Latest / The FIT4Privacy Podcast | Exploring ISO Standards AI Privacy | Grow Skills Store / Medical Identity Theft
Transcript
- 0:00So medical identity theft is something I discovered
- 0:02accidentally. I had been asked by a
- 0:05congressional, AUS congressional subcommittee, the National
- 0:09Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, to come testify
- 0:12before them. This would have been in 2000.
- 0:15And I think four or five right in there.
- 0:20Sorry, it was a long time ago and I was sitting there thinking
- 0:25and the the my topic was the NHIN, the National Proposed
- 0:30National Health Information Network.
- 0:32And I thought, what are the risks, the digital risks in such
- 0:35a network? And I was thinking and thinking,
- 0:38and I had time to prepare for this testimony.
- 0:40I had about 3 weeks, which is always dangerous, which means
- 0:42you, you, you have too much time to prepare and think, right?
- 0:46So I'm sitting there for days thinking, OK, what are the
- 0:48risks? And I outlined all the risks,
- 0:49but I kept coming back to identity risks because identity
- 0:53risks really show up very strong, in very strong ways in
- 0:58digital ecosystems. And they're very complex and
- 1:02they're, they're quite profound in, in the harms that they can
- 1:06cause. It's a really foundational harms
- 1:10that identity harms can cause. So I thought I wonder if medical
- 1:13identity theft exists because we know identity theft at that time
- 1:17was a huge problem in the US, credit card fraud what not.
- 1:21So I did a keyword search on all the various search engines for
- 1:25medical identity theft and nothing came up.
- 1:27It was not the term and I thought OK so I bet this exists
- 1:31under different names. So I checked the legal research
- 1:36databases such as PACER, the court systems, and I looked for
- 1:41a combination of medical data and fraud and identity.
- 1:48And I found four cases right away.
- 1:50And I, I dug into those cases. I interviewed people, I
- 1:54interviewed the insurance companies, the providers.
- 1:58I interviewed a lot of people before this testimony happened.
- 2:01And I wrote, I think it was 20 or 22 pages of testimony.
- 2:04And I included this topic in it. And I said, hey, there's
- 2:09something called medical identity theft that's running
- 2:11through this ecosystem already. You already have people posing,
- 2:17taking the health records of people, altering them and
- 2:21pretending to be those people and billing in their names in
- 2:24order to make money. It's a sub form of healthcare
- 2:28fraud and it's very dangerous. People have been misdiagnosed,
- 2:33people have been laying on surgical tables and people have
- 2:37almost operated on the wrong organ because their health
- 2:40record had been altered. And I said this is going to be a
- 2:43serious problem and no one had ever even had this research in
- 2:48their hands before. The providers hadn't been
- 2:51discussing it. No one had really been
- 2:53discussing it because it just wasn't a public issue at that
- 2:55time. So the chairman of the committee
- 2:59came up to me immediately after the testimony, and he said, you
- 3:05need to write about this. No one's heard of this, and it's
- 3:07very important and people can die from this.
- 3:11And I said, yeah, I think so. And he said, I hope you can go
- 3:15do it. So without any funding at all to
- 3:18do this work and no backers at all to do this work, I went
- 3:21ahead and researched. It took about half a year.
- 3:24I worked as fast and as hard as I could.
- 3:27And the following year in 20, I think it was 2005 or 2006 in the
- 3:33spring, we came out with a report.
- 3:36I worked on the report with Robert Gellman, who's one of the
- 3:39leading health experts in the entire world and has been for
- 3:42many, many decades. He's an incredible legal mind.
- 3:46So we looked at, you know, what are the problems here?
- 3:50How deep is it? How big are the problems?
- 3:53And it was very, very substantive.
- 3:56We were able to get the numbers and quantify all of this for the
- 3:59first time and then talk about the solutions.
- 4:03And the report made a massive splash when it was published.
- 4:06And what ended up happening is I was invited to speak to hymns,
- 4:12which is the entire nation in the US of the health information
- 4:16management system at the, which at the time was different.
- 4:19There were thousands of people in the audience, and they
- 4:21allowed me to talk about solutions for medical identity
- 4:24theft. And this was a real turning
- 4:26point because, you know, it's one thing to do the research and
- 4:29to write a report and point out what's wrong, but then you need
- 4:33to take the next step and work toward a solution.
- 4:36So I'm very proud that I worked with all of these folks to come
- 4:40to a solution and what would work.
- 4:42So we came to a variety of really effective solutions for
- 4:46medical identity theft. One is called a Jane and John
- 4:49Doe file extraction, which means that you remove the fictitious
- 4:53information from the file while retaining the legal integrity of
- 4:57the file. Because it's actually in HIPAA,
- 4:59you don't have the right to delete data.
- 5:02So even if it's fictitious data and could kill you, you can't
- 5:06delete it. So there's now a method that you
- 5:08can do that. And there's red flags, there's
- 5:11all sorts of name warnings. There's, there's, there's huge
- 5:15advancement. So medical identity theft is
- 5:17becoming much less prevalent. People know about it.
- 5:21It's well known. And I, I, the problem is greatly
- 5:25improved from where it was. So that's that work.
- 5:29No, that's indeed an area and you have done a huge
- 5:33contribution through World Privacy Forum and your research
- 5:36in that space. And you, another area that comes
- 5:40to my mind in which you have contributed immensely is the AI
- 5:44Principles, especially at the OECD level.
- 5:47Because a few years back, if I recall well and recall our
- 5:51conversation, there was nothing and you were part of the group
- 5:54that created the AI principles. Tell us something about that as
- 5:57well. Yeah.
- 5:59So I've actually worked with OECD for about 20 years, but I
- 6:03was mainly working in health privacy.
- 6:05I was part of their Health Data uses working group many, many
- 6:08years ago in the Super early 2000s.
- 6:12But what happened is that I had been invited to a group in
- 6:17Switzerland to make a a very technical AI presentation on
- 6:22basically how AI ecosystems operated and how the data flows,
- 6:27and then where trustworthy AI could be articulated within that
- 6:31and where it couldn't be. So I gave this extremely
- 6:35technical presentation and it just so happened that two people
- 6:38from OECD were there and the audience, and it just so
- 6:42happened that they were scouting for people who knew, who
- 6:46understood the tech technology of AI, but who also understood
- 6:51the trustworthy aspects. And I had the privacy piece in a
- 6:55way that most people who are in AI don't have, in that I have,
- 7:00you know, the kind of the legal privacy and then the technical
- 7:03privacy that's, that's fairly rare even today.
- 7:06So they approached me and they asked me if I might want to join
- 7:11a new effort that the OCD had going to develop multilateral
- 7:16principles on trustworthy AI. And I'm like, oh, are you
- 7:19kidding? You can't hold me back.
- 7:22So I started with that immediately there was a core of
- 7:25us. It was called I go the AI
- 7:28Network of experts. And I think I mean, it was a
- 7:32very small group to begin with and it was a really incredible
- 7:37conversation. I'm still in touch with most of
- 7:39the people who are in that group.
- 7:40Marco Groeberlingkit from Slovenia, just really, really
- 7:46amazing researchers and and thinkers and people.
- 7:49So I did that until 2019 while still doing work at full time at
- 7:56World Privacy Forum. It was a very busy time, but
- 8:00that work was extraordinary. It was really foundational in
- 8:03really talking to all of the stakeholders because it was a
- 8:07very broad effort. By the end, I think they were
- 8:09about, I think the group expended to about 54 experts
- 8:13plus all the governments. And it was, it was a very
- 8:17robust, very, very incredible conversation.
- 8:20Very rich, important time of transition.