Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The Online Safety Act is here, Uber for Her | HBR News 513

Transcript

The Online Safety Act is here, Uber for Her | HBR News 513 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five thirteen. The Online Safety
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Act is here. Uber for her were discussed the news
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: of the week and give it the Badger treatment relentlessly
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: we push into the breach. Hello everybody, and welcome to
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian. I'm here with
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Allison and Mike, and this is our news show. Trying
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: to like make the openings a little bit shorter so
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: we can jump right into them. I feel like people
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: they're not you know, you guys know we're about at
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: this point. So but I will say, let me just
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: give you guys a summary, because because we got a
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: lot going on, I had to like trim it down
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: to just a few stories so that our show had
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: a reasonable sausage length. We're gonna be talking about the
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: latest news, such as the United Kingdom's new Online Safety Act.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: UBER has finally gone forward with their women only service,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: which we actually covered on the show some years back
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: when it was being proposed. I believe anti masogyny is
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: now going to be taught in UK schools and more so,
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: stick around. It's going to be a good time and
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: we should have joined us afterwards for the patron only show.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: So on the Patron Show. I have a couple of
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: things because I couldn't decide what I wanted to talk about.
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: One was, you guys know, we're not covering it on
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: the show today, but hul Cogan passed away. It was
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: like the day after our last news show, so it
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: was like really close to that other one. And not
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: all of the commentary was positive about him because of
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: his basically his little spat with Gawker, and I thought
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: about covering some of the reactions.
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: Well, it's mostly because of his little spat with the
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: Republican Party, tearing his shirt off and going, yeah, that's
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: the real reason.
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: No, that's the real reason for sure. But they didn't
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: like him anyway because of the Gawker thing, or at
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: least they used it as you know, a method to
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: like take a shit on his legacy or try to.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: But and then I thought, you know, I thought I
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: would look to see what man Boobs has been up to.
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: So I went through We hunted the Mammoth. I think
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: Hanna did a thing on this not that long ago,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: on one of his articles. But I found this article
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: that reads, or is titled You'll never guess how in
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: cells and MRAs responded to a new UK report whitewashing
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: the manisphere or maybe you will, and I'd be curious
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: to see what his take on it is. And then
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: I had another thought because I also didn't make this
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: a story, but apparently Sidney Sweeney has been making headlines
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: and upsetting a lot of people because she made a
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: gene commercial for American Eagle and women in particular, well
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: it maybe even exclusively. We're really but hurt about it.
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: And I have a couple of let's say, TikTok's videos
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: that women made essentially, you know, engaging in what I
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: can only call mate suppression behavior where they attack women
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: that they perceive as a threat to them and then
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: they make it look like it's you know, but they
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: use threat narratives around men to essentially attack other women.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: And as you can see in the posts that I made,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: I reposted this one and I said, nobody hates women
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: more than other women. So we might look at that.
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: I don't know, it depends on what I'm in the
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: mood for. We might be we're either going to be
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: looking at the win we hunted the mammoth article, or
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: we're gonna look at some Sydney Sweeney stuff. I think
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: the Sydney Sweeney Star could be more like chill axing.
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: I think we Hunted the Mammoth could be like rage inducing,
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: especially because he's going after in cells. Apparently they're like
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: Indian dudes. I don't know. I don't know what. I'm
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: not intersectional because I don't believe in that gobbllygook. But
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: it seems like a weird thing, a weird place to
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: plant your flag. So yeah, it's either man boobs or
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: it's good boobs. I don't know. We'll figure that out
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: in the after show, So let me know what you
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: guys think when when we do that. And if you
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: want to join us for the after show, please go
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com force slast subscribe to
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: join us. The after shows are a lot more relaxed
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: and chill. We just talk about whatever. I usually have
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: a topic and a lot of people have a lot
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: to say on these things. So and if you don't
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that we've
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: been yeaed from the Internet, go to badgerfeed dot com.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: A's badgerfeed dot com. That's where all of our content lives.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: So let's get that out of the way, let's get
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: into today's stories, all right. First things first, the UK
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: Online Safety Act, which was it was an act that
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: was put forward in twenty twenty three, was fully enacted
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: in July twenty ninth and twenty twenty five. It's a
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: comprehensive law designed to regulate online platforms and enhance user safety,
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: particularly for chill in the UK. Administered by Offcom, it
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: mandates platforms to remove illegal and harmful content, including child
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: sexual abuse, material content promoting suicide or self harm, and pornography,
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: while requiring robust age verification systems. Non compliant companies face
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: fines up to eighteen million pounds or ten percent of
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: global revenue, and Offcom can block access to offending sites.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: Platforms like x Reddit and Discord have implemented age assurance measures,
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: but are reported one thousand, four four hundred percent surge
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: in VPN usage suggest users are circumventing restrictions for privacy
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: or access. Supporters such as the NSPCC praise the Act
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: for protecting vulnerable users, citing the removal of two hundred
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: and ninety one two hundred and seventy child sexual abuse
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: web pages in twenty twenty four, while critics including the
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: Electronic Frontier Foundation, argue that AT risks free se speech
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: and privacy through vague content definitions and potential encryption backdoors,
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: which could enable excessive surveillance or data breaches. Other countries
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: have adopted similar measures. Australia's Online Safety Act twenty twenty
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: one requires platforms to remove age inappropriate content, and France
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: enforces age verification for adult sites. The EU's Digital Services
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Act DSA imposes risk assessments and user protections, but avoids
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: mandatory monitoring, while China has explored limiting children's Internet time,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: raising censorship concerns. JD Van's US senator and twenty twenty
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: four Republican Vice President has expressed concerns about the act's
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: extra territorial impact, warning in a twenty twenty four statement
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: that it could quote force American companies to censor speech
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: to comply with UK laws, undermining US sovereignty and First
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Amendment rights. End quote. Supporters counter that global corporation is
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: necessary or global cooperation sorry is necessary to combat online harms,
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: but critics like VANCE and privacy advocates fear the AXE
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: broad scope could chill international platforms and strain diplomatic ties
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: with some calling its enforcement mechanisms overly punitive and prone
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: to overreach.
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: There's a lot of stuff in these laws that doesn't
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: need to happen, all right. They don't need to make
• 7:25
  Speaker 3: the websites responsible for children at all, aside from content
• 7:32
  Speaker 3: that's illegal shouldn't be on there, so you know, I
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: don't think I need to tell you guys what that
• 7:37
  Speaker 3: that should be limited to. But you make the parents responsible.
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: If your child access is a porn site while in
• 7:46
  Speaker 3: your home, you go to jail, right, because that's that's
• 7:51
  Speaker 3: child neglect. You get treated the same way as if
• 7:54
  Speaker 3: you didn't feed your child that day because you were
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: busy doing stupid that that didn't have anything to do
• 8:01
  Speaker 3: with your child. If your child develops a porn addiction,
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: you get the same punishment as if your child ended
• 8:07
  Speaker 3: up in the hospital for starvation because you weren't taking
• 8:10
  Speaker 3: care of them like you have the food, you have,
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: the money, you're not feeding your child. The government has
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: a way they respond to that. You pay attention to
• 8:20
  Speaker 3: what your kids are doing.
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: If you're going to do that, if you're going to
• 8:25
  Speaker 3: make somebody responsible for what children are doing online, make
• 8:31
  Speaker 3: the parents responsible, right.
• 8:35
  Speaker 4: The reason that.
• 8:35
  Speaker 3: Our generation is seeing generation after generation after us of
• 8:41
  Speaker 3: kids not knowing how to do things, and kids not
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: knowing how to communicate with each other without texting each
• 8:48
  Speaker 3: other on their phones, and kids not being able to
• 8:53
  Speaker 3: work at their jobs put their phones down and work
• 8:57
  Speaker 3: at their jobs. Is because parents are allowed their children
• 9:01
  Speaker 3: free reign on the Internet. Parents are allowing their children
• 9:05
  Speaker 3: to substitute devices for activity.
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: Parents are allowing their children to go into chat rooms
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: and websites that have weird content and all kinds of
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: stuff without the parent knowing what the child is doing.
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: They're allowing their children to have a computer in their
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: room with the door closed and a phone in their
• 9:27
  Speaker 3: pocket that mom or dad isn't checking to see what
• 9:30
  Speaker 3: they're doing with it. Right, that's dangerous. You might as
• 9:34
  Speaker 3: well give your kids a gun. If you let your
• 9:38
  Speaker 3: kid handle a gun and you don't teach them gun safety,
• 9:44
  Speaker 3: there are consequences that could go as far as you
• 9:48
  Speaker 3: having to bury your child because your child did something stupid,
• 9:51
  Speaker 3: or you going to jail and your child going to
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: jail because your child did something stupid, while another parent
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: has to bury their child. There are websites that are
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: just for kids or that are just for young people
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: to goof around and stuff that kids are going into
• 10:11
  Speaker 3: and parents think, oh, this is safe, it's for kids,
• 10:14
  Speaker 3: and they're getting picked up by child predators.
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: And I've seen video.
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: I've seen it demonstrated by individuals who tag predators online
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: for the FBI, where you go into one of the
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: messaging rooms or chat rooms or any type of discussion
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: between players in these websites, like roblocks is one of them.
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: It sounds really innocent, right, sounds like some kind of
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: fun game for kids. But you can be in there
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: for ten minutes as a convincing seven year old and
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: pick up twenty predators, get messages from twenty predators. So
• 11:10
  Speaker 3: parents need to be the ones that are responsible for this.
• 11:15
  Speaker 3: You can't this from like the schools can't prevent this,
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: the websites can't prevent this, the government can't prevent this.
• 11:29
  Speaker 3: Only parents have the capacity to prevent this. And we're
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: going opposite fucking direction right now, or at least we
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: have been in the United States, right the state trying
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: to take over parenthood, the state trying to to have
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: schools tell parents you can't know what your kids are
• 11:47
  Speaker 3: doing in school. We're gonna parent your children. You're gonna
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: just keep them at home for bedtime. But it's us now, right,
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: that's exactly the opposite of what needs to happen. Everything
• 12:01
  Speaker 3: else they're doing is unnecessary for protecting children. You don't
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: need people's ID to protect children.
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: You don't need any.
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: Restrictions on what people can see online without an ID
• 12:15
  Speaker 3: to protect children. In fact, children are more adept at
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: getting around that than adults, and you certainly don't need
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: to protect people from seeing who's protesting what to protect
• 12:28
  Speaker 3: children from being picked up by predators or seeing inappropriate
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: material for their age.
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: So if if people.
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: Are celebrating this, you maybe need to consider what the
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: ulterior motive is, because the purpose of the law is
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: what it's accomplishing, not what the name is. They put
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: protect children in the name so that you feel bad
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: about objecting to it, right, But the accomplishment is the
• 13:07
  Speaker 3: government gets to tell you what you can and can't criticize.
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: The government gets to tell you what you can and
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: can't see as an adult. The government gets to tell
• 13:15
  Speaker 3: websites what they can and cannot host, and not just
• 13:21
  Speaker 3: material that comes from harming children, but also material that
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: disagrees with what the government says it. Also material that
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: criticizes what the government is doing. Also material that demonstrates
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: that you're not the only one who's mad about whatever
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: it is that you're mad about, right, And that's really dangerous,
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: that's extremely dangerous. Just make it so that if you
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: have the inappropriate material, like the exploitation of children being
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: shown on your website, and you're allowing people to post
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: that and you're not it can be shown that you're
• 14:06
  Speaker 3: not doing anything to stop it, and you're not turning
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: people putting that on your website over to law enforcement.
• 14:14
  Speaker 4: Then you go to jail.
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: And if you're a parent and your child is accessing
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: porn and you don't know and other people find out,
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: you have repercussions too.
• 14:29
  Speaker 4: That's it.
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: That's all that needs to be done. And the other
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: aspect of this that really disturbs me is like every
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: fucking day we hear about this system or that system,
• 14:42
  Speaker 3: even government systems that should be the most secure systems
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: because we're paying for those, whether we want to or not,
• 14:51
  Speaker 3: getting hacked, and all of people's private information it's on
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: that system being made you know, public on on the
• 15:01
  Speaker 3: dark web, or being sold, you know, being used to
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: to steal from them and so on. Right, the the
• 15:11
  Speaker 3: the local hospital system here in Dayton where you know,
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: in in in my neck of the woods, where everybody
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: that that needs access to healthcare that's their their location
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: or their local choice to go to. All of people's
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: medical information just got exposed.
• 15:33
  Speaker 4: Right, that's bad.
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: Enough that there should never be a mandatory you must
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: give private information to this online uh this online company.
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: It's people's credit cards get stolen that way, People's uh
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: I d gets stolen that way, people's bank accounts get
• 15:59
  Speaker 3: it stolen that way, everything that's in it gets taken.
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: People's homes are getting stolen that way, right, people's people's
• 16:08
  Speaker 3: medical insurance is getting used by others.
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 16:11
  Speaker 4: People are getting medical bills for.
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: Care that's been provided to others that that that they
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: don't have any responsibility for. Like, every single time you
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: put that information out there, you're making it vulnerable. It's
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: like leaving money out on the sidewalk in front of
• 16:32
  Speaker 3: your house. Right, So the government shouldn't be telling people.
• 16:37
  Speaker 4: That we have to do that.
• 16:40
  Speaker 3: If people choose to do that, that's their choice. But
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: the government shouldn't be making people do that. And I
• 16:46
  Speaker 3: think that The only way that we can fight this
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: is we're gonna have to uh actually start protesting it
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: here in the United States, and it's gonna have to
• 17:00
  Speaker 3: be vehement enough that legislators become afraid to pass this
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: kind of law. And it's also going to have to
• 17:10
  Speaker 3: involve economic protest. If your information gets stolen, you sue
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: take legal action. This can't stand. This is very dangerous
• 17:24
  Speaker 3: and it will do nothing, absolutely nothing to protect children.
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: Everything that people are calling a benefit of this law
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: can be done without this law, every bit of it.
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: Don't let anybody fool you into thinking that protesting against
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: this law is protesting against protecting children, because it's not.
• 17:49
  Speaker 3: It's protesting against setting up a system that will allow
• 17:53
  Speaker 3: your children to be enslaved and will allow your children
• 17:58
  Speaker 3: to be basically stuck under a social credit system where
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: their information is never private again, and everything they do
• 18:11
  Speaker 3: can get them blocked from spending their money and enjoying
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: their lives.
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: All right, Mike, Yeah, I suppose as a brit and
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: I'm very sorry to start the argument with as a
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: X or whatever, I think it is right as a
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: brit as a Ukman or whatever. It is the first
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: and most obvious observation one can make about this is
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: how bad the timing is. Because at a time when
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: the biggest story, like day to day in the UK
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: is the one with all the nasis, the foreign criminal
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: nancys being but into the country constantly at the taxpayer's expense,
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: and while people across the country are protesting outside these
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: migrant hotels and they're chanting protect the children, like from
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: these foreign nasens. While that's going on, the UK government goes, okay, then,
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: to protect the children, we're gonna lock you out of
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: the internet unless you dox yourself. Wait what, how how
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: does that even protect them? And if you don't like it,
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: you're aiding and abetting child abuse. What are you a nons?
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: It is surreal, ladies and gentlemen. It's baffling, the surrealist
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: what the UK government does nowadays. It's it's beyond the
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: point of anger and rage. It's just it's surreal how
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: garishly they just flip reality upside down right in front
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: of you and just expect you to go along with it.
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: And that's where we are. If you complain about the
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: nass you are the nons. The actual noanss are not
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: the nonss. The non nonss are the Nazis. Don't get
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: me wrong. There's a lot of nonsen going on in
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: the UK right now and something needs to be done
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: about it. And the thing is, it would be trivially
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: easy to cut the noansen in half, at least half,
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: if you just deported all the foreign nonss, the ones
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: who illegally broke into the UK, specifically so they could
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: rape and pillage their way through the country at the
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: expense of the taxpayer. If you could deport those people
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: and also stop in ports.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: Oh, Mike, Mike, you might have muted yourself or something,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: or your chord. Can you hear me? He was getting
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: he was getting a bit animated. Yeah, yeah, Mike. When
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: I'll in the mean you just figure that out because
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: you dropped. But you're there. You're still in the call.
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: Oh he's gone. I'll see if he comes back. Somebody
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: asked he might have he might have yanked a chord
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: or something because he was getting animated. He's back, he's back.
• 21:36
  Speaker 4: There we go.
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: There is Okay, Yes, are you there? What?
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: Yes?
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: Can you Yeah, I can hear you. Yeah, You're good, Okay, Sorry.
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: Go ahead. As I was saying if you could, if
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: you could depart the people doing that and also stop
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: importing them in the first place, yeah, that would be great. Yeah,
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: but but there are also there are white British men
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: who rape children too. Yes, yes, there are women also,
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: by the way, and yeah, they should all be buried
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: under the wood chipper. When it comes to the Jimmy
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: Saviles of the world and the Hugh Edwardses and the
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: Prince Andrew's, we don't have anywhere to deport them too,
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: so it's our problem. The problem would be much easier
• 22:28
  Speaker 2: to solve if the BBC wasn't lying for a living
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: and binging on cocaine while they rape infants allegedly in Minecraft.
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: If and when we find the super predator nonces among
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: our own ranks, we will deal with them accordingly. I
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: eat wood chipper, and to be fair, we could do
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: the same with the foreign Nazs. Just show them in
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: the word chipper. But it shouldn't be our burden to
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: expend the energy necessary to power an industrial woodchipper for
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: the approximately thirty four seconds it takes to mince a nouns.
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: Fuck that we should just stash these foreign perverts in
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: the luggage compartment of an airplane destined for their home country.
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: And if their wasted, frozen body isn't already a corpse,
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: we dump it at the feet of their own corrupt
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: government and let them fire up their own goddamn woodshipper,
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: or set them free to go raping and pillaging in
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: a land where they belong. It's up to your Lauren.
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: Just step back, hey, Lauren.
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: So yeah, Donald Trump has demonstrated how easy it is
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: to control your borders. You don't need a fucking bill
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: full of pork. You just need a leader who is
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: willing to control the borders.
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: You guys need to find your Tom Holman. Yes, if
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: you Eastend guy, it's all.
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: If your government is not controlling your borders, it's because
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: it does not want to, or worse, it wants not to.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: And excuse me, princess, but I would have thought the
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: first and foremost thing the government of a given country
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: should do is draw a border around that country and
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: solemnly set out to prioritize the interests of the people
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: within that border. If instead of that, you are prioritizing
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: the interests of people on the other side of that border,
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: if everyone from beyond the borders of your country is
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: a first class citizen, and everyone from inside it is
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: just the help. What you've created there is the opposite
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: of a country. It's a country shaped whole in the
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: fabric of countries. It is a null space, yes, but
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: yeah no, it's it's a null space to be filled
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: with other countries. It's like if you're playing Risk, right,
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: you're many hours into the game and one of you
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: just goes, fuck it, I'm not playing anymore. They just
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: walk off. What do you mean you're not playing anymore?
• 25:23
  Speaker 2: What are we supposed to do with your territories? I
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: don't care, Just just have them? Would we get who
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: has them? I don't know. I don't know whoever gets
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: there first? Fuck it? Like, you can't do that in Risk,
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: It's not in the rules. It's just assumed that all
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: the players are going to stick it out to the end.
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: But when it comes to real life, large scale geopolitics, no, yeah, no,
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: the robot pedo gremlins in charge of the UK could
• 25:55
  Speaker 2: just go fuck it. This is no longer a country.
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: I will give all of my REINFORCEM cards to whoever
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: attacks me first. The various territories of Europe are doing
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: it too. We're playing a completely different game at this point.
• 26:09
  Speaker 2: We're playing who can lose the game fastest. You can
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: bend any rule you like, you can exploit any glitch
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: you like. You just gotta. You just got a speed
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: run the destruction of your civilization. And the UK is
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: winning at this point, at least, at least in the
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: European leg of the tournament. I think Canada might be
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: ahead of US overall, and Japan and South Korea are
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: outside favors of the upcoming Asian tournament. It's how much
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: you emasculate men, ladies and gentlemen. Have you noticed? That's
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: the cheat code for this anti game within the game.
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: The harder you emasculate your countrymen, the faster you implode
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: your civilization. And what better way to emasculate the population
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: and then to arrest them for standing up for themselves.
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: What better way than for a tyrant to commit crimes,
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: large scale crimes against the people, and then punish the
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: people if and when they witnessed those crimes. That's what
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: the Online Safety Act is doing, blocking content about legal immigration.
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: It took twelve hours, twelve hours from when it was
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: declared law, but before even Twitter had to block coverage
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: of protests against the legal immigration, not just in the
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: UK but in various other European countries. It just went
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: along with it because they were fucking terrified that they
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: would get fined ten percent of a fucking To summarize,
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: the UK government is trafficking criminals into the country on purpose,
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: and if if anyone in the general public bears witness
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: to those crimes, the UK government will do whatever it
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: can to track them down and kidnap them for that offense.
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: This is mob rule, Asi and gentlemen, what I just
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: described is exactly what the mafia does. Crime, crime, crime, crime,
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: murder the witness, crime, crime, crime, and so on. And
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: that's all this is. It's the mob giving the mob
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: the human right to murder the witness. As I've often said,
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: the difference between a mafia and a government is the
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: same as the difference between a cult and a religion
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: is just a matter of scale. It's a matter of
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: who comes out on top. And I'm not crime is
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: worse than religion a lot. I just want to make actly.
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: Crime is bad, religion is well neutral, but they can
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: manifest in similar gradients. It's a similarly you know this,
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: and yeah, no, Britain is not being run by the
• 29:05
  Speaker 2: British people anymore. It is being run by organized crime cartels,
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: by rival gangs jockeying for position in the ashes of
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: an already scorched earth. The only game left to play
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: is who can scorch the ashes into even smaller particles.
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: These people want to end Britain. By these people, I
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: mean the Labor Party, and by end Britain I mean
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: they are deliberately going out of their way to collapse
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: the country economically, educationally, militarily on every possible vector. They
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: intend to turn the UK into a failed state so
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: they can blame it all on capitalism and conclude that
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: the only solution is yet another communist experiment. This has
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: been the playbook every fucking time, and it's by far
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: the most likely explanation for why they've spent the last
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: twenty eight years making the worst possible decisions they could
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: have made with regard to the prosperity of the British people.
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: And so have their sidekicks, the so called the so
• 30:17
  Speaker 2: called Conservative Party, both of them. Every time they come
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: down on the side that fucks the British people the
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: most it's not. It can't be a coincidence. Getting it
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: wrong half of the time is the baseline for a
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: random number generator getting it wrong.
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: Every Oh, Mike did it again on no, wait, he's
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: now he's in here, but he dropped again. It's all right, Um,
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: I was just gonna say because somebody asked me in
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: the chat, and I'm just gonna do this while Mike. Well,
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: I wait for Mike to come back in. He can
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: just start talking when he gets in. They asked me,
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: what if I could reread the the law again, So
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: it's very vaguely worded, which is part of the reason
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: why it's it's a problem. Mike, you're back.
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: Hello.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: It's basically like we're going to try to protect children
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: from harmful or illegal content. Of course, like illegal in
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: the UK means like anything. Really, I mean, this is
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: the problem with when you're attacking speech. But go ahead, Mike.
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: You you had just dropped, so.
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I'm yeah. This isn't incompetence, it's it's it's malice.
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: The Labor Party is trying to destroy the country, and
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: I'm sick of pretending that the Labor Party isn't just
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: a trojan horse for communism and always has been. Their
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: goal has always been as Marx's goal always was to
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: tear down society from top to bottom and start again
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: in a brave new world where this brave new guy
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: is in charge. And yes he acts like a tyrant
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: king who takes ninety percent of everyone's spoils and then
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: spats it up the wall for nothing, but we don't
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: call him a king. We call him a democratic Republican
• 32:17
  Speaker 2: or some shit. So this is all for your own
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: good peasants. Stop complaining, trust me, comrade, or I will
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: shoot you in your man pussy. Has your culture got
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: as far as man pussies yet? Yes we have, comrade, excellent,
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: carry on, enjoy your progress. Look we in terms of kings,
• 32:38
  Speaker 2: we had a bad king once in England. Well we
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: we had a fucking bunch of them, but we had
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: a really bad one called King John. He was so
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: bad that we had to come at him with a
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: scroll going I back off deckhead and it worked. It
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: kind of worked. Bro backed off and now we can
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: actually have our own private property eventually, sort off maybe
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: one day. But that mac nakata was not just a scroll.
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: It was backed up by the force of the will
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: of the people, well the will of the baron's I suppose,
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: But the point is it was a force too mighty
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: for the king to ignore. And that's what it's going
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: to take this time around to stop this downward spiral,
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: the implied force behind the will of the people. And
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: we've only got four years for it to happen, because
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: labor has only got four years to collapse the country
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: and bring about communism before we have any more of
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: those pesky elections. I'm I'm not saying you should fight, gentlemen,
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: because my government would arrest me if I said that.
• 33:55
  Speaker 2: And I'm not saying you should flee the country, gentlemen,
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: and just saying you might want to hang around in
• 34:01
  Speaker 2: the vicinity of the fire exit like I am, like,
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: with your foot in the door, because because that that
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: that whole evacuation area is going to get pretty crowded
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: at some point in the next four years. Do it
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: before the hyperinflation, not a moment after what hyperinflation might
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: to be continued anyway, Rural Botannia's fault, and God bless
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: America for allowing me to say these things. I love it.
• 34:30
  Speaker 3: Here, so yeah, you know why no government is going
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: to do what I suggested and hold parents accountable instead
• 34:38
  Speaker 3: of instead of websites, because the majority of kids that
• 34:43
  Speaker 3: are getting exploited like that, the majority of kids that
• 34:46
  Speaker 3: are online unsupervised, that predators have free access to because
• 34:51
  Speaker 3: nobody's keeping track of what their kids are doing, are
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: living in single mother homes, and that there would be
• 34:58
  Speaker 3: those moms that would be going.
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: To Yeah, although I think the Online Protection Act or
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: the Online Safety Act is really not about safety and
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: it's not about children. It's about power and control. And
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: you know, Mike is hitting it on the head when
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: he talks about this being a COMI problem, which I
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: go after. This is why I go after the COMMI
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: so hard as often as I do. This is why
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: I don't accept that there are comedies that are well
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: intentioned or might be good for men's rights. I think
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: that's ridiculous. So I will go hard on them as
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: much as possible. And if you make the argument that
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: there is a scenario somewhere on Earth where a communist
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: can be good for men's issues, then I would ask
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: that you also bring me a Nazi that's also good
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: for men's issues. And if that makes you gasp, guess
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: what you've been programmed. But anyway, so, yeah, this is
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: fucked up, and I don't know what's gonna happen. Like,
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: I think that the only thing that the US can be,
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: because you know, as an American, is hopefully like you know,
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: an example of at least pointing in the right direction,
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: because don't get it twisted. The United States's freedom of
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: speech is constantly under attack as well. And remember this
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: act was also or something like it was also pushed
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: through the European Union and Australia, so like, this isn't
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: just a UK problem. Canada is probably gonna follow suit
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: if they're not already doing it. I know that cops
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: will show up at your door if you post shit
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: they don't like. That's basically what this is about. So anyway,
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: just hang in there. If my British friends and uh,
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: you know, we but you might have to like start
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: you know, taking taking serious considerations onto either doing something
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: something about it. I don't know as an American. That's
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: not all I'm gonna say about it. So anyway, let
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one in
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: the comments. It was really the biggest story that we
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: had but thought of was a very important one, and
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: we're going to move on to the next story. So
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: Uber is planning to roll out a new feature in
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: the US aimed at female users of the ride sharing app.
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: The new Women Preference Settings will give women riders and
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: women drivers the ability to select to toggle on a
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: settings and receive only women riders or drivers in response.
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: Uber's women Preference mode initially launched in Saudi Arabia in
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. There are women drivers in Saudi Araa. I
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: thought they weren't allowed to do that with Australia, Mexico,
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: Canada and now the US being added. Later, Uber's vice
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: president of Operations, Camille Irving, said the following statement, quote
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: after hearing from women riders and drivers around the world,
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: it was clear many want the option to match with
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: other women. When we make our platform better for women,
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: we make it better for everyone. It's about giving women
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: more choice, more control, and more comfort when they ride
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: and drive. End quote.
• 38:08
  Speaker 3: Uh, they're there are only two things that are actually
• 38:11
  Speaker 3: wrong with this. The first one is they're not promoting
• 38:16
  Speaker 3: this as freedom of choice. They're promoting it as as
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: a thing that needs to be done because men make
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: women unsafe, which is bullshit. And it's a lie and
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: it's very sexist. The other thing is they're not giving
• 38:28
  Speaker 3: men the same freedom of choice, So they're discriminating against
• 38:32
  Speaker 3: men by offering women a service that is not available
• 38:36
  Speaker 3: to men, the ability to choose the sex of the
• 38:40
  Speaker 3: driver that we'll be driving you. And that's that's really
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: something that in the United States a company could be
• 38:51
  Speaker 3: sued for. And I'm not suggesting any individual, Uh, maybe
• 38:59
  Speaker 3: go in contact the attorneys at the National Coalition for
• 39:04
  Speaker 3: Men and see if they are interested in taking up
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: a class action lawsuit in the United States on behalf
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: of all men against the company for not giving men
• 39:14
  Speaker 3: the same option in order to avoid the threat of
• 39:18
  Speaker 3: false accusations. But if somebody did suggest that, it would
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: be a very good suggestion.
• 39:27
  Speaker 2: So is this going to be another one of those
• 39:32
  Speaker 2: situations where they somehow figure out a way to determine
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: whether or not a customer is female, They add all
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: those women to their database, and then their entire database
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: gets leaked for all the world to see. This is
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: how much stuff we've got going on this week, folks.
• 39:53
  Speaker 2: We don't even have space to talk about the tea
• 39:55
  Speaker 2: app and all that Brian and Alison did a feature
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: piece about it yesterday. Go check it out if you
• 40:02
  Speaker 2: haven't already. But today it's just a casual aside while
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: we talk about a story that looks very much like
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: I hear we go again. It's hard to estimate the
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: sheer size of the market when it comes to women
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: claiming special treatment over men. Women will spend billions of
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: dollars in the pursuit of avoiding men, confronting men, and
• 40:26
  Speaker 2: avoiding the men they've confronted, and confronting the men they've avoided,
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: and so on. I suppose men might also be willing
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: to put capital into the prospect of men getting their
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: own safe spaces away from women. But it's effectively illegal
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: for men to do that at this point. It's not
• 40:45
  Speaker 2: technically illegal, like it's just like it's not technically illegal
• 40:49
  Speaker 2: for those folks in the Arkansas Outback region or wherever
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: it is to create a whites only community. That's another story,
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: not covering officially, just tangentially veering into. But here we are,
• 41:06
  Speaker 2: and now that the general public has been made virally
• 41:09
  Speaker 2: aware that there is a community somewhere in the Arkansas
• 41:13
  Speaker 2: Outback that has the audacity to reject non white people
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: of no doubt there are race baiting law sharks circling
• 41:21
  Speaker 2: the place doing whatever they can to shut it down.
• 41:24
  Speaker 2: Just keep putting pressure on it until that white only
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: community is getting violently invaded by outraged kikes and their
• 41:34
  Speaker 2: nigger slaves. I sorry, that's what it is, and they
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: have no choice but to scatter into the wilderness lest
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: they all be diversified to death. In the same way,
• 41:46
  Speaker 2: it's effectively impossible for men to have men only spaces,
• 41:50
  Speaker 2: even though it's technically legal. When it's private, that male
• 41:54
  Speaker 2: space will be brute forced out of existence, and the government,
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: which is supposed to be in the business of protecting
• 42:02
  Speaker 2: the inalienable rights of law abiding citizens from the tyranny
• 42:06
  Speaker 2: of the majority, mysteriously turns a blind eye when it's
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: men and or white people who are being violently terrorized
• 42:14
  Speaker 2: by everyone else, or indeed bureaucratically terrorized by the government itself,
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: or indeed violently terrorized by the government itself like in Britain.
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: That's that's that's in your future, America, unless big thing
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: happens soon. You got to make big thing happen. And yeah,
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: the other thing I have to ask uber the same
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: thing I would ask t the app that only allows
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: verifiably female users. How are you verifying this? I know,
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: I know you're taking pictures with webcams and snapshots of
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: driver's licenses and whatnot. So is that an admission that
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: you can tell a person's gender by what their face
• 42:59
  Speaker 2: looks like and whether their ID says male or female?
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: Given that you are dealing with feminists, and you are
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: necessarily dealing with feminists, how are you dealing with all
• 43:12
  Speaker 2: the complaints that you must be getting from the men
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: who identify as women you know, and their allies and advocates.
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: You're must be getting complaints along the lines of your
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: facial recognition software has misgendered me. I know I have
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: a strong jaw, but my jaw identifies as a weak jaw.
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: How dare you? And yes, I know it says M
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: on my driver's license, but that's only because Orange Man
• 43:39
  Speaker 2: is forcing me to misgender myself. This is transphobia of
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: the highest order, and I won't let you get away
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: with it. And how could it not be transphobia? How
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: can an app determine biological sex through its own kind
• 43:55
  Speaker 2: of biometric data and not be accused of transphobia Under
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: the brads umbrella definition of transphobia, like, how are you
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: getting away with it when you obviously have thousands of
• 44:08
  Speaker 2: feminist parents willingly admitting themselves into your ranks. They can't
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: all be urfs, surely, But this is how feminists don't
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: care about transphobia. When it comes to the matter of
• 44:23
  Speaker 2: shitting on men and defaming and destroying men and giving
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: themselves special spaces away from men, they don't care. They
• 44:32
  Speaker 2: will completely overlook transphobia because transphobia was only ever a
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: secondary or tertiary munition in their arsenal of missandric weapons
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: of mass destruction. When when it comes to the crunch,
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: they know the difference between a man and a woman.
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: They know it can be determined instantaneously phenotypically using the
• 44:59
  Speaker 2: facial record ignition software we all have in our brains,
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: and they know it can be determined genetically if need be.
• 45:06
  Speaker 2: They only pretend that there is no difference if and
• 45:10
  Speaker 2: when it helps them marginalize men, and they will admit
• 45:14
  Speaker 2: there is a difference if and when it helps them
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: marginalize men, just like they will allow foreign nonsense to
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: rape and pillage your country as long as it helps
• 45:25
  Speaker 2: them marginalize men. The men with whom they are familiar.
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: It's relational aggression asi and gentlemen. And when I say
• 45:36
  Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen, I mean ladies because it is very
• 45:39
  Speaker 2: much a lady thing, although not exclusively. They would rather
• 45:44
  Speaker 2: attack their own men and their own families than give
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: a moment's notice to the barbarians at the gates of
• 45:53
  Speaker 2: their society. There is another word for this phenomenon, and yes,
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: it's like a phobia. Drink drink for I said the word.
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: But a point I don't make often enough is like
• 46:05
  Speaker 2: a phobia aka. Relational aggression is very much a female
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: condition for the most part, And yes, I would go
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: so far as to say xenophobia is a majority male condition.
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: We have evolved this way. Men defend the tribe by
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: patrolling the physical boundaries of that tribe so they can
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: defend it from outsiders, whereas women control the tribe from
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: within by patrolling its societal rules. And we're at a
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: very strange time in history where men are not allowed
• 46:48
  Speaker 2: to do that man thing anymore. They're not allowed to
• 46:53
  Speaker 2: defend anyone from outsiders, whereas women are encouraged, incentivized, and
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: hyper fi sated on doing their thing, where they micromanage
• 47:05
  Speaker 2: their own tribe, and so we place impossible standards on
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: our own tribe while imposing no restrictions whatsoever on those
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: who would invade us, on those who are invading us,
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: And it's only going to get worse until we can
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: recognize the source of this problem, you know, men being
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: unmended and women being hyper women. Until we can snap
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: out of this ship, it's only going to get worse.
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: And that's why we talk about what we're talking about
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: here at mounted News HNI Badger Radio, even like in
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: a comment.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So I just want to say that I think
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: this is a self correcting problem for a number of reasons.
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: I think that it is inevitable that a trans woman
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: is going to complain that they're not getting the same tree.
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: They basically complain about everything, and they intentionally put themselves
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: in situations where they could be victimized so that they
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: could complain, in particular on social media. So they're gonna
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: run into problems with that. This is this is the
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: powder keg okay waiting to explode. On the other hand,
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: trans men are gonna complain because they're gonna feel excluded
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: by it because they're men and they're gonna say, wait,
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: I'm marginalized in a way that is unique to me
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: because I'm a trans man. Where's my Uber driver? Where's
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: where are the trans mail Uber drivers for the trans
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: mail Uber passengers? Which brings me to the next thing.
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: I think most Uber drivers are men, So women looking
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: to use this app are not gonna find rides that
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: they're They're gonna have a harder time finding them. So
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: I think that's funny too, because they're not gonna they're
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: gonna have a harder time getting to where they need
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: to go because if they're if they're using this feature,
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: because there's gonna be few were women driving because more
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: men drive Ubers. And then lastly, I wouldn't want a
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: female Uber driver anyway. Women generally are worst drivers and
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: they're also worst passengers. So could you imagine a woman
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: driving another woman somewhere and that woman is being a
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: backseat driver to the woman that's trying to drive, and
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: she's like, you know, it's it's it's gonna be hilarious.
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: And I think that it's a self correcting issue. I
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: think it won't last long. I mean, sure, maybe in
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia it works, but but I think that this
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: is gonna be funny, but it is. It is, you know,
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: discrimination all that. But personally, like, I believe in freedom
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: of association anyway, like one hundred percent. Like you want
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: to have an all white city, you're, well, I don't care,
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: I really don't. I'm I'm all one hundred percent for
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: freedom of association. I don't give a shit. The only
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: the only time I think it's an issue is if
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: it's the government doing it because we pay them. But
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: like when it comes to you know, citizens and the
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: private sector associating with whoever they want and discriminating in whatever,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: I don't care. I think it should be all legal.
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: I think that all of these allegations of bigotry and discrimination,
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: they're all just tools to control people's behavior. I don't
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: agree with any of it in my personal opinion. I
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: know that that's too much for a lot of people,
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: but I think that it's like freedom of association is everything,
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: and we do it already anyhow. So like if women
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: are gonna do like, why why isn't there an uper Uh?
• 50:33
  Speaker 1: That's that's mail for men only because men don't give
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: a shit. That's that's why they're not threatened by everybody.
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: They're They basically just go about their business and a
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: lot of them they have their own cars. So anyway,
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: that's all I want to say about that. But because
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: I mean Hannah and Mike, they basically covered it pretty well.
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: So let us know what you guys. Oh, I got
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: some super Child's I really got to read. I skipped them,
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: so I'm gonna read those and then we're going to
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: move on to the sory. So first, this morning at
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: ten twenty six, somebody named cat Man again gave us
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: one hundred dollars. Thank you. I don't know if this
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: was like to support the fundraiser or what, because it
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: is a large amount. But then they said consider using
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: rumble dot com. Well you're in luck. We do. We
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: are on Rumble and we have been on Rumble for
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: years now, and all you gotta do is look us
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: up on Rumble HB Radio. It's there. While I'm currently
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: looking at the Rumble chat, shout out to the Rumble gang.
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: You can just join us. But thank you for the recommendation.
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: I did take it up because I know that Rumble
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: is growing and I think that we should be posting there.
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: And I've been saying this for a long time, and
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: I'm glad that we do so, thank you Catman again.
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: I hope I'm pronouncing that right. That's what it looks
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: like for the Superchow. And then Meredith g gave us
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: five dollars on the show and said, HBr News number
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: five thirteen. I'm going to point out that anyone who
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: was a federal employee during the twenty's and twenty tens
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: has to have time monitoring of their credit because the
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: US federal government's payroll system was hacked and some have
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: been provided multiple lifetime monitoring due to different hacks. That
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: was like something that happened a while back.
• 52:13
  Speaker 4: Right, That's that's something that you know.
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: This is everywhere I can't remember which which city it was,
• 52:21
  Speaker 3: there was a pipeline that was the the electronic systems
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: for that was were hacked and and they couldn't get
• 52:32
  Speaker 3: supplies for petroleum supplies for their their city. Uh not
• 52:40
  Speaker 3: just the local gas stations and everything, but for like
• 52:43
  Speaker 3: the city buses and so it like the whole city
• 52:46
  Speaker 3: just about shut down. That was in Florida and the
• 52:49
  Speaker 3: pipeline was on the East coast.
• 52:52
  Speaker 4: There have been.
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: Instances where cities in the United states have had like
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: their utility systems have been hacked and the city operations
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: systems have been hacked. And so these hackers do pretty
• 53:09
  Speaker 3: much the same thing that the FBI virus does to
• 53:13
  Speaker 3: your computer. They break the system and hold it hostage,
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: and all you can get and send out are communications
• 53:21
  Speaker 3: back and forth with the hackers who demand ransom. And
• 53:26
  Speaker 3: there have been cities that have paid tens of thousand
• 53:29
  Speaker 3: dollars thousands of dollars in ransom because they can't find
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: and catch these hackers. So this idea that the government
• 53:37
  Speaker 3: is going to force you to hand over your identity information,
• 53:41
  Speaker 3: you're personally identifying information, Like if you drop your prescription bag,
• 53:47
  Speaker 3: you take the pill bottle out of it, and yet
• 53:49
  Speaker 3: drop it on the ground at CBS and somebody else
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: picks it up and gets your information before a CBS
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: employee can grab it and put it in the trash.
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: Those kinds of lawsuits have gone through where the company
• 54:06
  Speaker 3: has been held responsible. A company like CBS or Walgreens
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: or Rite Aid or Walmart, any company that has a
• 54:14
  Speaker 3: pharmacy like they've been held responsible for that information getting
• 54:21
  Speaker 3: into the wrong hands, even when the individual was completely
• 54:27
  Speaker 3: careless with their information because it's medical. But the government
• 54:32
  Speaker 3: wants you to give your driver's license and other personally
• 54:36
  Speaker 3: identifying information that can be used to get into all
• 54:41
  Speaker 3: of your financial shit to strangers on the internet so
• 54:47
  Speaker 3: you can watch porn or see if somebody is protesting,
• 54:52
  Speaker 3: or talk about politics or complain about the government.
• 54:56
  Speaker 4: Oh wait, no, you're not allowed to do that, all.
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: Right, So thank you Meredith for that. And we're gonna
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: move on to the next story. So let's see here.
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: So this one is not a written up thing, but
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: I just you shared this, Hannah, and I thought it
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: was pretty interesting. I was gonna read a couple of
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: the highlights. So there's a guy named Gory DeAngelis, and
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: he is apparently a school choice evangelist, so he's a
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: big pro he's a pro school choice guy. I can
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: respect that. I think that's great. And he said this
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: on a post recently. I think it was like yesterday,
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: the day before the twenty fifth, so it was like
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: four days ago. Breaking the nation's largest teachers union just
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: scrubbed their twenty twenty five handbook from their website. Too
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: bad for them. I saved the four hundred and thirty
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: four page document and he includes a thread. So I'm
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: going to read a couple of the things from the
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: handbook that they tried to get rid of that he
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: is basically dug up. So I found their handbook two
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: days ago exposed some of their radical agenda on X.
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: The National Education Association handbook says, here's some of the
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: stuff from the handbook. These are the things that are
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: public schools. And I know this shouldn't be a surprise
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: to anybody. Is going to be you know, is trying
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: to push into our kids. The National Education Association handbook
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: says educators must acknowledge the existence of white supremacy culture
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: as a primary root cause of institutional racism, structural racism,
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: and white privilege. Educators must also work to prohibit institutionally
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: racist systems. And then there's like a blurb from the
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: book here, and then he says the NEA this a
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: National Educational Association, will push strategies fostering the eradication of
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: institutional racism and white privilege perpetuated by white supremacy culture.
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: School districts must provide training and cultural competence, implicit bias,
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: restorative practices and techniques, and racial justice. But they're not
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: teaching these kids critical race theory. Guys. The National Education
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: Association believes that in order to achieve racial and social
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: justice for descendants of formerly enslaved people, educational reparations must
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: be made. And it's not just the black civil rights stuff.
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: There's all the other things. It's feminism, it's communism, it's
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: everything else. Right, The National Education Association believes that every
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: phase of governance and an all decision making levels of
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: the Association, there should be a minority participation at least
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: proportionate to the identified ethnic minority population of that geographic level.
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: And here's a bit on homeschooling. It says the homeschooling
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: programs based on parental choice cannot provide the student with
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: a comprehensive education experience, which he is like, obviously they're
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: against school choice, but they really are against homeschooling. So
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: you'll see a lot of that. Actually, a lot of
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: the people that I know that live around here homeschool
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: their kids, and their kids are smarter than the kids
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: that I've subbed for at the same grade level. So
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: the National Educational Association's handbook basically erases Jews from the Holocaust.
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: Any a shall promote the celebration of International Holocaust Remember
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: It's Day on January twenty seventh annually on its website
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: and the through other appropriate media to recognize the more
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: than twelve million victims of the Holocaust from different faiths, ethnicities, racist,
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: political beliefs, genders, and general identification, abilities, disability, and other
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: targeted characteristics. Well, actually, I think that's actually more true.
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: I think a lot of Christians were killed during the
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: during World War Two, and not just the Jews. But
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: have you ever heard of the holodomor as well? Anyway, So,
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: but like other than that, though, he basically has exposed
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: these people for not educating your kids but programming them
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: to be activists. So I thought I would share that.
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: I don't know if there's any other like.
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: Really, yeah, there's one of the main reasons I shared this,
• 58:55
  Speaker 3: like the the you know, dea stuff that's getting you know,
• 59:00
  Speaker 3: all of the stuff that's getting taught that's bad. We've
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: been talking about that. But there's another underlying reason, all right.
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: So historically in the United States, the reason that unions
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: have existed was because when you get corporations that are big,
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: that that have work that is being done that is
• 59:24
  Speaker 3: dangerous and very demanding on the body of the individual
• 59:31
  Speaker 3: and so on. There needed to be collective bargaining between
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: the workers and the corporation in order to protect the
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: workers from exploitative, unsafe working conditions that could have been
• 59:48
  Speaker 3: made safer.
• 59:49
  Speaker 4: And you know, bad pay policy.
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: Where the workers are not getting paid what their work
• 59:56
  Speaker 3: is worth. And they would negotiate as a group instead
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 3: of individually, because you know, you can tell one guy, well,
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 3: everybody else is getting paid this, I don't see why
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 3: you want more, But it's harder to tell the entire
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: company everybody else is putting up with this. Why are
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 3: why aren't you putting up with this when it's the
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 3: entire list of employees, Right, And that was that was
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 3: the reason that the unions cropped up, Right, The reason
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 3: the union's cropped up didn't have anything to do with
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: imposing a political perspective of diversity or uh, controlling what
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: people think about race and ethnicity and all that stuff.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: They didn't crop up to make people guynescentric. They didn't
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 3: crop up to make people question their sexuality. They cropped
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: up to make sure that if a man was trying
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 3: to support his family and he went and took a
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: where he could be killed on the job because of
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: the difficulty and danger in the job, that he would
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 3: be fairly compensated, right, and that if the employer could
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: make the job reasonably safer, that they would that they wouldn't,
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 3: you know, throw people away and treat people like canan
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: fodder in the workplace. And unions like the NEA are
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 3: creating and it's not the only union. They are creating
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 3: a system within the union where the employee gets no
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 3: support from the union in terms of the rights of
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 3: the employee, the needs of the employee. The workplace isn't
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 3: being protected against threats, the workplace isn't being protected against
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 3: exploited of overtime, or any other worker related protection. Instead,
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: the unions are wasting the the union dues on this shit.
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 3: And it's not just the teachers union. The teachers union
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 3: is the most blatant and obvious. They should not be
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 3: deciding curriculum by the way the Teachers' union is. Their
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 3: function is supposed to be just what I said, protecting
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: the teachers from employer abuses of the employee.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 4: The people that.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: Should be determining curriculum should be the school boards. The
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: school boards should be beholden to the parents and not
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: the unions, and the local community and not the unions,
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: because the local community are the people who are going
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: to be hiring those students after they get out of school,
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 3: which is designed to prepare students to go out and
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 3: get a job when they become adults. But unfortunately, following
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 3: the the lead of the teachers unions, the retail workers unions,
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 3: medical workers unions, unions for pretty much any like. I
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 3: don't know if if like the big the truckers unions
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 3: and the manufacturing unions are doing this, but I do
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 3: know that the unions.
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 4: For a lot of the jobs where.
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: A lot of the workers are women and they're not
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 3: vigilant as to what their unions are doing and using
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 3: their money for, have become like this. If you actually
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 3: need union representation in your workplace, they don't do jack
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 3: shit for you. But if your workplace doesn't have enough
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: DEI policies and doesn't promote, uh, the celebration of being
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 3: having a sexuality, that's the celebration of having a sexuality
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 3: in June or July or whatever month it is, and.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 4: The celebration of being female.
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 3: One month a year, and the celebration of being black
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: one month a year and so on, like then they
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 3: get in they get on them over that right. They
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 3: don't get on them. If you're forced to work more
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: overtime than the union REGs say you should be forced
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 3: to work, they don't get on them. If you're made
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 3: to do things that the union REGs say you're not
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 3: supposed to be made to do because they're unsafe. Like
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 3: for example, when I worked for a retail outlet as
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: a shift supervisor, and one of my duties involved taking
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 3: the money that was earned that day to the bank
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: and depositing it. And and I literally would leave the
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: store with a bag full of cash and go to
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 3: a bank and deposit it. The union REGs said that
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: had to be done before sundown. It had to be
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: done before five pm, so you know, five thirty pm.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 3: So sundown hit before five thirty pm, it started getting dark,
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 3: I'd leave, Like there were some days when it had
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 3: to be done before five pm because of that, And
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 3: if it wasn't done before that time, it wasn't wasn't
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 3: done that day, it would be put in the safe
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 3: and done the next day, which was you know, the
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 3: company basically said you can't do that, So it has
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: to be done before that time period, no excuses, right,
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 3: And my manager didn't do it during her shift, and
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 3: I came in at six o'clock and she didn't tell
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 3: me she didn't do it. And so at ten pm
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: when I start counting down the registers, there's the bag
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 3: in the safe. And the next day she wrote me
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: up for not taking it, and I called my union rep. Oh, well,
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 3: it's only one write up, it's not a big deal. Right.
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 3: Every time someone at my store had a problem like that, Oh,
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: it's only one write up, it's not that big a deal.
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 3: And then I watched a colleague get fired because it
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 3: was only one write up. Happened multiple times with things
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 3: that were against union policy. So when I talk about this,
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: I'm not talking out of my ass. I'm talking about
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 3: it from experience. It's one of the reasons I got
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 3: out of retail, because there are more and more companies
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: requiring you to be part of a union that doesn't
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 3: do anything to represent you when the employer violates union regulations,
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 3: and even the union stewards aren't standing up for their
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: colleagues in those situations. So, yeah, this represents the breakdown
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 3: not just of you know, our ability to avoid communism,
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: but the breakdown of a system that was initially created
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: by men to protect men from exploitative and harmful work conditions,
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 3: and now it's being used for everything except that because
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 3: women got involved and decided that it should be you know, babysitter,
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: a political babysitter instead.
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Fuck unions though, Okay, so they're basically just communist organizations.
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: I read through that. Yeah, yeah, Well, I mean I
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: think that a case could be made that there would.
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: They always were, but they used like actual issues that
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: working class people had to get their foot in the
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: door and say will help you as they like rub
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: their hands together and then create what unions I think
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: always have been. I've always been critical unions for as
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: long as I understood them. So and I think there's
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: a lot of organized crime shit that goes on there too,
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: just like.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 4: What are going yes, uh so.
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, fuck unions, But I get it, I mean I
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: get the sympathy. All right, let's uh you see there
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: are I get any super chants or chows? No, Okay,
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: let me know if you guys, send a super chow
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: if you have something to say about that story. We
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: got one more to go. Let's go ahead and knock
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: this one out. Let me know you guys think about
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: that other one in the comments. All right, we're back
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: on the UK again. Uh So, the UK has introduced
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: and anti misogyny lessons in schools. See how though, see
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: how this is coming together. See that it's like we're
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: talking about the UK and they're getting authoritarian. They were
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: talking about schools and like the school unions and their
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: and their work, and now we're doing a mix. We
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: brought it together. We got peanut butter, we got jelly,
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: and now we got a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: Uh okay, so.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: Anyway, banut butter, jelly sandwiches, pregnant lady food fucking fight me.
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: I think they're good, but I wouldn't. I wouldn't eat them.
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: It was it was delicious when I was a kid.
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: The UK has introduced anti misogny lessons in schools, said
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: to be implemented under or updated Relationships, Health and Sex
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: Education Guidance. All things that probably shouldn't be taught in
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: schools anyway by September twenty twenty five, with mandatory compliance
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: by September twenty twenty six. Mandatory compliance prompted by the
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: Netflix series Adolescens Yes Yes it did. This was Not
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: an accident, which depicts a young boy influenced by online
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: misogyny committing a violent act. The initiative aims to combat
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: the rise of toxic masculinity and mantosphere ideologies propagated by
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: figures like Guess Who Andrew Tait. The lessons, targeting primary
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: and secondary students, focus on fostering healthy relationships, emotional literacy
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: that's fucking made up, comedy, gobbledegook, consent, and digital literacy
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: to counter harmful online content, including in cell culture, deep fakes,
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: and pornography. The Department of Education reports that fifty four
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: percent of eleven to ninet teen year roles have witnessed
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: misogynistic comments, highlighting the urgency of addressing this issue. Supporters,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: including Prime Minister Kierre Starmer and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson,
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: argue the lessons are vital to equip young people, as
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: specially boys, with tools to resist harmful online influences and
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: promote respect, citing real world incidents like the twenty twenty
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: four Southport stabbings. The critics, however, warn a potential backfire,
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 1: arguing that poorly designed lessons could alienate boys, reinforce rebellion,
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: or fail to address root causes like poor parenting or
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: lack of male role models. What are you talking about
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: with only a third of secondary school staff being male.
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: Some like JD Vance, express concerns about overreach, suggesting such
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: policies could unfairly target boys and will or oversimplify complex
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: social issues, potentially ignoring mis injury or broader societal failures.
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: Well, why do they need to call it anti misogyny? What?
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: What hole do they think they're filling with that sly
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: little neologism there, Yeah, as though anti misogyny is this
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 2: brand new concept that's never been explored before. Despite you
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: know how school children have been taught the feminist framework,
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: the feminist curriculum for I think four generations. Now. It
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: started with the boomers, hence the sixties and all that shit,
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: And with each successive generation, feminism has dug deeper and
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: deeper into our education system. And at this point there's
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: scarcely anything left but parasite matter and the holes they
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 2: leave behind. With everything we've been taught wrapped up in
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: a marketable blog called feminism, could none of it have
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: been described as anti misogyny. How are they defending this?
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: Why are you calling it anti misogyny instead of just feminism.
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: You keep telling us that feminism just means equality, and
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: you would think that would cover anti misogyny. Yeah, and
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 2: you kind of did for a while until we all
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 2: got sick of your shit and the word feminism became
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 2: so toxic that they had to reinvent it as anti misogyny.
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: But what you've implied there is that feminism is not
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 2: anti misogyny. And that's correct. It's not feminism is just
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 2: mis andry feminism. Feminists will say the most misogynistic shit
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 2: and they get away with it because they have party privilege,
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 2: the party being missionry. That's it. It's a single issue party.
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 2: Let us hate men forever over our irrational fear of
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: a nightmare past that never happened. It's okay to hate
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 2: women as long as you hate men even more. And
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: I wish I had a nutshell. I guess that was
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: the nutshell in which to put all this in. But
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: I just please remember this whenever anyone compares the quote
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: unquote red pill community to feminism, as though they are
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: even close to the same point in the gradient. No
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: school and I mean, no school anywhere in the world
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: is teaching children to be red pill, whatever the fuck
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 2: that even means. They're not teaching children to even consider
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: the possibility that feminism is wrong in any way whatsoever.
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 2: They are teaching children to dogmatically believe that feminism is
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: right and good and true and unassailable in any context,
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 2: that men oppress women everywhere and always have. And when
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 2: I say children, I mean all the way down to kindergarten.
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 2: It has indeed got that far. It started in universities
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 2: with eighteen eighteen to twenty one year olds or whatever,
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: and then it soaked its way down the system like
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: a funky green mold that smells of eggs, and it
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 2: does smell of eggs. So please, in the light of
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 2: stories like these, do not tell us with a straight
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 2: face that there is any male equivalent of feminism in
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: terms of power and influence, a male equivalent of feminism
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 2: where they indoctrinate children from the earliest possible age to
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 2: believe that women oppress men everywhere and always have. Find
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: me that cult, find me that country, Find me anyone
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 2: who believes that and has systematically invaded an entire education
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: system on that assertion. Fuck off, mate, and then fuck
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: back on again, and then fuck up and down sideways
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 2: and then fuck off again. All right, that'll do.
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 3: I think there's an interesting thing that I noticed about
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 3: about feminist men, right.
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 4: There's there's two.
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: Very distinct, uh uh, sort of heavily divided groups of them.
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 3: There's there's the feminist men who are under thirty who
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 3: drop out, most of them from feminism at some point
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 3: in their lives because they they figure out really quickly
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 3: that it's bullshit and it's not do anything for them,
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 3: and it's not really that good for women either, And
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 3: then then they're the ones that are lifelong feminist men.
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 3: The ones that are lifelong feminist men are usually malicious,
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 3: manipulative assholes that are in it for something other than
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 3: a belief that they are helping women in any way.
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 3: It's usually a means of controlling other people, it means
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 3: of bullying other people, a means of making money off
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 3: of other people, a means of self aggrandizement. It's almost
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 3: never genuine, genuinely about belief that they're doing anything to
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 3: help women, you know, unless they have an IQ of
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 3: like sixty. Right, it's it's that bad. They have to be.
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 3: They have to have, you know, a disabling level of
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 3: low IQ to get to say fifty and uh and
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 3: still be a feminist and genuinely think that they're helping
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 3: women by by being involved in feminism. So an effort
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 3: like this, you know, boys might be feminist when they're
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 3: in school, if they're if they're indoctrinated by this. Maybe
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 3: if they don't see through it right away, they might
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 3: even be feminists while they're in college for the same reason.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 3: They might even be feminists up into their twenties, till
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 3: they start having to live on their own outside their
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: parents' home, pay their own bills, and they start dating
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 3: women that are you know, putting up profiles on dating
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: apps just so that they can get free dinners, and
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 3: they're not actually interested in a relationship with anybody, you know,
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 3: and they won't go dutch. You'll know, those those gals
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 3: that you know, they won't go Dutch on the first date.
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 3: But in any case, they'll they'll get enough bullshit from women,
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 3: and they'll also see enough damage to women from feminism
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 3: that they will stop believing the bullshit sometime around you know,
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: twenty five to thirty years old, and by the time
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 3: they hit the age where you shouldn't trust anyone over
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 3: that age, they will they will no longer fall for
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 3: that bullshit, right, So, and I don't believe that feminists
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 3: are unaware of that. I think feminists know that too,
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: because they are always complaining about how bad feminist men
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 3: are and how many of them abandon feminism and the
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 3: ones that don't seem to be all assholes right or
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 3: sexual predators. So they're not giving the ones that stay
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 3: a pass. They're just mad about the ones that they
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 3: can't use feminism to control. So there is an alternate
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 3: purpose for this, clearly, because.
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 4: It's not.
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 3: Teaching boys something that they're going to it's going to
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 3: carry through their whole lives. And it's been demonstrated undeniably
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 3: over and over again that if you actually want boys
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 3: to grow up to be well adjusted, hard working, diligent,
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 3: responsible young men who treat the people around them the
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 3: way they want to be treated and don't use violence
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 3: and bullying as their primary means of handling conflicts of
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: interest between themselves and other people. You raise them a
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: home with a father. You raise them at home with
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 3: a father who is involved, who is invested in the
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 3: welfare of the child, who will not only go out
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: and earn a living to support the child, but who
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 3: will come home and through play with the child, teach
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 3: him things like sportsmanship and respect for others' boundaries and
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 3: autonomy and a sense of fairness and a sense of
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 3: recognition of you know, his impact, his behavior's impact on
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 3: other people's desire to be around him, and things like that.
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 3: The same thing men do for their daughters, same thing
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: fathers do for their daughters.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 4: Right, But.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 3: They don't want to do that because this issue isn't
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: about raising boys to grow up to be good men
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 3: who will have happy lives, who will be respected members
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 3: of their community and contributors to their community. It's about
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: sliding in a means of mind control to your school system.
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 3: And it's easy to do it if you convince women
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 3: that they have to be afraid of the way boys think. Right,
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 3: this threats of misogyny and feminist ideals as a means
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 3: of addressing that misogyny. It's been a long time since
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: I've talked about this. I think I've talked about it
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 3: a few times.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 4: Though.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: Feminism is the wedge that authoritarian micromanagement idealogues and power
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 3: use the establishment uses to get in between you and
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 3: your boundaries, your personal boundaries, and the boundaries between your
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 3: family and your government, and including your children. Right, So
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 3: this is not being used just to demonize boys and men.
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 3: This is being used to convince women to use the
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 3: school system to control political thought. And it's the same
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 3: thing as the laws we were talking about earlier. You
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 3: scare women, They don't think about the implications of the
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 3: thing that they are accepting. They think about the initial
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 3: benefit that they are being told that women will receive,
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 3: which is control over male thought in a world where
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 3: they are told that misogyny is rampant and dangerous. We
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: already have laws against violence, and we already have laws
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 3: that specifically address violence that is motivated by anything that
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 3: feminists would call misogyny. So we don't really have anything
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 3: else that we need to do to address as a
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 3: society to address that kind of behavior, other than maybe
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 3: stop taking fathers out of homes, because fathers are the
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: ones that raise their boys not to engage in those
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 3: kind of behaviors, not to be violent, not to be stupid. Right,
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 3: But these laws, the whole point of these laws is
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: so that a few years down the line, they can
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 3: introduce like they've already introduced the gender ideology, but they'll
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 3: introduce things like and they've already introduced the racial ideology
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: and stuff like that. Right, they'll introduce things like almost
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 3: a worship of government authority. They'll introduce, you can't question
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 3: it if it comes from the government. They'll introduce you
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 3: can't you can't keep your money because other people might
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: need it, and it's selfish if you do that, So
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 3: you have to redistribute your wealth so that everybody has
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: the same thing. They'll start introducing.
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 4: You don't have to own stuff.
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 3: You should lease everything, or everything should just be communal
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 3: property and nobody should have any control over it except
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 3: through a governing body. And they might even introduce, uh,
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 3: you know, if your neighbors are criticizing the government, you
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 3: should turn them in. If your parents are criticizing the government,
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 3: you should turn them in. If your siblings are criticizing
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 3: the government, you should turn them in. That's what this
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 3: is for. It has absolutely nothing to do with misogyny
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 3: and everything to do with establishment control over thought.
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, absolutely all right, Well, let know you guys
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 1: think about that. In the comments, I got too rumble
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 1: rants and then we're gonna hit into the Patron show
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: talk a little bit about Sidney Sweeney and the triggered
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: reaction thereof So Sean Mao gave us a dollar. This
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: was in relation to the previous story, I think, and
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: he said, I knew someone who was set up by
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: the union for a safety issue. He his union steward
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: and his manager were all let go. Yeah, I mean
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: it makes sense.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yep.
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: And then Nova Fan twenty one gave us a dollar
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: and said, I can't wait for the day the UK's
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: feminist effort backfires so hard that boys decide they benefit
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: from male privilege and patriarchy. UK government, we need to
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: ban men even harder. Now. Well, I think the fact
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: that they're like cracking down so hard in all these
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: different ways is actually evidence that they're afraid. You know
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: you just like that line from Star Wars, you know,
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 1: the tighter what is it that Leah said to Grandma
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: of Tarkin, the the more systems fingers. Yeah, I think
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: that's what they're doing. I think that they're they're really
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: and I think Jet Trump getting into the into the
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: White House honestly is a big part of it, because
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: it's like they had all the pieces in place, and
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: this thing didn't go the way it should have. I
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: think that's also true of others like Bouquet of El
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: Salvador and Javier Millier who's apparently turning things around in Argentina.
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: And there's all this populis stuff that's rising up. Japan
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 1: is rising up right now. I think Italy and some
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: other countries in Europe, and they're not like changing completely,
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: but there's like a shift happening. So I think that's
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: why they're like really cracking down, especially on the speech thing.
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: And I didn't talk about Collective Shout and what they're
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 1: doing with games, but I do think it's related. But
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: that's because I just had too much to cover. We
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: could talk a little bit about that. I think there's
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: a relationship between collective Shout and what's going on with
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: our education and what's going on with you know, the
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: Online Safety Act and all that. I think it's all connected.
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 1: I think there's concerted, combined effort to control fought because
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: when we went the Internet, we got we became global
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: in terms of the conversation broadening, which is like a
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: double edged sword for them, right, So on the one hand,
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: they could spread their propaganda to more people and they
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: could like get it from any number of places that
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: use social media. But on the other hand, there were
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: more normal people who could also get the word out
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: of like dissenting opinions. And you can't censor everybody, you know.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: So yeah, anyway, well we gotta we gotta run. You know.
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: You know how the UK requires a license to watch TV?
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: Mm hmm, well it's a quite similar thing happening to
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: the Internet right now, because I'm sitting here going what next, UK?
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 2: We have to dox ourselves just to watch the TV
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 2: we have, we have to we have to enjoy an
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 2: army of government goons knocking on our doors telling us like,
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 2: you can't watch TV unless you give us all of
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: your information. And yeah, it's as bizarre as the idea
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: of a TV license sounds to countries who don't have
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: a TV license. It's the same thing is happening with
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 2: the Internet. Like if you want to say things or
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: listen to things or watch things on the internet, have
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 2: you got a license for that? That's all it is.
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: Like if you if if you want to witness things
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: on the internet, you need to dox yourself to the government.
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 2: There's nothing wrong with that. Don't worry about it. What
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 2: you're a fascist if you don't like it, fuck's sake.
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, we're gonna go now into the Paige and Show.
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: We can talk more about it there, and we're gonna
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: look at some of this stuff. So if you want
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 1: to join us for that, then become a member. Go
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: to feedbachel dot com, forward slash subscribe, and hopefully we'll
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: see you guys in the Patron Show, either watching on
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: YouTube or in the actual chat itself, and you can
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: give us your opinions to our faces, to our digital
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: avatar faces. But anyway, with all that said, if you guys,
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: we're gonna wrap it up there. So thank you guys
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: for coming on. Thank you Hannah and Mike for joining us.
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: If you guys liked this video, please like subscribe. If
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: you're not already subscribed to the develop notifications, leave me
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 1: a comment, let us know what you guys think about
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: what we discussed on the show today, and please please
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: please share this video because sharing is caring. Thanks so
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: we'll talk to you guys in the next