Latest / Elon Musk Podcast / Trillion Dollar SpaceX IPO Funds Orbital AI

Transcript

Trillion Dollar SpaceX IPO Funds Orbital AI · Elon Musk Podcast

0:00
SpaceX is preparing an initial public offering targeting a
0:02
valuation of $1.75 trillion, with founder Elon Musk
0:07
structuring the deal so that the only person who can fire him is
0:10
himself. Yeah.
0:11
And that offering aims to raise like $75 billion, which just to
0:16
put that capital into perspective, Saudi Aramco
0:19
previously set the global records for the largest public
0:21
listing by raising 29.4 billion, right?
0:25
So we are looking at a fundamentally unconventional
0:28
corporate governance structure demanding absolute control, plus
0:32
a complete operational shift from manufacturing rockets to
0:35
providing artificial intelligence infrastructure and
0:38
an executive compensation plan tied directly to interplanetary
0:41
settlement. So if a company is absorbing
0:43
billions in net losses to build experimental orbital
0:46
infrastructure, how is it convincing Wall Street to value
0:49
it at nearly $2 trillion? Well, the path to that 1.75 to
0:53
$2 trillion target relies heavily on exactly how the
0:55
company is allocating its shares right out of the gate.
0:58
The current plan outlines allocating 30% of the available
1:01
shares directly to retail investors.
1:03
Let me stop you there, because 30% sounds like a random number
1:06
until you look at the historical precedent for this kind of
1:09
event. Exactly.
1:11
For an offering of this magnitude, the typical retail
1:13
allocation hovers right around, you know, 10%.
1:16
The remaining 90% usually get swallowed up by institutional
1:20
investors, pension funds, mutual funds and large asset managers.
1:24
So by tripling the standard availability for individual
1:27
everyday investors, the company is altering the demand dynamics
1:30
before the opening bell even rings.
1:33
I mean, they are bypassing the traditional Wall Street
1:36
gatekeepers and going directly to the consumer base to build
1:39
immediate buying momentum. Yeah, but the valuation leap
1:42
itself requires some serious attention, because the math here
1:46
defies traditional private market gravity.
1:48
Yeah, it really does. The company's implied valuation
1:51
jumped from $400 billion during a prior internal tender offer
1:55
straight to 800 billion, then to 1.25 trillion before finally
2:01
landing at this IPO target of 1.75 trillion.
2:04
Right. And we can compare that
2:06
trajectory to Saudi Aramco. In its pre IPO window, Aramco
2:10
only saw a valuation movement of roughly 1.2 times.
2:15
So a 4.4 times multiple increase over a sequence of private
2:18
secondary market transactions indicates an entirely different
2:22
kind of pricing mechanism at work.
2:24
Wait, I want to clarify how those private transactions
2:27
actually function for someone who might not follow venture
2:29
capital mechanics. An internal tender offer means
2:32
the company's private, but they organize a structured event
2:35
where existing employees or early investors can sell their
2:38
private shares to approved outside buyers at a specific
2:41
company approved price. That is correct.
2:43
In standard private markets, when that share price goes up
2:46
between tender offers, it typically correlates with
2:49
corresponding leaps in current revenue or expanding profit
2:52
margins. Like if you double your software
2:53
sales, your valuation might double.
2:55
Makes sense? Here, though the pricing is
2:57
heavily driven by future expectations, It creates a
3:00
market phenomenon we refer to as narrative scarcity.
3:03
So think of the tech investment world right now like a giant
3:06
stadium filled with institutional cash.
3:09
Everyone in that stadium wants a piece of Elon Musk's specific
3:13
brand of high growth technology, right?
3:15
But right now there is only one open exit door they can walk
3:18
through, and that door is labeled Tesla.
3:21
If SpaceX goes public, suddenly a second door opens up.
3:24
Yeah, and narrative scarcity directly alters the flow of
3:27
capital because of portfolio managers and institutional funds
3:31
have a rigidly defined allocation for high risk, high
3:34
reward technology equities. Having two massive publicly
3:38
traded entities led by the same founder creates a 0 sum capital
3:42
environment. So they're basically competing
3:44
with each other for those same specific dollars.
3:46
Exactly. Investors who previously
3:48
utilized Tesla stock as a proxy for Musk's broader technology
3:51
ventures now have a direct pureplay alternative.
3:54
Which forces portfolio managers to make a hard choice.
3:57
They have to decide if they should shift capital away from
4:00
the electric vehicle manufacturer and redirect it
4:02
into the aerospace company. Right.
4:04
And that behavior fundamentally alters the capital flow across
4:07
the entire technology sector, draining liquidity from one area
4:10
to flood another. Wait, back up a 4.4 times
4:13
valuation jump between private rounds.
4:15
That kind of leap requires a totally new business model, not
4:19
just selling more rockets or launching more satellite.
4:21
The math simply does not support a near $2 trillion valuation
4:26
based on aerospace logistics alone.
4:28
You are hitting on the core operational reality there.
4:32
The justification for that multiple expansion requires an
4:34
entirely new revenue frontier, which brings us to the
4:37
structural shift that permanently changed the identity
4:40
of the company. SpaceX completely absorbed XAI
4:44
in an all stock merger. Right.
4:46
The transaction valued XAI at $250 billion, bringing the
4:50
combined entity to a valuation of $1.25 trillion prior to the
4:54
IPO target. That merger is the mechanical
4:56
engine behind the new valuation. The company is no longer purely
4:59
focused on aerospace logistics, but bringing a dedicated
5:03
artificial intelligence subsidiary under the same
5:05
corporate umbrella. The company positions itself to
5:08
monetize raw computational power.
5:10
And we have already seen the first major commercial
5:13
application of this strategy with Anthropic.
5:16
The company leased access to its terrestrial supercomputer
5:19
facility in Memphis, TN. This facility, referred to as
5:23
Colossus One, houses over 220,000 NVIDIA GPU's.
5:28
Which is staggering. The physical reality of Colossus
5:31
1 is vital to understand. It draws 300 megawatts of power
5:35
directly from the local grid. Anthropic secured access to this
5:39
specific cluster, which directly enabled them to expand the usage
5:43
limits for their clawed code product.
5:45
To give you an idea of that power draw, a 300 MW facility is
5:49
a massive piece of physical infrastructure.
5:51
A typical large scale commercial data center might pull 30 to 50
5:55
megawatts. 300 megawatts is enough to power 10s of thousands
5:58
of homes. Yeah, and the power required to
6:00
run 220,000 GPU's simultaneously creates severe bottlenecks on
6:04
traditional terrestrial power grids.
6:06
The local utility has to completely reconfigure its
6:08
distribution to handle that localized load.
6:10
Plus all the heat, right? Exactly.
6:12
The heat generated by that density of computational
6:15
hardware requires extraordinary cooling resources.
6:19
You need massive industrial water cooling loops just to keep
6:22
the servers from melting down. This physical friction on Earth
6:26
is exactly where the long term strategy of the XAI merger comes
6:29
into focus. The internal road map outlines
6:32
the creation of Orbital AI data centers, a project referred to
6:35
internally as Terafab, or sometimes Macro hard.
6:38
The strategy involves putting the actual GPU's into orbit.
6:42
By placing the hardware in space, the company bypasses the
6:45
physical limitations of the terrestrial power grid.
6:48
In orbit, you have access to uninterrupted, unfiltered solar
6:51
energy. You deploy massive solar arrays
6:54
that do not suffer from nighttime interruptions or
6:56
atmospheric weather degradation. You also solve the terrestrial
6:59
real estate and water cooling problems, though you trade them
7:02
for the physics of radiating heat in a vacuum.
7:04
But the data transmission part is where the existing
7:07
infrastructure comes in. They utilize the existing
7:09
Starlink satellite network to facilitate edge computing.
7:13
The mechanics of edge computing are fascinating here.
7:16
Normally, if you ask an AI model a complex question on your
7:19
phone, your prompt travels through local cell towers into
7:23
terrestrial fiber optic cables across the country to a data
7:27
center in Virginia or Texas. It's processed and travels all
7:30
the way back. So with the orbital model, your
7:33
prompt beams directly up to a Starlink satellite, routes to a
7:36
connected orbital data center, gets processed right there in
7:39
low Earth orbit, and beams directly back down to your dish.
7:43
And this permanently changes the identity of SpaceX.
7:46
It limits its pure aerospace focus.
7:48
A rocket now serves as the deployment vehicle for their own
7:51
computational hardware, expanding far beyond typical
7:54
commercial payload delivery. Which opens up an entirely new
7:57
revenue frontier. It positions the company as a
8:00
tier one infrastructure rival to established cloud providers like
8:03
Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure.
8:06
Exactly. If the computational processing
8:08
happens in orbit and beams down to the user via Starlink, the
8:12
company controls the entire vertical stack of the artificial
8:15
intelligence economy. They own the launch vehicle, the
8:18
power generation, the compute hardware, and the data delivery
8:21
network. So building an orbital data
8:24
center is an incredible engineering feat.
8:26
How are they proving the commercial viability of this AI
8:30
strategy right now while the space hardware is still in
8:33
development? Well, they're approving it
8:34
terrestrially. The Anthropic deal demonstrates
8:37
the company can successfully operate massive GPU clusters and
8:41
generate immediate high margin artificial intelligence revenue
8:44
on Earth at the Colossus facility.
8:46
But putting hundreds of thousands of GPU's into orbit
8:49
requires buying the GPU's, building the custom server
8:52
racks, and launching hundreds of rockets.
8:55
Where is the cash coming from today to keep the lights on and
8:58
fund this physical expansion? The financial reality of the
9:01
combined company relies entirely on the cash generated by the
9:04
Starlink network. Starlink Acts is the primary
9:07
financial engine, currently generating over $10 billion in
9:10
revenue. Wow.
9:12
Yeah. And it operates with a 54%
9:14
EBITDA margin servicing roughly 10 million subscribers globally.
9:18
I'm looking at these numbers and a 54% margin is incredibly high
9:22
for a hardware heavy business that involves building physical
9:25
Anas and launching rockets. It is, but satellite Internet
9:28
economics behave similarly to software economics.
9:31
Once the initial hardware is deployed in space, the fixed
9:35
cost of launching a satellite constellation is astronomical.
9:38
You're burning billions of dollars just to get the network
9:41
functional right. However, once the satellite is
9:44
in orbit and active, the marginal cost of adding a single
9:48
new subscriber on the ground is effectively 0.
9:51
You just mail them a dish, they plug it in, and they start
9:53
paying a monthly subscription. Exactly.
9:56
The satellite does not cost any more to operate, whether it is
9:59
serving one person in a rural area or 100 people.
10:03
That specific dynamic allows the 54% margin to generate the free
10:08
cash flow necessary to cover the capital expenditures of the
10:11
other divisions. Because in comparison, the
10:13
legacy Launch Services division, which operates the workhorse
10:16
Falcon 9 rockets for commercial clients, contributes a smaller
10:20
share of roughly 4 to $5 billion in revenue.
10:22
Right. But we also have the Star Shield
10:24
division, which handles defense and national security contracts.
10:28
The filings indicate $3.3 billion in unclassified revenue.
10:33
And additionally, there is a $1.8 billion classified contract
10:37
to build a spy satellite network.
10:39
The Pentagon recently expanded the ceiling for its proliferated
10:43
low Earth orbit program from $900 million all the way to $13
10:47
billion. Which makes sense because the
10:50
proliferated Low Earth orbit program relies on launching
10:52
hundreds of small, relatively cheap satellites rather than a
10:56
few massive, multibillion dollar exquisite satellites.
11:00
If one gets shot down or fails, the network barely notices.
11:03
Precisely, Star Shield provides a reliable government backed
11:07
revenue stream perfectly insulated from consumer market
11:09
fluctuations. The $13 billion program ceiling
11:13
confirms the military views this distributed satellite
11:15
infrastructure as a permanent tactical necessity.
11:18
Hold on. They are generating 10s of
11:20
billions in recurring revenue across consumer Internet
11:22
subscriptions, commercial rocket launches and defense contracts,
11:25
but the consolidated filings show a net loss.
11:28
Yes, the financials show a $5.3 billion net loss.
11:32
This represents a sharp reversal from a prior reported profit of
11:35
$790 million. How does a company swinging from
11:39
a profit to a $5 billion loss command a near $2 trillion
11:44
valuation from Wall Street? Because this specific loss
11:48
changes the entire investment thesis, the deficit stems
11:52
entirely from aggressive capital expenditures rather than
11:55
declining sales or losing customers.
11:57
Ah, I see. The company is actively spending
12:00
billions on the research and development of the next
12:02
generation Starship vehicle, alongside the billions required
12:06
for the XAI integration and the procurement of hundreds of
12:09
thousands of high end NVIDIA GPU's.
12:12
So. Investors are not buying into a
12:14
mature dividend yielding utility company.
12:16
They are funding an aggressive transition phase.
12:19
Exactly. They are absorbing massive
12:21
capital double expenditures to build the next generation of
12:23
infrastructure, relying entirely on Starling's operating margins
12:27
to subsidize the intense burn rate required to reach the
12:29
tariff ambition. With investors taking on the
12:32
heavy financial burden of these multibillion dollar losses, you
12:34
have to look at what rights those investors actually get in
12:37
return. And that is where things get
12:39
really unique. The filings detail a dual class
12:42
share structure explicitly designed to sever economic
12:46
ownership from voting control. Class A shares, which will be
12:50
the shares available to the public on the open market,
12:52
receive 1 vote per share. Class B shares, which are
12:56
reserved strictly for insiders and early backers, carry 10
12:59
votes per share. The math on that structure
13:02
creates an absolute fortress around the founder.
13:05
Musk holds 42.5% of the equity. That means his actual financial
13:10
ownership is less than half the company.
13:13
However, because of the 12:50 voting ratio on his Class B
13:16
shares, he wields 83.8% of the voting control.
13:20
And that overwhelming voting dominance is reinforced by the
13:22
legal framework surrounding the company.
13:24
The company deliberately reincorporated in Texas
13:27
utilizing the newly updated Texas Business Organization's
13:30
code. Moving away from Delaware, which
13:32
is the traditional home for corporate governance, changes
13:35
the legal playing field. The new corporate charter
13:37
mandates private arbitration for all shareholder disputes.
13:40
It explicitly bans class action lawsuits against the company,
13:44
its officers, its directors, or the investment bankers involved
13:47
in the public offering. If you feel the company
13:50
defrauded you, you cannot band together with other retail
13:54
investors to sue them in a public court.
13:56
Wow. Yeah, you have to go through a
13:58
private arbitrator chosen under the rules stipulated in the
14:01
charter. Furthermore, if a shareholder
14:03
wants to force a vote on a governance proposal, say
14:06
proposing a new environmental standard or a change in
14:09
executive pay, they are required to hold 3% of the company or $1
14:14
million in stock just to get the proposal on the ballot.
14:17
Which limits investor power entirely.
14:20
The 83.8% voting control legally classifieds the entity as a
14:24
controlled company under federal securities regulations.
14:27
And that specific designation is a powerful legal shield.
14:31
It allows the company to legally bypass standard corporate
14:34
governance requirements that apply to normal public
14:36
companies. Exactly.
14:37
They are not required to maintain an independent board
14:39
majority. They do not need independent
14:41
directors to oversee the company's direction.
14:43
They are not required to have independent compensation
14:46
committees to set salaries or independent nominating
14:49
committees to choose new board members.
14:51
It establishes a hard legal precedent for future founder LED
14:55
tech companies, potentially entities like Anthropic or Open
14:58
AI, to raise capital from the public markets without conceding
15:02
any operational influence to the people providing that capital.
15:06
It is exactly like buying a ticket on a luxury cruise ship
15:09
where you are legally barred from complaining to the captain
15:12
and you have to sign away your right to a lifeboat before you
15:15
board. You are paying a premium for the
15:17
journey, but you have absolutely no say in the navigation.
15:20
That is a great way to put it. If the ship hits a storm and
15:23
takes on water, you cannot sue the crew.
15:25
Right. That analogy captures the
15:27
precise legal reality retail investors face here, and the
15:31
structure actually becomes more restrictive over time.
15:34
How so? The charter stipulates that if
15:36
an insider decides to sell their Class B shares, those shares
15:40
automatically convert to Class A shares upon the execution of the
15:43
sale. Which is a critical mathematical
15:46
mechanism. As early employees and insiders
15:49
slowly liquidate their holdings to buy houses or diversify their
15:52
portfolios, the total pool of super voting shares shrinks.
15:56
Exactly. And because Musk is highly
15:58
unlikely to sell his core holdings, his percentage of the
16:02
remaining Class B shares will mathematically increase as
16:05
others sell. This mechanism guarantees his
16:08
voting power will concentrate even further beyond the current
16:11
83.8% threshold. Since the board of directors
16:15
answers only to Musk due to that voting dominance, their
16:18
decisions on executive compensation reflect a reality
16:21
totally detached from traditional corporate metrics,
16:23
right? Musk's compensation plan
16:25
completely abandoned standard financial targets.
16:28
You will not find bonuses tied to quarterly revenue growth,
16:31
customer acquisition costs, or operating margins.
16:34
His base cash salary remains A nominal 54,000 $80.
16:38
His actual wealth generation is tied entirely to science fiction
16:41
level milestones. We have the breakdown of the
16:43
specific tranche is required to unlock his equity.
16:46
Tranche One offers 200 million super voting shares if two
16:48
distinct conditions are met simultaneously.
16:50
And those conditions are. The company must reach a $7.5
16:53
trillion valuation A&D. The company must establish a
16:57
self-sustaining human colony on Mars with 1,000,000 residents.
17:01
I mean, wow. And Tranche 2 offers an
17:04
additional 60.4 million shares. The condition for this second
17:08
charge requires the company to successfully operate space data
17:11
centers delivering 100 terawatts of compute capacity.
17:15
Which is just a massive number. To properly contextualize 100
17:19
terawatts of compute capacity, we have to look at global energy
17:23
production. 100 terawatts is roughly equivalent to the total
17:26
energy output of 100,001 GW nuclear reactors running
17:30
simultaneously. Setting compensation targets
17:32
based on interplanetary settlement and orbital nuclear
17:35
level energy consumption opens up an entirely new corporate
17:38
philosophy. Executive wealth is now directly
17:40
aligned with the physical expansion of human civilization,
17:43
rather than the standard financial returns delivered to
17:46
shareholders. You are tying the CEO's payout
17:48
to the literal survival of a million people on another
17:51
planet. However, it limits traditional
17:53
financial accountability. Exactly.
17:55
Measuring and auditing a metric like 1,000,000 people on Mars
18:00
falls entirely outside the scope of traditional financial
18:03
regulators. Right, because the Securities
18:05
and Exchange Commission relies on certified public accountants
18:08
to verify corporate revenue, physical assets and liabilities.
18:12
A-Team of accountants from a BIG4 firm cannot verify the
18:15
biological self sustainability of an off world.
18:18
Colony They cannot easily audit the agricultural yields of
18:21
Martian greenhouses or the atmospheric processing plants
18:24
required to keep a million people alive.
18:26
There is no standard accounting mechanism or regulatory
18:29
framework to verify the success of an off world colony.
18:33
This lack of framework places the execution and awarding of
18:36
this massive compensation plan entirely in the hands of the
18:40
internal non independent board. While the company looks toward
18:43
Mars and orbital computing, labor groups and financial
18:46
watchdogs are raising alarms back on Earth about the
18:49
immediate impact this structure has on average investors.
18:52
Yeah, the initial public offering structure has generated
18:55
significant external backlash. Randi Weingarten, representing
18:59
the American Federation of Teachers, specifically warns
19:02
against the application of the fast entry rule.
19:05
For those who don't know, the Fast Entry rule is a mechanism
19:07
that allows a newly public company of this massive size to
19:10
bypass the standard waiting period.
19:13
It allows them to join major financial indexes like the
19:16
NASDAQ 100 just weeks after public trading begins.
19:20
The American Federation of Teachers argues that the fast
19:22
and true rule forces retail investors and teachers pension
19:26
funds to blindly buy into the stock completely, regardless of
19:30
the lack of financial transparency or the unusual 0
19:33
recourse governance structure. Additionally, the SoC Investment
19:37
Group raises specific concerns regarding auditor independence.
19:41
They highlight potential conflicts of interest stemming
19:43
from Musk's role in the Department of Government
19:45
efficiency. Right They're Concerned centers
19:47
on questioning whether federal regulators can impartially
19:50
review the financial disclosures of a company led by a sitting
19:53
federal appointee. Wait, I want to clarify the
19:55
mechanics of how the index inclusion actually effects a
19:57
normal person. Even if an individual investor
20:01
reads the prospectus, looks at the dual class shares, looks at
20:04
the net losses, and actively chooses to avoid buying this
20:07
stock, they might still be forced to buy it, Yes.
20:11
That is the mechanical reality of passive index funds.
20:14
An index fund operates on a strict algorithm.
20:16
It automatically buy shares of every single company listed in
20:20
its designated index, and it weights those purchases by the
20:23
market capitalization of the company.
20:25
So if this company lists at $1.75 trillion and immediately
20:28
enters the NASDAQ 100, it instantly becomes one of the
20:32
heaviest weightings in the entire index.
20:34
Exactly. Every single retirement account,
20:36
public pension fund, and individual 4-O1K portfolio
20:39
holding a NASDAQ 100 index fund is automatically forced to
20:42
purchase the stock to match the new index weighting.
20:45
Wow. Yeah.
20:46
The portfolio managers running those funds have absolutely no
20:49
discretion to opt out based on governance concerns or valuation
20:52
worries. Because of index funds.
20:54
Even if you personally think orbital data centers are a crazy
20:58
pipe dream, your retirement money is automatically going to
21:02
be buying SpaceX stock. Which changes the risk profile
21:05
for public pensions and forces millions of unsuspecting retail
21:09
investors to absorb the financial risk of experimental
21:12
space and AI infrastructure. This forced market participation
21:16
highlights the inherent volatility of the stock, leading
21:19
to how wealth managers and financial advisors are telling
21:22
their clients to navigate the actual trading mechanics.
21:24
The public float for this offering is incredibly small,
21:28
and the float is the actual percentage of shares available
21:30
to be bought and sold on the open market.
21:32
Only three to 4% of the company's total equity will be
21:35
floated for public trading. A small float combined with
21:37
massive global demand creates extreme price and stability.
21:41
The order book dictates the price.
21:43
Right, because so few shares are actually available to trade on
21:46
the exchanges, A slight increase in buying pressure or a certain
21:50
wave of selling pressure causes exaggerated movements in the
21:53
stock price. This mathematical reality
21:56
amplifies what analysts call the Musk effect.
21:59
Because the order book is so incredibly thin, a single
22:02
comment from the founder on social media or a sudden
22:05
political event could easily cause 20 to 30% price swings in
22:09
the stock in a single trading session.
22:11
Facing this guaranteed volatility, financial advisors
22:15
are uniformly telling their retail clients to avoid the
22:18
initial rush of the IPO day. They advise waiting for the post
22:22
IPO lockup period to expire. A lockup period is a legally
22:26
binding contract that prevents early private investors and
22:29
current employees from selling their shares for a specific
22:32
timeframe, usually six months after the IPO date.
22:35
It prevents insiders from dumping all their stock on day
22:38
one and crashing the price. When that six month period
22:41
expires, a flood of new shares hits the open market,
22:44
drastically increasing the float.
22:46
The sudden increase in supply typically causes the share price
22:49
to drop. Advisors recommend waiting to
22:51
buy during that inevitable post lock up dip.
22:54
We have to look at the internal wealth generation happening for
22:57
the workforce. The company has roughly 18,000
23:00
employees holding restricted stock units and incentive stock
23:02
options. Right.
23:03
The initial public offering creates a massive liquidity
23:06
event for these engineers and technicians.
23:09
But this liquidity event carries severe, often misunderstood tax
23:13
implications. Tell me about it.
23:15
Employees exercising incentive stock options face severe
23:19
alternative minimum tax risks. Normally you pay tax when you
23:23
sell a stock and realize the actual cash gain, But with
23:27
incentive stock options under the alternative minimum tax
23:29
rules, the IRS forces these employees to pay tax on the
23:33
paper profit the day they exercise the option, even if
23:37
they are legally barred from selling the stock yet because of
23:39
that six month block up period. Right.
23:41
So if an engineer exercises options worth millions on paper,
23:44
they owe taxes on that imaginary gain immediately.
23:48
If the highly volatile stock crashes the next day or during
23:51
the lockup period, they still owe massive taxes to the IRS on
23:54
money they never actually made. They face severe concentration
23:57
risk when an employee salary, their annual bonuses and their
24:01
entire net worth are tied to a single, highly volatile stock.
24:05
A 30% swing in the share price drastically alters their
24:07
fundamental financial stability. Despite the tax hurdles and the
24:11
concentration risk, this liquidity event will likely
24:13
spawn what industry watchers call a SpaceX mafia.
24:17
Yes. We saw this exact phenomenon
24:19
previously with the PayPal mafia, where early employees
24:23
cashed out during an acquisition or IPO and used their new found
24:26
wealth to fund the next generation of tech companies.
24:29
The sudden influx of liquid capital to 18,000 highly skilled
24:34
aerospace and artificial intelligence engineers will fuel
24:37
a massive wave of well funded alumni leaving to start new
24:41
ventures. They will take their capital and
24:43
their expertise and seed a new ecosystem of robotics, AI and
24:47
aerospace startups, permanently altering the secondary tech
24:50
economy in areas like Austin, Los Angeles and Seattle.
24:53
I do have to point out that while these employees possess
24:55
generational wealth on paper, the strict company controls over
24:59
internal tender offers and those long lockup periods mean that
25:02
the wealth is heavily restricted.
25:04
The company maintains the absolute authority to limit how,
25:07
when and to whom employees can sell their shares.
25:09
The company is offering the public a chance to fund the
25:12
creation of Interplanetary Logistics and Orbital Artificial
25:17
Intelligence, but entirely on its own terms.
25:20
Investors are being asked to absorb billions in capital
25:23
losses while legally signing away their right to influence
25:26
the Founders vision. If the public market accepts
25:29
these restrictive 0 recourse governance terms in exchange for
25:33
access to unprecedented growth, how will this completely reshape
25:37
the balance of power between future tech founders and Wall
25:40
Street? If you're not subscribed yet,
25:41
take a second and hit follow on whatever app you're using.
25:44
It helps us keep making this. We appreciate you being here.
25:46
Also, check out our YouTube channel for more business and
25:48
tech updates. There's a link in the
25:50
description, yeah.