Latest / Wellness, Actually with Emily Oster & Perry Wilson, MD / Choosing to Induce: How a randomized trial gave birth to a new era in obstetrics
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: This is parent data. I'm Emily Oster.
- 0:04Speaker 2: One of the most common questions I get about the
- 0:06Speaker 2: end of pregnancy is whether it's a good idea to
- 0:09Speaker 2: have a labor.
- 0:09Speaker 1: Induction for those of you who are wondering.
- 0:14Speaker 3: What this is.
- 0:15Speaker 2: For many people at the end of pregnancy, they go
- 0:17Speaker 2: into labor on their own. That's called the spontaneous labor,
- 0:21Speaker 2: but sometimes it makes sense to induce labor, to encourage
- 0:25Speaker 2: labor to start using a combination of medications. Over the
- 0:30Speaker 2: past several years.
- 0:32Speaker 1: There has been a push towards more of these labor inductions.
- 0:37Speaker 2: And for many more people they are being offered or
- 0:41Speaker 2: even actively encouraged to induce labor at the end of
- 0:45Speaker 2: their pregnancy. For some people, this is really welcome. A
- 0:49Speaker 2: lot of the feelings of pregnancy are about giving up control,
- 0:52Speaker 2: but the possibility of having some of that control back,
- 0:55Speaker 2: at least for a little while, of being able to
- 0:57Speaker 2: pick when you have your birth, that seems appealing.
- 1:01Speaker 1: It's easier to plan around. But for other people this
- 1:05Speaker 1: isn't what they want.
- 1:06Speaker 2: They were thinking of their labor experience as something that
- 1:09Speaker 2: would start on its own, and being offered or strongly
- 1:14Speaker 2: encouraged towards an induction makes them uncomfortable. The reason this
- 1:19Speaker 2: has changed so much in the last few years is
- 1:22Speaker 2: because of something called the Arrived trial, which will explain
- 1:25Speaker 2: at much more length in this episode, But the most
- 1:29Speaker 2: important baseline thing to understand is that this is a
- 1:32Speaker 2: randomized controlled trial. It was designed to test whether labor
- 1:37Speaker 2: induction made c sections more likely. That was one of
- 1:41Speaker 2: the concerns about labor induction, and what the trial showed
- 1:44Speaker 2: is that it didn't. The group that had their labor
- 1:47Speaker 2: induced was no more likely to have C sections than
- 1:51Speaker 2: the group that didn't have their labor induced. And a
- 1:54Speaker 2: result of that is that many more providers became comfortable
- 1:59Speaker 2: with the idea of labor inductions. And as they became
- 2:03Speaker 2: more comfortable, we started to move towards a world in
- 2:05Speaker 2: which maybe everyone should have a labor induction. After all,
- 2:09Speaker 2: it's easier to plan, it's easier to schedule. This landscape,
- 2:13Speaker 2: this moving landscape, has caused a lot of tension, a
- 2:18Speaker 2: lot of discomfort for a lot of women.
- 2:21Speaker 1: And today I'm going to talk with doctor Nate Fox
- 2:25Speaker 1: about induction, about.
- 2:26Speaker 2: This trial, about what we should learn from this trial,
- 2:29Speaker 2: what we shouldn't learn from the trial, about the limits
- 2:32Speaker 2: of evidence in general, and also about how we bring
- 2:35Speaker 2: our own preferences to our care.
- 2:38Speaker 1: We talk about the risks of induction versus the risk of.
- 2:41Speaker 2: Waiting, and we really try to get into how people
- 2:44Speaker 2: can make this decision in the most informed way for themselves.
- 2:49Speaker 2: A quick note, Nate and I talk about ACOG, which
- 2:52Speaker 2: stands for the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
- 2:56Speaker 1: Just to be clear on that one.
- 2:59Speaker 2: After the break, Doctor Nate Fox, Hello, Nate, Hey, welcome
- 3:19Speaker 2: to Parent Data.
- 3:20Speaker 1: Can I ask you to introduce yourself?
- 3:23Speaker 3: Yes, you can. Thanks thanks for having me. My name
- 3:25Speaker 3: is Nate or doctor Nathan Fox formerly, but that doesn't
- 3:30Speaker 3: usually happen. So I am. Let's see, I'm an obgyn
- 3:34Speaker 3: and maternal feedal medicine specialist. I am in practice in
- 3:38Speaker 3: New York City and I'm originally from the Midwest, which
- 3:42Speaker 3: explains my pleasant demeanor. And I live in New Jersey
- 3:46Speaker 3: with my wife and I have four children, some in
- 3:49Speaker 3: the house, some moved out of the house, and two dogs.
- 3:53Speaker 2: So you're also your most important job is you're my
- 3:55Speaker 2: co author on our book The Unexpected, which is coming
- 3:59Speaker 2: out at the end of April. Would you say that
- 4:01Speaker 2: your most is that your most important role?
- 4:04Speaker 3: It certainly appears to be the most impressive thing I've
- 4:07Speaker 3: done in the past several years if you ask anybody
- 4:09Speaker 3: in my life, so like, how the hell did you
- 4:11Speaker 3: get roped in with Emily Oster? But yeah, no, it's
- 4:13Speaker 3: been awesome. I'm very pleased to do that, and I'm
- 4:16Speaker 3: really excited about the book and it's going to be great.
- 4:18Speaker 1: I agree.
- 4:20Speaker 2: Okay, So today we're going to talk about the Arrived trial,
- 4:23Speaker 2: and I actually want to structure the way we're talking
- 4:25Speaker 2: about this and sort of before, during, and after, and
- 4:30Speaker 2: so to start with the before. So in the years
- 4:34Speaker 2: and really the decades before this trial, including when I
- 4:37Speaker 2: wrote Expecting Better, I think a lot of people saw
- 4:39Speaker 2: induction as part of what they would call the cascade
- 4:43Speaker 2: of interventions. I believe that phrase is from Ricky Lake.
- 4:47Speaker 3: And the great, the great philosopher rick the.
- 4:50Speaker 2: Great philosopher Ricky Lake, and the concern was that labor
- 4:54Speaker 2: induction would lead to a stalled labor, which would then
- 4:56Speaker 2: ultimately lead to a Cesarean section and from a day
- 5:00Speaker 2: at a standpoint, that conclusion, my senses was based on
- 5:03Speaker 2: the observation that people with induced labor are more likely
- 5:07Speaker 2: to have cesarean sections than those who start labor spontaneously. Obviously,
- 5:13Speaker 2: in a lot of cases there are underlying risk factors
- 5:15Speaker 2: which drive the decision to induce and make people more
- 5:17Speaker 2: likely to need a cesarean.
- 5:19Speaker 1: It's very difficult to draw a causal conclusion from that data.
- 5:23Speaker 2: So from your standpoint in this kind of pre arrived
- 5:26Speaker 2: frial period, how did you think about the consequences of
- 5:29Speaker 2: labor induction for C sections.
- 5:31Speaker 3: Yeah, it's it's a great question, and it's an interesting topic. Now,
- 5:36Speaker 3: it was certainly an interesting topic then, you know, I
- 5:40Speaker 3: when you mentioned the term cascade of events, it's it's
- 5:43Speaker 3: interesting because a lot of people use that term and
- 5:48Speaker 3: what they typically use it to mean as well, once
- 5:52Speaker 3: you go to a hospital or go to a doctor,
- 5:54Speaker 3: they're going to start doing this, and it's going to
- 5:56Speaker 3: lead to that, and it's going to lead to that
- 5:57Speaker 3: and ultimately it's going to lead to you know, world
- 6:00Speaker 3: destruction or something like that. But labor induction really wasn't
- 6:05Speaker 3: part of the cascade because it was really considered itself
- 6:10Speaker 3: something you really should not do. It wasn't like because
- 6:13Speaker 3: it'll lead to A to B to C. It was like,
- 6:15Speaker 3: you should not induce, and during my training and during
- 6:19Speaker 3: the beginning part of my practice, the tenant was that
- 6:22Speaker 3: we know that if you induce someone's labor, you are
- 6:26Speaker 3: going to increase their chance of a cesarean delivery, Like
- 6:29Speaker 3: that is the biggest downside.
- 6:32Speaker 2: Just to be that was something where it was like,
- 6:34Speaker 2: we know that's true. That's something we accept as part
- 6:36Speaker 2: of our or at least we think is true.
- 6:39Speaker 3: Well, that's what was taught. I disagreed at the time.
- 6:42Speaker 3: I'll explain why, and I think that I've been vindicated.
- 6:46Speaker 3: But that's what we were taught. That was in the textbooks.
- 6:49Speaker 3: That was what you were taught first day of your
- 6:51Speaker 3: first you know, internship, Like if you induce labor, you're
- 6:54Speaker 3: increasing the risk of C section. That was the biggest downside,
- 6:57Speaker 3: and then the other downsides you know, in terms of
- 7:00Speaker 3: patient experience, it's going to take longer, which are all true. Fine,
- 7:03Speaker 3: but the problem was, and this was a problem at
- 7:06Speaker 3: the time, the data was poor or limited, and the
- 7:11Speaker 3: reason the day was limited is basically what they did
- 7:14Speaker 3: is imagine if I went onto the labor floor and
- 7:16Speaker 3: we have a labor board of let's say twenty patients
- 7:19Speaker 3: are in labor and I say, all right, patients one
- 7:22Speaker 3: through ten, just so you know, all showed up in
- 7:25Speaker 3: spontaneous labor, and patients eleven through twenty are here because
- 7:29Speaker 3: they're getting induced. It is true that patients eleven through
- 7:33Speaker 3: twenty had a higher rate of sea section than patients
- 7:37Speaker 3: one through ten. And so the conclusion people made is okay,
- 7:41Speaker 3: people who are getting induced have a higher rate of
- 7:44Speaker 3: sea section than those who come in spontaneous labor. True statement.
- 7:49Speaker 3: The problem is clinically, if I'm seeing someone and making
- 7:53Speaker 3: a decision about whether to induce them or not, the
- 7:56Speaker 3: alternative to being induced is not you shall be in labor,
- 8:00Speaker 3: it is go home, right, And so we don't really
- 8:04Speaker 3: have an opportunity clinically to decide whether someone should be
- 8:08Speaker 3: induced or be in labor. We have a decision whether
- 8:11Speaker 3: to induce them or not induce them, which means I'm
- 8:14Speaker 3: going to send you home and come back when you're
- 8:17Speaker 3: labor or in a week or whatever. And so that
- 8:20Speaker 3: was not advertised as part of the conclusion that induction.
- 8:25Speaker 2: Increases the risk of labor and sonate just to pause
- 8:29Speaker 2: on that, what are the kinds of things that would
- 8:32Speaker 2: make you want to induce.
- 8:34Speaker 1: Versus weight right.
- 8:35Speaker 3: So basically, since there was this idea that if you
- 8:39Speaker 3: induce labor, you're increasing the risk of sea section, we
- 8:42Speaker 3: would always weigh the benefits of induction versus this risk
- 8:48Speaker 3: of sea section. So, for example, if I was worried
- 8:50Speaker 3: about an increased risk of stillbirth, or if I was
- 8:53Speaker 3: worried about the mother having an infection, or if I
- 8:56Speaker 3: was worried because her blood pressure is going up and
- 8:59Speaker 3: she may or not aclamsey, which is unsafe. So we're balancing,
- 9:01Speaker 3: all right, the risk of inducing which is c section,
- 9:06Speaker 3: versus the risk of not inducing or staying pregnant, which
- 9:10Speaker 3: could be something bad to the mother or baby. And
- 9:12Speaker 3: based on the specifics of the situation or the condition,
- 9:16Speaker 3: we make a decision, all right, we should induce, we
- 9:18Speaker 3: shouldn't induce, Will we wait longer, will we not wait longer?
- 9:21Speaker 3: And that's sort of that's how we did it then.
- 9:23Speaker 3: But people started to question that basic fact that c
- 9:29Speaker 3: section is increased by being induced. And the first way
- 9:32Speaker 3: they did it is they went back and looked at
- 9:34Speaker 3: the same data that they used to conclude that induction
- 9:38Speaker 3: increases the risk of sea section, but they looked at
- 9:41Speaker 3: it differently. Instead of looking at women who are in
- 9:44Speaker 3: labor versus induced. They looked at like a week earlier,
- 9:48Speaker 3: people who were induced versus people told to go home,
- 9:51Speaker 3: and when they did it again retrospective, observational. Even in
- 9:55Speaker 3: those studies, when they re examined it in a way
- 9:57Speaker 3: that makes more sense clinically, they saw no difference in
- 10:02Speaker 3: the rate of sea section between the groups. And that's
- 10:05Speaker 3: actually what prompted the arrived trial. They said, whoa wait
- 10:08Speaker 3: a second, when we look at the data in a
- 10:11Speaker 3: more logical way or a more clinical way, this may
- 10:17Speaker 3: be wrong. We may have been telling people the wrong
- 10:19Speaker 3: thing for all these years. We need to do this
- 10:22Speaker 3: in a really well designed prospective trial, and that's what
- 10:25Speaker 3: led to the arrived trial.
- 10:28Speaker 1: So we're going to get the arrived trial in a second.
- 10:31Speaker 2: Yeah, but just to like to sort of put a
- 10:35Speaker 2: fine point on why this initial data is not good
- 10:38Speaker 2: or is not necessarily compelling.
- 10:41Speaker 1: It is this issue of you know, you.
- 10:44Speaker 2: Mentioned, you know, preclamsya, stillbirth risks, infection risks are characteristics
- 10:49Speaker 2: that would push you to say, hey, let's induce now.
- 10:51Speaker 1: Let's not wait, let's induce now.
- 10:54Speaker 2: Those are characteristics which themselves lead to a higher risk
- 10:58Speaker 2: of sea section, for I would guess a bunch of reasons.
- 11:00Speaker 2: For example, if labor starts to go get a little
- 11:03Speaker 2: more complicated, you're going to be more likely to pull
- 11:05Speaker 2: the trigger on a C section because you're worried about
- 11:08Speaker 2: other risks or worried about other aspects of the baby.
- 11:11Speaker 1: Is that basically these.
- 11:13Speaker 3: Issues potentially, I mean, it's sort of you know, when
- 11:17Speaker 3: you have a situation where there's concern like preclamcyr or
- 11:21Speaker 3: something like that, the reason to induce is not because
- 11:26Speaker 3: I want to lower the risk of a sea section, though,
- 11:28Speaker 3: it's because I want to lower the risk to the
- 11:30Speaker 3: mother and baby. So we say, even if it does
- 11:33Speaker 3: increase increase the risk of sea section, we're willing to
- 11:36Speaker 3: take that risk because we're helping the other baby. But yes,
- 11:38Speaker 3: it is possible that, in fact, it would lower the
- 11:41Speaker 3: risk of sea section because we don't know what's going
- 11:42Speaker 3: to happen, because no one tends to wait on those patients.
- 11:45Speaker 3: But they did start to chip away at this idea
- 11:49Speaker 3: of induction increases the risk of sea section, and they
- 11:52Speaker 3: did it in sort of subsets, like women with ruptured membranes.
- 11:56Speaker 3: There's old, old data that you induce them you don't
- 11:59Speaker 3: increase the risk. Then they did it for women who
- 12:01Speaker 3: had hypertension, and the same thing. If you induce them,
- 12:04Speaker 3: you don't increase the risk. Then they did it for
- 12:05Speaker 3: women who are over thirty five, and if you induce them,
- 12:08Speaker 3: you don't increase the risk. Meaning there was more and
- 12:10Speaker 3: more mounting evidence, at least in smaller populations that maybe
- 12:14Speaker 3: this is incorrect. And the reason you would want to
- 12:19Speaker 3: know that is number one, just in terms of counseling,
- 12:23Speaker 3: and number two, it may change, It may tip the scales,
- 12:27Speaker 3: You may need less of a risk of waiting to
- 12:31Speaker 3: push you over the edge to induce if you're not
- 12:33Speaker 3: worried about the risk of induction, maybe even to the
- 12:36Speaker 3: point and I'm not suggesting that you need to do this,
- 12:39Speaker 3: but maybe to the point that you should just induce everyone, Right,
- 12:41Speaker 3: I mean, that's sort of the possible conclusion from something
- 12:44Speaker 3: like this.
- 12:45Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, so then we sort of have this kind
- 12:48Speaker 2: of suggestive evidence, which the way that I would frame
- 12:51Speaker 2: it is, you know, once you limit to people where
- 12:53Speaker 2: you know the reason for induction, and the reason for
- 12:55Speaker 2: induction isn't something that itself would lead to a risk
- 12:58Speaker 2: of CEA section, then you're start to get evidence that
- 13:02Speaker 2: it doesn't.
- 13:02Speaker 3: Matter or or in general again even in the general population,
- 13:07Speaker 3: because they looked at people who are induced electively. And
- 13:10Speaker 3: also this is really also talking about first time moms,
- 13:14Speaker 3: meaning even back then, way back when, before the arrived trial,
- 13:17Speaker 3: if you're taking someone who's already had a baby vaginally, yes,
- 13:22Speaker 3: inducing might increase the risk of a sea section, but
- 13:24Speaker 3: only by like a couple of percent points, not by
- 13:27Speaker 3: a really massive difference.
- 13:29Speaker 2: Once you have already had a vaginal birth, it's all
- 13:31Speaker 2: like it's all loosened up, so it's just you know,
- 13:33Speaker 2: it just slips right out.
- 13:34Speaker 3: That's it just walks right out.
- 13:36Speaker 1: It was just like they're basically okay, all right. So
- 13:39Speaker 1: then we come to the arrived trial. So this is
- 13:42Speaker 1: a trial.
- 13:43Speaker 2: A large randomized general trial was published in the New
- 13:46Speaker 2: England Journal Medicine in twenty eighteen.
- 13:48Speaker 1: The aim in this trial is.
- 13:50Speaker 2: To evaluate whether routine labor induction at thirty nine weeks
- 13:53Speaker 2: of pregnancy makes a sea section more likely. The trial
- 13:57Speaker 2: includes about six thousand low risk women having their first
- 14:01Speaker 2: child and it randomized them into either induction at thirty
- 14:04Speaker 2: nine weeks or expectant management, which is just another word
- 14:08Speaker 2: for just sending.
- 14:08Speaker 1: Them home and waiting.
- 14:11Speaker 2: They actually, of course, like as always at a trial
- 14:13Speaker 2: like this, they weren't forced to make the choice they
- 14:15Speaker 2: were randomized into. But in the end, because of this encouragement,
- 14:19Speaker 2: groups did have very different induction.
- 14:21Speaker 1: Rates and the results.
- 14:23Speaker 2: What the authors find is that infant outcomes is very
- 14:26Speaker 2: similar in both groups, and if anything, there is a
- 14:28Speaker 2: slightly lower C section rate in the group that was induced.
- 14:31Speaker 1: So both groups.
- 14:32Speaker 2: Are actually very low, which we'll come back to. It's
- 14:35Speaker 2: about eight to eleven percent of birth star c sections.
- 14:38Speaker 2: That's relative to a US rate of about thirty percent.
- 14:41Speaker 2: But on face value, this trial really puts a wrench
- 14:46Speaker 2: into the idea that labor inductions increase the risk of
- 14:51Speaker 2: sea sections.
- 14:52Speaker 1: So when this came out, did you just say, I
- 14:55Speaker 1: told you so.
- 14:58Speaker 3: I'm not a big I told you so guy. But
- 15:00Speaker 3: it was definitely yeah, you would think I am no.
- 15:04Speaker 3: I mean, you know, it was even even to those
- 15:08Speaker 3: of us who were sort of questioning that idea. I
- 15:13Speaker 3: think a lot of us were still surprised how much
- 15:16Speaker 3: it really didn't seem to matter. And like you said,
- 15:19Speaker 3: maybe a slightly lower risk in the group that got induced.
- 15:22Speaker 1: I don't pretty it's a small difference.
- 15:24Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't make too much of that. As expected,
- 15:28Speaker 3: the group that got induced had a slightly lower risk
- 15:30Speaker 3: of getting hypertension because as you wait longer in pregnancy,
- 15:34Speaker 3: that risk goes up. So that was not a surprise,
- 15:37Speaker 3: But the fact that it really did not impact C
- 15:40Speaker 3: section rates was. It was definitely surprising to like everybody,
- 15:45Speaker 3: but even those of us who are knee deep in
- 15:46Speaker 3: it already were still a little bit like, oh, pretty cool.
- 15:50Speaker 3: It was a very impressive study and it absolutely changed
- 15:56Speaker 3: the way a lot of people think about induction. I
- 15:59Speaker 3: think correct, it changed the way I'm sure we'll discuss it.
- 16:03Speaker 3: I think some people might go a little too far
- 16:05Speaker 3: with this, but whatever, it was impressive. It is impressive.
- 16:09Speaker 2: So let me ask you for you, and then I
- 16:11Speaker 2: want to talk about the more general question. But for you,
- 16:13Speaker 2: did this change how you advise people? Did it change
- 16:16Speaker 2: your clinical practice?
- 16:18Speaker 4: So?
- 16:19Speaker 3: Yes, and no, it didn't ultimately change my clinical practice
- 16:23Speaker 3: because before the arrived trial I was talking to people
- 16:29Speaker 3: about risk and benefits of induction versus you know, expect
- 16:33Speaker 3: to management. But ultimately, since the only reason we would
- 16:37Speaker 3: really induce people is because of a medical indication. It
- 16:44Speaker 3: didn't really make a big difference, right, we were already
- 16:47Speaker 3: inducing people who needed to be induced. The people who
- 16:49Speaker 3: it really affects are people who are thinking about what
- 16:51Speaker 3: we call elective inductions, like just getting induced because I
- 16:55Speaker 3: don't want to be pregnant anymore, which is God bless.
- 16:57Speaker 3: That's a very reasonable feeling to have. But whether it's
- 17:01Speaker 3: a problem to induce for that reason that was a
- 17:03Speaker 3: real question. So we weren't doing a ton of that
- 17:05Speaker 3: in my practice to begin with, and so we didn't.
- 17:08Speaker 3: Really it didn't really impact us. The main thing after
- 17:11Speaker 3: the arrived trial, I would say, is it really made
- 17:15Speaker 3: conversations about induction easier. Because it used to be I
- 17:20Speaker 3: would say, listen, we're going to induce you. I hope
- 17:24Speaker 3: it doesn't increase your risk of sea section. But even
- 17:26Speaker 3: if it does, listen, we really got to do it
- 17:28Speaker 3: because of this concern or that concern, or this reason
- 17:32Speaker 3: or that reason. But now I can tell people I
- 17:36Speaker 3: think you should be induced because of this reason or
- 17:39Speaker 3: this reason and this reason, and just so you know,
- 17:42Speaker 3: this really should not increase your risk of a sea section.
- 17:45Speaker 3: And that makes it much more palatable for people on
- 17:49Speaker 3: the receiving ends of that kind of counsel link.
- 17:51Speaker 2: So it's interesting because I do want to when we
- 17:53Speaker 2: talk about sort of how this has changed practice, I
- 17:56Speaker 2: actually really want to dive into this elective induction because
- 17:59Speaker 2: it sounds, for from your standpoint, like that's just.
- 18:01Speaker 1: Not something you do much of that you basically, yeah.
- 18:04Speaker 2: That's not a big part of your clinical practice right
- 18:06Speaker 2: now or before or after.
- 18:08Speaker 3: So I don't I don't have a problem with it,
- 18:10Speaker 3: and certainly I would be okay doing it. Like if
- 18:13Speaker 3: someone said I'm thirty nine weeks or I'm forty weeks
- 18:16Speaker 3: and I want to be induced because you know, I'm done,
- 18:18Speaker 3: or whatever it is. I think it's fine that the
- 18:21Speaker 3: problem is from a data standpoint, you can justify it again,
- 18:26Speaker 3: and you may be able to justify it on everybody
- 18:28Speaker 3: if someone's as well, you know, why not induced they
- 18:31Speaker 3: don't have hypertension, maybe there's a slightly lower risk ascese section.
- 18:34Speaker 3: Like I get it. But the problem is practically, when
- 18:37Speaker 3: you induce someone's labor, they're in a labor room for
- 18:41Speaker 3: a very long time, and so we just don't have
- 18:44Speaker 3: like the space for that. You know, our labor floor
- 18:46Speaker 3: is x amount of labor rooms and if the average
- 18:49Speaker 3: time of an induction for a first baby is about
- 18:53Speaker 3: eighteen hours, somewhere between twelve and twenty four and so
- 18:56Speaker 3: someone's in a labor room for twelve to twenty four
- 18:59Speaker 3: hours versus someone who comes in and labor on their own,
- 19:02Speaker 3: and the average time in a room is six hours,
- 19:04Speaker 3: you're gonna need fo you know, three to four times
- 19:07Speaker 3: as many rooms to deliver the same number of people.
- 19:10Speaker 3: And so even if I wanted to induce everyone electively
- 19:13Speaker 3: thirty nine weeks, my hospital wouldn't let me. They'd be dude,
- 19:16Speaker 3: we don't have room, like, we can't do it. And
- 19:18Speaker 3: so it doesn't it doesn't come into play in our practice,
- 19:22Speaker 3: and maybe smaller hospitals which are have a lot of space,
- 19:25Speaker 3: and it doesn't really make a difference. Yes, potentially, but
- 19:29Speaker 3: in our practice it's just not relevant, which is also
- 19:32Speaker 3: part of the reason when people are saying, you know,
- 19:34Speaker 3: whatever big studies come out, it's not the I told
- 19:37Speaker 3: you so is. But what happens is a big study
- 19:39Speaker 3: comes out and within like fifteen minutes, every expert in
- 19:43Speaker 3: every society feels like they have to put this like
- 19:45Speaker 3: long winded statement about it, and like, what is the conclusion.
- 19:48Speaker 3: It's it's like anything, and it's it's frankly kind of annoying,
- 19:51Speaker 3: and you know, it's sort of like the race to
- 19:54Speaker 3: like be better. You know, I'm gonna get on this first.
- 19:56Speaker 3: I'm gonna get on this first, Like I got the scoop.
- 19:58Speaker 3: But the problem is people make these recommendations like, oh,
- 20:01Speaker 3: you know, since it doesn't increase the risk of se
- 20:03Speaker 3: section and since there was a slightly lower risk and
- 20:05Speaker 3: no hype pretension, I think everybody should be induced. You know.
- 20:08Speaker 3: It's like watching you know, it's like watching Sports Center,
- 20:11Speaker 3: you know, and someone's saying, oh, we got to trade
- 20:13Speaker 3: this guy because they missed a free throw, and it's
- 20:15Speaker 3: it's literally the same thing. But people don't think that through.
- 20:17Speaker 3: Like if we induce everyone, we can't deliver anybody. We
- 20:21Speaker 3: don't have enough labor rooms in this country to do that,
- 20:23Speaker 3: and so these things have to be much more thoughtful
- 20:26Speaker 3: and how to you know, how to deal with new data.
- 20:29Speaker 2: I just want to say that with my second kid,
- 20:31Speaker 2: I had the baby twenty three minutes after arriving at
- 20:35Speaker 2: the hospital, So I feel like I was really efficient
- 20:38Speaker 2: in my use of the labor.
- 20:39Speaker 3: You should get a discount I should get a DIF
- 20:41Speaker 3: like a rebate.
- 20:41Speaker 1: I want. I want my baby rebate.
- 20:43Speaker 2: Yeah, all I got was this baby and it's no
- 20:46Speaker 2: rebates at all. So I want to talk a little
- 20:49Speaker 2: bit about the limitations of the study before we talk
- 20:52Speaker 2: about some of this issue about how it's changed practice important,
- 20:56Speaker 2: but to talk about the limitations, so I'm interested. I
- 20:59Speaker 2: can tell you for I think the most significant limitations
- 21:02Speaker 2: on this study are number one, the kind of low
- 21:05Speaker 2: risk women with their first child restriction and the question
- 21:09Speaker 2: of whether that applies more broadly.
- 21:11Speaker 1: And the second is.
- 21:12Speaker 2: That the overall C section rate in this cohort is
- 21:16Speaker 2: really low relative to the US rate overall, and that
- 21:20Speaker 2: makes me worried that this did not reflect the broader
- 21:24Speaker 2: swath of the US population.
- 21:26Speaker 3: So you are definitely correct across the board, as you
- 21:31Speaker 3: often are. I don't think that ends up being the
- 21:34Speaker 3: biggest issue with this study, though, because the low risk
- 21:39Speaker 3: women are the ones who we were most concerned about
- 21:42Speaker 3: increasing their risk of sea section. Right, So someone's young
- 21:46Speaker 3: and healthy and fit and their pregnancy is going great,
- 21:48Speaker 3: You're like, hey, you should have the lowest risk of
- 21:50Speaker 3: sea section out of anybody. Again, amongst people having their
- 21:53Speaker 3: first baby, And so the fear is if I just
- 21:56Speaker 3: induce you, maybe I'm going to screw that up, you know,
- 21:58Speaker 3: and double your risk of sea sect or something like that.
- 22:01Speaker 3: And so I think this study did show that that
- 22:05Speaker 3: does not seem to be the case. Meaning, if you
- 22:07Speaker 3: are young, low risk, healthy, all these things, it probably
- 22:11Speaker 3: does not make a big difference whether you get induced
- 22:13Speaker 3: or wait to go into libor on your own. I
- 22:15Speaker 3: agree that you can't apply these numbers to higher risk cohorts,
- 22:20Speaker 3: but I would retort with two things. Number one, in
- 22:27Speaker 3: the higher risk cohorts, it seems to be the same
- 22:30Speaker 3: like if you look at other high risk cours, does
- 22:32Speaker 3: not seem to increase the risk a seay section. And
- 22:35Speaker 3: the only difference is that they may have a higher
- 22:38Speaker 3: risk overall whether they get induced or they wait. Meaning
- 22:42Speaker 3: of let's say it's about ten percent to the youngest
- 22:44Speaker 3: healthiest of patients. Great, and if you take a different court,
- 22:47Speaker 3: maybe it's twenty percent, and another one it might be
- 22:50Speaker 3: thirty percent. But it does not seem to differ whether
- 22:53Speaker 3: you induce them or wait. And that seems to be
- 22:56Speaker 3: what the data shows. I think the biggest problem, not problem,
- 23:00Speaker 3: but the biggest uh mis interpretation of this study is
- 23:04Speaker 3: that this is what's going to be everywhere in the country,
- 23:07Speaker 3: because this is you're talking about major academic medical centers
- 23:11Speaker 3: with lots of resources, twenty four hour ob residents and
- 23:15Speaker 3: attendings and antithesiologists and one you know, and you know
- 23:19Speaker 3: a lot of nurses and they know they're being studied,
- 23:22Speaker 3: so they're doing their inductions very cautiously and patiently sort
- 23:25Speaker 3: of the quote unquote right way. But if you try
- 23:28Speaker 3: to like replicate this in every hospital in the US,
- 23:32Speaker 3: there's a lot more pressures. Like I said, what if
- 23:34Speaker 3: they're like, dude, we are we are cramped with rooms
- 23:37Speaker 3: out of Yeah you got like yeah, like move it
- 23:39Speaker 3: like move it along, section your patient get or delivered,
- 23:42Speaker 3: whatever it is. We got three people waiting for a room.
- 23:45Speaker 3: And those are legitimate pressures. And some of them are
- 23:48Speaker 3: just doctors practice differently, or nurses practice differently, or patients
- 23:52Speaker 3: have different desires. Maybe some of them are sort of
- 23:54Speaker 3: only half heartedly in on the induction versus that, and
- 23:58Speaker 3: so in practice, those C section rates are not replicated.
- 24:04Speaker 3: But it does not mean that inducing increases the risk ever.
- 24:08Speaker 3: Else It just means people might not be following the
- 24:10Speaker 3: protocol the exact same way they did it, right.
- 24:13Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I think that's in some ways, that's
- 24:15Speaker 1: a little bit.
- 24:16Speaker 2: Of an academic distinction, because from the standpoint of a patient,
- 24:19Speaker 2: the question is if I have this induction, will it
- 24:21Speaker 2: increase my risk of C section? And there's a there's
- 24:24Speaker 2: a kind of mechanistic question which is like would it
- 24:26Speaker 2: have to as done perfectly?
- 24:28Speaker 1: And they think that this trial says is no. And
- 24:31Speaker 1: then there's a question of might it in the real.
- 24:33Speaker 2: World because you know, they're running out of rooms and
- 24:36Speaker 2: and you know, we know that inductions are slower and
- 24:39Speaker 2: that you need patients. I don't know if you're somebody
- 24:43Speaker 2: told me, like, bring a long book was their main advice.
- 24:46Speaker 1: I don't know if that was you.
- 24:47Speaker 3: I never, I never, not until I wrote books, did
- 24:49Speaker 3: I ever tell people to bring a book.
- 24:51Speaker 2: I bring a charger, charger, bring an iPad, a charger
- 24:55Speaker 2: and a lot bring a charger. But I think, I mean,
- 24:57Speaker 2: I think that is important because it from the standpoint
- 25:00Speaker 2: the patient, if you want to ask the question, will
- 25:02Speaker 2: being induced to increase my risk of sease? Actually, you
- 25:04Speaker 2: do want to think about, you know, does the place
- 25:06Speaker 2: that I'm doing this have the capacity to wait, to
- 25:09Speaker 2: have the capacity to like have me there for twenty
- 25:11Speaker 2: four hours, and that's part of the mechanism and something
- 25:14Speaker 2: that doesn't show up much in the trial for a
- 25:16Speaker 2: bunch of reasons.
- 25:17Speaker 3: I think for people listening from the patient perspective, if
- 25:20Speaker 3: you're trying to get a sense of like, how do
- 25:22Speaker 3: I know if this applies to me? The simplest way
- 25:25Speaker 3: is to ask your doctor or midwife, what are your inductions, like,
- 25:31Speaker 3: like what happens? And if in that process they say,
- 25:34Speaker 3: you know, we do A, we do B, we do C,
- 25:37Speaker 3: and they say things like and we're very patient because
- 25:40Speaker 3: it takes a long time, and we know it takes
- 25:42Speaker 3: a long time, and we really try to wait as
- 25:44Speaker 3: long as we can as long as it's safe. Then
- 25:47Speaker 3: probably you're getting an induction that's very similar to what
- 25:51Speaker 3: they did in the study, and probably it's not increasing
- 25:54Speaker 3: your risk of a C section. If they say, you
- 25:58Speaker 3: know what, people say, inductions don't increase to risk a
- 26:00Speaker 3: see sections. But I don't buy it. I don't know.
- 26:02Speaker 3: I'm sectioning everybody by four or five pm the next day,
- 26:06Speaker 3: you know, twelve hours later, and so I haven't found that,
- 26:08Speaker 3: then probably you're getting a less patient form of an
- 26:12Speaker 3: induction and might be maybe it will increase the risk
- 26:15Speaker 3: for you, and I think that's really the best way
- 26:17Speaker 3: to sort this out, you know, on your own.
- 26:19Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, And so it's interesting to sort of move
- 26:22Speaker 2: now to thinking about this like after period, right, it
- 26:25Speaker 2: is like two things that to pull out, So one
- 26:28Speaker 2: is actually there. There have been some sort of studies
- 26:33Speaker 2: post to this which have like less good data, so
- 26:37Speaker 2: they are not their data is not as good as
- 26:39Speaker 2: it's not randomized, but have suggested that that there is
- 26:42Speaker 2: still a relationship between inductions and safe sections, and maybe
- 26:45Speaker 2: that is reflective of the same biases in the data before.
- 26:48Speaker 2: Maybe it's reflective of you know, some changes or some
- 26:52Speaker 2: of this lack of patients. But the other thing that
- 26:56Speaker 2: comes out is people will now say, you know, my
- 26:59Speaker 2: doctor told me that they always induce at thirty nine weeks,
- 27:04Speaker 2: that that is now standard practice, or people will say,
- 27:07Speaker 2: my doctor told me that ACOG recommends that everyone be
- 27:11Speaker 2: induced at thirty nine weeks, and some people don't want that.
- 27:15Speaker 2: And it was sort of interesting to hear your answer
- 27:17Speaker 2: at the beginning about how that isn't how you're practicing,
- 27:22Speaker 2: because there is a really really important distinction between telling
- 27:26Speaker 2: a patient you know, there are some reasons to induce,
- 27:29Speaker 2: and by the way, there isn't this downside on the
- 27:32Speaker 2: other side, and telling somebody we really like ACOG is
- 27:36Speaker 2: saying you got to get the baby out.
- 27:38Speaker 1: Or you might have a stillbirth, which is what some
- 27:40Speaker 1: of these guys are hearing.
- 27:41Speaker 3: So ACOG does not say that. For the record, they
- 27:43Speaker 3: do not say that you have to learn it.
- 27:45Speaker 2: They don't say that, but people are hearing from their
- 27:47Speaker 2: doctors that ACOG.
- 27:47Speaker 3: Says this, right. No, I agree. I think that one
- 27:51Speaker 3: of the I gave a lecture recently about it was
- 27:54Speaker 3: called when to Go Rogue, sort of like there's recommendations
- 27:57Speaker 3: out there and where they just don't make sense and
- 28:00Speaker 3: what are the great ones is if you're a low risk,
- 28:02Speaker 3: uncomplicated pregnancy and you're seeing one of those doctors who
- 28:07Speaker 3: says things like that up until thirty eight weeks and
- 28:11Speaker 3: six days, you will be told you absolutely positively cannot
- 28:16Speaker 3: be induced because it's dangerous for the baby. It's not allowed,
- 28:20Speaker 3: it's illegal, I'm going to lose my hospital privileges. And
- 28:23Speaker 3: then when midnight hits and you're thirty nine weeks and
- 28:26Speaker 3: zero days, you must be induced. It's absolutely the best
- 28:28Speaker 3: thing for you and the baby. Now, there is no
- 28:31Speaker 3: biologic plausibility to that. Zero. It makes no sense anyone
- 28:35Speaker 3: listening to be like, well, that's stupid. But if you
- 28:37Speaker 3: sort of look at things as black and white, okay,
- 28:41Speaker 3: you could have one study that says, black and white,
- 28:43Speaker 3: you shouldn't be induced before thirty nine weeks with the reason,
- 28:46Speaker 3: and another study that says, black and white, you should
- 28:49Speaker 3: be induced at thirty nine weeks. But you have to
- 28:52Speaker 3: take everything in, all of the data together into context.
- 28:55Speaker 3: So I don't think it's unreasonable to say I think
- 29:00Speaker 3: think the best strategy is to induce everybody at thirty
- 29:03Speaker 3: nine weeks because it does not increase the risk of
- 29:06Speaker 3: sea section, and because you know it might lower the
- 29:09Speaker 3: risk or lower the risk of that. Okay, but that
- 29:12Speaker 3: doesn't mean it's the right answer for everyone, because again
- 29:15Speaker 3: there's logistical issues, like we mentioned before, there are patient
- 29:20Speaker 3: preference issues. I don't want to be induced at thirty
- 29:22Speaker 3: nine weeks. I don't want to have a twenty four
- 29:24Speaker 3: hour labor. I want to wait and go into labor
- 29:26Speaker 3: my own ASO it's shorter, B because I think it'll
- 29:29Speaker 3: make my chance of needing an epidural lower or c
- 29:32Speaker 3: because it'll just make me feel more in touch with
- 29:35Speaker 3: the labor. Whatever the reason is, those are all quite
- 29:38Speaker 3: reasonable thought processes, and unless there's some reason not to
- 29:44Speaker 3: wait past thirty nine weeks, that should be an option.
- 29:47Speaker 3: So what I tell people typically is any time between
- 29:51Speaker 3: thirty nine and forty one weeks, and maybe for some
- 29:55Speaker 3: people forty two weeks is a reasonable time to be induced.
- 30:01Speaker 3: And there's benefits to going earlier towards thirty nine weeks,
- 30:05Speaker 3: and there's benefits to waiting longer towards forty one weeks.
- 30:09Speaker 3: And unless there's a real medical issue at hand, you know,
- 30:14Speaker 3: no one could say that one benefits are better than
- 30:16Speaker 3: the other benefits. And so I tell people typically, again,
- 30:19Speaker 3: unless there's a reason to deliver earlier or for a
- 30:22Speaker 3: specific time, I'm very comfortable thirty nine to forty one weeks.
- 30:25Speaker 3: If you're someone who wants to be done as soon
- 30:27Speaker 3: as humanly possible, you don't feel well, you've got people
- 30:32Speaker 3: coming in town, whatever it is you want to be delivered.
- 30:33Speaker 3: At thirty nine weeks, I'll say fine, if we can
- 30:36Speaker 3: get a room, just be prepared for long induction. God
- 30:38Speaker 3: bless and if they want to wait till forty one weeks.
- 30:41Speaker 3: The downside is, well, you're pregnant for two weeks more,
- 30:45Speaker 3: you may not go into labor, and you may end
- 30:46Speaker 3: up with an induction anyways, And there's small risks to
- 30:50Speaker 3: you and to the baby, very slight. I don't try
- 30:52Speaker 3: to scare people or anything, but you know that's they are.
- 30:55Speaker 3: There's very small risks of waiting longer pregnancy, and that's it.
- 30:58Speaker 3: And most people will tell you what they want. Most
- 31:01Speaker 3: people will show you their cards. It's not that hard.
- 31:03Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think giving people the space to talk
- 31:06Speaker 2: about their preferences and talk about their preferences for their birth,
- 31:10Speaker 2: which people have. I mean, when I was pregnant, like
- 31:14Speaker 2: I really wanted to go into labor without an induction, I.
- 31:18Speaker 1: Did not want to have an epidural.
- 31:20Speaker 2: I think it's pretty clear from the data that an
- 31:22Speaker 2: induction increases the pain associated with parts of labor, and
- 31:25Speaker 2: people are more likely to have epidurals for a bunch
- 31:28Speaker 2: of reasons.
- 31:29Speaker 3: I think it increases the duration. I don't the pound
- 31:32Speaker 3: for pound, the contractions I'm told, well they are, I don't.
- 31:36Speaker 3: I've never had an induction or a contraction. But I
- 31:39Speaker 3: think the data is that the actual contractions don't hurt
- 31:42Speaker 3: more of the differences. You basically start, you slam on
- 31:45Speaker 3: the gas at the very beginning versus a very slow
- 31:48Speaker 3: uptick to get into labor.
- 31:51Speaker 2: Yeah, but for me, this was, you know, it was
- 31:53Speaker 2: actually very It was important to avoid an induction or
- 31:57Speaker 2: at least do what do what I could. And that
- 32:01Speaker 2: I mean, I think those those preferences have value in people,
- 32:03Speaker 2: and people differ in what their their preferences are there,
- 32:07Speaker 2: and it's that's just that's important.
- 32:08Speaker 3: That's something we need to be thinking of one hundred percent. Listen,
- 32:11Speaker 3: this is one of the great sort of not secrets,
- 32:14Speaker 3: but one of the real arts in medicine. And just
- 32:16Speaker 3: as a plug. We do discuss this in the book
- 32:19Speaker 3: that on the one hand, you know, like, what's my
- 32:22Speaker 3: job as a doctor, and is it to just tell
- 32:26Speaker 3: you what's right and tell you what to do, or
- 32:28Speaker 3: is it for me to just discuss all the options,
- 32:31Speaker 3: lay them out on the table and let you choose
- 32:33Speaker 3: like you're at a restaurant choosing from a menu. And
- 32:36Speaker 3: I would argue it's really neither of those. It's in between.
- 32:39Speaker 3: It's to have a conversation with you about what I
- 32:42Speaker 3: think are sort of reasonable brackets, you know, to put
- 32:45Speaker 3: around your options, and for me to tell you, like
- 32:49Speaker 3: I think this is a bad option because of this,
- 32:52Speaker 3: if you're going to make a bad choice, Like if
- 32:54Speaker 3: you said, I don't want to be induced because I
- 32:56Speaker 3: don't want to get an epidural and I want to
- 32:58Speaker 3: go till i'm forty three weeks pregnant, I would have
- 33:00Speaker 3: said to you, I think you're making a mistake. Like
- 33:03Speaker 3: obviously I can't, you know, force you to be induced,
- 33:05Speaker 3: but I would be firm. I would say, I think
- 33:06Speaker 3: you're making mistake. Here is why, and I would explain
- 33:10Speaker 3: the reason why. But if you're within a time frame
- 33:13Speaker 3: that I think is reasonable, like you said, well, I
- 33:14Speaker 3: don't want to be induced at thirty nine weeks, I
- 33:16Speaker 3: want to wait until as close to possible as forty
- 33:19Speaker 3: one weeks. Are go a little bit past than my
- 33:20Speaker 3: job is, you know, talk to you about the pluses
- 33:22Speaker 3: and minuses and then let you make a choice. And
- 33:24Speaker 3: that's reasonable. And I think that a lot of either
- 33:29Speaker 3: patients want something different or a lot of doctors do
- 33:32Speaker 3: something different, where they're on the one hand, either too
- 33:35Speaker 3: dogmatic and they just give people black and white, or
- 33:38Speaker 3: they can't make up their damn mind, and people are
- 33:40Speaker 3: left with, well, you're the doctor, like what do you think?
- 33:43Speaker 3: And some people just won't give an opinion, which I
- 33:45Speaker 3: think is also a mistake.
- 33:46Speaker 1: Yeah, no, it's interesting.
- 33:47Speaker 2: I mean it feels like such a balance, like a
- 33:50Speaker 2: hard balance for a practitioner to be kind of simultaneously
- 33:54Speaker 2: the menu but an expert an expertly curated menu. Yeah,
- 33:57Speaker 2: you know, there's a lot of things on here you
- 33:59Speaker 2: can have. But me to tell you, the oysters aren't
- 34:02Speaker 2: that great.
- 34:02Speaker 1: Today, but you know we do have them.
- 34:03Speaker 3: No, but that's really but that's really true. And it's
- 34:06Speaker 3: also not sometimes just preference. It's if I said, well,
- 34:09Speaker 3: I mean, think of it more this way, like you're
- 34:11Speaker 3: allergic to nuts, donat these four things, right, or you're
- 34:14Speaker 3: gluten free, don'tat these six things. Or you said that
- 34:17Speaker 3: you know this makes you you don't like this spice,
- 34:20Speaker 3: don't have this, Meaning that it's more than just giving
- 34:24Speaker 3: someone advice, although there is some of that, it's really
- 34:26Speaker 3: about saying, Okay, this preference of yours is reasonable and safe,
- 34:31Speaker 3: even if it's not let's say typical whatever. Whereas this
- 34:34Speaker 3: one is really just not a safe idea, and here's why.
- 34:37Speaker 3: And to be able to articulate that is also not easy,
- 34:41Speaker 3: because sometimes it's just easier to say, let's do this
- 34:43Speaker 3: and like all right, and that some people are okay
- 34:45Speaker 3: with that, but many people are not, so Nay.
- 34:48Speaker 2: You've talked a couple of times about the possible benefits
- 34:52Speaker 2: of induction, and can you just or the possible dangers
- 34:55Speaker 2: of waiting longer. Can you just say a little bit
- 34:57Speaker 2: more about about what those are?
- 34:59Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, but if you take someone who's thirty
- 35:01Speaker 3: nine weeks and low risks, no issues going on, and
- 35:07Speaker 3: you deliver the baby on that day, right, whether it's
- 35:10Speaker 3: a C section or its induction, whatever it is, the
- 35:12Speaker 3: outcomes for the baby are as good or better than
- 35:17Speaker 3: if waiting, meaning there isn't an increased risk of prematurity
- 35:22Speaker 3: or delivering before it's time or anything like that, whereas
- 35:25Speaker 3: earlier in pregnancy that's always a concern. So once you
- 35:28Speaker 3: get to thirty nine weeks, you don't really have that
- 35:31Speaker 3: benefit to the baby of waiting longer, letting the baby
- 35:34Speaker 3: develop further, grow further, things like that, and so that
- 35:39Speaker 3: upside is kind of done at thirty nine weeks. But
- 35:42Speaker 3: there is a downside of waiting, and it's hard to
- 35:46Speaker 3: talk about because it's terrifying and it's also very rare,
- 35:51Speaker 3: and that's the risk of stillbirth. Right, a perfectly healthy
- 35:55Speaker 3: pregnancy can end up having a baby that passes away
- 35:58Speaker 3: inside after thirty nine weeks. It could happen in any
- 36:01Speaker 3: point in pregnancy, but that risk is present if you're
- 36:04Speaker 3: still pregnant, and it's absent if you've delivered. And so
- 36:09Speaker 3: even though that risk is very very small, fortunately you know,
- 36:13Speaker 3: well less than one percent, it is on the table.
- 36:17Speaker 3: And so for some people they're like, listen, everything's good today,
- 36:22Speaker 3: I want the baby out. And again that's not unreasonable.
- 36:26Speaker 3: It's not a recommendation because the likelihood of something bad
- 36:30Speaker 3: happening between thirty nine and forty one weeks is so low,
- 36:35Speaker 3: especially if someone is you know, monitoring how the baby's moving,
- 36:38Speaker 3: or they come to the office, they have a test,
- 36:40Speaker 3: whatever it is, that they're getting prenatal care in some capacity.
- 36:43Speaker 3: The chance is so so low that it's not recommended
- 36:45Speaker 3: that everybody has to be induced. But it is a
- 36:48Speaker 3: potential risk, and so for that reason, some people are
- 36:52Speaker 3: more adamant about delivering at thirty nine weeks, just to
- 36:55Speaker 3: make that miniscule risk a more minuscule risk. There's also
- 37:00Speaker 3: or risk of developing hypertension as you move on in pregnancy,
- 37:03Speaker 3: like just stationial apepretension, preclamsy up. That does not tend
- 37:06Speaker 3: to be a life threatening thing for the mother or
- 37:09Speaker 3: baby if it's again followed and watched and treated all
- 37:12Speaker 3: these things. So the bigger driving force tends to be
- 37:15Speaker 3: that possibility is still birth versus you're not increasing the
- 37:20Speaker 3: risk to the baby after birth of things like prematurity.
- 37:24Speaker 2: And this is just to kind of touch on this
- 37:26Speaker 2: because it's something we talk a little bit about in
- 37:28Speaker 2: the book. But your prior experiences with pregnancies sometimes play
- 37:33Speaker 2: into this choice. So if someone has had a stillbirth
- 37:37Speaker 2: or even a pregnancy loss earlier, sometimes those risks, even
- 37:43Speaker 2: if they are in practice.
- 37:45Speaker 1: Very small, can loom much larger.
- 37:47Speaker 2: And so that is a reason why you know, it
- 37:50Speaker 2: could make sense for somebody to induce at thirty nine
- 37:53Speaker 2: weeks if that's sort of if that's a present a
- 37:55Speaker 2: present risk in their minds, even if it is not
- 37:58Speaker 2: something that is medically higher risk.
- 38:00Speaker 3: Right or sometimes even I mean even earlier, potentially someone
- 38:03Speaker 3: has a history of a still birth. Frequently we deliver
- 38:07Speaker 3: them before thirty nine weeks, and we take that extra
- 38:09Speaker 3: risk after birth of the baby being slightly less mature.
- 38:13Speaker 3: I mean at thirty seven or thirty eight weeks, the
- 38:15Speaker 3: risks aren't huge, but okay, well, sometimes take that risk
- 38:18Speaker 3: because number one, the anxiety overweighting is so great understandably
- 38:23Speaker 3: for these women. I mean, it's it's awful the anxiety
- 38:26Speaker 3: that they're having at that point. And since we're humble
- 38:30Speaker 3: enough to know we don't know everything about everything, And
- 38:33Speaker 3: I couldn't possibly tell someone, oh, because your still birth
- 38:37Speaker 3: happened for X reason, there's no chance it's going to
- 38:41Speaker 3: happen again this pregnancy. That would be very That would
- 38:44Speaker 3: be a lot of hubrists for me to say that,
- 38:45Speaker 3: And so sometimes even earlier, but yes, people's own fears
- 38:49Speaker 3: and anxiety. Sometimes it's a cousin of mine had a
- 38:52Speaker 3: still birth, right, so if a cousin of mine had
- 38:54Speaker 3: a still birth, there's no I'm not an increased risk
- 38:57Speaker 3: of having a still birth, but it's on my mind
- 38:59Speaker 3: a lot more than someone who's never really had that
- 39:03Speaker 3: in their world, to thank God. And so people's anxieties
- 39:07Speaker 3: in general definitely play into that decision about when they
- 39:09Speaker 3: want to deliver. I would say for most people, it's
- 39:12Speaker 3: not pressing in their mind. Fortunately, that would be very
- 39:17Speaker 3: daunting to be pregnant if it's always pressing in someone's mind,
- 39:21Speaker 3: but occasionally is. But that is sort of the risk,
- 39:24Speaker 3: the unspoken risk that people try not to say out
- 39:27Speaker 3: loud too much, because it's just once you drop stillbirth
- 39:30Speaker 3: during a prenatal visit, it just it changes everything afterwards.
- 39:35Speaker 3: It's very hard to talk about it but not talk
- 39:37Speaker 3: about it at the same time.
- 39:40Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, So to bring it back to the
- 39:42Speaker 2: arrived trial, and we sort of think about takeaways. I
- 39:44Speaker 2: think the biggest takeaways for me here and then I'm
- 39:46Speaker 2: going to let you give your big takeaways if they disagree.
- 39:50Speaker 3: Are or shadowing the book.
- 39:52Speaker 2: Number one, this is a really good trial and that
- 39:57Speaker 2: in general based on and this is the best evidence
- 40:01Speaker 2: we have, and it does not suggest that an induction
- 40:03Speaker 2: needs to lead to an increased risk of C section.
- 40:06Speaker 2: But my second takeaway is that it also doesn't mean
- 40:10Speaker 2: that you have to have an induction at thirty nine weeks,
- 40:13Speaker 2: and that it's worth asking. I mean, this is really
- 40:16Speaker 2: your point. So I'm stealing it because I got to
- 40:18Speaker 2: go first, but that it is worth talking to your
- 40:21Speaker 2: provider about. Really, their ability to be patient is the
- 40:26Speaker 2: biggest thing I would put out there. Their ability to
- 40:30Speaker 2: let the induction take along time.
- 40:32Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean my takeaways obviously I agree with all three.
- 40:36Speaker 3: I would say that one of the important aspects about
- 40:42Speaker 3: induction is asking why are you recommending this? Right? Are
- 40:49Speaker 3: you recommending it just because I'm thirty nine weeks and
- 40:51Speaker 3: I've hit a certain number but everything is going perfectly fine,
- 40:55Speaker 3: in which case I think there's a lot of room
- 40:58Speaker 3: for waiting and pushback, like you know, maybe I don't
- 41:00Speaker 3: want to me do Versus are you recommending it because
- 41:02Speaker 3: you have a specific concern for me or my baby
- 41:07Speaker 3: about waiting on top of just the I'm getting more pregnant?
- 41:12Speaker 3: Meaning is it because I'm forty five years old and
- 41:16Speaker 3: you're worried about a risk of a stillbirth? Is it
- 41:18Speaker 3: because I have diabetes and you're worry about a risk
- 41:21Speaker 3: of a still birth? Is it because my blood pressure
- 41:23Speaker 3: is creeping up and you're worried about me getting severe hypertension.
- 41:25Speaker 3: That's a very different reasoning than just because, right, I
- 41:29Speaker 3: think having a conversation like you mentioned that I mentioned
- 41:36Speaker 3: about the ability to be patient, but also even more
- 41:41Speaker 3: generic than that, just tell me what an induction is
- 41:44Speaker 3: like with you or at your hospital. And again, just
- 41:48Speaker 3: like you know, patients will tell you what they think,
- 41:51Speaker 3: doctors and midwise will tell you what they think. We're
- 41:53Speaker 3: not secretive, like you know. Our personalities come out, our
- 41:56Speaker 3: opinions come out, and you want to get a sense. Ideally,
- 42:00Speaker 3: these conversations should happen early in pregnancy, not specifically about induction,
- 42:05Speaker 3: but just in general, because you get a sense is
- 42:08Speaker 3: this a person I trust? And if it's a person
- 42:10Speaker 3: I trust, then probably this conversation will be very easy
- 42:14Speaker 3: because you'll already have that rapport. If you're not sure
- 42:17Speaker 3: if you trust this person, that's not a good place
- 42:19Speaker 3: to be.
- 42:21Speaker 2: I wish I had had that advice with my first pregnancy,
- 42:24Speaker 2: because I remember getting to the end and telling the doctor, I,
- 42:28Speaker 2: don't you know, I'm planning not to have an epidural,
- 42:31Speaker 2: and they were like, oh, yeah, we'll see.
- 42:33Speaker 1: How that goes.
- 42:34Speaker 2: Good luck with that, and I was like, oh, we
- 42:36Speaker 2: should should have touched on this earlier.
- 42:38Speaker 3: Yeah, but it's but that's I but it's interesting. I
- 42:41Speaker 3: mean I tell people that, you know, get at abadua
- 42:43Speaker 3: doc abadual, like God Bless, you know, whatever you want
- 42:45Speaker 3: to find. It is true that at least in our hospital,
- 42:48Speaker 3: ninety percent of women get epidurals. That's just sort of
- 42:51Speaker 3: the numbers. But I don't you know, God Bless, if
- 42:53Speaker 3: you're gonna be in the ten percent, I think that's awesome.
- 42:56Speaker 3: You know, as I say, your labor won't hurt me
- 42:58Speaker 3: one bit. So whatever works great, I think it's terrific.
- 43:01Speaker 3: There are a few exceptions when I may sort of
- 43:03Speaker 3: push someone into epiderble I mean twins. I mean, you know,
- 43:06Speaker 3: sort of rare exceptions. Yeah, but it's more important. I
- 43:09Speaker 3: mean things like you know, I mean we discuss that
- 43:11Speaker 3: attitudes in general about inductional Like if someone has a
- 43:16Speaker 3: rule that they induce all our patients at thirty nine weeks,
- 43:19Speaker 3: that's something that probably should be like told upfront, you know,
- 43:22Speaker 3: at the beginning of pregnancy when you join, because it's
- 43:24Speaker 3: not that's not what's recommended. It's fine, it's not unreasonable,
- 43:29Speaker 3: but it's not like the only way to do it,
- 43:31Speaker 3: and it's not what ACC says. We don't do it.
- 43:33Speaker 3: We don't induce everyone in thirty nine weeks, and you
- 43:35Speaker 3: know we seem to have not been arrested.
- 43:46Speaker 2: Nate.
- 43:46Speaker 1: I love to talk to you. I can't wait to
- 43:48Speaker 1: talk to you more.
- 43:48Speaker 2: We'll do more stuff with our new book, and it's
- 43:51Speaker 2: always just a treat. Love it.
- 43:53Speaker 3: Thanks for having me, Thanks for bringing me into your world.
- 43:55Speaker 3: It's been a wild ride and it's awesome.
- 44:07Speaker 1: Thank you again to doctor Nate Fox.
- 44:09Speaker 2: You'll be hearing more from him when our book The
- 44:11Speaker 2: Unexpected is released in April twenty twenty four. More parent data,
- 44:17Speaker 2: including your induction stories after the break.
- 44:40Speaker 5: So this is an induction story actually for my second baby,
- 44:44Speaker 5: not my first baby. My first baby actually came on
- 44:47Speaker 5: his due date, and so in my mind that was
- 44:51Speaker 5: like how babies are born. And so when I went
- 44:55Speaker 5: in for my thirty eight week appointment, I figured, okay,
- 45:00Speaker 5: little buddy, you've got exactly two weeks left because you're
- 45:04Speaker 5: going to be born on your due date too.
- 45:07Speaker 4: I was really not expecting to have an induction for
- 45:10Speaker 4: my whole pregnancy. My plan was to labor for as
- 45:13Speaker 4: long as I could without medication, and then getting up
- 45:17Speaker 4: adural when I just couldn't take it anymore. For the
- 45:20Speaker 4: last six weeks, I was pregnant. My feet itched more
- 45:24Speaker 4: than they've ever itched in my entire life. I couldn't sleep,
- 45:26Speaker 4: I was strapping ice packs to them. Nothing helped, and
- 45:29Speaker 4: my doctors kept testing me for something called colistasis. I
- 45:33Speaker 4: never tested positive, but as we got closer to my
- 45:36Speaker 4: due date, they basically said, look, if you want to
- 45:38Speaker 4: be extra cautious, we could give you an induction.
- 45:42Speaker 5: Right before I went into the doctor's office, I got
- 45:45Speaker 5: a phone call from my now two and a half
- 45:47Speaker 5: year old's school saying that he was having a really
- 45:50Speaker 5: tough day and that I needed to come pick him up.
- 45:53Speaker 5: And that's when they took my blood pressure and they said,
- 45:57Speaker 5: you know, we're really kind of concerned. Blood pressure is
- 46:00Speaker 5: higher than we'd like, so we'll tell you what. You
- 46:04Speaker 5: sit there and wait, and you know, we'll just take
- 46:08Speaker 5: it again in twenty minutes. And in my head, I'm like,
- 46:12Speaker 5: I have to go pick up my kid, like I
- 46:14Speaker 5: can't wait twenty minutes, and I don't think this is
- 46:17Speaker 5: going to help the blood pressure situation.
- 46:19Speaker 4: I decided that seems like the safest thing for me
- 46:22Speaker 4: and my baby, But I was really terrified of induction.
- 46:25Speaker 4: I'd only heard negative stories about it, and I felt
- 46:28Speaker 4: like all my plans were just going.
- 46:29Speaker 5: To go out the window. And so the doctor came
- 46:31Speaker 5: in and was like, I think we need to induce you.
- 46:36Speaker 5: And that was not what I wanted to hear. I
- 46:39Speaker 5: don't know why it bothered me so much. I guess
- 46:42Speaker 5: I was like, I wasn't expecting to have today be
- 46:46Speaker 5: the last breakfast with my family of three.
- 46:51Speaker 4: One of the first positive things that happened is I
- 46:53Speaker 4: felt like I could prepare myself mentally and emotionally for
- 46:58Speaker 4: the time I was going to give birth. I went
- 47:01Speaker 4: on a nice walk with my husband. I spent hours
- 47:04Speaker 4: just listening to music and writing in my journal. And
- 47:07Speaker 4: then it was go time.
- 47:08Speaker 5: I begged them. I said, look, I need one more
- 47:11Speaker 5: night at home with my older kid. I need to
- 47:15Speaker 5: tell him where I went. So they gave me that
- 47:19Speaker 5: they let me go home. I got that one last night.
- 47:22Speaker 5: The next day, I check in all ready to go
- 47:25Speaker 5: before they give me the potocin. I go into labor naturally,
- 47:29Speaker 5: so the doctors think that that's why my blood pressure
- 47:32Speaker 5: was high, because I was going into labor, and it
- 47:38Speaker 5: was a really beautiful labor for a really sweet little baby.
- 47:44Speaker 4: I ended up having a really positive induction experience. Meeting
- 47:48Speaker 4: my daughter for the first time was, without a doubt,
- 47:51Speaker 4: the happiest moment of my entire life, and I wouldn't
- 47:53Speaker 4: change a thing.
- 47:58Speaker 6: For my third pregnancy. After my first two were born
- 48:03Speaker 6: a month early, I was told by some male gynecologist,
- 48:09Speaker 6: I'm sure that I had an incompetent cervix. So they
- 48:14Speaker 6: did curclage and kind of wrapped something I guess around
- 48:19Speaker 6: the cervix that would keep the baby in to term,
- 48:23Speaker 6: and they worked, and by the time I got to
- 48:27Speaker 6: the end of the pregnancy, they were going to induce me.
- 48:31Speaker 6: So I went to the hospital and checked myself in,
- 48:35Speaker 6: never had to miss a meal, and they took off
- 48:38Speaker 6: the circlauge and I went into labor independently. So I
- 48:41Speaker 6: had my third child exactly when she was supposed to
- 48:44Speaker 6: be born. And now she's the producer of this podcast,
- 48:51Speaker 6: You're Welcome.
- 49:03Speaker 2: Parent Data is produced by Tamar Avishai with support from
- 49:06Speaker 2: the parent Data team and PI Rex. Also special thanks
- 49:10Speaker 2: to our house violinist, my daughter Penelope. No Problem.
- 49:13Speaker 1: Well, if you have.
- 49:14Speaker 2: Thoughts on this episode, please join the conversation on my
- 49:17Speaker 2: Instagram at prof Emily Oster and If you want to
- 49:21Speaker 2: support the show, become a subscriber to the parent Data
- 49:24Speaker 2: newsletter at parentdata dot org, where I write weekly posts
- 49:27Speaker 2: on everything to do with parents and data to help
- 49:30Speaker 2: you make better, more informed parenting decisions. For example, in
- 49:35Speaker 2: April twenty twenty, I wrote a post going through the
- 49:38Speaker 2: Arrived trial in much more detail. If you like what
- 49:41Speaker 2: you hear, please leave the show or positive review on
- 49:43Speaker 2: Apple Podcasts. It really helps people find out about us.
- 49:46Speaker 2: Write Penelope, write mom.
- 49:51Speaker 1: We'll see you next time.