Latest / International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better / Carney’s Davos “Take the Sign Down” Moment — Canada Diversifies, Rulebook Fallout

Transcript

Carney’s Davos “Take the Sign Down” Moment — Canada Diversifies, Rulebook Fallout · International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better

• 0:00
  Hello, good morning. Welcome. I am
• 0:02
  Samuel Trap. This is International
• 0:05
  Flavor. You are on DAM radio coming to
• 0:09
  you live today from the Lake Ozark real
• 0:12
  estate of the art studio. And what a
• 0:15
  beautiful morning, you know, [snorts]
• 0:17
  nice and crispy cold. I hate the cold,
• 0:20
  by the way, that. So, I was never a huge
• 0:22
  fan of Florida living down there. Um,
• 0:24
  and uh, still got plenty of ties down
• 0:28
  there [laughter]
• 0:29
  and I I want to go back cuz it's warm,
• 0:32
  but I don't, you know, the the the palm
• 0:34
  trees, you know, throw in some oak.
• 0:37
  Throw in some nice trees somewhere. I'm
• 0:39
  so tired of u of, I don't know, palm
• 0:42
  trees and everything's the same. But
• 0:45
  everything's the same up here, too. But
• 0:47
  here it's just I like here I'm a fall
• 0:49
  and spring person. The winter I just I
• 0:52
  have no use for summer uh I don't know
• 0:56
  why am I saying this? I don't really
• 0:58
  care. If you feel like calling in today
• 1:00
  5737468020
• 1:02
  I got plenty to talk about and uh I've
• 1:05
  been watching this economic forum stuff
• 1:08
  and um I was surprised by a uh speech
• 1:13
  and I'm going to play it for you.
• 1:14
  Yesterday I talked about uh Mark Carney
• 1:16
  and I talked about Canada and I talked
• 1:19
  about Canada starting to make uh deals
• 1:22
  and uh diversify as it were uh
• 1:25
  [clears throat] away from the United
• 1:27
  States and not really but everyone in
• 1:31
  the world is doing it. And my theory and
• 1:35
  you don't have to believe it. I don't it
• 1:37
  doesn't matter to me. Today's uh
• 1:38
  Wednesday, by the way, the uh greatest
• 1:40
  day in radio history, and it occurs
• 1:44
  every single week. There's a new
• 1:45
  greatest day in radio history on DAM
• 1:48
  radio because we have so many uh
• 1:50
  wonderful um chat people. And we're not
• 1:54
  chat bots. We're real people. And uh
• 1:57
  we're real people with a variety of
• 1:59
  opinions. And we love to spew them out.
• 2:01
  Uh I want to spew out some opinions
• 2:05
  today. I'd uh appreciate it if you all
• 2:08
  joined uh in my charity. We're we're
• 2:10
  supposed to go live with the website.
• 2:12
  It's it's already up, I believe. Let me
• 2:15
  uh let me digress for just a minute and
• 2:20
  see if it is because we are on a roll.
• 2:26
  We're like butter and uh we are on a
• 2:31
  roll.
• 2:32
  And oops, I can't spell though. And so
• 2:35
  we cannot get to our web page.
• 2:41
  And [snorts] I'm not going to say what
• 2:42
  it is, although I've said it before. I
• 2:44
  just don't want to say it and have
• 2:45
  people not be able to go there
• 2:49
  because it's really technically not live
• 2:52
  yet, but oh, it's looking pretty far
• 2:55
  fantastic already. So, our modern law
• 2:58
  ecosystem
• 3:00
  uh is also under construction that is
• 3:03
  not quite done. And in that one on the
• 3:06
  modern law ecosystem, I want to talk a
• 3:08
  little bit this week about uh uh
• 3:11
  phenomenon that's that's gripping the
• 3:13
  world of AI and uh I believe it's a big
• 3:16
  deal and you need to to join our
• 3:19
  ecosystem. So I've started a website
• 3:22
  called the modern law ecosystem.
• 3:25
  Well, not me. I have partners and uh uh
• 3:27
  but we've started that. And what we
• 3:28
  would like to do, well, it's a long
• 3:30
  story. You know what? And I wasn't going
• 3:31
  to get into that today and I'm not, but
• 3:33
  uh I I I wanted to test out and uh I've
• 3:36
  been testing it over the last night and
• 3:38
  it's looking fantabulous. It's not quite
• 3:40
  done, but it it does have a blog. It's
• 3:43
  called Civic Outlaws. And uh we attack
• 3:48
  government overreach. We we go after
• 3:50
  them. And uh this is, you know, you can
• 3:53
  become a civic warrior by donating to
• 3:56
  our cause. It's not cheap to keep these
• 3:59
  people in line. And we do it through
• 4:01
  sunshine law requests, through filing of
• 4:04
  strategic suits. We have several uh
• 4:07
  several focuses that we are making right
• 4:10
  now. Flock cameras, HOA, Missouri
• 4:13
  alcohol, tobacco control overreach. You
• 4:16
  know, I always talk about the Missouri
• 4:17
  bar corruption and overreach and uh time
• 4:20
  share schemes, gaming machines in
• 4:22
  Missouri. Those are some of the things
• 4:24
  that we're working on right now. and
• 4:26
  we're looking for support in this uh
• 4:29
  endeavor as we go and attack. And so I I
• 4:33
  want you to know who we are. And the
• 4:36
  website is just about done, but you got
• 4:37
  to forgive me because
• 4:40
  I I've been trying to announce it for a
• 4:42
  couple of weeks, but it's just not quite
• 4:44
  perfect. And uh I'm I'm probably going
• 4:46
  too far, but it is certainly very
• 4:48
  welldeveloped. And uh uh you know it is
• 4:51
  it and I get to thinking about this and
• 4:54
  go you know why don't we just talk about
• 4:55
  it and say that civic outlaws is up and
• 4:58
  available and we're ready to go after uh
• 5:00
  government overreach on behalf of you
• 5:02
  right now. We're focused on uh Missouri,
• 5:05
  Florida cuz that's where uh we we have a
• 5:08
  lot of location, but Illinois, too, cuz
• 5:10
  we got plenty over there. And uh you
• 5:13
  know, we're we're going to we're going
• 5:14
  to spread. Our goal is to have offices
• 5:17
  in every state. And if you got there's
• 5:20
  strength in numbers, people. And so
• 5:23
  we're hoping that you'll become one of
• 5:25
  our civic warriors. So on Civic Outlaws
• 5:28
  and there's we're going to have
• 5:29
  beautiful merch for you to buy and stuff
• 5:31
  like that uh for our charitable
• 5:33
  contributions and we're going to uh uh
• 5:35
  connect with other charities, connect
• 5:37
  with making movements, connect with uh
• 5:40
  funding our own um you know
• 5:42
  [clears throat]
• 5:43
  I don't know agitators,
• 5:46
  you know, our protesters and we'll start
• 5:48
  we're going to start attacking
• 5:49
  government overreach where it needs to
• 5:51
  be attacked. And uh uh that's that is
• 5:54
  what we do. That's what I've done for
• 5:56
  Jesus forever. That's part of the reason
• 5:58
  I believe that they attacked me when I
• 6:00
  was a lawyer is cuz I was I was I kept
• 6:03
  bombarding them with various lawsuits,
• 6:06
  you know, for government uh overreach
• 6:08
  and corruption and BS and there's still
• 6:10
  plenty of it going along and uh you
• 6:12
  know, I've been quiet too long about it
• 6:14
  and so I'm I'm not going to be anymore.
• 6:16
  And so, uh, we have founded this Civic
• 6:19
  Outlaws and, uh, you can become a civic
• 6:22
  warrior by funding us, and, uh, we hope
• 6:25
  that you do. Anyway, uh, I I digressed a
• 6:27
  little bit. We're also going to have the
• 6:29
  modern law ecosystem, which I read to
• 6:32
  you the complaint that the Missouri bar
• 6:34
  made about me that came from one of our
• 6:36
  wouldbe founders that the
• 6:38
  [clears throat]
• 6:40
  he took the money and ran is what
• 6:42
  happened. The guy took the money and
• 6:44
  ran. and I'll tell you who it is one
• 6:46
  day, but I'm still uh struggling with
• 6:48
  the fact that he did it. But he took the
• 6:50
  money and ran and uh uh you know to
• 6:54
  waited for some funding, did very little
• 6:58
  if anything. We're currently in a
• 7:00
  lawsuit and and it's nonsense that that
• 7:02
  that these sort of things happen.
• 7:04
  Anyway, that is not my theme for today.
• 7:06
  My theme for today was this uh speech I
• 7:09
  heard yesterday. I told you about Mark
• 7:11
  Carney
• 7:12
  who is Canadian of course and he uh gave
• 7:18
  a speech at the economic forum and I'm
• 7:20
  going to share it with you. It's like 14
• 7:22
  15 minutes. I'm going to share it with
• 7:23
  you in its entirety because um people
• 7:26
  are starting to say things and it's uh
• 7:28
  and from Canada this is before we get
• 7:31
  there I want to talk about cuz we all
• 7:33
  talk about it on this station I believe
• 7:35
  you know that we are uh we're very well
• 7:37
  verssed in uh uh the the world order you
• 7:41
  know the uh uni party the what do you
• 7:47
  call them the global globalist elites
• 7:50
  sometimes people call them that and the
• 7:52
  globalist elites in my view are people
• 7:56
  like Carney or at least they have been
• 7:59
  forever and I believe that and and you
• 8:03
  know you can believe what you want. You
• 8:04
  don't have to believe this. This is just
• 8:05
  an opposing point of view to many that
• 8:08
  are that are spoken and and but I
• 8:11
  believe that that that mine is pretty
• 8:14
  welldeveloped and reasonable. Everybody
• 8:16
  knows I've had a hobby for years of
• 8:18
  following uh Vladimir Putin, his rise to
• 8:21
  power, what he's done. I I have watched
• 8:25
  and listened in Russian. I I like to
• 8:27
  keep my Russian um proficiency and Yahoo
• 8:32
  Narus. I want to speak in Russian and I
• 8:35
  and I have a channel that's in Russian
• 8:37
  and I and I and I I follow this stuff
• 8:40
  and I've watched because I was in arms
• 8:43
  control years ago [clears throat] and uh
• 8:47
  as an interpreter, inspector, escort
• 8:49
  over here in the United States when when
• 8:52
  people would come over and I and I I it
• 8:55
  was during the time the the wall
• 8:57
  collapsed in what was it ' 89 or
• 8:59
  something is when they uh uh they they
• 9:02
  took it down. Soviet Union collapsed,
• 9:03
  the CIS was formed and uh there there
• 9:07
  was been been uh you know horror story
• 9:11
  for Russia in the '9s just a horror
• 9:13
  story and out of the ashes of that
• 9:16
  horror story which we didn't help at
• 9:19
  all. We went in like corporate raiders
• 9:22
  and tried to steal all their stuff and
• 9:24
  they resented that and they resented us.
• 9:27
  Not
• 9:29
  I I don't know how to put it. We screwed
• 9:33
  up. We by we, I mean the globalist
• 9:37
  elitist a-holes. I don't mean me. I
• 9:39
  didn't screw up. I was sitting there
• 9:41
  thinking about this the whole time. It's
• 9:43
  like, geez, what a reversal from what
• 9:46
  the Soviet Union was. And trust me,
• 9:48
  they're not going to stay down. You
• 9:50
  know, I knew enough about Russian people
• 9:52
  to keep it. Well, this world order
• 9:55
  theory
• 9:57
  basically started after World War II.
• 9:59
  And I want and and and basically this is
• 10:02
  part of the reason that we are where we
• 10:04
  are. And I want to talk to you and and
• 10:06
  basically all I did to show you this and
• 10:09
  I'm going to read this to you before I
• 10:11
  share Mark Carney's speech with you
• 10:13
  because I I think it's important that
• 10:15
  you hear this stuff. And he started it
• 10:17
  in French, but I think I got it right to
• 10:19
  the part where it's uh it's uh in
• 10:22
  English and he he gives the rest of the
• 10:24
  speech in English cuz there was a little
• 10:25
  bit of a simultaneous interpretation in
• 10:28
  the beginning that kind of is
• 10:29
  distracting. I hate it when they do
• 10:31
  that. I'd rather see the the whole video
• 10:34
  and not in two languages at the same
• 10:36
  time because it's hard to focus on one,
• 10:38
  you know. And uh anyway, I want to give
• 10:41
  you about the new world order. It's a
• 10:44
  term that is often used in hype. Now,
• 10:47
  now I don't believe this. This is this
• 10:49
  is what people talk about this new world
• 10:52
  order conspiracy theory. And so this has
• 10:56
  a little bit of liberalist BS from
• 10:59
  Wikipedia sprinkled in. Okay, everybody
• 11:02
  needs to know that this is not my
• 11:04
  thoughts of the new world order. If I
• 11:06
  have things that diverge from this
• 11:07
  though, I shall tell you what the new
• 11:09
  world order has usually refers to a
• 11:13
  conspiracy theory that hypothesizes that
• 11:16
  a secretly emerging totar totalitarian
• 11:20
  world government will emerge. The common
• 11:24
  theme in these theories is a new world
• 11:26
  order is a secretive power elite
• 11:29
  globalist agenda that is conspiring to
• 11:33
  eventually rule the world. Now think
• 11:37
  about that. I think that's basically
• 11:40
  true. But all it is is the same old rich
• 11:44
  elites because the group is quite small.
• 11:48
  your 1enters that have all the money and
• 11:51
  all the power and the rest of us since
• 11:54
  the dark ages have been fighting this
• 11:58
  sort of thing and living under their
• 12:01
  thumb, living under their rules,
• 12:04
  fighting their wars because we are
• 12:08
  expendable trash and they are not. they
• 12:13
  are the globalist elites and it's the
• 12:15
  but it's the same thing for centuries
• 12:17
  that that people have been fighting.
• 12:19
  That's that's my theory, okay? That the
• 12:22
  tendency is always to
• 12:25
  consolidate and keep and build your own
• 12:29
  power. That's what we're watching now.
• 12:31
  It's no different under Donald Trump
• 12:33
  than it was under anyone else. It's just
• 12:35
  the base parties have changed. But up at
• 12:39
  the at the top levels,
• 12:42
  the people who get appointed to run
• 12:45
  government agencies that stay there
• 12:48
  after the presidents move on, which is
• 12:52
  why Donald Trump did one of the very
• 12:54
  best things that I liked is he kind of
• 12:56
  purged a lot of the the careerist level
• 13:00
  of these globalist that they
• 13:02
  needed to get rid of, right? And so I'm
• 13:04
  for that. Anyway, the theme continues
• 13:07
  that uh
• 13:10
  one world government will replace
• 13:13
  sovereign nation states. Now, we're
• 13:15
  watching that in some degree with what's
• 13:18
  going on in Europe. They're discovering
• 13:19
  that they're just pawns in America's
• 13:23
  game in NATO, in the EU. Canada has
• 13:26
  identified the same thing. I told you
• 13:27
  that yesterday. and an all-encompassing
• 13:30
  propaganda which ideology. They don't
• 13:34
  really care about the ideology. They
• 13:36
  care about keeping us so distracted that
• 13:38
  we don't notice that Oz is ruling from
• 13:41
  behind a curtain somewhere. Pay no
• 13:43
  attention to the man behind the curtain
• 13:46
  because we have globalist, you know,
• 13:48
  queer boy transgender theory to spread
• 13:51
  to you. And that's far more important
• 13:53
  than who's fingerpeting the world from
• 13:56
  behind the curtain, right? Many
• 13:59
  influential historical and contemporary
• 14:02
  figures have been alleged to be part of
• 14:05
  a cabal that operates through numerous
• 14:08
  front organizations um GMOs I'm sorry
• 14:12
  NOS's
• 14:14
  NOS's and uh to orchestrate significant
• 14:17
  political and financial events. We're
• 14:19
  watching this. This is not a conspiracy
• 14:22
  theory. This is truth. This is what's
• 14:25
  happening. Okay? It's no longer a a
• 14:28
  conspiracy theory. People know that this
• 14:31
  is true, that it that it it might take a
• 14:34
  different form than what they thought it
• 14:36
  was. It's not a group of people, the
• 14:38
  same 10 people who meet, though the
• 14:40
  parties may change, but it's globalist
• 14:43
  elite a-holes that rise to power through
• 14:46
  whatever means, and then they get sucked
• 14:48
  into this cabal
• 14:50
  of power because they have the ticket to
• 14:53
  get in the door, which is fabulous.
• 14:55
  wealth and so they keep it and try to
• 14:58
  generate generationally keep it in the
• 15:01
  same hands that I absolutely believe in
• 15:05
  and that power, you know, getting the
• 15:07
  blessing of the Republicans that are in
• 15:10
  power before somebody approves you to be
• 15:12
  a judge, getting the uh blessing of
• 15:15
  those that are a federal judge and or
• 15:17
  even many state judges. I believe
• 15:19
  Missouri is extremely corrupt in that
• 15:21
  regard. And uh I also believe that
• 15:23
  federally it's the same thing. It's
• 15:25
  who's whose ass you've kissed and how
• 15:27
  you and it's regionally for federal
• 15:29
  judges and how they get picked. But it's
• 15:32
  the same sort of system as you go. Any
• 15:34
  sort of bureaucratic position, any sort
• 15:36
  of of high level, you know, call it GS15
• 15:40
  and up, you know, you're you're going to
• 15:42
  have to kiss the political ass. And
• 15:45
  certainly in the general ranks, up to
• 15:47
  the rank of colonel,
• 15:50
  doesn't matter. After that, you better
• 15:52
  be licking the butts of power. Uh
• 15:54
  because that's how it works. You can get
• 15:57
  one star and by God if you lick enough
• 15:59
  ass you'll get two and and it keeps on
• 16:02
  going. I'm not saying these aren't
• 16:03
  stellar soldiers in many regards because
• 16:06
  they are and you know they're very
• 16:09
  impressive and but don't go thinking
• 16:11
  that they aren't part of the same
• 16:15
  sort of militaryindustrial complex
• 16:18
  because that's part of the ticket to get
• 16:23
  further on as you spread the wealth
• 16:26
  among the those who are already wealthy.
• 16:30
  That's how you do it. And it's hard to
• 16:32
  tap in and get into that circle, but
• 16:35
  once you're in, it's a globalist sort of
• 16:37
  of theory. I believe that it makes sense
• 16:40
  to me. Okay. So although I don't
• 16:43
  necessarily believe everything is here,
• 16:45
  many influential and historical and
• 16:47
  contemporary figures have been alleged
• 16:49
  to be part of this and uh they take
• 16:51
  advantage of systemic crisis. Never let
• 16:54
  a good crisis go to waste or cause
• 16:57
  crises in order to push through
• 17:00
  controversial policies. Think about
• 17:02
  9/11. Think about that. Think about
• 17:05
  what's going on in Ukraine. Don't tell
• 17:07
  me that somebody didn't push through
• 17:08
  that. Can you imagine Hillary Clinton or
• 17:10
  any of these other a-holes, even
• 17:12
  Republican ones, going around and
• 17:14
  creating the same sorts of things? And
• 17:16
  don't go thinking that Marco Rubio isn't
• 17:19
  doing the same old thing that Lindsey
• 17:21
  Graham who's been sitting up there with
• 17:23
  his thumb up his ass doing nothing
• 17:25
  except collecting military-industrial
• 17:28
  complex money and spreading that wealth
• 17:30
  and creating uh chaos wherever he goes.
• 17:35
  That is how you keep the power.
• 17:37
  [laughter] That's how you keep spreading
• 17:40
  the wealth and the same make
• 17:41
  same amount of money. Before the early
• 17:44
  1990s, New World Order conspiracy was
• 17:47
  limited to two American countercultures.
• 17:50
  The military anti-govern militantly
• 17:53
  anti-government right
• 17:56
  which probably included me and part of
• 17:59
  the fundamental Christianity concerned
• 18:02
  wi concerned with endtime emergence of
• 18:05
  the antichrist. Okay, those two have
• 18:07
  kind of blended together. But this is
• 18:09
  the theory. Academics who study
• 18:10
  conspiracy theory and religious
• 18:12
  extremists, and they gave some names,
• 18:15
  but I'm not going to talk about that,
• 18:16
  observed that right-wing conspiracy
• 18:19
  theories about this new world order not
• 18:22
  only have been embraced by many seekers
• 18:24
  of this knowledge, but have also seeped
• 18:26
  into pop culture, which fuel a surge of
• 18:29
  interest and participation in
• 18:32
  survivalism, paramilitarism, as many
• 18:34
  people actively prepare for apocalyptic
• 18:37
  and millennarian scenario. Okay, this is
• 18:40
  Wikipedia trying to say, "Oh, gez, are
• 18:42
  still all nuts." Right? We're not nuts.
• 18:45
  These political scientists warned that
• 18:47
  mass hysteria
• 18:50
  over new world order conspiracy theory
• 18:53
  could eventually have a devastating
• 18:55
  effect on American political life,
• 18:58
  ranging from escalating lonewolf
• 19:00
  terrorism, you know, school shooters, to
• 19:03
  the rise of the power of the
• 19:05
  authoritarian ultraist demagoguery. They
• 19:08
  claim that it's uh you know that's some
• 19:11
  sort of a Trumpist. Now Trump if he was
• 19:14
  staying totally nationally or doing
• 19:16
  things
• 19:18
  I said yesterday that I'm trying to
• 19:20
  embrace the fact that reality exists and
• 19:23
  that we're going to steal Greenland.
• 19:25
  We've already stolen Venezuela. But I I
• 19:28
  don't want it ever to be said that I am
• 19:32
  uh for this kind of government
• 19:34
  and government overreach because I am
• 19:36
  not that I I do not believe that what we
• 19:40
  are doing is
• 19:42
  an existential threat to America like
• 19:45
  they're trying to pump down our throats.
• 19:47
  This is the same old story from a
• 19:50
  reverse angle. Instead of the global
• 19:53
  elitists being people like the Clintons,
• 19:57
  the Bidens, the Obamas, it's they've
• 20:00
  been pushed down a level for a while.
• 20:03
  They'll come back or or or their heirs
• 20:06
  will come back. That's what's going to
• 20:08
  happen. And uh you know, they'll they'll
• 20:11
  be back at some point. might not be the
• 20:14
  the 20 uh the 2024 elections, but uh uh
• 20:21
  what am I talking about? 2028 elections,
• 20:24
  but they they'll be back, you know, and
• 20:26
  uh we may be in the in a different path.
• 20:29
  I always talk about the pendulum
• 20:31
  swinging and the pendulum goes uh you
• 20:34
  know both ways you know and uh we're at
• 20:37
  we're at one extreme of the pendulum
• 20:39
  right now but don't think it won't be
• 20:41
  going back the other way. uh progressive
• 20:44
  welcome international organization and
• 20:46
  regimes such as the United Nations after
• 20:49
  world wars were conducted but argued
• 20:52
  that these initiatives suffered from a
• 20:54
  democratic deficit and they tried to
• 20:57
  create all these free states like
• 21:00
  Ukraine. Ukraine ain't free. Ukraine
• 21:02
  doesn't have anything relate related to
• 21:05
  democracy, right? It's just not there.
• 21:07
  This was used during the cold war.
• 21:09
  There's plenty of history on um
• 21:14
  new world order, but postcold war the
• 21:17
  new world order was a focus of the
• 21:19
  American Christian right allegedly by
• 21:21
  Wikipedia. I don't believe that. I think
• 21:23
  it was it was uh more of a centrist
• 21:27
  deal. And uh uh the new world order is a
• 21:30
  a prophesied anti-Christian enemy
• 21:33
  established by globalists who use
• 21:35
  perceived secular philosophy such as
• 21:38
  environmentalism, feminism, socialism to
• 21:41
  thwart Christianity through the work of
• 21:44
  organizations such as the UN, the
• 21:46
  European Union, World Trade
• 21:48
  Organization, World Health Organization.
• 21:51
  These are all corrupt organizations.
• 21:53
  Every single one of them that they list
• 21:55
  is corrupt.
• 21:58
  Crazy stuff. It's been observed that
• 21:59
  throughout the 90s, the galvanized
• 22:01
  language used by conspiracy theorists
• 22:04
  led to militancy in the rise of American
• 22:07
  militia movement. An anti-government
• 22:10
  ideology spread through speeches,
• 22:13
  rallies, meetings, books, videotapes
• 22:16
  sold at gun shows. They allege shortwave
• 22:19
  satellite radio and now propaganda
• 22:22
  independent radio that these things are
• 22:26
  uh these conspiracy theories. They talk
• 22:29
  about they say the end time is a
• 22:31
  conspiracy theory. They talk about the
• 22:33
  Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Protocol
• 22:36
  of Elder Zion and all of these things,
• 22:39
  the Knights of the Round Table. They and
• 22:41
  and open conspiracies. They talk about
• 22:44
  new age people, the fourth Reich, alien
• 22:47
  invasions, brave new world, and they put
• 22:50
  all of these under the umbrella of this
• 22:53
  new world order. Now, we have have
• 22:57
  watched and mass surveillance. This is
• 22:59
  true. I mean, all this stuff, but they
• 23:00
  say you're paranoid if you if you uh
• 23:03
  discuss these sort of things. Well, just
• 23:05
  because you're not paranoid doesn't mean
• 23:07
  they're not out to get you. [laughter]
• 23:10
  You know, if you're not paranoid, you're
• 23:13
  you're living in a dream world of your
• 23:15
  own creation. Anyway, so the new world
• 23:17
  order, we're talking about that. My
• 23:19
  theory of the new world order is more of
• 23:22
  a globalist elite. Uh, if you want to
• 23:24
  call me a conspiracy theorist, it's
• 23:26
  great. But I believe that there is some
• 23:30
  kind of not a not a
• 23:33
  not something that's been around and it
• 23:35
  h but it has been around but it's not
• 23:37
  the same people father to son father to
• 23:39
  daughter independent although big
• 23:41
  families certainly with uh generational
• 23:45
  wealth do have a tendency to be part of
• 23:48
  this and uh you know if you can create
• 23:50
  your own generational wealth you can get
• 23:54
  your family into this cabal. Okay. I
• 23:58
  believe that huge money, wherever it
• 24:01
  comes from, is the entry ticket. And the
• 24:04
  fact that huge money is coming from
• 24:06
  so-called third world countries that
• 24:08
  really are not,
• 24:11
  I think that's been a problem for these
• 24:13
  globalist elites that have, you know,
• 24:15
  done this stuff for years. Okay, that's
• 24:18
  the SAM part of the theory. Okay. And
• 24:21
  and and most of that with variation,
• 24:25
  various forms of that, you know,
• 24:27
  population control, coupet, mind
• 24:29
  control, you know, alleged conspirators,
• 24:32
  all these things. Um, I believe in
• 24:35
  certain
• 24:37
  uh degrees. But I also am a realist and
• 24:40
  I think, so you want to call me a
• 24:41
  conspiracy theorist, great. But what I
• 24:44
  wanted to get to was the fact that with
• 24:47
  Trump came a huge fracture in this world
• 24:50
  order because Trump was not allowed to
• 24:53
  be a part of it. He was a loose cannon.
• 24:56
  He was the grenade with the the uh pin
• 24:59
  already pulled and somebody just holding
• 25:01
  on the clip. And uh that is Donald
• 25:04
  Trump. And he has been doing things that
• 25:07
  do not comply with the rest. has focused
• 25:10
  it back to America and you can like
• 25:14
  that. I don't really like what he's
• 25:17
  doing internationally. I've been pretty
• 25:18
  clear about that. And uh you know
• 25:21
  regardless of some of the justifications
• 25:23
  for what people have made that oh gez
• 25:26
  it's an existential threat. China,
• 25:28
  Russia, existential threats to the US.
• 25:32
  And that that's crap. And uh uh
• 25:35
  basically if we would economically
• 25:39
  work with and not against these two
• 25:43
  great powers, the three of them and
• 25:45
  people have alleged also that that Xi
• 25:48
  Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump
• 25:50
  could form a triumvirate that really
• 25:52
  could create a new world safe peaceful
• 25:56
  order. The trouble is is the safe and
• 25:59
  peaceful never remains ultimately safe
• 26:02
  and peaceful. But that for a couple of
• 26:04
  generations if the three of them had get
• 26:06
  together and create something and I
• 26:08
  would say you would have to add somebody
• 26:10
  like a Modi from India maybe some of the
• 26:13
  BRICS countries. Remember me telling you
• 26:15
  about being at the BRICS conference in
• 26:17
  Kazan, Russia last year and getting
• 26:20
  interviewed uh by a fake Vladimir Putin.
• 26:23
  I was holding a photo of Putin and it
• 26:25
  was like I had to speak to him and they
• 26:27
  uh they asked me and I said well you
• 26:29
  know in 10 years could America join
• 26:31
  Bricks? Frankly, I think that is and
• 26:35
  that was my instinct way back then. You
• 26:38
  need to join these type of things that
• 26:41
  are focused on economic
• 26:44
  power.
• 26:45
  You don't need to lonewolf it like we're
• 26:48
  doing and creating in the US. Okay. And
• 26:51
  so with all that and the Sam backdrop of
• 26:54
  what I believe the new world order could
• 26:56
  or should or is uh you know and my very
• 26:59
  and I'm open to discussion on that. I I
• 27:01
  I I like that sort of theory. I want to
• 27:05
  share with you Mark Carney's World
• 27:07
  Economic Forum speech, okay? Which just
• 27:11
  happened yesterday, okay? And it's it's
• 27:13
  about a new world order. It was at the
• 27:15
  annual meeting in Davos, World Economic
• 27:18
  Forum. Donald Trump is going to speak
• 27:20
  there. Um I hope I haven't missed it,
• 27:22
  but I really haven't paid attention to
• 27:23
  the schedule and I'm doing most of it
• 27:25
  through YouTube. This is out on YouTube
• 27:27
  and a lot of people need to pay
• 27:29
  attention to Davos. Ukraine has been,
• 27:31
  you know, shuffled off to, you know, a
• 27:34
  much lower priority in the agenda and
• 27:38
  the agenda is Greenland, world power,
• 27:42
  uh, sovereignty of many types. And so
• 27:44
  Mark Carney gave a speech yesterday.
• 27:46
  He's a Canadian prime minister, I think,
• 27:49
  is his title. Don't don't quote me on
• 27:51
  that. It could they could call him
• 27:52
  something else, and I always get I
• 27:53
  haven't really paid much attention to
• 27:55
  this guy. Um, but he spent some time in
• 27:59
  China create like I told you yesterday
• 28:02
  and and and I followed that that speech
• 28:05
  yesterday. I walked you through what uh
• 28:07
  I believe his name was Jansen, a guy on
• 28:09
  YouTube spoke about uh Canada
• 28:13
  diversifying
• 28:14
  away from the United States and that is
• 28:17
  also happening. And what we are causing,
• 28:20
  and when I say we, Donald Trump in this
• 28:23
  instance, the the what our country is
• 28:26
  doing in talking about seizing Greenland
• 28:29
  and that be an existential threat,
• 28:31
  It's not uh seizing the
• 28:35
  Venezuelan government, claiming it's a
• 28:37
  drug war. That is too. That's
• 28:40
  not true. And uh I'm not saying they
• 28:42
  don't shuffle off drugs, but there are
• 28:44
  far greater countries in the same region
• 28:48
  of South America that do it 10 times
• 28:51
  better than Venezuela ever did. And you
• 28:54
  justify it by going and by arresting a
• 28:57
  guy out of your jurisdiction and and
• 28:59
  creating law that doesn't exist to keep
• 29:02
  him. But the real thing is the same old
• 29:05
  regime change that America engages in to
• 29:08
  keep its power. And the reason is all
• 29:11
  economic. Don't go thinking this is
• 29:13
  anything other than economic uh theft.
• 29:16
  We've stolen the oil and and all of the
• 29:19
  rich resources of Venezuela and we're
• 29:22
  putting in a puppet government that will
• 29:24
  support America. Period. And that is
• 29:28
  what we have done. And and we have done
• 29:31
  it in a quiet and in a way that Russia
• 29:34
  hasn't been able to do with Ukraine.
• 29:37
  But it's the same sort of we aren't
• 29:40
  putting up with this on our border and
• 29:43
  so America can't really complain about
• 29:45
  what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Right?
• 29:48
  So with all that being said, I speak way
• 29:51
  too much, but it's my radio show. So
• 29:52
  there you go. I've given you a very good
• 29:55
  uh I believe view of Samism. We can call
• 29:59
  it the theory of Sam uh that you can put
• 30:02
  uh in your pocket and choose to believe
• 30:05
  it or not believe it. But now we're
• 30:07
  going to listen to Mark Carney. And this
• 30:09
  is about a 15minute
• 30:12
  deal. And we will probably listen to all
• 30:15
  of it because this is important. Pay
• 30:18
  attention to what he said here.
• 30:21
  It seems that every day we're reminded
• 30:25
  that we live in an era of great power
• 30:28
  rivalry. That the rules-based order is
• 30:31
  fading. that the strong can do what they
• 30:34
  can and the weak must suffer what they
• 30:37
  must. And this apherism of Thusidities
• 30:41
  is presented as inevitable as the
• 30:44
  natural logic of international relations
• 30:47
  reasserting itself.
• 30:49
  And faced with this logic,
• 30:52
  there is a strong tendency for countries
• 30:55
  to go along to get along, to
• 30:58
  accommodate,
• 31:00
  to avoid trouble, to hope that
• 31:02
  compliance will buy safety.
• 31:06
  Well, it won't.
• 31:09
  So, what are our options?
• 31:11
  In 1978, the Czech dissident Vaslav
• 31:14
  Havl, later president,
• 31:17
  wrote an essay called the power of the
• 31:19
  powerless. And in it, he asked a simple
• 31:22
  question. How did the communist system
• 31:25
  sustain itself?
• 31:27
  And his answer began with a green
• 31:29
  groceryer. Every morning, this
• 31:31
  shopkeeper places a sign in his window,
• 31:34
  workers of the world unite. He doesn't
• 31:37
  believe it. No one does. But he places
• 31:41
  the sign anyway to avoid trouble, to
• 31:43
  signal compliance, to get along. And
• 31:47
  because every shopkeeper on every street
• 31:49
  does the same, the system persists,
• 31:52
  not through violence alone, but through
• 31:55
  the participation of ordinary people in
• 31:58
  rituals they privately know to be false.
• 32:02
  Havl called this living within a lie.
• 32:06
  The system's power comes not from its
• 32:08
  truth, but from everyone's willingness
• 32:09
  to perform as if it were true.
• 32:13
  And its fragility comes from the same
• 32:15
  source. When even one person stops
• 32:19
  performing, when the green grosser
• 32:21
  removes his sign, the illusion begins to
• 32:23
  crack.
• 32:26
  Friends, it is time for companies and
• 32:30
  countries to take their signs down.
• 32:34
  Four decades. [applause]
• 32:42
  For decades, countries like Canada
• 32:44
  prospered under what we called the
• 32:45
  rules-based international order. We
• 32:48
  joined its institutions. We praised its
• 32:50
  principles. We benefited from its
• 32:52
  predictability.
• 32:54
  And because of that, we could pursue
• 32:55
  values-based foreign policies under its
• 32:57
  protection.
• 32:59
  We knew the story of the international
• 33:01
  rulesbased order was partially false.
• 33:04
  That the strongest would exempt
• 33:06
  themselves when convenient. That trade
• 33:08
  rules were enforced s asymmetrically.
• 33:13
  And we knew that international law
• 33:15
  applied with varying rigor depending on
• 33:16
  the identity of the accused or the
• 33:19
  victim.
• 33:21
  This fiction was useful and American
• 33:24
  hijgemony in particular helped provide
• 33:26
  public goods, open sea lanes, a stable
• 33:29
  financial system, collective security
• 33:32
  and support for frameworks for resolving
• 33:34
  disputes.
• 33:36
  So we placed the sign in the window. We
• 33:39
  participated in the rituals and we
• 33:42
  largely avoided calling out the gaps
• 33:45
  between rhetoric and reality.
• 33:48
  This bargain no longer works. Let me be
• 33:52
  direct. We are in the midst of a
• 33:54
  rupture, not a transition.
• 33:57
  Over the past two decades, a series of
• 33:59
  crises in finance, health, energy, and
• 34:01
  geopolitics have laid bare the risks of
• 34:04
  extreme global integration. But more
• 34:06
  recently, great powers have begun using
• 34:09
  economic integration as weapons. Tariffs
• 34:12
  as leverage, financial infrastructure as
• 34:15
  coercion, supply chains as
• 34:16
  vulnerabilities to be exploited.
• 34:20
  You cannot live within the lie of mutual
• 34:22
  benefit through integration. When
• 34:25
  integration becomes the source of your
• 34:28
  subordination,
• 34:31
  the multilateral institutions on which
• 34:33
  the middle powers have relied, the WTO,
• 34:36
  the UN, the COP, the architecture, the
• 34:40
  very architecture of collective problem
• 34:43
  solving are under threat.
• 34:46
  And as a result, many countries are
• 34:48
  drawing the same conclusions that they
• 34:50
  must develop greater strategic autonomy
• 34:53
  in energy, food, critical minerals, in
• 34:55
  finance and supply chains. And this
• 34:58
  impulse is understandable. A country
• 35:01
  that can't feed itself, fuel itself, or
• 35:03
  defend itself has few options. When the
• 35:06
  rules no longer protect you, you must
• 35:09
  protect yourself.
• 35:11
  But let's be cleareyed about where this
• 35:13
  leads.
• 35:14
  A world of fortresses will be poorer,
• 35:17
  more fragile, and less sustainable.
• 35:20
  And there's another truth. If great
• 35:23
  powers abandon even the pretense of
• 35:25
  rules and values for the unhindered
• 35:27
  pursuit of their power and interests,
• 35:30
  the gains from transactionalism
• 35:33
  will become harder to replicate.
• 35:37
  Hegeimons cannot continually monetize
• 35:40
  their relationships.
• 35:42
  Allies will diversify to hedge against
• 35:45
  uncertainty.
• 35:47
  They'll buy insurance, increase options
• 35:50
  in order to rebuild sovereignty.
• 35:52
  Sovereignty that was once grounded in
• 35:54
  rules, but will increasingly be anchored
• 35:57
  in the ability to withstand pressure.
• 36:02
  This room knows this is classic risk
• 36:05
  management. Risk management comes at a
• 36:08
  price.
• 36:10
  But that cost of strategic autonomy of
• 36:12
  sovereignty can also be shared.
• 36:16
  Collective investments in resilience are
• 36:18
  cheaper than everyone building their own
• 36:20
  fortresses.
• 36:22
  Shared standards reduce fragmentations.
• 36:24
  Complimentarities are positive some. And
• 36:28
  the question for middle powers like
• 36:30
  Canada is not whether to adapt to the
• 36:33
  new reality. We must. The question is
• 36:36
  whether we adapt by simply building
• 36:38
  higher walls or whether we can do
• 36:40
  something more ambitious.
• 36:44
  Now, Canada was amongst the first to
• 36:47
  hear the wakeup call leading us to
• 36:49
  fundamentally shift our strategic
• 36:51
  posture.
• 36:53
  Canadians know that our old comfortable
• 36:55
  assumptions that our geography and
• 36:57
  alliance memberships automatically
• 36:58
  conferred prosperity and security,
• 37:02
  that assumption is no longer valid.
• 37:05
  And our new approach rests on what
• 37:07
  Alexander Stub, the president of
• 37:09
  Finland, has termed valuebased realism.
• 37:12
  Or to put another way, we aim to be both
• 37:15
  principled and pragmatic.
• 37:18
  Principled in our commitment to
• 37:19
  fundamental values, sovereignty,
• 37:22
  territorial integrity, the prohibition
• 37:24
  of the use of force except when
• 37:26
  consistent with the UN charter, and
• 37:28
  respect for human rights. and pragmatic
• 37:31
  in recognizing that progress is often
• 37:33
  incremental, that interests diverge,
• 37:36
  that not every partner will share all of
• 37:39
  our values. So, we're engaging broadly,
• 37:42
  strategically with open eyes. We
• 37:44
  actively take on the world as it is, not
• 37:48
  wait around for a world we wish to be.
• 37:52
  We are calibrating our relationships so
• 37:55
  their depth reflects our values. And
• 37:58
  we're prioritizing broad engagement to
• 38:00
  maximize our influence given and given
• 38:02
  the fluidity of the world at the moment,
• 38:04
  the risks that this poses and the stakes
• 38:07
  for what comes next.
• 38:10
  And we are no longer just relying on the
• 38:12
  strength of our values, but also the
• 38:14
  value of our strength.
• 38:17
  We are building that strength at home.
• 38:20
  Since my government took office, we have
• 38:22
  cut taxes on incomes, on capital gains
• 38:25
  and business investment. We have removed
• 38:27
  all federal barriers to interprovincial
• 38:29
  trade. We are fast-tracking a trillion
• 38:31
  dollars of investments in energy, AI,
• 38:34
  critical minerals, new trade corridors,
• 38:36
  and beyond. We're doubling our defense
• 38:38
  spending by the end of this decade, and
• 38:40
  we're doing so in ways that build our
• 38:42
  domestic industries.
• 38:44
  And we are rapidly diversifying abroad.
• 38:47
  We've agreed a comprehensive strategic
• 38:50
  partnership with the EU, including
• 38:52
  joining SAFE, the European defense
• 38:55
  procurement arrangements. We have signed
• 38:57
  12 other trade and security deals on
• 39:00
  four continents in 6 months. In the past
• 39:03
  few days, we've concluded new strategic
• 39:05
  partnerships with China and Qatar. We're
• 39:08
  negotiating free trade packs with India,
• 39:11
  ASEAN, Thailand, Philippines, and
• 39:12
  Marasur.
• 39:15
  We're doing something else.
• 39:17
  To help solve global problems, we're
• 39:19
  pursuing variable geometry. In other
• 39:22
  words, different coalitions for
• 39:23
  different issues based on common values
• 39:26
  and interests. So on Ukraine, we're a
• 39:29
  core member of the coalition of the
• 39:31
  willing and one of the largest per
• 39:33
  capita contributors to its defense and
• 39:35
  security.
• 39:37
  on Arctic's sovereignty. We stand firmly
• 39:40
  with Greenland and Denmark and fully
• 39:42
  support their unique right to determine
• 39:45
  Greenland's future.
• 39:50
  [applause]
• 39:55
  Our commitment to NATO's Article 5 is
• 39:58
  unwavering.
• 40:00
  So, we're working with our NATO allies,
• 40:03
  including the Nordic Baltic Gate, to
• 40:05
  further secure the alliance's northern
• 40:07
  and western flanks, including through
• 40:10
  Canada's unprecedented investments in
• 40:13
  over the horizon radar, in submarines,
• 40:16
  in aircraft, and boots on the ground,
• 40:19
  boots on the ice.
• 40:21
  Canada strongly opposes tariffs over
• 40:24
  Greenland and calls for focused talks to
• 40:27
  achieve our shared objectives of
• 40:30
  security and prosperity in the Arctic.
• 40:34
  On plurilateral trade, we're championing
• 40:36
  efforts to build a bridge between the
• 40:38
  Trans-Pacific Partnership in the
• 40:40
  European Union, which would create a new
• 40:42
  trading block of 1.5 billion people. On
• 40:46
  critical minerals, we're forming buyers
• 40:48
  clubs anchored in the G7 so that the
• 40:50
  world can diversify away from
• 40:52
  concentrated supply. And on AI, we're
• 40:55
  cooperating with like-minded democracies
• 40:58
  to ensure that we won't ultimately be
• 41:00
  forced to choose between hegeimons and
• 41:03
  hyperscalers.
• 41:06
  This is not naive multilateralism,
• 41:09
  nor is it relying on
• 41:11
  their institutions. It's building
• 41:14
  coalitions that work issues by issue
• 41:17
  with partners who share enough common
• 41:19
  ground to act together.
• 41:22
  In some cases, this will be the vast
• 41:24
  majority of nations. What it's doing is
• 41:28
  creating a dense web of connections
• 41:30
  across trade investment culture on which
• 41:32
  we can draw for future challenges and
• 41:35
  opportunities.
• 41:38
  argue the middle powers must act
• 41:40
  together because if we're not at the
• 41:41
  table, we're on the menu.
• 41:46
  But I'd also say that great powers,
• 41:49
  great powers can afford for now to go it
• 41:51
  alone. They have the market size, the
• 41:53
  military capacity, and the leverage to
• 41:56
  dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But
• 42:00
  when we only negotiate bilaterally with
• 42:02
  a hedgeimon, we negotiate from weakness.
• 42:05
  We accept what's offered. We compete
• 42:08
  with each other to be the most
• 42:10
  accommodating.
• 42:12
  This is not sovereignty. It's the
• 42:14
  performance of sovereignty while
• 42:15
  accepting subordination.
• 42:19
  In a world of great power rivalry, the
• 42:21
  countries in between have a choice.
• 42:24
  Compete with each other for favor or to
• 42:27
  combine to create a third path with
• 42:30
  impact.
• 42:33
  We shouldn't allow the rise of hard
• 42:35
  power to blind us to the fact that the
• 42:38
  power of legitimacy, integrity, and
• 42:40
  rules will remain strong if we choose to
• 42:44
  wield them together,
• 42:46
  which brings me back to Hav.
• 42:49
  What does it mean for middle powers to
• 42:52
  live the truth? Well, first, it means
• 42:55
  naming reality. Stop invoking
• 42:57
  rules-based international order as
• 43:00
  though it still functions as advertised.
• 43:02
  Call it what it is, a system of
• 43:04
  intensifying great power rivalry where
• 43:07
  the most powerful pursue their interests
• 43:09
  using economic integration as coercion.
• 43:13
  It means acting consistently applying
• 43:16
  the same standards to allies and rivals.
• 43:19
  When middle powers criticize economic
• 43:21
  intimidation from one direction but stay
• 43:24
  silent when it comes from another, we
• 43:26
  are keeping the sign in the window.
• 43:30
  It means building what we claim to
• 43:32
  believe in
• 43:34
  rather than waiting for the old order to
• 43:36
  be restored. It means creating
• 43:38
  institutions and agreements that
• 43:40
  function as described.
• 43:42
  And it means reducing the leverage that
• 43:44
  enables coercion. That's building a
• 43:47
  strong domestic economy. should be every
• 43:49
  government's immediate priority.
• 43:52
  And diversification internationally is
• 43:54
  not just economic prudence. It's a
• 43:56
  material foundation for honest foreign
• 43:58
  policy because countries earn the right
• 44:01
  to principled stands by reducing their
• 44:03
  vulnerability to retaliation.
• 44:07
  So Canada
• 44:11
  has what the world wants. We are an
• 44:13
  energy superpower. We hold vast reserves
• 44:16
  of critical minerals. We have the most
• 44:18
  educated population in the world. Our
• 44:21
  pension funds are amongst the world's
• 44:23
  largest and most sophisticated
• 44:24
  investors. In other words, we have
• 44:27
  capital, talent. We also have a
• 44:29
  government with immense fiscal capacity
• 44:31
  to act decisively.
• 44:34
  And we have the values to which many
• 44:37
  others aspire.
• 44:39
  Canada is a pluralistic society that
• 44:42
  works. Our public square is loud,
• 44:45
  diverse, and free. Canadians remain
• 44:48
  committed to sustainability.
• 44:50
  We are a stable and reliable partner in
• 44:53
  a world that is anything but. A partner
• 44:56
  that builds and values relationships for
• 44:58
  the long term.
• 45:00
  And we have something else. We have a
• 45:02
  recognition of what's happening and a
• 45:04
  determination to act accordingly. We
• 45:07
  understand that this rupture calls for
• 45:09
  more than adaptation. It calls for
• 45:11
  honesty about the world as it is. We are
• 45:14
  taking the sign out of the window. We
• 45:17
  know the old order is not coming back.
• 45:20
  We shouldn't mourn it. Nostalgia is not
• 45:23
  a strategy.
• 45:25
  But we believe that from the fracture,
• 45:27
  we can build something bigger, better,
• 45:29
  stronger, more just. This is the task of
• 45:33
  the middle powers, the countries that
• 45:36
  have the most to lose from a world of
• 45:38
  fortresses and a most to gain from
• 45:40
  genuine cooperation.
• 45:43
  The powerful have their power,
• 45:46
  but we have something too. The capacity
• 45:49
  to stop pretending, to name reality, to
• 45:52
  build our strength at home, and to act
• 45:55
  together. That is Canada's path. We
• 46:00
  choose it openly and confidently, and it
• 46:03
  is a path wide open to any country
• 46:06
  willing to take it with us. Thank you
• 46:09
  very much. [applause]
• 46:15
  Well, friends and neighbors, I wanted to
• 46:18
  share that entire speech with you. And
• 46:22
  that was Mark Carney. Now, I haven't
• 46:24
  been the greatest of Mark Carney fans.
• 46:27
  You know, I'm not. He's certainly better
• 46:29
  than Justin Trudeau, who uh by the way
• 46:32
  is dating I forget who is it. He's
• 46:35
  dating somebody uh
• 46:38
  some uh music star here. some pop music
• 46:41
  star. I forget her name. I forget which
• 46:43
  one. But uh I always thought he was
• 46:45
  truthfully I thought he was gay. But uh
• 46:47
  I [laughter] I don't know. Never really
• 46:50
  paid much attention. But uh at any rate,
• 46:53
  if you if you I thought it was that
• 46:57
  speech.
• 47:00
  Think about this. Think about what he
• 47:02
  said, what he admitted
• 47:06
  about the world
• 47:09
  that we have all been saying for years.
• 47:14
  The sign in the window um metaphor. I
• 47:17
  like that, you know, I and and that
• 47:19
  truly is one of the reasons why these
• 47:23
  sorts of new world order
• 47:26
  uh these sorts of I don't know what um
• 47:32
  emphasis on, you know, the the world
• 47:35
  that you think it ought to be, you know.
• 47:37
  Um and and and of course he was slamming
• 47:39
  communism and talking about communism. I
• 47:43
  frankly systems of government all have
• 47:46
  their pluses and all have their minuses.
• 47:48
  If you think that democracy means that
• 47:51
  we're better than everybody else, you
• 47:53
  better think again. you know, having
• 47:55
  lived in Qatar where they have a prince
• 47:58
  and uh generally uh uh uh levels of and
• 48:04
  structure of
• 48:07
  I don't know racebased
• 48:09
  racebased activity, which they really
• 48:12
  do, and laws that I might not approve
• 48:16
  of. You know, I I I've told you the
• 48:18
  story about uh traffic light cameras,
• 48:21
  which I strongly oppose and and and I
• 48:23
  always did when practicing law in the
• 48:26
  United States. I remember Canada had
• 48:28
  these stupid traffic light cameras and
• 48:31
  they would trying to charge people with
• 48:33
  a crime in a traffic light camera based
• 48:36
  on the uh license plate. And well,
• 48:39
  there's no person. You can't identify
• 48:41
  the person driving the car. You know,
• 48:43
  how how the hell are you going to charge
• 48:45
  somebody with a crime? Uh, you're going
• 48:47
  to charge a car with the crime and who's
• 48:50
  the witness if the witness is a camera
• 48:52
  that is uh monitoring but not live
• 48:56
  seeing of a of a witness. There are all
• 48:58
  kinds of ways to attack that camera. So,
• 49:01
  we had and I always did, you know, from
• 49:03
  a constitutional
• 49:05
  American perspective.
• 49:08
  But I got a ticket in Qatar. got
• 49:11
  something uh I got a traffic ticket
• 49:14
  running a red light or something and uh
• 49:17
  with a camera. Well, there the prince
• 49:20
  has put in [laughter] has put in these
• 49:23
  traffic light cameras. It's a different
• 49:25
  structure. You just pay the ticket and
• 49:27
  move on. There's no constitutional, oh
• 49:29
  jeez, who's the witness? Where's the you
• 49:32
  know there the arguments just fall flat.
• 49:34
  And I'm not and Qatar is a fantastic
• 49:36
  country. I I I loved living there for
• 49:39
  the year plus that I lived there. And
• 49:42
  hell, I'd go back in a heartbeat.
• 49:44
  Morocco was fantastic. And Morocco is I
• 49:48
  was only there for two weeks, but uh
• 49:50
  Morocco is is Muslim and and it's and
• 49:53
  it's they they stop your car just to
• 49:56
  check, you know. There's all kind
• 49:58
  there's roadblocks all over the place.
• 50:01
  And uh there's police. They just they
• 50:03
  don't chase people down the road. They
• 50:05
  stop. They they're they're they're
• 50:07
  parked in little places along the road
• 50:09
  and every day they go to a different
• 50:11
  place and if you happen to go past there
• 50:13
  you will be stopped and they will ask to
• 50:16
  check your documents and blah blah blah.
• 50:17
  In Russia if somebody comes up and asks
• 50:19
  you to present your papers you do it.
• 50:21
  Here in America you'd [clears throat] go
• 50:23
  oh my god what the why are you stopping
• 50:26
  me? That not so in other countries but
• 50:29
  they're still fantastic countries. It's
• 50:32
  just a different structure. you live in
• 50:35
  the reality that you are presented. And
• 50:38
  for Americans, this is somewhat hard
• 50:40
  because, you know, we have been taught
• 50:43
  our entire lives that we are superior to
• 50:46
  everyone else. We just happen to live in
• 50:49
  the richest. Um, we can say we're the
• 50:52
  best, but I trust me, other countries
• 50:55
  don't like us. Plenty of other countries
• 50:58
  don't like us. And and because of that,
• 51:01
  you know, we think we're American
• 51:03
  exceptional and in some respects we are
• 51:08
  in some but when you go to a different
• 51:10
  society, you have to live according to
• 51:13
  the rules of that society.
• 51:16
  And good neighborliness
• 51:19
  is a concept that everyone needs to
• 51:23
  everyone in every nation everywhere. You
• 51:27
  can be as nationalist as you like. And I
• 51:30
  and I like that. You know, I want to
• 51:32
  focus on doing better for America. And
• 51:35
  on the Trump agenda for that, 90% of it
• 51:39
  I back. You know what? I I think this
• 51:41
  ICE stuff is a little bit nonsensical.
• 51:44
  It's gone a little too far in my
• 51:45
  opinion, but I, you know, but I can live
• 51:48
  with that because there's so many other
• 51:51
  things that are that are so much better
• 51:53
  than when Joe Biden was in office. You
• 51:56
  know what I mean? I I I I saw a gas uh
• 52:00
  price of u $2.40,
• 52:04
  $ 239, something like that. I was like,
• 52:07
  "Holy crap." you know that it's but what
• 52:11
  we've done is we've stolen
• 52:13
  50 million barrels of oil from Venezuela
• 52:19
  because our southern uh refineries which
• 52:22
  are built to process that oil were
• 52:25
  living with that oil being taken to
• 52:29
  other ports and the US doesn't have the
• 52:32
  oil to supply because of a lot of you
• 52:34
  know environmentalist stuff and for
• 52:36
  other reasons and That is the reason we
• 52:39
  are in Venezuela. Okay. And Trump was
• 52:43
  very direct about it. We're stealing
• 52:45
  their oil. You know, this is that's what
• 52:47
  we are doing. Canada, he's he's he just
• 52:50
  like narotism was the fake, you know,
• 52:54
  let's let's and I'm not saying it's
• 52:56
  fake. I'm not saying there aren't there
• 52:58
  aren't I don't call it terrorism. I call
• 53:00
  it narot trafficking.
• 53:03
  But they they they use that as a
• 53:10
  a pretext to attack and to arrest a
• 53:15
  sitting president. And that was a shock
• 53:18
  to the world. I think that's part of the
• 53:20
  reason for Mark Carney's speech. The UN,
• 53:25
  that's for other people. That's not for
• 53:27
  the US. We don't have to follow that. We
• 53:29
  can about it if somebody else
• 53:31
  doesn't. But he admitted, Carney
• 53:33
  admitted that the problem that all the
• 53:35
  middle countries had for years is that
• 53:38
  this rulesbased order didn't apply the
• 53:41
  rules equally. Russia's been saying that
• 53:43
  for years. So have many other countries.
• 53:46
  I mean, you know, this you you guys are
• 53:47
  a joke. You you create rules that
• 53:50
  everyone else has to live by, but you
• 53:52
  never live by them. You regime change
• 53:54
  all the time. You do it all the time.
• 53:57
  And we aren't in that. We have
• 53:59
  existential threats to our security when
• 54:02
  you build NATO all the way up to within
• 54:04
  striking distance of Moscow.
• 54:07
  And we've been telling you for 30 years
• 54:09
  not to do it. And you wonder why we're
• 54:12
  making a stand. You know, we we've lived
• 54:15
  through World War II and the Nazi
• 54:17
  threat. And if it wasn't for us, Russia
• 54:20
  saying this, the Europe would be
• 54:22
  speaking German. And that's there's no
• 54:24
  doubt of that. You know, the US's
• 54:26
  600,000 may have been the catalyst at
• 54:28
  the end that made it all uh go away, but
• 54:31
  don't go make a living under the
• 54:34
  illusion that America won that war.
• 54:39
  26 million Russians that died would say
• 54:43
  otherwise, that died for their own
• 54:45
  country. And immediately the US
• 54:48
  transferred away from saying that the uh
• 54:52
  Nazi threat of Germany was a problem.
• 54:54
  and immediately focusing on the the
• 54:57
  communism factor, we switched right into
• 55:00
  that and demonized Russia because they
• 55:03
  were a rising power and we knew who the
• 55:06
  two opposing parties were going to be.
• 55:09
  That's why they didn't, you know, that's
• 55:11
  why they lament not taking Stalin out
• 55:13
  when they thought they could because
• 55:15
  Russia was on its heels. I got news for
• 55:17
  you. Russia would have fought all the
• 55:19
  way to the end, you know, is is what I
• 55:21
  believe. I know enough Russians. They're
• 55:23
  the exact same as Americans. You know
• 55:25
  that nobody's coming to America. We'll
• 55:27
  fight to the last man. You know that.
• 55:30
  And you know that for yourself. Russia
• 55:32
  feels the same way about their own
• 55:34
  homeland. And so regardless of whether
• 55:37
  they live through Stalin or not, they've
• 55:40
  lived through the '9s. And the current
• 55:42
  population having lived through the 90s
• 55:45
  and seen that the world-based order
• 55:47
  helped them not a stitch and instead
• 55:50
  came in and robbed them blind and took
• 55:54
  all of their resources and all their
• 55:56
  money. Let me tell you this with no
• 55:58
  equivocation at all. They understand
• 56:02
  that when the McDonald's of the world
• 56:04
  left, when the Starbucks of the world
• 56:07
  left because we're going to punish
• 56:09
  Russia, they saw it as a gift. They
• 56:13
  created their Kusna toka, tasty period,
• 56:17
  instead of McDonald's that took all the
• 56:19
  stores. They created star coffee instead
• 56:22
  of Starbucks. And all they did was
• 56:26
  nationalize and sell. They seized all of
• 56:29
  those things and then sold them to uh
• 56:32
  somebody else to operate them. All of
• 56:35
  the power supply was already in there.
• 56:37
  They did the same thing to auto plants
• 56:39
  and let Chinese places come in and do
• 56:42
  it. All the all the development and the
• 56:44
  stuff that the the America globalist
• 56:48
  elitists were like, "Huh, screw them.
• 56:51
  Without our money, they can't do it."
• 56:53
  That's not true. It's wrong. And you
• 56:56
  know, I I say all of that just to point
• 57:00
  out that this speech that Mark Carney
• 57:03
  gave, if it's not a wakeup call
• 57:07
  to you to understand what's going on in
• 57:11
  the world, it should be what America is
• 57:15
  doing. And I'm a patriot, you know, I
• 57:18
  served my time in the military. I'm a
• 57:20
  I'm a I'm a soldier. I I I I I uh
• 57:25
  I didn't fight. I was in the in the army
• 57:27
  during two wars, but I was a Russian
• 57:30
  interpreter. We were, you know, that was
• 57:32
  just a constant, you know, you know, two
• 57:35
  fists raised in the air, one in the east
• 57:37
  and one in the west. And while, you
• 57:39
  know, other wars were going on in the
• 57:41
  Middle East that we created, you know,
• 57:44
  artificially, [laughter]
• 57:46
  our artificial wars were created
• 57:49
  everywhere else to seize resources. You
• 57:52
  know, that's what that's what was done.
• 57:53
  The political wars that we have fought
• 57:56
  as Americans to steal other people's
• 57:58
  resources have been going on for
• 58:00
  decades.
• 58:03
  [laughter] We haven't we have not been
• 58:05
  good neighbors. So, you could call
• 58:08
  Carney's speech that he just gave and I
• 58:10
  and and if you have, you know, I hope
• 58:12
  you listen to all that and you could
• 58:13
  listen to it again. I I would call that
• 58:15
  the
• 58:17
  good neighbor speech. Remember what he
• 58:19
  said? the same thing that uh uh that
• 58:21
  they pointed out yesterday. We
• 58:24
  appreciate and are living in the world
• 58:28
  that is
• 58:30
  not the world as we wish it was.
• 58:34
  Those are powerful words and uh I I tell
• 58:38
  you what his speech and again I'm no
• 58:40
  carney lover but he's he's absolutely
• 58:44
  right that uh Canada is diversifying
• 58:47
  Canada
• 58:49
  what what Trump did with tariffs against
• 58:52
  Canada and the demonizing of Canadians
• 58:56
  and turning them into the 51st state and
• 59:00
  treating them like you know the the ugly
• 59:04
  stepchild, you know, and slapping them
• 59:06
  around because you're you're beautiful
• 59:09
  child uh you know, is uh is your world
• 59:14
  and this horrible Harry Potter stepchild
• 59:17
  that lives in the cupboard under the
• 59:18
  stairs, you know, is just Canada. And
• 59:21
  and we treated them just like that.
• 59:24
  And and I'm not saying that some of it
• 59:27
  wasn't deserved. You know, Canada, we
• 59:30
  have been funding. Carney admitted it.
• 59:32
  We we've been helping them and they've
• 59:35
  benefited as he said from being a part
• 59:39
  of
• 59:41
  the global elite. Now, I disagree that
• 59:45
  because what what he didn't mention at
• 59:47
  all, notice how he skirted this about
• 59:50
  what I told you yesterday for the last 3
• 59:52
  4 days before this Davos uh economic
• 59:55
  forum.
• 59:57
  He was where? He was in China creating
• 1:00:00
  deals and diversifying and making new
• 1:00:02
  trade arrangements there. Canada is
• 1:00:04
  already in the Arctic. Canada could make
• 1:00:08
  some strong alliances with uh China in
• 1:00:12
  that regard
• 1:00:14
  on an economic level playing good
• 1:00:18
  economic neighbor and I don't understand
• 1:00:22
  why the US doesn't attempt that first in
• 1:00:25
  trying to instead we're creating a fake
• 1:00:28
  threat that China and Russia are going
• 1:00:30
  to steal Greenland which is complete
• 1:00:32
  horse crap you know was mentioned one
• 1:00:35
  time in a footnote [laughter]
• 1:00:38
  of some report done in a UN deal and uh
• 1:00:43
  uh but nope that's what we're using you
• 1:00:46
  know to talk about um you know anyway
• 1:00:50
  [laughter]
• 1:00:51
  excuse me I still got that that long uh
• 1:00:54
  long present cough my emphyma from chain
• 1:00:58
  smoking 40 packs of cigarettes a day in
• 1:01:01
  my youth actually I've never smoked a
• 1:01:03
  cigarette but u there you
• 1:01:05
  Um, let's [clears throat] see.
• 1:01:08
  Um, I was sent a wonderful uh
• 1:01:15
  uh
• 1:01:17
  [cough]
• 1:01:18
  really sorry about that. An ex post
• 1:01:21
  about Scott Ritter and uh I I believe um
• 1:01:26
  this is something that I also wish to
• 1:01:29
  talk about. I I knew where I was going
• 1:01:31
  after the economic forum today. You know
• 1:01:34
  that the the Davos economic forum has
• 1:01:37
  been my focus. But but get this,
• 1:01:41
  this is according to Scott Ritter. And
• 1:01:43
  if this is true now, this was shared
• 1:01:45
  with with me uh by the uh wonderful and
• 1:01:50
  talented JR who shared this with me and
• 1:01:53
  he shared a couple of them, but I only
• 1:01:54
  had time to read one of them. And I'm
• 1:01:57
  going to share this in its entirety. And
• 1:01:59
  you might be able to go and find this on
• 1:02:01
  the Judging Freedom podcast. He'll
• 1:02:03
  probably share the audio of it today.
• 1:02:05
  I'm not going to I got a different route
• 1:02:08
  to go, but I am going to share the
• 1:02:10
  story. It says Scott Ritter makes a
• 1:02:12
  claim that if true reframes everything.
• 1:02:16
  Okay. And Scott Ritter, who I
• 1:02:19
  interviewed just the one time, I'd like
• 1:02:21
  to interview him again. Maybe I'll try
• 1:02:23
  to get him on this program again and see
• 1:02:26
  if I can get a good interview with him.
• 1:02:28
  According to him, Trump's lastminute
• 1:02:30
  decision not to trigger an attack on
• 1:02:33
  Iran wasn't hesitation, but a deliberate
• 1:02:36
  deliberate move to dismantle.
• 1:02:40
  A longprepared regime change operation
• 1:02:44
  involving MSAD, the CIA, and the usual
• 1:02:48
  Lindsey Graham types of the world,
• 1:02:50
  neocon warhawks. The way Ritter
• 1:02:53
  describes it, Trump allowed these actors
• 1:02:56
  to believe that he was aligned with
• 1:02:57
  their objective. At Mara Lago, he came
• 1:03:00
  to an agreement with Netanyahu. He let
• 1:03:03
  them plan, activate networks, and
• 1:03:06
  position assets. In other words, he let
• 1:03:08
  the operation reach the point of maximum
• 1:03:11
  exposure, and then at the last minute,
• 1:03:14
  he didn't pull the trigger. Iran
• 1:03:17
  allegedly alerted by Russia with Trump's
• 1:03:20
  knowledge. we wonder moved in time to
• 1:03:23
  dismantle the entire covert network.
• 1:03:26
  Assets were rolled up, communications
• 1:03:29
  compromised, entire infrastructure was
• 1:03:32
  destroyed.
• 1:03:34
  Keep in mind that these kinds of
• 1:03:35
  intelligence networks take years to
• 1:03:37
  form, sometimes decades to build. So
• 1:03:40
  once exposed, they don't simply get
• 1:03:43
  rebuilt. The capability itself
• 1:03:45
  disappears. So, if this account is true,
• 1:03:48
  Trump didn't just stop a regime change
• 1:03:51
  operation. He removed the ability to
• 1:03:54
  carry one out in the future, at least
• 1:03:57
  under Israel, you know, for Israel being
• 1:03:59
  able to do it. Frankly, I do hope this
• 1:04:02
  is true. But, but the geniuses of it,
• 1:04:06
  the genius of it doesn't stop there. By
• 1:04:09
  allowing the situation to escalate right
• 1:04:12
  up to the edge, Trump forced Iran into
• 1:04:16
  believing that an attack was imminent.
• 1:04:18
  And when a regime believes the moment
• 1:04:20
  has arrived, it reveals itself.
• 1:04:23
  Emergency protocols also get activated,
• 1:04:27
  military movements occur, communication
• 1:04:30
  pathways change, and leadership
• 1:04:32
  protection mechanisms are triggered. In
• 1:04:35
  other words, Iran shows its capabilities
• 1:04:38
  and its hand and and who's going to
• 1:04:41
  support them. I would add
• 1:04:45
  that response, how they move, what they
• 1:04:48
  protect, what is prioritized, what is
• 1:04:51
  triggered is priceless from an
• 1:04:53
  intelligence point of view, which you
• 1:04:57
  only get when the other side believes
• 1:04:59
  the threat to be real. Right? Israel and
• 1:05:03
  its intelligence hawks were allowed to
• 1:05:06
  overextend themselves and expose their
• 1:05:09
  own covert machinery. Iran was pressured
• 1:05:12
  into revealing its defensive response
• 1:05:14
  and what it would be. No war was
• 1:05:17
  launched. No missiles were fired. But
• 1:05:19
  the strategic balance has completely
• 1:05:22
  changed. If this was a carefully
• 1:05:25
  premeditated plan by Trump,
• 1:05:28
  as Ritter suggests, then it was just a
• 1:05:32
  genius move. War mongers themselves were
• 1:05:36
  neutralized. The adversary was exposed.
• 1:05:40
  War was avoided and Trump walks away
• 1:05:44
  holding all the leverage. Strategically,
• 1:05:47
  that's a masterful move. And it's why
• 1:05:50
  Trump continues to confound both his
• 1:05:52
  enemies and his allies. And uh I don't
• 1:05:57
  know that's a you know people are going
• 1:05:59
  to claim that's a conspiracy theory. I
• 1:06:01
  can see it as being everybody says uh
• 1:06:05
  most notably JR. He and I argue you know
• 1:06:08
  uh friendly sorts of arguments all the
• 1:06:10
  time because he disagrees with things
• 1:06:12
  that I say. I disagree with some of the
• 1:06:14
  things he says. But I love listening to
• 1:06:15
  him and I like differing opinions. I
• 1:06:18
  have no problem with it, you know, and
• 1:06:20
  uh I consider him a a long time and very
• 1:06:23
  good friend. And uh I know he disagrees
• 1:06:26
  with me on some of the stuff that I like
• 1:06:28
  to spew out.
• 1:06:31
  And I am not as big a Trumper as he is.
• 1:06:35
  I don't know that there's anybody that
• 1:06:38
  is as big a Trumper as he is. And and
• 1:06:41
  I'm not against that. I I think that
• 1:06:43
  Trump has been uh in many many respects
• 1:06:49
  exactly what America needed at exactly
• 1:06:51
  the right time.
• 1:06:54
  Think about that. Uh if if you believe
• 1:06:57
  in conspiracy theories, if you believe
• 1:07:01
  in end times sorts of things, if you
• 1:07:05
  believe that we are on the verge of the
• 1:07:08
  second coming of Jesus Christ, well,
• 1:07:12
  Trump couldn't be better placed than he
• 1:07:16
  is. As you know, I remember uh growing
• 1:07:20
  up, I grew up Mormon and uh uh we also
• 1:07:23
  have the end times theory. I would share
• 1:07:26
  a story with you, but it's way too
• 1:07:28
  personal for me to uh to share
• 1:07:32
  unless it's like, you know, deep and
• 1:07:34
  true friends that I that I would share
• 1:07:36
  it with. But um there are things that I
• 1:07:40
  believe that I would never share with
• 1:07:43
  anybody and uh uh that I wouldn't that I
• 1:07:46
  wouldn't spew out. Um 98%
• 1:07:51
  of me is a wide open book, you know, and
• 1:07:55
  I am am
• 1:07:57
  I I accept who I am, okay? I accept, you
• 1:08:01
  know, my shortcomings and my, you know,
• 1:08:03
  I'm I'm comfortable in life at present.
• 1:08:07
  There there are some things that I wish
• 1:08:08
  I could change. I mean, everybody's like
• 1:08:10
  that, but in general, I've lived uh a
• 1:08:14
  pretty good life, you know, and in my
• 1:08:17
  older age, you know, I'm not old yet,
• 1:08:20
  but I'm on the verge. [laughter]
• 1:08:22
  I'll be I'll be old before to you know
• 1:08:25
  if I was a young kid you know I'm old
• 1:08:27
  you know but uh uh it's um but the older
• 1:08:30
  you get the less old you feel that's
• 1:08:33
  that's especially if you are generally
• 1:08:35
  healthy as I am you know that doesn't
• 1:08:38
  mean I can't kick off tomorrow and so I
• 1:08:41
  believe in living the you know the life
• 1:08:43
  that I wish to lead and hope to lead and
• 1:08:48
  uh you know I hope that everyone else is
• 1:08:50
  doing the same But uh the world is
• 1:08:53
  vastly different than what
• 1:08:57
  I was led to believe in my youth and to
• 1:09:00
  what and but some of those core beliefs
• 1:09:03
  that I learned in the Mormon church are
• 1:09:05
  still in my in my brain, you know, are
• 1:09:09
  are there those are fundamental tools,
• 1:09:13
  you know, I'm not a faright, you know,
• 1:09:15
  religious loony, you know, of of of any
• 1:09:18
  kind, you know, and far-right religious
• 1:09:20
  loonies exist in all kinds of religions.
• 1:09:23
  Okay. So, but but I'm I'm I'm a a
• 1:09:27
  believer without picking a a certain
• 1:09:29
  denomination. Let's put it that way. I
• 1:09:32
  have my own belief structure because I
• 1:09:35
  think every
• 1:09:37
  uh earthbased
• 1:09:40
  church has its own problems to deal
• 1:09:43
  with. You know, I'm not a preacher. I'm
• 1:09:45
  not Well, maybe I am. [laughter] I'm
• 1:09:47
  preaching to you live from the Lake
• 1:09:49
  Ozark real estate of the art studio
• 1:09:51
  today. And uh but mine is the policy of
• 1:09:55
  of of [sighs]
• 1:09:58
  of knowledge that you might you don't
• 1:10:02
  have to agree with me on, but I hope
• 1:10:04
  that you respect my opinion. You know,
• 1:10:08
  obviously if you if you're listening,
• 1:10:09
  I've I've engaged you to think part of
• 1:10:13
  the way that I I think or at least be an
• 1:10:15
  opposing point of view. You know what I
• 1:10:17
  mean? And I like listening to people
• 1:10:19
  that I don't necessarily agree with. And
• 1:10:21
  when they car thing came up for me to
• 1:10:24
  watch in the middle of the night, I was
• 1:10:26
  like, "Oh jeez, this guy's a a a bone
• 1:10:29
  head." You know, I ain't listening. But
• 1:10:32
  then I listened and I'm very glad I did.
• 1:10:34
  And I'm very glad I shared it with you.
• 1:10:36
  And I did because he is a person that I
• 1:10:40
  wouldn't necessarily
• 1:10:43
  jump to agree with.
• 1:10:46
  Liberal world leaders like those in
• 1:10:48
  Europe I considered to be weak and I
• 1:10:51
  find them to be weak because they don't
• 1:10:54
  generally do what Mark Carney did.
• 1:10:59
  Stand up. You don't have to agree with
• 1:11:02
  everything that he said, but he believes
• 1:11:06
  what he said and that is why his opinion
• 1:11:10
  matters. He's not just spewing. I mean,
• 1:11:13
  anytime Hillary Clinton opened her
• 1:11:15
  mouth, I didn't believe a word of it
• 1:11:17
  because she didn't believe a word of it.
• 1:11:20
  She was a used car salesman selling crap
• 1:11:24
  to make sure that her generational
• 1:11:26
  wealth for her family was funded by
• 1:11:29
  money from those who wish to who fund
• 1:11:32
  NOS's in the government. I mean what did
• 1:11:35
  her daughter get? How many millions did
• 1:11:37
  her go daughter get from the US
• 1:11:39
  government never have to work again? Did
• 1:11:42
  do you think they funded their family uh
• 1:11:47
  uh for generations?
• 1:11:49
  Do you think there's generational power
• 1:11:52
  now in the Clinton family that didn't
• 1:11:54
  exist before uh uh they took some form
• 1:11:58
  before they convinced Arkansas to uh
• 1:12:02
  elect them and before they you know did
• 1:12:05
  their political ass kissing. That is the
• 1:12:09
  game [laughter] in democracy. That's the
• 1:12:12
  game for the huge power. If you lick the
• 1:12:15
  right rear end,
• 1:12:18
  you can have that power. You can get
• 1:12:20
  elected to Congress and be fabulously
• 1:12:23
  wealthy. That's how it works. And you
• 1:12:27
  can go in extremely poor and when you
• 1:12:29
  leave, you're a multi-millionaire.
• 1:12:31
  And hopefully you have enough to fund
• 1:12:35
  your family for generations. The same is
• 1:12:38
  true state of Missouri. Same is true in
• 1:12:40
  many states. This is the reason why I am
• 1:12:43
  creating and we have created civic
• 1:12:45
  outlaws. We wish to go after that kind
• 1:12:47
  of thing. We wish to expose that kind of
• 1:12:50
  thing. We wish to use sunshine law and
• 1:12:53
  freedom of information act documents to
• 1:12:56
  obtain information
• 1:12:59
  that is extremely useful and they have
• 1:13:03
  to provide it but it's expensive. Do you
• 1:13:05
  know I I I shared it with you last week
• 1:13:08
  that the alcohol tobacco morons in
• 1:13:12
  Missouri sent us a document that says
• 1:13:15
  that the the sunshine request that we
• 1:13:17
  requested will take [snorts]
• 1:13:19
  $390,000
• 1:13:22
  to uh pay for and they won't start until
• 1:13:25
  we pay it in advance and 44 some odd
• 1:13:29
  years to process and we can have the
• 1:13:33
  documents after all of us are long dead,
• 1:13:36
  then we can have them. That's how
• 1:13:38
  sunshine works in the uh alcohol tobacco
• 1:13:41
  control halls of the state of Missouri.
• 1:13:45
  They're a bunch of nuts in there and uh
• 1:13:47
  they're one of our targets and some of
• 1:13:49
  it is out there on Civic Outlaws. Now,
• 1:13:52
  you can go out there and see some of the
• 1:13:55
  stuff that uh some of these documents
• 1:13:58
  that Missouri Alcohol Tobacco has just
• 1:14:01
  put out. [laughter]
• 1:14:02
  They're hilarious. And uh it's like, oh
• 1:14:04
  my god, who do these people think they
• 1:14:07
  are? They're nuts. And uh they they get
• 1:14:10
  to dictate their own morality to the
• 1:14:13
  rest of the world. It's pretty funny.
• 1:14:15
  And so that is one objective that we're
• 1:14:17
  making on civic outlaws. Another one is
• 1:14:20
  uh we're we're we're very concerned with
• 1:14:23
  HOAs
• 1:14:25
  in Florida and Missouri. This is this is
• 1:14:27
  an important concept. So, HOAs,
• 1:14:32
  they're and we're looking at multiple
• 1:14:34
  acts to go after them bec because they
• 1:14:39
  are screwing the hell out of their their
• 1:14:41
  people. They they paid for their
• 1:14:44
  existence and their property decades
• 1:14:47
  ago. They've been paid off, but every
• 1:14:50
  year the fee goes up another $100,
• 1:14:54
  another $200. You know, you're paying
• 1:14:57
  $1,250
• 1:14:59
  for a lot rent for a a a trailer park
• 1:15:04
  mobile home in a community of a,000 plus
• 1:15:07
  units. And imagine this. A,000 time
• 1:15:11
  a,000 is what? A million. A million
• 1:15:15
  bucks plus a month to do what? Have a
• 1:15:20
  swimming tool pool that was built in the
• 1:15:22
  '9s. They're funding the same
• 1:15:25
  generational wealth that's been going,
• 1:15:27
  but they but they're not happy with, you
• 1:15:30
  know, geez 200,000 300,000 a month,
• 1:15:33
  which would be a reasonable rate.
• 1:15:37
  They're upping it every year because
• 1:15:39
  why? They have to fund their uh
• 1:15:44
  globalist tendencies. They're building
• 1:15:47
  generational wealth by theft from
• 1:15:49
  everybody else by by profit margins that
• 1:15:53
  instead of being 10, 15, 20%, they're
• 1:15:58
  500%.
• 1:16:00
  [laughter] And that's nonsense. You
• 1:16:02
  know, I have no problem with people
• 1:16:04
  making money. I I I I
• 1:16:07
  live in. You have to make money. You
• 1:16:10
  have to survive. but screwing people.
• 1:16:14
  That's what we're against. And mostly
• 1:16:17
  from
• 1:16:19
  governmental and quasi governmental
• 1:16:21
  organizations. This is what I'm talking
• 1:16:23
  about. Um and and and uh so the but you
• 1:16:27
  know, I'm sorry I got myself distracted
• 1:16:29
  because I I live civic outlaws sorts of
• 1:16:32
  things just about all day long. and
• 1:16:34
  we're creating this modern law ecosystem
• 1:16:37
  that is going to be a and it's and we're
• 1:16:40
  very very close. We're we're starting it
• 1:16:43
  and but we're still doing a little bit
• 1:16:45
  of research on it and and it allows for
• 1:16:49
  uh
• 1:16:50
  well I'll tell that story another time.
• 1:16:52
  Let's get back to to to Mark Carney, but
• 1:16:54
  I definitely want to share that with you
• 1:16:56
  and and I think that on Wednesdays
• 1:16:58
  especially when people are listening to
• 1:17:01
  damn radio in larger numbers. I don't
• 1:17:04
  because it's a big day because it's a
• 1:17:06
  big day. people start listening um in
• 1:17:08
  the you know early in the mornings and
• 1:17:10
  uh uh I mean not that I have a decent
• 1:17:12
  amount of people that listen to me
• 1:17:13
  anyway you know I don't have any trouble
• 1:17:15
  with that and uh I do it [laughter] I
• 1:17:18
  would babble anyway cuz I like doing it
• 1:17:21
  and uh um I I hope that you also
• 1:17:26
  appreciate where I'm coming from and
• 1:17:28
  this Mark Carney thing from today and
• 1:17:30
  what America is doing and where I wish
• 1:17:32
  to focus back to aside from getting
• 1:17:35
  distracted acted like I often do from my
• 1:17:38
  own uh my own when my brain wanders I go
• 1:17:42
  with it. I just go with it. And uh sorry
• 1:17:45
  that sometimes leads to a bit of a
• 1:17:46
  disjointed show and but civic outlaws is
• 1:17:49
  very important to me and civic outlaws
• 1:17:51
  is something that is going to be a huge
• 1:17:54
  endeavor and what's charity 501c3. We
• 1:17:57
  got all of our ocu uh documentation and
• 1:18:00
  we are ready to go. And uh we are almost
• 1:18:03
  done with uh pulling the trigger and if
• 1:18:05
  you want to be a civic warrior, you can
• 1:18:07
  uh support us. And uh all of that is
• 1:18:11
  like 98% live. We just have a little bit
• 1:18:15
  of fine-tuning to go.
• 1:18:18
  And I think it's important because when
• 1:18:20
  we look at the world as it is today,
• 1:18:25
  government overreach is a fact of life.
• 1:18:28
  What Trump did in Venezuela, what he's
• 1:18:31
  planning to do, and and I for me it's a
• 1:18:33
  foregone conclusion. He already said it,
• 1:18:36
  you know, one way or the other, we're
• 1:18:37
  taking Greenland. You know, we're going
• 1:18:39
  to come in and, you know, if we have to
• 1:18:41
  murder 56,000 Greenlanders, well, so be
• 1:18:44
  it. It's America. It's America's
• 1:18:47
  destiny, you know, we're we're manifest
• 1:18:49
  destiny to uh own Greenland, I suppose.
• 1:18:53
  And uh what are we gonna do about Canada
• 1:18:55
  with Mark Carney saying what he just
• 1:18:57
  said? He said that because Trump is
• 1:19:00
  supposed to speak today, too. Or is it
• 1:19:02
  tomorrow? Trump's speaking this week. I
• 1:19:05
  in uh uh we will I'm I'm sure if I don't
• 1:19:08
  Jr. will share the uh entire uh
• 1:19:12
  statement of Trumpster uh because Davos
• 1:19:15
  is a big deal and I would love to be at
• 1:19:17
  the World Economic Forum. You know, I'd
• 1:19:19
  love to be a fly on the wall in there
• 1:19:21
  and to talk to some of the interstellar
• 1:19:24
  levels of people in there. But Mark
• 1:19:26
  Carney said what many people, including
• 1:19:28
  me, are thinking that you don't just
• 1:19:32
  create rules for others that you don't
• 1:19:34
  have to live by. And uh and and I see
• 1:19:38
  how quiet he was about the fact that he
• 1:19:41
  he admitted it. He said, you know, we
• 1:19:42
  don't always follow them ourselves
• 1:19:44
  basically because the US has led it. And
• 1:19:47
  you know, if you agree, well, you don't
• 1:19:50
  say anything. And we agreed with pushing
• 1:19:53
  Russia to the brink. We agreed with
• 1:19:56
  creating an enemy that didn't exist in
• 1:19:59
  Russia, but now we're often joining
• 1:20:02
  forces with China. You know, in the
• 1:20:06
  Arctic Circle,
• 1:20:07
  think about it. If Canada joined Russia
• 1:20:10
  and China and India
• 1:20:13
  in creating something, what would that
• 1:20:15
  do to the US?
• 1:20:17
  I mean, frankly, creating it as a
• 1:20:20
  military sort of
• 1:20:24
  existential threat to America, which I
• 1:20:26
  disbelieve, I think is a foolish move. I
• 1:20:31
  think it would have been and maybe you
• 1:20:33
  know I've had people tell me a lot of
• 1:20:35
  people and and you know I I don't
• 1:20:38
  believe in this type of I don't believe
• 1:20:41
  in positionbased bargaining which Trump
• 1:20:44
  truly believes in. He sets positions
• 1:20:48
  that he doesn't believe in but he sets
• 1:20:51
  the position. The position is we have to
• 1:20:54
  control the Arctic and in order to do
• 1:20:56
  that we must have Greenland. But he
• 1:20:58
  don't believe that. He's lying to you.
• 1:21:01
  He believes that we need to have a
• 1:21:03
  strong presence in Greenland and we need
• 1:21:06
  to up our military presence. Maybe build
• 1:21:09
  a huge base up there so that we have a
• 1:21:13
  foothold. Give us a 500year lease to the
• 1:21:16
  tip of Greenland so that we control a
• 1:21:19
  huge portion on either end of the North
• 1:21:22
  American continent. One in one in uh
• 1:21:25
  Alaska and one in Greenland. I could
• 1:21:28
  support that.
• 1:21:30
  I don't like lying to get there. I am an
• 1:21:33
  interestbased
• 1:21:35
  bargainer. I've given you this theory
• 1:21:37
  before. I believe in interestbased
• 1:21:39
  negotiation, not positionbased. Trump is
• 1:21:42
  a true positionbased. That's all he
• 1:21:45
  does. He makes uh outlandish demands
• 1:21:49
  that he doesn't think are now
• 1:21:51
  outlandish. That doesn't mean he won't
• 1:21:53
  use the military to enforce it. You
• 1:21:55
  know, he he like Carney said, he's
• 1:21:56
  seizing power and he is not living by
• 1:22:00
  rules. He believes and he has said it.
• 1:22:03
  The the the uh what the hell is his his
• 1:22:06
  economic dude's name? Marco Rubio's even
• 1:22:08
  saying it that and there's [laughter]
• 1:22:11
  his his morons uh uh Steven Miller is
• 1:22:16
  that are that are spouting this crap off
• 1:22:19
  uh that we're taking it regardless and
• 1:22:22
  it might makes right is what they're
• 1:22:24
  saying. I don't agree with that from a
• 1:22:28
  fundamental point of view. From also a
• 1:22:30
  fundamental point of view, I do not
• 1:22:33
  believe the lie that is being spewed
• 1:22:36
  about that Russia and China plan to
• 1:22:40
  seize Greenland in the future.
• 1:22:43
  That's nuts. That is propaganda to get
• 1:22:47
  people to say, "Oh yeah, existential
• 1:22:50
  threat with an existential threat." you
• 1:22:53
  know, where some lone
• 1:22:56
  geopolitical commentator said, you know,
• 1:23:00
  what if China and Russia got together
• 1:23:03
  and took Greenland? Wouldn't that suck?
• 1:23:07
  And you can [laughter] and then taking
• 1:23:10
  that statement made by one lone wolf
• 1:23:13
  from far away with a with a paper
• 1:23:18
  to sell and turning it into your
• 1:23:23
  I don't know your uh belief structure
• 1:23:26
  for seizing a sovereign state, another
• 1:23:30
  sovereign state. I think the seizing of
• 1:23:33
  of Venezuela
• 1:23:35
  was a huge mistake and a wakeup call to
• 1:23:38
  the rest of the world that rules
• 1:23:40
  absolutely
• 1:23:42
  do not count. If they can do that to
• 1:23:45
  Maduro, who else can they do it to?
• 1:23:48
  Which, by the way, is the only reason
• 1:23:52
  that Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham
• 1:23:55
  convinced Trump that this was the right
• 1:23:57
  move. I don't you know and
• 1:24:02
  they lost the globalist elite people
• 1:24:05
  lost in Ukraine.
• 1:24:08
  They've lost. They they they couldn't
• 1:24:10
  put up. So they had to shut up. So the
• 1:24:14
  backup plan is Jesus. We got to seize
• 1:24:17
  oil in uh you know we've lost over
• 1:24:20
  there. We have to seize you know we're
• 1:24:23
  not pushing Russia down. We need to
• 1:24:25
  focus on our own hemisphere. That I
• 1:24:28
  agree with. I think we ought to pull
• 1:24:30
  back all the the 750
• 1:24:32
  military bases around the planet. I'm
• 1:24:34
  very much against the middle states, the
• 1:24:37
  carnese of the world creating a
• 1:24:42
  I don't know what a core some of what he
• 1:24:46
  said. You know, we have to we can't each
• 1:24:49
  individually
• 1:24:51
  beg for recognition from the hedgeimon.
• 1:24:54
  We have to work together
• 1:24:58
  to resist such things like stealing
• 1:25:03
  Greenland. You know, I think the if you
• 1:25:07
  call it a positionbased bargaining that
• 1:25:09
  what Trump is doing in Greenland is a
• 1:25:12
  mistake. And in this one, they should be
• 1:25:16
  interestbased bargaining and not setting
• 1:25:20
  ridiculous positions that you know
• 1:25:22
  you're not going to stick with. And uh I
• 1:25:25
  mean, imagine you're in a car accident.
• 1:25:27
  You got a little fender bender and you
• 1:25:30
  and you I don't know, your back is sore
• 1:25:32
  and you go to a chiropractor for a
• 1:25:34
  couple of weeks.
• 1:25:36
  The positionbased
• 1:25:38
  bargaining is knowing that you got a
• 1:25:40
  million dollar policy from the guy who
• 1:25:43
  rearended you and making a position that
• 1:25:46
  your claim is worth a million bucks. Why
• 1:25:49
  is it worth a million bucks? Because
• 1:25:51
  there's a possibility you might get a
• 1:25:54
  million bucks if you were really
• 1:25:56
  injured. Does that mean you're going to
• 1:25:57
  get the million bucks? Absolutely not.
• 1:26:01
  That's positionbased bargaining.
• 1:26:04
  Interestbased bargaining would be, you
• 1:26:06
  know,
• 1:26:07
  I got these damn chiropractor bills that
• 1:26:10
  have never been paid and I got some
• 1:26:12
  collection agency calling me. I want
• 1:26:14
  these to quit calling.
• 1:26:17
  The the pos the positionbased bargaining
• 1:26:20
  of saying, "Well, they owe me a million
• 1:26:21
  bucks." Isn't going to get that
• 1:26:23
  resolved. But the interest base is,
• 1:26:25
  look, I really my interest I just want
• 1:26:28
  these people to quit calling me. you
• 1:26:30
  gotta reasonably settle this claim for
• 1:26:32
  me. And I'm not asking for a million
• 1:26:34
  bucks, but geez, how about 30,000? 10
• 1:26:39
  for the 10 for the chiropractor, 10 for
• 1:26:42
  the lawyer, and 10 for me. If you do
• 1:26:44
  that, I'm out. And generally that that
• 1:26:48
  that interest, those interests, you had
• 1:26:52
  to hire a lawyer because they won't pay
• 1:26:54
  you. You know, they'll give you $1,000
• 1:26:57
  if you don't have a lawyer. So you had
• 1:26:59
  to have a lawyer. That lawyer costs
• 1:27:01
  money. That increased the value of your
• 1:27:03
  claim. It remember the the positionbased
• 1:27:07
  bargaining is the same in the other
• 1:27:09
  direction. By the way, the insurance
• 1:27:12
  company is going, "Oh, these people are
• 1:27:13
  all fakes. We're not paying them. You
• 1:27:15
  know, this claim is worth 5,000 bucks."
• 1:27:17
  Yeah. But the danger is the lawyer talks
• 1:27:20
  them into creating a claim that's worth
• 1:27:22
  250 to 500 because there's a million
• 1:27:25
  bucks out there. That's a potential
• 1:27:28
  payout. That is your theory. And I
• 1:27:30
  believe that Trump and company are very
• 1:27:33
  seriously creating an error in the way
• 1:27:38
  they approached Venezuela and what they
• 1:27:42
  are currently doing about Greenland. And
• 1:27:45
  I'm very eager to hear Trump's full
• 1:27:48
  speech at the Davos Economic Forum. I
• 1:27:51
  will hopefully share that with you on my
• 1:27:53
  last day of the week tomorrow morning. I
• 1:27:56
  I I hope to pay attention to that. Well,
• 1:27:58
  I hope you've enjoyed the program. This
• 1:28:00
  is International Flavor. I am Samuel
• 1:28:03
  Trap. Come to you live every morning
• 1:28:06
  from the Lake Ozark Real Estate Studio
• 1:28:10
  Monday through Thursday.
• 1:28:12
  You can follow us at damradio.comlive
• 1:28:16
  and listen to the other great programs.
• 1:28:18
  Uh, my programs are always stewarded at
• 1:28:21
  internationalflavor.com.
• 1:28:23
  Usually within a half an hour to an hour
• 1:28:25
  of the program, I get them uploaded out
• 1:28:27
  there and you can always go back and
• 1:28:29
  listen to uh things that I've had to say
• 1:28:31
  at internationalflavor.com.
• 1:28:34
  And I hope you listen to us. Today is
• 1:28:36
  the biggest day in radio. It's uh
• 1:28:39
  Wednesday and uh next week will be
• 1:28:42
  another Wednesday which will be the
• 1:28:44
  biggest day in radio. And [laughter] so
• 1:28:47
  this is the biggest day in internet
• 1:28:49
  radio, let's say. And you can always
• 1:28:51
  listen and find our schedule at
• 1:28:53
  damradio.com/scched.
• 1:28:56
  And I hope that you do. It has been a
• 1:28:59
  very pleasant morning. I hope you have a
• 1:29:01
  great mid Missouri uh day. Looks like we
• 1:29:04
  have a snowstorm coming for the weekend
• 1:29:06
  is what I've been hearing. But those
• 1:29:08
  things are always lies. You know, it
• 1:29:10
  never goes as as they say. They're
• 1:29:13
  hedging their bets, too. That's just
• 1:29:15
  what people do. I believe in direct uh
• 1:29:19
  knowledge. So, you know, uh there's the
• 1:29:22
  joke that Wilt Chamberlain allegedly uh
• 1:29:25
  fan went up to him and said, "Uh, hey,
• 1:29:28
  how's the weather up there?" And he
• 1:29:30
  said, "It's raining." And spit on him.
• 1:29:32
  That's reality, folks. Actually, I don't
• 1:29:34
  know if that's reality. That could be a
• 1:29:36
  complete lie, but I heard that joke
• 1:29:38
  years ago and thought it was appropriate
• 1:29:40
  for today's program. Thanks for joining
• 1:29:43
  me. I hope you join again tomorrow and
• 1:29:46
  every Monday through Thursday.