Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Oliver Anthony Finds Out, Diddy and Weinstein Updates | HBR News 507

Transcript

Oliver Anthony Finds Out, Diddy and Weinstein Updates | HBR News 507 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five oh seven. Oliver Anthony
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: finds out Diddy and Weinstein updates where we discussed the
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I hope
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: you guys are doing well this week and that you're
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: laughing and all of this absurdity so that you're not
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: consumed by it. I am your host Brian as always,
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: I'm enjoying by my lovely co hosts Hannah and doctor
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Randmercam Hello on today. Yes, hello, I understand that it's
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: really hot in London or in the UK right now,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: which if you can aid.
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: My friend, I keep trying to turn it off while
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: turning my microphone on at the same time. It's like
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: it's like musical chairs. It's like trying to spind plate.
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: But I think I can do it.
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well we actually we can't hear it right now,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: but that might be because it's not on. But yeah,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: I understand if you have to use it, so don't
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: sweat it. So anyway, welcome to the show. We have
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: a great show line up for you guys this week.
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: Lots going on. I had to narrow it down sorry,
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: are you not going to be talking about Israel and
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: Iran today? I know that people have opinions on that,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: feel free to share it. But I think that things
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: in that part of the world, as well as Ukraine
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: and Russia, changed so quickly and there's so much going
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: around that it's best to just wait until the dust
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: settles and then talk about whatever happens, you know, whatever
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: has happened from there, anything really significant.
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: But we're not going to be talking about the investigation
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: into the grooming gangs in Brasien either. Yeah, kiss, fuck
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: the Jews and fuck the Muslims. We don't really give
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: a shit. Yeah, talk about what's going on with our cultures.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, the ones that we that have a chance.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: So anyway, on this week's HBr new Shows, we're going
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: to be looking at the latest updates in the Sean
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: Diddy Comb's case and Harvey Weinstein's case, respectively. And there
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: was an assassination of a couple of government officials which
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: has sparked a lot of controversy and debate and finger pointing,
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: and we just want to like see what we can
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: do to clear the air on that and all the
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: narratives surrounding that, as well as some recent things that
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: happened with Oliver Anthony, which if you haven't heard it
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: should be fairly interesting. So stick around, it's gonna be
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: a good time, and be sure to join us afterwards
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: for the Patron Only show. I found this on Miss Magazine.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: It's from a few months ago, but I never saw it.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: It was sort of like a year in review thing,
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: and I don't go to Miss magazine very often, but
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: yes it still exists, and yes it's still a tremendous
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: force in the world of feminism, so much so that
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: apparently Miss Magazine has the ability to judge other feminisms
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: to find out which feminisms are feminism a meaning right,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: And so they have a roundup of the best and
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: Worst quotes of twenty twenty four by Libya Follett, a
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: collection of this year's most inspiring and infuriating things said
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: by and about women. You'll notice in the title it
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: doesn't say anything about feminists. It just says women.
• 3:00
  Speaker 3: Got to realize.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: This.
• 3:02
  Speaker 3: This magazine is the magazine that Glorias Steinem started it.
• 3:08
  Speaker 3: It literally is a syop and and it is the
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: most solid bit of evidence that the at least the
• 3:16
  Speaker 3: second wave of feminism and everything that came after it
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: is a syop. Probably the first wave was as well,
• 3:23
  Speaker 3: because we went back and traced and it's it's actually
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: been establishment from the beginning, from the roots, so you
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: could call it a sy up, although obviously when feminism
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: started there was no such thing as the CIA.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: But yeah, like.
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: Just one more thing about modern women, shall we call
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: them white women in the exist wait? Women, wise women?
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: And one more thing about the grooming gangs in Britain.
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: There's people notice that the only people still defend the
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: Pakistani grooming gangs are middle aged white women, and people
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: are people are sort of up in arms, going why
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: is this happening? Why would why would these uh, these
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: white European women be the only ones left defending the
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: Pakistani grooming gangs. And I'm like, it's so more obvious
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: than you think it is. It's because modern women are
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: like modern governments. They're not interested in defending women, or
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: helping women, or defending or helping minorities. They're only interested
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: in controlling their property. And by their property, I mean
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: the men of their own nation, namely in this case
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: white men. So in this case, white women are only
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: interested in punishing white men because it's it's it's the
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: only thing in their political vocabulary. No matter how much
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: non white men and white women a sort of having
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: disputes of some kind, the only solution they can think
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: of is punishing white men. So yeah, I hope that
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: explains as many of the hot topics going on this
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: week as it can. We've been under the thumb of
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: modern governments and modern feminism whose only solutions to anything
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: is punishing white men.
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: You're the same is true of other women too, Like
• 5:29
  Speaker 3: black women use black feminism to control black men. And
• 5:32
  Speaker 3: we've talked about like when one culture conquers another culture,
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: the women of the culture, as their men are just
• 5:39
  Speaker 3: being killed off, they join the conquering culture. What ends
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: up happening, then, is they use the gynocentric female victim
• 5:48
  Speaker 3: narrative to control the new culture, and in particular the
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: men of the new culture, because they're the ones that
• 5:55
  Speaker 3: are going to be doing the heavy lifting. And it
• 5:57
  Speaker 3: happens every time. So the men who are in Europe
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: right now, who are not native to Europe, who are
• 6:07
  Speaker 3: watching the white women of Europe use you to control
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: the white men of Europe, just wait because they'll be
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: coming for you next.
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, if you want to join us to
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: partake in us reading through this article from MS magazine,
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: you have to become a Badger yourself a going to
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com and setting up a monthly
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: subscription five bucks a month will get you into our discord,
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: where you'll be able to watch all of the additional
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: content like all of our patron shows and lots of
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: other exclusives. And there's also lots of other things going
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: on the discord. So please consider joining the discord by
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: becoming a member feed Thebadger dot com forward slash subscribe,
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: or if you just want to check it out for free,
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: you can check out the free version of it by
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: going to Badger Nation dot online. And if you don't
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that our
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: content has been finally permanently removed from the mainstream Internet,
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: then please Well, first of all, you should be following
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: up on our alternative platforms. We are streaming to Rumble.
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: It's HB Radio on Rumble, so just look it up there.
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: And we are also on kick Now, which is also
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio on kick. So with all that all
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: out of the way, let us now get into today's stories,
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: all right. So, in the latest developments in Harvey Weinstein's
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: New York sex crimes retrial, Judge Curtis Farber declared a
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: mistrial on June twelfth, twenty twenty five, for a third
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: degree rape charge involving actress Jessica Man. This followed Jessica Man,
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: I don't she was in some B movies, so I
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: don't really know. Not a stellar career. I looked her up,
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: don't recognize her from anything. This followed a partial verdict
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: on June, where the jury convicted Weinstein of a first
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: degree criminal sexual act against Miriam Hayley for an assault
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: in two thousand and six, but acquitted him of a
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: similar charge of all Kaja socola from that same year.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: The mistrial stemmed from the jury four persons refusal to
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: continue deliberating, citing threats and bullying from another juror, including
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: a comment about meeting him outside. Tensions in the jury
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: room had escalated over days, with the four person reporting
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: feeling unsafe, leading Farvard to end deliberations on the remaining charge.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced plans to retry Weinstein
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: on the rape charge, with the status hearing set for
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: July second, twenty twenty five. Weinstein, who has denied all charges,
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: remains incarcerated due to his New York conviction and a
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: separate sixteen year sentence from a twenty twenty two California
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: rape conviction, which he is currently appealing. The retrial followed
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: the overturning of his twenty twenty New York conviction by
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: the state's Court of Appeals on April twenty twenty four,
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: which found the original trial prejudiced due to improper testimony.
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Jessica Man, who testified about the twenty thirteen rape, expressed
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: determination to testify again, stating I will never give up
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: on myself and making sure my voice and my truth
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: is heard. The case continues to be a significant touchstone
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: for the hashtag me too movement, with prosecutors emphasizing accountability.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: Despite the jury's deadlock on Man's charge, Weinstein's defense, led
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: by Arthur Idalla, argues that the conviction may be challenged
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: due to alleged juror misconduct. Was also claimed again. I'm
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: just pointing out that the reason why these cases are
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: starting to fall apart is because of the nature of consent,
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: which is that consent was supposedly given, and that is
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: essentially all they have to go off of is to
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: try to convince the jury and the judge that despite
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: the fact that consent was given, there were other factors
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: at play that may have made it difficult or impossible
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: for the women to consent. So anyway, that's it. I
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: leave you the floor for which you guys could share
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: your opinions.
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: What that What that basically means is they're they're taking
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: a woman's consent and saying, well, after the fact, I
• 10:08
  Speaker 3: withdraw this, it was invalid, and they're using things like, oh,
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: there was a difference in power, or there was a
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: you know, she wanted something really badly and only he
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: controlled her access to it, basically as as the argument
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: that her consent was invalid. But you have to remember
• 10:29
  Speaker 3: that this was not the only way she could have
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: gotten what she wanted, and it sounds like she she
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: rode the casting couch and actually all she got was
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: this lousy B movie part, which sounds really really bad.
• 10:43
  Speaker 3: So she's probably this is this is probably a little
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: bit of sour grapes and all reality, and that's why
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: she's trying so hard to make this happen. But when
• 10:55
  Speaker 3: it comes down to it, if you look at what
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: the basis for this story is, a jury may be
• 11:02
  Speaker 3: a hung jury or something because the one guy won't
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: go back because he's afraid of another juror's behavior. That
• 11:08
  Speaker 3: indicates that somebody in the jury room is basing their
• 11:13
  Speaker 3: decision making process an emotion and not logic. Because if
• 11:18
  Speaker 3: you're going through a set of facts and you're trying
• 11:21
  Speaker 3: to make a decision as to what is indicated by
• 11:24
  Speaker 3: the set of facts, what do these facts, if taken together,
• 11:28
  Speaker 3: actually mean about the situation and how should we describe
• 11:32
  Speaker 3: the situation? Should we call him guilty or should we
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: call him not guilty? Like that's the question jurors go
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: in to deliberate, right, there shouldn't be any emotion involved
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: in making that decision. There shouldn't be It shouldn't get heated.
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: And if you've ever seen the movie Twelve Angry Men,
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: you can sort of see how people's underlying beliefs and
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: prejudices biases will influence and their positions they take when
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: they're making these kind of decisions, and how the individuals
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: who don't have any questions because they have biases will
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: get angry, and they'll get angry at the individuals who
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: do have questions because they don't have biases. And this
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: is something that happens in every type of argument. If
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: you're making a decision in the workplace, what are we
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: going to do about situation X? Where you're making a
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: decision in your family, what are we going to do
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: about this budget problem? It becomes an emotional argument when
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: the facts are not the only thing on your mind.
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: We really want.
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: To spend this money on this thing, but if we do,
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: we won't be able to afford to spend it on
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: something else that is important, And your emotion of really wanting,
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: you know, being emotionally attached to the expenditure you want
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: gets in the way of making an unemotional decision about
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: how you should spend them money. That couples divorce over
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: this shit, right, So jurors when you have somebody who
• 13:06
  Speaker 3: is married to the idea that if she says she
• 13:12
  Speaker 3: was raped, she must have been raped. Or there's a
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: political outcome that you think should be happening because of
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: this case, or you have a particular affiliation with you know,
• 13:24
  Speaker 3: the business or the individual, you have a personal investment
• 13:29
  Speaker 3: in a particular outcome and the facts point in a
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: different direction, You're likely to get emotional and start bullying
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: and badgering, and you won't argue based on logic and reason. Well,
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: this evidence indicates X y Z, and I don't see
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: where your questions are coming from or this evidence answers
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: your question. If somebody comes up with a question that
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: you can't answer from the perspective of the decision that
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: you've already made, then it comes a moment of curiosity, Well,
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: what is he brought up? Let's take a look at this.
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: Maybe this the outcome is different than I thought. But
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: if you're married to a particular outcome for whatever reason,
• 14:11
  Speaker 3: then you're offended by that and then you start behaving badly.
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: And that's probably what's going on here. You probably have
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: either a juror who is looking at evidence and saying,
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: you know this, this evidence isn't sufficient to prove guilt.
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: Is there something that we're missing, and another juror saying,
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: obviously he's guilty. He found guilty once, we should find
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: him guilty again. And who maybe has you know, a
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: feminist outlook or something along those lines. It's getting mad
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: and threatening him, or it's the other way around. And
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: you have somebody who is questioning that the lack of evidence, say,
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: somebody saying, you know, hey, he looks from everything that's
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: in front of me, he looks guilty, and somebody going no, no,
• 14:56
  Speaker 3: I'm not voting guilty. This was over turned once, we
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: should overturn it again. And we don't know. All we
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: know is that somebody in the room is acting out
• 15:09
  Speaker 3: of emotion instead of logic. And the result is probably
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: going to be this is going to have to be
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: started all over again, or it's going to be dropped.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: Yep. I suspect it's gonna get thrown out. And I
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: think that's the reason why the media is essentially like
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: not talking about it right now. Like when the allegations
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: came out, it was everywhere, and then it quickly spread
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: from a situation or a condition of Hollywood or cultural
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: problem with Hollywood to becoming a problem everywhere else, and
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: it was like, oh no, it's not just the casting couch.
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: It's the boardroom, it's the you know, it's the manager's office.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: It's your professors, it's your teachers, it's it's it's the
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: game development studio, it's the animation department whatever it was.
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: Started hearing regular women sounding like that Radfim from the
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: women's room. All men are rapists and that's all that
• 16:07
  Speaker 3: they are, like the most famous quote from that book.
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: And it's been everywhere. It's gone everywhere, and it's cost
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: people their jobs, and it's cost people, some people their lives.
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: There have been people that have committed suicide as a
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: result of false allegations that were bolstered by the movement
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: started by Harvey Weinstein's accusers.
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: And remember they tried they used it as a political tool.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: They tried to use it to ensure that Trump didn't
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: get elected twice, like in both both all three times.
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: They tried to use it against Justice Kavanaugh. They tried
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: to use it. I mean they use it to get jobs.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: Like why why does like our film and gaming industry
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: suck so much? Well because a bunch of talented people
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: got me tooed and lost their jobs.
• 16:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, y'all remember Alyssa Milano sitting at the at the
• 16:55
  Speaker 3: Kavanaugh hearings, yes and looking like she was going to
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: say so.
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: She dressed up like the Handmaid's Tale too.
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: No, I don't think she was dressed up like the
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: Handmaid's Sale. The weird thing was the way she was
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: looking around, and we watched her at some point and
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: it it seriously looked like she was waiting for something,
• 17:11
  Speaker 3: waiting for a que or a sign for something to happen,
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: like she was there was she was something had something
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: off about her at that and fortunately whatever whatever it
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: was didn't go down. But I will never forget that
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: because I'm like, does she think that she's on the
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: set of Charm instead of yeah?
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: Right, she never grew up. But the last thing I'll
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: say about it is that it looks like he's It
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: looks like he's all of his cases falling apart. The
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: case against him is falling apart, the case against Andrew
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: Tate fell apart, the case against Trump. There was some
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: new developments with e. G. Carroll that I thought about
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: bringing on here, but apparently like that's still going on.
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: It's still looming, and I think that the media is
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: going to either never speak of this again because it
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: won't go well for them, or they're going to try
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: to figure out a way to spin it so that
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: or may it might be both of these things, so
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: that Harvey Weinstein beating this case in the same way
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: that Bill Cosby might beat his case because I think
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: it's still going to appeal and many others. Is only
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: proof of how powerful the patriarchy is and how men
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: can just do things and get away with it, because
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: they have drilled it into the minds of normies so
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: much that this is real and true and this guy's
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: a monster that no matter what the outcome is, it's
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: only gonna you know, people are gonna validate what they
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: already believe.
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: To be true, and they're gonna Feminists are going to
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: because they do this already, they're gonna generalize it to
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: all men everywhere all the time.
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, that's the point of it, right.
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: You look at the way they talk about violent crime.
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: Less than four percent of the population are perpetrators of
• 18:49
  Speaker 3: violent crime. All of the violent crime, including domestic violence,
• 18:55
  Speaker 3: is perpetrated by a tiny percentage of the population, and
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: they eliminate the women from that percentage when they're talking
• 19:04
  Speaker 3: about it. And then they also generalize it to all
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: men and boys everywhere all the time.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: And when you.
• 19:10
  Speaker 3: Talk about the fact that you know, most men over
• 19:16
  Speaker 3: ninety six percent nonviolent, they say, well, but ninety nine
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: percent of this or that crime is perpetrated by men,
• 19:24
  Speaker 3: which may or may not be true, But it doesn't
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: matter even if it is true, if it is less
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: than four percent of the entire population, and some of
• 19:35
  Speaker 3: those are women. So we're talking about less than ninety
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: or less than or over ninety six percent of men
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: being nonviolent. It doesn't matter what percentage of the violent
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: portion of the population is male. It still doesn't translate
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: into all men everywhere all the time, does it.
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: No? No, of course not a Mike. Did you want
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: to say anything about this or should we want to
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: save it for Diddy because like kind of similar stories?
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no, yeah, it's the story is connected. I did
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: watch twelve Angry Man only because it's the fifth highest
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: rated movie on IMDb, so I had to go, well,
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: what's all this about? And it was all about one
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: of the twelve Angry Men, sort of going well, maybe
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: this maybe this minority man isn't guilty. Yeah, I can't
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: remember what minority man it was. I think he was
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: an African American of some sort, and.
• 20:32
  Speaker 3: He was accused of a knife crime.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: Yes, and some guy threw the same knife on the
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: table and it was all very dramatic. Yeah, and the
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: modern day equivalent is hard to pin down, even with
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: a knife to a table. I guess the modern equivalent
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: is a man like. Just because a man is accused
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: doesn't mean he's necessarily guilty. And it takes one of
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: the twelve angry Birthing persons to really expose any doubt
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: as to whether a man is guilty. Yeah, well, we'll
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: get to it in the second story. At the second story,
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: we'll do it then.
• 21:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm gonna assign homework. Though, if you're listening to
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: this or watching this and you have not seen go
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: back to the original black and white version of Twelve
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: Angry Men. Watch that movie. It's gonna seem dry in
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: comparison to modern movies, but if you really pay attention
• 21:34
  Speaker 3: to what's going on in that movie, it is an
• 21:36
  Speaker 3: emotional roller coaster and it is a great history lesson,
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: and you really should. It's also a great lesson on
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: the way the legal system works versus how it should work,
• 21:46
  Speaker 3: and you really really should watch that movie, especially if
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: you are living in the United States and you're old
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: enough or close to old enough to get called for
• 21:54
  Speaker 3: jury duty. Is it something you should have in mind
• 21:57
  Speaker 3: if you ever do get called.
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, well, let us know what you guys
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: think about this story in the comments. We're gonna move
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: on to the next one, which is related. It's quite similar.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: So let's get into the next story. So we're gonna
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: be talking about the latest news or updates with the P.
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: Diddy trial, which is also kind of shocking. So uh.
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: The Shawn Didty Combs trial, ongoing as of June seventeenth,
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, has seen significant developments. In the sixth week,
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: Comb's faces charges.
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: Why don't we pronounce it Combs? It makes so much
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: sense if it was Combs.
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess it would. No, It's okay. Combs faces
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: charges of racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: in prostitution, to which he has pleaded not guilty. The
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: trials centrist on allegations that Combs ran a criminal enterprise
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: involving coercion, abuse, and drug fueled sexual events call Freakoffsky.
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: Testimony has come from his ex girlfriend Cassie Ventura, not
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: related to Jesse Ventura is assume, who detailed physical abuse
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: and coercion into sexual performances, and another accuser named Jane,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: which I assume just means. Jane oaks they don't want
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: to be identified, who described similar experiences from twenty twenty
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: one to twenty twenty four, including a violent twenty twenty
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: four altercation where Combs allegedly choked her. On June seventeenth,
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: financial documents were presented linking Combs's bad boy entertainment to
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: alleged freak off payments and text messages showed Combs's persistent
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: attempts to contact Ventura after a twenty sixteen incident, including
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: a message reference her referencing her black eye and fat
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: lip a. Jura was dismissed for inconsistent residency claims, raising
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: concerns about jury diversity and judge Aurun Subu Ramanian why
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: I pronounce that threatened sanctions over a potential evidence leak.
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: The defense has challenged witness credibility, particularly targeting Ventura and
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: Jane's motives, suggesting their participation in sexual encounters was consensual.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: Combs's attorney, Tenny Gregoros gros Geragos Sorry has framed the
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: case as involving quote love, jealousy, infidelity, and money end quote,
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: admitting Combs's violence but disputing criminal intent. Notable moments include
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: Kanye West's brief appearance on June thirteenth to support Comb's
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: Wow Doo Doo Doo, and a courtroom incident where Combs
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: was nearly removed for interacting with jurors. The prosecution has
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: called over thirty witnesses, including former assistants and a hotel
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: security guard, with some testifying under immunity. The defense estimates
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: estimates its case may last two to five days, with
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: jury deliberations potentially starting next week. The trial has drawn
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: significant attention, amplified by online content creators, some of whom
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: have faced criticism for leaking witness identities.
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: A few weeks ago. I can't remember what show it was,
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: but I raised the controversial hypothetical that I might become
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: skeptical with the god to Diddy being thrown under the bus,
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: only because when Hollywood and the music industry and the
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: degenerate communist factory that controls them, whenever they throw someone
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: under the bus, that doesn't necessarily mean that person is
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: guilty of anything. In all likelihood, It's that this is
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: their latest scapegoat. The degenerate communist entertainment factory is a
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: deeply dark place that takes children from the earliest possible
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: age and warps them into highly disturbed adults. It's very
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: much a cult that requires a human sacrifice every now
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: and again. It's what happened to Michael Jackson. He was
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: put through the ringers of this machine from the age
• 26:09
  Speaker 2: of eleven right up until his death at fifty ish.
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: I mean it was he was He was denied a
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: normal childhood, so he became a stunted adult who couldn't
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: really really relate to anyone except children. That made him
• 26:29
  Speaker 2: the ideal sacrificial lamb for the factory. You what you
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: hang around with children? Well, shit, Jacko, you do what
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: you're gonna do. But don't you dare ever criticize the Jews. Shit,
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: you criticized the Jews, not nuns. Everyone called wacko Jacko.
• 26:48
  Speaker 2: ANNs will promise you millions of dollars if you call
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: him a nance. Step right up. It's gonna be a
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: delicious blood bath of undeveloped entrails. And there's no shortage
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: in In fact, there's an overflowing wealth of adults who
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: have been broken ever since childhood, whom we will strap
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: to the altar and plunge a diamond dagger through their hearts.
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: The moment they criticize the wrong people. Now, I'm not
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: interested in defending Diddy. I think in all probability, he
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: is guilty of just about everything of which he's accused.
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: All I'm thinking of is he's not the only one.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: I get the distinct feeling that what he's described as
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: doing is the kind of thing that happens at Hollywood parties.
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: As a matter of course, like I've been to university,
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: I went to student parties. I'm not saying they involved
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: the kind of drug field sexuality debauchery described in the
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: Diddy case. In fact, I didn't get involved in the
• 28:02
  Speaker 2: sexual debauchery whatsoever. I was far too busy with the
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: drugs and the rock and roll. But it can hardly
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: be denied. There is a time and a place for everything,
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: and it's called college. Well, the Hollywood degeneracy factory is
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: that times a thousand, there's people who indulge in a decadent,
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: rebellious lifestyle because they're can afford it. But times a thousand,
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: it's people holding on to that tutemic juvenility for as
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: long as they can because it's their job to harness
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: the juvenile spirit of rebellion for the sake of the
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: billions of dollars that comes with pertaining to it. I
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: guess what I'm saying is, if you think Diddy is
• 28:57
  Speaker 2: the only celebrity who's guilty of this shit, I have
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: a bridge to sell you again. I think he probably
• 29:05
  Speaker 2: is guilty of what he's accused, but I think he's
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: only being charged with it because he was the worst offender.
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: There are no doubt countless celebrities who have been almost
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: as evil, but they all agreed to target Diddy and
• 29:26
  Speaker 2: throw him under the bus so that they could pat
• 29:29
  Speaker 2: themselves on the back and go, well, at least I'm
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: not as bad as Diddy. Well maybe not, but the
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: fact that you're getting away with it arguably makes you
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: even worse. In the same way, you know, Tupac was
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: murdered and Biggie Small's was murdered, but his close comrade
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: Diddy was not murdered. I mean that doesn't necessarily mean
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: Didd he is implicated in anything, but it does mean
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: he might deserve the survivor's guilt to which he might
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: be subjected. And that goes for the rest of you
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: who have been raping and beating innocent Nobody's for the
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: last thirty or forty years and getting away with it.
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: Do you feel bad? Do you feel mad? Maybe you should,
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: and maybe you should fuck off and enjoy your millions
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: in the acute duper's delight of knowing you got away
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: with it. Ideally you should get the electric chair or
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: something to that effect. Be thankful that you never will,
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: whoever you are. And I won't even name the names
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: who are guilty, because it would probably be quicker to
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: name the names who are not. Stay away from the
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: Hollywood communist factory, folks, it's not worth it, That's what
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: I'm saying.
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: I point out some things that have been bothering me
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: for quite a while about all of these allegation frenzies,
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: feeding frenzies, the Cosby frenzy, the Weinstein frenzy, the frenzy,
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: the political allegation frenzies, the Diddy frenzy. Everything that's happened
• 31:15
  Speaker 3: all right. When hashtag me too started, there was a
• 31:20
  Speaker 3: documentary that came out, and there were some groups that
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: came out talking about it called an Open Secret about
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: the sexual abuse specifically of little boys in Hollywood, but
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: little girls too, And this happens to children of both sexes,
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: and it has been going on for a very long time.
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: It's generational. It's not even something that just happened to
• 31:43
  Speaker 3: actors when gen X were kids. This was something that happened.
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: It goes back to the early days of Hollywood, like
• 31:52
  Speaker 3: when Shirley Temple was famous, and children working in Hollywood
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: would have been overworked, taken advantage of, tossed aside when
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: they got a little older, ruined pretty much for any
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: other type of work, bankrupted and then thrown aside. They've
• 32:13
  Speaker 3: been sexually abused, they've been physically beaten and abused, and
• 32:18
  Speaker 3: they've been denied any type of an education for the
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: longest time they had. Laws had to be passed to
• 32:25
  Speaker 3: ensure that these children actually received a basic education, and
• 32:32
  Speaker 3: their mothers signed on for this, this fame, and you know,
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: like stage moms are notorious for pushing their child's fame
• 32:44
  Speaker 3: over everything else and not caring how what is being
• 32:50
  Speaker 3: done to their child ultimately affects the child's welfare. And
• 32:55
  Speaker 3: there were there were allegations against some handlers basically that
• 33:06
  Speaker 3: parents pretty much signed custody over too and their children
• 33:10
  Speaker 3: lived with these handlers and were taken to parties and abused,
• 33:15
  Speaker 3: they were abused in the workplace, they were they were
• 33:18
  Speaker 3: just completely and utterly abandoned in terms of any adult
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: that would protect them to the predators in Hollywood. And
• 33:28
  Speaker 3: there have been if you look at the information has
• 33:32
  Speaker 3: come out about what has happened to children, various children
• 33:39
  Speaker 3: in Hollywood over the generations. There have been suicides. There
• 33:44
  Speaker 3: have been slow suicides where the induvides.
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: I think the vertical did not go offline for whatever reason.
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: It's a strange beast, so let me just make sure. Okay,
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: So we're going to have a new stream on the horizontal,
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: and I don't know about Rumble. That might just be
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: a lost cause to rumble can pick up it can't
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: pick it up. It could, it could pick it up.
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: What's the one that's represented by a K?
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Is that that's kick? It's like a new thing that
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: we we do now. That didn't go down either. Yeah,
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: kick and is like twitch. It's like a it's like
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: a twitch competitor, so you know, it doesn't go down.
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: So all right, Sorry, guys, I think I'm live now
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: on this one. Sorry about that. It's completely out of
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: my control. Basically that there's a storm and when there's
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: a storm, anything can happen, and because you know, I
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: rely on things like electricity to do my job, if
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: something happens to it, I'm just screwed. So I am
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: sorry for for that. I wish it wasn't that way,
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: but it is that way. I wish it don't be
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: what it do, but it is, but it do. The
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: life science man says.
• 34:56
  Speaker 3: So the attack of the crazy weather, like, what would
• 34:59
  Speaker 3: feminists call that? Because of course it interrupted me, right, yeah,
• 35:02
  Speaker 3: it can't be manterrupting because the weather is Mother Earth
• 35:08
  Speaker 3: only storm interrupted.
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, all right, So it never happens in Britain
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: because we King King.
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's totally it.
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: The King control.
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: Make sure the chat is working, okay, and then Hannah,
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: you can go ahead and give your testimony where we
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: left off before the Jews interrupted you with their weather machine.
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: Just kidding.
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: I've watched the videos of people talking about the belief
• 35:37
  Speaker 3: in that and everything, but I just just just to
• 35:40
  Speaker 3: word off any of that. This weather has been predicted
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: for for more than a day. They've been saying for
• 35:45
  Speaker 3: more than a day that this was coming, so it
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: couldn't have been something that was spontaneous. Right in the
• 35:50
  Speaker 3: middle of me talking about, uh, the the Hollywood child
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: molestation machine and the feminist reaction to that Hollywood child
• 36:01
  Speaker 3: molestation machine being discussed during the outbreak of hashtag me too,
• 36:08
  Speaker 3: because it would be it would be impossible for them
• 36:13
  Speaker 3: to anticipate two days ago that I was going to
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: say any of that and to you know, know, to
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: set up the weather to to earth dirupt or whatever
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: and and stop this evil anti Hollywood monologue. What I was,
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: what I was talking about, what I was going to
• 36:34
  Speaker 3: say here, is that as important as it is to
• 36:37
  Speaker 3: deal with predators at every level and you know, whatever
• 36:43
  Speaker 3: it is, it is obviously horrible when somebody's life gets
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: disrupted so badly by a violent sexual assault, regardless of
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: how old they are and what the consequences of that
• 36:55
  Speaker 3: assault are to them. The fact that when I talked
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: to about this and with other people talked about this
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: during the hashtag me two movement, when we talked about
• 37:06
  Speaker 3: an open secret and whether or not, you know, like,
• 37:08
  Speaker 3: is this legit? Is this what's going on with this documentary?
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: Are these accusers up front? Is that? What's the evidence?
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: And so on? We got lamp based, We got attacked
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: by feminists in the hashtag for stealing women's moment of truth, right,
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: stealing women's moment of vengeance and stealing women's moment of
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: having their say getting getting justice by naming their perpetrators
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: in public and not giving them any opportunity at due process.
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: So the phenomenon was not important enough to drump that. Literally,
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: they threw children under the bus because women, that was
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: that was their their whole take. They did not care,
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: and in fact, they were angry that we were talking
• 38:02
  Speaker 3: about that instead of talking about them.
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: Don't.
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: I don't think you can get more narcissistic than that, honestly,
• 38:10
  Speaker 3: to get angry that people care more about what happens
• 38:15
  Speaker 3: to children than people care about the Hollywood casting couch
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: and how adults have created and handled that situation.
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: Yes, and I wanted to add this is the thing
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: I was going to bring up before my everything imploded
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: on my internet and electricity. First of all, Meredith g
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: gives us five dollars and says HBr News number five
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: oh seven, honey for the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith. And
• 38:41
  Speaker 1: what I was going to say is what he did,
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: he is accused of, and what the evidence is are
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: different things, and that's important because they're trying. There seems
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: to be an attempt to lay out alligator or let's say,
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: make a case for more crimes than we have evidence
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: for that we can see. So, you know, there was
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: that video that was going around of P Diddy, like
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: you know, dragging a woman off by her hair, and
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: maybe there was some more violent action and that, Yeah,
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: that looks bad. And there that's a crime. It's called assault,
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: and maybe even like you know, maybe even a more
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: severe form of assault, could the case could be made
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: for that. But what he's being accused of or what
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: his yeah, he faces charges of is different. Racketeering, conspiracy,
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution. Those are
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: the charges that he's pleading not guilty of, and that
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: video clip is what is being used to support the
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: case for much more serious crimes, or at least what
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: I assume are much more serious crimes. And so, like,
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: I think the idea would be for us to keep
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: a cool head about this because what they're doing I
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: think is and again, he could be guilty of everything,
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: but if he is, then let's see the evidence and
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: let's see the case as it is, dispassionately not have
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: a cow about it and just look at it objectively. Okay,
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: I should probably put myself on camera for this and
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: what But what it seems to be happening here is
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: they found a clip of him, you know, essentially like
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: dragging a woman by the hair. I think it was
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: in a hotel room or something, and he's got a
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: towel around his neck. We don't know the full context
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: of it, but it doesn't look good for him, and
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: I think that what he's doing is wrong and there
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: should be there's a crime. It's called assault. You know,
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: it could be something more than that, but I mean, no,
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: no more serious than if it was two men engaging
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: in the same thing. But because I think that the
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: way that it could be used is to say, look,
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: he is doing this to a woman, and that has
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: an emotional effect on people where they're like, oh my god,
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: this guy must be a monster. And so when they say, well,
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: he's also guilty of it, well he's also being charged
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: with these other things, people are more likely to be like, oh, yeah,
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: well he must. I mean if he was willing to
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: hit a woman, that he would be. He's capable of anything.
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: And then they just kind of go along with it,
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: and so the jury could be biased in this way.
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: But I mean more than that, Like, no matter what
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: we do on this little show, with all of its
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: technical problems and everything, it will not change the public
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: perception of Ditty himself. It's not going to affect what
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: people think about him. So that's that is almost like
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: what it's almost like the same thing as the Derek
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: Chauvin case. Okay, Derek Chauvin was not accused of murdering
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: George Floyd. Jered Chauvin was accused of racism, and the
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: poor to public opinion resoundingly thought found him guilty of that.
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: So everything that follows from that is basically permissible because
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: he is guilty of the worst possible crime, which is bigotry.
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: And in the same sense, this could be the same
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: kind of weaponization of people's emotions on Ditty by saying
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: he was willing to harm a woman, therefore he could
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: do anything. There's like nothing off the table, and all
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: of a sudden people will be willing to buy into that.
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: So again, I don't know that, Like, according to the
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: details of the case, it looks like there's a lot
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: of shit that's been thrown in him that there's not
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: a strong case for. And what the media and the
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: people to the influencers and all of that around this
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: want you to do is see this a certain way,
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: in a certain emotional framework, which will essentially cause you
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: to you know, like lose your sense of reason and
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: basically go with the narrative because in particular, there are
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: female victims involved. And is it the same thing as
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: the Harvey Weinstein thing. When when you understand that women
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: are human and they're capable of evil and lies and
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: manipulation and exploitation, and they're guilty of all the same
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: human failings and foibles that men are, then the Harvey
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: Weinstein case cannot hold water because you're like, well, it's
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: a casting couch anybody, you know, Like this is what
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: people do. Unfortunately, it's the reality, you know. But when
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: they frame it in such a way that there is
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: a man and men are you know, they have a
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: completely different physical and psychological profile than women, and so
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: they're uniquely capable of evil things and women are not,
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: and women are uniquely victimized by those things, then it
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: has an emotional effect. And you see it all the time.
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: I mean you see it all the time, Like every
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: case that we've gone, we've looked at that, we've had
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: to go to bat for people, people we didn't really
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: like personally, Like I'm not a fan of Harvard Weinstein,
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: but I hate that I even have to say that,
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: like some kind of like you know, preamble guys don't
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: like I'm not I don't hate the I don't like
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: the guy, but like, I hate that. Like I'm just
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: looking at it objectively as what we see the case
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: for what it is. So I think that it is
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: an emotional manipulation and we should be very cautious of
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: our own biases. We're gonna see what we want to
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: see if we allow this to affect us. So How'll
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: be waiting to see what comes out of it. But
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: I just want to bear in mind what did he
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: is guilty of that we can see and what he
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: is being accused of are very different things.
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: So the guys over both of his shoulders just doing
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: that meme of like, yes, you mean in the.
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: Court in the courtroom, art.
• 44:20
  Speaker 3: I have to crack something I said earlier pointed out
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: to me that I'm probably conflating to kill a mocking
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: bird with twelve angry men in my head the defendant
• 44:33
  Speaker 3: and the original twelve Angry Men was actually Puerto Rican.
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: Well, finally some representation. Thank you, Hollywood, about time. I know,
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: I know that's funny, all right. Well, anyway, let us
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: know of you guys think about this one. Unfortunately, this
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: whole thing with my electricity going down put us a
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: little bit behind the gun or under the gun. So
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to the next story and try
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: to keep it brief. But everybody's talking about it, so
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: let's take a look at it, all right. So On
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: June fourteen, twenty twenty five, Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: fifty five and her husband Mark Hortman, fifty eight, were
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: fatally shot at their home in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, in
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: what Governor Tim Wallas described as a politically motivated assassination.
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: The suspect vance Luther Bolter. I hope I'm pronouncing that right.
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: I think it pronounced Bolter. It's Oe lt Er, fifty seven,
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: allegedly posed as a police officer, using a vehicle with
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: emergency lights and wearing a tactical vest. Bolter was arrested
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: on June fifteen, twenty twenty five, after a two day
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: manhunt and faces six federal charges, including murder, as well
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: as state charges. In a related attack, State Senator John Hoffmann,
• 45:42
  Speaker 1: sixty and his wife, Yvette, were shot in their home
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: in Champlain, approximately nine miles away, around two am on
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: June fourteenth. Both survived and are recovering after surgery, with
• 45:53
  Speaker 1: Yvette reportedly shielding their daughter during the attack. Authorities found
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: a hit list in Bolcher's vehicle contained over fifty names,
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: including Minnesota lawmakers, abortion rights advocates, and Democratic officials like
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: US Senator Tammy Baldwin. Bolter, who served on the state's
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: Workforce Development Board with Hoffmann, had conducted surveillance on his targets.
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: The Hennepin County Medical and Xaminer confirmed the Hortman's died
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: of multiple gunshot wounds, with Melissa pronounced dead at the
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: scene and Mark at North Memorial Health in Robinsdale. And
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: around this there's been a lot of like people were
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: the rumor mill was swirling like crazy, right, and I
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: was not able to like easily determine the facts from fiction.
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: I think this is like what I The reason why
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: I picked the story was primarily because whenever something tragic happens,
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: everyone scrambles to figure out who to blame, and in
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: particular the hardcore like leftists and rightists are like, oh,
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: it's those guys that did it right, and they're looking
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: for any evidence they can find that points to that.
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: But this is not like, this is like a very
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: strange situation. I think it behooves us again, like I
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: said with the Diddy and the Weinstein thing, that we
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: remain cool headed and wait to see what we learn
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: as things develop, and not try to use all of
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: this stuff to like leverage, you know, our positions and
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: like score political points or whatever. I usually get like
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: upset when I feel like people are hiding things from me,
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: like the transmass shooter, you know, their manifestos were like
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: I think that to some degree, they're still being kept
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: from us, and that is terrible because then we're forced
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: we can't do anything but speculate, and I think that
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: it's better if we have all the information. But anyway,
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: so some misinformation has circulated, particularly on social media platforms
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: like x. One post falsely claims that the shootings were
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: quote state sanctioned assassinations linked to Trump, police and Ice,
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: which lacks evidence completely and contradicts official reports identifying Bolter
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: as the sole suspect as an individual, at least as
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: far as we know. Another point of confusion involves the motive,
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: which remains under investigation. That's us today. Like I think
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: that there might be some breaking, breaking stuff I'll check
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: on while you guys are talking about this, but as
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: of right now, he appears to be he was acting alone.
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: While the attacks were labeled politically motivated due to the
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: targeting of democratic lawmakers and the hit list, no definitive
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: ideological motive has yet been confirmed, and speculation about broader
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: conspiracies is unsubstantiated. Additionally, some reports initially misnamed Senator John
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: Hoffman as John Huffman, which has been corrected in subsequent
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: coverage because that's a different person. I guess. The claim
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: that Boulter's wife was detained under a passport and weapon
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: or found in her car has not been independently verified
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: by multiple sources, so it should be treated with caution.
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: So anyway, so this is an ongoing story. I did
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: try to do some last minute digging on this. There
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: were some people that claim that he was a militant
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: anti abortion extremist with a Christian nationalist manifesto. This is
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: This has no corroboration for with any official sources, so
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: it should be treated as inconclusive. While his hit list
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: included abortion rights advocates, no confirmed manifesto tied to Christian
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: nationalism has been reported by authorities, not that Christian nationalists
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: have a pattern of assassinating political targets, but I digress.
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: Another false claim suggested his wife was detained with a
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: passport like I mentioned, or weapon. So yeah, I mean, like,
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: there's just not much that we know, but I wanted
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: to like mention it. This is just I think this
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: guy is a particular brand of crazy. That's what I
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: think anyway, or at least radical, you know. So I
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: don't know. Let you guys say what you want to
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: say about it.
• 49:53
  Speaker 3: I think I've talked about this particular brand of crazy before.
• 49:56
  Speaker 3: In response to, well, the baseball shooting was one the
• 50:01
  Speaker 3: the Senate, I think it's senate. It might be house
• 50:06
  Speaker 3: baseball game shooting. But there's a particular brand of crazy.
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: Like like Brian says that when rhetoric gets the rhetoric
• 50:16
  Speaker 3: itself isn't violent, but it implies value to violence that
• 50:22
  Speaker 3: is individually targeted or outside of the normal ways that
• 50:27
  Speaker 3: violence is used to handle something. So outside of arrest,
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: outside of declarations of war, where an individual just goes
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: off and goes off the deep end like this, that
• 50:37
  Speaker 3: particular brand of crazy see validity in that and sees
• 50:44
  Speaker 3: his own personal issues in that and his own personal
• 50:49
  Speaker 3: tendencies in that. And it can be a female can
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: do the same thing, but it's usually when somebody's going
• 50:57
  Speaker 3: to act on it, when somebody's going to add actually
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: take action. It's it's usually a man, and there's usually
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: signs and symptoms that people have missed prior to that
• 51:09
  Speaker 3: when somebody goes off like that, even when it's a
• 51:12
  Speaker 3: small thing. You know, I had an experience with an
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: assailant in nineteen that had the same kind of there
• 51:19
  Speaker 3: were several signs that everybody missed that this person was
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: going to go off. And now after the fact we
• 51:25
  Speaker 3: are all like, oh, well that, you know, we should
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: have noticed when she did this and she did that.
• 51:30
  Speaker 3: But when it's a guy, the violence is more efficient
• 51:35
  Speaker 3: and unfortunately more effective, And that's what we see in
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: this instance, and unfortunately people are going to ignore all
• 51:44
  Speaker 3: of the contributing factors. For instance, in the pro life movement,
• 51:49
  Speaker 3: we all have an awareness that there is a fringe
• 51:52
  Speaker 3: edge of the anti abortion movement within the pro life
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: movement that is violent. There have been attacks on abortion providers,
• 52:04
  Speaker 3: there had been clinic bombings and everything, and as a result,
• 52:08
  Speaker 3: those of us in the mainstream of the anti abortion
• 52:12
  Speaker 3: movement do our best to keep our rhetoric clear of
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: any implied advocacy or approval of violence as a solution
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: to this issue. But unfortunately, when it comes to politics,
• 52:26
  Speaker 3: people have not done that. And when it comes to
• 52:29
  Speaker 3: politics of such a contingent nature as we currently have,
• 52:35
  Speaker 3: it's become this kind of thing was predicted. It's become
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: so bad that the people who will go off the
• 52:42
  Speaker 3: deep end. And I think we've been warning about this too,
• 52:46
  Speaker 3: that the people who go off the deep end are
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: getting the fuel they need to put them off the
• 52:51
  Speaker 3: deep end. And this is the result. And we've seen
• 52:55
  Speaker 3: it on both sides of the left right political spectrum.
• 52:59
  Speaker 3: We've seen it for years. We've seen it from people
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: who have single issue obsession, which is one of the
• 53:07
  Speaker 3: things that happens with abortion clinic bombings. It's also the
• 53:10
  Speaker 3: same thing that happens with people who let animals out
• 53:13
  Speaker 3: of labs that are testing scary germs, or who attack
• 53:18
  Speaker 3: ordinary people in ordinary places with a crazy environmentalist message
• 53:24
  Speaker 3: that doesn't necessarily relate to the rest of environmentalism. When
• 53:28
  Speaker 3: you turn your rhetoric toward the other side is evil
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: and the other side deserves to die or deserves to
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: suffer rather than the other side is very wrong about
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: this issue. And if they're not listing, then we have
• 53:43
  Speaker 3: to take control of the legislative process and override them.
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: You get crazy people that shoot other people or go
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: off in a variety of other ways. You get bombings,
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: you get horrible stuff like this, and it's just important
• 54:01
  Speaker 3: for people to remember that if you're in a group
• 54:05
  Speaker 3: of people where if you happen to know somebody who
• 54:10
  Speaker 3: is it looks like they're in that situation, it's better
• 54:15
  Speaker 3: to talk to them before it gets to that point
• 54:19
  Speaker 3: and see if you can change the way that they're
• 54:22
  Speaker 3: thinking about the subject so that they're not thinking in
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: terms of violence, but they're thinking in terms of other
• 54:29
  Speaker 3: types of solutions that are more effective. You know, or
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: or contact authorities if you have to, if you're really
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: sure that something like this might happen, but you know
• 54:41
  Speaker 3: that's that's the only thing that you can do, and unfortunately,
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: what people are more likely to do is take sides
• 54:48
  Speaker 3: on this is this is evidence that Democrats are evil,
• 54:52
  Speaker 3: or this is evidence that Republicans are evil, or this
• 54:55
  Speaker 3: is not evidence, you know, and we'll probably see people
• 54:58
  Speaker 3: arguing on social media more about whether this happens more
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: on one side than the other, rather than what can
• 55:08
  Speaker 3: be done about this.
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, let us know what you guys think about
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. Unfortunately, if you were watching
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: on Rumble, you'll have to come over here because the
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: Rumble stream is down. I'm not going to be able
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: to get it back up without like leaving the show
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: and setting up another stream and all of that. I'm
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: not gonna do that. So hopefully you'll just come on
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: over to YouTube and bite the bullet or go to kick.
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: Go watch us on kick, because it's still it's still
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: going on kick, all right. So anyway, with that said,
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this story
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: in the comments section. We got to move on to
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: the next one, all right. So this is our last story,
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: and let me just show you guys. All right, so
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: you guys probably know Oliver Anthony. As many of you recall,
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: there was a song in twenty twenty three that went viral.
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: It was called Richmond North of Richmond, and it catapulted
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: musician Oliver Anthony to stardom. The song, which many viewed
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: as an anthem for the common man, quickly brought him
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: fame and fortune. But Anthony wasn't here, wasn't heard from
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: much since. With his new single Scornful Woman, we can
• 56:14
  Speaker 1: get a sense of what his life has been like
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: in the past years. Anthony's former wife, Tiffany Lunsford, whom
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: he shares two children with, had been married to him
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: for seemingly many years. Like basically they were married for
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: the whole time he was broke before he blew up,
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: dating back before his Richmond North of Richmond fame. The
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: lyrics paid a dark image of the recent happenings within
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: the marriage. Joe Rogan recently examined the lyrics on his
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: latest episode of his podcast. He also had Anthony on
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: after that to sort of like confirm what the lyrics
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: were about, and Joe said this, he starts making millions
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: of dollars doing arenas the wife divorces him. She wants everything.
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: She wants more than half. She wants all the money
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: he's gonna be making in the future because she was
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: with him when he was broke. He's just tortured and
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: wants to die, and he writes this song end quote.
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: So have you guys heard the song, by the way,
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: scornful woman. Yeah, it's good, it's it's actually it's better
• 57:16
  Speaker 1: than rich men north of Richmond in my opinion.
• 57:18
  Speaker 2: But because he got a band together to sorry completely, No, No,
• 57:22
  Speaker 2: it's great.
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: There's a fiddle solo. It's great. It's a good song.
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: Even if you don't buy his story, which I kind
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: of do, But Mike, I know you have a lot
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: to save, so I'm gonna let you talk about it. Yeah.
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: As tragic as this story is, and as proverbial as
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: mister Anthony may have been at the time in blaming
• 57:44
  Speaker 2: rich men north of Richmond, I hope he now understands
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: the error of his, albeit proverbial ways. It's not just
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: people north of Richmond, Virginia who are to blame, and
• 58:01
  Speaker 2: it shore as fuck, not just men who are to blame.
• 58:06
  Speaker 2: And let us not try to act as though there's
• 58:09
  Speaker 2: any significant disconnect between the agenda of the machinations of Washington,
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: d C. Which is indeed north of Richmond only just
• 58:20
  Speaker 2: and the machinations of the average American women. Maybe the
• 58:26
  Speaker 2: agenda of the former informs the agenda of the latter,
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: or maybe it is the other way around. I really
• 58:35
  Speaker 2: hope the general public can get on board with what
• 58:39
  Speaker 2: we at Honey Badger Radio have been saying for like
• 58:44
  Speaker 2: half a generation. The average American woman doesn't care about
• 58:49
  Speaker 2: or understand what goes on in the American government, but
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: the American government is almost exclusively interested in the pursived
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: in flat plight of the American woman. It's the same
• 59:04
  Speaker 2: in Europe and especially in the UK. Most women don't
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: care about the government, but our governments only care about
• 59:12
  Speaker 2: pandering to women, and so they steal from men. They
• 59:18
  Speaker 2: will offer any woman the opportunity to steal everything from
• 59:23
  Speaker 2: any man, they will facilitate it for the sake of
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: their own cut of the heist. And that missteranderny anthony
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: is why, to quote your own lyrics, is why your
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: dollar ain't shit and it's taxed to no end. It's
• 59:46
  Speaker 2: not because of rich men north of Richmond. It's because
• 59:49
  Speaker 2: of women. Scornful women northwest, south and east of Richmond,
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: stealing your resources without remorse and without consequences. I do
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 2: feel bad for you, as I feel bad for any
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 2: man to whom it happens, and I hope you understand
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: that you're not alone. You are in the company of
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: millions of men, hundreds of millions of men. I look
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: forward to you writing and performing a song that can
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: look beyond the scornful woman that ruined your life and
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: look towards the scornful women and the scornful governments, praying
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: upon them who have made all of this immoral, ideological
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: wealth redistribution possible. And in your quest for understanding, I
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: hope you don't get demoralized by the shipmongers who accuse
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: you of indulging in victim mentality. The hit that made
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 2: you famous those all of two years ago was a
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 2: country song about how bad you have it? That does
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: seem to be a sub category of country music these
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 2: so category that merged with blues. Yes, that lyrical genre
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: that was all about singing your heart out about the
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: tribulations affecting your life. I woke up this morning and
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 2: my bitch had taken all my shit and all that business.
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 2: It's something white men and black men have in common,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: because we all have to deal with bitches, scornful bitches
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 2: who take all our shit, take all our children, and
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 2: leave us with nothing. Any musical historian will tell you
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: how this manifested in the evolution of musical genres. Black
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: men lost all their shit to women. They expressed it
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 2: through blues music. White men lost all their shit to
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 2: a woman. They expressed it through country music. These two
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: genres amalgamated together to form a super genre incorporating blues
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 2: and country. It's called rock and roll. It evolved into
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 2: literally all of the best music history has ever produced.
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: Throughout the twentieth century, men of all races have been
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: marginalized by women at the behest of our increasingly feminist government.
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 2: As a result, we have been screaming about it with
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: our music, sometimes to address it, but usually just to
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: escape it. Much the same goes for technology. Men have
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 2: built the most incredible, mind blowing technological devices over the
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: last one hundred years or so, and we did it
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: because we couldn't be bothered with and shit anymore. So
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: we sequestered ourselves into our man caves and we created excellence.
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 2: This leaves us in something of a dualistic quandary. When
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 2: men can't be bothered with women, they fuck off to
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 2: be alone, and they create art and science that exceeds
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: the boundaries of previous generations by exponential measures. So for
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: all our complaints about feminism, it has to be said
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: feminism was the catalyst that made us realize just how
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: much we can achieve without a bunch of bitches constantly
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 2: yelling in our ears about pointless, narcissistic bullshit. It's been
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: an interesting experiment, one that has advanced art and science
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: and technology to killably unpredictable extent. Maybe we've gone too far.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: Maybe everyone having a device in their back pocket that
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: can give them the answers to everything is too far.
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: So okay, maybe this is the point where we stop
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: doing that, the point at which we stop pushing men
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: out of the family unit and we let them get
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: back to the ancient ritual of letting them look after
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: their children, even if the women don't want them to.
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: Maybe now is a good time to tell women you
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: no longer like the men you chose. You want to
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 2: divorce him, right, alrighty, then fuck off, Let him keep
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 2: his money, let him look after his children while you
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: continue to work as an assistant manager at a goddamn Walgreens.
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 2: No you don't like that whole setup, then don't divorce him.
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 2: How about that? How about you don't just monkey branch
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 2: onto the next best man you can find, in the
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: hope that you steal all his money, in the hope
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: that he makes it big one day.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 3: No.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but I'm by no means the first to point
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: this out, ladies, But you can't have equality and hypergamy
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: at the same time. If you want equality with men
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: when it comes to money and power, you can't simultaneously
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: covet a man who makes more money than you and
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 2: is more powerful than you. This should be obvious, and
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: it is obvious. It would be obvious to even the
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: lowest IQ woman were it not for the machinations of
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: the rich men and women in Washington, d C. Who
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: continue to brainwash you into what is obviously an impossible
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: logical contradiction. I really don't want to leave this on
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 2: a straightforward go fuck yourselves, because for the time being,
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: we do, in fact need to fuck each other. I'm
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: just warning you this age of technology, of technology that
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: rapidly advances through Moore's law, but we're rapidly advancing towards
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: a point in history where men don't need women anymore.
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: If and when that happens, the x ex half of
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 2: the human race will die on its ass. I know
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 2: you think I'm a misogynist for saying that. I know
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: you think I hate you, But trust me, I am
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 2: looking to the future, and I am trying to help
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: you because I don't necessarily want the Warhammer forty thousand future.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: I would like the human race to include women for
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 2: as long as possible, but you'd better give us some incentive.
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 2: You better pull us back towards nature by being naturally feminine.
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 2: Otherwise you are in the event that you are that fought.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: We won't look back because I'll be dead by then. Hey,
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 2: so apparently it doesn't matter, right, It doesn't matter if
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 2: a demographic is replaced by another demographic as long as
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 2: I'm dead by then, Right, guy, I think I think
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: it's the best onst I'm going to stop. I should
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 2: have stopped long ago. I should have died ago.
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 3: It's been such an interesting series of events leading up
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 3: to the circumstances of today where those kind of thing
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: is common. Right.
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: You look back at.
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 3: Nineteenth century UK and the first feminist family court advocate
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 3: in the UK for for changes to custody law. Argued
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: in court that that God meant for women to have
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 3: custody of their children up until about the age of seven.
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 3: I'm not kidding. That was the argument that it was.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 3: Essentially the entirety of her argument was that God meant
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 3: for women to be the primary custodial parents of their
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 3: children up until the age of seven because before that,
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 3: because the father was primarily responsible, paternal custody was the
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: norm in a divorce. If child was born out of wedlocks,
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 3: born into the mother's custody, different story. But in a divorce,
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 3: unless there was fault with how the husband and father
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: left the marriage, the father got custody. So Carolyn Norton
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: made that argument, and they changed the law based on
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 3: that argument. A lot of advocacy, and then women came
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 3: along and went, gosh, if we play victims and we
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 3: demand that in the name of God, you give us
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 3: what we want, we get what we want. Well, women
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 3: had been politically active throughout the existence of politics, and
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 3: they'd been getting what they wanted by simply telling the
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 3: men in charge, or where there was a queen, the
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 3: woman in charge, this is hurting us. You have to
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 3: change it, and here's how you have to change it.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 3: Do this instead, and they would get what they wanted.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: And that continued right up until women got voting rights.
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 3: And we have heard throughout modern history that up until
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 3: that point, women were terribly oppressed by the patriarchy. They
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 3: were not whole people under the patriarchy. They were only
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 3: chattel and they had no legal power, no authority, no options,
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 3: no nothing, no protections and so on, and so they
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 3: were horribly mistreated, terribly oppressed by the patriarchy. And then
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 3: women browbeat the establishment. Women, the elite, women browbeat the
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 3: rest of the female population, demanding voting rights. We must
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 3: have voting rights, and they got them. But women were
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 3: still terribly oppressed by the patriarchy even though they were
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 3: part of it now, and we had this next history
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 3: of women changing the laws through voting and through pressure
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 3: campaigns like they always had. The laws that held women
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 3: accountable for their side of intimate partnerships. So you're not responsible.
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 3: You're not at fault if you cheat, if you lie,
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 3: if you psychologically abuse your male partner, your husband, your boyfriend, whatever,
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 3: you're not at fault for that. You don't get busted
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 3: for that, you don't get forced to pay child support
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: and alimony. You get to leave him and take all
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 3: of his shit. Women are still terribly terribly oppressed by
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: the patriarchy. Literally chattel guys. It is just so hard
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 3: to be a woman, you know, you just can't understand
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 3: what it's like to never get called a deadbeat for
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 3: not having a job. How horrible, what oppression? What patriarchy?
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 3: Such terrible terrible pressure, right, And what it's like to
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 3: know that nothing you can do is wrong enough to
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 3: keep you from getting custody of your children unless you
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 3: kill them, and then nobody has custody and then you
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 3: get to make a lot of excuses. Terribly terribly oppressed
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 3: by the patriarchy. Women are just awful. Can't imagine what
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 3: it's like to live like that if you're not not
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 3: one of us poor victims of the patriarchy, and if
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 3: you happen to recommand, just completely utterly destroy him, abuse
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 3: him to the point where he commits suicide, and people
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 3: talk about his suicide and the abuse that led to
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 3: it and the pain and suffering he must have gone through.
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 3: You're a victim of that, if you're a woman, right,
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 3: you're terribly oppressed by the power. How dare they not
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 3: consider your feelings as the person who has been condemned
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 3: for causing this man to harm himself. He's the one
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 3: who did it, obviously, not you. Right, It's not because
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 3: you stole all of his shit. It's not because you
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 3: said terrible things about him or to him. It's not
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 3: because you hit him in private. It's not because you
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 3: cheated on him, lied to him, tore him down, made
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 3: him feel like nothing, made him feel like a burden
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 3: on you, made him feel like a burden on his children,
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 3: made him feel like a burden on the public. No, No,
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 3: it's because he is the bad guy. He was trying
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 3: to abuse you, right by playing the victim and killing himself,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 3: And now you know you're suffering the consequences terribly oppressed
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 3: by the patriarchy. And this is what it is in
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 3: women's mind. This is what it is and the minds
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 3: of feminists today, that even though under law and policy
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 3: that has been pressure campaigned for, advocated for, voted for,
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 3: and legislated by female legislators, that a woman can do
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 3: nothing to earn any of the money that a man
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 3: has coming to him for his work, That she can
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: be completely disloyal, that she can be emotionally abusive, that
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 3: she can be physically abusive, that she can mistreat him
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 3: and his children and then abandon the family, and unlike
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 3: how a man gets treated when he abandons the family,
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 3: She's a victim and she gets paid, she gets compensation,
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 3: she gets custody of the children, she gets child support,
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 3: she gets all of the property, she gets at least
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 3: half of the income, and she gets to claim that
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 3: she has some sort of ownership of his future labor.
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 3: Why because she's so terribly, horribly, awfully oppressed by the patriarchy.
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 3: Y'all are doing it right, man, This patriarchy sucks. This.
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 3: This is the worst patriarchy ever. Like, how on earth
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 3: are you supposed to keep women down doing this shit?
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: Yeap? Women were still viewed as chattel. All right, Well
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: that's it. I guess. The only thing I will say
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: about this Oliver Anthony thing, which is kind of interesting,
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: is that it's just crazy, like how many men are
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: going through this like that, that they are having this
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: very same experience. You know. Mike joked before the show
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: that Oliver Anthony is speed running the male experience with
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 1: both of his songs, and I mean that really kind
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: of sums it up. But like I feel like whenever
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: I see like a man I run into or friends
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: that I've known, Like a couple of weeks ago, I
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: went to a funeral for a very old friend of
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: mine and there were some other guys that I saw
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: there at the funeral. And these were like my high
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: school buddies that I used to be, you know, hang
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: out with all the time we were going to high
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: and you know, when I was going to high school
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: in the late eighties, early nineties, so that's a long
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: time ago. And I'm following up with them and seeing
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: how things are going, and like most of them are
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: like separated, divorced, fighting for child custody. It's like, how
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: did this happen? And it's it's not uncommon, Like this
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: is a very very common problem I see everywhere. And
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: like when I'm out here and about in you know, Virginia,
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: and I'm like, go to the dog park and I
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: talked to you know, maybe I'm making small talk with
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: another dog owner that's there and if it's a guy,
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: and they asked me, like what I do, and I
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 1: tell them what I do? You know, Oh, I run
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: a podcast. Oh what's it about? And I say, well,
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: I talk about men's issues. I'm a little bit worried
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: that they're gonna be like laughing at me, but the
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: men never do. They're like, oh, oh really, like what
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: And I tell oh, yeah, you know, child custody, divorce,
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: you know, circumcision. I list off all the things and
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: they all have a story to tell. They're like, oh
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: my god, dude, like I know a guy, or I
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: went through this, or I know how bad it is.
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: And you know, watching Oliver and Anthony go from you know,
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: basically a working class guy. He worked in factories. I
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: think he sold like, you know, machinery or something before
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: and he was doing music on the side. And of
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: course you know, he was in I think West Virginia
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: and West Virginia because of like, you know, what's happened
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: to the very in the rust belt is essentially what
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: it is. I believe, you know, they don't have like
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: the there's like the Hollers and a lot of the
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: minds were closed out because they did they wanted to
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: stop you know, getting fossil fuels, and they put all
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: these people out of work. And there's and because there's
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: a lot of people there that are you know, working class,
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: low income. They don't have a lot of money, they
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: don't have a lot of job opportunities, They can't really
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 1: go anywhere, so they end up stuck there with their families,
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: get on drugs because there's a lot of like you know,
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: like crystal meth abuse and things like that. Alcohol. It's
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: a big it's a big thing in West Virginia in particular.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: And you know, he lived there and he was going
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: through that struggle, and I have a lot of sympathy
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: for that. I watched a guy, I can't remember the
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: name of his channel, but he goes all over the
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: country to like these little pockets to like talk to people.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: It's a very good channel, very interesting, and it gives you, like,
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: you know, he humanizes people all over the United States
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: that live in different areas. And he goes to the
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: hollers in West Virginia and he's like talking to them,
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: to the men there, and they all like our guys
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: that haven't worked forever. But they used to work in
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: the mines and stuff, and now they can't work anywhere.
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 1: So what happens you have nothing to do? You seek,
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: you know, distractions. You some people maybe they make the
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: most of it, but a lot of people don't. And
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: I mean it's just like it's just crazy, Like he
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: blows up, and then, like Joe Rogan, he goes on
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: Joe Rogan's podcast if the first song blows up, and
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: Joe says like, whatever you do, don't sign anything. They're
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: gonna try to take your money, you know, basically warning
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: him about the music labels, which I completely understand because again,
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: we were just talking about Michael Jackson who was constantly
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 1: fighting with the record labels, and you know, the stuff
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: that happened to people like p Diddy and like Will
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: Smith who just came out with a new song It's
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: it's cringe as hell, and Kanye all these issues. So
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: obviously there's a lot of like, you know, there's a
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: dark cd underbelly to our entertainment and cultural institutions, which
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: is a problem because you know, art should be beautiful
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: and enjoyed by all, but it's run by some very
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: evil people. And so he does he probably takes Joe
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: Rogan's advice, and his wife is like, what the fuck,
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: why aren't you taking the money? And maybe that sort
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 1: of started it because you know, again, he's thinking about
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: what is best in the long run. Joe Rogan's trying
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: to give him advice, and maybe I don't want to
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: speak for it because we don't have all the details.
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: We certainly don't have her side of the story. But
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: maybe she became embittered with him because he didn't sign
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: any contracts because he didn't want to, you know, basically
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: be controlled by some record label. And you can just
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: look around at the industry and see, like look at
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: what you know you talked about, you know, like these
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: young men in the industry, like we were talking about
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: PGDDY and people who enter the business very young, and
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: I was thinking about, you know, guys like Britney Spears
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: and Justin Bieber, you know, and all that they went through.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: Like I would see that as a serious warning, Like
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: I don't want to get involved with that, right, I'd
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: rather just you know, maybe I'll make some maybe i'll
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: make less money, but I can like strike out of
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: my own and feel like I'm in co control of
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: my own destiny. And maybe his wife was like that's
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: not good enough and just wants to like I don't know,
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: maybe she wants to take him for whatever he has.
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: Maybe she has people in her ear saying you know
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: you can get half. You know, you know you can
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: get half. You know you can get half. But she's
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: like half, Eddie, I want half. So it's possible. But
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: without speculating too much on his particular situation, it is
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: interesting to see just how common this problem is, Just
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: how common it is for men to find someone, you know,
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: think that they're set, maybe they're in a bad place,
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: and that woman is with them, like ride or die.
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: At first, maybe they're maybe they had a lot and
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: then I lost it, but for whatever reason, it goes
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 1: sideways and the women leave them, and these guys are
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: just like a shell of what they were. And you know,
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: when I went to that my friend's funeral and I
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: saw those guys, some of them, I was like, man,
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: I wish I could help you, but I don't know
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: what to do. And of course they're still kind of
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: trying to figure out how to make it work, you know,
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: and I just I don't know.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: So anyway, there's something else that needs to be said
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 3: about this, because I'm encountering more and more. I guess
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 3: this is sort of the male version of fatalism, where
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 3: guys are saying, you know, this is this is just
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: the way women are and they have to be controlled.
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 3: That's not a good way to look at it, right,
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 3: It's not just the way women are. Women who do
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 3: this are responsible for their actions. They are capable of
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: not doing this, and they are choosing to do it anyway.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: And if the general male population finds it necessary to
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 3: push back hard against what feminists would call advancements, but
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: not everybody would, it's not because women can't help doing this.
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 3: It's because women are culpable for their actions and they
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: have refused to not do this. They can do it.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: If they're doing wrong, they deserve to be treated like
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 3: they did wrong, the same as any man who does
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 3: wrong and held accountable. I have no objection to pushing back.
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 3: In fact, I think that quite a bit of what
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: feminism would call advancements needs to be pushed way the
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 3: hell back, including voting rights. But it's not because women
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 3: are incapable of controlling themselves. It's because women have exploited
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: men's goodwill and abused the systems that they were able
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 3: to take advantage of, and have criminally abused what they
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: refer to as the patriarchy, which is really just again
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: men's goodwill, and they deserve to be held culpable and
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 3: to face consequences for their actions. And there aren't any
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 3: of these consequences that these men are talking about that
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: I can't live with. Right, as long as we know
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 3: that the world will be run the way men have
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 3: always run it, we don't have to worry that women
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 3: are going to suffer because women didn't suffer the way
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: that feminists claim they did in the past. Most women
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 3: were pretty content with the old system. So yeah, don't
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 3: treat it like, oh, these poor women, they don't know
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: any better. We have to take care of them. It's
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: fine to have that advocacy push back on this stop
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: the train, but stop it because women are responsible, women
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 3: are culpable, and not because men have to take responsibility
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 3: for women. Men have a right to defend themselves.
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: All right. Then, Well, with that said, we're gonna wrap
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: the show up there. It's a little bit of a
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: longer one because of the technical problems, but we're gonna
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: be going into the patron show. Now. We're gonna look
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: at this from Miss magazine, which is feminist roundup the
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: best and worst quotes of twenty twenty four yeha. So
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 1: we'll find out what Miss magazine deems as real feminine
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: versus fake feminism, and we'll see what they say about
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: that in the Patron Show. But with that said, if
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: you guys want to join us for that, you have
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: to go to Feed the Badge with our comfort slash
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 1: subscribe so you can hop on to the Discord server
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 1: and hang out with us and watch the additional content
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: and even give us your takes. Maybe you want to
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: come in there and demolish us with reason and logic
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: and a debate or something, or maybe you just want
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 1: to tell us that we're right because we usually are.
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: Whichever one it is, you know, like, feel free to
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: do that. So anyway, with that said, I want to
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: thank Hannah and Mike for joining me on the news show,
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: and I thank you guys most of all for being
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 1: so patient as I deal with Virginia Internet and its
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: ability to cope with thunderstorms, which apparently it can't because
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: every time it rains there's a power outage. So I
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: don't know what's going on with Appalachian Power, but there
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 1: appears to be an issue with their ability to keep
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 1: the grid up and running. So anyway, thank you guys
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: so much for coming on the show. If you guys
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: liked this video, please like, subscribe. If you're not already subscribed,
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: hit the bellf notifications, leave us a comment, let us
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: know you yes, think about what we'll be discussed on
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: the show today, and please please please share this video
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: because sharing is caring. Thank you, guys so much for
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: coming on today's episode of HPR News, and we will
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: talk to you guys in the next one.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 4: Men's right activists are machines, dude, Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 4: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 4: deal with, especially if you have, like especially if you
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 4: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 4: On top of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked