Latest / UK Column Radio / An Ordinary Man Who Extraordinarily Questioned the Covid Injections

Transcript

An Ordinary Man Who Extraordinarily Questioned the Covid Injections · UK Column Radio

0:08
Hello everyone. This is Diane Rasmussen with UK
0:10
Column. I'm really happy to be here
0:12
today in Northumbria in the far north of England with my friend
0:17
and fellow Stand in the Park colleague Tim Coulter.
0:21
It's nice to be here today with you, Tim.
0:23
And I'd like to also note that we are being supported in film
0:26
today by the Rumble Channel called We the People NE, which
0:30
has done work with UK Column previously.
0:32
And I would like to suggest that you check out the channel.
0:34
We're really thankful to them for their support today.
0:37
And Tim, thank you for having me here to your beautiful home up
0:40
here in the far north of England.
0:43
I know we've we've talked previously.
0:45
I had you on a short interview previously on UK column when I
0:48
first met you, just some of the basic details that you were
0:52
doing for work at the time through the pandemic.
0:54
It was really great to hear just a few minutes of it, but I'm
0:57
glad that we have more time today with this beautiful
1:00
setting as well to be talking with you and some more details
1:03
about your life and, and kind of what you've done in your, your,
1:07
in your career and, you know, since 2020 as well.
1:10
So maybe if we could start a little bit by talking about kind
1:13
of your background, your a little bit about your life and
1:17
kind of what led you to this place where you are right now.
1:20
Well. Thank you Dai, and yes, you're
1:23
most welcome here to my Dai. Thank you.
1:27
My lovely house here which I built up in the early 2000s and
1:31
so on and you can see the green roof and the Cedars and December
1:36
vedrons and so on in the view in the background.
1:39
Now this this is slightly funny to begin with because part of my
1:44
background many generations ago my great great grandfather was
1:48
called Benjamin Dewhurst and he developed some pills and this is
1:53
a funny bit. He developed pills in
1:55
Huddersfield called Dewhurst pills for foul and windy
2:00
stomachs. Now he.
2:05
Very descriptive and he sold these.
2:09
Now this was a synthesis of probably the first pill to use
2:13
chamomile to synthesise it into a pill.
2:16
And he sold those and then came along a Wizard of a marketing
2:21
man. And that's rather important is
2:25
to recede to this day. The Wizard of the marketing man
2:30
was called Beecham and he bought the formula and the the pills
2:35
were called Beecham's pills. And that obviously helps found
2:41
the Beecham Empire, which went on and people still remember
2:44
Beecham's pills and they went on the Beecham's powders and then
2:49
the firm got amalgamated or bought out, I'm not quite sure
2:52
which one became Smith, Kline, Beecham, then Smith Kline, then
2:58
Glaxo, Smith Kline and now Glaxo.
3:00
So in my background, I've got this interest in chemistry and
3:07
also the development of pharmaceuticals.
3:10
But this was pharmaceuticals with a a natural product, you
3:14
know, rather like aspirin, salicylic acid.
3:17
And this development obviously went on, but now the
3:23
Pharmaceutical industry rather turned into a monster.
3:26
Yeah, yeah. And this is a great pity,
3:31
because those good beginnings of these Wesleyan Methodists in the
3:34
North Country have been in a way, to some degree subverted by
3:39
the use of money. Right, right.
3:43
And now we see it's gone completely the very dark
3:47
direction with the all being entirely profit driven and the
3:50
things that have happened over the past decades in particular.
3:53
And the whole pharmaceutical industrial complex has just got
3:57
completely out of control, which we're going to get into a little
4:00
bit today with the COVID jobs. But it's really interesting to
4:05
hear that it came from such a background with such a positive
4:08
place, and to see where it's come to is actually quite
4:12
disturbing to me. But it's interesting to hear
4:14
about that. And you were married to a
4:17
doctor, weren't you? I was married to a medical
4:20
doctor and my father in This is all in Newcastle.
4:34
And he was a very dedicated cardiologist, a Mountaineer and
4:41
he'd been an officer in India and Burma during the Second
4:47
World War where he'd treated the troops.
4:50
Obviously the RAF #17 squadron, he was medical officer there.
4:57
So he had a long and, and very interesting career as a
5:00
cardiologist. Quite what he would have made of
5:02
what's going on now, I don't know.
5:04
Right. So that's, that was quite
5:07
interesting. So yes, I was married to a
5:09
doctor. I had a lot of interest in
5:12
medical things. We attended courses together and
5:18
I designed doctors surgeries. I worked on ancient monuments.
5:24
This is all as an architect because I qualified at the
5:28
Newcastle School of Architecture way back when, you know,
5:33
spending the seven years to qualify.
5:37
I went to Sweden in my year out, which is something we'll go on
5:41
to and talk about because that's been very, very interesting for
5:44
me in that what's happened in Sweden.
5:48
But for my father in law, he got mini strokes when he was older
5:54
in retirement and I took over his business and he'd
5:59
unfortunately become a name Lies of London.
6:02
He was a coverable man and thought this was a good thing to
6:04
do and he had one profitable year underwriting at Lloyds as a
6:10
name and then things went completely haywire for him and
6:17
basically I had to take over the often had as many strokes.
6:22
I had to take over the business of trying to stop him going
6:26
bankrupt and so I joined an organisation which was called
6:33
the Gouda Walker Action Group and we sued the Gouda Walker
6:39
syndicates and one in the High Court in what was called a class
6:44
action. There about 2020 of us and I was
6:48
his power of attorney in this action and we won a huge amount
6:52
of money which we never really saw 2.4 billion US billion
6:59
billion pounds, a huge amount of money.
7:01
But as someone's pointed out when you divide it by 2020, it's
7:05
not so much money. It sounds impressive, sounds
7:10
impressive anyway. And it was impressive to me
7:13
because there I was trying to earn a cross in the North East,
7:17
which is quite a difficult place for an architect to work in and
7:23
I was leaving with these fabulous sums of money which my
7:26
father in law was potentially losing.
7:29
So a lot of these losses were in the field of asbestos.
7:33
He had, he ended up with 24, what they call open years at
7:37
Lloyds of London and I was dealing with that for many
7:42
years. So the High Court action brought
7:46
some of that to an end, but he still only came out of Lloyds of
7:50
London. He always had to put down a
7:52
certain amount, amount of money, 100,000 lbs to go into Lloyds of
7:55
London. I bought him out after he'd paid
7:58
a lot of losses with about 40,000 lbs as a result of the of
8:06
the action. So the interest of the question
8:09
of the asbestos is that it's something a material I dealt
8:15
with earlier in my career. My dad had introduced me to a a
8:19
rapid Turner or Newell, one of the big asbestos companies in in
8:23
the UK. My dad was a very respected
8:27
architect in London who did a lot of big jobs and he was also
8:33
an army engineer during the Second World War, served from 35
8:38
through to 52 and was quite highly decorated.
8:43
But anyway, going on from there, the asbestos question was really
8:51
serious because they'd actually known the lady factory
8:55
inspectors had identified that it was a dangerous material.
9:00
But when did this occur? I mean just take a guess when
9:03
they realised it was so dangerous.
9:06
Would it have been in the 50s? Maybe am I completely wrong?
9:10
Completely wrong it was. It was in the First World War.
9:13
You know, wow, all the. Men were sent away to the front.
9:16
I mean, my great uncles were and my grandfather were all there at
9:20
the front and they, the women were running the munitions
9:25
factories essentially and they had lady factory inspectors and
9:30
they identified that in 1916. So in 19, 85 or 86 it was
9:37
actually banned. I wasn't allowed to write on my
9:40
drawings, you know, use asbestos that's board and saw it up and
9:45
there was all the white and the blue asbestos, all these lethal
9:48
things. So it took all that time for
9:51
this commercial interest from 19, say 16 or 17 right away so
9:56
that 70 years for this to get banned.
9:59
So this is one of my fears with the mRNA technology, that
10:04
there's such a financial pressure on it, much, much more
10:08
than with the asbestos, I might say.
10:11
But many people have lost their lives to asbestos,
10:15
mesotheliomia, a result and it comes on 20 years afterwards.
10:20
And this is my fear again on why I've been alerted to the dangers
10:24
of mRNA because not testing this sort of product properly over
10:29
say 10 to 15 years, I mean, asbestos, we see 20 years, you
10:33
can get these problems arising on often longer time scale.
10:40
So that's a very important thing in my background and one of the
10:44
reasons why I've been so concerned.
10:46
Now very few people have gone through the trauma of dealing
10:50
with these financial matters as I have.
10:52
So it's been very interesting, but very holding.
10:55
Yeah, no, it's, it's good to get that background from you just to
10:58
kind of see how you've come on to the things that these
11:02
concerns about science and medicine and research.
11:05
And and I think that's kind of something that I want to go on
11:07
to you because you and I both have come into research from
11:11
very different at angles, of course.
11:14
You know, I have 20 something years in academia pushed out for
11:18
wanting real science and actually speaking truth.
11:20
And so that pushed me out of my academic career as a full
11:23
professor, as, as you know, and what I've seen happen just from
11:28
my own perspective, the lot, especially these last few years
11:32
as the globalist agenda has come in, they've kind of pushed the
11:36
things that the UN, the World Economic Forum and UNESCO and
11:40
all of the globalist organisations wants.
11:42
And as I've discussed in previous coverage of Professor
11:44
Gloria Moss and some of our other interviews, who has also
11:47
pushed out as an academic that anything that doesn't support a
11:51
financial agenda or globalist agenda, whatever it is, they
11:56
don't want us to be doing it. And so science has actually
11:59
become corrupted as a result. Because anything that we find,
12:04
whether it's the questions we're asking or the results that we
12:06
have, if they don't line up with whatever it is that that whoever
12:10
these elites are that are pushing it, they don't want it
12:12
to happen. And so we're seeing manipulative
12:15
research results. We're seeing things that, you
12:18
know, you have to make the funder happy.
12:20
And so if you did it, you know, a clinical trial on something
12:23
and it didn't turn out well, but then sorry, Glaxos funded it,
12:28
They want the results, right? So this is what what's
12:33
happening, not just in medicine, but throughout research and
12:36
academia in science. And so I guess I would like to
12:40
maybe hear some of the things that you found about it, because
12:43
we all remember in 2021 and the very end of 2020, all of us safe
12:50
and effective messaging over and over again, which a lot of
12:54
people at the time, you can't call them, I have to say, was at
12:58
the front of one of the the organisations that was trying to
13:01
get the message out at the time. And a lot of people were tuning
13:04
into that. But a lot of people, obviously,
13:06
as we've seen the, the millions of people around the world that
13:09
went ahead and took these experimental injections have now
13:14
been suffering serious damage. They have lost their lives,
13:18
people, families have split up over, you know, arguments about
13:23
whether or not they should have happened.
13:25
We've seen a lot of things happen.
13:27
So I'd like to hear from you because I know you've done a lot
13:31
of research around what this means for science and for the
13:36
MNR in particular. So I think I'd like to hear from
13:39
you some of the work that you've done because I know you've done
13:41
quite a bit. Yes, I've done an enormous
13:43
amount of work and it's almost quite difficult to philtre it
13:46
all down with so much work, but I did really I I made some notes
13:52
here and in 2000 I was looking at the modelling from Professor
14:01
Ferguson, Neil Ferguson from Imperial.
14:04
We all know. We all know Professor Neil
14:06
Ferguson. Who?
14:07
Who My youngest brother recommended me to and he's a
14:14
very clever brother and so on and I love him dearly.
14:17
Luckily I haven't fallen out with my brothers over over these
14:21
issues, although we've taken very different views.
14:23
Good, that's good. Which is very good and so on.
14:26
We continue to meet and have a good time together.
14:29
Yeah, so that's very good. And it's lovely to see all the
14:32
the nephews coming on and so on and his nieces and that's very
14:36
good. So you know, I'm I'm, I'm
14:39
already glowed from the North East in a way.
14:42
But you know, I've obviously got special specialised skilled as
14:45
an architect and you know, I've been used to solving problems.
14:50
Now when solving problems, you've got to analyse the
14:52
problem and then you've got to come up with a synthesis.
14:57
And in a way I feel my training in architecture, it's not so
15:02
much of rote learning that the poor old doctors that they learn
15:06
their their medicine by rote learning in a way.
15:09
There's so much stuff they have to take in that in a way they're
15:13
in a then a bit of a bind in that their critical thinking
15:17
abilities have been put aside and then of course they've been
15:21
coerced by the system. So in 2020 I was looking at at
15:27
that modelling from Professor Ferguson.
15:29
I thought it was crazy because from the start it was assuming
15:33
that everyone was going to get the disease at one time and
15:36
obviously ones interested in real world data and the real
15:41
world data shows that people got the disease over time.
15:45
Virtually everyone has had the disease now whether you've been
15:49
jabbed or not, so called vaccinated.
15:53
And the result of that is that people got it over time.
15:57
I didn't get the disease immediately at all.
15:59
In fact I went nearly two years into it without getting it at
16:03
all and I was going around, taking my time, going into shops
16:07
and so on. Eventually I got ill going to
16:12
Edinburgh Airport and all places.
16:14
See, I never got anything the thing right.
16:17
I never had anything. I never, never put anything in
16:19
my arm. Never.
16:20
I'm fine. And and so this narrative that
16:22
we were getting pushed around the time from the pharmaceutical
16:25
companies saying if you don't do this, you're going to die.
16:27
And there are still a lot of people who believe that.
16:30
Well, yes, that's obviously the encouragement of that sort of
16:35
thinking was very peculiar indeed.
16:39
And I don't know other than the globalist agenda which you talk
16:42
about, why, why would you do that?
16:45
Why? Why?
16:46
You know, we had all of our countries had a perfectly good
16:50
pandemic preparedness plans. And the question is, why did
16:53
some 180 countries all rather not go in and, and take up this
16:57
crazy plan? Of course, that's that's where
17:01
my trips to Sweden were so interesting because for some
17:05
reason or another, which even to this day I don't quite
17:07
understand, Sweden didn't go down that line.
17:11
I think that chief medical officer was it Andrus Tegnell.
17:19
He, he was very much in charge and people were believing what
17:24
he said. So I went there early on every
17:30
well, in fact, I've been there every year for the last 2829
17:33
years and early on in, in the, in the pandemic, he the so
17:39
called pandemic as well. I might say he was, he was not,
17:44
he kept the schools open, people didn't wear masks.
17:47
So, for instance, I flew to Castro airport in Copenhagen via
17:52
Amsterdam and I, I came out of the airport, got on the, the
17:59
train and you know, we were forced to go with masks to put
18:03
them on, to go through the, the airport and got on, on the train
18:10
across the Edison's bridge, Edison's Braun.
18:13
And halfway across everyone took off their masks.
18:17
So it was kind of hilarious. And I virtually didn't see
18:20
another mask. I went to a place called Carl's
18:23
Corner. I didn't virtually see another
18:26
mask till I came back through a caslup it.
18:36
Was all theatre. It was all theatre.
18:41
So this. This, this is pretty hilarious
18:43
and I asked my friends who are in a sort of medical type
18:46
business in the first year 2020, do you know of any people
18:51
locally that have died of COVID? No, we don't know of anyone.
18:55
No. So that was rather strange.
18:58
Now then I, I heard that Somalis were dying up in in Stockholm.
19:05
You know, they've obviously got darker skins.
19:06
They don't produce so much vitamin D.
19:09
And that's interesting because at that time a book came out
19:12
from Professor Anderson and, and David Grimes, He's been
19:17
interviewed, both have been interviewed by Doctor John
19:20
Campbell. And they produced this little
19:23
booklet, which I was looking for before the Today and I couldn't
19:28
find it. But I mean, that clearly laid
19:30
out that if you had a fairly good vitamin D3 level, which it
19:36
takes a while to build it up, say a couple of weeks and so on,
19:39
that you would only get much more mild COVID than if you
19:44
didn't have a good vitamin D3 level.
19:46
So this was already already published at the beginning
19:50
before we were ever injected with anything.
19:53
So, you know, I thought that was quite an interesting science.
19:56
Well, I think I think vitamin D is a good idea for everyone
19:59
living in this country in, in the sort of places where we have
20:02
dark winters and not a lot of sun, such as in the UK or
20:05
anywhere in the North. Because we just don't get enough
20:08
of it year round. And there's not enough chances
20:11
for us, at least up here in the north of England or Scotland
20:15
especially to go out and get it naturally yourself.
20:18
So. I think it, it, it tends to be
20:20
from what I understand, and I do this myself.
20:22
Again, UK column doesn't say anything one way or the other,
20:24
but what people should do. But it's just been my, my
20:27
experience and research and advice from nutritionists and,
20:32
and, and help me pass people that I've spoken to that we
20:35
should all be supplementing in the winter, regardless of what
20:39
is or isn't going around because it just helps us stay healthier,
20:43
generally speaking. Well, I'd like to comment on
20:46
that. I think that's certainly so one
20:49
of the things that Doctor Grimes has talked about in his
20:51
interviews with Doctor Campbell is that as you get older, you
20:55
don't reduce the vitamin D so well.
20:59
So people in my age group, which is well over 70, would be well
21:03
to take some vitamin D3 in the winter and also to have their
21:08
levels checked, checked maybe a couple of times a year to see
21:11
how they're getting on. Right.
21:13
So I think that that was very good advice.
21:16
So we've got doctors who are saying sensible things to us.
21:20
And, you know, it's good to know that these people are out there,
21:24
but unfortunately, these are fellows who are probably, you
21:27
know, in the 70s, eighties or even mid 80s, I'm not quite sure
21:30
how old. Yeah.
21:31
And it was of course your age group that was advised to get
21:34
the many, as many jobs as possible because you were
21:37
considered to be at higher risk according to the NHS, right?
21:41
So we were seeing people getting jabbed 8 times because they were
21:44
in your age group thinking that you were supposed to be the most
21:48
protected or the most, you know, whatever.
21:50
Which is highly unfortunate for everyone involved because you
21:54
know the the message for the children was of course don't
21:56
kill granny. It would Meanwhile granny's
21:59
getting a jabs right? So what's going on?
22:02
Well, this is one of the things I looked at fairly carefully.
22:05
Early on. I looked at figures from John I
22:07
and Edie's, and these figures were later confirmed by the, you
22:11
know, Stanford University. He's supposedly a world famous
22:16
epidemiologist. I didn't quite know who to look
22:19
at other than people like that, but they're all showing that
22:24
really you had virtually no risk of dying of the disease if you
22:29
were under say 60 or 65 unless you had a lot of comorbidities.
22:35
So, and even the risk in, in my age group, which was 75 plus or
22:41
so I think they were, they were saying that if you got them the
22:47
original type that is and not not the later Omicron version,
22:51
we hadn't got to that stage at that point.
22:55
Then the risks were really even say living on your own, say 3
23:02
out of 100 might be very badly affected.
23:05
But of course it didn't take into consideration what methods
23:10
of mitigation you might be using to improve your health.
23:14
Right. Well, and and I, I think
23:16
something that some people are aware of, but cannot be repeated
23:19
enough in my opinion, was that the government actually
23:21
downgraded so called COVID to a a non high consequential disease
23:27
and then locked us up a couple of days after that.
23:29
And I think that's very key point in the story that we all
23:33
need to remember that it was they never considered anything
23:35
to be adaptive virus from the beginning.
23:38
And then, you know, of course, everyone was so scared at the
23:40
time that we were watching the films coming in from Muhan and
23:43
people literally following up on their backs on the streets,
23:47
waiting for direction from the directors.
23:49
OK, what do I do after I've fallen over, Right.
23:52
And so this was supposed to have been terrifying us and and but
23:56
this is what we were told. And it was, it was all of the
23:58
fear campaign that, that we were Brian and Brian Garrish and Mike
24:02
Robinson recovering so well at the time about the psychological
24:07
manipulation, about the, you know, the, the fear control,
24:10
which I've spoke about, as well as at the Scottish People's
24:13
COVID inquiry about the fear campaign.
24:15
The media campaign was, was so important to all of this.
24:18
And, you know, I can't help but think going back to this, the
24:21
safety of these mRNA injections, that maybe this was all part of
24:26
the setup to make us all lined up to get the things.
24:28
Because, you know, if you think about it, it wasn't our doctors
24:31
that were saying to go get these things.
24:33
It was the government and they were the ones that had the
24:35
contracts with the Pfizer and the Moderna and all the
24:37
companies pushing this out right.
24:40
So it was not an individual decision to say go talk to your
24:43
GP and see if you should get this.
24:46
It was Boris Johnson or Nicola Sturgeon going on the telly
24:48
every night saying go, go line up and get these things, no
24:52
questions asked. Everyone needs it.
24:54
So. Well, that's right.
24:55
That was, that's obviously was a great big disappointment that
24:58
the coercing of the doctors, which of course is something
25:03
that happened in Nazi Germany with a psychologist before the
25:08
Second World War, you know, when they were writing off children
25:13
and killing them off basically anyone who was defective and was
25:18
being killed. And this is a very worrying
25:23
consequence of this very centralised system that we've
25:26
got here. You know, having been married to
25:29
a doctor and seeing what they're going through.
25:31
I do, you know, I do have a lot of sympathy for their position
25:35
because if they really spoke out about what was going on, they
25:38
were going to lose their licence.
25:40
So this is the most terrible situation.
25:46
Well, you know, I will share with, with my GP that I had at
25:49
the time I was still living in Glasgow and at at the time and
25:52
my, my GP said told me not to get them because I had had a
25:56
previous incident of having a DVT, a blood clot in my leg that
26:00
was caused by different medication about 7 years before
26:04
that. And once you've had one, you had
26:06
higher risk of getting another one.
26:08
So the first time I heard even, I think it was just a tiny
26:11
little snippet on the BBC where they said, oh, there's this,
26:14
this tiniest, tiniest risk of, of this one type of jab and a
26:17
blood clot. And immediately I thought, OK, I
26:20
need to ask about this because I already know that I'm at higher
26:22
risk. And so I called my GP and he
26:25
said to me, well, you're at higher risk of, of dying for a
26:28
blood clot then you are of any respiratory illness.
26:31
So don't get them. So I think the problem, I don't
26:34
know if all GPS were that honest.
26:35
I was really lucky to have that support.
26:37
I think you were lucky, yes. But you know, if more GPS had
26:41
really considered what they were doing and the other question is,
26:45
were people actually going to their GPS for advice?
26:48
Because letters were showing up through people's post boxes,
26:50
right? And just saying here's your
26:51
appointment, go get it. Or here's a, here's a van we've
26:54
set up, or here's a vaccination centre in the local retail park,
26:57
go just go get it. And people were just lining up
27:00
without questioning or saying why, Why am I doing this?
27:03
Why have they even talked to get some medical advice about do I
27:08
need this? I'm from 30 years old and
27:10
completely healthy, right? So I, but I think all of that
27:13
goes back again to the science not being in place and nobody
27:18
even questioning whether it was in place.
27:21
And then myself, still being in academia at the time, all of the
27:25
academics were lining up to get it, even though we were all
27:28
supposed to have been highly trained researchers and
27:30
apparently apparently intelligent people.
27:32
And they were all lining. Up.
27:33
This is very peculiar. I know which is why I am no
27:37
longer in the system and working happily for UK column.
27:43
Well, I wasn't in the system in a way, in the most, you know,
27:46
beyond retirement age, still working along.
27:49
Yeah, in a way, all those lockdowns, it did destroy my
27:52
workload, which was so bad, but it gave me time to study what
27:57
was going on, strangely enough. And so it's it's like you're
28:01
able to do things that you weren't able to do before.
28:03
And I had the same experience in a way.
28:06
Obviously I've got an active brain and was very interested in
28:09
what was happening. And that's led me to where I am
28:12
now, which was really five years of writing letters to the likes
28:19
of MPs. Yeah.
28:21
Let's go on to that a little bit because again, this was the part
28:24
that we covered previously and when I did a short interview
28:27
with you a few months ago. But I, I do know, and again, I
28:31
know you've got a lot more detail about all of the, the
28:34
recent science including announcement just this past
28:37
week. And what we can do for the sake
28:38
of time is put some links to this in the write up for this
28:41
interview that will be on ukcolumn.org around some of the
28:45
recent research saying no, these were never safe and effective.
28:49
So research is coming out. We'll just put some links into
28:52
some of the peer reviewed studies just to save our time so
28:55
that viewers can take a look at that.
28:57
And but also just in the recent days, it was announced over
29:02
across the pond in America that they have revoked the emergency
29:07
use authorization of mRNA. Is that right?
29:09
Because I remember you showed me an article about that.
29:11
Yes, well, that, that's, that's right.
29:13
I think the two articles which I thought were extremely
29:18
interesting that have come out is 1, the Japan study, which is
29:21
so massive, like 20, between 20 and 22 million people.
29:26
They've somehow gone to the good records in Japan.
29:29
They've gone and tracked down the records and so on.
29:32
And then they've been able to, from this number of people,
29:36
they've been able to write, draw out a graph and show and it
29:42
shows that if you're unvaccinated that the excess
29:45
mortality runs along on a flat line down the base of this
29:49
graph. And then if you have been
29:54
inoculated or injected, jabbed, so called vaccinated, but it
30:01
doesn't quite react, the body doesn't react quite excess
30:04
mortality comes up in a gentle curve reaching a peak after
30:09
about 100 to 120 days and then begins to decline after that.
30:15
So that's an extraordinary result.
30:17
So when it comes to the GPS, they haven't been for instance,
30:21
they were never told to look for the list of side effects which
30:28
Pfizer had in their in their original research.
30:31
So there were over 1000 listed pages of listed research and so
30:36
on. And in this, when that was put
30:40
out, I think that was a study in the first three months have been
30:44
put out from December 2023 to February 2021 where you had
30:53
these 1223 deaths in the Pfizer paper.
30:57
And they, this was where this Judge Pittman in, in Texas in,
31:02
in the Circuit Court there or whatever you call it in the USA.
31:08
He, he allowed the, the putting out of all this data, this
31:14
enormous amount of data they had on it, which has been eventually
31:18
researched in, in the Pfizer papers by Naomi Wolf and Amy
31:23
Kelly. And there's obviously marvellous
31:25
researchers behind it, over 1 or 2000 people who helped write it
31:29
all up, which is a vast effort. But of course, they came to a
31:33
completely different opinion as to what was going on than Pfizer
31:40
did or Pfizer maybe came to that conclusion but didn't actually
31:43
do anything about it. So.
31:44
Well, see, this is when we go back to the corruption of
31:46
research, right? So of course, if you have
31:48
researchers working for Pfizer, and even if they did find out
31:52
that there are all these horrible side effects and it was
31:54
killing people, Pfizer isn't going to continue to write your
31:57
paycheck. If you're going to go back and
31:59
say, well, you've developed this thing that you're going to give
32:01
to the whole world, but it's killing people, they don't want
32:03
to hear that, right? And so this is what we go back
32:05
to with this corruption of who's funding the research.
32:08
Is it the Gates Foundation? Is it Pfizer?
32:10
Is it maternal? Is it, you know, and and that's
32:12
that's where we see this problem with science.
32:14
And that's when we say trust the science, like they were saying
32:16
at the time, was that the Pfizer executive who said that it was
32:20
moving at the speed of science. Do you remember that one speed,
32:23
whatever the speed of sciences? That was Janine Small when she
32:27
was asked by Rob Ruse in the European Parliament.
32:30
Yeah, direct question, but I would say a thing you see in my
32:34
research is I'd already realised that the because I was watching
32:39
various programmes in November of 2020 that the, the, the jabs
32:48
would not stop infection and transmission.
32:51
They didn't have been tested for that.
32:53
And they they didn't because everyone has had this disease.
32:57
I mean, look at poor old Biden. He's probably had the disease.
33:01
Goodness, how many times is it? 3 Whatever it's convenient for
33:04
Biden is when Biden has had the disease.
33:06
That's what I think. So, so we've, we've got all this
33:11
research you've done all this reading, you know, even back
33:13
back then at that time. And so you decided to start
33:17
doing something. So what did you start to do?
33:20
Could I? Yes, I will if I can move on to
33:22
that when I finish this thing. The thing is that the only Kelly
33:25
and Naomi Wolf came up with it, that the jabs were particularly
33:30
damaging to women and their fertility.
33:34
And I thought this this was the second big thing that's come
33:37
out. And now we've got Viva Kamaneka,
33:40
who's put out a lot of good. She's a Danish researcher.
33:43
She's put out a lot of stuff early on and she's, she's shown
33:50
by look at the the gold standard check data, because there are
33:54
only a few places in the world where we get the proper level
33:59
level record data out. And there's level record data
34:03
has really shown that fertility in women who've taken the jabs
34:08
has probably gone down by about 1/3.
34:10
So we're going to have a population collapse while all
34:15
these people are pouring into the country at one end, our own
34:18
populations are collapsing. The replacement migration in
34:23
policy, yes, yeah. Exactly.
34:25
So sorry. Now we're we're going to move on
34:28
to next. No, no, it's yeah.
34:30
So moving on at the speed of science to the next point.
34:35
I just wanted to hear from you a little bit about your
34:37
experiences and what you were doing.
34:39
I know you were doing FO is you're writing to your MP and
34:43
this is what we touched on briefly in our first interview.
34:46
So I, I think what I would like to hear from you is kind of some
34:49
of the things that you did and, and what happened when you did
34:52
these things. Yes, well, early on, that was
34:56
the 9th of of January 20 was it. 99th of December 2020 was when
35:04
I, I started to get so frustrated with what was going
35:07
on, I wrote my first letter to the MP.
35:11
Now I'm not a person who really wants to write to the MP.
35:14
I've had a help from a previous Tory MP from Hexham.
35:19
I had maybe an exchange of one or two letters with the Hexham
35:24
MP Guy Offerman many years, maybe a decade before.
35:29
So anyway, the first letter I put out, I'll just get the title
35:34
of it. Oh yeah, let's get this.
35:50
I think I've got it here as well. 9th of December 2020 I
36:01
first wrote to the MP Guy Opperman about the 14th of
36:05
December 2020 debate. Reject any restrictions on those
36:09
who refuse the COVID-19 vaccination.
36:12
I was already aware that the injections did not stop
36:15
infection and transmission in November 2020.
36:20
So then I went on. I didn't really hear back from
36:23
him, but he sent that letter to Nadim Zahawi, the Minister for
36:29
COVID Vaccine Deployment. And I, I on the 28th of March, I
36:36
wrote to the Cabinet Office stating that injections do not
36:41
stop infection and transmission because they were asking for
36:45
feedback from the, the people and they got it from me.
36:50
Quite a decent letter. You know, I'm most polite in how
36:54
I write my letters. Generally, I'm going to consider
36:56
it to be polite. I'm a man from the North
36:59
Country. We do like to call.
37:02
Call a spade a bloody shovel. Good for you.
37:10
So anyway, I I informed on 6th of April 21.
37:17
I informed Guy Opperman of the 28th March information that the
37:20
injections did not stop infection and transmission and
37:23
requested an attention attendance in his surgery.
37:28
I expressed concerns about the influence of the WEF.
37:32
Quest. Because I was very well aware of
37:34
them rumbling around in the background and so on.
37:37
And so that went on. So on 29th of 22nd of April, I
37:44
got a letter from Nadim Zahawi which made various claims.
37:49
And I, I thought, well, I thought about these various
37:52
claims and so on. And that caused me to write to
37:58
Nadim Zahawi a notice. Not a letter, there's a notice.
38:02
It's a very useful piece of that we can use, a very useful thing
38:09
we can use and really stating his claims and asking him to
38:16
provide proof of his claims because so many people are
38:19
making ridiculous claims all the time.
38:21
Yeah, I'm, I'm not making claims all the time.
38:25
I'm very careful not to make outrageous claims, but it's I
38:30
think there's a maxim in law that says, you know, he who
38:33
makes a claim is, I won't have it quite right this, but it's
38:37
he's basically got to, it's up to him to provide proof of that
38:40
claim. It's not up to me to bow down to
38:44
the likes of Madam Zahawi. I don't know what the hell he
38:47
knows. He probably knows less than I
38:48
do. Probably.
38:53
Yeah. So we got into this situation
38:55
with our our parliamentarians. Now they think they're in charge
38:59
of us, whereas in fact they are there to represent us, whatever
39:04
that quite means, represent us. But it's not working very well
39:09
at the moment. No, no.
39:11
So we went through that. We went through basically you
39:15
didn't really. You got kind of ignored, didn't
39:18
you? Well, I got ignored and so on
39:20
and let's see what I can find here, what I actually wrote to
39:24
Madim because I did ask various important things of him.
39:32
I mean, this has been a complex business trying to get through
39:35
it. Here it is now, he says these
39:39
are his claims, his paragraphs 3.
39:43
We have now accepted the recommendations from the
39:45
Independent Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory
39:49
agency MHMRHA to authorise 3 COVID-19 vaccines for use
39:54
including Pfizer, Biontech, Oxidasezenica and Moderna.
39:59
This follows months of rigorous clinical trials and a thorough
40:04
analysis of the data. But isn't it usually?
40:06
Something like 10 years to develop a new medication.
40:08
Yes, so this is this is immediately the claim is
40:13
farcical who have concluded that all three vaccines met the
40:17
regular strict standards of safety, quality and
40:20
effectiveness. Well, I you don't need to be a
40:24
medical expert to see this is ridiculous so #2 claim your
40:30
paragraph for the current UK operates the system informed
40:33
consent for vaccinations. Our objective is to vaccinate as
40:37
many people as possible, or at least he's saying something
40:40
truthfully, very in line with the advice of the Joint
40:44
Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisations.
40:47
We will continue to provide clear information to the public,
40:50
encouraging people to seek NHS's advice so that they have the
40:54
right information to make an informed choice.
40:57
Well, what the hell does the NHS know after the thing has never
41:02
been tested? I mean, the the whole thing is a
41:04
farce. Yeah, yeah, it's a farce.
41:08
Please provide the doc. This is me speaking.
41:10
Please provide the documentation by the experts of the MHRA
41:13
concluding all three vaccines met the regulator's strict
41:16
standards of safety, quality and effectiveness.
41:18
Please provide these standards and the test results showing
41:21
that these products meet these standards.
41:24
So that was quite AI mean. I would probably have a million
41:27
pages but it might not have said much.
41:30
Please provide the documentation that prior to vaccination that
41:33
each vaccine recipient receives the information and make an
41:37
informed consent. And this, this is dated 2020,
41:44
first of August 2021. And all of these are present #1
41:49
the vaccine insert to the contents of the vaccine to be
41:54
used. Three, how it works.
41:56
Four, that there is no liability clause in the vaccination
42:00
agreement. I mean, if you're wanting to
42:02
vaccinate, you know, so called vaccinate the whole population,
42:06
you know, they need a little bit of reassurance, you know, this
42:09
this peculiar thing called informed consent.
42:13
That went out the window. The operation of this even more
42:16
peculiar thing called the precautionary principle that the
42:21
vaccine maturers do not claim their products stop infection or
42:24
transmission and the public are now informed of the resulting
42:27
breakthrough cases which we could see in the official data
42:31
actually. But that the manufacturer or the
42:34
person carrying out the injection, Dr nurses and others
42:37
do not carry any liability whatsoever for damage to
42:40
individuals. That they are informed that
42:43
before commencement of the vaccination programme that no
42:46
studies were carried out on animals, pregnant women,
42:50
children, people with comorbidities and the elderly.
42:53
That's me. That they are informed of all
42:57
possible side effects so far identified, including death,
43:00
micro macro blood clotting in many parts of the body causing
43:03
heart attacks, strokes, lungs problems, myocarditis, Guillaume
43:08
Bars syndrome, Bells palsy, and other side effects identified to
43:12
date. That they're informed that these
43:14
products use experimental technology where there have been
43:17
no long term safety studies that might identify all possible side
43:21
effects. These include studies of
43:23
toxicity, pharmakinetics, brackets to what part of the
43:28
body do the injected materials spread, and pharmodynamics comma
43:34
what does the injecting material do when it gets there.
43:39
That there are now, that they are now informed that these
43:42
products, injected gene therapy treatments have produced more
43:47
adverse reactions worldwide than any other recent vaccination
43:51
programme because all this has come out.
43:53
I mean, we'd had a safety signal basically in January or February
43:58
from the vast system, the American Vaccine adverse Events
44:02
Reporting system in, in, in that time that far more people were
44:07
dying than had ever died in the, in the previous years since they
44:11
started this system. Was it 1986 or?
44:14
And there was the same in the UK with the yellow card system and
44:17
UK column actually had a searchable database online where
44:21
we people could actually go in and look at what was coming in
44:24
through the yellow card system that had been facilitated by UK
44:27
column at the time. It was really it was the same
44:30
kind of thing that was coming through the ver system.
44:33
And so of course this would have been everywhere, but again, safe
44:36
and effective was the line that continued, wasn't it?
44:39
Well, we had Eudro, Vigilance and various other systems as
44:45
well. So, yeah, which were in the
44:47
background. That due to the accelerated
44:51
release of the experiment of all of us, there are no long term
44:54
studies of suspected side effects such as genetic damage,
44:57
autoimmune disease, cancer, sterility in men and women,
45:01
antibody dependent enhancement, and otherwise yet unknown
45:04
damage. Because at that time we didn't
45:06
quite know, but we suspected there were people telling us who
45:10
were from the drug industry, Pharmaceutical industry, were
45:16
telling us that these things could occur.
45:20
That the risk of deaths for anyone under the age of 60 from
45:23
COVID-19 is miniscule. That there are several published
45:26
early home treatment protocols which became known as early as
45:30
April 2020. It is reported they can reduce
45:34
hospitalisation and death by up to 85%, which for people under
45:40
over 60 who become infected can produce robust natural immune.
45:45
So then I said please provide a sworn affidavit supporting your
45:50
above claims in one and two numbered above.
45:54
These are the claims by so are we backed by your commercial
45:57
liability of a million of a minimum of £2,000,000?
46:00
Because you know, if the government's going to tell
46:02
everyone to go out and get these things, surely it can someone in
46:06
the government can swear an affidavit that these things are
46:10
true, that we're being told it's safe and effective.
46:12
I mean, obviously they, they didn't swear an affidavit which
46:17
would be. So then I say please supply your
46:21
reply to this notice within 40 days of the above date.
46:24
Failure to reply will mean that I will conclude that you agree
46:27
with me. A That you have no documentation
46:31
supporting your above claims. B That all three vaccines failed
46:35
to meet the regulator's strict standards of safety, quality and
46:38
effectiveness. C That the public has not been
46:41
informed concerning the risks involved and unable to to make
46:46
it an informed consent. D That so called vaccination is
46:50
generally by coercion. E that you are spreading false
46:54
information. F That you should, as Minister
46:57
Responsible in Parliament, forthwith shut down the
47:00
Government's so called vaccination programme.
47:03
I enclose a copy of your letter 22nd of April 2020 for your
47:06
records. This contains your claims.
47:10
So I thought that was pretty crushing for him, but of course
47:13
he wouldn't reply and I'd gone on subsequent that to really
47:19
everything was followed up from that initial submission.
47:25
So, you know, I kept after this, I kept after the local MPI sent
47:31
the information to him during the year and followed up because
47:37
he didn't respond. I mean, he's a barrister.
47:40
He must be used to looking at evidence or was he's no longer
47:45
the MP now looking at evidence. But I could see immediately that
47:51
he didn't want to look at anything.
47:53
So it's very like was, you know, when Andrew Bridges spoke in the
47:59
Parliament and obviously he was the only man who probably there
48:03
who actually had a degree in biological science, could speak
48:07
authority with authority on the subject.
48:12
And he was mostly speaking to empty rooms.
48:14
When he was speaking, nobody, nobody stayed to listen to him.
48:18
He'd maybe two people in the room and some of the coverage
48:20
that I saw when he was speaking up.
48:23
Well, that's right. He had a little bit of support
48:25
from the likes of Christopher Chope and some of the ladies,
48:29
but generally speaking they all kept away.
48:32
Now he'd done a lot of good work before obviously exposing the
48:36
post Office scandal and when the films were made of the post
48:39
office scandal, he never even got a a mention.
48:42
Why was that? That's extraordinary because he
48:45
did very good work for those sub postmasters and mistresses and
48:49
some something that people don't even realise because they cut
48:52
him out of the narrative. So yes, I continued following
48:59
after Mr Hoffman, Guy Hoffman, our local MP and I, I tried to
49:06
set up a meeting with him before I wrote this letter.
49:09
I've always tried, you know, a whole of my career, it's been a
49:12
lot of it's been about negotiation, talking to people,
49:15
trying to come to an amicable conclusion with people.
49:19
And so I wanted to meet him face to face and see what he was
49:22
about, but he wouldn't do so. So this is very frustrating for
49:27
any individual to withstand. You know, when you, you had a, a
49:33
leading career as an architect in the, in the locality, you
49:36
know, in the North East of England, I've worked for some of
49:39
the most faint, well famous architects.
49:42
You know, I'm not. I've had a very interesting
49:45
career, you could say. And what happened?
49:48
Did he just ignore you? Did he write back?
49:49
To you. Well, he would write back, but
49:52
he would not really. He wouldn't meet me.
49:57
He said he was too busy to meet me.
49:59
And I said, well, because he's had so many important issues,
50:03
but this was a very important issue where he was trying to ram
50:07
a needle into everyone's arm. Quite important, yeah.
50:10
Quite important and it could potentially kill some people.
50:13
Obviously people were dying of it.
50:17
And as this recent Japanese study of 22 million people
50:21
shows, people did die and they didn't die when you thought they
50:26
would die. You know, some people died on
50:28
the same day as they took a jab. Some people died the next few
50:33
days, you know, fulfilling the Bradford Hill criteria for cause
50:36
of death. You know, there's always talk
50:40
about causality and so on and that that, but actually the
50:46
death is occurring. The maximum death is occurring
50:48
this 100 to 120 days later. And the and the obviously the
50:53
major profession were not taught to look for this.
50:56
So that's been a disgraceful race or aspect to this
51:00
technology they've tried to force on us so.
51:06
I, I will say just in the interest of time you've got
51:08
quite, you've, you've given me quite a very detailed look at
51:13
what you did, you did over sort of these few years from 2021
51:16
onwards. Unfortunately, we don't have
51:18
time to go through all of it today, but I, I, I will sort of
51:22
write a summary of some of this that I'll put in the write up
51:24
for the interview just so people can see exactly how much work
51:28
you put into it and coming at to it from different directions.
51:31
But I think overall the point is that you were just ignored.
51:34
It was ignored despite all this work.
51:36
We were so ignored that we went outside and we the people NE we
51:42
actually, some of my later letters, I read them out outside
51:46
the MP's office. He wouldn't, his assistant
51:51
wouldn't come out and see me. This is after another MP got
51:54
stabbed and killed, which was obviously we're very sorry about
51:57
that, right, right. But the fact that they wouldn't
52:01
meet me was very bad. So I then put in two notices to
52:05
him in early 2022 for potential malfeasance in public office.
52:12
It was by this time it was very frustrating with the, the goings
52:17
on and thought this is not, not at all correct and so on.
52:20
And I'm submitting very good evidence to him.
52:23
I'm not, I'm not making a lot of claims.
52:26
I'm just saying this is what's going on elsewhere.
52:29
Would you have a proper look at this and please, would you
52:32
change your mind and, you know, come to reality, please?
52:37
It didn't happen to. So yes, that's gone on and it's
52:41
went right until 2024 when I put in my final notice.
52:44
I sent 3 notices to him or more. Yeah, we've got here.
52:52
So I know some of this as well. We can point people to the We
52:54
the People Northeast Channel because I know you've had some
52:57
some things on there as well, which of course we can.
52:59
We can send the audience there and so we kind of go into
53:05
investigation of crime. The 10th of May 2024.
53:08
I thought that was an important point.
53:11
Well, The thing is I put all this time in and I did put him
53:15
in a time schedule and I was moving towards that, putting him
53:20
a letter before claiming to him. Unfortunately I fell I'll at
53:26
that time. I don't know how much this is
53:31
knocked me back. I mean, obviously the decent
53:33
agent could be ill anyway, but anyway, he was moving towards
53:39
towards taking a legal action against him and I don't know
53:44
whether he's had a lucky escape or I've had a lucky escape.
53:51
Well, because The thing is how well protected are these MPs for
53:55
not actually, it's a point of great interest to me as to how
54:00
well are they protected. I mean, it's very important that
54:03
MPs can stand up in Parliament and speak without fear or
54:08
favour. This was a point made to me.
54:09
My, my father in And he always said this was
54:25
vital, that the MP should be able to stand out of Parliament
54:28
without fear or favour and say what they thought.
54:31
And now we seem to have got a situation in the Parliament
54:34
where there's a lot of skulduggery going on with the
54:39
whips and you've got the likes of Bill Gates coming in.
54:43
Every time we get a new Prime Minister, he arrives.
54:46
What? What is it?
54:47
I'm asking a question. What is he offering?
54:49
Why is there no transparency in all of this?
54:52
I mean, we're a sovereign nation and we should have, we should
54:56
have some knowledge of what he's talking about.
54:59
If he's offering a lot of money, which he has, you know, he gave
55:03
say a few 100 million in, in in 2020 to to the likes of Imperial
55:13
College. He gave to Oxford, he was giving
55:16
to SEPI and Gavi and all these other people.
55:19
Well, what's he expecting in in return for all of this?
55:23
I mean, I may have my figures slightly wrong here.
55:26
I'm just going off memory now and if I have I do apologise.
55:32
Yeah, it's, yeah, there's, there's a lot of evidence of
55:35
that. And I can refer viewers to my
55:37
interview with Gloria Moss on funding for universities and
55:42
kind of how that has, again, as we said earlier, taken over
55:45
who's who's doing what, who's paying for what.
55:48
So what did you learn from all of this, all of these years of
55:53
correspondence and standing up? What what, what was your big?
55:56
Do you have a take away from any of this?
56:00
The take away would be that in a way it's seemed rather
56:05
worthless. But I had a quote there from
56:07
Gandhi. I want to say to everyone, shall
56:12
I look at that? I'm getting exactly the quote.
56:14
Yeah, I've got it here some more, I believe.
56:18
I think it says that people will or somehow will be made out that
56:22
what you're you're doing is useless.
56:25
Everything that you do will be seen as insignificant.
56:28
But do it anyway, yeah? See.
56:31
Might as well. So I followed that.
56:35
I mean, I'm not a tremendous follower of Gandhi, I have to
56:37
say. But then it's it also said it is
56:40
beneath human dignity to lose 1's individuality, but to become
56:47
a mere cog in the machine. And then Martin Luther King our
56:53
lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that
56:57
matter. When I say a little prayer here,
57:00
I ask and pray this is this is from a friend of mine.
57:04
I ask and pray that I more and more align myself with the
57:08
objective universe. I'm set aside my own distortions
57:13
of reality. So, you know, as an ordinary
57:17
person from the North East ceiling, Like this is what we're
57:20
trying to do, I think, yes. Yeah, yeah.
57:23
And I think that's something that we can go on to as well.
57:25
If you're happy to do that is, you know, something that we talk
57:30
about frequently on UK column is people ask us what can we do,
57:35
right? And so our job as a news
57:36
organisation is not to tell people what to do, but it's
57:39
certainly our job to get the word out from people who have
57:41
done things and give ideas and inspiration.
57:44
So I do you have anything that maybe can inspire someone who's
57:50
is becoming aware, has been aware of what's going on in all
57:54
of the different ways that they're trying to do things to
57:57
us? What?
57:58
What advice would you give to them?
58:01
Well, I mean, working in, in the architectural professional these
58:06
years, I've sometimes, you know, you put a lot of pressure onto
58:09
planners or people, neighbours or whatever it is.
58:12
And you don't know, you don't always get the result you think
58:16
you're going to get, but you do get some sometimes result you
58:20
don't expect. So I think you need to keep the
58:23
pressure up on the people who are supposedly, you know, in the
58:27
government. I think, you know, we did have
58:30
some results in that we went out in, in groups to challenge the,
58:36
for instance, of when they started to want to jab people
58:39
under the age of 12. And we did have some success
58:42
there. I mean, I, I don't think, I
58:46
think our resistance has had some effect, yes.
58:49
Yeah, I think so too. I think that, you know, we could
58:52
have all been living under vaccine passports and digital
58:56
IDs already. If those of us who did stand up
58:59
hadn't done something, if we at all just 100% complied, I think
59:02
they would have been a lot further along than they are now.
59:05
And one bit of hope that I like to give to people the the, the
59:10
work that I've been doing, looking at sustainable
59:11
development goals in the United Nations Agenda 2030.
59:14
And Sandy Adams has done a lot of work on this, obviously.
59:18
He's also one of the UK column presenters is that they're not
59:21
very far along to where they want to be.
59:23
They're actually behind, very badly behind on Agenda 2030 and
59:27
the Sustainable Development Goals.
59:28
And I would like to think that those of us who are standing up
59:31
and taking action and doing things and informing people are
59:35
making a difference. Because if you look at it,
59:37
they're actually starting to panic a little bit.
59:40
But they only have five years to get to where they need to be and
59:42
they're nowhere near where they wanted to be by now.
59:45
So the more the more of us though that are starting to
59:48
stand up. Do things right to your MP, do
59:50
Freedom of Information requests, do read, you know, read things
59:54
out loud, whatever it is that we can do.
59:56
I think the more we, we stand up, the last they're going to be
1:00:01
to where they want us to be and find some of the best news
1:00:04
possible. Now on that, I just want to say
1:00:08
because unfortunately we're about out of time here.
1:00:11
Normally the last thing I do when I interview someone is I
1:00:13
asked if there is anything else that they would like to share.
1:00:15
But in your case, I think I will end a little bit differently
1:00:18
because I understand that you're going to have some for us today.
1:00:21
And I'm, I'm ready to be saying to you after discussing all of
1:00:25
this important information. So we're going to have.
1:00:27
You said you're going to have a song for us that you're going to
1:00:30
sing. Oh yes, that's right.
1:00:32
Yes, exactly. A song.
1:00:33
Yes, I do like singing, you know.
1:00:36
Well, I think people used to enjoy listening to me and I
1:00:41
thought, where have I put it? I've got it here.
1:00:43
Is that it? I used to be a folk singer,
1:00:49
really, that's it, when I performed at the Newcastle City
1:00:53
Hall and all over the place years ago.
1:00:56
But I haven't got my guitar, so we'll.
1:00:59
Do acapella. It's fine.
1:01:00
But anyway, all right. Ode to Falchi.
1:01:03
Ode to Falchi. You're a very good friend.
1:01:05
And mine, if you knew Falchi, like I know Falchi.
1:01:13
Oh, oh, oh, what a guy. He's so entrancing.
1:01:18
He'll have you dancing. Oh, oh, oh, what a guy.
1:01:25
You may be prancing at the thought of his dancing.
1:01:29
Oh, oh, oh, what a guy. He is the science upon which we
1:01:36
have reliance. Oh, oh, oh, what a guy.
1:01:42
He'll have you injecting with jabs, overdosing 12345678910 and
1:01:50
more. He's destroyed his science upon
1:01:56
where which there's no reliance. Oh oh oh what a guy.
1:02:02
But after dosing you could be morosing.
1:02:06
Oh oh oh what a guy. Thank you.
1:02:17
Well, I can't think of a better place to leave this discussion,
1:02:20
so again, I want to thank the audience for the time today.
1:02:23
Again, this is Diane Rasmussen with UK column up in the
1:02:26
northeast of England. I've been talking with Mr Tim
1:02:29
Coulter today, and it's been a fascinating discussion and I
1:02:32
hope everyone enjoys it as well. So thank you again for joining
1:02:35
us, and I will be signing off from here.
1:02:38
Thank you all for watching.