  Speaker 4: You see you know, development after development of two hundred
• 38:46
  Speaker 4: and seventy five to three hundred and twenty five thousand
• 38:47
  Speaker 4: dollars houses, you know, going up in what used to
• 38:50
  Speaker 4: be farmland there. If you drive to exurban Charlotte or
• 38:53
  Speaker 4: Greenville or Richmond, you'll see the same thing. I mean,
• 38:57
  Speaker 4: houses are getting built. But there are communities, you know,
• 39:00
  Speaker 4: Metro DC would be one of them where you don't
• 39:02
  Speaker 4: see housing getting built. And so you know, you have
• 39:05
  Speaker 4: to ask the question of why that is part of
• 39:07
  Speaker 4: its cost, part of its land, and part of its
• 39:11
  Speaker 4: you know, resistance to growth by the inhabitants of various markets.
• 39:15
  Speaker 4: And it again, one of the benefits of having the
• 39:17
  Speaker 4: six states that have is you can see places that
• 39:19
  Speaker 4: are growing and housing is getting built, and you can
• 39:21
  Speaker 4: see places where it's not.
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: So is it fair to say the headwind for putting
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: up more houses is not a national set of policies
• 39:31
  Speaker 2: but mostly state, local, regional both regulations and just hey,
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: you know they the fewer houses that are built, the
• 39:40
  Speaker 2: more my house is worth. There's a little bit of
• 39:44
  Speaker 2: self interest amongst the people who oppose more home construction.
• 39:49
  Speaker 4: Well, what I keep saying is we're in a competition
• 39:51
  Speaker 4: for developers. There are only so many There are only
• 39:53
  Speaker 4: so many construction people, and you want them to come
• 39:56
  Speaker 4: to your neighborhood and build houses in your places.
• 39:58
  Speaker 3: So how do you do that.
• 40:00
  Speaker 4: Well, all of your local regulation and policies matter, permitting zoning,
• 40:05
  Speaker 4: amount of time to get approvals, certainty as to construction time.
• 40:10
  Speaker 4: So that's one big piece of it. Another big piece
• 40:13
  Speaker 4: of it is land availability. And once you start thinking
• 40:16
  Speaker 4: about land availability, you almost don't stop. I mean, I
• 40:19
  Speaker 4: drive into some community colleges and they've got a huge
• 40:21
  Speaker 4: plots of land, and then I find out that the
• 40:23
  Speaker 4: state doesn't allow the building of dorms on community college campuses,
• 40:27
  Speaker 4: and you go, now, okay, wait a second, you can
• 40:29
  Speaker 4: get student housing built. Why can't we get that built.
• 40:32
  Speaker 4: You go to some of these older world towns that
• 40:34
  Speaker 4: have been depopulated over the years, and they've got all
• 40:37
  Speaker 4: this land that's dilapidate housing, but they can't fix it
• 40:41
  Speaker 4: because there's absentee landowners.
• 40:42
  Speaker 3: I mean, once you start.
• 40:43
  Speaker 4: Thinking about the role of land in making this attractive
• 40:46
  Speaker 4: for developers, you almost can't stop thinking about it. And
• 40:49
  Speaker 4: I think that really is the lever of communities can
• 40:52
  Speaker 4: provide real assurance that they can provide land, and that
• 40:55
  Speaker 4: land can get built on at a predictable and reasonable
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: time period.
• 41:00
  Speaker 3: Think, then it.
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: Works really really interesting. So now let's pivot to your
• 41:05
  Speaker 2: work on the FOMC and the state of monetary policy today.
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: Starting with let's talk a little bit about that fiscal
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: stimulus during COVID. If you total all the programs up,
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: CARES Act one and two under President Trump, CARES Act
• 41:23
  Speaker 2: three under President Biden, all the Infrastructure Bill, all the
• 41:27
  Speaker 2: other ten year legislative acts that pass some form of
• 41:31
  Speaker 2: fiscal stimulus, you know, you can get that up to
• 41:33
  Speaker 2: about four trillion dollars or more. Uh, that's a huge,
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: huge amount of money coursing through the system. How did
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: that impact inflation? And is it fair to say that
• 41:48
  Speaker 2: maybe transitory has gotten a bad rap because it seemed
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: to be kind of transitory. It just transitory took longer
• 41:57
  Speaker 2: than everybody expected.
• 41:58
  Speaker 4: Well, though there's been a lot of papers and about
• 42:00
  Speaker 4: what drove the inflation, you know, to me, it's in
• 42:02
  Speaker 4: all of the above. I mean, you had a surge
• 42:05
  Speaker 4: and demand that came from fiscal policy and monetary policy
• 42:10
  Speaker 4: and vaccines. You know, as people got out of their
• 42:14
  Speaker 4: house and felt the freedom to spend. You had constraints
• 42:17
  Speaker 4: in supply which came from you know, labor constraints, people
• 42:21
  Speaker 4: driven by the crisis, by the health crisis, maybe labor
• 42:25
  Speaker 4: constraints caused by policy and supply chain constraints. As demand
• 42:28
  Speaker 4: sort of overwhelmed supply, and so then you saw you know,
• 42:32
  Speaker 4: demand surge well and excess of supply that led prices up.
• 42:35
  Speaker 4: I think the most interesting question for entree policy is
• 42:38
  Speaker 4: why did it last so long? Because you know, to
• 42:41
  Speaker 4: your point on transitory, okay, that's fine, you have more
• 42:43
  Speaker 4: demand than supply. Expectations are anchored, so price went up,
• 42:46
  Speaker 4: they should have come back down. And I just think
• 42:49
  Speaker 4: it goes back to what I described earlier as how
• 42:51
  Speaker 4: I think about people's inflation expectations, which is it's part
• 42:54
  Speaker 4: today in part tomorrow, and it just takes time to
• 42:56
  Speaker 4: get back to tomorrow after you've had a surge today. The
• 43:00
  Speaker 4: real life way to think about it is, Okay, now
• 43:03
  Speaker 4: you're you know, somebody's lawn service, and you don't really
• 43:07
  Speaker 4: have big cost increases, but everybody else has raised their price.
• 43:11
  Speaker 4: Maybe you look around you go, huh, maybe I can
• 43:12
  Speaker 4: raise my price. And so there's a lot of attempts
• 43:15
  Speaker 4: to raise prices that go through in the aftermath of
• 43:18
  Speaker 4: an inflationary episode that might not have been they might
• 43:22
  Speaker 4: have the courage to do without an inflationary episode, And
• 43:25
  Speaker 4: so I think it was this. The inflation way that
• 43:29
  Speaker 4: we saw was definitely time bound. I mean, we have
• 43:31
  Speaker 4: seen the supply chains heel, we've seen people back in
• 43:34
  Speaker 4: the workforce, and we have seen prices come down. But
• 43:38
  Speaker 4: the question of what the definition of transitory is is
• 43:41
  Speaker 4: challenging because the word first got used, I think in
• 43:44
  Speaker 4: March twenty one or April twenty one, and now it's
• 43:47
  Speaker 4: four years later, and so a lot of people think
• 43:50
  Speaker 4: transtory means like a minute, where in fact, the original
• 43:52
  Speaker 4: meaning of it was in our lifetimes. And so probably
• 43:56
  Speaker 4: the right definition is somewhere between those two.
• 43:58
  Speaker 2: On a long enough time line, everything that's transitor. You
• 44:02
  Speaker 2: have a quote from earlier this year that I'm a
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: big fan of because I have a buddy who is
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: a commodities trader and he says the exact same thing
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: all the time, and the quote is the cure for
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: high prices is high prices. Explain that because I'm just
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: such a fan of that line.
• 44:20
  Speaker 4: Well, so it's a great economist line. It has two
• 44:23
  Speaker 4: meanings and both of them matter. One is that if you,
• 44:27
  Speaker 4: as a consumer get high prices, the first thing you
• 44:31
  Speaker 4: want to do is look for an alternative. Maybe you
• 44:33
  Speaker 4: go to private label, maybe you go to from beef
• 44:35
  Speaker 4: to chicken, maybe you go from a department store to
• 44:38
  Speaker 4: a Walmart. But you're looking for some are alternative. And
• 44:42
  Speaker 4: so if a company raises its price is too high,
• 44:45
  Speaker 4: then its customers are going to do something else and
• 44:47
  Speaker 4: that'll teach the company that that price is too high.
• 44:49
  Speaker 4: The other version of it is a supply side point,
• 44:52
  Speaker 4: which is that if prices are high and successfully passed on,
• 44:56
  Speaker 4: then new competitors will come in, you know, to increase
• 45:00
  Speaker 4: or lower prices and so and I really want to
• 45:03
  Speaker 4: say this has happened. I mean, this has happened in
• 45:06
  Speaker 4: this economy. If you look at earnings reports from all
• 45:09
  Speaker 4: the major retailers, you know you'll hear this. You know,
• 45:12
  Speaker 4: customers are tapped out, customers are trading down. You can
• 45:15
  Speaker 4: see a big move in terms of where people are
• 45:18
  Speaker 4: buying their groceries today, private label, e commerce, like I said,
• 45:21
  Speaker 4: beef to chicken, all these things are happening. And I
• 45:23
  Speaker 4: think it's because, you know, consumers having gotten through the
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: COVID period where they were exhausted. It was all coming
• 45:30
  Speaker 4: at once, and by the way, they had lots of
• 45:32
  Speaker 4: money because of repress spendings or in COVID or elevated
• 45:35
  Speaker 4: stock market or stimulus checks. They just spent it and
• 45:39
  Speaker 4: they paid it, and that's what we got the inflation
• 45:41
  Speaker 4: of twenty twenty two.
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: We're not in a period.
• 45:43
  Speaker 4: Where consumers feel like they have extra money. And so
• 45:46
  Speaker 4: those people who are out there trying to raise prices
• 45:48
  Speaker 4: for whatever set of good and bad reasons, they're facing
• 45:51
  Speaker 4: a consumer that doesn't want to pay it now, and
• 45:53
  Speaker 4: it's got the time and the mental energy to make choices,
• 45:56
  Speaker 4: and so I think you know that do that will
• 45:59
  Speaker 4: fix high price is over time.
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: So during the pandemic, we kind of pivoted from a
• 46:05
  Speaker 2: service driven economy to very much a stuck at home,
• 46:09
  Speaker 2: can't travel, go to restaurants, go to sporting events, so
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: we're gonna consume more goods. That very much was a
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: key driver of inflation, along with all these other issues
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: including snarled supply chains. Feels like that's mostly returned back
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: to normal. The Summer of Revenge travel everybody seems to
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: be out about, at least in my area. I book
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: restaurant reservations three weeks in events. So we seem to
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: be in a place that's kind of normalized. How is
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: the FMC looking at the state of the economy today?
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: Are we in a normal post inflation environment or is
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: there something else that we're going on that we should
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: be aware of.
• 46:55
  Speaker 4: Well, I think there's today and tomorrow. Today we're in
• 47:00
  Speaker 4: the closing stages of bringing the economy back to normal.
• 47:03
  Speaker 3: That's how I put it.
• 47:04
  Speaker 4: I mean, unemployment's four point two, that's a historically low number.
• 47:09
  Speaker 4: Inflation headline two point three, that's very close to a
• 47:12
  Speaker 4: two percent target GDP if you adjust for the one
• 47:16
  Speaker 4: timers that we're in the first quarter is still growing
• 47:18
  Speaker 4: in the two and a half percent range. So think
• 47:21
  Speaker 4: of it as a very strong, stable economy. The challenge
• 47:25
  Speaker 4: we all have is the uncertainty about you know, where
• 47:28
  Speaker 4: we're headed, and you know, you or I could articulate
• 47:32
  Speaker 4: an upside to that or a downside of that. I'm
• 47:34
  Speaker 4: not making a comment on it, but it is elevated uncertainty.
• 47:36
  Speaker 4: It's what I was describing as the fog. And so
• 47:39
  Speaker 4: you know, we're sort of on the brink of a
• 47:40
  Speaker 4: different environment, and that different environment will have different terarif
• 47:44
  Speaker 4: rates and different levels of immigration and different levels of
• 47:47
  Speaker 4: government spending and different levels of regulation and different energy policy.
• 47:52
  Speaker 4: You know, all that is I think locked in. I mean,
• 47:55
  Speaker 4: we know the direction, we just don't know the destination.
• 47:58
  Speaker 4: And it turns out people kind of I want to
• 48:00
  Speaker 4: know where they're headed before they pack, and so that's
• 48:04
  Speaker 4: that's the challenge we've got right now, is just determining
• 48:06
  Speaker 4: what's the destination so that you know, businesses and consumers
• 48:09
  Speaker 4: can make the choices they make.
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: So, given this fog, driven in large part by uncertainty
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: over tariffs, how does the FMC make policy if there's
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: such a lack of clarity as to we understand today?
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: But really, tariffs are on, tariffs are off. Wait, European tariffs,
• 48:30
  Speaker 2: oh wait, we're going to put them on hold until
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: mid July. That must be incredibly challenging to make long
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: term policy decisions in light of these very short term
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: policy swings.
• 48:44
  Speaker 4: I'd say, sometimes our job is very straightforward and sometimes
• 48:47
  Speaker 4: it's not. It's very straightforward when unemployment's high, inflation is loow,
• 48:50
  Speaker 4: because you know which direction to go, and it's you know,
• 48:53
  Speaker 4: relatively straightforward. When the forecast seems pretty clear, that you
• 48:57
  Speaker 4: have stability and confidence in the forecast. You know, in
• 49:00
  Speaker 4: today's world, neither one of those is true. I mean,
• 49:02
  Speaker 4: inflation has come down but is not yet at our target.
• 49:05
  Speaker 4: Employment unemployment is low, but either risk to it, and
• 49:10
  Speaker 4: the forecast is unclear, and so you have to reflect
• 49:13
  Speaker 4: on where you are. You know, where I think we
• 49:15
  Speaker 4: are is modestly restrictive. In other words, a four point
• 49:18
  Speaker 4: three percent overnight rate is constrained the economy a modest amount,
• 49:22
  Speaker 4: but not a significant amount at a time where inflation
• 49:24
  Speaker 4: is still over our target and unemployment is low, And
• 49:28
  Speaker 4: then you just have to I mean, you could choose.
• 49:32
  Speaker 4: If you had conviction in the forecast, then you might
• 49:35
  Speaker 4: choose to move whichever way you felt you had to
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: move given that forecast. But if, like me, you don't
• 49:40
  Speaker 4: have that much conviction in the forecast, then you say,
• 49:42
  Speaker 4: let's wait and see where we go.
• 49:44
  Speaker 2: So let's talk about conviction. Another quote of yours that
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: I'm fond of is monetary policy, and I'm going to
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: paraphrase monetary policy needs to balance both conviction and humility.
• 49:58
  Speaker 4: Discuss well, my dad said, used to say, Tom, I
• 50:01
  Speaker 4: want you to be humble because I know you well
• 50:03
  Speaker 4: and you have a lot to be humble about. And
• 50:06
  Speaker 4: I think the point he was making is don't be
• 50:09
  Speaker 4: too full of yourself here, and so you could, you know,
• 50:13
  Speaker 4: stand up pound the table and say, you know, by God,
• 50:15
  Speaker 4: I see where this is going, and inflation's rising or
• 50:19
  Speaker 4: unemployments rising, and therefore we need to move you know,
• 50:23
  Speaker 4: left or move right and support of one of those
• 50:25
  Speaker 4: parts of our mandate. I mean, I listened to my colleagues.
• 50:29
  Speaker 4: You have many different points of view on this. I'm
• 50:31
  Speaker 4: humble enough about my own forecasting ability. It just makes
• 50:35
  Speaker 4: me think that, you know, I'll learn more. I'll learn
• 50:37
  Speaker 4: more with time.
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: So talking about your colleagues and the rest of the
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: folks on the FMC board, one of the things I've
• 50:47
  Speaker 2: noticed through history is that they are very deliberate. They
• 50:52
  Speaker 2: don't surprise the markets with anything. Everything is always very calculated.
• 50:58
  Speaker 2: And hey, we're going to be raising rates in a
• 51:00
  Speaker 2: few months. Hey next month. Look at the dot plot.
• 51:04
  Speaker 2: We're looking at PC and CPI. Okay, here it comes.
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: There are never shocks to the market. At the same time,
• 51:14
  Speaker 2: the criticism has been seems to be a little late
• 51:18
  Speaker 2: to the party sometimes. We saw that spike of inflation
• 51:22
  Speaker 2: late twenty twenty early twenty one. It took the FED
• 51:25
  Speaker 2: a while before they began raising rates, and then CPI
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: peaked June twenty twenty two, took a while before we
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: went on to pause and then cutting. How do you
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: balance the lack of clarity, the need for humility with
• 51:40
  Speaker 2: the latest noisy data and trying to be not too
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: far behind what you're actually is happening on the ground.
• 51:50
  Speaker 4: Well, so you started with, you know, being methodical, and
• 51:54
  Speaker 4: that's probably accurate. Bernanki had the insight which he published
• 51:58
  Speaker 4: back in the early two thousands that markets can do
• 52:01
  Speaker 4: a lot of work for us if they have a
• 52:03
  Speaker 4: good sense of the path, then we don't have to
• 52:06
  Speaker 4: do as much in policy because they'll you know, work
• 52:08
  Speaker 4: the rate path for you. And I think there is
• 52:11
  Speaker 4: some effort made to try to communicate clearly certainly why
• 52:14
  Speaker 4: you know, I and my peers try to talk as
• 52:16
  Speaker 4: much as we do to see if we can't you
• 52:18
  Speaker 4: bring some clarity to that situation. And so I think
• 52:20
  Speaker 4: it's fair to say, you know, trying to do it,
• 52:22
  Speaker 4: but we will move faster than people expect when we
• 52:25
  Speaker 4: need to, as we proved in twenty twenty two, in
• 52:28
  Speaker 4: terms of getting it right, I'll just go back to
• 52:31
  Speaker 4: what I said about false precision a little bit ago,
• 52:33
  Speaker 4: which is, I think we're always going to be wrong.
• 52:37
  Speaker 4: I mean, you know, you're never going to precisely, you know,
• 52:39
  Speaker 4: get the peak of inflation or the peak of unemployment
• 52:43
  Speaker 4: or the trough of either. You make your best efforts,
• 52:46
  Speaker 4: and I think if the standard is that you know
• 52:49
  Speaker 4: every decimal on every forecast actually played out, then I
• 52:52
  Speaker 4: think we're all guilty of missing that.
• 52:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, to say say the very least. We talked earlier
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: about transitory, Let's talk for a moment about the nineteen seventies,
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: which was clearly very structural. How similar are the twenty
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: twenties to the nineteen seventies and how different are they.
• 53:11
  Speaker 2: As someone who was a kid during that era, I
• 53:15
  Speaker 2: kind of remember just being parents being freaked out about stuff.
• 53:20
  Speaker 2: I remember going to get gas. I had a little
• 53:23
  Speaker 2: side business mowing lawns, and the guy at the gas
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: station asked me, you do you have an even license
• 53:30
  Speaker 2: plate or an odd license I don't know, I'm twelve.
• 53:33
  Speaker 2: I just need a gallon of gas to mow the lawn. Yeah,
• 53:36
  Speaker 2: So how similar is is are the twenty twenties and
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: what are the key differences.
• 53:40
  Speaker 4: So there's a chart that makes the rounds that you know,
• 53:43
  Speaker 4: adjust the scales, but sort of puts the sixties and
• 53:46
  Speaker 4: seventies up against you know, the last five years and
• 53:49
  Speaker 4: says there's just about to be another big bout of inflation.
• 53:53
  Speaker 4: And you know, I find that chart annoying, but you know,
• 53:56
  Speaker 4: I understand the fear. You know, a reminder for all
• 54:00
  Speaker 4: your listeners that in the early seventies there's a strong
• 54:04
  Speaker 4: historic sense that there was a set of mistakes made
• 54:06
  Speaker 4: by the FED of not being tough enough on inflation
• 54:09
  Speaker 4: that were then exacerbated in the middle and late seventies
• 54:12
  Speaker 4: by two big oil spike price spikes. And you know,
• 54:16
  Speaker 4: I can't predict an oil price bike, and neither can
• 54:18
  Speaker 4: anybody else, and so who knows, you know, how that'll
• 54:20
  Speaker 4: play out. The fact that I've found interesting about the
• 54:24
  Speaker 4: seventies is how elevated long term bond rates were, you know,
• 54:29
  Speaker 4: how the term premium was, and basically how much inflation
• 54:32
  Speaker 4: expectations were embedded in long term rates. And that's an
• 54:37
  Speaker 4: interesting thing to look at because it sort of gets
• 54:40
  Speaker 4: to this question of expectations. We had price shocks like
• 54:44
  Speaker 4: the oil price spike in seventy four or the one
• 54:46
  Speaker 4: in seventy eight, and who knows whether we'll have those again.
• 54:48
  Speaker 4: But those price shocks didn't just affect today's prices. It
• 54:53
  Speaker 4: also affected the market's views on tomorrow's prices. And I say,
• 54:56
  Speaker 4: I would just say that's a huge difference between the
• 54:59
  Speaker 4: seventies and today's that you know, metrics of long term
• 55:01
  Speaker 4: expectations feel very grounded, even if you do have short
• 55:05
  Speaker 4: term price backs. I think that's because of an expectation
• 55:09
  Speaker 4: that the Fed will do what we need to do
• 55:11
  Speaker 4: if you were to see that inflation, which I hope
• 55:13
  Speaker 4: we validated in twenty twenty two.
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: So it seems like the street, Wall Street in particular,
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: Wall Street and the bond market in particular have been
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: erroneously forecasting Fed rig cuts for I don't know, two three,
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: maybe even almost back to when the FED started raising
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: rates this cycle. What is the Fed looking for in
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: order to feel comfortable? Okay, we've wrestled inflation into submission
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: and the economy is starting to show a little signs
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: of some minor stress let's take rates down one or
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: two more times. I'm not asking you for a date,
• 55:56
  Speaker 2: I'm asking you for what are you looking at? What
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: is the FMC looking at? That would make them comfortable
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: saying all right, we could we could ease a little
• 56:03
  Speaker 2: bit off the brake and tap the accelerator a little bit.
• 56:07
  Speaker 4: Okay, So first of all, I wouldn't be so tough
• 56:09
  Speaker 4: on the professional forecasters. Another joke is that you know,
• 56:13
  Speaker 4: economic forecasting was created to make weather forecasting look good.
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: I heard it to make to make astrologists look good.
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: But another and actually, the weather forecasters are getting better
• 56:23
  Speaker 2: and better.
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: That's the difference, as are the economics.
• 56:27
  Speaker 4: But whenever, whenever you look at the market quote unquote
• 56:31
  Speaker 4: market's view on the number of rate cuts, you have
• 56:34
  Speaker 4: to remember that in that assessment includes tail risks. And
• 56:40
  Speaker 4: so you know, if you think at any given point
• 56:42
  Speaker 4: in time, there's a twenty or twenty five percent of
• 56:44
  Speaker 4: a recession, at which point the FED might you know, respond,
• 56:48
  Speaker 4: then that's embedded in that. So when the you know,
• 56:51
  Speaker 4: the the SEP forecast has two rate cuts, let's say,
• 56:54
  Speaker 4: and the market has three, I'm not sure I view
• 56:57
  Speaker 4: that as a difference. I just think one's got one
• 57:00
  Speaker 4: a modal and one's a weighted average, and I think
• 57:02
  Speaker 4: those aren't the same things, just in defensive economic forecasters.
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: But if we look, you know, look at twenty three,
• 57:08
  Speaker 2: twenty four to twenty.
• 57:09
  Speaker 3: Five, sometimes they're different.
• 57:11
  Speaker 4: Sometimes they're different, and wildly I was gonna say, in
• 57:15
  Speaker 4: terms of your other question, what would I want to see?
• 57:17
  Speaker 4: You'd want to see inflation sustainably under control, or you'd
• 57:21
  Speaker 4: want to see you know, the economy, you know, tipping
• 57:24
  Speaker 4: to a level that that amount of downturn would have
• 57:27
  Speaker 4: an impact on inflation and bring it into control. And
• 57:30
  Speaker 4: so you can get inflation on of control through rates,
• 57:32
  Speaker 4: and you can get it through economic you prefer to
• 57:34
  Speaker 4: do it through rates.
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: But we'll see.
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: And I only have you for another two minutes, so
• 57:38
  Speaker 2: let me throw you a curveball question. Okay, I was
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: just out in La Joya on Tory Pines. I know
• 57:45
  Speaker 2: you're an avid golfer in your Federal reserve district. What
• 57:50
  Speaker 2: are some of your favorite courses? I used to be
• 57:54
  Speaker 2: on the USGA board. I'm assuming you still play. Where
• 57:57
  Speaker 2: do you like to play in? What's your home?
• 58:00
  Speaker 4: Of course, i'd play Kidlock and Richmond and We have
• 58:03
  Speaker 4: a place in Paully's Island where I play the w Club,
• 58:07
  Speaker 4: which is a Pete Die course down there. And thank
• 58:09
  Speaker 4: you for mentioning you know golf golf is a lot
• 58:11
  Speaker 4: like monetary policy, and that I wish I were better
• 58:14
  Speaker 4: at both of them.
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: Well, that's the perfect quote on which to end this.
• 58:20
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Tom for being so generous with your time.
• 58:23
  Speaker 2: We have been speaking with Tom Barkin. He is President
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: and CEO of the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank, as well
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: as a member of the Federal Open Market Committee that
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: helps set federal reserve rates. If you enjoy this conversation, well,
• 58:39
  Speaker 2: be sure and check out any of the five hundred
• 58:41
  Speaker 2: and forty six we've done since twenty thirteen. You can
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: find those at Bloomberg, iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you find
• 58:51
  Speaker 2: your favorite podcasts. I would be remiss if I not
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: thank the crack team that helps me put these conversations together.
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: My audio engineer is Steve Gonzalez. Anna Luke is my producer.
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: Sean Russo is my researcher. Sage Bauman is the head
• 59:06
  Speaker 2: of podcasts at Bloomberg. Be sure and check out my
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: new book How Not to Invest The ideas numbers and
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: behaviors that destroys wealth, and how to avoid them. Wherever
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: you buy your favorite audio, e and hardcover books. I'm
• 59:23
  Speaker 2: Barry Richdolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business on
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: Bloomberg Radio.