Latest / Trend Watch / Episode 38: Do Presidential Debates Still Matter?
Transcript
- 0:04SPEAKER_01: Ready to take a deeper look at where history, politics, and economics all intersect?
- 0:10SPEAKER_01: Well, then you've come to the right place.
- 0:13SPEAKER_01: Each week,
- 0:14SPEAKER_01: here's where we pull back the headlines and focus on the big trends,
- 0:18SPEAKER_01: the stuff that actually shapes our future.
- 0:21SPEAKER_01: Through the noise, we focus on the signal.
- 0:24SPEAKER_01: I'm your host, Neil Howe, and this is TrendWatch.
- 0:30SPEAKER_01: Today is September 12th, 2024, and this is Trend Watch.
- 0:35SPEAKER_01: Welcome back, everybody.
- 0:37SPEAKER_01: As usual, I have on my fellow analyst, Christian Ford.
- 0:41SPEAKER_01: So, Christian, what I always ask, how was your week?
- 0:45SPEAKER_00: Oh, my week was pretty good, Neil, but I honestly don't have much to report.
- 0:48SPEAKER_00: It's been kind of a boring but peaceful fall, but I'll turn it around on you.
- 0:53SPEAKER_00: I know you have a big trip coming up.
- 0:55SPEAKER_00: You're going to, what, Lithuania this weekend?
- 0:58SPEAKER_01: I am.
- 0:58SPEAKER_01: I'm going to go actually visit the Baltic states, find out what's worrying NATO way up there.
- 1:07SPEAKER_01: I wonder.
- 1:10SPEAKER_01: And it is interesting now with the Finland and Sweden joining NATO,
- 1:15SPEAKER_01: the Baltic Sea has become a kind of NATO lake,
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: right?
- 1:19SPEAKER_01: With the exception of the tiny little bit of coastline around St.
- 1:22SPEAKER_01: Petersburg and Kaliningrad.
- 1:26SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I'll be coming in at Palanga.
- 1:30SPEAKER_01: And I do believe that we will be going down to Vilnius, which is sort of southeast.
- 1:39SPEAKER_01: And that'll be interesting.
- 1:41SPEAKER_01: You know, Vilnius is the capital of Lithuania.
- 1:44SPEAKER_01: It's a fairly large city.
- 1:46SPEAKER_01: And it is ancient.
- 1:48SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 1:49SPEAKER_01: it was the center of the great,
- 1:51SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 1:54SPEAKER_01: Polish Lithuanian kingdom,
- 1:57SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 1:57SPEAKER_01: back in the Middle Ages.
- 1:59SPEAKER_01: And it's been variously claimed by Poland, Belarus, Lithuania and Russia at various points.
- 2:08SPEAKER_01: It is rich with history.
- 2:10SPEAKER_01: And while it was a capital of this huge Lithuanian-Polish Commonwealth,
- 2:19SPEAKER_01: it was one of the most multicultural cities in Europe.
- 2:25SPEAKER_01: And it really was, as were many cities in Europe all the way up to
- 2:31SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 2:31SPEAKER_01: that tragic century,
- 2:32SPEAKER_01: the 20th century,
- 2:34SPEAKER_01: with the Russian Revolution,
- 2:36SPEAKER_01: World War I,
- 2:38SPEAKER_01: and all the other things which purified in various ways all these areas of Europe,
- 2:43SPEAKER_01: which used to be multicultural.
- 2:45SPEAKER_01: Anyway, that's where I will be headed.
- 2:47SPEAKER_01: So I will tell you all about it when I get back.
- 2:50SPEAKER_01: Christian,
- 2:51SPEAKER_01: if you don't want to tell me anything about your week,
- 2:54SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 2:55SPEAKER_01: if that's it for you,
- 2:57SPEAKER_01: maybe I just ought to start out with reminding all of our listeners.
- 3:01SPEAKER_01: If you like this podcast, please go ahead and share it with friends and family.
- 3:05SPEAKER_01: Repost it on social media.
- 3:07SPEAKER_01: From now on, only some episodes will remain free.
- 3:11SPEAKER_01: And maybe,
- 3:13SPEAKER_01: Christian,
- 3:13SPEAKER_01: we should take a moment to clarify to listeners that this podcast isn't all we do
- 3:19SPEAKER_01: on Substack.
- 3:20SPEAKER_01: We also have lots of written content.
- 3:23SPEAKER_01: Would you care to explain?
- 3:25SPEAKER_00: Oh, that's right, Neil.
- 3:26SPEAKER_00: You know,
- 3:26SPEAKER_00: I always take this time to tell our listeners to go check out either our videos or
- 3:31SPEAKER_00: written pieces.
- 3:32SPEAKER_00: And you had a piece that got a lot of press recently about where we actually stand in the election.
- 3:38SPEAKER_00: You came to some interesting conclusions that,
- 3:40SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 3:41SPEAKER_00: while Kamala Harris might be ahead in the polls,
- 3:45SPEAKER_00: Trump might have some strategic advantages in his back pocket.
- 3:49SPEAKER_00: Do you want to explain what those are?
- 3:52SPEAKER_01: Well, yeah, I know we're going to get to the debate shortly.
- 3:58SPEAKER_01: And that's kind of an interesting question.
- 4:01SPEAKER_01: How often do debates change the election?
- 4:04SPEAKER_01: But we'll talk about that in a bit.
- 4:07SPEAKER_01: What I wanted to lay out really was how we should calculate odds given,
- 4:13SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 4:13SPEAKER_01: recent experience and where the two parties are.
- 4:16SPEAKER_01: There's no question that late July through nearly the end of August was a terrific,
- 4:22SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 4:23SPEAKER_01: five weeks for the Democratic Party.
- 4:26SPEAKER_01: They got rid of Biden and they, you know, unceremoniously deposed him.
- 4:31SPEAKER_01: And with nary a primary, they put in Kamala Harris.
- 4:36SPEAKER_01: And it was remarkable how quickly she galvanized the party,
- 4:41SPEAKER_01: re-energized the Democrats,
- 4:46SPEAKER_01: particularly the activists,
- 4:48SPEAKER_01: the engaged Democrats.
- 4:51SPEAKER_01: and gave her really tremendous momentum to the extent that not only was she leading
- 4:57SPEAKER_01: in national polls,
- 4:58SPEAKER_01: she was often leading and continues to lead in many of the battleground state polls.
- 5:06SPEAKER_01: And her momentum was such that the betting odds, which had heavily favored Trump in late June,
- 5:15SPEAKER_01: um, completely switched around and actually favored, uh, Harris.
- 5:20SPEAKER_01: Uh,
- 5:20SPEAKER_01: these are,
- 5:21SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 5:22SPEAKER_01: these are the poly markets and predict it and all the various British betting sites.
- 5:27SPEAKER_01: That was, that was remarkable.
- 5:29SPEAKER_01: And then over the last two weeks, she lost momentum, right?
- 5:32SPEAKER_01: Um, the national polls closed a little bit.
- 5:35SPEAKER_01: You had that recent,
- 5:36SPEAKER_01: um,
- 5:37SPEAKER_01: uh,
- 5:37SPEAKER_01: Siena college,
- 5:38SPEAKER_01: New York times poll,
- 5:39SPEAKER_01: which actually showed that Trump was ahead one point nationally,
- 5:42SPEAKER_01: uh,
- 5:43SPEAKER_01: And you had some of these closing polls in some of the battleground states, particularly in the Midwest.
- 5:50SPEAKER_01: And the odds went the other way.
- 5:53SPEAKER_01: And then we had the debate and it began to shift another way.
- 5:56SPEAKER_01: Look, this is going to be a very close election.
- 5:58SPEAKER_01: I've never seen the odds so close for so long.
- 6:03SPEAKER_01: But one thing I did write about was...
- 6:06SPEAKER_01: How Trump enjoys certain structural advantages.
- 6:11SPEAKER_01: And I lay out three of them.
- 6:12SPEAKER_01: And I guess I should maybe just explain them very quickly.
- 6:16SPEAKER_01: One is the the popular electoral threshold, you know, because the.
- 6:25SPEAKER_01: And the Republicans are dominant in some of these lower population states.
- 6:29SPEAKER_01: He has an electoral college edge,
- 6:31SPEAKER_01: and that edge really translates into the requirement that the Democrats get
- 6:38SPEAKER_01: somewhere between a two to four point position.
- 6:41SPEAKER_01: percentage point advantage in the national vote in order to have a even chance of
- 6:49SPEAKER_01: beating Trump in the Electoral College.
- 6:51SPEAKER_01: Don't forget that in 2020,
- 6:57SPEAKER_01: Trump was beaten by Biden by four and a half percentage points in the national vote,
- 7:04SPEAKER_01: but he lost three states by only
- 7:08SPEAKER_01: Forty five thousand votes total.
- 7:10SPEAKER_01: I mean, there were only three states in that election that were decided by less than one percent.
- 7:16SPEAKER_01: They were all decided by an average of point four percent for Biden.
- 7:21SPEAKER_01: So, you know, Biden, you could say was a little bit lucky.
- 7:24SPEAKER_01: He got all three of them and that won him the election.
- 7:27SPEAKER_01: It was probably a long shot that Trump could have won that election.
- 7:31SPEAKER_01: But the fact that he actually had a chance at all is truly amazing.
- 7:37SPEAKER_01: So that's the first thing.
- 7:39SPEAKER_01: The second thing I talked about was the turnout skew.
- 7:45SPEAKER_01: This is something that used to favor Democrats.
- 7:47SPEAKER_01: But in this new age of Trump and populism, it now favors the Republicans.
- 7:52SPEAKER_01: And that is the tendency of one party or another to do better as the turnout rises.
- 7:59SPEAKER_01: And this used to be, again, an advantage for the Democrats.
- 8:02SPEAKER_01: They had more working class people.
- 8:04SPEAKER_01: They had more non-college people, people who generally weren't as engaged in politics.
- 8:09SPEAKER_01: They tended not to vote in midterms and special elections, but they voted in big presidential elections.
- 8:16SPEAKER_01: Well, we still have a turnout skew, but it's reversed.
- 8:19SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 8:20SPEAKER_01: And I present all the evidence to show how it's reversed.
- 8:24SPEAKER_01: And the real dividing line is 2016.
- 8:26SPEAKER_01: You just begin to see the line begins to go the other way.
- 8:31SPEAKER_01: It is now true that the bigger the turnout, the better Trump will probably do.
- 8:38SPEAKER_01: Which is interesting, right?
- 8:39SPEAKER_01: Because with all the debates,
- 8:42SPEAKER_01: I don't know if you recall,
- 8:43SPEAKER_01: Christian,
- 8:43SPEAKER_01: all those debates about,
- 8:45SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 8:46SPEAKER_01: COVID and making sure that,
- 8:47SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 8:48SPEAKER_01: making sure that every voter is absolutely eligible and tightening up on ID laws
- 8:53SPEAKER_01: and so on.
- 8:54SPEAKER_01: The assumption was,
- 8:54SPEAKER_01: yeah,
- 8:55SPEAKER_01: the assumption was always that,
- 8:56SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 8:57SPEAKER_01: the more people showed up,
- 8:58SPEAKER_01: the better Democrats would do.
- 9:00SPEAKER_01: As I conclude in my piece, the exact opposite is now the truth.
- 9:05SPEAKER_01: The better the turnout, the better Donald Trump will do.
- 9:08SPEAKER_01: And in fact,
- 9:08SPEAKER_01: that explains why the Democrats have recently done better in the midterms than they
- 9:15SPEAKER_01: do in the presidential elections.
- 9:17SPEAKER_01: They surprise on the upside when there are fewer people turning out,
- 9:20SPEAKER_01: particularly in the special elections.
- 9:21SPEAKER_01: I don't know if you've noticed that.
- 9:23SPEAKER_01: Democrats do very well.
- 9:26SPEAKER_01: But they have done hugely.
- 9:30SPEAKER_01: They have hugely underperformed when the turnout is large.
- 9:34SPEAKER_01: And that's true in the presidential elections.
- 9:36SPEAKER_01: It also explains why in the last two presidential elections, Trump being in both of them, there was.
- 9:44SPEAKER_01: A tremendous October surge by Trump.
- 9:47SPEAKER_01: And I think you can make the assumption that voters who decide late tend to be
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: voters who are relatively disengaged.
- 9:55SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 9:57SPEAKER_01: And it explains that as well.
- 9:58SPEAKER_01: Anyway, I go through the evidence on that.
- 10:01SPEAKER_01: And I think that does explain, too, why Trump is pitching his campaign campaign.
- 10:10SPEAKER_01: Not so much to the high realm of policy,
- 10:14SPEAKER_01: but to the low realm of symbols and emotion and sort of tribal connection.
- 10:21SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 10:22SPEAKER_01: I mean, he wants to get those unengaged voters.
- 10:25SPEAKER_01: He wants to give them emotional reason to show up at the polls.
- 10:29SPEAKER_01: He's not really interested in the, you know, the.
- 10:34SPEAKER_01: The the professionals and the college degreed Republicans who would have preferred Nikki Haley.
- 10:41SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 10:42SPEAKER_01: He figures they're going to show up anyway and vote for the Republicans.
- 10:46SPEAKER_01: He's interested in all those people who don't ordinarily show up in elections.
- 10:49SPEAKER_01: So it's just tremendous evidence supporting that.
- 10:52SPEAKER_01: And I make that point.
- 10:53SPEAKER_01: And finally, the point which has been much discussed, and that's the partisan non-response bias issue.
- 11:01SPEAKER_01: The fact that we do not now have genuine random samples that was given up when we
- 11:08SPEAKER_01: can no longer,
- 11:09SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 11:10SPEAKER_01: use random sample phone dialing.
- 11:13SPEAKER_01: And we can't really do random sample address addresses either.
- 11:17SPEAKER_01: So what we generally tend to do now is sort of a convenience poll online to get people to show up.
- 11:24SPEAKER_01: And then we try to adjust them by each group's share of the electorate.
- 11:29SPEAKER_01: You know, if they're
- 11:31SPEAKER_01: if they're male,
- 11:32SPEAKER_01: female,
- 11:33SPEAKER_01: what age they are,
- 11:34SPEAKER_01: whether they have,
- 11:35SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 11:35SPEAKER_01: how,
- 11:36SPEAKER_01: how educated they,
- 11:36SPEAKER_01: you know what I mean?
- 11:37SPEAKER_01: All the usual kind of demographic, you know, we push and pull on the data, right.
- 11:42SPEAKER_01: To, to make them quote unquote representative.
- 11:46SPEAKER_01: That will work to some extent,
- 11:48SPEAKER_01: but it will not work if people in exactly the same demographic in every way,
- 11:57SPEAKER_01: But they only differ because, you know, one of them likes Trump and one of them likes Biden.
- 12:02SPEAKER_01: And for that reason, it's the one that likes Trump who prefers not to respond.
- 12:08SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 12:09SPEAKER_01: And that's hidden.
- 12:10SPEAKER_01: There's no way of measuring that.
- 12:12SPEAKER_01: You can try to estimate it.
- 12:13SPEAKER_01: But generally, that's hidden to the pollsters.
- 12:15SPEAKER_01: And this is these are not stunning conclusions because the pollsters have talked about all these things.
- 12:23SPEAKER_01: But what I try to do is is lay out all the evidence possible.
- 12:28SPEAKER_01: you know, in perspective.
- 12:30SPEAKER_01: And these are the, this presents a challenge to Harris because Harris needs to
- 12:38SPEAKER_01: She needs to launch a second stage.
- 12:41SPEAKER_01: She would lose today if the election were held right now because she would not
- 12:48SPEAKER_01: overcome those three structural problems that we talked about,
- 12:53SPEAKER_01: including the fact that she's not ahead large enough in the popular vote.
- 12:58SPEAKER_01: Keep in mind that Trump in the popular vote today is well in front of where he was
- 13:04SPEAKER_01: at the same date in 2016 or 2020.
- 13:08SPEAKER_01: So from his point of view,
- 13:10SPEAKER_01: even as James Carville said,
- 13:13SPEAKER_01: right,
- 13:14SPEAKER_01: as James Carville said,
- 13:15SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 13:16SPEAKER_01: we have a three percent deficit.
- 13:18SPEAKER_01: So when Harris is ahead, too, we're actually behind one.
- 13:24SPEAKER_01: So I don't know.
- 13:25SPEAKER_00: What's your reaction to all this?
- 13:27SPEAKER_00: I think the real question will be, what will the turnout be?
- 13:31SPEAKER_00: And that's a hard thing to say because these unengaged voters,
- 13:36SPEAKER_00: they are the voters that also forget it's election day.
- 13:39SPEAKER_00: So it will be interesting to see if Trump can take advantage of them.
- 13:43SPEAKER_01: It's kind of like trying to find out something about a black hole, you know.
- 13:47SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 13:48SPEAKER_01: You know, they don't respond.
- 13:49SPEAKER_01: They're not engaged.
- 13:51SPEAKER_01: You don't, you know.
- 13:51SPEAKER_01: And take a look at people trying to predict turnout.
- 13:56SPEAKER_01: No one has any idea what the turnouts could be.
- 13:58SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 13:58SPEAKER_01: Except that I think it's fair to say that it will be high.
- 14:02SPEAKER_01: It may not be quite as high.
- 14:04SPEAKER_01: The extraordinary turnout we had in 2020,
- 14:07SPEAKER_01: the presidential turnout,
- 14:09SPEAKER_01: the voting rate of all the eligible voters in 2020 was the highest in a century,
- 14:14SPEAKER_01: right?
- 14:14SPEAKER_01: It was the highest, I think, more than a century.
- 14:18SPEAKER_01: It was before 1920.
- 14:19SPEAKER_01: I think it was...
- 14:23SPEAKER_01: It was actually I think it goes back 120 years.
- 14:26SPEAKER_01: I believe if you look at the election project numbers,
- 14:29SPEAKER_01: I think it was McKinley against William Jennings Bryan 1900.
- 14:34SPEAKER_01: So there you go.
- 14:36SPEAKER_01: That was an extraordinary year.
- 14:38SPEAKER_01: I don't know.
- 14:39SPEAKER_01: Do you think that was probably covid keeping people at home and giving them nothing
- 14:44SPEAKER_01: else to do with their time?
- 14:45SPEAKER_01: I have no idea.
- 14:47SPEAKER_01: Let's look at the stories of the week and we'll come down to the end.
- 14:52SPEAKER_01: We'll do markets.
- 14:54SPEAKER_01: On Tuesday,
- 14:55SPEAKER_01: Kamala Harris and Donald Trump faced off on ABC for their first and possibly only
- 15:00SPEAKER_01: presidential debate.
- 15:02SPEAKER_01: Again, more about the election, right?
- 15:05SPEAKER_01: President Biden is signaling that he will block Nippon Steel from acquiring U.S.
- 15:10SPEAKER_01: Steel,
- 15:11SPEAKER_01: a position also endorsed by Trump,
- 15:13SPEAKER_01: several senators,
- 15:15SPEAKER_01: I think notably from Ohio and Pennsylvania,
- 15:18SPEAKER_01: and the United Steelworkers.
- 15:22SPEAKER_01: And abroad,
- 15:22SPEAKER_01: let's go abroad,
- 15:23SPEAKER_01: the US and Iraqi forces raided multiple ISIS outposts in the deserts of Iraq and
- 15:30SPEAKER_01: Syria at a time when many observers think ISIS may be resurging.
- 15:36SPEAKER_01: Western intelligence says that Russia is receiving tactical ballistic missiles from Iran.
- 15:42SPEAKER_01: The US accuses China of providing direct and very substantial support for Russia's war machine.
- 15:51SPEAKER_01: Israeli military intelligence say they found the bodies of six October 7th hostages,
- 15:57SPEAKER_01: including one American executed by Hamas,
- 16:00SPEAKER_01: further inflaming the debate in Israel about how to proceed in Gaza.
- 16:05SPEAKER_01: Following the hung National Assembly elected in France over the summer,
- 16:10SPEAKER_01: President Emmanuel Macron has appointed a well-known conservative Republican,
- 16:15SPEAKER_01: Michel Barnier,
- 16:16SPEAKER_01: as prime minister.
- 16:18SPEAKER_01: And finally, to move back to our own hemisphere here, Mexico's Senate today.
- 16:23SPEAKER_01: has passed new legislation making the nation's entire judiciary elective,
- 16:29SPEAKER_01: a move that is triggering protests.
- 16:31SPEAKER_01: Well, some of it from its own people, but also from Mexico's leading allies and trading partners.
- 16:39SPEAKER_01: So with that, Christian, that's a big lineup.
- 16:42SPEAKER_01: So let's get into it.
- 16:44SPEAKER_00: All right, let's start with the markets, Neil.
- 16:46SPEAKER_00: It was a pretty good day in the markets.
- 16:47SPEAKER_00: The S&P closed up 0.75%, and over the last five trading days is up 1.68%.
- 16:49SPEAKER_00: As for the global Dow, that closed up 1.1%, and over the last five trading days is up 0.39%.
- 16:52SPEAKER_00: The VIX closed at 17.8%.
- 17:04SPEAKER_00: which is a little bit below what we had been seeing earlier in the week.
- 17:08SPEAKER_00: And as for the 10-year Treasury, that is at 3.688%, down 4.5 basis points over the last five days.
- 17:11SPEAKER_00: Yeah, I will say...
- 17:20SPEAKER_01: 17 is still high, right?
- 17:22SPEAKER_01: We're not down to those 12 levels that we were seeing, you know, earlier in the summer.
- 17:29SPEAKER_01: So we'll see.
- 17:31SPEAKER_01: Maybe another good week or two, right?
- 17:34SPEAKER_01: And we'll be soaring again.
- 17:37SPEAKER_00: All right, let's go on to indicators in the U.S.
- 17:40SPEAKER_00: In August, non-farm payrolls rose from 89,000 to 142,000.
- 17:44SPEAKER_00: While that was an increase, Neil, it was still below expectations.
- 17:49SPEAKER_00: We had August ISM PMIs.
- 17:52SPEAKER_00: Manufacturing rose to 47.2.
- 17:56SPEAKER_00: That marks 21 months of contraction out of the last 22 readings.
- 18:00SPEAKER_00: And services slightly rose to 51.5, so that indicates growth.
- 18:05SPEAKER_00: In August, CPI rose 2.5% year over year.
- 18:07SPEAKER_00: That's down from 2.9% in July.
- 18:08SPEAKER_00: And core inflation was steady at 3.2%.
- 18:16SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 18:17SPEAKER_01: I mean, particularly the month-over-month trends really haven't altered much.
- 18:23SPEAKER_01: The markets did know how to react to that.
- 18:25SPEAKER_01: You notice early in the day, the markets plunged.
- 18:28SPEAKER_01: Late in the day, they came back again.
- 18:31SPEAKER_01: And I think there's a real unsureness, right?
- 18:36SPEAKER_01: Is the problem that the Fed will not be able to cut as much as it otherwise might have?
- 18:43SPEAKER_01: which would then risk both.
- 18:46SPEAKER_01: You know, the markets don't like that because interest rates aren't down.
- 18:48SPEAKER_01: It's harder to borrow.
- 18:50SPEAKER_01: But it also may be that it will be higher for longer and that will hurt the economy.
- 18:55SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 18:56SPEAKER_01: So you've got all of these things going on.
- 19:00SPEAKER_01: I will say one thing that you didn't mention,
- 19:02SPEAKER_01: but we should mention the 10 year,
- 19:05SPEAKER_01: two year uninverted interest.
- 19:07SPEAKER_01: And for anyone who follows our recession indicators,
- 19:11SPEAKER_01: right,
- 19:11SPEAKER_01: all about the indicators,
- 19:13SPEAKER_01: will know what a huge move that is,
- 19:15SPEAKER_01: right?
- 19:15SPEAKER_01: I mean, how long have those been inverted, right?
- 19:18SPEAKER_01: The 10-year 90-day is obviously still inverted.
- 19:23SPEAKER_01: But for anyone who remembers past recessions, right?
- 19:29SPEAKER_01: It's a great long-term indicator.
- 19:31SPEAKER_01: You know, 18 months, two years before the recession, it often inverts.
- 19:39SPEAKER_01: But it almost always un-inverts right before the recession starts, right?
- 19:45SPEAKER_01: So it's interesting how yield curve inversions are both a short-term,
- 19:49SPEAKER_01: I should say a long-term and a short-term indicator,
- 19:52SPEAKER_01: right?
- 19:53SPEAKER_01: Now, they sometimes don't invert.
- 19:54SPEAKER_01: They sometimes invert briefly before the election, before the recession.
- 19:58SPEAKER_01: Sometimes they invert early in the recession.
- 20:01SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 20:02SPEAKER_01: But I should say uninvert early in the recession.
- 20:05SPEAKER_01: But clearly,
- 20:07SPEAKER_01: clearly,
- 20:07SPEAKER_01: as the Fed starts cutting and if you look at the CME forecast,
- 20:11SPEAKER_01: it's going to be cutting a lot rapidly.
- 20:15SPEAKER_01: You're going to you're going to see all these things invert.
- 20:17SPEAKER_01: So there you have that, too.
- 20:20SPEAKER_00: All right, Neil.
- 20:21SPEAKER_00: Well, for global indicators, I only have one for you from China.
- 20:24SPEAKER_00: We have the Caixin PMIs for August.
- 20:27SPEAKER_00: Manufacturing rose from 49.8 to 50.4, so we're in positive growth there.
- 20:33SPEAKER_00: And services fell from 52.1 to 51.6, but that still marks 20 months of growth.
- 20:41SPEAKER_00: All right.
- 20:42SPEAKER_00: Great.
- 20:43SPEAKER_00: Do you want to plunge in here?