Latest / The Morning Edition / Harry and Meghan’s 'grifting': What the royals are doing Down Under
Transcript
- 0:03S1: For years. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry
- 0:07S1: and Meghan have been tanking in popularity. Meghan is now
- 0:11S1: the second most disliked royal, beaten only by the disgraced
- 0:14S1: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. So why this faux royal tour Down Under now?
- 0:21S1: When the British monarchy is arguably on the nose. I'm
- 0:24S1: Samantha Selinger Morris, and you're listening to Morning Edition from
- 0:28S1: The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald today. Senior writer
- 0:32S1: Bevan Shields on the recent bullying accusations against Prince Harry.
- 0:36S1: What they're doing here this week and how much they're
- 0:38S1: charging us for the pleasure. It's April the 14th. Welcome, Bevan,
- 0:45S1: back to the podcast.
- 0:46S2: Thank you for having me again.
- 0:47S1: Okay, let's kick off because Harry and Meghan's official tour
- 0:51S1: starts in Melbourne today. And surely you could not pick
- 0:54S1: a worse time for a tour connected with the British
- 0:57S1: royal family, right?
- 0:58S2: Well, there's a bit going on. There is a small
- 1:01S2: scandal I'm sure listeners have heard about involving Harry's uncle,
- 1:05S2: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who's in all sorts of strife. But there
- 1:10S2: is also, you know, a lot of other things going
- 1:12S2: on that make this a little bit weird. We've got
- 1:18S2: a huge crisis, global crisis in the war in Iran.
- 1:22S2: Cost of living is already a big issue in the
- 1:26S2: UK and Australia, only exacerbated by the war. And we
- 1:30S2: also now have the news that Harry is being sued
- 1:35S2: by a charity that he set up in 2006 in
- 1:38S2: honor of his mother, Princess Diana.
- 1:42S3: Just days out from arriving in Australia. Prince Harry has
- 1:45S3: some fresh legal woes, being sued for.
- 1:47S4: Defamation by a charity he co-founded.
- 1:51S3: He claims he orchestrated a campaign against it after resigning
- 1:55S3: last year.
- 1:56S4: Relationship now so damaged it's descended into a legal battle.
- 2:01S2: There's been a massive brawl between him and the people
- 2:04S2: who've been running the charity. It's now spilled out into
- 2:07S2: the public arena. I let's see where this goes. It
- 2:10S2: may not may be a bit of a flash in
- 2:11S2: the pan, but again, he's back in the news and
- 2:15S2: we've got this collision of all these things going on.
- 2:18S2: That does make it a really weird and awkward time
- 2:21S2: for them to be flying to Australia to dispense their,
- 2:25S2: you know, brand of wisdom to Australians.
- 2:27S1: Such that it is. Okay, so why in God's name
- 2:29S1: are they here? Why? Why are they here and why
- 2:31S1: are they here now?
- 2:32S2: Well, if you asked them, they would say, because we're
- 2:35S2: such wonderful people and we're here to, you know, make
- 2:39S2: everyone feel good and talk to charities that align with
- 2:42S2: our values. If you ask me, another cynical people like me,
- 2:45S2: this is about money and reputation. So yes, they are
- 2:49S2: doing some visits to children's hospitals and mental health charities
- 2:54S2: and things like that while they're here. There aren't a
- 2:56S2: lot of those visits, to be honest, and they're very
- 2:59S2: stage managed. They're very closely managed. But what this really
- 3:03S2: is about is money.
- 3:05S1: Okay, well, let's get into the personal rehabilitation in terms
- 3:08S1: of the reputation first, perhaps because the money's going to
- 3:11S1: go on for a while. So first of all, why
- 3:13S1: do they need reputational rehabilitation? Because I don't think I
- 3:17S1: realized just how unpopular they are. I mean, I knew
- 3:20S1: they were on the nose, but until I read your column,
- 3:22S1: I didn't realize just how bad. So walk us through it.
- 3:25S2: Well, to put it in context of just how bad
- 3:28S2: Megan is, the second least liked member of the royal family.
- 3:32S2: Only Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is more unpopular than her.
- 3:35S1: Um, let's just take a moment for that because that
- 3:36S1: is astounding.
- 3:38S2: Yeah. So there's a pollster called YouGov that for many,
- 3:41S2: many years has recorded public sentiment towards the royal family.
- 3:45S2: And it's absolutely fascinating to see how it bounces around
- 3:48S2: and reflects the times who's doing well, who's not doing well.
- 3:52S2: And while they're very Harry and Meghan are very unpopular.
- 3:55S2: Now that was not always the way. And in fact,
- 3:58S2: after their last visit to Australia in 2018, when they
- 4:02S2: were working members of the Royal family. Their popularity was huge.
- 4:07S2: So after that tour, Harry actually went back to the
- 4:11S2: UK as the most popular member of the royal family.
- 4:14S2: He eclipsed William, he eclipsed Kate, he eclipsed the Queen
- 4:17S2: who was alive at that point. He has now completely crashed. 60%
- 4:22S2: of people have an unfavorable view of him now, and 66%
- 4:26S2: have an unfavorable view of Meghan. So they are you know,
- 4:32S2: the public is absolutely off them. This is not a
- 4:35S2: case of, you know, it's polarized and there's sort of 50, 50.
- 4:39S2: Half of people love them. Half of people can't stand them.
- 4:42S2: There is a very, very strong sentiment against them. And
- 4:45S2: why this matters for them is their popularity is directly
- 4:49S2: tied to the amount of money that they will be
- 4:52S2: able to make. If they're, as you know, if they
- 4:55S2: are toxic, big companies are not going to want to
- 4:58S2: do business with them. So there is a dual element
- 5:01S2: here in my view, around this visit. One is around
- 5:03S2: making a little bit of money while they're here at
- 5:05S2: various events where they'll command a fee. And then also
- 5:08S2: it's about boosting, enhancing their reputation so that they can
- 5:12S2: keep making deals.
- 5:13S1: Okay, well, let's get into the money then, because boy,
- 5:15S1: you did not mince your words when you wrote in
- 5:18S1: your most recent column about what a moneymaker this could
- 5:21S1: be for them. You said, and I quote, forget interest
- 5:23S1: rate hikes, skyrocketing fuel prices and stubborn inflation. Harry and
- 5:28S1: Meghan are landing in Australia and happy to help relieve
- 5:31S1: us of all that spare cash they believe we're carrying.
- 5:35S1: So break it down for us. How much money might
- 5:37S1: they make while they're here?
- 5:38S2: Well, like all things Harry and Meghan, it's covered in
- 5:42S2: a little bit of mystery. They don't speak openly about this,
- 5:44S2: so we do have to rely a little bit on
- 5:46S2: some informed speculation. What we do know is an event,
- 5:51S2: a women's retreat that Meghan is headlining in Sydney on
- 5:54S2: the weekend. Tickets there cost $2,700 each. If you want
- 5:59S2: the privilege of having a group photo with her on
- 6:02S2: your table, you cough up another 500 bucks and you
- 6:05S2: get that wonderful experience. So that's a sense of the
- 6:08S2: kind of money Harry is doing an event in Melbourne
- 6:12S2: that is a for profit event, but some of the
- 6:15S2: money goes towards lifeline. There is a lot of talk
- 6:18S2: that he's getting tens of thousands of dollars for that
- 6:20S2: appearance now. Harry has talked a lot about mental health,
- 6:24S2: and I think he's actually quite genuine about his commitment
- 6:27S2: to mental health.
- 6:27S1: Yeah, yeah, he's been he's been quite open. Right. He
- 6:29S1: spoke about using eMDR for post-traumatic stress. But all of
- 6:33S1: that makes.
- 6:34S2: It a little bit hard to swallow that he could
- 6:36S2: be talking to an event about mental health and asking
- 6:40S2: for money for that. So yeah, they will probably get,
- 6:43S2: you know, between them two, $300,000 out of this trip potentially.
- 6:48S2: But as I say, I think this is also about
- 6:50S2: reputation restoration. And the better this trip goes off, the
- 6:55S2: better they look, the more likely organizations, companies will be
- 7:00S2: to do business with them.
- 7:01S1: Okay. Well, we're going to get into why they need
- 7:03S1: reputational rehab in just a little bit. But first, I
- 7:05S1: just want to ask you, I mean, is this gouging
- 7:07S1: that they might be doing financially? Is this unprecedented for
- 7:11S1: previous royal visits? I mean, would Queen Elizabeth II be
- 7:14S1: rolling over in her grave right about now?
- 7:16S2: Well, she certainly didn't, um, headline a women's retreat, uh,
- 7:20S2: the $2,700 a ticket while she was here. This is
- 7:24S2: what makes this visit so weird. They are trying to
- 7:26S2: pass this off as a de facto royal visit. And
- 7:30S2: it is not. It is not. Yep. Sure. They're going
- 7:32S2: to do some. They're going to do some charity visits
- 7:35S2: while they're here. But it is not a royal visit.
- 7:38S2: This is really unprecedented territory and I am just not convinced.
- 7:42S2: I think Australians to the you know, to the annoyance
- 7:45S2: of Republicans and the Republican movement in Australia, Australians are
- 7:50S2: largely sympathetic to the royal family and the monarchy. We're
- 7:53S2: very interested in them. Um, there's no sign at all
- 7:57S2: in the distant future that we are going to to
- 7:59S2: ditch them. But I am not convinced that this business
- 8:03S2: model that Harry and Meghan have created is going to
- 8:07S2: fly in Australia. I think that's where Australians will draw
- 8:10S2: the line and go, well, look, we're happy for royals
- 8:12S2: to come here and do what they've always done, but
- 8:15S2: if you come here and try and, you know, fleece
- 8:17S2: us of some money, that's where we draw the line
- 8:20S2: and that's and I think it will go down very
- 8:22S2: poorly when people realise the actual business model underlying this visit.
- 8:27S1: So do we prefer the royals of Queen Elizabeth the Second?
- 8:30S1: You know, the woman who famously, I think, accepted ration
- 8:33S1: coupons from members of the public to buy? I think
- 8:35S1: her wedding dress, because I believe it was around war time.
- 8:38S1: Is that is that what we want Royals?
- 8:39S2: People want a bit of authenticity. And I don't think
- 8:44S2: you could use that word to describe these two. They
- 8:47S2: also want access. They want to be able to go
- 8:50S2: to the opera House forecourt, as happened last time when
- 8:53S2: Harry and Meghan were here, and be able to try
- 8:56S2: and shake their hand and meet them. That is not
- 8:59S2: what is happening this time. This time it's all behind
- 9:01S2: closed doors. Every charity visit is very tightly managed. There's
- 9:06S2: a thing called a media pool, which is a very
- 9:08S2: small group of journalists who are picked to cover it,
- 9:12S2: and then all other media organizations, you know, use that,
- 9:15S2: use what they have gathered. And then the other events,
- 9:19S2: as we've discussed, you have to cough up an absolute
- 9:21S2: stack of cash to get in the door to hear them.
- 9:24S2: So there is no public access to these two during
- 9:27S2: this trip. And look, I also wonder whether, you know,
- 9:30S2: given everything that has happened with them, where their popularity is,
- 9:33S2: even if they walk down George Street tomorrow in Sydney or,
- 9:38S2: you know, Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne, would there be
- 9:41S2: a flock of people come out to see them? I'm
- 9:43S2: actually not sure, given how toxic they are.
- 9:45S1: And would they perhaps be heckled like King Charles was
- 9:48S1: not that long ago?
- 9:49S2: That's a big that's a big risk. And they always
- 9:51S2: all members of the royal family try and avoid that.
- 9:54S2: Everything is fairly tightly managed. It happens every now and then,
- 9:58S2: but they would be very, as a brand conscious couple
- 10:01S2: in a world of social media where moments like that
- 10:03S2: can go, can go viral and go crazy. They would
- 10:06S2: be very conscious of that.
- 10:07S1: Well, have the events actually sold out? Like have tickets
- 10:10S1: sold well? And do you think the public is actually
- 10:12S1: aware of just how stage managed this is and how
- 10:15S1: actually they might be selling it as royal visit, but
- 10:18S1: actually it isn't royal a visit and there isn't going
- 10:20S1: to be that access. Do you think people know that?
- 10:22S2: Look, I don't purely for the reason that this is
- 10:25S2: a busy time and a very difficult time for a
- 10:27S2: lot of people. They're trying to afford petrol, supermarket bills,
- 10:32S2: energy bills, all of that stuff. I think now that
- 10:34S2: they've actually landed in Australia, their little, you know, faux
- 10:38S2: tour is underway. I think people will engage a little
- 10:41S2: bit more and will be understanding what this is about
- 10:44S2: in terms of the ticket sales. Uh, there are still
- 10:47S2: tickets available for both events. The main event in Sydney
- 10:51S2: and Harry's mental health talk in Melbourne. That doesn't bode
- 10:55S2: well for the organizers and as I say, does possibly
- 10:59S2: speak to where their popularity and their sort of their
- 11:02S2: pulling power is at the moment. And look, as I
- 11:05S2: wrote in the piece, if people I don't criticize people
- 11:08S2: who want to go and hear from them, that's fine.
- 11:10S2: If you want to wait.
- 11:12S1: If you. It sounds like you are though, because it
- 11:14S1: sounds like you're saying they completely lack authenticity and they're
- 11:17S1: trying to mug us.
- 11:18S2: The Harry and Meghan. Yes, but if people want to
- 11:21S2: make a decision to cough up their own cash and
- 11:23S2: to go and do this, good luck to them. It's
- 11:25S2: a free country. They can do what they want. I
- 11:27S2: don't think they're going to get a lot from it,
- 11:29S2: but they're more than entitled to. My issue is that
- 11:33S2: this new business model that they have created is not
- 11:37S2: going to fly in Australia. And while they might have
- 11:40S2: few hundred, couple of thousand people going hear them speak
- 11:44S2: and pay money for that and potentially enjoy it, there
- 11:47S2: will be many, many more people that. This just goes
- 11:50S2: down like a lead balloon with.
- 11:55S1: After the break.
- 11:58S2: The reason for their plunge in the public's perception of
- 12:01S2: them is because of the decisions that they have made
- 12:03S2: since that split, because of the business model they've created.
- 12:07S2: And I just think there is this feeling that people
- 12:10S2: can't shake, that Harry and Meghan are all about Harry
- 12:15S2: and Meghan.
- 12:25S1: Okay, well, you just mentioned their their money model, and
- 12:27S1: I want to ask you a bit about that because
- 12:29S1: you had an incredible line in your piece about how
- 12:32S1: else they make their money, because it isn't just what
- 12:33S1: they're doing on this tour. Of course. And you mentioned
- 12:36S1: that they had struck a $20 million podcast deal with Spotify,
- 12:40S1: but the arrangement imploded after Meghan delivered just 12 episodes.
- 12:44S1: And this is the kicker. Spotify's head of podcast innovation
- 12:47S1: and monetization, Bill Simmons, later said he wished he had
- 12:50S1: made a podcast series about the ex-royals titled The Grifters.
- 12:55S1: So tell us, I guess about. Yeah, how they're making
- 12:58S1: their money.
- 12:59S2: Some of these figures are eye watering. I think there
- 13:03S2: is a perception that they're really hard up. You know
- 13:06S2: they don't have a lot of money. They have a
- 13:09S2: stack of cash still. Now some of these deals, as
- 13:12S2: you referenced with Spotify, have not gone to plan. Others have.
- 13:16S2: So here's a couple of examples. They struck a multi-year
- 13:18S2: deal with Netflix. There's been talk that maybe that deal
- 13:22S2: has not been going so well. Some of the projects
- 13:25S2: have done well, others have flopped.
- 13:27S1: And that was a reported $100 million multi-year deal.
- 13:30S2: Exactly. So that that's US dollars. So that is a huge,
- 13:34S2: huge amount of money. There's also the 20 million Spotify deal.
- 13:39S2: Harry got about a 20 million US as an advance
- 13:43S2: for his book spare, which actually sold very well. So
- 13:46S2: he would have done well out of that. The then
- 13:48S2: Prince Charles, now King Charles, gave them some cash when
- 13:51S2: they separated to help with the transition. And what is
- 13:54S2: not known is that the widely known is that Princess
- 13:58S2: Diana left Harry several million dollars in her will, and
- 14:04S2: the Queen mother, when she died, had set up a
- 14:07S2: trust so that when her grandkids at that time turned 40,
- 14:10S2: they would get some money out of that. And it's
- 14:14S2: reported that he that Harry got £8 million from that
- 14:18S2: trust when he turned 40 a couple of years ago.
- 14:20S2: So this is big money, you know. So again, you know,
- 14:26S2: when people in Australia are struggling with cost of living
- 14:29S2: right now, I just don't think there's going to be
- 14:31S2: a lot of sympathy for Harry and Meghan's grifting.
- 14:34S1: Okay. So does that partly explain their absolute tanking in
- 14:38S1: popularity from their last visit in 2018 to now? Is
- 14:42S1: it that they're seen as grifters? Is it that they're
- 14:45S1: seen as tone deaf and entitled? Like, why do you
- 14:49S1: think they are so reviled by so many people?
- 14:52S2: Again, if you could ask them and and people have
- 14:55S2: in interviews, they would say the answer lies in racism
- 14:59S2: and sexism. And I think that explains some things. A
- 15:05S2: small number of things. It does not explain everything. I
- 15:08S2: think the reason they're so unpopular is because of the
- 15:11S2: choices that they have made. I don't think even the
- 15:14S2: act itself of leaving the royal family in January 2020
- 15:18S2: was enough to cause the dip in popularity. I think
- 15:22S2: people were prepared to to give them a go and
- 15:25S2: see how that would work out. The reason for their
- 15:27S2: plunge in the public's perception of them is because of
- 15:30S2: the decisions that they have made since that split, because
- 15:34S2: of the business model they've created. And I just think
- 15:36S2: there is this feeling that people can't shake, that Harry
- 15:43S2: and Meghan are all about Harry and Meghan, and people
- 15:46S2: do not respond well to that when they are trying
- 15:51S2: to say, well, no, no, no, that's not true. We
- 15:53S2: care about this charity and that charity and this cause
- 15:56S2: and that cause. If people fundamentally can't shake this vibe
- 16:01S2: that these two are in it for themselves, and that's it,
- 16:04S2: that is a very hard thing to overcome.
- 16:06S1: And so what are the chances that this visit will
- 16:08S1: help repair the reputation of the royals after, of course,
- 16:12S1: Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's extraordinary fall from grace. And obviously that's
- 16:17S1: still to be played out, right? I mean, he's still
- 16:18S1: being investigated. As I understand it, charges haven't been laid,
- 16:22S1: so things could get worse. Of course.
- 16:23S2: Definitely. I don't think it will have any impact at all.
- 16:28S2: And while Andrew needs all the help he can get,
- 16:31S2: there are other members of the royal family who, despite
- 16:34S2: what's happening with Harry and Meghan, despite what's happening with Andrew,
- 16:38S2: are actually sky high in the popularity rankings like William
- 16:42S2: and Kate can do nothing wrong. And when you look
- 16:46S2: at their. You look at how YouGov has tracked their
- 16:49S2: approval ratings. It hasn't blipped it hasn't gone up or down.
- 16:54S2: It has just stayed sky high for the last 5
- 16:57S2: or 6 years. They can do no wrong. King Charles
- 16:59S2: there is a lot of affection for him at the moment,
- 17:02S2: I think. He seems to be doing a very good job.
- 17:05S2: The public feels the same. He's very human. He's he
- 17:08S2: seems to be extremely personable and and more in touch
- 17:13S2: than perhaps his mother was. He's going through cancer treatment.
- 17:16S2: So people are very conscious of that. So the royals,
- 17:19S2: other than Andrew are actually doing okay. Andrew was a disaster,
- 17:22S2: don't get me wrong. But I don't think that is
- 17:24S2: an existential threat for the monarchy. And I certainly don't
- 17:29S2: think anything that Harry and Meghan will be up to.
- 17:31S2: Bopping around Australia is going to particularly trouble the likes
- 17:36S2: of King Charles and Prince William and Kate.
- 17:39S1: And I wanted to ask you about, you know, whether
- 17:41S1: we're mugs then for helping to pick up the bill
- 17:44S1: for this visit. And you can walk us through just
- 17:46S1: how much we are or are not paying for the
- 17:49S1: pleasure of having Harry and Meghan visit us. Do you
- 17:52S1: think that this is the moment that we perhaps consider
- 17:55S1: cutting the apron strings with the monarchy. Despite what you've
- 17:58S1: just said, of course, about the popularity of William and
- 18:02S1: Kate and King Charles and so forth.
- 18:04S2: So Harry and Meghan and their team have been at
- 18:07S2: pains to stress that this trip is privately funded. That's
- 18:10S2: the term that they use. Now, that is true in
- 18:13S2: the sense of they'll pick up the bill for their
- 18:15S2: flights here, accommodation. Some of the private security that they
- 18:20S2: will have, their own staffing costs, things like that. That
- 18:23S2: is true. Now, if this was a genuine royal visit,
- 18:26S2: all those things would be covered by taxpayers. Normally, what
- 18:29S2: taxpayers will be on the hook for is policing. So
- 18:33S2: there is some talk, I believe that they may go
- 18:36S2: to the Bondi Massacre site. That's unconfirmed. We don't know
- 18:40S2: when that might be. If they were to go there,
- 18:43S2: there would have to be policing there. You can imagine
- 18:46S2: if something went wrong there.
- 18:47S1: Oh God.
- 18:48S2: What? That you know what that could the implications of that.
- 18:51S2: So there will be policing there. will pay for that.
- 18:54S2: They're going to go to the footy in Sydney. That's
- 18:56S2: a public event. You know there will be some policing
- 19:00S2: element at that. There's probably some policing element when they
- 19:03S2: arrive at the airport and leave all that kind of stuff,
- 19:05S2: that sort of policing we will be on the hook for.
- 19:07S1: Okay. Devil's advocate though. While I certainly don't want these
- 19:11S1: people to be harmed here, or anyone for that matter,
- 19:14S1: should we be even on the hook for that given
- 19:15S1: that they are not working royals? So what what do
- 19:18S1: we owe them?
- 19:18S2: Well, Harry's view on that that he has expressed previously
- 19:22S2: is he was born into this system. He was born
- 19:26S2: into fame. He's had paparazzi lenses in his face since
- 19:30S2: he was literally born. So his fame and potential to
- 19:37S2: make him and his family a target is out of
- 19:39S2: his control. And I actually have some sympathy for that. And,
- 19:44S2: you know, I do think a way of looking at
- 19:46S2: this is if something did go wrong while they were here,
- 19:50S2: it would be cataclysmically bad. Yeah. So I think, you know,
- 19:56S2: if they're in a public venue in the same way
- 19:58S2: anyone else that's high profile is if there's some policing
- 20:01S2: there look fine. But what we certainly shouldn't be paying
- 20:05S2: for is their flights, accommodation, staffing costs. We aren't. And look,
- 20:10S2: you know, whether or not people respond to this, let's see.
- 20:13S2: It's going to be a really fascinating week. It's going
- 20:16S2: to be fascinating to see how these private events go.
- 20:18S2: It's going to be fascinating to see what the public
- 20:20S2: sentiment is towards the end of the week. I may
- 20:23S2: be wrong. And, you know, there's this huge outpouring of
- 20:26S2: love and affection for them by the end of the week.
- 20:28S2: But I, I strongly I strongly doubt that, but we'll see.
- 20:31S1: Bevin, are you going to be going to any of
- 20:33S1: the events yourself just to witness it?
- 20:34S2: Well, we have applied for accreditation to cover some of
- 20:37S2: these things, but I suspect after the piece that we
- 20:39S2: have published today, they might be thinking twice about whether
- 20:43S2: I'm selected in that group of people to to go
- 20:46S2: and cover them.
- 20:46S1: And. Sure. And and while we don't know how this
- 20:49S1: is going to pan out in terms of their popularity here,
- 20:51S1: is it possible that Megan's going to be mugging us
- 20:53S1: on her way out. Because as you pointed out in
- 20:56S1: your piece, she's trademarked her as ever lifestyle brand in Australia,
- 21:00S1: signalling an impending expansion. I loved I loved how you
- 21:03S1: wrote this. The trademark was accepted for registration in June
- 21:07S1: 2025 under a category titled Bevin what was it fancy?
- 21:11S2: Which really, when I spotted that made me laugh for
- 21:15S2: a good five minutes. So yes, as ever, it was
- 21:17S2: initially partly funded by Netflix. Netflix has cooled on this
- 21:21S2: deal a little bit.
- 21:22S1: Wait, is that is that because a go to hostess
- 21:24S1: gift box of jams, honey and tea will set you back?
- 21:26S1: Wait a minute. How much? Bevin.
- 21:28S2: Uh, 132 us. Uh, what a steal. Uh, it's not
- 21:32S2: going so well as ever. Um, it's jams and honey
- 21:35S2: and candles and all this other kind of crap, and
- 21:38S2: people are not interested in it. They are not buying
- 21:41S2: what she is selling. Um, are we.
- 21:43S1: Going to buy it here? Bevin?
- 21:44S2: Well, I don't think so. I really don't think so.
- 21:47S1: Tell us. Tell us what the website declares as ever,
- 21:50S1: as being.
- 21:51S2: It's very modest. It's very modestly, declares the brand as ever,
- 21:55S2: as more than a brand. It's a love language. Uh,
- 21:59S2: so if you want to part ways with few hundred
- 22:01S2: bucks for.
- 22:02S1: Jam.
- 22:03S2: To buy into love language of jam, then, um, be
- 22:06S2: my guest.
- 22:07S1: Now, would it be fair to say after your column
- 22:08S1: that you think that perhaps money is Harry and Meghan's
- 22:11S1: love language?
- 22:11S5: I think.
- 22:12S2: That's, uh, that, uh, would not be inaccurate. No.
- 22:17S1: Bevan, thanks for your time.
- 22:19S2: Good to chat. Thank you.
- 22:30S1: Today's episode was produced by Josh towers. Our executive producer
- 22:34S1: is Tammy Mills, and our podcasts are overseen by Lisa
- 22:38S1: Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If you like our show, follow
- 22:42S1: The Morning Edition and leave a review for us on
- 22:44S1: Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.