Transcript

Proof - Part 1 · Urantia Radio

0:00
So today we're going to talk about the Urantia book and what
0:05
I wrote about my first paper, which is still available on
0:09
Amazon, by the way. It's called A New Revelation
0:11
exploring the Urantia book. And in this particular chapter,
0:16
I go through what I think are validation points, things that
0:22
are proven that the book is a revelation that somebody
0:27
couldn't have made it up. And the chances that they would
0:29
have been right in picking these facts are just so astronomical
0:35
that there's no way anybody could have made this stuff up.
0:38
So it's either somebody was authentically writing this book
0:42
based on information that we don't have, or somebody was
0:46
pretty damn lucky, like a one in 10 million chance.
0:49
They'll only roll through just a few things in the Arantia book
0:53
that are are truly revelational. In other words, the knowledge
0:58
did not previously exist until the book was published in 1955.
1:04
S In The Life and Teachings of Jesus, the revelation states
1:07
that Jesus was born at noon on August 21st 7 BC.
1:13
Taking into account the revision of the Julian calendar and the
1:18
narration of the. The Star of Bethlehem points to
1:22
the fact that the same year that Jesus was born, which was August
1:27
21st 7 BC that on May 29th, September 29th and December 5th
1:32
of that year. Because of the proclivity of men
1:36
to mix facts with miracles, the legend of a bright evening star
1:40
appearing as a guiding light to herald the miraculous birth of
1:44
Jesus was later interwoven in the biblical account.
1:48
Now what that means is that for them to have picked those dates
1:53
May 29th, September 29th and December 5th of seven BC that
1:59
they say there was a conjunction that occurred and that
2:03
conjunction was the conjunction occurred between Jupiter and
2:08
Saturn occurring in the constellation of Pisces on the
2:12
exact dates mentioned. Now, no one knows that except
2:17
the for the fact that it's verifiable.
2:19
That's a verifiable fact. You can go and look back now
2:23
with computer models and actually go back to seven BC
2:28
what was in the nighttime sky on those dates, and you will see
2:31
that there is a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in the
2:35
constellation of Pisces to add to that.
2:39
But what are the chances they would have been able to pluck
2:42
those dates out of thin air? And why is it that no one else
2:46
has ever discovered that fact? So that's just one example of
2:50
many. There's another one here too,
2:55
which I found interesting. Back in the 90s there was a
2:59
paleontologist who published a series of articles in National
3:03
Geographic talking about the Neanderthal in 1934.
3:11
The following passages appear in the revelatory text on the
3:15
subject of Neanderthals. The Neanderthalers were
3:19
excellent fighters. This is the quote from the
3:21
Urantia book. And they traveled extensively.
3:25
They gradually spread from the highland centers in northwest
3:29
India to France on the West, China on the east, and even down
3:33
into northern Africa. And regarding the use of tools
3:38
that the Neanderthalers used, the Urantia revelators write
3:43
quote the reindeer was highly useful to these Neanderthal
3:48
people serving as food, clothing since they made various uses of
3:52
the horns and bones. Large flints attached to wooden
3:56
handles came back into use and served as axes and picks.
4:00
OK, 2003. Joe Alper publishes an article
4:05
in National Geographic, and he says other tools found would
4:10
have been halved or set in wooden handles, recovered stones
4:15
typically fashioned from nearby sources of flints or quartz.
4:20
Well, that's just what the Urantia book said.
4:22
Urantia book says large flints attached to wooden handles came
4:27
back into use. Joe Alper writes NOR and
4:30
Neanderthal groups mingled and exchanged mates.
4:34
Such interactions may have been necessary for survival.
4:37
Now take that quote from That's 2003 and then compare it to 1934
4:44
when the Uranto revelators write Neanderthals were the first to
4:48
adopt the practice of giving the most successful hunters the
4:51
choice of women for wives. Now how did they know that when
4:57
that wasn't even published until 2003 due to more recent
5:01
archaeological finds? The only way they would have
5:04
known that is if they were there or they had knowledge that no
5:08
one else apparently had in the anthropology community.
5:13
Now, there's other things too, and this comes from Calabrese.
5:18
It's an interesting examination. Phil Calabrese is a
5:21
mathematician. He says the chances that the
5:24
Urantia book would have falsely pushed the narrative of the
5:29
Piltdown Man turned out to be a hoax.
5:33
I don't know if you know the story of the Piltdown Man, but
5:36
these two guys pretended they had discovered new fossils and
5:41
it turns out that it was a hoax. So when the Urantia Book was
5:44
published, it talks about the Neanderthal, the CRO, Magnon,
5:48
Java, Heidelberg man, but it doesn't talk about the Piltdown
5:53
Man. Now, it's interesting because at
5:56
the time the Urantia book was first being read, which is in
5:59
the late 20s, Piltdown Man was assumed to be a scientific
6:03
accuracy or a fact, and it was only later be shown to be a
6:07
fraud. But the Arrangi book writers
6:09
didn't include it in their book. Those are just three things that
6:14
you could point to that say foreknowledge.
6:17
Next segment we'll talk more about that.
6:19
Hang on.