Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Sh0e Gets It Right | Maintaining Frame 163

Transcript

Sh0e Gets It Right | Maintaining Frame 163 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: is Brian. I'm here with Allison and this is maintaining
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: frame number one sixty three. She gets it right. Allison
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: chose that title before people start flipping out in the chat, So, oh,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: do you think they'll flip out like I mean, I
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: s yeah. I think that she was a little because
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: she can be pretty sketch sometimes, so.
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, but you know, give props when it's due.
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: As far as I'm considered, I watched this whole thing
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: and not only was I like, yep, that's a good point,
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: she actually brought up points that I thought, you know what,
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: I should have thought of that. So that's that's impressive because,
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: at the risk of sounding incredibly arrogant, I don't. I
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: don't feel that very often. But there are some really
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: good arguments. And I don't know if they're original to
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: her or if she she found somewhere, but they are
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: really good arguments, and I think it's uh. I think
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: she did a good job on this one. I'm guessing
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: that maybe you disagree, or you think the chat will disagree.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: I think there are people in the chat that are
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: suspicious of shoe so I am a little bit but
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: not like of her intentions, but rather her the compatibility
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: of her values. I just put it that way. But yeah,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: I mean, well we get it too. I don't know,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: we should like watch the video. So and before I
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: say anything, but let me just get my advanced scene
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: switcher up.
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: And I'll do the things.
• 1:45
  Speaker 4: All right.
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: So, if you want to send us a message at
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: any point throughout the show, and we do do these
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: shows live, which generally involves some technical difficulties, but we
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: do it live so we can respond to people in
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: real life. That's one of the things we've always done
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: is try to have that community component. But if you
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: would like to support the show and send a message live,
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: you can do so at feed the Badger dot com
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: slash just the tip that goes directly to our community
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: and we can well you can send it at any
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: point and we'll see it and receive it in our
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: community at Badger Nation dot online. But anyway, send those
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: messages to feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: tip very best way to send us a message and
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: to give us a tip, because you avoid YouTube's obscure
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: comment appraisal system and get a little bit more space
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: to elaborate upon your thoughts and we get the full
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: benefit of whatever funds you send.
• 2:39
  Speaker 4: So it's a win win and not so much win
• 2:42
  Speaker 4: for YouTube, but they can they can afford a loss
• 2:45
  Speaker 4: now and then.
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: And so feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: tip and if you'd like to support the show, feed
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: the Badger dot com slash support and big announcement and
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: I'll keep doing this. We are going to be having
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: another meetup in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September thirteenth, So that's
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: two months away, almost exactly two months I think on
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: the Saturday, or was it the previous Saturday, but anyway,
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: it's about two months away. We have a venue and
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: so we're going to be able to mingle and have
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: a space to do so where we will not be
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: chased off the grounds. I don't know if we were
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: chased off last time, but it felt.
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: Like we're just talked about like the last last year.
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: Last year, nothing happened that the Dutch proprietor was just
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: a little a little concerned about how many there.
• 3:35
  Speaker 4: Was of us.
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: So anyway, Feed the Badger dot com slash meet meet uh,
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: Feed the Badger dot com slash events for information about
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: that event and feed the Badger dot com slash support
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: to support us.
• 3:50
  Speaker 4: It should all be in the low bar. Do you
• 3:51
  Speaker 4: have the meeting?
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: I don't think I have.
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: The you know, I'll get that to you so you
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: can can slot in right into the spots.
• 4:02
  Speaker 4: All right, So those are the things.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: I think.
• 4:04
  Speaker 4: Brian is now ready, so let us know.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: I'm ready. Let us before we get started. We did
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: get Yeah, before we get started, we did get a
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: super chat from Chris Mizuno. So thank you Chris Mizuno
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: for the five dollars. You didn't add any comments. If
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: you wanted to say something, go ahead and do so.
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: So thank you for the five dollars, Chris Mizuna. All right,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: so I have the video. I don't know what part
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: you wanted me to play, so I didn't grab time codes.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: But we can jump into.
• 4:36
  Speaker 4: After the intro is fine?
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, after the intro. So this is called the male
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: Loser Epidemic, and yeah, so let's play it from here.
• 4:47
  Speaker 5: Sure, right now, let's get back to the video.
• 4:52
  Speaker 6: With all these.
• 4:52
  Speaker 5: Issues men arefacing, they seem to be moving to the
• 4:55
  Speaker 5: right and the Republicans more since the left and Democrats
• 4:58
  Speaker 5: have essentially just become young.
• 5:00
  Speaker 7: Men, eat and die movement.
• 5:02
  Speaker 5: Months ago, I covered how the Democratic Party was losing
• 5:04
  Speaker 5: young men's and I predicted Kamala Harris would lose in
• 5:07
  Speaker 5: part because of young men overwhelmingly voting for Trump, and.
• 5:10
  Speaker 7: I was correct.
• 5:11
  Speaker 5: Well, now the Democrats have unveiled their final solution to
• 5:15
  Speaker 5: the right wing male loser epidemic. Democrats spending millions to
• 5:19
  Speaker 5: learn how to speak to American men and win back
• 5:22
  Speaker 5: the working class.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: Okay, we pause it there for a second. Is this
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: the Is this the part that you wanted that where
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: Shoe gets it right? Because I know there's like the
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: bit where she goes into Tommy Lauren.
• 5:36
  Speaker 4: And oh I like that part too.
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: But yes, okay, all right, I mean, like, I'm not
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: gonna speak for you, but I thought that again, this
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: was this, this this was pure gold. And I have
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: had it in like I've had it out with Shoe.
• 5:50
  Speaker 4: It was a to be.
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: Honest, it was a really weird sort of argument that
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: I had with Shoe. And I don't know if she
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: still agrees with her position that she was arguing against
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: me with at this point in time, because many many
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: years ago, in the before times guys, So you can
• 6:07
  Speaker 2: imagine how many many years ago it was. I tweeted
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: a condemnation of various individuals addressing the Memorial Day I
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: believe it was Memorial Day.
• 6:21
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, yeah, it.
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: Was a Memorial Day controversy. And I basically said, these
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: these individuals are not mentioning the fact that this is
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: majority mail. This is a majority male sacrifice.
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's in war throughout all of history. That's what memorial.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: Exactly, exactly, the deaths and war throat all of history,
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: and nobody's mentioning the fact that it's ninety nine percent male,
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: just like the deaths of my cameras ninety nine percent
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: due to voidcat which he's attempting to do again. And
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: I just mentioned that, and Shue noticed that I said
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: this to AOC I believe in, and then said, oh, well, she.
• 7:02
  Speaker 4: Gets a lot wrong.
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: But you know, just this is not not one thinking
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: that it was a partisan like a commentary. But the
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: thing is I had also tweeted Millennia Trump who had
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: done a similar thing, so it wasn't partisan. It was
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: a general observation about how we treat men's sacrifice in
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: the past. Then I explained that if we ignore the
• 7:23
  Speaker 2: fact of men's sacrifice in the past for the society
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: that we enjoy, we are going to lose that society.
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: And I think that a lot of that's been born true,
• 7:33
  Speaker 2: born out as as we have in the in the
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: after times, after the before times. So that was my statement,
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: and I think eventually she got what I was saying,
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: but not before she sent like a billion zillion of
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: her gremlins to you know, not not that I she necessarily.
• 7:49
  Speaker 4: Intended dis.
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, and and she so, but I don't
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: know if she intended.
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: To her grandma. You may not have intended to. But
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: it just shows you, like how easy it is or
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: someone to conclude you must hate women because you are
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: pointing out a factual statement. It just happens to be
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: majority men. People immediately see that as a strike against women,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: and we're so conditioned to do that that yes, you
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: can't you can't like have and you can't make any
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: like statements without considering and making vocal your consideration for
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: women in said statement. No matter what it is, you
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: have to be like, Okay, just so you guys know,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: I think women are fine. Okay, now I'm going to
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: talk about this thing I need to talk about. You know,
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: it just shows you where we are, like, that's where
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: it is.
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: But essentially, my my overarching point is again this was
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: an a majority male sacrifice throughout all of human history,
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: and on only male sacrifice. If you look at conscription draft,
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: I think Israel is the only place that genuinely drafts
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: women or conscripts them.
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: They probably don't have them fight though, but yeah, no, no.
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: They can exempt themselves from fighting. So this has been
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: a majority male sacrifice, a majority male compelled sacrifice throughout history.
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: And because we don't recognize it, and we whitewash it,
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: we operate on a under a false worldview that will eventually,
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: you know, cause problems because you can't lie to yourself forever, right,
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: And that was the basic statement that I made, and
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: I think again, this is my prediction is sort of
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: being born true in the current era after.
• 9:29
  Speaker 4: The before times.
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: And so that was the basically the argument I got
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: into it with her. Karen eventually stepped up and talked
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: to her, and I think she conceded the point slightly.
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: And I think really what happened was it was a
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: misreading of why the intent behind the tweet. So It's
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: not like I haven't and I don't hold a grudge
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: because you know, Twitter, everything is absolute. You know, the
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: Twitter is the place for blood sports, shall we say,
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: so you know it happens. But yeah, in this case,
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: I think she's spot on almost from stem to stern
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: in this particular video. I read it, I watched it,
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: read it, I watched it with Relish actually, and again,
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: like I said, there was points that she made and
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: I was thinking, Wow, I wish I had made those
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: points because they're very on point. And yeah, she starts
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: with a real banger. You know, the Left has become
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: the eat shit and die party for men, and men
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: are taking notice and they're realizing that maybe they don't
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: want to eat shit and die, and they're moving away
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: from the left, you know. And uh, and that she
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: puts it very succinctly, and I think she's accurate. And
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: the Left is going to continue to lose men. I
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: mean the right what may too as well.
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 10:44
  Speaker 4: Really, I honestly think we need.
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: A u anti government spending party, but I guess that
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: ship stailed with Ross Perrot.
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: Regardless.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: You know, the Left is going to continue to lose
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: the young male vote as long as a principal part
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: of its plank is to force them to take responsibility
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: for things that they have not actually benefited from and
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: they are not personally responsible for. Right, Okay, so let's continue.
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: I'm really trying to prevent voidcat from destroying the stream.
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: All right, I'm gonna play more.
• 11:20
  Speaker 5: Democrats have blown millions of dollars on efforts to appeal
• 11:23
  Speaker 5: to American men who turned to President Donald Trump in
• 11:26
  Speaker 5: droves on election day in hopes of winning back the
• 11:29
  Speaker 5: working class. Democrats have spent twenty million on their efforts,
• 11:32
  Speaker 5: with donors and strategists holding up in luxury hotel rooms
• 11:36
  Speaker 5: brainstorming how to convince working classmen to return to the party.
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: Ah.
• 11:40
  Speaker 5: Yes, nothing more relatable to working classmen than luxury hotel rooms.
• 11:45
  Speaker 7: Great job, guys.
• 11:47
  Speaker 5: The plan code name SAM or speaking with American men
• 11:51
  Speaker 5: a strategic plan, promises to use the funds to study
• 11:55
  Speaker 5: the syntax, language, and content that gains attention and virality
• 11:59
  Speaker 5: in these spaces. The effort also recommends Democrats by advertisement
• 12:02
  Speaker 5: in video games, among other things. The Democrat Party is
• 12:07
  Speaker 5: treating young men like exotic animals.
• 12:09
  Speaker 7: They're studying now.
• 12:11
  Speaker 5: As you can see here is the young man in
• 12:13
  Speaker 5: his natural habitat in a dark, messy cave, surrounded by
• 12:17
  Speaker 5: taco bell wrappers and empty mountain dew bottles. Here is
• 12:22
  Speaker 5: another young man, as you can see, also dwelling in
• 12:25
  Speaker 5: a dark cave. This one has dyed his hair to
• 12:29
  Speaker 5: scare off potential predators. Unfortunately it also scares off potential mates.
• 12:34
  Speaker 5: But moving on, here is another young man.
• 12:38
  Speaker 4: We think.
• 12:40
  Speaker 6: We're not quite sure about this one. We are, we're
• 12:43
  Speaker 6: still studying it.
• 12:44
  Speaker 7: Listen, Democrats spend million dollars.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: All right, sir, I'm having I am struggling with the
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: voidcat today.
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 12:54
  Speaker 4: You I have given you treats.
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: They are up there, go up there.
• 12:59
  Speaker 4: Just all you have to do is go up the
• 13:01
  Speaker 4: last six inches. All right, It's not enough. She's too
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: lazy to do that.
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: Okay, So no, I think this is again spot on.
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: Did you have any commentary, Brian? You stopped it here?
• 13:14
  Speaker 5: No.
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: I mean, I've covered the speaking to men thing like
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: already on this channel a couple of times, and it's
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: really just just so you know, like, I don't know
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: if Hugh makes this realization, but okay, framing this as
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: a party thing, the Democrat party. But I think it's
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: a leftist thing, which is basically much bigger than the party.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: It's more of a philosophical problem. They're not actually concerned
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: with trying to help men with their problems. They're only
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: trying to figure out a better way to market their
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: bad ideas to appeal to men, so that it's it's
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: not it's not like they're there to help men. And
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: I don't know if she realizes this, because I know
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: she's a lefty too, so she's see like, well, we
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: should uh market to them better, but she knows that's
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: a that's not the solution. And what the reason why
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: men went to to Trump in record numbers and also
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: a lot of women, by the way, it had more
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: to do with the pragmatic, you know, it was the
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: pragmatic an obvious answer. And then we're like, yeah, you
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: know what, we're not gonna We're not gonna, you know, uh,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: like sink this ship, like so many of these modern
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: single women are doing right now, where they're like, I
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: don't care if the whole country burns down, if I can,
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: if I can kill my babies. So these guys are like, well,
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: we're just gonna step up and do something, And I
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: don't know if if Shuga is gonna be able to
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: address that, because this is like a paradoxical conflict that
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: is not resolvable without actually addressing men's concerns. And what
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: men's concerns involved is actually the government becoming less of
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: an obstacle to their thriving while also a providing them
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: the space to be able to do what they want
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: with their life, which is basically simple things like have
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: a decent job, buy a home, and get married to
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: a woman that doesn't hate him for what he is
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: so they can have kids and these things. You can't
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: first of all, most of that stuff you can't actually
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: like use the state to fix. You can only ask
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: the state to get the fuck out of the way.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: So that's one problem. And of course, you know, like
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: I saw an interview with a congressman I can't remember
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: his name. He was on Tucker Carlson's show. It was
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: like a week ago, and he said that everybody in
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: Congress is a little bit communist because they all want
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: power no matter what. So that's why I don't This
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: is why when I talk about this stuff, I don't
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: talk about Democrats and Republicans, and I don't talk about
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: it because it's pointless. I talk about leftists and rightists
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: or statists and people who are a little bit like
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: less statist. There's everybody in some degree is statist. There,
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: it's just varying degrees of statism. I mean even I
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: am to some degree because we need things like cops
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: and firemen. So, but like the issue is is that
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: the left is actually just interested in They believe in,
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: you know, things like you know, government planning and policy
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: and all of these things because they feel like that's
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: what the role should be. And I think that that
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: is an obstacle to men for a number of reasons,
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: not just their ability to thrive, but also their ability
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: to compete for you know, like a partner, because guess what,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: you can't beat the government when it comes to money
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: and resources. So women will vote for that. So this
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: is just this is something that I don't know if
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: she ever like if she's gonna be wrestling with this,
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: but it is an inevitable thing you have to reckon
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: with the role that women play in making the state
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: the way it is, and they are the reason why
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: it is the way it is. This is actually the
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: reason why Republicans and democrats are both status because they're
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: both trying to appeal to women. That's how you appeal
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: to women.
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, to take away the fear of a world
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: in which you know there is uncertainty because women are
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: more risk averse, and this is one hundred percent proven
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: in studies. Women are more risk averse than men. And
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: people will to the hills praise women for the behaviors
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: that they like as a result of women being risk adverse,
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: but they won't admit to the negatives of being risk adverse,
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: which is that you want to embrace more government control
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: over risks.
• 17:31
  Speaker 4: And something I wanted.
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: To bring up in conjunction with your your concept about
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: the statism versus not statism, the state when it tries
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: to work with the meritocracy, that would be the free market.
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: I'm not going to use capitalism because that's who know,
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: heck knows what it means anymore.
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: But the free markets.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: Were socialists to criticize property rights. Yeah, it's just property rights.
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean, how else are you going to
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: incentivize people's lives? Or I mean communism usually just uses
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: guns and gulags. But regardless, the free market. So the
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: idea that people can earn based on their labor and
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: the products that they make. Now a government's relationship to
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: the free market is I think the real question here
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: and what we need to look at. Because so if
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: you take something like education, for example, education as I
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: think originally conceived, was intended, like public education, was intended
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: to reduce the gap between people on top of the
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: economic ladder and those below. So you get an education,
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: you get a basic become basic literate in order to
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: be able to reduce the gap, so reduce the class gap.
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: And now education in many senses seems to be more
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: about indoctrinating young people into the pet projects of the
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: bureaucratic class of the United States and other Western nations.
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: They see the difference. So one is trying to get
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: to even out and give poorer, poorer children and some
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: kind of step up to be able to compete within
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: the free market by giving them a good basic education, literacy,
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: et cetera. And the other is basically teach them to
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: parrot and support bureaucratic pet product pet projects which generally
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: involve finding the smallest number of people that you have
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: to advocate for and removing everyone else's rights. In advocacy,
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: for them and also getting a lot of money. Right,
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: let's face it. So it's gone from actually trying to
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: break down class and support upward mobility in the working
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: class to support these kind of moral caste systems that
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: benefit government spending.
• 20:07
  Speaker 4: That makes it.
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: Okay, I'll leave that there. I'll let people cheo that.
• 20:11
  Speaker 4: Over and let's let's continue.
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: All right, let's keep going dollars to do that.
• 20:15
  Speaker 5: Stupid Maybe you should, I don't know, actually listen to men.
• 20:19
  Speaker 5: I listen to men for free all the time. All
• 20:21
  Speaker 5: I have to do is read my comment section. Let's
• 20:23
  Speaker 5: see here, Shoe one head is a perfect example of
• 20:25
  Speaker 5: why we need to repeal the nineteen Greetings from Albania.
• 20:28
  Speaker 7: I hate women so much, it's unreal.
• 20:30
  Speaker 5: Ooh, shoe mommy, Milky's Milki's milkies.
• 20:32
  Speaker 7: Mommy, mommy, mommy.
• 20:34
  Speaker 5: One time I got my penis stuck in a soda bottle. Okay,
• 20:37
  Speaker 5: on second thought, maybe my comment section is not the
• 20:40
  Speaker 5: best source.
• 20:41
  Speaker 8: And is Trump scored big with young male voters last election.
• 20:44
  Speaker 8: Democrats are spending twenty million dollars to learn how to
• 20:48
  Speaker 8: speak their language. I think it's a waste of money.
• 20:50
  Speaker 8: Maybe these guys should spend their money on teaching men
• 20:54
  Speaker 8: to not be such sexist Maybe that's the stats. Don't
• 20:56
  Speaker 8: fire that out now that.
• 20:59
  Speaker 9: We look at what young women have to choose from,
• 21:01
  Speaker 9: the pickens are slim. Yes, we might have a feminism
• 21:04
  Speaker 9: problem in America, but it's the feminization of men.
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: Okay, let's stop for a second here.
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, so we know the view is going to
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: be a toxic pit of shrewdom, which nevertheless exerts political
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: power in the US now or maybe it always has. Yeah,
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: it's it's like the modern for like women.
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: Like like women who are at home, because it's like
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: day it's like daytime TV.
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: It's like a modern day extension of the custom of
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: looking on in which women would influence political the political
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: process by because in the past votes for public they
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: would watch the people that are the men that men
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: voted for and made their opinions known in the process.
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: So the view is almost like an extension of that.
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: And so I guess it makes sense that it has
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: become a political force, and yet it's incredibly vapid. So yes,
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: but you'd almost expect this from the view.
• 22:04
  Speaker 4: Then you have Fox. Yeah that's time, are you Allison?
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: Does that really surprise you. Modern women are modern women everywhere,
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: Tommy Lawrence not conservative. I'm sorry. She's a girl boss
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: feminist one hundred percent. She just found a way to
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: make her money. This doesn't surprise me at all. She's
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: just like the other bitches. She's just younger and she
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: likes sees on Fox News doing the same shit and
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: so look, I'm sorry. It's just women that are pundits
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: are generally all on the same page that This is
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: one of the reasons why I brought up Hanna Cocks
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: back in the day when she was like, I'm the
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: libertarian feminist and I was like, yeah, you're basically the
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: same as everybody else. And sure enough she is there
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: because all women want to hold on to whatever power
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: they have, whatever they the illusion of that power, to
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: be honest, and Tommy Lauren is is just is She
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: is a honored woman, just like the view, just like
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: all these just like Hanna Cock's just like all these
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: other people. So I mean, for me, it's not shocking
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: at all. Like even making Kelly was all on that
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: bandwagon as well, you know, I mean she kind of
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: like tilted a little bit when you know, the election
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: was coming up and she did. She did say, you
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: know what, we need to help men out. But even
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: then I wouldn't be surprised if she went back on
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: that girl boss thing, you know, So anyway, I'm sorry,
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: go ahead. It doesn't surprise me though, Alison, this is
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: not at all shocking. I talked about this too.
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: Okay, So realist in the room. If you want to
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: stop being put into timeouts by me, please actually put
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: forth substantive points that are of interest the arguments being made.
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: Stop making continuous stream of insults.
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: Insulting.
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: Yeah, he's insulting you.
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: I know. No, it's okay. I think he's got a
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: crush on me, and I'm sorry, but yeah, I know
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: I'm that way.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: You know what, do you know what happened today? Chariso
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: became somehow became today's HBr or top fan. He also
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: sent us money, So I I think we're having another
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: Codure situation with Chariso. He hates us so much he
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: has to send us money.
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: He did. I read it out loud, and I appreciate it.
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Chris.
• 24:25
  Speaker 4: I just call him Cheriso because it's easier.
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: I know, I get it, I get it. I think
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: is delicious. So but anyway, Okay, let's keep.
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: Going spicy, just like just like kids, they want to
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: m No. I just said that cheriso is delicious but spicy,
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: just like Chris.
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, sure, Okay, I have.
• 24:46
  Speaker 9: Stable families, but there are a lot of young men
• 24:48
  Speaker 9: out there who want to live in mama's basement and.
• 24:51
  Speaker 5: Order door dash. Oh oh no. The very night I
• 24:56
  Speaker 5: was sitting on my couch writing the script to my
• 24:59
  Speaker 5: video about how the Democrats are spending twenty million dollars
• 25:03
  Speaker 5: to relate to young men. This came on my TV
• 25:06
  Speaker 5: on Fox News, a Tommy Larrn and Laura Ingram segment
• 25:09
  Speaker 5: about stay at home sons men who still live at home.
• 25:13
  Speaker 5: Literally minutes after this aired, it went absolutely viral on
• 25:17
  Speaker 5: Twitter for not good reasons.
• 25:20
  Speaker 6: So we are going to unpack this.
• 25:22
  Speaker 5: Peace by peace because even though everyone was mocking it
• 25:25
  Speaker 5: and making fun of it, as far as I saw,
• 25:27
  Speaker 5: nobody was really dissecting it and breaking down exactly why
• 25:31
  Speaker 5: she was so egregiously wrong. So come join me in
• 25:35
  Speaker 5: debunking the male loser epidemic, because who all, right?
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: Should I? This time code is about.
• 25:43
  Speaker 4: Over Yeah, it's fun.
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: I like her, I like her analysis of this, and
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: she actually goes into where this came from, which was
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: I believe just a tweet and oh no, it.
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: Was from yet Jeopardy. A contestant on Jeopardy.
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: He he won like a bunch of money, and he
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: like lives at home with his parents. He's got like
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: a like a master's degree in some stem major, but
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: he's not doing anything with it.
• 26:14
  Speaker 10: Yeah yeah, yeah, so he he basically said I am
• 26:20
  Speaker 10: a stay at home son, as like just a throwaway
• 26:23
  Speaker 10: comedic line, and then the femosphere seesed upon it and
• 26:30
  Speaker 10: turned it into a massive anti mail propaganda campaign.
• 26:36
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna just call it the memosphere.
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: Now, if they're gonna call if they're gonna say this,
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: like loose collection of things that interests men are the menosphere.
• 26:44
  Speaker 2: Like fitness, health supplements, protein powder, shaving, you know, all
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: of that stuff is part of the manosphere. Stobs, job jobs, Yeah,
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: just anything associated with men.
• 26:59
  Speaker 4: Is part of the manosphere.
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna say that this much more consolidated, funded, and
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: more regimented controlled industrial and institutional government, corporate NGO mass
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: the femosphere, or perhaps the feminine Femodarth's death star. I'm
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: going to start calling it that because to be honest,
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: there is a lot better argument to say that the
• 27:36
  Speaker 2: femosphere is more organized, more funded, more dangerous, more inculcated,
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: like more infiltrated, woven into the fabric of society than
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: the manosphere.
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: It's like, the.
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: Femosphere is a billion, if not trillion dollar industry. And
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: this is what we found from USA, from feminist NGOs,
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: from all of this other stuff, from exporting this feminism
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: into the rest of the world, destabilized regions. It is
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: a gigantic, massive, powerful, and sort of evil organized like
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: collection of organizations, all with a very clear mandate that
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: they all share. So let's call it the femosphere. And
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: as I've said before, the difference between in size between
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: the femosphere and the manosphere is the femosphere is the
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: size of the death Star.
• 28:31
  Speaker 4: The manosphere is the size of.
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: An Ewok ert like it's it's the size of the
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: Ewok village, the Ewoks, you know, Yeah, okay, yeah, I
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: said that the femosphere is the size of the death Starr.
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: The manosphere is the size of the Ewok village.
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but the Ewok village did beat the stormtroopers. It
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: just they just had to be really clever about it.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: They also ate them, but anyway, the ateh them and
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: fed them to the rebels at the end of the movie.
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys notice.
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: That the darkness, Like Lando knows that he was eating
• 29:14
  Speaker 3: Stormtrooper at the Ewok village and he couldn't really say
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: no because it would have been impolite.
• 29:19
  Speaker 4: But this is this is long pork.
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, okay.
• 29:26
  Speaker 5: Who else better equipped to talk about men's issues than
• 29:29
  Speaker 5: two stupid blonde bimbos. Hold on one second, three stupid
• 29:35
  Speaker 5: blonde bimbos. Sorry I felt left out. All right, let's
• 29:39
  Speaker 5: go wait any my gamer fuel, see I do drink it.
• 29:46
  Speaker 7: That one's for you, techtone.
• 29:47
  Speaker 9: It's a major problem. And you know, Speaker Johnson has
• 29:50
  Speaker 9: been talking about those maybe deadbeat folks that are on Medicaid,
• 29:54
  Speaker 9: and maybe some of those folks are the stay at
• 29:56
  Speaker 9: home suns. We don't know, but I'll tell you this.
• 29:58
  Speaker 9: Leave it to gen Z rebrand laziness and social awkwardness
• 30:03
  Speaker 9: as something cutesy, like a stay at home son.
• 30:05
  Speaker 6: But Laura, I gotta tell you this is also.
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: A big one person.
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: You just latch onto it like some kind of massive
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: latching machine and They're like, we can use that stuff
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: fuel our death laser.
• 30:22
  Speaker 4: Like anyway, Yeah, I.
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: Think Tommy it was brought on to like get a
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: SoundBite and razor platform, So I think they saw this
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: as opportunity to jump on for some ratings, and it
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: did work in that regard.
• 30:40
  Speaker 9: Do I think declining birth rates? People not getting married
• 30:43
  Speaker 9: and having children, you know, that's a big problem. They
• 30:45
  Speaker 9: blame it on women.
• 30:47
  Speaker 6: Well, look at.
• 30:47
  Speaker 9: What young women have to choose from the pickens are slim. Yes,
• 30:51
  Speaker 9: we might have a feminism problem in America, but it's
• 30:54
  Speaker 9: the feminization of men. There are a lot of young
• 30:57
  Speaker 9: women out there that want to get married, they want
• 30:59
  Speaker 9: to have is, they want to have stable families. But
• 31:02
  Speaker 9: there are a lot of young men out there who
• 31:04
  Speaker 9: want to live in mama's basement and order door dash
• 31:07
  Speaker 9: And that's why we have declining birth rates and a
• 31:09
  Speaker 9: lot of other problems in society. It's time to go out,
• 31:11
  Speaker 9: get a job, breathe the fresh air, meet people in
• 31:14
  Speaker 9: real life. Let's just get back to basics.
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: So it didn't take long for them to blame men,
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: or at least Tommy Lauren.
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, personally, I blame cats.
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: You blame cats Yeah, they've captured our brains in order
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: to make us serve them and turn off our desire
• 31:35
  Speaker 2: to have children or something. I don't know, toxoplasmosis. It's
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: it's a real thing, you know. Let's listen to the
• 31:43
  Speaker 2: shoe shoe.
• 31:44
  Speaker 5: Okay, So first of all, this stay at home something
• 31:48
  Speaker 5: is not a real thing. It was a random throwaway,
• 31:51
  Speaker 5: self deprecating joke some contestant on Jeopardy, said one guy.
• 31:55
  Speaker 7: Because I guess.
• 31:56
  Speaker 5: There's nothing else there we go going on that they
• 31:58
  Speaker 5: could cover on the news. Really made this into a
• 32:01
  Speaker 5: fake phenomenon so they can on young men. Meanwhile, we're
• 32:04
  Speaker 5: spending millions of dollars trying to win back young men.
• 32:09
  Speaker 5: Oh no, the young men are leaving us in droves.
• 32:11
  Speaker 6: How do we get them back?
• 32:13
  Speaker 5: Don't worry, I got this. Hey, you fat, lazy, cheeto
• 32:17
  Speaker 5: dust covered slobs.
• 32:18
  Speaker 6: You nice.
• 32:20
  Speaker 5: Thanks?
• 32:22
  Speaker 6: I love you.
• 32:23
  Speaker 4: I love you too.
• 32:31
  Speaker 7: The amount of.
• 32:41
  Speaker 4: Okay, let's keep calling.
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: I don't know if.
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: You can yes what, I don't know if we can
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: say anything to that except it's hilarious.
• 32:50
  Speaker 4: I find it hilarious.
• 32:51
  Speaker 7: Is it because they're.
• 32:52
  Speaker 5: Lazy bombs and just want to order door dash all day?
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: No?
• 32:55
  Speaker 5: And also they're not paying for door Dash, Tommy, they're
• 32:58
  Speaker 5: financing it.
• 33:00
  Speaker 4: Oh that's terrible times.
• 33:01
  Speaker 9: There are a lot of young men out there who
• 33:03
  Speaker 9: want to live in mama's basement and order door Dash,
• 33:06
  Speaker 9: and that's why we have declining birth rates. It's time
• 33:08
  Speaker 9: to go out, get a job. Breathe the fresh air pot.
• 33:11
  Speaker 5: Either of you tried applying for a job as a
• 33:13
  Speaker 5: young man recently or tried buying a house on the
• 33:16
  Speaker 5: salary of one of these young men. Have you experienced
• 33:19
  Speaker 5: the dating market, been on the dating sites.
• 33:21
  Speaker 7: As a young man?
• 33:23
  Speaker 11: No?
• 33:23
  Speaker 7: Interesting, okay, just wondering. Listen.
• 33:26
  Speaker 5: I know the average age of a Fox News viewer
• 33:28
  Speaker 5: is like seventy nowadays, and you need to pander to them.
• 33:30
  Speaker 5: But Tommy, you are like two years younger than me.
• 33:33
  Speaker 5: You know this isn't true.
• 33:35
  Speaker 4: Why are you.
• 33:35
  Speaker 6: Talking like this?
• 33:36
  Speaker 5: Why are you talking like a thing boomer? I'm sorry,
• 33:39
  Speaker 5: I have no other word for this, but I hate this,
• 33:41
  Speaker 5: Like a generational pick meet. I was born in the
• 33:43
  Speaker 5: wrong generation. I'm not like those other young people. And
• 33:46
  Speaker 5: you know what, she's not like those other young people.
• 33:49
  Speaker 5: Not all young people can afford a nice one.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: Well, actually, Tommy looks really old. I'm surprised that she's
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: younger than Shoe actually, because yeah, Tommy looks like she's
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: got a lot of mind. There's a lot of mileage
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: on that vehicle.
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: So but anyway, Blood's age differently, you know, I guess
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: it's a little bit worse.
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I think she is Italian, so.
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: She'll probably look like this until she's like eighty five,
• 34:16
  Speaker 2: and then instantaneously she'll become like the cryptkeeper.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah the uh, the pasta bomb is going to land
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: and she's gonna look really old. Turn in to my mom.
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: But anyway, okay, I just pause it there so that
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: we don't get Banana.
• 34:34
  Speaker 5: Snow's job and lip filler and get a cushy job
• 34:37
  Speaker 5: on Fox News based entirely on merit. I'm sure the
• 34:40
  Speaker 5: main problem with this brain dead boomer ass take is
• 34:43
  Speaker 5: not only is it cringe, but it's completely divorced from reality.
• 34:47
  Speaker 5: This slop is specifically designed for people who paid like
• 34:50
  Speaker 5: five dollars for a house. Un listens, not old boomers. Okay,
• 34:54
  Speaker 5: my parents, they are lovely people.
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: A lot of what I'm not sure if the boomer
• 34:59
  Speaker 2: brandt is is necessary.
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: We can skip it, okay, I mean I don't know
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: how long it goes for.
• 35:07
  Speaker 4: I think, well, I could actually make a commentary on this.
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: I think that I think what boomers might be talking
• 35:14
  Speaker 2: about is, yes, there were jobs, but they were also
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: like a lot of manual labor and not very like
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: not very soul fulfilling jobs. And I think this generation
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: doesn't want to do the manual labor or doesn't want
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: to do it for the prices that are available, which
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: will make everything else.
• 35:35
  Speaker 4: Very expensive. The cost of living will go up.
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: If if if we if we, you know, make manual labor,
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: give the kind of wages that the current generation wants.
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: But here's the thing, we're asking something very different from
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: the current generation than we did from the boomers. The
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: boomers having a family and raising children was accessible to
• 35:59
  Speaker 2: them because they weren't at the.
• 36:04
  Speaker 4: What is that cancer term?
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: The cancer hadn't metastasized at that point, so they weren't
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: dealing with generations of women who take an identity, literally
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: take an identity from rejecting men, which is a consequence
• 36:19
  Speaker 2: of the whole feminist framework around feminists deciding how men
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: and women should relate to each other. Feminists made that decision,
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: and they taught it in schools, we're experiencing the fallout.
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: So for those individuals who want a family, it's unlikely
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: to happen for them. So there's no real incentive to
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: take those jobs because a lot of them, way back
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: when almost all of humanity took jobs in order to
• 36:44
  Speaker 2: have a family. Now that seems to be a pie
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: in the sky for the average worker. So is what
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: what are you asking of them? You're asking to take
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: an identity from your job, not your family. And now
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: these individuals want a job that gives them more than
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: just money for a family. They want a job that
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: makes them be fulfilled on other levels emotionally and in
• 37:09
  Speaker 2: terms of who they are, who they feel they are.
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: And I think that simultaneously that means that, you know,
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: you can't really judge boomers for the circumstances they were in. Yes,
• 37:20
  Speaker 2: they took shitty jobs in order to pay for families
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: that they could actually afford. And you can't really judge
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: the current generation either, because they're being asked to take
• 37:28
  Speaker 2: shitty jobs for no positive sense of self, no sense
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: of purpose. So they want the debt to come from
• 37:35
  Speaker 2: the jobs. Does that make sense? And if it doesn't,
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: they want jobs to pay more. So I'm like, maybe
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: we should quit it with this like generational conflict.
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: Maybe a little yeah, I mean, I think there's a
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: desire to blame the Boomers for stuff and I but
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: I don't think it's completely unfounded because my understanding of
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: the criticism of the Boomers is they were essentially the
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: generation of the sixties, So like all of the kind
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: of social ills we have now are downstream from the
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: hippies of the sixties, of which like my parents are hippies,
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: I know, they're boomers, and that's part of it. The
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: other part of it is that the Boomers didn't really
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: like prepare their children for the future to inherit like
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: what they had, whereas previous generations did. And so you
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: have like boomers now that like you know, they want
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: to hold on all their stuff until they die because
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: it's become they become far more materialistic than say the
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: Silent Generation or the Greatest Generation. I'm not saying it's
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: all on them. I'm just trying to put on like
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: the you know, I'm looking at it like trying to
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: be as fair as possible to the people who have
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: those criticisms. But that being said, you could in turn
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: then say well, maybe it's their parents' fault that they're
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: like this, and then it goes on, it goes right.
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: I think that ultimately what everybody wants is to have
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: a job that they can support a family on and
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: is within reach because a lot of people have dream jobs.
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: But like most people don't get those dream jobs. They
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: just they just do what they have to do. The
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: problem is is that I think a man in particular
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: is willing to work whatever job he's able to work
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: with dignity and appreciation if he's doing it for a
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: family that he wants to support, and if but there is,
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: if there isn't one, then a man's not gonna do
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: anything more than he needs to just for himself to survive.
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: So like what, because you know, it goes back to
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: the joke of if men, if men didn't have to
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: give women nice things to attract them, they would live
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: in a cardboard box or like a studio apartment with
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: you know, a mattress and a and a PlayStation and
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: that be it. You know, TV, a PlayStation, a mattress,
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: and but they they generally and I'm not saying that,
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: you know, I'm not making a blanket statement before any
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: men get upset and triggered in the comments. But I
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: think in general that's why men achieve is because they
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: want to attract women. But if women are saying they
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: don't need them, then men have no incentive to achieve
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: because it's like, what am I doing it for you?
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: Yes, so you might as well take an identity from
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: your job or a sense of purpose from your job,
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: which means that you are not interested in the labor
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: jobs because you don't really get a sense of purpose
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: maybe in like the utilities, I think, because you know,
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: there's a sense that you are doing something very important
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: for society.
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: But who knows, Like, well there's people who are garbage men,
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: and I mean I'm sure they wouldn't think their job
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: is glamorous what but like for that's what I'm saying,
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: Like some you know, we have this like we tend
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: to overly focus. Not we but like I see when
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: people are talking about jobs, are always talking about like
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: these kind of like high flying prestigious jobs like in
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: stem and tech and stuff, and it's like yeah, but
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: a lot of people they just want to you know,
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: like what happened in West Virginia where they close down
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: all the coal mines because of you know, global warming.
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: A bunch of men who didn't really have like the
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: greatest skill set, but they were hard workers. They all
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: lost work. And I'm like, well, everybody should be able
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: to do something, you know, that is within their pay
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: grade with dignity and be able to make some living
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: off of it. And so and again I would say that,
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: you know, what happened in West Virginia in the hollers
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: is a product of government interference ultimately, like you know,
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: but so yeah, I mean, I don't like, I don't know,
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: like I think that the idea that men have to
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: romantically take something out of their work is I think
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: it's a little bit pie in the sky because I
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: think that most people they just do whatever they can do.
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: They work in a factory, they work in a machine company,
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: they drive a truck. None of it's glamorous, none of
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: it's high status. But the problem is is that women
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: are the ones that are looking for high set at
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: his jobs. In men, they want to be able to say,
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: my man is a lawyer, my man is in tech,
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: my man programs AI. Not my man drives a truck.
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: My man is you know, like works in a warehouse.
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: You know, yeah, yeah, forklift, you know, definitely, there's this
• 42:15
  Speaker 2: idea you want a partner or a man who makes
• 42:18
  Speaker 2: your girlfriends jealous. But how do you all have a
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: man who makes your girlfriends jealous?
• 42:23
  Speaker 4: It's impossible.
• 42:24
  Speaker 2: It's why women in these with this kind of mindset
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: end up aiming for the top ten percent of men.
• 42:29
  Speaker 2: And even if all men became the top ten percent
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: of men, there would be a top ten percent of
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: that mean, because the idea of making your girlfriends jealous
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: is a constantly.
• 42:38
  Speaker 4: Moving target that men can never actually hit.
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: But what I was trying to say is, and this
• 42:44
  Speaker 2: is not with any condemnation, but if having a family
• 42:49
  Speaker 2: is out of your reach, because we live in the
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: era of every man has to be in the top
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: ten percent, which is absolutely physically impossible, then you wouldn't
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: you would You would probably want to have a job
• 43:06
  Speaker 2: that gives you a sense of purpose if you're not
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: going to get it from family. And I'm not saying
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: that to condemn men who think that way, or the
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: so called alleged son stay at.
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: Home son, stay its home son is just a new
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: way of describing failure to launch, which is a very
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: old like it's been going on forever, you know.
• 43:27
  Speaker 4: Yeah, but you're not saying this.
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: I'm not saying this is in terms of condemning it.
• 43:33
  Speaker 4: I'm saying this seems like to me.
• 43:35
  Speaker 2: Like a natural response and explain some of the things
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: that I'm seeing, which is like, uh, there there is
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: some evidence that young men and probably young women don't
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: want to take the jobs that boomers necessarily took. But
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: they don't have the same incentive structure that boomers had,
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: so that may be why they don't don't want to
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: take those jobs. So it's just it's that's that's the
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: only thing that I'm pointing out, And it's not a
• 44:00
  Speaker 2: lot of condemnation. It's like we should be giving somehow
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: or as a culture, we need to have some thought
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: to how young people pair up in a way that
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: secures a stable future for them. And that stable future
• 44:17
  Speaker 2: means they pair up and they don't get divorced. Right
• 44:20
  Speaker 2: in our society is we've just dropped the ball on that.
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: We have decided that instead of caring about the future
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: and making sure people pair off or we create a
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: circumstance in which they can do so, we have decided
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: to embrace whatever feminists came up with pulled out of
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: their ass about the relationship between men and women, which
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: is like the exact opposite of bringing men and women together,
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: if you think about it, it's basically saying that they
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: are enemy camps, that men oppress women, And of course,
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: in academic feminism they assert that men use rape and
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: domestic violence to uphold patriarchy. So men oppress women through
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: rape and domestic violence. Where do you go with that?
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: When you're teaching children at this point that that is
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: the relationship between men and women.
• 45:13
  Speaker 4: Where do you go with that? You go to hell?
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: All right, listen, yeah, hold on, I'm just looking something up. Okay,
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: So here we go.
• 45:24
  Speaker 7: What if you guys are boomers.
• 45:25
  Speaker 5: When the baby boomer generation sends its people, it is
• 45:28
  Speaker 5: not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending
• 45:31
  Speaker 5: people who have lots of problems. They're bringing the housing crisis,
• 45:34
  Speaker 5: they're bringing wage stagnation, they're falling for AI generated photos
• 45:37
  Speaker 5: on Facebook. But some I assume are good people, But
• 45:41
  Speaker 5: my god, I truly believe they do not understand how
• 45:43
  Speaker 5: good they had it. They could support a family on
• 45:45
  Speaker 5: a single income, a single income from a job that
• 45:48
  Speaker 5: didn't require.
• 45:49
  Speaker 6: A college degree.
• 45:50
  Speaker 5: Their leaders didn't prostitute away their economic future for some
• 45:53
  Speaker 5: cheap plastic shit from China. They inherited the greatest economy
• 45:57
  Speaker 5: known to man, and they pretend it's a.
• 45:59
  Speaker 6: Paradise that they earned.
• 46:00
  Speaker 5: I just don't understand, Like, why don't boomers and spiritual
• 46:03
  Speaker 5: boomers like Tommy Lauren see people struggling and go, wow,
• 46:07
  Speaker 5: I wish I could fix this. They should have it
• 46:09
  Speaker 5: better than I had it.
• 46:10
  Speaker 10: Do you wonder.
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: Well? The boomer generation was also called the me generation. Again,
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: it goes back to like that hippie thing, and they
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: had it really good then, like in terms of their
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: economy was so good that they were brat. So one
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: of the things I was looking up I was curious
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: about was what how well were boomers doing in terms
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: of their marriage rates and divorce rates as compared to
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: later generations. And from what I see here, it seems
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: this is what I found out. Divorce rates among baby
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: boomers born nineteen forty six to nineteen sixty four are
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: notably higher than those of later generations, particularly when considering
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: great divorce divorce among those age five and older, Baby
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: boomers have the highest divorce rates of any generation studies,
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: especially in later life. Isn't that interesting. So the hippies
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: of the Hippie generation have the highest. Now later generations
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: like well Xers, millennials, and Zoomers. I think Zoomers are
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: of the age of their getting married now, they're like
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: in their twenties and thirties. The alphas are still too
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: young to look at but they're just not getting married,
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: so you're not gonna get the divorce rates. But there
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: was a massive spike in divorces during the Boomer generation. Obviously,
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: the boomers themselves are products of marriage. That's why it's
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: called the baby boom. Right, Like the people came back
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: from war and they were like, we're gonna have to
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: repopulate the country after World War Two. So the Boomers
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: have the highest divorce rates of any generation studied, especially
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: in their later life. Between nineteen ninety and twenty fifteen,
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: divorce rates for adults age fifteen older doubled from five
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: to ten divorces per one thousand married persons. For those
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: sixty five and older to pay, the rate tripled. And
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: a lot of this also had to do with the
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: fact that no fault divorce had just come like they
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: had been embraced by, you know, this unique time in history.
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: So and Gen X has lower divorce rates than boomers.
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: Millennials have the lowest, but they're also not getting married.
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: And Generation Z we don't really we can't measure right
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: now because they're too young to tell, but they are
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: they're not getting married either or they're getting married very late.
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: So the youngest Gen zs are still like thirteen. I
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: think that they're maybe maybe uh, I know that these
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: these are not like you know, measuring the generations is
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: not solid, but they're around twenty ish years old Gen Z,
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: so they're getting they're they're probably at the point where
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: they're thinking about it. But I wanted to I wanted
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: to look at that because what I'm wondering about is
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: how much the zeitgeist of the of the boomers in
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: their time contributed to this problem. And also they're they're
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: sort of like blinders on like what's going on, because
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: if you grew up in the best time in history,
• 49:19
  Speaker 1: you probably don't think there's anything that you have to
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: be stewards of, like your own kids. And they're obviously
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: thinking about themselves when they just get divorces because they're like, oh, well,
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: you know this isn't working, you know, and I would
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: be curious to see which sex was more likely to
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: initiate divorce, But it was the divorce rates did spike
• 49:38
  Speaker 1: when no fault divorce was introduced during the Boomer generation.
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: And I think it was Ronald Reagan that put that
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: one into uh into into action. So you can thank
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: Reagan for that. M M. But anyway, are you distracted
• 49:58
  Speaker 1: or should I keep playing?
• 50:00
  Speaker 5: But are why so many Millennials and Zoomers don't want kids?
• 50:04
  Speaker 5: I want to make the world a better place for
• 50:06
  Speaker 5: my children. I want to make the world a better
• 50:09
  Speaker 5: place for my children. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
• 50:12
  Speaker 5: You spoiled bratt children.
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: Not happening.
• 50:17
  Speaker 9: Well, look at what young women have to choose from
• 50:19
  Speaker 9: the pickens are slim.
• 50:21
  Speaker 5: You might have a feminism problem in.
• 50:23
  Speaker 9: America, but it's the feminization of men.
• 50:26
  Speaker 5: Young men are becoming lazy because they're becoming feminized. So
• 50:30
  Speaker 5: they're becoming lazy because they act more like women.
• 50:33
  Speaker 7: What did she mean?
• 50:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I think I called sorry. It tall me out
• 50:41
  Speaker 4: for that as well.
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: I think it seems to Yeah, well, I mean there's
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: no getting around that.
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: You just said it yeah, or it was somebody else
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: who was who's Oh no, it was the bro whisperer Withers,
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah yeah. Or actually, you can go to
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: the left and they're constantly insulting men by implying they're
• 51:06
  Speaker 2: like women constantly, And I find that really amusing because
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: they're the ones who call out femophobia, and yet from
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: what I can tell, they're also the ones who use
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: it the most, because the right is more likely to
• 51:23
  Speaker 2: say something like, you know, women are behaving in this
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: way because you're not you're not doing something right as
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: a man. And it's not that women are are lesser
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: than men, it's that men fail to live up to
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: the masculine standard in order to properly lead women. Whereas
• 51:41
  Speaker 2: the left, so far from what we what I have
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: seen this year, really goes into the uh. For example,
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: Donald Trump and Elon Musk behaving like teenage girls having
• 51:54
  Speaker 2: a spat and then other kinds of shaming just like that,
• 51:58
  Speaker 2: so comparing men in order to share them. The left
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: has really been on a terror doing that this year,
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: I've noticed, although this was Tommy Lauren doing it, so
• 52:07
  Speaker 2: I guess, I guess I'm just wintering my apology.
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: Tom's a feminist.
• 52:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, okay. It's something I noticed with feminists. It's
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: something I noticed with women who buy into or people
• 52:22
  Speaker 2: who buy into the the patriarchy narrative, is that when
• 52:26
  Speaker 2: they want to shame men, they use that you're like
• 52:31
  Speaker 2: a woman, and it's like, well, what does that make
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: you think of women? I remember there was somebody who
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: accused me of something on Twitter and they said, you
• 52:39
  Speaker 2: think like a woman, Like, well, I am one, Yeah, okay,
• 52:46
  Speaker 2: just like a woman.
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: I still don't have my soundboard yet, so all right, No,
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: I know, I got some work to do over the weekend.
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: I may have to reinstall windows and start all over
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: because this thing is using too much CPU. So I'm
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: just but anyway, I.
• 53:02
  Speaker 5: Know there's like a decrease in testosterone or something happening.
• 53:05
  Speaker 5: But men are moving right wing all over the world.
• 53:09
  Speaker 5: Does that correlate with the feminization or I mean there
• 53:12
  Speaker 5: are suspiciously a lot of far right femboys, so.
• 53:18
  Speaker 7: Maybe.
• 53:18
  Speaker 5: But uh, here's the thing, Tommy, there is absolutely no
• 53:22
  Speaker 5: evidence that young women want to start families more than
• 53:25
  Speaker 5: young men.
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: None.
• 53:26
  Speaker 5: In fact, old data says the exact thing opposite.
• 53:30
  Speaker 4: Another thing, I appreciate.
• 53:31
  Speaker 5: Sixty four percent of women younger than fifty say they
• 53:34
  Speaker 5: just don't want to have children, no reason, they just
• 53:36
  Speaker 5: don't want them, verse fifty percent of men who say
• 53:39
  Speaker 5: the same.
• 53:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this is this is good, Like she did a
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: lot of good research to annihilate these stupid arguments. I
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: don't know we didn't skip the part where she points
• 53:50
  Speaker 2: out the whole thing with the immigration taking people's job. Yeah, okay,
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: because I thought that that was a really good point. Okay,
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: let's keep going.
• 54:00
  Speaker 5: Another study by Archbridge Institute shows the same. Sixty three
• 54:04
  Speaker 5: percent of women without children said they have no desire
• 54:06
  Speaker 5: to have a child, while only fifty percent of men
• 54:08
  Speaker 5: said the same. For men, the most commonly cited factor
• 54:11
  Speaker 5: was personal finance, but among women, the strongest reason not
• 54:14
  Speaker 5: to have a child was their desire to maintain their
• 54:17
  Speaker 5: personal independence.
• 54:18
  Speaker 7: Basically, they don't.
• 54:19
  Speaker 5: Want to give up their brunch of mimosas they've been
• 54:22
  Speaker 5: asked blasted with probably their whole lives, telling them their
• 54:25
  Speaker 5: lives will be ruined, their bodies will be ruined, they'll
• 54:28
  Speaker 5: never have fun again, they'll be miserable forever if they
• 54:31
  Speaker 5: have children.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: So would you say, then let's go back to the
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: because I don't know if she was going to bring
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: this up, but if men's primary reason for not wanting
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: to start a family, or at least like not wanting
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: to get married starter family has is more about money
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: because they're like, well, I don't think I can afford it,
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: which I think kind of boils down to I don't
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: think I can make enough money to attract a woman
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: that would take that would take me on, like I
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: can't compete, you know, on that ground, like just because
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: of like women just want too much. And then and
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: so we see the stay at home sun as this
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: like refusal to grow up, this childish you know, desire
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: for men to like be perpetually living in a state
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: of adolescents where they just stay at home, live in
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: their mama's basement and play video games and order door Dash.
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: But a woman who doesn't want to start her family
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: because she wants to continue to go to the club
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: and hang out with her girlfriends and do brunches, that's
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: not childish at all. No. No, Okay, well, maybe yes
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: women have been propagandized, but maybe you could.
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: Argue that women are men's life doesn't change as much
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: because they just continue to work, but they usually end
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: up working more and investing more and being willing to
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: tolerate more in their work in order to provide for
• 55:56
  Speaker 2: their families, which I think just loops back to my
• 56:00
  Speaker 2: point that if men are willing to tolerate more in
• 56:04
  Speaker 2: work to make more in order to provide for a family,
• 56:09
  Speaker 2: then if men know that there's no family likely to result.
• 56:14
  Speaker 4: In their work, they probably tolerate less. That's what I'm
• 56:19
  Speaker 4: getting it.
• 56:21
  Speaker 2: They tolerate less, soul destroyingness, less purposelessness, et cetera.
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, why would Yeah for sure.
• 56:29
  Speaker 5: Okay, someone who has had a children best decision I've
• 56:33
  Speaker 5: ever made, ten to ten highly recommend would do it again.
• 56:36
  Speaker 5: But yes, this idea that men are the ones primarily
• 56:39
  Speaker 5: responsible for the low birth rates is laughable.
• 56:43
  Speaker 6: We'll laughing over here.
• 56:44
  Speaker 5: But honestly, it's not really women or men's fault. There
• 56:47
  Speaker 5: are a lot of factors that play into this. But Tommy,
• 56:50
  Speaker 5: I really got to ask.
• 56:52
  Speaker 7: Is it men or is it you?
• 56:54
  Speaker 5: This is gonna be a summer of canceling boys.
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: Oh well, this is an old one. We responded to
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: this too when she did this video. This is when
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: I knew, Tommy Lauren was just the feminists.
• 57:05
  Speaker 12: My friends are attractive, All of my friends are successful.
• 57:08
  Speaker 12: All of my friends have something going on. Almost every
• 57:13
  Speaker 12: single one of them have an issue with men. But
• 57:16
  Speaker 12: if all of these women, including myself, are having.
• 57:18
  Speaker 6: Issues, then I have to think it might not be us.
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: It might be you.
• 57:24
  Speaker 12: It is not just the guys in Los Angeles, Nashville, Dallas,
• 57:26
  Speaker 12: and it's not They're not any better in the Midwest.
• 57:28
  Speaker 6: They quite frankly, I think they're trash all over this country.
• 57:31
  Speaker 5: My friends are successful.
• 57:32
  Speaker 4: Men don't think about that.
• 57:34
  Speaker 5: They marry a Walmart cashier if she was nice to them.
• 57:37
  Speaker 9: I think men in between the ages of twenty and thirty, yes,
• 57:40
  Speaker 9: you would think that.
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: Okay, I'm having flickering, so there may be an issue flickering. Yeah,
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: like everything's flickering. So that means that we might be
• 57:52
  Speaker 2: dealing with the potential brow I just wanted to give it.
• 57:55
  Speaker 4: You might lose power, Yeah, I might lose power. You know,
• 57:58
  Speaker 4: I am rural.
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: So Tommy Lauren says, we are all successful, and apparently
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: you all regard men as trash. Maybe you should have
• 58:10
  Speaker 2: focused on improving your attitude towards men rather than your success.
• 58:14
  Speaker 4: If you wanted a man.
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: Possible. Also, like how many women have jobs that are
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: just fake, Like they're consultants at Google and they get
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: paid like shit tons of money to just be a
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: woman that works there. I'm a marketing director, I organize meetings,
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: I eat avocado toast, and get paid really well, which
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: basically essentially sets men up for failure and her because
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: she's like, well, all I need to do is find
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: a man who makes twice what I make doing this
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: made up job. Meanwhile, men are getting paid a lot
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: less doing actual jobs, jobs that allow her to do
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: that job, like men that are doing things that make
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: her job possible, that make her company possible, rights working
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: as electricians and laying down you know, pipe no pun intended.
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: So anyway, it's just something to think about. Like, she's
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: a successful journalist, commentator, So the anti couldn't She couldn't
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: do what she does if it weren't for men doing
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: jobs that she looks down on.
• 59:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, okay, guys, send in those super chows feedabadger
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: dot com, slash just the tip very much appreciated. So
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: the anti social contract says in the special chat, boomers
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: took for granted all of the social and cultural advantages
• 59:34
  Speaker 2: of a market economy. They can't relate to living in
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: a world that's been impacted by the policies they supported. Yeah, well,
• 59:40
  Speaker 2: the policies that they supported were based on sort of
• 59:45
  Speaker 2: conceits that ended up facilitating the expansion of the bureaucratic state,
• 59:52
  Speaker 2: because it every bureaucrat worth is his or her salt
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: wants to be set up as a consultant for a
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: minority group because they get access to all kinds of
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 2: funds in order to consult, to represent or to consult
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 2: for this minority group. And there's no oversight because if
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: if any oversights comes their way, they just call you
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: a racist, sexist, transphobe, homophobe. Okay, so they just it's
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 2: just like they open up another vein of slush right
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: towards them with these with these conceits. So instead of
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: promoting the conceits that actually maintain the meritocracy, as I
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 2: call it, they promoted conceits that gave justifications to bureaucrats
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: to give themselves gigantic salaries in order to advocate for groups.
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 2: And the more helpless the group, the better, because if
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: you think about it, there's no oversight from the group
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 2: either like you, if you advocate for deceased trans lesbians
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 2: in wheelchairs, who's gonna tell you boo, they're dead. Like
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: the more the smaller the group, the less likely that
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 2: that group's gonna be like, where is this money going to?
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 4: It's not going to us.
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: And the less capable of the group is to question
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: what you're doing, the better. And I know this sounds
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: really cynical, but these these beliefs, these moral beliefs, are
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: facilitate the It's like feeding yeast sugar. These moral beliefs
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: to the the the bureaucrats and government are the yeast,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: and these beliefs are sugar. And then suddenly you have
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 2: a gigantic overgrowth of yeast thanks to the boomers wanting
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: to be seen as virtuous and deciding that it was
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 2: a virtue to destroy the principles and the expectations of
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 2: the previous generation. Okay, so yeah, I sort of agree
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 2: with that, but you know, I guess it was well meaning.
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: Uh yeah, okay, let's keep going.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 9: In most cases, for marriage, are you usually not ready
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 9: to be husbands and fathers.
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: That's a cultural issue.
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 9: So I would actually back to your point. I think
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 9: it's a biological thing.
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 5: So let me get the straight men are all trash
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 5: and won't commit and won't leave mommy's basement, and they're
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 5: destroying the birth rates. But also young men are biologically
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 5: incapable of commitment and being parents.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: What but white.
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 4: There's more.
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 5: She also believes women don't have to bring anything to
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 5: the table.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 9: And as a woman, I want a strong man who
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 9: is a protector and a provider that will go to
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 9: war if need be, that will protect me, protect.
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: My family, make money.
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 9: But I don't think a man needs to get something
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 9: out of.
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 5: It to be a manly man, a protector and a provider.
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 9: If you think you need to get something out of it,
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 9: I quite frankly don't consider you a real man.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 5: Never before in history have women demanded so much and
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 5: offered so little. So before we get deeper into this retarded.
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 4: Amount, I think you about this.
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: I was thinking about this, Like there's women who are
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: saying on Twitter while the reason why we're rejecting men
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: is because their personalities are not good enough. I'm like,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: do you honestly think that women's over the last like
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: fifty years, women's personalities have improved in relation to men.
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 7: I don't think so.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 2: So what you're saying is that men need to pursue
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: this nebulous personality improvement, which honestly usually seems to amount
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: to getting a six pack and gaining three inches. But
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 2: and also you know, developing the sociopathic personality style. So
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: let's not forget there are personality factors involved, it's just
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: really ugly ones. And so men need to do all
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: of this, but women need to do less and less
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: in terms of making their personality at all pallatable for men.
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: And I don't even mean like becoming like submissive trad wives.
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 2: I mean not having a philosophy in which you think
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: any man in your life is a prep is like
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 2: out to get you, and that you have to be
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: in some kind of emotional cold war with him.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 4: Okay, yes, I got some.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: Like what do you call it? Super things to read out.
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: So nova fan sent us a rumble rant, Thank you
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: nova Fan for a dollar, and he says, if women
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: want men to be more financially stable to be attractive
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: to women, they need to give up their jobs. Thank
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: you for that, Nova Fan. I don't think that's gonna
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: happen anytime soon. And then Chris Mizzouno gives us two dollars.
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: Another super chat from Chris Maszuno, thank you, and he
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: says thoughts on Lauren Southern and Andrew Tate. I will
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: be bringing that on the next HBr News show. We
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: don't have to get into it. All I will say
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 1: is this. All I will say is this, Andrew Tate
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 1: is guilty or I'm sorry, innocent until proven guilty. Period.
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: That's it. Lauren Southern, I don't trust what she says
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: just because she wrote it in a book somewhere. I
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: don't care what you think about Andrew Tate. He is
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 1: innocent until proven guilty because that's the way that works, period.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: That's all, okay.
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 2: And a lot of the people who a lot of
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: the men have been proven guilty, accused, accused, yes, accused
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: and proven guilty, some of them, Bill Cosby started started to.
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 1: Come out that yeah they oh yeah, Bill Cosby, Harvey
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: Wi Yeah. I mean it's it's you know, I just
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: just as an aside the the guys that I've been
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: doing a lot of interviews with, working with Harvest Owens
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: and these guys in the military that I've been facing,
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: a lot of men get false accused and they and
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: they don't even get tried, they get court martialed, they
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: get put on sex offender registries, and almost all the
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: time it's basically like, uh, you know, a man gets
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: involved with a woman, they have one night stand. Turns
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: out the woman was lying about her marital status. She
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: was actually married, looking, you know, get a fling for
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: the weekend. She's afraid she's gonna get caught. She accuses
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: the guy of raping her so that her husband will
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: divorce her, and the guy just gets run through the
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: ringer in the court system. And this happens all the time,
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: and they have actually Pete Hegseth the I think it's
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: the Secretary of Defense. He has basically put forth an
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: initiative that is basically going to treat these allegations a
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 1: lot more seriously and give those men to process. Yes, no,
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: he is. He's going to change the way they do things.
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: And they're they're talking about penalties for false accusations as well.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: So we know this stuff happens. And look, this is
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: I'll say, this is the last thing I'll say about
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: because I don't want to get into it now, because
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: it's it's we're talking about this. It's not drama, but
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: when you make an accusation in your like memoir or
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: book or whatever, but you did not go to the
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: police or you don't have a report to file, I'm
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: gonna be super suspicious. And and but I think that, like,
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: like I said, go through the trial. Let's see what happens.
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: That's the way the system works. Guys. Women don't get
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: to cry something happened, and we're just supposed to believe them.
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: That's not reality. Okay, So that's all I'll say about that.
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 4: No, it's a that's a good point.
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 2: And I just wanted to say that somebody sent me
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: a tweet that Lauren Southern sent and I looked at
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: it and I read the first line and I'm like, oh,
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: the stinks of drama. Then I just was like, okay,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: I'm I didn't even read it. So Tommy, Laura, are sorry.
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: Not not drama. It's it's not drama. But it is
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: a really shitty thing to do because that the act,
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: the accusation became the whole thing, and it's like, dude,
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: this is not good. Do not do this. This is
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: not good.
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 4: Is it against your ex husband?
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: No, it's against he accused Andrew Tate of of drugging
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: and raping.
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 5: Her basically Lauren Southern, Yeah.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: Lauren Southern, Yes, yes, the woman who had sex with
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: Destiny willingly.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 13: So.
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: But again, I don't know. But the thing is, you
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: put this out there in the ether on the internet.
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: I mean, I can only assume you're doing it for attention,
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: to become relevant. Again, so I'm like, but it's but
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: it's a really really shitty way to go about it,
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: because you are attacking someone's character and you're doing it
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: in a way that is extremely dangerous. I don't care
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: what you think about Andrew Tate. Okay, if he is guilty,
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: then let's do it the right way. You don't write
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: a fucking book about it. That's the way it works.
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I don't mean to hurt your feelings, but
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: that's the way the legal system works. Women don't get
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: to say this happened, and then we're all supposed to
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: react like it's true. Well, I mean ridiculous, and you're
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: retarded if you agree with her or think that she's
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: telling the truth, you're retarded. Just the legal process. That's
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 1: why it exists.
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, well, I mean she can write whatever she wants.
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 2: That's the problem. She can write whatever she wants in
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: her book evidence of anything, and if it is a
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: false accusation, hopefully he sues her for libel. If it isn't,
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: well what the hell is she can't go forward with
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: the fricking court case now.
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 4: So I don't know.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: Like I said, Lauren, Southern is starting to strike me
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: as somebody who just does things for attention, like like
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: you said, Brian, And that's.
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: Why when I read it, I'm like, it's weird. It's
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: a weird thing to do out of the blue. So
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: but anyway, let's get back to this.
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 7: At home sun narrative.
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 5: Let's check the Facebook comments of this Fox News video
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 5: because I am really interested to see what, like the
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 5: typical Fox News viewer thinks about this. If the women
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 5: are anything like these two, I can hardly blame the
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 5: men for staying home and not wanting to date them.
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 6: Blame, blame, blame.
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 5: These two women have a combined age of ninety three
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 5: and I have zero children between both of them.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 7: You both have repunded.
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 5: Personality type, so listen to this was like male birth
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 5: control to me. My goodness, boomers are ruthless.
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 7: A bunch of sissies.
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 5: I served six years, two years in Southeast Asia after
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 5: Vietnam was over. When I was eighteen, rent was four
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 5: hundred and fifty dollars and I could afford to get
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 5: my own place. She's so spot on nothing streams. I'm
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 5: a loser run for me than a guy living at
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 5: home in his parents' house with his twelve year old
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 5: boys bedroom decor at age of thirty. Thank God, we
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 5: raise our sons to be men who grew up, lived
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 5: on their own, found their souls.
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 4: These are your sons.
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: That's a woman. That's a woman that made that post.
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: Like, if you're a boomer, these are your flipping sons
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 2: or your grandsons.
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: Like, no, but she, but she's saying that she this
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: is a flex Okay, this woman is basically saying I'm
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: a good woman. I'm a better woman than these other
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: women because my kids don't have this problem. So it's
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: not really an attack on the stay at home sons.
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: It's an attack on their mother's She's basically just going
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: doing it through the men. She's like using the men
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: as weapons against the other women. You know, that's what
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: I think anyway, I mean, based on this picture, this
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: looks like a woman so like, yeah, there's a lot.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: Of what we're seeing, and this is one of the
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: reasons why men. You really can't put it on men.
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: A lot of what we're seeing in the dating landscape,
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 2: in the social landscape is a cult female female aggression
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 2: and competition that's completely unchecked. Right, There's there's no there's
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: no check on it. It's why women are want the
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: six sixty six because again, they want a man who
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: makes their girlfriends jealous. But in order to have a
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: man who makes their girlfriends jealous, they have to have
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: a man that's likely because you know, girlfriends tend to
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: look a lot and have the same level of attractiveness.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 2: They have to have a man that is more attractive
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: in some ways than really they can, you know, is
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: reasonable to expect. So they need to go for the
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 2: top ten percent to make their girlfriends jealous. But then
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: that's all always moving and it's like it's it's in
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 2: the dating landscape. If the real criteria for men to
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 2: live up to is makes her girlfriends jealous, that is
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 2: a losing game for everyone.
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 4: Okay, because.
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 2: There's no way that women can pair up the average
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: women can pair up with the average man and make
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: her girlfriend's jealous. No way, why do you even care?
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, let's keep going.
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 7: People full home and started a family.
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 5: I was out the door at eighteen, worked on the
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 5: assembly line at Dodge, and in the Air Force at nineteen.
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 7: Never went back home. I can't relate to this. Yes,
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 7: we know, we know.
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 6: You people can't relate.
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 5: We know, but the world has changed. Why can't you
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 5: people get this.
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 6: Through your heads.
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 7: I will never let my son stay home. I'm trying
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 7: to push them out of the nest.
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 5: Okay, I really got to ask, is this an Anglo thing?
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 5: Immediately kicking your kid out when they turn eighteen years old?
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 5: My Mediterranean mind cannot comprehend this. And honestly, why don't
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 5: you Could a man leave home, leave his mother's cooking
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 5: for a woman who probably can't cook. Not me, though
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 5: personally I can cook amazing homemade meals.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 4: I'll have you know.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 6: I am a great triad wife, boneapple teeth.
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 5: Unfortunately, Tommy Lauren wasn't the only one a.
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 4: Push that funny.
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, yeah, she gets she She justifiably gets a
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 2: lot of attention because she makes it entertaining. I think, ultimately, Brian,
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: the difference between our content and the content of the
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: people who really go viral.
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 4: They're more entertaining. Let's be frank and they we're not entertaining.
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: We're just like two freaking nerds just overthinking things about Honestly,
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: I don't think it's overthinking, but perceptually people look at
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: us and you say, well, you're overthinking.
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 4: Maybe me more than you, but you're overthinking things like that.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 2: I don't know, because I've predicted a lot of stuff.
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: So but yeah, it's just because we don't focus on
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 2: on like the entertaining skits and and storytelling and other
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: stuff like that, just focus on talking about this stuff.
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 2: And so I finally admit it, Yeah, we're not entertaining enough.
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 4: So I don't know how we'd solve that.
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: Guys can try to figure it out. How do we
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 2: make ourselves more entertaining? Do I need to learn juggling?
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: Do I need to have a circus act with Scipio
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: and Voidcat?
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 4: I don't know. Tell us all in the comments below, Okay,
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 4: keep going unless you have a comment.
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: Well, look, I don't have boxy eyes and a cute
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: girly face, so that's probably going to be a major
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: limit for me.
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, me as well, said me as well.
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 5: Yeah, twenty nine year old men playing video games all day.
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 5: Steve Scalis did it with thirty five year old men
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 5: playing video games all day. And just the other night
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 5: I saw this on my TV again.
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 11: A Wall Street General headline got our attention. The new
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 11: dream job for young men, stay at home son. Oh
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 11: good lord, afraid it has taken off since twenty seven
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 11: year old Brendan Leo.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: What have you you see?
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 11: Like thousand dollars on jip?
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: You just see the femosphere with its pincers like this
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 2: gigantic mechanical sphere just woke stay at home son, and
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: then it ingests it and then blaring it out from
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 2: all of its.
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 4: Propaganda speakers everywhere.
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 2: This thing that it found is like, oh, I can
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 2: turn this into evil.
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 4: Okay, I know, weird image.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 11: He has a master's degree in political science, but he's unemployed.
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 11: Grow up, get a job, get a wife, build a family.
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 9: Just get a wife.
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 5: Bro, Just get a job.
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 4: Bro'll get a job.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 5: Just get a job on a strap on my job helmet,
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 5: squeeze out into a job.
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 4: Cannon fire us at a job land.
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 5: We're jobs drawing jobbies. The term welfare Queen must have
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 5: fell out of fashion with Republicans because it seems even
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 5: they know the approved safe demographic to go after now,
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 5: because it's very obvious what demographic they are talking about
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 5: when they say young men in their basements playing video games.
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 5: This just get a job lazy attitude is not surprising,
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 5: but it's especially funny coming from Fox News, of all places,
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 5: Fox News that spends so much time yapping about immigrants
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 5: taking American jobs. Fox News will talk for years about
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 5: how Americans are being screwed out of the workforce, but
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 5: when this issue manifests itself in gen Z, suddenly it's
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 5: a moral failure. The fact is a lot of American
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 5: jobs held by men are being lost to automation, offshoring,
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 5: and yes, cheap foreign labor. Companies and billionaires would rather
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 5: have cheap labor that they can essentially abuse, not pay
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 5: fair wages to just good little worker drones who won't unionize,
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 5: rather than hire America workers for a living wage.
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: Oh so she's she's making the leftist argument for like
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: the reason why this problem exists. It's not like, you know,
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: we just have a bunch of illegals getting paid next
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: to nothing to do these jobs that men want to do.
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: It's not that you know these like they're they're outsourcing
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: a bunch of shit to foreign countries. It's because the
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: people that they are giving this to won't unionize.
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 2: All right, Sorry, I actually thought this was pretty pretty
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 2: on point. Honestly, if I could push back on what
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: you said, I think.
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: Go ahead.
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 2: Unfortunately, I'm completely distracted by voidcat, so I just have
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: to confirm that this is what was said. She talked
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: about how the right wing or the political right wing,
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: still a lot of statists say that the jobs are
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 2: being taken by immigrants and offshore, and I.
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 4: Think there was other one other comment, one.
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 2: Other phenomenon that happened automation, automation. Yeah, I think she's
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: right in terms of the pointing out the hypocrisy of it.
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 2: Like if you're gonna say that jobs are being taken
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 2: away from American men because of automation and immigration.
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 4: And then turn around and then blame.
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 2: The lack of jobs on American men, that's not really fair.
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 2: And I you know, I know it's agreeing with a leftist,
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: but I think that and again I think.
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: It's well, again she's saying something true, but I think
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: that her prescription is gonna be bad for men too.
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: It's just like saying, well, what we need is welfare
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: for men. It's like no, because men will never get welfare.
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: It will. We just never happen that way. As a
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: matter of fact, the welfare problem is the problem the
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: boomers left us with because they were voting for policies
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: that they thought would be good for their the following generations.
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: Or we'll vote in all this socialism shit and that way,
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: we don't have to do it ourselves because the government
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: will do it. And now look where we are. Yeah,
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: those social programs that they agreed with that put us
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: in this position. So I am all for men working
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: for and us doing something about immigration. I think that's
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: all true. We don't need illegals here working for next
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: to nothing. We don't need foreign labor, we don't need
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: people buying from China, mostly women, by the way, like
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: basically getting products that are essentially cheap because they're built
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: with slave labor like prices or slave labor wages, and
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: that that should be brought over here. So it's going
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: to require more than just you know, well, what we
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: need are guys that will unionize. No, no, no, no, no,
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: we don't need that. But what we you need to
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: do is stop working with people who essentially have slaves
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: making products.
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 2: Okay, fair enough, now, I think that there's a point
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 2: here that could be overlooked, which is, and I don't
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 2: know if she's recognizing the greater on lying thing, which
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 2: is what I pointed out, which is I don't think
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 2: young men do want those jobs at these prices, because again,
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 2: they don't have the incentive structure. They don't have the
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: incentive structure to do these jobs because what are they
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 2: going to have families at the end of the end
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 2: of the day because of doing these jobs.
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 4: And the answer is no.
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: And this is something that I need, I think we
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: need to really wrestle with because I think what they're
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: importing with this immigrant labor is not necessarily people who will.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 4: Take these jobs. But that's like the outward thing.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: What they're importing is men who know their women will
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 2: make families with them if they take these jobs. American men,
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: if they take these jobs, know that that's not the case.
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: So the real issue here at that heart of all
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: of this is again selling this anti natalism, anti family
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: rhetoric to women's starting with the idea that men are
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 2: the worst thing they could ever do to themselves like so,
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: And I don't know. I don't think Shu has made
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: all of those connections, because yes, she's coming at this
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: from a more leftist perspective, and yes, I have criticisms
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: of the leftist perspective, but I also have criticisms of
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: the right, because again, you can't keep blaming men for this.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 4: You can't.
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: And if you're going to embrace feminism on the right,
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: you are embracing your own destruction, the destruction of whatever
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 2: it is you want to conserve. And by feminism, I
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 2: don't necessarily mean the kumbaya. Oh, let's all be equal.
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 4: Under the law.
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 2: Fine, that's not a bad thing to aim for for anyone,
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 2: because you know, if you want to make men superior,
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 2: you better start with equal.
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 4: But regardless, I'm not talking.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: About that feminism. I'm talking about the feminism which is,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 2: as far as I can tell, all of them, that
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 2: believes that the primary relationship between men and women defined
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: through oppression. Right, So, left to their own devices, somehow,
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 2: men always are in a state of war with women,
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 2: always aggressive to women, always using violence to subjugate women. Right,
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 2: And I went on a long walk about with GROC
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: a couple days ago, I asked Groc to list the
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 2: female only communes, and then I asked it if, in
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 2: feminist conjecture, patriarchy uses violence to subjugate women, have these
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 2: communes ever been subject to the kind of violence that
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 2: societies use against other groups that they consider threatening economically, socially, politically,
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: militarily threatening.
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 4: And the presounding answer is no.
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 2: If patriarchy really uses violence to subjugate women, why aren't
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 2: these women's communes being genocided?
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 2: This doesn't make any sense. So this entire construct, that's
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 2: just one example of many how this entire construct is
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: basically rendered wrong by reality. But we have embraced this,
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 2: and then this is the knock on. This is the
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: downstream effects of all of it, of embracing this, this
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 2: lie about ourselves, it's a lie. Men don't oppress women.
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: Men didn't do all of the things that they did
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 2: throughout history to stick it to women and tie them
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 2: to train tracks. They did it in order to protect
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 2: and provide for women in those things that they were
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 2: better at.
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 4: And society always made it so.
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 2: That there was an expectation that when men gained power
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 2: in terms of military power or economic success that was
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: funneled into women. There was always the social and legal
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 2: expectations of that.
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 5: So it's like this is this.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: Conjecture is incredibly destructive, and it's destroying young men's desire
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 2: to participate in the workforce outside of the minimum And
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 2: that's completely understandable. And again, what we're importing when we
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: import meg migrants is though migrants wives saying yes, I
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 2: will wife, I'll husband you up if you get a
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 2: job on picking oranges in the States because that's good
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: money for us and I'm willing to do that. We're
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: importing a actual cooperative relationship between men and women to
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 2: try to fix our destruction, to try to plaster over
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 2: the absolute corrupt, decadent mess that we've made of the
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 2: relationship between men and women by embracing a command narrative
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 2: that only benefits rich connected women and rich connected men.
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 2: And she can talk about unions all she wants, but
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 2: I think it's that narrative that actually liquefied upward mobility.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: Because the people who are doing the best in terms
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 2: of upward mobility, what do they do. They don't divorce,
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: They get married, they stay married, They work towards a legacy,
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 2: they work towards family, they work towards generational wealth. Well,
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 2: that's been destroyed, and that is the primary means to
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 2: keep class more flat. That's the primary means. Family, no divorce, legacy,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 2: generational wealth. That's why we had it fifty years ago,
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 2: seventy five years ago. That's why in the fifties there
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 2: was less class stratification in the dread age of patriarchy,
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 2: and now we're going into more and more and more
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 2: class stratification. The middle class is being completely gutted.
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: Why.
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 2: It's not because of the loss of unions, maybe that
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: might be a part of it. It's because of the
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 2: loss of two people working together to create a family,
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 2: or multiple people, multiple generations working together to create a family.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 2: It's the loss of a sense of legacy in the
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 2: middle class.
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 4: Okay, that's what I think.
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: All Right, I got a super chow from Great Indoors.
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 1: He gives us five dollars and says, to answer Allison's
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: question about the characteristic of the relationship between the free
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 1: market slash property rights and the state, I would say
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: they are at odds always. Okay, thank you for that,
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: Great Indoors.
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 5: All right, the cheaper the labor they hire, the more
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 5: money they make. I remember when Bernie Sanders called open
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 5: borders a Koch Brothers conspiracy.
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 13: That's a Coke brother's proposal, which says, essentially, there is
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 13: no United States, but anybody the global poorn richardouldn't it
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 13: going to make everybody in America port? Then you're doing
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 13: away with with the concept of the nation state where
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 13: that guy go.
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 5: A lot of these jobs.
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: He actually said we should all vote for Hillary Clinton
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 1: because he hates the billionaires. That's where that's where he.
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 4: Went that this is the problem.
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: That's like the entire time the else.
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: You're breaking up. What was that? Hello? Are you? I
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: can't hear you now for some reason, I think your
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 1: cat did something. Uh are you need you need to
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: do something? Maybe? Oh?
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 2: There you go there, my cat, boy cat has destroyed
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 2: yet another thing.
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 4: I don't know how you did that. I think it's
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 4: because the cord. I don't know. Mac cords are not
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 4: not great. Okay, you you you get away from that cord.
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 4: Oh there's a heat bent there. You like the heat bent?
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 2: Hum?
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 4: Well, no, you can't have the heat fence here. I'll
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 4: squeeh squeashed the cat. All right, okay, all right, hello, no,
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 4: let's just do more.
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I had a thought, but voidcat sucked it out of.
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 4: My Brain's gone gone into the void.
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 5: Are jobs traditionally held by men, like construction and factory jobs,
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 5: manual labor work. But it's not just manual labor jobs.
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 5: It's also the tech industry and business industry, which are
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 5: careers also mainly held by men. There are many, many
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 5: examples of this, such as Microsoft recently cutting a thousand.
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: Actually I'm not I'm not so sure about that. Like, yes,
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 1: men are still predominantly in those industries, but they are
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: pushing women in them hard. And again, okay, okay, and
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: again it's sort of irrelevant because not like most men
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: can't do these tech jobs. Most men just do like
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 1: working class or even like you know, like like laborist jobs,
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: and that's that's all they can do, and that has
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: its own dignity that goes with it, and they should
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 1: they should be incentivized to do that. But just paying
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: them more isn't gonna be enough. I mean, they want
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: to get what they are, what they deserve, but the
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: purpose of working for men is to support a family.
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 1: If there is no family, then there is no incentive.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: It's the only thing that you need. And unfortunately, no
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: amount of Bernie Sanders is going to change that. Yeah,
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: and there's no way he's gonna say, ladies need to
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 1: step up. There is no way. Political suicide. It's political suicide.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 2: Right, So there's no way any of them are because
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: this is the narrative that gets them paid. It's it
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: is the foundation for all of the other narratives about
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 2: protecting the purse puppies, the saw like the all of
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: the groups of people that.
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 4: Are that are victimized by the system. Okay, yeah, all right,
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 4: go get your Drea, I put your streets.
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 5: Pointeen thousand more H one B workers this year. Some
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 5: of those job positions include data scientists, which are seventy
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 5: percent men, software developers which are eighty percent men, and
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 5: electronic engineers which are ninety percent.
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 7: Men, and many more like that.
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 5: Another example of this was Tesla We're Roughly fifteen thousand
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 5: American employees were fired in April twenty twenty four, and
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 5: many were replaced with H one B VISA holders.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 4: On Twitter, Elon.
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 5: Muskin Vivek Ramaswami tried to chalk this up to these
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 5: immigrants just simply being the best and the brightest. Yeah, okay,
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 5: you're paying them less for longer hours and more work,
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 5: and they're willing to deal with it in order to
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 5: stay in the country. It's coercive, exploitative, and dare I
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 5: say not very America first.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 11: Yeah, we are.
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 4: We are dealing with something somewhere in Canada.
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: The well, that's why so many people were against it, Like, yes,
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 1: the people who voted for Trump did not like the
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 1: h one bs. So this is not like, I don't
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 1: know why you think this is a ding against that,
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 1: because that's why there was so much more mean v
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: Ramas not you. Vivick Ramaswami was pushed into obscurity because
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 1: of that. They were like, nope, you're not our guy,
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 1: and that and that because that, like the people who
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: actually are supporting America, like they're part of this America
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: first thing, they're not putting up with that shit. So yes,
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: that's true.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: So I'm just going to use an example from what
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 2: I've seen. There was a young man who's sort of
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 2: involved in the movement, and he left a job that
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 2: paid significantly more than average, specifically because he knew that
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 2: it was unlikely to get make him more interesting to
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 2: a woman. So that was the specific reason, and I
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 2: think there's a lot of that happening. So again the
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 2: problem goes right back to, yeah, you can get rid
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 2: of immigration, and you can, but the young men aren't
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: taking the jobs because they're not going to result in
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 2: a family. I think what's actually going to happen is
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 2: again automation and AI will probably take over these jobs
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 2: that you're getting rid of immigrants to do, because now
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 2: we're seeing these factories that have nobody on the floor,
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 2: like there's nobody in the factory, just run remotely from
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 2: like a switchboard by one person or maybe a shift
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 2: of people. So this is like, I mean, I understand
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 2: the I absolutely one percent understand the desire to maintain
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 2: the idea that people gain things through their own work,
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 2: through the threat of their bow. But at the other hand,
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: there's also all of this stuff that's coming AI and
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 2: automation that is going to significantly change the economic landscape,
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 2: and somehow we have to deal with it because what
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 2: it's looking like now, and it really doesn't matter if
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 2: AI can actually do those jobs. What matters is that
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 2: these companies think it can. So they're holding off actually
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 2: getting entry level hiring grads into entry level positions because
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 2: they think they might be able to save money by
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: having AI do it. And by the time all this
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: sorts out, what is gonna what is the economy going
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 2: to look like?
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 4: And then also we have this.
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 2: Massive like status and government, right, massive increase, what a surprise,
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: massive increase in government spending.
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 4: Massive right.
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 2: I'm not gonna say specifically why it's happening or who's
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: doing it, but we are dealing with one of the
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 2: biggest increases in government debt in the States. Also Canada,
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 2: but Canada goes without saying like when I point out
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 2: to the United States, just assume I'm saying Canada is
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 2: thirty times worse, one hundred times worse.
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 4: Right, So, massive debt.
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 2: And the real issue with the debt is like the
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 2: modern monetary theorists say that as long as the state
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 2: is sovereign, it can issue issue as much debt as
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 2: it wants and.
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 4: Buy back its own debt. But here's the problem.
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 2: A lot of this debt is financed. A lot of
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: American debt is financed by something called a carry trade.
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 2: And what that means is that Americans will are the
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: American political apparatus. I don't want to say Americans, because
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 2: that's something completely different.
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 4: American political apparatus will.
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: Take out a loan at the lowest rate of interest
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: in the world, and that's because of exorbitant privilege. Americans
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 2: generally get the lowest rate of interest of any country
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: in the world, and then they will turn around and
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 2: loan money to another country where they can charge like
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: four times the interest and then the interest off the
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: loan to the loan like they're taking the loan and
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 2: loaning to another country can pay the interest on their loan.
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: So if that interest goes up on American loans, that
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 2: is going to screw the carry trades. And yeah, that's
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: a big problem too. And that's going to be a
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 2: big problem if there's no employment income, like employment tax income,
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 2: because that's the biggest tax income.
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 4: In the States.
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: So there is a lot of really bad shit going
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 2: on that's about to hit and we need to think
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 2: about those things. And it can't just be like arguments
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 2: over unions and not unions and UBI and not UBI,
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 2: because this could be absolutely devastating. Like I said, it's
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 2: the spires will start when the carry trade hot potato
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: begins begins being handed around the governments of the of
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: the world. All right, storry about that little segue into economics.
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying that this is stuff that and a
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 2: lot of it. This catastrophe that is looming is because
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: of statists expanding the government beyond what can be reasonably
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 2: maintained by people, and then status getting in bed or
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 2: allowing or enabling or taking part in these gigantic tech
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 2: bubbles where these companies are actually making anything related to
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 2: a prophet.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: Everything.
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 2: Their stock just keeps going up and up and up
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 2: on the promise that eventually they will deliver a product
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 2: that people want. And that's a big part of it too.
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 2: So it's it is it's just imagine this gigantic what
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 2: are those balls like in the Japanese game where they
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 2: just gather up more and more crap.
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 4: Uh talky. Sorry, it's like a like it's you roll
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 4: a ball and it just gathers more.
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 1: Oh, you're talking about.
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 2: Ka kada mari like the debt karda marii ball is
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 2: just rolling towards us.
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 4: And it's because.
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 2: Of this bullshit, this idea that you can just create debt,
• 1:36:51
  Speaker 2: give yourself a nice fat troth to feed on and
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 2: no oversight.
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 4: And if if people are giving you oversight while they're.
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 2: Just fascists, how dare how dare they ask you where
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 2: their money is, where their tax money is going. They're
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 2: just a bunch of fascists.
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 4: Who doesn't.
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 1: Oh, I'll see your microphone did a thing again. I'm
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: gonna play more of the video while you figure that out.
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 5: Elon Musk for this last year he told somebody and
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 5: I quote, take a big step back and fick yourself
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 5: in the face.
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 2: I will go to war on this.
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 5: Issue, the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend. So
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 5: when it comes to replacing American workers in manual labor
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 5: with cheap foreign labor, it's to port to port to port,
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 5: But when it comes to replacing his American workers with
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 5: cheap foreign labor, it's fuck yourself in the face. Interesting,
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 5: there's also affirmative action and DEI, which are other things
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 5: Fox News always pisses and about. But suddenly when the
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 5: conversation is about gen z men, the demographic of people
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 5: who are victims of these things, suddenly these things just
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 5: like don't exist anymore. Then it's oh, young men are
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 5: all just lazy. They just want to be in their
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 5: parents' peacemen ordering dodaute of playing video games.
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: But it's not just the brown people because they can't
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: see them. And the DEI thing is actually mostly women,
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: not just brown people. So they yeah, they're not making
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: the connection. They're not putting these things together. That's true,
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean the DEI is not a problem.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: Alix in your microphone is still not fixed. Hello, quinn
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: uh okay, taking your jobs.
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 5: I am not beating the allegations with this one. The
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 5: brown people are not taking your jobs. Okay, it's not
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 5: their fault.
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 6: They're just cheaper aim upwards.
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 7: But it's not just the brown people taking your jobs.
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 7: It's the women too.
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 5: Many of the dying industries are male dominated.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: While oh I got I think I'm getting sound now
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 1: because your thing just wait.
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I was gonna say, while you went on that wreck,
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 2: you just just wait a moment. She's gonna she's gonna
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 2: cover the women.
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 1: No, I know, I as you said it before, and
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: I'm hearing myself on your end for some reason.
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 2: Oh freak, okay, just to give me a second here,
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 2: let me let.
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 4: Me see what I can do.
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: It sounds like I'm just picking up your speaker.
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 4: Okay, that's that's how about this?
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 11: Is this?
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 1: Is this better test test tests? Yeah, it's better?
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 2: Okay, good, all right, Sorry about that. It was indeed Voidcat,
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 2: I don't know what the heck she's doing. She wasn't
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 2: even close to that cable. But apparently she just has
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 2: an aura of chaos.
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 4: Okay, let's keep going, all right.
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 5: Many of the growing industries are female dominated, and stigma
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 5: around these jobs being women jobs usually stops men from
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 5: working them. Women are overwhelmingly and during and excelling in
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 5: college and the workforce, and they're more flexible about job
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 5: position and pay, while young men usually hold out for
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 5: higher paying your position jobs that will make them the breadwinner.
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 5: Because you see, despite the world progressing and the role
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 5: of women changing, the role of men has not changed.
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 5: Every woman is a feminist until the dinner bill comes.
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 5: But what's crazy is women might be the ones paying
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 5: that dinner bill soon the UK.
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: No they're not. They're just going they'd rather not date. Yep,
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: they're just gonna avoid men. That's another thing too, like
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 1: what well, maybe she knows this, but like women when
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: the when women entered the workforce, pay went down across
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: the board. Like it's not a new thing, it's not recent.
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: This was like the moment they entered the workforce and
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: started taking jobs as secretaries or whatever like you know
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: way back in the day. That immediately lowered everybody's wages
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: because women were willing to work for less. They were
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: willing to you know, take time off to have children
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: or whatever. But it just completely altered the landscape. And
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: you could say, oh, the corporations did that on purpose,
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Women agree to it. They went along with it.
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 1: It's like saying, you know, the welfare state, the like
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: Lyndon Johnson did this, Yeah he did, but the women
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: said I'll take it, and they signed off on that.
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: So we can't, like you gotta you can't separate these things.
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: And so yeah, this isn't a new thing. This isn't
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: a new thing. And men have been like getting boned
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: by this forever because when even though you would argue
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 1: that men would make more money, they weren't making it
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: for themselves. Is what I always say about the wage gap,
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 1: which still comes up to this day for some reason. Uh,
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: it's it doesn't matter who makes more, it matters who
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 1: gets more. Money spent on them, and it doesn't even Yeah,
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 1: it doesn't matter who makes more, It doesn't even matter
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: who spends more. What matters is who it is spent on. Yeah,
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: and women are they spend money on themselves and men
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: spend their money on women. So yeah, I don't even
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: want to measure that gap. It doesn't matter to me.
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 2: But and okay, I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go deep, guys,
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 2: so just just bear with me. So, this government spending,
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 2: this idea that the government can spend and someone else
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 2: picks up the tab has a very it's it feels
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 2: like a type of thinking from a you know, from
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 2: that would come out of a particular group of people.
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: And I think that that there's something deeper to that.
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 2: So let's let's let me, let me get out my nuts,
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 2: my conspiracy nut board, and and and let's let's go let's.
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 4: Go deep into this.
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 2: I think why the foundation of overspending in the government
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: is feminism. And I think it's because it delegitimates the meritocracy.
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: So the economy free market becomes something evil because it
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: picks winners and losers, right, So that's not evil. Yes,
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 2: some people are gonna make a lot of money in
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 2: the free market. But the point is that in the
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 2: free market there is a lot of people who can make.
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 4: A decent living.
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 2: And I'm not saying what we have now is anything
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 2: closed to a free market at all. There is a
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: lot of control, and I would argue if a government
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 2: is the one printing the money and the Federal Reserve,
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 2: the idea that it's separate from the government, it's a
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 2: little sketchy, But if that's the case, or at the
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: very least, the government can get the Federal reserved underwrite
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: its debt, which is totally unfair. I don't think there
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 2: is necessarily a free market, but regardless, as long as
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 2: we preserve that meritocracy, that expectation that people get benefit
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 2: can people can buy more because of their productivity. So
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 2: you create a bunch of items for sale that gives
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 2: you money, and then you can buy your neighbor's items
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 2: that they have for sale, that kind of thing, and
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: that's what gives you material wealth. It's not how much
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: money you can buy or have to buy things. It's
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 2: how much your money buys, and how much your money
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 2: buys is contingent on how productive everybody is in the system. Right,
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 2: how much things that they are creating to buy. Okay,
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 2: so that's the meritocracy. If you make more things, you
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 2: get to buy more things, simple as but again there
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: are going to be winners and losers. Now we somewhere
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 2: we went from I guess liberals wanting to make it
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 2: so that the meritocracy is as flat as possible, so
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 2: that every child starts with a closer situation in terms
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 2: of their learning, so that they can learn to make
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 2: the widgets, be they intellectual or physical, because they have
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 2: a solid foundation in education. Somewhere we went from that,
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 2: let's let us equalize the class structure. Let us remove,
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 2: like reduce, take that really really tall, like highly stratified
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 2: class and try to make it a flat as possible
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 2: through educating the next generation. We went from that to
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 2: the way that we fix things is by advocating for
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 2: victims of the system. So instead of equipping people to
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 2: work within the system, we decided to try to make
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 2: it easier for people who are supposedly victims of the system.
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 2: Do you see the difference, And it's a different in thinking.
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 2: It's a shift in thinking from let us judge people
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 2: by how well they do, but reduce how much they're
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 2: judged not by their actions and decisions, but by arbitrary
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 2: factors that they can't help, such as education based on
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 2: how rich your parents are, such as racism, sexism, transphobia, homophobia.
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 2: So we want to reduce those factors and make sure
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 2: that everybody has a level playing field. To advocating for
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 2: government spending on victims because they're victims, and not to
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 2: with an eye to making it so that they can
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 2: they can compete effectively in the meritocracy. No, just to
• 1:46:05
  Speaker 2: make them dependent on the system. And there's that shift,
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 2: and I think it comes with the increase of women
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 2: into politics and bureaucracy. There's a shift between Okay, if
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: there's a disenfranchised group's let's try to make it. Let's
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 2: try to let's try to equalize the playing field so
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 2: they can play in it, to there's a disenfranchised group,
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 2: let's get rid of the playing field so that there's
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 2: no disenfranchised groups. Do you see what I'm saying? And
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 2: that classical liberal attitude I think is not necessarily harmful,
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 2: but at some point it tipped. It tipped from everybody
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 2: should have an as much of an equal chance too,
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: because everybody the outcomes aren't equal. We need to intervene,
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 2: dismantle everything, and give everybody a trophy prize, which will
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 2: soon mean absolutely nothing.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 1: Right, because it operates on this assumption, which was altruistic,
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: that oh, well, if we do this, then everything will
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 1: turn out good. And it did not happen. So they
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: were like, well, we must not have done this hard enough,
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 1: and so they just keep doing it more and more,
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: and then they bring the state in to do it,
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: and then they start doing in other parts of the world.
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 1: That's how you get you know, feminism exported to like
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: third world countries and ultimately it destabilizes them, or at
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 1: least that's what that's how they read it. And they're like, well,
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: don't bring that shit over here. But yeah, I mean,
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: that's that's what it is. They're just like, this thing
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: that we know is like the morally best way to
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 1: live doesn't seem to be giving us the outcomes that
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 1: we wanted, even though you know, we initially started this
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: under the assumption that we weren't all about the outcomes,
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: but now we are about the outcomes. Yes, So yeah,
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 1: it was kind of an inevitable thing.
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 4: I guess it's not just inevitable.
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 2: It's a shift in thinking from let's try to make
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 2: let's try to make it so that everybody is an
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 2: effective competitor, or try to eat things not in the competition,
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 2: but try to make it so. I'll just use one example.
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 2: Let's say Tommy's born to a working class family and
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: Timmy or sorry, let's let me let me use not
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 2: a t word, like Danny is born to a rich family.
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 2: Danny's going to have an advantage in his education in
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 2: eventually making something of himself at Tommy won't.
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 4: So what do we do education? We put in an
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 4: a position education.
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 2: In place to try to equalize that advantage, right, and
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 2: so we have and that's something that was very much
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 2: pushed for in like the first half of the twentieth century,
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 2: especially in the with the baby Burmers. And so that
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 2: tends to level the class, like the stratification of class. Right,
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 2: if you give people a good start, they compete well
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 2: in the system. That was the point behind it. But
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 2: the point was to make them competitive. That is fundamentally
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 2: different than what's driving us now. It's not to make
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 2: people competitive in the free market. It's not to say, hey,
• 1:49:13
  Speaker 2: people should be judged by their actions and the behaviors. Instead,
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 2: we've gone into this situation where we look at everybody
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 2: who's supposedly disenfranchised by the prior system and we say, no,
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 2: we're not going to make them competitive, We're just gonna
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 2: give them money. That's a fundamentally different That's a change
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 2: in thinking from classical liberalism, which is freedom of speech,
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 2: freedom of autonomy, being able to control the fruits of
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 2: your labor, that kind of stuff. And also maybe public
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 2: education could be under that, although that ended up being
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 2: really fucked but regardless, So it's all of this trying
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: to maintain as equal a playing field as possible in
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 2: the free marketplace. And then you switch over to while well,
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 2: let's just advocate for these victim groups because they're disenfranchised
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 2: and we don't even care about making it an equal
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 2: playing field, will tilt the playing field in favor of them,
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 2: will give them government money, will treat them in terms
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 2: of their victimhood rather than their actions.
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 4: That's the difference.
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 11: Yeah.
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 1: But even then though, like leftism isn't really about bringing
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: up the people who are supposedly downtrodden or left behind.
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: It's actually revenge on the people who are doing well
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 1: and it's masked as caring for them. Many feminism is
• 1:50:34
  Speaker 1: not about lifting women up right, it's revenge against men.
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 1: So that if you look at that, all of these
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: other like let's say, programs or initiatives that are supposedly
• 1:50:45
  Speaker 1: trying to correct things are just getting revenge on the
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 1: group that is seen to be you know, in power,
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: whatever that is, whether it's men or white people, or
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: the straits or whatever, or the rich. And that's kind
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 1: of like my that's kind of like my core problem
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 1: with shoes prescriptions because she hasn't completely abandoned the paradigm.
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 1: She's just moving the pieces around, so obviously she doesn't
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: have a problem with men, but like she's still operating
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 1: in this rich poor thing, which the truth is is
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: that you can like do everything you can to try
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 1: to help people, you know, to you know, give them
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 1: a fighting chance, but they're not gonna come out equal
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: because we're not equal, Like we're just not so rich. Kid.
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 1: Even when you give people education, some people are gonna
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 1: get better education on others, and public education in particular
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: god awful, and some people are just gonna be better
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: at things. So we have to like be okay with that.
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 1: I think that's the you know, a lot of people
• 1:51:45
  Speaker 1: are concerned about, like, you know, how about representation and
• 1:51:50
  Speaker 1: this and that and like whether or not, you know,
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: everyone's doing really well. But I think that's less important
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: than people being like, you know, being okay with their
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: position in life. You know, it's like the wreck at
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: Ralph story. You know, like this is my lot in life.
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 1: It's accepting that and being okay with that, and other
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 1: people not not necessarily shitting on that. And this is
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: like an issue because I think that with with women
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: in particular, they see everything in terms of status. Right,
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 1: So a man who's a uh, you know, works for
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 1: the sanitation department is looked down on even though his
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 1: work probably pays well. It's it's you know it, he
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: does it with dignity. He's okay with that. That's the thing.
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 1: It's like a to me, it's like a social thing.
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 1: We have to like, you know, we have to change
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 1: people's perspective on what to stop looking at certain things
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 1: being worthy of more praise than others and see it
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 1: all as you know, it's all necessary, especially the essential
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 1: work that a lot of men do in silence without
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 1: any you know, I don't know, without any recognition.
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 2: You know, Okay, So in in special Chat, Kyle sell
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 2: says what benefits has capitalism brought us? And by capitalism
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 2: I'm assuming means the free market, all right, so property rights.
• 1:53:08
  Speaker 2: The benefits that property rights have brought you is the
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 2: rise of the middle class and the idea that people
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 2: can develop legacy through working, so that it's not just
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 2: aristocrats who are descended from ancestors that were best able
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 2: to wield a sword that can have a legacy. People
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 2: who work hard and build material wealth and do things
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 2: like trade and create products that are benefit to the
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 2: greater society.
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 1: We should sick the anti social contract on this guy
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: because he'll like destroy him. But ultimately that's what it is.
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 2: It's like, it's allowing people to gain legacy through hard work,
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 2: not just through being descended from people who are men
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 2: most who subjugated other groups of people.
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 4: Now, if you can tell me what.
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 2: Other system allows people to gain legacy through their own
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 2: hard work, I'm all ears like this, this is what
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 2: I talk to you with communists. I'm like, well, if
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 2: you can incentivize merit in some other way besides being
• 1:54:19
  Speaker 2: able to buy stuff from your neighbors, tell me about
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 2: it like it'd be great. I'm open to This is
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 2: the thing that people think are like, oh, you're you're
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 2: a so against communism. I'm just like, yeah, if communism
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 2: can develop a completely new way that people earn things
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 2: through their actions, like I would honestly argue that Star
• 1:54:40
  Speaker 2: Trek is an example of it. The incentive structure in
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 2: Star Trek is greater freedom. If you actually watch it carefully,
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 2: the people who participate and I guess produce the most
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 2: in the system, or at least are seen as the
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 2: most beneficial in the system, get more freedom, more freedom
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 2: to move around in the universe. Right, That's that's an
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 2: incentive structure. If communists can invent an incentive structure that
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 2: has nothing to do with being paid for your labor,
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 2: you might have something. Until you do, all you have
• 1:55:12
  Speaker 2: is archaic systems. Well, basically just going back to the
• 1:55:15
  Speaker 2: system where you do it. Because I'm the one with
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 2: the sword, right, which has been the system throughout a
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 2: lot of his human history. So it's not new, Okay,
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 2: let's keep let's keep going.
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 1: Star Truck is like a post It's a society that
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: basically doesn't have scarcity, So it's a post scarcity society.
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 4: It still has an incentive structure.
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: No, I know, but I'm saying like that because you
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 1: live they live in a world where you can just
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: put stuff in the maked machine, and it makes it
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 1: like we don't live in that world. That's why it's
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: a fantasy. It's a fantasy for like women. Basically, that's.
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 4: Why do you assume that the people with the most
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 4: money work the hardest. I don't. Yes, nobody depends on.
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 1: How they got the money though, yeah, some people.
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 4: Like yes, some people did.
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, some people.
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 2: Some people who have money didn't have money because they
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 2: created products that people wanted, like indoor heating, indoor plumbing.
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 2: It brought value, electricity, you.
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 4: Know, other thing.
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 2: They brought value to the greatest number of people. Right now,
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 2: people have money because they can sell a widget and
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 2: they can they can like venture capitalists.
• 1:56:29
  Speaker 4: They can be like, oh, well, I have.
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 2: This amazing thing that can thing the things, and everybody's.
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 4: Like, wow, we want to give you money for the
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 4: thing that can think the things.
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 2: Hasn't been proven to thing the things, No, but it's
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 2: gonna be awesome when we get it working. And this
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 2: is going on for years and years and years and no,
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 2: it hasn't shown to have any value to anyone, but
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 2: people pile money into it because it's well sold, it's
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 2: well marketed. You know, that's a lot of the stock
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 2: market now no actual value being made. So you're right,
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 2: like there's there is now a real issue with people
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 2: have money, did they really earn it? You have a
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 2: lot of inside trader happening, trading happening in congress, you
• 1:57:12
  Speaker 2: have a lot of taking loans in the taxpayer's name
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 2: for pet projects that are maybe virtue signaling at best,
• 1:57:21
  Speaker 2: but basically just amount to giving money to.
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 4: The people who manage them.
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 2: So yeah, you're right, there's a lot of people now
• 1:57:28
  Speaker 2: with money that really they didn't earn. So I on
• 1:57:33
  Speaker 2: one hundred percent agree with you. There is no way
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 2: to manage that.
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 1: But that's not property rights. That's literally like using the
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 1: government to give you. Yes, it's literally using things like
• 1:57:44
  Speaker 1: that completely not the thing that you call capitalism at all.
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no, it's not free market, it's not at all.
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 2: But it's an emergent property of going off the gold
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 2: standard because this carry trade and all of that other stuff.
• 1:57:58
  Speaker 2: And that's a long conversation, but yes.
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 4: You're right.
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 5: Anyway, there's no way to ensure that the people.
• 1:58:04
  Speaker 2: Who have money actually earned it. But if and now,
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 2: because of a lot of government and corporate collusion, the
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 2: middle class is disappearing. I don't know what tweet I
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 2: can say to you. Don't ever let a government print
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 2: its own currency or take out debt.
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 1: That's it, all right, So I got a super child
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 1: from great indoors who gives us five dollars and says.
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 1: Ever since the massive layoffs in the wake of the
• 1:58:33
  Speaker 1: coopf lockdowns, when politicians basically said, if we can save
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 1: only one person, to hell with the entire economy, shut
• 1:58:40
  Speaker 1: it all down. We have been hiring almost exclusively foreign people,
• 1:58:44
  Speaker 1: to the extent that we are unable to communicate internally
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 1: with anything else than the English language. Also, these foreign
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 1: co workers are paying much less tax for the first
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 1: five years as well. I bet those tax cuts are
• 1:58:56
  Speaker 1: also applicable to the company itself as well, not to
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 1: mention the fantastic dei status that probably goes along with it,
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 1: which presumably also helps the company in acquiring the much
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 1: needed government grants that subsidize the current green projects that
• 1:59:13
  Speaker 1: as of yet brought its zero money. Yeah, and it's like,
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 1: you know, where Black Rock and Vanguard comes from too.
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: But none of this is you know, like the idea
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: of a corporation itself is not capitalists, which I hesitate
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: to use the word because I don't like it, because
• 1:59:30
  Speaker 1: it is in fact, a government is a government project,
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: a company in bed with the government, which is literally fascism.
• 1:59:38
  Speaker 1: That's what a corporation is. And we have to like
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: reckon with that as a reality. So yeah, I mean,
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Commis, but you're just failing.
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 4: Okay, So again and a special check.
• 1:59:53
  Speaker 2: So Kyle sell says, owners playing laborers to do the
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 2: work that they're too lazy to do as a silly system,
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 2: so we should fix it. So okay, Kyle, do we
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 2: not pay laborers? Alternatively, does everybody only benefit from their
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 2: own labor?
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 4: That's going to be.
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 2: That's going to be a no economy, subsistence living. And
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 2: here's the question that I asked the people who are like, well,
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 2: what is capitalism? What is free market done for any
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 2: of us? Okay, so in there in your system, guys
• 2:00:26
  Speaker 2: listening to me, now, who is going to make stuff
• 2:00:29
  Speaker 2: and what is going to incentivize them to do? So okay,
• 2:00:34
  Speaker 2: let's continue, all.
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 1: Right, playing more of the video.
• 2:00:37
  Speaker 5: Okay found women aged twenty two to twenty nine earned
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 5: about one thousand more annually than men, completely reversing the
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 5: traditional gender pay gap for this age group in the US.
• 2:00:46
  Speaker 5: A twenty twenty two Pew Research Center analysis showed that
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 5: women under thirty out earned men in many metropolitan areas,
• 2:00:53
  Speaker 5: with median earnings at or above one hundred percent of
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 5: men's in cities like New York and Washington, d C.
• 2:00:59
  Speaker 5: That may not sound like a lot of money now,
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 5: but it's a growing.
• 2:01:01
  Speaker 7: Trend that has never been seen before.
• 2:01:03
  Speaker 5: It's so bad that it's really starting to affect the
• 2:01:06
  Speaker 5: dating world. American women have never been this resigned to
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 5: staying single. They are responding to major demographic shifts, including
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 5: huge and growing gender gaps in economic and educational attainment,
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 5: political affiliation, and beliefs about what family should look like.
• 2:01:19
  Speaker 1: Yes. Yes, you give women more, and they want even more.
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 2: You know, it just occurred to me that Lauren Southern
• 2:01:26
  Speaker 2: has accused a lot of different people of something.
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 2: Maybe eventually she'll accuse Milo.
• 2:01:34
  Speaker 1: You know, it's funny Milo got that from the chat
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: Milo dunked on her on the on X. It's hilarious
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: by the way, but I don't want to like bring
• 2:01:43
  Speaker 1: that up. But he milo's been on fire and Andrew Wilson,
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: they've been going after her. Pretty funny. Uh okay, So no, no, okay, okay.
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 2: So Kyle Stell says, not their worth. Where do profits
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 2: come from?
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 4: Well?
• 2:02:00
  Speaker 2: Offits usually go to the people who fund the actual idea,
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 2: right and also to pay for the people managing it.
• 2:02:12
  Speaker 2: They come from the people who want the products. So
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 2: you're saying that if somebody develops an idea for a
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 2: product or service, they shouldn't get any income from the
• 2:02:22
  Speaker 2: work on developing the idea for the product or service.
• 2:02:26
  Speaker 2: Is that what you're saying, Well, then nobody's going to
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 2: develop ideas for products or services if they're getting nothing
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 2: from it and not their worth. Well, they're free to
• 2:02:34
  Speaker 2: go and sell what they offer anywhere else in the
• 2:02:39
  Speaker 2: marketplace to someone who's willing to buy to buy what
• 2:02:42
  Speaker 2: they have to offer. The same people who make stuff
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 2: now make it what So.
• 2:02:49
  Speaker 4: Okay, they do it for.
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 2: Nothing, Like you just told me, where do the profits.
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 2: People labor for the big bosses and they labor for
• 2:02:59
  Speaker 2: not another money. And now you say these people who
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 2: labor for not enough money? Are gonna labor for free?
• 2:03:07
  Speaker 4: Okay, So.
• 2:03:09
  Speaker 2: I don't know, fifteen dollars an hour is too low,
• 2:03:12
  Speaker 2: but zero dollars an hour is just right for you.
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 1: Well, you see in this, in this, in this amazing
• 2:03:21
  Speaker 1: future house, and everything will be free and money won't
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: have to exist because we'll just be sharing. That's what
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 1: that's that's the that's the world we're gonna live in.
• 2:03:30
  Speaker 1: Just walk with me down the yellow brick road and
• 2:03:32
  Speaker 1: see the wizard and he will grant our wishes. This
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 1: is worse than that, well, yeah, because that involves walking.
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: We don't we don't have to do that.
• 2:03:40
  Speaker 6: No, it's worse than that.
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 2: Because, okay, she says, the same people will make stuff
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 2: now will make it so the same people who make
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 2: stuff now for fifteen dollars an hour will make it
• 2:03:48
  Speaker 2: for nothing. And they're incentive, and their incentive structure is life,
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 2: so they'll do it so that they can continue to
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 2: subsist and survive. All right, Humans lived for one hundred
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 2: thousand years without the free market Aristotle. I don't care
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 2: what Aristotle hated, all right, Okay, so human beings existed
• 2:04:11
  Speaker 2: for one hundred thousand years without toilets too.
• 2:04:15
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, Xerinx gave us a super chat for
• 2:04:18
  Speaker 1: ten dollars. Thank you, z ernks, and he says, I
• 2:04:21
  Speaker 1: think that was the goal. There was no need to
• 2:04:23
  Speaker 1: shut down small businesses or to myopically decide what was essential,
• 2:04:27
  Speaker 1: especially since the bug proved how networked the economy is.
• 2:04:31
  Speaker 1: It managed its managed decline. Thank you zarynks. Okay, so
• 2:04:38
  Speaker 1: we survived it. We're pretty resilient people, so I think
• 2:04:42
  Speaker 1: we'll be okay. But let's play some more.
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 5: More women than men are attending college, buying houses, and
• 2:04:46
  Speaker 5: focusing on their friendships and careers over dating and marriage.
• 2:04:50
  Speaker 5: The challenges of finding a romantic partner have been made
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 5: more complicated by a growing divide in education and career
• 2:04:55
  Speaker 5: prospects between men and women. In twenty twenty four, forty
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 5: percent of American women twenty five to thirty four had
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 5: a bachelor's degree, according to Pugh, compared to thirty seven
• 2:05:04
  Speaker 5: percent of men. A bachelor's degree increases net lifetime earnings
• 2:05:07
  Speaker 5: by an estimated one million.
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 7: Women are doing comparatively.
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 5: Well when it comes to education in their early years
• 2:05:12
  Speaker 5: in the labor horse, and men are doing comparatively badly.
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: All right, I'm just pausing for the banana there. These
• 2:05:20
  Speaker 1: statistics are a little bit like, I mean, it doesn't
• 2:05:23
  Speaker 1: necessarily bear out that women will be making more, but
• 2:05:27
  Speaker 1: if they're led to believe they will, then that will
• 2:05:29
  Speaker 1: just change what their standards are, so they'll be looking
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: for men that don't exist basically, and that's what's happening now.
• 2:05:36
  Speaker 1: That's why you're seeing more and more thought pieces like men,
• 2:05:39
  Speaker 1: where are you please come back?
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 2: You know?
• 2:05:42
  Speaker 1: And men?
• 2:05:43
  Speaker 2: I mean.
• 2:05:44
  Speaker 1: The other thing too, is that women are entering relationships
• 2:05:47
  Speaker 1: and marriages with like debt from college that they need
• 2:05:52
  Speaker 1: help paying off, as opposed to bringing their own sort
• 2:05:55
  Speaker 1: of like half of the economy to a marriage and family.
• 2:05:59
  Speaker 1: So this is these things quite a bit. But Alison,
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 1: are you trying to talk because I think you're muted again.
• 2:06:06
  Speaker 2: No, I'm just I'm just pondering the communists and what
• 2:06:09
  Speaker 2: they're saying. Somebody mentioned a Coconut Island analogy, which I'm
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 2: looking at.
• 2:06:16
  Speaker 1: God, Okay, can we stop entertaining communists like you guys
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 1: have been failing for hundreds of years. You're not going
• 2:06:23
  Speaker 1: to succeed. Just stop it, Okay, this like you're just
• 2:06:27
  Speaker 1: not serious. People well, I want to talk about what
• 2:06:30
  Speaker 1: we can actually do that's not going to get millions
• 2:06:32
  Speaker 1: of people killed. Okay, like, not this, not this. Men
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: don't want this. They want to earn, they want to
• 2:06:38
  Speaker 1: be They want an incentive structure that actually operates as
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 1: an incentive structure. Communism has nothing to offer men, full
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 1: stop period. Okay. Well, if you are still a communist,
• 2:06:49
  Speaker 1: you're lazy. That's all it is.
• 2:06:51
  Speaker 2: Go to work, Okay, I just I just want to
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 2: say that this, this, what we're dealing with now is
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 2: imploding as well.
• 2:06:58
  Speaker 1: But but yeah, it's like it's it's statism that did this. Okay,
• 2:07:06
  Speaker 1: Communists only offer more of the same. They just offer
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 1: more statism.
• 2:07:10
  Speaker 2: But the thing is, okay, so this Kyle says that.
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 2: They says, the same people who make the stuff will
• 2:07:16
  Speaker 2: make it. And the incentive structure is life. So the
• 2:07:18
  Speaker 2: incentive structure goes from money to life. What does that
• 2:07:21
  Speaker 2: even mean?
• 2:07:22
  Speaker 1: That means you get to live if you can.
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 4: You get to live or survive that.
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 2: So you want to somehow have an advanced system based
• 2:07:32
  Speaker 2: on subsistence living. Okay, based on the incentive structure of
• 2:07:38
  Speaker 2: a subsistence living culture or society. I don't know if
• 2:07:44
  Speaker 2: that will work, but you know you do you Okay,
• 2:07:46
  Speaker 2: let's let's all.
• 2:07:48
  Speaker 4: Right, are we not done?
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 1: Like I'm exasperated with communists? I'm sorry, okay, no with
• 2:07:54
  Speaker 1: this is like the section called just what just get
• 2:07:57
  Speaker 1: a wife? Bro. So Albatross gives us five dollars and
• 2:08:02
  Speaker 1: says thank you. Albatross at work right now, so just
• 2:08:05
  Speaker 1: cannot talk much. Here's five bucks for some Badger coffee
• 2:08:07
  Speaker 1: and donuts. Thank you appreciate it, okay.
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 7: Ruggles seem to be having the biggest effect on women.
• 2:08:17
  Speaker 5: Without a college degree, whose marriage rates by forty five
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 5: have pumentive to fifty two percent for those born between
• 2:08:22
  Speaker 5: at nineteen thirty and nineteen eighty. According to research by
• 2:08:25
  Speaker 5: Cornell University, young men without a degree are struggling so
• 2:08:28
  Speaker 5: much as a group that there simply aren't enough with study,
• 2:08:31
  Speaker 5: jobs and earnings for non college women to date, men
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 5: are poor women most affected. Modern women are no longer
• 2:08:37
  Speaker 5: tied to their gender role. Birth control has freed them
• 2:08:39
  Speaker 5: from the prison that is their biology, and they are
• 2:08:41
  Speaker 5: making their own money, sometimes more than men. They can
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 5: have it all, they can do anything, they can be anything.
• 2:08:47
  Speaker 5: While at the same time and men are still expected
• 2:08:49
  Speaker 5: to be the provider, and more importantly, many men still
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 5: want to be the provider but they can't, and women,
• 2:08:55
  Speaker 5: though strong and independent, still want men to be the provider.
• 2:09:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's true. This is the best point she makes.
• 2:09:03
  Speaker 1: I think in this that people have to reckon with
• 2:09:06
  Speaker 1: is that men are still expected to do the traditional thing.
• 2:09:09
  Speaker 1: Women are of course, liberated from all of that. So
• 2:09:13
  Speaker 1: the general thing that feminism supposedly fights again doesn't exist
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 1: because they still want men to be in their role,
• 2:09:19
  Speaker 1: even the so called anti gender abolitionist types, because they
• 2:09:24
  Speaker 1: still want men to essentially do their job as men
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: and there would challenge their masculinity if they don't do it. Meanwhile,
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 1: women can do whatever they want and men can't even
• 2:09:33
  Speaker 1: have an opinion on that.
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 2: So okay, all right, So I think we're getting to
• 2:09:39
  Speaker 2: the root of the matter, and I do think it's
• 2:09:41
  Speaker 2: worth it to talk to people like this or individuals
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 2: in the special chat. Kyl Sel says, I'm a man,
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 2: I want not to be a paid laborer with nothing
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 2: to own. Well, unfortunately, we now have a system that's
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 2: completely corrupted by government debt and also insane financial shenanigans.
• 2:10:06
  Speaker 2: So yeah, I feel for you, But I don't think
• 2:10:11
  Speaker 2: the solution is to make you work to live instead
• 2:10:14
  Speaker 2: of making you worked for withever whatever wage you have. Now,
• 2:10:18
  Speaker 2: like you're basically saying, I want to be in more
• 2:10:20
  Speaker 2: poverty while doing the same amount of work. And yeah,
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 2: I like the how do you say that?
• 2:10:27
  Speaker 6: Word of men?
• 2:10:28
  Speaker 2: The gigantic ball of things, the kada mari, the debt
• 2:10:33
  Speaker 2: kada mari is huge and disturbing, but making it bigger
• 2:10:38
  Speaker 2: is probably not going to help anyone. And he says,
• 2:10:41
  Speaker 2: I work forty hours a week. Okay, you don't have
• 2:10:44
  Speaker 2: strong ideas, so you make fun of different opinions. I
• 2:10:47
  Speaker 2: didn't make fun of your opinion. I repeated it to you,
• 2:10:50
  Speaker 2: and I said, make this work. You can't hide from
• 2:10:55
  Speaker 2: the truth.
• 2:10:56
  Speaker 4: Look, I get it.
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 2: It's painful right now participating in this economy.
• 2:11:03
  Speaker 4: Upward mobility is gone.
• 2:11:06
  Speaker 2: Downward mobility is the name of the game now, and
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 2: young people aren't getting into new jobs because of all
• 2:11:12
  Speaker 2: of this. This this technological bubbles on things that people
• 2:11:16
  Speaker 2: are willing to put money into that never show any
• 2:11:20
  Speaker 2: return on making anybody's life better. Like the widgets that
• 2:11:26
  Speaker 2: just are in your head. It's just concepts and have
• 2:11:29
  Speaker 2: never actually made money because nobody really needs them.
• 2:11:33
  Speaker 4: And that's a lot.
• 2:11:34
  Speaker 2: It seems to be a lot of the new tech offerings. Yeah,
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 2: it's really bad, but it's not going to be made
• 2:11:41
  Speaker 2: better by going back to a subsistence living system and
• 2:11:45
  Speaker 2: which life motivates you to work. Like, I just don't
• 2:11:52
  Speaker 2: get the idea. I don't get your process here. You're
• 2:11:56
  Speaker 2: now working for a wage. Now you want to work
• 2:11:59
  Speaker 2: for nothing just to live with no ability to buy anything,
• 2:12:06
  Speaker 2: just to get wheat from the government or who knows
• 2:12:09
  Speaker 2: what will be the new way of.
• 2:12:11
  Speaker 4: Keeping people from starving.
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 2: Like Kyle Sell says, learned didactical and historical materialism. I
• 2:12:21
  Speaker 2: don't need to learn those things. I just need to
• 2:12:23
  Speaker 2: learn logic, because if you learned from those things, you
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 2: are not presenting a strong case for anything related to
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 2: something that will work. All right, Well I am kind okay,
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 2: all right, I think I'm just female but regardless, okay, Yeah,
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 2: And as.
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 9: A woman, I want a strong man who is a
• 2:12:48
  Speaker 9: protector and a provider that will go to war if
• 2:12:50
  Speaker 9: need be, that will protect me, protect my family, make money.
• 2:12:54
  Speaker 5: Basically, men are like we're worried we're not making enough money,
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 5: and women are like, we're worried men are not making
• 2:13:00
  Speaker 5: enough money.
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 7: Holoclass.
• 2:13:03
  Speaker 5: I am miss on head, I am substituting for your teacher.
• 2:13:07
  Speaker 5: Today she was arrested for molesting a twelve year old boy.
• 2:13:10
  Speaker 6: So today we are learning about a.
• 2:13:14
  Speaker 1: Nice a nice one, right there. Yeah, yeah yeah.
• 2:13:18
  Speaker 5: The graph this is the growth in productivity versus hourly
• 2:13:23
  Speaker 5: compensation graph, and you can trace almost everything bad happening
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 5: in society back to this graph.
• 2:13:29
  Speaker 2: I actually can actually can we pause this because this
• 2:13:32
  Speaker 2: graph is not correct. What you really need is the
• 2:13:37
  Speaker 2: hourly wage versus inflation graph, and the inflation in the economy,
• 2:13:44
  Speaker 2: which is suppressed, which is functionally suppressed. The hourly wage
• 2:13:48
  Speaker 2: is a direct result of government spending. Period, That's what's happening.
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 2: The reason why your wages are not increasing in order
• 2:14:00
  Speaker 2: to compensate for inflation is because government spending is exponential,
• 2:14:05
  Speaker 2: is becoming exponential, so you need to absorb more and
• 2:14:10
  Speaker 2: more and more government spending in your economy. And the
• 2:14:13
  Speaker 2: way that this works is that government rights itself a debt,
• 2:14:17
  Speaker 2: like it writes itself some money, right, It says, okay,
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 2: give me money, Federal Reserve, give me money.
• 2:14:22
  Speaker 4: No, it's not the way that works. But give me money.
• 2:14:24
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna I'm gonna make it. I'm gonna make a debt.
• 2:14:27
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna give money to all the bureaucrats who have
• 2:14:31
  Speaker 2: discovered some kind of pet project that gives them an
• 2:14:33
  Speaker 2: excuse to get their fist in the trough.
• 2:14:35
  Speaker 4: They're facing the trough. All the money filters up, they
• 2:14:38
  Speaker 4: go out into the economy.
• 2:14:40
  Speaker 2: They get that money first, right, they spend, They inflate
• 2:14:45
  Speaker 2: the cost of everything, and then you get to cover that.
• 2:14:51
  Speaker 2: That's where inflation comes from. It comes from the government
• 2:14:54
  Speaker 2: writing itself blank checks that not only do you you
• 2:15:00
  Speaker 2: have to cash in terms of inflation, in terms of
• 2:15:02
  Speaker 2: increasing how much everything costs in your economy, but you
• 2:15:07
  Speaker 2: also have to pay the interest on with your income tax.
• 2:15:12
  Speaker 2: When you truly understand that, when that truly penetrates your brain,
• 2:15:17
  Speaker 2: you realize that we are not in a free market
• 2:15:21
  Speaker 2: economy at all. We are actually in a new aristocracy
• 2:15:26
  Speaker 2: where we have a group of people on top that
• 2:15:30
  Speaker 2: basically just dips into our productivity whenever they want. And
• 2:15:35
  Speaker 2: I'm not saying corporations are different at this point, since
• 2:15:38
  Speaker 2: the government now picks winners and losers, they might as
• 2:15:41
  Speaker 2: well be part of the government. They go and they
• 2:15:43
  Speaker 2: dip into the trough whenever they want, and you give
• 2:15:46
  Speaker 2: whatever remains. And yet you are the one who's filling
• 2:15:49
  Speaker 2: the trough. So you go and you go to the
• 2:15:51
  Speaker 2: trough and you dump your you dump everything, you've all
• 2:15:54
  Speaker 2: your productivity in and you're like, oh boy, we're going
• 2:15:58
  Speaker 2: to share our productivity and thus make each other much wealthier.
• 2:16:01
  Speaker 2: And then the government comes in and gobbles all of it,
• 2:16:05
  Speaker 2: or almost all of it, and you're left with a
• 2:16:07
  Speaker 2: little bit of shit in the bottom. And you made
• 2:16:10
  Speaker 2: you were the ones who made all of that wealth
• 2:16:14
  Speaker 2: in the first place. Once it gets once that you
• 2:16:18
  Speaker 2: actually wrap your mind around it, it's so unbelievably sickening.
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 2: You will never ever advocate, advocate for anything a sniff
• 2:16:31
  Speaker 2: of that again. And let me tell you, Kyle, you
• 2:16:34
  Speaker 2: will never be the one who gets the first dip
• 2:16:37
  Speaker 2: in the trough.
• 2:16:38
  Speaker 14: Never.
• 2:16:39
  Speaker 2: I'm never gonna be a one who gets the first
• 2:16:41
  Speaker 2: dip in the trough. Brian is never gonna be a
• 2:16:43
  Speaker 2: one to get the first dip in the trough. That's
• 2:16:45
  Speaker 2: always gonna be the people who network really well in Washington, DC,
• 2:16:49
  Speaker 2: who rub elbows, who kiss rings and that is a
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 2: reflection of what communism ends up being. It's still a meritocracy.
• 2:16:58
  Speaker 2: Communism is still a maritalk, except the merit is how
• 2:17:02
  Speaker 2: well you suck up to the party.
• 2:17:04
  Speaker 4: And that's what we're seeing.
• 2:17:05
  Speaker 1: Now.
• 2:17:06
  Speaker 2: You're never gonna get These people are never going to
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 2: give you a drink it from the trough. They will
• 2:17:13
  Speaker 2: only ever drink. They'll only ever do to you, Kyle.
• 2:17:18
  Speaker 2: They will take your glass that you have earned through
• 2:17:22
  Speaker 2: your own labor. They will give a good, good long
• 2:17:25
  Speaker 2: glug of it, and then they'll give you back an ounce.
• 2:17:30
  Speaker 4: That's all they'll ever do. And now what you're.
• 2:17:33
  Speaker 2: Saying is, oh, yeah, well, actually, could you take my
• 2:17:37
  Speaker 2: glass that I've I've awed, my productivity that I've developed
• 2:17:41
  Speaker 2: over the last I don't know a year, and then
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 2: they'll drink it all go and then they'll piss in
• 2:17:46
  Speaker 2: it and give it to you. That's your improvement, Like,
• 2:17:52
  Speaker 2: come on, I'm not nicer. I'm just I think it's
• 2:17:55
  Speaker 2: just because I'm the girl or the woman. All right,
• 2:17:59
  Speaker 2: let's keep you all right anyway. That's that's my analysis
• 2:18:03
  Speaker 2: of that chart.
• 2:18:04
  Speaker 5: Okay, priest, While compensation barely grew over the same time period,
• 2:18:09
  Speaker 5: Notice they tracked very closely up until around nineteen seventy two. Now,
• 2:18:14
  Speaker 5: what happened around nineteen seventy two, class well, the top
• 2:18:18
  Speaker 5: marginal tax rate was reduced from seventy percent in nineteen
• 2:18:22
  Speaker 5: sixty four to fifty percent by nineteen eighty one. The
• 2:18:27
  Speaker 5: federal minimum wage began to stagnate. Income going to the
• 2:18:31
  Speaker 5: one percent rose from nine percent in the sixties to
• 2:18:35
  Speaker 5: sixteen percent in twenty twenty three.
• 2:18:38
  Speaker 6: CEOs also went from making twenty times.
• 2:18:40
  Speaker 5: More than the average worker to making three hundred and
• 2:18:44
  Speaker 5: fifty times.
• 2:18:45
  Speaker 2: Not just that, it's not just the tax. It is
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 2: not just the tax. There was a We also went
• 2:18:51
  Speaker 2: off the gold standard, which allowed governments to massively inflate
• 2:18:57
  Speaker 2: their debt massively. As before they had to have gold
• 2:19:01
  Speaker 2: as collateral, so they actually couldn't land. They couldn't give
• 2:19:06
  Speaker 2: themselves more money than they had gold to back to
• 2:19:09
  Speaker 2: a certain degree, they kept decreasing how much collateral they
• 2:19:12
  Speaker 2: actually needed.
• 2:19:13
  Speaker 4: Now they don't need collateral.
• 2:19:15
  Speaker 2: They can just right themselves more debt whenever they want,
• 2:19:20
  Speaker 2: which we then have to service with their income, and
• 2:19:23
  Speaker 2: they also get to use that debt to get first
• 2:19:26
  Speaker 2: DIBs on all of the products that we've made, which
• 2:19:30
  Speaker 2: they tax the in order to gain that income.
• 2:19:35
  Speaker 5: So they get first DIBs on everything.
• 2:19:37
  Speaker 2: We made in the trough, and what we made making
• 2:19:43
  Speaker 2: everything in the trough they get to use to subsidize
• 2:19:47
  Speaker 2: their next first gibbs. God damn, it is such a
• 2:19:51
  Speaker 2: shitty system. And I'm actually I absolutely understand everybody who
• 2:19:57
  Speaker 2: looks at the system and says blah. And the thing
• 2:19:59
  Speaker 2: is that you can't trust anyone in government because they
• 2:20:03
  Speaker 2: all buy into this shit. This is that I can't
• 2:20:07
  Speaker 2: articulate this enough. This is immoral. This is absolutely immoral
• 2:20:14
  Speaker 2: what they're doing in government in terms of their spending,
• 2:20:16
  Speaker 2: in terms of debt.
• 2:20:18
  Speaker 4: There is no excuse for this.
• 2:20:20
  Speaker 2: This is worse than everything on the plate as a
• 2:20:24
  Speaker 2: moral issue. I think this is why when Jesus went
• 2:20:28
  Speaker 2: into the temple and saw the money lenders, he went
• 2:20:32
  Speaker 2: ape shit. And now we're ruled by the one people,
• 2:20:36
  Speaker 2: the one group of people that made Jesus just lose
• 2:20:40
  Speaker 2: his absolute shit.
• 2:20:43
  Speaker 4: Okay, not even money.
• 2:20:47
  Speaker 1: Okay, So I got a super chow from Dan de
• 2:20:51
  Speaker 1: Philippo who gives us seven dollars and fifty. I think
• 2:20:54
  Speaker 1: that was like a maybe for the fundraiser or something.
• 2:20:59
  Speaker 1: I don't know. We're not doing fundraiser yet, right, But
• 2:21:02
  Speaker 1: it's two. There's two. It's a double back thing. And
• 2:21:04
  Speaker 1: he says property rights is part of capitalism, but not
• 2:21:09
  Speaker 1: exclusive to it. Capitalism is mostly good, but the free
• 2:21:12
  Speaker 1: market is proving to be a difficulty. Both need to
• 2:21:15
  Speaker 1: be tempered to prioritize stability in society. We are enamored
• 2:21:19
  Speaker 1: of capitalism because of a holdover from Cold War era
• 2:21:22
  Speaker 1: animosity towards communism. Male hierarchies are the viable alternative to
• 2:21:26
  Speaker 1: capitalism for a productivity incentive structure.
• 2:21:33
  Speaker 4: Yeah, but I don't think.
• 2:21:34
  Speaker 2: That male hierarchies generally have government oversight.
• 2:21:38
  Speaker 4: You just leave men alone and they'll form them.
• 2:21:44
  Speaker 1: So capitalism is a word invented by socialists so they
• 2:21:48
  Speaker 1: can criticize property rights. It's just property rights, Dan, That's
• 2:21:52
  Speaker 1: all it is. I make something, it belongs to me.
• 2:21:55
  Speaker 1: I can give it to you in exchange for something else.
• 2:21:57
  Speaker 1: You can call it the barter system. The word capitalism
• 2:22:01
  Speaker 1: was a word made up by commis so they can
• 2:22:03
  Speaker 1: criticize people owning things. That's all it is. It's very simple.
• 2:22:08
  Speaker 1: It's very simple, and I suggest you guys stop using
• 2:22:11
  Speaker 1: the word capitalism because you're just you're just buying into
• 2:22:15
  Speaker 1: the framework of communists that want to talk about property.
• 2:22:19
  Speaker 1: Is this, this mug belongs to me. This is my property.
• 2:22:22
  Speaker 1: I can sell it to you or I can trade
• 2:22:24
  Speaker 1: it to you, but it's mine. That's what property rights means.
• 2:22:27
  Speaker 1: If I make it, it's also mine. If I draw
• 2:22:30
  Speaker 1: something that's my drawing, I can give it to you,
• 2:22:33
  Speaker 1: then that's property rights because I have the right to
• 2:22:35
  Speaker 1: do that. That's it. It's a very simple concept.
• 2:22:39
  Speaker 4: It just occurs to me.
• 2:22:40
  Speaker 2: It's very beneficial for a group of people who think
• 2:22:43
  Speaker 2: that that this system is legitimate. Where we all of
• 2:22:48
  Speaker 2: us who labor and make stuff that people want, we
• 2:22:52
  Speaker 2: put it in the big trough, right, and then the
• 2:22:55
  Speaker 2: money we make putting get putting all the stuff in
• 2:22:58
  Speaker 2: the big trough, they get a percentage of But then
• 2:23:01
  Speaker 2: they turn around and use that percentage that they took
• 2:23:05
  Speaker 2: from us making the goods and use that to underwrite
• 2:23:10
  Speaker 2: making gigantic loans so they can be the first people
• 2:23:13
  Speaker 2: to use the goods. And no wonder these people embrace
• 2:23:18
  Speaker 2: the idea that property rights are somehow evil because they
• 2:23:21
  Speaker 2: want our property.
• 2:23:22
  Speaker 1: See that's exactly that's see that you got, you're basically
• 2:23:26
  Speaker 1: you're right there else And so if you call it capitalism,
• 2:23:31
  Speaker 1: then you can criticize it and say weird like things
• 2:23:34
  Speaker 1: like oh it's greed, like as o. Greed is like
• 2:23:37
  Speaker 1: some problem associated with a system and not just a
• 2:23:40
  Speaker 1: problem that human beings have always had, like oh, you
• 2:23:44
  Speaker 1: have something I want, or I have something and I
• 2:23:46
  Speaker 1: don't want to give it to anybody else. That's that
• 2:23:48
  Speaker 1: exists no matter what system you're under, because greed is
• 2:23:51
  Speaker 1: a human problem. It's not a material problem. It's not
• 2:23:54
  Speaker 1: a capitalist problem. But when you call it property rights,
• 2:23:58
  Speaker 1: which is what it is. When you criticize property rights,
• 2:24:01
  Speaker 1: then you see it for what it really is. I
• 2:24:04
  Speaker 1: don't like that you have things you shouldn't be allowed
• 2:24:07
  Speaker 1: to have things, which is why desperate comedies try to
• 2:24:10
  Speaker 1: draw a line between property rights and personal or personal
• 2:24:14
  Speaker 1: property and private property. But it's all private property, guys, Stop,
• 2:24:19
  Speaker 1: you're just coping, Okay. The personal property is different. We've
• 2:24:24
  Speaker 1: seen the attempts at communes. They almost always collapse into
• 2:24:28
  Speaker 1: disaster because somebody wants somebody else's toothbrush, or ultimately it
• 2:24:32
  Speaker 1: becomes like people's bodies become their property, you know, So Look,
• 2:24:38
  Speaker 1: you can have whatever opinions you want you think, I'm
• 2:24:40
  Speaker 1: mean whatever. I'm trying to save you from yourself. Communism
• 2:24:43
  Speaker 1: is for morons, that's all I'm saying. Okay, we've tried it.
• 2:24:46
  Speaker 1: It's killed millions of people. I'm not gonna apologize for that.
• 2:24:50
  Speaker 1: But don't tell me that property rights is not what
• 2:24:53
  Speaker 1: you're criticizing.
• 2:24:54
  Speaker 2: So well, yeah, that's the thing. Like again, what is okay,
• 2:24:59
  Speaker 2: who's gonna make the stuff and what is.
• 2:25:01
  Speaker 4: Their incentive for doing so?
• 2:25:03
  Speaker 2: Now, if you said something like, you know, the Fiat
• 2:25:05
  Speaker 2: currency that the government controls and rights itself debts in
• 2:25:10
  Speaker 2: is not enough compensation for the average.
• 2:25:12
  Speaker 4: Worker, I'd be right on that, right on. The average worker.
• 2:25:18
  Speaker 2: Deserves to be paid in a currency that isn't going
• 2:25:20
  Speaker 2: to be inflated out of existence because bureaucrats want free shit, right,
• 2:25:24
  Speaker 2: that one, behind that one. But if you're going to say, well,
• 2:25:28
  Speaker 2: it's life that's gonna set No, No, we're not going
• 2:25:31
  Speaker 2: from a situation where it's bad right now to a
• 2:25:35
  Speaker 2: situation where it's even worse and nobody gets anything.
• 2:25:40
  Speaker 4: That's the wrong direction. Okay, uh is there anything further?
• 2:25:44
  Speaker 14: Right?
• 2:25:45
  Speaker 1: I mean she uh, they warrants again.
• 2:25:50
  Speaker 2: For a long time, I thought it was gonna be
• 2:25:51
  Speaker 2: like an hour.
• 2:25:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's yeah, this is like two and a
• 2:25:54
  Speaker 1: half hours. Do you want to play more of this
• 2:25:56
  Speaker 1: or what?
• 2:25:58
  Speaker 13: Well?
• 2:25:59
  Speaker 2: Uh, yeah, let her finish your point, because although I
• 2:26:03
  Speaker 2: don't agree with.
• 2:26:04
  Speaker 4: The chart, she did have a good point.
• 2:26:06
  Speaker 5: Yeah, anything else, anything else happened around nineteen seventy two. Yes, Jimmy,
• 2:26:11
  Speaker 5: that is correct. Women joined the workforce around this time.
• 2:26:14
  Speaker 6: But we don't have to get into that today.
• 2:26:18
  Speaker 11: The fact is hard.
• 2:26:19
  Speaker 1: It seems to be the most important point though. Yeah,
• 2:26:22
  Speaker 1: Like I think it's bigger than the whole like you know,
• 2:26:24
  Speaker 1: a billionaires CEOs, how about women entered the workforce? And
• 2:26:29
  Speaker 1: it was probably also a big mass immigration thing too
• 2:26:33
  Speaker 1: that happened as well. And I say this as somebody
• 2:26:35
  Speaker 1: who was probably a benefactor or beneficiary of that that
• 2:26:40
  Speaker 1: were people willing to work for less as well, so
• 2:26:42
  Speaker 1: you know, drive down wages. We got to be honest
• 2:26:44
  Speaker 1: about it. But I think that women had a big
• 2:26:47
  Speaker 1: part to play, and I don't blame them. Like I said,
• 2:26:50
  Speaker 1: it sounded really appealing and at the time people probably
• 2:26:53
  Speaker 1: thought this is like a good idea, you know, but
• 2:26:56
  Speaker 1: it turned out to be not a good idea. I
• 2:26:59
  Speaker 1: don't know house to put it, so, uh, alson, are
• 2:27:06
  Speaker 1: you there?
• 2:27:07
  Speaker 2: No, I'm just looking at things. I want to thank
• 2:27:09
  Speaker 2: Dan Philippine de Philippo. I hope that your response was
• 2:27:13
  Speaker 2: of interest. Toreism has disappeared.
• 2:27:17
  Speaker 4: That's interesting.
• 2:27:18
  Speaker 1: I think he's I don't know, I haven't looked, but uh,
• 2:27:23
  Speaker 1: he's probably lurking or he's it's bedtime, okay, So anyways,
• 2:27:34
  Speaker 1: I'll play a little bit more of this. I think
• 2:27:35
  Speaker 1: this is her final point.
• 2:27:36
  Speaker 5: Work no longer guarantees success, and the will to work
• 2:27:40
  Speaker 5: is tied to the fruits of your labor, and young
• 2:27:42
  Speaker 5: men are fed up today because niger fruit is rotten. Now,
• 2:27:45
  Speaker 5: is there some truth to modern young people being lazy?
• 2:27:49
  Speaker 1: Sure?
• 2:27:49
  Speaker 5: I guess every generation had lazy people, and we do
• 2:27:53
  Speaker 5: basically live in late stage mouse utopia. After all, young
• 2:27:56
  Speaker 5: people today are faced with two options, revolution or escapism,
• 2:28:01
  Speaker 5: and a lot of them are choosing escapism. Many have
• 2:28:04
  Speaker 5: basically given up. But it's not like they didn't try.
• 2:28:07
  Speaker 5: They tried, and they found out the juice just isn't
• 2:28:09
  Speaker 5: worth the squeeze, whether it's college, dating or the job market.
• 2:28:13
  Speaker 5: And in a way, many.
• 2:28:14
  Speaker 1: I like how she says young people, men just say it.
• 2:28:19
  Speaker 1: It's men women women. Are you already pointed out. Women
• 2:28:23
  Speaker 1: are getting a higher education, they're making more money. They're
• 2:28:27
  Speaker 1: they're just not finding any men because there are no
• 2:28:29
  Speaker 1: men who will live up to their standards. That's their
• 2:28:31
  Speaker 1: problem is that they can't lower their standards. Men are
• 2:28:35
  Speaker 1: the ones that are choosing escapism, which you should be
• 2:28:37
  Speaker 1: fortunate that they're not choosing revolution. So you know, some
• 2:28:42
  Speaker 1: of them are like they they're definitely like you know,
• 2:28:44
  Speaker 1: probably people in our chat that feel frustrated enough to
• 2:28:47
  Speaker 1: do that.
• 2:28:47
  Speaker 4: Okay, all right, like communism, okay.
• 2:28:50
  Speaker 2: Lo Fi Kami says, yes, I wanted you to force
• 2:28:53
  Speaker 2: you to get paid fairly and have affordable housing.
• 2:28:55
  Speaker 4: I'm pretty much the devil.
• 2:28:57
  Speaker 2: No, you want to create a government branch of free housing,
• 2:29:03
  Speaker 2: which means the Ministry of free Housing, which means you
• 2:29:07
  Speaker 2: are going to open up yet another opportunity for a
• 2:29:11
  Speaker 2: bunch of bureaucrats to go get their share of the
• 2:29:14
  Speaker 2: trough that we have made.
• 2:29:16
  Speaker 4: That's all that's going to happen.
• 2:29:19
  Speaker 2: That's it. That there's no a solution here except them
• 2:29:27
  Speaker 2: eating more of the stuff that we make. All they
• 2:29:31
  Speaker 2: can do is maybe rearrange the stuff that we make.
• 2:29:36
  Speaker 2: We are making it us.
• 2:29:39
  Speaker 1: You.
• 2:29:40
  Speaker 2: You are making the housing, You are making the medical stuff,
• 2:29:44
  Speaker 2: you are making, the art, you are making, the food.
• 2:29:48
  Speaker 2: You This stuff doesn't come from the bureaucracy. At best,
• 2:29:53
  Speaker 2: they can maybe distribute it. But that's not the track
• 2:29:56
  Speaker 2: record i'm seeing. The track record i'm seeing is they
• 2:30:00
  Speaker 2: take if they'll say something like, we'll distribute housing, but
• 2:30:05
  Speaker 2: first we'll give all the mansions to us, and then
• 2:30:10
  Speaker 2: we'll give all the nice four bedroom single family houses
• 2:30:15
  Speaker 2: to our children, and then we'll give all the nice
• 2:30:18
  Speaker 2: condos to our grandchildren. And you can get a yerked
• 2:30:25
  Speaker 2: next to the cricket farm, Like don't you notice this
• 2:30:29
  Speaker 2: at all?
• 2:30:31
  Speaker 4: Okay?
• 2:30:32
  Speaker 5: Mm hmm, Like where do you?
• 2:30:35
  Speaker 4: Okay?
• 2:30:35
  Speaker 5: I wish these people would.
• 2:30:36
  Speaker 2: I wish the individuals who are calling themselves communists would
• 2:30:40
  Speaker 2: get this through their head. The stuff comes from us.
• 2:30:45
  Speaker 2: The stuff comes from us. The stuff comes from your neighbor,
• 2:30:51
  Speaker 2: The stuff comes from your dad. The stuff comes from you,
• 2:30:56
  Speaker 2: The stuff comes from your your friends. It does not
• 2:31:00
  Speaker 2: come from the commune, from the bureaucrats in government. The
• 2:31:06
  Speaker 2: only thing you're going to do if you say bureaucrats.
• 2:31:09
  Speaker 2: Give us free housing is give the bureaucrats the right
• 2:31:14
  Speaker 2: to control the stuff that you make.
• 2:31:17
  Speaker 4: That's it. Okay, okay, I'm sorry.
• 2:31:21
  Speaker 5: This is sort of aggregate of choosing revolution. The never
• 2:31:24
  Speaker 5: before seen large shift right word in young men is
• 2:31:27
  Speaker 5: a small revolution in a way. They're saying this, this
• 2:31:29
  Speaker 5: isn't working for me, this sucks, I hate this, I
• 2:31:32
  Speaker 5: want something different. This is also manifesting on the Democrats
• 2:31:35
  Speaker 5: side in general. The young men that are still voting
• 2:31:37
  Speaker 5: left are voting further left. You saw this recently in
• 2:31:40
  Speaker 5: New York City where Zoran Mendani, a self proclaimed democratic socialist,
• 2:31:44
  Speaker 5: won the Democratic primary. Young Men are tired of the
• 2:31:47
  Speaker 5: establishment left and right. They're tired of the system and
• 2:31:50
  Speaker 5: they want to burn it down and start again. They
• 2:31:52
  Speaker 5: want something that works for them because this is not
• 2:31:55
  Speaker 5: working for them.
• 2:31:56
  Speaker 1: If you wake up and white. Yeah, but what they
• 2:31:58
  Speaker 1: want is to be able to support a family with
• 2:32:02
  Speaker 1: a woman that loves them. That's all they ever wanted.
• 2:32:06
  Speaker 1: If you let them have that, there would be no issues.
• 2:32:09
  Speaker 1: But that's been an issue, and so yeah, they're blaming
• 2:32:12
  Speaker 1: the government for it, and yeah, the government does bear
• 2:32:15
  Speaker 1: some of that, but ultimately, like I mean where I live,
• 2:32:19
  Speaker 1: there are men and women who are married with multiple children.
• 2:32:22
  Speaker 1: They're not fans of the government, but you know what
• 2:32:24
  Speaker 1: they get by without burning anything down because they love
• 2:32:26
  Speaker 1: each other. But like most women now, they're not they're
• 2:32:31
  Speaker 1: not looking for that.
• 2:32:33
  Speaker 13: You do.
• 2:32:34
  Speaker 2: You know why aristocratic families and families in power are
• 2:32:38
  Speaker 2: absolutely nuts about marriage and legacy. It's because these things
• 2:32:44
  Speaker 2: create wealth.
• 2:32:46
  Speaker 4: Period.
• 2:32:48
  Speaker 2: What you're talking about, Brian, is the ability to create wealth,
• 2:32:51
  Speaker 2: which is the ability to form families. What is the
• 2:32:54
  Speaker 2: first thing that our government did when it gained all
• 2:32:59
  Speaker 2: of these narrative It turned around and it destroyed and
• 2:33:03
  Speaker 2: feminism is very much a government sponsored concept. It destroyed
• 2:33:08
  Speaker 2: the ability for people to form families and create legacy
• 2:33:12
  Speaker 2: and work together with each other to help each other out.
• 2:33:15
  Speaker 2: It destroyed family. That's the first thing it did. And
• 2:33:20
  Speaker 2: I mean you could say that it did it in
• 2:33:22
  Speaker 2: the concept contact context of creating greater consumerism, doesn't matter.
• 2:33:26
  Speaker 4: That's what it did.
• 2:33:28
  Speaker 2: And yeah, so why don't we finish Let her finish
• 2:33:31
  Speaker 2: your point?
• 2:33:32
  Speaker 1: There is some more stuff. There's a clip from uh.
• 2:33:34
  Speaker 2: What well, okay, there's something in the This lady is
• 2:33:39
  Speaker 2: so close to realizing communism is what she's been searching for. Yes,
• 2:33:44
  Speaker 2: but the Okay, your neighbors create your stuff, their stuff, right, Okay,
• 2:33:50
  Speaker 2: they create the stuff, not the bureaucrats. Okay, how do
• 2:33:53
  Speaker 2: we create a way of fairly exchanging stuff? Because I'm
• 2:33:59
  Speaker 2: not giving the stuff to the bureaucrats to decide who
• 2:34:02
  Speaker 2: they give it to. So you tell me, how do
• 2:34:05
  Speaker 2: we create a way all of us, you know, like
• 2:34:08
  Speaker 2: we're in a community. Ted grows cucumbers, Fred makes or
• 2:34:14
  Speaker 2: I shouldn't use Fred, I don't know, Chris grows beef.
• 2:34:17
  Speaker 2: How do we create a system by which everybody can
• 2:34:21
  Speaker 2: exchange stuff fairly without the government involving itself. You think
• 2:34:28
  Speaker 2: about that and you come up with your answer. Kyle, Okay,
• 2:34:32
  Speaker 2: let's all right.
• 2:34:33
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna play this.
• 2:34:34
  Speaker 14: Mean you find yourself in a society where twenty three
• 2:34:37
  Speaker 14: year olds with four year college degrees and like initiative,
• 2:34:41
  Speaker 14: who aren't smoking weed every day, if they can't make
• 2:34:44
  Speaker 14: enough to buy a car, much else at home, much,
• 2:34:47
  Speaker 14: les get married, much les have children. Then why should
• 2:34:51
  Speaker 14: you be surprised when half of them say they prefer socialism?
• 2:34:55
  Speaker 4: Huh?
• 2:34:56
  Speaker 5: Fox News should hire that guy. There is an entire
• 2:34:59
  Speaker 5: generation of fighting aged men who are enraged.
• 2:35:02
  Speaker 1: Isn't it funny that the system is designed to fall
• 2:35:05
  Speaker 1: apart enough so that men vote in the system that
• 2:35:08
  Speaker 1: did this in the first place, and they call it progress. Yeah,
• 2:35:12
  Speaker 1: but I mean it's a trap, guys. It's a trap.
• 2:35:14
  Speaker 1: They did it to the women in the seventies. Okay,
• 2:35:17
  Speaker 1: I'm just saying because she was like all about it, like, oh,
• 2:35:20
  Speaker 1: that's a good idea. We'll talk. I don't watch people,
• 2:35:22
  Speaker 1: and then the rich are going to leave the country
• 2:35:24
  Speaker 1: and we're gonna have nothing. Actually, they're already doing that
• 2:35:27
  Speaker 1: in the Blue States. A lot of the big companies
• 2:35:29
  Speaker 1: have left. Why too much socialism, So you know, yeah,
• 2:35:33
  Speaker 1: let's just let's just do that. Let's just do more
• 2:35:35
  Speaker 1: of that. I don't I don't you know what. I
• 2:35:36
  Speaker 1: need to go out a diet anyways.
• 2:35:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, Well I think that he had Tucker. It's
• 2:35:43
  Speaker 2: Tucker's point. I think he does have a point. If
• 2:35:46
  Speaker 2: this system is providing no word up, no upward mobility
• 2:35:50
  Speaker 2: for anyone, then you're right. It's basically young men saying, well,
• 2:35:56
  Speaker 2: what where's my I mean, after after generations of paying
• 2:36:00
  Speaker 2: into this shitty system which is now just stealing their
• 2:36:05
  Speaker 2: lives the livelihood of their sons. Their sons are saying, well,
• 2:36:09
  Speaker 2: give back we want from the system now, and yeah,
• 2:36:14
  Speaker 2: it is buying into the system again. And it's not
• 2:36:17
  Speaker 2: gonna work.
• 2:36:18
  Speaker 1: It was one.
• 2:36:19
  Speaker 4: It's not gonna happen.
• 2:36:20
  Speaker 2: It's not gonna work the instant it happens, it's all
• 2:36:22
  Speaker 2: gonna go like gone. Its unfortunate fact is that we're
• 2:36:26
  Speaker 2: stuck with this now. We have to labor for these
• 2:36:29
  Speaker 2: people who treat us like farm animals. And then the
• 2:36:32
  Speaker 2: the to respond to the special chat they say, by
• 2:36:36
  Speaker 2: equal lo fi commie says, by equal ownership of the stuff. Lady,
• 2:36:40
  Speaker 2: you're so close, So you're saying that everybody in the
• 2:36:43
  Speaker 2: community should equally own everything that's made. Well, first of all,
• 2:36:48
  Speaker 2: that is proven to reduce productivity overall. But second of all, no,
• 2:36:55
  Speaker 2: have you ever freakin grown anything? You know how much
• 2:36:59
  Speaker 2: effort you put in.
• 2:37:00
  Speaker 4: I am not going to make.
• 2:37:03
  Speaker 2: My potatoes available to the entire community.
• 2:37:07
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 2:37:08
  Speaker 2: I might give them to my friends and family, but
• 2:37:11
  Speaker 2: they are not available to the entire community. I put
• 2:37:14
  Speaker 2: the effort in. If somebody wants my effort, they give
• 2:37:19
  Speaker 2: me something that allows me to purchase somebody else's effort. Okay,
• 2:37:25
  Speaker 2: And the thing is that you say equally everybody. Then
• 2:37:29
  Speaker 2: once again, you are talking about having an organization that
• 2:37:33
  Speaker 2: takes all of the stuff that the community provides and
• 2:37:36
  Speaker 2: distributes it, right, or are you just saying we all
• 2:37:41
  Speaker 2: dump it into a pile? How are the goods distributed
• 2:37:46
  Speaker 2: in your system? We all equally own it, How are
• 2:37:49
  Speaker 2: they distributed? Who controls the distribution of those goods? If
• 2:37:53
  Speaker 2: they're all equally owned, the equally Owned Goods ministry, think
• 2:38:00
  Speaker 2: about it? And what did the hell? Why do you
• 2:38:02
  Speaker 2: have such a fucking problem with the idea that I
• 2:38:06
  Speaker 2: grew these damn potatoes. You're gonna give me something that
• 2:38:09
  Speaker 2: will allow me to purchase some beef. Why do you
• 2:38:12
  Speaker 2: have such a fucking problem with that?
• 2:38:18
  Speaker 5: Now you got me pissed, It's like good grief.
• 2:38:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I want my damn potatoes.
• 2:38:28
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's keep going.
• 2:38:30
  Speaker 2: As you can see, I'm not I am not unfamiliar
• 2:38:33
  Speaker 2: with starches. I'm not a stranger to starches.
• 2:38:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 2:38:38
  Speaker 5: Four, you should probably start caring. When they saw the
• 2:38:44
  Speaker 5: Fox News, they saw an angry woman nagging in their
• 2:38:46
  Speaker 5: faces about how everything wrong in the world is their fault.
• 2:38:50
  Speaker 5: An all too familiar thing they have been hearing for
• 2:38:52
  Speaker 5: far too long. But unfortunately for Democrats, nobody under the
• 2:38:55
  Speaker 5: age of sixty watches Fox News. So this is not
• 2:38:58
  Speaker 5: really going to have an effect on your men whatsoever.
• 2:39:01
  Speaker 5: So keep that twenty million dollars. You might still need
• 2:39:04
  Speaker 5: it unless we get dragged into another war in the
• 2:39:05
  Speaker 5: Middle East. If we do get dragged into another war
• 2:39:08
  Speaker 5: in the Middle East, young men might come running back
• 2:39:11
  Speaker 5: to the Democratic Party.
• 2:39:12
  Speaker 1: Maybe not.
• 2:39:13
  Speaker 5: Maybe not even a George Bush to Electric Boogloo will
• 2:39:17
  Speaker 5: have men coming back to the Democratic Party.
• 2:39:19
  Speaker 6: Hopefully we don't find out.
• 2:39:20
  Speaker 5: And as I'm editing this right now, a lot of
• 2:39:22
  Speaker 5: young people, even the podcast brows, seem pretty upset about
• 2:39:25
  Speaker 5: the Epstein thing. But we know Democrats won't take advantage
• 2:39:27
  Speaker 5: of the situation in order to protect the Clintons.
• 2:39:29
  Speaker 1: So okay, I'm just pausing. There is just more like yeah,
• 2:39:34
  Speaker 1: she's basically like done here with this. I think yay.
• 2:39:37
  Speaker 2: Siguilo first says, I love how dead is a problem
• 2:39:40
  Speaker 2: of making people this lives better. But handouts and welfare
• 2:39:42
  Speaker 2: to business and the wealthy is fine.
• 2:39:46
  Speaker 4: Oh good grief.
• 2:39:48
  Speaker 2: I have just spent the entire two hours calling out
• 2:39:53
  Speaker 2: handouts to the wealthy and business.
• 2:39:55
  Speaker 4: Primarily.
• 2:39:56
  Speaker 2: The reason why welfare to people who are earnning the
• 2:40:00
  Speaker 2: income at this point now is going to be a
• 2:40:02
  Speaker 2: problem is because if you put UBI in position, there
• 2:40:06
  Speaker 2: will be no incentive for anybody to work, so there
• 2:40:08
  Speaker 2: will be no income and the whole system is going
• 2:40:11
  Speaker 2: to come crashing down. That's fine, it's a shitty system anyway,
• 2:40:15
  Speaker 2: but it's going to be quite a rocky transition.
• 2:40:18
  Speaker 4: So sure do it.
• 2:40:19
  Speaker 2: Put in UBI, implode the system.
• 2:40:22
  Speaker 1: Alison, it will work this time. This is random person
• 2:40:25
  Speaker 1: in the in our vertical YouTube chat just said, so
• 2:40:29
  Speaker 1: I forget what all those philosophers wrote about, and like
• 2:40:32
  Speaker 1: you know, Chairman Mao, and like Stalin and Lenin and
• 2:40:36
  Speaker 1: you know Polepod, forget those people. They weren't as intellectually
• 2:40:40
  Speaker 1: robust as the guy in our vertical chat saying it's
• 2:40:43
  Speaker 1: totally going to work this time, just like you know,
• 2:40:45
  Speaker 1: go educate yourself, Alison, Okay.
• 2:40:47
  Speaker 4: All right, all right.
• 2:40:51
  Speaker 2: I hate this fucking system, right, I hate the system
• 2:40:56
  Speaker 2: in which bureaucrats get richer off of all of these
• 2:41:00
  Speaker 2: bullshit narratives, and corporations get richer for providing nothing to nobody,
• 2:41:05
  Speaker 2: just a pie in the sky. All maybe we'll make
• 2:41:08
  Speaker 2: something that makes money eventually. Yeah, this system is shit.
• 2:41:12
  Speaker 2: What I am saying is that once you put in
• 2:41:15
  Speaker 2: place UBI, which at this point I have no moral
• 2:41:18
  Speaker 2: objection to, because this situation is shit, everything's going to
• 2:41:22
  Speaker 2: implode and we are going to have to go back
• 2:41:25
  Speaker 2: to a system in which people get stuff for making stuff.
• 2:41:31
  Speaker 2: And again, some of the no incentive thing is garbage.
• 2:41:35
  Speaker 2: What's the incentive? Okay, I make my I spend hours
• 2:41:39
  Speaker 2: and hours and hours raising my potatoes. What's my incentive
• 2:41:43
  Speaker 2: to give them to Ted for nothing because he equally
• 2:41:47
  Speaker 2: owns them?
• 2:41:49
  Speaker 4: Because why.
• 2:41:52
  Speaker 2: My labor made those potatoes? Why does Ted get equal
• 2:41:57
  Speaker 2: access to my potatoes? What incentive do I have to
• 2:42:03
  Speaker 2: share them with Ted? And why should that incentive be
• 2:42:06
  Speaker 2: controlled centrally and not by me and Ted just exchanging
• 2:42:10
  Speaker 2: something that has some kind of universal value to everyone involved?
• 2:42:15
  Speaker 2: Like it's infuriating. Why don't they don't see this? Okay,
• 2:42:25
  Speaker 2: let's let's keep going.
• 2:42:27
  Speaker 5: All right, Oh, maybe not even this will save them,
• 2:42:30
  Speaker 5: but we'll see I guess hold on one second, Oh.
• 2:42:35
  Speaker 7: That's better.
• 2:42:36
  Speaker 4: So that was that video?
• 2:42:37
  Speaker 5: What do you think of the male loser epidemic? Do
• 2:42:40
  Speaker 5: you agree with Tommy Lauren?
• 2:42:42
  Speaker 7: Is it all men's fault?
• 2:42:43
  Speaker 5: Leave your comments below.
• 2:42:44
  Speaker 1: I read that it's women's fault. That's it.
• 2:42:48
  Speaker 2: No, literally, it's like the average woman has not gotten
• 2:42:53
  Speaker 2: better in the last seven years. The average man, you know,
• 2:42:57
  Speaker 2: bit larger, but still doing work generally right, doing the
• 2:43:03
  Speaker 2: work that that's required to keep society running. So why
• 2:43:07
  Speaker 2: is it that now the average woman is just too
• 2:43:11
  Speaker 2: good for the average man. That's bullshit. If that was
• 2:43:14
  Speaker 2: ever the case in human history, we would have gone
• 2:43:16
  Speaker 2: extinct except for those pinch points, those evolutionary pinch points,
• 2:43:20
  Speaker 2: which there was like only seventeen men for every one
• 2:43:23
  Speaker 2: woman or seventeen women for every one men. But something
• 2:43:26
  Speaker 2: happened to reduce the population to that point, so that's
• 2:43:30
  Speaker 2: not actually the way it works. But regardless, so why
• 2:43:34
  Speaker 2: is it that it's men now? Not the fact that
• 2:43:38
  Speaker 2: all the women just want a man who makes their
• 2:43:40
  Speaker 2: girlfriends jealous, which all women can't have. You can't have
• 2:43:45
  Speaker 2: it because if you have a man, like, if your
• 2:43:49
  Speaker 2: man makes your girlfriends jealous, that means you're likely way
• 2:43:52
  Speaker 2: out of your league because you tend to use your
• 2:43:55
  Speaker 2: girlfriends of equivalent attractiveness, So you're all shooting for men
• 2:44:00
  Speaker 2: who are technically way out of your league, And if
• 2:44:03
  Speaker 2: you all get men who are way out of your league,
• 2:44:05
  Speaker 2: then you can't make your girlfriend's jealous because she also
• 2:44:08
  Speaker 2: has a man who's way out of your league. So
• 2:44:11
  Speaker 2: then you have to shoot for men who are way,
• 2:44:13
  Speaker 2: way way out of your league. But then if your
• 2:44:16
  Speaker 2: girlfriend gets a man who's also way way way out
• 2:44:19
  Speaker 2: of your league, then you can't make your jealous.
• 2:44:22
  Speaker 4: So then you have to shoot for men who are way, way,
• 2:44:23
  Speaker 4: way way way out of your league.
• 2:44:26
  Speaker 2: But then if your girlfriend gets that because she's entitled,
• 2:44:28
  Speaker 2: because it's obviously not a problem with women, then you
• 2:44:31
  Speaker 2: have to shoot from and it's just never ending, and
• 2:44:35
  Speaker 2: it's a problem with women's mentality.
• 2:44:39
  Speaker 4: Okay, I'm good. There's a lot of communists.
• 2:44:43
  Speaker 1: That's the end. Yeah, I don't know that. You guys
• 2:44:45
  Speaker 1: all come here from like shoes comments section, So that's
• 2:44:49
  Speaker 1: the end of the that's the end of the video.
• 2:44:52
  Speaker 1: She just sort of, like, you know, asks for opinions
• 2:44:54
  Speaker 1: and stuff. So we got through the whole thing.
• 2:44:59
  Speaker 4: Okay, well that's good.
• 2:45:01
  Speaker 1: We might have.
• 2:45:02
  Speaker 4: Did you get all the super chows?
• 2:45:04
  Speaker 1: Yes, I'm looking just one more quick lookover. Yes, all
• 2:45:10
  Speaker 1: of the No, that's it, that's all of them.
• 2:45:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well they might be there might be one stuck
• 2:45:15
  Speaker 2: in the tube.
• 2:45:15
  Speaker 4: So I'm just gonna okay, all right, we're good. We're good. No,
• 2:45:20
  Speaker 4: no super chows stuck in the chute.
• 2:45:22
  Speaker 2: If you awys want to get in the last one,
• 2:45:25
  Speaker 2: feed the badger dot com slash just the tip and.
• 2:45:31
  Speaker 4: And uh, let me see if there's anything further. Because
• 2:45:36
  Speaker 4: I need other people's work, yes.
• 2:45:38
  Speaker 2: That's fine, but I might not need them immediately. So
• 2:45:41
  Speaker 2: for example, I may need he needs Sandy's grains.
• 2:45:46
  Speaker 4: And Paul's carpenter.
• 2:45:47
  Speaker 2: I may need Paul's carpentry stills, but Paul does not
• 2:45:51
  Speaker 2: need my potatoes. However, Tony may need my potatoes, but
• 2:45:56
  Speaker 2: he doesn't need Paul's mark apart. So he's going to
• 2:46:00
  Speaker 2: give me some kind of medium of exchange so that
• 2:46:03
  Speaker 2: I can sell my potatoes to Tony. He gives me
• 2:46:06
  Speaker 2: some kind of medium of exchange, which then I can
• 2:46:09
  Speaker 2: use to get carpentry spills for skills from Paul. I
• 2:46:13
  Speaker 2: don't think we need an entire bureaucratic apparatus of everybody
• 2:46:18
  Speaker 2: owns everything equally in order to manage this. We can
• 2:46:21
  Speaker 2: have just a distributed system of a symbol that could
• 2:46:25
  Speaker 2: possibly be based on something with historical value, like a
• 2:46:28
  Speaker 2: type of metal. Instead, why do we need to go
• 2:46:32
  Speaker 2: to bureaucratic the ministry of equal everyone owning everything equally
• 2:46:39
  Speaker 2: in order? Like I go to the ministry of owning
• 2:46:41
  Speaker 2: everyone owning everything equally and be like, here's my potatoes,
• 2:46:44
  Speaker 2: and they're saying.
• 2:46:44
  Speaker 4: Thank you, we will take ten.
• 2:46:48
  Speaker 2: We will take ten out of every We'll take nine
• 2:46:50
  Speaker 2: out of every ten potatoes, and then that last one
• 2:46:54
  Speaker 2: potato you can use to actually get.
• 2:46:57
  Speaker 4: Something you need.
• 2:46:59
  Speaker 2: No thank you, I'd rather just use money. The funny
• 2:47:03
  Speaker 2: thing is that money is what we control, or we
• 2:47:05
  Speaker 2: did before it became this gigantic fiat system. Okay, all right,
• 2:47:15
  Speaker 2: all right, yeah, I can argue with.
• 2:47:17
  Speaker 4: The communists all day.
• 2:47:19
  Speaker 2: It's actually more fun than the feminists because at least
• 2:47:22
  Speaker 2: the communists are like, well what about this, but what
• 2:47:23
  Speaker 2: about this? Whereas feminists are just like, you are a
• 2:47:26
  Speaker 2: man with a small penis.
• 2:47:29
  Speaker 4: Yeah, so it's nowhere to go.
• 2:47:32
  Speaker 2: There's just immediately default onto some kind of fricked up,
• 2:47:35
  Speaker 2: fucked up shaming. So I'll give you the communists this.
• 2:47:38
  Speaker 2: At least you are trying to think of things of
• 2:47:42
  Speaker 2: actual things, systemic things to bring up to say, oh
• 2:47:45
  Speaker 2: but what about this?
• 2:47:46
  Speaker 4: At least you haven't said yet.
• 2:47:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they're really stupid things, but I guess they are things.
• 2:47:52
  Speaker 4: Yeah, well compared to what feminists do.
• 2:47:55
  Speaker 1: Well, feminists are just trying to control you with their emotions.
• 2:47:58
  Speaker 1: But like, so, yeah, there's like no substance. No, it's
• 2:48:01
  Speaker 1: like you can't even you can't even call it dumb.
• 2:48:04
  Speaker 1: But I can't call communists dumb because it is dumb.
• 2:48:08
  Speaker 2: So okay, yeah, at least you you at least you
• 2:48:11
  Speaker 2: register on the scale of intelligence. Yeah, okay, all right,
• 2:48:16
  Speaker 2: So I'll do the things I really I'm gonna not
• 2:48:19
  Speaker 2: look at the special chat guys.
• 2:48:21
  Speaker 4: You gotta I gotta close this out, all right.
• 2:48:23
  Speaker 2: So if you want to send us a comment, if
• 2:48:25
  Speaker 2: any of you communists want to correct me about all
• 2:48:29
  Speaker 2: the things that I've said, feed the Badger dot com
• 2:48:31
  Speaker 2: slash just the tip. You no longer I'm gonna leave.
• 2:48:34
  Speaker 2: Now I'm gonna go and do my life. You no
• 2:48:36
  Speaker 2: longer get the benefit of my labor, so now you
• 2:48:39
  Speaker 2: have to pay for it. Feed the Badger dot com
• 2:48:41
  Speaker 2: slash just the tip. And if you want to support
• 2:48:43
  Speaker 2: the show. Feed the Badger dot com slash support if
• 2:48:46
  Speaker 2: you want to join us enjoy having more access to
• 2:48:50
  Speaker 2: our resources and events and other stuff like that.
• 2:48:54
  Speaker 4: Badger Nation don online. Actually, if you're interested in the.
• 2:48:57
  Speaker 2: Event that we're having in Calgary, albert to Canada Teener thirteenth,
• 2:49:00
  Speaker 2: it'd be a good idea to go to Badger Nation
• 2:49:02
  Speaker 2: don online and join our community, or just go to
• 2:49:06
  Speaker 2: feed the Badger dot com slash events and that has
• 2:49:09
  Speaker 2: some more information about it.
• 2:49:10
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna hand that, so this should all be in
• 2:49:13
  Speaker 4: the low bar. Did I give you that link to
• 2:49:14
  Speaker 4: the events thing?
• 2:49:16
  Speaker 1: Umm, I will add it. You did not send it
• 2:49:19
  Speaker 1: to me yet.
• 2:49:20
  Speaker 13: Oh I will.
• 2:49:21
  Speaker 4: I will send something to you.
• 2:49:22
  Speaker 2: Just give me a second here. I actually went to
• 2:49:24
  Speaker 2: Feed the Badger, but then I just sort of forgot
• 2:49:26
  Speaker 2: about it. Do you give me like link finding music here?
• 2:49:33
  Speaker 1: You know I can find it. I know what it is.
• 2:49:35
  Speaker 1: I'll just write it in myself, just like wrap it
• 2:49:37
  Speaker 1: up and I'll do it after the show.
• 2:49:38
  Speaker 4: Okay, Okay, I'm done.
• 2:49:39
  Speaker 2: I've sent Brian the link, so it's wrapped up. Take
• 2:49:42
  Speaker 2: it away, Brian.
• 2:49:43
  Speaker 1: All right. Well, if you guys liked this video, please
• 2:49:45
  Speaker 1: hit like subscribe, if you're not already subscribed, hit the belflifications,
• 2:49:49
  Speaker 1: leave us a comment, let us know what you guys
• 2:49:50
  Speaker 1: think about what we discussed on the show today, and
• 2:49:53
  Speaker 1: please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 2:49:56
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 2:49:59
  Speaker 1: of Maintaining Frame even the Communists, and will talk to
• 2:50:02
  Speaker 1: you guys in the next one.