Latest / Becker’s Healthcare Podcast / No Surprises Act Costs, Price Transparency, and the Latest Payer Policy Shifts with Jakob Emerson
Transcript
- 0:02- GLP ones, Medicare Advantage Headwinds, a Medicaid landscape
- 0:06- that looks different
- 0:07- every quarter.
- 0:09- Their leadership right now means making durable decisions
- 0:11- in an environment that keeps moving, and the
- 0:13- organizations pulling ahead are the ones that stopped
- 0:16- waiting for stability
- 0:18- before acting. Becker's fifth annual fall payer issues
- 0:21- roundtable convenes more than 500
- 0:24- executive level attendees
- 0:25- and 70 plus speakers November second and third
- 0:28- at the Swiss Hotel Chicago.
- 0:30- Two days of senior level dialogue on affordability,
- 0:33- benefit design, value based care, and the strategies
- 0:36- shaping how care gets financed
- 0:39- and delivered. Featuring a celebrity keynote from pro
- 0:39- football hall of famer, Emmitt Smith. The
- 0:50- This is Scott Becker with the Beckers Health
- 0:53- Care Podcast.
- 0:55- Thrilled today to visit with Jacob Emerson who
- 0:57- covers the payer arena at Beckers HealthCare.
- 1:00- Jacob's brilliant. I I and I always learn
- 1:02- something talking to Jacob, and I always figure
- 1:05- as an interviewer,
- 1:07- if I learn something, that's usually an indication
- 1:10- their audience is likely to learn something and
- 1:11- find it interesting too. And and Jacob's one
- 1:13- of the best at this. Jacob,
- 1:16- with that sort of pressure and stress, let
- 1:18- me ask you to take it away and
- 1:20- tell us what are a couple of stores
- 1:21- that you're watching in the payer world currently.
- 1:24- Absolutely, Scott. No. I I'm feeling the pressure,
- 1:27- apply right now. But, hopefully, yeah, I can
- 1:29- I can, help the audience learn something?
- 1:32- I think, at least for me, what has
- 1:35- stood out this week so far or not,
- 1:37- of course, all the way through the week,
- 1:38- but there's some interesting new data out from
- 1:40- CMS
- 1:41- around the no surprises acts,
- 1:44- the arbitration process.
- 1:46- So, basically, that that dispute process that exists
- 1:49- federally,
- 1:50- for out of network providers and insurers to
- 1:52- argue over how to get paid. Basically, that
- 1:55- the cost have exploded
- 1:56- just last year alone. And now we're we're
- 1:59- seeing the government go on record kind of
- 2:00- taking the side of insurers in all of
- 2:02- this,
- 2:03- in terms of some of what they've been
- 2:04- complaining about in some of the recent earnings
- 2:06- calls just these last week these last few
- 2:09- weeks or so.
- 2:10- Talk to us about that. Talk to us
- 2:12- about this perspective because Yeah. It does seem
- 2:14- like doctor Oz
- 2:16- seems to be in the pair camp.
- 2:18- That might just be his view of the
- 2:19- world. It might be his view that that's
- 2:21- the way we should go.
- 2:23- I I don't quite
- 2:24- but it does seem like you have this
- 2:26- perspective of being a little bit pro payer
- 2:29- at a time when that was so popular
- 2:30- just six months ago.
- 2:32- What is the perspective? What what are you
- 2:34- seeing in in DC with respect to this?
- 2:36- It from the administration, I know that's not
- 2:37- the perspective of senate and congress, but but
- 2:40- it says something that the hospitals and health
- 2:41- systems and doctors
- 2:43- are taking a little bit on the on
- 2:44- the
- 2:45- or or or or getting shot at it
- 2:47- a little bit.
- 2:48- Yeah. I would I would agree. And I
- 2:49- think it seemed like when the administration first
- 2:52- came in from from the CMS perspective,
- 2:54- there was rhetoric around how,
- 2:57- CMS
- 2:58- doctor Oz would be a little bit more
- 2:59- hard on the insurance industry compared to previous
- 3:02- administrations.
- 3:04- I I think the conversations were a a
- 3:06- lot around Medicare Advantage,
- 3:09- And it seemed like there was for a
- 3:10- little bit in the first few months, at
- 3:12- least rhetorically, but then, you know, we saw
- 3:14- the right notice that was pretty favorable for
- 3:16- the industry.
- 3:17- And now we're seeing stuff like this where
- 3:19- CMS does seem to be largely siding with,
- 3:22- insurers when it comes to the no surprises
- 3:24- act. But I'd also say, you know, at
- 3:27- least as of right now, the the data
- 3:28- seems to be backing that up.
- 3:31- But I also think, Scott, you know, I'm
- 3:33- I'm saying this on a podcast listened to
- 3:35- by a lot of providers.
- 3:36- There's also the argument that, I've seen made
- 3:39- and I think is very valid that
- 3:41- these high payments under this IDR system
- 3:44- just reflects,
- 3:45- underpayments
- 3:46- from the insurers from the beginning, and now
- 3:48- providers are finally able to fairly get what
- 3:50- they should have gotten from the beginning. So
- 3:52- let me just detail what some of this
- 3:54- new data is and what CMS has said
- 3:55- because I really think this is a this
- 3:57- is a huge turning point this week,
- 3:59- for the no surprises saga that we've been
- 4:01- seeing. And so, basically, you know, the the
- 4:04- law passed in 2020, it set up that
- 4:06- system in 2022,
- 4:08- where
- 4:09- unexpected bills for out of network emergency care
- 4:11- and some other services get routed through a
- 4:14- payment, a federal payment dispute system,
- 4:17- that is over seen by federal,
- 4:19- mediators basically. And so
- 4:22- it's it's far the the process has gone
- 4:24- awry.
- 4:25- Costs are up by billions.
- 4:28- They're they're being the the process is being
- 4:30- flooded
- 4:31- with far more,
- 4:33- far more claims than was originally expected. And
- 4:36- so
- 4:37- last year alone in 2025, CMS just put
- 4:39- out this data,
- 4:40- yesterday,
- 4:42- saying that the the process has reached almost
- 4:45- $15,000,000,000
- 4:46- in costs in in 2025 alone. That compares
- 4:48- to $4,000,000,000
- 4:50- in 2024.
- 4:51- So the costs are have exploded, and then
- 4:54- we're seeing the insurance companies really complain about
- 4:56- this now on their earnings calls, which to
- 4:59- me, I kind of take that as a
- 5:01- basically, it's political rhetoric. They they they're prepping
- 5:04- for these calls ahead of time. They know
- 5:06- what they wanna say publicly, basically, to the
- 5:07- entire industry.
- 5:09- And so you've got UnitedHealthcare
- 5:10- saying that this entire process is no longer
- 5:12- working, that it needs to be reformed,
- 5:15- and that it's driving up their commercial costs
- 5:17- overall, which then just trickles down to self
- 5:20- insured employers, which at the end of the
- 5:22- day basically is the payer. They have to
- 5:23- pay those claims. They have to pay that
- 5:25- money out. You know, it's United that just
- 5:27- administers the the employee plan.
- 5:30- So that's all going on. And then the
- 5:32- government also found that it's it's really only
- 5:34- a handful of companies that's,
- 5:35- accounting for a good chunk of these disputes
- 5:38- overall. So basically,
- 5:40- provider groups, physician groups, air ambulance companies,
- 5:43- they hire these these medical billing companies,
- 5:46- to file these disputes for them. And and
- 5:49- and these these companies are the most active
- 5:51- filers. And so the insurers are then suing
- 5:54- those companies in court basically saying they're defrauding
- 5:57- them, they're flooding them with these claims that
- 5:59- they're using AI to to,
- 6:02- boost in terms of the share quantity.
- 6:04- And the courts are largely siding with the
- 6:07- the medical billing companies and by extension the
- 6:09- providers.
- 6:10- They're not siding with the insurance companies.
- 6:12- And then, to add on all this, CMS
- 6:14- said that while the no surprises act is
- 6:16- critical for protecting patients from receiving surprise bills,
- 6:20- the system is being gamed to get higher
- 6:22- prices and CMS is actively working to clean
- 6:24- it up. And that's a spokesperson to the
- 6:25- Wall Street Journal yesterday. So it's fascinating all
- 6:28- this is going on. The costs are exploding.
- 6:30- The insurers are mad. The courts are not
- 6:32- siding with the insurers, and the government is
- 6:34- saying the insurers are getting gamed. So it's
- 6:36- a it's a whole mess. It's a whole
- 6:37- debacle.
- 6:39- I would expect we'll probably see some some
- 6:41- rulemaking, some reforms over the next year or
- 6:43- so proposed at least,
- 6:45- to try to get a a hold of
- 6:47- of this this situation.
- 6:50- Well, it it is a lot of be
- 6:51- careful what you ask for because the insurance
- 6:53- companies certainly were very pro the no surprises
- 6:56- act.
- 6:57- Exactly. Industry of the IDR stuff has evolved
- 6:59- out of that.
- 7:01- The courts have been largely sympathetic to
- 7:04- the plaintiffs or the people, you know, saying
- 7:06- that they were underpaid by the insurers in
- 7:08- these disputes.
- 7:09- And, of course, this has led the insurers
- 7:11- now not like the no surprise act as
- 7:12- much as they thought they might to begin
- 7:14- with. Certainly, a fascinating sort of turn of
- 7:16- events. And I think that's a really, really
- 7:18- good point about all this as well, Scott,
- 7:20- is that the insurers
- 7:22- lobbied for this law.
- 7:23- I think they thought this was gonna go
- 7:25- way more in their favor. And now that
- 7:26- it's not,
- 7:27- now they're on the earnings calls complaining about
- 7:30- it, calling for it to be changed,
- 7:32- back into their favor. But I think that's
- 7:34- another interesting tidbit about all of this as
- 7:36- well is, they they wanted this process originally,
- 7:39- how it's currently set up.
- 7:41- So we'll see what happens. But I do
- 7:42- think it's also a valid point that
- 7:45- self insured employers have to pay off this
- 7:47- money,
- 7:48- which means higher premiums
- 7:50- for, you know, you and me, basically. Yeah.
- 7:52- Yeah. Like, a 100%. A 100%. So that's
- 7:55- fascinating.
- 7:56- Tell us what else you're watching besides the
- 7:58- administration being very sympathetic and seems like the
- 8:00- payers on some of these issues.
- 8:02- Yeah. So then on the other side of
- 8:04- things, you've got congress
- 8:06- now taking concrete steps to,
- 8:09- advance price transparency legislation,
- 8:12- basically codify the rules that have already been
- 8:14- in place, that were put in place under,
- 8:16- president Trump's first term.
- 8:19- So we've got these big health care packages
- 8:21- that passed or that advanced set of committees
- 8:25- this week, yesterday, and then Tuesday.
- 8:28- And so
- 8:30- expanding and codifying the hospital and payer price
- 8:32- transparency rules. But then what I thought was
- 8:35- really interesting is that in the,
- 8:37- in the senate bill,
- 8:39- there's,
- 8:40- there's a there's a provision that would basically
- 8:42- give
- 8:44- commercial plans,
- 8:46- so employers
- 8:47- and then third party administrators,
- 8:49- PBMs,
- 8:50- more access to their own claims data. So
- 8:53- it's been a it's been an issue for
- 8:55- I'd say, I mean, for a while now,
- 8:57- and there's been a lot of lawsuits where
- 8:59- you'll basically have and this is a real
- 9:01- example. You'll basically have a company like Kraft
- 9:02- Heinz,
- 9:03- who employs tens of thousands of people. They'll
- 9:06- sue their third party administrator, which is, a
- 9:09- company like Aetna or United,
- 9:11- who administers their employee health plan. They want
- 9:13- their full claims data. They wanna know, what
- 9:16- are they being charged for? How is how
- 9:18- is everything being negotiated on their behalf with
- 9:21- providers?
- 9:22- And payers have been pretty,
- 9:24- reluctant to give over that data for obvious
- 9:25- reasons. I mean, that's their that's their bread
- 9:27- and butter. That's their competitive advantage against other
- 9:30- payers.
- 9:31- And now the government is coming in and
- 9:33- basically saying, you know, if these bills were
- 9:34- signed into law, basically saying,
- 9:36- employers have legal legal rights to to their
- 9:39- claims data,
- 9:41- and and reimbursement formulas around around drug prescription
- 9:44- drugs as well with with the PBAM side
- 9:46- of things. So I think overall, just what
- 9:48- it tells us about, you know, the context
- 9:50- of what's going on is that, and I've
- 9:52- written about this for backers is,
- 9:55- the the negotiating power of the of the
- 9:57- payers
- 9:58- just keeps getting worse over time.
- 10:01- You know, now they've had to be the
- 10:03- hospitals and the payers have been having to
- 10:05- post their prices now for a little bit,
- 10:07- and we know that's being used in contract
- 10:09- negotiations. And that's why they've gotten so intense
- 10:12- over these last few years between hospitals and
- 10:14- insurers or one reason for it. But now
- 10:16- Congress is signaling,
- 10:18- they wanna take it a step further and
- 10:20- basically,
- 10:21- start to go after the leverage or really
- 10:24- the entire infrastructure of how the, you know,
- 10:26- the insurer
- 10:27- and claims and pricing structure of the health
- 10:29- care system is built on. So I think
- 10:31- that's really fascinating to to see how this
- 10:34- is gonna all shake out as well. But
- 10:36- there it's huge health care packages, so,
- 10:38- we've got, you know, full analysis going up
- 10:40- on the websites today.
- 10:43- Jacob, just, fantastic your coverage. I'm constantly trying
- 10:46- to work with this IDR thing as there's
- 10:48- these companies that have gotten really deeply involved
- 10:50- in IDR and trying to understand how this
- 10:52- plays through. And hearing your explanation on some
- 10:54- of this is really, really helpful. I I
- 10:56- wanna thank you as always for joining us
- 10:58- on the Becker Becker's Healthcare podcast. Just a
- 11:00- pleasure to visit with you. Thank you. Yeah.
- 11:02- Thank you, Scott. I appreciate it.