Latest / Investor Exchange / Datapulse Technology Interim Financials 1HFY2025
Transcript
- 0:02Time for another Investor Exchange podcast. Here are your hosts, Matt and Sally.
- 0:08Ever feel like you're drowning in numbers when you look at a company's financial
- 0:11report? Try and figure out, you know, are they actually doing well?
- 0:14Yeah, it can definitely seem overwhelming, like a whole different language sometimes.
- 0:18Exactly. But what if we could sort of decode it together, pull out what really
- 0:23matters? That's the plan.
- 0:25Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we're looking at Datapulse Technology Limited,
- 0:29Specifically, their results for the six months ending January 31st, 2025.
- 0:341-H-F-Y 2025, as they call it.
- 0:37Right. And our mission really is to get past just the surface figures.
- 0:41We want to understand the story behind their performance. And we're using their official release.
- 0:46The 1-H-F-Y 2025 results. That's the one. Focusing on those condensed interim financial statements.
- 0:53That's our main source for figuring out how they did in the first half of their
- 0:56financial year. So not just the what revenue costs profit, but the why and crucially
- 1:01what they see coming down the road.
- 1:04Precisely. The reasons behind the numbers and their outlook.
- 1:06That's where the real insight is. OK, let's dive right in then.
- 1:09Revenue seems like the natural starting point. Always is. And we see a slight
- 1:14dip overall from about three point one million dollars down to just under three million dollars.
- 1:18Yeah, of a five point two percent decrease roughly.
- 1:21But the interesting part is within that number. Go on. Well,
- 1:24their main hotel business in Seoul to Travelodge, Myongdong City Hall,
- 1:27that actually held really steady.
- 1:29$2.9 million in revenue, same as last year. Hmm. $2.9 million stable.
- 1:33So, despite the overall dip, their core operation seems pretty solid.
- 1:39What does that suggest about, say, the Korean hospitality market?
- 1:43It could mean a few things. Maybe the market's recovering well,
- 1:46or maybe TLMC specifically is just performing strongly.
- 1:49Good sign for them? Shows resilience. OK, so that stability is the anchor.
- 1:52But where did the drop come from then? Well, one clear place is asset management fees.
- 1:57They went from $0.2 million last year. To zero this period. Exactly.
- 2:02The report's pretty clear and agreement just expired.
- 2:04Right. Straightforward enough lost revenue stream that obviously hurts the total.
- 2:08It does. Shows how diversifying revenue matters, you know.
- 2:10But it wasn't all negative on the income side, was it? Investment income looked better.
- 2:14Yeah, much better, actually. Jumped from basically $10,000 to $100,000.
- 2:18Significant jumps. So what was behind that? Seems like a strategic shift.
- 2:22They moved more into debt securities, which apparently offered better returns
- 2:26than the fixed deposits they held before.
- 2:28Ah, OK. So they were actively managing their investments to get more income.
- 2:33Looks that way. And that probably explains why other income went down slightly
- 2:37less interest coming in from those fixed deposits they moved out of. Makes sense.
- 2:42OK, let's slip over to the expenses side. What's happening there?
- 2:45Big drop in staff costs. Yeah, quite noticeable.
- 2:49Down over 26 percent from $0.9 million to $0.6 million.
- 2:55And the reason given is headcount reduction. Right. Fewer people means lower payroll costs.
- 3:01That's a direct saving. What are the sort of implications of that?
- 3:03Good for the bottom line now, but.
- 3:05Well, yes, it boosts short term profit, but you always wonder about the longer term.
- 3:09Does it impact their ability to operate or grow? It's a balance.
- 3:13And what about the hotel itself? Operating expenses there. Also down slightly,
- 3:17about 4 percent went from one point three million dollars to one point two million dollars.
- 3:21Even though revenue was stable. Exactly. Which they put down to cost saving measures.
- 3:26So that looks like, you know, good operational management doing the same business
- 3:29for a bit less cost. Okay.
- 3:32Efficient depreciation stayed the same, more or less?
- 3:35Pretty consistent at $0.3 million,
- 3:37mainly the building and renovations depreciating, as you'd expect.
- 3:40And finance costs. I saw those were down too. Yep.
- 3:43Down 30%. That's because they've been paying down their bank loans.
- 3:45Less debt, less interest to pay. Always good to see debt reduction.
- 3:48Okay. So some good cost control. Yeah.
- 3:51But there's a but, isn't there? Other operating expenses? Ah, yes.
- 3:55That's where things went the other way. A big jump there, up over 36 percent
- 3:59from $0.6 million to $0.8 million.
- 4:03And the main reason. Foreign exchange losses. A $0.3 million hit,
- 4:07primarily from moving money from Korean won back to Singapore dollars,
- 4:11the one weakened against the SGD.
- 4:14Ouch. How typical is that for international companies? It's a constant risk.
- 4:18Currencies fluctuate, and if you operate across borders, you're exposed.
- 4:21A loss like that can really sting, and it definitely offsets some of their other savings here.
- 4:25So it wiped out some of the gains from staff, cost cuts, and things. Partially, yes.
- 4:30The report mentions lower professional fees helped offset it a bit,
- 4:33but the FX loss was the big driver. Okay, so let's pull it all together.
- 4:37Profitability. What's the final picture? Well, profit before tax took a pretty
- 4:41big hit, down about 50 percent from $0.3 million to $0.15 million.
- 4:46Wow. Halved, basically. Pretty much. And profit attributable to the owners,
- 4:51the net profit, followed suit, down just over 50 percent as well to $0.149 million.
- 4:58And that flows through to earnings per share, naturally. Basic EPS down from
- 5:020.13 cents to 0.06 cents. Correct.
- 5:04Diluted also down significantly. So despite some of those cost savings.
- 5:08The drop in asset management fees, and especially that currency loss,
- 5:12really squeezed the profit margin.
- 5:14That's the main takeaway, I think. The core hotel was stable,
- 5:17some costs were managed, but those two factors pulled the overall profit down significantly.
- 5:22And there's another angle too, right? The total comprehensive loss.
- 5:25That actually got worse.
- 5:26Yes, significantly worse. It increased by 77% from a loss of about $0.8 million
- 5:32to a loss of $1.4 million.
- 5:35Whoa. Why is that different from the net profit figure, and why did it increase so much?
- 5:40Okay, so total comprehensive income or loss includes things that don't necessarily
- 5:45hit the main profit and loss statement immediately.
- 5:48The big one here is foreign currency translation adjustments.
- 5:53Ah, so the value of their Korean subsidiary, when translated back into Singapore
- 5:58dollars for the group accounts,
- 6:00went down because the one weakened. Exactly. So even beyond the direct loss
- 6:04on remittances we talked about
- 6:05earlier, the value of their overseas net assets decreased in SGD terms.
- 6:10That's captured in the comprehensive loss. Got it.
- 6:13So it gives a sort of broader picture of how currency swings affected their
- 6:17overall net worth during the period.
- 6:19Precisely. And that large increase shows just how much impact that weaker one
- 6:23had. Okay, so let's summarize the drivers then.
- 6:25Positives. Definitely the stable hotel revenue in Seoul.
- 6:29That's a big plus. Shows the core business is holding up. Right.
- 6:32Also, the increase in investment income, that was a smart move.
- 6:35Financial agility, perhaps.
- 6:37And the cost savings, lower staff costs, a bit lower hotel operating costs,
- 6:42lower finance costs from paying down debt. Those are all good operational points.
- 6:45Okay. And the negatives that pulled it down. Number one, the loss of that asset
- 6:49management revenue. A direct hit to the top line.
- 6:52Then, lower interest income from fixed deposits, though that was linked to the investment shift.
- 6:56But the really big one seems to be the foreign exchange impact,
- 7:01both the direct loss hitting operating expenses and the translation loss hitting comprehensive income.
- 7:06So external factors, particularly the KRWS-GD rate, played a huge role here.
- 7:11Absolutely. It feels like those external headwinds combined with the lost revenue
- 7:16stream just outweighed the internal cost management efforts and the stable hotel
- 7:20performance in this half year. Right.
- 7:22OK, let's shift briefly to their financial position.
- 7:25The balance sheet as of Jan 31st, 2025, property, plant and equipment down a bit.
- 7:31Yeah, from thirty eight point one million dollars to thirty six point zero million
- 7:35dollars. That's partly normal depreciation.
- 7:37Wear and tear. But also, again, those negative currency movements hitting the
- 7:41translated value of their Korean assets like the hotel building.
- 7:45Ah, the currency effect hits the balance sheet values, too. Yeah.
- 7:48OK, what else stands out? Well, they have some long-term investments,
- 7:52about $4.3 million in other hotels, and receivables related to loans to those
- 7:57investees. Okay. And on the current asset side?
- 8:00A noticeable increase in short-term investment securities, up to $3.3 million.
- 8:06These are quoted investments held for trading. Held for trading.
- 8:10So more active management of their cash.
- 8:13Trying to get returns. Seems like it. It ties in with the higher investment income we saw.
- 8:17They're putting cash to work in the market, aiming for short-term gains, likely.
- 8:22These are valued at fair value through profit or loss. I see.
- 8:25And cash itself. Cash balance is actually decreased, down to $10.7 million.
- 8:30Okay, so money moving out of cash into those short-term investments,
- 8:34liability side, anything major.
- 8:36Loans and borrowings are down, which is consistent with the lower finance costs.
- 8:40They're making those monthly principal repayments.
- 8:42Good. And payable's down, too. Right. Likely just timing of paying expenses.
- 8:46Overall, their net assets decreased slightly from $61.8 million to $60.4 million.
- 8:52And the net asset value per share dipped a bit as well. Yeah,
- 8:56from $0.26.12 down to $0.25.51.
- 9:00Reflects that decrease in overall equity driven largely by that compretence
- 9:04of loss. Let's quickly touch on cash flow for the six months.
- 9:07Where did the cash go? Well, net cash used in operating activities was $3.0 million.
- 9:12The main reason, buying those quoted investments we just talked about.
- 9:16So investing in securities counted as an operating outflow here.
- 9:19Because they're held for trading, yes, the purchases often flow through operations
- 9:24in the cash flow statement.
- 9:25Investing activity has actually generated a little cash, mainly interest received.
- 9:29And financing. Used about $0.3 million, mainly for those bank loan repayments.
- 9:34So overall, cash went down by about $3.1 million during the period,
- 9:38mostly into those new investments and paying down debt. That seems to be the picture.
- 9:42Okay, looking ahead then, what's the company's outlook?
- 9:44They express cautious optimism about the hotel in Seoul.
- 9:48They see the potential there, despite acknowledging the economic and political
- 9:52challenges in Korea. Cautious optimism.
- 9:55Sounds about right, given the
- 9:56results. Yeah. And they specifically mention monitoring those key risks.
- 10:00Foreign exchange, rising costs, inflation. They know what the headwinds are.
- 10:05And they're committed to managing these things and looking for opportunities.
- 10:08But notably, no dividend declared. No, not for this period or the same period last year.
- 10:14They state the funds are needed for potential business opportunities and for working capital.
- 10:18What does that typically signal when a company holds back on dividends?
- 10:22It usually means they see better uses for the cash internally right now,
- 10:27either investing in growth, shoring up the balance sheet, or just being prudent
- 10:30in uncertain times. Could be a myth of all three here.
- 10:33Okay, so let's wrap up this deep dive on Getapulse's half-year results.
- 10:37Key takeaways. I'd say a resilient core hotel business, which is fundamental,
- 10:43some definite positives in cost control and managing investments and debt,
- 10:47but significantly impacted by factors like the lost asset management contract
- 10:52and critically the negative foreign exchange movements.
- 10:55That currency impact really overshadowed the operational stability in this period,
- 11:00especially in the comprehensive loss figure.
- 11:03It really highlights how external economic factors can sway results,
- 11:07doesn't it? Absolutely. Which leads to a final thought for you, the listener.
- 11:10When you look at a company like this, how much weight do you give to the solid
- 11:15performance of its main business versus, say, the impact of currency fluctuations
- 11:20that are largely out of its control?
- 11:22And tied to that, what does their decision to keep cash for opportunities rather
- 11:27than pay dividends tell you about their confidence, their strategy,
- 11:29or maybe just the current economic climate they're navigating?
- 11:32Thinking about how these different pieces, operations, finance,
- 11:36external factors all connect really gives you that deeper understanding we're always aiming for.
- 11:42Music.